US20090020063A1 - Propelled Tow Body - Google Patents

Propelled Tow Body Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090020063A1
US20090020063A1 US12/110,756 US11075608A US2009020063A1 US 20090020063 A1 US20090020063 A1 US 20090020063A1 US 11075608 A US11075608 A US 11075608A US 2009020063 A1 US2009020063 A1 US 2009020063A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
tow
cable
propulsion
tow body
attachment point
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/110,756
Inventor
Anthony A Ruffa
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
US Government
Original Assignee
AMERICA UNITED STATES OF
US Government
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by AMERICA UNITED STATES OF, US Government filed Critical AMERICA UNITED STATES OF
Priority to US12/110,756 priority Critical patent/US20090020063A1/en
Assigned to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE reassignment UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RUFFA, ANTHONY A.
Publication of US20090020063A1 publication Critical patent/US20090020063A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63CLAUNCHING, HAULING-OUT, OR DRY-DOCKING OF VESSELS; LIFE-SAVING IN WATER; EQUIPMENT FOR DWELLING OR WORKING UNDER WATER; MEANS FOR SALVAGING OR SEARCHING FOR UNDERWATER OBJECTS
    • B63C11/00Equipment for dwelling or working underwater; Means for searching for underwater objects
    • B63C11/34Diving chambers with mechanical link, e.g. cable, to a base
    • B63C11/36Diving chambers with mechanical link, e.g. cable, to a base of closed type
    • B63C11/42Diving chambers with mechanical link, e.g. cable, to a base of closed type with independent propulsion or direction control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63GOFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    • B63G8/00Underwater vessels, e.g. submarines; Equipment specially adapted therefor
    • B63G8/04Superstructure
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63GOFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    • B63G8/00Underwater vessels, e.g. submarines; Equipment specially adapted therefor
    • B63G8/08Propulsion
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63GOFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    • B63G8/00Underwater vessels, e.g. submarines; Equipment specially adapted therefor
    • B63G8/42Towed underwater vessels

Definitions

  • FIG. 1 depicts a tow body of the present invention in which the tow body has a tow attachment point;

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Laying Of Electric Cables Or Lines Outside (AREA)

Abstract

A tow body is provided with an attachment point to connect to a tow cable. The attachment point is positioned nominally at a nonzero angle relative to the length of the tow body. Propulsion components of the body generate thrust. The body is capable of accepting electric power for a propulsion motor within the body. The motor provides the power for the propeller or other propulsion equipment. The power for the motor can also provided by a tow cable. The addition of forward thrust by the propeller decreases cable scope (the need for long lengths of cable) and required winch volume for storing the cable.

Description

    STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/963,202, filed on Jul. 18, 2007 and entitled “Propelled Tow Body” by the inventor, Anthony A. Ruffa.
  • STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
  • The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • (1) Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a tow body with a propulsion component. The tow body is capable of forward thrust by the propulsion component thereby allowing the use of a compact and lightweight handling system for the tow body.
  • (2) Description of the Prior Art
  • It is known in the art that conventional design principles require a heavy tow cable a heavy tow body or a depressor tow body to achieve a required depth. A 1.6 inch diameter cable is an example of a “heavy” tow cable in that it weighs more than 2 pounds per foot in air or water thereby requiring a winch diameter exceeding four feet.
  • A depressor tow body is an upside-down wing that produces force in a downward direction to achieve a depth. Depressor wings are typically large (more than four-feet across); thereby complicating handling requirements.
  • To illustrate the effects of the use of a tow cable, the following catenary equations describe a steady state configuration for a tow cable.
  • The catenary equations (See Table 1 for symbol definitions are:
  • T s = - ρ 0 ( σ - 1 ) π a 2 g sin φ - ρ 0 v 2 π aC T cos φ T φ s = ρ 0 ( σ - 1 ) π a 2 g cos φ + ρ 0 av 2 [ C D sin φ + π C N ] sin φ ; x s = cos φ ; and y s = - sin φ . ( 1 )
  • TABLE 1
    Parameter Description
    α Radius of tow cable
    ρ0 Density of sea water
    (1025 Kg/m3)
    g Gravitational acceleration
    (9.81 m/s2)
    ν Tow speed
    CT Tangential drag coefficient
    (0.0025)
    CN Drag co-efficient 0.75CT
    CD Normal drag coefficient (1.4)
    σ Specific gravity of tow cable
    L Length of tow cable
    T Tension of tow cable
    φ Incidence angle of tow cable
    x x-coordinate (positive along
    the direction of the flow
    y y-coordinate (positive in the
    downward direction)
    S Cable scope (distance along
    the cable measure from the aft
    end
  • The uncertainty associated with modeling a towed system is dominated by that of the drag coefficients. This modeling can lead to depth variations up to ten percent (measured drag data typically has a lot of scatter). In other words, if a drag measurement is made multiple times, the results will not always match. This disparity is generally due to the nonlinear nature of fluid mechanics that can magnify small differences in test conditions.
  • Small changes in speed and angle of the tow cable can lead to significant changes in drag, resulting in a chaotic system. Vortex shedding does not always occur. However, when vortex shedding occurs would be when the wake is altered, and the drag on the cable can increase by a factor of two.
  • A high-fidelity model usually makes a build-test-build process unnecessary; therefore, modeling can sufficiently explore the tradeoff space. A high-fidelity model has high accuracy, both in the absolute sense (i.e. small errors in predicted forces and displacements), and in the relative sense (i.e. accurately predicting tends due to design changes, allowing the tradeoff space to fully explored). As such, a system designed from a catenary model is considered (as a practical manner) identical to a system that would be built and tested (except for approximately ten percent uncertainty in depth). Dynamic cable behavior is more difficult to simulate and may require some testing.
  • In critical angle tow, the cable catenary is virtually a straight line (except for a small region near the aft end of the tow body having a nonzero curvature). When there is a concentrated force at the aft end of the tow cable, the extent of the curvature increases.
  • A towed system in two dimensions is described by four equations and four unknowns (T, φ, x, y). Steady state towed systems form an initial value problem, requiring initial conditions for each variable at the aft end. The following test cases are useful to check sign conventions and other errors.
  • Test Case 1: Zero tow speed. In Test Case 1, the tow cable hangs vertically, so that φ=π/2. The equations reduce to:
  • T s - ρ 0 ( σ - 1 ) π a 2 g = 0 φ s = 0 ; x s = 0 ; and y s = - 1. ( 2 )
  • In Test Case 1, the tension at any point equals the weight of the cable below.
  • Test Case 2: Neutrally buoyant cable. In Test Case 2, the cable tows horizontally when φ=0. The equations reduce to:
  • T s - ρ 0 v 2 π a 2 C T = 0 φ s = 0 ; x s = 1 ; and y s = - 0. ( 3 )
  • In Test Case 2, the drag at any point equals the accumulated drag of the tow cable behind the point.
  • In a working example, consider a tow body (e.g. a countermeasure) towed from a one inch diameter steel cable at five knots. The critical angle would be approximately 18 degrees and the tow body would achieve a depth of 100 meters (m) with a cable scope of 340 meters (m) and a cable tension of 100 pounds (lbs).
  • Based on the drag calculations and the working example, a propellable tow body would be a significant improvement in the art and would have significant benefits over known tow systems. However, a propellable tow body cannot have a nose tow (front end tow attachment point) because propulsion of the tow body would cause tow cable compression. Therefore, an alternate propelled tow body arrangement is needed.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, it is a general purpose and primary object of the present invention to provide a propellable tow body.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide a propellable tow body which achieves depth requirements with a shortened or lighter tow cable compared to achieving depth requirements with those tow cables typically used with tow bodies.
  • It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a propellable tow body which allows the use of a compact and lightweight handling system.
  • In order to attain the objects described above, a propellable tow body with a “top” tow attachment point is provided. A tow cable would be secured at the attachment point and along with the attachment point positioned nominally at a nonzero angle relative to the direction of thrust. The thrust is achieved by an operating propulsion component of the tow body with the result of forward thrust without a cable compression because the tow cable pivots about the tow point, increasing an angle relative to the thrust direction as thrust is increased. This effect eliminates the possibility of cable compression, which could lead to mechanical failure.
  • The tow body is also capable of accepting electric power for an electric propulsion motor within the body. The electric propulsion motor provides the power for the propeller or other propulsion equipment. Alternatively, the power for the electric motor could be provided by a tow cable or a power storage capability within the tow body.
  • The addition of forward thrust by the propulsion components of the tow body decreases cable scope (i.e., the cable length) and the required winch volume for storing the long length of cable.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A more complete understanding of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereto will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals and symbols designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views and wherein:
  • FIG. 1 depicts a tow body of the present invention in which the tow body has a tow attachment point;
  • FIG. 2 depicts the propellable towed body of the present invention in arrangement with a support ship;
  • FIG. 3 is a depiction of a steady state shape of a one inch tow cable with a horsepower of thrust at five knots; and
  • FIG. 4 depicts a graph showing the depth of the tow body as a function of thrust.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • In FIG. 1, a propellable tow body 10 with a “top” tow attachment point 12 is shown. The attachment point 12 may be any securing mechanism known to those ordinarily skilled in the art. Importantly, the attachment point 12 allows a tow cable 100 to be secured nominally at a nonzero angle relative to the direction of thrust of the propellable tow body 10. The tow cable pivots about the tow point, increasing is angle relative to the thrust direction as thrust is increased. This effect eliminates the possibility of cable compression, which could lead to mechanical failure.
  • When the tow body 10 is powered for propulsion by an electric motor 16 (commercially-available motors would be suitable) and under propulsion by a propulsion component 18 (i.e., propeller blades), forward thrust is achieved without compression of the tow cable 100. The addition of forward thrust of the tow body 10 decreases cable scope and the required volume for storing the tow cable 100 on a winch 110 on a ship 120 (See FIG. 2).
  • Under power, the tow cable 100 takes the shape of a bow (due to the normal drag on the tow cable and the tow body 10) with the propelled tow body directly below the ship 120. FIG. 3 (having units of meters on both axes) shows that the tow cable takes the shape of a bow (due to the normal drag). In this figure, the tow body is oriented directly under the ship. There is no other way to achieve this much depth at speed with such a short tow cable. In practice, there are cases where the depth at a given speed achievable by conventional means is limited, and the use of forward thrust is the only way to overcome such limitations.
  • The tow cable 100 could also provide power from a power source (not shown) for the electric motor 16 or could supply the power directly to the propulsion component 18.
  • To further illustrate the advantages of the invention, the propellable tow body 10 would increase the depth to 165 meters when the forward thrust is 900 lbs at 5 knots (8.4 ft/sec). This translates to approximately 13.7 horse power (900 lbs×8.4 ft/sec divided by 550 ft/lbs.
  • Power conductors, typically required for operation of the electric motor 16, can fit in a one-inch diameter tow cable with sufficient spare volume for conductors supporting other components (e.g., sensors). When the tow body 10 transmits significant acoustic power, additional power conductors would be required. In such an instance, coaxial cables or non-twisted conductor pairs can be used to minimize volume use within the tow cable 100.
  • Additionally or alternatively, power storage in the tow body 10 can support use of the propulsion component 18. The diameter of the tow cable 100 cannot be made too small and simultaneously achieve depth at speed, since the weight of the tow cable varies with the area and the drag varies with the diameter. [Note: This is only true without a propelled tow body, because the depth is achieved with weight or downward thrust. With a propelled tow body, the depth at speed can be achieved with any cable diameter.]
  • In relation to the working example in the “Description of the Prior Art” section, a non-propelled system would increase the scope of the tow cable 100 from 340 meters to 570 meters to achieve the same depth. In other words, addition of forward thrust decreases cable scope (and therefore the required winch volume) by 40 percent. Thrust increases the tension to 292 lbs; however, the tension of the non-propelled system would increase to 160 lbs when considering the cable scope. No approach known in the art can increase depth this much with such a small impact on size and weight.
  • Important advantages of the present invention are reduced handling system size, strength rating requirements and weight. The tow body 10 also enables use of legacy handling systems that are too small for conventional towing, or for use from unmanned surface vehicles having comparatively small handling systems.
  • The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. It is not intended to be exhaustive nor to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed; and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to a person skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined by the accompanying claims.

Claims (8)

1. A tow body capable of propulsion for use with a tow cable, said tow body comprising:
a front end;
a rear end located at an end of an extension of said tow body from said front end;
an attachment point positioned on said tow body with said attachment point capable of attachment to the tow cable, said attachment point positioned nominally at a nonzero incidence angle to said front and rear ends of said body;
a propulsion component positioned at said rear end; and
an electric motor within said tow body, said motor electrically connected to said propulsion component with said motor capable of providing power for said propulsion component such that said tow body is capable of propulsion.
2. The tow body in accordance with claim 1 further comprising a power supply within said tow body wherein said electric motor is powered by said power supply.
3. The tow body in accordance with claim 2 wherein said propulsion component is a set of propellers.
4. The tow body in accordance with claim 1 wherein said electric motor is capable of being powered by the tow cable.
5. The tow body in accordance with claim 4 wherein said propulsion component is a set of propellers.
6. The tow body in accordance with claim 1 wherein said attachment point allows an increased cable angle relative to that of a direction of thrust by the propulsion of said tow body as the magnitude of the thrust is increased such that compression of the tow cable is eliminated.
7. A tow system capable of propulsion, said tow system comprising:
a tow body with a front end and a rear end located at an end of an extension of said tow body from said front end with an attachment point positioned on said tow body nominally at a nonzero incidence angle to said front and rear ends of said body and including a propulsion component positioned at said rear end with an electric motor within said tow body, said motor electrically connected to said propulsion component with said motor capable of providing power for said propulsion component such that said tow body is capable of propulsion; and
a tow cable attached at said attachment point with said tow cable capable of being secured to a towing vehicle.
8. The tow system in accordance with claim 7 wherein said tow cable contains conductors to supply electric power to said propulsion component and conductors for additional tow-body based mission packages.
US12/110,756 2007-07-18 2008-04-28 Propelled Tow Body Abandoned US20090020063A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/110,756 US20090020063A1 (en) 2007-07-18 2008-04-28 Propelled Tow Body

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US96320207P 2007-07-18 2007-07-18
US12/110,756 US20090020063A1 (en) 2007-07-18 2008-04-28 Propelled Tow Body

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090020063A1 true US20090020063A1 (en) 2009-01-22

Family

ID=40263817

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/110,756 Abandoned US20090020063A1 (en) 2007-07-18 2008-04-28 Propelled Tow Body

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20090020063A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014185811A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2014-11-20 Ivandaev Sergey Ivanovich Method for escorting self-propelled vessels and vessel for carrying out said method
US20160090160A1 (en) * 2013-06-11 2016-03-31 Ihi Corporation Underwater mobile body
US9778388B1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2017-10-03 Thayermahan, Inc. Systems and methods for autonomous towing of an underwater sensor array
US9791862B1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-10-17 Thayermahan, Inc. Systems and method for unmanned undersea sensor position, orientation, and depth keeping
CN111959728A (en) * 2020-08-17 2020-11-20 中国船舶科学研究中心 Marine towing navigation operation system of deep sea submersible vehicle
US11105662B2 (en) 2017-11-02 2021-08-31 Thayermahan, Inc. Continuous unmanned airborne and underwater monitoring platform

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3719116A (en) * 1971-09-22 1973-03-06 C Burton Underwater saw for tree and stump removal
US4766385A (en) * 1987-09-08 1988-08-23 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Underwater buried mine classifier
US6901876B2 (en) * 1999-07-19 2005-06-07 Nova Ray, Inc. Methods and apparatus for hull attachment for submersible vehicles

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3719116A (en) * 1971-09-22 1973-03-06 C Burton Underwater saw for tree and stump removal
US4766385A (en) * 1987-09-08 1988-08-23 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Underwater buried mine classifier
US6901876B2 (en) * 1999-07-19 2005-06-07 Nova Ray, Inc. Methods and apparatus for hull attachment for submersible vehicles

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014185811A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2014-11-20 Ivandaev Sergey Ivanovich Method for escorting self-propelled vessels and vessel for carrying out said method
US20160090160A1 (en) * 2013-06-11 2016-03-31 Ihi Corporation Underwater mobile body
US9791862B1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-10-17 Thayermahan, Inc. Systems and method for unmanned undersea sensor position, orientation, and depth keeping
US9778388B1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2017-10-03 Thayermahan, Inc. Systems and methods for autonomous towing of an underwater sensor array
US11105662B2 (en) 2017-11-02 2021-08-31 Thayermahan, Inc. Continuous unmanned airborne and underwater monitoring platform
CN111959728A (en) * 2020-08-17 2020-11-20 中国船舶科学研究中心 Marine towing navigation operation system of deep sea submersible vehicle

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090020063A1 (en) Propelled Tow Body
Liang et al. Wing load investigation of the plunge-diving locomotion of a gannet Morus inspired submersible aircraft
US4862739A (en) Wind tunnel model support mechanism
Lambert et al. Stability analysis of a tethered aerostat
US6088296A (en) Soft-bodied, towable, active acoustic module
US3276251A (en) Test unit free-flight suspension system
Schram et al. A three-dimensional dynamic analysis of a towed system
US9823371B2 (en) Methods and systems for towing acoustic source sub-arrays
US5235848A (en) Thruster test fixture
Piatak et al. Comparison of Ares IX Wind-Tunnel-Derived Buffet Environment with Flight Data
KR102041427B1 (en) Metthod and apparatus for measuring the thrust of flying object
US10029765B2 (en) Submerged object suspended from a towing cable optimized to neutralize disrupting hydrodynamic forces
US3337004A (en) Impact energy absorber
US6598554B1 (en) Submarine towed measuring system
Shaw et al. Full-scale flight demonstration of active control of a pod wake
Gingras Experimental investigation of a multi-aircraft formation
Ruffa et al. Propelled Tow Body
US9057738B1 (en) Inertial dynamics measurement and structural configuration variation for hydrodynamic stability evaluation of a towed body
Vinod et al. depth enhancement of an underwater towed system using Hydrodynamic depressor
Larsson et al. A study of ground simulation-correlation between wind-tunnel and water-basin tests of a full scale car
Amer Experimental Study of High-Speed Boats with Suspended Flaps for Reducing the Slamming Forces
Redd Evaluation of a wind-tunnel gust response technique including correlations with analytical and flight test results
Nissen et al. Correlation of the drag characteristics of a typical pursuit airplane obtained from high-speed wind-tunnel and flight tests
US7497128B2 (en) Power meter for measuring and calculation of forces on bodies
US8773954B1 (en) Acoustic source reactive to tow cable strum

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES OF, RHODE ISLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RUFFA, ANTHONY A.;REEL/FRAME:020890/0520

Effective date: 20080423

Owner name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, RHODE ISLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RUFFA, ANTHONY A.;REEL/FRAME:020890/0520

Effective date: 20080423

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION