US20080250706A1 - Coal desulphurization - Google Patents

Coal desulphurization Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080250706A1
US20080250706A1 US12/014,306 US1430608A US2008250706A1 US 20080250706 A1 US20080250706 A1 US 20080250706A1 US 1430608 A US1430608 A US 1430608A US 2008250706 A1 US2008250706 A1 US 2008250706A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
coal
solution
sulphur
ferric ion
elemental sulphur
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/014,306
Inventor
Zola N. Kwela
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EXXARO COAL Ltd
Original Assignee
EXXARO COAL Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EXXARO COAL Ltd filed Critical EXXARO COAL Ltd
Assigned to EXXARO COAL LIMITED reassignment EXXARO COAL LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KWELA, ZOLA N.
Publication of US20080250706A1 publication Critical patent/US20080250706A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
    • C10L9/00Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion
    • C10L9/02Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion by chemical means
    • C10L9/06Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion by chemical means by oxidation
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel

Definitions

  • This invention relates to desulphurization of coal.
  • the invention relates to a process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal.
  • coal sources provide coal with a high sulphur content. For environmental reasons, it is undesirable to burn the coal and thereby to release SO2 into the atmosphere.
  • a process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal including
  • a process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal including
  • the ferric ion solution may be a ferric sulphate solution, although ferric chloride and ferric nitrate may also be used.
  • the ferric ion solution may be selected from the group consisting of a ferric sulphate solution, a ferric chloride solution, a ferric nitrate solution and mixtures thereof.
  • reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution thus includes contacting the coal with the ferric ion solution by mixing the coal and the ferric ion solution.
  • an effective amount of the ferric ion solution must be used. The effective amount will depend, amongst other factors, on the amount of coal treated, the pyritic sulphur content of the coal being treated, and the ferric ion concentration of the ferric ion solution.
  • the nitric acid used to oxidise the elemental sulphur may be at a concentration of less than 2.75% by mass, e.g. about 2.2% by mass. Typically, the nitric acid is at a concentration of at least 0.5% by mass.
  • the elemental sulphur may be reacted with nitric acid at a temperature of less than 71° C., e.g. about 70° C. Preferably however, the temperature is at least 40° C., more preferably at least 50° C.
  • the process in accordance with the second aspect of the invention may include, after reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution, separating the coal, which includes elemental sulphur from the ferric ion solution before reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur with nitric acid.
  • the coal, which includes elemental sulphur is filtered from the ferric ion solution and washed, e.g. with water, before reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur with nitric acid.
  • the process may thus be a two-stage process.
  • pyritic sulphur is oxidized to elemental sulphur using a ferric ion solution and, in the second stage, the elemental sulphur is oxidized to sulphate sulphur, forming sulphuric acid, by reaction with nitric acid.
  • the two-stage process is more advantageous than a single-stage process.
  • Separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution typically includes filtering the coal from the acidic solution.
  • separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution includes washing the separated coal, e.g. with water.
  • FIG. 2 shows a graph of percentage sulphur removed as a function of temperature, for different nitric acid concentrations, for a single stage process and a double stage process in accordance with the invention.
  • the stating temperature of the solution was selected such that the added sulphuric acid raised the temperature to a desired temperature, e.g. about 70° C.
  • Slurry samples were taken at predetermined time intervals using a glass pipette. After a predetermined reaction time, e.g. 30 minutes, nitric acid was added to the solution to reach a required concentration, e.g. 2.2% nitric acid by mass.
  • the acidic solution was kept at a desired temperature, e.g. 70° C. After the required reaction time, e.g. 15 minutes, the coal was filtered from the acidic solution and washed free of sulphur with water.
  • the reaction temperatures were controlled by conducting the reactions in a double walled leach reactor and controlling the temperature of water flowing through a jacket of the double walled leach reactor.
  • a peristaltic pump was used to transfer the coal slurry from the double walled leach reactor to a filtration assembly. Probes were used to measure pH and reaction temperature.
  • a vibrating feeder was used to feed the coal into the double walled leach reactor.
  • This Example illustrates a two stage process in accordance with the invention.
  • a predetermined amount of ferric sulphate e.g. between 20 g/L and 300 g/L, was dissolved in about 1.8 liters of water and the solution was heated, if necessary, to a temperature of about 30° C.
  • the solution was acidified with sulphuric acid to obtain a pH ⁇ 1.
  • About 200 g of coal was rapidly fed through a screw feeder into a double walled leach reactor, and sulphuric acid was again used to maintain the pH ⁇ 1.
  • the solution volume was raised with hot water to reach the required temperature.
  • the starting temperature of the solution was selected so that a desired final temperature is reached as a result of the addition of the sulphuric acid, e.g. 60° C.
  • the coal slurry was removed from the leach reactor and filtered.
  • the coal solids were washed with water and then recycled to the double walled leach reactor.
  • Nitric acid was injected into the double walled leach reactor to obtain a desired concentration, e.g. about 2.2% nitric acid by mass.
  • the temperature was kept at a desired level, e.g. about 70° C.
  • the required reaction time e.g. about 15 minutes
  • the contents of the double walled leach reactor were again filtered, and the coal solids washed free of sulphur with water.
  • Example 1 the desulphurized coal was dried and studied with a scanning electron microscope.
  • Samples of the acid solutions from the double walled leach reactor were titrated with barium chloride to determine sulphate sulphur content, using sulfonanzo III as indicator.
  • Iron content of the solution samples was determined by complexometry with EDTA using 5-sulfosalicyclic acid as indicator.
  • Total sulphur was determined using Leco apparatus.
  • FIG. 1 of the drawings The effectiveness of the process in accordance with the invention for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal, using different concentrations of nitric acid and a single stage process or a double stage process along the lines of Example 1 or Example 2, is illustrated in FIG. 1 of the drawings.
  • the double stage process with the ferric ion solution at 60° C. and the nitric acid solution at 80° C., is considerably more effective at removing sulphur than a single stage process operating at 80° C.
  • the advantage of using a double stage process is marked at low concentrations of less than about 2.2% nitric acid and greater than 0.5% nitric acid. It is believed that the adhesion of ferric sulphate to the coal and the loss of nitric acid as ferrous sulphate are minimized at high acid concentrations and high temperatures.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the effectiveness of the process of the invention in reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal, using a double stage process at two different nitric acid concentrations, and a single stage process, for different temperatures for both the double stage process and the single stage process.
  • the single stage process is sensitive to temperature and is only significantly reactive at temperatures above 60° C.
  • the double stage process even at lower nitric acid concentrations, is much less sensitive to temperature.
  • the process of the invention can effectively remove a substantial portion of the pyritic sulphur content of coal, without affecting the integrity of the coal.

Abstract

A process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal includes reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution to oxidise the pyritic sulphur to elemental sulphur, and separating the coal, which includes elemental sulphur from the ferric ion solution. The coal and the elemental sulphur are then reacted in an acidic solution with nitric acid to oxidize the elemental sulphur, forming sulphuric acid. The coal is separated from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution to provide coal with a reduced pyritic sulphur content.

Description

  • This invention relates to desulphurization of coal. In particular, the invention relates to a process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal.
  • Many coal sources provide coal with a high sulphur content. For environmental reasons, it is undesirable to burn the coal and thereby to release SO2 into the atmosphere.
  • It would be advantageous to provide an improved process to desulphurize coal particularly if such a process does not negatively affect the coking properties of the coal.
  • According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal, the process including
      • reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution to oxidise the pyritic sulphur to elemental sulphur;
      • separating the coal, which includes elemental sulphur from the ferric ion solution;
      • reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur in an acidic solution with nitric acid to oxidize the elemental sulphur, forming sulphuric acid; and
      • separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution to provide coal with a reduced pyritic sulphur content.
  • The coal may be reacted with the ferric ion solution at a temperature of less than 100° C. The nitric acid used to oxidise the elemental sulphur may be at a concentration of less than 10% by mass.
  • According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal, the process including
      • reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution at a temperature of less than 100° C. to oxidise the pyritic sulphur to elemental sulphur;
      • reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur in an acidic solution with nitric acid at a concentration of less than 10% by mass to oxidise the elemental sulphur, forming sulphuric acid; and
      • separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution to provide coal with a reduced pyritic sulphur content.
  • Preferably, the coal is reacted with the ferric ion solution at a temperature of less than 90° C., more preferably less than 85° C., e.g. between 60° C. and 80° C.
  • The ferric ion solution may be a ferric sulphate solution, although ferric chloride and ferric nitrate may also be used. Thus, the ferric ion solution may be selected from the group consisting of a ferric sulphate solution, a ferric chloride solution, a ferric nitrate solution and mixtures thereof.
  • Typically, reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution thus includes contacting the coal with the ferric ion solution by mixing the coal and the ferric ion solution. As will be appreciated, an effective amount of the ferric ion solution must be used. The effective amount will depend, amongst other factors, on the amount of coal treated, the pyritic sulphur content of the coal being treated, and the ferric ion concentration of the ferric ion solution.
  • The process may include adjusting the pH of the ferric ion solution to be acidic. Preferably, the pH of the ferric ion solution is maintained at less than 1. The pH of the ferric ion solution may be adjusted with sulphuric acid.
  • The nitric acid used to oxidise the elemental sulphur may be at a concentration of less than 2.75% by mass, e.g. about 2.2% by mass. Typically, the nitric acid is at a concentration of at least 0.5% by mass.
  • The elemental sulphur may be reacted with nitric acid at a temperature of less than 71° C., e.g. about 70° C. Preferably however, the temperature is at least 40° C., more preferably at least 50° C.
  • The process in accordance with the second aspect of the invention may include, after reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution, separating the coal, which includes elemental sulphur from the ferric ion solution before reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur with nitric acid. Typically, the coal, which includes elemental sulphur, is filtered from the ferric ion solution and washed, e.g. with water, before reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur with nitric acid. The process may thus be a two-stage process. In the first stage, pyritic sulphur is oxidized to elemental sulphur using a ferric ion solution and, in the second stage, the elemental sulphur is oxidized to sulphate sulphur, forming sulphuric acid, by reaction with nitric acid. Indications are that the two-stage process is more advantageous than a single-stage process.
  • Separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution typically includes filtering the coal from the acidic solution. Preferably, separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution includes washing the separated coal, e.g. with water.
  • The invention will now be more fully described with reference to the following examples and the accompanying diagrammatic drawings, in which
  • FIG. 1 shows a graph of percentage sulphur removed as a function of nitric acid concentration for a single stage process and a double stage process in accordance with the invention; and
  • FIG. 2 shows a graph of percentage sulphur removed as a function of temperature, for different nitric acid concentrations, for a single stage process and a double stage process in accordance with the invention.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • This Example illustrates a single stage process in accordance with the invention. A predetermined amount of ferric sulphate, typically between 20 g/L and 300 g/L, was dissolved in about 1.8 liters of water and the solution was heated to a predetermined temperature, e.g. 40° C. The solution was acidified with sulphuric acid to obtain a pH<1. 200 g of sub-bituminous coal obtained from the secondary spiral product of the beneficiation plant of Exxaro Resources, Grootegeluk, South Africa was rapidly fed through a screw feeder, and sulphuric acid was again used to maintain the pH below 1. The solution volume was raised with hot water to reach the required temperature. The stating temperature of the solution was selected such that the added sulphuric acid raised the temperature to a desired temperature, e.g. about 70° C. Slurry samples were taken at predetermined time intervals using a glass pipette. After a predetermined reaction time, e.g. 30 minutes, nitric acid was added to the solution to reach a required concentration, e.g. 2.2% nitric acid by mass. The acidic solution was kept at a desired temperature, e.g. 70° C. After the required reaction time, e.g. 15 minutes, the coal was filtered from the acidic solution and washed free of sulphur with water.
  • The reaction temperatures were controlled by conducting the reactions in a double walled leach reactor and controlling the temperature of water flowing through a jacket of the double walled leach reactor. A peristaltic pump was used to transfer the coal slurry from the double walled leach reactor to a filtration assembly. Probes were used to measure pH and reaction temperature. A vibrating feeder was used to feed the coal into the double walled leach reactor.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • This Example illustrates a two stage process in accordance with the invention. A predetermined amount of ferric sulphate, e.g. between 20 g/L and 300 g/L, was dissolved in about 1.8 liters of water and the solution was heated, if necessary, to a temperature of about 30° C. The solution was acidified with sulphuric acid to obtain a pH<1. About 200 g of coal was rapidly fed through a screw feeder into a double walled leach reactor, and sulphuric acid was again used to maintain the pH<1. The solution volume was raised with hot water to reach the required temperature. The starting temperature of the solution was selected so that a desired final temperature is reached as a result of the addition of the sulphuric acid, e.g. 60° C.
  • After a predetermined reaction time, e.g. 30 minutes, the coal slurry was removed from the leach reactor and filtered. The coal solids were washed with water and then recycled to the double walled leach reactor. Nitric acid was injected into the double walled leach reactor to obtain a desired concentration, e.g. about 2.2% nitric acid by mass. The temperature was kept at a desired level, e.g. about 70° C. After the required reaction time, e.g. about 15 minutes, the contents of the double walled leach reactor were again filtered, and the coal solids washed free of sulphur with water.
  • In both Example 1 and Example 2, the desulphurized coal was dried and studied with a scanning electron microscope. Samples of the acid solutions from the double walled leach reactor were titrated with barium chloride to determine sulphate sulphur content, using sulfonanzo III as indicator. Iron content of the solution samples was determined by complexometry with EDTA using 5-sulfosalicyclic acid as indicator. Total sulphur was determined using Leco apparatus.
  • The effectiveness of the process in accordance with the invention for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal, using different concentrations of nitric acid and a single stage process or a double stage process along the lines of Example 1 or Example 2, is illustrated in FIG. 1 of the drawings. As can be noted, the double stage process, with the ferric ion solution at 60° C. and the nitric acid solution at 80° C., is considerably more effective at removing sulphur than a single stage process operating at 80° C. The advantage of using a double stage process is marked at low concentrations of less than about 2.2% nitric acid and greater than 0.5% nitric acid. It is believed that the adhesion of ferric sulphate to the coal and the loss of nitric acid as ferrous sulphate are minimized at high acid concentrations and high temperatures.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the effectiveness of the process of the invention in reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal, using a double stage process at two different nitric acid concentrations, and a single stage process, for different temperatures for both the double stage process and the single stage process. As will be noted, the single stage process is sensitive to temperature and is only significantly reactive at temperatures above 60° C. The double stage process, even at lower nitric acid concentrations, is much less sensitive to temperature.
  • The process of the invention, as illustrated, can effectively remove a substantial portion of the pyritic sulphur content of coal, without affecting the integrity of the coal.

Claims (20)

1-17. (canceled)
18. A process for reducing the pyritic sulphur contest of coal, the process including
reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution to oxidise the pyritic sulphur to elemental sulphur;
separating the coal, which includes elemental sulphur from the ferric ion solution;
reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur in an acidic solution with nitric acid to oxidize the elemental sulphur, forming sulphuric acid; and
separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution to provide coal with a reduced pyritic sulphur content.
19. The process as claimed in claim 18, in which the coal is reacted with the ferric ion solution at a temperature of less than 100° C.
20. The process as claimed in claim 18, in which the ferric ion solution is selected from the group consisting of a ferric sulphate solution, a ferric chloride solution, a ferric nitrate solution and mixtures thereof.
21. The process as claimed in claim 18, which includes adjusting the pH of the ferric ion solution to be acidic.
22. The process as claimed in claim 21, in which the pH of the ferric ion solution is maintained at less than 1.
23. The process as claimed in claim 18, in which the nitric acid used to oxidise the elemental sulphur is at a concentration of less than 10% by mass.
24. The process as claimed in claim 18, in which the elemental sulphur is reacted with nitric acid at a temperature of less than 71° C., but at least 40° C.
25. The process as claimed in claim 19, in which the coal is reacted with the ferric iron solution at a temperature of less than 90° C.
26. The process as claimed in claim 25, in which said temperature is between 60° C. and 180° C.
27. The process as claimed in claim 24, in which the nitric acid used to oxidize the elemental sulphur is at a concentration of less than 2.75% by mass.
28. A process for reducing the pyritic sulphur content of coal the process
reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution at a temperature of less than 100° C. to oxidise the pyritic sulphur to elemental sulphur;
reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur in an acidic solution with nitric acid at a concentration of less than 10% by mass to oxidise the elemental sulphur forming sulphuric acid; and
separating the coal from the acidic sulphuric acid containing solution to provide coal with a reduced pyritic sulphur content.
29. The process as claimed in claim 28, in which the coal is reacted with the ferric ion solution at a temperature of less than 90° C.
30. The process as claimed in claim 29, in which said temperature is between 60° C. and 80° C.
31. The process as claimed in claim 28, in which the ferric ion solution is selected from the group consisting of a ferric sulphate solution, a ferric chloride solution, a ferric nitrate solution and mixtures thereof.
32. The process as claimed in claim 28, which includes adjusting the pH of the ferric ion solution to be acidic.
33. The process as claimed in claim 32, in which the pH of the ferric ion solution is maintained at less than 1.
34. The process as claimed in claim 28, in which the elemental sulphur is reacted with nitric acid at a temperature of less than 71° C., but at least 40° C.
35. The process as claimed in claim 28, which includes, after reacting the coal with a ferric ion solution, separating the coal, which includes elemental sulphur from the ferric ion solution before reacting the coal and the elemental sulphur with nitric acid.
36. The process as claimed in claim 28, in which the nitric acid used to oxidize the elemental sulphur is at a concentration of less than 2.75% by mass.
US12/014,306 2007-01-18 2008-01-15 Coal desulphurization Abandoned US20080250706A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ZA2007/00528 2007-01-18
ZA200700528 2007-01-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080250706A1 true US20080250706A1 (en) 2008-10-16

Family

ID=39434322

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/014,306 Abandoned US20080250706A1 (en) 2007-01-18 2008-01-15 Coal desulphurization

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20080250706A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1950275A2 (en)
AU (1) AU2007211951A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200706429B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100287827A1 (en) * 2009-05-13 2010-11-18 Chandrashekhar Sonwane Process for obtaining treated coal and silica from coal containing fly ash

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110030271A1 (en) * 2009-08-10 2011-02-10 General Electric Company Method for removing impurities from coal in a reaction chamber
US20110030270A1 (en) * 2009-08-10 2011-02-10 General Electric Company Methods for removing impurities from coal including neutralization of a leaching solution
CN102120141A (en) * 2010-12-03 2011-07-13 青岛大学 Method for desulfurizing flue gas by using coal slime

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4569678A (en) * 1984-05-25 1986-02-11 Simpson Charles H Method for removing pyritic, organic and elemental sulfur from coal

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4569678A (en) * 1984-05-25 1986-02-11 Simpson Charles H Method for removing pyritic, organic and elemental sulfur from coal

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100287827A1 (en) * 2009-05-13 2010-11-18 Chandrashekhar Sonwane Process for obtaining treated coal and silica from coal containing fly ash

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1950275A2 (en) 2008-07-30
AU2007211951A1 (en) 2008-08-07
ZA200706429B (en) 2010-07-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5453253A (en) Method of reprocessing jarosite-containing residues
SE452307B (en) PROCEDURE FOR PURIFICATION OF POLLUTANEOUS WATER SOLUTIONS CONTAINING ARSENIC AND / OR PHOSPHORUS
TW200819398A (en) Process for recycling waste acid
US20080250706A1 (en) Coal desulphurization
CN105567976B (en) A kind of vanadium extraction industrial acidic wastewater processing and the method for valuable metal synthetical recovery
US9555362B2 (en) Method for separating arsenic and heavy metals in an acidic washing solution
CA1203029A (en) Treatment of solutions to facilitate the removal of ferric iron therefrom
US4491454A (en) Sulfur removal from coal
US11008221B2 (en) Polyferric sulphate solution
JP6015824B2 (en) Processing method of copper smelting ash
CN103131847A (en) Method for desulphurizing high-sulphur rhodochrosite
US8906328B2 (en) Heap leaching of manganese-containing ores
FI56553C (en) EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR EXHAUST METALS WITHOUT VAT
FI64790B (en) FOERFARANDE FOER ROSTNING AV SELENHALTIGT MATERIAL
CA3157393A1 (en) Vanadium recovery process
CN114761586A (en) Solid-liquid-solid hydrometallurgical process optimised to improve the dissolution of metals from ores and/or concentrates in acid-chloride media
US4210422A (en) Removal of sulfur compounds from coal during pipeline transport
SU1119984A2 (en) Method of removing sodium sulfate from aqueous solutions
US4008306A (en) Method of recovering manganese values from a mixture obtained by catalytically oxidizing a paraffin with gaseous oxygen
EP2773783A1 (en) Extraction of uranium from wet-process phosphoric acid
US20220017390A1 (en) Method for the precipitation of arsenic and heavy metals from acidic process water
GB2246561A (en) Aqueous ferric sulphate solutions
CN106621167B (en) A kind of technique and system of electric field synergistic stabilization processes multivalent state arsenic-containing waste residue
EP0126763A1 (en) A method for producing pure sulphuric acid and a high-grade mercury product from gases that contain sulphur dioxide and mercury
US2114354A (en) Process for utilization of spent reagents

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EXXARO COAL LIMITED, SOUTH AFRICA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KWELA, ZOLA N.;REEL/FRAME:021192/0908

Effective date: 20080626

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION