US20070228223A1 - Device for activation and monitoring of a light-signal system for railway traffic - Google Patents

Device for activation and monitoring of a light-signal system for railway traffic Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070228223A1
US20070228223A1 US11/731,003 US73100307A US2007228223A1 US 20070228223 A1 US20070228223 A1 US 20070228223A1 US 73100307 A US73100307 A US 73100307A US 2007228223 A1 US2007228223 A1 US 2007228223A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
signal
control unit
control
installation
functional mode
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/731,003
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Gotz Dittmar
Walter Pyschny
Ralf Siebelds
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tiefenbach GmbH
Original Assignee
Tiefenbach GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE102006017628A external-priority patent/DE102006017628A1/de
Application filed by Tiefenbach GmbH filed Critical Tiefenbach GmbH
Assigned to TIEFENBACH GMBH reassignment TIEFENBACH GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PSYCHNY, WALTER, SIEBELDS, RALF, DITTMAR, GOTZ
Publication of US20070228223A1 publication Critical patent/US20070228223A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L5/00—Local operating mechanisms for points or track-mounted scotch-blocks; Visible or audible signals; Local operating mechanisms for visible or audible signals
    • B61L5/12—Visible signals
    • B61L5/18—Light signals; Mechanisms associated therewith, e.g. blinders
    • B61L5/1809—Daylight signals
    • B61L5/1881—Wiring diagrams for power supply, control or testing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/30—Trackside multiple control systems, e.g. switch-over between different systems

Definitions

  • the object of this invention is a method and a device for operating a signal installation within a railroad trackage block based on the modular activation of local control units either at the site of the signal installation or as locally dedicated units, as conceptually specified in claim 1 and claim 10 , respectively.
  • signal installation in this case refers in particular to a light signal which, for example, directs the access to a track section by appropriate signal switching.
  • the method for operating the signal installation of a railroad block whereby at least one first local control unit and one second local control unit are dedicated to the signal installation, each control unit capable of transmitting at least one control signal, is based on a concept whereby the signal installation is operated in a first functional mode when
  • first functional mode refers to a safe condition in which any endangerment of the railroad traffic can be reliably prevented.
  • a safe functional mode in particular, is a state in which the signal installation displays a warning signal and especially a stop or comparable signal.
  • the inventive method ensures at all times the operation in the safe functional mode even if only one of the dedicated local control units transmits the first control signal.
  • That first control signal is the control signal which in normal operation is designed to switch the signal installation into the first functional mode.
  • the minimum of one second functional mode encompasses all other functional modes of the signal installation. In particular, it may include the display of various different signals implemented in the signal installation.
  • each of these second functional modes may have assigned to it a second control signal of its own, so that the transmission of the second control signal triggers the corresponding second functional mode, which may in turn take place via the AND-relation.
  • the signal installation will be switched into or operated in a second functional mode only when both control units transmit the appropriate second control signal.
  • the control units are preferably implemented with a suitable microprocessor.
  • a control signal as defined for the purpose of this patent application specifically is constituted of a signal that switches the signal installation into a particular functional mode and a signal by means of which the status of a functional mode determined by the control unit is transmitted.
  • control signals of the first and the second control units are mutually compared in at least one of the control units.
  • Each of the control units is preferably designed to permit an internal comparison of the control signals.
  • the intrinsic control signal of each control unit also defines a functional mode determined and monitored by the control unit concerned.
  • the comparison of the control signals extends over a preselectable length of time.
  • the length of time is so selected as to take into account the usual time lag of the control units. This will have the desirable effect of preventing the signal installation from being operated in the first functional mode even though both control units are transmitting identical control signals but not in parallel due to system inertia.
  • a central signal controller transmits a single- or dual-channel control command to the control units.
  • This central signal controller may be constituted of or integrated in a signal-and-points control box.
  • the central signal controller transmits to the control units a control command in response to which the signal installation is to be switched into a particular second functional mode.
  • the control units receive and process that control command. Specifically, a given control command of the controller is transferred to the signal installation to cause it to operate in the appropriate functional mode specified by that control command.
  • each control unit monitors the signal installation for proper operation in the setpoint functional mode and transmits a control signal that can be associated with the functional mode of the signal installation being monitored.
  • control signal transmitted in essentially continuous fashion, thus permits the determination of the current functional mode of the signal installation. Since each control unit transmits a corresponding control signal that represents the detected setpoint functional mode, a comparison of the control signals of the individual control units permits the monitoring of the overall system. As a result, according to the invention, the signal installation will be operated in the safe first functional mode whenever there is a discrepancy between the control signals of the control units.
  • the central signal controller and the first and second control units communicate with one another via at least one of the following means:
  • bus systems e.g. RS485, TCP/IP
  • RS485, TCP/IP bus systems
  • communication via electromagnetic radiation in this case refers in particular to wireless communication preferably based on electromagnetic radiation in the radio frequency range.
  • Communication via light waves includes data transmission untethered to fiber optics conductors, for instance by means of a suitably operated laser.
  • Communication using light waves may also be in the form of data transmission via optical conductors such as appropriately configured fiber optic cables.
  • Modulation of the supply voltage refers in particular to so-called power-line communication where a voltage serving to power the control units is suitably modulated, especially frequency-modulated.
  • each control unit compares the control signal of at least one other control unit with its own control signal.
  • Yet another advantageous implementation of the method according to the invention includes an error check of at least part of the signal installation and/or of the control units.
  • the signal installation typically encompasses at least one light source, preferably at least one incandescent lamp or an LED array.
  • the signal installation is preferably equipped with 4 to 10 incandescent lamps.
  • each of these incandescent lamps may feature a so-called secondary filament.
  • the secondary filament is switched on when a break of the primary filament has been detected. This constitutes additional redundancy, since a failure of the primary filament does not cause a failure of the signal installation, given its continued operability with the secondary filament pending repair of the primary filament.
  • the control units or at least one control unit are/is so designed as to permit the testing of the primary as well as the secondary filaments of the individual incandescent lamps of the signal installation.
  • control units can be tested.
  • another advantageous enhancement of the invention provides for a second control signal to be assigned to the second functional mode, whereby the signal installation will again be operated in the second functional mode when the first control unit and the second control unit transmit the second control signal in mutually independent fashion.
  • Another proposed aspect of this invention consists in a device for operating the signal installation of a railroad trackage block. It encompasses at least one first local control unit and one second local control unit. Each control unit is capable of transmitting at least one control signal. According to the invention, each control unit includes means for monitoring the functional condition of the signal installation and means for comparing the functional mode detected with a control signal of another control unit as well as means for transmitting a control signal. Each control unit is designed to permit the operation of the signal installation in a first functional mode when at least one control unit transmits the first control signal, and the operation of the signal installation in the first functional mode when the control signal of the first and second control units are mutually inconsistent.
  • each control unit can be in the form of a suitable microprocessor.
  • the first functional mode is a so-called safe functional mode which virtually precludes any endangerment of the railroad traffic.
  • the first functional mode of a light signal is a STOP signal.
  • control units are so designed that they permit the signal installation to be operated in a second functional mode when the first and second control units transmit at least one control signal independently of each other.
  • several second functional modes are possible to each of which an individual second control signal is assigned.
  • control units can be so designed as to permit the operation of the signal installation in a second functional mode when, independent of each other, the first control unit and the second control unit transmit a second control signal.
  • Another advantageous design version of the device according to the invention incorporates a communication interface for maintaining a link to a central controller.
  • Maintaining a link means that a connection is established and sustained.
  • the connection may be in wired or wireless form.
  • the central controller may for instance be part of an appropriately configured signal-and-points control box permitting manual or automatic operation.
  • the communication interface permits data transmission via at least one of the following means:
  • bus systems e.g. RS485, TCP/IP
  • RS485, TCP/IP bus systems
  • Modulation of the supply voltage involves so-called power-line communication whereby the supply voltage for the device according to the invention or for one or both of the control units or for other components is suitably modulated for data transmission.
  • Particularly preferred in this context is frequency modulation.
  • At least one of the control units is so designed as to permit error-checking of at least part of the signal installation.
  • both control units are so designed that, through the combined action of these control units, part or all of the signal installation and/or of the device according to the invention can be tested.
  • control units are electrically separated from one another.
  • Electrical separation advantageously enhances the reliability of the device according to the invention since it prevents electric interference of a control unit by one of the other control units.
  • the communication interface is electrically and/or optically separated from the control units. Electrical and/or optical separation of the communication interface from the control units advantageously minimizes the possibility of interference pulses traveling from the communication interface to the control units, and vice versa.
  • the device according to the invention is provided with an enclosure that forms an electromagnetic shield around at least certain components of the device.
  • the enclosure constitutes a Faraday cage, shielding in particular the control units and/or the communication interface against electromagnetic radiation.
  • the electromagnetic shield preferably provides protection from electromagnetic pulses or electrostatic discharges.
  • the local light-signal operating system includes two separate control units for instance in the form of microprocessors. Data transmission via an appropriate interface allows the two control units to communicate with the central signal controller.
  • the system can be expanded in a manner whereby both control units can individually and independently communicate, via a data transmission line, with the central signal controller in the signal-and-points control box.
  • the light-signal operating device is installed locally near the signal installation and communicates with the central processor (control circuit board, slave board) of the central signal controller.
  • This communication between the local light-signal operating system and the central signal controller can be implemented through power-line, fiber optic cable, databus or radio transmission. For example—among others—the following light signals can be activated:
  • the device In its basic configuration the device is capable of individually activating six lamps. Two of these six lamps feature a primary and a secondary filament, which secondary filament is independently activated when a break in the primary filament has been detected. In a suitably expanded system as many as 28 lamps can be individually activated and monitored.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a first design example of a device according to the invention
  • FIG. 2 shows an example of the layout of a control unit
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a second design example of a device according to the invention
  • FIG. 4 is a first flow chart explaining the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a second flow chart explaining the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a third flow chart explaining the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a fourth flow chart explaining the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a first circuit diagram of the signal installation with a device according to the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a second circuit diagram of the device according to the invention in conjunction with the signal installation.
  • FIG. 10 is a third circuit diagram of the device according to the invention in conjunction with the signal installation
  • FIG. 11 shows a single-channel data transmission line
  • FIG. 12 shows a dual-channel data transmission line
  • FIG. 13 Flow chart: Response to a command or status query
  • FIG. 14 Flow chart: Reciprocal check of the ⁇ -processors
  • FIG. 15 Flow chart: A light signal has been activated
  • FIG. 16 Flow chart: A light signal remains activated.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a first design example of a device 1 according to the invention serving to operate a signal installation 2 of a railroad trackage block.
  • the device 1 encompasses a first control unit 3 and a second control unit 4 .
  • These control units 3 , 4 are designed for local operation, i.e. locally dedicated to the signal installation 2 . Specifically, this means that these units are not housed in a remote signal-and-points control box but are located close to the signal installation 2 .
  • Each control unit 3 , 4 is capable of transmitting a first control signal and at least one second control signal and of monitoring the functional state of the signal installation 2 .
  • FIG. 2 is a detailed schematic illustration of the control units 3 , 4 .
  • Each of these control units 3 , 4 is provided with means 5 for monitoring the functional state of the signal installation 2 , with means 6 for comparing the functional mode determined with a control signal of another control unit 3 , 4 , and with means 7 for transmitting a control signal.
  • each control unit 3 , 4 is so designed as to allow the operation of the signal installation 2 in a first functional mode when at least one control unit 3 , 4 transmits a control signal, and to allow the operation of the signal installation 2 in a first functional mode when the control signals of the first control unit 3 and the second control unit 4 are mutually inconsistent.
  • the means 5 , 6 , 7 are connected, via signal lines 8 , with one another, with the signal installation 2 and with the respective other control unit 4 , 3 .
  • the means 5 for monitoring the functional mode permit the continuous or discontinuous read-out of the functional mode of the signal installation 2 .
  • the signal installation 2 may be operated in a first functional mode or a second functional mode, or a defect is detected in the signal installation 2 .
  • the comparison means 6 perform a comparison of the functional mode detected by the means 5 with the control signal of the respective other control unit 4 , 3 and, where indicated, with its own control signal transmitted by the means 7 . In the event the comparison means 6 detect a discrepancy between the control signals transmitted by the first control unit 3 and the second control unit 4 , the signal installation 2 will automatically be caused to operate in the first, safe functional mode. In addition, a corresponding alert message may be sent to a central controller, advising it of a malfunction in the signal installation 2 and/or one of the control units 3 , 4 .
  • the device 1 includes a communication interface 9 permitting data transmission via electromagnetic radiation, a databus, light waves and/or a modulation of the supply voltage for the device 1 and/or the control units 3 , 4 .
  • This may for instance be in the form of a so-called power-line modem, a fiber optic converter or a wireless modem.
  • the communication between the control units 3 , 4 which are connected via corresponding links 10 with one another and with the communication interface 9 , preferably takes place through a so-called RS485 interface.
  • the links 10 are preferably implemented in redundant fashion so that, if one of the links 10 were to fail, the device 1 according to the invention can still be operated.
  • setpoint functional modes of the signal installation 2 can be communicated to the control units 3 , 4 .
  • the functional mode of the signal installation 2 is to be established on the basis of this setpoint functional mode.
  • the control units 3 , 4 can read out the respective current functional mode of the signal installation 2 .
  • appropriate control signals can be transmitted by the control units 3 , 4 to the signal installation 2 in order to change or, as the case may be, maintain the current functional mode of the signal installation 2 .
  • the signal installation 2 is operated in a first functional mode when at least one control unit 3 , 4 transmits the first control signal.
  • a first control signal transmitted by one of the control units 3 , 4 will switch the signal installation 2 into its first functional mode and/or will operate it in that mode.
  • only both control units 3 , 4 together can bring about a second functional mode of the signal installation 2 in that both control units 3 , 4 transmit the minimum of one matching control signal to the signal installation 2 . That signal congruity is verified in both control units 3 , 4 .
  • control signal of the control unit 3 or 4 concerned is transmitted via the links 10 to the respective other control unit 4 , 3 for a comparison with its own control signal and/or with the functional mode of the signal installation 2 as detected by that control unit 4 , 3 . If one of the control units 3 , 4 determines that the control signals of the control units 3 , 4 are not identical, the signal installation 2 will automatically shift into the first functional mode and will be operated in that mode.
  • the inventive method and the inventive device thus permit a redundant control operation of the signal installation 2 whereby, if a system component such as a control unit 3 , 4 or any part of the control unit 3 or 4 were to fail, the signal installation 2 is automatically switched into the safe first functional mode and operated in that mode.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a second design example of a device 1 according to the invention. It differs from the first design example in that instead of one communication interface 9 it is equipped with two communication interfaces 9 , each of which is redundantly connected to both control units 3 , 4 via appropriate links 10 .
  • FIG. 4 is a first diagrammatic flow chart explaining the method according to the invention.
  • the communication interface 9 receives a command intended to switch the signal installation 2 into a setpoint functional mode.
  • Step 100 also forwards that command via the communication interface 9 to the control units 3 , 4 .
  • the control units 3 , 4 are addressed individually, allowing the control units 3 , 4 in step 101 to determine whether that command is intended for them.
  • the target address is the address of the control unit 3 , 4 . If the control unit 3 , 4 finds that it is not the intended recipient of the command, no further action will take place.
  • the control unit 3 executes the command.
  • the command concerned is monitored by the first control unit 3 .
  • the second control unit 4 executes the command in step 105 and monitors in step 106 the execution of the command.
  • the second control unit 4 relays the respective status to the first control unit 3 .
  • the first control unit 3 compares the status received by the first control unit 3 through the monitoring of the signal installation 2 with the status received by the second control unit 4 through the monitoring of the signal installation 2 . For the comparison in this procedural step as in all other procedural steps involving a comparison, a preselectable length of time is allowed, i.e. there is a wait for the duration of the preset time period before the comparison is made.
  • step 109 the first control unit 3 will cause the signal installation 2 to be operated in the first functional mode.
  • step 110 the first control unit 3 sends its status message to the communication interface 9 through which the data will be forwarded to a central controller.
  • Step 110 will also be performed when the status messages of both control units 3 , 4 in step 108 are identical.
  • the status of the signal installation 2 determined by the first control unit 3 is sent to the second control unit 4 .
  • the second control unit 4 compares the status of the signal installation 2 reported by the first control unit 3 with the status of the signal installation 2 determined by the second control unit 4 . If that status is identical, then in step 112 the second control unit 4 as well will send its status message to the communication interface 9 to be forwarded to the central controller.
  • step 111 If the comparison made by the second control unit 4 (in step 111 ) turns out negative, meaning that the first control unit 3 and the second control unit 4 have each arrived at a different status of the signal installation 2 , then in step 113 the second control unit 4 will switch the signal installation 2 into the first functional mode. In step 114 the second control unit 4 will transmit that status to the communication interface 9 .
  • steps 114 and 110 in which the communication interface 9 and, beyond it, the central controller have been informed of the current status of the control units 3 , 4 , any malfunction that triggers the switching of the signal installation 2 into its first functional mode and its operation in that mode will come to the attention of the central processor, permitting appropriate troubleshooting. Operation in the first functional mode may in advantageous fashion allow the activation of an automatic train warning system such as a so-called inductively operated automatic train-running control.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the communication between the two control units 3 , 4 .
  • Such communication between the two control units 3 , 4 is implemented in particular on the basis of a so-called CAN network (controller area network).
  • the second control unit 4 transmits to the first control unit 3 the status of the signal installation 2 as detected by it.
  • the first control unit 3 compares the status of the signal installation 2 as determined by the control unit 3 with the status of the signal installation 2 as determined and forwarded by the control unit 4 . If the two status messages match, the first control unit 3 will send to the second control unit 4 the status of the signal installation 2 as determined by it.
  • step 201 reveals that the two status messages do not match, the first control unit 3 will, initially in step 203 , address the signal installation 2 so as to cause it to operate in the first functional mode, while in step 202 sending to the second control unit 4 the status information determined by it.
  • step 204 the second control unit 4 compares the status of the signal installation 2 as determined by the second control unit 4 with the status of the signal installation 2 forwarded by the first control unit 3 .
  • steps 204 and 201 a comparison is made with the data from a predefined period of time, i.e. there is a wait for a preselected duration before the comparison concerned is made.
  • step 204 reveals identical status information, the process continues with step 200 . If the check in step 204 reveals diverging status information, then in step 205 the second control unit 4 will address the signal installation 2 so as to cause it to operate in the first functional mode, proceeding from there to procedural step 200 .
  • the flow chart in FIG. 6 shows how the signal installation 2 is switched into a second functional mode. That may for instance be the activation or retention of a light signal other than a STOP signal.
  • the initial premise in step 300 is that the signal installation 2 is being operated in its first functional mode, meaning in particular that the signal installation 2 is in the STOP mode.
  • the second control unit 4 receives the command to operate the signal installation 2 in a different functional mode. In other words, step 301 relays to the second control unit 4 a setpoint functional mode.
  • the second control unit 4 causes the signal installation 2 to shift into its second functional mode.
  • the first control unit 3 receives in step 302 the command to operate the signal installation 2 in a setpoint functional mode.
  • the first control unit 3 causes the signal installation 2 to change over into its setpoint functional mode.
  • steps 301 , 302 a central controller sends out the commands which are received by the communication interface 9 and forwarded via the links 10 to the control units 3 , 4 .
  • step 303 the second control unit 4 determines the status of the signal installation 2 and forwards that status information to the first control unit 3 .
  • step 304 the first control unit 3 determines the status of the signal installation 2 and forwards that status information to the second control unit 4 .
  • the term status of the signal installation 2 refers in particular to the detected setpoint functional mode of the signal installation 2 .
  • step 305 the control units 3 , 4 compare the status determined by them with the status information received from the respective other control unit 3 , 4 . If there is a match (step 306 ), the result will be the state shown in 307 , whereby the signal installation 2 is operated in its second functional mode that corresponds to the predefined setpoint functional mode.
  • step 308 one of the control units 3 , 4 will switch the signal installation 2 into a second [sic] functional mode, operate it in that mode and send a corresponding message to the central controller via the communication interface 9 .
  • FIG. 7 is another flow chart explaining the method according to the invention.
  • the first control unit 3 checks the status of the signal installation 2 in step 401 .
  • the first control unit 3 transmits that status information, constituting a control signal, to the second control unit 4 at least once but preferably several times.
  • the second control unit 4 checks the status of the signal installation 2 .
  • the second control unit 4 transmits that status information to the first control unit 3 at least once but preferably several times.
  • the first control unit 3 compares the status of the signal installation 2 as determined by the first control unit 3 with the status of the signal installation 2 as received from the second control unit 4 . If there is a match, the process continues with step 400 , with the operation of the signal installation 2 continuing in the second functional mode.
  • step 408 the second control unit 4 compares the status determined by the second control unit 4 with the status of the signal installation 2 reported by the first control unit 3 . If the two status messages are identical, the process continues with procedural step 400 . If in step 403 and in step 408 the status messages are not identical, the signal installation 2 will be switched into its first functional mode and a corresponding message will be transmitted to the central controller via the communication interface 9 .
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of the circuitry that serves to shift the signal installation 2 into its first functional mode.
  • a power supply 11 connects to an incandescent lamp 15 via a drop resistor 12 , a first switch 13 and a second switch 14 .
  • the first switch 13 consists of the first control unit 3 or is a component of it and/or is a switch controlled by it.
  • the second switch 14 consists of the second control unit 4 or is a component of it and/or is a switch controlled by it. Specifically, these may be relays that are activated by the associated control unit 3 , 4 .
  • the incandescent lamp 15 is an incandescent lamp that is lit in the first functional mode of the signal installation 2 .
  • this is a red incandescent lamp constituting a STOP signal.
  • the circuitry further includes a first precision resistor 16 and a second precision resistor 17 .
  • These precision resistors 16 , 17 function as so-called shunt resistors. Measured in this process is the voltage drop across these precision resistors 16 , 17 or the current flowing through these precision resistors 16 , 17 . Applying Ohm's law, the measured variables can be mutually converted. In principle it is possible to provide one single precision resistor 16 , 17 ; however, using two precision resistors 16 , 17 according to the invention offers the advantage of a redundant design permitting a further improvement of the measuring accuracy. With the measured variables thus established, various test cycles can be run for testing different components of the signal installation 2 and/or of the device 1 .
  • a first test cycle can be run during the transition from the first functional mode to a second functional mode of the signal installation 2 .
  • a primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 there is a so-called secondary filament which could be incorporated in the same incandescent lamp or it could constitute a second incandescent lamp.
  • the control units 3 , 4 are equipped with a so-called automatic secondary-filament activation circuit which in the event of a defective primary filament in the incandescent lamp 15 will automatically activate the secondary filament assigned to it.
  • the test cycle initially causes the first and the second control units 3 , 4 to deactivate the automatic secondary-filament detection.
  • the second switch 14 of the second control unit 4 turns off the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 .
  • the first switch 13 of the first control unit 3 is closed. This is accomplished by means of the above-mentioned measured variables, given that the current flowing through the precision resistors 16 , 17 must remain constant.
  • the second switch 14 of the second control unit 4 reactivates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 .
  • the first switch 13 of the first control unit 3 turns off the corresponding primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 . It can now be checked whether the switch 14 of the second control unit 4 is closed. In this case as well the current measured at the precision resistors 16 , 17 must remain constant.
  • the first control unit 3 then turns on the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit.
  • the second switch 14 of the second control unit 4 deactivates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 . This permits verification of the proper operating condition of the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit in the first control unit 3 which must now turn on the secondary filament. Again, the measured current should remain constant.
  • the second control unit 4 turns on the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit while the first control unit 3 turns off its automatic secondary-filament activation circuit. This allows verification of whether the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit of the second control unit 4 is intact. Throughout this test cycle, assuming proper operating condition of all elements, the current measured across the precision resistors 16 , 17 must remain essentially constant.
  • this test cycle permits the automatic testing of other components of the control units 3 , 4 . Additional functions can be tested when the signal installation 2 is shifted into its first functional mode, for instance when the STOP signal is activated. To that effect, for example, both the first control unit 3 and the second control unit 4 turn off the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit.
  • the second switch 14 of the second control unit 4 turns on the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 . This allows verification of whether the second switch 14 is closed.
  • the first control unit 3 on its part then activates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 .
  • the second switch 14 of the control unit 4 turns off the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 .
  • a third test cycle can be run while the signal installation 2 is in its first functional mode.
  • the automatic secondary-filament activation circuits of the first and second control units 3 , 4 are turned off.
  • the second switch 14 of the second control unit 4 deactivates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 .
  • the first control unit 3 turns on the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit.
  • the first control unit 3 deactivates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 . This permits verification of whether the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit of the first control unit 3 is intact.
  • the second control unit 4 turns on the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit while the first control unit 3 turns its automatic secondary-filament activation circuit off. This permits verification of whether the automatic secondary-filament activation circuit of the second control unit 4 is intact.
  • the first control unit 3 turns on its automatic secondary-filament activation circuit.
  • the second control unit 4 activates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 . This permits verification of whether the second switch 14 of the second control unit 4 is intact.
  • the first control unit 3 reactivates the primary filament of the incandescent lamp 15 . Throughout this entire test cycle, if all components tested function properly, the current measured across the precision resistors 16 , 17 must remain essentially constant.
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a circuit system serving to activate an additional light signal, i.e. to operate the signal installation 2 in a second functional mode.
  • the signal installation 2 can be operated in several different functional modes.
  • this circuitry includes a third switch 18 in the first control unit 3 and a fourth switch 19 in the second control unit 4 . These switches are connected in series so as to activate the second incandescent lamp 20 when both switches 18 and 19 are closed at the same time.
  • FIG. 10 is another schematic diagram of a circuit system for the signal installation 2 operating in a second functional mode.
  • This schematic diagram will show how an additional incandescent lamp 20 , when turned off, can be tested via the control units 3 , 4 .
  • the function of the first switch 18 and the second switch 19 is tested as well.
  • the second control unit 4 is provided with a fifth switch 21 and the first control unit 3 is provided with a sixth switch 22 .
  • the second control unit 4 opens the fifth switch 21 while the first control unit 3 closes the sixth switch 22 .
  • the first control unit 3 activates the third switch 18 . This allows the detection of a short-circuit in the fourth switch 18 [sic].
  • the second control unit 4 activates the fourth switch 19 .
  • the first control unit 3 deactivates the third switch 18 . That permits the detection of a short-circuit in the third switch 18 .
  • the second control unit 4 deactivates the fourth switch 19 .
  • the second control unit 4 opens the sixth switch 22 while the first control unit 3 closes the fifth switch 21 .
  • a low test current flows through the circuit, low enough not to light up the incandescent lamp 20 .
  • This test serves to check the switches 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 of the control units 3 , 4 as well as the corresponding filaments of the second incandescent lamp 20 . This test as well is based on the monitoring of the current that flows through the precision resistors 16 , 17 . If all components are intact, the current should remain essentially constant throughout the test.
  • the central controller 23 in the signal-and-points control box with its PLC modem (or alternatively with a fiber optics converter, a bus system or a wireless modem) is connected via two conductors with both the first control unit 3 (hereinafter also referred to as “microprocessor 3 ” or “ ⁇ C1”) and the second control unit 4 (hereinafter also referred to as “microprocessor 4 ” or “ ⁇ C2”), locally installed in immediate proximity to a signal installation (not illustrated).
  • ⁇ C1 first control unit 3
  • microprocessor 4 hereinafter also referred to as “microprocessor 4 ” or “ ⁇ C2”
  • ⁇ C2 the second control unit 4
  • each of the microprocessors 3 / ⁇ C1 and 4 / ⁇ C2 connects to the signal installation 2 via a link 10 and to function-mode monitoring means 5 via signal control lines 8 .
  • both microprocessors are interconnected via (network) links 10 .
  • This circuit configuration performs the following functions:
  • the data transmission between the central signal controller 23 and the microprocessors employs one modem for each, meaning a total of 2 modems, the following applies:
  • the local signal-operating device 1 detects a disruption of the communication with the central signal controller 23 (for instance if the timer has run out), the local signal-operating device must switch over into the safe signal mode.
  • the STOP signal will be activated when there is no communication between the local light-signal operating device 1 and the central signal controller 23 .
  • the STOP signal will also be activated when there is no communication with the signal control unit(s), which will be detected by the central signal controller 23 from where a corresponding command will be forwarded to the local signal operating device 1 .
  • a STOP signal is also activated when the two ⁇ Cs show a discrepancy in their monitoring results.
  • the local light-signal activating device will continuously check the various “filaments” (PFR, SFR, PFW, position light), permitting in the event of a failure an immediate message to be sent to the central signal controller 23 before a line-clear signal for a track section is needed.
  • AWS automatic train stop or warning system
  • a train that runs a STOP signal will be automatically brought to a stop.
  • the AWS is activated when the signal is set on STOP.
  • the AWS consists of a track magnet in an aluminum housing that is “electrically open” toward the top.
  • the two ⁇ Cs communicate with each other via the CAN interface. Since in mutually independent fashion both ⁇ Cs perform the signal activation and monitoring, the communication between the two ⁇ Cs must be continuous. The moment one ⁇ C reports its status to the other, that other ⁇ C must check its own status for congruity: If within a preselected time span an identical monitoring result is not found, the ⁇ C must switch the signal into the safe functional mode.
  • either ⁇ C can independently set the signal in the safe mode. Run-related settings (such as MS1, MS2, position light etc.) can only be made jointly. Therefore, prior to any reciprocal status check, a certain delay in the progression is needed to give the other ⁇ C enough time to perform the activation concerned.
  • the circuitry is laid out based on the principle of “non-reactivity and maximum isolation of the internal from the external system”. Therefore, the circuitry is preferably implemented with optically controlled components, in particular MOSFETs, photovoltaic relays, fiber-optic couplers, linear optoelectronic couplers, current sensor modules each with a linear optoelectronic coupler.
  • optically controlled components in particular MOSFETs, photovoltaic relays, fiber-optic couplers, linear optoelectronic couplers, current sensor modules each with a linear optoelectronic coupler.
  • the STOP signals should be turned on and off along a given sequence to ascertain proper function of the two switches. During an extended On-state it is possible to test the individual switches without that being visible from the outside.
  • the inventive method and the inventive device 1 advantageously permit the safe operation of the signal installations 2 of railroad trackage blocks.
  • the method and device 1 according to the invention ensure that in the event of a malfunction within the control electronics the signal installation 2 will always be operated in a safe first functional mode for instance in the form of a STOP signal.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
US11/731,003 2006-03-29 2007-03-29 Device for activation and monitoring of a light-signal system for railway traffic Abandoned US20070228223A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102006014802 2006-03-29
DE102006014802.9 2006-03-29
DE102006017628.6 2006-04-12
DE102006017628A DE102006017628A1 (de) 2006-04-12 2006-04-12 Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betrieb einer Signaleinrichtung einer Eisenbahnanlage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070228223A1 true US20070228223A1 (en) 2007-10-04

Family

ID=38191099

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/731,003 Abandoned US20070228223A1 (en) 2006-03-29 2007-03-29 Device for activation and monitoring of a light-signal system for railway traffic

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20070228223A1 (de)
EP (1) EP1999001B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE460325T1 (de)
DE (1) DE502007003081D1 (de)
PL (1) PL1999001T3 (de)
WO (1) WO2007112942A1 (de)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090266943A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2009-10-29 Ajith Kuttannair Kumar System and Method For Pacing A Powered System Traveling Along A Route
ITGE20110034A1 (it) * 2011-03-31 2012-10-01 Automazione E Sicurezza Ferroviaria S R L Sistema di rappresentazione in sicurezza dello stato dell'equipaggiamento di un impianto di segnalamento ferroviario
US20120325981A1 (en) * 2011-06-27 2012-12-27 Thales Rail Signalling Solutions Inc. Railway Signaling System with Redundant Controllers
US20140166822A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2014-06-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Signal transmitter
US20150028164A1 (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-01-29 Ansaldo Sts Usa, Inc. System and method for identifying point detection calibration prior to point detector lock-out and switch machine failure
JP2015074323A (ja) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-20 公益財団法人鉄道総合技術研究所 二重系装置の故障表示方法およびその装置
US20150177706A1 (en) * 2013-12-20 2015-06-25 Thales Canada Inc Safety assurance of multiple redundant systems
US10332708B2 (en) 2015-12-09 2019-06-25 Thales Canada Inc Seamless switchover system and method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6556898B2 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-04-29 Bombardier Transportation Gmbh Distributed track network control system
US7016197B2 (en) * 2002-04-26 2006-03-21 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Electronic built-in device

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3223779A1 (de) * 1982-06-23 1984-01-05 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt Fehlersichere adersparende lichtsignalsteuereinrichtung
ES2050320T3 (es) * 1990-08-21 1994-05-16 Scheidt & Bachmann Gmbh Disposicion para el funcionamiento controlado de un consumidor.
DE102004035901B4 (de) * 2004-07-19 2016-02-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Einrichtung zum Steuern eines sicherheitskritischen Prozesses

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6556898B2 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-04-29 Bombardier Transportation Gmbh Distributed track network control system
US7016197B2 (en) * 2002-04-26 2006-03-21 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Electronic built-in device

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7922127B2 (en) * 2008-04-28 2011-04-12 General Electric Company System and method for pacing a powered system traveling along a route
US20110186692A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2011-08-04 Ajith Kuttannair Kumar System and method for pacing a powered system traveling along a route
US8442708B2 (en) 2008-04-28 2013-05-14 General Electric Company System and method for pacing a powered system traveling along a route
US20090266943A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2009-10-29 Ajith Kuttannair Kumar System and Method For Pacing A Powered System Traveling Along A Route
ITGE20110034A1 (it) * 2011-03-31 2012-10-01 Automazione E Sicurezza Ferroviaria S R L Sistema di rappresentazione in sicurezza dello stato dell'equipaggiamento di un impianto di segnalamento ferroviario
US9096245B2 (en) * 2011-06-27 2015-08-04 Thales Canada Inc. Railway signaling system with redundant controllers
US20120325981A1 (en) * 2011-06-27 2012-12-27 Thales Rail Signalling Solutions Inc. Railway Signaling System with Redundant Controllers
WO2013000063A1 (en) * 2011-06-27 2013-01-03 Thales Canada Inc. Railway signaling system with redundant controllers
US8668170B2 (en) * 2011-06-27 2014-03-11 Thales Canada Inc. Railway signaling system with redundant controllers
CN103764480A (zh) * 2011-06-27 2014-04-30 泰雷兹加拿大公司 具有冗余控制器的铁路信号发送系统
US20140138495A1 (en) * 2011-06-27 2014-05-22 Thales Canada Inc. Railway signaling system with redundant controllers
US20140166822A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2014-06-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Signal transmitter
US9180896B2 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-11-10 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Signal transmitter
AU2012289114B2 (en) * 2011-07-28 2017-03-16 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Signal transmitter
US20150028164A1 (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-01-29 Ansaldo Sts Usa, Inc. System and method for identifying point detection calibration prior to point detector lock-out and switch machine failure
US9592843B2 (en) * 2013-07-24 2017-03-14 Ansaldo Sts Usa, Inc. System and method for identifying point detection calibration prior to point detector lock-out and switch machine failure
US10370013B2 (en) 2013-07-24 2019-08-06 Hitachi Rail Sts Usa, Inc. System and method for identifying point detection calibration prior to point detector lock-out and switch machine failure
JP2015074323A (ja) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-20 公益財団法人鉄道総合技術研究所 二重系装置の故障表示方法およびその装置
US20150177706A1 (en) * 2013-12-20 2015-06-25 Thales Canada Inc Safety assurance of multiple redundant systems
US9618909B2 (en) * 2013-12-20 2017-04-11 Thales Canada Inc Safety assurance of multiple redundant systems
US10332708B2 (en) 2015-12-09 2019-06-25 Thales Canada Inc Seamless switchover system and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL1999001T3 (pl) 2010-08-31
WO2007112942A1 (de) 2007-10-11
EP1999001A1 (de) 2008-12-10
ATE460325T1 (de) 2010-03-15
DE502007003081D1 (de) 2010-04-22
EP1999001B1 (de) 2010-03-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070228223A1 (en) Device for activation and monitoring of a light-signal system for railway traffic
US20100258682A1 (en) System and method for interfacing wayside signal device with vehicle control system
US7140577B2 (en) Remote system for monitoring and controlling railroad wayside equipment
US6556898B2 (en) Distributed track network control system
CA2824967C (en) Airfield lighting control and monitoring system utilizing fiber optic double loop self healing communications
AU2002311963A1 (en) Distributed track network control system
CA2987474C (en) Monitoring system, wayside led signaling device, and method for monitoring a wayside led signaling device
AU2018429145B2 (en) Lamp assembly, lamp system and method for operating a lamp system
US20110204189A1 (en) Electronic track relay, and railroad signaling system using the same
US4808982A (en) Facility for monitoring the operation of a signal lamp
KR100412063B1 (ko) 전자제어식 자동 폐색장치
CN102317875A (zh) 控制引导车辆领域中的电开关系统的开关状态的调整的方法和设备
US11459119B2 (en) Installation and method for controlling signalling lights arranged in series
JP4272755B2 (ja) 信号機および親装置
BG109785A (bg) Led сигнални лампи и метод за надеждно управлениена led сигнални лампи
KR200275626Y1 (ko) 전자제어식 자동 폐색장치
EP2386458B1 (de) Lichtsignal für Eisenbahnsysteme
TWI498861B (zh) 地震偵測器旁路系統
WO2016166591A2 (en) An improved control system
JP4338815B2 (ja) 運転方向制御装置
TWM459407U (zh) 地震偵測器旁路系統
CZ304889B6 (cs) Zapojení pro vyhodnocení funkčního stavu návěstní svítilny

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TIEFENBACH GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DITTMAR, GOTZ;PSYCHNY, WALTER;SIEBELDS, RALF;REEL/FRAME:019338/0248;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070507 TO 20070521

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION