US20080136139A1 - Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly - Google Patents

Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080136139A1
US20080136139A1 US11/608,888 US60888806A US2008136139A1 US 20080136139 A1 US20080136139 A1 US 20080136139A1 US 60888806 A US60888806 A US 60888806A US 2008136139 A1 US2008136139 A1 US 2008136139A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
hitch
trailer
jackknifing
resilient
pair
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/608,888
Other versions
US7540523B2 (en
Inventor
David Russell
Chi Yip
Dennis Kessler
Paul Snyder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ford Global Technologies LLC
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ford Global Technologies LLC filed Critical Ford Global Technologies LLC
Priority to US11/608,888 priority Critical patent/US7540523B2/en
Assigned to FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC reassignment FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KESSLER, DENNIS, RUSSELL, DAVID, SNYDER, PAUL, YIP, CHI
Publication of US20080136139A1 publication Critical patent/US20080136139A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7540523B2 publication Critical patent/US7540523B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60D—VEHICLE CONNECTIONS
    • B60D1/00—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices
    • B60D1/24—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices characterised by arrangements for particular functions
    • B60D1/30—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices characterised by arrangements for particular functions for sway control, e.g. stabilising or anti-fishtail devices; Sway alarm means
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60D—VEHICLE CONNECTIONS
    • B60D1/00—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices
    • B60D1/24—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices characterised by arrangements for particular functions
    • B60D1/30—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices characterised by arrangements for particular functions for sway control, e.g. stabilising or anti-fishtail devices; Sway alarm means
    • B60D1/32—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices characterised by arrangements for particular functions for sway control, e.g. stabilising or anti-fishtail devices; Sway alarm means involving damping devices
    • B60D1/327—Traction couplings; Hitches; Draw-gear; Towing devices characterised by arrangements for particular functions for sway control, e.g. stabilising or anti-fishtail devices; Sway alarm means involving damping devices using cables

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to articulated vehicles, and more particularly to an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly with a simple and robust construction that enhances control of an articulated vehicle, as compared with conventional anti-jackknifing couplings.
  • Jackknifing is the accidental folding of an articulated vehicle such that it resembles the acute angle of a folding knife.
  • One example of jackknifing occurs when a tow vehicle skids and a trailer pushes the tow vehicle from behind until the tow vehicle spins around and faces backwards.
  • Typical causes for jackknifing include equipment failure, improper braking, or adverse conditions, such as an icy road surface.
  • One known anti-jackknifing device includes a pair of stop blocks extending from the trailer, which engage a pair of latch blocks extending from the tow vehicle. These rigid blocks prevent movement of the vehicle beyond a predetermined range of free articulation. However, it will be appreciated that the rigid blocks may fracture when the stop blocks impact the latch blocks under an initial impulse load. Also, the rigid blocks typically do not warn the driver of over-articulation of the vehicle.
  • Typical anti-sway hitches can include an array of complex linkages with helical springs for damping the swaying movement of improperly loaded trailers. These complex linkages can increase the time required for installation on vehicles.
  • an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly having a simple construction that improves control of an articulated vehicle, provides feedback regarding trailer position, and prevents over-articulation of the vehicle.
  • An anti-jackknifing hitch assembly (“assembly”) is provided.
  • the assembly includes a hitch, a tongue, a pair of resilient members, and a routing member.
  • the hitch is attached to a tow vehicle.
  • the tongue extends from a trailer and is pivotally attached to the hitch.
  • the tongue pivots about a pivot axis within a predetermined range of articulation defined by the resilient members.
  • the hitch has a pair of opposing end portions, with the trailer having a pair of opposing front corner portions.
  • the resilient members respectively connect the end portions of the hitch to the front corner portions of the trailer.
  • the resilient members are sized to prevent over-articulation of the tow vehicle and the trailer.
  • the routing member assists the resilient members in applying a restoring moment about the pivot axis.
  • the routing member extends from one of the hitch and the tongue adjacent to the pivot axis.
  • the routing member includes a pair of attachment members with the resilient members extending therethrough.
  • One advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that prevents an articulated vehicle from jackknifing and damaging itself.
  • Another advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that has a simple robust construction with lower costs, as compared with conventional anti-jackknifing devices.
  • Yet another advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that is sufficiently strong for stabilizing an articulated vehicle and receiving an impulse load typically associated with a jackknifing vehicle.
  • Still another advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that notifies a driver about the articulation of the trailer.
  • FIG. 1 is a side view of an articulated vehicle having an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly, according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective exploded view of the anti-jackknifing hitch assembly shown in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 is a top plan view of the articulated vehicle shown in FIG. 1 , illustrating the anti-jackknifing hitch assembly during normal operation of the vehicle;
  • FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the articulated vehicle shown in FIG. 1 , illustrating the anti-jackknifing hitch assembly under a jackknifing condition.
  • an articulated vehicle 10 having an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly 12 (“assembly”), according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the assembly 12 is beneficial for preventing the articulated vehicle 10 from jackknifing, enhancing control of the vehicle 10 , and providing feedback as to trailer position. Also, it will be appreciated that the assembly 12 has a simple and robust construction that can be readily integrated within existing vehicles at a substantially low cost, as compared with existing anti-jackknifing couplings.
  • the articulated vehicle 10 includes a tow vehicle 14 , a trailer 16 , and the assembly 12 pivotally attaching the trailer 16 to the tow vehicle 14 .
  • the assembly 12 includes a hitch 18 , a tongue 20 , a pair of resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b and a routing member 24 .
  • the hitch 18 is attached to the tow vehicle 14 .
  • the hitch 18 is a fixed-tongue hitch with a hitch ball 26 (shown in FIG. 2 ).
  • the hitch 18 can instead be a fixed-undercar hitch, a receiver-style hitch, a custom hitch, a round-tube hitch, or various other suitable hitches.
  • the tongue 20 extends from the trailer 16 and is attached to the hitch 18 .
  • the tongue 20 is a series of beams 28 extending from the trailer 16 and converging to a bracket 30 with a coupler socket 32 .
  • the coupler socket 32 receives the hitch ball 26 and pivotally attaches to the same. In this way, the tongue 20 and the trailer 16 articulate about a pivot axis 34 (shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b connect the trailer 16 and the hitch 18 and are sized for limiting articulation of the vehicle 10 within a predetermined range.
  • the hitch 18 has a pair of opposing end portions 36 a, 36 b with ring anchors 38 .
  • the trailer 16 has a pair of opposing front corner portions 40 a, 40 b with ring anchors 38 .
  • Resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b attach the end portions 36 a, 36 b respectively to front corner portions 40 a, 40 b.
  • the outermost webbing in a turn is pulled taut when the vehicle 10 articulates beyond the predetermined range of articulation.
  • the webbings 22 a, 22 b are sized for defining a forty-degree range of articulation. However, it is understood that the webbings 22 a, 22 b can be sized for defining other suitable ranges of articulation.
  • the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b apply a restoring moment to the vehicle 10 by the routing member 24 .
  • the routing member 24 is a frame 44 attached to the tongue 20 adjacent to the pivot axis 34 .
  • the routing member 24 can instead be attached to the hitch 18 .
  • the frame 44 is formed from a series of bars 46 and a pair of loops 48 a, 48 b which hold the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b. In this way, the slackened resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b slide through the loops 48 a, 48 b as the vehicle 10 articulates during normal operation (shown in FIG. 3 ) and applies a restoring moment about the pivot axis 34 when the vehicle articulates beyond the predetermined range of articulation (shown in FIG. 4 ).
  • the frame 44 of the routing member 24 includes six bars 46 , extending from the tongue 20 and converging to a pair of plates 50 a, 50 b with the respective loops 48 a, 48 b.
  • Four lower bars 46 which are coplanar with the beams 28 of the tongue 20 , extend perpendicularly from the tongue 20 for supporting a significant load transferred from the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b.
  • Two bars 46 extend downward from bracket 30 to the respective loops 50 a and 50 b.
  • the plates 50 a, 50 b assist in transferring the load to the tongue 20 .
  • the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b are sufficiently strong for receiving an impulse load and straightening the articulated vehicle 10 . In this way, the vehicle 10 drifts and slows down so as to improve control of the vehicle 10 .
  • the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b are sufficiently elastic for notifying the driver of the articulation and providing him with time to correct the over-articulation.
  • the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b are formed from a nylon material that can receive a load of 30,000 lbs with a spring constant of 4,200 pounds per inch. It is contemplated that the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b can be formed from a variety of suitable materials, receiving more or less than 30,000 lbs. and having a spring constant that is more or less than 4,200 lbs. per inch.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Vehicle Cleaning, Maintenance, Repair, Refitting, And Outriggers (AREA)

Abstract

An anti-jackknifing hitch assembly (12) (“assembly”) includes a hitch (18), a tongue (20), two resilient members (22 a, 22 b), and a routing member (24). The hitch (18) is attached to a tow vehicle (10). The tongue (20) extends from a trailer (16) and is attached to the hitch (18). The tongue (20) pivots about a pivot axis (34) within a predetermined range of articulation (52) defined by the resilient members (22 a, 22 b). In particular, resilient members (22 a, 22 b) respectively connect end portions (36 a, 36 b) of hitch (18) to front corner portions (40 a, 40 b) of trailer (16) and are sized for preventing over-articulation. Routing member (24) assists resilient members (22 a, 22 b) in applying a restoring moment about the pivot axis (34). Namely, the routing member (24) extends from the hitch (18) or tongue (20) adjacent to pivoting axis (34). The routing member (24) includes attachment members (48 a, 48 b) with resilient members (22 a, 22 b) extending therethrough.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates generally to articulated vehicles, and more particularly to an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly with a simple and robust construction that enhances control of an articulated vehicle, as compared with conventional anti-jackknifing couplings.
    • BACKGROUND
  • Anti-jackknifing couplings have been developed to prevent damage to articulated vehicles. Jackknifing is the accidental folding of an articulated vehicle such that it resembles the acute angle of a folding knife. One example of jackknifing occurs when a tow vehicle skids and a trailer pushes the tow vehicle from behind until the tow vehicle spins around and faces backwards. Typical causes for jackknifing include equipment failure, improper braking, or adverse conditions, such as an icy road surface.
  • One known anti-jackknifing device includes a pair of stop blocks extending from the trailer, which engage a pair of latch blocks extending from the tow vehicle. These rigid blocks prevent movement of the vehicle beyond a predetermined range of free articulation. However, it will be appreciated that the rigid blocks may fracture when the stop blocks impact the latch blocks under an initial impulse load. Also, the rigid blocks typically do not warn the driver of over-articulation of the vehicle.
  • Typical anti-sway hitches can include an array of complex linkages with helical springs for damping the swaying movement of improperly loaded trailers. These complex linkages can increase the time required for installation on vehicles.
  • It is therefore desirable to provide an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly having a simple construction that improves control of an articulated vehicle, provides feedback regarding trailer position, and prevents over-articulation of the vehicle.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An anti-jackknifing hitch assembly (“assembly”) is provided. The assembly includes a hitch, a tongue, a pair of resilient members, and a routing member. The hitch is attached to a tow vehicle. The tongue extends from a trailer and is pivotally attached to the hitch. The tongue pivots about a pivot axis within a predetermined range of articulation defined by the resilient members. In particular, the hitch has a pair of opposing end portions, with the trailer having a pair of opposing front corner portions. The resilient members respectively connect the end portions of the hitch to the front corner portions of the trailer. The resilient members are sized to prevent over-articulation of the tow vehicle and the trailer. The routing member assists the resilient members in applying a restoring moment about the pivot axis. Namely, the routing member extends from one of the hitch and the tongue adjacent to the pivot axis. The routing member includes a pair of attachment members with the resilient members extending therethrough.
  • One advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that prevents an articulated vehicle from jackknifing and damaging itself.
  • Another advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that has a simple robust construction with lower costs, as compared with conventional anti-jackknifing devices.
  • Yet another advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that is sufficiently strong for stabilizing an articulated vehicle and receiving an impulse load typically associated with a jackknifing vehicle.
  • Still another advantage of the invention is that an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly is provided that notifies a driver about the articulation of the trailer.
  • Other advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon considering the following detailed description and appended claims, and upon reference to the accompanying drawings.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of this invention, reference should now be made to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying drawings and described below by way of the examples of the invention:
  • FIG. 1 is a side view of an articulated vehicle having an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly, according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective exploded view of the anti-jackknifing hitch assembly shown in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a top plan view of the articulated vehicle shown in FIG. 1, illustrating the anti-jackknifing hitch assembly during normal operation of the vehicle; and
  • FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the articulated vehicle shown in FIG. 1, illustrating the anti-jackknifing hitch assembly under a jackknifing condition.
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • In the following figures, the same reference numerals are used to identify the same components in the various views.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, there is illustrated an articulated vehicle 10 having an anti-jackknifing hitch assembly 12 (“assembly”), according to one embodiment of the invention. As detailed below, the assembly 12 is beneficial for preventing the articulated vehicle 10 from jackknifing, enhancing control of the vehicle 10, and providing feedback as to trailer position. Also, it will be appreciated that the assembly 12 has a simple and robust construction that can be readily integrated within existing vehicles at a substantially low cost, as compared with existing anti-jackknifing couplings.
  • The articulated vehicle 10 includes a tow vehicle 14, a trailer 16, and the assembly 12 pivotally attaching the trailer 16 to the tow vehicle 14. As best shown in FIG. 2, the assembly 12 includes a hitch 18, a tongue 20, a pair of resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b and a routing member 24.
  • The hitch 18 is attached to the tow vehicle 14. In the illustrated embodiment, the hitch 18 is a fixed-tongue hitch with a hitch ball 26 (shown in FIG. 2). However it is contemplated that the hitch 18 can instead be a fixed-undercar hitch, a receiver-style hitch, a custom hitch, a round-tube hitch, or various other suitable hitches.
  • The tongue 20 extends from the trailer 16 and is attached to the hitch 18. Specifically, the tongue 20 is a series of beams 28 extending from the trailer 16 and converging to a bracket 30 with a coupler socket 32. The coupler socket 32 receives the hitch ball 26 and pivotally attaches to the same. In this way, the tongue 20 and the trailer 16 articulate about a pivot axis 34 (shown in FIG. 1).
  • With attention to FIGS. 3 and 4, the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b connect the trailer 16 and the hitch 18 and are sized for limiting articulation of the vehicle 10 within a predetermined range. Namely, the hitch 18 has a pair of opposing end portions 36 a, 36 b with ring anchors 38. Likewise, the trailer 16 has a pair of opposing front corner portions 40 a, 40 b with ring anchors 38. Resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b attach the end portions 36 a, 36 b respectively to front corner portions 40 a, 40 b. As shown in FIG. 4, the outermost webbing in a turn is pulled taut when the vehicle 10 articulates beyond the predetermined range of articulation. In the illustrated embodiment, the webbings 22 a, 22 b are sized for defining a forty-degree range of articulation. However, it is understood that the webbings 22 a, 22 b can be sized for defining other suitable ranges of articulation.
  • The resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b apply a restoring moment to the vehicle 10 by the routing member 24. In particular, the routing member 24 is a frame 44 attached to the tongue 20 adjacent to the pivot axis 34. However, it is understood that the routing member 24 can instead be attached to the hitch 18. As best shown in FIG. 2, the frame 44 is formed from a series of bars 46 and a pair of loops 48 a, 48 b which hold the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b. In this way, the slackened resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b slide through the loops 48 a, 48 b as the vehicle 10 articulates during normal operation (shown in FIG. 3) and applies a restoring moment about the pivot axis 34 when the vehicle articulates beyond the predetermined range of articulation (shown in FIG. 4).
  • In the illustrated embodiment, the frame 44 of the routing member 24 includes six bars 46, extending from the tongue 20 and converging to a pair of plates 50 a, 50 b with the respective loops 48 a, 48 b. Four lower bars 46, which are coplanar with the beams 28 of the tongue 20, extend perpendicularly from the tongue 20 for supporting a significant load transferred from the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b. Two bars 46 extend downward from bracket 30 to the respective loops 50 a and 50 b. The plates 50 a, 50 b assist in transferring the load to the tongue 20.
  • The resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b are sufficiently strong for receiving an impulse load and straightening the articulated vehicle 10. In this way, the vehicle 10 drifts and slows down so as to improve control of the vehicle 10. The resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b are sufficiently elastic for notifying the driver of the articulation and providing him with time to correct the over-articulation. For instance, in the illustrated embodiment, the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b are formed from a nylon material that can receive a load of 30,000 lbs with a spring constant of 4,200 pounds per inch. It is contemplated that the resilient webbings 22 a, 22 b can be formed from a variety of suitable materials, receiving more or less than 30,000 lbs. and having a spring constant that is more or less than 4,200 lbs. per inch.
  • While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only in terms of the appended claims.

Claims (20)

1. An anti-jackknifing hitch assembly, comprising:
a hitch attached to a tow vehicle;
a tongue extending from a trailer and pivotally attached to said hitch;
said tongue pivoting about a pivot axis within a predetermined range of articulation;
a pair of resilient members sized for defining said predetermined range of articulation and preventing said tow vehicle and said trailer from jackknifing;
said hitch having a pair of opposing end portions;
said trailer having a pair of opposing front corner portions;
said resilient members respectively connecting said opposing end portions of said hitch with said opposing front corner portions of said trailer; and
a routing member assisting said resilient members in applying a restoring moment about said pivot axis;
said routing member extending laterally from one of said hitch and said tongue adjacent to said pivot axis.
2. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 wherein said resilient members are slackened when said tow vehicle and trailer are positioned within said predetermined range of articulation.
3. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 wherein one of said resilient members is pulled taut when said tow vehicle and said trailer articulate beyond said range of predetermined articulation.
4. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 wherein said resilient members are formed from a nylon material.
5. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 wherein said resilient members have a spring constant substantially equal to 4,200 pounds per square inch.
6. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 wherein said pair of attachment members of said routing member are positioned diametrically across said pivot axis.
7. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 wherein said resilient members are respectively attached to said opposing end portions of said hitch and said front corner portions of said trailer by a series of ring anchors.
8. An articulated vehicle, comprising:
a tow vehicle having a rear end structure;
a trailer; and
said anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 1 with said tongue extending from said trailer and said hitch extending from said tow vehicle.
9. An anti-jackknifing hitch assembly, comprising:
a hitch attached to a tow vehicle;
a tongue extending from a trailer and pivotally attached to said hitch;
said tongue pivoting about a pivot axis within a predetermined range of articulation;
a pair of resilient webbings sized for defining said predetermined range of articulation and preventing said tow vehicle and said trailer from jackknifing;
said hitch having a pair of opposing end portions;
said trailer having a pair of opposing front corner portions;
said resilient webbings respectively connecting said opposing end portions of said hitch with said opposing front corner portions of said trailer; and
a routing member assisting said resilient webbings in applying a restoring moment about said pivot axis;
said routing member extending laterally from one of said hitch and said tongue adjacent to said pivot axis;
said routing member formed from a frame having at least one pair of bars and at least one pair of loops with said resilient members extending therethrough.
10. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein said at least one pair of bars of said routing member extends perpendicularly from said tongue.
11. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein said at least one pair of bars of said routing member includes three of said bars converging to each of said loops.
12. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein said resilient webbings are slackened when said tow vehicle and trailer are positioned within said predetermined range of articulation.
13. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein one of said resilient webbings is pulled taut when said tow vehicle and said trailer articulate beyond said range of predetermined articulation.
14. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein said resilient webbings are formed from a nylon material.
15. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein said pair of loops of said routing member are positioned diametrically across said pivot axis.
16. The anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 wherein said resilient webbings are respectively attached to said opposing end portions of said hitch and said front corner portions of said trailer by a series of ring anchors.
17. An articulated vehicle, comprising:
a tow vehicle having a rear end structure;
a trailer; and
said anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 9 with said tongue extending from said trailer and said hitch extending from said tow vehicle;
said tongue including a coupler, a bracket, and a plurality beams;
said plurality of beams converging toward said bracket;
said bars of said routing member extending perpendicularly from said plurality of beams and said bracket.
18. An anti-jackknifing hitch assembly, comprising:
a hitch attached to a tow vehicle;
a tongue extending from a trailer and pivotally attached to said hitch;
said tongue pivoting about a pivot axis within a predetermined range of articulation;
a pair of resilient webbings sized for defining said predetermined range of articulation and preventing said tow vehicle and said trailer from jackknifing;
said hitch having a pair of opposing end portions;
said trailer having a pair of opposing front corner portions;
said resilient webbings respectively connecting said opposing end portions of said hitch with said opposing front corner portions of said trailer; and
a routing member assisting said resilient webbings in applying a restoring moment about said pivot axis;
said routing member extending laterally from said tongue adjacent to said pivot axis;
said routing member having a pair of loops with said resilient members extending therethrough;
said routing member further including a pair of contoured plates adjacent to said loops with said contoured plates distributing a force across a predetermined length of said resilient webbings.
19. An articulated vehicle, comprising:
a tow vehicle having a rear end structure;
a trailer; and
said anti-jackknifing hitch assembly recited in claim 18 with said tongue extending from said trailer and said hitch extending from said tow vehicle;
said resilient webbings are slackened when said tow vehicle and trailer are positioned within said predetermined range of articulation;
one of said resilient webbings is taut when said tow vehicle and said trailer are positioned beyond said range of predetermined articulation.
20. The articulated vehicle recited in claim 19 wherein said resilient webbings are respectively attached to said opposing end portions of said hitch and said front corner portions of said trailer by a series of ring anchors.
US11/608,888 2006-12-11 2006-12-11 Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly Expired - Fee Related US7540523B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/608,888 US7540523B2 (en) 2006-12-11 2006-12-11 Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/608,888 US7540523B2 (en) 2006-12-11 2006-12-11 Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080136139A1 true US20080136139A1 (en) 2008-06-12
US7540523B2 US7540523B2 (en) 2009-06-02

Family

ID=39497063

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/608,888 Expired - Fee Related US7540523B2 (en) 2006-12-11 2006-12-11 Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7540523B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10406877B2 (en) * 2017-12-07 2019-09-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Monitoring of anti-sway bar chains of trailer hitch systems

Families Citing this family (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2447672B (en) 2007-03-21 2011-12-14 Ford Global Tech Llc Vehicle manoeuvring aids
US7752991B2 (en) * 2008-02-26 2010-07-13 James D Graves Transportation safety device
US9513103B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2016-12-06 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Hitch angle sensor assembly
US9683848B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2017-06-20 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System for determining hitch angle
US9434414B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2016-09-06 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for determining a hitch angle offset
US9937953B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2018-04-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer backup offset determination
US9290203B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2016-03-22 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer length estimation in hitch angle applications
US9335163B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2016-05-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer length estimation in hitch angle applications
US9290202B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2016-03-22 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method of calibrating a trailer backup assist system
US10196088B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2019-02-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Target monitoring system and method
US9373044B2 (en) 2011-07-25 2016-06-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer lane departure warning system
US9517668B2 (en) 2014-07-28 2016-12-13 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Hitch angle warning system and method
US9963004B2 (en) 2014-07-28 2018-05-08 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer sway warning system and method
US9340228B2 (en) 2014-10-13 2016-05-17 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer motion and parameter estimation system
US9315212B1 (en) 2014-10-13 2016-04-19 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer sensor module and associated method of wireless trailer identification and motion estimation
US9533683B2 (en) 2014-12-05 2017-01-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Sensor failure mitigation system and mode management
US9607242B2 (en) 2015-01-16 2017-03-28 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Target monitoring system with lens cleaning device
US9522699B2 (en) * 2015-02-05 2016-12-20 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer backup assist system with adaptive steering angle limits
US9616923B2 (en) 2015-03-03 2017-04-11 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Topographical integration for trailer backup assist system
US9804022B2 (en) 2015-03-24 2017-10-31 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for hitch angle detection
US10384607B2 (en) 2015-10-19 2019-08-20 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer backup assist system with hitch angle offset estimation
US10611407B2 (en) 2015-10-19 2020-04-07 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Speed control for motor vehicles
US9836060B2 (en) 2015-10-28 2017-12-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer backup assist system with target management
US10017115B2 (en) 2015-11-11 2018-07-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer monitoring system and method
US9798953B2 (en) 2015-12-17 2017-10-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Template matching solution for locating trailer hitch point
US9827818B2 (en) 2015-12-17 2017-11-28 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Multi-stage solution for trailer hitch angle initialization
US9610975B1 (en) * 2015-12-17 2017-04-04 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Hitch angle detection for trailer backup assist system
US10011228B2 (en) 2015-12-17 2018-07-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Hitch angle detection for trailer backup assist system using multiple imaging devices
US9796228B2 (en) * 2015-12-17 2017-10-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Hitch angle detection for trailer backup assist system
US10155478B2 (en) 2015-12-17 2018-12-18 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Centerline method for trailer hitch angle detection
US9934572B2 (en) 2015-12-17 2018-04-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Drawbar scan solution for locating trailer hitch point
US10005492B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2018-06-26 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer length and hitch angle bias estimation
KR102100788B1 (en) * 2016-03-10 2020-04-14 센요 고교 가부시키가이샤 Connection structure of connected vehicle
US10106193B2 (en) 2016-07-01 2018-10-23 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Enhanced yaw rate trailer angle detection initialization
US10046800B2 (en) 2016-08-10 2018-08-14 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer wheel targetless trailer angle detection
US10222804B2 (en) 2016-10-21 2019-03-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Inertial reference for TBA speed limiting
US10710585B2 (en) 2017-09-01 2020-07-14 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer backup assist system with predictive hitch angle functionality
US11077795B2 (en) 2018-11-26 2021-08-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer angle detection using end-to-end learning
US10829046B2 (en) 2019-03-06 2020-11-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Trailer angle detection using end-to-end learning
US11142265B2 (en) * 2019-11-08 2021-10-12 Michael Shalit Anti-jackknifing apparatus

Citations (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2612382A (en) * 1950-10-19 1952-09-30 Christian G Landis Trailer stabilizing connection
US3250524A (en) * 1963-10-21 1966-05-10 Earlish L Boatright Stabilizer
US3338595A (en) * 1965-10-23 1967-08-29 Nelson H Bogie Trailer stabilizer
US3659874A (en) * 1969-01-16 1972-05-02 William L Rendessy Sway control for trailer hitch
US3837676A (en) * 1969-08-08 1974-09-24 W Rendessy Sway control device for trailer hitches
US3871686A (en) * 1973-06-12 1975-03-18 William L Rendessy Trailer sway control device
US3963265A (en) * 1975-06-05 1976-06-15 Robert E. Kornoelje Anti-jackknife mechanism
US3964767A (en) * 1975-03-19 1976-06-22 Berdell Williams Anti-sway trailer hitch
US3989269A (en) * 1974-08-30 1976-11-02 Rendessy William L Sway control devices utilizable in conjunction with equalizer hitches
US4065149A (en) * 1974-11-01 1977-12-27 Safe Track Manufacturing Limited Anti-jackknife apparatus
US4204700A (en) * 1978-11-08 1980-05-27 Haines Towing Inc. Anti-jackknife apparatus
US4278267A (en) * 1977-09-09 1981-07-14 Societe Anonyme Etablissements Vasseur & Cie Equipments for attaching trailers
US4281846A (en) * 1979-10-24 1981-08-04 Hall Kenneth A Anti-jackknife mechanism
US4306734A (en) * 1979-06-29 1981-12-22 Atwood Vacuum Machine Company Apparatus for use with a trailer equipped with a surge brake actuator and with an anti-sway mechanism
US4582337A (en) * 1984-05-30 1986-04-15 Hsueh Paul Y J Anti-sway trailer hitch
US4585248A (en) * 1984-06-13 1986-04-29 Ray Miller Anti-jackknife and steering control system
US4714264A (en) * 1985-04-26 1987-12-22 Emile Woestelandt Coupling structure between a towing vehicle and a towed vehicle
US4917406A (en) * 1988-03-23 1990-04-17 Jean Walterscheid Gmbh Length-adjustable holding device for the lower steering arm of a three-point coupling device
US4991863A (en) * 1989-10-06 1991-02-12 Jim-Jak, Inc. Anti-jackknife apparatus for trailer trucks
US5016899A (en) * 1989-12-14 1991-05-21 Leonard Euteneier No-slack restricted-drum stabilizer for commercial multitrailer combinations
US5335856A (en) * 1992-10-13 1994-08-09 Fmc Corporation Air boom sprayer trailer hitch and suspension
US5348331A (en) * 1992-02-21 1994-09-20 Delta Estates, Inc. Trailer stabilizer and method
US5407220A (en) * 1993-05-13 1995-04-18 Fischer; Edmond M. Rotary trailer sway dampener
US5984341A (en) * 1996-05-30 1999-11-16 University Of Kentucky Research Foundation Weight distributing hitch and slide bracket assembly
US6203047B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2001-03-20 Gkn Walterscheid Gmbh Device for stabilizing the two lower steering arms of a tractor
US6340167B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2002-01-22 Joseph J. Boyd Anti-jackknife trailer coupling
US6386571B1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2002-05-14 Gkn Walterscheid Gmbh Side strut for a lower steering arm of a tractor
US6401876B1 (en) * 1999-05-24 2002-06-11 James A. Boros Vehicle emergency brake and anti-jackknife system
US6474675B1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2002-11-05 Mark Bockman Stabilizer for a multi-trailer rig
US6485046B1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2002-11-26 Paul Hsueh Anti-sway trailer hitch
US6629701B1 (en) * 1998-01-12 2003-10-07 Colibert Enterprises Load leveling weight distributing hitch
US6722682B2 (en) * 2001-09-06 2004-04-20 Cequent Towing Products, Inc. Trailer hitch with load adjustment
US6854557B1 (en) * 2003-08-21 2005-02-15 General Motors Corporation Anti-jackknife control for vehicle-trailer backing up using rear-wheel steer control

Patent Citations (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2612382A (en) * 1950-10-19 1952-09-30 Christian G Landis Trailer stabilizing connection
US3250524A (en) * 1963-10-21 1966-05-10 Earlish L Boatright Stabilizer
US3338595A (en) * 1965-10-23 1967-08-29 Nelson H Bogie Trailer stabilizer
US3659874A (en) * 1969-01-16 1972-05-02 William L Rendessy Sway control for trailer hitch
US3837676A (en) * 1969-08-08 1974-09-24 W Rendessy Sway control device for trailer hitches
US3871686A (en) * 1973-06-12 1975-03-18 William L Rendessy Trailer sway control device
US3989269A (en) * 1974-08-30 1976-11-02 Rendessy William L Sway control devices utilizable in conjunction with equalizer hitches
US4065149A (en) * 1974-11-01 1977-12-27 Safe Track Manufacturing Limited Anti-jackknife apparatus
US3964767A (en) * 1975-03-19 1976-06-22 Berdell Williams Anti-sway trailer hitch
US3963265A (en) * 1975-06-05 1976-06-15 Robert E. Kornoelje Anti-jackknife mechanism
US4278267A (en) * 1977-09-09 1981-07-14 Societe Anonyme Etablissements Vasseur & Cie Equipments for attaching trailers
US4204700A (en) * 1978-11-08 1980-05-27 Haines Towing Inc. Anti-jackknife apparatus
US4306734A (en) * 1979-06-29 1981-12-22 Atwood Vacuum Machine Company Apparatus for use with a trailer equipped with a surge brake actuator and with an anti-sway mechanism
US4281846A (en) * 1979-10-24 1981-08-04 Hall Kenneth A Anti-jackknife mechanism
US4582337A (en) * 1984-05-30 1986-04-15 Hsueh Paul Y J Anti-sway trailer hitch
US4585248A (en) * 1984-06-13 1986-04-29 Ray Miller Anti-jackknife and steering control system
US4714264A (en) * 1985-04-26 1987-12-22 Emile Woestelandt Coupling structure between a towing vehicle and a towed vehicle
US4917406A (en) * 1988-03-23 1990-04-17 Jean Walterscheid Gmbh Length-adjustable holding device for the lower steering arm of a three-point coupling device
US4991863A (en) * 1989-10-06 1991-02-12 Jim-Jak, Inc. Anti-jackknife apparatus for trailer trucks
US5016899A (en) * 1989-12-14 1991-05-21 Leonard Euteneier No-slack restricted-drum stabilizer for commercial multitrailer combinations
US5348331A (en) * 1992-02-21 1994-09-20 Delta Estates, Inc. Trailer stabilizer and method
US5335856A (en) * 1992-10-13 1994-08-09 Fmc Corporation Air boom sprayer trailer hitch and suspension
US5407220A (en) * 1993-05-13 1995-04-18 Fischer; Edmond M. Rotary trailer sway dampener
US5984341A (en) * 1996-05-30 1999-11-16 University Of Kentucky Research Foundation Weight distributing hitch and slide bracket assembly
US6629701B1 (en) * 1998-01-12 2003-10-07 Colibert Enterprises Load leveling weight distributing hitch
US6203047B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2001-03-20 Gkn Walterscheid Gmbh Device for stabilizing the two lower steering arms of a tractor
US6401876B1 (en) * 1999-05-24 2002-06-11 James A. Boros Vehicle emergency brake and anti-jackknife system
US6386571B1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2002-05-14 Gkn Walterscheid Gmbh Side strut for a lower steering arm of a tractor
US6340167B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2002-01-22 Joseph J. Boyd Anti-jackknife trailer coupling
US6474675B1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2002-11-05 Mark Bockman Stabilizer for a multi-trailer rig
US6722682B2 (en) * 2001-09-06 2004-04-20 Cequent Towing Products, Inc. Trailer hitch with load adjustment
US6485046B1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2002-11-26 Paul Hsueh Anti-sway trailer hitch
US6854557B1 (en) * 2003-08-21 2005-02-15 General Motors Corporation Anti-jackknife control for vehicle-trailer backing up using rear-wheel steer control

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10406877B2 (en) * 2017-12-07 2019-09-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Monitoring of anti-sway bar chains of trailer hitch systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7540523B2 (en) 2009-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7540523B2 (en) Anti-jackknifing hitch assembly
US11890903B2 (en) Pin box assembly with gooseneck coupler
US6170849B1 (en) McCall air ride 5th wheel hitch system
US5520404A (en) Trailer hitch
US7934742B2 (en) Apparatus for raising a spring arm on a trailer hitch
US6142500A (en) Adjustable, weight distributing trailer hitch apparatus with spring dampening assembly
US5246244A (en) Concealed frame mounted hitch assembly
US10633039B2 (en) Fifth wheel to gooseneck torsion suspension coupler
US7093845B1 (en) Motion absorbing hitch
CA2611395A1 (en) Multiple hitch assembly
EP2986488A1 (en) Coupling system
US2789834A (en) Trailer hitch load equalizer
US6637765B2 (en) Towing safety device
US8025307B2 (en) Anti-sway trailer hitch devices
US5775714A (en) Tow bar
US20080296867A1 (en) Pin box assembly with torsion resistant pivot and air spring
US5947503A (en) Fifth-wheel trailer connector
US6601867B2 (en) Breakaway coupler assembly
US7984816B2 (en) Load stabilizer for an automobile
WO2011053372A1 (en) Towing apparatus for vehicles
US20070075513A1 (en) Suspension reinforcing kit for a small all terrain vehicle
US8075013B2 (en) Mounting apparatus
US6981715B1 (en) Sliding hitch
US7815210B1 (en) Trailer hitch assembly
US2872212A (en) Trailer hitch for automobiles

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RUSSELL, DAVID;YIP, CHI;KESSLER, DENNIS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018609/0877

Effective date: 20061208

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20210602