US20070175897A1

US20070175897A1 - Multimember closures whose members change relative position

Info

Publication number: US20070175897A1
Application number: US11/698,004
Authority: US
Inventors: Richard Ellson
Original assignee: Labcyte Inc
Current assignee: Labcyte Inc
Priority date: 2006-01-24
Filing date: 2007-01-24
Publication date: 2007-08-02
Also published as: US8361418B2; US20110277425A1

Abstract

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a closure for a container comprises at least two closure members. The relative position of the closure members with respect to each other is altered upon mating of the closure and container. The alteration of the relative position of the closure members may result in one or more of the members approaching the container more closely. The alteration may result in one or more of the members pressing against the container. The pressing may take place in such a way that exit paths for vapor from fluid in the container would require passage through the pressed surfaces.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Priority is claimed to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/761,908, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to containers for fluids, and in particular to containers for small quantities of fluid used in chemical and biomedical research and development.

BACKGROUND

In chemical and biomedical research and development, it is common to manipulate large numbers (e.g., thousands) of fluid containers which must be readily and automatably opened and closed, and yet must also be stored for months or years. The need to open and close the containers readily tends to induce the use of relatively poorly sealed containers, whereas the desire to store the containers for months or years tends to make it desirable to achieve tight sealing, for example to avoid evaporation loss and contamination from the outside.
The fluid containers used in chemical and biomedical research are subject to substantial chemical compatibility constraints, for example that they should not be made of materials which would be attacked by the solvents which they are designed to hold. Such constraints will also apply to the closures of such fluid containers. Adhesives are generally not preferred for closure of such fluid containers because of concerns about contamination and nonuniformity arising from adhesive residue left over from one closure to the next. Adhesives are nonetheless in widespread use.
Examples of fluid containers widely used in chemical and biomedical research and development are well plates and micro tubes. Well plates are commonly used which have 96, 384, and 1536 wells, although other numbers of wells are also in use. The dimensions and other characteristics of well plates have been standardized by the Society for Biomolecular Screening. A common size of well plate is 127.76 by 85.48 by 14.35 mm. Well plates are commonly designed to be stacked on top of each other in storage. Microtubes are commonly used in racks of 96 or 384. These racks of microtubes conform to dimensions similar to the length and width of well plates so they can be handled by similar robotic and automation equipment.
For well plates, a wide variety of lids have been developed. An example of a well plate lid of the prior art is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0108450. That well plate lid uses the weight of the lid to provide the force which holds the lid to the well plate. The lid is stated to weigh 400 g preferably. A compliant sealing member, preferably of silicone rubber, forms part of the lid and is pressed against the well plate.
A commercially available lid for well plates is the SealTite lid from TekCel, Inc. (Hopkinton, Mass.). The SealTite lid has a metal spring/clamp structure to form a better seal than would be possible if the weight of the lid were the only force holding the lid to the well plate. The use of force as provided, for example, by a spring/clamp may give rise to difficulties in automation of the handling of well plates with lids. See in this regard the TekCel poster at http://lab-robotics.org/Presentations/Posters/Poster2038.pdf.
There have also been efforts in the art to adapt to evaporation losses. In particular, in some cases the outer wells of a well plate are not used to hold fluids of interest but instead are filled with a volume of the solvent in which those fluids are stored. This solvent in the outer wells has been observed to reduce the rate at which the solvent in the inner wells evaporates. The outer wells are sometimes referred to as “moat wells” when so used.
An alternative means to adapt to evaporation losses is to periodically audit the fluid levels in the reservoirs of the container and to add solvent to those reservoirs as needed. United States Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0150257 describes a convenient automatable way of carrying out the auditing by means of focused acoustic energy.
Cost considerations make it preferable for the containers and their closures to be manufactured by means of molding or similarly economical processes, with limited or no machining. Typical molding processes such as injection molding result in different reservoirs within a container, such as wells in a well plate, being different from each other. For example, there may be a small overall bending or “bow” across a well plate. Such bow is expected, for example, when polymer is injected into the mold at a single point—the “gate”—which is located in or near the center of a substantially flat part such as a well plate. Such processes may also result in there being dimensional differences between different supposedly identical containers or closures manufactured from the same molds or molds intended to be identical. In addition, because containers and their closures may be manufactured separately, by different companies, there may be dimensional mismatches in both containers and closures which result in imperfections in intended mating of containers and closures.
It is often desired to maintain well plates for periods of months. In such situations, it is desired to be certain that the well plates can last for a known time without need for inspection or replenishment. If even only one well of the well plate loses solvent too quickly, this desirable certainty is not achieved.
There is therefore a need in the art to adapt to the evaporation losses caused by less than perfect seals which are used in order to facilitate the automated opening and closing of containers which hold small quantities of fluid.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts in schematic partial cross section a container and a closure of the invention as the closure is brought into contact with the container.
FIG. 2 depicts schematically a possible arrangement for the elastic component of one portion of the closure of the invention.
FIG. 3 depicts schematically a possible arrangement for the elastic component for both the upper and lower members of the closure of the invention.
FIG. 4 depicts schematically an arrangement of spring-like structures on one sides of one of the members of a closure of the invention.
FIG. 5 depicts schematically an arrangement of spring-like structures on two sides of one of the members of a closure of the invention.
FIG. 6 depicts schematically the positions of the upper and lower members of a closure of the invention relative to projections in the container.
FIGS. 7A-7C depicts the results of an experiment in which four closures which press against projections on a well plate are compared to two control closures.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to specific fluids, containers, or device structures, as such may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include both singular and plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a reservoir” includes a plurality of reservoirs as well as a single reservoir, reference to “a droplet” includes a plurality of droplets as well as single droplet, and the like.
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.
The term “fluid” as used herein refers to matter that is nonsolid, or at least partially gaseous and/or liquid, but not entirely gaseous. A fluid may contain a solid that is minimally, partially, or fully solvated, dispersed, or suspended. Examples of fluids include, without limitation, aqueous liquids (including water per se and salt water) and nonaqueous liquids such as organic solvents and the like. As used herein, the term “fluid” is not synonymous with the term “ink” in that an ink must contain a colorant and may not be gaseous.
“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described circumstance may or may not occur, so that the description includes instances where the circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.
The term “reservoir” as used herein refers to a receptacle or chamber for containing a fluid. A reservoir may also be a volume of a member within which a fluid is constrained or held.
The term “closure” as used herein refers to a member used to close a container for fluids. It thus encompasses for example lids, stoppers, and caps. A container may be closed with one closure or, in some cases, with multiple closures. Closures normally meet with containers at respective surfaces on each member. The mechanical match of the closure and container at the surfaces where they meet may not be perfect, so that some exchange of vapor between the inside and outside of the container may be possible even with closures in place.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a closure for a container comprises at least two closure members. The relative position of the closure members with respect to each other is altered upon mating of the closure and container.
The alteration of the relative position of the closure members may result in one or more of the members approaching the container more closely. The alteration may result in one or more of the members pressing against the container. The pressing may take place in such a way that exit paths for vapor from fluid in the container would require passage through the pressed surfaces.
A motivation for having closure members press against the container is that, all else being equal, a seal formed by such pressure will be tighter than a seal formed without such pressure.
In many cases the relative motion of the members of the closure is achieved by connecting them in such a way that relative motion is enabled. This can be achieved by an elastic component, through the flexure of a connecting element, or by having the components interlocked with a loose fit.
When closure members press against the container, the force is preferably generated by interaction of the container and the closure, such as through the process of putting the closure on the container. However, the force could be generated through external means such as magnets.
The relative motion of the closure members may be designed such that two members press against the container in directions which are at an angle to each other. This angle may be 90 degrees or greater. In certain embodiments the angle may be approximately 180 degrees, so that two members press against the container in directions which are approximately opposite to each other.
Commonly, the places at which the container and closure meet when the container is closed are close to a horizontal plane. The closure in normal use commonly lies on top of the container. In that way, the force of gravity helps the closure remain affixed to the container.
The container may be designed so that it has approximately vertical projections which meet the closure. For example, a closure which is roughly flat and rectangular in form, as for example a well plate, may have two concentric vertical projections surrounding its outer edge, and the closure may be designed to meet one or both of the vertical projections.
FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary embodiment of the invention in which the container is a well plate and the closure is a lid for the well plate. The top portion of the figure depicts a vertical cross section through part of the container and closure. The bottom portion depicts a horizontal cross section through the container and closure. The container has two vertical projections 10 and 12 around its circumference. The closure has an upper and a lower member 14 and 16. In between the upper and lower members there is a reservoir for liquid. The upper member has two vertical projections 18 and 20 around its circumference. The lower member is designed to be on the inside of both vertical projections. An elastic component causes the lower member to press against the inner projection on the plate. In FIG. 1, this elastic component is show as being composed of four parts 22 attached to two sides of the lower closure member.
FIG. 2 depicts schematically an exemplary construction for the elastic component in the context of the embodiment of FIG. 1. Like the upper part of FIG. 1, this figure is a vertical cross section through the container and closure. For simplicity, this figure depicts only the lower closure member 16 and a portion of the elastic component which acts upon that lower member. In the upper part of the figure, we see the lower closure member 16 prior to contact between closure and container 26. The elastic component, which comprises one or more flexible members 28 attached at one end to the lower closure member as in FIG. 1, is depicted here to the right of the closure in the figure. As the lower closure member 16 is lowered into position, the elastic component 28 responds to the presence of the container and bends, generating a force that sends the lower closure member 16 leftwards. The pressure forces the lower closure member against the left wall of the inner projection of the container.
In FIG. 3 we see a schematic cross-section of a closure of the invention depicting both the upper and lower members of the closure 14 and 16. In this figure, the upper and lower closure members both have portions 32 and 34 of an elastic component attached. The elastic component is of a somewhat different design than that shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, being attached towards the bottom of the closure member wall and extending upward. For the upper closure member 14, the corresponding portion 34 of the elastic component is shown attached at the left hand side, while the lower member 16 has its portion 32 of the elastic component depicted as being attached on the right hand side. Again, as in FIG. 2, when the upper and lower members of the closure are lowered onto the container, the elastic component acts upon them to the right and to the left respectively. Thus, the upper member presses against the outer projection of the container while the lower member presses against the inner projection.
FIG. 4 provides further detail on an elastic component of the kind depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2. The elastic component has two spring- like parts 38 and 40 which project outwards from a side of a closure member. Each of the spring-like pieces that make up the elastic component is tapered and also has a tapered cross-section. The form of the pieces is thus somewhat like that of a wing. While FIG. 4 shows the spring- like pieces 38 and 40 as having a sharp bottom edge, the bottom edge may also be rounded or blunt, and the tapering of both the overall shape and of the cross-section may be more or less gradual. In this embodiment it is intended that the downward force of placing the closure on the container will first apply force between the finger and shoulder of the spring- like pieces 38 and 40 to press them closer into the body. The exact point at which the spring-like pieces will make contact with the container depends on design details as well as deviations from nominal dimensions and misalignment of closure and container in the insertion process. The intent, however, is that as contact is made the spring- like pieces 38 and 40 are forced towards the main portion of the closure member, exerting a force on it.
It is also possible in the embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3 to use more than one spring-like structure on each side of the inner and outer members. For example, we could have three or five or ten spring-like structures attached to one side of the lower member. In addition, we could have spring-like structures attached to two adjacent (non-opposite) sides of the lower member. This is shown in FIG. 5, which depicts schematically a member of a closure of the invention with a number of spring-like structures such as 44 on each of two adjacent sides. That would result in the lower member pressing against a corner of the container projection and thus making a better, more sealing contact against two of the walls of the container projection. The same multiplicity of spring-like structures is possible for the upper member.
If the spring-like structures of the upper member press against a corner of the outer container projection opposite to the corner of the inner container projection against which the lower member presses, then the interior of the inner container projection is almost entirely surrounded by a superior, more sealing contact on all four sides. This may be seen in FIG. 6, a bottom view where the shaded rectangles depict the positions of the upper closure member 14 and lower closure member 16 relative to the projections 10 and 12 on the container in the embodiment of FIG. 3. As may be seen, a molecule of fluid from the container escaping by diffusion towards the outside will find its path blocked by the superior, pressure-assisted seals on the right and bottom (shown as thicker lines). It will therefore tend to move outward through the sides of the inner projection 12 which are not blocked by such seals (shown as thinner lines). However, if it moves outward through those sides, it will tend to be blocked by the superior, pressure-assisted seals on outer projection 10 depicted at the left and top (also shown as thicker lines).
In situations where the fluid in the container is hygroscopic and thus tends to trap water molecules which diffuse inward, the arrangement depicted in FIG. 6 will also tend to limit the inward diffusion of water.
In FIG. 3 for simplicity the upper and lower members of the closure are not depicted as being connected. It would be possible for the two members of the closure to be separate, although that would have the disadvantage that they would have to be removed in two operations. Alternatively, it is possible to have the two members of the closure be connected provided the connection between them has sufficient elasticity to allow them to be pushed apart as required for them to press against the closure as discussed above.
It is desired in certain embodiments that the closure be easily put into contact with the container and removed from contact with the container, for example by a robot arm or similar automated piece of machinery. Commonly, when this is carried out, the container is held firmly while the robot arm also presses firmly against the closure. When the closure needs to be brought into contact with the container, the robot arm brings the closure into a suitable, calculated position atop the container and then presses down with moderate force. The position into which the closure is put may need to be determined based on the position of the container, which may for example be sensed by some type of sensor.
In U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/073,660, closures containing reservoirs for solvent are described. Such reservoirs are conveniently employed in the closures of the present invention. While many of the techniques described in the Ser. No. 11/073,660 application are usable with the closures of the present invention, a particularly attractive possibility is for a reservoir for solvent to be attached to the top of the lower closure or bottom of the upper closure. The solvent reservoir could, for example, be made of a substance which absorbs and holds the solvent.
In application Ser. No. 11/073,660 referred to above there is also a discussion of so-called “labyrinth seals.” In general, it is desirable for the closures of the invention to be so arranged as to make a labyrinth seal which serves to prevent the outward diffusion of volatilizing solvent and the inward diffusion of water and of other undesirable vapor into the container.
The materials of which the closure could be made are dependent on the types of fluids which the reservoir contains. The two members of the closure may be made, for example, of polymers widely used for the manufacture of well plates as described in the literature. Fluids where DMSO by itself or DMSO and water are solvents are of particular interest in chemical and biomedical research. Materials for closures which are compatible with DMSO include cyclic olefin co-polymers (COC), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). COC is made by Ticona Engineering Polymers (Summit, N.J.), which is part of Celanese Corporation, and goes by the trade name Topas. One preferred Topas resin is 8007.
The elastic component may be made of a suitable polymer having the appropriate elasticity, or alternatively for example of a metallic alloy such as steel. It may be desirable that the elastic component be made of a polymer which can conveniently be welded ultrasonically to the closure members. It may alternatively be desirable that the elastic component be made integral to the closure members and that the elastic component be fabricated in the same molding process that serves to fabricate the closure members. It is believed that an elastic component as depicted in FIG. 4 can be fabricated in the same molding process as the closure member to which it is attached.
Instead of two members it would be possible to practice this invention with three, four, or more closure members, each pressing against a particular zone in the container. If the container included, for example, three rather than two concentric projections around its circumference, there could be value in having a third closure member lying above the upper member in an embodiment analogous to FIG. 3, pressing against the outermost of the concentric projections in the container.
It is generally desired that closure members be dimensioned for convenient insertion into the corresponding portions of the container with which they are intended to mate, leaving as small a gap as is compatible with successful insertion taking into account the dimensional variation encountered both in the closure members and in the containers themselves, as well as the accuracy of positioning achievable with available robots. In general, each of these tolerances may be expected to be on the order of a few tenths of a millimeter, so that it is generally desired that the gap between a closure member and the portion of the container with which it is intended to mate be less than 2 mm, preferably less than 1.5 mm or less than 1 mm, more preferably less than 0.8 mm or less than 0.4 mm or less than 0.25 mm.
In the figures of this application the projections of the closures and containers have been depicted as being vertical. While it is preferred that these projections be approximately vertical, it is advantageous that such projections be 1, 2, 3, or more degrees away from the vertical. This facilitates their extraction from the mold during manufacture if they are made by a molding process. The desired angle will vary with the material, molding conditions and other factors know to those of skill in the art. This deviation from being precisely vertical also facilitates their coming into contact as the closure is lowered, as depicted for example in FIG. 3, lower part. When a closure is designed to work with a particular container, it is desirable that the projections in the closure which will press against projections on the container be designed to have an angle of deviation from the vertical which matches the angle of deviation of the projections in the container.
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, gravitational force assists in the maintenance of the seals in closures of the invention where their projections which meet corresponding projections in the container have a deviation from the vertical. While it is desirable from a simplicity and cost standpoint not to add artificial weight to the closures of the invention, it would be possible to do so if that were seen as valuable for improving the quality of the seal due to the additional force which gravity would exert in that case.
In FIGS. 2-5 for simplicity the elastic component of the closures has been depicted as lying on the outside walls of rectangular members. It will be appreciated that if a robot or other such machine, or a human hand, were to pick up closure members so designed (e.g., as depicted in FIG. 5) it would press against the elastic component. For this reason it may be better in some cases to have at least the outer closure member have an overhang or projection at the top at which it can be gripped.
It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the preferred specific embodiments thereof, that the foregoing description and the examples that follow are intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications within the scope of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.
All patents, patent applications, and publications mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. However, where a patent, patent application, or publication containing express definitions is incorporated by reference, those express definitions should be understood to apply to the incorporated patent, patent application, or publication in which they are found, and not to the remainder of the text of this application, in particular the claims of this application.

EXAMPLE

Well plates containing DMSO were tested over a 64-day period. Each well plate had two concentric projections around its circumference. Two well plates, 400C and 250C, had a closure which contained a reservoir for DMSO but did not have any elastic component causing the closure to press against the well plate. Four well plates were provided with a single elastic component causing the closure to press towards a corner of the projections. Two of these, 400A and 250A, were connected to an elastic component causing the closure to press towards the lower right corner; two others, 400FF and 250FF, were connected to an elastic component causing the closure to press towards the upper left corner. The well plates denoted by numbers beginning with 400 had closures designed to leave a 400 micrometer gap between a projection on the well plate and the closest projection on the closure; those denoted by numbers beginning with 250 had closures designed to leave a 250 micrometer gap between a projection on the well plate and the closest projection on the closure. No screws, clips, adhesives, or any other means besides the weight of the closure and the elastic components were used to maintain the seal between the closures and the well plates.
The results obtained are depicted in FIGS. 7A-7C. In the figures, the black color denotes wells within the well plate where the fluid content fell to less than 90% of the original fluid content during the 64-day test period. It is desired that there be no wells of this type in the well plate. As may be seen the closures which press against a corner achieved generally a smaller number of wells of this type and in general no wells of this type in the quadrant towards which they pressed. This suggests that a closure of the type described above in connection with FIG. 3 will achieve no wells with more than 10% DMSO loss over two months.
Similar improvements in the lid performance would be expected for protecting other solvents in the container when covered by the closure containing a reservoirs of the solvent. For example, to preserve aqueous solutions in the container, the lid may be filled with water. Compared to DMSO, water is lighter and more volatile. It would be expected to both evaporate more rapidly and have a faster rate of diffusion. Hence, the time scales for the process would be much faster, measuring in days rather than months. Performance of a closure of this type with water would be expected to achieve no wells with more than 10% water loss over a period of three days.

Claims

1. A closure for a container comprising at least two closure members such that the relative position of the closure members with respect to each other is altered upon mating of the closure and container.

2. The closure of claim 1, wherein the change in relative position of the closure members upon mating causes a closure member to approach the container more closely.

3. The closure of claim 2, wherein an elastic component contributes to the change in relative position.

4. The closure of claim 2, wherein the change in relative position of the closure members upon mating causes a closure member to press against the container.

5. The closure of claim 4, wherein at least two closure members press against the container in directions which are approximately horizontal when the closure is in use.

6. The closure of claim 5, wherein the portions of the container against which the closure members press are approximately vertical when the closure is in use.

7. The closure of claim 5, wherein the closure members press against the container in directions which are at least 90 degrees apart when the closure is in use.

8. The closure of claim 7, wherein the closure members press against the container in directions which are approximately opposite to each other when the closure is in use.

9. The closure of claim 1, wherein one of the closure members is a top member and a second of the closure members lies between the top member and the container when the closure is in use.

10. The closure of claim 1, wherein the container is approximately flat.

11. The closure of claim 10, wherein the container is a micro-well plate.

12. The closure of claim 1, wherein the closure is approximately flat.

13. The closure of claim 1, wherein the closure further comprises a reservoir which holds a quantity of a solvent.

14. The closure of claim 1, wherein the closure may be removed from the container by gripping the container and lifting the closure off the container.

15. The closure of claim 14, wherein the container comprises multiple separate reservoirs and the closure permits the container to be used with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solvent and with <10% loss of solvent in any reservoir over two months.

16. The closure of claim 14, wherein the container comprises multiple separate reservoirs and the closure permits the container to be used with water solvent and with <10% loss of solvent in any reservoir over three days.

17. The closure of claim 1, wherein at least one closure member is manufactured by injection molding.

18. The closure of claim 17, wherein at least one closure member is manufactured by single-gate injection molding.

19. The closure of claim 17, wherein a closure member manufactured by injection molding comprises a cyclic olefin copolymer.

20. The closure of claim 1, wherein the container comprises two concentric projections which the closure contacts.

21. The closure of claim 20, wherein one of the closure members presses against one of the two concentric projections and another of the closure members presses against another of the two concentric projections.

22. The closure of claim 20, wherein at least one of the two concentric projections is of substantially rectangular form with optionally rounded corners.

23. The closure of claim 22, wherein the area of contact between one of the two members and the rectangular projection with which it contacts comprises approximately half the circumference of the projection.

24. The closure of claim 3, wherein the elastic component comprises a portion which operates in the manner of a leaf spring.

25. The closure of claim 3, where the elastic component presses with increasing force as the closure and the container are brought into contact.

26. The closure of claim 3, wherein no screws or clips or adhesives are needed to maintain a seal between the closure and the container when the closure is in place.

27. The closure of claim 3, wherein a seal is maintained between the closure and the container solely by the weight of the closure against the container and the force of the elastic component.