US20070199373A1 - Acceleration sensor status detecting apparatus - Google Patents
Acceleration sensor status detecting apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070199373A1 US20070199373A1 US11/711,744 US71174407A US2007199373A1 US 20070199373 A1 US20070199373 A1 US 20070199373A1 US 71174407 A US71174407 A US 71174407A US 2007199373 A1 US2007199373 A1 US 2007199373A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- acceleration sensor
- state
- predetermined time
- limit value
- detecting apparatus
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01P—MEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
- G01P21/00—Testing or calibrating of apparatus or devices covered by the preceding groups
Definitions
- This invention generally relates to an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus. More particularly, this invention pertains to an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus that detects a state of an acceleration sensor provided at a vibrating body.
- an acceleration sensor is provided at an engine mount so as to control the vibration isolator based on a measured result of the acceleration sensor.
- the vibration isolator cannot be controlled correctly and thus an effective elimination of vibration cannot be achieved.
- various acceleration sensor state detecting apparatuses have been considered for detecting whether the acceleration sensor operates properly.
- JP07-174787A and JP11-190741A each disclose an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus.
- an upper limit value and a lower limit value are defined relative to a measured result of an acceleration sensor on the basis of a measured object thereof.
- an error in the acceleration sensor is determined.
- a rotation sensor for detecting a rotation speed of wheels is provided so as to detect a state of an acceleration sensor that measures an acceleration of a vehicle in motion. Then, an acceleration acquired on the basis of a measured result of the rotation sensor, and a measured result of the acceleration sensor are compared so as to detect an error in the acceleration sensor.
- the error in the acceleration sensor can be detected if the measured value thereof is retained over the upper limit value or below the lower limit value.
- an error that may possibly occur in the acceleration sensor when the measured value is specified between the upper limit value and the lower limit value cannot be detected.
- an error in the acceleration sensor occurring when the measured value thereof is retained between the upper limit value and the lower limit value can be detected.
- the measured values by the other sensor and the acceleration sensor are compared for the detection of the error in the acceleration sensor, an error that might occur, in fact, in the other sensor may be mistakenly determined as the error in the acceleration sensor.
- an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus for detecting a state of an acceleration sensor provided at a vibrating body includes a calculating method for calculating a difference between measured results of the acceleration sensor obtained per first predetermined time that is shorter than a vibration period of the vibrating body, and a determining method for determining that the acceleration sensor is in an error state in a case that a state in which the difference calculated falls into a range between a predetermined upper limit value and a predetermined lower limit value continues for a second predetermined time or more.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a vibration isolator of an automobile engine
- FIGS. 3A and 3B are views illustrating an example condition for determining a state of the acceleration sensor.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart for detecting a state of the acceleration sensor.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus 10 .
- the state detecting apparatus 10 detects a state of an acceleration sensor 7 based on an output signal g that is a measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 .
- the state detecting apparatus 10 includes a calculating means 11 and a determining means 12 .
- the calculating means 11 calculates a difference between measured results of the acceleration sensor 7 that are obtained per first predetermined time dt.
- the determining means 12 determines whether the acceleration sensor 7 operates normally and properly on the basis of the calculated difference of the measured results, and, for example, predetermined upper limit and lower limit values that have been specified according to a vibrating state of a vibrating body. Precisely, the determining means 12 determines that an error occurs in the acceleration sensor 7 when a state, in which the calculated difference of the measured results falls into a range between the upper limit value and the lower limit value, continues for a second predetermined time or longer.
- the output signal from the acceleration sensor 7 is amplified by an input interface circuit 5 d for signal amplification, for example, and is then input as an amplified signal G to the calculating means 11 .
- the calculating means 11 calculates a difference ⁇ G in the amplified signal G that is obtained per first predetermined time dt.
- the determining means 12 determines whether the acceleration sensor 7 operates normally on the basis of the calculated difference ⁇ G.
- the state detecting apparatus 10 also includes a frequency detecting means 41 for detecting a vibration frequency of the vibrating body.
- a detection result of the frequency detecting means 41 is transmitted via an input interface circuit 5 a to the calculating means 11 .
- the calculating means 11 determines the first predetermined time dt based on the detection result of the frequency detecting means 41 .
- the vibration isolator 100 of the engine 13 (vibrating body) generates vibration in an opposite phase to that of the engine 13 .
- the anti-phase vibration is generated by a solenoid 2 arranged at an engine mount 9 (vibrating body) so as to prevent the vibration of the engine 13 from being transmitted to a vehicle body.
- a vibration control ECU (Electronic Control Unit) 100 includes a microcomputer 1 , a solenoid drive circuit 3 , a power supply circuit 8 , interface circuits 5 a to 5 d that perform electrical matching with various peripheral devices, and the like.
- the various peripheral devices include an engine control unit 4 , an in-vehicle communication bus 6 connected to other control units, and the like.
- the microcomputer 1 which forms the core of the vibration control ECU 100 , functions as the state detecting apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment.
- the microcomputer 1 receives an engine rotational signal (hereinafter referred to as “TACH signal”) via the input interface circuit 5 a from the engine control unit 4 . Afterwards, the microcomputer 1 generates a control signal such as a control pulse signal for driving the solenoid 2 , which is then output to the solenoid drive circuit 3 . Precisely, the microcomputer 1 outputs the control signal for switching a direction of power supply of the solenoid 2 , a pulse width modulation signal Po, and the like.
- TACH signal engine rotational signal
- Po pulse width modulation signal
- the solenoid 2 is controlled by the microcomputer 1 so that the solenoid 2 generates the vibration in an opposite phase to that of the engine 13 .
- the acceleration sensor 7 is provided at the engine mount 9 .
- the acceleration sensor 7 inputs an acceleration signal obtained by the vibration of the engine 13 via an input interface circuit 5 c to the microcomputer 1 .
- the microcomputer 1 controls the solenoid 2 based on the acceleration signal from the acceleration sensor 7 .
- the vibration of the engine 13 may be influenced by temperature, and the like. Accordingly, in order to improve accuracy of vibration control, information such as outside air temperature is input from the other control unit that includes a temperature sensor and the like to the microcomputer 1 via the communication bus 6 and a communication interface 5 b.
- the microcomputer 1 includes a ROM that stores a program, a RAM serving as a backup memory during execution of a program, a timer that calculates a rotational number of the engine 13 based on the TACH signal, an A/D (analog-digital) converter that digitalizes an input voltage from the acceleration sensor 7 , and the like. Further, since a power supply voltage of the microcomputer 1 is low, i.e. 5V, 3.3V or the like in general, a voltage provided to the microcomputer 1 from a battery (not shown), i.e. 12V, 24V or the like, is converted by the power supply circuit 8 .
- the solenoid drive circuit 3 includes a bridge circuit for driving the solenoid 2 and a driver circuit for pressurizing a low voltage control signal input from the microcomputer 1 and connecting that pressurized control signal to the bridge circuit.
- the bridge circuit includes a power transistor, a power MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor), and the like.
- the microcomputer 1 performs PWM control on the solenoid 2 by means of the solenoid drive circuit 3 .
- the acceleration signal from the acceleration sensor 7 as mentioned above is also input to the microcomputer 1 via the input interface circuit 5 d for signal amplification.
- the microcomputer 1 which serves as the state detecting apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment, determines whether the acceleration sensor 7 operates normally and appropriately on the basis of the amplified acceleration signal. Further, the microcomputer 1 determines a first predetermined time, a second predetermined time, and upper and lower limit values used for error detection based on the TACH signal input through the input interface circuit 5 a from the engine control unit 4 . At this time, the first predetermined time may be equal to or smaller than a third of a half vibration period of the engine 13 .
- FIGS. 3A and 3B are views illustrating an example condition used for determining whether the acceleration sensor 7 is in an error state or not.
- FIG. 3A illustrates g (t) that is a change with time in output signal g from the acceleration sensor 7 .
- FIG. 3B illustrates g (t)/dt that is a variation in g (t) per first predetermined time.
- T 1 , T 2 and T 3 in FIGS. 3A and 3B each illustrate one vibration period of the engine 13 .
- 3B is a determination time for determining that the acceleration sensor 7 is in the error state and corresponds to the second predetermined time according to the present embodiment.
- the acceleration sensor 7 operates normally and appropriately in the period of T 1 and T 2 .
- the acceleration sensor 7 is in the error state in which, for example, the change with time in output signal g (t) is retained at a substantially constant value.
- the acceleration sensor 7 is in the error state when a wiring for output the acceleration signal is shorted with the other wiring, the acceleration cannot be detected because of the failure of the acceleration sensor 7 itself, and the like.
- the vibration of the engine 13 is not completely eliminated. Accordingly, when the acceleration sensor 7 is in the normal operating state, the acceleration sensor 7 detects the vibration and then the change with time in output signal g (t) represents a vibration waveform as in the period of T 1 and T 2 in FIG. 3A . On the other hand, when the acceleration sensor 7 is in the error state, the change with time in output signal g (t) represents, for example, a substantially constant value as in the period of T 3 in FIG. 3A instead of the vibration waveform.
- the variation in g (t) per first predetermined time dg (t)/dt represents the vibration waveform.
- dg (t)/dt exceeds an error detection upper limit value gth and falls below an error detection lower limit value ⁇ gth one time each during one vibration period of the engine 13 .
- dg (t)/dt is retained at a substantially constant value.
- dg (t)/dt is defined to be within a range between the error detection upper limit value gth and the error detection lower limit value ⁇ gth.
- the error in the acceleration sensor 7 can be determined.
- the determination time Tth is defined on the basis of frequency of the engine 13 and is equal to or greater than a half period, more precisely, one period, of the vibration of the engine 13 , for example.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B an example of detecting the error in the acceleration sensor 7 by monitoring the variation in g (t) per first predetermined time dg (t)/dt is illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B .
- the amplified signal G obtained by amplifying the output signal g from the acceleration sensor 7 may be used.
- the difference ⁇ G in the amplified signal G is used for detecting the state of the acceleration sensor 7 .
- a signal such as a high frequency noise other than the measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 may be mixed with the output signal of the acceleration sensor 7 .
- a noise may be appropriately eliminated by means of a low-pass filter.
- a phrase of “on the basis of the measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 ” includes not only a case in which the output signal g of the acceleration sensor 7 is used as it is but also a case in which the output signal g that has been appropriately processed, i.e. amplified or filtered, is used.
- Step 1 Step 1 (Step will hereinafter be referred to as “S”), the calculating means 11 obtains an amplified signal Gn. Then, in S 2 , the calculating means 11 calculates ⁇ Gn, which is a difference between the amplified signal Gn currently obtained and an amplified signal Gn ⁇ 1 obtained immediately before the amplified signal Gn.
- the determining means 12 receives the difference ⁇ Gn calculated by the calculating means 11 and determines whether or not the difference ⁇ Gn is above a predetermined upper limit value Gth and below a predetermined lower limit value ⁇ Gth in S 3 .
- an error time counter CT is incremented by one in S 5 .
- the error time counter CT is reset to zero in S 4 .
- the error time counter CT and an error time upper limit value CTMAX (which corresponds to the second predetermined time according to the present embodiment) are compared in S 6 .
- the acceleration sensor 7 is determined as in the error state in S 7 .
- an occupant of the vehicle may be warned of the error in the acceleration sensor 7 by a warning light turned on, for example.
- the controlling method of the vibration isolator 100 may be switched to a method not relating to the measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 .
- the difference ⁇ G is obtained by subtracting the amplified signal Gn ⁇ 1 acquired immediately before the currently obtained amplified signal Gn therefrom.
- the difference ⁇ G may be obtained by subtracting an amplified signal Gn ⁇ 2 from the currently acquired amplified signal Gn, or the like.
- absolute values of the upper limit value and the lower limit value are identical with each other. However, the absolute values can be different from each other.
- the acceleration sensor 7 in order to detect the state of the acceleration sensor 7 provided at the engine mount 9 , the acceleration sensor 7 is determined as in the error state when a sate, in which the difference between the measured results of the acceleration sensor 7 obtained per first predetermined time through calculation by the calculating means 11 is neither above the predetermined upper limit value Gth nor below the predetermined lower limit value ⁇ Gth, continues for the second predetermined time or longer. That is, the state of the acceleration sensor 7 is detected on the basis of the measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 , i.e. on the basis of whether the measured result fluctuates. Accordingly, even when the measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 is fixed at an intermediate value between the upper limit value and the lower limit value, the error in the acceleration sensor 7 can be detected.
- the state of the acceleration sensor 7 is detected on the basis of the measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 itself instead of a comparison between a measured result of the other sensor and a measured result of the acceleration sensor 7 as in the conventional manner.
- the error in the acceleration sensor 7 can be prevented from being wrongly detected at the time the acceleration sensor 7 is actually in the normal operating state.
- the acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus with high reliability can be obtained accordingly. As a result, the state of the acceleration sensor 7 can be appropriately detected.
- At least three measured results used for acquiring the difference therebetween can be obtained within a half vibration period of the engine 13 . That is, the difference is not obtained from identical measured values. As a result, the error in the acceleration sensor 7 can be prevented from being wrongly detected at the time the acceleration sensor 7 is actually in the normal operating state.
- the first predetermined time and the second predetermined time can be defined, on the basis of the measured result of a frequency detecting means, to an appropriate value in response to the number of vibrations of the vibrating body.
- the state of the acceleration sensor can be more precisely detected.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Combined Controls Of Internal Combustion Engines (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is based on and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-052238, filed on Feb. 28, 2006, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- This invention generally relates to an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus. More particularly, this invention pertains to an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus that detects a state of an acceleration sensor provided at a vibrating body.
- In the case of eliminating or preventing vibration of a vibrating body such as an engine by using a vibration isolator, for example, an acceleration sensor is provided at an engine mount so as to control the vibration isolator based on a measured result of the acceleration sensor. In this case, if the acceleration sensor does not operate normally and properly, the vibration isolator cannot be controlled correctly and thus an effective elimination of vibration cannot be achieved. In order to avoid such issue, various acceleration sensor state detecting apparatuses have been considered for detecting whether the acceleration sensor operates properly.
- JP07-174787A and JP11-190741A each disclose an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus. According to the acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus disclosed in JP07-174787A, an upper limit value and a lower limit value are defined relative to a measured result of an acceleration sensor on the basis of a measured object thereof. When a state in which the measured result is above the upper limit value or below the lower limit value continues for a predetermined time or more, an error in the acceleration sensor is determined. In addition, according to the acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus disclosed in JP11-190741A, a rotation sensor for detecting a rotation speed of wheels is provided so as to detect a state of an acceleration sensor that measures an acceleration of a vehicle in motion. Then, an acceleration acquired on the basis of a measured result of the rotation sensor, and a measured result of the acceleration sensor are compared so as to detect an error in the acceleration sensor.
- According to the acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus disclosed in JP07-174787A, the error in the acceleration sensor can be detected if the measured value thereof is retained over the upper limit value or below the lower limit value. However, an error that may possibly occur in the acceleration sensor when the measured value is specified between the upper limit value and the lower limit value cannot be detected. Further, according to the acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus disclosed in JP11-190741A, an error in the acceleration sensor occurring when the measured value thereof is retained between the upper limit value and the lower limit value can be detected. However, since the measured values by the other sensor and the acceleration sensor are compared for the detection of the error in the acceleration sensor, an error that might occur, in fact, in the other sensor may be mistakenly determined as the error in the acceleration sensor.
- Thus, a need exists for an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus that can accurately detect a state of an acceleration sensor.
- According to an aspect of the present invention, an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus for detecting a state of an acceleration sensor provided at a vibrating body includes a calculating method for calculating a difference between measured results of the acceleration sensor obtained per first predetermined time that is shorter than a vibration period of the vibrating body, and a determining method for determining that the acceleration sensor is in an error state in a case that a state in which the difference calculated falls into a range between a predetermined upper limit value and a predetermined lower limit value continues for a second predetermined time or more.
- The foregoing and additional features and characteristics of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description considered with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus; -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a vibration isolator of an automobile engine; -
FIGS. 3A and 3B are views illustrating an example condition for determining a state of the acceleration sensor; and -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart for detecting a state of the acceleration sensor. - An embodiment of the present invention will be explained with reference to the attached drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an acceleration sensorstate detecting apparatus 10. Thestate detecting apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment detects a state of anacceleration sensor 7 based on an output signal g that is a measured result of theacceleration sensor 7. Thestate detecting apparatus 10 includes a calculatingmeans 11 and a determiningmeans 12. The calculating means 11 calculates a difference between measured results of theacceleration sensor 7 that are obtained per first predetermined time dt. The determining means 12 determines whether theacceleration sensor 7 operates normally and properly on the basis of the calculated difference of the measured results, and, for example, predetermined upper limit and lower limit values that have been specified according to a vibrating state of a vibrating body. Precisely, the determining means 12 determines that an error occurs in theacceleration sensor 7 when a state, in which the calculated difference of the measured results falls into a range between the upper limit value and the lower limit value, continues for a second predetermined time or longer. - According to the present embodiment, the output signal from the
acceleration sensor 7 is amplified by aninput interface circuit 5 d for signal amplification, for example, and is then input as an amplified signal G to the calculatingmeans 11. The calculating means 11 calculates a difference ΔG in the amplified signal G that is obtained per first predetermined time dt. The determining means 12 determines whether theacceleration sensor 7 operates normally on the basis of the calculated difference ΔG. - The
state detecting apparatus 10 also includes a frequency detecting means 41 for detecting a vibration frequency of the vibrating body. A detection result of the frequency detecting means 41 is transmitted via aninput interface circuit 5 a to the calculatingmeans 11. The calculating means 11 determines the first predetermined time dt based on the detection result of the frequency detecting means 41. - A case in which the
state detecting apparatus 10 is employed in avibration isolator 100 of anengine 13 of a vehicle will be explained with reference toFIG. 2 . Thevibration isolator 100 of the engine 13 (vibrating body) generates vibration in an opposite phase to that of theengine 13. Precisely, the anti-phase vibration is generated by asolenoid 2 arranged at an engine mount 9 (vibrating body) so as to prevent the vibration of theengine 13 from being transmitted to a vehicle body. - As illustrated in
FIG. 2 , the vibration isolator, precisely, a vibration control ECU (Electronic Control Unit) 100 includes amicrocomputer 1, asolenoid drive circuit 3, apower supply circuit 8,interface circuits 5 a to 5 d that perform electrical matching with various peripheral devices, and the like. In this case, the various peripheral devices include anengine control unit 4, an in-vehicle communication bus 6 connected to other control units, and the like. - The
microcomputer 1, which forms the core of thevibration control ECU 100, functions as thestate detecting apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment. Themicrocomputer 1 receives an engine rotational signal (hereinafter referred to as “TACH signal”) via theinput interface circuit 5 a from theengine control unit 4. Afterwards, themicrocomputer 1 generates a control signal such as a control pulse signal for driving thesolenoid 2, which is then output to thesolenoid drive circuit 3. Precisely, themicrocomputer 1 outputs the control signal for switching a direction of power supply of thesolenoid 2, a pulse width modulation signal Po, and the like. - As mentioned above, the
solenoid 2 is controlled by themicrocomputer 1 so that thesolenoid 2 generates the vibration in an opposite phase to that of theengine 13. In order to monitor the vibrating state of theengine 13, theacceleration sensor 7 is provided at theengine mount 9. Theacceleration sensor 7 inputs an acceleration signal obtained by the vibration of theengine 13 via aninput interface circuit 5 c to themicrocomputer 1. Themicrocomputer 1 controls thesolenoid 2 based on the acceleration signal from theacceleration sensor 7. At this time, the vibration of theengine 13 may be influenced by temperature, and the like. Accordingly, in order to improve accuracy of vibration control, information such as outside air temperature is input from the other control unit that includes a temperature sensor and the like to themicrocomputer 1 via the communication bus 6 and acommunication interface 5 b. - The
microcomputer 1 includes a ROM that stores a program, a RAM serving as a backup memory during execution of a program, a timer that calculates a rotational number of theengine 13 based on the TACH signal, an A/D (analog-digital) converter that digitalizes an input voltage from theacceleration sensor 7, and the like. Further, since a power supply voltage of themicrocomputer 1 is low, i.e. 5V, 3.3V or the like in general, a voltage provided to themicrocomputer 1 from a battery (not shown), i.e. 12V, 24V or the like, is converted by thepower supply circuit 8. - Meanwhile, a relatively high voltage such as 12V or 24V is provided via the battery or the
power supply circuit 8 to thesolenoid 2 and thesolenoid drive circuit 3 since thesolenoid 2 and thesolenoid drive circuit 3 are power circuits. Thesolenoid drive circuit 3 includes a bridge circuit for driving thesolenoid 2 and a driver circuit for pressurizing a low voltage control signal input from themicrocomputer 1 and connecting that pressurized control signal to the bridge circuit. The bridge circuit includes a power transistor, a power MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor), and the like. Themicrocomputer 1 performs PWM control on thesolenoid 2 by means of thesolenoid drive circuit 3. - The acceleration signal from the
acceleration sensor 7 as mentioned above is also input to themicrocomputer 1 via theinput interface circuit 5 d for signal amplification. Themicrocomputer 1, which serves as thestate detecting apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment, determines whether theacceleration sensor 7 operates normally and appropriately on the basis of the amplified acceleration signal. Further, themicrocomputer 1 determines a first predetermined time, a second predetermined time, and upper and lower limit values used for error detection based on the TACH signal input through theinput interface circuit 5 a from theengine control unit 4. At this time, the first predetermined time may be equal to or smaller than a third of a half vibration period of theengine 13. - Next, the detection of an error in the
acceleration sensor 7 conducted by thestate detecting apparatus 10 will be explained with reference toFIGS. 3A and 3B .FIGS. 3A and 3B are views illustrating an example condition used for determining whether theacceleration sensor 7 is in an error state or not. Precisely,FIG. 3A illustrates g (t) that is a change with time in output signal g from theacceleration sensor 7.FIG. 3B illustrates g (t)/dt that is a variation in g (t) per first predetermined time. T1, T2 and T3 inFIGS. 3A and 3B each illustrate one vibration period of theengine 13. Tth inFIG. 3B is a determination time for determining that theacceleration sensor 7 is in the error state and corresponds to the second predetermined time according to the present embodiment. As illustrated inFIGS. 3A and 3B , theacceleration sensor 7 operates normally and appropriately in the period of T1 and T2. On the other hand, during and after the period of T3, theacceleration sensor 7 is in the error state in which, for example, the change with time in output signal g (t) is retained at a substantially constant value. Theacceleration sensor 7 is in the error state when a wiring for output the acceleration signal is shorted with the other wiring, the acceleration cannot be detected because of the failure of theacceleration sensor 7 itself, and the like. - Even during the operation of the
vibration isolator 100, the vibration of theengine 13 is not completely eliminated. Accordingly, when theacceleration sensor 7 is in the normal operating state, theacceleration sensor 7 detects the vibration and then the change with time in output signal g (t) represents a vibration waveform as in the period of T1 and T2 inFIG. 3A . On the other hand, when theacceleration sensor 7 is in the error state, the change with time in output signal g (t) represents, for example, a substantially constant value as in the period of T3 inFIG. 3A instead of the vibration waveform. - As illustrated in
FIG. 3B , in the cases where theacceleration sensor 7 is in the normal operating state, the variation in g (t) per first predetermined time dg (t)/dt represents the vibration waveform. Thus, dg (t)/dt exceeds an error detection upper limit value gth and falls below an error detection lower limit value −gth one time each during one vibration period of theengine 13. On the other hand, in the cases where theacceleration sensor 7 is in the error state, dg (t)/dt is retained at a substantially constant value. Thus, dg (t)/dt is defined to be within a range between the error detection upper limit value gth and the error detection lower limit value −gth. Accordingly, by monitoring whether a state, in which calculated dg (t)/dt is not above the upper limit value and not below the lower limit value, continues for the determination time Tth (which corresponds to the second predetermined time according to the present embodiment), the error in theacceleration sensor 7 can be determined. The determination time Tth is defined on the basis of frequency of theengine 13 and is equal to or greater than a half period, more precisely, one period, of the vibration of theengine 13, for example. - For the purpose of simple explanation, an example of detecting the error in the
acceleration sensor 7 by monitoring the variation in g (t) per first predetermined time dg (t)/dt is illustrated inFIGS. 3A and 3B . In this case, in fact, since dt is an extremely short period, the variation in g (t) per first predetermined time dg (t)/dt is extremely small. Accordingly, the amplified signal G obtained by amplifying the output signal g from theacceleration sensor 7 may be used. Then, the difference ΔG in the amplified signal G is used for detecting the state of theacceleration sensor 7. Further, a signal such as a high frequency noise other than the measured result of theacceleration sensor 7 may be mixed with the output signal of theacceleration sensor 7. Thus, a noise may be appropriately eliminated by means of a low-pass filter. According to the present embodiment, a phrase of “on the basis of the measured result of theacceleration sensor 7” includes not only a case in which the output signal g of theacceleration sensor 7 is used as it is but also a case in which the output signal g that has been appropriately processed, i.e. amplified or filtered, is used. - An example of procedures for detecting the error in the
acceleration sensor 7 by thestate detecting apparatus 10 will be explained with reference to a flowchart illustrated inFIG. 4 . According to the present embodiment, the state of theacceleration sensor 7 is detected by using the amplified signal G that is obtained by amplifying the output signal g from theacceleration sensor 7. In Step 1 (Step will hereinafter be referred to as “S”), the calculating means 11 obtains an amplified signal Gn. Then, in S2, the calculating means 11 calculates ΔGn, which is a difference between the amplified signal Gn currently obtained and an amplified signal Gn−1 obtained immediately before the amplified signal Gn. - The determining means 12 receives the difference ΔGn calculated by the calculating means 11 and determines whether or not the difference ΔGn is above a predetermined upper limit value Gth and below a predetermined lower limit value −Gth in S3. When it is determined that the difference ΔGn is neither above the upper limit value Gth nor below the lower limit value −Gth, i.e. the difference ΔGn falls into a range between the upper limit value Gth and the lower limit value −Gth, an error time counter CT is incremented by one in S5. Meanwhile, when it is determined that the difference ΔGn is above the upper limit value Gth or below the lower limit value −Gth in S3, the error time counter CT is reset to zero in S4. Afterwards, the error time counter CT and an error time upper limit value CTMAX (which corresponds to the second predetermined time according to the present embodiment) are compared in S6. When it is determined that the error time counter CT exceeds the error time upper limit value CTMAX, the
acceleration sensor 7 is determined as in the error state in S7. At this time, an occupant of the vehicle may be warned of the error in theacceleration sensor 7 by a warning light turned on, for example. In addition, the controlling method of thevibration isolator 100 may be switched to a method not relating to the measured result of theacceleration sensor 7. On the other hand, when it is determined that the error time counter CT is equal to or smaller than the error time upper limit value CTMAX in S6, theacceleration sensor 7 is not determined as in the error state. The processes from S1 to S6 are repeated so as to keep detecting the state of theacceleration sensor 7. - According to the aforementioned embodiment, the difference ΔG is obtained by subtracting the amplified signal Gn−1 acquired immediately before the currently obtained amplified signal Gn therefrom. However, the difference ΔG may be obtained by subtracting an amplified signal Gn−2 from the currently acquired amplified signal Gn, or the like. Further, according to the aforementioned embodiment, absolute values of the upper limit value and the lower limit value are identical with each other. However, the absolute values can be different from each other.
- According to the aforementioned embodiment, in order to detect the state of the
acceleration sensor 7 provided at theengine mount 9, theacceleration sensor 7 is determined as in the error state when a sate, in which the difference between the measured results of theacceleration sensor 7 obtained per first predetermined time through calculation by the calculating means 11 is neither above the predetermined upper limit value Gth nor below the predetermined lower limit value −Gth, continues for the second predetermined time or longer. That is, the state of theacceleration sensor 7 is detected on the basis of the measured result of theacceleration sensor 7, i.e. on the basis of whether the measured result fluctuates. Accordingly, even when the measured result of theacceleration sensor 7 is fixed at an intermediate value between the upper limit value and the lower limit value, the error in theacceleration sensor 7 can be detected. Further, the state of theacceleration sensor 7 is detected on the basis of the measured result of theacceleration sensor 7 itself instead of a comparison between a measured result of the other sensor and a measured result of theacceleration sensor 7 as in the conventional manner. Thus, the error in theacceleration sensor 7 can be prevented from being wrongly detected at the time theacceleration sensor 7 is actually in the normal operating state. The acceleration sensor state detecting apparatus with high reliability can be obtained accordingly. As a result, the state of theacceleration sensor 7 can be appropriately detected. - Further, according to the aforementioned embodiment, at least three measured results used for acquiring the difference therebetween can be obtained within a half vibration period of the
engine 13. That is, the difference is not obtained from identical measured values. As a result, the error in theacceleration sensor 7 can be prevented from being wrongly detected at the time theacceleration sensor 7 is actually in the normal operating state. - Furthermore, according to the aforementioned embodiment, the first predetermined time and the second predetermined time can be defined, on the basis of the measured result of a frequency detecting means, to an appropriate value in response to the number of vibrations of the vibrating body. As a result, the state of the acceleration sensor can be more precisely detected.
- The principles, preferred embodiment and mode of operation of the present invention have been described in the foregoing specification. However, the invention which is intended to be protected is not to be construed as limited to the particular embodiments disclosed. Further, the embodiments described herein are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. Variations and changes may be made by others, and equivalents employed, without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Accordingly, it is expressly intended that all such variations, changes and equivalents which fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the claims, be embraced thereby.
Claims (4)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2006052238A JP2007232460A (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2006-02-28 | State detecting device for acceleration sensor |
JP2006-052238 | 2006-02-28 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070199373A1 true US20070199373A1 (en) | 2007-08-30 |
US7281522B1 US7281522B1 (en) | 2007-10-16 |
Family
ID=38442762
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/711,744 Expired - Fee Related US7281522B1 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2007-02-28 | Acceleration sensor status detecting apparatus |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7281522B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007232460A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130199809A1 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2013-08-08 | Alfing Montagetechnik Gmbh | Assembly device and assembly method |
US20190041425A1 (en) * | 2015-09-30 | 2019-02-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for detecting a defect in an acceleration sensor, and measuring system |
US10634697B2 (en) * | 2015-04-08 | 2020-04-28 | Hitachi, Ltd. | High-sensitivity sensor system, detection circuit, and detection method |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9014944B2 (en) * | 2009-06-18 | 2015-04-21 | United Technologies Corporation | Turbine engine speed and vibration sensing system |
CN101963547B (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2011-12-14 | 福建工程学院 | Special dynamic performance measuring and control system for vehicle rubber shock absorber |
US9047907B2 (en) * | 2011-06-23 | 2015-06-02 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Electronic device avoiding false detection of free fall event based on detected operating modes |
US9429590B2 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2016-08-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Accelerometer autocalibration in a mobile device |
US20130125651A1 (en) * | 2011-11-17 | 2013-05-23 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Fail safe test for a bandwidth check on inertial sensing components |
US8953274B1 (en) | 2013-06-06 | 2015-02-10 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Deceleration of spindle motor in disk drive |
US8885285B1 (en) | 2013-07-23 | 2014-11-11 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Impact detection for data storage device |
US9076471B1 (en) | 2013-07-31 | 2015-07-07 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Fall detection scheme using FFS |
CN103793618B (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2017-01-18 | 北京航天飞行控制中心 | Thermosphere atmospheric density correction method |
WO2018147158A1 (en) * | 2017-02-08 | 2018-08-16 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Acceleration sensor |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4418567A (en) * | 1979-10-19 | 1983-12-06 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Knock sensing apparatus with fail indicator for use in an internal combustion engine |
US5121729A (en) * | 1990-08-21 | 1992-06-16 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Knocking control method and apparatus for internal combustion engine |
US5212640A (en) * | 1988-09-09 | 1993-05-18 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automotive control system employing acceleration sensor and fault detecting system therefor |
US5265472A (en) * | 1989-07-26 | 1993-11-30 | Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft | Process for compensating acceleration sensor errors |
US5377523A (en) * | 1991-07-19 | 1995-01-03 | Mitsubishi Petrochemical Co., Ltd. | Acceleration sensor suitable for self-checking and a self-checking circuit therefore |
US5652374A (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 1997-07-29 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Method and apparatus for detecting failure in vibrating sensors |
US5713438A (en) * | 1996-03-25 | 1998-02-03 | Lord Corporation | Method and apparatus for non-model based decentralized adaptive feedforward active vibration control |
US6510397B1 (en) * | 1999-03-13 | 2003-01-21 | Textron Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for self-diagnosis of a sensor |
US6516651B1 (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2003-02-11 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Coriolis effect transducer |
US6682153B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2004-01-27 | Bosch Automotive Systems Corporation | Method for detecting output-stuck fault of car body acceleration sensor, apparatus for detecting output-stuck fault of car body acceleration sensor, and anti-lock braking system for car |
US6889655B1 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2005-05-10 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Device for controlling the ignition timing for internal combustion engines |
US7162911B2 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2007-01-16 | Denso Corporation | Semiconductor acceleration sensor and method of testing the same |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3351074B2 (en) | 1993-12-21 | 2002-11-25 | 株式会社デンソー | Abnormality detection device for acceleration sensor |
JPH11190741A (en) | 1997-12-26 | 1999-07-13 | Nisshinbo Ind Inc | Method for converting output value of g sensor into acceleration/deceleration of vehicle and method for detecting abnormality of g sensor |
KR19990062746A (en) | 1997-12-24 | 1999-07-26 | 모찌즈키 아키히로 | Output value correction and abnormal detection of mouse sensor |
JP4169174B2 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2008-10-22 | マツダ株式会社 | Abnormality detection device for vehicle running state detection sensor and vehicle behavior control device |
JP2001013160A (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2001-01-19 | Ubukata Seisakusho:Kk | Acceleration responding element and acceleration sensor |
JP2002022766A (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2002-01-23 | Hino Motors Ltd | Sensor failure determining device |
JP2005189074A (en) * | 2003-12-25 | 2005-07-14 | Yokogawa Denshikiki Co Ltd | Flow velocity measuring apparatus |
-
2006
- 2006-02-28 JP JP2006052238A patent/JP2007232460A/en active Pending
-
2007
- 2007-02-28 US US11/711,744 patent/US7281522B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4418567A (en) * | 1979-10-19 | 1983-12-06 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Knock sensing apparatus with fail indicator for use in an internal combustion engine |
US5212640A (en) * | 1988-09-09 | 1993-05-18 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automotive control system employing acceleration sensor and fault detecting system therefor |
US5265472A (en) * | 1989-07-26 | 1993-11-30 | Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft | Process for compensating acceleration sensor errors |
US5121729A (en) * | 1990-08-21 | 1992-06-16 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Knocking control method and apparatus for internal combustion engine |
US5377523A (en) * | 1991-07-19 | 1995-01-03 | Mitsubishi Petrochemical Co., Ltd. | Acceleration sensor suitable for self-checking and a self-checking circuit therefore |
US5652374A (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 1997-07-29 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Method and apparatus for detecting failure in vibrating sensors |
US5713438A (en) * | 1996-03-25 | 1998-02-03 | Lord Corporation | Method and apparatus for non-model based decentralized adaptive feedforward active vibration control |
US6510397B1 (en) * | 1999-03-13 | 2003-01-21 | Textron Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for self-diagnosis of a sensor |
US6516651B1 (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2003-02-11 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Coriolis effect transducer |
US6682153B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2004-01-27 | Bosch Automotive Systems Corporation | Method for detecting output-stuck fault of car body acceleration sensor, apparatus for detecting output-stuck fault of car body acceleration sensor, and anti-lock braking system for car |
US7162911B2 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2007-01-16 | Denso Corporation | Semiconductor acceleration sensor and method of testing the same |
US6889655B1 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2005-05-10 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Device for controlling the ignition timing for internal combustion engines |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130199809A1 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2013-08-08 | Alfing Montagetechnik Gmbh | Assembly device and assembly method |
US10634697B2 (en) * | 2015-04-08 | 2020-04-28 | Hitachi, Ltd. | High-sensitivity sensor system, detection circuit, and detection method |
US20190041425A1 (en) * | 2015-09-30 | 2019-02-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for detecting a defect in an acceleration sensor, and measuring system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7281522B1 (en) | 2007-10-16 |
JP2007232460A (en) | 2007-09-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7281522B1 (en) | Acceleration sensor status detecting apparatus | |
US8180520B2 (en) | Electronic safing system | |
US6397969B1 (en) | Vehicular electric power steering device and methods for controlling same | |
JP4969943B2 (en) | Battery charge / discharge current detector | |
EP2177918B1 (en) | Sensor apparatus with failure diagnosis | |
US6666090B2 (en) | Vibrating gyroscope and electronic device using the same | |
US20040064228A1 (en) | Motor-driven power steering control apparatus | |
US20070055429A1 (en) | Air bag system | |
JP3687472B2 (en) | Temperature detection device | |
JP4564253B2 (en) | Circuit arrangement for generating a stabilized supply voltage | |
JPWO2018078870A1 (en) | Control device and control method of control device | |
CN110758026B (en) | Pressure relief fault detection method, device and system and vehicle | |
US20200023895A1 (en) | Steering assistance method based on a driver assistance method, steering assistance system and transportation vehicle | |
JPWO2008139743A1 (en) | Vehicle state detection device and occupant protection device equipped with the same | |
JP4924858B2 (en) | Angular velocity measuring device | |
JP3992648B2 (en) | AT control unit | |
JP4007038B2 (en) | Electronic control device for vehicle | |
JP2021079733A (en) | On-vehicle electronic control device | |
JP2007062467A (en) | Steering angle abnormality diagnostic device | |
EP1524501A1 (en) | Single sensing multiple output system | |
JP2007069741A (en) | Car-mounted electronic control device | |
KR20140032045A (en) | Method and device for detecting error of acceleleration sensor | |
KR102493225B1 (en) | System and method for controlling sudden acceleration of vehicle | |
JP2000161532A (en) | Abnormality detection device for solenoid valve | |
JP2004247367A (en) | Linear solenoid driving-gear |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AISIN SEIKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SATO, KENICHI;HIROSE, KENTARO;ICHIKAWA, HIROYUKI;REEL/FRAME:019044/0778;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070201 TO 20070206 Owner name: TOKAI RUBBER INDUSTRIES, LTD., JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SATO, KENICHI;HIROSE, KENTARO;ICHIKAWA, HIROYUKI;REEL/FRAME:019044/0778;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070201 TO 20070206 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SUMITOMO RIKO COMPANY LIMITED, JAPAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:TOKAI RUBBER INDUSTRIES, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:034016/0613 Effective date: 20141001 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SUMITOMO RIKO COMPANY LIMITED, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AISIN SEIKI CO., LTD.;REEL/FRAME:035283/0256 Effective date: 20150302 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20191016 |