US20080018179A1

US20080018179A1 - Linear electrodynamic system and method

Info

Publication number: US20080018179A1
Application number: US11/867,609
Authority: US
Inventors: Songgang Qiu
Original assignee: Infinia Corp
Current assignee: RICOR GENERATION Inc
Priority date: 2005-02-11
Filing date: 2007-10-04
Publication date: 2008-01-24
Also published as: US7352088B2; WO2006086514A3; WO2006086514A2; US20060181157A1

Abstract

An exemplary description provided for patent searches includes a linear electrodynamic system for conversion of mechanical motion into electrical power or conversion of electrical power into mechanical motion involving advantageous use of magnetic material positioned on a mover. Bore surfaces of the magnetic material is shape complementary to bore surfaces of stator poles. Some implementations utilize non-annularly shaped bore surfaces while others utilize annularly shaped bore surfaces.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 11/255,789 filed Oct. 21, 2005, which claims a priority benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/652,132 filed on Feb. 11, 2005, where these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed generally to electrodynamic systems and, more particularly, to linear alternators and linear motors.
2. Description of the Related Art
Linear electrodynamic systems including linear alternators and linear motors are particularly useful, for instance, in combination with Stirling cycle engines for electrical power generation and for refrigeration applications. These electrodynamic systems require substantial mass in their construction for adequate performance. Typically, iron laminations are used for the mover and stator components and copper wire is used for the windings.
Unfortunately, the amount of mass involved with these linear electrodynamic systems can be undesirable, for example, with situations where construction or operational costs are dependent upon equipment weight. As another example, for portable equipment, the amount of mass used for these linear electrodynamic systems can lessen the ease of use of the equipment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a conventional electrothermal system.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the conventional linear electrodynamic system of FIG. 1 with its mover in a first position.
FIG. 3 is a top view of the conventional stator lamination and a conventional mover lamination pair associated with the mover in the first position of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the conventional linear electrodynamic system of FIG. 1 with its mover in a second position.
FIG. 5 is a top view of the conventional stator lamination and the conventional mover lamination pair associated with the mover in the second position of FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is an exploded isometric view of an implementation of the innovative linear electrodynamic system according to the present invention.
FIG. 7 is an isometric view of the implementation of the linear electrodynamic system of FIG. 6 showing the mover in a first position.
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional isometric view taken substantially along the line 8-8 of FIG. 7.
FIG. 9 is an end view of a non-annular convex eight-V implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system of FIG. 6 without windings.
FIG. 10 is an end view of a non-annular concave four-parabolic implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11 is an end view of a non-annular concave four-V implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is an end view of a non-annular convex four-arc implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 13 is an end view of a non-annular convex four-arc implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 14 is an end view of a non-annular convex four-V implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 15 is an end view of a non-annular convex eight-parabolic implementation of a stator lamination and a mover lamination pair of the linear electrodynamic system according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As will be discussed in greater detail herein, an innovative linear electrodynamic system and method is disclosed to convert linear mechanical motion into an electrical current such as for a linear alternator for heat engines including Stirling cycle engines, or to convert electrical current into linear mechanical motion such as for a linear motor associated with mechanical cooling devices. Due to innovative concepts embodied therein and described below, the innovative linear electrodynamic system has size and weight advantages over conventional linear electrodynamic systems.
A conventional electrothermal system 10 using a heat module 12 and a power module 14 is shown in FIG. 1. When in the form of a Stirling cycle engine, the heat module 12 has a displacer 16 and working fluid 18 in fluid communication with a power piston 20, which is part of the power module 14. The power piston 20 of the power module 14 is connected to a conventional linear electrodynamic system 22 through a shaft 23 coupled to a mover 24. The conventional linear electrodynamic system 22 further includes a stator 26 and a paired electrical line 28 to furnish or receive electrical power. The stator 26 has conventional stator laminations 30 stacked together and secured by stator connecting rods 32 positioned through stator connecting rod holes 33, as shown in FIG. 2 in which the mover 24 is in a first position.
The conventional stator laminations 30 each have four stator pole laminations 34 shown in FIG. 3 in the 3:00, 6:00, 9:00, and 12:00 o'clock positions. The stator pole laminations 34 form stator poles 34′ of the stator 26 when the stator pole laminations are stacked. The stator poles 34′ are made of a magnetic field enhancing material, such as iron, shaped to form slots 35 (best shown in FIG. 3), which receive windings 36, such as formed by winding copper wire through the stator slots around the stator poles. Orientation of the windings 36 is shown for a first winding 36 a and a second winding 36 b in FIGS. 2 and 3 and is additionally shown for a third winding 36 c and a fourth winding 36 d in FIG. 3.
Four annular concave arc magnets 38 are each glued to a portion (seven conventional stator laminations 30 in FIG. 2) of one of the four stator poles 34′ (for instance, the stator pole in the 12:00 position of FIG. 3). The annular concave arc magnet 38 is so named because its bore surface 38′ opposite the stator pole 34′ has a concave shape in the form of an arc being in cylindrical alignment with the other annular concave arc magnets attached to the other stator poles of the stator 26. This cylindrical alignment of the bore surfaces 38′ of the annular concave arc magnets 38 is depicted by an illustrative circle 39 that is not part of the structure of the stator 26, but is shown in FIGS. 3 and 5 only for explanatory purposes.
The mover 24 is made up of collections of stacked conventional mover laminations 40 made of a magnetic field enhancing material, such as iron, and has mover sections 41 with arcuate bore surfaces 41′ shaped to complement the shape of the bore surfaces 38′ of the annular concave arc magnets 38.
The annular nature of the annular concave arc magnets 38 allows for the mover 24 to be shaped to fit inside the illustrative circle 39 with a gaseous gap 43 of typically one-hundredth of an inch between bore surfaces 41′ of the mover sections 41 and the bore surfaces 38′ of the annular concave arc magnets 38. With such an arrangement the rotational tolerances for securing the mover 24 in the conventional linear electrodynamic system 22 are not rigorous regarding the amount of rotation allowed for the mover. Since the bore surfaces 38′ of the annular concave arc magnets 38 are cylindrical coincident with the illustrative circle 39, the arcuate bore surface 41′ of the mover sections 41 allow the mover 24 to rotate a significant amount without contacting the stator 26 should torque on the shaft 23 cause the mover to rotate.
The conventional mover laminations 40 are held together by mover connecting rods 42 inserted through mover connecting rod holes 44. A portion of the shaft 23 is coupled to the mover 24 through shaft holes 45 in the conventional mover laminations 40.
The annular concave arc magnets 38 have a first orientation 38 a in which the north pole of the magnet is the bore surface 38′ and a second orientation 38 b in which the south pole of the magnet is the bore surface. The first orientation 38 a and the second orientation 38 b are alternated along the axis of the shaft 23 as shown in FIG. 2 and alternated around the 3:00, 6:00, 9:00, and 12:00 positions as shown in FIG. 3. Magnetic flux lines 50 are shown in FIG. 3 for a pair of one of the conventional stator laminations 30 and an adjacent one of the conventional mover laminations 40 when the mover 24 is in the first position shown in FIG. 2. Magnetic flux lines 51 are shown in FIG. 5 for the pair of one of the conventional stator laminations 30 and an adjacent one of the conventional mover laminations 40 when the mover 24 is in a second position shown in FIG. 4.
An innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 is shown in FIG. 6 having an innovative stator 102, an innovative mover 104, and a shaft 106. Various implementations of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 are described below, which result in reduced mass of the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 compared with the conventional linear electrodynamic system 22 of comparable performance capability. Mass reduction is achieved by enhancing magnetic flux distribution through the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104, reduction of size and volume of the innovative stator and the innovative mover, and reduction of the amount of metal (typically copper) required in the associated windings. Furthermore, as shown in the implementations below, the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 are more efficiently packaged to better use available space compared with conventional approaches resulting in further reductions of size of the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100.
As part of the approach used, the flux is concentrated flux by increasing total magnet volume found in the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100. With increases of magnet volume and flux concentration, the number of turns in stator windings required to develop a given voltage is reduced. Increased magnetic flux allows for decreases in outer diameter of the innovative stator 102 and more narrow poles of the innovative stator allow for smaller sized turns for stator windings. Stator mass and volume both scale with the square of stator diameter. As further discussed below, magnets are positioned on the innovative mover 104 thus generally allowing a comparable shortening of the length of the innovative stator 102 by approximately half since the innovative mover is generally allowed a comparable doubling in length to allow for alternating of magnetic poles. These attributes mentioned can all factor into a significant overall reduction of mass and volume associated with the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 compared to the conventional linear electrodynamic system 22 of comparable performance capability.
Shapes of the magnets discussed below found with the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 also can reduce magnetic side loading on the innovative mover 104 as compared with the conventional linear electrodynamic system 22 described above.
The innovative stator 102 has stator laminations 108, which are stacked together using stator connecting rods 109. The innovative stator 102 further has windings 110. The non-annular magnets 111 are glued to portions of the innovative mover 104. In the depicted implementations of the innovative mover 104 discussed herein, the non-annular magnets 111 are arranged on the innovative mover to have first and second orientations similar to that discussed above for the conventional stator laminations 30. For instance, with the implementation depicted in FIG. 6 in which the magnets' north surfaces 111 n and the magnets' south surface 111 s are alternated as bore surfaces 111 of the innovative mover. The non-annular magnets 111 are designated as such because their north bore surfaces 111 n and their south bore surfaces 111 s are not in a cylindrical arrangement such as is the arrangement depicted by the illustrative circle 39 accompanying the description above of the conventional linear electrodynamic system 22.
Being non-annular in nature is a significant departure from conventional approaches and not suggested thereby. For instance, use of non-annular magnets 111 having the north bore surface 111 n and the south bore surface 111 s with a non-annular shape requires that rotational tolerances for the innovative mover 104 be much more strict than conventional approaches since even slight rotational movement will result in the innovative mover 104 striking the innovative stator 102. In addition, the non-annular magnets 111 are so shaped that they can introduce an additional torque load on the innovative mover 104 that need not be addressed by conventional approaches. Conventional linear electrodynamic systems are designed to avoid these results.
In the first implementation of the present invention shown in FIG. 6, there are eight non-annular stator poles 112 shaped as non-annular convex V stator poles with bore surfaces 112′. For the implementation shown in FIG. 6, thirty two non-annular magnets 111 are affixed, such as by gluing, to eight mover sections 116 to form eight concave V magnet sections 120. The term “V” is used due to the general “V” shape of the V magnet sections 120 formed from the non-annular magnets 111 in this implementation.
The innovative mover 104 is made up of mover laminations 118 which are bound together and define a plurality of the non-annular mover sections 116. FIGS. 7 and 8 shows the eight non-annular concave V magnet sections 120 of the particular implementation shown in FIGS. 6 of the innovative mover 104 midway in its reciprocal travel within the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100.
The implementation of FIGS. 6-8 is shown in FIG. 9 from the end without the windings 110 illustrated. There is a gaseous gap 122 between the bore surfaces 111′ of the eight non-annular magnets 111 shown and the corresponding bore surfaces 112′ of the eight non-annular stator poles 112 of the innovative stator 102. Due to the geometry, the design of the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 allows little tolerance for rotational movement of the innovative mover 104 relative to the innovative stator 102. Movement of more than the size of the gaseous gap 122 will result in the innovative mover 104 contacting the innovative stator 102. Thus, the innovative mover 104 must be retained with minimal rotational movement as the innovative mover reciprocates longitudinally within the innovative stator 102.
The mover laminations 118 each further has a central shaft hole 123 for coupling the mover lamination to the shaft 106. The innovative stator 102 has stator connecting rod holes 124 to receive the stator connecting rods 109. The innovative stator 102 further has stator slots 125 positioned between the non-annular stator poles 112 and shaped to accommodate the windings 110 with each extending above one of the non-annular stator poles 112 and shaped to accommodate the shape and positioning of the innovative mover 104. Connector rod holes (not shown) are provided in the mover laminations 118 for securing the mover laminations 118 of the innovative mover 104 together with connecting rods.
A second implementation of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is shown in FIG. 10. In this implementation, the innovative stator 102 has four non-annular concave parabolic stator poles 126 with stator pole voids 127. The stator pole voids 127 are formed to reduce the mass of the non-annular concave parabolic stator poles 126. Two non-annular convex parabolic magnets 128 with bore surfaces of opposite polarity are coupled to a different one of four mover sections 130. The non-annular convex parabolic magnets 128 are so named because in this implementation the bore surfaces 128′ of the non-annular magnets 128 have a convex parabolic shape and are non-annular in terms of the above discussion regarding the illustrative circle 39.
The innovative mover 104 of the implementation of FIG. 10 has the four mover sections 130 complementary to the four non-annular concave parabolic stator poles 126 such that only the gaseous gap 122 exists between the stator poles 126 and the bore surfaces of the four non-annular convex parabolic magnets 128. The mover sections 130 have mover section voids 131 to reduce the mass of the innovative mover 104 and to receive connecting rods (not shown) to hold the mover laminations together.
A third implementation of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is shown in FIG. 11. In this implementation, the innovative stator 102 has four non-annular concave V stator poles 132 with stator pole voids 133. The stator pole voids 133 are formed to reduce the mass of the non-annular concave V stator poles 132. Two non-annular convex V magnets 134 with bore surfaces of opposite polarity are coupled to a different one of four mover sections 136. The non-annular convex V magnets 134 are so named because in this implementation the bore surfaces of the non-annular magnets 134 have a convex V shape and are non-annular in terms of the above discussion regarding the illustrative circle 39.
The innovative mover 104 of the implementation of FIG. 11 has the four mover sections 136 complementary to the four non-annular concave V stator poles 132 such that only the gaseous gap 122 exists between the stator poles 126 and the bore surfaces of the four non-annular convex V magnets 134. The mover sections 136 have mover section voids 137 to reduce the mass of the innovative mover 104 and to receive connecting rods (not shown) to hold the mover laminations together.
A fourth implementation of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is shown in FIG. 12. In this implementation, the innovative stator 102 has four non-annular convex arc stator poles 138 with stator pole voids 139. The stator pole voids 139 are formed to reduce the mass of the non-annular convex arc stator poles 138. Two non-annular concave arc magnets 140 with bore surfaces of opposite polarity are coupled to a different one of four mover sections 142. The non-annular concave arc magnets 140 are so named because in this implementation the bore surfaces of the non-annular magnets 140 have a concave arc shape and are non-annular in terms of the above discussion regarding the illustrative circle 39.
The innovative mover 104 of the implementation of FIG. 12 has the four mover sections 142 complementary to the four non-annular convex arc stator poles 138 such that only the gaseous gap 122 exists between the stator poles 138 and the bore surfaces of the four non-annular concave arc magnets 140. The mover sections 142 have mover section voids 143 to reduce the mass of the innovative mover 104 and to receive connecting rods (not shown) to hold the mover laminations together.
A fifth implementation of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is shown in FIG. 13. In this implementation, the innovative stator 102 has four non-annular convex parabolic stator poles 144 with stator pole voids 145. The stator pole voids 145 are formed to reduce the mass of the non-annular convex parabolic stator poles 144. Two non-annular concave parabolic magnets 146 with bore surfaces of opposite polarity are coupled to a different one of four mover sections 148. The non-annular concave parabolic magnets 146 are so named because in this implementation the bore surfaces of the non-annular magnets 146 have a concave parabolic shape and are non-annular in terms of the above discussion regarding the illustrative circle 39.
The innovative mover 104 of the implementation of FIG. 13 has the four mover sections 148 complementary to the four non-annular convex parabolic stator poles 144 such that only the gaseous gap 122 exists between the stator poles 144 and the bore surfaces of the four non-annular concave parabolic magnets 146. The mover sections 148 have mover section voids (not shown) to reduce the mass of the innovative mover 104 and to receive connecting rods (not shown) to hold the mover laminations together.
A sixth implementation of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is shown in FIG. 14. In this implementation, the innovative stator 102 has four non-annular convex V stator poles 150 with stator pole voids 151. The stator pole voids 151 are formed to reduce the mass of the non-annular convex V stator poles 150. Two non-annular concave V magnets 152 with bore surfaces of opposite polarity are coupled to a different one of four mover sections 154. The non-annular concave V magnets 152 are so named because in this implementation the bore surfaces of the non-annular magnets 152 have a concave V shape and are non-annular in terms of the above discussion regarding the illustrative circle 39.
The innovative mover 104 of the implementation of FIG. 14 has the four mover sections 154 complementary to the four non-annular convex V stator poles 150 such that only the gaseous gap 122 exists between the stator poles 150 and the bore surfaces of the four non-annular convex V magnets 152. The mover sections 154 have mover section voids (not shown) to reduce the mass of the innovative mover 104 and to receive connecting rods (not shown) to hold the mover laminations together.
A seventh implementation of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is shown in FIG. 15. In this implementation, the innovative stator 102 has eight non-annular convex parabolic stator poles 156 with stator pole voids 157. The stator pole voids 157 are formed to reduce the mass of the non-annular convex parabolic stator poles 156. Two non-annular concave parabolic magnets 158 with bore surfaces of opposite polarity are coupled to a different one of eight mover sections 160. The non-annular concave parabolic magnets 158 are so named because in this implementation the bore surfaces 158′ of the non-annular magnets 158 have a concave parabolic shape and are non-annular in terms of the above discussion regarding the illustrative circle 39.
The innovative mover 104 of the implementation of FIG. 15 has the eight mover sections 160 complementary to the eight non-annular convex parabolic stator poles 156 such that only the gaseous gap 122 exists between the stator poles 156 and the bore surfaces of the eight non-annular concave parabolic magnets 158. The mover sections 160 have mover section voids 161 to reduce the mass of the innovative mover 104 and to receive connecting rods (not shown) to hold the mover laminations together.
In some of the implementations shown, the number of non-annular stator poles for the innovative stator 102 was eight rather than four. Other implementations are possible including six, eight, ten, and other even numbers of non-annular stator poles. As shown in FIGS. 1-5, conventional approaches have used four stator poles 34′ for the stator 26 of the conventional linear electrodynamic system 22. Increasing the number of non-annular stator poles as with some implementations of the present invention can allow further increase in magnet volume and a corresponding reduction in the number of turns generally required for the windings 110 thereby further reducing total mass and size of the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100.
Although certain curvilinear and angular shapes, including V shapes and parabolas, for the bore surface of the non-annular magnets are used in the depicted implementations, other non-annular shapes for the bore surfaces of the non-annular magnets are envisioned for additional implementations to increase magnet volume while reducing the size of the non-annular stator poles for the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 as compared with the annularly oriented conventional linear electrodynamic system 22. These non-annular shapes can include other open curves such as hyperbola, special curves, symmetrically angular shapes, or non-symmetrical or other non-regular curves or angular shapes, in distinction over conventional annular approaches to thereby increase magnet volume and to decrease the size of the non-annular stator poles for comparable performance capability and an overall mass reduction of the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100. Software such as ANSOFT Maxwell 2D/3D can be used to perform magnetic circuit analysis to help determine desired curvatures for the non-annular magnets to be further balanced with other concerns associated with performance, mass reduction, ease of component manufacture and assembly, and quality control for the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100. These various shapes can be obtained by gluing or otherwise affixing flat pieces of flat magnets to the variously shaped surfaces and/or by forming curves or other shapes into the structure of the magnets.
As discussed above, the non-annular nature of the innovative stator 102 and the innovative mover 104 is a significant departure from the conventional approach. Contrary to the conventional approach, there can only be less than a gaseous gap for the innovative mover 104 to rotate before it strikes the innovative stator 102. Because of the extraordinary demand placed upon rotational tolerances for the innovative mover 104, the innovative linear electrodynamic system 100 is further enhanced.
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a housing;

a longitudinal shaft movably coupled to the housing to longitudinally and linearly reciprocate relative to the housing in the longitudinal direction of the shaft;

a stator rigidly coupled to the housing, the stator shaped to define an inner space to receive a portion of the longitudinal shaft, the stator having stator poles extending inwardly with bore surfaces facing toward that portion of the longitudinal shaft received by the stator;

windings wound around the stator poles;

a mover affixed to the shaft, the mover; and

magnetic material affixed to the mover, the magnetic material having bore surfaces facing outward in correspondence with the bore surfaces of the stator poles to define a gaseous gap between each of the correspondingly positioned ones of the bore surfaces of the magnetic material and the stator poles, portions of the bore surfaces of the stator poles being closer to the shaft than portions of the bore surfaces of the magnetic material.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the stator poles each have at least one stator pole void.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the bore surface of at least a portion of the magnetic material affixed to the mover comprises an arc shape.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein the bore surface of at least a portion of the magnetic material affixed to the mover comprises a V shape.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the bore surface of at least a portion of the magnetic material affixed to the mover comprises a convex shape.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein the bore surface of at least a portion of the magnetic material affixed to the mover comprises a parabolic shape.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein the bore surface of at least a portion of the magnetic material affixed to the mover comprises a convex shape.

8. A system comprising:

a longitudinal shaft mounted for longitudinal and linear reciprocal movement;

a stator shaped to define an inner space to receive a portion of the longitudinal shaft, the stator having stator poles extending inwardly with bore surfaces facing toward that portion of the longitudinal shaft received by the stator;

windings wound around the stator poles;

a mover affixed to the shaft; and

magnetic material affixed to the mover, the magnetic material having bore surfaces facing outward in correspondence with the bore surfaces of the stator poles to define a gaseous gap between each of the correspondingly positioned ones of the bore surfaces of the magnetic material and the stator poles, portions of the bore surfaces of the stator poles being substantially the same distance from the shaft as portions of the bore surfaces of the magnetic material.

9. A system comprising:

a stator defining an inner space, the stator having stator poles with bore surfaces extending inwardly within the inner space;

a mover positioned within the inner space for longitudinal and linear reciprocal movement therein;

windings wound around the stator poles; and

magnetic material affixed to the mover and having outwardly facing surfaces positioned in correspondence with the bore surfaces of the stator poles to define a gaseous gap between each of the correspondingly positioned ones of the outwardly facing surfaces of the magnetic material and the inwardly facing surface portions of the mover, the magnetic material positioned on the mover within the inner space to permit uninhibited longitudinal and linear reciprocal movement of the mover within the inner space while limiting rotational movement of the mover more than the distance of the gaseous gap existing between the correspondingly positioned ones of the inwardly facing bore surfaces of the stator and the outwardly facing surface portions of the magnetic material.

10. A system comprising:

a stator with inwardly extending stator poles, the stator defining an inner space with the stator poles having bore surfaces defining a portion of the inner space;

windings wound around the stator poles;

a mover positioned within the inner space for longitudinal and linear reciprocal movement therein; and

magnetic material affixed to the mover, the magnetic material having bore surfaces facing outward in correspondence with the bore surfaces of the stator poles to define a gaseous gap between each of the correspondingly positioned ones of the bore surfaces of the magnetic material and the bore surfaces of the stator poles, the bore surfaces of the magnetic material and the bore surfaces of the stator poles having mating non-annular shapes.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein the bore surface of each of the stator poles has a convex shape.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the bore surface of each of the stator poles has an arc shape.

13. The system of claim 10 wherein the bore surface of each of one of the stator poles has a V shape.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein the bore surface of each of the stator poles has a convex shape.

15. The system of claim 10 wherein the bore surface of each of the stator poles has a parabolic shape.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the bore surface of each of the stator poles has a convex shape.