US20090081716A1 - Method for Monitoring the Immune Response and Predicting Clinical Outcomes in transplant recipients - Google Patents
Method for Monitoring the Immune Response and Predicting Clinical Outcomes in transplant recipients Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090081716A1 US20090081716A1 US12/328,854 US32885408A US2009081716A1 US 20090081716 A1 US20090081716 A1 US 20090081716A1 US 32885408 A US32885408 A US 32885408A US 2009081716 A1 US2009081716 A1 US 2009081716A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- patient
- atp
- immune response
- transplant
- lymphocytes
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 105
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 239000003018 immunosuppressive agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 229940124589 immunosuppressive drug Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- ZKHQWZAMYRWXGA-KQYNXXCUSA-J ATP(4-) Chemical compound C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP([O-])(=O)OP([O-])(=O)OP([O-])([O-])=O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O ZKHQWZAMYRWXGA-KQYNXXCUSA-J 0.000 claims description 82
- ZKHQWZAMYRWXGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Adenosine triphosphate Natural products C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1C1OC(COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)C(O)C1O ZKHQWZAMYRWXGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 82
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 claims description 70
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 claims description 68
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 claims description 50
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 claims description 49
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 claims description 49
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000001506 immunosuppresive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000003226 mitogen Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims description 8
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 claims description 7
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 claims description 7
- 241000725303 Human immunodeficiency virus Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 208000011231 Crohn disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 4
- 206010025135 lupus erythematosus Diseases 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000006166 lysate Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 206010039073 rheumatoid arthritis Diseases 0.000 claims description 4
- 102100024222 B-lymphocyte antigen CD19 Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 101000980825 Homo sapiens B-lymphocyte antigen CD19 Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 101000581981 Homo sapiens Neural cell adhesion molecule 1 Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 102100027347 Neural cell adhesion molecule 1 Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003670 luciferase enzyme activity assay Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000005298 paramagnetic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000017420 CD3 protein, epsilon/gamma/delta subunit Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108050005493 CD3 protein, epsilon/gamma/delta subunit Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- IGXWBGJHJZYPQS-SSDOTTSWSA-N D-Luciferin Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@H]1CSC(C=2SC3=CC=C(O)C=C3N=2)=N1 IGXWBGJHJZYPQS-SSDOTTSWSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- CYCGRDQQIOGCKX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dehydro-luciferin Natural products OC(=O)C1=CSC(C=2SC3=CC(O)=CC=C3N=2)=N1 CYCGRDQQIOGCKX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- BJGNCJDXODQBOB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fivefly Luciferin Natural products OC(=O)C1CSC(C=2SC3=CC(O)=CC=C3N=2)=N1 BJGNCJDXODQBOB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 101000716102 Homo sapiens T-cell surface glycoprotein CD4 Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- DDWFXDSYGUXRAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Luciferin Natural products CCc1c(C)c(CC2NC(=O)C(=C2C=C)C)[nH]c1Cc3[nH]c4C(=C5/NC(CC(=O)O)C(C)C5CC(=O)O)CC(=O)c4c3C DDWFXDSYGUXRAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 102100036011 T-cell surface glycoprotein CD4 Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000013592 cell lysate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002934 lysing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003834 intracellular effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 49
- 210000002865 immune cell Anatomy 0.000 description 26
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 25
- QJJXYPPXXYFBGM-LFZNUXCKSA-N Tacrolimus Chemical compound C1C[C@@H](O)[C@H](OC)C[C@@H]1\C=C(/C)[C@@H]1[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)CC(=O)[C@H](CC=C)/C=C(C)/C[C@H](C)C[C@H](OC)[C@H]([C@H](C[C@H]2C)OC)O[C@@]2(O)C(=O)C(=O)N2CCCC[C@H]2C(=O)O1 QJJXYPPXXYFBGM-LFZNUXCKSA-N 0.000 description 22
- 230000003915 cell function Effects 0.000 description 22
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 21
- QJJXYPPXXYFBGM-SHYZHZOCSA-N tacrolimus Natural products CO[C@H]1C[C@H](CC[C@@H]1O)C=C(C)[C@H]2OC(=O)[C@H]3CCCCN3C(=O)C(=O)[C@@]4(O)O[C@@H]([C@H](C[C@H]4C)OC)[C@@H](C[C@H](C)CC(=C[C@@H](CC=C)C(=O)C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C)C)OC QJJXYPPXXYFBGM-SHYZHZOCSA-N 0.000 description 19
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 19
- 108010047620 Phytohemagglutinins Proteins 0.000 description 18
- 230000001885 phytohemagglutinin Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 17
- 229960001967 tacrolimus Drugs 0.000 description 17
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 17
- 206010062016 Immunosuppression Diseases 0.000 description 16
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 15
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 14
- PMATZTZNYRCHOR-CGLBZJNRSA-N Cyclosporin A Chemical compound CC[C@@H]1NC(=O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@H](C)C\C=C\C)N(C)C(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)N(C)C(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)N(C)C(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)N(C)C(=O)[C@@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)N(C)C(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)N(C)C(=O)CN(C)C1=O PMATZTZNYRCHOR-CGLBZJNRSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 108010036949 Cyclosporine Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 210000000987 immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 210000000496 pancreas Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 12
- 206010033296 Overdoses Diseases 0.000 description 11
- 210000004970 cd4 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 10
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 10
- 229930105110 Cyclosporin A Natural products 0.000 description 9
- 238000001574 biopsy Methods 0.000 description 9
- 229960001265 ciclosporin Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 229930182912 cyclosporin Natural products 0.000 description 9
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000002650 immunosuppressive therapy Methods 0.000 description 9
- FQISKWAFAHGMGT-SGJOWKDISA-M Methylprednisolone sodium succinate Chemical compound [Na+].C([C@@]12C)=CC(=O)C=C1[C@@H](C)C[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@@H](O)C[C@]2(C)[C@@](O)(C(=O)COC(=O)CCC([O-])=O)CC[C@H]21 FQISKWAFAHGMGT-SGJOWKDISA-M 0.000 description 8
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 229940126585 therapeutic drug Drugs 0.000 description 8
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 229940087854 solu-medrol Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 6
- DDRJAANPRJIHGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N creatinine Chemical compound CN1CC(=O)NC1=N DDRJAANPRJIHGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000003285 pharmacodynamic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000009118 salvage therapy Methods 0.000 description 6
- QFJCIRLUMZQUOT-HPLJOQBZSA-N sirolimus Chemical compound C1C[C@@H](O)[C@H](OC)C[C@@H]1C[C@@H](C)[C@H]1OC(=O)[C@@H]2CCCCN2C(=O)C(=O)[C@](O)(O2)[C@H](C)CC[C@H]2C[C@H](OC)/C(C)=C/C=C/C=C/[C@@H](C)C[C@@H](C)C(=O)[C@H](OC)[C@H](O)/C(C)=C/[C@@H](C)C(=O)C1 QFJCIRLUMZQUOT-HPLJOQBZSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 208000001388 Opportunistic Infections Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229940046731 calcineurin inhibitors Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003018 immunoassay Methods 0.000 description 5
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 5
- ZAHRKKWIAAJSAO-UHFFFAOYSA-N rapamycin Natural products COCC(O)C(=C/C(C)C(=O)CC(OC(=O)C1CCCCN1C(=O)C(=O)C2(O)OC(CC(OC)C(=CC=CC=CC(C)CC(C)C(=O)C)C)CCC2C)C(C)CC3CCC(O)C(C3)OC)C ZAHRKKWIAAJSAO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229960002930 sirolimus Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 230000008733 trauma Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002407 ATP formation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000024932 T cell mediated immunity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 206010052779 Transplant rejections Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 4
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009093 first-line therapy Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 4
- ZFGMDIBRIDKWMY-PASTXAENSA-N heparin Chemical compound CC(O)=N[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](COS(O)(=O)=O)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](C(O)=O)O[C@@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]3[C@@H](OC(O)[C@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)[C@H]3O)C(O)=O)O[C@@H]2O)CS(O)(=O)=O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O ZFGMDIBRIDKWMY-PASTXAENSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000036737 immune function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229940124622 immune-modulator drug Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 229960003444 immunosuppressant agent Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 4
- 206010002091 Anaesthesia Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 108050006400 Cyclin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000009339 Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 230000006044 T cell activation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000037005 anaesthesia Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011088 calibration curve Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229940109239 creatinine Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 210000002216 heart Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000006249 magnetic particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000009115 maintenance therapy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- RTGDFNSFWBGLEC-SYZQJQIISA-N mycophenolate mofetil Chemical compound COC1=C(C)C=2COC(=O)C=2C(O)=C1C\C=C(/C)CCC(=O)OCCN1CCOCC1 RTGDFNSFWBGLEC-SYZQJQIISA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229960004866 mycophenolate mofetil Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000003431 steroids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 231100000155 toxicity by organ Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 230000007675 toxicity by organ Effects 0.000 description 3
- -1 Ca2+ ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 208000035473 Communicable disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108010062580 Concanavalin A Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000701022 Cytomegalovirus Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000030453 Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse reaction Diseases 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- XJLXINKUBYWONI-NNYOXOHSSA-O NADP(+) Chemical compound NC(=O)C1=CC=C[N+]([C@H]2[C@@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OC[C@@H]3[C@H]([C@@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H](O3)N3C4=NC=NC(N)=C4N=C3)O)O2)O)=C1 XJLXINKUBYWONI-NNYOXOHSSA-O 0.000 description 2
- 108010033737 Pokeweed Mitogens Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 206010070863 Toxicity to various agents Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000000961 alloantigen Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000340 anti-metabolite Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940100197 antimetabolite Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000002256 antimetabolite Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005784 autoimmunity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001185 bone marrow Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002651 drug therapy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002532 enzyme inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011194 good manufacturing practice Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006450 immune cell response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001861 immunosuppressant effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001802 infusion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940063121 neoral Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229960004618 prednisone Drugs 0.000 description 2
- XOFYZVNMUHMLCC-ZPOLXVRWSA-N prednisone Chemical compound O=C1C=C[C@]2(C)[C@H]3C(=O)C[C@](C)([C@@](CC4)(O)C(=O)CO)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 XOFYZVNMUHMLCC-ZPOLXVRWSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229940072288 prograf Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004809 thin layer chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 2
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-OFKYTIFKSA-N 1-[(2r,4s,5r)-4-hydroxy-5-(tritiooxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-5-methylpyrimidine-2,4-dione Chemical compound C1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO[3H])O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C(C)=C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-OFKYTIFKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000030507 AIDS Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 231100000582 ATP assay Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- BSYNRYMUTXBXSQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Aspirin Chemical compound CC(=O)OC1=CC=CC=C1C(O)=O BSYNRYMUTXBXSQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000023275 Autoimmune disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100024217 CAMPATH-1 antigen Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010065524 CD52 Antigen Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004631 Calcineurin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010042955 Calcineurin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229940122739 Calcineurin inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 101710192106 Calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100024123 Calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 208000024172 Cardiovascular disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- CMSMOCZEIVJLDB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cyclophosphamide Chemical compound ClCCN(CCCl)P1(=O)NCCCO1 CMSMOCZEIVJLDB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000537377 Fraxinus berlandieriana Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000006395 Globulins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010044091 Globulins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010018364 Glomerulonephritis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101001055144 Homo sapiens Interleukin-2 receptor subunit alpha Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000701806 Human papillomavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000829111 Human polyomavirus 1 Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000000588 Interleukin-2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100026878 Interleukin-2 receptor subunit alpha Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000701460 JC polyomavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108060001084 Luciferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000005089 Luciferase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010089814 Plant Lectins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001505332 Polyomavirus sp. Species 0.000 description 1
- 201000004681 Psoriasis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010070834 Sensitisation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 206010043376 Tetanus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000735 allogeneic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000781 anti-lymphocytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000030741 antigen processing and presentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000612 antigen-presenting cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960002170 azathioprine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- LMEKQMALGUDUQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N azathioprine Chemical compound CN1C=NC([N+]([O-])=O)=C1SC1=NC=NC2=C1NC=N2 LMEKQMALGUDUQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960004669 basiliximab Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036765 blood level Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002798 bone marrow cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 244000309466 calf Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940107810 cellcept Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000020832 chronic kidney disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003246 corticosteroid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960001334 corticosteroids Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960004397 cyclophosphamide Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000016396 cytokine production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004163 cytometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960002806 daclizumab Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000779 depleting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000000890 drug combination Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002526 effect on cardiovascular system Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000000523 end stage renal failure Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009585 enzyme analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003743 erythrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005714 functional activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000006454 hepatitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 231100000283 hepatitis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003118 histopathologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000028996 humoral immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005965 immune activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008629 immune suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000899 immune system response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002955 immunomodulating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010874 in vitro model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002458 infectious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011221 initial treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007885 magnetic separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002483 medication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960004584 methylprednisolone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- HPNSFSBZBAHARI-UHFFFAOYSA-N micophenolic acid Natural products OC1=C(CC=C(C)CCC(O)=O)C(OC)=C(C)C2=C1C(=O)OC2 HPNSFSBZBAHARI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011859 microparticle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006540 mitochondrial respiration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002297 mitogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001616 monocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004091 panning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003071 parasitic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013610 patient sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000005259 peripheral blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011886 peripheral blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003819 peripheral blood mononuclear cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003726 plant lectin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960005205 prednisolone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OIGNJSKKLXVSLS-VWUMJDOOSA-N prednisolone Chemical compound O=C1C=C[C@]2(C)[C@H]3[C@@H](O)C[C@](C)([C@@](CC4)(O)C(=O)CO)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 OIGNJSKKLXVSLS-VWUMJDOOSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940099538 rapamune Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000022983 regulation of cell cycle Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008313 sensitization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000021 stimulant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000011285 therapeutic regimen Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000472 traumatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011269 treatment regimen Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
- G01N33/5008—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
- G01N33/5044—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics involving specific cell types
- G01N33/5047—Cells of the immune system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
- G01N33/5091—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing the pathological state of an organism
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
- G01N2800/24—Immunology or allergic disorders
- G01N2800/245—Transplantation related diseases, e.g. graft versus host disease
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
- G01N2800/52—Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10S436/827—Lectins
Definitions
- the invention generally relates to methods for monitoring the immune response in a patient receiving immunosuppressive drugs.
- the invention provides methods based on the measurement of metabolic markers of activation in immune cells as an indicator of the patient's immune response. The methods may be used to predict clinical outcomes and determine treatment courses for patients such as transplant recipients.
- TDM Therapeutic drug monitoring
- the subject invention provides a method of monitoring immune responses in a patient who is being evaluated as an organ recipient and/or is receiving at least one immunosuppressive drug.
- This convenient and reliable method includes the steps of analyzing the immunological responses of a set or subset of lymphocytes from a blood sample by determining at least one level of functional activity and comparing it with the immunological responses of lymphocytes with defined levels of human immunological responses (low, moderate or strong). The immune status assessment of the patient is based on this comparison. Immunological responses are ascertained by measuring an intracellular component that is increased if the cells have responded to a stimulus.
- the patient is a transplant recipient.
- the patient may be a recipient of a heart, lungs, kidney, pancreas, liver, small bowel or other organs, tissues, or bone marrow transplant.
- At least one immunosuppressive drug may be administered, for example, calcineurin inhibitors, enzyme inhibitors, antimetabolites, lymphocyte depleting drugs, corticosteroids, or other immune modulators. Drug combinations may also be administered.
- the overall effect of drugs on immune responses may be measured using an assay which detects increases in an intracellular component, for example ATP, by a mitogen or antigen stimulation and then employing a luciferase assay, or by measuring other metabolic intermediates such as NADP, ionic metabolites such as Ca 2+ , or proteins involved in cell cycle regulation such as PCNA.
- an assay which detects increases in an intracellular component, for example ATP, by a mitogen or antigen stimulation and then employing a luciferase assay, or by measuring other metabolic intermediates such as NADP, ionic metabolites such as Ca 2+ , or proteins involved in cell cycle regulation such as PCNA.
- One aspect of the invention is a method for predicting a clinical outcome in a patient who is receiving none or one or more immunosuppressive drugs.
- the method utilizes measured ranges of lymphocyte responses derived from a cohort of apparently healthy individuals as a means of defining normal ranges of reactivities, and includes the steps of determining at least one value of lymphocyte response in a sample of blood from a patient before or after administration of immunosuppressive drug(s); determining whether the lymphocyte response of the cells from the patient receiving the immunosuppressant drug is higher or lower than the range defined for apparently healthy individuals, or falls within it; and providing a guide for therapy and predicting a clinical outcomes based on the comparison.
- Clinical outcomes or conditions which may be predicted include transplant rejection, over-medication, and infection.
- a lymphocyte response that falls in the low range indicates high immunosuppression and may be indicative of over-medication which may lead to organ toxicity, infection, or, in the long term, cancer.
- a lymphocyte response which falls in the strong range indicates a low immunosuppressed condition, which may be indicative of infection or a course leading to organ rejection.
- a lymphocyte response which falls in the moderate range may indicate that stability of the immunological response has been achieved and that no changes in therapeutic regimen are warranted at that time.
- the invention provides a method for assessing the pharmacodynamic impact (physiological effect) of an immunosupressant drug in a non-transplant patient.
- the method includes the steps of determining a value of an immune response in at least one sample of lymphocytes from the non-transplant patient; comparing the value with values in a reference set comprising ranges of values of immunological response for lymphocytes; and assessing the pharmacodynamic impact of the immunosupressant drug based on a comparison made in said comparing step.
- the non-transplant patient may be receiving the immunosupressant drug for a disease condition such as autoimmunity, inflammation, Crohn's Disease, lupus erythromatosus, or rheumatoid arthritis.
- the method will typically be carried out in order to reduce complications from infections or cancer in the non-transplant patient.
- FIG. 1 Schematically illustrates an immune cell function assay as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,232 which is herein incorporated by reference in entirety. Lymphocytes are stimulated, incubated, and CD4+ cells are separated via magnetic separation; cells are washed and lysed to released ATP, which is detected.
- FIG. 2 Immune response distributions of apparently healthy adults, transplant recipients and HIV patients.
- Y axis ATP (ng/mL). Zones of low ( ⁇ 225 ng/mL ATP), moderate (>225 ng/mL ATP and ⁇ 525 ng/mL ATP) and strong ( ⁇ 525 ng/mL ATP) immune response are indicated.
- FIG. 4 Comparison of CylexTM immune cell function response in kidney, liver and pancreas and simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) recipients.
- Y axis ATP (ng/mL).
- FIG. 5 Immune response versus Tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring trough.
- X axis Tacrolimus concentration (ng/mL); Y axis ATP (ng/mL).
- FIG. 6 Immune cell response range vs. time since transplant.
- Y axis tracks time since transplant;
- X axis is % population.
- FIG. 7 Case Study 1: Rejection associated with immune cell function despite reduced lymphocyte count following induction therapy.
- the present invention provides methods of determining and/or monitoring the state of an individual's immune system.
- the methods involve measuring the level of metabolic markers of cellular activation in a subset of immune cells as a measure of immune response, and assignment of the immune response to a standardized range or zone of immune reactivity.
- the practice of the method thus provides a single time point “snapshot” of the individual's immune response.
- by monitoring an individual's immune response at several time points it is possible to obtain a complete picture of the immune system's reactivity over time.
- the methods of the present invention make it possible to observe, for example, the response of a patient's immune system to a medical procedure and to adjust treatment protocols accordingly.
- a patient whose immune system is monitored may be on an immunosuppressive drug therapy regimen.
- the immunosuppressive drug(s) are administered as the result of an organ transplant.
- metabolic markers of cellular activation examples include but are not limited to adenosine triphosphate (ATP), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and/or Ca 2+ ions.
- ATP adenosine triphosphate
- NADP nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- PCNA proliferating cell nuclear antigen
- Ca 2+ ions examples include but are not limited to subsets of lymphocytes such as CD4, CD3, CD19 and CD56 cells.
- the state of the immune system is ascertained by measuring the level of ATP present in CD4 cells.
- a sample of whole blood is obtained from the patient.
- suitable stimulants include but are not limited to mitogens (for example, the plant mitogens phytohemagglutinin, Concanavalin A or Pokeweed mitogen); alloantigens (which may be, for example, located on a cellsurface, selectively purified, or bound to a synthetic surface e.g. plastic); autoantigens (which also may be, for example, located on a cell surface, selectively purified, or bound to a synthetic surface e.g. plastic), and foreign antigens such as those which originate from bacteria, viruses, and various parasitic organisms.
- mitogens for example, the plant mitogens phytohemagglutinin, Concanavalin A or Pokeweed mitogen
- alloantigens which may be, for example, located on a cellsurface, selectively purified, or bound to a synthetic surface e.g. plastic
- autoantigens which also may be, for example, located on a cell surface, selectively purified, or bound to a synthetic surface e.g. plastic
- the stimulant is a mitogen such as the plant mitogen phytohemagglutin.
- the CD4 cells are removed from (i.e. isolated from) the sample. In general, the time for incubation of the whole blood sample and the mitogen is in the range of hours to days, and preferably in the range of about 0.5-6 to about 24-48 hours. The CD4 cells are then removed, e.g. by using paramagnetic particles containing an antibody specific for CD4 cells. However, those of skill in the art will recognize that removal of the CD4 cells may be carried out by any of a variety of means which are well known, such as column separations, panning, or by using plastic or ferrous particles with ligands for the immune cell attachment.
- the isolated CD4 cells are then lysed, and the level of ATP in the lysate is quantified.
- Methods of lysis are well known in the art. Detection of ATP can be accomplished by any of several suitable methods, such as enzyme analysis, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), or thin layer chromatography (TLC). However, in a preferred embodiment, the ATP is detected by a luciferin-luciferase assay.
- HPLC high pressure liquid chromatography
- TLC thin layer chromatography
- the ATP is detected by a luciferin-luciferase assay.
- An alternative is that the cells are not lysed, and the activation product is measured inside the cell via cytometry, colorimetrically or by chemiluminescent reporter.
- the inventor's have discovered that the immune response of an individual at any point in time may be classified according to the amount of a metabolic marker of activation in immune cells that is detected. For example, a level of ATP that is detected in a patient may be quantified versus known standard levels of ATP detected in apparently healthy individuals and generated using a calibration curve.
- the invention thus also provides a system for classifying an immune response as low, moderate, or strong; or alternatively, for assigning an immune response to a low, moderate, or strong range or zone of reactivity.
- ATP is the metabolic marker
- an immune response is low if the level of ATP detected is 225 ng/mL or less, moderate if the level is greater than 225 ng ATP/mL but less than 525 ng ATP/mL, and strong if the level is 525 ng ATP/mL or greater.
- an individual's immune response may be ranked as low, moderate or strong based on the level of metabolic marker (e.g. ATP) that is detected.
- ATP levels may be monitored before, during and after drug therapy, or before and after organ transplant surgery is performed, in order to monitor changes over time in the immune response of the patient in response to these medical procedures.
- This information regarding the patient's immune status may be useful as an adjunct to therapeutic drug monitoring at any point in the course of therapy in order to assess the progress of a patient, the suitability of a drug regimen, and to predict clinical outcomes for a patient (see below).
- the present invention provides methods of determining and monitoring the state of a patient's immune system in response to a stimulus.
- the patient is one who is receiving or will be receiving an immunomodulating drug or drugs.
- the patient may be the recipient of an organ such as heart, lungs, kidney, pancreas, liver, bowel, skin, bone marrow or other organs.
- a transplant patient may be the recipient of more than one organ, e.g. a “heart-lung” transplant recipient.
- the transplant may be transplanted tissue.
- the transplanted tissue or organ(s) may be from any source known to those of skill in the art, for example, from a live organ donor such as a relative (e.g.
- the patient may be under treatment for an autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, etc.
- the patient may be afflicted with an infectious disease, such as Human Immune Deficiency Syndrome related viruses (HIV-1), or Hepatitis associated viruses (HCV).
- HIV-1 Human Immune Deficiency Syndrome related viruses
- HCV Hepatitis associated viruses
- the patient may be a cancer patient.
- the invention provides a method for assessing the pharmacodynamic impact of an immunosupressant drug in a non-transplant patient.
- the method includes the steps of determining a value of an immune response in at least one sample of lymphocytes from the non-transplant patient; comparing the value with values in a reference set comprising ranges of values of immunological response for lymphocytes; and assessing the pharmacodynamic impact of the immunosupressant drug based on a comparison made in said comparing step.
- the non-transplant patient may be receiving the immunosupressant drug for a disease condition such as autoimmunity, inflammation, Crohn's Disease, lupus erythromatosus, or rheumatoid arthritis.
- the method will typically be carried out in order to reduce complications from infections or cancer in the non-transplant patient.
- immunosuppressive drugs include but are not limited to antilymphocyte drugs such as OKT3, Antithymocytegamma globulin (ATGAM), Daclizumab, and Basiliximab (anti IL2R); calcineurin inhibitors such as Tacrolimus (Prograf®, FK506) or cyclosporin (Neoral®); antimetabolites such as Azathioprine, Cyclophosphamide, and Mycophenolate mofetil; enzyme inhibitors such as Sirolimus (Rapamune), or corticocorticoids such as Prednisone, or methylprednisolone (Solumedrol.).
- antilymphocyte drugs such as OKT3, Antithymocytegamma globulin (ATGAM), Daclizumab, and Basiliximab (anti IL2R)
- calcineurin inhibitors such as Tacrolimus (Prograf®, FK506) or cyclosporin (Neoral®
- antimetabolites
- the present invention provides a method of guiding decisions regarding therapies and of predicting a clinical outcome of a patient receiving one or more immunosuppressive drugs.
- Possible clinical outcomes include, for example, rejection of the transplanted organ, infection, or organ toxicity.
- Any given immune response value (ATP ng/mL) can be assigned to a category of a known range of values, and a comparison of changes in measured values over time allows the observation of trends in the immune response of the patient. For example, the patient's immune response at any point in time may be classified as low (ATP ng/mL ⁇ 225), moderate (ATP ng/mL>225 and ⁇ 525), or strong (ATP ng/mL ⁇ 525), and a trend toward a heightened or diminished immune response can be observed.
- an initial blood sample is obtained and tested prior to organ transplant surgery and before any immunosuppressant drug is administered.
- the immune response value is ascertained and compared to the categories of known value ranges (e.g., low, moderate or strong). Based on these values the initial drug dose may be maintained within or modified from the usual practice of dose assignment on the basis of patient body weight. For example, a transplant candidate who is determined to be immunosuppressed due to an infectious disease (e.g. AIDS) may be given a lower or no drug dose, compared to another individual of the same body weight.
- an infectious disease e.g. AIDS
- an initial blood sample is obtained and tested prior to organ transplant surgery and before any immunosuppressant drug is administered, and another blood sample is tested after surgery and after the administration of drugs.
- medical judgements can be made relative to the effect of the surgery and drugs on the patient specifically regarding the immune status. For example, if the value obtained from the sample obtained subsequent to the first was in a lower range than the first, additional testing may be indicated and or medication doses reduced to avoid the possibility of over medication. If the value obtained from the sample obtained subsequent to the first one was in a higher range than the first, additional testing may be indicated and or medication doses increased to avoid the possibility of organ rejection.
- a blood sample obtained and tested at any point after surgery can provide immune status information regarding the level of immune suppression when the values are compared to categories of known value ranges. For example, if the value obtained is in the weak range, additional testing maybe indicated and or medication doses reduced to avoid the possibility of over medication. If the value obtained is in the strong range, additional testing may be indicated and/or medication doses increased, or rescue therapy initiated to avoid the possibility of organ rejection. Further, if the value is in the moderate range, and particularly if the value does not fluctuate significantly (e.g. stays within the same zone) for at least two consecutive monthly measurements, this may indicate that stability of the immune response has been achieved, and that adjustments to the treatment regimen are not necessary at that time.
- sampling may be done at any point at which a skilled practitioner (e.g. a physician) deems it to be advisable. In general, such testing would be carried out at most daily (e.g. during a time when a patient is most at risk) and at least monthly (e.g. during a time when a patient appears to be relatively stable).
- multiple blood samples are obtained and tested at multiple points after the organ transplant surgery and during the period when immunomodulating drugs are being administered.
- An example of the predictive value of the methods would be the detection, by utilizing the methods of the present invention, of an increase in the immune response of the patient from the low to moderate to the strong range over a period of time.
- the results may be predictive of potential acute rejection of the transplanted organ, and may warrant, for example: initiation of other confirmatory tests (e.g. organ biopsy or organ specific blood chemistry analyses); an increase in the dose of the drug being administered; a rescue therapy with an alternate drug; or a new combination of drugs.
- the state of the immune response must be monitored for several days, and preferably for about 3-5 days.
- monitoring ATP in order to conclude that a risk of organ rejection exists, the immune response of the patient must show an increase in the range of at least about 50 ng/mL ATP to 100 ng/mL ATP.
- an unexpected decrease in the immune response over a period of time may be predictive of the risk of developing an opportunistic infection due to over medication. For example, if a patient's immune response declines from the moderate range to the low range, this may be indicative of over-medication and warrant the initiation of further confirmatory tests (e.g. organ biopsy or organ function analysis, or assays for infectious organisms by PCR), or a reduction or change in medication.
- further confirmatory tests e.g. organ biopsy or organ function analysis, or assays for infectious organisms by PCR
- the state of the immune response must be monitored for several days, and preferably for about 3-5 days. In order to conclude that a risk of overmedication exists, the immune response of the patient must show a decrease in the range of at least about 50 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL ATP.
- the method may further be useful for monitoring a patient's immune response during the standard immunosupressive-therapy phase of “weaning” the patient from the drugs, i.e. the phase during which a patient's drug dosage is lowered as much as possible to reduce the risk of toxicity, while maintaining a low chance of transplant rejection.
- this assay is especially valuable for monitoring tolerance protocols where the objective is the eventual removal of all immunosuppressive drugs.
- drugs doses may be reduced in a patient whose FK506 (Tacrolimus) blood drug level is greater than 15 mg/mL, to 6-10 mg of FK506 per Kg of body weight 2-3 times per week until the desired immune response level is attained.
- the method may also be used to assess patient compliance with prescribed medication regimens.
- the method is also of value in monitoring the functional status of the immune responses of long-term organ recipients, who have been on the same medication dosages for extended time periods (years). Patients who have taken immunosuppressive drugs over a long period have been shown to suffer from over suppression concurrent with extended drug courses.
- the methods of the present invention may be used alone as the primary means of tracking a patient's progress. More frequently, the methods will be used in conjunction with and as an adjunct to other means of assessing a patient's progress, for example, monitoring drug levels in the blood, organ biopsy, organ specific blood chemistry tests, and the like.
- the inclusion criteria for healthy adults, living donor candidates, and volunteers consisted of men and women between the ages of 19 and 64 who were eligible to donate blood according to established blood donation guidelines.
- the inclusion criteria for transplant recipients consisted of men and women aged 19 to 64 who were recipients of cadaveric, living-related, or living unrelated kidney, liver, or pancreas organs. Transplant patients were excluded from the trial if they were infected with human immunodeficiency virus or if they were more than five (5) years post transplant.
- the apparently healthy adult population who were blood donors consisted of 24% (37) females, 68% (105) males and 8% (13) undesignated, with an age range of 20-60 years.
- the ethnicity of the population was 59% (91) African American, 28% (44) Caucasian, and 13% (20) other.
- the transplant population consisted of 43% (55) females, and 57% (72) males, with an age range of 20-64 years.
- the ethnicity of the population was 24% (31) African American, 69% (87) Caucasian, 7% (9) other.
- the organs transplanted were, 59% (75) kidney, 34% (43) liver, 2% (3) pancreas and 5% (6) multiple organs (simultaneous kidney and pancreas).
- Transplant patient history included the condition predisposing patient for transplant, organ(s) transplanted and their source (cadaver or living related or unrelated), type of immunosuppressive therapy, time relative to transplant, dosage and blood levels of immunosuppressive drugs at time of sample collection, gender and age.
- immunosuppressive therapies were not limited during this study.
- Use and dosage were based on standard practice at each center and varied both within and between centers.
- the bioluminescent product was measured in a luminometer (PHL Mediators, Austria or Berthold, Maryville, Tenn., or Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, Calif.) (See FIG. 1 ).
- the amount of light emitted was compared to a standard curve generated with ATP calibrators (0, 1, 10, 100, 1000 ng/mL).
- the concentration of ATP (ng/mL) in each sample was then calculated from the calibration curve using an Excel-based program provided by CylexTM.
- trough levels of cyclosporin or Taerolimus were performed on whole blood using a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (META) on the IMx immunoassay system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abbott Diagnostics, North Chicago, Ill.).
- MEA microparticle enzyme immunoassay
- the immunosuppressive therapy requirements for patients undergoing transplant are a function of a large number of variables, including the underlying disease which led to the transplant, degree of histocompatibility matching and pre-transplant sensitization, organ type, as well as the individual patients ability to metabolize the drug.
- the trauma of surgery, anesthesia, and possibly blood transfusions will collectively impact the patient's net state of immunosuppression. 16 No tests performed today allow the assessment of the patient's immune status either prior to surgery or during the post-transplant period, now averaging 10 years.
- This application describes the results of a multicenter trial which was designed to statistically establish ranges of immune reactivity in recipients of solid organ transplants using an assay for the measurement of T-cell mediated immunity using the CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay (ImmuKnowTM), which is depicted in FIG. 1 .
- ImmuKnowTM CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay
- the CylexTM assay uses a whole blood sample which is stimulated with the plant mitogen, phytohemagglutinin (PHA).
- PHA phytohemagglutinin
- Whole blood was deliberately chosen as the sample to maintain the lymphocytes in the presence of the immunosuppressive drugs, which are partitioned between the red cells and the plasma 17 .
- the cells are also maintained in their own plasma, avoiding the additional stimulation from foreign serum which would be required to incubate purified cells.
- Phytohemagglutinin was the stimulus of choice because transplant patients may be anergic and not expected to respond to weaker stimuli including recall antigens or alloantigens.
- cyclosporine and Tacrolimus were designed to inhibit total T cell activity, a broad spectrum mitogen (like PHA) is most appropriate.
- mitogens PHA is more potent than Concanavalin A, or pokeweed mitogen. Therefore, in highly suppressed patients, some “breakthrough” response might still be expected.
- lymphoproliferation has been used as an in vitro model for cell-mediated immunity 18 .
- the CylexTM assay gave comparable results to lymphoproliferation 10 .
- Dose response curves of the PHA response comparing a whole blood adaptation of LPA, showed greater sensitivity of the CylexTM assay to lower doses of PHA with responses measurable at 24 hours vs. 3 days for LPA 10 .
- LPA has several disadvantages because it requires 3 to 7 days to perform and uses radioactive tritiated thymidine 18 . Perhaps more importantly, peripheral blood monocytes are purified from the blood prior to culture, thereby removing the red cells in which the major calcineurin inhibitors are sequestered. Zeevi 17 recently demonstrated that recall responses, alloreactivity, and PHA-induced activation were also suppressed in the whole blood ATP assay while proliferation in isolated PBMC were still measurable in transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. One possible explanation is that removal of red cells and the prolonged incubation time (3-7 days) of LPA allowed the recovery of cells from immunosuppression which cannot occur in the human physiological model. Others have since demonstrated (26) that red blood cells from transplant patients added back to LPA cultures can restore immunosuppressive activity in vitro.
- CD4 cells are selected using paramagnetic particles (Dynal) coated with a monoclonal antibody to the CD4 epitope.
- CD4 positive cells which orchestrate both cellular and humoral immune responses are targeted since the major immunosuppressive drugs were designed to specifically inhibit T cell activation which has been implicated in rejection 19 .
- Both cyclosporin and Tacrolimus inhibit T cell activation by reducing transcription of IL-2 26 .
- ATP directly inhibits the cascade of steps required for lymphocyte functionality including transcription of cytokine mRNA, cytokine production, and ultimately lymphocyte proliferation, which is also largely cytokine dependent.
- ATP preceded the appearance of most cytokines measured 26 .
- Transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy are generally weakly or non-responsive to skin tests and show inhibited cytokine responses in vitro 4 (Ahmed et al.).
- the CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay uses the plant lectin phytobemagglutinin (PHA) to stimulate activation of lymphocytes 5 . Since most of the effector functions of immune cells depend upon cellular energy supply 8 , the assay was designed to measure increases in intracellular ATP following activation by mitogenic, recall antigen, or allogeneic stimulation 9,10,11 . Given that the target of the major immunosuppressive drugs, cyclosporin and Tacrolimus, is T cell function, CD4 cells were selected for measurement.
- Both cyclosporin and Tacrolimus are lipophilic drugs which partition in the red cell membranes.
- the assay uses a whole blood sample to maintain the presence of the drug during the incubation. Use of whole blood not only avoids the necessity of pre-purification of lymphocytes but also maintains an environment for effective antigen presentation. By using whole blood, the patient's own plasma is present during the overnight incubation, rather than foreign serum (human AB or fetal calf), which might provide exogenous stimulation 11 . Patient samples may be used up to 30 hours after collection. Since incubations are overnight, testing can be batched at the end of each day.
- FIG. 1 A schematic representation of the assay is given in FIG. 1 .
- the assay was used to obtain the results presented in the Examples 2-12.
- the CylexTM ImmuKnowTM assay may also be used to measure the immune response during weaning patients of their immunosuppressive drugs. Reducing the drug dose results in a corresponding increase in immune response activity.
- This Example demonstrates that the distribution of immune responses in healthy adults as compared to transplant recipients is statistically different. These differences can be used to categorize a transplant recipient's immune response as strong, moderate or low in order to assess the relative pharmacodynamic impact of immunosuppressant drugs in the management of the transplant patient. Similarly, this example demonstrates that the technology is further applicable to other immunosuppressed populations such as HIV infected individuals.
- the mean immune response at two of the three sites falls within the moderate zone.
- the population of patients at Site 3 which included a larger number of liver transplants, fell slightly below the moderate zone, consistent with the greater net immunosuppression in these patients resulting from the aggregate effects of more traumatic surgery and lower biological functioning.
- kidney recipients When the average immune response is determined for patients receiving kidneys vs. livers or pancreas or simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), kidney recipients exhibit stronger immune responses on average than those receiving either liver or pancreas ( FIG. 4 ) (p ⁇ 0.05). While most protocols prescribe higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs for kidney recipients than liver or pancreas, the liver transplant patients are generally more seriously ill. An additional explanation for the liver transplant recipients to be more suppressed is that unpaired metabolism in the liver leads to increased drug levels or prolonged half-life and therefore inhibition of immunity.
- kidney transplant recipients gave statistically stronger immune responses than liver or pancreas (either alone or simultaneously with kidney).
- These results emphasize the importance of measuring the net immunosuppression of the patient, since it is well documented that trauma, anesthesia, transfusion and the underlying disease of the patient, as well as the therapeutic drugs all contribute to the effective level of immunosuppression. Therefore, the observation that liver patients, who receive lower doses of immunosuppressive drugs but also experience more trauma and are generally more sick than kidney patients, actually demonstrate lower levels of immune reactivity. These other factors undoubtedly contribute more in the early post-transplant period (3 months) and may account for another observation from this study that greater immunosuppression is measured in the most “stable” post-transplant period, despite the reduction in dosing of immunosuppressive drugs.
- This Example demonstrates that the ability to measure net immunosuppression of an allograft recipient by taking into account the effects of medications, type of allograft, time post-transplant, trauma, and general health is valuable in managing a transplant patient appropriately.
- an immunosuppressant drug is administered to a patient immediately after transplant surgery, and followed up with additional doses taken daily.
- Drug monitoring assays and organ function assays, e.g. creatinine
- the CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay may be performed concurrently to detect changes in the immune response over a period of time.
- results showing a progression in immune response from the low range ( ⁇ 225 ng/mL ATP), through the moderate range, and into the strong range ( ⁇ 525 ng/mL ATP) may serve as a cautionary marker of potential acute rejection, permitting the treating physician to increase drug or introduce a rescue therapy with alternate drug doses, or use in combination with others, or initiate other clinical confirmatory tests (e.g., organ biopsy).
- CASE STUDY 1 Induction therapy in transplant recipients leads to a dramatic decrease in the total number of circulating lymphocytes and is intended to reduce acute rejection episodes.
- This Case Study reports a patient's clinical course as monitored by the CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay for 1-year following transplantation ( FIG. 7 ).
- the functional responsiveness of circulating lymphocytes is a critical measure in assessing the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. This example demonstrates that despite effective lymphodepletion and ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, the lymphocytes remained metabolically active as measured by ATP and as reflected in the ensuing rejection event. ImmuKnowTM provides a valuable adjunct to other clinical parameters in the monitoring of patients post transplant.
- a 48-year-old African American female was treated with rATG and infused with donor bone marrow cells prior to receiving an irradiated, multivisceral transplant (small bowel). She received tacrolimus as maintenance therapy.
- the CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay provides a measure of a patient's global immune response that incorporates the aggregate impact of multiple drugs, and the patient's clinical condition. As shown in FIG. 8 , initial treatment with OKT3 did not reduce the patient's immune response adequately. A second treatment was needed, but the usual length of time was reduced from 7 to 3 days. By supplementing maintenance therapy of tacrolimus with steroids, this patient is now clinically stable with an intact, functional and rejection free organ. The CylexTM immune function assay ImmuKnowTM assay gauged the effectiveness of rescue therapy and helped limit the amount of immunosuppressants administered to this patient.
- the CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay provides a measure of the aggregate impact of immunosupressive therapy, allowing the physician to better individualize a patient's course of therapy.
- a dose of an immunosuppressant drug such as Rapamycin is reduced over time according to a protocol during post-liver-transplant therapy.
- Therapeutic drug monitoring assays are performed monthly which indicate that drug trough levels are within expected range.
- the CylexTM assay performed at the same time detects an unexpected continued decrease in the immune response over an extended period of time from the moderate range (>225 ng/mL ATP, ⁇ 525 ng/mL ATP) to the low range ( ⁇ 225 ng/mL ATP). Further monitoring indicates a continuing decrease over time.
- These results serve as an indication of potential risk of opportunistic infection due to over medication, and allows the physician to reduce drug doses or initiate other clinical confirmatory tests (e.g., organ biopsy or organ function analysis). See case studies 1 and 2.
- An immunosuppressive drug such as Cyclosporin is administered over an extended period of time after heart transplant surgery. During this time the drug is weaned in order to avoid long-term toxic effects. Drug level monitoring reflects this decrease, however the CylexTM immune function assay performed concurrently indicates that the patient's immune response remains within the moderate range (>225 ng/mL ATP, ⁇ 525 ng/mL ATP). This indicates that there is little likelihood of rejection or damage to the organ due to toxicity.
Abstract
Methods for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes for patients on immunosuppressive drugs (such as transplant patients) are provided. The methods are based on the measurement of an intracellular metabolic marker in lymphocytes (such as ATP) as an indicator of a patient's immune response.
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S.
Provisional Application 60/371,402, the complete contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference. - 1. Field of the Invention
- The invention generally relates to methods for monitoring the immune response in a patient receiving immunosuppressive drugs. In particular, the invention provides methods based on the measurement of metabolic markers of activation in immune cells as an indicator of the patient's immune response. The methods may be used to predict clinical outcomes and determine treatment courses for patients such as transplant recipients.
- 2. Background of the Invention
- Each year, 55,000 organ transplants are performed worldwide.1 Cumulatively, the number of living organ recipients is now estimated to be over 300,000. Most of these transplant recipients will remain on immunosuppressive drugs for the remainder of their lives to prevent rejection episodes. Controlled doses of these drugs are required to prevent overmedication, which may leave the patient susceptible to opportunistic infection, increased risk of cancer and cardio-vascular disease, and drug toxicity effects, or under-dosing, which may lead to shortened graft survival due to rejection episodes.
- The two major drugs used in transplant maintenance today are cyclosporin (Novartis) and Tacrolimus1 (Fujisawa). These drugs are inhibitors of calcineurin, a key enzyme involved in T cell activation.2 Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for these two immunosuppressive drugs is routinely performed, as prescribed by the manufacturers. However, the amount of drug measured in the blood does not directly correlate with the dose of drug administered because of individual pharmacokinetic differences.3 In addition, the level of drug determined by immunoassay is not correlated with immunosuppressive drug efficacy.4 Therefore, the main value of these TDM tests is the avoidance of toxic levels and monitoring patient compliance.
- There is currently no method available for the direct assessment of immune status in transplant recipients.
- The subject invention provides a method of monitoring immune responses in a patient who is being evaluated as an organ recipient and/or is receiving at least one immunosuppressive drug. This convenient and reliable method includes the steps of analyzing the immunological responses of a set or subset of lymphocytes from a blood sample by determining at least one level of functional activity and comparing it with the immunological responses of lymphocytes with defined levels of human immunological responses (low, moderate or strong). The immune status assessment of the patient is based on this comparison. Immunological responses are ascertained by measuring an intracellular component that is increased if the cells have responded to a stimulus.
- In an advantageous embodiment, the patient is a transplant recipient. For example, the patient may be a recipient of a heart, lungs, kidney, pancreas, liver, small bowel or other organs, tissues, or bone marrow transplant. At least one immunosuppressive drug may be administered, for example, calcineurin inhibitors, enzyme inhibitors, antimetabolites, lymphocyte depleting drugs, corticosteroids, or other immune modulators. Drug combinations may also be administered. The overall effect of drugs on immune responses may be measured using an assay which detects increases in an intracellular component, for example ATP, by a mitogen or antigen stimulation and then employing a luciferase assay, or by measuring other metabolic intermediates such as NADP, ionic metabolites such as Ca2+, or proteins involved in cell cycle regulation such as PCNA.
- One aspect of the invention is a method for predicting a clinical outcome in a patient who is receiving none or one or more immunosuppressive drugs. The method utilizes measured ranges of lymphocyte responses derived from a cohort of apparently healthy individuals as a means of defining normal ranges of reactivities, and includes the steps of determining at least one value of lymphocyte response in a sample of blood from a patient before or after administration of immunosuppressive drug(s); determining whether the lymphocyte response of the cells from the patient receiving the immunosuppressant drug is higher or lower than the range defined for apparently healthy individuals, or falls within it; and providing a guide for therapy and predicting a clinical outcomes based on the comparison. Clinical outcomes or conditions which may be predicted include transplant rejection, over-medication, and infection. For example, a lymphocyte response that falls in the low range indicates high immunosuppression and may be indicative of over-medication which may lead to organ toxicity, infection, or, in the long term, cancer. A lymphocyte response which falls in the strong range indicates a low immunosuppressed condition, which may be indicative of infection or a course leading to organ rejection. Alternatively, a lymphocyte response which falls in the moderate range may indicate that stability of the immunological response has been achieved and that no changes in therapeutic regimen are warranted at that time.
- Another aspect of the invention is to use the assay to monitor patients who are being weaned from the immunosuppressant drug(s), or for measuring patient compliance with medication prescriptive instructions.
- In yet another aspect, the invention provides a method for assessing the pharmacodynamic impact (physiological effect) of an immunosupressant drug in a non-transplant patient. The method includes the steps of determining a value of an immune response in at least one sample of lymphocytes from the non-transplant patient; comparing the value with values in a reference set comprising ranges of values of immunological response for lymphocytes; and assessing the pharmacodynamic impact of the immunosupressant drug based on a comparison made in said comparing step. The non-transplant patient may be receiving the immunosupressant drug for a disease condition such as autoimmunity, inflammation, Crohn's Disease, lupus erythromatosus, or rheumatoid arthritis. The method will typically be carried out in order to reduce complications from infections or cancer in the non-transplant patient.
-
FIG. 1 : Schematically illustrates an immune cell function assay as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,232 which is herein incorporated by reference in entirety. Lymphocytes are stimulated, incubated, and CD4+ cells are separated via magnetic separation; cells are washed and lysed to released ATP, which is detected. -
FIG. 2 : Immune response distributions of apparently healthy adults, transplant recipients and HIV patients. Y axis=ATP (ng/mL). Zones of low (≦225 ng/mL ATP), moderate (>225 ng/mL ATP and <525 ng/mL ATP) and strong (≧525 ng/mL ATP) immune response are indicated. -
FIG. 3 : Comparison of functional immune responses at three sites. Y axis=ATP (ng/mL). -
FIG. 4 : Comparison of Cylex™ immune cell function response in kidney, liver and pancreas and simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) recipients. Y axis=ATP (ng/mL). -
FIG. 5 . Immune response versus Tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring trough. X axis Tacrolimus concentration (ng/mL); Y axis=ATP (ng/mL). -
FIG. 6 . Immune cell response range vs. time since transplant. Y axis tracks time since transplant; X axis is % population. -
FIG. 7 : Case Study 1: Rejection associated with immune cell function despite reduced lymphocyte count following induction therapy. X axis=time (days); left Y axis, immune response (ATP ng/mL); right Y axis=number of lymphocytes. -
FIG. 8 :Case Study 2. Duration of rescue therapy by measurement of immune function. X axis=time in weeks; Y axis=immune response (ATP ng/mL). - The present invention provides methods of determining and/or monitoring the state of an individual's immune system. The methods involve measuring the level of metabolic markers of cellular activation in a subset of immune cells as a measure of immune response, and assignment of the immune response to a standardized range or zone of immune reactivity. The practice of the method thus provides a single time point “snapshot” of the individual's immune response. Alternatively, by monitoring an individual's immune response at several time points, it is possible to obtain a complete picture of the immune system's reactivity over time. The methods of the present invention make it possible to observe, for example, the response of a patient's immune system to a medical procedure and to adjust treatment protocols accordingly. In addition, the inventors have discovered that, using the methods of the present invention, it is possible to predict certain clinical outcomes related to immune system functioning. For example, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, a patient whose immune system is monitored may be on an immunosuppressive drug therapy regimen. In some embodiments, the immunosuppressive drug(s) are administered as the result of an organ transplant. By monitoring the immune response of such a patient, it is possible to predict a risk of rejection of the transplanted organ; or to ascertain if the patient is overmedicated, a condition which can contribute to an increased risk of opportunistic infection, organ toxicity or cardiovascular complication.
- Examples of metabolic markers of cellular activation that can be measured in the practice of the present invention include but are not limited to adenosine triphosphate (ATP), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and/or Ca2+ ions. Examples of subsets of immune cells in which a metabolic marker can be measured include but are not limited to subsets of lymphocytes such as CD4, CD3, CD19 and CD56 cells.
- In one embodiment of the present invention, the state of the immune system is ascertained by measuring the level of ATP present in CD4 cells. In order to make an ATP measurement, a sample of whole blood is obtained from the patient. Certain advantages accrue from using whole blood in the incubation. For example, the immunosuppressive drugs and antigen presenting cells required for cellular activation are retained in the sample, the cells are maintained in their own plasma, and an initial prepurification step is eliminated. The whole blood sample is incubated with at least one stimulant. Examples of suitable stimulants include but are not limited to mitogens (for example, the plant mitogens phytohemagglutinin, Concanavalin A or Pokeweed mitogen); alloantigens (which may be, for example, located on a cellsurface, selectively purified, or bound to a synthetic surface e.g. plastic); autoantigens (which also may be, for example, located on a cell surface, selectively purified, or bound to a synthetic surface e.g. plastic), and foreign antigens such as those which originate from bacteria, viruses, and various parasitic organisms. Examples of viruses include but are not limited to polyoma viruses (e.g. human polyoma virus BK, polyoma virus JC), human papilloma virus or cytomegalovirus (CMV). In preferred embodiments of the invention, the stimulant is a mitogen such as the plant mitogen phytohemagglutin. After sufficient incubation time, the CD4 cells are removed from (i.e. isolated from) the sample. In general, the time for incubation of the whole blood sample and the mitogen is in the range of hours to days, and preferably in the range of about 0.5-6 to about 24-48 hours. The CD4 cells are then removed, e.g. by using paramagnetic particles containing an antibody specific for CD4 cells. However, those of skill in the art will recognize that removal of the CD4 cells may be carried out by any of a variety of means which are well known, such as column separations, panning, or by using plastic or ferrous particles with ligands for the immune cell attachment.
- The isolated CD4 cells are then lysed, and the level of ATP in the lysate is quantified. Methods of lysis are well known in the art. Detection of ATP can be accomplished by any of several suitable methods, such as enzyme analysis, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), or thin layer chromatography (TLC). However, in a preferred embodiment, the ATP is detected by a luciferin-luciferase assay. An alternative is that the cells are not lysed, and the activation product is measured inside the cell via cytometry, colorimetrically or by chemiluminescent reporter.
- The inventor's have discovered that the immune response of an individual at any point in time may be classified according to the amount of a metabolic marker of activation in immune cells that is detected. For example, a level of ATP that is detected in a patient may be quantified versus known standard levels of ATP detected in apparently healthy individuals and generated using a calibration curve. The invention thus also provides a system for classifying an immune response as low, moderate, or strong; or alternatively, for assigning an immune response to a low, moderate, or strong range or zone of reactivity. In one embodiment of the classification system of the present invention, ATP is the metabolic marker, and an immune response is low if the level of ATP detected is 225 ng/mL or less, moderate if the level is greater than 225 ng ATP/mL but less than 525 ng ATP/mL, and strong if the level is 525 ng ATP/mL or greater. Thus, an individual's immune response may be ranked as low, moderate or strong based on the level of metabolic marker (e.g. ATP) that is detected.
- In addition to obtaining a measurement of an individual's immune system response at a single time point, it may frequently be useful to compare metabolic marker levels obtained at several time points, for example, in order to monitor the impact of a course of events on an individual's immune system. For example, ATP levels may be monitored before, during and after drug therapy, or before and after organ transplant surgery is performed, in order to monitor changes over time in the immune response of the patient in response to these medical procedures. This information regarding the patient's immune status may be useful as an adjunct to therapeutic drug monitoring at any point in the course of therapy in order to assess the progress of a patient, the suitability of a drug regimen, and to predict clinical outcomes for a patient (see below).
- The present invention provides methods of determining and monitoring the state of a patient's immune system in response to a stimulus. In some embodiments, the patient is one who is receiving or will be receiving an immunomodulating drug or drugs. For example, the patient may be the recipient of an organ such as heart, lungs, kidney, pancreas, liver, bowel, skin, bone marrow or other organs. Further, a transplant patient may be the recipient of more than one organ, e.g. a “heart-lung” transplant recipient. Alternatively, the transplant may be transplanted tissue. The transplanted tissue or organ(s) may be from any source known to those of skill in the art, for example, from a live organ donor such as a relative (e.g. a sibling) or a matched non-related donor; from a cadaver; or from a tissue or artificial “organ” that has been developed and/or maintained in a laboratory setting, e.g. tissue or “organs” grown from stem cells, or cultured in a laboratory setting from tissue or cell samples. Alternatively, the patient may be under treatment for an autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, etc. Or the patient may be afflicted with an infectious disease, such as Human Immune Deficiency Syndrome related viruses (HIV-1), or Hepatitis associated viruses (HCV). Further, the patient may be a cancer patient. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the methods of the present invention may be used to monitor and/or assess the immune system of any individual for any reason.
- In yet another aspect, the invention provides a method for assessing the pharmacodynamic impact of an immunosupressant drug in a non-transplant patient. The method includes the steps of determining a value of an immune response in at least one sample of lymphocytes from the non-transplant patient; comparing the value with values in a reference set comprising ranges of values of immunological response for lymphocytes; and assessing the pharmacodynamic impact of the immunosupressant drug based on a comparison made in said comparing step. The non-transplant patient may be receiving the immunosupressant drug for a disease condition such as autoimmunity, inflammation, Crohn's Disease, lupus erythromatosus, or rheumatoid arthritis. The method will typically be carried out in order to reduce complications from infections or cancer in the non-transplant patient.
- Those of skill in the art will recognize that many types of immunosuppressive drugs exist that may be administered, the effects of which on the immune system of a patient may be monitored by the methods of the present invention. Examples include but are not limited to antilymphocyte drugs such as OKT3, Antithymocytegamma globulin (ATGAM), Daclizumab, and Basiliximab (anti IL2R); calcineurin inhibitors such as Tacrolimus (Prograf®, FK506) or cyclosporin (Neoral®); antimetabolites such as Azathioprine, Cyclophosphamide, and Mycophenolate mofetil; enzyme inhibitors such as Sirolimus (Rapamune), or corticocorticoids such as Prednisone, or methylprednisolone (Solumedrol.).
- The present invention provides a method of guiding decisions regarding therapies and of predicting a clinical outcome of a patient receiving one or more immunosuppressive drugs. Possible clinical outcomes include, for example, rejection of the transplanted organ, infection, or organ toxicity. In order to predict clinical outcomes such as these, it is advantageous to determine an initial level of the immune response as early in the immunosuppressive drug course as possible in order to start surveillance of the patient's immune status coincident with or soon after transplant surgery, but monitoring may begin at any point after the administration of the immunomodulating drugs. Subsequent immune responses are ascertained and compared to the earlier response, and to each other. Any given immune response value (ATP ng/mL) can be assigned to a category of a known range of values, and a comparison of changes in measured values over time allows the observation of trends in the immune response of the patient. For example, the patient's immune response at any point in time may be classified as low (ATP ng/mL≦225), moderate (ATP ng/mL>225 and <525), or strong (ATP ng/mL≧525), and a trend toward a heightened or diminished immune response can be observed.
- In a preferred embodiment, an initial blood sample is obtained and tested prior to organ transplant surgery and before any immunosuppressant drug is administered. The immune response value is ascertained and compared to the categories of known value ranges (e.g., low, moderate or strong). Based on these values the initial drug dose may be maintained within or modified from the usual practice of dose assignment on the basis of patient body weight. For example, a transplant candidate who is determined to be immunosuppressed due to an infectious disease (e.g. AIDS) may be given a lower or no drug dose, compared to another individual of the same body weight.
- In another preferred embodiment, an initial blood sample is obtained and tested prior to organ transplant surgery and before any immunosuppressant drug is administered, and another blood sample is tested after surgery and after the administration of drugs. By comparing the values obtained from these samples, medical judgements can be made relative to the effect of the surgery and drugs on the patient specifically regarding the immune status. For example, if the value obtained from the sample obtained subsequent to the first was in a lower range than the first, additional testing may be indicated and or medication doses reduced to avoid the possibility of over medication. If the value obtained from the sample obtained subsequent to the first one was in a higher range than the first, additional testing may be indicated and or medication doses increased to avoid the possibility of organ rejection.
- In another preferred embodiment, a blood sample obtained and tested at any point after surgery can provide immune status information regarding the level of immune suppression when the values are compared to categories of known value ranges. For example, if the value obtained is in the weak range, additional testing maybe indicated and or medication doses reduced to avoid the possibility of over medication. If the value obtained is in the strong range, additional testing may be indicated and/or medication doses increased, or rescue therapy initiated to avoid the possibility of organ rejection. Further, if the value is in the moderate range, and particularly if the value does not fluctuate significantly (e.g. stays within the same zone) for at least two consecutive monthly measurements, this may indicate that stability of the immune response has been achieved, and that adjustments to the treatment regimen are not necessary at that time.
- Regarding the frequency at which blood samples are analyzed, those of skill in the art will recognize that sampling may be done at any point at which a skilled practitioner (e.g. a physician) deems it to be advisable. In general, such testing would be carried out at most daily (e.g. during a time when a patient is most at risk) and at least monthly (e.g. during a time when a patient appears to be relatively stable).
- In yet another preferred embodiment, multiple blood samples are obtained and tested at multiple points after the organ transplant surgery and during the period when immunomodulating drugs are being administered. An example of the predictive value of the methods would be the detection, by utilizing the methods of the present invention, of an increase in the immune response of the patient from the low to moderate to the strong range over a period of time. The results may be predictive of potential acute rejection of the transplanted organ, and may warrant, for example: initiation of other confirmatory tests (e.g. organ biopsy or organ specific blood chemistry analyses); an increase in the dose of the drug being administered; a rescue therapy with an alternate drug; or a new combination of drugs. In general, in order to predict potential organ rejection, the state of the immune response must be monitored for several days, and preferably for about 3-5 days. In the case of monitoring ATP, in order to conclude that a risk of organ rejection exists, the immune response of the patient must show an increase in the range of at least about 50 ng/mL ATP to 100 ng/mL ATP.
- On the other hand, an unexpected decrease in the immune response over a period of time may be predictive of the risk of developing an opportunistic infection due to over medication. For example, if a patient's immune response declines from the moderate range to the low range, this may be indicative of over-medication and warrant the initiation of further confirmatory tests (e.g. organ biopsy or organ function analysis, or assays for infectious organisms by PCR), or a reduction or change in medication. In general, in order to detect possible over medication, the state of the immune response must be monitored for several days, and preferably for about 3-5 days. In order to conclude that a risk of overmedication exists, the immune response of the patient must show a decrease in the range of at least about 50 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL ATP.
- The method may further be useful for monitoring a patient's immune response during the standard immunosupressive-therapy phase of “weaning” the patient from the drugs, i.e. the phase during which a patient's drug dosage is lowered as much as possible to reduce the risk of toxicity, while maintaining a low chance of transplant rejection. In particular this assay is especially valuable for monitoring tolerance protocols where the objective is the eventual removal of all immunosuppressive drugs. For example, drugs doses may be reduced in a patient whose FK506 (Tacrolimus) blood drug level is greater than 15 mg/mL, to 6-10 mg of FK506 per Kg of body weight 2-3 times per week until the desired immune response level is attained. Similarly, the method may also be used to assess patient compliance with prescribed medication regimens.
- The method is also of value in monitoring the functional status of the immune responses of long-term organ recipients, who have been on the same medication dosages for extended time periods (years). Patients who have taken immunosuppressive drugs over a long period have been shown to suffer from over suppression concurrent with extended drug courses.
- The methods of the present invention may be used alone as the primary means of tracking a patient's progress. More frequently, the methods will be used in conjunction with and as an adjunct to other means of assessing a patient's progress, for example, monitoring drug levels in the blood, organ biopsy, organ specific blood chemistry tests, and the like.
- A multicenter study was conducted with a cohort of 155 apparently healthy adults and 127 organ transplant recipients. The inclusion criteria for healthy adults, living donor candidates, and volunteers consisted of men and women between the ages of 19 and 64 who were eligible to donate blood according to established blood donation guidelines. The inclusion criteria for transplant recipients consisted of men and women aged 19 to 64 who were recipients of cadaveric, living-related, or living unrelated kidney, liver, or pancreas organs. Transplant patients were excluded from the trial if they were infected with human immunodeficiency virus or if they were more than five (5) years post transplant.
- The apparently healthy adult population who were blood donors consisted of 24% (37) females, 68% (105) males and 8% (13) undesignated, with an age range of 20-60 years. The ethnicity of the population was 59% (91) African American, 28% (44) Caucasian, and 13% (20) other. The transplant population consisted of 43% (55) females, and 57% (72) males, with an age range of 20-64 years. The ethnicity of the population was 24% (31) African American, 69% (87) Caucasian, 7% (9) other. The organs transplanted were, 59% (75) kidney, 34% (43) liver, 2% (3) pancreas and 5% (6) multiple organs (simultaneous kidney and pancreas).
- Transplant patient history included the condition predisposing patient for transplant, organ(s) transplanted and their source (cadaver or living related or unrelated), type of immunosuppressive therapy, time relative to transplant, dosage and blood levels of immunosuppressive drugs at time of sample collection, gender and age.
- The types of immunosuppressive therapies were not limited during this study. The standard of care protocol at each center for transplant patients at hospital discharge and during maintenance outpatient visits was followed. The types of therapy included: induction therapy with OKT3 or ATG; calcineurin inhibitors including Tacrolimus (Prograf®) or cyclosporine-A (Neoral®); steroids (prednisolone); and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) Cellcept®. Use and dosage were based on standard practice at each center and varied both within and between centers.
- Sample Collection.
- Two whole blood samples (one each, sodium heparin and EDTA anticoagulated Vacutainer® tubes) (B-D, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) were drawn from apparently healthy adults and transplant patients. Samples collected in sodium heparin vacutainer tubes (green-tops) were used for the Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay ImmuKnow™ and samples collected in EDTA vacutainer tubes (lavender-tops) were used for flow cytometry. Samples were handled and tested according to each manufacturer's package insert.
- Whole blood (100 μl of a 1:4 dilution) was tested in quadruplicate with or without phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (2.5 μg/mL) overnight (15-18 hours in a CO2 incubator at 37° C.). Anti-human CD4 monoclonal antibody coated magnetic particles (Dynal Biotech A.S.A., Oslo, Norway) were added to immunoselect CD4 cells from both the stimulated and non-stimulated wells. After washing the CD4 cells selected on a strong magnet (Cylex™ Cat. 1050) a lysing reagent was added to release intracellular ATP. A luciferin/luciferase mixture was then added to the cell lysate. Within 30 minutes after addition of enzyme, the bioluminescent product was measured in a luminometer (PHL Mediators, Austria or Berthold, Maryville, Tenn., or Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, Calif.) (See
FIG. 1 ). The amount of light emitted (emission maximum 562 nm) was compared to a standard curve generated with ATP calibrators (0, 1, 10, 100, 1000 ng/mL). The concentration of ATP (ng/mL) in each sample was then calculated from the calibration curve using an Excel-based program provided by Cylex™. - The trough levels of cyclosporin or Taerolimus were performed on whole blood using a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (META) on the IMx immunoassay system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abbott Diagnostics, North Chicago, Ill.).
- The Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay ImmuKnow™ results from apparently healthy adults and transplant patients were analyzed by ANOVA or two-tailed t Tests6 to assess the statistical significance of differences. A double probability plot (modified ROC Analysis) was used to establish three zones of immune reactivity in the two populations7.
- Successful management of the transplant recipient currently requires lifelong immunosuppression of the patient to avoid graft rejection13. While calcineurin inhibitors have dramatically improved graft survival, the patient is at increased risk of drug toxicity, opportunistic infections and cancer14. Managing the relatively narrow therapeutic range of these drugs remains one of the challenges of transplant medicine. While tests for the trough levels of the major transplant drugs are routinely performed for patient monitoring, their main value is the avoidance of toxicity and assessing patient compliance. Prior to the present invention, no test existed which directly measured the bioactivity of these drugs in the patient at any point in time. The methods of the present invention were designed specifically to assess the immune response in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs.
- The immunosuppressive therapy requirements for patients undergoing transplant are a function of a large number of variables, including the underlying disease which led to the transplant, degree of histocompatibility matching and pre-transplant sensitization, organ type, as well as the individual patients ability to metabolize the drug. Once the transplant is performed and therapy initiated, the trauma of surgery, anesthesia, and possibly blood transfusions will collectively impact the patient's net state of immunosuppression.16 No tests performed today allow the assessment of the patient's immune status either prior to surgery or during the post-transplant period, now averaging 10 years. This application describes the results of a multicenter trial which was designed to statistically establish ranges of immune reactivity in recipients of solid organ transplants using an assay for the measurement of T-cell mediated immunity using the Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay (ImmuKnow™), which is depicted in
FIG. 1 . - The Cylex™ assay uses a whole blood sample which is stimulated with the plant mitogen, phytohemagglutinin (PHA). Whole blood was deliberately chosen as the sample to maintain the lymphocytes in the presence of the immunosuppressive drugs, which are partitioned between the red cells and the plasma17. In addition, while the prepurification step is avoided, the cells are also maintained in their own plasma, avoiding the additional stimulation from foreign serum which would be required to incubate purified cells.
- Phytohemagglutinin was the stimulus of choice because transplant patients may be anergic and not expected to respond to weaker stimuli including recall antigens or alloantigens. In addition, since cyclosporine and Tacrolimus were designed to inhibit total T cell activity, a broad spectrum mitogen (like PHA) is most appropriate. Among mitogens, PHA is more potent than Concanavalin A, or pokeweed mitogen. Therefore, in highly suppressed patients, some “breakthrough” response might still be expected.
- Traditionally, lymphoproliferation (LPA) has been used as an in vitro model for cell-mediated immunity18. In healthy adults undergoing vaccination with tetanus, the Cylex™ assay gave comparable results to lymphoproliferation10. Dose response curves of the PHA response, comparing a whole blood adaptation of LPA, showed greater sensitivity of the Cylex™ assay to lower doses of PHA with responses measurable at 24 hours vs. 3 days for LPA10.
- LPA has several disadvantages because it requires 3 to 7 days to perform and uses radioactive tritiated thymidine18. Perhaps more importantly, peripheral blood monocytes are purified from the blood prior to culture, thereby removing the red cells in which the major calcineurin inhibitors are sequestered. Zeevi17 recently demonstrated that recall responses, alloreactivity, and PHA-induced activation were also suppressed in the whole blood ATP assay while proliferation in isolated PBMC were still measurable in transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. One possible explanation is that removal of red cells and the prolonged incubation time (3-7 days) of LPA allowed the recovery of cells from immunosuppression which cannot occur in the human physiological model. Others have since demonstrated (26) that red blood cells from transplant patients added back to LPA cultures can restore immunosuppressive activity in vitro.
- Following overnight incubation of blood with PHA, CD4 cells are selected using paramagnetic particles (Dynal) coated with a monoclonal antibody to the CD4 epitope. CD4 positive cells which orchestrate both cellular and humoral immune responses are targeted since the major immunosuppressive drugs were designed to specifically inhibit T cell activation which has been implicated in rejection19. Both cyclosporin and Tacrolimus inhibit T cell activation by reducing transcription of IL-226.
- Most immune cell functions depend directly or indirectly on the production of ATP8. Weir (U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,232 the complete contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference) originally patented the use of ATP as a marker of lymphocyte activation5. When assessing the immune status of transplant patients on cyclosporin or Tacrolimus, cellular ATP is an appropriate target because both compounds inhibit mitochondrial respiration, which is a major source of intracellular ATP20,21.
- Therefore, reduced ATP production directly inhibits the cascade of steps required for lymphocyte functionality including transcription of cytokine mRNA, cytokine production, and ultimately lymphocyte proliferation, which is also largely cytokine dependent. In a direct comparison of the kinetics of ATP production and cytokines, ATP preceded the appearance of most cytokines measured26.
- Transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy are generally weakly or non-responsive to skin tests and show inhibited cytokine responses in vitro4 (Ahmed et al.). The Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay (ImmuKnow™) uses the plant lectin phytobemagglutinin (PHA) to stimulate activation of lymphocytes5. Since most of the effector functions of immune cells depend upon cellular energy supply8, the assay was designed to measure increases in intracellular ATP following activation by mitogenic, recall antigen, or allogeneic stimulation9,10,11. Given that the target of the major immunosuppressive drugs, cyclosporin and Tacrolimus, is T cell function, CD4 cells were selected for measurement. Both cyclosporin and Tacrolimus are lipophilic drugs which partition in the red cell membranes. The assay uses a whole blood sample to maintain the presence of the drug during the incubation. Use of whole blood not only avoids the necessity of pre-purification of lymphocytes but also maintains an environment for effective antigen presentation. By using whole blood, the patient's own plasma is present during the overnight incubation, rather than foreign serum (human AB or fetal calf), which might provide exogenous stimulation11. Patient samples may be used up to 30 hours after collection. Since incubations are overnight, testing can be batched at the end of each day.
- A schematic representation of the assay is given in
FIG. 1 . The assay was used to obtain the results presented in the Examples 2-12. - A population-based study was conducted comparing the immune response characteristics of apparently healthy adult controls and recipients of solid organ transplants. As shown in
FIG. 2 , the apparently healthy control population (n=155) gave a stimulation response on average of 432 ng/mL ATP. The immune response characteristics of transplant recipients (n=127) were significantly statistically lower (P<0.0001) than healthy controls by over 150 ng of ATP, and averaged 282 ng/ml ATP. Statistical comparison of the two populations using a modified double probability plot allowed the description of three zones of reactivity. Ninety-two percent (92%) of the transplant patients gave immune response ATP values of less than 525 ng/mL. Ninety-four percent (94%) of apparently healthy patients gave immune response ATP values of greater than 225 ng/mL. This allows the characterization of a patient's immune response at any point in time as low (≦225), moderate (>225 but <525), or strong (≧525). Also shown is the distribution of viral-induced immunosuppressed HIV patients. This immunosuppressed population was statistically similar to transplant recipients with an average immune response of 287 ng/mL ATP. - Most immunosuppressive drugs are currently administered on the basis of body weight13. Yet it is clear that the baseline levels of immune response in patients awaiting transplant vary enormously. Today, no method is available for assessing the patient's basal immune reactivity or their initial response to therapy. In an effort to better predict therapeutic efficacy, Kahan22 have proposed that patients undergo a trial dosing regimen prior to surgery. While this may not always be practical, an assay which measures a global immune response, like PHA-induced activation, can detect the net effect of surgery, anesthesia, transfusions and therapeutic drugs on immunosuppression. Therefore, following transplant, patient's responses were statistically distributed at three levels of reactivity by the Cylex™ Immune Function Assay: low, moderate or strong. These groupings provide relative measures of reactivity, especially when the patient is used as his/her own control for subsequent determinations. Following surgery and the conversion to oral therapy, the status of immune reactivity for each patient could be assessed prior to discharge. Once the patient is stabilized in the post-transplant period, the assay has utility as a measure of compliance with therapy. The Cylex™ ImmuKnow™ assay may also be used to measure the immune response during weaning patients of their immunosuppressive drugs. Reducing the drug dose results in a corresponding increase in immune response activity.
- This Example demonstrates that the distribution of immune responses in healthy adults as compared to transplant recipients is statistically different. These differences can be used to categorize a transplant recipient's immune response as strong, moderate or low in order to assess the relative pharmacodynamic impact of immunosuppressant drugs in the management of the transplant patient. Similarly, this example demonstrates that the technology is further applicable to other immunosuppressed populations such as HIV infected individuals.
- A study was undertaken to ascertain the consistency results obtained using the methods of the present invention at several different clinical centers. The distributions in
FIG. 3 show that there are no significant differences in patient immune responses at each of the three clinical centers. Site 1 (n=31) had a mean transplant patient immune response of 300 ng/mL ATP which was not statistically different from site 2 (n=49) or site 3 (n=47) with mean immune response values of 296 and 256 ng/mL ATP respectively. - The mean immune response at two of the three sites falls within the moderate zone. The population of patients at
Site 3, which included a larger number of liver transplants, fell slightly below the moderate zone, consistent with the greater net immunosuppression in these patients resulting from the aggregate effects of more traumatic surgery and lower biological functioning. - Despite differences in populations, therapeutic protocols, and type of transplant, all three sites performed equivalently as determined by the Standard two-tailed t-Test. In addition, each laboratory was equipped with luminometers, manufactured by different vendors, and the assays were performed by technologists with a range of prior laboratory experience. All three sites demonstrated proficiency in the use of the test. Traditionally, assays for cell-mediated immunity have been difficult to standardize. For the Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay ImmuKnow™, an ATP calibration curve is run on each plate and reagents have been manufactured according to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).
- These results demonstrate that the described methodology is applicable to multiple immunosupressant protocols as used by different medical institutions.
- The variables of gender and race were also examined. The immune responses of male and female transplant recipients as measured by ATP production were not statistically different, though males had immune responses 53 ng/mL ATP lower than females. This same trend was seen in apparently healthy adults where males gave statistically lower immune responses than females (p<0.04). In addition, the immune responses of African Americans and Caucasians could not be statistically distinguished within transplant patient populations or within apparently healthy adult populations respectively. However, on average, African Americans receive higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs at each of the clinical sites.
- In the recent past, the incidence of organ transplant rejection in African Americans has been significantly higher than for Caucasians16,23,24,25. This difference has been attributed to increased metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs by African Americans. As a result, most protocols for African Americans now reflect the use of higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs. All three institutions in this multi-center trial adhere to such protocols. Therefore, we analyzed this population of transplant patients on the basis of ethnicity. The results demonstrated no statistical difference between African Americans, Caucasians and other ethnic groups among transplant recipients with regard to the average immunosuppression achieved. One of the questions that could be asked is whether healthy adults demonstrate different baseline responses. Apparently healthy adults also gave equivalent immune response levels in this assay. Therefore, equivalent functional suppression of all ethnic groups has been achieved across the three centers, as measured by this assay.
- Statistical comparisons of immune response levels on the basis of gender was also made. Among apparently healthy adults, a marginally significant difference was seen between males and females, with males demonstrating weaker immune responses. Among the transplant recipients, although the differences were not statistically significant, males again gave lower responses to PFIA in this assay when compared to females.
- This Example demonstrates that despite differences in drug dosing protocols for African Americans and Caucasians, they achieve similar levels of immunosuppressive impact. By individualizing patient immunosuppressant drug management, gender and ethnic difference in immune response can be overcome by changed dosing of medication. Over-medication based on ethnicity alone can be prevented by monitoring the patient using the Cylex™ assay.
- When the average immune response is determined for patients receiving kidneys vs. livers or pancreas or simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), kidney recipients exhibit stronger immune responses on average than those receiving either liver or pancreas (
FIG. 4 ) (p<0.05). While most protocols prescribe higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs for kidney recipients than liver or pancreas, the liver transplant patients are generally more seriously ill. An additional explanation for the liver transplant recipients to be more suppressed is that unpaired metabolism in the liver leads to increased drug levels or prolonged half-life and therefore inhibition of immunity. - In this study, kidney transplant recipients gave statistically stronger immune responses than liver or pancreas (either alone or simultaneously with kidney). These results emphasize the importance of measuring the net immunosuppression of the patient, since it is well documented that trauma, anesthesia, transfusion and the underlying disease of the patient, as well as the therapeutic drugs all contribute to the effective level of immunosuppression. Therefore, the observation that liver patients, who receive lower doses of immunosuppressive drugs but also experience more trauma and are generally more sick than kidney patients, actually demonstrate lower levels of immune reactivity. These other factors undoubtedly contribute more in the early post-transplant period (3 months) and may account for another observation from this study that greater immunosuppression is measured in the most “stable” post-transplant period, despite the reduction in dosing of immunosuppressive drugs.
- This Example demonstrates that the ability to measure net immunosuppression of an allograft recipient by taking into account the effects of medications, type of allograft, time post-transplant, trauma, and general health is valuable in managing a transplant patient appropriately.
- Since the majority of patients in this study received Tacrolimus therapy, a comparison was made between the level of Tacrolimus in whole blood as detected by immunoassay, and the Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay (see
FIG. 5 ). No correlation (r2=0.02) was observed, emphasizing the importance of measuring a direct effect of the drug on real time immune system parameter.4,12 - Perhaps the most important observation from this trial is that the level of Tacrolimus as measured by immunoassay of whole blood is not correlated with the degree of biological immunosuppression as measured by the PHA-induced ATP levels.
- It is well known that because of pharmacokinetics differences between individuals, the does of calcineurin inhibitor administered is not correlated with the analytical level measured in the blood. These data emphasize the importance of having a functional readout of immunosuppression. Both Ahmed4 and Shulick12 have provided similar data using cytokine based measures of T cell function.
- This Example demonstrates that the analytical measurement of immunosuppressant drug is not an adequate reflection of the pharmacodynamic impact of the drug.
- Based on the statistically established cutoffs in this study, the proportion of transplant patients who were low responders (≦225 ng/mL ATP) or strong responders (≧525 ng/mL ATP) in this assay, were plotted versus time after transplant (see
FIG. 6 ). In the first two months aftertransplant patients 50% of newly transplanted patients demonstrated immune cell function ATP levels greater than 525 ng/mL and the smallest proportion (˜30%) gave ATP levels less than 225 ng/mL. Over the next few months, the proportion of patients showing PHA induced ATP levels<225 ng/mL increased steadily. In the 6-12 month window, no patients reacted in the strong immune response zone (≧525 ng/mL). The greatest deviation in the low and strong immune responder groups occurred at one year or more after transplant with a slight upswing in the ATP values ≧525 ng/mL at 4 years. - When the proportion of transplant patients with immune response ATP values of ≧525 ng/mL or ≦225/ng/mL are plotted as a function of time, it is not surprising that the greatest number of patients at the extremes of this assay occur in the first months following transplant. In this multi-center trial, 6-12 months appeared to be the point of greatest stability, with no patients with values greater than 525 ng/mL. At later points (>1 year), the proportion of patients with immune response levels ≦225 ng/mL increases. It would appear that once patients have recovered from the trauma of surgery, the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy appears to increase over time, despite lower dosing of these drugs. This demonstrates again the importance of the measurement of net immunosuppression, which may indicate that there is additional rationale supporting individualized titration of immunosuppressive therapy. The availability of a direct measure of immune system activity reflecting the potency of therapy in real time allows for a mechanism for drug adjustment. The assay also readily responds to intervention therapies, so that the relative impact of such therapies can now be calibrated, better reflecting a patient's individualized response to these drugs. Ultimately, tailored therapies offer the promise of reducing the long-term morbidities associated with the prolonged use of these drugs without compromising the life of the transplanted organ.
- This Example demonstrates that most patients receiving immunosuppressant therapy for prolonged periods of time (greater than one year) show high levels of functional suppression of immunity that does not correlate with the drug level in the blood, which is often at its lowest point.
- Typically, a high dose of an immunosuppressant drug is administered to a patient immediately after transplant surgery, and followed up with additional doses taken daily. Drug monitoring assays and organ function assays, (e.g. creatinine) are performed on a monthly basis. The Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay may be performed concurrently to detect changes in the immune response over a period of time. For example, results showing a progression in immune response from the low range (≦225 ng/mL ATP), through the moderate range, and into the strong range (≧525 ng/mL ATP) may serve as a cautionary marker of potential acute rejection, permitting the treating physician to increase drug or introduce a rescue therapy with alternate drug doses, or use in combination with others, or initiate other clinical confirmatory tests (e.g., organ biopsy).
- CASE STUDY 1: Induction therapy in transplant recipients leads to a dramatic decrease in the total number of circulating lymphocytes and is intended to reduce acute rejection episodes. This Case Study reports a patient's clinical course as monitored by the Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay for 1-year following transplantation (
FIG. 7 ). - A 51 year-old Caucasian male with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to glomerulonephritis received a living related haplotype-matched kidney. The immunosuppression protocol consisted of induction with anti-CD52 antibodies and maintenance therapy with Sirolimus. The patient's immune response was monitored by the methods of the present invention.
- To perform the assay, 200 μl of sodium heparin anticoagulated whole blood was diluted, aliquoted into wells of a 96-well microtiter plate and stimulated overnight with PHA. CD4+ cells were then selected using antibody-coated magnetic particles, washed and lysed to release intracellular ATP. The intensity of the patient's immune response was quantified by measuring the amount of intracellular ATP produced in response to stimulation.
- Treatment with anti-CD52 at transplant led to profound lymphocyte depletion, but the intensity of the post-transplant immune response actually rose from pre-transplant to
day 13 seeFIG. 7 ). On day 23, a protocol biopsy revealed a Banff Ib rejection (in the absence of a significant rise in creatinine). Rescue therapy consisted of treatment with solumedrol, a prednisone taper, and Sirolimus. Following this treatment, the patient's Immune Response dropped, indicating an increase in the level of immunosuppression. During this period, Sirolimus drug dosing remained constant, creatinine levels were stable, and lymphocyte counts progressively increased. - Thus, initial induction therapy with anti CD52 led to reduction in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes. A decrease in the cell number, however, did not translate into suppression of the patient's functional immune response. The immune response level after induction was increased over the pre-transplant value and was associated with rejection. The patient rejected about a week later, despite dramatically lower absolute lymphocyte counts, necessitating modifications to the drug regimen.
- The functional responsiveness of circulating lymphocytes is a critical measure in assessing the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. This example demonstrates that despite effective lymphodepletion and ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, the lymphocytes remained metabolically active as measured by ATP and as reflected in the ensuing rejection event. ImmuKnow™ provides a valuable adjunct to other clinical parameters in the monitoring of patients post transplant.
-
CASE STUDY 2. Following rejection, the duration of infusion of monoclonal antibody OKT3 (anti-CD3) (7 to 14 days together with steroids) is based on the degree of rejection as judged by biopsy. Mild to moderate rejections may be given a 7-day treatment while severe rejections warrant a 14-day course. This Case Study describes the clinical course of a multivisceral transplant recipient following treatment for acute rejection with OKT3 and Solumedrol as a function of her immune response (FIG. 8 ). - A 48-year-old African American female was treated with rATG and infused with donor bone marrow cells prior to receiving an irradiated, multivisceral transplant (small bowel). She received tacrolimus as maintenance therapy.
- To perform the Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay, 200 μl of sodium heparin anticoagulated whole blood was diluted, aliquoted into wells of a 96-well microtiter plate and stimulated overnight with PHA. CD4+ cells were then selected using antibody-coated magnetic particles, washed and lysed to release intracellular ATP. The intensity of the patient's immune response was quantified by measuring the amount of intracellular ATP produced in response to stimulation. Acute rejection was diagnosed by histopathologic studies of random and endoscopically guided multiple mucosal biopsies. To treat the acute rejection, the patient was given infusions of OKT3 at 10 mg/day in conjunction with IV tacrolimus and solumedrol.
- Following a period of stabilization after transplant, tapering of tacrolimus was initated. On week 38, the patient was diagnosed with an acute rejection and infused with OKT3/FK and Solumedrol. On
week 39, the immune response as measured by Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay was extremely high (ATP=954 ng/mL, seeFIG. 8 ). An additional three-day course of OKT3, instead of 7 days, was given. The immune response dropped by half (ATP=582 ng/mL) and OKT3 and Solumedrol were stopped. The immune response continued to drop throughweek 41, but climbed to the upper end of the moderate zone two weeks later (week 43). Solumedrol treatment was re-initiated and the immune response dropped significantly (week 44). The patient is currently clinically stable. - Once a recipient's immune system begins to reject an allograft, extremely potent immunosuppressants are required to limit damage or potential loss of the organ. Until recently, the type and dosage of drug(s) and the length of time required to rescue an acute rejection event were based predominately on biopsy results alone. The Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay provides a measure of a patient's global immune response that incorporates the aggregate impact of multiple drugs, and the patient's clinical condition. As shown in
FIG. 8 , initial treatment with OKT3 did not reduce the patient's immune response adequately. A second treatment was needed, but the usual length of time was reduced from 7 to 3 days. By supplementing maintenance therapy of tacrolimus with steroids, this patient is now clinically stable with an intact, functional and rejection free organ. The Cylex™ immune function assay ImmuKnow™ assay gauged the effectiveness of rescue therapy and helped limit the amount of immunosuppressants administered to this patient. - The Cylex™ Immune Cell Function Assay provides a measure of the aggregate impact of immunosupressive therapy, allowing the physician to better individualize a patient's course of therapy.
- A dose of an immunosuppressant drug such as Rapamycin is reduced over time according to a protocol during post-liver-transplant therapy. Therapeutic drug monitoring assays are performed monthly which indicate that drug trough levels are within expected range.
- The Cylex™ assay performed at the same time detects an unexpected continued decrease in the immune response over an extended period of time from the moderate range (>225 ng/mL ATP, <525 ng/mL ATP) to the low range (≦225 ng/mL ATP). Further monitoring indicates a continuing decrease over time. These results serve as an indication of potential risk of opportunistic infection due to over medication, and allows the physician to reduce drug doses or initiate other clinical confirmatory tests (e.g., organ biopsy or organ function analysis). See
case studies - An immunosuppressive drug such as Cyclosporin is administered over an extended period of time after heart transplant surgery. During this time the drug is weaned in order to avoid long-term toxic effects. Drug level monitoring reflects this decrease, however the Cylex™ immune function assay performed concurrently indicates that the patient's immune response remains within the moderate range (>225 ng/mL ATP, <525 ng/mL ATP). This indicates that there is little likelihood of rejection or damage to the organ due to toxicity.
-
- 1. UNOS, 2001 International Transplant Directory. Transplant News; Transplant Communications Inc., Fresno, Calif.
- 2. Rovira, P, Mascarell, L and Truffa-Bachi, P. The Impact of Immune Suppressive Drugs on the Analysis of T Cell Activation. Current Medicinal Chem. 2000(7):673-692.
- 3. Venkataraman, R, Shaw, L M, Sarkozi, L, Mullins, R, Pirsch, J, et al. Clinical Utility of Monitoring Tacrolimus Blood Concentrations in Liver Transplant Patients. J. Clin. Pharm. 2001; 41:542-551.
- 4. Ahmed, M, Vankataraman, R, Logar, A J, Rao, A S, Bartley, G P, Robert, K, Dodson, F S, Shapiro, R, Fung J J and Zeevi, A. Quantitation of Immunosuppression by Tacrolimus Using Flow Cytometric Analysis of Interleukin-2 and Y-Interferon and Inhibition in CD8− and CD8+ Peripheral Blood T Cells, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2001; 23(4): 354-362.
- 5. Weir, M L Methods for Measurement of Lymphocyte Function. U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,232: 1998.
- 6. Hawkins, D M Diagnostics for Conformity of Paired Quantitative Measurements, In: Statistics in Medicine: 2001
- 7. Rocke, D M and Lorenzato, S. A Two-Component Model for Measurement Error in Analytical Chemistry, Technometrics, 1995; 37, 176-184.
- 8. Buttgereit, F, Burmester, G-R, Brand, M D. Bioenergetics of Immune Functions. Fundamental and Therapeutic Aspects. Immunol. Today 2000; 21:192-199.
- 9. Britz, J A, Sottong, P. and Kowalski, R. In vitro CMI™: Rapid Assay for Measuring Cell-Mediated Immunity. In: Luminescence Biotechnology Instruments and Applications. Ed. Van Dyke, Van Dyke and Woodfork, CRC Press. 2002; p. 331-344.
- 10. Sottong, P R, Rosebrock, J A, Britz, J A and Kramer, T R. Measurement of T-lymphocyte Responses in Whole Blood Cultures Using Newly Synthesized DNA and ATP. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2000; Vol. 7:307-311.
- 11. Halsey, J F, New Methods, Clinical Applications of T Cell Functional Assays. Advance/Laboratory. October 2001; p 67-72.
- 12. Schulick, R D, Weir, M B, Miller, M W, Cohen, D J, Bernas, B L and Shearer, G M. Longitudinal Study of In Vitro CD4+ Helper Cell Function in Recently Transplanted Renal Allograft Patients Undergoing Tapering of their Immunosuppressive Drugs, Transplantation. 1993; Vol. 56 No. 3:590-596.
- 13. Danovitch, G M. Current Immunosuppressive Regimes in Organ Transplantation. Kidney International. 2001. Vol. 59:p 388-402.
- 14. Danovitch, G M. Immunosuppressive medications for renal transplantation: A multiplechoice question. International Society of Nephrology. Kidney International. 2001 Vol. 59:388-402.
- 15. Jusko, W J, Thomson, A W, et al. Consensus Document: Therapeutic Monitoring of Tacrolimus (FK-506). Ther. Drug Monitoring; 1995; 17:606-614.
- 16. Burdick, J F, Shinozuka, N. Immune Monitoring for Transplant Recipients. In: Kidney Transplant & Rejection: Diagnosis and Treatment. Ed. Racusen, Dekker, Marcel Inc. 1998; p 563-575.
- 17. Zeevi, A, Bentlejewski, C, Spichty, K, Griffith, B, Abu-Elmagd, K, Hooper, N, Kowalski, R, and Fung, J. Post Transplant Immune Monitoring—ATP Based Assay for T Cell activation. Presented at 2001 Clinical Histocompatibility Workshop, Honolulu, Hi.
- 18. Fletcher, M A, Urban, R G, Asthana, D., Walling, J., Friedlander, A., Page, J. B. Lymphocyte Proliferation, In: Rose, N. R., et al (eds.), Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology: 5th Ed. American Society for Microbiology, 1997; p 313-319. Washington, D.C.
- 19. Liu, J, Farmer, JD, Lane, W S, et al. Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilincyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes. 1991. Cell 66:807-901.
- 20. Karlsson H, DePierre J W, Nassberger, L. Energy Levels in Resting and Mitogen-Stimulated Human Lymphocytes During Treatment with FK506 or Cyclosporin A In Vitro. 1997. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1319(2-3):301-310.
- 21. Horigome, A, Hirano T, Oka, K. Tacrolimus-Induced Apoptosis and its Prevention by Interleukins in Mitogen-Activated Human Peripheral-Blood Mononuclear Cells. 1998. Immunopharmacology 39(1):21-30.
- 22. Kahan, B D, M. Welsh, L. Rutzky, et al. The Ability of Pretransplant Test-Dose Pharmacokinetic Proflies to Reduce Early Adverse Events after Renal Transplantation. Transplantation 1992; 53:345.
- 23. Butkus, D E, Meydrech, E F, Raju, S S. Racial Differences in the Survival of Cadaveric Renal Allografts. Overriding Effects of HLA Matching and Socioeconomic Factors. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992. 327.-840-845.
- 24. Van Buren, D H. Renal Transplantation Outcomes in African-American Patients. Transplant Immunol. Lett. 1999. 15:61-11.
- 25. Nagashima, N, Watanabe, T, Nakamura, M, Shalabi, A, Burdick, J F. Decreased Effect of Immunosuppression on Immunocompetence in African-Americans After Kidney and Liver Transplantation, Clin. Transplantation. 2001. 15:111-115.
- 26. Halsey, personal communication.
- While the invention has been described in terms of its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present invention should not be limited to the embodiments as described above, but should further include all modifications and equivalents thereof within the spirit and scope of the description provided herein.
Claims (8)
1-49. (canceled)
50. A method of assessing an immune response to an antigen stimulant in a patient, comprising the steps of:
incubating a blood sample from said patient for 0.5-48 hrs, at least a first portion of said blood sample including an antigen stimulant, and at least a second portion of said blood sample being non-stimulated;
selectively separating a subset of lymphocytes from said first portion and from said second portion of said blood sample, said subset of lymphocytes being selected from CD3, CD4, CD19, and CD56 cells, said selectively separating step being performed with a substrate having an antibody specific for said subset of lymphocytes;
lysing said subset of lymphocytes from each of said first portion and said second portion of said blood sample to produce a lysate containing adenosine triphosphate (ATP);
quantifying ATP in said lysate for said subset of lymphocytes from said first portion and said second portion of said blood sample; and
determining if said patient has been previously exposed to said antigen stimulant based on a difference between said ATP in said lysate for said subset of lymphocytes from said first portion and said second portion of said blood sample.
51. The method of claim 50 wherein said quantifying step is performed with a luciferin:luciferase assay.
52. The method of claim 50 wherein said substrate used in said selectively separating step is paramagnetic beads.
53. The method of claim 50 wherein said lymphocytes are CD3 lymphocytes.
54. A method of monitoring an immune response in a patient receiving at least one immunosuppresive drug, comprising the steps of:
at first and second time periods, determining a value of an immune response for said patient which reflects activation of one of CD3, CD4, CD 19, or CD56 lymphocytes in a whole blood sample stimulated by exposure to a mitogen or antigen stimulant wherein said value is measured in terms of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) present in cell lysate of said one or CD3, CD4, CD19 or CD 56 lymphocytes isolated from said blood sample;
comparing said value determined at said first time period with said value determined at said second time period, and if there is a decrease of at least about 50 ng/ml ATP, determining that said patient is at risk of being overmedicated with said one or more immunosuppressive drugs.
55. The method of claim 54 wherein said patient has at least one of Crohn's disease, cancer, human immunodeficiency virus, inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, or lupus erythmatosus.
56. The method of claim 54 wherein said patient is an organ or non-organ transplant patient.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/328,854 US20090081716A1 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2008-12-05 | Method for Monitoring the Immune Response and Predicting Clinical Outcomes in transplant recipients |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US37140202P | 2002-04-11 | 2002-04-11 | |
US10/411,353 US7476514B2 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2003-04-11 | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
US12/328,854 US20090081716A1 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2008-12-05 | Method for Monitoring the Immune Response and Predicting Clinical Outcomes in transplant recipients |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/411,353 Continuation US7476514B2 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2003-04-11 | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090081716A1 true US20090081716A1 (en) | 2009-03-26 |
Family
ID=29250671
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/411,353 Active 2024-06-04 US7476514B2 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2003-04-11 | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
US12/328,854 Abandoned US20090081716A1 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2008-12-05 | Method for Monitoring the Immune Response and Predicting Clinical Outcomes in transplant recipients |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/411,353 Active 2024-06-04 US7476514B2 (en) | 2002-04-11 | 2003-04-11 | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7476514B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1495134B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE538378T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003226067A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2379252T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003086177A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2379252T3 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2012-04-24 | Cyclex, Inc. | Method to monitor the immune response and predict clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
ATE538138T1 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2012-01-15 | Amnis Corp | IMAGING-BASED QUANTIFICATION OF MOLECULAR TRANSLOCATION |
US7785806B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2010-08-31 | Vaxdesign Corporation | Method for determining the immunogenicity of an antigen |
US8071373B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2011-12-06 | Sanofi Pasteur Vaxdesign Corp. | Co-culture lymphoid tissue equivalent (LTE) for an artificial immune system (AIS) |
US8030070B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2011-10-04 | Sanofi Pasteur Vaxdesign Corp. | Artificial lymphoid tissue equivalent |
US8298824B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2012-10-30 | Sanofi Pasteur Vaxdesign Corporation | Methods of evaluating a test agent in a diseased cell model |
US7771999B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2010-08-10 | Vaxdesign Corp. | Disease model incorporation into an artificial immune system (AIS) |
US7709256B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2010-05-04 | Vaxdesign Corp. | Disease model incorporation into an artificial immune system (AIS) |
US7855074B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2010-12-21 | Vaxdesign Corp. | Artificial immune system: methods for making and use |
US7785883B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2010-08-31 | Vax Design Corp. | Automatable artificial immune system (AIS) |
EP1879632A2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2008-01-23 | Atrium Medical Corporation | Drug delivery coating for use with a medical device and methods of treating vascular injury |
CA2634123C (en) | 2005-12-21 | 2015-11-24 | Vaxdesign Corporation | In vitro germinal centers |
EP1963491B1 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2011-01-12 | VaxDesign Corporation | In vitro method of evaluating the potential reaction of an animal to an agent |
WO2007127493A2 (en) * | 2006-05-02 | 2007-11-08 | Therakos, Inc. | Methods and reagents for detecting susceptibility to graft versus host disease or transplant related mortality |
AU2007345747A1 (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2008-08-07 | Vaxdesign Corporation | Models for vaccine assessment |
US20090062237A1 (en) * | 2007-06-15 | 2009-03-05 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Evaluating immune competence |
WO2009048661A1 (en) * | 2007-07-16 | 2009-04-16 | Vaxdesign Corporation | Artificial tissue constructs comprising alveolar cells and methods for using the same |
ES2735438T3 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2019-12-18 | Cellestis Ltd | An assay to measure cell-mediated immune response capacity |
EP3090263A4 (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2017-08-23 | Yeda Research and Development Co., Ltd. | Methods for assaying immunological competence |
JP2017503169A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2017-01-26 | イエダ・リサーチ・アンド・デベロツプメント・カンパニー・リミテツド | Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus using oligonucleotide antigens |
US11047855B2 (en) | 2015-03-01 | 2021-06-29 | Immunarray Ltd. | Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus using protein, peptide and oligonucleotide antigens |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4677061A (en) * | 1984-10-19 | 1987-06-30 | Genetic Systems Corporation | T-cell lymphocyte subset monitoring of immunologic disease |
US4959302A (en) * | 1987-08-20 | 1990-09-25 | Endogen, Inc. | Method of evaluating immune system response to allografts, viral infection and immunosuppressive therapy |
US5292636A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1994-03-08 | T Cell Diagnostics, Inc. | Therapeutic and diagnostic methods using soluble T cell surface molecules |
US5569585A (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 1996-10-29 | Cellcor, Inc. | In vitro assay measuring degree of activation of immune cells |
US6150121A (en) * | 1999-02-16 | 2000-11-21 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Assessing immunological state of transplant recipients |
US6251616B1 (en) * | 1999-01-14 | 2001-06-26 | Biocrystal Ltd. | Methods and assay kits for detecting altered mononuclear cell phenotype related to a pro-tumor immune response |
US20020150952A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2002-10-17 | Peter Sottong | Methods for measuring lymphocyte activation by mitogens and antigens |
US20030199006A1 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2003-10-23 | Britz Judith A. | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4778750A (en) * | 1986-02-19 | 1988-10-18 | Imreg, Inc. | Diagnostic methods for immune function |
CA1296622C (en) * | 1986-08-12 | 1992-03-03 | Jeffrey E. Anderson | Method and apparatus for automated assessment of the immunoregulatory status of the mononuclear leukocyte immune system |
US5344755A (en) * | 1990-04-21 | 1994-09-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services | Method for detecting immune system dysfunction in asymptomatic, HIV-scropositive individuals |
WO1997036008A1 (en) * | 1996-03-26 | 1997-10-02 | Biotechnology Transfer, Inc. | Methods for measurement of lymphocyte function |
WO2000011476A1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-03-02 | The Immune Response Corporation | Methods for evaluating immune function |
-
2003
- 2003-04-11 ES ES03746717T patent/ES2379252T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-04-11 WO PCT/US2003/011117 patent/WO2003086177A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-04-11 EP EP03746717A patent/EP1495134B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-04-11 AT AT03746717T patent/ATE538378T1/en active
- 2003-04-11 EP EP11000891A patent/EP2322928A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-04-11 US US10/411,353 patent/US7476514B2/en active Active
- 2003-04-11 AU AU2003226067A patent/AU2003226067A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2008
- 2008-12-05 US US12/328,854 patent/US20090081716A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4677061A (en) * | 1984-10-19 | 1987-06-30 | Genetic Systems Corporation | T-cell lymphocyte subset monitoring of immunologic disease |
US5292636A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1994-03-08 | T Cell Diagnostics, Inc. | Therapeutic and diagnostic methods using soluble T cell surface molecules |
US4959302A (en) * | 1987-08-20 | 1990-09-25 | Endogen, Inc. | Method of evaluating immune system response to allografts, viral infection and immunosuppressive therapy |
US5569585A (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 1996-10-29 | Cellcor, Inc. | In vitro assay measuring degree of activation of immune cells |
US6251616B1 (en) * | 1999-01-14 | 2001-06-26 | Biocrystal Ltd. | Methods and assay kits for detecting altered mononuclear cell phenotype related to a pro-tumor immune response |
US6150121A (en) * | 1999-02-16 | 2000-11-21 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Assessing immunological state of transplant recipients |
US20020150952A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2002-10-17 | Peter Sottong | Methods for measuring lymphocyte activation by mitogens and antigens |
US20030199006A1 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2003-10-23 | Britz Judith A. | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
US7476514B2 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2009-01-13 | Cylex, Inc. | Method for monitoring the immune response and predicting clinical outcomes in transplant recipients |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2003086177A3 (en) | 2004-10-21 |
ES2379252T3 (en) | 2012-04-24 |
ATE538378T1 (en) | 2012-01-15 |
EP1495134A2 (en) | 2005-01-12 |
EP1495134B1 (en) | 2011-12-21 |
AU2003226067A1 (en) | 2003-10-27 |
AU2003226067A8 (en) | 2003-10-27 |
EP2322928A1 (en) | 2011-05-18 |
US7476514B2 (en) | 2009-01-13 |
WO2003086177A2 (en) | 2003-10-23 |
US20030199006A1 (en) | 2003-10-23 |
EP1495134A4 (en) | 2008-02-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20090081716A1 (en) | Method for Monitoring the Immune Response and Predicting Clinical Outcomes in transplant recipients | |
Kowalski et al. | Immune cell function testing: an adjunct to therapeutic drug monitoring in transplant patient management | |
Patel et al. | Renal transplantation in patients with pre‐transplant donor‐specific antibodies and negative flow cytometry crossmatches | |
Liu et al. | Evaluating the effects of immunosuppressants on human immunity using cytokine profiles of whole blood | |
MacKinney et al. | Diphenylhydantoin effects on human lymphocytes in vitro and in vivo: An hypothesis to explain some drug reactions | |
Reinsmoen et al. | ORGAN-SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF DONOR ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC HYPOREACTIVITY AND PERIPHERAL BLOOD ALLOGENEIC MICROCHIMERISM IN LUNG, KIDNEY, AND LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1 | |
Altrich et al. | Comparison of the in vivo autologous skin test with in vitro diagnostic tests for diagnosis of chronic autoimmune urticaria. | |
US9448229B2 (en) | Kit for monitoring immune status after transplant and method for monitoring immune status using same | |
Boleslawski et al. | CD25, CD28 and CD38 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a tool to predict acute rejection after liver transplantation | |
Boleslawski et al. | CD28 expression by peripheral blood lymphocytes as a potential predictor of the development of de novo malignancies in long‐term survivors after liver transplantation | |
US6630316B1 (en) | Method for measurement of lymphocyte function | |
US20070202085A1 (en) | Systems and methods for monitoring immune responses and predicting outcomes in transplant recipients | |
Rodriguez-Perez et al. | Clinical and immune aspects of idiopathic acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome | |
Min et al. | Cyclosporine trough concentrations in predicting allograft rejection and renal toxicity up to 12 months after renal transplantation | |
US5968755A (en) | Methods for determining T-cell profiles of immunocompromised subjects | |
Willcox et al. | Variable corticosteroid sensitivity of thymic cortex and medullary peripheral-type lymphoid tissue in myasthenia gravis patients: structural and functional effects | |
Hirano et al. | Individual variations in lymphocyte-responses to glucocorticoids in patients with bronchial asthma: comparison of potencies for five glucocorticoids | |
US20130183686A1 (en) | Method of evaluating immunosuppression | |
Ekong et al. | Successful resolution of inflammation and increased regulatory T cells in sirolimus‐treated post‐transplant allograft hepatitis | |
US7169571B2 (en) | Methods for measurement of lymphocyte function | |
Wieland | Markers of lymphocyte activation and proliferation | |
Qu et al. | Correlation between survival interval and CD4+ T-cell intracellular ATP levels in liver transplant recipients | |
Bouic et al. | In vitro reactivities of blood lymphocytes from symptomatic and asymptomatic pigeon breeders to antigen and mitogens | |
deShazo et al. | Studies in homosexual patients with and without lymphadenopathy: relationships to the acquired immune deficiency syndrome | |
US20040029554A1 (en) | Method for histocompatibility testing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VIRACOR-IBT LABORATORIES, INC., MISSOURI Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CYLEX INC.;REEL/FRAME:030168/0855 Effective date: 20130208 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FIFTH THIRD BANK, MISSOURI Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:VIRACOR-IBT LABORATORIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031912/0795 Effective date: 20131206 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |