US20080052404A1 - Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the Internet - Google Patents

Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the Internet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080052404A1
US20080052404A1 US11/928,042 US92804207A US2008052404A1 US 20080052404 A1 US20080052404 A1 US 20080052404A1 US 92804207 A US92804207 A US 92804207A US 2008052404 A1 US2008052404 A1 US 2008052404A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
stream
media
signal
copies
concentrator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/928,042
Inventor
F. Leighton
Daniel Lewin
David Shaw
Bruce Maggs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Akamai Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Akamai Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US09/478,571 priority Critical patent/US6665726B1/en
Priority to US10/457,266 priority patent/US7296082B2/en
Application filed by Akamai Technologies Inc filed Critical Akamai Technologies Inc
Priority to US11/928,042 priority patent/US20080052404A1/en
Publication of US20080052404A1 publication Critical patent/US20080052404A1/en
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/40Services or applications
    • H04L65/4069Services related to one way streaming
    • H04L65/4092Control of source by destination, e.g. user controlling streaming rate of server
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L29/00Arrangements, apparatus, circuits or systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04L1/00 - H04L27/00
    • H04L29/02Communication control; Communication processing
    • H04L29/06Communication control; Communication processing characterised by a protocol
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/60Media handling, encoding, streaming or conversion
    • H04L65/601Media manipulation, adaptation or conversion
    • H04L65/605Media manipulation, adaptation or conversion intermediate
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/60Media handling, encoding, streaming or conversion
    • H04L65/607Stream encoding details
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/60Media handling, encoding, streaming or conversion
    • H04L65/608Streaming protocols, e.g. RTP or RTCP
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/80QoS aspects
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/20Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/25Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
    • H04N21/266Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel
    • H04N21/26616Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel for merging a unicast channel into a multicast channel, e.g. in a VOD application, when a client served by unicast channel catches up a multicast channel to save bandwidth
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L29/00Arrangements, apparatus, circuits or systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04L1/00 - H04L27/00
    • H04L29/02Communication control; Communication processing
    • H04L29/06Communication control; Communication processing characterised by a protocol
    • H04L29/0602Protocols characterised by their application
    • H04L29/06027Protocols for multimedia communication

Abstract

A replication process provides fault tolerance for a continuous media stream in a computer network. In one embodiment, the original or source signal is sent to several splitters which, in turn, each make copies of the signal and send the copies into a second layer of devices, which are referred to as “concentrators.” A given concentrator receives as input one or more copies of the source signal. In a preferred embodiment, a given concentrator receives two copies of the source signal from at least two different splitters. The concentrators process the incoming streaming signal copies, for example, by merging them into a single or composite copy of the original source signal according to a given processing algorithm. The output of a given concentrator may then be fed into a splitter, with the process then being repeated if desired to make an arbitrary large number of copies of the signal. At the end of the replication process, the output of a splitter or a concentrator is fed directly or indirectly to an end user. The replication process is fault-tolerant, and thus the end user's signal is not interrupted regardless of signal or equipment problems within the distribution mechanism.

Description

  • This application is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 10.457,266, filed Jun. 9, 2003, which application was a continuation of Ser. No. 09/478,571, filed Jan. 6, 2000.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Technical Field
  • The present invention relates generally to digital signal transmission over a computer network and, in particular, to a method and system for streaming content over the Internet in a fault tolerant manner.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • Most Internet users do not have fast enough access to the Internet to download large multimedia files quickly. Streaming is a technique for delivering web-based video, audio and multimedia files so that these files can be processed as a steady and continuous stream at the requesting client, typically using a browser plug-in, such as Microsoft NetPlayer, Apple QuickTime, Real Networks RealSystem G2, or the like. Streaming video, for example, is an online video distribution mechanism that provides audio and video to Internet users, without the users having to wait while content completely downloads to their hard drives. Through caching, content is played as it is received, and buffering mechanisms ensure that content is played smoothly. Theoretically, streaming video plays to the end user, or viewer, as an immediate and ongoing broadcast.
  • From a network perspective, traditional approaches to streaming Internet content involve transmitting a streaming signal from a source to a device known as a splitter (or repeater, reflector or mirror), which, in turn, replicates the source signal into multiple signals. Each of the multiple signals is the same, and each is sent on to a different destination. By cascading splitters in a tree-like fashion, a single source stream can be replicated into thousands or more identical copies. In this manner, a large number of viewers on the Internet can receive the same streaming signal simultaneously.
  • A critical problem with existing streaming methods of this type is that they are not fault tolerant. FIG. 1 illustrates why this is the case. In this example, a source signal (A) is sent to a splitter (B), which then sends copies of the signal to ten splitters (C1, . . . , C10). Each of the second level splitters then sends a copy of the signal to five end customers (D1, . . . , D50). Thus, for example, splitter C1 sends a copy to end users D1-D5, splitter C2 sends a copy to end users D6-D10, and so forth. If communications at a given splitter fail, however, certain users are unable to receive the original signal. In the network of FIG. 1, this would be the case with respect to users D6-D10 if C2 fails. To overcome this problem, it is also known in the art to enable end users to detect they are no longer receiving the streaming signal and to enable such users to attempt to contact an alternative splitter (e.g., C3) in an effort to get another copy of the signal. Such approaches, however, can result in an interruption of the signal and are expensive to implement.
  • Thus, there remains a need in the art to provide improved streaming techniques that are fault tolerant. The present invention solves this important problem.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a replication process to provide fault tolerance for a streaming signal in a computer network. In one embodiment, the original or source signal is sent to several splitters which, in turn, each make copies of the signal and send the copies into a second layer of devices, which are referred to as “concentrators.” A given concentrator receives as input one or more copies of the source signal. In a preferred embodiment, a given concentrator receives two copies of the source signal from at least two different splitters. The concentrators process the incoming streaming signal copies, for example, by merging them into a single or composite copy of the original source signal according to a given processing algorithm. Thus, preferably a given concentrator receives streams from multiple sources, removes duplicate packets, and then outputs a single stream. The output of a given concentrator may then be fed into a splitter, with the process then being repeated if desired to make an arbitrary large number of copies of the signal. At the end of the replication process, the output of a splitter or a concentrator is fed directly or indirectly to an end user. The replication process is fault-tolerant, and thus the end user's signal is not interrupted regardless of signal or equipment problems within the distribution mechanism.
  • One type of processing algorithm that is implemented at a concentrator simply transmits the first copy of each packet in the signal stream. Copies of packets that have already been transmitted are simply discarded. This algorithm may be implemented by maintaining a data array f(i) that has a first value (e.g., “1”) if packet i in the stream has been forwarded and f(i) that has a second value (e.g., “0”) otherwise. When a copy of packet i is received from one of the incoming streams, it is forwarded if and only if f(i) equals the second value. This technique is advantageous because a complete stream can be reconstructed from two or more partial streams. Thus, as long as the incoming copies of the stream collectively contain all the packets of the original stream, the concentrator produces a copy of the original stream.
  • Another type of processing algorithm that may be implemented at a concentrator uses a buffering technique. In this approach, a buffer of a given size is kept for each input stream to create an n-dimensional array, where n is the number of input streams. At a given cycle rate, the concentrator transmits a smallest index packet (namely, a packet that is earliest in the stream sequence) contained in any of the stream buffers. As each packet is transmitted, the data in the array is updated so that future copies of the same packet can be discarded. This protocol enables the concentrator to reorder the packets in a stream so that they are output in a correct order.
  • One or more concentrators as described above enable fault tolerant media streaming over a computer network such as the Internet, an intranet, a virtual private network, or the like.
  • The foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent objects and features of the present invention. These objects should be construed to be merely illustrative of some of the more prominent features and applications of the invention. Many other beneficial results can be obtained by applying the disclosed invention in a different manner or modifying the invention as will be described. Accordingly, other objects and a fuller understanding of the invention may be had by referring to the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference should be made to the following Detailed Description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of a known streaming architecture in which a plurality of splitters is used to transmit the source signal to a plurality of end users or viewers;
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram illustrative the inventive use of concentrators according to the teachings of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a first type of processing routine that may be used in a concentrator;
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a second type of processing routine that may be used in a concentrator;
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a concentrator used in the present invention;
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a client-server computing environment in which the present invention may be implemented; and
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an implementation of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Streaming media is a type of Internet content that has the important characteristic of being able to play back while still in the process of being downloaded. A client can play the first packet of the stream, decompress the second, while receiving the third. Thus, the user can start enjoying the multimedia without waiting to the end of transmission. Streaming is very useful for delivering media because media files tend to be large, particularly as the duration of the programming increases. To view a media file that is not streamed, users must first download the file to a local hard disk—which may take minutes or even hours—and then open the file with player software that is compatible with the file format. To view streaming media, the user's browser opens player software, which buffers the file for a few seconds and then plays the file while simultaneously downloading it. Unlike software downloads, streaming media files are not stored locally on users' hard disks. Once the bits representing content are used, the player discards them.
  • Streaming media quality varies widely according to the type of media being delivered, the speed of the user's Internet connection, network conditions, the bit rate at which the content is encoded, and the format used. These last two concepts are explained in more detail below. In general, streaming audio can be FM quality, but streaming video is poor by TV standards, with smaller screens, lower resolution, and fewer frames per second. The source for streaming media can be just about any form of media, including VHS or Beta tapes, audio cassettes, DAT, MPEG video, MP3 audio, AVI, and the like. Prior to streaming the content, the content must first be encoded, a process which accomplishes four things: conversion of the content from analog to digital form, if necessary; creation of a file in the format recognized by the streaming media server and player; compression of the file to maximize the richness of the content that can be delivered in real-time given limited bandwidth; and, establishing the bit rate at which the media is to be delivered. Streaming media uses lossy compression, which means that after decompression on the client end, some portions of the content are not retained. For example, compression may reduce a VHS video clip with 30 frames per second to just 15 fps. Typically, media must be encoded at a specific bit rate, such as 28 kbps, 56 kbps, 100 kbps, or the like. Content owners typically choose to encode media at multiple rates, so that users with fast connections get as good an experience as possible, but users with slow connections can also access the content. Obviously, the lower the encoding rate, the more original content must be discarded when compressing.
  • Non-streaming content is standards-based in the sense that the server and client software developed by different vendors—Apache, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Netscape Communicator, and the like—generally work well together. Streaming media, however, usually relies on proprietary server and client software. The server, client, production and encoding tools developed by a streaming software vendor are collectively referred to as a format. Streaming media encoded in a particular format must be served by that format's media server and replayed by that format's client. Streaming media clients are often called players, and typically they exist as plug-ins to Web browsers. Streaming media clients are also often capable of playing standards-based non-streaming media files, such as WAV or AVI.
  • The three major streaming media formats in use today are: RealNetworks RealSystem G2, Microsoft Windows Media Technologies (“WMT”), and Apple QuickTime. RealSystem G2 handles all media types including audio, video, animation, still images and text, but it does not support HTML. RealSystem G2 supports SMIL, an XML-based language that allows the content provider to time and position media within the player window. To deliver the media in real time Real uses RTSP. To stream in WMT's Advanced Streaming Format, content providers must have Microsoft NT 4 Server installed. WMT does not support SMIL or RTSP but has its own protocol that it calls HTML+Time. Apple QuickTime recently has added the capability to serve streaming media. QuickTime can support a number of formats including VR, 3D, Flash, and MP3. QuickTime Streaming uses RTSP to deliver the movies in realtime, and a dedicated media server is required.
  • By way of further background, RTSP, the Real Time Streaming Protocol, is a client-server multimedia presentation protocol to enable controlled delivery of streamed multimedia data over IP network. It provides “VCR-style” remote control functionality for audio and video streams, like pause, fast forward, reverse, and absolute positioning. Sources of data include both live data feeds and stored clips. RTSP is an application-level protocol designed to work with lower-level protocols like RTP (Realtime Transport Protocol) and RSVP (Resource Reservation Protocol) to provide a complete streaming service over the Internet. It provides means for choosing delivery channels (such as UDP, multicast UDP and TCP), and delivery mechanisms based upon RTP. RTSP establishes and controls streams of continuous audio and video media between the media servers and the clients. In RTSP, each presentation and media stream is identified by an RTSP URL. The overall presentation and the properties of the media are defined in a presentation description file, which may include the encoding, language, RTSP URLs, destination address, port, and other parameters. The presentation description file can be obtained by the client using HTTP, email or other means. RTSP differs from HTTP for several reasons. First, while HTTP is a stateless protocol, an RTSP server has to maintain “session states” in order to correlate RTSP requests with a stream. Second, HTTP is basically an asymmetric protocol where the client issues requests and the server responds, but in RTSP both the media server and the client can issue requests. For example the server can issue a request to set playing back parameters of a stream.
  • The transport layer of non-streaming content uses the Transmission Control Protocol, or TCP. This is a connection-oriented protocol, which means a connection between server and client is established and maintained until the content has been completely received. One reason for the connection is that the client can report if any IP packets are not received, which are then retransmitted by the server. The result is that a file successfully transmitted over TCP, a logo for example, is always identical to its source—although the time required for transmission may vary widely depending on infrastructure.
  • By contrast, the transport layer for streaming media uses User Datagram Protocol, or UDP. UDP is a connectionless protocol, under which IP packets are sent from the server to the client without establishing a connection. This protocol enables streaming media's real-time nature: no need to wait to resend dropped packets. But it also means that the content quality may be degraded markedly between server and client, or that two different users may have a much different experience.
  • The present invention is designed to be used with any streaming media source, encoding scheme, media format, and streaming (or other transport) protocol.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, a packet-switched network 200 in which the present invention is implemented comprises a signal source A, a set of splitters B1-Bn, and a set of end users D1-Dn. According to the invention, the network also includes a set of so-called “concentrators” C1-Cn that facilitate an inventive signal replication process. This process ensures that each end user will always receive a copy of the source signal irrespective of interruptions in the transmission, e.g., due to equipment, device or communication failures, that occur within other elements of the distribution system.
  • Preferably, concentrators C are positioned within the network in a physical and/or logical layer located between the splitters B and the end users D. The physical configuration illustrated in FIG. 2, of course, is merely exemplary. An end user, of course, is typically a client computer that includes a browser or other graphics viewer having a plug-in or native support for streaming content. In a preferred embodiment, a concentrator C is a software program, namely, a set of computer instructions that comprise one or more processes, executable within a processor. As illustrated in FIG. 2, each concentrator C receives as input one or more copies of the source signal data stream. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, each concentrator C receives a copy of the source signal data stream from at least two (2) different splitters B. Thus, for example, in this embodiment, the original signal is sent to several splitters B1, . . . , B5. These splitters make copies of the signal and send them to the concentrators C1, . . . , C20. Splitter B1 sends a copy of the signal it received from source A to each of the concentrators C1, . . . , C8. Splitter B2 sends a copy of the signal it received from source A to each of the concentrators C9, . . . , C16. Splitter B3 sends a copy to concentrators C17, . . . , C20 and C1, . . . , C4, whereas B4 sends copies to C5, . . . , C12, and B5 sends copies to C13, . . . , C20. Again, these examples are not to be taken to limit the present invention in any way. In each case, however, it can be seen that every concentrator C receives a copy of the source signal data stream from precisely two splitters. Stated another way, each concentrator receives two streams, UDP1 and UDP2, representing copies of the original source stream.
  • Generally, the function of a concentrator it to process the incoming streams and to merge them into a single or composite copy of the source signal data stream that is then output from the concentrator. A concentrator removes duplicate packets and preferably outputs a single stream feed. This processing is quite advantageous. In particular, given several copies of a stream, even if they are all lossy, a single pristine stream can be generated from the remnants of the duplicate streams. The technique is very robust and can take a large number of failures before end user experience is impaired.
  • The processing of the data streams may be accomplished in a number of different ways. FIG. 3, for example, is a flowchart illustrating a first embodiment of the processing routine wherein the concentrator transmits only the first copy of each packet in the stream. Copies of packets that have already been transmitted are simply discarded. FIG. 4 illustrates a second embodiment of the processing routine wherein multiple copies of the streams are buffered to enable out-of-order packets to be reordered as the output is generated. Each of the embodiments will now be described in detail.
  • Referring now to FIG. 3, a first embodiment of the processing routine utilizes an array f(i) for the source signal. An element in the data array has a given first value, e.g., 1, if packet i in the stream has been forwarded from the concentrator and a second value, e.g., 0, otherwise. The routine begins at step 300. At step 302, an instance of the processing routine is spawned, typically when the first packet of the stream arrives at the concentrator. At step 304, the array is initialized. The processing routine then continues at step 306 to test whether a packet i has been received from one of the incoming streams. If not, the routine cycles. If, however, the outcome of the test at step 306 is positive, which indicates that the packet has been received, a test is performed at step 308 to determine whether f(i)=0. If so (because this is the first occurrence of the packet i), the routine continues at step 310 to forward the packet from the concentrator without delay. At step 312, the routine updates the array by setting the value of the packet i in the array equal to 0. Control then returns to step 306. If, however, the outcome of the test at step 308 indicates that f(i) is not equal to 0, then the routine continues at step 314 to discard the packet (since it has already been forwarded).
  • Thus, in effect, the processing routine parses packets as they arrive at the concentrator. If the parser has already seen the stream packet, the packet is discarded; otherwise, it is forwarded.
  • The processing routine of FIG. 3 is advantageous in that it is simple to implement and does not introduce any delay into the streams (which, for example, might be caused by waiting for a particular copy of a packet to arrive). This routine also has the desirable feature that a complete stream can be reconstructed from two or more partial streams. Thus, as long as the incoming copies of the stream collectively contain all the packets in the original stream, then the concentrator will produce a copy of the original stream.
  • As an example, and with reference to FIG. 2 again, if one of the splitters (e.g., B1) ceases to function, then each of concentrators C1, . . . C4 will still receive the stream from splitter B3 and each of concentrators C5, . . . , C8 will still receive the stream from splitter B4. There is never an interruption of the signal transmitted by any of the concentrators in this illustrative example. This property is preserved irrespective of which splitter is not functioning. Indeed, even if two splitters (e.g., B1 and B3) suffer packet loss, it is still possible for each of the concentrators C1, . . . C4 to reconstruct the original signal using the process described above (provided that the packet loss is less than 50%).
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, an alternate embodiment is shown wherein each incoming stream at a concentrator has a buffer associated therewith. By buffering stream packets, the concentrator may reorder the packets in the stream before output. The routine begins at step 400. At step 402, the buffers are initialized. The routine then continues at step 404 to test whether a given cycle has elapsed. If not, the routine continues at step 406 (for each stream) to test whether a given incoming packet (for the stream) has already been forwarded. If the outcome of the test at step 406 is positive, the routine discards the packet at step 408. If the given incoming packet has not been forwarded, the packet is buffered at step 410. Control then returns to step 404. Using the buffering scheme, for example, packets from stream UDP1 are buffered in a first buffer, packets from stream UDP2 are buffered in a second buffer, and so on. When the outcome of the test at step 404 indicates that the given cycle has elapsed, control branches to step 412 to identify the packet that is the earliest in the stream sequence. At step 414, a test is performed to determine whether this packet is out of sequence. If so, the routine reorders the packets as necessary at step 416. The resulting stream is then output from the concentrator at step 418. At step 420, the array is updated to reflect the packets that have been forwarded. Step 418 is also reached if there is a negative outcome of the test at step 414.
  • Thus, in the routine of FIG. 4, a buffer of a given size is kept for each input stream copy. At each cycle, the concentrator transmits the smallest index packet contained in any of the buffers. As each packet is transmitted, the data in the array is updated so that future copies of the same packet can be discarded when they arrive at the concentrator. As can be seen, the protocol of FIG. 4 is similar to the routine of FIG. 3 except that it has the additional desired feature that it can reorder the packets in the stream so that they are output in the correct order. The larger the buffer size, the more likely it is that out-of-order packets can be output in order. In this way, packets that are slowed down in the network have the opportunity to catch up at the buffer.
  • Regardless of which technique (FIG. 3 or FIG. 4) is used at a given concentrator C, the output of a given concentrator can then be fed back to a splitter or to an end user directly. When the concentrator is output to a splitter, the process can be repeated to make an arbitrarily large number of copies of the source signal data stream. At the end of the replication process, the output of a splitter or concentrator (or some other device) is fed directly to a viewer. The resulting replication process is completely fault-tolerant. In particular, no matter what signal is destroyed, the end user's signal is not interrupted.
  • The number of signals input to each concentrator determines the number of faulty streams that can be tolerated by the distribution system. For example, if every concentrator receives the signal from at least k different splitters, then the system can tolerate faults in any subset of k−1 signals without compromising the signal received by any end user. If the faults in signals (or system components) are random, then the system can tolerate F faults before any end user's signal is interrupted, where F is about N{1−1/k} and N is the number of components in the system. If the packet loss rate being experienced on each stream is p, then the loss rate, after concentration, is pk×the number of streams.
  • In a preferred embodiment, it is desirable to input two (2) input streams to a given concentrator. The cost of more streams, of course, is more network bandwidth for the distribution mechanism. Where multiple input streams are supplied to a concentrator (or output from a splitter), a variant of the present invention is to incorporate given coding schemes within the splitters/concentrators to recover some of the bandwidth used to transmit multiple data streams. In this variant, as a stream is output from a given device (e.g., a splitter), it is encoded using an encoding routine. As the stream enters the concentrator in the underlying layer, it is decoded and processed in the manner described above. When coding techniques are used, then the copies of the data stream output from the splitters need not be identical; rather, the copies may vary as a result of the encoding algorithm used within a given device.
  • In an illustrative embodiment, a useful encoding scheme is the Rabin Information Dispersal Algorithm. Information dispersal involves the breaking-up of packets into a collection of subpackets that are routed in a greedylike fashion to their common destination along edge-disjoint paths. The advantage of information dispersal is that the dispersal of large packets into many small subpackets tends to results in very balanced communication loads on the edges of a network. As a consequence, the maximum congestion in the network is likely to be very low, and there is a good chance that packets will never be delayed at all. In addition, if the contents of a packet are encoded into a collection of subpackets in a redundant fashion, an information dispersal algorithm becomes more fault tolerant as only a fraction of the subpackets have to reach the destination for the original packet to be reconstructed. Further information about the Information Dispersal Algorithm may be found in the following reference, Leighton, Introduction To Parallel Algorithms and Architectures: Arrays, Trees, Hybercubes, Morgan Kaufmann (1992), Section 3.4.8, which is incorporated herein by reference. Thus, in an illustrative embodiment, the Rabin Information Dispersal Algorithm is implemented within a given splitter and a given concentrator.
  • As noted above, a concentrator for use in the present invention is a software program executable on a computer. FIG. 5 illustrates a representative concentrator 500 comprising a manager routine 502, an array manager process 504, and a set of stream concentration processes 506 a-n. One or more coding/decoding routines 508 may be provided as described in the variant above. In operation, the manager routine 502 is initialized upon startup of the concentrator. As an input data stream is received, the manager routine 502 launches an instance of the stream concentration process 506, which manages the merging of the individual data streams into the stream that is then output from the concentrator. The array manager process is invoked by the manager routine 502 to establish an array (or other data structure or equivalent work area) for use by a given stream concentration process 506. By using multiple stream concentration processes, a given concentrator may be used to concentrate different content streams under the control of the manager routine.
  • The fault-tolerant distribution mechanism of the present invention may be implemented within a conventional client-server distributed computing environment. FIG. 6 illustrates a conventional client-server environment in which the streaming framework may be implemented. In this example, a plurality of Internet client machines 610 are connectable to a computer network service provider 612 via a network such as a telephone network 614. The service provider 612 interfaces the client machines 610 to the remainder of the network 618, which may include a plurality of web content server machines 620. Network 618 typically includes other servers (not shown) for control of domain name resolution, routing and other control functions. A client machine typically includes a suite of known Internet tools. Various known Internet protocols are used for these services.
  • A given client machine and the server may communicate over the public Internet, an intranet, or any other computer network. If desired, given communications may take place over a secure connection. Thus, for example, a client may communication with the server using a network security protocol, such as Netscape's Secure Socket Layer (SSL) protocol or the like.
  • A representative client is a personal computer, notebook computer, Internet appliance or pervasive computing device (e.g., a PDA or palm computer) that is x86-, Pentium-, PowerPC®- or RISC-based. The client includes an operating system such as Microsoft Windows '98, Microsoft NT, Windows CE or PalmOS. The client includes a suite of Internet tools including a Web browser, such as Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, that has a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and support for application plug-ins or helper applications.
  • A representative web server comprises a processor 622, an operating system 624 (e.g., Linux, Windows NT, Unix, or the like) and a web server program 626. OS 624 and web server program 626 are supported in system memory 623 (e.g., RAM). Of course, any convenient server platform (e.g., Apache, WebSphere, or the like) may be supported. The server may include an application programming interface 628 (API) that provides extensions to enable application developers to extend and/or customize the core functionality thereof through software programs including plug-ins, CGI programs, servlets, and the like.
  • A representative concentrator is a computer or computer platform having an operating system and support for network connectivity. Thus, for example, a representative concentrator comprises a computer running Windows NT (Intel and DEC Alpha), IBM AIX, HP-UX, Sun Solaris (SPARC and Intel Edition), Novell NetWare or Windows '98.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an implementation of the present invention. The system 700 comprises a pair of relay servers 702 and 704 residing, for example, at a streaming video production facility 706. These servers are equipped, for example, with two (2) network cards each, one set of which are wired onto a common network with encoder machines 708, and the other set of which is connected to the Internet 710. The encoder machines 708 encode the video and audio data and send the encoded packets to a broadcast address of the network they share with the relay servers 702 and 704. The relay servers pick up the packets and re-send them out, for example, over two dedicated T-1 lines to two different data centers 712 and 714. From these two data centers, content fans out to two more data centers each 716, 718, 720 and 722, thus making four duplicates of each data packet. Each of the four data centers sends a copy of each packet to each of a set of regions 724 a-n, with each server region 724 comprising a set of content hosting servers 726 a-n. Each region includes a concentrator 728, which removes the duplicates and feeds the single remaining stream to each server 726 in that region. Although not meant to be limiting, the server regions may comprise part of a distributed content hosting system such as Akamai FreeFlow™, which is a high-performance, fault-tolerant web content delivery service.
  • As noted above, the invention may be implemented in software executable in a processor, namely, as a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in the random access memory of the computer. Until required by the computer, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory, for example, in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory, or downloaded via the Internet or other computer network.
  • In addition, although the various methods described are conveniently implemented in a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by software, one of ordinary skill in the art would also recognize that such methods may be carried out in hardware, in firmware, or in more specialized apparatus constructed to perform the required method steps.

Claims (6)

1. A method of fault tolerant delivery of live media content, the content being available in a given media format as a stream of data packets, comprising:
receiving the stream at each of one or more data centers;
from at least one data center, outputting a copy of each packet in the stream to a set of remote server regions, wherein a remove server region comprises a set of one or more media servers associated with the given media format;
at a remote server region, feeding the stream to each of the set of one or more media servers associated with the given media format so that each of the set of one or more media servers in the remote server region is available to provide the stream of data packets;
within the remote server region, at each of the one or more media servers in the set of media servers, receiving the stream of data packets; and
in response to each end user request that is directed, via a content delivery network (CDN) domain name server, to one of the set of media servers in the remote server region that has received the stream of data packets, outputting the stream of data packets from a given media server in the remote server region.
2. The method as described in claim 1 wherein data packets are delivered to each server region via a non-streaming media protocol and the stream of data packets is output from the given media server over a streaming protocol.
3. The method as described in claim 2 wherein the streaming protocol is RTSP.
4. The method as described in claim 2 wherein the non-streaming media protocol is UDP.
5. The method as described in claim 1 further including the step of receiving, at a remote server region, two or more copies of the stream of data packets, with each copy being received from one of the set of multiple delivery sources.
6. The method as described in claim 1 wherein the stream is received from an encoder.
US11/928,042 2000-01-06 2007-10-30 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the Internet Abandoned US20080052404A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/478,571 US6665726B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2000-01-06 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet
US10/457,266 US7296082B2 (en) 2000-01-06 2003-06-09 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet
US11/928,042 US20080052404A1 (en) 2000-01-06 2007-10-30 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the Internet

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/928,042 US20080052404A1 (en) 2000-01-06 2007-10-30 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the Internet

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/457,266 Continuation US7296082B2 (en) 2000-01-06 2003-06-09 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080052404A1 true US20080052404A1 (en) 2008-02-28

Family

ID=23900461

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/478,571 Active US6665726B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2000-01-06 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet
US10/457,266 Active US7296082B2 (en) 2000-01-06 2003-06-09 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet
US11/928,042 Abandoned US20080052404A1 (en) 2000-01-06 2007-10-30 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the Internet

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/478,571 Active US6665726B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2000-01-06 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet
US10/457,266 Active US7296082B2 (en) 2000-01-06 2003-06-09 Method and system for fault tolerant media streaming over the internet

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US6665726B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1247383B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4723151B2 (en)
AT (1) AT506795T (en)
AU (1) AU774277B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2396261C (en)
DE (1) DE60144466D1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001050710A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060184670A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2006-08-17 Beeson Jesse D System and method for analyzing the performance of multiple transportation streams of streaming media in packet-based networks
US20060271293A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2006-11-30 Global Locate, Inc. Method And Apparatus For Locating Mobile Receivers Using A Wide Area Reference Network For Propagating Ephemeris
US20060274727A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2006-12-07 Microsoft Corporation Transport-neutral in-order delivery in a distributed system
US20080063003A1 (en) * 2001-09-13 2008-03-13 Network Foundation Technologies System and method for broadcasting content to nodes on computer networks
US20090097413A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2009-04-16 Todd Marc A C System and Method for Analyzing the Performance of Multiple Transportation Streams of Streaming Media in Packet-Based Networks
US20100223378A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Yottaa Inc System and method for computer cloud management
US20100223364A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Yottaa Inc System and method for network traffic management and load balancing
US20100228819A1 (en) * 2009-03-05 2010-09-09 Yottaa Inc System and method for performance acceleration, data protection, disaster recovery and on-demand scaling of computer applications
US20100251329A1 (en) * 2009-03-31 2010-09-30 Yottaa, Inc System and method for access management and security protection for network accessible computer services
US20110215893A1 (en) * 2010-03-04 2011-09-08 Michael Nussbaum Planar audio amplifier output inductor with current sense
US20110225454A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2011-09-15 Huawei Device Co., Ltd Method, recording terminal, server, and system for repairing media file recording errors
US20110307584A1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2011-12-15 Akamai Technologies, Inc. HTML delivery from edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN)
US20120072604A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2012-03-22 France Telecom technique for delivering content to a user
US8930563B2 (en) * 2011-10-27 2015-01-06 Microsoft Corporation Scalable and extendable stream processing

Families Citing this family (102)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6275470B1 (en) 1999-06-18 2001-08-14 Digital Island, Inc. On-demand overlay routing for computer-based communication networks
US6868452B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2005-03-15 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method for caching of media files to reduce delivery cost
US8543901B1 (en) 1999-11-01 2013-09-24 Level 3 Communications, Llc Verification of content stored in a network
US7346676B1 (en) * 2000-07-19 2008-03-18 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Load balancing service
US6339785B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2002-01-15 Idan Feigenbaum Multi-server file download
US6519773B1 (en) 2000-02-08 2003-02-11 Sherjil Ahmed Method and apparatus for a digitized CATV network for bundled services
US6937814B1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2005-08-30 Realnetworks, Inc. System and method for play while recording processing
US6990616B1 (en) * 2000-04-24 2006-01-24 Attune Networks Ltd. Analysis of network performance
US7299291B1 (en) 2000-05-18 2007-11-20 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Client-side method for identifying an optimum server
US7587497B1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2009-09-08 Palmsource Inc. Information exchange between a handheld device and another computer system using an exchange manager and uniform resource locator (URL) strings
US7020709B1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2006-03-28 Intel Corporation System and method for fault tolerant stream splitting
US8572278B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2013-10-29 Facebook, Inc. Generating multiple data streams from a single data source
US20020040479A1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2002-04-04 Eric Ehrman Method and apparatus for streaming content via a network
US7249185B1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2007-07-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods, devices and software for redundant transmission of voice data over a packet network connection established according to an unreliable communication protocol
FR2817016B1 (en) * 2000-11-21 2003-02-21 Snecma Moteurs Method for assembling a fuel injector for a turbomachine combustion chamber
US20040025186A1 (en) * 2001-01-19 2004-02-05 Jennings Charles A. System and method for managing media
US8554940B2 (en) 2001-01-19 2013-10-08 Single Touch Interactive, Inc. System and method for routing media
US20020147634A1 (en) * 2001-01-31 2002-10-10 Ronald Jacoby System for dynamic generation of online streaming media advertisements
US7130908B1 (en) 2001-03-13 2006-10-31 Intelsat Ltd. Forward cache management between edge nodes in a satellite based content delivery system
US7174373B1 (en) 2001-03-13 2007-02-06 Panamsat Corporation Self-contained demonstration node in a satellite based content delivery system
US7237017B1 (en) 2001-03-13 2007-06-26 Panamsat Corporation Micronode in a satellite based content delivery system
US7154898B1 (en) 2001-03-13 2006-12-26 Intelsat, Ltd. Scalable edge node
US7715934B2 (en) 2003-09-19 2010-05-11 Macrovision Corporation Identification of input files using reference files associated with nodes of a sparse binary tree
WO2003105006A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2003-12-18 America Online, Inc. Load balancing with direct terminal response
US7266609B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2007-09-04 Aol Llc Generating multiple data streams from a single data source
US7237033B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2007-06-26 Aol Llc Duplicating switch for streaming data units to a terminal
US7124166B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2006-10-17 Aol Llc Duplicating digital streams for digital conferencing using switching technologies
US7292571B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2007-11-06 Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company Load balancing with direct terminal response
US6757735B2 (en) * 2001-07-03 2004-06-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method for distributing multiple description streams on servers in fixed and mobile streaming media systems
US20060259607A1 (en) * 2001-09-13 2006-11-16 Network Foundation Technologies, Llc System and method for distributing data over a computer network
US7860964B2 (en) 2001-09-28 2010-12-28 Level 3 Communications, Llc Policy-based content delivery network selection
AU2002362568A1 (en) 2001-09-28 2003-04-07 Savvis Communications Corporation System and method for policy dependent name to address resolutioin.
US7373644B2 (en) 2001-10-02 2008-05-13 Level 3 Communications, Llc Automated server replication
US20030079027A1 (en) 2001-10-18 2003-04-24 Michael Slocombe Content request routing and load balancing for content distribution networks
US20030140156A1 (en) * 2002-01-18 2003-07-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for broadcasting world wide web content
US9167036B2 (en) 2002-02-14 2015-10-20 Level 3 Communications, Llc Managed object replication and delivery
US7076544B2 (en) * 2002-04-08 2006-07-11 Microsoft Corporation Caching techniques for streaming media
AU2003230868A1 (en) 2002-04-10 2003-10-27 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Method and system for enhancing live stream delivery quality using prebursting
US20030204602A1 (en) * 2002-04-26 2003-10-30 Hudson Michael D. Mediated multi-source peer content delivery network architecture
US8117328B2 (en) * 2002-06-25 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation System and method for automatically recovering from failed network connections in streaming media scenarios
US8028092B2 (en) 2002-06-28 2011-09-27 Aol Inc. Inserting advertising content
FI116816B (en) * 2002-10-14 2006-02-28 Nokia Corp Streaming Media
US7552192B2 (en) * 2002-12-18 2009-06-23 Ronnie Gerome Carmichael Massively parallel computer network-utilizing MPACT and multipoint parallel server (MPAS) technologies
US20050089014A1 (en) * 2003-10-27 2005-04-28 Macrovision Corporation System and methods for communicating over the internet with geographically distributed devices of a decentralized network using transparent asymetric return paths
US7877810B2 (en) * 2004-03-02 2011-01-25 Rovi Solutions Corporation System, method and client user interface for a copy protection service
US20050223277A1 (en) * 2004-03-23 2005-10-06 Eacceleration Corporation Online storage system
KR100636147B1 (en) * 2004-06-24 2006-10-18 삼성전자주식회사 Method for controlling content over network and apparatus thereof, and method for providing content over network and apparatus thereof
US7437364B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2008-10-14 Google Inc. System and method of accessing a document efficiently through multi-tier web caching
US7587398B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2009-09-08 Google Inc. System and method of accessing a document efficiently through multi-tier web caching
US8224964B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2012-07-17 Google Inc. System and method of accessing a document efficiently through multi-tier web caching
US8676922B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2014-03-18 Google Inc. Automatic proxy setting modification
US7558822B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2009-07-07 Google Inc. Accelerating user interfaces by predicting user actions
US7565423B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2009-07-21 Google Inc. System and method of accessing a document efficiently through multi-tier web caching
US7526566B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2009-04-28 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Methods of operating radio communications devices including predefined streaming times and addresses and related devices
US7519074B2 (en) * 2005-02-22 2009-04-14 Level 3 Communications, Llc Voice call coordinator
US7436936B2 (en) * 2005-02-22 2008-10-14 Level 3 Communications, Llc VoIP call through tester
US7870602B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2011-01-11 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for reducing data stream interruption during failure of a firewall device
US7809943B2 (en) * 2005-09-27 2010-10-05 Rovi Solutions Corporation Method and system for establishing trust in a peer-to-peer network
CA2632235A1 (en) 2005-12-02 2007-06-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing authentication credentials from a proxy server to a virtualized computing environment to access a remote resource
US8086722B2 (en) * 2005-12-21 2011-12-27 Rovi Solutions Corporation Techniques for measuring peer-to-peer (P2P) networks
US7716586B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2010-05-11 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, system, and method for progressively disclosing information in support of information technology system visualization and management
US8151323B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2012-04-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing levels of access and action control via an SSL VPN appliance
US7747749B1 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-29 Google Inc. Systems and methods of efficiently preloading documents to client devices
US7953889B2 (en) 2006-08-03 2011-05-31 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for routing VPN traffic around network disruption
US8677007B2 (en) 2006-08-03 2014-03-18 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for bypassing an appliance
US20080049720A1 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Sbc Knowledge Ventures, Lp System and method of delivering data via a network
WO2008064356A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-29 Metis Enterprise Technologies Llc Real-time multicast peer-to-peer video streaming platform
US8065275B2 (en) 2007-02-15 2011-11-22 Google Inc. Systems and methods for cache optimization
US8812651B1 (en) 2007-02-15 2014-08-19 Google Inc. Systems and methods for client cache awareness
JP5014074B2 (en) * 2007-11-12 2012-08-29 株式会社リコー Multi-function input / output device
US8849838B2 (en) 2008-01-15 2014-09-30 Google Inc. Bloom filter for storing file access history
US8593570B2 (en) * 2008-11-07 2013-11-26 Looxcie, Inc. Video recording camera headset
CN102792291B (en) 2009-08-17 2015-11-25 阿卡麦科技公司 Stream-based methods and systems of distribution http
US8392748B2 (en) * 2009-10-06 2013-03-05 Microsoft Corporation Reliable media streaming
US8458769B2 (en) * 2009-12-12 2013-06-04 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Cloud based firewall system and service
US8769614B1 (en) 2009-12-29 2014-07-01 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Security framework for HTTP streaming architecture
US8880633B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2014-11-04 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Proxy server with byte-based include interpreter
US20120265853A1 (en) * 2010-12-17 2012-10-18 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Format-agnostic streaming architecture using an http network for streaming
US8867337B2 (en) 2011-04-26 2014-10-21 International Business Machines Corporation Structure-aware caching
US20120303797A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2012-11-29 Saroop Mathur Scalable audiovisual streaming method and apparatus
US8737803B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2014-05-27 Looxcie, Inc. Method and apparatus for storing and streaming audiovisual content
US20130117418A1 (en) 2011-11-06 2013-05-09 Akamai Technologies Inc. Hybrid platform for content delivery and transcoding
US9742858B2 (en) 2011-12-23 2017-08-22 Akamai Technologies Inc. Assessment of content delivery services using performance measurements from within an end user client application
US9419852B1 (en) 2011-12-30 2016-08-16 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for identifying and characterizing client devices
US8875287B2 (en) 2012-10-04 2014-10-28 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Server with mechanism for reducing internal resources associated with a selected client connection
US9654579B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2017-05-16 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Scalable content delivery network request handling mechanism
US9509804B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2016-11-29 Akami Technologies, Inc. Scalable content delivery network request handling mechanism to support a request processing layer
US9729605B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2017-08-08 Akamai Technologies Inc. Mechanism for distinguishing between content to be served through first or second delivery channels
US9183261B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2015-11-10 Shutterstock, Inc. Lexicon based systems and methods for intelligent media search
US9819721B2 (en) 2013-10-31 2017-11-14 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Dynamically populated manifests and manifest-based prefetching
US9485456B2 (en) 2013-12-30 2016-11-01 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Frame-rate conversion in a distributed computing system
US9866655B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2018-01-09 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Server initiated multipath content delivery
US9900643B2 (en) * 2014-10-10 2018-02-20 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and apparatus for transmitting media content
US20160226998A1 (en) 2015-01-30 2016-08-04 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Using resource timing data for server push
US10313463B2 (en) 2015-02-19 2019-06-04 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for avoiding server push of objects already cached at a client
US9667619B1 (en) 2016-10-14 2017-05-30 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for utilizing client side authentication to select services available at a given port number
US10084855B2 (en) 2017-01-23 2018-09-25 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Pixel-based load balancing
US9986269B1 (en) 2017-03-03 2018-05-29 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Maintaining stream continuity counter in a stateless multiplexing system
WO2018165190A1 (en) 2017-03-07 2018-09-13 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Cooperative multipath
US10439925B2 (en) 2017-12-21 2019-10-08 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Sandbox environment for testing integration between a content provider origin and a content delivery network
US10440142B2 (en) 2018-03-06 2019-10-08 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Automated TTL adjustment using cache performance and purge data
US10452563B1 (en) 2018-05-07 2019-10-22 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Cache eviction scheme for acceptable substitutes in online media

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6263371B1 (en) * 1999-06-10 2001-07-17 Cacheflow, Inc. Method and apparatus for seaming of streaming content
US6314466B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2001-11-06 Realnetworks, Inc. System and method for providing random access to a multimedia object over a network
US6415323B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2002-07-02 Fastforward Networks Proximity-based redirection system for robust and scalable service-node location in an internetwork
US6732162B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2004-05-04 Internet Pictures Corporation Method of providing preprocessed images for a plurality of internet web sites

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5285441A (en) * 1992-03-17 1994-02-08 At&T Bell Laboratories Errorless line protection switching in asynchronous transer mode (ATM) communications systems
JPH0637764A (en) * 1992-07-20 1994-02-10 Fujitsu Ltd Routing system for remote bridge and remote bridge device
GB2281672A (en) * 1993-09-03 1995-03-08 Ibm Video conferencing system
DE4416718C2 (en) * 1994-05-11 1997-08-21 Siemens Ag Circuit arrangement for interference-free redirecting a message cell stream onto an alternate route
US5996001A (en) * 1994-09-27 1999-11-30 Quarles; Philip High availability on-line transaction processing system
JPH08139748A (en) * 1994-11-08 1996-05-31 Nec Corp Broadcast communication processing method for store-and-forward switching device
US5854898A (en) 1995-02-24 1998-12-29 Apple Computer, Inc. System for automatically adding additional data stream to existing media connection between two end points upon exchange of notifying and confirmation messages therebetween
DE19509602C1 (en) * 1995-03-16 1996-05-30 Siemens Ag Redundancy optimised line network for ATM cells and SDH containers
EP0732828B1 (en) * 1995-03-16 2008-02-27 Nokia Siemens Networks Gmbh & Co. Kg Redundancy optimised communication network for transmission of data signals
US5623483A (en) * 1995-05-11 1997-04-22 Lucent Technologies Inc. Synchronization system for networked multimedia streams
CA2196622C (en) * 1996-02-06 2001-10-16 Hiroshi Jinzenji Network data distribution system
US5805785A (en) * 1996-02-27 1998-09-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method for monitoring and recovery of subsystems in a distributed/clustered system
US5831975A (en) * 1996-04-04 1998-11-03 Lucent Technologies Inc. System and method for hierarchical multicast routing in ATM networks
US5778187A (en) 1996-05-09 1998-07-07 Netcast Communications Corp. Multicasting method and apparatus
DE19741577A1 (en) * 1997-09-20 1999-03-25 Cit Alcatel Methods and apparatus for setting up point-to-multipoint connections and multipoint-to-point Verbindugen
US5928331A (en) * 1997-10-30 1999-07-27 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Distributed internet protocol-based real-time multimedia streaming architecture
US6466574B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2002-10-15 International Business Machines Corporation Quality of service improvement of internet real-time media transmission by transmitting redundant voice/media frames
US6195680B1 (en) * 1998-07-23 2001-02-27 International Business Machines Corporation Client-based dynamic switching of streaming servers for fault-tolerance and load balancing
US6505240B1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2003-01-07 Trevor I. Blumenau Ameliorating bandwidth requirements for the simultaneous provision of multiple sets of content over a network
US6529475B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2003-03-04 Nortel Networks Limited Monitor for the control of multimedia services in networks
US6594798B1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2003-07-15 Microsoft Corporation Receiver-driven layered error correction multicast over heterogeneous packet networks
US6697365B1 (en) * 1999-06-10 2004-02-24 Charles Hayes Messenger Method of listener transmitted broadcasting
US6496477B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2002-12-17 Texas Instruments Incorporated Processes, articles, and packets for network path diversity in media over packet applications
US6339785B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2002-01-15 Idan Feigenbaum Multi-server file download

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6314466B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2001-11-06 Realnetworks, Inc. System and method for providing random access to a multimedia object over a network
US6263371B1 (en) * 1999-06-10 2001-07-17 Cacheflow, Inc. Method and apparatus for seaming of streaming content
US6415323B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2002-07-02 Fastforward Networks Proximity-based redirection system for robust and scalable service-node location in an internetwork
US6732162B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2004-05-04 Internet Pictures Corporation Method of providing preprocessed images for a plurality of internet web sites

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8307088B2 (en) * 2000-04-17 2012-11-06 Akamai Technologies, Inc. HTML delivery from edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN)
US20110307584A1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2011-12-15 Akamai Technologies, Inc. HTML delivery from edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN)
US20090267833A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2009-10-29 Van Diggelen Frank Method and apparatus for locating mobile receivers using a wide area reference network for propagating ephemeris
US20060271293A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2006-11-30 Global Locate, Inc. Method And Apparatus For Locating Mobile Receivers Using A Wide Area Reference Network For Propagating Ephemeris
US8930137B2 (en) 2000-07-13 2015-01-06 Global Locate, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating mobile receivers using a wide area reference network for propagating ephemeris
US9599720B2 (en) * 2000-07-13 2017-03-21 Broadcom Corporation Method and apparatus for locating mobile receivers using a wide area reference network for propagating ephemeris
US7843855B2 (en) * 2001-09-13 2010-11-30 Network Foundation Technologies, Llc System and method for broadcasting content to nodes on computer networks
US20080063003A1 (en) * 2001-09-13 2008-03-13 Network Foundation Technologies System and method for broadcasting content to nodes on computer networks
US20090097413A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2009-04-16 Todd Marc A C System and Method for Analyzing the Performance of Multiple Transportation Streams of Streaming Media in Packet-Based Networks
US8838772B2 (en) 2003-08-29 2014-09-16 Ineoquest Technologies, Inc. System and method for analyzing the performance of multiple transportation streams of streaming media in packet-based networks
US8588069B2 (en) 2003-08-29 2013-11-19 Ineoquest Technologies, Inc. System and method for analyzing the performance of multiple transportation streams of streaming media in packet-based networks
US9590816B2 (en) * 2003-08-29 2017-03-07 Ineoquest Technologies, Inc. System and method for creating multiple transportation streams of streaming media network test traffic in packet-based networks
US20120014254A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2012-01-19 Todd Marc A C System and method for creating multiple transportation streams of streaming media network test traffic in packet-based networks
US9191426B2 (en) 2003-08-29 2015-11-17 Inequest Technologies, Inc. System and method for analyzing the performance of multiple transportation streams of streaming media in packet-based networks
US20060184670A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2006-08-17 Beeson Jesse D System and method for analyzing the performance of multiple transportation streams of streaming media in packet-based networks
US20060274727A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2006-12-07 Microsoft Corporation Transport-neutral in-order delivery in a distributed system
US7747894B2 (en) * 2005-06-06 2010-06-29 Microsoft Corporation Transport-neutral in-order delivery in a distributed system
US8627139B2 (en) * 2008-11-21 2014-01-07 Huawei Device Co., Ltd. Method, recording terminal, server, and system for repairing media file recording errors
US20110225454A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2011-09-15 Huawei Device Co., Ltd Method, recording terminal, server, and system for repairing media file recording errors
US20100223364A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Yottaa Inc System and method for network traffic management and load balancing
US8209415B2 (en) 2009-02-27 2012-06-26 Yottaa Inc System and method for computer cloud management
US20100220622A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Yottaa Inc Adaptive network with automatic scaling
US20100223378A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Yottaa Inc System and method for computer cloud management
US20100228819A1 (en) * 2009-03-05 2010-09-09 Yottaa Inc System and method for performance acceleration, data protection, disaster recovery and on-demand scaling of computer applications
US20100251329A1 (en) * 2009-03-31 2010-09-30 Yottaa, Inc System and method for access management and security protection for network accessible computer services
US20120072604A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2012-03-22 France Telecom technique for delivering content to a user
US20110215893A1 (en) * 2010-03-04 2011-09-08 Michael Nussbaum Planar audio amplifier output inductor with current sense
US8930563B2 (en) * 2011-10-27 2015-01-06 Microsoft Corporation Scalable and extendable stream processing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2396261C (en) 2009-10-13
JP2003519967A (en) 2003-06-24
US7296082B2 (en) 2007-11-13
WO2001050710A1 (en) 2001-07-12
AT506795T (en) 2011-05-15
AU774277B2 (en) 2004-06-24
DE60144466D1 (en) 2011-06-01
AU2300601A (en) 2001-07-16
EP1247383B1 (en) 2011-04-20
US6665726B1 (en) 2003-12-16
JP4723151B2 (en) 2011-07-13
CA2396261A1 (en) 2001-07-12
EP1247383A1 (en) 2002-10-09
US20030200326A1 (en) 2003-10-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7424730B2 (en) Multimedia presentation latency minimization
US5838927A (en) Method and apparatus for compressing a continuous, indistinct data stream
JP4676833B2 (en) System and method for distributed streaming of scalable media
US7325066B1 (en) Video and audio streaming for multiple users
US7383346B2 (en) Progressive streaming media rendering
JP3653569B2 (en) Function similar to the vcr to render the video on-demand
US6754443B2 (en) Media server system having improved asset types for playback of digital media
EP1217803B1 (en) Streaming of data in a peer-to-peer architecture
CN101099142B (en) System and method for retrieving digital multimedia content from a network node
US5996022A (en) Transcoding data in a proxy computer prior to transmitting the audio data to a client
US5761416A (en) Method and apparatus for distributing network bandwidth on a video server for transmission of bit streams across multiple network interfaces connected to a single internet protocol (IP) network
JP5320740B2 (en) Adaptive rate shifting apparatus, system and method for streaming content
EP2467786B1 (en) Method and system for http-based stream delivery
US9253532B2 (en) Two-way audio and video communication utilizing segment-based adaptive streaming techniques
CN1126344C (en) Distributed internet protocol based real time multimedia streaming architecture
US7548948B2 (en) Client-side caching of streaming media content
US9247276B2 (en) System and method for progressive delivery of media content
US7310680B1 (en) Video and audio streaming for multiple users
RU2543568C2 (en) Smooth, stateless client media streaming
US8516144B2 (en) Startup bitrate in adaptive bitrate streaming
ES2394182T3 (en) Procedure and multifusion apparatus
CN100565504C (en) Method and system for embedding a session description message in a real-time control protocol (RTCP) message
US8117328B2 (en) System and method for automatically recovering from failed network connections in streaming media scenarios
US7761585B2 (en) Techniques for automatically detecting protocols in a computer network
US6970937B1 (en) User-relayed data broadcasting

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION