US20090021775A1 - Workflow scheduling method and system - Google Patents
Workflow scheduling method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090021775A1 US20090021775A1 US11/779,494 US77949407A US2009021775A1 US 20090021775 A1 US20090021775 A1 US 20090021775A1 US 77949407 A US77949407 A US 77949407A US 2009021775 A1 US2009021775 A1 US 2009021775A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- job
- subgroup
- setup
- size
- jobs
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/12—Digital output to print unit, e.g. line printer, chain printer
- G06F3/1201—Dedicated interfaces to print systems
- G06F3/1223—Dedicated interfaces to print systems specifically adapted to use a particular technique
- G06F3/1224—Client or server resources management
- G06F3/1226—Discovery of devices having required properties
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/12—Digital output to print unit, e.g. line printer, chain printer
- G06F3/1201—Dedicated interfaces to print systems
- G06F3/1202—Dedicated interfaces to print systems specifically adapted to achieve a particular effect
- G06F3/1211—Improving printing performance
- G06F3/1212—Improving printing performance achieving reduced delay between job submission and print start
- G06F3/1214—Improving printing performance achieving reduced delay between job submission and print start at the submitting node
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/12—Digital output to print unit, e.g. line printer, chain printer
- G06F3/1201—Dedicated interfaces to print systems
- G06F3/1223—Dedicated interfaces to print systems specifically adapted to use a particular technique
- G06F3/1237—Print job management
- G06F3/126—Job scheduling, e.g. queuing, determine appropriate device
- G06F3/1262—Job scheduling, e.g. queuing, determine appropriate device by grouping or ganging jobs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/12—Digital output to print unit, e.g. line printer, chain printer
- G06F3/1201—Dedicated interfaces to print systems
- G06F3/1278—Dedicated interfaces to print systems specifically adapted to adopt a particular infrastructure
- G06F3/1282—High volume printer device
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
Definitions
- the disclosed embodiments relate generally to a method and system for scheduling jobs in a manufacturing or production environment.
- Manufacturing and production processes produce results by receiving sets of instructions and materials required to create or modify an item, such as a document, a vehicle, a computing device or another item. Often, the processes must permit some customization or alteration of individual items based on customer desires. For example, although an automobile production line may be configured to produce a particular make and model of car, the individual cars produced may have different specifications, such as leather or cloth seating, standard or premium wheels, exterior paint color and other specifications of type. As another example, document production environments, such as print shops, convert printing orders, such as print jobs, into finished printed material. A print shop may process print jobs using resources such as printers, cutters, collators and other similar equipment. Typically, resources in print shops are organized such that when a print job arrives from a customer at a particular print shop, the print job can be processed by performing one or more production functions.
- Scheduling architectures that organize jobs arriving in a production process and route the jobs to autonomous cells are known in the art and are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,328 to Rai et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,065,567 to Squires et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
- Production environments can receive high volume jobs.
- the known scheduling architecture may be inefficient in processing high volume, highly variable jobs.
- Variation in these production requirements from job to job can cause significant processing delays even when resources have been allocated to balance the job flow.
- jobs can have a number of different setup characteristics, and each setup characteristic may correspond to several different characteristic types.
- Significant setup delays can arise in processing jobs with variable setup characteristics in a production environment. Setup time can be particularly acute in production environments where substantial interruption in operation is unacceptable, such as environments that utilize continuous feed or processing equipment. Setup delays can significantly impact throughput.
- a system of scheduling a plurality of jobs in a production environment may include a plurality of resources and a computer-readable storage medium comprising one or more programming instructions for performing a method of processing a plurality of jobs in a production environment.
- the method may include receiving a plurality of jobs and at least one setup characteristic corresponding to each job. Each job may have a corresponding job size.
- the method may also include determining, for each job, whether the corresponding job size exceeds a job size threshold, grouping each job having a job size that exceeds the job size threshold into a large job subgroup, grouping each job having a job size that does not exceed the job size threshold into a small job subgroup and routing the small job subgroup to a small job autonomous cell that includes one or more resources for processing the small job subgroup.
- the large job subgroup may be classified as a high setup subgroup or a low setup subgroup based on the setup characteristics corresponding to each job in the large job subgroup.
- the large job subgroup may be routed to a large job autonomous cell.
- the large job autonomous cell may include one or more first resources for processing the large job subgroup. If the large job subgroup is a low setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more second resources for processing the large job subgroup.
- a computer-implemented method of scheduling a plurality of jobs in a document production environment may include receiving a plurality of jobs and at least one setup characteristic corresponding to each job. Each job may have a corresponding job size. The method may also include determining, for each job, whether the corresponding job size exceeds a job size threshold, grouping each job having a job size that exceeds the job size threshold into a large job subgroup, grouping each job having a job size that does not exceed the job size threshold into a small job subgroup and routing the small job subgroup to a small job autonomous cell that includes one or more resources for processing the small job subgroup.
- the large job subgroup may be classified as a high setup subgroup or a low setup subgroup based on the setup characteristics corresponding to each job in the large job subgroup.
- the large job subgroup may be routed to a large job autonomous cell. If the large job subgroup is a high setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more first resources for processing the large job subgroup. If the large job subgroup is a low setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more second resources for processing the large job subgroup.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary print shop production environment according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 2A depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 2B depicts an exemplary large job subgroup according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 2C depicts an exemplary small job subgroup according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs and corresponding form types and insert types according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 4 depicts an exemplary fast job subgroup according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 6 depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 7A depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs and corresponding job sizes, form types and insert types according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 7B depicts an exemplary large job subgroup according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 7C depicts an exemplary small job subgroup according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 8 depicts an exemplary plurality of autonomous cells and corresponding utilization percentages and positions in a sequence according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary graph of a job size distribution and size intervals using the SITA-E routing policy according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary flow chart of a partitioning process according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 11 depicts an exemplary environment suitable for processing a plurality of jobs according to an embodiment.
- a “production environment” or “production process” refers to an entity having multiple items of equipment to manufacture and/or process items that may be customized based on customer requirements.
- a vehicle production environment may exist in an automobile assembly plant, where different areas exist to assemble and/or finish portions of the automobile such as the engine, trim, drive train and other parts.
- a document production environment includes document production resources, such as printers, cutters, collators and the like.
- a chemical, pharmaceutical or other process industry production environment may include production resources such as chemical processing units, vessels, heating equipment, mixing equipment and the like.
- a production environment may be a freestanding entity, including one or more production-related devices, or it may be part of a corporation or other entity. Additionally, the production environment may communicate with one or more servers by way of a local area network or a wide area network, such as the Internet or the World Wide Web.
- a “job” refers to a logical unit of work that is to be completed for a customer.
- a job may include one or more jobs to build, assemble or process a product.
- a production system may include a plurality of jobs.
- FIG. 1 shows an example of a production environment 50 , in this case, exemplary elements of a print shop.
- Print jobs may enter the print shop manually or electronically and be collected at an electronic submission system 55 such as a computing device and/or scanner. Jobs are sorted and batched at the submission system or another location before being delivered to one or more print engines such as a color printer 56 , black-and-white printer 57 and/or a continuous feed printer 58 . Jobs may exit the print engine and be delivered to one or more finishing devices or areas such as a collator 60 , cutter 62 , and/or binder 64 . The finishing areas may include automatic or manual areas for such finishing activities and they also may include an automatic or manual inserter 70 .
- jobs may move to a postage metering station 72 and/or shipping station 74 . Jobs may move from one location to another in the print shop by automatic delivery or manual delivery such as by hand or by one or more paper carts 81 - 85 .
- An autonomous cell refers to a group of resources used to process jobs.
- An autonomous cell may include the resources needed to complete at least one job.
- an autonomous cell for processing the job may include at least one printer, one cutter and one collator.
- an autonomous cell may include production resources necessary to convert a plurality of raw material inputs into one or more complete chemical outputs.
- jobs may be partitioned into subgroups based on job size.
- FIG. 2A illustrates a plurality of jobs, J 1 -J 10 200 , and corresponding job sizes.
- the size of each job may be determined and compared to a threshold size.
- the threshold size may represent a value necessary to optimize process flow. If the size of a job equals or exceeds the threshold size, the job may be classified as a large job. If the size of a job is less than the threshold volume, the job may be classified as a small job.
- job J 1 205 is grouped in a large job subgroup because its size (i.e., 7,500) exceeds the threshold size (i.e., 5,000).
- job J 2 210 is grouped in a small job subgroup because its size (i.e., 2,300) is less than the threshold size (i.e., 5,000).
- a subgroup may be categorized based on setup characteristics.
- a setup characteristic may include a feature of any step in the production process.
- the printer setup may be dependent on the type of form used.
- the insertion operation setup may depend on one or more inserts associated with each job.
- setup characteristics may be associated with cleaning and preparing production resources to process a next chemical product type.
- a setup characteristic may include a time required to clean one production resource before it may be used to process another chemical product.
- each setup characteristic may be associated with one or more types.
- a form type setup characteristic may be associated with three types of forms: form A, form B and form C.
- setup characteristics may result from customer selections of trim design, exterior paint color, interior color, seating type, transmission type, engine size, audio equipment, security systems, remote start systems, other electronics options and/or other features.
- setup characteristics may result from customer selections of hard drive capacity, random access memory capacity, processing speed, video or graphics cards, storage drives, operating systems, sound cards, installed software and/or other features.
- Subgroups may be categorized based on the number of types associated with each setup characteristic. For example, in a vehicle production environment, a subgroup may be associated with two setup characteristics, such as trim type and exterior color. As illustrated by FIG. 3 , ten jobs, jobs J 1 -J 10 300 may be associated with a trim type characteristic 305 and an exterior color characteristic 310 . For example, job J 1 315 may be associated with trim type A and exterior color type 1 .
- subgroups may be categorized based on the average number of types associated with each setup characteristic over a specified interval.
- the average number of setup characteristics may be evaluated over multiple intervals. For example, a subgroup may utilize one trim type on day 1 , three trim types on day 2 and two trim types on day 3 , thus producing an average of two trim types per day.
- a threshold value may be determined for each setup characteristic.
- the threshold value may represent the number of types associated with each setup characteristic that may be necessary to optimize job flow.
- the threshold value may be determined using a simulation model, such as a model based on discrete event simulation, to simulate and optimize the workflow.
- a simulation-based approach may be used to determine an optimal number of types for each setup characteristic by using manual iteration until an improved solution is obtained.
- formal optimization techniques may be used. If formal optimization techniques are used, the threshold parameters may be specified as variables and a performance measure, such as the total number of late jobs, total production cost or the like, of the overall print shop may be used as an objective function to be optimized. Constraint functions may also be specified in addition to constraints on variables. Threshold parameters may then be determined via an optimization of the simulation model.
- Several techniques such as mixed-integer programming, simulated annealing, genetic programs and the like can be used to perform the optimization that may include discrete and continuous decision variables.
- a subgroup may be categorized based on a comparison between the number of types associated with each setup characteristic and the threshold value for each setup characteristic. For example, if the threshold value associated with trim type is ‘2’ and the threshold value associated with exterior color type is ‘3’, a subgroup having two or fewer trim types and three or fewer exterior color types may be identified as a low setup subgroup.
- a low setup subgroup may include jobs that have low setup requirements when compared to the thresholds associated with the setup requirements. For example, a low setup subgroup may include jobs with similar setup requirements which may ease transitioning from one job to the next.
- a subgroup having more than two trim types and/or more than three exterior color types may be identified as a high setup subgroup or the like.
- a high setup subgroup may include jobs that have high setup requirements when compared to the thresholds associated with the setup requirements.
- a high setup subgroup may include several small to mid-sized jobs with substantially different setup requirements which may cause significant delays in transitioning from one job to the next.
- FIG. 4 illustrates categorizing a subgroup 400 , J 1 -J 5 , in this manner.
- subgroup 400 utilizes two trim types (i.e., trim type A and trim type B) and two exterior color types (i.e., exterior color type 1 and exterior color type 2 ). If the trim type threshold value is 2 and the exterior color type threshold value is 3, then the subgroup 400 may be identified as a low setup subgroup because the number of trim types associated with the subgroup equals the trim type threshold value and because the number of exterior color types associated with the subgroup is less than the exterior color type threshold value.
- the subgroup 500 , J 1 -J 5 utilizes four trim types (i.e., trim type A, trim type B, trim type C and trim type D) and two exterior color types (i.e., exterior color type 1 and exterior color type 2 ).
- trim type A trim type A
- trim type B trim type B
- trim type C trim type D
- exterior color type 1 exterior color type 2
- the subgroup 500 may be identified as a high setup subgroup because the number of trim types associated with the subgroup 500 (i.e., 4) exceeds the threshold value associated with the trim type setup characteristic (i.e., 2).
- a subgroup may be grouped based on different threshold conditions. For example, a subgroup may be identified as a low setup subgroup if the number of types associated with one setup characteristic is less than the threshold value associated with that setup characteristic. For example, a subgroup may be identified as a low setup subgroup if the number of form types associated with the subgroup is less than or equal to the threshold value associated with the form type characteristic. Referring to FIG. 5 , if the form type threshold value is 5, then the subgroup 500 may be identified as a low setup subgroup because the subgroup 500 utilizes four trim types which is less than the threshold value associated with the trim type characteristic.
- a subgroup may be identified according to a plurality of thresholds associated with the same setup characteristic. For example, a subgroup having a number of types less than a first threshold value, but more than a second threshold value may be grouped in an intermediate setup subgroup.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a subgroup 600 , J 1 -J 5 , having a trim type setup characteristic 605 and an exterior color type setup characteristic 610 .
- the first threshold value associated with the trim type setup characteristic may be ‘3’
- the second threshold value associated with the trim type setup characteristic may be ‘1’.
- the first setup characteristic associated with the exterior color type setup characteristic may be ‘4’
- the second threshold value associated with the exterior color type setup characteristic may be ‘2’.
- the subgroup 600 utilizes two trim types (i.e., trim type A and trim type B) which is between the first threshold value (i.e., 3) and the second threshold value (i.e., 1) associated with the trim type characteristic.
- the subgroup also utilizes three exterior color types (i.e., exterior color type 1 , exterior color type 2 and exterior color type 3 ) which is between the first threshold value (i.e., 4) and the second threshold value (i.e., 2) associated with the exterior color type characteristic.
- a subgroup may be categorized based on multiple job attributes. For example, jobs may first be grouped into a large job subgroup or a small job subgroup based on job sizes.
- FIG. 7A illustrates jobs, J 1 -J 5 700 , and corresponding job sizes 705 , trim types 710 and exterior color types 715 .
- the jobs 700 may be grouped into a large job subgroup, illustrated by FIG. 7B , and a small job subgroup, illustrated by FIG. 7C .
- the size of job J 1 720 i.e., 1,000
- job J 1 may be grouped in a small job subgroup.
- the size of job J 2 725 i.e., 2,350
- job J 2 may be grouped in a large job subgroup.
- the large job subgroup illustrated in FIG. 7B may be categorized as a low setup subgroup or a high setup subgroup based on the setup characteristics associated with the subgroup. For example, if the trim type threshold value is 2 and the exterior color type threshold value is 2, then the large job subgroup may be identified as a high setup subgroup because the number of trim types associated with the large job subgroup (i.e., 3) exceeds the form type threshold value.
- jobs in a subgroup may be arranged prior to being processed.
- jobs may be sequenced according to a first-in-first-out (“FIFO”) policy, an earliest due date (“EDD”) policy or the like.
- FIFO first-in-first-out
- EDD earliest due date
- a FIFO policy may arrange jobs based on the order in which they were received. For example, a subgroup may contain three jobs, J 1 -J 3 . If J 2 is received first, J 1 is received second and J 3 is received third, the subgroup may be processed in the following order. J 2 , J 1 , J 3 .
- An EDD policy may arrange jobs based on the order in which they are due. For example, a subgroup may contain three jobs, J 1 -J 3 . If J 3 is due first, J 1 is due second and J 2 is due last, then the subgroup may be processed in the following order: J 3 , J 1 , J 2 .
- a subgroup may be routed to one or more autonomous cells using a least work-in-progress policy, a round robin policy, a random policy, a size interval task assignment with equal load (“SITA-E”) policy or the like.
- a least work-in-progress policy a round robin policy, a random policy, a size interval task assignment with equal load (“SITA-E”) policy or the like.
- SITA-E size interval task assignment with equal load
- a least work-in-progress policy may determine a volume of work within each autonomous cell and may route job sets to the autonomous cell with the smallest work volume. For example, as illustrated by FIG. 8 , autonomous cell A 4 820 has the lowest volume of all autonomous cells, A 1 -A 5 800 , so using a least work-in-progress policy, a job may be routed to autonomous cell A 4 820 .
- a round robin policy may route a subgroup to an autonomous cell in a particular order. For example, autonomous cells may receive subgroups sequentially or in a specified order. The round robin policy may route a subgroup to the autonomous cell which is next in the order. As illustrated by FIG. 8 , autonomous cells A 1 -A 5 800 may receive subgroups in a specified sequence based on each cell's position in the sequence, namely: A 3 815 , A 1 805 , A 2 810 , A 5 825 , A 4 820 . As such, if autonomous cell A 2 810 received the last subgroup, autonomous cell A 5 825 may receive the next subgroup using a round robin policy.
- a random policy may randomly route jobs to an autonomous cell. For example, referring to FIG. 8 , any one of the autonomous cells A 1 -A 5 800 may have an equal probability of receiving a job.
- a SITA-E policy may route subgroups to an autonomous cell tasked with processing job sets of similar sizes. For example, each autonomous cell may be assigned a separate range of job sizes so that the total load each autonomous cell receives is roughly the same.
- a job size distribution that appears to have heavy-tail characteristics may be modeled using a bounded Pareto distribution such that:
- Variable k may represent the smallest job size in the distribution
- variable p may represent the largest job size in the distribution
- a may represent the index of stability that may be determined through fitting the distribution.
- the job size distribution may then be divided into multiple segments where each segment may be represented as:
- FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary job size cumulative density function curve and corresponding segments according to an embodiment.
- the range of job sizes associated with jobs in a subgroup may be determined and the jobs may be routed to an autonomous cell which processes jobs of the determined size range.
- FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary flow chart of a grouping a plurality of jobs according to an embodiment.
- a plurality of jobs may be received 1000 and the jobs may be grouped 1005 based on job size.
- the jobs may either be identified as a large job subgroup 1010 or a small job subgroup 1015 .
- a large job subgroup may be categorized 1020 based on setup characteristics as a high setup subgroup 1025 or a low setup subgroup 1030 .
- the subgroups may be routed 1035 to one or more corresponding autonomous cells for processing.
- FIG. 11 depicts an environment suitable for practicing the illustrative embodiments.
- the production environment 1100 may include a workflow management system 1105 that is responsible for managing workflow in the production environment 1100 , a job routing module 1110 that is responsible for routing jobs to resources and/or autonomous cells and a computer-readable storage medium 1115 .
- the production environment 1100 may also include resources 1130 a -N such as (in a document production environment) a printer, a copier, a binder, a hole-punch, a collator, a sealer or any other equipment used to process jobs.
- the resources may be grouped into autonomous cells 1125 a -N such that each autonomous cell 1125 a -N includes one or more resources 1130 a -N necessary to process at least one job.
- the workflow management system 1105 may be implemented on a stand-alone computer system or may be integrated into the resources.
- the workflow management system 1105 may also be implemented by distributed components such as separate electronic devices.
- a network 1120 may interconnect the resources 1130 a -N with the workflow management system 1105 , as illustrated in FIG. 11 .
- the network 1120 may include a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, the World Wide Web or the like.
- the network 1120 may also be formed by communication links that interconnect the workflow management system 1105 and the resources 1130 a -N.
- the disclosed embodiments may be practiced in environments where there is no network connection.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/______, attorney docket no. 20061667-US-NP/121782.18901; 11/______, attorney docket no. 20061667Q1-US-NP/121782.18921; 11/______ (attorney docket no. 20060649-US-NP/121782.18701); 11/______ (attorney docket no. 20060707-US-NP/121782.18711); 11/______ (attorney docket no. 2006730-US-NP/121782.18801); and 11/______ attorney docket no. 2006730Q-US-NP/121782.18811).
- Not Applicable
- The disclosed embodiments relate generally to a method and system for scheduling jobs in a manufacturing or production environment.
- Manufacturing and production processes produce results by receiving sets of instructions and materials required to create or modify an item, such as a document, a vehicle, a computing device or another item. Often, the processes must permit some customization or alteration of individual items based on customer desires. For example, although an automobile production line may be configured to produce a particular make and model of car, the individual cars produced may have different specifications, such as leather or cloth seating, standard or premium wheels, exterior paint color and other specifications of type. As another example, document production environments, such as print shops, convert printing orders, such as print jobs, into finished printed material. A print shop may process print jobs using resources such as printers, cutters, collators and other similar equipment. Typically, resources in print shops are organized such that when a print job arrives from a customer at a particular print shop, the print job can be processed by performing one or more production functions.
- Scheduling architectures that organize jobs arriving in a production process and route the jobs to autonomous cells are known in the art and are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,328 to Rai et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,065,567 to Squires et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
- Production environments can receive high volume jobs. In addition, there can be significant variability associated with the jobs due to multiple types of setup characteristics associated with each job. As such, the known scheduling architecture may be inefficient in processing high volume, highly variable jobs.
- Variation in these production requirements from job to job can cause significant processing delays even when resources have been allocated to balance the job flow. For example, jobs can have a number of different setup characteristics, and each setup characteristic may correspond to several different characteristic types. Significant setup delays can arise in processing jobs with variable setup characteristics in a production environment. Setup time can be particularly acute in production environments where substantial interruption in operation is unacceptable, such as environments that utilize continuous feed or processing equipment. Setup delays can significantly impact throughput.
- Before the present methods are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular systems, methodologies or protocols described, as these may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure which will be limited only by the appended claims.
- It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a “job” is a reference to one or more jobs and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. As used herein, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.”
- In an embodiment, a system of scheduling a plurality of jobs in a production environment may include a plurality of resources and a computer-readable storage medium comprising one or more programming instructions for performing a method of processing a plurality of jobs in a production environment. The method may include receiving a plurality of jobs and at least one setup characteristic corresponding to each job. Each job may have a corresponding job size. The method may also include determining, for each job, whether the corresponding job size exceeds a job size threshold, grouping each job having a job size that exceeds the job size threshold into a large job subgroup, grouping each job having a job size that does not exceed the job size threshold into a small job subgroup and routing the small job subgroup to a small job autonomous cell that includes one or more resources for processing the small job subgroup. The large job subgroup may be classified as a high setup subgroup or a low setup subgroup based on the setup characteristics corresponding to each job in the large job subgroup. The large job subgroup may be routed to a large job autonomous cell. If the large job subgroup is a high setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more first resources for processing the large job subgroup. If the large job subgroup is a low setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more second resources for processing the large job subgroup.
- In an embodiment, a computer-implemented method of scheduling a plurality of jobs in a document production environment may include receiving a plurality of jobs and at least one setup characteristic corresponding to each job. Each job may have a corresponding job size. The method may also include determining, for each job, whether the corresponding job size exceeds a job size threshold, grouping each job having a job size that exceeds the job size threshold into a large job subgroup, grouping each job having a job size that does not exceed the job size threshold into a small job subgroup and routing the small job subgroup to a small job autonomous cell that includes one or more resources for processing the small job subgroup. The large job subgroup may be classified as a high setup subgroup or a low setup subgroup based on the setup characteristics corresponding to each job in the large job subgroup. The large job subgroup may be routed to a large job autonomous cell. If the large job subgroup is a high setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more first resources for processing the large job subgroup. If the large job subgroup is a low setup subgroup, the large job autonomous cell may include one or more second resources for processing the large job subgroup.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary print shop production environment according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 2A depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 2B depicts an exemplary large job subgroup according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 2C depicts an exemplary small job subgroup according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs and corresponding form types and insert types according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 4 depicts an exemplary fast job subgroup according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 6 depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 7A depicts an exemplary plurality of jobs and corresponding job sizes, form types and insert types according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 7B depicts an exemplary large job subgroup according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 7C depicts an exemplary small job subgroup according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 8 depicts an exemplary plurality of autonomous cells and corresponding utilization percentages and positions in a sequence according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary graph of a job size distribution and size intervals using the SITA-E routing policy according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary flow chart of a partitioning process according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 11 depicts an exemplary environment suitable for processing a plurality of jobs according to an embodiment. - For purposes of the discussion below, a “production environment” or “production process” refers to an entity having multiple items of equipment to manufacture and/or process items that may be customized based on customer requirements. For example a vehicle production environment may exist in an automobile assembly plant, where different areas exist to assemble and/or finish portions of the automobile such as the engine, trim, drive train and other parts. A document production environment includes document production resources, such as printers, cutters, collators and the like. A chemical, pharmaceutical or other process industry production environment may include production resources such as chemical processing units, vessels, heating equipment, mixing equipment and the like. A production environment may be a freestanding entity, including one or more production-related devices, or it may be part of a corporation or other entity. Additionally, the production environment may communicate with one or more servers by way of a local area network or a wide area network, such as the Internet or the World Wide Web.
- A “job” refers to a logical unit of work that is to be completed for a customer. A job may include one or more jobs to build, assemble or process a product. A production system may include a plurality of jobs.
-
FIG. 1 shows an example of aproduction environment 50, in this case, exemplary elements of a print shop. Print jobs may enter the print shop manually or electronically and be collected at an electronic submission system 55 such as a computing device and/or scanner. Jobs are sorted and batched at the submission system or another location before being delivered to one or more print engines such as acolor printer 56, black-and-white printer 57 and/or acontinuous feed printer 58. Jobs may exit the print engine and be delivered to one or more finishing devices or areas such as acollator 60, cutter 62, and/orbinder 64. The finishing areas may include automatic or manual areas for such finishing activities and they also may include an automatic ormanual inserter 70. Finally, jobs may move to apostage metering station 72 and/orshipping station 74. Jobs may move from one location to another in the print shop by automatic delivery or manual delivery such as by hand or by one or more paper carts 81-85. - Jobs may have different processing requirements. For example, incoming jobs may have variable job sizes, setup requirements, processing frequency and the like. An autonomous cell refers to a group of resources used to process jobs. An autonomous cell may include the resources needed to complete at least one job. For example, in a document production environment, if the job requires printing, cutting and collating, an autonomous cell for processing the job may include at least one printer, one cutter and one collator. In a chemical production environment, an autonomous cell may include production resources necessary to convert a plurality of raw material inputs into one or more complete chemical outputs.
- In an embodiment, jobs may be partitioned into subgroups based on job size.
FIG. 2A illustrates a plurality of jobs, J1-J10 200, and corresponding job sizes. In an embodiment, the size of each job may be determined and compared to a threshold size. The threshold size may represent a value necessary to optimize process flow. If the size of a job equals or exceeds the threshold size, the job may be classified as a large job. If the size of a job is less than the threshold volume, the job may be classified as a small job. - As illustrated in
FIG. 2B ,job J1 205 is grouped in a large job subgroup because its size (i.e., 7,500) exceeds the threshold size (i.e., 5,000). Similarly, as illustrated inFIG. 2C ,job J2 210 is grouped in a small job subgroup because its size (i.e., 2,300) is less than the threshold size (i.e., 5,000). - In an embodiment, a subgroup may be categorized based on setup characteristics. A setup characteristic may include a feature of any step in the production process. For example, in a document production system, the printer setup may be dependent on the type of form used. Alternatively, the insertion operation setup may depend on one or more inserts associated with each job. As yet another example, in a chemical production environment, setup characteristics may be associated with cleaning and preparing production resources to process a next chemical product type. For example, a setup characteristic may include a time required to clean one production resource before it may be used to process another chemical product.
- In an embodiment, each setup characteristic may be associated with one or more types. For example, a form type setup characteristic may be associated with three types of forms: form A, form B and form C. In an automobile production environment, setup characteristics may result from customer selections of trim design, exterior paint color, interior color, seating type, transmission type, engine size, audio equipment, security systems, remote start systems, other electronics options and/or other features. In a computer system production environment, setup characteristics may result from customer selections of hard drive capacity, random access memory capacity, processing speed, video or graphics cards, storage drives, operating systems, sound cards, installed software and/or other features.
- Subgroups may be categorized based on the number of types associated with each setup characteristic. For example, in a vehicle production environment, a subgroup may be associated with two setup characteristics, such as trim type and exterior color. As illustrated by
FIG. 3 , ten jobs, jobs J1-J10 300 may be associated with a trim type characteristic 305 and anexterior color characteristic 310. For example,job J1 315 may be associated with trim type A andexterior color type 1. - In an alternate embodiment, subgroups may be categorized based on the average number of types associated with each setup characteristic over a specified interval. In addition, the average number of setup characteristics may be evaluated over multiple intervals. For example, a subgroup may utilize one trim type on
day 1, three trim types onday 2 and two trim types onday 3, thus producing an average of two trim types per day. - In an embodiment, a threshold value may be determined for each setup characteristic. The threshold value may represent the number of types associated with each setup characteristic that may be necessary to optimize job flow. The threshold value may be determined using a simulation model, such as a model based on discrete event simulation, to simulate and optimize the workflow. A simulation-based approach may be used to determine an optimal number of types for each setup characteristic by using manual iteration until an improved solution is obtained. Alternatively, formal optimization techniques may be used. If formal optimization techniques are used, the threshold parameters may be specified as variables and a performance measure, such as the total number of late jobs, total production cost or the like, of the overall print shop may be used as an objective function to be optimized. Constraint functions may also be specified in addition to constraints on variables. Threshold parameters may then be determined via an optimization of the simulation model. Several techniques, such as mixed-integer programming, simulated annealing, genetic programs and the like can be used to perform the optimization that may include discrete and continuous decision variables.
- In an embodiment, a subgroup may be categorized based on a comparison between the number of types associated with each setup characteristic and the threshold value for each setup characteristic. For example, if the threshold value associated with trim type is ‘2’ and the threshold value associated with exterior color type is ‘3’, a subgroup having two or fewer trim types and three or fewer exterior color types may be identified as a low setup subgroup. A low setup subgroup may include jobs that have low setup requirements when compared to the thresholds associated with the setup requirements. For example, a low setup subgroup may include jobs with similar setup requirements which may ease transitioning from one job to the next.
- A subgroup having more than two trim types and/or more than three exterior color types may be identified as a high setup subgroup or the like. A high setup subgroup may include jobs that have high setup requirements when compared to the thresholds associated with the setup requirements. For example, a high setup subgroup may include several small to mid-sized jobs with substantially different setup requirements which may cause significant delays in transitioning from one job to the next.
-
FIG. 4 illustrates categorizing asubgroup 400, J1-J5, in this manner. As illustrated inFIG. 4 ,subgroup 400 utilizes two trim types (i.e., trim type A and trim type B) and two exterior color types (i.e.,exterior color type 1 and exterior color type 2). If the trim type threshold value is 2 and the exterior color type threshold value is 3, then thesubgroup 400 may be identified as a low setup subgroup because the number of trim types associated with the subgroup equals the trim type threshold value and because the number of exterior color types associated with the subgroup is less than the exterior color type threshold value. - In comparison, as illustrated by
FIG. 5 , thesubgroup 500, J1-J5 utilizes four trim types (i.e., trim type A, trim type B, trim type C and trim type D) and two exterior color types (i.e.,exterior color type 1 and exterior color type 2). Even though the number of exterior color types associated with the subgroup 500 (i.e., 2) is less than the threshold value associated with the exterior color type setup characteristic (i.e., 3), thesubgroup 500 may be identified as a high setup subgroup because the number of trim types associated with the subgroup 500 (i.e., 4) exceeds the threshold value associated with the trim type setup characteristic (i.e., 2). - In an alternate embodiment, a subgroup may be grouped based on different threshold conditions. For example, a subgroup may be identified as a low setup subgroup if the number of types associated with one setup characteristic is less than the threshold value associated with that setup characteristic. For example, a subgroup may be identified as a low setup subgroup if the number of form types associated with the subgroup is less than or equal to the threshold value associated with the form type characteristic. Referring to
FIG. 5 , if the form type threshold value is 5, then thesubgroup 500 may be identified as a low setup subgroup because thesubgroup 500 utilizes four trim types which is less than the threshold value associated with the trim type characteristic. - In another embodiment, a subgroup may be identified according to a plurality of thresholds associated with the same setup characteristic. For example, a subgroup having a number of types less than a first threshold value, but more than a second threshold value may be grouped in an intermediate setup subgroup.
FIG. 6 illustrates asubgroup 600, J1-J5, having a trimtype setup characteristic 605 and an exterior colortype setup characteristic 610. The first threshold value associated with the trim type setup characteristic may be ‘3’, and the second threshold value associated with the trim type setup characteristic may be ‘1’. Similarly, the first setup characteristic associated with the exterior color type setup characteristic may be ‘4’, and the second threshold value associated with the exterior color type setup characteristic may be ‘2’. Thesubgroup 600 utilizes two trim types (i.e., trim type A and trim type B) which is between the first threshold value (i.e., 3) and the second threshold value (i.e., 1) associated with the trim type characteristic. The subgroup also utilizes three exterior color types (i.e.,exterior color type 1,exterior color type 2 and exterior color type 3) which is between the first threshold value (i.e., 4) and the second threshold value (i.e., 2) associated with the exterior color type characteristic. - In an embodiment, a subgroup may be categorized based on multiple job attributes. For example, jobs may first be grouped into a large job subgroup or a small job subgroup based on job sizes.
FIG. 7A illustrates jobs, J1-J5 700, andcorresponding job sizes 705,trim types 710 and exterior color types 715. - If the threshold job size value is 1100, for example, the
jobs 700 may be grouped into a large job subgroup, illustrated byFIG. 7B , and a small job subgroup, illustrated byFIG. 7C . For example, the size of job J1 720 (i.e., 1,000) is less than the threshold job size value, so job J1 may be grouped in a small job subgroup. Likewise, the size of job J2 725 (i.e., 2,350) exceeds the threshold job size value, so job J2 may be grouped in a large job subgroup. - The large job subgroup illustrated in
FIG. 7B may be categorized as a low setup subgroup or a high setup subgroup based on the setup characteristics associated with the subgroup. For example, if the trim type threshold value is 2 and the exterior color type threshold value is 2, then the large job subgroup may be identified as a high setup subgroup because the number of trim types associated with the large job subgroup (i.e., 3) exceeds the form type threshold value. - Although this embodiment illustrates categorizing jobs first based on job size, then based on setup characteristics, additional and/or alternate methodologies may be used within the scope of this disclosure.
- In an embodiment, jobs in a subgroup may be arranged prior to being processed. For example, jobs may be sequenced according to a first-in-first-out (“FIFO”) policy, an earliest due date (“EDD”) policy or the like.
- A FIFO policy may arrange jobs based on the order in which they were received. For example, a subgroup may contain three jobs, J1-J3. If J2 is received first, J1 is received second and J3 is received third, the subgroup may be processed in the following order. J2, J1, J3.
- An EDD policy may arrange jobs based on the order in which they are due. For example, a subgroup may contain three jobs, J1-J3. If J3 is due first, J1 is due second and J2 is due last, then the subgroup may be processed in the following order: J3, J1, J2.
- In an embodiment, a subgroup may be routed to one or more autonomous cells using a least work-in-progress policy, a round robin policy, a random policy, a size interval task assignment with equal load (“SITA-E”) policy or the like.
- A least work-in-progress policy may determine a volume of work within each autonomous cell and may route job sets to the autonomous cell with the smallest work volume. For example, as illustrated by
FIG. 8 ,autonomous cell A4 820 has the lowest volume of all autonomous cells, A1-A5 800, so using a least work-in-progress policy, a job may be routed toautonomous cell A4 820. - A round robin policy may route a subgroup to an autonomous cell in a particular order. For example, autonomous cells may receive subgroups sequentially or in a specified order. The round robin policy may route a subgroup to the autonomous cell which is next in the order. As illustrated by
FIG. 8 , autonomous cells A1-A5 800 may receive subgroups in a specified sequence based on each cell's position in the sequence, namely:A3 815,A1 805,A2 810,A5 825,A4 820. As such, ifautonomous cell A2 810 received the last subgroup,autonomous cell A5 825 may receive the next subgroup using a round robin policy. - A random policy may randomly route jobs to an autonomous cell. For example, referring to
FIG. 8 , any one of the autonomous cells A1-A5 800 may have an equal probability of receiving a job. - A SITA-E policy may route subgroups to an autonomous cell tasked with processing job sets of similar sizes. For example, each autonomous cell may be assigned a separate range of job sizes so that the total load each autonomous cell receives is roughly the same. In an embodiment, a job size distribution that appears to have heavy-tail characteristics may be modeled using a bounded Pareto distribution such that:
-
- Variable k may represent the smallest job size in the distribution, variable p may represent the largest job size in the distribution and a may represent the index of stability that may be determined through fitting the distribution. The job size distribution may then be divided into multiple segments where each segment may be represented as:
-
-
FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary job size cumulative density function curve and corresponding segments according to an embodiment. For example, the area under thecumulative density curve 900 between x0=k 905 and x1 910 may be substantially the same as the area under thecumulative density curve 900 between x1 910 and x2 915, between x2 915 and xi 920, and so on, where x1, x2, xi, . . . , xh represent job sizes between the smallest job size in the distribution (i.e., k) and the largest job size in the distribution (i.e., p). As such, the range of job sizes associated with jobs in a subgroup may be determined and the jobs may be routed to an autonomous cell which processes jobs of the determined size range. -
FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary flow chart of a grouping a plurality of jobs according to an embodiment. A plurality of jobs may be received 1000 and the jobs may be grouped 1005 based on job size. The jobs may either be identified as alarge job subgroup 1010 or asmall job subgroup 1015. A large job subgroup may be categorized 1020 based on setup characteristics as ahigh setup subgroup 1025 or alow setup subgroup 1030. The subgroups may be routed 1035 to one or more corresponding autonomous cells for processing. -
FIG. 11 depicts an environment suitable for practicing the illustrative embodiments. Theproduction environment 1100 may include aworkflow management system 1105 that is responsible for managing workflow in theproduction environment 1100, ajob routing module 1110 that is responsible for routing jobs to resources and/or autonomous cells and a computer-readable storage medium 1115. Theproduction environment 1100 may also include resources 1130 a-N such as (in a document production environment) a printer, a copier, a binder, a hole-punch, a collator, a sealer or any other equipment used to process jobs. The resources may be grouped into autonomous cells 1125 a-N such that each autonomous cell 1125 a-N includes one or more resources 1130 a-N necessary to process at least one job. Theworkflow management system 1105 may be implemented on a stand-alone computer system or may be integrated into the resources. Theworkflow management system 1105 may also be implemented by distributed components such as separate electronic devices. Anetwork 1120 may interconnect the resources 1130 a-N with theworkflow management system 1105, as illustrated inFIG. 11 . Thenetwork 1120 may include a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, the World Wide Web or the like. Thenetwork 1120 may also be formed by communication links that interconnect theworkflow management system 1105 and the resources 1130 a-N. Alternatively, the disclosed embodiments may be practiced in environments where there is no network connection. - It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/779,494 US8725546B2 (en) | 2007-07-18 | 2007-07-18 | Workflow scheduling method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/779,494 US8725546B2 (en) | 2007-07-18 | 2007-07-18 | Workflow scheduling method and system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090021775A1 true US20090021775A1 (en) | 2009-01-22 |
US8725546B2 US8725546B2 (en) | 2014-05-13 |
Family
ID=40264610
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/779,494 Expired - Fee Related US8725546B2 (en) | 2007-07-18 | 2007-07-18 | Workflow scheduling method and system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8725546B2 (en) |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090025002A1 (en) * | 2007-07-18 | 2009-01-22 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for routing large, high-volume, high-variability print jobs in a document production environment |
US20090268230A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Xerox Corporation | Compensation system for production printing environment |
US20100030617A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of forecasting print job related demand |
US20110173626A1 (en) * | 2010-01-12 | 2011-07-14 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Efficient maintenance of job prioritization for profit maximization in cloud service delivery infrastructures |
US8570579B2 (en) | 2011-11-18 | 2013-10-29 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for determining capacity allocation and job size thresholds for print jobs having heavy-tailed distributions |
US20140031963A1 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2014-01-30 | Christos T. Maravelias | Computerized System for Chemical Production Scheduling |
US20140058787A1 (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2014-02-27 | Ron BANNER | Plan Choosing in Digital Commercial Print Workflows |
US8896867B2 (en) | 2012-09-11 | 2014-11-25 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for assigning jobs to production devices |
US8896863B2 (en) | 2011-01-24 | 2014-11-25 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of modeling customer demand in a print production environment |
US20150302330A1 (en) * | 2012-03-05 | 2015-10-22 | Ron BANNER | Automated Job Assignment to Service Providers |
US9176690B2 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2015-11-03 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for print shop job routing |
US9201619B2 (en) | 2014-01-17 | 2015-12-01 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for assigning a job source to a hub in a print production environment |
US9213510B1 (en) | 2014-06-13 | 2015-12-15 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Print scheduling mechanism |
US20150363150A1 (en) * | 2014-06-13 | 2015-12-17 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Printer Roll Management Mechanism |
CN110262878A (en) * | 2019-05-06 | 2019-09-20 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Timed task processing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10678488B2 (en) | 2016-01-20 | 2020-06-09 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Dynamic splitting of portable document format print jobs |
US10901669B2 (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2021-01-26 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Mechanism to predict print performance using print metadata |
US10713090B2 (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2020-07-14 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Context aware prioritization in a distributed environment using tiered queue allocation |
Citations (64)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4821029A (en) * | 1984-04-26 | 1989-04-11 | Microtouch Systems, Inc. | Touch screen computer-operated video display process and apparatus |
US5095369A (en) * | 1990-09-28 | 1992-03-10 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for improved job stream printing in an electronic printer with various finishing function |
US5287194A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1994-02-15 | Xerox Corporation | Distributed printing |
US5513126A (en) * | 1993-10-04 | 1996-04-30 | Xerox Corporation | Network having selectively accessible recipient prioritized communication channel profiles |
US5559933A (en) * | 1994-04-22 | 1996-09-24 | Unisys Corporation | Distributed enterprise print controller |
US6223205B1 (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2001-04-24 | Mor Harchol-Balter | Method and apparatus for assigning tasks in a distributed server system |
US20010055123A1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2001-12-27 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and method for describing, planning and automatically programming complex finishing tasks |
US20020057455A1 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2002-05-16 | Tetsuya Gotoh | Printer controlling device, printer controlling method, and computer product |
US20020129081A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2002-09-12 | Sudhendu Rai | Production server architecture and methods for automated control of production document management |
US6509974B1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2003-01-21 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Automated job creation for job preparation |
US6546364B1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2003-04-08 | Impresse Corporation | Method and apparatus for creating adaptive workflows |
US20030098991A1 (en) * | 2001-11-26 | 2003-05-29 | Tim Laverty | Autobatching and print job creation |
US6573910B1 (en) * | 1999-11-23 | 2003-06-03 | Xerox Corporation | Interactive distributed communication method and system for bidding on, scheduling, routing and executing a document processing job |
US20030105661A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-06-05 | Koichiro Matsuzaki | Demand forecast device, method, and program product |
US6583852B2 (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2003-06-24 | Shutterfly, Inc. | Apparatus, architecture and method for high-speed printing |
US20030121431A1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2003-07-03 | Riso Kagaku Corporation | Stencil printer |
US20030149747A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2003-08-07 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for modeling print jobs |
US6631305B2 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2003-10-07 | General Electric Company | Capability analysis of assembly line production |
US6633821B2 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2003-10-14 | Xerox Corporation | System for sensing factory workspace |
US20030200252A1 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2003-10-23 | Brent Krum | System for segregating a monitor program in a farm system |
US20030202204A1 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2003-10-30 | Terrill Jody L. | Method and system for print consumables management |
US6687018B1 (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2004-02-03 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for distributing print jobs |
US20040060650A1 (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2004-04-01 | The Boeing Company | Composite material collation machine and associated method for high rate collation of composite materials |
US20040130745A1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2004-07-08 | Laser Substrates, Inc. | Automatic printer optimization settings |
US6763519B1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2004-07-13 | Sychron Inc. | Multiprogrammed multiprocessor system with lobally controlled communication and signature controlled scheduling |
US6762851B1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2004-07-13 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and system for print stream job determination and analysis |
US20040135838A1 (en) * | 2003-01-14 | 2004-07-15 | Kevin Owen | Estimating consumable sufficiency before printing |
US6805502B2 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2004-10-19 | Xerox Corporation | Method for determining optimal batch sizes for processing print jobs in a printing environment |
US20040239992A1 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2004-12-02 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing device, network printing system, and computer program |
US20040267485A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Penov Francislav P | Test execution framework for automated software testing |
US20050065830A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-03-24 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for the acquisition and analysis of data for print shop performance evaluation and adjustment |
US20050068562A1 (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2005-03-31 | Ferlitsch Andrew Rodney | Systems and methods for load balancing toner use in a printer pool |
US20050154625A1 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2005-07-14 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Finite capacity scheduling using job prioritization and machine selection |
US6925431B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2005-08-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for predicting communication delays of detailed application workloads |
US6961732B2 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2005-11-01 | General Electric Company | Web based process capability data collection and reporting system |
US6970261B1 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2005-11-29 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Printing system and method with print job distribution among a number of printers |
US6993400B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2006-01-31 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for real-time assignment of jobs to production cells |
US7016061B1 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2006-03-21 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Load balancing for raster image processing across a printing system |
US7065567B1 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2006-06-20 | Xerox Corporation | Production server for automated control of production document management |
US20060149755A1 (en) * | 2005-01-05 | 2006-07-06 | First Data Corporation | Insertion machine job scheduling systems and methods |
US7079266B1 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2006-07-18 | Xerox Corporation | Printshop resource optimization via the use of autonomous cells |
US7092922B2 (en) * | 2003-05-23 | 2006-08-15 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Adaptive learning enhancement to automated model maintenance |
US7099037B2 (en) * | 2003-04-22 | 2006-08-29 | Lightning Source Inc. | N-up printing |
US7125179B1 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2006-10-24 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of evaluating print shop consolidation options in an enterprise |
US7148985B2 (en) * | 2001-07-21 | 2006-12-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Management of print services |
US7152589B2 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2006-12-26 | Alfa Laval Corporate Ab | Method and a device for cleaning of crankcase gas |
US7161699B2 (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 2007-01-09 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Printer apparatus and printer system using unique job indentifiers, and control method therefor |
US7174232B2 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2007-02-06 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Job release with multiple constraints |
US20070070379A1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-03-29 | Sudhendu Rai | Planning print production |
US7200505B2 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2007-04-03 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Methods and systems for identifying recurrent patterns |
US7206087B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2007-04-17 | Xerox Corporation | Finishing module coordinator apparatus and method for assembler/finisher systems |
US20070091355A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for dynamically reconfiguring one or more autonomous cells in a print shop environment |
US7382484B2 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2008-06-03 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing apparatus and its control method |
US7408658B2 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2008-08-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Generation and usage of workflows for processing data on a printing device |
US7523048B1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2009-04-21 | Bluefire Systems, Inc. | Multipurpose presentation demand calendar for integrated management decision support |
US7548335B2 (en) * | 2005-02-25 | 2009-06-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Print job queuing and scheduling systems and methods |
US7562062B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2009-07-14 | British Telecommunications Plc | Forecasting system tool |
US7567360B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2009-07-28 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image forming system, method and program of controlling image forming system, and storage medium |
US7576874B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2009-08-18 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for mixed chroma print jobs |
US7584116B2 (en) * | 2002-11-04 | 2009-09-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Monitoring a demand forecasting process |
US7590937B2 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2009-09-15 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Graphical user interface for procurement risk management system |
US7684066B2 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2010-03-23 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing apparatus and method for controlling printing operations to a plurality of printers, and a program for implementing the control method |
US7689694B2 (en) * | 2004-06-15 | 2010-03-30 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Process management apparatus, computer systems, distributed processing method, and computer program for avoiding overhead in a process management device |
US8384927B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2013-02-26 | Konica Minolta Laboratory U.S.A., Inc. | Print job management method and apparatus with grouping function to group print jobs and submit groups of print jobs to printing devices |
Family Cites Families (45)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002074350A (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2002-03-15 | Canon Inc | Image processing system, control method therefor and image processor |
US7064848B2 (en) | 2000-12-12 | 2006-06-20 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for converting print jobs stored in printshop job description language files into printshop workflow |
US7761336B1 (en) | 2001-04-20 | 2010-07-20 | Lincoln Global, Inc. | System and method for managing welding consumables |
US20020174093A1 (en) | 2001-05-17 | 2002-11-21 | Fabio Casati | Method of identifying and analyzing business processes from workflow audit logs |
US20020198794A1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-12-26 | Williams Edward P. | Inventory management system for determining suggested part stocking levels for a vehicle dealer |
US7076695B2 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2006-07-11 | Opnet Technologies, Inc. | System and methods for adaptive threshold determination for performance metrics |
NL1018634C2 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2003-01-28 | Oce Tech Bv | Method for producing documents, printing device adapted to perform this method and a computer program element comprising a program code for performing the method. |
US7426352B2 (en) | 2002-10-24 | 2008-09-16 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image formation apparatus |
US7872767B2 (en) | 2003-04-04 | 2011-01-18 | Xerox Corporation | Parallel printing system |
JP2005011066A (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2005-01-13 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Print system, printer selection processing program, and storage medium |
US20040268349A1 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Sabre Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for assigning at least one task to at least one shift |
US20050114829A1 (en) | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Facilitating the process of designing and developing a project |
US7420699B2 (en) | 2003-12-22 | 2008-09-02 | Xerox Corporation | Systems and methods for rapid processing of raster intensive color documents |
US7379206B2 (en) | 2004-01-12 | 2008-05-27 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for determining resource capabilities for a lean production environment |
JP2005250823A (en) | 2004-03-04 | 2005-09-15 | Osaka Gas Co Ltd | Multiple computer operation system |
US8537384B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2013-09-17 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Integrated task management systems and methods for executing rule-based operations |
JP4592081B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2010-12-01 | キヤノン株式会社 | Print schedule control apparatus, print schedule control method, and program |
US20060031585A1 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2006-02-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Configuration options for a segmented print job |
US7517036B2 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2009-04-14 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Printhead module capable of printing a maximum of n channels of print data |
US20050275875A1 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2005-12-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for printer-side print queue priority self-monitoring |
JP2005352697A (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-22 | Canon Inc | Computer system, and allocating method for job of the system |
US7742185B2 (en) | 2004-08-23 | 2010-06-22 | Xerox Corporation | Print sequence scheduling for reliability |
EP1705556A1 (en) | 2005-03-25 | 2006-09-27 | Océ-Technologies B.V. | Structuring a staggered job termination pattern |
US7242302B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2007-07-10 | Xerox Corporation | Systems and methods for capturing workflow information |
US20060224440A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Xerox Corporation | Systems and methods for determining process cycle efficiency in production environments |
JP4781023B2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2011-09-28 | 株式会社沖データ | Printing apparatus and printing system |
US7626717B2 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2009-12-01 | Xerox Corporation | Print job allocation system and method |
US7286923B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2007-10-23 | General Electric Company | System and method for estimating turbine engine deterioration rate with noisy data |
US7542161B2 (en) | 2005-10-20 | 2009-06-02 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for determining an optimal batch size for a print job |
US9396445B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2016-07-19 | Xeroz Corporation | Controlled data collection system for improving print shop operation |
US7791752B2 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2010-09-07 | Xerox Corporation | Dynamic offer generation based on print shop machine load |
US7755778B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2010-07-13 | Xerox Corporation | Print job management system |
US8120801B2 (en) | 2006-04-25 | 2012-02-21 | Xerox Corporation | Print job management system for managing disturbances in a plurality of print jobs |
US8259321B2 (en) | 2006-04-25 | 2012-09-04 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for scheduling disturbance jobs |
DE102006020175A1 (en) | 2006-05-02 | 2007-11-08 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Aggregated prognosis deviation determining method for product, involves aggregating prognosis deviation in pre-defined surrounding, and implementing prognosis deviation in error determination |
US7860602B2 (en) | 2006-05-30 | 2010-12-28 | Xerox Corporation | Mail processing system |
US20070279675A1 (en) | 2006-06-02 | 2007-12-06 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System and method for intelligent management of document processing jobs |
US20080013109A1 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2008-01-17 | Yen-Fu Chen | Method for Selecting Printers Based On Paper Availability Or Paper Congestion |
US8149449B2 (en) | 2007-03-29 | 2012-04-03 | Konica Minolta Laboratory U.S.A., Inc. | Systems and methods for print scheduling |
US7949740B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2011-05-24 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for prioritized servicing or maintenance of networked printers |
US8468527B2 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2013-06-18 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for optimal batching in a production environment |
US7797189B2 (en) | 2007-10-09 | 2010-09-14 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of forecasting print job related demand |
US8190488B2 (en) | 2008-06-16 | 2012-05-29 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for evaluating the impact of consolidating print shops on inventory levels |
US8311903B2 (en) | 2008-06-17 | 2012-11-13 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for evaluating the impact of migrating to a dynamic processing environment |
US20090327033A1 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2009-12-31 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for forecasting inventory levels in a production environment |
-
2007
- 2007-07-18 US US11/779,494 patent/US8725546B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (68)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4821029A (en) * | 1984-04-26 | 1989-04-11 | Microtouch Systems, Inc. | Touch screen computer-operated video display process and apparatus |
US5095369A (en) * | 1990-09-28 | 1992-03-10 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for improved job stream printing in an electronic printer with various finishing function |
US5287194A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1994-02-15 | Xerox Corporation | Distributed printing |
US5513126A (en) * | 1993-10-04 | 1996-04-30 | Xerox Corporation | Network having selectively accessible recipient prioritized communication channel profiles |
US7161699B2 (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 2007-01-09 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Printer apparatus and printer system using unique job indentifiers, and control method therefor |
US5559933A (en) * | 1994-04-22 | 1996-09-24 | Unisys Corporation | Distributed enterprise print controller |
US6223205B1 (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2001-04-24 | Mor Harchol-Balter | Method and apparatus for assigning tasks in a distributed server system |
US6687018B1 (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2004-02-03 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for distributing print jobs |
US6546364B1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2003-04-08 | Impresse Corporation | Method and apparatus for creating adaptive workflows |
US6762851B1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2004-07-13 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and system for print stream job determination and analysis |
US6763519B1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2004-07-13 | Sychron Inc. | Multiprogrammed multiprocessor system with lobally controlled communication and signature controlled scheduling |
US6573910B1 (en) * | 1999-11-23 | 2003-06-03 | Xerox Corporation | Interactive distributed communication method and system for bidding on, scheduling, routing and executing a document processing job |
US20030200252A1 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2003-10-23 | Brent Krum | System for segregating a monitor program in a farm system |
US6631305B2 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2003-10-07 | General Electric Company | Capability analysis of assembly line production |
US7061636B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2006-06-13 | Xerox Corporation | Production monitor controller apparatus and method for assembler/finisher systems |
US20020016803A1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2002-02-07 | Xerox Corporation | Graphic user interface for managing assembler/finisher systems |
US7092963B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2006-08-15 | Xerox Corporation | Database method and structure for a finishing system |
US20010055123A1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2001-12-27 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and method for describing, planning and automatically programming complex finishing tasks |
US7206087B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2007-04-17 | Xerox Corporation | Finishing module coordinator apparatus and method for assembler/finisher systems |
US6509974B1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2003-01-21 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Automated job creation for job preparation |
US6925431B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2005-08-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for predicting communication delays of detailed application workloads |
US6970261B1 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2005-11-29 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Printing system and method with print job distribution among a number of printers |
US6583852B2 (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2003-06-24 | Shutterfly, Inc. | Apparatus, architecture and method for high-speed printing |
US7016061B1 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2006-03-21 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Load balancing for raster image processing across a printing system |
US7079266B1 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2006-07-18 | Xerox Corporation | Printshop resource optimization via the use of autonomous cells |
US7065567B1 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2006-06-20 | Xerox Corporation | Production server for automated control of production document management |
US20020057455A1 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2002-05-16 | Tetsuya Gotoh | Printer controlling device, printer controlling method, and computer product |
US6633821B2 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2003-10-14 | Xerox Corporation | System for sensing factory workspace |
US7523048B1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2009-04-21 | Bluefire Systems, Inc. | Multipurpose presentation demand calendar for integrated management decision support |
US6805502B2 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2004-10-19 | Xerox Corporation | Method for determining optimal batch sizes for processing print jobs in a printing environment |
US20020129081A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2002-09-12 | Sudhendu Rai | Production server architecture and methods for automated control of production document management |
US7051328B2 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2006-05-23 | Xerox Corporation | Production server architecture and methods for automated control of production document management |
US7148985B2 (en) * | 2001-07-21 | 2006-12-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Management of print services |
US20030098991A1 (en) * | 2001-11-26 | 2003-05-29 | Tim Laverty | Autobatching and print job creation |
US7408658B2 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2008-08-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Generation and usage of workflows for processing data on a printing device |
US20030105661A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-06-05 | Koichiro Matsuzaki | Demand forecast device, method, and program product |
US6961732B2 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2005-11-01 | General Electric Company | Web based process capability data collection and reporting system |
US20030121431A1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2003-07-03 | Riso Kagaku Corporation | Stencil printer |
US20040239992A1 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2004-12-02 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing device, network printing system, and computer program |
US20030149747A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2003-08-07 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for modeling print jobs |
US20040060650A1 (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2004-04-01 | The Boeing Company | Composite material collation machine and associated method for high rate collation of composite materials |
US20030202204A1 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2003-10-30 | Terrill Jody L. | Method and system for print consumables management |
US7152589B2 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2006-12-26 | Alfa Laval Corporate Ab | Method and a device for cleaning of crankcase gas |
US7590937B2 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2009-09-15 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Graphical user interface for procurement risk management system |
US7584116B2 (en) * | 2002-11-04 | 2009-09-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Monitoring a demand forecasting process |
US20040130745A1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2004-07-08 | Laser Substrates, Inc. | Automatic printer optimization settings |
US20040135838A1 (en) * | 2003-01-14 | 2004-07-15 | Kevin Owen | Estimating consumable sufficiency before printing |
US6993400B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2006-01-31 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for real-time assignment of jobs to production cells |
US7567360B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2009-07-28 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image forming system, method and program of controlling image forming system, and storage medium |
US7099037B2 (en) * | 2003-04-22 | 2006-08-29 | Lightning Source Inc. | N-up printing |
US7092922B2 (en) * | 2003-05-23 | 2006-08-15 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Adaptive learning enhancement to automated model maintenance |
US20040267485A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Penov Francislav P | Test execution framework for automated software testing |
US20050065830A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-03-24 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for the acquisition and analysis of data for print shop performance evaluation and adjustment |
US20050068562A1 (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2005-03-31 | Ferlitsch Andrew Rodney | Systems and methods for load balancing toner use in a printer pool |
US7174232B2 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2007-02-06 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Job release with multiple constraints |
US20050154625A1 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2005-07-14 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Finite capacity scheduling using job prioritization and machine selection |
US7382484B2 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2008-06-03 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing apparatus and its control method |
US7689694B2 (en) * | 2004-06-15 | 2010-03-30 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Process management apparatus, computer systems, distributed processing method, and computer program for avoiding overhead in a process management device |
US7684066B2 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2010-03-23 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing apparatus and method for controlling printing operations to a plurality of printers, and a program for implementing the control method |
US7200505B2 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2007-04-03 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Methods and systems for identifying recurrent patterns |
US20060149755A1 (en) * | 2005-01-05 | 2006-07-06 | First Data Corporation | Insertion machine job scheduling systems and methods |
US7548335B2 (en) * | 2005-02-25 | 2009-06-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Print job queuing and scheduling systems and methods |
US7576874B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2009-08-18 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for mixed chroma print jobs |
US7562062B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2009-07-14 | British Telecommunications Plc | Forecasting system tool |
US7125179B1 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2006-10-24 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of evaluating print shop consolidation options in an enterprise |
US20070070379A1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-03-29 | Sudhendu Rai | Planning print production |
US20070091355A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for dynamically reconfiguring one or more autonomous cells in a print shop environment |
US8384927B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2013-02-26 | Konica Minolta Laboratory U.S.A., Inc. | Print job management method and apparatus with grouping function to group print jobs and submit groups of print jobs to printing devices |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
Burkard Rainer E., et al., "A process scheduling problem arising from chemical production planning," Optimization methods and software, vol. 10 issue 2, 1998 pp. 175-196. * |
Crovella, Mark E., Mor Harchol-Balter, and Cristina D. Murta. "Task assignment in a distributed system (extended abstract): improving performance by unbalancing load." ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. Vol. 26. No. 1. ACM, 1998. * |
Kallrath Josef, "Planning nd scheduling in the process industry," OR Spectrum, Springer-Verlag (2002), 24:219-250. * |
Mestha, Lalit K., et al. "Control elements in production printing and publishing systems: DocuColor iGen3." Decision and Control, 2003. Proceedings. 42nd IEEE Conference on. Vol. 4. IEEE, 2003. * |
Potts, Chris N., and Mikhail Y. Kovalyov. "Scheduling with batching: a review." European Journal of Operational Research 120.2 (2000): 228-249. * |
Schroeder, Bianca, and Mor Harchol-Balter. "Evaluation of task assignment policies for supercomputing servers: The case for load unbalancing and fairness." Cluster Computing 7.2 (2004): 151-161. * |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090025002A1 (en) * | 2007-07-18 | 2009-01-22 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for routing large, high-volume, high-variability print jobs in a document production environment |
US20090268230A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Xerox Corporation | Compensation system for production printing environment |
US20100030617A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of forecasting print job related demand |
US8768745B2 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2014-07-01 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of forecasting print job related demand |
US20110173626A1 (en) * | 2010-01-12 | 2011-07-14 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Efficient maintenance of job prioritization for profit maximization in cloud service delivery infrastructures |
US8896863B2 (en) | 2011-01-24 | 2014-11-25 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of modeling customer demand in a print production environment |
US20140058787A1 (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2014-02-27 | Ron BANNER | Plan Choosing in Digital Commercial Print Workflows |
US8570579B2 (en) | 2011-11-18 | 2013-10-29 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for determining capacity allocation and job size thresholds for print jobs having heavy-tailed distributions |
US20150302330A1 (en) * | 2012-03-05 | 2015-10-22 | Ron BANNER | Automated Job Assignment to Service Providers |
US20140031963A1 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2014-01-30 | Christos T. Maravelias | Computerized System for Chemical Production Scheduling |
US9146550B2 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2015-09-29 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Computerized system for chemical production scheduling |
US8896867B2 (en) | 2012-09-11 | 2014-11-25 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for assigning jobs to production devices |
US9176690B2 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2015-11-03 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for print shop job routing |
US9201619B2 (en) | 2014-01-17 | 2015-12-01 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and systems for assigning a job source to a hub in a print production environment |
US9213510B1 (en) | 2014-06-13 | 2015-12-15 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Print scheduling mechanism |
US20150363150A1 (en) * | 2014-06-13 | 2015-12-17 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Printer Roll Management Mechanism |
CN110262878A (en) * | 2019-05-06 | 2019-09-20 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Timed task processing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8725546B2 (en) | 2014-05-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8725546B2 (en) | Workflow scheduling method and system | |
US8400679B2 (en) | Workflow partitioning method and system | |
US8145517B2 (en) | Methods and systems for scheduling job sets in a production environment | |
US20090025002A1 (en) | Methods and systems for routing large, high-volume, high-variability print jobs in a document production environment | |
US8468527B2 (en) | Method and system for optimal batching in a production environment | |
US8520254B2 (en) | Methods and systems for processing a set of print jobs in a print production environment | |
US7125179B1 (en) | System and method of evaluating print shop consolidation options in an enterprise | |
US8599421B2 (en) | Method for managing one or more print processing queues | |
US8427670B2 (en) | System and method for improving throughput in a print production environment | |
US8190488B2 (en) | Methods and systems for evaluating the impact of consolidating print shops on inventory levels | |
US8127012B2 (en) | System and methods for efficient and adequate data collection in document production environments | |
US8144364B2 (en) | Methods and systems for processing heavy-tailed job distributions in a document production environment | |
US20090313063A1 (en) | Methods and systems for evaluating the impact of migrating to a dynamic processing environment | |
Pak et al. | Cargo revenue management: Bid-prices for a 0-1 multi knapsack problem | |
US20130128302A1 (en) | Methods and systems for determining capacity allocation and job size thresholds for print jobs having heavy-tailed distributions | |
US7859692B2 (en) | System and method for developing a configuration for a combination of two or more printshops | |
Sherali et al. | Polyhedral analysis and algorithms for a demand-driven refleeting model for aircraft assignment | |
US8730503B2 (en) | Methods and systems for balancing job assignments to machines in a production environment | |
US7925460B2 (en) | System and method for improving print shop operability | |
Celikbilek et al. | Cellular design-based optimisation for manufacturing scheduling and transportation mode decisions | |
US20030105616A1 (en) | Transportation crew dispatch method based on single day business | |
US8274688B2 (en) | Capacity planning incorporating job size distribution | |
US8074221B2 (en) | Job allocation method for document production | |
US7787135B2 (en) | System and method for developing a configuration for a combination of two of more printshops | |
Sun et al. | Optimization of postal distribution network based on rendezvous with heterogeneous vehicles and capacity constraints |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: XEROX CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RAI, SUDHENDU;REEL/FRAME:019570/0663 Effective date: 20070712 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551) Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20220513 |