US20090086086A1 - Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090086086A1
US20090086086A1 US12/252,565 US25256508A US2009086086A1 US 20090086086 A1 US20090086086 A1 US 20090086086A1 US 25256508 A US25256508 A US 25256508A US 2009086086 A1 US2009086086 A1 US 2009086086A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
level
pixel array
voltage
exposure level
image
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/252,565
Inventor
Matthew Michael Borg
Dietrich Werner Vook
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Aptina Imaging Corp
Original Assignee
Micron Technology Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Micron Technology Inc filed Critical Micron Technology Inc
Priority to US12/252,565 priority Critical patent/US20090086086A1/en
Publication of US20090086086A1 publication Critical patent/US20090086086A1/en
Assigned to APTINA IMAGING CORPORATION reassignment APTINA IMAGING CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N23/00Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
    • H04N23/70Circuitry for compensating brightness variation in the scene
    • H04N23/71Circuitry for evaluating the brightness variation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N23/00Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
    • H04N23/70Circuitry for compensating brightness variation in the scene
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/70SSIS architectures; Circuits associated therewith
    • H04N25/709Circuitry for control of the power supply
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/70SSIS architectures; Circuits associated therewith
    • H04N25/76Addressed sensors, e.g. MOS or CMOS sensors
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N3/00Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages
    • H04N3/10Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages by means not exclusively optical-mechanical
    • H04N3/14Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages by means not exclusively optical-mechanical by means of electrically scanned solid-state devices
    • H04N3/15Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages by means not exclusively optical-mechanical by means of electrically scanned solid-state devices for picture signal generation
    • H04N3/155Control of the image-sensor operation, e.g. image processing within the image-sensor
    • H04N3/1568Control of the image-sensor operation, e.g. image processing within the image-sensor for disturbance correction or prevention within the image-sensor, e.g. biasing, blooming, smearing

Definitions

  • the invention is directed towards the field of image sensors, and more specifically, towards optimizing noise and dynamic range in the image sensors.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an illustrative prior art pixel array 103 .
  • Pixel array 103 includes auxiliary circuitry such as drivers, buffers, and multiplexers for the signals in the array.
  • a voltage supply 105 supplies the pixel array 103 with power.
  • a reset signal 107 is asserted to reset some or all of the pixels in the pixel array 103 . Consequently, the pixels are charged to a reset voltage, which is typically a function of the voltage supply 105 .
  • the voltages at each pixel decrease.
  • the final voltage of each pixel is compared to its original reset voltage.
  • These voltage swings represent the captured image, and are proportional to the exposure level of the pixel array 103 .
  • Large voltage swings indicate a high exposure level, which means that the pixel array 103 was exposed to bright light or had a long exposure period.
  • small voltage swings indicate a low exposure level, which means that the pixel array 103 was exposed to dim light or had a short exposure period.
  • the voltage swings are read from the pixel array 103 as image signals 111 .
  • a higher voltage supply increases the dynamic range of a pixel array, because each pixel has a larger reset voltage, and thus a bigger range for the voltage swing.
  • a larger dynamic range allows the pixel array to capture a more faithful image when the exposure level is high.
  • both pixel temporal noise and dark current noise hereinafter, collectively referred to as just “noise” or “pixel noise” have been found to increase along with the voltage supply when the pixel array is created with complimentary metal oxide silicon (CMOS) technology. The noise distorts the image captured by the pixel array.
  • CMOS complimentary metal oxide silicon
  • a method and apparatus are described for optimizing the voltage supply of an image sensor pixel array.
  • the voltage supply is varied in response to the exposure level of the pixel array when it captures an image.
  • the voltage supply is increased when exposure levels are higher, to increase the reset voltage and expand the dynamic range of the pixel array.
  • the voltage supply is decreased to lower the reset voltage, thus lowering the noise level and reducing its effect on image quality.
  • the exposure level is determined by checking the gain of a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) that amplifies the signals from the pixel array, before the signals are digitized by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC).
  • a gain control block controls the gain of the PGA to match the signal range from the pixel array to the input range of the ADC to minimize quantization error.
  • a high PGA gain indicates lower signal levels from the pixel array, whereas a low PGA gain indicates higher signal levels from the pixel array. The gain of the PGA is thus an indicator of the exposure level.
  • the exposure level is determined by comparing the mean signal value from the pixel array to a threshold value. When the mean signal value is above the threshold value, then the pixel array has a high exposure level. When the mean signal value is below the threshold value, then the pixel array has a low exposure level.
  • the exposure level can be determined by comparing the median or maximum signal value from the pixel array to a threshold value.
  • the pixel array has more than one voltage supply.
  • One or more of the voltage supplies is changed in response to the exposure level of the pixel array to optimize the noise level and dynamic range of the pixel array.
  • the pixel array may be designed so that its reset voltage is not a function of a voltage supply to the pixel array.
  • the reset voltage may also be optimized independently of the voltage supply to reduce noise levels in response to the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a prior art pixel array.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a system for optimizing the voltage supply of a pixel array in response to exposure levels, made according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates one possible implementation for the exposure level determiner in FIG. 2
  • FIG. 3B shows an alternate implementation for the exposure level determiner.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a possible implementation for the variable voltage source.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a pixel array having multiple voltage supplies.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a process flow chart according to the present invention.
  • the pixel noise is negligible because the image signals are large compared to the pixel noise floor.
  • the large signal-to-noise ratio results in high image quality under high exposure levels.
  • the voltage swings of the pixel array may be relatively small under low exposure levels.
  • the signal-to-noise ratio is lower in these conditions and results in poorer image quality. Therefore, the voltage supply to the pixel array is varied in response to its exposure level to optimize the noise levels and dynamic range of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a system 201 for optimizing the voltage supply of a pixel array in response to its exposure level, made according to the present invention.
  • a pixel array 203 is used to capture an image, represented by image signals 211 .
  • An exposure level determiner 207 determines the exposure level of the image signals 211 and generates an exposure level indicator 209 for feedback to the supply adjuster 206 .
  • a supply adjuster 206 adjusts the voltage from a voltage supply 205 to provide an optimized voltage supply (Array Vdd 204 ) to the pixel array 203 .
  • Array Vdd 204 is selected for the optimal balance between noise level and dynamic range at the exposure level indicated by exposure level indicator 209 .
  • the supply adjuster 206 increases Array Vdd 204 . This allows for greater dynamic range in the pixel array 203 .
  • the supply adjuster 206 decreases Array Vdd 204 . Decreasing Array Vdd 204 does not hurt the dynamic range of the pixel array 203 in low exposure levels, since the voltage swings at each pixel are smaller. Decreasing Array Vdd 204 also reduces the amount of pixel noise, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio and the quality of images captured under low exposure levels.
  • the criteria for distinguishing low exposure levels from high exposure levels will vary from system to system, depending on factors such as length of exposure time, the pixel sensitivity, intensity of the ambient light, and other system variables. Generally, however, when the image signals 211 are higher than a reference value, the pixel array 203 has a high exposure level. When the image signals 211 are lower than a reference value, the pixel array 203 has a low exposure level.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates one possible implementation for the exposure level determiner 207 in FIG. 2 .
  • the inputs to the exposure level determiner 207 are the image signals 211 .
  • the image signals 211 are read from the pixel array 203 and amplified by a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) 301 when needed. Whether amplification is needed or not is discussed further below.
  • PGA programmable gain amplifier
  • the amplified image signals 302 are processed by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 303 , which converts the amplified image signals 302 into digital form (digitized image signals 304 ).
  • ADC analog-to-digital converter
  • the PGA 301 amplifies weak image signals to better match the range of the ADC 303 .
  • a gain control block 305 analyzes the digitized image signals from the ADC 303 to determine if amplification is needed. For example, if the mean level of the digitized image signals 304 does not meet a target value, the gain control block 305 adjusts the gain setting 306 of the PGA 301 accordingly.
  • the gain setting 306 of the PGA 301 is therefore an indicator of the exposure levels of the image signals 211 .
  • a high gain indicates that the image signals 211 needed to be amplified a considerable amount for input to the ADC 303 . Therefore, the pixel array 203 had a low exposure level. Conversely, a low gain indicates that little or no amplification was needed for the image signals 211 , and indicates that the pixel array 203 had a high exposure level.
  • the exposure level indicator 209 output from the exposure level determiner 207 is just the gain setting 306 of the PGA 301 .
  • FIG. 3B shows an alternate implementation for the exposure level determiner 207 .
  • the mean value of the image signals 211 is calculated by a mean value calculator 311 .
  • a comparator 307 compares the mean signal value to a threshold value 309 . When the mean signal value is above the threshold value 309 , then the pixel array has a high exposure level. When the mean pixel value is below a threshold value 309 , then the pixel array has a low exposure level.
  • the comparator 209 can compare the median or maximum signal value from the image signals 211 to a threshold value 309 .
  • the exposure level indicator 209 output from this exposure level determiner 207 is simply the output of the comparator 307 . Other methods may also be used to determine the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a possible implementation for the supply adjuster 206 , using a voltage control block 401 and a voltage regulator 403 .
  • the exposure level indicator 209 will be representative of the exposure level in which the image 211 was captured.
  • the voltage control block 401 generates a voltage reference 405 , based on the exposure level indicator 209 .
  • the optimal value for the voltage reference 405 is one that minimizes pixel noise in the pixel array 203 without compromising its dynamic range. These optimal values can be determined for the system beforehand and stored in a look-up memory table within the voltage control block 401 .
  • an algorithm may be developed for calculating the optimal value for the voltage reference 405 , based on the exposure level indicator 209 .
  • This algorithm may be implemented in hardware circuitry or software within voltage control block 401 .
  • An exemplary algorithm would be a comparison function.
  • the voltage control block 401 could include a comparator that compares the exposure level indicator 209 to a threshold value. If the exposure level indicator 209 is greater than the threshold value, then the voltage reference 405 is increased. If the exposure level indicator 209 is less than the threshold value, then the voltage reference 405 is decreased.
  • the voltage regulator 403 regulates Array Vdd 204 to match the optimal voltage reference 405 .
  • the voltage regulator 403 has an operational amplifier (op-amp) 407 that drives the gate of a transistor 409 .
  • the negative input of the op-amp 407 is connected to the drain of the transistor 409 , while the source of the transistor 409 is connected to the voltage supply 205 .
  • the voltage regulator 403 is a well-known circuit in the art, and the implementation illustrated here is just one of many possible designs.
  • the auxiliary circuitry for a pixel array may derive its power from one or more distinct voltage supplies. Each of these voltage supplies may also be optimized to reduce noise levels in response to the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a pixel array 203 having multiple voltage supplies 205 A, 205 B, and 205 C. Each voltage supply is adjusted by a supply adjuster 206 A, 206 B, and 206 C, respectively, to optimize the voltage supply for the exposure level indicated by the exposure level indicator 209 .
  • the pixel array may be designed so that its reset voltage is not a function of a voltage supply to the pixel array.
  • the noise level of the pixel array remains dependent on the reset voltage—the noise increases with the reset voltage.
  • the reset voltage may also be optimized independently of the voltage supply to reduce noise levels.
  • the reset voltage is a function of the reset signal 208 in some image sensors.
  • a reset voltage adjuster similar to the supply adjuster 206 , can be used to adjust the reset signal 208 in response to the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a process flow chart according to the present invention.
  • an image is captured on a pixel array.
  • the image is analyzed to determine its exposure level. If the exposure level is low, then a voltage supply of the pixel array is lowered. If the exposure level is relatively high, then the voltage supply can be increased. After adjustment, the next image can be captured and the process begins again at step 601 .
  • the reset voltage is not a function of the voltage supply, the reset voltage may also be adjusted independently of the voltage supply.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Transforming Light Signals Into Electric Signals (AREA)
  • Studio Devices (AREA)
  • Image Input (AREA)
  • Facsimile Heads (AREA)

Abstract

A method and apparatus for optimizing the voltage supply of an image sensor pixel array to minimize pixel noise and maximize dynamic range is disclosed. The voltage supply is adjusted in response to the exposure level of the pixel array when it captures an image. The voltage supply is increased in higher exposure levels to expand the dynamic range of the pixel array. In lower exposure levels, when the full dynamic range of the pixel array is not utilized, the voltage supply is decreased to lower pixel noise level and reduce its effect on image quality.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention is directed towards the field of image sensors, and more specifically, towards optimizing noise and dynamic range in the image sensors.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • An image sensor uses an array of pixels to capture an image when the image sensor is exposed to light. FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an illustrative prior art pixel array 103. Pixel array 103 includes auxiliary circuitry such as drivers, buffers, and multiplexers for the signals in the array. A voltage supply 105 supplies the pixel array 103 with power. At the beginning of an exposure period, a reset signal 107 is asserted to reset some or all of the pixels in the pixel array 103. Consequently, the pixels are charged to a reset voltage, which is typically a function of the voltage supply 105. As the pixel array 103 is exposed to incident light 109, the voltages at each pixel decrease.
  • At the end of an exposure period, the final voltage of each pixel is compared to its original reset voltage. These voltage swings represent the captured image, and are proportional to the exposure level of the pixel array 103. Large voltage swings indicate a high exposure level, which means that the pixel array 103 was exposed to bright light or had a long exposure period. Conversely, small voltage swings indicate a low exposure level, which means that the pixel array 103 was exposed to dim light or had a short exposure period. The voltage swings are read from the pixel array 103 as image signals 111.
  • A higher voltage supply increases the dynamic range of a pixel array, because each pixel has a larger reset voltage, and thus a bigger range for the voltage swing. A larger dynamic range allows the pixel array to capture a more faithful image when the exposure level is high. However, both pixel temporal noise and dark current noise (hereinafter, collectively referred to as just “noise” or “pixel noise”) have been found to increase along with the voltage supply when the pixel array is created with complimentary metal oxide silicon (CMOS) technology. The noise distorts the image captured by the pixel array.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method and apparatus are described for optimizing the voltage supply of an image sensor pixel array. The voltage supply is varied in response to the exposure level of the pixel array when it captures an image. The voltage supply is increased when exposure levels are higher, to increase the reset voltage and expand the dynamic range of the pixel array. When the exposure levels are lower and the full dynamic range of the pixel array is not utilized, the voltage supply is decreased to lower the reset voltage, thus lowering the noise level and reducing its effect on image quality.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, the exposure level is determined by checking the gain of a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) that amplifies the signals from the pixel array, before the signals are digitized by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC). A gain control block controls the gain of the PGA to match the signal range from the pixel array to the input range of the ADC to minimize quantization error. A high PGA gain indicates lower signal levels from the pixel array, whereas a low PGA gain indicates higher signal levels from the pixel array. The gain of the PGA is thus an indicator of the exposure level.
  • In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, the exposure level is determined by comparing the mean signal value from the pixel array to a threshold value. When the mean signal value is above the threshold value, then the pixel array has a high exposure level. When the mean signal value is below the threshold value, then the pixel array has a low exposure level. Alternatively, the exposure level can be determined by comparing the median or maximum signal value from the pixel array to a threshold value.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the pixel array has more than one voltage supply. One or more of the voltage supplies is changed in response to the exposure level of the pixel array to optimize the noise level and dynamic range of the pixel array.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the pixel array may be designed so that its reset voltage is not a function of a voltage supply to the pixel array. In such configurations, the reset voltage may also be optimized independently of the voltage supply to reduce noise levels in response to the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of preferred embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying exemplary drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a prior art pixel array.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a system for optimizing the voltage supply of a pixel array in response to exposure levels, made according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates one possible implementation for the exposure level determiner in FIG. 2
  • FIG. 3B shows an alternate implementation for the exposure level determiner.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a possible implementation for the variable voltage source.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a pixel array having multiple voltage supplies.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a process flow chart according to the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • When the pixel array has a high exposure level, the pixel noise is negligible because the image signals are large compared to the pixel noise floor. The large signal-to-noise ratio results in high image quality under high exposure levels. However, the voltage swings of the pixel array may be relatively small under low exposure levels. The signal-to-noise ratio is lower in these conditions and results in poorer image quality. Therefore, the voltage supply to the pixel array is varied in response to its exposure level to optimize the noise levels and dynamic range of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a system 201 for optimizing the voltage supply of a pixel array in response to its exposure level, made according to the present invention. A pixel array 203 is used to capture an image, represented by image signals 211. An exposure level determiner 207 determines the exposure level of the image signals 211 and generates an exposure level indicator 209 for feedback to the supply adjuster 206. A supply adjuster 206 adjusts the voltage from a voltage supply 205 to provide an optimized voltage supply (Array Vdd 204) to the pixel array 203. Array Vdd 204 is selected for the optimal balance between noise level and dynamic range at the exposure level indicated by exposure level indicator 209.
  • For example, when the exposure level determiner 207 indicates that the pixel array 203 has a high exposure level, the supply adjuster 206 increases Array Vdd 204. This allows for greater dynamic range in the pixel array 203. When the exposure level determiner 207 indicates that the pixel array 203 has a low exposure level, the supply adjuster 206 decreases Array Vdd 204. Decreasing Array Vdd 204 does not hurt the dynamic range of the pixel array 203 in low exposure levels, since the voltage swings at each pixel are smaller. Decreasing Array Vdd 204 also reduces the amount of pixel noise, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio and the quality of images captured under low exposure levels. The criteria for distinguishing low exposure levels from high exposure levels will vary from system to system, depending on factors such as length of exposure time, the pixel sensitivity, intensity of the ambient light, and other system variables. Generally, however, when the image signals 211 are higher than a reference value, the pixel array 203 has a high exposure level. When the image signals 211 are lower than a reference value, the pixel array 203 has a low exposure level.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates one possible implementation for the exposure level determiner 207 in FIG. 2. The inputs to the exposure level determiner 207 are the image signals 211. The image signals 211 are read from the pixel array 203 and amplified by a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) 301 when needed. Whether amplification is needed or not is discussed further below. Next, the amplified image signals 302 are processed by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 303, which converts the amplified image signals 302 into digital form (digitized image signals 304).
  • Whenever analog signals are digitized, quantization errors occur which introduce additional noise into the digitized signals. If the quantization noise is comparable to or larger than the noise present on the analog signal being digitized, then the quantization noise will degrade the overall signal-to-noise ratio. To minimize the effect of quantization noise, the analog signal may be amplified, such that the signal amplitude is maximized (without exceeding the ADC input range) before the addition of quantization noise. This minimizes the effect of the added quantization noise on the signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, the PGA 301 amplifies weak image signals to better match the range of the ADC 303. A gain control block 305 analyzes the digitized image signals from the ADC 303 to determine if amplification is needed. For example, if the mean level of the digitized image signals 304 does not meet a target value, the gain control block 305 adjusts the gain setting 306 of the PGA 301 accordingly.
  • The gain setting 306 of the PGA 301 is therefore an indicator of the exposure levels of the image signals 211. A high gain indicates that the image signals 211 needed to be amplified a considerable amount for input to the ADC 303. Therefore, the pixel array 203 had a low exposure level. Conversely, a low gain indicates that little or no amplification was needed for the image signals 211, and indicates that the pixel array 203 had a high exposure level. The exposure level indicator 209 output from the exposure level determiner 207 is just the gain setting 306 of the PGA 301.
  • FIG. 3B shows an alternate implementation for the exposure level determiner 207. The mean value of the image signals 211 is calculated by a mean value calculator 311. A comparator 307 compares the mean signal value to a threshold value 309. When the mean signal value is above the threshold value 309, then the pixel array has a high exposure level. When the mean pixel value is below a threshold value 309, then the pixel array has a low exposure level. Alternatively, the comparator 209 can compare the median or maximum signal value from the image signals 211 to a threshold value 309. The exposure level indicator 209 output from this exposure level determiner 207 is simply the output of the comparator 307. Other methods may also be used to determine the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a possible implementation for the supply adjuster 206, using a voltage control block 401 and a voltage regulator 403. Regardless of how the exposure level determiner 207 is implemented (i.e. the implementation of FIG. 3A, 3B, or any other implementation), the exposure level indicator 209 will be representative of the exposure level in which the image 211 was captured. The voltage control block 401 generates a voltage reference 405, based on the exposure level indicator 209. The optimal value for the voltage reference 405 is one that minimizes pixel noise in the pixel array 203 without compromising its dynamic range. These optimal values can be determined for the system beforehand and stored in a look-up memory table within the voltage control block 401.
  • Alternatively, an algorithm may be developed for calculating the optimal value for the voltage reference 405, based on the exposure level indicator 209. This algorithm may be implemented in hardware circuitry or software within voltage control block 401. An exemplary algorithm would be a comparison function. The voltage control block 401 could include a comparator that compares the exposure level indicator 209 to a threshold value. If the exposure level indicator 209 is greater than the threshold value, then the voltage reference 405 is increased. If the exposure level indicator 209 is less than the threshold value, then the voltage reference 405 is decreased.
  • The voltage regulator 403 regulates Array Vdd 204 to match the optimal voltage reference 405. The voltage regulator 403 has an operational amplifier (op-amp) 407 that drives the gate of a transistor 409. The negative input of the op-amp 407 is connected to the drain of the transistor 409, while the source of the transistor 409 is connected to the voltage supply 205. The voltage regulator 403 is a well-known circuit in the art, and the implementation illustrated here is just one of many possible designs.
  • In some image sensors, the auxiliary circuitry for a pixel array (such as the drivers, buffers, multiplexers, etc.) may derive its power from one or more distinct voltage supplies. Each of these voltage supplies may also be optimized to reduce noise levels in response to the exposure level of the pixel array. FIG. 5 illustrates a pixel array 203 having multiple voltage supplies 205A, 205B, and 205C. Each voltage supply is adjusted by a supply adjuster 206A, 206B, and 206C, respectively, to optimize the voltage supply for the exposure level indicated by the exposure level indicator 209.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the pixel array may be designed so that its reset voltage is not a function of a voltage supply to the pixel array. However, the noise level of the pixel array remains dependent on the reset voltage—the noise increases with the reset voltage. In such configurations, the reset voltage may also be optimized independently of the voltage supply to reduce noise levels. For example, the reset voltage is a function of the reset signal 208 in some image sensors. A reset voltage adjuster, similar to the supply adjuster 206, can be used to adjust the reset signal 208 in response to the exposure level of the pixel array.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a process flow chart according to the present invention. First, in step 601, an image is captured on a pixel array. Next, in step 603, the image is analyzed to determine its exposure level. If the exposure level is low, then a voltage supply of the pixel array is lowered. If the exposure level is relatively high, then the voltage supply can be increased. After adjustment, the next image can be captured and the process begins again at step 601. When the reset voltage is not a function of the voltage supply, the reset voltage may also be adjusted independently of the voltage supply.
  • Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to particular preferred embodiments, persons possessing ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains will appreciate that various modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims that follow.

Claims (21)

1. An imager, comprising:
a pixel array for capturing an image and outputting an image signal corresponding to the captured image; and
a supply adjuster for adjusting a level of a first voltage supplied to a reset circuit based on an exposure level of light incident on the pixel array.
2. The imager according to claim 1, wherein the supply adjuster independently adjusts a level of a second voltage supplied to the pixel array, during an interval when the image is captured and read.
3. The imager according to claim 1, wherein the second voltage supplied to the pixel array is adjusted based on the exposure level.
4. The imager according to claim 1, further comprising:
a programmable gain loop for generating a digital image signal and including a gain control signal derived from the digital image signal for adjusting a gain setting of the programmable gain loop,
wherein the second voltage level is controlled in accordance with the gain control signal from the programmable gain loop.
5. The imager according to claim 1, further comprising:
an exposure level determiner for determining the exposure level of the incident light, the exposure level determiner including:
a processor, coupled to the pixel array to receive the image signal, for determining a mean, median or maximum value of the image signal; and
a comparator, coupled to the processor, for comparing the determined value from the processor to a threshold value and outputting a comparison signal.
6. The imager according to claim 2, further comprising:
a voltage supply for generating a common supply voltage;
wherein the supply adjuster includes:
a first adjuster, coupled to the voltage supply, for supplying the reset circuit with the first voltage level, and
a second adjuster, coupled to the voltage supply, for supplying the pixel array with the second voltage level.
7. The imager according to claim 6, further comprising:
a further adjuster, coupled to the voltage supply, for supplying a third voltage level, different from the first or second voltage levels, to the pixel array.
8. The imager according to claim 7, wherein the further adjuster is coupled to one or more auxiliary circuits of the pixel array to reduce noise levels related to the third voltage level in response to the exposure level of the incident light on the pixel array.
9. The imager according to claim 6, further comprising:
a processor for determining the exposure level of the incident light based on the outputted image signal and for outputting a control signal, wherein the first and second voltage levels are individually controlled in accordance with the control signal by the first and second adjusters, respectively.
10. The imager according to claim 6, wherein:
the first adjuster includes a first lookup table having first adjustment values that are associated with exposure level values, receives a respective exposure level value corresponding to a current exposure level of the incident light on the pixel array and outputs the first voltage level based on a respective first adjustment value associated with the current exposure level; and
the second adjuster includes a second lookup table having second adjustment values, different from the first adjustment values, that are associated with the exposure level values, receives the respective exposure level value corresponding to the current exposure level and outputs the second voltage level based on a respective second adjustment value associated with the current exposure level.
11. The imager according to claim 6, wherein the first and second adjusters each operates according to a respective algorithm for calculating an optimal value of the respective first and second voltage levels based on an exposure level signal received by the first and second adjusters.
12. The imager according to claim 6, wherein the second adjuster decreases the second voltage level when the exposure level of the incident light on the pixel array is below a threshold and increases the second voltage level when the exposure level is above the threshold.
13. A method for adjusting voltages for an imager, comprising:
capturing an image with a pixel array;
outputting an image signal corresponding to the captured image;
adjusting, by a first adjuster, a level of a first voltage supplied to a reset circuit of the imager based on an exposure level of light incident on the pixel array.
14. The method according to claim 13, further comprising
independently adjusting, by a second adjuster, a level of a second voltage supplied to the pixel array during image-capture based on the exposure level of the light incident on the pixel array.
15. The method according to claim 13, further comprising:
determining one of a mean value, a median value or a maximum value of the outputted image signal for each image captured; and
adjusting the first and second voltage levels responsive to changes in the determined value.
16. The method according to claim 13, wherein the imager includes an automatic gain control, the method further comprising controlling, based on a common gain control signal, a gain setting of the automatic gain control, the first voltage level of the reset circuit and the second voltage level of the pixel array.
17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the adjusting of the second voltage level includes:
decreasing the second voltage level when the gain setting increases; and
increasing the second voltage level when the gain setting decreases.
18. A system, comprising:
a pixel array for capturing images and outputting image signals corresponding to the captured images;
a supply adjuster for adjusting a level of a supply voltage supplied to the pixel array during image-capture based on an exposure level of light incident on the pixel array, and for independently adjusting a level of a reset signal supplied to a reset circuit; and
a controller for deriving the exposure level from the outputted image signals and for controlling the supply adjuster to supply the adjusted reset signal level to the reset circuit responsive to the derived exposure level.
19. The system according to claim 18, wherein the controller determines the exposure level based on a maximum value or median value of a current image signal associated with a current captured image.
20. The system according to claim 18, wherein the supply adjuster includes a reset supply adjuster for adjusting the reset signal level independent of the supply voltage level.
21. The system according to claim 18, wherein the pixel array captures a subsequent image using the adjusted reset signal level and the adjusted supply voltage level.
US12/252,565 2003-04-30 2008-10-16 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range Abandoned US20090086086A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/252,565 US20090086086A1 (en) 2003-04-30 2008-10-16 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/427,318 US7440012B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2003-04-30 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range
US12/252,565 US20090086086A1 (en) 2003-04-30 2008-10-16 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/427,318 Continuation US7440012B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2003-04-30 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090086086A1 true US20090086086A1 (en) 2009-04-02

Family

ID=32176770

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/427,318 Active 2025-07-20 US7440012B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2003-04-30 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range
US12/252,565 Abandoned US20090086086A1 (en) 2003-04-30 2008-10-16 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/427,318 Active 2025-07-20 US7440012B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2003-04-30 Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US7440012B2 (en)
JP (1) JP4441703B2 (en)
DE (1) DE10357241B4 (en)
GB (1) GB2401274B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190306447A1 (en) * 2018-03-29 2019-10-03 Analog Devices Global Unlimited Company Lookup table

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7616698B2 (en) 2003-11-04 2009-11-10 Atheros Communications, Inc. Multiple-input multiple output system and method
KR100610478B1 (en) * 2004-05-06 2006-08-08 매그나칩 반도체 유한회사 Image sensor and method for compensation of digital gain thereof
JP2007180654A (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-07-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Image pickup device
US7488926B2 (en) * 2006-01-06 2009-02-10 Microsoft Corporation Pixel array with shared pixel output lines
JP5003127B2 (en) * 2006-12-01 2012-08-15 ソニー株式会社 Imaging apparatus, control method therefor, and camera
US7714266B2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2010-05-11 Aptina Imaging Corporation Method and apparatus for measuring source follower gain in an image sensor array
DE602007000910D1 (en) 2007-01-12 2009-05-28 St Microelectronics Res & Dev Power supply for an image sensor
CN101594457B (en) * 2008-05-30 2012-11-21 深圳艾科创新微电子有限公司 Grading noise reduction system and grading noise reduction method
JP2010273158A (en) * 2009-05-22 2010-12-02 Toshiba Corp Power source noise removing circuit
JP2011055308A (en) * 2009-09-02 2011-03-17 Ricoh Co Ltd Imaging apparatus
JP6137997B2 (en) * 2012-10-31 2017-05-31 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 Solid-state imaging device
US9491383B2 (en) * 2013-06-07 2016-11-08 Invisage Technologies, Inc. Image sensor with noise reduction
KR102083776B1 (en) * 2013-09-03 2020-04-16 삼성전자 주식회사 Image sensor for supplying a different voltage to pixels based on illumination change, operation method thereof, and device having image sensor
KR102205702B1 (en) * 2014-07-30 2021-01-21 삼성전자주식회사 Image sensor and method of driving image sensor, and image capturing apparatus using the same
US11095840B2 (en) * 2017-06-14 2021-08-17 Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation Control apparatus and imaging apparatus capable of reducing power consumption
US10965303B2 (en) 2019-08-23 2021-03-30 Analog Devices International Unlimited Company Data converter system with improved power supply accuracy and sequencing
GB201913244D0 (en) 2019-09-13 2019-10-30 Univ Tartu Method for making a fuel tablet

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4860108A (en) * 1986-12-29 1989-08-22 Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha Image sensing device for an electronic still camera
US5473374A (en) * 1993-06-17 1995-12-05 Sony Corporation Exposing apparatus for performing exposure control corresponding to the luminance level of an object
US5631705A (en) * 1992-08-13 1997-05-20 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Video camera having circuit for setting exposure compensation value
US6108037A (en) * 1991-09-05 2000-08-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup apparatus in which the white balance controller contains a circuit to calculate the color temperature from the color signals
US20010038064A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-11-08 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Image pickup device
US6445022B1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2002-09-03 Micron Technology, Inc. Increasing pixel conversion gain in CMOS image sensors
US20030174226A1 (en) * 2002-03-12 2003-09-18 Hyun-Joo Ahn Image sensor capable of controlling reset voltage automatically and control method thereof
US6690000B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2004-02-10 Nec Corporation Image sensor
US6788340B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2004-09-07 Texas Instruments Incorporated Digital imaging control with selective intensity resolution enhancement
US6850278B1 (en) * 1998-11-27 2005-02-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Solid-state image pickup apparatus
US6881941B1 (en) * 2001-11-08 2005-04-19 Ess Technology, Inc. Multi-mode imager with pinned photo region photoreceptors
US6911640B1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2005-06-28 Ess Technology, Inc. Reducing reset noise in CMOS image sensors
US7038820B1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2006-05-02 Eastman Kodak Company Automatic exposure control for an image sensor
US7236192B2 (en) * 2000-02-02 2007-06-26 Minolta Co., Ltd. Image-sensing device
US7327393B2 (en) * 2002-10-29 2008-02-05 Micron Technology, Inc. CMOS image sensor with variable conversion gain

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1715439A3 (en) * 1998-11-02 2007-10-10 Datalogic S.P.A. Device for the acquisition and automatic processing of data obtained from optical codes
JP4436513B2 (en) 2000-01-05 2010-03-24 オリンパス株式会社 Imaging device
JP2001217182A (en) 2000-02-03 2001-08-10 Canon Inc Sensor control device and aligner using the same

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4860108A (en) * 1986-12-29 1989-08-22 Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha Image sensing device for an electronic still camera
US6108037A (en) * 1991-09-05 2000-08-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup apparatus in which the white balance controller contains a circuit to calculate the color temperature from the color signals
US5631705A (en) * 1992-08-13 1997-05-20 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Video camera having circuit for setting exposure compensation value
US5473374A (en) * 1993-06-17 1995-12-05 Sony Corporation Exposing apparatus for performing exposure control corresponding to the luminance level of an object
US6850278B1 (en) * 1998-11-27 2005-02-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Solid-state image pickup apparatus
US6690000B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2004-02-10 Nec Corporation Image sensor
US6788340B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2004-09-07 Texas Instruments Incorporated Digital imaging control with selective intensity resolution enhancement
US6445022B1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2002-09-03 Micron Technology, Inc. Increasing pixel conversion gain in CMOS image sensors
US7236192B2 (en) * 2000-02-02 2007-06-26 Minolta Co., Ltd. Image-sensing device
US20010038064A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-11-08 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Image pickup device
US6881941B1 (en) * 2001-11-08 2005-04-19 Ess Technology, Inc. Multi-mode imager with pinned photo region photoreceptors
US20030174226A1 (en) * 2002-03-12 2003-09-18 Hyun-Joo Ahn Image sensor capable of controlling reset voltage automatically and control method thereof
US7038820B1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2006-05-02 Eastman Kodak Company Automatic exposure control for an image sensor
US6911640B1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2005-06-28 Ess Technology, Inc. Reducing reset noise in CMOS image sensors
US7327393B2 (en) * 2002-10-29 2008-02-05 Micron Technology, Inc. CMOS image sensor with variable conversion gain

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190306447A1 (en) * 2018-03-29 2019-10-03 Analog Devices Global Unlimited Company Lookup table
CN110324547A (en) * 2018-03-29 2019-10-11 亚德诺半导体无限责任公司 Active picture element image sensor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040218088A1 (en) 2004-11-04
GB2401274A (en) 2004-11-03
US7440012B2 (en) 2008-10-21
DE10357241A1 (en) 2004-12-02
DE10357241B4 (en) 2009-12-31
JP4441703B2 (en) 2010-03-31
GB0406232D0 (en) 2004-04-21
JP2004336747A (en) 2004-11-25
GB2401274B (en) 2006-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090086086A1 (en) Method and apparatus for optimizing image sensor noise and dynamic range
US6788340B1 (en) Digital imaging control with selective intensity resolution enhancement
US7830436B2 (en) Method of controlling semiconductor device, signal processing method, semiconductor device, and electronic apparatus
US8154635B2 (en) Image sensor and digital gain compensation method thereof
US6774942B1 (en) Black level offset calibration system for CCD image digitizer
US7443442B2 (en) Image apparatus and method for compensating for high and low luminance image portions via exposure control and gamma correction
KR100776134B1 (en) Image sensor and method for controlling distribution of image brightness
US20010007473A1 (en) Imaging method and apparatus for generating an output image with a wide dynamic range
JPH07118786B2 (en) Imaging device
US20040179132A1 (en) Camera system and camera control method
TW202034679A (en) Image capturing device
KR100873985B1 (en) Optical pointing device and auto gain control method thereof
EP1067775A2 (en) Digital imaging control with selective intensity resolution enhancement
US20040129861A1 (en) Optical image detector and method for controlling illumination of the same
US7295237B2 (en) Image capturing apparatus capable of extracting a moving object
US7084911B1 (en) Black level calibration method for imager with hysteresis comparison and adaptive step size
JPWO2008129885A1 (en) Output control circuit and imaging apparatus
JP2001013005A (en) Light quantity detecting circuit capable of controlling photoelectric conversion ratio
KR100750100B1 (en) Image processing apparatus having A/D converter
US6567124B1 (en) Electronic image processing technique for achieving enhanced image detail
US20060087378A1 (en) Preamplifier circuit having a variable feedback resistance
JP2807928B2 (en) Sensitivity up circuit for video camera
US20030179312A1 (en) Auto-strobe apparatus and method for digital camera
JP2001309393A (en) Imaging unit
JPH05336436A (en) Automatic gain controller

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: APTINA IMAGING CORPORATION, CAYMAN ISLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023159/0424

Effective date: 20081003

Owner name: APTINA IMAGING CORPORATION,CAYMAN ISLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023159/0424

Effective date: 20081003

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION