US20070295954A1 - Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment - Google Patents
Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070295954A1 US20070295954A1 US11/847,203 US84720307A US2007295954A1 US 20070295954 A1 US20070295954 A1 US 20070295954A1 US 84720307 A US84720307 A US 84720307A US 2007295954 A1 US2007295954 A1 US 2007295954A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- qubit
- transmission line
- node
- circuit
- frequency
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F15/00—Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
- B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
- B82Y10/00—Nanotechnology for information processing, storage or transmission, e.g. quantum computing or single electron logic
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F15/00—Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
- G06F15/16—Combinations of two or more digital computers each having at least an arithmetic unit, a program unit and a register, e.g. for a simultaneous processing of several programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N10/00—Quantum computing, i.e. information processing based on quantum-mechanical phenomena
- G06N10/40—Physical realisations or architectures of quantum processors or components for manipulating qubits, e.g. qubit coupling or qubit control
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N10/00—Quantum computing, i.e. information processing based on quantum-mechanical phenomena
- G06N10/70—Quantum error correction, detection or prevention, e.g. surface codes or magic state distillation
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to a quantum computer. More specifically, to a method and structure which locates a qubit at a node of a qubit basic operational frequency on control and readout transmission lines, so as to minimize decoherence caused by these control and readout functions.
- a number of entities are in the process of designing, developing, and building computers that use the quantum mechanical state of a physical system to represent the logical state of the computer.
- Such a computer is called a “quantum computer” and the logical gates in such a computer are called “qubits”.
- a quantum computer would be able to solve certain types of problems far more rapidly than any conceivable classical computer. For example, such tasks as searching, encryption, and searching a large database for the optimal solution to a multidimensional optimization problem, such as the well-known “traveling salesman” problem, would be orders of magnitude faster on a quantum computer.
- a fundamental problem in making a qubit is that of minimizing the effects of the environment on the quantum mechanical state of the qubit. This effect is similar to that of noise in a conventional circuit, such as a basic logic gate, in that sufficient noise will cause a conventional logic gate to toggle to a new and possibly unknown state.
- the small size, the quantum mechanics involved, and the plurality of possible states all combine to cause a qubit to be particularly sensitive to “noise” such as temperature and stray magnetic fields.
- a partial solution is to operate the qubit at a very cold temperature, typically less than 0.1 K. In this way, the thermal noise that the qubit experiences is reduced.
- the qubit itself is usually designed to have very little internal dissipation. In this way, direct coupling of the qubit to the thermal noise of the environment is minimized.
- decoherence or reduction of the magnitude or duration of the qubit signal.
- decoherence must be minimized in order to make a high quality qubit, which is needed for making a quantum computer.
- a second type of decoherence occurs when electrical circuits and signals are applied to the qubit.
- a qubit could be designed to be totally isolated from the environment. But, unless its state can be modified or measured using external circuits, the qubit will be of little use.
- a method of coupling to a qubit including locating the qubit near a transmission line approximately at a location corresponding to a node in the control parameter at a basic operating frequency of the qubit.
- a circuit including a qubit having a basic operating frequency and at least one transmission line related to an operation of the qubit, wherein the qubit is located near the transmission line approximately at a node in the control parameter at the basic operating frequency.
- a circuit including at least one qubit and a means for coupling to the at least one qubit in a manner that minimizes a decoherence of the at least one qubit.
- a method of forming a qubit circuit including providing a transmission line to be used for one of controlling the qubit and reading out a state of the qubit and locating the qubit near the at least one transmission line approximately at a location corresponding to a node at a predetermined frequency related to a basic operation of the qubit.
- a method of isolating a qubit from its environment including locating the qubit at a location along a transmission line that minimizes a decoherence of the qubit.
- the present invention therefore, provides a method and circuit to minimize decoherence caused, for example, by control and readout functions of a qubit. It also provides a method in which coupling to the qubit for control and readout functions can be increased, by providing a method to couple to the qubit that minimizes noise at a basic operating frequency of the qubit.
- FIG. 1 shows one exemplary configuration 100 for coupling to a qubit in accordance with the principles of the present invention
- FIG. 2 illustrates a second exemplary configuration 200 for coupling to a current-based qubit, using a superconducting microstrip transmission line with a shorted end;
- FIG. 3 illustrates a third exemplary configuration 300 for coupling to a voltage-based qubit, using a superconducting microstrip transmission line with an open end;
- FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary basic flowchart 400 of the techniques described herein.
- the present invention provides a method of decoupling a qubit from the environment at a frequency that has the largest effect in causing decoherence in the qubit (e.g., frequency F 01 ), while at the same time coupling the qubit at most other frequencies, such as the frequencies over which the qubit is operated and measured.
- the noise from the environment will usually vary as a function of frequency.
- the environmental noise at two specific frequencies is important.
- the most important frequency e.g., the noise that decoheres the qubit the most
- the basic operational frequency of the qubit referred to as the “F01” frequency.
- F 01 is the frequency difference between the “0” (e.g., the lowest energy state) and the “1” (e.g., the second lowest energy state of the qubit).
- the present invention should not be viewed as limited to the F 01 frequency, since some qubit designs operate at other frequencies, such as “F12”.
- the present invention includes a broader concept in which details may vary from one qubit design to another and frequency “F01” is exemplarily used herein for the sake of discussion.
- a second important frequency in terms of decoherence is the noise near zero frequency, typically referred to as “dc”.
- a strategy is currently known that reduces the decoherence from the environment from the zero frequency noise (e.g., dc). That strategy is to operate the qubit at a “degenerate point”.
- a degenerate point is somewhat like a local minimum in a characteristic curve. At this point, small changes in the environment do not produce first order changes in the operating point.
- the present invention addresses this problem of this noise, exemplarily at frequency F 01 .
- the present invention can be described as decoupling a qubit from the environment at a frequency, such as F 01 , that has the largest effect in causing decoherence in the qubit, while still allowing the qubit to be coupled at most other frequencies, such as the frequencies over which the qubit is operated and measured.
- the present invention thereby teaches arranging a current or voltage node for the frequency (e.g., F 01 ) at a particular location along the transmission line, and that the qubit be placed at that node location.
- F 01 the frequency
- a node is a point in the transmission line where the signal is zero.
- An antinode is a point where the signal is peak.
- a voltage node is a current antinode in a transmission line, and vice versa.
- the node can be implemented by terminating the ends of the transmission line using opens or shorts, depending upon whether a voltage or current node is desired.
- the use of a resistive termination would preferably be avoided, since such resistive termination would be noisy, and that noise would be coupled to the qubit.
- FIG. 1 shows a first exemplary configuration 100 that illustrates this basic concept.
- Qubit 101 is placed near transmission line 102 that is connected to a circuit 103 .
- Transmission line 102 provides a function of coupling to qubit 101 for the purpose of either controlling or reading out the qubit's state.
- Qubit 101 would typically have one or more such transmission lines, some for control inputs and some for reading out the state of the qubit. For simplicity, only one transmission line 102 is shown in FIG. 1 .
- Exemplary transmission line 102 is a coplanar strip line that would be used to pass current from control circuit 103 so that magnetic flux from the current flow would be used as one of the control inputs into qubit 101 .
- qubit 101 is located near a node of the transmission line 102 and, ideally, would be exactly at the node location.
- the resistive element 104 shown in FIG. 1 is intended to represent both the noise aspect of the control circuit 103 and its aspect of having a characteristic output impedance to which the transmission line is designed to match (e.g., 50 ⁇ ).
- Transmission line 102 would, therefore, typically be designed with a number of parameters in mind, as is well known in the art.
- the coplanar strip line shown in FIG. 1 would have a length and line separation to match the circuit 103 output impedance (e.g., 50 ⁇ ) and a thickness and width to provide the current capacity.
- the material for the transmission line 102 would typically be a superconductor material such as aluminum or niobium.
- a typical transmission line is designed to operate at 2 GHz, a typical value for a qubit F 01 frequency, and has a typical length of approximately 1 cm.
- the qubit will be of smaller physical dimensions (e.g., 100 ⁇ m) than the length of the transmission line and, as stated above, it would be placed at a current or voltage node along the line.
- the qubit 101 is located approximately 2, 30, or 100 ⁇ m from the transmission line 102 , depending upon which of the three qubit transmission lines is involved. It should be apparent that the distance between the qubit and the transmission line is one parameter that is used to determine the degree of coupling.
- FIG. 1 shows a flux qubit 101 that is placed 1 ⁇ 4 wavelength (at the F 01 frequency) from the shorted end of superconducting transmission line. At the quarter-wave point, there is no current at frequency F 01 . Also the impedance at that frequency at the point is space is very high and, ideally, infinite.
- the qubit 101 is, in theory, totally uncoupled from the electrical noise of this circuit 103 at the crucial F 01 frequency.
- the qubit can still be operated, since the control signals can be chosen to exclude components at the F 01 frequency.
- the same method can be used reduce the noise from the electrical circuit that is used to measure the state of the qubit.
- the noise from the measurement circuit e.g., a preamplifier
- the measurement frequency is not F 01 , but at much lower frequencies.
- the measurement can be done, while at the same time shielding the qubit from the F 01 frequency noise of the qubit.
- the qubit cannot be reduced in size to be confined to the theoretical point-size of the node. Therefore, one additional parameter of some interest relates to the fact that the qubit, although small in size, is not infinitely small.
- the present inventors have discovered that this unavoidable small amount of coupling can be minimized as a function of the ratio of the qubit size and the length of the transmission line. In the exemplary configuration of FIG. 1 , this ratio might, therefore, be approximately the ratio of 1 cm to 100 ⁇ m.
- the exemplary flux qubit 101 shown in FIG. 1 is intended only for purpose of illustration. Other types of qubits would benefit from the concepts of the present invention, since a generic qubit inherently suffers from a problem of decoherence at a specific frequency, such as F 01 .
- FIGS. 2 and 3 show additional non-limiting alternative configurations 200 , 300 of transmission lines that further illustrate the concepts of the present invention.
- the exemplary configuration 200 of FIG. 2 shows a current-biased qubit 201 with superconducting microstrip line 202 .
- the microstrip is formed from two superconducting layers 203 , 204 , wherein superconducting layer 204 forms a planar surface beneath the layer containing the qubit 201 and superconducting layer 203 .
- current node 205 is located at the 1 ⁇ 4 wavelength position 206 from the shorted end 207 of the microstrip line 202 .
- Current source 208 represents the current source of the biasing circuit, including noise and resistor 209 represents the output impedance of the current source, including noise.
- the exemplary configuration 300 of FIG. 3 shows a voltage-biased qubit with superconducting microstrip line 302 .
- the voltage node 303 is located at the 1 ⁇ 4 wavelength position 304 from the open end 205 of the microstrip line 302 .
- FIG. 4 shows an exemplary flowchart 400 for the basic concepts of implementing the present invention.
- the appropriate characteristic frequency of the qubit is determined. As exemplarily discussed above, this characteristic frequency might be frequency F 01 .
- step 402 the designer determines whether the qubit coupling circuit being designed is based on a magnetic/current principle or on a voltage principle, and, in step 403 , a transmission line is designed.
- the qubit is located on the transmission line at either a current node or a voltage node, as based on whether the coupling is current-based or voltage-based.
- step 405 remaining coupling circuits, if any, are similarly addressed by the designer.
- the present invention provides one method of minimizing the effects of the environment on the quantum mechanical state of the qubit and to minimize the decoherence from the control and readout circuits of the qubit.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Nanotechnology (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Superconductor Devices And Manufacturing Methods Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/782,811 having a filing date of Feb. 23, 2004.
- This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. MDA972-01-C-0052 from the U.S. Defense Advanced REsearch Projects Agency (DARPA). The Government has certain rights to this invention.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention generally relates to a quantum computer. More specifically, to a method and structure which locates a qubit at a node of a qubit basic operational frequency on control and readout transmission lines, so as to minimize decoherence caused by these control and readout functions.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- A number of entities, including the assignee of the present Application, are in the process of designing, developing, and building computers that use the quantum mechanical state of a physical system to represent the logical state of the computer. Such a computer is called a “quantum computer” and the logical gates in such a computer are called “qubits”.
- A quantum computer would be able to solve certain types of problems far more rapidly than any conceivable classical computer. For example, such tasks as searching, encryption, and searching a large database for the optimal solution to a multidimensional optimization problem, such as the well-known “traveling salesman” problem, would be orders of magnitude faster on a quantum computer.
- The reason for this drastic increase in capability is that, in an ordinary classical computer, the logical state of the computer is represented by “0”s and “1”s, or in other words, the classical states of a physical system. Therefore, the basic logic gate in the classical computer stores a single bit of information. In contrast, a qubit simultaneously stores multiple bits of information.
- A fundamental problem in making a qubit is that of minimizing the effects of the environment on the quantum mechanical state of the qubit. This effect is similar to that of noise in a conventional circuit, such as a basic logic gate, in that sufficient noise will cause a conventional logic gate to toggle to a new and possibly unknown state.
- The small size, the quantum mechanics involved, and the plurality of possible states (e.g., the plurality of bits of information) all combine to cause a qubit to be particularly sensitive to “noise” such as temperature and stray magnetic fields.
- A partial solution is to operate the qubit at a very cold temperature, typically less than 0.1 K. In this way, the thermal noise that the qubit experiences is reduced.
- Also, the qubit itself is usually designed to have very little internal dissipation. In this way, direct coupling of the qubit to the thermal noise of the environment is minimized.
- The noise in the environment causes “decoherence”, or reduction of the magnitude or duration of the qubit signal. Thus, decoherence must be minimized in order to make a high quality qubit, which is needed for making a quantum computer.
- A second type of decoherence occurs when electrical circuits and signals are applied to the qubit. A qubit could be designed to be totally isolated from the environment. But, unless its state can be modified or measured using external circuits, the qubit will be of little use.
- The most common method to modify the qubit state and measure the state is by the use of electrical signals. Unfortunately, the sources of these electrical signals and the measuring circuits also inherently have thermal and quantum noise, and this noise will decohere the qubit. Therefore, the couplings of these signals to the qubit are usually designed to be weak, in order to minimize the decoherence from the control and readout circuits.
- So far, there has not been a satisfactory solution for this inherent decoherence problem of qubits.
- In view of the foregoing, and other, exemplary problems, drawbacks, and disadvantages of the conventional system, it is an exemplary feature of the present invention to provide a method and structure to address the inherent problem of decoherence in a qubit.
- It is another exemplary feature of the present invention to provide a method of coupling to a qubit for controlling the qubit or reading a state of the qubit in a manner that minimizes the inherent problem of decoherence.
- It is another exemplary feature of the present invention, for minimizing decoherence of the control and readout transmission lines and circuits, to provide a method of strengthening the coupling to a qubit, relative to conventional coupling methods.
- To achieve the above exemplary features and others, in a first exemplary aspect of the present invention, described herein is a method of coupling to a qubit, including locating the qubit near a transmission line approximately at a location corresponding to a node in the control parameter at a basic operating frequency of the qubit.
- In accordance with an exemplary second aspect of the present invention, also described herein is a circuit including a qubit having a basic operating frequency and at least one transmission line related to an operation of the qubit, wherein the qubit is located near the transmission line approximately at a node in the control parameter at the basic operating frequency.
- In accordance with an exemplary third aspect of the present invention, also described herein is a circuit including at least one qubit and a means for coupling to the at least one qubit in a manner that minimizes a decoherence of the at least one qubit.
- In accordance with an exemplary fourth aspect of the present invention, also described herein is a method of forming a qubit circuit, including providing a transmission line to be used for one of controlling the qubit and reading out a state of the qubit and locating the qubit near the at least one transmission line approximately at a location corresponding to a node at a predetermined frequency related to a basic operation of the qubit.
- In accordance with an exemplary fifth aspect of the present invention, also described herein is a method of isolating a qubit from its environment, including locating the qubit at a location along a transmission line that minimizes a decoherence of the qubit.
- The present invention, therefore, provides a method and circuit to minimize decoherence caused, for example, by control and readout functions of a qubit. It also provides a method in which coupling to the qubit for control and readout functions can be increased, by providing a method to couple to the qubit that minimizes noise at a basic operating frequency of the qubit.
- The foregoing and other purposes, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 shows oneexemplary configuration 100 for coupling to a qubit in accordance with the principles of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a secondexemplary configuration 200 for coupling to a current-based qubit, using a superconducting microstrip transmission line with a shorted end; -
FIG. 3 illustrates a thirdexemplary configuration 300 for coupling to a voltage-based qubit, using a superconducting microstrip transmission line with an open end; and -
FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary basic flowchart 400 of the techniques described herein. - Referring now to the drawings, and more specifically,
FIGS. 1-4 , the present invention provides a method of decoupling a qubit from the environment at a frequency that has the largest effect in causing decoherence in the qubit (e.g., frequency F01), while at the same time coupling the qubit at most other frequencies, such as the frequencies over which the qubit is operated and measured. - For a qubit, the noise from the environment will usually vary as a function of frequency. In the normal operation of a qubit, the environmental noise at two specific frequencies is important. The most important frequency (e.g., the noise that decoheres the qubit the most) is noise at the basic operational frequency of the qubit, referred to as the “F01” frequency.
- In other words, F01 is the frequency difference between the “0” (e.g., the lowest energy state) and the “1” (e.g., the second lowest energy state of the qubit). However, the present invention should not be viewed as limited to the F01 frequency, since some qubit designs operate at other frequencies, such as “F12”. Thus, the present invention includes a broader concept in which details may vary from one qubit design to another and frequency “F01” is exemplarily used herein for the sake of discussion.
- A second important frequency in terms of decoherence is the noise near zero frequency, typically referred to as “dc”.
- A strategy is currently known that reduces the decoherence from the environment from the zero frequency noise (e.g., dc). That strategy is to operate the qubit at a “degenerate point”. A degenerate point is somewhat like a local minimum in a characteristic curve. At this point, small changes in the environment do not produce first order changes in the operating point.
- Similarly, when a qubit is designed to operate at a degenerate point, small changes in the dc noise level do not change the basic operation frequency of the qubit, and hence do not decohere the qubit. This effect is similar to operating the qubit at a balanced point. The measured coherence of a qubit will greatly increase when operated at the degenerate point, as the effective dc or very low frequency noise is reduced.
- However, unfortunately, the noise at frequency F01 is not reduced at the degenerate point. Decoherence, therefore, remains a problem, even when the qubit operates at one of its degenerate points, and is due to the noise at frequency F01.
- The present invention addresses this problem of this noise, exemplarily at frequency F01. Thus, in view of the discussion above, the present invention can be described as decoupling a qubit from the environment at a frequency, such as F01, that has the largest effect in causing decoherence in the qubit, while still allowing the qubit to be coupled at most other frequencies, such as the frequencies over which the qubit is operated and measured.
- This result is accomplished by adjusting the coupling of the qubit to a transmission line, usually a superconducting transmission line. By adjusting the length of the transmission line and the terminations at both ends, the present invention thereby teaches arranging a current or voltage node for the frequency (e.g., F01) at a particular location along the transmission line, and that the qubit be placed at that node location.
- It is noted that a node is a point in the transmission line where the signal is zero. An antinode is a point where the signal is peak. A voltage node is a current antinode in a transmission line, and vice versa.
- As is well known in the art, the node can be implemented by terminating the ends of the transmission line using opens or shorts, depending upon whether a voltage or current node is desired. The use of a resistive termination would preferably be avoided, since such resistive termination would be noisy, and that noise would be coupled to the qubit.
-
FIG. 1 shows a firstexemplary configuration 100 that illustrates this basic concept.Qubit 101 is placed neartransmission line 102 that is connected to acircuit 103.Transmission line 102 provides a function of coupling to qubit 101 for the purpose of either controlling or reading out the qubit's state.Qubit 101 would typically have one or more such transmission lines, some for control inputs and some for reading out the state of the qubit. For simplicity, only onetransmission line 102 is shown inFIG. 1 . -
Exemplary transmission line 102 is a coplanar strip line that would be used to pass current fromcontrol circuit 103 so that magnetic flux from the current flow would be used as one of the control inputs intoqubit 101. As shown inFIG. 1 ,qubit 101 is located near a node of thetransmission line 102 and, ideally, would be exactly at the node location. To one of ordinary skill in the art, other transmission line configurations will be readily apparent, after understanding the discussion herein and taking it as a whole, and after considering the additional exemplary configurations described shortly. - The
resistive element 104 shown inFIG. 1 is intended to represent both the noise aspect of thecontrol circuit 103 and its aspect of having a characteristic output impedance to which the transmission line is designed to match (e.g., 50 Ω). -
Transmission line 102 would, therefore, typically be designed with a number of parameters in mind, as is well known in the art. For example, the coplanar strip line shown inFIG. 1 would have a length and line separation to match thecircuit 103 output impedance (e.g., 50 Ω) and a thickness and width to provide the current capacity. The material for thetransmission line 102 would typically be a superconductor material such as aluminum or niobium. Exemplarily, a typical transmission line is designed to operate at 2 GHz, a typical value for a qubit F01 frequency, and has a typical length of approximately 1 cm. - Usually the qubit will be of smaller physical dimensions (e.g., 100 μm) than the length of the transmission line and, as stated above, it would be placed at a current or voltage node along the line. In current prototypes of the configuration exemplarily shown in
FIG. 1 , thequbit 101 is located approximately 2, 30, or 100 μm from thetransmission line 102, depending upon which of the three qubit transmission lines is involved. It should be apparent that the distance between the qubit and the transmission line is one parameter that is used to determine the degree of coupling. - There are various qubit designs currently in development by various groups throughout the world, using a number of approaches. In accordance with the concepts of the present invention, a qubit that is operated using magnetic flux or a current would be placed at a current node at the F01 frequency for that qubit. Similarly, a qubit that is operated using voltage would be placed at a voltage node at the frequency F01.
- To expound a bit more, as a non-limiting example,
FIG. 1 shows aflux qubit 101 that is placed ¼ wavelength (at the F01 frequency) from the shorted end of superconducting transmission line. At the quarter-wave point, there is no current at frequency F01. Also the impedance at that frequency at the point is space is very high and, ideally, infinite. - In other words the
qubit 101 is, in theory, totally uncoupled from the electrical noise of thiscircuit 103 at the crucial F01 frequency. At the same time, the qubit can still be operated, since the control signals can be chosen to exclude components at the F01 frequency. - The same method can be used reduce the noise from the electrical circuit that is used to measure the state of the qubit. Here, the noise from the measurement circuit (e.g., a preamplifier), at the F01 frequency, would greatly decohere the qubit. In most cases, the measurement frequency is not F01, but at much lower frequencies. Hence, the measurement can be done, while at the same time shielding the qubit from the F01 frequency noise of the qubit.
- Unfortunately, in the “real world”, the qubit cannot be reduced in size to be confined to the theoretical point-size of the node. Therefore, one additional parameter of some interest relates to the fact that the qubit, although small in size, is not infinitely small. The present inventors have discovered that this unavoidable small amount of coupling can be minimized as a function of the ratio of the qubit size and the length of the transmission line. In the exemplary configuration of
FIG. 1 , this ratio might, therefore, be approximately the ratio of 1 cm to 100 μm. - At this point, it is again noted that the
exemplary flux qubit 101 shown inFIG. 1 is intended only for purpose of illustration. Other types of qubits would benefit from the concepts of the present invention, since a generic qubit inherently suffers from a problem of decoherence at a specific frequency, such as F01. -
FIGS. 2 and 3 show additional non-limitingalternative configurations - The
exemplary configuration 200 ofFIG. 2 shows a current-biasedqubit 201 withsuperconducting microstrip line 202. The microstrip is formed from twosuperconducting layers superconducting layer 204 forms a planar surface beneath the layer containing thequbit 201 andsuperconducting layer 203. It is noted thatcurrent node 205 is located at the ¼wavelength position 206 from the shortedend 207 of themicrostrip line 202.Current source 208 represents the current source of the biasing circuit, including noise andresistor 209 represents the output impedance of the current source, including noise. - The
exemplary configuration 300 ofFIG. 3 shows a voltage-biased qubit withsuperconducting microstrip line 302. Thevoltage node 303 is located at the ¼wavelength position 304 from theopen end 205 of themicrostrip line 302. -
FIG. 4 shows an exemplary flowchart 400 for the basic concepts of implementing the present invention. In step 400, the appropriate characteristic frequency of the qubit is determined. As exemplarily discussed above, this characteristic frequency might be frequency F01. - In
step 402, the designer determines whether the qubit coupling circuit being designed is based on a magnetic/current principle or on a voltage principle, and, instep 403, a transmission line is designed. - In
step 404, the qubit is located on the transmission line at either a current node or a voltage node, as based on whether the coupling is current-based or voltage-based. - Finally, in
step 405, remaining coupling circuits, if any, are similarly addressed by the designer. - It will be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the exemplary design process shown in
FIG. 4 is only for illustration, since a designer would typically be considering all these steps more or less simultaneously, along with other aspects of the design that are not covered in this flowchart. - Using the methods exemplarily described herein, combined with operating the qubit at a degenerate point, would result in a qubit having, to first order, no loss in decoherence from coupling to the environmental. At the same time, the qubit can still be operated and measured using the same sets of transmission lines.
- Thus, in summary, the present invention provides one method of minimizing the effects of the environment on the quantum mechanical state of the qubit and to minimize the decoherence from the control and readout circuits of the qubit.
- While the invention has been described in terms of an exemplary embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
- Further, it is noted that, Applicants' intent is to encompass equivalents of all claim elements, even if amended later during prosecution.
Claims (26)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/847,203 US7925614B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2007-08-29 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,811 US7321884B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2004-02-23 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
US11/847,203 US7925614B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2007-08-29 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,811 Continuation US7321884B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2004-02-23 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070295954A1 true US20070295954A1 (en) | 2007-12-27 |
US7925614B2 US7925614B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 |
Family
ID=34861092
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,811 Active 2026-01-27 US7321884B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2004-02-23 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
US11/847,203 Active 2025-09-28 US7925614B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2007-08-29 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,811 Active 2026-01-27 US7321884B2 (en) | 2004-02-23 | 2004-02-23 | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7321884B2 (en) |
JP (2) | JP4244344B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100745475B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100339867C (en) |
TW (1) | TWI335670B (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110022340A1 (en) * | 2009-07-23 | 2011-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Measuring Quantum States of Superconducting Resonators |
US12087503B2 (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2024-09-10 | SeeQC, Inc. | System and method of flux bias for superconducting quantum circuits |
US12317757B2 (en) | 2018-10-11 | 2025-05-27 | SeeQC, Inc. | System and method for superconducting multi-chip module |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7321884B2 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2008-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
US7533068B2 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2009-05-12 | D-Wave Systems, Inc. | Analog processor comprising quantum devices |
US7921372B2 (en) | 2005-03-25 | 2011-04-05 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for pinning tabs in a tabbed browser |
WO2008064491A1 (en) * | 2006-12-01 | 2008-06-05 | D-Wave Systems, Inc. | Superconducting shielding for use with an intergrated circuit for quantum computing |
US20080284545A1 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-20 | George Andrew Keefe | Fixed impedance low pass metal powder filter with a planar buried stripline geometry |
US9159033B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2015-10-13 | Internatinal Business Machines Corporation | Frequency separation between qubit and chip mode to reduce purcell loss |
US8972921B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-03-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Symmetric placement of components on a chip to reduce crosstalk induced by chip modes |
US8865537B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Differential excitation of ports to control chip-mode mediated crosstalk |
US9501748B2 (en) * | 2014-11-04 | 2016-11-22 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Mixed coupling between a qubit and resonator |
WO2016183213A1 (en) | 2015-05-14 | 2016-11-17 | D-Wave Systems Inc. | Frequency multiplexed resonator input and/or output for a superconducting device |
CN109564938A (en) * | 2016-08-15 | 2019-04-02 | 英特尔公司 | Band line and microstrip transmission line for quantum bit |
WO2018063205A1 (en) * | 2016-09-29 | 2018-04-05 | Intel Corporation | On-chip wireless communication devices for qubits |
US10176432B2 (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2019-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Weakly tunable qubit based on two coupled disparate transmons |
CN116957087A (en) * | 2017-08-09 | 2023-10-27 | 谷歌有限责任公司 | Frequency patterns for reducing parasitic interactions in quantum grids |
CA3072403C (en) | 2017-08-09 | 2023-03-21 | Google Llc | Reducing parasitic interactions in a qubit grid for surface code error correction |
US10614371B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2020-04-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Debugging quantum circuits by circuit rewriting |
CN109755379B (en) * | 2017-11-24 | 2020-06-05 | 中国科学院物理研究所 | Device for realizing topological quantum bit and corresponding preparation method |
EP3744001B1 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2024-07-31 | D-Wave Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for coupling a superconducting transmission line to an array of resonators |
WO2019217313A1 (en) | 2018-05-11 | 2019-11-14 | D-Wave Systems Inc. | Single flux quantum source for projective measurements |
US11422958B2 (en) | 2019-05-22 | 2022-08-23 | D-Wave Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for efficient input and output to quantum processors |
US11004896B1 (en) | 2019-11-06 | 2021-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for non-invasive large-scale qubit device characterization technique |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5342828A (en) * | 1991-06-06 | 1994-08-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Superconducting Tl-Pb-Sr-Ca-Cu-O thin film |
US20030086138A1 (en) * | 2001-11-06 | 2003-05-08 | Pittman Todd B | Techniques for performing logic operations using quantum states of single photons |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AUPO926897A0 (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 1997-10-09 | Unisearch Limited | Quantum computer |
US6081882A (en) | 1998-04-09 | 2000-06-27 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Quantum acceleration of conventional non-quantum computers |
JP3949318B2 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 2007-07-25 | 富士通株式会社 | Quantum computer |
DE19941311C1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2001-06-07 | Cryoelectra Ges Fuer Kryoelek | Band filter |
AUPQ975900A0 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2000-09-21 | Unisearch Limited | A process for the fabrication of a quantum computer |
US6580102B2 (en) | 2001-06-05 | 2003-06-17 | D-Wave Systems, Inc. | Four-terminal system for reading the state of a phase qubit |
JP4961650B2 (en) | 2001-09-18 | 2012-06-27 | 富士通株式会社 | Quantum circuit device |
US6791109B2 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2004-09-14 | D-Wave Systems, Inc. | Finger SQUID qubit device |
US6900454B2 (en) | 2002-04-20 | 2005-05-31 | D-Wave Systems, Inc. | Resonant controlled qubit system |
FR2839389B1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2005-08-05 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | JOSEPHSON JUNCTION SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTIC BIT DEVICE |
US7321884B2 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2008-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment |
-
2004
- 2004-02-23 US US10/782,811 patent/US7321884B2/en active Active
- 2004-12-17 JP JP2004365414A patent/JP4244344B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-01-24 KR KR1020050006185A patent/KR100745475B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-31 CN CNB2005100064269A patent/CN100339867C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-02-01 TW TW094103117A patent/TWI335670B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2007
- 2007-08-29 US US11/847,203 patent/US7925614B2/en active Active
-
2008
- 2008-10-30 JP JP2008279382A patent/JP5078839B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5342828A (en) * | 1991-06-06 | 1994-08-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Superconducting Tl-Pb-Sr-Ca-Cu-O thin film |
US20030086138A1 (en) * | 2001-11-06 | 2003-05-08 | Pittman Todd B | Techniques for performing logic operations using quantum states of single photons |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110022340A1 (en) * | 2009-07-23 | 2011-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Measuring Quantum States of Superconducting Resonators |
US8117000B2 (en) | 2009-07-23 | 2012-02-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators |
US12317757B2 (en) | 2018-10-11 | 2025-05-27 | SeeQC, Inc. | System and method for superconducting multi-chip module |
US12087503B2 (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2024-09-10 | SeeQC, Inc. | System and method of flux bias for superconducting quantum circuits |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7321884B2 (en) | 2008-01-22 |
TW200541069A (en) | 2005-12-16 |
US20050184284A1 (en) | 2005-08-25 |
KR20050083578A (en) | 2005-08-26 |
JP4244344B2 (en) | 2009-03-25 |
JP2009076091A (en) | 2009-04-09 |
JP5078839B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 |
US7925614B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 |
TWI335670B (en) | 2011-01-01 |
CN100339867C (en) | 2007-09-26 |
JP2005242991A (en) | 2005-09-08 |
CN1661631A (en) | 2005-08-31 |
KR100745475B1 (en) | 2007-08-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7925614B2 (en) | Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment | |
US11170846B2 (en) | Qubit apparatus and a qubit system | |
Bosman et al. | Multi-mode ultra-strong coupling in circuit quantum electrodynamics | |
Ortlepp et al. | Flip-flopping fractional flux quanta | |
US20100194466A1 (en) | Quantum bit variable coupling method, quantum computing circuit using the method, and variable coupler | |
US9438245B2 (en) | Reducing spontaneous emission in circuit quantum electrodynamics by a combined readout and filter technique | |
JP5432073B2 (en) | Superconducting flux qubit circuit | |
US11271280B2 (en) | Transmission line resonator coupling | |
JP6998459B2 (en) | Multipath Interfering Josephson Isolator Based on Non-Degenerate Three-Wave Mixed Josephson Device | |
JP2009225213A (en) | Parametric amplifier | |
Wittrock et al. | Non-hermiticity in spintronics: oscillation death in coupled spintronic nano-oscillators through emerging exceptional points | |
Kim et al. | Superconducting flux qubit with ferromagnetic Josephson π-junction operating at zero magnetic field | |
CN114118429A (en) | Quantum circuit, control method thereof, superconducting quantum chip and superconducting quantum computer | |
Strong et al. | A resonant metamaterial clock distribution network for superconducting logic | |
Upadhyay et al. | Microwave quantum diode | |
Ranni et al. | High impedance Josephson junction resonators in the transmission line geometry | |
Kalashnikov et al. | Demonstration of a Josephson vortex-based memory cell with microwave energy-efficient readout | |
Wei et al. | Compact superconducting transmon qubit circuits made of ultrathin NbN | |
Kim et al. | Tunable superconducting cavity using superconducting quantum interference device metamaterials | |
Devoret et al. | Superconducting qubits | |
Lo et al. | Superconducting Quantum Circuits Based on 2D Materials | |
Hays | The Device | |
US20250202483A1 (en) | Frequency placement of qubit readout resonators | |
Zhang | Applications of superinductors in superconducting quantum circuits | |
WO2025046164A1 (en) | Superconducting circuit comprising multi-resonator structures and quantum computing system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036550/0001 Effective date: 20150629 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC., CAYMAN ISLANDS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC;GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.;REEL/FRAME:036779/0001 Effective date: 20150910 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.;REEL/FRAME:049490/0001 Effective date: 20181127 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.;REEL/FRAME:054633/0001 Effective date: 20201022 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC., CAYMAN ISLANDS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:054636/0001 Effective date: 20201117 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC., NEW YORK Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:056987/0001 Effective date: 20201117 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |