US20080018904A1

US20080018904A1 - Method and apparatus for suppression of crosstalk and noise in time-division multiplexed interferometric sensor systems

Info

Publication number: US20080018904A1
Application number: US11/866,032
Authority: US
Inventors: Ole Waagaard; Erlend Ronnekleiv
Original assignee: Optoplan AS
Current assignee: Alcatel Submarine Networks Norway AS
Priority date: 2005-02-11
Filing date: 2007-10-02
Publication date: 2008-01-24
Also published as: US7466422B2; NO20060681L; US20080291461A1; CA2655811C; GB2423149B; GB2423149A; CA2655817A1; CA2655811A1; NO338787B1; CA2535964A1; CA2535964C; US20060181711A1; CA2655817C; US20080018905A1; GB0602752D0; US7336365B2

Abstract

Unwanted signal components in time-division multiplexed (TDM) systems may lead to crosstalk and noise if these pulses overlap with signal pulses from an interrogated sensor. The crosstalk and noise are dominated by interference between the signal pulses from the interrogated sensor and the unwanted signal components and can be greatly reduced by suppressing this interference signal. The unwanted signal components may include overlapping pulses originating from different sets of interrogation pulses (repetition periods). Modulating the phase or frequency between the repetition periods so that the unwanted interference signal does not appear at frequencies from which the phase of the interrogated sensor is demodulated suppresses this interference. Other unwanted signal components include leakage light during dark periods of the duty cycle of an interrogation signal. Modulating the phase difference between the interrogation signal and the leakage light suppresses the interference between the leakage light and the interrogation signal.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/056,970 filed Feb. 11, 2005, which is herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to time division multiplexed interferometric sensors. More specifically, the present invention relates to interrogating interferometric sensors in a manner that improves signal-to-noise ratios.
2. Description of the Related Art
A interferometric sensor system may comprise a transmitter unit that produces an interrogation signal for the interferometric sensors, a sensor network, and a receiver unit that detects the signals from the sensor network. The sensor network may comprise several optical pathways from its input to its output, and some pairs of optical pathways form sensor interferometers. These optical pathways are called sensor pathways. Each sensor interferometer comprises a sensor and lead paths, the parts of the two sensor pathways that are not common define the sensor, while the common parts define the lead paths. In a fiber optic sensor network the lead paths are called lead fibers. The portion of the lead paths between the transmitter unit and a sensor is called the down-lead path and the portion of the lead paths between a sensor and the receiver unit is called the up-lead path. The portion of the lead paths that are common to both the down-lead path and the up-lead path is called the common lead path, or common lead fiber for a fiber optic sensor network. The sensors interferometer can be Michelson interferometers, Mach-Zender interferometers or Fabry-Perot interferometers. The sensor network can be a number of topologies, including a star network, a ladder network, a transmissive serial array, a serial Michelson array or an inline Fabry-Perot sensor array. The different paths through the sensor network may typically be formed by optical waveguides and splitters like optical fibers, optical splitters, circulators, and other waveguide coupled components, or free space optical paths, mirrors, beam splitters and other bulk components. The time delay difference τ_sbetween the two sensor pathways is called the imbalance of that sensor, which is typically equal for all sensors. The sensor phase, which is the phase delay difference between the two sensor pathways, can be made sensitive to some physical property that one wants to measure. Thus, information about the physical property can be found by extracting the phase of the interference between the interrogation signal that has propagated the two sensor pathways.
Time-division multiplexing (TDM) of an interferometric sensor network is a form of pulsed interrogation that is achieved by producing light pulses within the transmission unit and transmitting the pulses into the sensor network in one or more pulse transmission time intervals. In between the pulses there may be time intervals without any transmitted light, which are called dark transmission time intervals. Each pulse transmission time interval has typically a length similar to the imbalance of the interrogated sensors. The interrogation signal is made up from a sequence of TDM repetition periods, where each TDM repetition period comprises a sequence of pulse transmission time intervals and dark transmission time intervals. Typically, the TDM repetition periods have equal length and the delay from the start of the TDM repetition periods to the respective pulse and dark transmission time intervals is fixed. A sequence of pulse transmission time intervals that are positioned equally in consecutive TDM repetition periods is called a pulse transmission time slot. Similarly, a sequence of dark transmission time intervals positioned equally in consecutive TDM repetition periods is called a dark transmission time slot. The following description uses transmission time slot as the collective term for pulse transmission time slot and dark transmission time slot. The signal of a transmission time slot is defined by masking out the interrogation signal during the time intervals that define the transmission time slot. The phase or frequency of the optical signal within a transmission time slot is typically varied.
Signals from two pulse transmission time slots are combined at the receiver unit in a receiver time slot after having propagated the two sensor pathways of a sensor interferometer. The interference signal within this receiver time slot includes information about the sensor phase. One or more receiver time slots are associated with the sensor, and the optical signal in at least one receiver time slot is detected, sampled with a sample rate that is equal to or an integer fraction of the TDM repetition rate and processed to extract a demodulated sensor phase as a measure for the sensor. The bandwidth of the demodulated sensor phase signal is less than the receiver Nyquist bandwidth, which is half the sampling rate. Any component of the sensor phase signal above the receiver Nyquist bandwidth is aliased. Thus, the TDM repetition period must therefore be chosen so that aliasing of the sensor phase signal is avoided. TDM of several sensors is typically achieved by having a different delay from the transmission unit to the receiver unit for each of the sensors so that different sensors are associated with different receiver time slots. A receiver time slot may also include information about the sensor phase of more than one sensor, and a set of receiver time slots can be processed to extract information about the individual sensors, as disclosed in O. H. Waagaard, “Method and Apparatus for Reducing Crosstalk Interference in an Inline Fabry-Perot Sensor Array,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/649,588, which is herein incorporated by reference.
A well-known time division multiplexed interrogation technique is the two pulse heterodyne sub-carrier generation technique as disclosed in J. P. Dakin, “An Optical Sensing System,” U.K. patent application number 2,126,820A (filed Jul. 17, 1982). The two pulse heterodyne technique repeatedly transmits two interrogation pulses in two pulse transmission time slots. The phase difference between the first and the second pulse from a TDM period to the next is linearly varied with time to produce a differential frequency shift between the two pulse transmission time slots. The signal from the two pulse transmission time slots that has propagated the two sensor pathways interferes within a receiver time slot. The interference signal comprises a component at a sub-carrier frequency equal to the differential frequency shift. The phase of this sub-carrier provides a measure for the sensor phase.
A well-known interrogation method for continuous wave (cw) interrogation of interferometric sensors is the phase generated carrier technique, disclosed in A. Dandrige, et al., “Homodyne Demodulation Scheme for Fiber Optic Sensors Using Phase Generated Carrier,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 18(10):1647-1653, 1982. The phase generated carrier technique is based on a harmonic bias modulation of the phase of the interference signal, for instance, by modulation of the source phase, resulting in a detected interference signal that has signal components at harmonics of the source modulation frequency. The sensor phase can be determined from a combination of the signal components of several harmonics of the source modulation frequency. This technique can also be used in combination with time-division multiplexing, see A. D. Kersey, et al. “Time-division Multiplexing of Interferometric Fiber Sensor Using Passive Phase-generated Carrier Interrogation,” Optics Letters, 12(10):775-777, 1987. The light source may then be pulsed in the same manner as for the two pulse heterodyne sub-carrier generation technique, while the source phase is modulated in the same manner as for the cw phase generated carrier technique. The detector is sampled at the arrival of the reflected pulses, and the sensor phase is calculated from the harmonics of the source modulation frequency.
With one interrogation method specially suited for interrogation of Fabry-Perot sensors, a multiple of interrogation pulses (larger than two) are generated within three or more pulse transmission time slots, see O. H. Waagaard and E. Rønnekleiv, “Multi-pulse Heterodyne Sub-carrier Interrogation of Interferometric Sensors,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/862,123, which is herein incorporated by reference. The phases of the different pulse transmission time slots are modulated at different linear rates. This method improves the signal-to-noise ratio because the multiple reflections generated within the Fabry-Perot cavity do not have to fade out between each pair of interrogation pulses as would be the case for two-pulse interrogation methods.
Unwanted light components that have propagated through other optical pathways from the transmitter unit to the receiver unit other than the two sensor pathways may lead to noise in the demodulated sensor phase or crosstalk from other sensors if these light components overlap with the sensor interference signal within the receiver time slots. For each interrogated sensor, the noise contributing pathways are define as all these optical pathways from the transmitter unit to the receiver unit apart from sensor pathways. Since the light components that have propagated through a noise contributing pathway have significantly lower amplitude than the light components that have propagated through the sensor pathways, the noise and crosstalk caused by these unwanted light components can be significantly reduced if the interference between the unwanted light components and the interference signal from the interrogated sensor can be suppressed.
A noise contributing pathways may arise due to discrete reflectors such as reflectors of other sensors, circulators, couplers, connectors, etc., or due to distributed reflectors such as Rayleigh scattering. If TDM is combined with wavelength division multiplexing (WDM), wavelength selective components such as fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) or WDM-splitters have limited sideband suppression. Thus, the interrogation signal within a certain WDM-channel may propagate optical pathways belonging to a sensor of a different WDM-channel. The delay of a noise contributing pathway may be such that a pulse that has propagated the noise contributing pathway is received by the receiver unit within a receiver time slot that is used to demodulate the sensor phase. This is the case if the difference in delay between the noise contributing pathway and one of the sensor pathways is equal to the delay between two pulse transmission time intervals. If the common lead path to the sensor is longer than the TDM repetition period, such noise contributing pathways may arise due to Rayleigh reflection along the common lead path. The points along the common lead path that give rise to such noise contributing pathways are called collision points.
A noise contributing pathway can also be a sensor pathway of other time-division multiplexed sensors within the same WDM-channel. If there is no light within the dark transmission time slots, these pathways do not contribute with noise and crosstalk on the interrogated sensor since the optical signal from another time-division multiplexed sensor appears in another receiver time slot. However, limited on/off extinction of the interrogation pulses, for instance, due to light leakage during the dark transmission time slots, may give rise to other light components that may interfere with the interference signal of the interrogated sensor. Such unwanted interference may also lead to unwanted demodulated noise and crosstalk. One proposed method for suppression of this interference includes applying a large phase generated carrier modulation with frequency f_pgcto a lithium niobate phase modulator during the dark transmission time slots, and thereby moving the signal components due to interference between one of the pulses and leakage light to multiples of f_pgc, see D. Hall and J. Bunn, “Noise Suppression Apparatus and Method for Time Division Multiplexed Fiber Optic Sensor Arrays,” U.S. Pat. No. 5,917,597, 1999. However, the amount of suppression of this interference depends on the time delay between the generated pulse and the leakage light, and there is no suppression when the time delay is 1/f_pgc. Also, a very large voltage signal has to be applied to the phase modulator, which makes this method impractical.
Therefore, there exists a need in the art for a method that reduces the sensitivity to the interference with unwanted light components reflected from other parts of a TDM sensor network than the interrogated sensor.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention generally relate to reducing crosstalk and noise in time-division multiplexed (TDM) systems by suppressing interference signals from unwanted light components that have propagated noise contributing pathways through the sensor network. The unwanted light components may lead to crosstalk and noise if they overlap in time with an optical signal received from an interrogated sensor. Noise and crosstalk are contributed from interference at the receiver unit between optical signals received from the interrogated sensor and unwanted light pulses that have propagated noise contributing pathways. Other contributions may come from interference between signals received from the interrogated sensor and leakage light that has propagated pathways of other time-division multiplexed sensors or other pathways with moderate transmission loss. Noise and crosstalk due to the unwanted interference between the optical signal from the sensor and unwanted light components can be suppressed by modulating the optical phase in the transmission time slots in such a way that the unwanted interference signals are distributed to frequency bands that do not affect the demodulated sensor signal.
In one embodiment of the invention, the optical phase of the transmission time slots is modulated in such a way that unwanted interference between the signal of a pulse transmission slot and a delayed signal of the same or another pulse transmission time slot or a dark transmission time slot is shifted in frequency such that the unwanted interference signal appears outside the frequency bands used for demodulation of the sensor. This allows for suppression of noise and crosstalk from noise contributing pathways that have a delay that differs with several TDM repetition periods from the delay of the sensor pathways, and a largest possible frequency separation between an optical signal from the interrogated sensor and the unwanted interference signal.
The modulation of the optical phase of the transmission time slots can be divided into a low frequency range and a high frequency range. In the low frequency range, the applied phase modulation is essentially equal within a single transmission time interval but changed from one TDM period to the next. The unwanted interference signal is shifted by a frequency smaller than the TDM repetition frequency but away from the frequency bands used for demodulation of the sensor so that the unwanted interference signal can be suppressed by a digital filter after sampling the signal within the receiver time slot. In order to suppress unwanted interference between the optical signal from the interrogated sensor and unwanted light pulses, the optical phase of the pulse transmission time slots is modulated with a phase function that varies quadratically with time. Suppression of unwanted interference between the optical signal from the interrogated sensor and leakage light is achieved by having a frequency shift between the pulse transmission time slots and the dark transmission time slots that is outside the frequency bands used for demodulation of the sensor.
In the high frequency range, the frequency of transmission time slots is shifted from one TDM period to the next by more than the receiver bandwidth of the receiver unit. The frequency of the interference between the optical signal from the sensor and the unwanted light components becomes larger than the receiver bandwidth and can therefore be suppressed by an analog receiver filter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
FIG. 1 illustrates schematically a time-division multiplexed (TDM) sensor system with Fabry-Perot sensors that incorporate the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1A shows schematically use of frequency modulation in a Fabry-Perot sensor array.
FIG. 2 illustrates an interrogation signal used with two pulse heterodyne sub-carrier generation.
FIG. 3 illustrates reflection of TDM interrogation pulses from a sensor with two reflectors R₁and R₂and an unwanted reflectors R_x.
FIG. 4 illustrates collision points along a common lead fiber where spurious reflectors may give rise to unwanted interference signals at a detector.
FIG. 5 shows a frequency axis where frequencies of signals due to interference between signal pulses from an interrogated sensor and unwanted pulses appear in a hatched part of the frequency axis that is filtered in order suppress crosstalk and noise.
FIG. 6 illustrates frequency shifts having f_step>RBW applied to interrogation signals to suppress interference between reflections of interrogation pulses originating from different TDM-periods and an interrogation pulse and reflected leakage light.
FIG. 7 shows generated beat frequencies formed by interference between a reflection from a collision point and a reflection from a sensor where the collision points are at distances of kT·2n/c, k=1, . . . , 16 away from the sensor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a fiber-optic time-division multiplexing (TDM) interferometric sensor system 100 that incorporates the principles of the present invention. The system 100 includes an array 114 of Fabry-Perot sensors 116, a transmitter unit 130 that produces an interrogation signal for the sensor array 114 and a receiver unit 132 that receives and demodulates the signals from the sensors. The transmitter unit 130 includes a laser 102, a switch 104, and a phase modulator 106, while the receiver unit 132 comprises a detector 110, a receiver filter 111 that suppresses frequency components in the detected optical signal that are outside the band required for demodulation of the sensors, a sample-and-hold circuit 126, an analog to digital (A/D) converter 128 and a demodulation unit 112 that extracts the phase of the individual sensors 116. The Fabry- Perot sensors 116 a and 116 b are individually formed on optical fibers 120 a and 120 b that are coupled together by a splitter 122 forming a star network topology. A fiber 124 b is connected to a circulator 108 which separates a lead fiber into down-lead fibers 124 a and up-lead fibers 124 c such that the fibers 124 a-c optically couple together elements of the system 100. The fibers 124 a, 124 b and 124 c are connected to the circulator so that the interrogation signal from the transmission unit 130 is directed towards the sensor array 114 and so the reflected signal from the sensor array is directed towards the receiver unit 132. A common lead fiber of sensor 116 a (116 b) is formed by the fiber 124 b and the portion of the fiber 120 a (120 b) between the coupler 122 and the sensor. Accordingly, a noise contributing fiber for the two sensors 116 a and 116 b are formed by the fibers 124 b, 120 a and 120 b.
While FIG. 1 illustrates the use of the laser 102 and the phase modulator 106, the principles of the present invention can be implemented as shown in FIG. 1A. FIG. 1A shows a transmitter unit 130 with a frequency shifter 150, such as a Bragg cell, which sweeps the frequency of the light from the laser 102. Additionally, while FIGS. 1 and 1A show interrogation of Fabry-Perot type interferometers, principles of the invention are highly suited for interrogation of other interferometer types, such as, for example, Michelson and Mach-Zender based interferometer topologies.
FIG. 2 shows aspects of TDM where the laser 102 outputs light with a periodic intensity pattern and with a repetition period T called a TDM repetition period. The TDM repetition period is divided into transmission time slots of a length equal to the sensor delay imbalance τ_s. A sequence of two or more interrogation pulses are generated in two or more transmission time slots by switching on and off the laser 102 directly or by using the switch 104. For the illustrated embodiment, the repetition period is divided into five transmission time slots, where time slots one and two are pulse transmission time slots while three, four and five are dark transmission time slots.
The signal of a certain transmission time slot is formed by masking out the portion of the interrogation signal within the transmission time slot. This is done by multiplying the interrogation signal with a signal that is one during the transmission time slot and zero in all other time slot. The duty-cycle of the laser 102 is defined as the fraction of time in which the laser 102 is turned on. The duty-cycle depends on the number of the sensors 116 multiplexed and the separation between the sensors 116. Pulses propagating a sensor path and a reference path of one of the sensors 116 interfere at the receiver producing optical power amplitudes that depend periodically on the phase delay difference between the two paths. The phase delay varies due to a response from a measurand.
FIG. 3 shows an unwanted reflector R_xand first and second reflectors R₁and R₂of the sensor 116 being interrogated. The overlapping pulses reflected from the reflectors R₁and R₂are reflections of interrogation pulses transmitted in the same TDM repetition period, while the pulses reflected from the unwanted reflector R_xare reflections of interrogation pulses transmitted in another TDM repetition period. When the dual-pass delay τ between the unwanted reflector R_xand one of the reflectors R₁or R₂is equal to a multiple of the TDM repetition period T, pulses reflected from the unwanted reflector R_xand the sensor 116 overlap in time at the receiver and the interference between the reflection from the sensor 116 and the unwanted reflector R_xmay give rise to noise or crosstalk on the demodulated signal from the sensor 116. Accordingly, unwanted reflectors positioned both before and after the sensor 116 may give rise to noise and crosstalk on the sensor.
FIG. 4 shows that reflections in the common lead fiber 124 b leading to interference between pulses originating from different TDM repetition periods appear at positions where the interrogation pulses propagating towards the sensors 116 collide with the reflected signal from the sensors 116. Weak reflections in the up-lead fiber 124 a and down-lead fiber 124 c to a first order approximation do not contribute to noise or errors in the detected and demodulated signals. The parts of the common lead fiber 124 b where the pulses collide define collision points 404. Although not shown in the figure, there are also collision points on fibers 120 a and 120 b. The distance between the collision points 404 is defined as c/(2n)·T, where c is the speed of light and n is the refractive index of the fiber. This means that the total number of collision points 404 per sensor reflector on the common lead fiber 124 b is k_max=└T_f/T┘, where T_fis the maximum difference in delay between a sensor pathway and a noise contributing pathway. Here, └.┘ denotes rounding down to the nearest integer. Thus, suppression of the interference only requires suppressing the interference between the reflections from two interrogation pulses that are less than or equal to k_maxTDM repetition periods apart.
For τ larger than the pulse coherence time, the pulses reflected from the unwanted reflector R_xdo not originate from the same repetition period as the reflectors R₁and R₂. This allows for suppression of crosstalk and noise by modulation of the phase or frequency of the interrogation pulses from TDM repetition period to TDM repetition period so that the interference between the pulses from the interrogated sensor 116 and the unwanted pulses does not include frequency components that are used to demodulate the sensor 116. By modulating the phase of the interrogation signal, the interference between the signal transmitted in one pulse time slot and the signal transmitted in the same or another pulse time slot delayed by more than the sensor imbalance provides a frequency outside the frequency bands used for demodulation of the sensors 116. Furthermore, modulating the phase of the interrogation signal so that the interference between the signal transmitted in one pulse time slot and any signal transmitted in the dark time slots provides a frequency outside the frequency bands used for demodulation of the sensors 116 and thus enables suppression of noise due to leakage during the dark time slots.
The following embodiments described assume that a variant of the two pulse heterodyne sub-carrier generation is used. However, other embodiments can also be used with other interrogation schemes such as phase-generated carrier interrogation and multi-pulse heterodyne sub-carrier interrogation.
In one embodiment, the phase difference between the two interrogation pulses in the pulse time slots is varied linearly with time so that the sensor phase can be found from the sequence of reflected pulses from the sensor 116 by processing information within a frequency band centered at the sub-carrier frequency f_scand with a bandwidth 2BW. The noise or crosstalk due to the interference between an unwanted light component and a pulse from an interrogated sensor is suppressed if the phase or frequency modulation of the interrogation pulses is such that the interference does not appear in the frequency band f_sc−BW≦f≦f_sc+BW. Signal components outside this frequency band can be removed either by the analog receiver filter 111 (shown in FIG. 1) or a digital filter within the demodulation unit 112.
In some applications, the interrogation signal may be divided into different channels that are interleaved in the time domain so that the sampling period T_sof each channel is a multiple of the TDM repetition period T. One example of such interleaving is the polarization-resolved interrogation method based on switching the polarization states of the interrogation pulses described in O. H. Waagaard and E. Rønnekleiv, “Method and Apparatus for Providing Polarization Insensitive Signal Processing for Interferometric Sensors,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/650,117, which is herein incorporated by reference. In this example, the repetition periods are divided into four polarization channels that are defined by the polarization states of the two interrogation pulses. The polarization channels are sequentially interrogated so that within P=4 repetition periods all polarization channels are interrogated. In general, the repetition periods may be divided into P≧1 interleaved channels, where P is an integer. The sampling period for each interleaved channel becomes T_s=PT.
The allowed frequencies range can be divided into a low-frequency (f<RBW) range and a high-frequency range (f>RBW), where RBW is the bandwidth of the receiver filter 111, which must be larger than 1/(2τ_s) in order to detect the individual pulses.
In one embodiment of the invention where the unwanted interference signal is shifted to the high-frequency range, the optical frequency is shifted from repetition period to repetition period so that the difference in frequency between any two pulses in k_maxsubsequent TDM repetition periods is larger than RBW. FIG. 6 shows how the interrogation signal can be shifted in frequency in steps that are larger than RBW. Interference between reflected interrogation pulses originating from different repetition periods produce frequencies larger than RBW. The receiver filter removes these interference signals. The required frequency modulation can be achieved by modulation of the phase using an electro-optical modulator 106 as shown in FIG. 1, by using a frequency shifter such as an acousto-optical modulator 150 as shown in FIG. 1A, or by tuning the frequency of the light source. The frequency shift is reset to f_stepafter minimum k_maxrepetition periods.
In FIG. 6, the optical frequency shift of leakage light that may occur in the time intervals when the intensity nominally should be zero is kept at zero, and it is therefore different from the frequency of any of the interrogation pulses. This means that the interference between reflected leakage light and reflected interrogation pulses is also suppressed since the frequency difference is larger than RBW.
In another embodiment, the unwanted interference signal is shifted to the low-frequency range by varying the optical phase of the interrogation pulses from repetition period to repetition period in such a manner that the interference between pulses reflected from the interrogated sensor and unwanted pulse reflections is shifted to a frequency that is outside the frequency band f_sc±BW that is used for the demodulation. The available frequency range to where the unwanted interference signal components can be shifted is limited by the sampling period of the individual sampling channels, T_s=PT, and the bandwidth BW of the signal from the interrogated sensor. All frequency components larger than the receiver Nyquist frequency 1/(2T_s) are aliased to the frequency in the range below 1/(2T_s) due to the sampled nature of the pulses and the receiver sampling. Crosstalk and noise caused by interference between pulses reflected from an interrogated sensor and pulses reflected from an unwanted reflector are therefore suppressed if the phase modulation between repetition periods is such that the unwanted interference signals do not appear at frequencies f in the ranges $\begin{matrix} \frac{k}{T_{s}} - f_{sc} - BW \leq f \leq \frac{k}{T_{s}} - f_{sc} + BW \frac{k}{T_{s}} + f_{sc} - BW \leq f \leq \frac{k}{T_{s}} + f_{sc} + BW, & (1) \end{matrix}$
where k is an integer larger than or equal to zero. These bands are the non-hashed parts of the frequency axis in FIG. 5.
The n'th repetition period in a TDM sampling sequence corresponds to the m'th point in the sampling sequence of the p'th (p=0, . . . , P−1) sampling (interleaved) channel so that n=Pm+p. The phase of the interrogation pulses in the first and second transmission time slot are
φ₁(n)=φ₁ ^p(m)=φ_rs(n)−(2−μ)φ_sc(n) (2a)
φ₂(n)=φ₂ ^p(m)=φ_ns(n)+μφ_sc(n), (2b)
respectively, where 0≧μ≧2 is a constant, φ_nsis the modulation that provides noise suppression from unwanted reflections and φ_scis the modulation that provides the sub-carrier, and they are given by
φ_ns(n)=φ_ns ^p(m)=n ² πf ₁ T=(Pm+p)² πf ₁ T (3a)
φ_sc(n)=φ_sc ^p(m)=mπf _sc T _s+φ ₀ ^p/2. (3b)
The phase difference between the two transmission time slots is φ₂ ^p(m)−φ₁ ^p(m)=2φ_sc ^p(m)=m2πf_scT_s+φ₀ ^p. The freedom to choose μ in Equations (2a) and (2b) enables selection so that the sub-carrier modulation is either on the first pulse (μ=0), on the second pulse (μ=2) or both (μ=1). Selection of the frequency f₁is discussed below. If the phase offset of the interleaved channels are chosen as φ₀ ^p=p2πf_scT, then φ_sc(n)=nπf_scT, and the phase difference between the two transmission time slots varies linearly with n. The phase offset φ₀ ^pmay be removed from the demodulated phase signal by subtraction. In the following discussions, it is assumed φ₀ ^p=0, so that φ_sc ^p(m)=φ_sc(m), ∀p.
The interference between reflectors R₁and R₂in interleaved channel p is given by
I ^p(m)=R ₁ I ₂ +R ₂ I ₁+2V ^p(m)√{square root over (R₁R₂I₁I₂)} cos( m2πf _sc T _s+φ_s ^p(m)) (4)
where I₁and I₂are the intensities of the two interrogation pulse, V^p(m) is the visibility of the interference and φ_s ^p(m) is the sensor phase. The complex reflection response of interleaved channel p,X_p(m)=r_p(m)exp[iφ_s ^p(m)], where r_p(m)=2V^p(m)√{square root over (R₁R₂I₁I₂)}, can be found from the sequence of detected pulses from a sub-carrier with frequency f_sc. From the P complex values X_p(m), p=0, . . . , P−1, the sensor phase can be calculated.
The dual-pass delay between the reflectors R₁and R_xis one TDM repetition period in FIG. 3. In order to analyze the interference between the reflections from R₁, R₂and R_xin a more general case, the dual-pass delay difference between the reflectors R₁and R_xis set to k=Pj+q (q=0, 1, . . . P−1) times the TDM repetition period. Note that the following discussion applies when the dual-pass delay difference differs with less than the pulse coherence length from k times the TDM repetition period. Pulses reflected from R_xappear in the same receiver time slot as the interference signal from the sensor. There are two unwanted interference components within this receiver time slot caused by interference with reflections from the unwanted reflector R_x. The first component is caused by the interference between pulses originating from the second pulse transmission time slot reflected from the first reflector R₁and pulses originating from the same pulse transmission time slot reflected from the unwanted reflector R_xand delayed by k TDM repetition periods. The second component is the interference between pulses originating from the first pulse transmission time slot reflected from the second reflector R₂and pulses originating from the second pulse transmission time slot and delayed by k TDM repetition periods reflected from the unwanted reflector R_x. The interference phase of these two components can be expressed as, $\begin{matrix} ϕ_{2}^{p} (m) - ϕ_{2}^{p - q} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) = ϕ_{n s} (n) - ϕ_{n s} (n - k) + {μϕ}_{sc} (m) - {μϕ}_{sc} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) = [n^{2} - {(n - k)}^{2}] π f_{1} T + μ [m - (m - j)] π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) = mk 2 π f_{1} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) - α_{k}^{p} {μβ}_{j} & (5 a) \\ ϕ_{1}^{p} (m) - ϕ_{2}^{p - q} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) = ϕ_{n s} (n) - ϕ_{n s} (n - k) - (2 - μ) ϕ_{sc} (m) - {μϕ}_{sc} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) = [n^{2} - {(n - k)}^{2}] π f_{1} T + [- (2 - μ) m - μ (m - j)] π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) = mk 2 π f_{1} T_{s} - m2π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) - α_{k}^{p} + {μβ}_{j} . & (5 b) \end{matrix}$
Here, α_k ^p=k(k+2p)πf₁T, β_j=jπf_scT_s, and φ_x ^p(m) is the phase delay difference between the second reflector R₂and the unwanted reflector R_x. φ_x ^p(m) is assumed to be slowly varying comparable to the receiver Nyquist frequency. Thus, the interference components in (5a) and (5b) are confined to frequency bands centered around kf₁and f_sc−kf₁.
While not shown in the figures, noise and crosstalk can also appear if the dual-pass delay between the second reflector R₂and the unwanted reflector R_xis equal to k=Pj+q(q=0, 1, . . . P−1) times the TDM repetition period. In this case, the signal from the sensor includes the interference between pulses originating from the second pulse transmission time slot reflected from the first reflector R₁and pulses originating from the first pulse transmission time slot reflected from the unwanted reflector R_xand the interference between pulses originating from the first pulse transmission time slot reflected from the second reflector R₂and pulses originating from the first pulse transmission time slot reflected from the unwanted reflector R_x. The phase of these two interference components is given as, $\begin{matrix} ϕ_{2}^{p} (m) - ϕ_{1}^{p - q} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) = ϕ_{n s} (n) - ϕ_{n s} (n - k) + {μϕ}_{sc} (m) + (2 - μ) ϕ_{sc} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) = [n^{2} - {(n - k)}^{2}] π f_{1} T + [μ m + (2 - μ) (m - j)] π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) = mk 2 π f_{1} T_{s} + m 2 π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) + ϕ_{s}^{p} (m) - α_{k}^{p} - (2 - μ) β_{j} & (6 a) \\ ϕ_{1}^{p} (m) - ϕ_{1}^{p - q} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) = ϕ_{n s} (n) - ϕ_{n s} (n - k) - (2 - μ) ϕ_{sc} (m) + {μϕ}_{sc} (m - j) + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) = [n^{2} - {(n - k)}^{2}] π f_{1} T + (2 - μ) [- m + (m - j)] 2 π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) = mk 2 π f_{1} T_{s} + ϕ_{x}^{p} (m) - α_{k}^{p} - (2 - μ) β_{j} . & (6 b) \end{matrix}$
In this case, the two interference components are confined to frequency bands centered around kf₁and f_sc+kf₁.
The two collision points with delays that differ by k times the TDM repetition period from the delays of R₁and R₂give rise to components in the detected signal at beat frequencies kf₁, f_sc−kf₁and f_sc+kf₁. Beat frequencies that are larger than 1/(2T_s) are aliased. In a preferred embodiment, the subcarrier frequency is chosen as f_sc=1/(N_pT_s), where N_pis an integer larger than 2. After aliasing to the Nyquist frequency range [0,1/(2T_s)), the beat signal frequencies become,
f _a(k)=|mod(kf ₁ +N _p f _sc/2,N _p f _sc)−N _p f _sc/2)| (7a)
f _b(k)=|mod(f _sc −kf ₁ +N _p f _sc/2,N _p f _sc)−N _p f _sc/2)| (7b)
f _c(k)=|mod(f _sc +kf ₁ +N _p f _sc/2,N _p f _sc)−N _p f _sc/2)| (7c)
f₁should be chosen such that neither f_a(k), f_b(k) nor f_c(k), k=1, 2, . . . k_maxappears in the frequency range between f_sc−BW and f_sc+BW. The separation between f_scand the beat frequency that is closest to f_scis defined as f_sep. In general, f_sepshould be as large as possible to avoid overlap between the beat signal band and the subcarrier band. The choice of frequency f₁that gives the largest possible value for f_sepis found by setting f_a(k_max+1)=f_scin Equation (7a). This equation has solutions f₁=lf_sepwhere l≦k_maxis an integer that has no common divisor with k_max+1, and $\begin{matrix} f_{sep} = \frac{f_{sc}}{k_{\max} + 1} = {[(k_{\max} + 1) N_{p} T_{s}]}^{- 1} . & (8) \end{matrix}$
Accordingly, f_sepis maximum if N_pis as small as possible, i.e., N_p=3 should be chosen.
FIG. 7 shows generated beat frequencies due to interference between the reflection from the collision points and the reflection from the sensor with k_max=16 and N_p=3. With l=1, the frequencies that are closest to f_scare f_b(1), f_c(1), f_b(k_max) and f_c(k_max). In some cases, it might be preferable to move f_b(1) and f_c(1) further away from f_sc. This is achieved by selecting l>1.
The interference between the leakage light reflected from another time-division multiplexed sensor and reflection of the interrogation pulses from the interrogated sensor can also be suppressed by modulating the difference between the phase of the pulse transmission time slots and the phase of the dark transmission time slots, φ_off. By setting φ_off(n)=φ_ns(n) and using Equation (2), the phase of the interference between the first or second pulse generated in TDM repetition period n, respectively, and the leakage light generated in TDM repetition n-k may be expressed as $\begin{matrix} ϕ_{1} (n) - ϕ_{off} (n - k) + ϕ_{x 1} (n) = ϕ_{n s} (n) - ϕ_{n s} (n - k) - (2 - μ) ϕ_{sc} (n) + ϕ_{x 1} (n) = mk 2 π f_{1} T_{s} - (2 - μ) m π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x 1} (n) + α_{k}^{p} & (9 a) \\ ϕ_{2} (n) - ϕ_{off} (n - k) + ϕ_{x 2} (n) = ϕ_{n s} (n) - ϕ_{n s} (n - k) + {μϕ}_{sc} (n) + ϕ_{x 2} (n) = mk 2 π f_{1} T_{s} + μ m π f_{sc} T_{s} + ϕ_{x 2} (n) + α_{k}^{p} & (9 b) \end{matrix}$
where φ_x1(n) and φ_x2(n) are the physical phase difference between the interfering components and α_k ^pis the same as in Equations (5a) and (5b). It is possible to choose μ and f₁so that the interference between signals received from the interrogated sensor and leakage light that has propagated pathways of other time-division multiplexed sensors or other pathways with moderate transmission loss appears at a frequency different from the sub-carrier frequency f_sc. In most cases the difference in delay between the time-division multiplexed sensors is less than the TDM repetition period. The interference between the leakage light and the interrogation pulses from the same TDM period (k=0) appears at a frequencies μf_scand (2−μ)f_scwhich is different from f_scwhen μ is different from 0 or 2. Note that the interference between interrogation pulses and leakage light can be suppressed also when φ_off(n)=φ_ns(n)=0, i.e., no modulation is applied to suppress interference between pulses originating from different TDM repetition periods. In a preferred embodiment, μ=1 may be chosen so that
φ₁(n)=φ_ns(n)−φ_sc(n) (10a)
φ₂(n)=φ_ns(n)+φ_sc(n) (10b)
Then, the interference between the leakage and the interrogation pulses from the same TDM repetition period appears at half the sub-carrier frequency. If f_sc>4BW, the interference between the interference pulses and the leakage light does not give any contribution in the signal band from which the sensor phase is extracted, and can therefore be filtered out by any appropriate digital filter.
With the phase modulation scheme described in Equations (9) and (10), φ_scmust be modulated two sub-carrier periods before the phase can be reset. This means that the maximum voltage applied to the phase modulator is twice the maximum voltage when the crosstalk due to leakage is not suppressed. However, φ_sccan be reset every sub-carrier period if a square wave pattern with period that is half the sub-carrier period and amplitude π/2 to is added to φ_off: $\begin{matrix} ϕ_{off} (n) = ϕ_{n s} (n) + \frac{π}{2} rect (\frac{n}{2 {PN}_{p}}), where & (11) \\ rect (x) = {\begin{matrix} 1 & x - ⌊ x ⌋ < 0.5 \\ - 1 & otherwise . \end{matrix} & (12) \end{matrix}$
Thus, the reset of φ_sc(n) is compensated by a phase shift of π in φ_off, leading to an interference signal between the leakage light and one of the two pulses that are periodic with half the sub-carrier period.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.

Claims

1. A method of interrogating sensor interferometers of an optical network comprising multiple optical pathways from a transmitter unit to a receiver unit, wherein pairs of optical pathways form the sensor interferometers, each sensor interferometer having a sensor imbalance, the method comprising:

defining a plurality of transmission time intervals;

dividing the plurality of transmission time intervals into a sequence of time-division multiplexing (TDM) repetition periods;

transmitting optical pulses from the transmitter unit during a portion of the transmission time intervals such that corresponding optical pulses are positioned equally in each TDM repetition period; and

modulating a frequency of the optical pulses between different TDM repetition periods such that unwanted interference signal components reaching the receiver unit are distributed to frequency bands that do not affect a demodulated sensor signal.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein modulating the frequency of the optical signals comprises:

applying a frequency shift between each TDM repetition period; and

resetting the frequency shift to an initial frequency after a predetermined number of TDM repetition periods.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the frequency shift is reset after at least k_maxrepetition periods, wherein k_max=└T_f/T┘, where Tis a period of one of the TDM repetition periods and T_fis a maximum difference in delay from the transmitter unit to the receiver unit between a sensor pathway and any other pathway from the transmitter unit to the receiver unit that gives rise to unwanted interference at the receiver unit.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the frequency shift is larger than a bandwidth of the receiver unit.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein modulating the frequency comprises at least one of using a frequency shifter and tuning the frequency of a light source for producing the optical pulses.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the unwanted interference signal components comprise unwanted interference between a delayed signal of one of the optical pulses in a first TDM repetition period and a signal of a corresponding optical pulse in a second TDM repetition period.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the unwanted interference signal components comprise unwanted interference between a delayed signal of one of the optical pulses in a first TDM repetition period and a signal of a non-corresponding optical pulse in the first or a second TDM repetition period.

8. An interferometric sensor system, comprising:

an optical network having multiple optical pathways between a transmitter unit and a receiver unit, wherein pairs of optical pathways form sensor interferometers, each sensor interferometer having a sensor imbalance;

an optical source for generating a sequence of pulses during a sequence of time-division multiplexing (TDM) repetition periods such that corresponding optical pulses are positioned equally in each TDM repetition period; and

a modulator configured to modulate a frequency of the pulses between different TDM repetition periods such that unwanted interference signal components reaching the receiver unit are distributed to frequency bands that do not affect a demodulated sensor signal.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the unwanted interference signal components comprise unwanted interference between a delayed signal of one of the optical pulses in a first TDM repetition period and a signal of a corresponding optical pulse in a second TDM repetition period.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the unwanted interference signal components comprise unwanted interference between a delayed signal of one of the optical pulses in a first TDM repetition period and a signal of a non-corresponding optical pulse in the first or a second TDM repetition period.

11. The system of claim 8, wherein the modulator is configured to provide a shift in frequency of interference between a delayed signal of one of the TDM repetition periods and a signal of any other one of the TDM repetition periods away from frequency bands used for the demodulated sensor signal.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the shift in frequency is larger than a bandwidth of the receiver unit.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the modulator comprises a Bragg cell.

14. The system of claim 8, wherein the modulator is configured to apply a frequency shift between each TDM repetition period and to reset the frequency shift to an initial frequency after a predetermined number of TDM repetition periods.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the frequency shift is reset after at least k_maxrepetition periods, wherein k_max=└T_f/T┘, where Tis a period of one of the TDM repetition periods and T_fis a maximum difference in delay from the transmitter unit to the receiver unit between a sensor pathway and any other pathway from the transmitter unit to the receiver unit that gives rise to unwanted interference at the receiver unit.

16. An interferometric sensor system, comprising:

an optical network having multiple optical pathways between a transmitter unit and a receiver unit, wherein pairs of optical pathways form sensor interferometers, each sensor interferometer having a sensor imbalance; and

a tunable optical source for generating a sequence of pulses during a sequence of time-division multiplexing (TDM) repetition periods such that corresponding optical pulses are positioned equally in each TDM repetition period, wherein the optical source is configured to modulate a frequency of the pulses between different TDM repetition periods such that unwanted interference signal components reaching the receiver unit are distributed to frequency bands that do not affect a demodulated sensor signal.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the unwanted interference signal components comprise unwanted interference between a delayed signal of one of the optical pulses in a first TDM repetition period and a signal of a corresponding optical pulse in a second TDM repetition period.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the unwanted interference signal components comprise unwanted interference between a delayed signal of one of the optical pulses in a first TDM repetition period and a signal of a non-corresponding optical pulse in the first or a second TDM repetition period.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein the optical source is configured to apply a frequency shift between each TDM repetition period and to reset the frequency shift to an initial frequency after a predetermined number of TDM repetition periods.

20. The system of claim 16, wherein the receiver unit comprises a demodulation unit for producing the demodulated sensor signal and at least one of a digital filter in the demodulation unit or an analog receiver filter for removing the unwanted interference signal components.