US20070205815A1 - Stochastic reset circuit - Google Patents
Stochastic reset circuit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070205815A1 US20070205815A1 US11/367,139 US36713906A US2007205815A1 US 20070205815 A1 US20070205815 A1 US 20070205815A1 US 36713906 A US36713906 A US 36713906A US 2007205815 A1 US2007205815 A1 US 2007205815A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- power
- circuit
- reset
- por
- storage elements
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11C—STATIC STORES
- G11C7/00—Arrangements for writing information into, or reading information out from, a digital store
- G11C7/20—Memory cell initialisation circuits, e.g. when powering up or down, memory clear, latent image memory
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11C—STATIC STORES
- G11C5/00—Details of stores covered by group G11C11/00
- G11C5/14—Power supply arrangements, e.g. power down, chip selection or deselection, layout of wirings or power grids, or multiple supply levels
- G11C5/143—Detection of memory cassette insertion or removal; Continuity checks of supply or ground lines; Detection of supply variations, interruptions or levels ; Switching between alternative supplies
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11C—STATIC STORES
- G11C8/00—Arrangements for selecting an address in a digital store
- G11C8/10—Decoders
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K17/00—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking
- H03K17/22—Modifications for ensuring a predetermined initial state when the supply voltage has been applied
- H03K17/223—Modifications for ensuring a predetermined initial state when the supply voltage has been applied in field-effect transistor switches
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K2217/00—Indexing scheme related to electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making or -breaking covered by H03K17/00
- H03K2217/0036—Means reducing energy consumption
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to integrated circuits, and more particularly but not exclusively to power on reset circuits.
- a power on reset circuit prevents invalid conditions in an electrical circuit by ensuring that the electrical circuit has sufficient power before it is initialized or allowed to operate.
- a POR circuit may be employed to ensure that sufficient power supply voltage is available to the device before the device is initialized or enabled. Otherwise, the POR circuit may keep the device disabled. A POR circuit thus allows the device to power up correctly after a shutdown, for example.
- FIG. 1 schematically shows an example POR circuit.
- the resistor ladder comprising resistors R 1 and R 2 scales the voltage of a power supply Vdd.
- a resistor R 3 pulls up the input of an inverter 103 when a transistor Q 1 is OFF, such as when Vdd is too low to generate sufficient voltage across the resistor R 2 .
- Vdd increases to a point where the voltage across resistor R 2 is sufficient to turn ON the transistor Q 1 .
- the transistor Q 1 pulls the input to the buffer formed by inverters 103 and 104 to ground, deasserting the power on reset signal at the output of the inverter 104 .
- the power on reset signal is active high and asserted at low Vdd to initialize the device.
- a POR circuit may also be used as a low voltage detector after the power ON event. For example, when Vdd subsequently falls below the trip point, the POR circuit of FIG. 1 may again assert the power on reset signal to re-initialize the device.
- Achieving low power consumption in integrated circuit devices becomes more important as battery powered devices become more popular. For example, it is desirable to minimize power consumption when a device enters sleep mode, which is characterized by a relatively long period of time when the device is essentially inactive. Because a POR circuit is for the most part inactive except during power up, it is desirable to disable the POR circuit after the power up sequence.
- One problem with disabling a POR circuit is that it is difficult to ensure that the POR circuit is enabled during power up. If the device is not enabled during power up, device failure can result.
- an integrated circuit device includes a power on reset (POR) circuit and a stochastic reset circuit configured to control enabling and disabling of the POR circuit.
- the stochastic reset circuit may have a value from among many possible values.
- the POR circuit may be enabled during a power up sequence of the device when the value of the stochastic reset during the power up is not a value designated to allow disabling of the POR circuit.
- the stochastic reset circuit may be configured such that the probability of the POR circuit being disabled during the power up is extremely low. After the power up sequence, the stochastic reset circuit may be controlled to allow disabling of the POR circuit to conserve power.
- FIG. 1 schematically shows an example power on reset (POR) circuit.
- FIG. 2 schematically shows an example core circuit, imbalanced latch, and POR circuit.
- FIG. 3 schematically shows a stochastic reset circuit controlling a POR circuit, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 schematically shows further details of a stochastic reset circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 schematically shows a stochastic reset circuit being driven by a write mechanism, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 schematically shows further details of a POR circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 schematically shows a control signal from a stochastic reset circuit being qualified by another signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 schematically shows a POR circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- logical states of a signal may refer to logical states of a signal as being active HIGH or active LOW. It is to be understood, however, that such logical states are arbitrary and depend on implementation details. For example, a signal being active (i.e., asserted) in the logical LOW state in one application may be active in the logical HIGH state in another application.
- a power on reset (POR) circuit may be designed to consume as little power as possible under operating conditions. This allows the POR circuit to be kept ON all the time without significantly straining device power. While desirable at first glance, this approach typically involves a penalty in terms of die area or performance. For example, the size of the circuit may be made relatively large to achieve low power consumption. The response time may also get slower because of the energy conserving design.
- Another approach to achieving low power consumption in a POR circuit is to use a circuit that will tend to power up in a particular desired state (e.g., enabled). The circuit can then be put in an alternate state (e.g., disabled) at some point after power up. This approach is now described with reference to FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 2 schematically shows an example core circuit 210 , imbalanced latch 220 , and POR circuit 130 .
- the imbalanced latch 220 is so named because it tends to power up in one state over another by design. In the example of FIG. 2 , the imbalanced latch 220 tends to power up with its Q output in the logical LOW state. A logical LOW at the disable input of the POR circuit 130 enables the POR circuit 130 to operate and thus assert its power on reset signal during power up.
- the imbalanced latch 220 includes a data input D and a write enable input W.
- the core circuit 210 may comprise electrical circuitry configured to write to the imbalanced latch 220 .
- the core circuit 210 may write to the imbalanced latch 220 by presenting a logical HIGH signal at the write enable input W and a logical HIGH signal at the data input D. This results in the Q output of the imbalanced latch 220 going to the logical HIGH state, which disables the POR circuit 130 to conserve power.
- the imbalanced latch 220 may be made imbalanced by using unequal values of capacitors C 1 and C 2 at the differential outputs Q and QB or using imbalanced feature sizes in the normally symmetric latch cell, for example.
- imbalanced latch 220 and similar circuits tend to have a failure rate under some conditions, such as at certain temperatures, voltages, power up rates (e.g., very fast or very slow), or power supply waveforms (e.g., bouncing power supply waveform).
- the imbalanced latch 220 will power up in a state where its Q output disables the POR circuit 130 , preventing the POR circuit 130 from properly initializing the device.
- FIG. 3 schematically shows a stochastic reset circuit 310 controlling a POR circuit 230 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the stochastic reset circuit 310 and the POR circuit 230 may be incorporated in an integrated circuit device.
- the POR circuit 230 has a disable input and outputs a power on reset signal.
- the disable input is active HIGH in that a logical HIGH signal disables the POR circuit 230 .
- a logical low signal at the disable input enables the POR circuit 230 , allowing it to generate the power on reset signal to enable or initialize the device during power up.
- the stochastic reset circuit generates an AllowDis (“allow disable”) signal that disables the POR circuit 230 .
- the AllowDis signal is typically asserted at some point in time after the device has completed its power up sequence.
- the stochastic reset circuit 310 may comprise a probabilistic circuit configured to allow the stochastic reset circuit 310 to have a very high probability of powering up in the desired state, which in the example of FIG. 3 is a state that enables the POR circuit 230 during power up.
- the stochastic reset circuit 310 is configured to have a very high probability of powering up in a state where the AllowDis signal is deasserted (logical LOW in the example of FIG.
- the stochastic reset circuit 310 may be controlled to assert the AllowDis signal (logical HIGH in the example of FIG. 3 ) to disable the POR circuit 230 , thereby minimizing power consumption.
- a power supply Vdd provides power to both the stochastic reset circuit 310 and the POR circuit 230 .
- the POR circuit 230 is disabled by removing the power supply Vdd from the POR circuit 230 .
- FIG. 4 schematically shows further details of the stochastic reset circuit 310 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the stochastic reset circuit 310 comprises a set of storage elements 400 (i.e., 400 - 1 , 400 - 2 , . . . 400 -N) and a decode logic 410 .
- Each storage element 400 may comprise an electrical circuit for storing information.
- a storage element 400 may comprise a register, a flip-flop, or latch, for example.
- the storage elements 400 comprise identical circuits manufactured using the same process to make their behavior even more predictable.
- the set of storage elements 400 outputs a binary word presented to the decode logic 410 for decoding.
- the set of storage elements 400 upon power up, the set of storage elements 400 will have a value among a plurality of possible values, the number of possible values depending on the number of storage elements 400 employed.
- the decode logic 410 may comprise an electrical circuit for decoding the outputs of the storage elements 400 .
- the decode logic 410 disables or allows disabling of the POR circuit 230 only for one particular value or limited number of values of the storage elements 400 .
- the decode logic 410 asserts the AllowDis signal only for a particular output value of the set of storage elements 400 . That is, assuming there are N storage elements 400 and each storage element 400 stores and outputs 1-bit of information, the decode logic 410 may assert the AllowDis signal to disable or allow disabling of the POR circuit 230 in only 1 value out of a possible 2 N values of the storage elements 400 .
- AllowDis signal Any other values of storage elements 400 will result in the AllowDis signal being deasserted (thus allowing the POR circuit 230 to be enabled).
- 1 value out of 65536 possible values may be used to assert the AllowDis signal. That particular value may be decoded by the decode logic 410 as an instruction to assert the AllowDis signal to disable the POR circuit 230 .
- the remaining 65535 values may be decoded by the decode logic 410 as an instruction to not assert the AllowDis signal to allow the POR circuit 230 to operate.
- the storage elements 400 will power up in an unknown state. However, since there is only one value out of many possible values of storage elements 400 outputs that will result in the POR circuit 230 being disabled, the chance of the storage elements 400 powering up in a state that will disable the POR circuit 230 is extremely low or, as explained below, essentially zero for practical purposes. Some time after the device is powered up and initialized, the storage elements 400 may be written with the one value that will result in the decode logic 410 disabling or allowing disabling of the POR circuit 230 . Disabling of the POR circuit 230 helps the device conserve power.
- the probability of the storage elements 400 powering up in the undesired state involves two considerations. First, if the power up state of the storage elements 400 is completely arbitrary, the probability of powering up in the desired state is a simple calculation. Assuming binary logic is employed in the design of the storage elements 400 and the decode logic 410 , the probability of the single undesired state coming up out of all the possible states is 1 in 2 N , where N is the number of storage elements 400 .
- a second consideration is that identical elements in an identical environment (e.g., process, temperature, voltage, power supply ramp profile, location inside the device) tend to power up in the same state. This can be exploited to improve the probability of power up in the desired state if the storage elements are kept as identical as practically possible. Assuming binary logic, if the storage elements power up to output either all logical HIGH or all logical LOW, then a decoding logic that requires approximately half of the storage elements to output a logical HIGH and half to output a logical LOW will have a very low probability of powering up in the undesired state. This can improve the probability of proper power up beyond the simple random-state calculation described above if all the elements power up randomly.
- FIG. 5 schematically shows the stochastic reset circuit 310 being driven by a write mechanism 510 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the write mechanism 510 may comprise electrical circuitry for writing a value into the storage elements 400 .
- the write mechanism 510 may comprise one or more registers of a microprocessor.
- Software may be used to write a disable code (i.e., unique value that will result in assertion of the AllowDis signal) into the register, which in turn outputs the disable code into the storage elements 400 .
- the storage elements 400 may form registers that are written to by the write mechanism 510 .
- the storage elements 400 present the disable code to the decode logic 410 , which decodes the disable code as an instruction to assert its AllowDis signal. Assertion of the AllowDis signal disables or allows disabling of the POR circuit 230 .
- the number of storage elements 400 may be increased to improve the probability of the stochastic reset circuit 310 enabling the POR circuit 230 during power up.
- the disable code to be entered into the storage elements 400 to disable the POR circuit 230 may also be chosen to maximize the chance of the storage elements 230 powering up with an output value that is different from the disable code.
- the disable code may have a random value that has nearly equal number of logical HIGHs and logical LOWs.
- the control signal that disables the POR circuit is active HIGH so that the signal is at logical LOW during low power supply levels, such as during a power up, thereby enabling the POR circuit.
- the AllowDis signal is preferably active HIGH. This way, the POR circuit 230 is enabled when the AllowDis signal is at logical LOW, a logical level that may be relatively easy to generate at low power levels.
- FIG. 6 shows further details of a POR circuit 230 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the POR circuit 230 receives a Disable signal and outputs a power on reset signal.
- the Disable signal may be the AllowDis signal of the stochastic reset circuit 310 (see FIG. 3 ), for example.
- a transistor Q 2 controls the feeding of a power supply Vdd to the rest of the POR circuit 230 except the NOR gate 610 , which is always connected to Vdd.
- the transistor Q 2 turns OFF when the Disable signal is asserted (logical HIGH in FIG. 6 ), thereby powering down the POR circuit 230 to achieve low power consumption.
- Asserting the Disable signal also forces the power on reset signal at the output of the NOR gate 610 to be deasserted (logical LOW in FIG. 6 ).
- the power supply Vdd is provided to the POR circuit 230 when the Disable signal is deasserted (logical LOW in FIG. 6 ).
- the resistor ladder comprising resistors R 4 and R 5 scales the voltage of the power supply Vdd.
- the resistor R 6 pulls up the input to the inverter 604 when a transistor Q 3 is OFF, such as when Vdd is too low to generate sufficient voltage across the resistor R 5 . This results in the output of the inverter 604 driving a logical LOW into an input of the NOR gate 610 . With the Disable signal deasserted and the output of the inverter 604 at logical LOW, the power on reset signal is thus asserted at low Vdd.
- Vdd Upon power up, Vdd increases to a point where the voltage across resistor R 5 is sufficient to turn ON the transistor Q 3 . At that point, the transistor Q 3 pulls the input of the inverter 604 to ground, resulting in a logical HIGH being presented at an input of the NOR gate 610 . With the Disable signal deasserted and the output of the inverter 604 at logical HIGH, the power on reset signal at the output of the NOR gate 610 is deasserted. The power on reset signal may be used to reset the device that incorporates the POR circuit 230 to ensure proper initialization.
- AllowDis signal may be qualified by another signal.
- both the AllowDis signal and a Sleep signal must be asserted to disable the POR circuit 230 .
- the AllowDis signal may be asserted by writing the disable code into the storage elements of the stochastic reset circuit 310 .
- the Sleep signal may come from other parts of the device to indicate that the device is going into sleep mode, which is a power conservation mode of the device.
- the Sleep signal and the AllowDis signal are ANDed by the AND gate 720 , which outputs the Disable signal to the POR circuit 230 when both conditions (sleep mode and entry of disable code) for disabling the POR circuit 230 are satisfied. This way, the POR circuit 230 can only be disabled during sleep mode.
- FIG. 8 schematically shows a POR circuit 830 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the POR circuit 830 is similar in design and operation to the POR circuit 230 of FIG. 6 except for the addition of a transistor Q 4 to accept a Sleep signal.
- a deasserted Sleep signal (logical LOW in FIG. 8 ) turns ON the transistor Q 4 to allow the power supply Vdd to be provided to the POR circuit 830 even when the Disable signal is asserted.
- both the Sleep signal and the Disable signal need to be asserted (both logical HIGH in FIG. 8 ) to turn OFF the POR circuit 830 .
- the Disable signal may be asserted before asserting the Sleep signal to power down the POR circuit 830 for sleep mode. To reawaken from sleep mode during normal operation, the Sleep signal may be deasserted while keeping the Disable signal asserted.
- Other components of the POR circuit 830 have been previously described in connection with FIG. 6 .
- the configurations shown in FIGS. 6 and 8 are exemplary, and additional devices may be introduced to drive nets to logical HIGH or LOW in the disabled state to achieve zero or low power consumption.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Electronic Switches (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits, and more particularly but not exclusively to power on reset circuits.
- 2. Description of the Background Art
- A power on reset circuit (POR) prevents invalid conditions in an electrical circuit by ensuring that the electrical circuit has sufficient power before it is initialized or allowed to operate. In an integrated circuit device, for example, a POR circuit may be employed to ensure that sufficient power supply voltage is available to the device before the device is initialized or enabled. Otherwise, the POR circuit may keep the device disabled. A POR circuit thus allows the device to power up correctly after a shutdown, for example.
-
FIG. 1 schematically shows an example POR circuit. In the example ofFIG. 1 , the resistor ladder comprising resistors R1 and R2 scales the voltage of a power supply Vdd. A resistor R3 pulls up the input of aninverter 103 when a transistor Q1 is OFF, such as when Vdd is too low to generate sufficient voltage across the resistor R2. Upon power up, Vdd increases to a point where the voltage across resistor R2 is sufficient to turn ON the transistor Q1. At that point, referred to as “trip point,” the transistor Q1 pulls the input to the buffer formed byinverters inverter 104. In the example ofFIG. 1 , the power on reset signal is active high and asserted at low Vdd to initialize the device. - A POR circuit may also be used as a low voltage detector after the power ON event. For example, when Vdd subsequently falls below the trip point, the POR circuit of
FIG. 1 may again assert the power on reset signal to re-initialize the device. - Achieving low power consumption in integrated circuit devices becomes more important as battery powered devices become more popular. For example, it is desirable to minimize power consumption when a device enters sleep mode, which is characterized by a relatively long period of time when the device is essentially inactive. Because a POR circuit is for the most part inactive except during power up, it is desirable to disable the POR circuit after the power up sequence. One problem with disabling a POR circuit is that it is difficult to ensure that the POR circuit is enabled during power up. If the device is not enabled during power up, device failure can result.
- In one embodiment, an integrated circuit device includes a power on reset (POR) circuit and a stochastic reset circuit configured to control enabling and disabling of the POR circuit. The stochastic reset circuit may have a value from among many possible values. The POR circuit may be enabled during a power up sequence of the device when the value of the stochastic reset during the power up is not a value designated to allow disabling of the POR circuit. The stochastic reset circuit may be configured such that the probability of the POR circuit being disabled during the power up is extremely low. After the power up sequence, the stochastic reset circuit may be controlled to allow disabling of the POR circuit to conserve power.
- These and other features of the present invention will be readily apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the entirety of this disclosure, which includes the accompanying drawings and claims.
-
FIG. 1 schematically shows an example power on reset (POR) circuit. -
FIG. 2 schematically shows an example core circuit, imbalanced latch, and POR circuit. -
FIG. 3 schematically shows a stochastic reset circuit controlling a POR circuit, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 schematically shows further details of a stochastic reset circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 schematically shows a stochastic reset circuit being driven by a write mechanism, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 schematically shows further details of a POR circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 schematically shows a control signal from a stochastic reset circuit being qualified by another signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 schematically shows a POR circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. - The use of the same reference label in different drawings indicates the same or like components.
- In the present disclosure, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of circuits, components, and methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details. In other instances, well-known details are not shown or described to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
- The examples below may refer to logical states of a signal as being active HIGH or active LOW. It is to be understood, however, that such logical states are arbitrary and depend on implementation details. For example, a signal being active (i.e., asserted) in the logical LOW state in one application may be active in the logical HIGH state in another application.
- A power on reset (POR) circuit may be designed to consume as little power as possible under operating conditions. This allows the POR circuit to be kept ON all the time without significantly straining device power. While desirable at first glance, this approach typically involves a penalty in terms of die area or performance. For example, the size of the circuit may be made relatively large to achieve low power consumption. The response time may also get slower because of the energy conserving design.
- Another approach to achieving low power consumption in a POR circuit is to use a circuit that will tend to power up in a particular desired state (e.g., enabled). The circuit can then be put in an alternate state (e.g., disabled) at some point after power up. This approach is now described with reference to
FIG. 2 . -
FIG. 2 schematically shows anexample core circuit 210, imbalancedlatch 220, andPOR circuit 130. The imbalancedlatch 220 is so named because it tends to power up in one state over another by design. In the example ofFIG. 2 , theimbalanced latch 220 tends to power up with its Q output in the logical LOW state. A logical LOW at the disable input of thePOR circuit 130 enables thePOR circuit 130 to operate and thus assert its power on reset signal during power up. The imbalancedlatch 220 includes a data input D and a write enable input W. - The
core circuit 210 may comprise electrical circuitry configured to write to theimbalanced latch 220. At some point in time after power up, thecore circuit 210 may write to theimbalanced latch 220 by presenting a logical HIGH signal at the write enable input W and a logical HIGH signal at the data input D. This results in the Q output of the imbalancedlatch 220 going to the logical HIGH state, which disables thePOR circuit 130 to conserve power. The imbalancedlatch 220 may be made imbalanced by using unequal values of capacitors C1 and C2 at the differential outputs Q and QB or using imbalanced feature sizes in the normally symmetric latch cell, for example. - One problem with the imbalanced
latch 220 and similar circuits is that they tend to have a failure rate under some conditions, such as at certain temperatures, voltages, power up rates (e.g., very fast or very slow), or power supply waveforms (e.g., bouncing power supply waveform). When a failure occurs, theimbalanced latch 220 will power up in a state where its Q output disables thePOR circuit 130, preventing thePOR circuit 130 from properly initializing the device. -
FIG. 3 schematically shows astochastic reset circuit 310 controlling aPOR circuit 230, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thestochastic reset circuit 310 and thePOR circuit 230 may be incorporated in an integrated circuit device. In the example ofFIG. 3 , thePOR circuit 230 has a disable input and outputs a power on reset signal. In one embodiment, the disable input is active HIGH in that a logical HIGH signal disables thePOR circuit 230. A logical low signal at the disable input enables thePOR circuit 230, allowing it to generate the power on reset signal to enable or initialize the device during power up. - In the example of
FIG. 3 , the stochastic reset circuit generates an AllowDis (“allow disable”) signal that disables thePOR circuit 230. The AllowDis signal is typically asserted at some point in time after the device has completed its power up sequence. Thestochastic reset circuit 310 may comprise a probabilistic circuit configured to allow thestochastic reset circuit 310 to have a very high probability of powering up in the desired state, which in the example ofFIG. 3 is a state that enables thePOR circuit 230 during power up. In one embodiment, thestochastic reset circuit 310 is configured to have a very high probability of powering up in a state where the AllowDis signal is deasserted (logical LOW in the example ofFIG. 3 ) to allow thePOR circuit 230 to operate during power up. After the device is in a desired operating condition, which is typically some time after the power up sequence, thestochastic reset circuit 310 may be controlled to assert the AllowDis signal (logical HIGH in the example ofFIG. 3 ) to disable thePOR circuit 230, thereby minimizing power consumption. In the example ofFIG. 3 , a power supply Vdd provides power to both thestochastic reset circuit 310 and thePOR circuit 230. In one embodiment, thePOR circuit 230 is disabled by removing the power supply Vdd from thePOR circuit 230. -
FIG. 4 schematically shows further details of thestochastic reset circuit 310 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example ofFIG. 4 , thestochastic reset circuit 310 comprises a set of storage elements 400 (i.e., 400-1, 400-2, . . . 400-N) and adecode logic 410. Each storage element 400 may comprise an electrical circuit for storing information. A storage element 400 may comprise a register, a flip-flop, or latch, for example. Preferably but not necessarily, the storage elements 400 comprise identical circuits manufactured using the same process to make their behavior even more predictable. Together, the set of storage elements 400 outputs a binary word presented to thedecode logic 410 for decoding. As can be appreciated, upon power up, the set of storage elements 400 will have a value among a plurality of possible values, the number of possible values depending on the number of storage elements 400 employed. - The
decode logic 410 may comprise an electrical circuit for decoding the outputs of the storage elements 400. Thedecode logic 410 disables or allows disabling of thePOR circuit 230 only for one particular value or limited number of values of the storage elements 400. In one embodiment, thedecode logic 410 asserts the AllowDis signal only for a particular output value of the set of storage elements 400. That is, assuming there are N storage elements 400 and each storage element 400 stores and outputs 1-bit of information, thedecode logic 410 may assert the AllowDis signal to disable or allow disabling of thePOR circuit 230 in only 1 value out of a possible 2N values of the storage elements 400. Any other values of storage elements 400 will result in the AllowDis signal being deasserted (thus allowing thePOR circuit 230 to be enabled). For example, in an application where there are 16 storage elements 400 driving thedecode logic 410,1 value out of 65536 possible values may be used to assert the AllowDis signal. That particular value may be decoded by thedecode logic 410 as an instruction to assert the AllowDis signal to disable thePOR circuit 230. The remaining 65535 values may be decoded by thedecode logic 410 as an instruction to not assert the AllowDis signal to allow thePOR circuit 230 to operate. - In operation, the storage elements 400 will power up in an unknown state. However, since there is only one value out of many possible values of storage elements 400 outputs that will result in the
POR circuit 230 being disabled, the chance of the storage elements 400 powering up in a state that will disable thePOR circuit 230 is extremely low or, as explained below, essentially zero for practical purposes. Some time after the device is powered up and initialized, the storage elements 400 may be written with the one value that will result in thedecode logic 410 disabling or allowing disabling of thePOR circuit 230. Disabling of thePOR circuit 230 helps the device conserve power. - Exploring the probability of the storage elements 400 powering up in the undesired state (i.e., state that disables the POR circuit 230) involves two considerations. First, if the power up state of the storage elements 400 is completely arbitrary, the probability of powering up in the desired state is a simple calculation. Assuming binary logic is employed in the design of the storage elements 400 and the
decode logic 410, the probability of the single undesired state coming up out of all the possible states is 1 in 2N, where N is the number of storage elements 400. - A second consideration is that identical elements in an identical environment (e.g., process, temperature, voltage, power supply ramp profile, location inside the device) tend to power up in the same state. This can be exploited to improve the probability of power up in the desired state if the storage elements are kept as identical as practically possible. Assuming binary logic, if the storage elements power up to output either all logical HIGH or all logical LOW, then a decoding logic that requires approximately half of the storage elements to output a logical HIGH and half to output a logical LOW will have a very low probability of powering up in the undesired state. This can improve the probability of proper power up beyond the simple random-state calculation described above if all the elements power up randomly. For example, in the case with 16 storage elements, assume there is a 90% chance that all storage elements will power up in the identical state, and a select eight storage elements must output a logical HIGH and the remaining eight storage elements must output a logical LOW in order to enter the state that allows a POR circuit to be disabled. In that case, the probability of a successful power up increases from about 1 in 65536 to 1 in 100,000,000. Therefore, it can be seen that by choosing a large enough number of storage elements, the probability of powering up in the undesired state can be made essentially zero. That is, the probability of powering up in the undesired state can be made small enough so that the number of power up events required to achieve a reasonable probability of failure can be much greater than the practical number power ups a device will undergo in its lifetime.
-
FIG. 5 schematically shows thestochastic reset circuit 310 being driven by awrite mechanism 510, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thewrite mechanism 510 may comprise electrical circuitry for writing a value into the storage elements 400. For example, thewrite mechanism 510 may comprise one or more registers of a microprocessor. Software may be used to write a disable code (i.e., unique value that will result in assertion of the AllowDis signal) into the register, which in turn outputs the disable code into the storage elements 400. Alternately, the storage elements 400 may form registers that are written to by thewrite mechanism 510. The storage elements 400 present the disable code to thedecode logic 410, which decodes the disable code as an instruction to assert its AllowDis signal. Assertion of the AllowDis signal disables or allows disabling of thePOR circuit 230. - As can be appreciated, the number of storage elements 400 may be increased to improve the probability of the
stochastic reset circuit 310 enabling thePOR circuit 230 during power up. The disable code to be entered into the storage elements 400 to disable thePOR circuit 230 may also be chosen to maximize the chance of thestorage elements 230 powering up with an output value that is different from the disable code. For example, the disable code may have a random value that has nearly equal number of logical HIGHs and logical LOWs. - Preferably, the control signal that disables the POR circuit is active HIGH so that the signal is at logical LOW during low power supply levels, such as during a power up, thereby enabling the POR circuit. For example, the AllowDis signal is preferably active HIGH. This way, the
POR circuit 230 is enabled when the AllowDis signal is at logical LOW, a logical level that may be relatively easy to generate at low power levels. -
FIG. 6 shows further details of aPOR circuit 230 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. ThePOR circuit 230 receives a Disable signal and outputs a power on reset signal. The Disable signal may be the AllowDis signal of the stochastic reset circuit 310 (seeFIG. 3 ), for example. In the example ofFIG. 6 , a transistor Q2 controls the feeding of a power supply Vdd to the rest of thePOR circuit 230 except the NORgate 610, which is always connected to Vdd. The transistor Q2 turns OFF when the Disable signal is asserted (logical HIGH inFIG. 6 ), thereby powering down thePOR circuit 230 to achieve low power consumption. Asserting the Disable signal also forces the power on reset signal at the output of the NORgate 610 to be deasserted (logical LOW inFIG. 6 ). - The power supply Vdd is provided to the
POR circuit 230 when the Disable signal is deasserted (logical LOW inFIG. 6 ). In that case, the resistor ladder comprising resistors R4 and R5 scales the voltage of the power supply Vdd. The resistor R6 pulls up the input to theinverter 604 when a transistor Q3 is OFF, such as when Vdd is too low to generate sufficient voltage across the resistor R5. This results in the output of theinverter 604 driving a logical LOW into an input of the NORgate 610. With the Disable signal deasserted and the output of theinverter 604 at logical LOW, the power on reset signal is thus asserted at low Vdd. - Upon power up, Vdd increases to a point where the voltage across resistor R5 is sufficient to turn ON the transistor Q3. At that point, the transistor Q3 pulls the input of the
inverter 604 to ground, resulting in a logical HIGH being presented at an input of the NORgate 610. With the Disable signal deasserted and the output of theinverter 604 at logical HIGH, the power on reset signal at the output of the NORgate 610 is deasserted. The power on reset signal may be used to reset the device that incorporates thePOR circuit 230 to ensure proper initialization. - As can be appreciated, other factors may be taken into account before disabling the
POR circuit 230. For example, besides requiring writing of a disable code in thestochastic reset circuit 310, other conditions may have to be met before thePOR circuit 230 is powered down. For example, the AllowDis signal may be qualified by another signal. - In the example of
FIG. 7 , both the AllowDis signal and a Sleep signal must be asserted to disable thePOR circuit 230. As previously described, the AllowDis signal may be asserted by writing the disable code into the storage elements of thestochastic reset circuit 310. The Sleep signal may come from other parts of the device to indicate that the device is going into sleep mode, which is a power conservation mode of the device. The Sleep signal and the AllowDis signal are ANDed by the ANDgate 720, which outputs the Disable signal to thePOR circuit 230 when both conditions (sleep mode and entry of disable code) for disabling thePOR circuit 230 are satisfied. This way, thePOR circuit 230 can only be disabled during sleep mode. -
FIG. 8 schematically shows aPOR circuit 830 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. ThePOR circuit 830 is similar in design and operation to thePOR circuit 230 ofFIG. 6 except for the addition of a transistor Q4 to accept a Sleep signal. In the example ofFIG. 8 , a deasserted Sleep signal (logical LOW inFIG. 8 ) turns ON the transistor Q4 to allow the power supply Vdd to be provided to thePOR circuit 830 even when the Disable signal is asserted. Thus, both the Sleep signal and the Disable signal need to be asserted (both logical HIGH inFIG. 8 ) to turn OFF thePOR circuit 830. To prevent glitching the power on reset signal at the output of the NORgate 610, the Disable signal may be asserted before asserting the Sleep signal to power down thePOR circuit 830 for sleep mode. To reawaken from sleep mode during normal operation, the Sleep signal may be deasserted while keeping the Disable signal asserted. Other components of thePOR circuit 830 have been previously described in connection withFIG. 6 . The configurations shown inFIGS. 6 and 8 are exemplary, and additional devices may be introduced to drive nets to logical HIGH or LOW in the disabled state to achieve zero or low power consumption. - Improvements to power on reset circuits have been disclosed. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been provided, it is to be understood that these embodiments are for illustration purposes and not limiting. Many additional embodiments will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art reading this disclosure.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/367,139 US7265595B1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2006-03-03 | Stochastic reset circuit |
PCT/US2007/005011 WO2007103049A2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-02-26 | Stochastic reset circuit |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/367,139 US7265595B1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2006-03-03 | Stochastic reset circuit |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7265595B1 US7265595B1 (en) | 2007-09-04 |
US20070205815A1 true US20070205815A1 (en) | 2007-09-06 |
Family
ID=38456904
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/367,139 Active US7265595B1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2006-03-03 | Stochastic reset circuit |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7265595B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007103049A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130145193A1 (en) * | 2010-08-25 | 2013-06-06 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Data processing device and data processing system |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100930410B1 (en) * | 2008-03-12 | 2009-12-08 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | Fuse Circuits and Control Methods for Semiconductor Integrated Circuits |
CN101834586A (en) * | 2010-04-21 | 2010-09-15 | 四川和芯微电子股份有限公司 | Random signal generating circuit and method |
US8531194B2 (en) | 2011-03-24 | 2013-09-10 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Selectable threshold reset circuit |
CN103748752B (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2017-12-08 | 马维尔国际贸易有限公司 | Start-up circuit |
Citations (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5115146A (en) * | 1990-08-17 | 1992-05-19 | Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. | Power-on reset circuit for controlling test mode entry |
US5187389A (en) * | 1991-05-03 | 1993-02-16 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Noise resistant low voltage brownout detector with shut off option |
US5394104A (en) * | 1992-06-25 | 1995-02-28 | Xilinx, Inc. | Power-on reset circuit including dual sense amplifiers |
US5523709A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1996-06-04 | Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. | Power-on reset circuit and method |
US5528182A (en) * | 1993-08-02 | 1996-06-18 | Nec Corporation | Power-on signal generating circuit operating with low-dissipation current |
US5778238A (en) * | 1996-06-19 | 1998-07-07 | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Power-down reset circuit |
US5844434A (en) * | 1997-04-24 | 1998-12-01 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Start-up circuit for maximum headroom CMOS devices |
US6060918A (en) * | 1993-08-17 | 2000-05-09 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Start-up circuit |
US6204701B1 (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 2001-03-20 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Power up detection circuit |
US6259286B1 (en) * | 1999-10-15 | 2001-07-10 | Triscend Corporation | Method and apparatus for a power-on-reset system |
US6271714B1 (en) * | 1998-04-13 | 2001-08-07 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Substrate voltage generator for semiconductor device |
US20020027460A1 (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2002-03-07 | Fujitsu Limited | Starting circuit for integrated circuit device |
US6362669B1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2002-03-26 | Xilinx, Inc. | Structure and method for initializing IC devices during unstable power-up |
US6437614B1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2002-08-20 | Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. | Low voltage reset circuit device that is not influenced by temperature and manufacturing process |
US20030011411A1 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2003-01-16 | Scott Sterrantino | Power-up control circuit |
US6621311B2 (en) * | 2000-12-30 | 2003-09-16 | Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. | Power noise prevention circuit in microcontroller unit |
US6677787B1 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2004-01-13 | Intel Corporation | Power indication circuit for a processor |
US20040012418A1 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2004-01-22 | Kim Kyung Whan | Power-up circuit |
US20040066218A1 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-04-08 | Koji Suzuki | Power-on reset circuit |
US6784704B2 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2004-08-31 | Fujitsu Limited | Semiconductor integrated circuit having circuit for changing timing of inactivating power-on resetting circuit |
US20040189357A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Power-up detector |
US6854067B1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2005-02-08 | Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | Method and system for interaction between a processor and a power on reset circuit to dynamically control power states in a microcontroller |
US6879193B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2005-04-12 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor integrated circuit and its reset method |
US6879194B1 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2005-04-12 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Apparatus and method for an active power-on reset current comparator circuit |
US20050140406A1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-30 | Pierre Rizzo | Power-on reset device |
US20050189970A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Yoshihiro Nakatake | Semiconductor integrated circuit having a power-on reset circuit in a semiconductor memory device |
US20050195000A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-08 | Parker Rachael J. | Power-on detect circuit for use with multiple voltage domains |
-
2006
- 2006-03-03 US US11/367,139 patent/US7265595B1/en active Active
-
2007
- 2007-02-26 WO PCT/US2007/005011 patent/WO2007103049A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5115146A (en) * | 1990-08-17 | 1992-05-19 | Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. | Power-on reset circuit for controlling test mode entry |
US5187389A (en) * | 1991-05-03 | 1993-02-16 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Noise resistant low voltage brownout detector with shut off option |
US5394104A (en) * | 1992-06-25 | 1995-02-28 | Xilinx, Inc. | Power-on reset circuit including dual sense amplifiers |
US5528182A (en) * | 1993-08-02 | 1996-06-18 | Nec Corporation | Power-on signal generating circuit operating with low-dissipation current |
US6060918A (en) * | 1993-08-17 | 2000-05-09 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Start-up circuit |
US6204701B1 (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 2001-03-20 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Power up detection circuit |
US5523709A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1996-06-04 | Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. | Power-on reset circuit and method |
US5778238A (en) * | 1996-06-19 | 1998-07-07 | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Power-down reset circuit |
US5844434A (en) * | 1997-04-24 | 1998-12-01 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Start-up circuit for maximum headroom CMOS devices |
US6271714B1 (en) * | 1998-04-13 | 2001-08-07 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Substrate voltage generator for semiconductor device |
US20020027460A1 (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2002-03-07 | Fujitsu Limited | Starting circuit for integrated circuit device |
US6259286B1 (en) * | 1999-10-15 | 2001-07-10 | Triscend Corporation | Method and apparatus for a power-on-reset system |
US6362669B1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2002-03-26 | Xilinx, Inc. | Structure and method for initializing IC devices during unstable power-up |
US6784704B2 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2004-08-31 | Fujitsu Limited | Semiconductor integrated circuit having circuit for changing timing of inactivating power-on resetting circuit |
US6854067B1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2005-02-08 | Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | Method and system for interaction between a processor and a power on reset circuit to dynamically control power states in a microcontroller |
US6621311B2 (en) * | 2000-12-30 | 2003-09-16 | Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. | Power noise prevention circuit in microcontroller unit |
US6437614B1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2002-08-20 | Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. | Low voltage reset circuit device that is not influenced by temperature and manufacturing process |
US20030011411A1 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2003-01-16 | Scott Sterrantino | Power-up control circuit |
US6879193B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2005-04-12 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor integrated circuit and its reset method |
US6677787B1 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2004-01-13 | Intel Corporation | Power indication circuit for a processor |
US20040012418A1 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2004-01-22 | Kim Kyung Whan | Power-up circuit |
US20040066218A1 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-04-08 | Koji Suzuki | Power-on reset circuit |
US20040189357A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Power-up detector |
US6879194B1 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2005-04-12 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Apparatus and method for an active power-on reset current comparator circuit |
US20050140406A1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-30 | Pierre Rizzo | Power-on reset device |
US20050189970A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Yoshihiro Nakatake | Semiconductor integrated circuit having a power-on reset circuit in a semiconductor memory device |
US20050195000A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-08 | Parker Rachael J. | Power-on detect circuit for use with multiple voltage domains |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130145193A1 (en) * | 2010-08-25 | 2013-06-06 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Data processing device and data processing system |
US9239612B2 (en) * | 2010-08-25 | 2016-01-19 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | First power-on reset circuit with higher power consumption than a second power-on reset circuit |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7265595B1 (en) | 2007-09-04 |
WO2007103049A2 (en) | 2007-09-13 |
WO2007103049A3 (en) | 2008-04-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9922684B2 (en) | Memory device ultra-deep power-down mode exit control | |
JP5385156B2 (en) | Method for reducing power consumption in a system having a semiconductor device and a plurality of interconnect devices | |
US9483108B2 (en) | Ultra-deep power-down mode for memory devices | |
US10539989B1 (en) | Memory device alert of completion of internally self-timed power-up and reset operations | |
JP5101286B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for protecting integrated circuits from erroneous operation | |
US7915920B2 (en) | Low latency, power-down safe level shifter | |
US7265595B1 (en) | Stochastic reset circuit | |
US8923088B2 (en) | Solid state storage device with sleep control circuit | |
EP3311384B1 (en) | Ultra-deep power down mode control in a memory device | |
US9471140B2 (en) | Valid context status retention in processor power mode management | |
KR20140122567A (en) | Semiconductor memory device including power on reset circuit | |
US20090219081A1 (en) | Internal voltage generator of semiconductor memory device | |
US7296170B1 (en) | Clock controller with clock source fail-safe logic | |
CN111161763B (en) | Power gating system | |
US10171110B1 (en) | Sequential power transitioning of multiple data decoders | |
US7795932B2 (en) | Reset signal generator and a method for generating reset signal of a semiconductor integrated circuit | |
US5559981A (en) | Pseudo static mask option register and method therefor | |
US9116701B2 (en) | Memory unit, information processing device, and method | |
US8909849B2 (en) | Pipeline architecture for scalable performance on memory | |
US20230018420A1 (en) | Sram with fast, controlled peak current, power efficient array reset, and data corruption modes for secure applications | |
US7336542B2 (en) | Nonvolatile latch | |
CN116030849A (en) | Low power standby mode of memory device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KUTZ, HAROLD;WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY;WHATELY, MORGAN;REEL/FRAME:017644/0510 Effective date: 20050302 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION;SPANSION LLC;REEL/FRAME:035240/0429 Effective date: 20150312 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.;REEL/FRAME:050896/0366 Effective date: 20190731 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., NEW YORK Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 8647899 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 035240 FRAME 0429. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTERST;ASSIGNORS:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION;SPANSION LLC;REEL/FRAME:058002/0470 Effective date: 20150312 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SPANSION LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:059410/0438 Effective date: 20200416 Owner name: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:059410/0438 Effective date: 20200416 |