US20080222514A1 - Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents - Google Patents
Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080222514A1 US20080222514A1 US12/126,532 US12653208A US2008222514A1 US 20080222514 A1 US20080222514 A1 US 20080222514A1 US 12653208 A US12653208 A US 12653208A US 2008222514 A1 US2008222514 A1 US 2008222514A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- character string
- electronic
- node
- operations
- media
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/166—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
- G06F40/186—Templates
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/12—Use of codes for handling textual entities
- G06F40/14—Tree-structured documents
- G06F40/143—Markup, e.g. Standard Generalized Markup Language [SGML] or Document Type Definition [DTD]
Definitions
- This invention relates to systems and methods for editing an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) document.
- XML eXtensible Markup Language
- XML is increasingly becoming the preferred format for transferring information.
- XML is a tag-based hierarchical language that is extremely rich in terms of the information that it can be used to represent.
- XML can be used to represent information spanning the spectrum from semi-structured information (such as one would find in a word processing document) to highly structured information (such as that which is contained in a table).
- XML is well-suited for many types of communication including business-to-business and client-to-server communication.
- XML, XSLT, and XML Schema For more information on XML, XSLT, and XML Schema, the reader is referred to the following documents which are the work of, and available from the W3C (World Wide Web consortium): XML 1.0 second edition specification; XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0; XML Schema section 1: Structures; and XML Schema section 2: Datatypes.
- W3C World Wide Web consortium
- Electronic forms are commonly used to aid in collecting information into an XML document.
- Electronic forms can be governed by a template, which can provide rules by which an XML document can be presented as an electronic form, such as with data-entry fields for entry of data.
- HTML and XML Schemas To create these templates, however, a programmer often needs a significant understanding of HTML and XML Schemas. A programmer often needs to understand how data-entry fields in an electronic form governed by the template are represented in the schema, HTML file, and XML document. The programmer also may need to understand how HTML, XML, and XML Schemas are structured and how they interrelate. Thus, to build a template, a programmer often must have significant experience and skill.
- a programmer may need to build a program to allow a user to edit an XML document governed by this template.
- an editing application is described that is capable of identifying nodes of an XML document that are editable and operations permitted for those nodes using elements of an electronic-form template.
- the editing application presents an XML document as an electronic form having data-entry fields representing nodes of the XML document.
- the editing application presents those nodes that are identified as editable in a parent element in another XML document governing the first XML document.
- the editing application enables certain operations for those editable nodes through the data-entry fields if a child element of the parent element identifies them.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a system with a display screen, computer, and user-input devices.
- the system implements a method for designing an electronic-form template.
- the system also implements a method for editing XML documents using an electronic-form template.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary component display area
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for generating electronic-form templates.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a component display area and a blank form-design area.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template, and a component display area.
- FIG. 7 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 6 after the electronic-form template comprises another component.
- FIG. 8 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 7 after the electronic-form template comprises other components.
- FIG. 9 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 8 showing also a component context menu and a structure submenu.
- FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary hierarchical view display area, a change inquiry window, and an add window.
- FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for editing an XML document using an electronic-form template.
- FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document having one editable node.
- FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document following an electronic-form template.
- FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a computer system that is capable of supporting processes for creation and use of an electronic-form template.
- the following disclosure describes a user-friendly way to design electronic-form templates using components and a form-designing area of a display.
- Components are presented in an area of a display screen, usually graphically, such as with an arrangement of icons. Icons representing each component are a simplification so that a designer can more easily understand the purpose of and choose from a list of components. A designer can choose each component that he or she wishes to include in an electronic-form template.
- the designer can choose a component, such as by clicking on an icon representing a component, and placing it in a form-designing area.
- the form-designing area is presented in an area of a display screen, usually appearing as a blank page, such as is often done when viewing a new document in a word-processing application.
- Components placed in a form-designing area can be manipulated by a designer to allow the designer to create an electronic-form template that provides a particular look and feel for an electronic-form representation of an XML document. Also by choosing particular components, a designer can build into the electronic-form template various types of permitted operations (e.g., editing operations).
- the electronic-form template (and its views) is altered to reflect that change.
- This incremental building of an electronic-form template and its views, and the fact that the views are linked so that a change to one can almost instantly be reflected in the other, allows a designer to quickly, easily, and intuitively create electronic-form templates.
- the resulting electronic-form template reflects a designer's chosen look, feel, and editing options for nodes of XML documents that are to be governed by the electronic-form template.
- nodes of an XML document can be located within the XML document, displayed, and made editable.
- an editor application is used to determine, based on this electronic-form template, how nodes of an XML document are to be edited.
- the visual representation of the components, hierarchical view, electronic-form design view, and XML document are described in the context of a single computer, a set of user-input devices, and a single display screen having areas for displaying a representation of the components, the electronic-form design view, the hierarchical view, and the XML document.
- the display screen, computer, and user-input devices will be described first, followed by a discussion of the techniques in which these and other devices can be used.
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary implementation of various devices and applications that can be used to facilitate the creation of an electronic-form template from components and enable editing of XML documents governed by the created electronic-form template.
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system 100 , which comprises a screen 102 , user-input devices 104 , and a computer 106 .
- the user-input devices 104 can comprise any device allowing a computer to receive a designer's preferences (or edits from an end-user), such as a keyboard 114 , other device(s) 116 , and a mouse 118 .
- the other input devices 116 can comprise a touch screen, a voice-activated input device, a track ball, and any other device that allows the system 100 to receive input.
- the computer 106 comprises a processing unit 120 and random access memory and/or read-only memory 122 including applications, such as an operating system 124 , a design application 126 , a user interface 128 , an editor application 130 , an electronic-form template 132 , and an XML document 134 .
- the computer 106 communicates with a designer and end-user through the screen 102 and the user-input devices 104 .
- the screen 102 comprises three displays or screen areas: a hierarchical view display area 108 ; a component display area 110 ; and an electronic-form-design area 112 . With these areas, a designer can see a representation of and select a component from a list of components. Any part or all of the screen 102 can be used to present an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 . With this representation an end-user can edit or view the XML document 134 .
- FIG. 2 shows an exemplary design screen 200 , including an example of the form-design area 112 and the hierarchical view display area 108 (entitled “Data Source”).
- a design view 202 of an exemplary embodiment of the electronic-form template 132 is partially within the form-design area 112 .
- This design view 202 provides information useful to aid a designer in constructing the electronic-form template 132 .
- an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 for editing and/or viewing by an end-user e.g., a data-entry user
- these user interfaces can reflect operations permitted by components added to the electronic-form template 132 by the designer.
- This electronic-form template 132 shown in the design view 202 is being built from components chosen by a designer.
- the components chosen are used by the design application 126 to create the data-entry fields shown in the design view 202 .
- These data-entry fields are one way in which the electronic-form template 132 can be represented to a designer or an end-user.
- These data-entry fields correspond to parts of the electronic-form template 132 , the parts also being shown through the icons displayed in the hierarchical view display area 108 .
- the icons displayed are a representation of part of the electronic-form template 132 and are arranged into a tree structure.
- FIG. 3 shows an example of components from which a designer can choose, which are displayed here at the component display area 110 .
- These various components comprise a text box 302 , a rich text box 304 , a drop-down list box 306 , a list box 308 , a date picker 310 , a check box 312 , an option button 314 , a section 316 , an optional section 318 , a repeating section 320 , a repeating table 322 , a bulleted list 324 , a numbered list 326 , a plain list 328 , a button 330 , and hyperlink 332 .
- Other components can be included as well.
- each of these components can be added to indicate an operation or operations that is permitted to be performed on a node or nodes of the XML document 134 .
- some of these components will be represented in an electronic form by data-entry fields enabling the component's operation.
- These data-entry fields can be associated with appropriate nodes of the XML document 134 .
- the entry can be reflected in the XML document 134 .
- the system 100 enables a designer to build the electronic-form template 132 .
- These components enable many different possible types of operations (and user interfaces), such as those shown with various data-entry fields in the design view 202 in the form-design area 112 of FIG. 2 .
- the process used to build the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below.
- FIG. 14 Another example of another known device that can be substituted for those shown in FIG. 1 is the device shown in FIG. 14 .
- Other examples include portable, handheld, or wireless devices.
- a system such as the system 100 of FIG. 1 , displays components to a designer.
- the designer can choose from the components to graphically and easily build the electronic-form template 132 .
- the system 100 can also incrementally build the electronic-form template 132 with each new component the designer adds.
- the system 100 also allows the designer to see two views of the electronic-form template 132 , here the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 .
- the system 100 then alters each view with each new component chosen.
- the designer may also change components existing in the electronic-form template 132 , the change to each being incrementally reflected in the views by the system 100 .
- FIG. 4 shows a process 400 for generating the electronic-form template 132 .
- the process 400 and the following processes are illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by the system 100 . These processes may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, the processes represent a set of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions stored in the memory 122 and executable by the processing unit 120 .
- the user interface 128 displays components and a form-design area. It does so to enable a designer to graphically design the electronic-form template 132 .
- FIG. 5 shows a design screen 500 created by the user interface 128 , having an example of the component display area 110 and a blank example of the form-design area 112 .
- the form-design area 112 is displayed to make it easy for a designer without typical programming skills to create the electronic-form template 132 .
- the user interface 128 can provide an editing experience to a designer similar to that commonly provided in word-processing systems.
- the user interface 128 can, for instance, work like a word-processing system by providing similar font controls and options.
- FIG. 5 for example, the user interface 128 displays the form-design area 112 looking like a page from a word-processing application—here, a blank white page. It can also display commonly used icons that represent operations that a designer can choose to perform, such as the font being used (in FIG. 5 , Verdana, size 10), bold/underline/italic options, and the like.
- These word-processing icons can be displayed in many different ways, including as shown in a word-processing icon display 502 of FIG. 5 .
- the components are displayed by the user interface 128 in the component display area 110 to make it easy for a designer without extensive knowledge of components to be able to understand what each of them can represent in the electronic-form template 132 .
- the user interface 128 displays icons and/or text to inform the designer, such as with the icons and text set forth in the component display area 110 set forth in FIGS. 3 and 5 .
- the text box 302 comprises an icon (i.e., a symbol) and text describing what a text box component represents.
- This icon shows a designer that, should he choose to include a text box component in his electronic-form template 132 , an operation allowing entry and editing of text for a node in the XML document 134 will be added to the electronic-form template 132 .
- the editor application 130 can then present the node of the XML document 134 in an electronic form as a data-entry field allowing input of text.
- the text describing the text box 302 (“Text Box”) is also descriptive.
- the designer can begin to build the electronic-form template 132 and view what an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 can look like. He can continue to build the electronic-form template 132 by adding components, but can also alter the electronic-form template 132 by altering existing components.
- This process of building and altering is shown as a design sub-process 403 , which includes blocks 404 to 412 .
- the sub-process 403 includes blocks used to describe the action and interaction of the designer and the system 100 .
- the design application 126 produces an electronic-form representation mirroring the operations allowed by the electronic-form template 132 (block 414 ). The process 403 and the block 414 will be described in greater detail below.
- the designer can pick a component from the list of components in the component display area 110 for insertion into the form-design area 112 (block 404 ).
- the designer can pick from components in various ways, including through the mouse 118 , the other devices 116 (such as a touch screen, track ball, voice-activation, and the like), and through the keyboard 114 , which are shown in FIG. 1 .
- the system 100 enables the designer to move the component in the form-design area 112 to where she desires.
- a designer can pick a component, for example, by dragging and dropping (from the component display area 110 ) a component's icon onto a form-design area 112 shown in FIG. 5 .
- the designer can pick a component to drag and drop with various devices, such as with the mouse 118 or commands entered through the keyboard 114 .
- the designer clicks on the icon and text for the text box 302 to select it.
- FIG. 6 shows an exemplary screen display 600 showing what the design application 126 creates after a designer selects the text box 302 in FIG. 5 (also shown in FIG. 6 ).
- the system 100 creates a text-function node 604 allowing entry of text, here represented by the text-box data-entry field 602 , which looks like a gray box for entry of text and is labeled “String 1:”.
- the design application 126 enables the designer to continue building his electronic-form template 132 by selecting components, thereby creating certain allowed operations associated with nodes of the XML document 134 .
- the design application 126 created part of the electronic-form template 132 that indicates a permitted function (here a text-entry function) with the text-function node 604 .
- the system 100 can identify which component was selected, identify the placement for that component on the form-design area 112 , build the electronic-form template 132 based on the component chosen and its location, and display the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 .
- These tasks are set forth in blocks 406 , 408 , 410 , and 414 of FIG. 4 , which will be described below.
- the design application 126 identifies which component was selected.
- the system 100 can access and/or contain many components, either from local or remote sources. Some of these components are set forth (via icons and text) in the component display area 110 shown in FIGS. 3 , 5 , 6 , and 7 .
- the design application 126 identifies where a component is placed in the form-design area 112 .
- the placement of the component can alter the structure of the electronic-form template 132 . How the placement of a component can alter the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below.
- the design application 126 will identify the component and this placement. With this information, the system 100 proceeds to build the electronic-form template 132 , which will be described in part using FIGS. 5 and 6 .
- the design application 126 changes the electronic-form template 132 based on a component selected.
- the design application 126 also changes the hierarchical view 204 and the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 by building in a representation of the added component.
- the design application 126 changes the views to reflect that alteration.
- a syntax also called a “character string”
- An exemplary list of operations and their related, operational syntaxes are shown below:
- An operation permitted can govern, for instance, how and what kind of information is permitted to be added into a node or nodes of the XML document 134 that is associated with that operational syntax.
- the node or nodes of the XML document 134 can be associated with the operational syntax.
- the operational syntax can be associated with a location syntax, such as an XPath expression. Both the operational syntax and the location syntax can be included within an XML element added to the electronic-form template 132 . XML elements will be described in greater detail below.
- FIG. 7 shows an exemplary screen display 700 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132 .
- the designer chose another component (the check box 312 of FIG. 6 ) to add to the electronic-form template 132 shown in FIG. 6 .
- the design application 126 adds the following XML element to the electronic-form template 132 :
- the design application 126 represents the added editability element as a Rich Text Box 702 .
- the Rich Text Box 702 is labeled “Xhtml 1”.
- the design application 126 altered the hierarchical view 204 to include an XHTML section 704 (labeled “xhtml1”) corresponding to the Rich Text Box 702 and the editability element.
- This editability element comprises XML attributes and additional child elements. These elements and attributes provide information that the editor application 130 can use to determine that a node or nodes of the XML document 134 are editable. These elements and attributes also provide the editor application 130 with information indicating which operations are permitted for these editable nodes.
- Syntax of the editability element indicates a name and/or location in the XML document 134 of a node or nodes. With this indicator, the editor application 130 can determine which node or nodes are potentially editable with operations permitted by this editability element. In one implementation, by using all of the electronic-form template 132 , the editor application 130 can determine all nodes in the XML document 134 that are potentially editable.
- the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/xhtml1” (the “value” of the attribute).
- This indicator can be used to determine that nodes having the name and/or location of “myFields/xhtml1” are potentially editable.
- the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate node(s) matching this XPath expression.
- An additional attribute can also be included, to indicate contextual conditions, if any, that should be present for the node to be deemed editable.
- a ‘container’ attribute can also be included, to indicate contextual conditions, if any, that should be present for the node to be deemed editable.
- the node indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” is editable without contextual conditions.
- an “operation element” in the editability element indicates operations (e.g., editing functions) permitted to be performed on or with the node(s) indicated in the editability element.
- the operation element entitled “editWith” indicates that operations associated with “xField” of type “rich” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1”.
- the operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from the syntax given in the operation element.
- the syntax “xField” with the additional “type” attribute, with value “rich” indicates an operation of rich-text editing, such as deleting and inserting text, changing the formatting of text, making it bold or italics, and other familiar rich-text editing operations familiar to word-processing.
- the nodes or data within the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” may be edited using these operations.
- the operation element can indicate permitted operations in various manners.
- a syntax of the operation element includes an element specifying the XML data able to be inserted by the associated operations.
- the electronic-form template 132 governs how information is handled and operations permitted for the XML document 134 for which it corresponds. Because the electronic-form template 132 comprises an editability element and its parts for each component chosen by the designer, the chosen component affects the syntax of the electronic-form template 132 .
- each component built into the electronic-form template 132 can govern the look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry field(s), as well as how and where information entered into these data-entry field(s) is mapped, such as to nodes of the XML document 134 .
- the editor application 130 can, however, use less than all of the electronic-form template 132 . It can, for instance, determine potentially editable nodes and operations permitted, but use a different look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry fields (or not use data-entry fields at all).
- Block 410 will be discussed first below, followed later by a discussion of block 414 .
- the user interface 128 displays the electronic-form template's 132 views.
- the hierarchical view 204 can be represented in various ways, including by visually showing the hierarchical structure of the electronic-form template 132 , if applicable.
- One example of this is the indentations of the hierarchical view 204 set forth in the hierarchical view display area 108 of FIG. 2 .
- the electronic-form template 132 can be represented in various ways.
- the user interface 128 can display the design view 202 to make it easy for a designer to understand the structure of the electronic-form template 132 , or can show the electronic-form template 132 without additional information.
- the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 can mimic an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 potentially seen by a user, such as set forth in the form-design area 112 of FIG. 2 .
- the design view 202 can show components built into the electronic-form template 132 with additional information showing details about the data-entry field or fields corresponding to the components to aid a designer in understanding and altering the components in the electronic-form template 132 .
- the user interface 128 can also display the hierarchical view 204 in order for the designer to assess the electronic-form template 132 after each change made by the designer. When the designer can quickly see the effect of his changes, the designer can more easily build the electronic-form template 132 to match the designer's intended results.
- the designer can continue to make changes or end the process. Ending the process will be discussed as part of the block 414 , described below.
- the design application 126 will build the electronic-form template 132 based on the identity and placement of the component.
- the electronic-form template 132 can be built incrementally. That is to say, with each component chosen, or in some implementations with each other action taken that will affect a view of the electronic-form template 132 , the electronic-form template 132 is altered. This incrementalism allows a designer to quickly see how the electronic-form template 132 is changing with each change made by the designer. The designer does not have to work on either a form or a schema and then save the form or schema to see how the corresponding schema or form looks or performs. Instead, as the designer makes a change, it is reflected in the views of the electronic-form template 132 . This makes designing an electronic-form template 132 easy and intuitive.
- the design application 126 can reflect each change made by a designer to both views of the electronic-form template 132 so quickly that the designer sees it in real time, regardless of whether the change was made to the electronic-form template 132 by altering the design view 202 or the hierarchical view 204 . By so doing, the designer can more easily design electronic-form templates.
- the design application 126 continues to enable the designer to add components to the electronic-form template 132 , returning to block 404 , or alter an existing component, block 412 .
- FIG. 2 is one view of an electronic-form template built from many components.
- FIG. 8 shows an exemplary design screen 800 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132 .
- the design screen 800 shows the views of the electronic-form template 132 from FIGS. 6 and 7 , and the results of the designer continuing to choose components.
- a designer can build everything from a simple electronic-form template, such as shown in FIG. 6 , to a moderately complex electronic-form template, such as shown FIG. 8 , to a large, complex electronic-form template, such as shown in FIG. 2 .
- the design application 126 adds the following editability element to the electronic-form template 132 :
- the editability element (entitled “xmlToEdit”) includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/container2/repeating_string” (the “value” of the attribute).
- This indicator gives a name/location of nodes in the XML document 134 that are potentially editable.
- the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate (i.e., identify) the nodes.
- This editability element also comprises a “container” attribute having a value, in this example, of: “myFields/container2”.
- This attribute determines a dynamic contextual condition for being able to edit the potentially editable nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”. In this implementation they are editable only if a node matching the XPath expression: “/myFields/container2” (an ancestor of “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) is shown (or rendered) as a section within an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 , and if the user of the editor application has selected a field somewhere within that section. In this example, the condition is met if the data-entry field is rendered within the section corresponding to the “myFields/container2” node's. If not, the editability element does not permit its operations for the potentially editable node(s).
- This editability element also contains an operation element entitled “editWith”. This operation element indicates that operations associated with “xCollection” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”, if the condition is met.
- the operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from its syntax.
- the syntax “xCollection” indicates a certain set of operations, described in part above.
- the set indicated by “xCollection” comprises selecting, inserting, deleting, pasting, and copying the potentially editable nodes (indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) or their subordinate nodes.
- a repeating section 804 is shown in the design view 202 of the XML document 134 .
- This repeating section 804 comprises data-entry fields shown at numerals 810 , 812 , and 814 . These data-entry fields represent the potentially editable nodes for the editability element.
- the editor application 130 can determine that the three nodes matching the XPath expression “myFields/container2/repeating_string” can be edited. Thus, by following the electronic-form template 132 , the editor application 130 can correctly enable editing according to the “xCollection” syntax of the operation element.
- the editor 130 can present the data-entry fields 810 , 812 , and 814 in an electronic form (e.g., through the user interface 128 ).
- the editor application 130 can also enable permitted operations on these data-entry fields (and thus their associated nodes of the XML document 134 ).
- the editor application 130 enables selection of and insertion, deletion, pasting, and copying of the editable nodes associated with the data-entry fields 810 , 812 , and 814 .
- a designer can simply make a change, like adding a component, to a view and see the change applied to both views.
- the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 are actively linked. This active linkage makes designing and changing the electronic-form template 132 quicker, easier, and more intuitive.
- the design application 126 enables a designer to select and alter existing components included in the electronic-form template 132 .
- the design application 126 allows the designer to intuitively and easily alter the views of the electronic-form template 132 , such as by including editing tools familiar to designers that know word-processing techniques.
- a designer can change a component stylistically (such as the font, color, size, and the like) and structurally (such as by changing a text box to a check box, and whether or to which other components the component governs or is subordinate).
- a designer can make these changes also by altering how a component (such as one displayed as a data-entry field) is represented on the design view 202 .
- a designer can click on a component on the form-design screen 112 , change the style, move it, delete it, and the like.
- the design application 126 alters the hierarchical view to continue to correspond to the altering electronic-form template 132 and its design view 202 .
- FIG. 8 shows the exemplary design screen 800 , which provides another example of the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 of an example of the electronic-form template 132 .
- the design application 126 (through the user interface 128 ) enables the designer to click on components displayed in the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 .
- a text box data-entry field 802 (labeled “String 5”), is shown as an example. Once the designer selects a component, in this example the text box data-entry field 802 , the design application 126 provides the designer with multiple options to change the data-entry field.
- the design application 126 provides options in a way comfortable to a designer familiar with common word-processing techniques and icons. If the designer clicked on the text box data-entry field 802 of FIG. 8 , the design application 126 can provide multiple pop-up menus of options for the designer.
- FIG. 9 sets forth the exemplary design screen 900 including multiple ways in which the design application 126 provides options for a designer. These comprise a component context menu 902 and a structure submenu 904 .
- the design application 126 enables the designer to change the electronic-form template 132 by changing a representation of a component in the form-design area 112 (such as a data-entry field or accompanying graphics and text).
- the design application 126 enables the designer to cut the component and move it (through selection and deleting or dragging the component), and change its font, borders, shading, and other style changes (through the component context menu 902 ), as well as change its structure (through the structure submenu 904 ).
- the designer changes the component by changing the structure of a data-entry field corresponding to the component (the text box data-entry field 802 ) into a date picker data-entry field by selecting a date picker component 906 .
- FIG. 10 shows an example of the hierarchical view display area 108 , and how it can be used by a designer to alter the electronic-form template 132 .
- a designer selected an integer node 1002 representing an editability element of the electronic-form template 132 .
- the design application 126 prompts the designer, asking for information, such as through a change inquiry window 1004 .
- the design application 126 enables the designer to make various changes to the editability element represented by the node 1002 . He can change, for instance, the data type and default value allowed for this editability element in the electronic-form template 132 .
- the design application 126 presents the designer with the current name, type, and data type of a selected editability element. The designer can then make changes by altering these current parameters of a selected editability element, such as set forth in the change inquiry window 1004 by changing the name to “myNewField” from “element” and the data type to “Text (string)” from “Whole Number (integer)” for the editability element represented by the node 1002 .
- FIG. 10 shows an example of a pop-up window with which the design application 126 can enable a designer to alter editability elements.
- the designer can add or delete aspects of an editability element, such as a name and repeatability of an element or establish whether or not it is allowed to be blank.
- the design application 126 makes appropriate changes to the electronic-form template 132 and its views. If the designer deletes a component, for instance, the design application 126 may delete the syntax (e.g., the editability element) corresponding to the component from the electronic-form template 132 .
- the syntax e.g., the editability element
- the end product is the electronic-form template 132 .
- One example of an electronic-form template created by the design application 126 is the purchase order example of the design view 202 of FIG. 2 .
- This purchase order electronic-form template 132 can be used by the editor application 130 to present an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 with appropriate permitted operations.
- the editor application 130 can enable this electronic-form representation to be edited by an end user, such as by allowing that user to perform an operation like keying in information into some of the data-entry fields. After entry of information, the information can be stored in the XML document 134 .
- the information stored can conform to the electronic-form template 132 , thereby allowing easy use and/or transfer of information stored in the XML document 134 .
- the electronic-form template 132 can be written in various languages, including schemas written to govern markup languages (such as XML). Schemas governing XML documents are commonly called XML Schemas, DTD (Document Type Definition) schemas, and XDR (XML-Data Reduced) schemas.
- the electronic-form template 132 can govern many different documents. Because of this, the electronic-form template 132 can be used to enable thousands of different users keying information into thousands of different documents, all of which can be governed by the electronic-form template 132 .
- the electronic-form template 132 comprises information by which an application can determine which nodes of an XML document are editable and in what manner.
- the editor application 130 of FIG. 1 is described above as one embodiment of an application that can use the electronic-form template 132 to aid in editing XML documents.
- the XML document 134 is assumed associated with the electronic-form template 132 . This association can be determined in various manners, such as by reading text in the XML document 134 indicating a relationship with the electronic-form template 132 .
- FIG. 11 shows a process 1100 for editing the XML document 134 .
- the editor application 130 uses the electronic-form template 132 to determine which nodes of the XML document 134 are editable.
- the electronic-form template 132 can also aid the editor application 130 in determining in what way those nodes are editable.
- the editor application 130 determines, using the electronic-form template 132 , that a node of the XML document 134 is potentially editable.
- the editor application 130 can do so by reading and analyzing editability elements in the electronic-form template 132 .
- the editability element comprises an indicator with a character string of “xmlToEdit”. This string indicates that a node or nodes associated with the indicator are editable (or potentially editable).
- This editability element also comprises an “item” attribute, which is usable to identify which nodes are editable.
- An XPath expression identifying the editable nodes is associated with this attribute (the “value” of the attribute).
- the editor application 130 can use the XPath expression in the editability element to determine which nodes of the XML document 134 are editable.
- the electronic-form template 132 comprises the following editability element:
- the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an “item” attribute, whose “value” is an XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”. This XPath expression indicates to the editor application 130 that nodes in the XML document 134 that match this expression are editable (or potentially editable).
- the editor application 130 presents data of the editable node.
- the editor application 130 can present this data using an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 and/or the editable node.
- the editor application 130 can do so with aid from the user interface 128 or otherwise.
- FIG. 12 shows an example of an electronic-form representation 1200 of the editable node.
- the editor application 130 presents the data of the editable node as an order data-entry field 1202 .
- a data-entry field presenting data of an editable node can be blank, such as when no information has been entered into the data-entry field.
- a data-entry field can also include information previously stored in the editable node, which in some cases can be edited, depending on what operations are permitted for the editable node.
- the editor application 130 determines what operations are permitted to be performed on the editable node. This determination can be performed by the editor application 130 prior to presenting the data of the editable node. In some cases determining the operations permitted can affect how data is presented.
- the editor application 130 determines the permitted operations based on an operation element of the electronic-form template 132 , discussed in part above.
- the operation element and the editability element are associated, such as by the operation element being a child element to the editability element.
- the operation element indicates operations permitted to be performed on the editable node.
- the operation element comprises a character string of “editWith”. This character string indicates to the editor application 130 that the operation element indicates certain types of operations that are permitted. Following this character string, another character sting of “component” is included. This character string can indicate that a value associated with the “component” string that is usable to determine permitted operations.
- the operation element comprises an operational syntax of “xCollection”. This syntax indicates the operations permitted to be performed on nodes of the XML document 134 matching the XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”.
- the editor application 130 can determine the operations associated with this syntax in various ways.
- the editor application 130 can use this syntax to locate executable code for this operation.
- executable code for operations indicated by various syntaxes are included within the editor application 130 .
- the editor application 130 enables the permitted operations.
- the editor application 130 can do so by supplying a user interface appropriate for the permitted operations.
- the editor application 130 can provide a word-processor-like experience in a data-entry field.
- the order data-entry field 1202 can be used as a user interface to enter data, delete data, copy and paste data, and the like.
- the editor application 130 by determining editable nodes and permitted operations for them, can enable certain types of editing for various editable nodes of the XML document 134 .
- the editor application 130 receives a selection of an enabled operation. Continuing the ongoing example, the editor application 130 can receive entry of “ACME Tire Company” into the order data-entry field 1202 .
- the editor application 130 alters data in the editable node (or the editable node itself or associated nodes) of XML document 134 by performing the selected operation.
- the editor application 130 can receive the text “ACME Tire Company” and alter data within the order node to reflect this text.
- the editor application 130 can add the text “ACME Tire Company” to the order node.
- the electronic-form template 132 can permit many different types of operations. These comprise, for instance, operations mentioned above and those described below.
- the editor application 130 can use the electronic-form template 132 to determine what operations are permitted. With this determination, the editor application 130 can enable permitted operations.
- the editor application 130 can determine that the electronic-form template 132 , for the node(s) indicated by “workItems/workItem”, permits an operation of inserting nodes adjacent to this “workItem” node (or under the node corresponding to the container attribute: “workItems”).
- the operation element comprises a syntax of “xCollection”, which indicates a permitted operation of inserting or deleting subnodes adjacent to the editable node indicated by “workItems/workItem”.
- This operation is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element).
- This context is given by a value for a “container” attribute.
- the container attribute's value is given by a syntax “workItems”.
- This syntax comprises a XPath expression.
- the editor application 130 can determine, based on the syntax given, that operations are not permitted unless a node locatable with the XPath expression “workItems” is exposed.
- the editor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node (the parent of the “workItems/workItem” node) is exposed, if a section associated with it is exposed in an electronic-form rendering of the “workItems” node. If the editor application 130 is rendering the XML document 134 , the editor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node is exposed by checking whether it or its user interface has exposed the node.
- Additional information useful in performing operations can also be included in the electronic-form template 132 .
- syntax can also be included in the operation element to indicate what data is to be inserted in the XML document by the operations.
- This syntax comprises a “fragmentToInsert” child element to the editability element. Using this information, the editor application 130 can determine that a child element of the fragmentToInsert element contains the data to be inserted.
- the electronic-form template 132 editability element provides syntax permitting deletion of the editable node or nodes using the syntax of “xCollection”.
- This operation element comprises a character string of “editWith” and “component”.
- the syntax following “component” i.e., “xOptional” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine operations permitted for the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author”.
- this operation is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element).
- This context is given by the value of the “container” attribute, in this case: “issue”.
- fragmentToInsert a syntax “fragmentToInsert” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine where and what to insert.
- the character string of “chooseFragment” indicates that an “author” attribute node having an value: “author name” is permitted to be added to the “issue” node.
- the operation element corresponding to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xOptional”, permits addition of only one node. It also permits that node (locatable with “item/@author”) to then be deleted.
- an attribute of the operation element indicates textual operations permitted on data of the editable node. This indication corresponds to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xField”, indicating that textual operations are permitted.
- Various types of textual operations may also be included in the electronic-form template 132 .
- a value of “component”, here “xField”, can be used to indicate that textual editing of data of the editable node is permitted.
- a value of “type”, here “rich”, can be used to indicate that rich-text editing is permitted.
- the syntax following “component” of “xField” and “rich” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine that rich-text editing of data of the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author” is permitted.
- a type attribute given by a syntax “plain” indicates that an operation for creation and modification of plain-text-data (but not rich-text-formatted data) of the editable node is permitted.
- FIG. 13 shows an electronic-form representation 1300 of an example of the XML document 134 .
- the electronic form 1300 shows data-entry fields enabling plain-text operations to be performed, referenced at numerals 1302 and 1304 . It also shows enabling of other operations: a repeating table shown at numeral 1306 ; a bulleted list at 1308 ; and an optional section at 1310 . Editability elements for these enabled operations can be represented in the electronic-form template 132 with:
- FIG. 14 shows an exemplary computer system that can be used to implement the processes described herein.
- Computer 1442 comprises one or more processors or processing units 1444 , a system memory 1446 , and a bus 1448 that couples various system components including the system memory 1446 to processors 1444 .
- the bus 1448 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
- the system memory 1446 comprises read only memory (ROM) 1450 and random access memory (RAM) 1452 .
- a basic input/output system (BIOS) 1454 containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 1442 , such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 1450 .
- BIOS basic input/output system
- Computer 1442 further comprises a hard disk drive 1456 for reading from and writing to a hard disk (not shown), a magnetic disk drive 1458 for reading from and writing to a removable magnetic disk 1460 , and an optical disk drive 1462 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 1464 such as a CD ROM or other optical media.
- the hard disk drive 1456 , magnetic disk drive 1458 , and optical disk drive 1462 are connected to the bus 1448 by an SCSI interface 1466 or some other appropriate interface.
- the drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for computer 1442 .
- exemplary environment described herein employs a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk 1460 and a removable optical disk 1464 , it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer-readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.
- RAMs random access memories
- ROMs read only memories
- a number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk 1456 , magnetic disk 1460 , optical disk 1464 , ROM 1450 , or RAM 1452 , including an operating system 1470 , one or more application programs 1472 (such as the design application 126 and the editor application 130 ), other program modules 1474 , and program data 1476 .
- a user may enter commands and information into computer 1442 through input devices such as a keyboard 1478 and a pointing device 1480 .
- Other input devices may comprise a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like.
- These and other input devices are connected to the processing unit 1444 through an interface 1482 that is coupled to the bus 1448 .
- a monitor 1484 or other type of display device is also connected to the bus 1448 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1486 .
- personal computers typically comprise other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as speakers and printers.
- Computer 1442 commonly operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 1488 .
- the remote computer 1488 may be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically comprises many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 1442 .
- the logical connections depicted in FIG. 14 comprise a local area network (LAN) 1490 and a wide area network (WAN) 1492 .
- LAN local area network
- WAN wide area network
- computer 1442 When used in a LAN networking environment, computer 1442 is connected to the local network through a network interface or adapter 1494 . When used in a WAN networking environment, computer 1442 typically comprises a modem 1496 or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 1492 , such as the Internet.
- the modem 1496 which may be internal or external, is connected to the bus 1448 via a serial port interface 1468 .
- program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 1442 may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
- the data processors of computer 1442 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer.
- Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory.
- the system described herein comprises these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the blocks described, in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor.
- the system described can also comprise the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein.
- programs and other executable program components such as the operating system are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
Abstract
A system and method capable of identifying that a node of an extensible markup language (XML) document is editable using an element of an electronic-form template is described. In at least some embodiments, the system and method are capable of determining operations that are permitted for the identified node using another element of the electronic-form template.
Description
- This application is a Divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/781,586, having a filing date of Feb. 17, 2004, and entitled S
YSTEMS AND METHOD FOR EDITING XML DOCUMENTS. - U.S. patent application having Ser. No. 10/395,505, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,275,216, filed on Mar. 24, 2003, and entitled S
YSTEM AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING ELECTRONIC FORMS AND HIERARCHICAL SCHEMAS of Paoli, et al is related to this application. - This invention relates to systems and methods for editing an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) document.
- XML is increasingly becoming the preferred format for transferring information. XML is a tag-based hierarchical language that is extremely rich in terms of the information that it can be used to represent. For example, XML can be used to represent information spanning the spectrum from semi-structured information (such as one would find in a word processing document) to highly structured information (such as that which is contained in a table). XML is well-suited for many types of communication including business-to-business and client-to-server communication. For more information on XML, XSLT, and XML Schema, the reader is referred to the following documents which are the work of, and available from the W3C (World Wide Web consortium): XML 1.0 second edition specification; XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0; XML Schema section 1: Structures; and XML Schema section 2: Datatypes.
- Before information can be transferred, however, it must first be collected. Electronic forms are commonly used to aid in collecting information into an XML document. Electronic forms can be governed by a template, which can provide rules by which an XML document can be presented as an electronic form, such as with data-entry fields for entry of data.
- To create these templates, however, a programmer often needs a significant understanding of HTML and XML Schemas. A programmer often needs to understand how data-entry fields in an electronic form governed by the template are represented in the schema, HTML file, and XML document. The programmer also may need to understand how HTML, XML, and XML Schemas are structured and how they interrelate. Thus, to build a template, a programmer often must have significant experience and skill.
- In addition, to use the template, a programmer may need to build a program to allow a user to edit an XML document governed by this template.
- For these reasons, creating and using templates can be difficult, time consuming, and require a programmer of significant skill.
- In the following description and figures, an editing application is described that is capable of identifying nodes of an XML document that are editable and operations permitted for those nodes using elements of an electronic-form template.
- In one implementation, the editing application presents an XML document as an electronic form having data-entry fields representing nodes of the XML document. The editing application presents those nodes that are identified as editable in a parent element in another XML document governing the first XML document. The editing application enables certain operations for those editable nodes through the data-entry fields if a child element of the parent element identifies them.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a system with a display screen, computer, and user-input devices. The system implements a method for designing an electronic-form template. The system also implements a method for editing XML documents using an electronic-form template. -
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template. -
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary component display area. -
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for generating electronic-form templates. -
FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a component display area and a blank form-design area. -
FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template, and a component display area. -
FIG. 7 illustrates the exemplary screen display ofFIG. 6 after the electronic-form template comprises another component. -
FIG. 8 illustrates the exemplary screen display ofFIG. 7 after the electronic-form template comprises other components. -
FIG. 9 illustrates the exemplary screen display ofFIG. 8 showing also a component context menu and a structure submenu. -
FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary hierarchical view display area, a change inquiry window, and an add window. -
FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for editing an XML document using an electronic-form template. -
FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document having one editable node. -
FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document following an electronic-form template. -
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a computer system that is capable of supporting processes for creation and use of an electronic-form template. - The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
- The following disclosure describes a user-friendly way to design electronic-form templates using components and a form-designing area of a display. Components are presented in an area of a display screen, usually graphically, such as with an arrangement of icons. Icons representing each component are a simplification so that a designer can more easily understand the purpose of and choose from a list of components. A designer can choose each component that he or she wishes to include in an electronic-form template.
- The designer can choose a component, such as by clicking on an icon representing a component, and placing it in a form-designing area. The form-designing area is presented in an area of a display screen, usually appearing as a blank page, such as is often done when viewing a new document in a word-processing application. Components placed in a form-designing area can be manipulated by a designer to allow the designer to create an electronic-form template that provides a particular look and feel for an electronic-form representation of an XML document. Also by choosing particular components, a designer can build into the electronic-form template various types of permitted operations (e.g., editing operations).
- With each new component added or modified, and in some cases each change made to an electronic-form design view or its hierarchical view, the electronic-form template (and its views) is altered to reflect that change. This incremental building of an electronic-form template and its views, and the fact that the views are linked so that a change to one can almost instantly be reflected in the other, allows a designer to quickly, easily, and intuitively create electronic-form templates.
- The resulting electronic-form template reflects a designer's chosen look, feel, and editing options for nodes of XML documents that are to be governed by the electronic-form template. Thus, by following this electronic-form template, nodes of an XML document can be located within the XML document, displayed, and made editable. In one embodiment, an editor application is used to determine, based on this electronic-form template, how nodes of an XML document are to be edited.
- For discussion purposes, the visual representation of the components, hierarchical view, electronic-form design view, and XML document are described in the context of a single computer, a set of user-input devices, and a single display screen having areas for displaying a representation of the components, the electronic-form design view, the hierarchical view, and the XML document. The display screen, computer, and user-input devices will be described first, followed by a discussion of the techniques in which these and other devices can be used.
- System Architecture
-
FIG. 1 shows an exemplary implementation of various devices and applications that can be used to facilitate the creation of an electronic-form template from components and enable editing of XML documents governed by the created electronic-form template. -
FIG. 1 shows anexemplary system 100, which comprises ascreen 102, user-input devices 104, and acomputer 106. - The user-
input devices 104 can comprise any device allowing a computer to receive a designer's preferences (or edits from an end-user), such as akeyboard 114, other device(s) 116, and amouse 118. Theother input devices 116 can comprise a touch screen, a voice-activated input device, a track ball, and any other device that allows thesystem 100 to receive input. Thecomputer 106 comprises aprocessing unit 120 and random access memory and/or read-only memory 122 including applications, such as anoperating system 124, adesign application 126, auser interface 128, aneditor application 130, an electronic-form template 132, and anXML document 134. Thecomputer 106 communicates with a designer and end-user through thescreen 102 and the user-input devices 104. - The
screen 102 comprises three displays or screen areas: a hierarchicalview display area 108; acomponent display area 110; and an electronic-form-design area 112. With these areas, a designer can see a representation of and select a component from a list of components. Any part or all of thescreen 102 can be used to present an electronic-form representation of theXML document 134. With this representation an end-user can edit or view theXML document 134. -
FIG. 2 shows anexemplary design screen 200, including an example of the form-design area 112 and the hierarchical view display area 108 (entitled “Data Source”). Partially within the form-design area 112 is adesign view 202 of an exemplary embodiment of the electronic-form template 132. Thisdesign view 202 provides information useful to aid a designer in constructing the electronic-form template 132. As will be shown later, an electronic-form representation of theXML document 134 for editing and/or viewing by an end-user (e.g., a data-entry user) can appear similar to thisdesign view 202 of the electronic-form template 132, though this is not necessary. In cases where the electronic-form representation contains data-entry fields and similar user interfaces, these user interfaces can reflect operations permitted by components added to the electronic-form template 132 by the designer. - This electronic-
form template 132 shown in thedesign view 202 is being built from components chosen by a designer. The components chosen are used by thedesign application 126 to create the data-entry fields shown in thedesign view 202. These data-entry fields are one way in which the electronic-form template 132 can be represented to a designer or an end-user. These data-entry fields correspond to parts of the electronic-form template 132, the parts also being shown through the icons displayed in the hierarchicalview display area 108. The icons displayed are a representation of part of the electronic-form template 132 and are arranged into a tree structure. -
FIG. 3 shows an example of components from which a designer can choose, which are displayed here at thecomponent display area 110. These various components comprise atext box 302, arich text box 304, a drop-down list box 306, alist box 308, adate picker 310, acheck box 312, anoption button 314, asection 316, anoptional section 318, a repeatingsection 320, a repeating table 322, abulleted list 324, a numberedlist 326, aplain list 328, abutton 330, and hyperlink 332. Other components can be included as well. As described in further detail below, each of these components can be added to indicate an operation or operations that is permitted to be performed on a node or nodes of theXML document 134. By way of example, some of these components will be represented in an electronic form by data-entry fields enabling the component's operation. These data-entry fields can be associated with appropriate nodes of theXML document 134. Thus, when an end-user uses an electronic form's data-entry field to make an entry, for instance, the entry can be reflected in theXML document 134. - With the listed components and other components the
system 100 enables a designer to build the electronic-form template 132. These components enable many different possible types of operations (and user interfaces), such as those shown with various data-entry fields in thedesign view 202 in the form-design area 112 ofFIG. 2 . The process used to build the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below. - The above devices and applications are merely representative, and other known devices and applications may be substituted for or added to those shown in
FIG. 1 . One example of another known device that can be substituted for those shown inFIG. 1 is the device shown inFIG. 14 . Other examples include portable, handheld, or wireless devices. - Techniques for Building Electronic-Form Templates
- A system, such as the
system 100 ofFIG. 1 , displays components to a designer. The designer can choose from the components to graphically and easily build the electronic-form template 132. Thesystem 100 can also incrementally build the electronic-form template 132 with each new component the designer adds. Thesystem 100 also allows the designer to see two views of the electronic-form template 132, here thedesign view 202 and thehierarchical view 204. Thesystem 100 then alters each view with each new component chosen. The designer may also change components existing in the electronic-form template 132, the change to each being incrementally reflected in the views by thesystem 100. -
FIG. 4 shows aprocess 400 for generating the electronic-form template 132. Theprocess 400 and the following processes are illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by thesystem 100. These processes may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, the processes represent a set of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions stored in thememory 122 and executable by theprocessing unit 120. - At
block 402, theuser interface 128 displays components and a form-design area. It does so to enable a designer to graphically design the electronic-form template 132. -
FIG. 5 shows adesign screen 500 created by theuser interface 128, having an example of thecomponent display area 110 and a blank example of the form-design area 112. The form-design area 112 is displayed to make it easy for a designer without typical programming skills to create the electronic-form template 132. - To make it easy, the
user interface 128 can provide an editing experience to a designer similar to that commonly provided in word-processing systems. Theuser interface 128 can, for instance, work like a word-processing system by providing similar font controls and options. InFIG. 5 , for example, theuser interface 128 displays the form-design area 112 looking like a page from a word-processing application—here, a blank white page. It can also display commonly used icons that represent operations that a designer can choose to perform, such as the font being used (inFIG. 5 , Verdana, size 10), bold/underline/italic options, and the like. These word-processing icons can be displayed in many different ways, including as shown in a word-processing icon display 502 ofFIG. 5 . - Also, as stated elsewhere herein, changes made by the designer to the form-
design area 112 can be reflected in the form-design area 112 instantaneously (from the perspective of the designer), further making the design process similar to a typical word-processing experience. By so doing, theuser interface 128 makes designing the electronic-form template 132 simpler and more intuitive for a person skilled in word-processing. - The components are displayed by the
user interface 128 in thecomponent display area 110 to make it easy for a designer without extensive knowledge of components to be able to understand what each of them can represent in the electronic-form template 132. To show what each component represents, theuser interface 128 displays icons and/or text to inform the designer, such as with the icons and text set forth in thecomponent display area 110 set forth inFIGS. 3 and 5 . InFIG. 3 , for example, thetext box 302 comprises an icon (i.e., a symbol) and text describing what a text box component represents. This icon shows a designer that, should he choose to include a text box component in his electronic-form template 132, an operation allowing entry and editing of text for a node in theXML document 134 will be added to the electronic-form template 132. Theeditor application 130 can then present the node of theXML document 134 in an electronic form as a data-entry field allowing input of text. Like the icon, the text describing the text box 302 (“Text Box”) is also descriptive. - With the
component display area 110 and the form-design area 112 displayed, the designer can begin to build the electronic-form template 132 and view what an electronic-form representation of theXML document 134 can look like. He can continue to build the electronic-form template 132 by adding components, but can also alter the electronic-form template 132 by altering existing components. This process of building and altering is shown as adesign sub-process 403, which includesblocks 404 to 412. The sub-process 403 includes blocks used to describe the action and interaction of the designer and thesystem 100. When the designer has finished with the electronic-form template 132, thedesign application 126 produces an electronic-form representation mirroring the operations allowed by the electronic-form template 132 (block 414). Theprocess 403 and theblock 414 will be described in greater detail below. - When the
component display area 110 and the form-design area 112 are presented, the designer can pick a component from the list of components in thecomponent display area 110 for insertion into the form-design area 112 (block 404). The designer can pick from components in various ways, including through themouse 118, the other devices 116 (such as a touch screen, track ball, voice-activation, and the like), and through thekeyboard 114, which are shown inFIG. 1 . To grant flexibility to the designer, thesystem 100 enables the designer to move the component in the form-design area 112 to where she desires. - A designer can pick a component, for example, by dragging and dropping (from the component display area 110) a component's icon onto a form-
design area 112 shown inFIG. 5 . The designer can pick a component to drag and drop with various devices, such as with themouse 118 or commands entered through thekeyboard 114. InFIG. 5 , the designer clicks on the icon and text for thetext box 302 to select it. - How an icon for a component looks may not exactly indicate how it will look in an electronic-form representation of the
XML document 134 that follows the electronic-form template 132. Icons, for instance, are often too small to be exact. Rather, icons are designed to indicate functions or operations (e.g., editing functions) associated with nodes of theXML document 134 that choosing the component will permit. -
FIG. 6 shows anexemplary screen display 600 showing what thedesign application 126 creates after a designer selects thetext box 302 inFIG. 5 (also shown inFIG. 6 ). In this example, thesystem 100 creates a text-function node 604 allowing entry of text, here represented by the text-box data-entry field 602, which looks like a gray box for entry of text and is labeled “String 1:”. Thedesign application 126 enables the designer to continue building his electronic-form template 132 by selecting components, thereby creating certain allowed operations associated with nodes of theXML document 134. In this example, thedesign application 126 created part of the electronic-form template 132 that indicates a permitted function (here a text-entry function) with the text-function node 604. - Once the
system 100 receives a selection of a component and the placement for the component, thesystem 100 can identify which component was selected, identify the placement for that component on the form-design area 112, build the electronic-form template 132 based on the component chosen and its location, and display thedesign view 202 and thehierarchical view 204. These tasks are set forth inblocks FIG. 4 , which will be described below. - In block 406, the
design application 126 identifies which component was selected. Thesystem 100 can access and/or contain many components, either from local or remote sources. Some of these components are set forth (via icons and text) in thecomponent display area 110 shown inFIGS. 3 , 5, 6, and 7. - Also in the block 406, the
design application 126 identifies where a component is placed in the form-design area 112. The placement of the component can alter the structure of the electronic-form template 132. How the placement of a component can alter the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below. - If, for example, a designer chooses the
text box 302 from thecomponent display area 110 ofFIG. 5 , and places thetext box 302 in the upper left corner of the form-design area 112, thedesign application 126 will identify the component and this placement. With this information, thesystem 100 proceeds to build the electronic-form template 132, which will be described in part usingFIGS. 5 and 6 . - In
block 408, thedesign application 126 changes the electronic-form template 132 based on a component selected. When a component is added, as has been described in part above, thedesign application 126 also changes thehierarchical view 204 and thedesign view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 by building in a representation of the added component. When an existing component is altered (discussed in greater detail below), thedesign application 126 changes the views to reflect that alteration. - Generally, when a component is added to the form-
design area 112, one or more operations are then permitted by the electronic-form template 132. A syntax (also called a “character string”) corresponding to each of these permitted operations can be added by thedesign application 126 to the electronic-form template 132. An exemplary list of operations and their related, operational syntaxes are shown below: -
Component Chosen Operation Permitted Syntax Added Repeating Section Insertion of Nodes xCollection Repeating Table Before or After Associated Node, and Removal of Nodes Optional Section Insert or Remove Nodes xOptional Plain List Text Editing of Data xTextList Bulleted List Within Associated Numbered List Node(s), Plus Merge, Split, and Removal of Subordinate Node(s) Rich Text Box Text Editing of Data xField Text Box Within Associated Node(s) Picture Insertion of Images Into xImage Associated Node(s) - An operation permitted can govern, for instance, how and what kind of information is permitted to be added into a node or nodes of the
XML document 134 that is associated with that operational syntax. The node or nodes of theXML document 134 can be associated with the operational syntax. The operational syntax can be associated with a location syntax, such as an XPath expression. Both the operational syntax and the location syntax can be included within an XML element added to the electronic-form template 132. XML elements will be described in greater detail below. -
FIG. 7 shows anexemplary screen display 700 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132. Here, the designer chose another component (thecheck box 312 ofFIG. 6 ) to add to the electronic-form template 132 shown inFIG. 6 . - In one embodiment, when the designer adds the Rich
Text Box component 304 to the form-design area 112, thedesign application 126 adds the following XML element to the electronic-form template 132: -
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=“xhtml1” item=“/myFields/xhtml1” > <xsf:editWith type=“rich” component=“xField” /> </xsf:xmlToEdit>
This XML element is an example of an “editability element”, described below. - In response to the designer's choice, the
design application 126 represents the added editability element as aRich Text Box 702. As shown in thescreen display 700, theRich Text Box 702 is labeled “Xhtml 1”. Also in response to the designer's choice, thedesign application 126 altered thehierarchical view 204 to include an XHTML section 704 (labeled “xhtml1”) corresponding to theRich Text Box 702 and the editability element. - This editability element comprises XML attributes and additional child elements. These elements and attributes provide information that the
editor application 130 can use to determine that a node or nodes of theXML document 134 are editable. These elements and attributes also provide theeditor application 130 with information indicating which operations are permitted for these editable nodes. - Syntax of the editability element indicates a name and/or location in the
XML document 134 of a node or nodes. With this indicator, theeditor application 130 can determine which node or nodes are potentially editable with operations permitted by this editability element. In one implementation, by using all of the electronic-form template 132, theeditor application 130 can determine all nodes in theXML document 134 that are potentially editable. - Continuing the ongoing example, the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/xhtml1” (the “value” of the attribute). This indicator can be used to determine that nodes having the name and/or location of “myFields/xhtml1” are potentially editable. In this example the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate node(s) matching this XPath expression.
- An additional attribute (a ‘container’ attribute) can also be included, to indicate contextual conditions, if any, that should be present for the node to be deemed editable. In the ongoing example, there is no ‘container’ attribute. Thus, in this example, the node indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” is editable without contextual conditions.
- Another child XML element, called an “operation element”, in the editability element indicates operations (e.g., editing functions) permitted to be performed on or with the node(s) indicated in the editability element. In the ongoing example, the operation element entitled “editWith” indicates that operations associated with “xField” of type “rich” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1”.
- The operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from the syntax given in the operation element. Thus, in the ongoing example the syntax “xField” with the additional “type” attribute, with value “rich”, indicates an operation of rich-text editing, such as deleting and inserting text, changing the formatting of text, making it bold or italics, and other familiar rich-text editing operations familiar to word-processing. In this example, then, the nodes or data within the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” may be edited using these operations.
- The operation element can indicate permitted operations in various manners. In one implementation, a syntax of the operation element includes an element specifying the XML data able to be inserted by the associated operations.
- Thus, the electronic-
form template 132 governs how information is handled and operations permitted for theXML document 134 for which it corresponds. Because the electronic-form template 132 comprises an editability element and its parts for each component chosen by the designer, the chosen component affects the syntax of the electronic-form template 132. - With the above syntax and the editability element, each component built into the electronic-
form template 132 can govern the look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry field(s), as well as how and where information entered into these data-entry field(s) is mapped, such as to nodes of theXML document 134. Theeditor application 130 can, however, use less than all of the electronic-form template 132. It can, for instance, determine potentially editable nodes and operations permitted, but use a different look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry fields (or not use data-entry fields at all). - Once the
system 100 changes the electronic-form template 132 (block 408), it proceeds to block 410 to display the electronic-form template's 132design view 202 andhierarchical view 204, or to block 414, to complete the process and produce the electronic-form template 132.Block 410 will be discussed first below, followed later by a discussion ofblock 414. - In the
block 410, theuser interface 128 displays the electronic-form template's 132 views. Thehierarchical view 204 can be represented in various ways, including by visually showing the hierarchical structure of the electronic-form template 132, if applicable. One example of this is the indentations of thehierarchical view 204 set forth in the hierarchicalview display area 108 ofFIG. 2 . - The electronic-
form template 132 can be represented in various ways. Theuser interface 128 can display thedesign view 202 to make it easy for a designer to understand the structure of the electronic-form template 132, or can show the electronic-form template 132 without additional information. Thedesign view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 can mimic an electronic-form representation of theXML document 134 potentially seen by a user, such as set forth in the form-design area 112 ofFIG. 2 . Thedesign view 202 can show components built into the electronic-form template 132 with additional information showing details about the data-entry field or fields corresponding to the components to aid a designer in understanding and altering the components in the electronic-form template 132. - The
user interface 128 can also display thehierarchical view 204 in order for the designer to assess the electronic-form template 132 after each change made by the designer. When the designer can quickly see the effect of his changes, the designer can more easily build the electronic-form template 132 to match the designer's intended results. Once thedesign view 202 is displayed and thehierarchical view 204 is displayed (if desired) in the hierarchicalview display area 108, the designer can continue to make changes or end the process. Ending the process will be discussed as part of theblock 414, described below. - Continuing the example above, the
design application 126 will build the electronic-form template 132 based on the identity and placement of the component. - One of the advantages of the
design application 126, and the method it employs, is that the electronic-form template 132 can be built incrementally. That is to say, with each component chosen, or in some implementations with each other action taken that will affect a view of the electronic-form template 132, the electronic-form template 132 is altered. This incrementalism allows a designer to quickly see how the electronic-form template 132 is changing with each change made by the designer. The designer does not have to work on either a form or a schema and then save the form or schema to see how the corresponding schema or form looks or performs. Instead, as the designer makes a change, it is reflected in the views of the electronic-form template 132. This makes designing an electronic-form template 132 easy and intuitive. - In one implementation, the
design application 126 can reflect each change made by a designer to both views of the electronic-form template 132 so quickly that the designer sees it in real time, regardless of whether the change was made to the electronic-form template 132 by altering thedesign view 202 or thehierarchical view 204. By so doing, the designer can more easily design electronic-form templates. - With the new change to electronic-
form template 132 shown, thedesign application 126 continues to enable the designer to add components to the electronic-form template 132, returning to block 404, or alter an existing component, block 412. - If the designer chooses to add another component, the
design application 126 enables him to do so in a manner similar to picking the first component as described above. Thedesign view 202FIG. 2 is one view of an electronic-form template built from many components. -
FIG. 8 shows anexemplary design screen 800 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132. Thedesign screen 800 shows the views of the electronic-form template 132 fromFIGS. 6 and 7 , and the results of the designer continuing to choose components. Through this process of adding components to the form-design area 112, a designer can build everything from a simple electronic-form template, such as shown inFIG. 6 , to a moderately complex electronic-form template, such as shownFIG. 8 , to a large, complex electronic-form template, such as shown inFIG. 2 . - In one embodiment, when a designer adds the repeating section component 320 (shown in
FIG. 3 andFIG. 6 ) to the form-design area 112, thedesign application 126 adds the following editability element to the electronic-form template 132: -
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=”repeating_string” item=”/myFields/container2/repeating_string” container=”/myFields /container2” > <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection”/> </xsf:xmlToEdit> - In this example, the editability element (entitled “xmlToEdit”) includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/container2/repeating_string” (the “value” of the attribute). This indicator gives a name/location of nodes in the
XML document 134 that are potentially editable. In this example the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate (i.e., identify) the nodes. - This editability element also comprises a “container” attribute having a value, in this example, of: “myFields/container2”. This attribute determines a dynamic contextual condition for being able to edit the potentially editable nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”. In this implementation they are editable only if a node matching the XPath expression: “/myFields/container2” (an ancestor of “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) is shown (or rendered) as a section within an electronic-form representation of the
XML document 134, and if the user of the editor application has selected a field somewhere within that section. In this example, the condition is met if the data-entry field is rendered within the section corresponding to the “myFields/container2” node's. If not, the editability element does not permit its operations for the potentially editable node(s). - This editability element also contains an operation element entitled “editWith”. This operation element indicates that operations associated with “xCollection” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”, if the condition is met.
- The operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from its syntax. Thus, in the ongoing example the syntax “xCollection” indicates a certain set of operations, described in part above. The set indicated by “xCollection” comprises selecting, inserting, deleting, pasting, and copying the potentially editable nodes (indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) or their subordinate nodes.
- In the ongoing example, a repeating
section 804 is shown in thedesign view 202 of theXML document 134. This repeatingsection 804 comprises data-entry fields shown atnumerals - The
editor application 130 can determine that the three nodes matching the XPath expression “myFields/container2/repeating_string” can be edited. Thus, by following the electronic-form template 132, theeditor application 130 can correctly enable editing according to the “xCollection” syntax of the operation element. In one implementation, theeditor 130 can present the data-entry fields editor application 130 can also enable permitted operations on these data-entry fields (and thus their associated nodes of the XML document 134). In this implementation, theeditor application 130 enables selection of and insertion, deletion, pasting, and copying of the editable nodes associated with the data-entry fields - Returning to the
process 400 ofFIG. 4 , a designer can simply make a change, like adding a component, to a view and see the change applied to both views. In this sense, thedesign view 202 and thehierarchical view 204 are actively linked. This active linkage makes designing and changing the electronic-form template 132 quicker, easier, and more intuitive. - In the
block 412, thedesign application 126 enables a designer to select and alter existing components included in the electronic-form template 132. Thedesign application 126 allows the designer to intuitively and easily alter the views of the electronic-form template 132, such as by including editing tools familiar to designers that know word-processing techniques. A designer can change a component stylistically (such as the font, color, size, and the like) and structurally (such as by changing a text box to a check box, and whether or to which other components the component governs or is subordinate). A designer can make these changes also by altering how a component (such as one displayed as a data-entry field) is represented on thedesign view 202. For example, a designer can click on a component on the form-design screen 112, change the style, move it, delete it, and the like. As the designer makes changes, thedesign application 126 alters the hierarchical view to continue to correspond to the altering electronic-form template 132 and itsdesign view 202. -
FIG. 8 shows theexemplary design screen 800, which provides another example of thedesign view 202 and thehierarchical view 204 of an example of the electronic-form template 132. To enable the designer to make changes to a component, the design application 126 (through the user interface 128) enables the designer to click on components displayed in thedesign view 202 of the electronic-form template 132. One such component, a text box data-entry field 802 (labeled “String 5”), is shown as an example. Once the designer selects a component, in this example the text box data-entry field 802, thedesign application 126 provides the designer with multiple options to change the data-entry field. As seen in a design screen 900 (described below), thedesign application 126 provides options in a way comfortable to a designer familiar with common word-processing techniques and icons. If the designer clicked on the text box data-entry field 802 ofFIG. 8 , thedesign application 126 can provide multiple pop-up menus of options for the designer. -
FIG. 9 sets forth theexemplary design screen 900 including multiple ways in which thedesign application 126 provides options for a designer. These comprise acomponent context menu 902 and astructure submenu 904. In this example, thedesign application 126 enables the designer to change the electronic-form template 132 by changing a representation of a component in the form-design area 112 (such as a data-entry field or accompanying graphics and text). Also, thedesign application 126 enables the designer to cut the component and move it (through selection and deleting or dragging the component), and change its font, borders, shading, and other style changes (through the component context menu 902), as well as change its structure (through the structure submenu 904). In this example, the designer changes the component by changing the structure of a data-entry field corresponding to the component (the text box data-entry field 802) into a date picker data-entry field by selecting adate picker component 906. -
FIG. 10 shows an example of the hierarchicalview display area 108, and how it can be used by a designer to alter the electronic-form template 132. In this example, a designer selected aninteger node 1002 representing an editability element of the electronic-form template 132. Once chosen, thedesign application 126 prompts the designer, asking for information, such as through achange inquiry window 1004. Using thewindow 1004, thedesign application 126 enables the designer to make various changes to the editability element represented by thenode 1002. He can change, for instance, the data type and default value allowed for this editability element in the electronic-form template 132. - Also as part of this example, the
design application 126 presents the designer with the current name, type, and data type of a selected editability element. The designer can then make changes by altering these current parameters of a selected editability element, such as set forth in thechange inquiry window 1004 by changing the name to “myNewField” from “element” and the data type to “Text (string)” from “Whole Number (integer)” for the editability element represented by thenode 1002. -
FIG. 10 shows an example of a pop-up window with which thedesign application 126 can enable a designer to alter editability elements. With analter window 1006, the designer can add or delete aspects of an editability element, such as a name and repeatability of an element or establish whether or not it is allowed to be blank. - As part of enabling the designer to makes these changes, the
design application 126 makes appropriate changes to the electronic-form template 132 and its views. If the designer deletes a component, for instance, thedesign application 126 may delete the syntax (e.g., the editability element) corresponding to the component from the electronic-form template 132. - According to block 414, when finished, the end product is the electronic-
form template 132. One example of an electronic-form template created by thedesign application 126 is the purchase order example of thedesign view 202 ofFIG. 2 . This purchase order electronic-form template 132 can be used by theeditor application 130 to present an electronic-form representation of theXML document 134 with appropriate permitted operations. Theeditor application 130 can enable this electronic-form representation to be edited by an end user, such as by allowing that user to perform an operation like keying in information into some of the data-entry fields. After entry of information, the information can be stored in theXML document 134. - The information stored can conform to the electronic-
form template 132, thereby allowing easy use and/or transfer of information stored in theXML document 134. The electronic-form template 132 can be written in various languages, including schemas written to govern markup languages (such as XML). Schemas governing XML documents are commonly called XML Schemas, DTD (Document Type Definition) schemas, and XDR (XML-Data Reduced) schemas. - The electronic-
form template 132 can govern many different documents. Because of this, the electronic-form template 132 can be used to enable thousands of different users keying information into thousands of different documents, all of which can be governed by the electronic-form template 132. - As discussed in part above, the electronic-
form template 132 comprises information by which an application can determine which nodes of an XML document are editable and in what manner. Theeditor application 130 ofFIG. 1 is described above as one embodiment of an application that can use the electronic-form template 132 to aid in editing XML documents. Here theXML document 134 is assumed associated with the electronic-form template 132. This association can be determined in various manners, such as by reading text in theXML document 134 indicating a relationship with the electronic-form template 132. -
FIG. 11 shows aprocess 1100 for editing theXML document 134. As part of this editing, theeditor application 130 uses the electronic-form template 132 to determine which nodes of theXML document 134 are editable. The electronic-form template 132 can also aid theeditor application 130 in determining in what way those nodes are editable. - At
block 1102, theeditor application 130 determines, using the electronic-form template 132, that a node of theXML document 134 is potentially editable. Theeditor application 130 can do so by reading and analyzing editability elements in the electronic-form template 132. - In one embodiment of the electronic-
form template 132, the editability element comprises an indicator with a character string of “xmlToEdit”. This string indicates that a node or nodes associated with the indicator are editable (or potentially editable). This editability element also comprises an “item” attribute, which is usable to identify which nodes are editable. An XPath expression identifying the editable nodes is associated with this attribute (the “value” of the attribute). Thus, theeditor application 130 can use the XPath expression in the editability element to determine which nodes of theXML document 134 are editable. - For example, if the electronic-
form template 132 comprises the following editability element: -
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=”Order” item=”/Document/Orders/Order” container=”/Document” > <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection”/> </xsf:xmlToEdit>
then the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an “item” attribute, whose “value” is an XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”. This XPath expression indicates to theeditor application 130 that nodes in theXML document 134 that match this expression are editable (or potentially editable). - At
block 1104, with the node or nodes of theXML document 134 identified, theeditor application 130 presents data of the editable node. Theeditor application 130 can present this data using an electronic-form representation of theXML document 134 and/or the editable node. Theeditor application 130 can do so with aid from theuser interface 128 or otherwise. -
FIG. 12 shows an example of an electronic-form representation 1200 of the editable node. Here theeditor application 130 presents the data of the editable node as an order data-entry field 1202. As shown, a data-entry field presenting data of an editable node can be blank, such as when no information has been entered into the data-entry field. A data-entry field can also include information previously stored in the editable node, which in some cases can be edited, depending on what operations are permitted for the editable node. - At
block 1106, theeditor application 130 determines what operations are permitted to be performed on the editable node. This determination can be performed by theeditor application 130 prior to presenting the data of the editable node. In some cases determining the operations permitted can affect how data is presented. Theeditor application 130 determines the permitted operations based on an operation element of the electronic-form template 132, discussed in part above. The operation element and the editability element are associated, such as by the operation element being a child element to the editability element. The operation element indicates operations permitted to be performed on the editable node. - In the ongoing example,
-
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=”Order” item=”/Document/Orders/Order” container=”/Document” > <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection”/> </xsf:xmlToEdit>
the operation element comprises a character string of “editWith”. This character string indicates to theeditor application 130 that the operation element indicates certain types of operations that are permitted. Following this character string, another character sting of “component” is included. This character string can indicate that a value associated with the “component” string that is usable to determine permitted operations. - In the ongoing example, the operation element comprises an operational syntax of “xCollection”. This syntax indicates the operations permitted to be performed on nodes of the
XML document 134 matching the XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”. - The
editor application 130 can determine the operations associated with this syntax in various ways. Theeditor application 130 can use this syntax to locate executable code for this operation. In one embodiment of the electronic-form template 132, executable code for operations indicated by various syntaxes are included within theeditor application 130. - At
block 1108, theeditor application 130 enables the permitted operations. Theeditor application 130 can do so by supplying a user interface appropriate for the permitted operations. For data alteration or addition, theeditor application 130 can provide a word-processor-like experience in a data-entry field. Like shown inFIG. 12 , the order data-entry field 1202 can be used as a user interface to enter data, delete data, copy and paste data, and the like. Thus, theeditor application 130, by determining editable nodes and permitted operations for them, can enable certain types of editing for various editable nodes of theXML document 134. - At
block 1110, theeditor application 130 receives a selection of an enabled operation. Continuing the ongoing example, theeditor application 130 can receive entry of “ACME Tire Company” into the order data-entry field 1202. - At
block 1112, theeditor application 130 alters data in the editable node (or the editable node itself or associated nodes) ofXML document 134 by performing the selected operation. For the ongoing example, theeditor application 130 can receive the text “ACME Tire Company” and alter data within the order node to reflect this text. Thus, theeditor application 130 can add the text “ACME Tire Company” to the order node. - Other Permitted Operations
- The electronic-
form template 132 can permit many different types of operations. These comprise, for instance, operations mentioned above and those described below. - The
editor application 130 can use the electronic-form template 132 to determine what operations are permitted. With this determination, theeditor application 130 can enable permitted operations. - For example, for an editability element of:
-
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=”workItem” item=”workItems/workItem” container=″workItems”> <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection” > <xsf:fragmentToInsert> <xsf:chooseFragment> <workItem description=″create visuals″></workItem> </xsf:chooseFragment> </xsf:fragmentToInsert> </xsf:editWith> </xsf:xmlToEdit> - The
editor application 130 can determine that the electronic-form template 132, for the node(s) indicated by “workItems/workItem”, permits an operation of inserting nodes adjacent to this “workItem” node (or under the node corresponding to the container attribute: “workItems”). In this example, the operation element comprises a syntax of “xCollection”, which indicates a permitted operation of inserting or deleting subnodes adjacent to the editable node indicated by “workItems/workItem”. - This operation, however, is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element). This context is given by a value for a “container” attribute. Here, the container attribute's value is given by a syntax “workItems”. This syntax comprises a XPath expression. Thus, the
editor application 130 can determine, based on the syntax given, that operations are not permitted unless a node locatable with the XPath expression “workItems” is exposed. Theeditor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node (the parent of the “workItems/workItem” node) is exposed, if a section associated with it is exposed in an electronic-form rendering of the “workItems” node. If theeditor application 130 is rendering theXML document 134, theeditor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node is exposed by checking whether it or its user interface has exposed the node. - Additional information useful in performing operations can also be included in the electronic-
form template 132. For the example immediately above, syntax can also be included in the operation element to indicate what data is to be inserted in the XML document by the operations. This syntax comprises a “fragmentToInsert” child element to the editability element. Using this information, theeditor application 130 can determine that a child element of the fragmentToInsert element contains the data to be inserted. - In this example, a child element having a character string of “chooseFragment” indicates that new XML content corresponding to the XML markup: “<workItem description=“create visuals”></workItem>” can be inserted next to the “workItem” node.
- In a similar way, the electronic-
form template 132 editability element provides syntax permitting deletion of the editable node or nodes using the syntax of “xCollection”. - Also by way of example, for an editability element of:
-
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=″author″ item=″issue/@author ″ container=”issue”> <xsf:editWith component=″xOptional″> <xsf:fragmentToInsert> <xsf:chooseFragment> <xsf:attributeData attribute=”author” value=”author name”/> </xsf:chooseFragment> </xsf:fragmentToInsert> </xsf:editWith> </xsf:xmlToEdit>
a node or nodes located with the XPath expression of “item/@author” has a permitted operation associated with the syntax “xOptional”. This operation element comprises a character string of “editWith” and “component”. The syntax following “component” (i.e., “xOptional”) can be used by theeditor application 130 to determine operations permitted for the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author”. - Like above, this operation, however, is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element). This context is given by the value of the “container” attribute, in this case: “issue”.
- For the example immediately above, a syntax “fragmentToInsert” can be used by the
editor application 130 to determine where and what to insert. Thus, the character string of “chooseFragment” indicates that an “author” attribute node having an value: “author name” is permitted to be added to the “issue” node. - Unlike the operation element having a syntax of “xCollection”, the operation element corresponding to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xOptional”, permits addition of only one node. It also permits that node (locatable with “item/@author”) to then be deleted.
- In another embodiment of the operation element, an attribute of the operation element indicates textual operations permitted on data of the editable node. This indication corresponds to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xField”, indicating that textual operations are permitted. Various types of textual operations may also be included in the electronic-
form template 132. - For example, for an editability element of:
-
<xsf:xmlToEdit item=″description/textItem″> <xsf:editWith component=”xField” type=”rich” /> </xsf:xmlToEdit>
a node or nodes located with the XPath expression of “description/textItem” has a permitted operation specified by “editWith” and “component”. A value of “component”, here “xField”, can be used to indicate that textual editing of data of the editable node is permitted. A value of “type”, here “rich”, can be used to indicate that rich-text editing is permitted. Thus, the syntax following “component” of “xField” and “rich” can be used by theeditor application 130 to determine that rich-text editing of data of the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author” is permitted. - In another embodiment of the “xField” operation element above, a type attribute given by a syntax “plain” indicates that an operation for creation and modification of plain-text-data (but not rich-text-formatted data) of the editable node is permitted.
-
FIG. 13 , for example, shows an electronic-form representation 1300 of an example of theXML document 134. Here many different nodes are presented and operations enabled. For instance, theelectronic form 1300 shows data-entry fields enabling plain-text operations to be performed, referenced atnumerals form template 132 with: -
<xsf:xmlToEdit name=“term_115” item=“/po:Document/po:terms/po:term” > <xsf:editWith component=“xTextList”/> </xsf:xmlToEdit> <xsf:editWith caption=“notes” component=“xOptional” > <xsf:fragmentToInsert> <xsf:chooseFragment> <po:notes/> </xsf:chooseFragment> </xsf:fragmentToInsert> </xsf:editWith> - A Computer System
-
FIG. 14 shows an exemplary computer system that can be used to implement the processes described herein.Computer 1442 comprises one or more processors orprocessing units 1444, asystem memory 1446, and abus 1448 that couples various system components including thesystem memory 1446 toprocessors 1444. Thebus 1448 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. Thesystem memory 1446 comprises read only memory (ROM) 1450 and random access memory (RAM) 1452. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 1454, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements withincomputer 1442, such as during start-up, is stored inROM 1450. -
Computer 1442 further comprises ahard disk drive 1456 for reading from and writing to a hard disk (not shown), amagnetic disk drive 1458 for reading from and writing to a removablemagnetic disk 1460, and anoptical disk drive 1462 for reading from or writing to a removableoptical disk 1464 such as a CD ROM or other optical media. Thehard disk drive 1456,magnetic disk drive 1458, andoptical disk drive 1462 are connected to thebus 1448 by anSCSI interface 1466 or some other appropriate interface. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data forcomputer 1442. Although the exemplary environment described herein employs a hard disk, a removablemagnetic disk 1460 and a removableoptical disk 1464, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer-readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment. - A number of program modules may be stored on the
hard disk 1456,magnetic disk 1460,optical disk 1464,ROM 1450, orRAM 1452, including anoperating system 1470, one or more application programs 1472 (such as thedesign application 126 and the editor application 130),other program modules 1474, andprogram data 1476. A user may enter commands and information intocomputer 1442 through input devices such as akeyboard 1478 and apointing device 1480. Other input devices (not shown) may comprise a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are connected to theprocessing unit 1444 through aninterface 1482 that is coupled to thebus 1448. Amonitor 1484 or other type of display device is also connected to thebus 1448 via an interface, such as avideo adapter 1486. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically comprise other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as speakers and printers. -
Computer 1442 commonly operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as aremote computer 1488. Theremote computer 1488 may be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically comprises many or all of the elements described above relative tocomputer 1442. The logical connections depicted inFIG. 14 comprise a local area network (LAN) 1490 and a wide area network (WAN) 1492. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and the Internet. - When used in a LAN networking environment,
computer 1442 is connected to the local network through a network interface oradapter 1494. When used in a WAN networking environment,computer 1442 typically comprises amodem 1496 or other means for establishing communications over thewide area network 1492, such as the Internet. Themodem 1496, which may be internal or external, is connected to thebus 1448 via aserial port interface 1468. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to thepersonal computer 1442, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used. - Generally, the data processors of
computer 1442 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer. Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory. The system described herein comprises these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the blocks described, in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor. The system described can also comprise the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein. - For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components such as the operating system are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
- The above-described system and method enables an end user to edit an XML document is ways permitted by an electronic-form template. Although the system and method has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the system and method defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed system and method.
Claims (22)
1. One or more computer-readable media comprising computer-executable instructions that perform the following when executed by one or more computers:
identifying a node of an extensible markup language (XML) document as editable using an editability element of an electronic-form template; and
determining operations permitted for the identified node using an operation element of the electronic-form template.
2. The media of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further perform a method comprising:
enabling selection of the operations through an electronic form;
receiving selection of one of the operations; and
performing the selected operation on at least one node of the XML document.
3. The media of claim 2 , wherein the one node of XML document comprises the identified node.
4. The media of claim 2 , wherein the one node of XML document comprises other nodes subordinate or sibling to the identified node.
5. The media of claim 1 , wherein the act of determining the operations permitted comprises determining a context in which the operations are permitted.
6. The media of claim 5 , wherein the act of determining the context in which the operations are permitted comprises locating a character string of “container” in the editability element.
7. The media of claim 5 , wherein the act of determining the context in which the operations are permitted comprises determining the context by locating a value associated with a character string of “container” in the editability element.
8. The media of claim 1 , wherein the act of identifying comprises finding an XPath expression in the editability element and comparing the XPath expression to nodes of the XML document.
9. The media of claim 1 , wherein the act of identifying comprises finding a character string of “xmlToEdit” and an XPath expression associated with the character string.
10. The media of claim 1 , wherein the act of determining the operations comprises finding a character string of “editWith” and syntax associated with the character string that is usable to determine the operations.
11. The media of claim 10 , wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component”.
12. The media of claim 10 , wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component”, and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xCollection”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise insertion or deletion of a node corresponding to or sibling to the identified node.
13. The media of claim 10 , wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component” and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xOptional”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise insertion or deletion of the identified node.
14. The media of claim 10 , wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component” and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xTextList”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise modification, insertion or deletion of a node corresponding to or sibling to the identified node.
15. The media of claim 10 , wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component”, and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xField”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise textual editing of data of the identified node.
16. The media of claim 15 , wherein the syntax further comprises a fourth character string of “rich”, the fourth character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise rich-text textual editing of data of the identified node.
17. The media of claim 15 , wherein the syntax further comprises a fourth character string of “plain”, the fourth character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise plain-text textual editing of data of the identified node.
18. An apparatus comprising:
means for identifying an editable node of an extensible markup language (XML) document by analyzing an editability element of an electronic-form template; and
means for determining an operation permitted for the editable node by analyzing an operation element of the electronic-form template.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , further comprising:
means for enabling selection of the operation;
means for receiving selection of the operation; and
means for performing the operation on the editable node or other nodes subordinate or sibling to the editable node.
20. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the means for identifying the editable node comprises means for finding a character string of “xmlToEdit” and an XPath expression associated with the character string.
21. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the means for determining the operation permitted comprises means for determining a context in which the operation is permitted by locating a value associated with a character string of “container” in the editability element.
22. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the means for determining the operation comprises means for finding a character string of “editWith” and a syntax associated with the character string that is associated with the operation.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/126,532 US20080222514A1 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2008-05-23 | Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/781,586 US7430711B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2004-02-17 | Systems and methods for editing XML documents |
US12/126,532 US20080222514A1 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2008-05-23 | Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/781,586 Division US7430711B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2004-02-17 | Systems and methods for editing XML documents |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080222514A1 true US20080222514A1 (en) | 2008-09-11 |
Family
ID=34838768
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/781,586 Expired - Fee Related US7430711B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2004-02-17 | Systems and methods for editing XML documents |
US12/126,532 Abandoned US20080222514A1 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2008-05-23 | Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/781,586 Expired - Fee Related US7430711B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2004-02-17 | Systems and methods for editing XML documents |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7430711B2 (en) |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060224948A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and software tool for processing an electronic form |
US20090313743A1 (en) * | 2008-06-20 | 2009-12-24 | Craig Jason Hofmeyer | Pants with saggy pants control system |
US7870478B1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2011-01-11 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Repurposing subsections and/or objects |
US7925621B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2011-04-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Installing a solution |
US7937651B2 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2011-05-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Structural editing operations for network forms |
US7971139B2 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2011-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms |
US7979856B2 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2011-07-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Network-based software extensions |
US8001459B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2011-08-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices |
US8010515B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2011-08-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Query to an electronic form |
US8074217B2 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2011-12-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for delivering software |
US8117552B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2012-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas |
US8200975B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2012-06-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Digital signatures for network forms |
US20120260200A1 (en) * | 2011-04-11 | 2012-10-11 | Data Systems International, Inc. | Multi-view form design |
US8892993B2 (en) | 2003-08-01 | 2014-11-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Translation file |
US8918729B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2014-12-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Designing electronic forms |
US9229917B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2016-01-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Electronic form user interfaces |
US9575949B2 (en) | 2011-04-11 | 2017-02-21 | Data Systems International, Inc. | Multi-view runtime interrogator |
JP2017201547A (en) * | 2012-10-31 | 2017-11-09 | リミテッド ライアビリティー カンパニー “1シー” | Automatic report generation method |
Families Citing this family (52)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7958443B2 (en) | 2003-02-28 | 2011-06-07 | Dictaphone Corporation | System and method for structuring speech recognized text into a pre-selected document format |
US20040243545A1 (en) * | 2003-05-29 | 2004-12-02 | Dictaphone Corporation | Systems and methods utilizing natural language medical records |
US8751950B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2014-06-10 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. | Capturing a user's intent in design software |
WO2005050474A2 (en) | 2003-11-21 | 2005-06-02 | Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh | Text segmentation and label assignment with user interaction by means of topic specific language models and topic-specific label statistics |
US7546542B2 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2009-06-09 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface incorporating graphically based management of controls |
US9098476B2 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2015-08-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Method and system for mapping between structured subjects and observers |
WO2009111885A1 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2009-09-17 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
US8487879B2 (en) | 2004-10-29 | 2013-07-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a screen |
US20060136810A1 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2006-06-22 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Electronic form generator |
US20060174216A1 (en) * | 2005-01-28 | 2006-08-03 | Trenten Peterson | Providing additional hierarchical information for an object displayed in a tree view in a hierarchical relationship with other objects |
US7934151B1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2011-04-26 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Specification of tables including objects with arbitrary formatting |
US8069411B2 (en) * | 2005-07-05 | 2011-11-29 | Dictaphone Corporation | System and method for auto-reuse of document text |
US7539343B2 (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2009-05-26 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Classifying regions defined within a digital image |
US20070079282A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Pawan Nachnani | Browser based designer and player |
US20070083805A1 (en) * | 2005-10-12 | 2007-04-12 | General Electric Company | Configurable system and method for order entry |
WO2007079424A2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-12 | Discovery Productions, Inc. | Method for combining input data with run-time parameters into xml output using xsl/xslt |
US7681135B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2010-03-16 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System and method for generating a composite source user interface |
US7624350B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2009-11-24 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System and method for XML based data driven generation of a composite source user interface |
US9183321B2 (en) * | 2006-10-16 | 2015-11-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Managing compound XML documents in a repository |
US9201854B1 (en) | 2006-10-25 | 2015-12-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Methods and systems for creating, interacting with, and utilizing a superactive document |
GB2443444A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Remotely editing a template document |
GB2443446B (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2011-11-30 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | A method of identifying an extractable portion of a source machine-readable document |
GB2443443A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | method of defining editable portions within the template document |
GB2443447A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | A method of constructing an output document by adding data from a variable data document to a template document |
US20080126988A1 (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2008-05-29 | Jayprakash Mudaliar | Application management tool |
US7664776B1 (en) * | 2006-12-19 | 2010-02-16 | Adobe Systems Inc. | Methods and apparatus for dynamic form definition |
US9613089B2 (en) * | 2007-09-04 | 2017-04-04 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Form template refactoring |
US20090249187A1 (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2009-10-01 | Embarq Holdings Company, Llc | System and Method for Generating a Converted Workflow Extensible Markup Language File Associated with a Workflow Application |
US8271442B2 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2012-09-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Formats for database template files shared between client and server environments |
US10157172B2 (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2018-12-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Property dependency visualization |
US20100199164A1 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-05 | John William Lumley | Controlling editing of a portion of a document |
US8707158B2 (en) * | 2009-08-05 | 2014-04-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Customizing a form in a model-based system |
US9189244B2 (en) * | 2009-08-18 | 2015-11-17 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Methods and systems for managing data service specifications |
AU2010219430B2 (en) * | 2009-09-15 | 2016-07-28 | Avoka Technologies Pty Ltd | Generation of electronic forms |
WO2011066452A2 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2011-06-03 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Inc. | Securely sharing design renderings over a network |
US20120166928A1 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-28 | Sap Ag | Field extensibility in service interfaces and forms message types |
CN103518195B (en) | 2011-03-10 | 2016-09-28 | J·瑞卡鲍格 | Apparatus, system, and method for vector-based form field documents |
CA2796664C (en) | 2011-06-11 | 2019-02-12 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Automated re-use of structural components |
US9519631B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2016-12-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Semantic diff and automerge |
US9529916B1 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2016-12-27 | Google Inc. | Managing documents based on access context |
US11308037B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2022-04-19 | Google Llc | Automatic collaboration |
US9495341B1 (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2016-11-15 | Google Inc. | Fact correction and completion during document drafting |
US9384285B1 (en) | 2012-12-18 | 2016-07-05 | Google Inc. | Methods for identifying related documents |
US20140258832A1 (en) * | 2013-03-11 | 2014-09-11 | Dartmouth Journal Services, Inc. | Computer Implemented System and Method for Author Editing of XML Documents With Structured Element Protection |
US9514113B1 (en) | 2013-07-29 | 2016-12-06 | Google Inc. | Methods for automatic footnote generation |
US9842113B1 (en) | 2013-08-27 | 2017-12-12 | Google Inc. | Context-based file selection |
US9529791B1 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2016-12-27 | Google Inc. | Template and content aware document and template editing |
US20150347352A1 (en) * | 2014-06-02 | 2015-12-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Form preview in a development environment |
US9703763B1 (en) | 2014-08-14 | 2017-07-11 | Google Inc. | Automatic document citations by utilizing copied content for candidate sources |
US20180165265A1 (en) * | 2016-12-08 | 2018-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Indicating property inheritance in object hierarchies |
CN111666740A (en) * | 2020-06-22 | 2020-09-15 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Flow chart generation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN113393553B (en) * | 2021-06-18 | 2024-06-28 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Method and device for generating flow chart and electronic equipment |
Citations (116)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2006A (en) * | 1841-03-16 | Clamp for crimping leather | ||
US4005579A (en) * | 1975-03-31 | 1977-02-01 | The Garrett Corporation | Turbocharger control and method |
US4005578A (en) * | 1975-03-31 | 1977-02-01 | The Garrett Corporation | Method and apparatus for turbocharger control |
US4256019A (en) * | 1979-06-12 | 1981-03-17 | The Garrett Corporation | Turbocharger control actuator |
US5287448A (en) * | 1989-05-04 | 1994-02-15 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing help information to users of computers |
US5388967A (en) * | 1993-03-10 | 1995-02-14 | Sullair Corporation | Compressor start control and air inlet valve therefor |
US5388968A (en) * | 1994-01-12 | 1995-02-14 | Ingersoll-Rand Company | Compressor inlet valve |
US5612719A (en) * | 1992-12-03 | 1997-03-18 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Gesture sensitive buttons for graphical user interfaces |
US5613837A (en) * | 1994-04-27 | 1997-03-25 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Air compressor inlet and outlet valve arrangement |
US5717939A (en) * | 1991-11-18 | 1998-02-10 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Method and apparatus for entering and manipulating spreadsheet cell data |
US5720016A (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 1998-02-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Multi-window display apparatus for managing writing frame memory |
US5734380A (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-03-31 | Adams; James S. | Method for controlling the presentation of displays in a multi-window computer environment |
US5870735A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1999-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for generating a decision-tree classifier in parallel in a multi-processor system |
US5873088A (en) * | 1990-08-31 | 1999-02-16 | Fujitsu Limited | Derived data base processing system enabling one program to access a plurality of data basis |
US5875815A (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 1999-03-02 | Nelson Irrigation Corporation | Combination pressure regulator/drain check valve |
US6012066A (en) * | 1997-10-01 | 2000-01-04 | Vallon, Inc. | Computerized work flow system |
US6021403A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 2000-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligent user assistance facility |
US6035336A (en) * | 1997-10-17 | 2000-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Audio ticker system and method for presenting push information including pre-recorded audio |
US6178551B1 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 2001-01-23 | Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. | Method of and system for installing a computer program |
US6336214B1 (en) * | 1998-11-10 | 2002-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automatically generating browsable language grammars |
US6336797B1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2002-01-08 | Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. | Oiless rotary scroll air compressor air inlet valve |
US20020010855A1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2002-01-24 | Eran Reshef | System for determining web application vulnerabilities |
US6343377B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2002-01-29 | Netscape Communications Corp. | System and method for rendering content received via the internet and world wide web via delegation of rendering processes |
US6344862B1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2002-02-05 | Hewlett-Packard Company | User interface mechanism for manipulating context in computer management applications |
US20020019812A1 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2002-02-14 | Board Karen Eleanor | System and service for receiving, customizing, and re-broadcasting high-speed financial data to users operating wireless network-capable devices |
US20020019941A1 (en) * | 1998-06-12 | 2002-02-14 | Shannon Chan | Method and system for secure running of untrusted content |
US20020023111A1 (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 2002-02-21 | Samir Arora | Draw-based editor for web pages |
US20020026462A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2002-02-28 | Shotton Charles T. | Apparatus for and method of selectively retrieving information and enabling its subsequent display |
US6353851B1 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2002-03-05 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for sharing asymmetric information and services in simultaneously viewed documents on a communication system |
US20020035617A1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2002-03-21 | Mark Lynch | E-business mobility platform |
US20020116371A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2002-08-22 | David Dodds | System and method for the storage, indexing and retrieval of XML documents using relation databases |
US6505344B1 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2003-01-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object oriented apparatus and method for allocating objects on an invocation stack |
US6505200B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2003-01-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Application-independent data synchronization technique |
US20030014406A1 (en) * | 2001-06-07 | 2003-01-16 | Urbanpixel Inc. | Intelligent browser windows in a multi-browser environment |
US6513154B1 (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 2003-01-28 | John R. Porterfield | System and method for testing of computer programs in programming effort |
US20030023953A1 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2003-01-30 | Lucassen John M. | MVC (model-view-conroller) based multi-modal authoring tool and development environment |
US20030023674A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2003-01-30 | Ibm | System and method for dynamically displaying HTML form elements |
US20030028762A1 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2003-02-06 | Kevin Trilli | Entity authentication in a shared hosting computer network environment |
US20030028550A1 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2003-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for maintaining information in database tables and performing operations on data in the database tables. |
US20030025693A1 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2003-02-06 | Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation | System and procedure for providing a user interface display |
US20030029911A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-02-13 | International Business Machines Corporations | System and method for converting digital content |
US20030033179A1 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-13 | Katz Steven Bruce | Method for generating customized alerts related to the procurement, sourcing, strategic sourcing and/or sale of one or more items by an enterprise |
US20030033037A1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2003-02-13 | Kam-Por Yuen | Method and system for developing a software program using compound templates |
US20030033606A1 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-02-13 | Puente David S. | Streaming media publishing system and method |
US6523027B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2003-02-18 | Accenture Llp | Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture |
US20030037021A1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2003-02-20 | Prasad Krothappalli | JavaScript in a non-JavaScript environment |
US20030038788A1 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Pierre Demartines | Automatically scrolling handwritten input user interface for personal digital assistants and the like |
US20030038846A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-02-27 | Fujitsu Limited | Message display program and message display apparatus |
US20030120978A1 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-06-26 | Fabbrizio Giuseppe Di | Method and apparatus for a programming language having fully undoable, timed reactive instructions |
US20030120671A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Xmlcities, Inc. | Extensible stylesheet designs in visual graphic environments |
US20030149934A1 (en) * | 2000-05-11 | 2003-08-07 | Worden Robert Peel | Computer program connecting the structure of a xml document to its underlying meaning |
US20030208533A1 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2003-11-06 | Digital Evolution | Method and apparatus for managing web services within a computer network system |
US20040002950A1 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2004-01-01 | Brennan Sean F. | Methods and apparatus for process, factory-floor, environmental, computer aided manufacturing-based or other control system using hierarchically enumerated data set |
US20040003341A1 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for processing electronic forms for use with resource constrained devices |
US20040002939A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Schemaless dataflow within an XML storage solution |
US20040006744A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for validating an XML document and reporting schema violations |
US6678625B1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2004-01-13 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and apparatus for a multipurpose configurable bus independent simulation bus functional model |
US20040010753A1 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2004-01-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Converting markup language files |
US6681370B2 (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2004-01-20 | Microsoft Corporation | HTML/XML tree synchronization |
US20040015778A1 (en) * | 2002-03-16 | 2004-01-22 | Catherine Britton | Electronic healthcare management form creation |
US20040015783A1 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-22 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Methods for interactively defining transforms and for generating queries by manipulating existing query data |
US20040024720A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2004-02-05 | John Fairweather | System and method for managing knowledge |
US20040031052A1 (en) * | 2002-08-12 | 2004-02-12 | Liberate Technologies | Information platform |
US20040032611A1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2004-02-19 | Daly John P. | Printer drivers using filters that are operating system-independent and printer-indendent |
US20040039881A1 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2004-02-26 | Netdelivery Corporation | Systems and methods for storing differing data formats in fixed field definitions |
US20040044965A1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2004-03-04 | Haruhiko Toyama | Structured document edit apparatus, structured document edit method, and program product |
US20040194016A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic data migration for structured markup language schema changes |
US20040205592A1 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2004-10-14 | Xmlcities, Inc. | Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs |
US20040210573A1 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2004-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program for generating structure pattern candidates |
US6842175B1 (en) * | 1999-04-22 | 2005-01-11 | Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. | Tools for interacting with virtual environments |
US6850895B2 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2005-02-01 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Assignment manager |
US20050027676A1 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2005-02-03 | Matthias Eichstaedt | Method and system for delivery alerts to a user |
US20050028073A1 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2005-02-03 | Henry Steven G. | Method and system for automating workflows |
US20050033626A1 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2005-02-10 | Sap Ag | Universal worklist service and user interface |
US20050033657A1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2005-02-10 | Keepmedia, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Personalized content management and presentation systems |
US20050039117A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2005-02-17 | Fuhwei Lwo | Method, system, and computer program product for comparing two computer files |
US20050102530A1 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2005-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for XSL/XML based authorization rules policy implementation |
US20050108634A1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2005-05-19 | Ranjit Sahota | Method and system for transforming content for execution on multiple platforms |
US20060004703A1 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2006-01-05 | Radar Networks, Inc. | Semantic web portal and platform |
US20060004815A1 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2006-01-05 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and apparatus for editing metadata, and computer product |
US20060004910A1 (en) * | 2000-05-18 | 2006-01-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Postback input handling by server-side control objects |
US20060005978A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2006-01-12 | Zaun Richard D | Knock-on sweep structure and tools therefor |
US20060010386A1 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2006-01-12 | Khan Emdadur R | Microbrowser using voice internet rendering |
US20060020883A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2006-01-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Web page personalization |
US6993722B1 (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2006-01-31 | Cirrus Logic, Inc. | User interface system methods and computer program products for multi-function consumer entertainment appliances |
US20060026500A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Qa Im-Maqami Hood | System and method for data collection and processing |
US7003548B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2006-02-21 | Gelco Corporation | Method and apparatus for developing and checking technical configurations of a product |
US20060041593A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Veritas Operating Corporation | System and method for communicating file system events using a publish-subscribe model |
US7107282B1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2006-09-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Managing XPath expressions in a database system |
US7143103B1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2006-11-28 | University College London | Method and apparatus for monitoring and maintaining the consistency of distributed documents |
US7159011B1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2007-01-02 | Maquis Techtrix, Llc | System and method for managing an online message board |
US20070005611A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-01-04 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Work flow managing system |
US20070011665A1 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2007-01-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Content syndication platform |
US20070011156A1 (en) * | 2005-07-05 | 2007-01-11 | Oracle International Corporation | RSS enabled logging |
US7178166B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2007-02-13 | Internet Security Systems, Inc. | Vulnerability assessment and authentication of a computer by a local scanner |
US20070074106A1 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2007-03-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Authoring Arbitrary XML Documents Using DHTML and XSLT |
US7240279B1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2007-07-03 | Microsoft Corporation | XML patterns language |
US20080021916A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2008-01-24 | Timebase Pty Limited | Maintenance of a markup language document in a database |
US20080027896A1 (en) * | 2003-05-29 | 2008-01-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Hierarchical triggers for database |
US20080040635A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2008-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | System and Method for Real-Time Validation of Structured Data Files |
US7334178B1 (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2008-02-19 | Xsigo Systems | Randomized self-checking test system |
US7334187B1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2008-02-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Electronic form aggregation |
US7337391B2 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2008-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for stylesheet execution interactive feedback |
US7337392B2 (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2008-02-26 | Vincent Wen-Jeng Lue | Method and apparatus for adapting web contents to different display area dimensions |
US20090013266A1 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2009-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Finding and Consuming Web Subscriptions in a Web Browser |
US7490167B2 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2009-02-10 | Sony Corporation | System and method for platform and language-independent development and delivery of page-based content |
US7490109B1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2009-02-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for offline editing of data files |
US20090043798A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2009-02-12 | Dean Tan | Techniques for automatically developing a web site |
US20090044103A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2009-02-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Rendering an html electronic form by applying xslt to xml using a solution |
US7496837B1 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2009-02-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Structural editing with schema awareness |
US7496632B2 (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2009-02-24 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method and system for distributing a public information release authorization (PIRA) form over an intranet |
US7653687B2 (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 2010-01-26 | Reisman Richard R | Method for distributing content to a user station |
US7669116B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2010-02-23 | Accenture Global Services, Gmbh | Single access point for filing of converted electronic forms to multiple processing entities |
US7877400B1 (en) * | 2003-11-18 | 2011-01-25 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Optimizations of XPaths |
US8117552B2 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2012-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas |
US8655998B1 (en) * | 2003-12-02 | 2014-02-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Client-side XML-based development environment for network device management applications |
Family Cites Families (167)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4201978A (en) | 1978-10-19 | 1980-05-06 | NCR Canada Ltd. -- NCR Canada Ltee | Document processing system |
US4514800A (en) | 1981-05-22 | 1985-04-30 | Data General Corporation | Digital computer system including apparatus for resolving names representing data items and capable of executing instructions belonging to general instruction sets |
US4498147A (en) | 1982-11-18 | 1985-02-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methodology for transforming a first editable document form prepared with a batch text processing system to a second editable document form usable by an interactive or batch text processing system |
US4641274A (en) | 1982-12-03 | 1987-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for communicating changes made to text form a text processor to a remote host |
US4564752A (en) | 1982-12-23 | 1986-01-14 | Ncr Canada Ltd | Concurrent, image-based, reject-re-entry system and method |
US4739477A (en) | 1984-08-30 | 1988-04-19 | International Business Machines Corp. | Implicit creation of a superblock data structure |
US4723211A (en) | 1984-08-30 | 1988-02-02 | International Business Machines Corp. | Editing of a superblock data structure |
US4962475A (en) | 1984-12-26 | 1990-10-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for generating a document utilizing a plurality of windows associated with different data objects |
US4674040A (en) | 1984-12-26 | 1987-06-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Merging of documents |
US4815029A (en) | 1985-09-23 | 1989-03-21 | International Business Machines Corp. | In-line dynamic editor for mixed object documents |
US5182709A (en) | 1986-03-31 | 1993-01-26 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | System for parsing multidimensional and multidirectional text into encoded units and storing each encoded unit as a separate data structure |
US5249275A (en) | 1986-04-21 | 1993-09-28 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Apparatus and method enabling a compiled program to exactly recreate its source code |
US4847749A (en) | 1986-06-13 | 1989-07-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Job interrupt at predetermined boundary for enhanced recovery |
US5072412A (en) | 1987-03-25 | 1991-12-10 | Xerox Corporation | User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects |
US5497489A (en) | 1987-05-05 | 1996-03-05 | Menne; David M. | Data storage and retrieval systems having labelling for data |
US5226161A (en) | 1987-08-21 | 1993-07-06 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Integration of data between typed data structures by mutual direct invocation between data managers corresponding to data types |
US5369778A (en) | 1987-08-21 | 1994-11-29 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Data processor that customizes program behavior by using a resource retrieval capability |
US5206951A (en) | 1987-08-21 | 1993-04-27 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Integration of data between typed objects by mutual, direct invocation between object managers corresponding to object types |
US5179703A (en) | 1987-11-17 | 1993-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically adaptive environment for computer programs |
JPH01155484A (en) | 1987-12-11 | 1989-06-19 | Toshiba Corp | Character reader |
US4933880A (en) | 1988-06-15 | 1990-06-12 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method for dynamically processing non-text components in compound documents |
CA1323448C (en) | 1989-02-24 | 1993-10-19 | Terrence C. Miller | Method and apparatus for translucent file system |
US5339423A (en) | 1989-06-16 | 1994-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for accessing objects external to an application using tables containing path definitions |
US5297283A (en) | 1989-06-29 | 1994-03-22 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Object transferring system and method in an object based computer operating system |
US5551035A (en) | 1989-06-30 | 1996-08-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for inter-object communication in an object-oriented program controlled system |
EP0407935B1 (en) | 1989-07-10 | 1999-10-06 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document data processing apparatus using image data |
EP0953900A3 (en) | 1989-07-21 | 2000-05-24 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Object based systems |
US6044205A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 2000-03-28 | Intermind Corporation | Communications system for transferring information between memories according to processes transferred with the information |
EP0502857B1 (en) | 1989-11-29 | 1994-04-06 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Process for dynamically linking definable programme elements of an interactive data-processing system |
AU631276B2 (en) | 1989-12-22 | 1992-11-19 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Name resolution in a directory database |
JP2758952B2 (en) | 1989-12-28 | 1998-05-28 | 富士通株式会社 | Display Method for Japanese Document Reading and Translation System at Correction |
US5218672A (en) | 1990-01-19 | 1993-06-08 | Sony Corporation Of America | Offline editing system with user interface for controlling edit list generation |
AU628753B2 (en) | 1990-08-14 | 1992-09-17 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for implementing server functions in a distributed heterogeneous environment |
AU639802B2 (en) | 1990-08-14 | 1993-08-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods and apparatus for providing dynamic invocation of applications in a distributed heterogeneous environment |
WO1992004678A1 (en) | 1990-09-10 | 1992-03-19 | Lotus Development Corporation | Apparatus and method for reformattable spreadsheet |
US5237680A (en) | 1990-09-27 | 1993-08-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for incremental rename propagation between hierarchical file name spaces |
US5204947A (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1993-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Application independent (open) hypermedia enablement services |
US5297249A (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1994-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hypermedia link marker abstract and search services |
CA2054026A1 (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1992-05-01 | William Monroe Turpin | Goal oriented electronic form system |
US5379419A (en) | 1990-12-07 | 1995-01-03 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Methods and apparatus for accesssing non-relational data files using relational queries |
JPH05303531A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1993-11-16 | Fields Software Group Inc | Electronic system and method for processing format |
US5191645A (en) | 1991-02-28 | 1993-03-02 | Sony Corporation Of America | Digital signal processing system employing icon displays |
US5187786A (en) | 1991-04-05 | 1993-02-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for apparatus for implementing a class hierarchy of objects in a hierarchical file system |
JP2811990B2 (en) | 1991-04-19 | 1998-10-15 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Program processing device and program processing method |
US5274803A (en) | 1991-04-26 | 1993-12-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for aligning a restored parent environment to its child environments with minimal data loss |
US5517655A (en) | 1991-04-26 | 1996-05-14 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method for monitoring transactions in an object-oriented environment |
EP0528617B1 (en) | 1991-08-19 | 1999-12-22 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for change control in multiple development environments. |
US5566330A (en) | 1991-08-20 | 1996-10-15 | Powersoft Corporation | Method for forming a reusable and modifiable database interface object |
US5377323A (en) | 1991-09-13 | 1994-12-27 | Sun Microsytems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for a federated naming system which can resolve a composite name composed of names from any number of disparate naming systems |
JPH05181769A (en) | 1991-12-28 | 1993-07-23 | Nec Corp | Document data managing system |
US5371675A (en) | 1992-06-03 | 1994-12-06 | Lotus Development Corporation | Spreadsheet program which implements alternative range references |
EP0578209B1 (en) | 1992-07-06 | 1999-10-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for organizing internal structure of a file |
US5581760A (en) | 1992-07-06 | 1996-12-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for referring to and binding to objects using identifier objects |
US5434975A (en) | 1992-09-24 | 1995-07-18 | At&T Corp. | System for interconnecting a synchronous path having semaphores and an asynchronous path having message queuing for interprocess communications |
US5438659A (en) | 1992-10-08 | 1995-08-01 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Object-action user interface management system |
US5748807A (en) | 1992-10-09 | 1998-05-05 | Panasonic Technologies, Inc. | Method and means for enhancing optical character recognition of printed documents |
US5412772A (en) | 1992-10-13 | 1995-05-02 | Novell, Inc. | System for permitting a view of an object or a user interface to be exchanged between operating system environments |
US5396623A (en) | 1992-10-30 | 1995-03-07 | Bmc Software Inc. | Method for editing the contents of a DB2 table using an editproc manager |
US5600789A (en) | 1992-11-19 | 1997-02-04 | Segue Software, Inc. | Automated GUI interface testing |
EP0820008A3 (en) | 1992-12-01 | 2006-05-24 | Microsoft Corporation | A method and system for in-place interaction with embedded objects |
US5550976A (en) | 1992-12-08 | 1996-08-27 | Sun Hydraulics Corporation | Decentralized distributed asynchronous object oriented system and method for electronic data management, storage, and communication |
GB9226137D0 (en) | 1992-12-15 | 1993-02-10 | Ibm | Data entry system |
US5535389A (en) | 1993-01-26 | 1996-07-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Business process objects with associated attributes such as version identifier |
US5446842A (en) | 1993-02-26 | 1995-08-29 | Taligent, Inc. | Object-oriented collaboration system |
JPH06301555A (en) | 1993-02-26 | 1994-10-28 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | System for plural symbiotic operating systems on micro kernel and for personality use |
US5608720A (en) | 1993-03-09 | 1997-03-04 | Hubbell Incorporated | Control system and operations system interface for a network element in an access system |
US5369766A (en) | 1993-03-25 | 1994-11-29 | Taligent, Inc. | Object-oriented loader system with support for different load formats |
US5459865A (en) | 1993-04-05 | 1995-10-17 | Taligent Inc. | Runtime loader |
US5408665A (en) | 1993-04-30 | 1995-04-18 | Borland International, Inc. | System and methods for linking compiled code with extended dictionary support |
EP0698242A1 (en) | 1993-05-10 | 1996-02-28 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System for automatically determining the status of contents added to a document |
CA2122182A1 (en) | 1993-05-20 | 1994-11-21 | Rene Leblanc | Method for rapid prototyping of programming problems |
US5649099A (en) | 1993-06-04 | 1997-07-15 | Xerox Corporation | Method for delegating access rights through executable access control program without delegating access rights not in a specification to any intermediary nor comprising server security |
US5577252A (en) | 1993-07-28 | 1996-11-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for implementing secure name servers in an object-oriented system |
US5555325A (en) | 1993-10-22 | 1996-09-10 | Lockheed Martin Federal Systems, Inc. | Data capture variable priority method and system for managing varying processing capacities |
US5806079A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1998-09-08 | Smartpatents, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for using intelligent notes to organize, link, and manipulate disparate data objects |
JP2710547B2 (en) | 1994-02-15 | 1998-02-10 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Graphical user interface |
US5704029A (en) | 1994-05-23 | 1997-12-30 | Wright Strategies, Inc. | System and method for completing an electronic form |
US5504898A (en) | 1994-06-20 | 1996-04-02 | Candle Distributed Solutions, Inc. | Threaded environment for AS/400 |
US5625783A (en) | 1994-12-13 | 1997-04-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated system and method for dynamic menu construction in a graphical user interface |
US5630126A (en) | 1994-12-13 | 1997-05-13 | International Business Machines Corp. | Systems and methods for integrating computations into compound documents |
US5706501A (en) | 1995-02-23 | 1998-01-06 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for managing resources in a network combining operations with name resolution functions |
US5862379A (en) * | 1995-03-07 | 1999-01-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Visual programming tool for developing software applications |
US5758184A (en) | 1995-04-24 | 1998-05-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System for performing asynchronous file operations requested by runnable threads by processing completion messages with different queue thread and checking for completion by runnable threads |
US5634121A (en) | 1995-05-30 | 1997-05-27 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System for identifying and linking domain information using a parsing process to identify keywords and phrases |
US5689667A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 1997-11-18 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Methods and system of controlling menus with radial and linear portions |
US5778402A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-07-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for auto-formatting a document using an event-based rule engine to format a document as the user types |
US5689565A (en) * | 1995-06-29 | 1997-11-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Cryptography system and method for providing cryptographic services for a computer application |
US5745683A (en) | 1995-07-05 | 1998-04-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for allowing disparate naming service providers to dynamically join a naming federation |
US6016520A (en) * | 1995-07-14 | 2000-01-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Method of viewing at a client viewing station a multiple media title stored at a server and containing a plurality of topics utilizing anticipatory caching |
US5644738A (en) | 1995-09-13 | 1997-07-01 | Hewlett-Packard Company | System and method using context identifiers for menu customization in a window |
US5572643A (en) | 1995-10-19 | 1996-11-05 | Judson; David H. | Web browser with dynamic display of information objects during linking |
US5758358A (en) | 1996-01-29 | 1998-05-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for reconciling sections of documents |
US5659729A (en) | 1996-02-01 | 1997-08-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for implementing hypertext scroll attributes |
US5761683A (en) | 1996-02-13 | 1998-06-02 | Microtouch Systems, Inc. | Techniques for changing the behavior of a link in a hypertext document |
US5802304A (en) | 1996-04-18 | 1998-09-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic dialer responsive to network programming interface access |
US5778372A (en) | 1996-04-18 | 1998-07-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote retrieval and display management of electronic document with incorporated images |
US5784555A (en) | 1996-04-18 | 1998-07-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Automation and dial-time checking of system configuration for internet |
US6026416A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 2000-02-15 | Microsoft Corp. | System and method for storing, viewing, editing, and processing ordered sections having different file formats |
US5790796A (en) | 1996-06-14 | 1998-08-04 | Symantec Corporation | Polymorphic package files to update software components |
US6026379A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 2000-02-15 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for managing transactions in a high availability system |
US6035297A (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 2000-03-07 | International Business Machines Machine | Data management system for concurrent engineering |
US6583797B1 (en) * | 1997-01-21 | 2003-06-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Menu management mechanism that displays menu items based on multiple heuristic factors |
US20050055627A1 (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 2005-03-10 | Signaturemail.Com, Llc | System and method for personalizing electronic mail messages |
DE69838801T2 (en) * | 1997-06-25 | 2008-10-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Browser-based control and home network |
US6366912B1 (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2002-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Network security zones |
US6345361B1 (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2002-02-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Directional set operations for permission based security in a computer system |
US6182095B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2001-01-30 | General Electric Capital Corporation | Document generator |
US6226618B1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2001-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic content delivery system |
US6691230B1 (en) * | 1998-10-15 | 2004-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for extending Java applets sand box with public client storage |
US6910179B1 (en) * | 1998-11-10 | 2005-06-21 | Clarita Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic form filling |
US6369840B1 (en) * | 1999-03-10 | 2002-04-09 | America Online, Inc. | Multi-layered online calendaring and purchasing |
US6338082B1 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2002-01-08 | Eric Schneider | Method, product, and apparatus for requesting a network resource |
US6704906B1 (en) * | 1999-03-27 | 2004-03-09 | Movaris, Inc. | Self-directed routable electronic form system and method |
US7000179B2 (en) * | 1999-03-27 | 2006-02-14 | Movaris, Inc. | Method and apparatus for programmatic learned routing in an electronic form system |
US6711679B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2004-03-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Public key infrastructure delegation |
US6701434B1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2004-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Efficient hybrid public key signature scheme |
US6546546B1 (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2003-04-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Integrating operating systems and run-time systems |
US7249328B1 (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2007-07-24 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | Tree view for reusable data markup language |
AUPQ291299A0 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 1999-10-07 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | A self mapping surface and related applications |
US6701486B1 (en) * | 1999-07-29 | 2004-03-02 | Grischa Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for automatic page suppression in forms |
US6697944B1 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2004-02-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Digital content distribution, transmission and protection system and method, and portable device for use therewith |
US7010580B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2006-03-07 | Agile Software Corp. | Method and apparatus for exchanging data in a platform independent manner |
US7519905B2 (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2009-04-14 | Webmd Corp. | Automatic formatting and validating of text for a markup language graphical user interface |
US6366907B1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2002-04-02 | Napster, Inc. | Real-time search engine |
US20020032706A1 (en) * | 1999-12-23 | 2002-03-14 | Jesse Perla | Method and system for building internet-based applications |
WO2001059675A1 (en) * | 2000-02-11 | 2001-08-16 | Ryan Mark H | Method and system for distributing and collecting spreadsheet information |
US20020032590A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2002-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | E-market architecture for supporting multiple roles and reconfigurable business porcesses |
AU2001268194A1 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2001-12-17 | Altoweb Systems, Inc. | System and method for accessing, organizing, and presenting data |
US7712024B2 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2010-05-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Application program interfaces for semantically labeling strings and providing actions based on semantically labeled strings |
US6941510B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2005-09-06 | Groove Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficient management of XML documents |
US6948135B1 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2005-09-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and systems of providing information to computer users |
US6853997B2 (en) * | 2000-06-29 | 2005-02-08 | Infoglide Corporation | System and method for sharing, mapping, transforming data between relational and hierarchical databases |
US20020032692A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2002-03-14 | Atsuhito Suzuki | Workflow management method and workflow management system of controlling workflow process |
US7020869B2 (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2006-03-28 | Corticon Technologies, Inc. | Business rules user interface for development of adaptable enterprise applications |
US7716591B2 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2010-05-11 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | System and method for dynamically generating a web page |
US20030048301A1 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2003-03-13 | Menninger Anthony Frank | System, method and computer program product for editing supplier site information in a supply chain management framework |
US20030018668A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enhanced transcoding of structured documents through use of annotation techniques |
US20030023641A1 (en) * | 2001-07-27 | 2003-01-30 | Gorman William Phillip | Web page authoring tool |
US20030061567A1 (en) * | 2001-09-05 | 2003-03-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for protecting entries in a form using access rights information |
US7120699B2 (en) * | 2001-09-20 | 2006-10-10 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Document controlled workflow systems and methods |
US20040039990A1 (en) * | 2002-03-30 | 2004-02-26 | Xorbix Technologies, Inc. | Automated form and data analysis tool |
US20040030991A1 (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2004-02-12 | Paul Hepworth | Systems and methods for facilitating automatic completion of an electronic form |
US20040003353A1 (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2004-01-01 | Joey Rivera | Workflow integration system for automatic real time data management |
US7032170B2 (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2006-04-18 | General Electric Company | Creating data structures from a form file and creating a web page in conjunction with corresponding data structures |
WO2004021329A1 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-03-11 | 4Gl School Solutions, Inc. | Method and system for compliance forms and compliance forms user interface |
US8381091B2 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2013-02-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time method, system and program product for collecting web form data |
US20040061706A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-01 | Cronin Thomas M. | Presentation of data to be displayed in a wireless network |
US6993714B2 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2006-01-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Grouping and nesting hierarchical namespaces |
US7002560B2 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2006-02-21 | Human Interface Technologies Inc. | Method of combining data entry of handwritten symbols with displayed character data |
AU2002952106A0 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2002-10-31 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Methods and systems (npw008) |
US7200806B2 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2007-04-03 | Ubs Ag | System and method for generating pre-populated forms |
US7254581B2 (en) * | 2002-11-13 | 2007-08-07 | Jerry Johnson | System and method for creation and maintenance of a rich content or content-centric electronic catalog |
US7024417B1 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2006-04-04 | Hyperion Solutions Corporation | Data mining framework using a signature associated with an algorithm |
US20040163041A1 (en) * | 2003-02-13 | 2004-08-19 | Paterra, Inc. | Relational database structures for structured documents |
US7168035B1 (en) * | 2003-06-11 | 2007-01-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Building a view on markup language data through a set of components |
US20040268229A1 (en) * | 2003-06-27 | 2004-12-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Markup language editing with an electronic form |
CA2443454A1 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2005-03-11 | Teamplate Inc. | Data binding method in workflow system |
US7636919B2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2009-12-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | User-centric policy creation and enforcement to manage visually notified state changes of disparate applications |
US7730410B2 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2010-06-01 | Sap Ag | System and method for customizing form elements in a form building application |
US20050065936A1 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2005-03-24 | Thomas Goering | System and method for reusing form elements in a form building application |
US20050071752A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-03-31 | Marlatt Jane E. | Forms management system |
US20050102612A1 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2005-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Web-enabled XML editor |
US8839090B2 (en) * | 2004-09-16 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method to capture and manage input values for automatic form fill |
US20060069605A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-03-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Workflow association in a collaborative application |
US9298513B2 (en) * | 2004-10-07 | 2016-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and structure for autonomic application differentiation/specialization |
US20070036433A1 (en) * | 2005-08-15 | 2007-02-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Recognizing data conforming to a rule |
US20070061467A1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Sessions and session states |
-
2004
- 2004-02-17 US US10/781,586 patent/US7430711B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-05-23 US US12/126,532 patent/US20080222514A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (119)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2006A (en) * | 1841-03-16 | Clamp for crimping leather | ||
US4005579A (en) * | 1975-03-31 | 1977-02-01 | The Garrett Corporation | Turbocharger control and method |
US4005578A (en) * | 1975-03-31 | 1977-02-01 | The Garrett Corporation | Method and apparatus for turbocharger control |
US4256019A (en) * | 1979-06-12 | 1981-03-17 | The Garrett Corporation | Turbocharger control actuator |
US5287448A (en) * | 1989-05-04 | 1994-02-15 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing help information to users of computers |
US5873088A (en) * | 1990-08-31 | 1999-02-16 | Fujitsu Limited | Derived data base processing system enabling one program to access a plurality of data basis |
US5717939A (en) * | 1991-11-18 | 1998-02-10 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Method and apparatus for entering and manipulating spreadsheet cell data |
US5612719A (en) * | 1992-12-03 | 1997-03-18 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Gesture sensitive buttons for graphical user interfaces |
US5388967A (en) * | 1993-03-10 | 1995-02-14 | Sullair Corporation | Compressor start control and air inlet valve therefor |
US5388968A (en) * | 1994-01-12 | 1995-02-14 | Ingersoll-Rand Company | Compressor inlet valve |
US5720016A (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 1998-02-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Multi-window display apparatus for managing writing frame memory |
US5613837A (en) * | 1994-04-27 | 1997-03-25 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Air compressor inlet and outlet valve arrangement |
US7653687B2 (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 2010-01-26 | Reisman Richard R | Method for distributing content to a user station |
US5870735A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1999-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for generating a decision-tree classifier in parallel in a multi-processor system |
US6021403A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 2000-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligent user assistance facility |
US20020023111A1 (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 2002-02-21 | Samir Arora | Draw-based editor for web pages |
US5734380A (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-03-31 | Adams; James S. | Method for controlling the presentation of displays in a multi-window computer environment |
US6513154B1 (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 2003-01-28 | John R. Porterfield | System and method for testing of computer programs in programming effort |
US6178551B1 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 2001-01-23 | Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. | Method of and system for installing a computer program |
US6012066A (en) * | 1997-10-01 | 2000-01-04 | Vallon, Inc. | Computerized work flow system |
US6035336A (en) * | 1997-10-17 | 2000-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Audio ticker system and method for presenting push information including pre-recorded audio |
US5875815A (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 1999-03-02 | Nelson Irrigation Corporation | Combination pressure regulator/drain check valve |
US6343377B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2002-01-29 | Netscape Communications Corp. | System and method for rendering content received via the internet and world wide web via delegation of rendering processes |
US6344862B1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2002-02-05 | Hewlett-Packard Company | User interface mechanism for manipulating context in computer management applications |
US20020019941A1 (en) * | 1998-06-12 | 2002-02-14 | Shannon Chan | Method and system for secure running of untrusted content |
US6336214B1 (en) * | 1998-11-10 | 2002-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automatically generating browsable language grammars |
US6850895B2 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2005-02-01 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Assignment manager |
US6353851B1 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2002-03-05 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for sharing asymmetric information and services in simultaneously viewed documents on a communication system |
US6993722B1 (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2006-01-31 | Cirrus Logic, Inc. | User interface system methods and computer program products for multi-function consumer entertainment appliances |
US7003548B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2006-02-21 | Gelco Corporation | Method and apparatus for developing and checking technical configurations of a product |
US6842175B1 (en) * | 1999-04-22 | 2005-01-11 | Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. | Tools for interacting with virtual environments |
US20040032611A1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2004-02-19 | Daly John P. | Printer drivers using filters that are operating system-independent and printer-indendent |
US7159011B1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2007-01-02 | Maquis Techtrix, Llc | System and method for managing an online message board |
US6681370B2 (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2004-01-20 | Microsoft Corporation | HTML/XML tree synchronization |
US7143103B1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2006-11-28 | University College London | Method and apparatus for monitoring and maintaining the consistency of distributed documents |
US7496632B2 (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2009-02-24 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method and system for distributing a public information release authorization (PIRA) form over an intranet |
US6523027B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2003-02-18 | Accenture Llp | Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture |
US20030033037A1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2003-02-13 | Kam-Por Yuen | Method and system for developing a software program using compound templates |
US20020116371A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2002-08-22 | David Dodds | System and method for the storage, indexing and retrieval of XML documents using relation databases |
US6505344B1 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2003-01-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object oriented apparatus and method for allocating objects on an invocation stack |
US20020010855A1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2002-01-24 | Eran Reshef | System for determining web application vulnerabilities |
US20050108634A1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2005-05-19 | Ranjit Sahota | Method and system for transforming content for execution on multiple platforms |
US20030149934A1 (en) * | 2000-05-11 | 2003-08-07 | Worden Robert Peel | Computer program connecting the structure of a xml document to its underlying meaning |
US20060004910A1 (en) * | 2000-05-18 | 2006-01-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Postback input handling by server-side control objects |
US6336797B1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2002-01-08 | Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. | Oiless rotary scroll air compressor air inlet valve |
US20020019812A1 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2002-02-14 | Board Karen Eleanor | System and service for receiving, customizing, and re-broadcasting high-speed financial data to users operating wireless network-capable devices |
US20070074106A1 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2007-03-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Authoring Arbitrary XML Documents Using DHTML and XSLT |
US6505200B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2003-01-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Application-independent data synchronization technique |
US20020026462A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2002-02-28 | Shotton Charles T. | Apparatus for and method of selectively retrieving information and enabling its subsequent display |
US6678625B1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2004-01-13 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and apparatus for a multipurpose configurable bus independent simulation bus functional model |
US20020035617A1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2002-03-21 | Mark Lynch | E-business mobility platform |
US20090043798A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2009-02-12 | Dean Tan | Techniques for automatically developing a web site |
US7178166B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2007-02-13 | Internet Security Systems, Inc. | Vulnerability assessment and authentication of a computer by a local scanner |
US20030023674A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2003-01-30 | Ibm | System and method for dynamically displaying HTML form elements |
US20030023953A1 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2003-01-30 | Lucassen John M. | MVC (model-view-conroller) based multi-modal authoring tool and development environment |
US20030037021A1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2003-02-20 | Prasad Krothappalli | JavaScript in a non-JavaScript environment |
US20030014406A1 (en) * | 2001-06-07 | 2003-01-16 | Urbanpixel Inc. | Intelligent browser windows in a multi-browser environment |
US20030025693A1 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2003-02-06 | Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation | System and procedure for providing a user interface display |
US20030120978A1 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-06-26 | Fabbrizio Giuseppe Di | Method and apparatus for a programming language having fully undoable, timed reactive instructions |
US20030029911A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-02-13 | International Business Machines Corporations | System and method for converting digital content |
US20030028550A1 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2003-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for maintaining information in database tables and performing operations on data in the database tables. |
US20030028762A1 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2003-02-06 | Kevin Trilli | Entity authentication in a shared hosting computer network environment |
US20030033606A1 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-02-13 | Puente David S. | Streaming media publishing system and method |
US20030033179A1 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-13 | Katz Steven Bruce | Method for generating customized alerts related to the procurement, sourcing, strategic sourcing and/or sale of one or more items by an enterprise |
US20030038788A1 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Pierre Demartines | Automatically scrolling handwritten input user interface for personal digital assistants and the like |
US20040205592A1 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2004-10-14 | Xmlcities, Inc. | Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs |
US20030038846A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-02-27 | Fujitsu Limited | Message display program and message display apparatus |
US20060005978A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2006-01-12 | Zaun Richard D | Knock-on sweep structure and tools therefor |
US20080021916A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2008-01-24 | Timebase Pty Limited | Maintenance of a markup language document in a database |
US20030120671A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Xmlcities, Inc. | Extensible stylesheet designs in visual graphic environments |
US20040024720A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2004-02-05 | John Fairweather | System and method for managing knowledge |
US7337391B2 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2008-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for stylesheet execution interactive feedback |
US20040015778A1 (en) * | 2002-03-16 | 2004-01-22 | Catherine Britton | Electronic healthcare management form creation |
US20060010386A1 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2006-01-12 | Khan Emdadur R | Microbrowser using voice internet rendering |
US7669116B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2010-02-23 | Accenture Global Services, Gmbh | Single access point for filing of converted electronic forms to multiple processing entities |
US20040002950A1 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2004-01-01 | Brennan Sean F. | Methods and apparatus for process, factory-floor, environmental, computer aided manufacturing-based or other control system using hierarchically enumerated data set |
US20030208533A1 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2003-11-06 | Digital Evolution | Method and apparatus for managing web services within a computer network system |
US20040044965A1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2004-03-04 | Haruhiko Toyama | Structured document edit apparatus, structured document edit method, and program product |
US7107282B1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2006-09-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Managing XPath expressions in a database system |
US7490167B2 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2009-02-10 | Sony Corporation | System and method for platform and language-independent development and delivery of page-based content |
US7240279B1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2007-07-03 | Microsoft Corporation | XML patterns language |
US20040015783A1 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-22 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Methods for interactively defining transforms and for generating queries by manipulating existing query data |
US20040003341A1 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for processing electronic forms for use with resource constrained devices |
US20040006744A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for validating an XML document and reporting schema violations |
US20040002939A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Schemaless dataflow within an XML storage solution |
US20040010753A1 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2004-01-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Converting markup language files |
US20040031052A1 (en) * | 2002-08-12 | 2004-02-12 | Liberate Technologies | Information platform |
US20040039881A1 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2004-02-26 | Netdelivery Corporation | Systems and methods for storing differing data formats in fixed field definitions |
US7337392B2 (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2008-02-26 | Vincent Wen-Jeng Lue | Method and apparatus for adapting web contents to different display area dimensions |
US20040210573A1 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2004-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program for generating structure pattern candidates |
US7490109B1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2009-02-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for offline editing of data files |
US8117552B2 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2012-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas |
US20040194016A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic data migration for structured markup language schema changes |
US20080040635A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2008-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | System and Method for Real-Time Validation of Structured Data Files |
US7865477B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2011-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for real-time validation of structured data files |
US20080027896A1 (en) * | 2003-05-29 | 2008-01-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Hierarchical triggers for database |
US20050027676A1 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2005-02-03 | Matthias Eichstaedt | Method and system for delivery alerts to a user |
US20050033626A1 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2005-02-10 | Sap Ag | Universal worklist service and user interface |
US20090044103A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2009-02-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Rendering an html electronic form by applying xslt to xml using a solution |
US20050033657A1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2005-02-10 | Keepmedia, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Personalized content management and presentation systems |
US20050028073A1 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2005-02-03 | Henry Steven G. | Method and system for automating workflows |
US20080052287A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2008-02-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Correlation, Association, or Correspondence of Electronic Forms |
US7334187B1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2008-02-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Electronic form aggregation |
US20050039117A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2005-02-17 | Fuhwei Lwo | Method, system, and computer program product for comparing two computer files |
US20050102530A1 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2005-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for XSL/XML based authorization rules policy implementation |
US7877400B1 (en) * | 2003-11-18 | 2011-01-25 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Optimizations of XPaths |
US8655998B1 (en) * | 2003-12-02 | 2014-02-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Client-side XML-based development environment for network device management applications |
US20060004703A1 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2006-01-05 | Radar Networks, Inc. | Semantic web portal and platform |
US20070005611A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-01-04 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Work flow managing system |
US7496837B1 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2009-02-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Structural editing with schema awareness |
US20060020883A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2006-01-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Web page personalization |
US20060004815A1 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2006-01-05 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and apparatus for editing metadata, and computer product |
US20060026500A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Qa Im-Maqami Hood | System and method for data collection and processing |
US20060041593A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Veritas Operating Corporation | System and method for communicating file system events using a publish-subscribe model |
US20090019063A1 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2009-01-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Finding and Consuming Web Subscriptions in a Web Browser |
US20090013266A1 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2009-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Finding and Consuming Web Subscriptions in a Web Browser |
US20070011665A1 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2007-01-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Content syndication platform |
US20070011156A1 (en) * | 2005-07-05 | 2007-01-11 | Oracle International Corporation | RSS enabled logging |
US7334178B1 (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2008-02-19 | Xsigo Systems | Randomized self-checking test system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
"XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0, by W3C Working Draft 12 November 2003, 72 pages. * |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7979856B2 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2011-07-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Network-based software extensions |
US8074217B2 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2011-12-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for delivering software |
US8918729B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2014-12-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Designing electronic forms |
US8117552B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2012-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas |
US7925621B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2011-04-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Installing a solution |
US9229917B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2016-01-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Electronic form user interfaces |
US9239821B2 (en) | 2003-08-01 | 2016-01-19 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Translation file |
US8892993B2 (en) | 2003-08-01 | 2014-11-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Translation file |
US8429522B2 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2013-04-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms |
US9268760B2 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2016-02-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms |
US7971139B2 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2011-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms |
US7937651B2 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2011-05-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Structural editing operations for network forms |
US20060224948A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and software tool for processing an electronic form |
US8448060B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2013-05-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and software tool for processing an electronic form |
US8010515B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2011-08-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Query to an electronic form |
US8200975B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2012-06-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Digital signatures for network forms |
US7870478B1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2011-01-11 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Repurposing subsections and/or objects |
US9210234B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2015-12-08 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices |
US8001459B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2011-08-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices |
US20090313743A1 (en) * | 2008-06-20 | 2009-12-24 | Craig Jason Hofmeyer | Pants with saggy pants control system |
US20120260200A1 (en) * | 2011-04-11 | 2012-10-11 | Data Systems International, Inc. | Multi-view form design |
US9329839B2 (en) * | 2011-04-11 | 2016-05-03 | Data Systems International, Inc. | Multi-view form design |
US9575949B2 (en) | 2011-04-11 | 2017-02-21 | Data Systems International, Inc. | Multi-view runtime interrogator |
JP2017201547A (en) * | 2012-10-31 | 2017-11-09 | リミテッド ライアビリティー カンパニー “1シー” | Automatic report generation method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050183006A1 (en) | 2005-08-18 |
US7430711B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7430711B2 (en) | Systems and methods for editing XML documents | |
US7275216B2 (en) | System and method for designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas | |
US8918729B2 (en) | Designing electronic forms | |
US7168035B1 (en) | Building a view on markup language data through a set of components | |
US7506243B2 (en) | System and method for integrating spreadsheets and word processing tables | |
US20040268229A1 (en) | Markup language editing with an electronic form | |
US8387055B1 (en) | System and method for providing information and associating information | |
US20050044486A1 (en) | User interface for integrated spreadsheets and word processing tables | |
WO2006137565A1 (en) | Document processing device, and document processing method | |
EP1818835A1 (en) | Document processing device, and document processing method | |
US7685229B1 (en) | System and method for displaying server side code results in an application program | |
US20080134019A1 (en) | Processing Data And Documents That Use A Markup Language | |
EP1816586A1 (en) | Data processing system, data processing method, and management server | |
US20080133563A1 (en) | Data Processing Device And Data Processing Method | |
US20090021767A1 (en) | Document processing device | |
WO2006051960A1 (en) | Document processing device and document processing method | |
JPWO2006051713A1 (en) | Document processing apparatus and document processing method | |
EP1811399A1 (en) | Data processing device and data processing method | |
EP1933233A1 (en) | Data processing apparatus | |
US7827195B2 (en) | Document management device and document management method | |
US20070283246A1 (en) | Processing Documents In Multiple Markup Representations | |
EP1830274A1 (en) | Server device and name space issuing method | |
JPWO2006051716A1 (en) | Document processing apparatus and document processing method | |
JPWO2006051712A1 (en) | Document processing apparatus and document processing method | |
WO2006051721A1 (en) | Document processing device, and document processing method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034564/0001 Effective date: 20141014 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |