US20070065333A1 - Treatment of chloraminated water - Google Patents

Treatment of chloraminated water Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070065333A1
US20070065333A1 US10/565,268 US56526804A US2007065333A1 US 20070065333 A1 US20070065333 A1 US 20070065333A1 US 56526804 A US56526804 A US 56526804A US 2007065333 A1 US2007065333 A1 US 2007065333A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
water
copper
disinfectant
copper ions
ammonia
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/565,268
Other versions
US7465401B2 (en
Inventor
Laszlo Koska
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Water Corp
Original Assignee
Water Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Water Corp filed Critical Water Corp
Assigned to WATER CORPORATION reassignment WATER CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KOSKA, LASZLO
Publication of US20070065333A1 publication Critical patent/US20070065333A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7465401B2 publication Critical patent/US7465401B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/50Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition or application of a germicide or by oligodynamic treatment
    • C02F1/505Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition or application of a germicide or by oligodynamic treatment by oligodynamic treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/50Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition or application of a germicide or by oligodynamic treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/72Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
    • C02F1/76Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation with halogens or compounds of halogens
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2303/00Specific treatment goals
    • C02F2303/20Prevention of biofouling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of treating chloraminated water.
  • Monochloramine is used as a disinfectant within the water.
  • Monochloramine is produced according to the following reactions: Cl2+H2O ⁇ HOCl+HCl NH3+HOCL ⁇ NH2Cl+H2O
  • the ration of chlorine:ammonia-nitrogen in the above reactions is approximately 5:1.
  • the reactions may take place in the presence of excess aqueous ammonia, for instance in a concentration of about 0.2 mg/L.
  • microbiological organisms generally form a biofilm. Once a biofilim is established, nitrification can continue, even in the presence of high levels of monochloramine (levels greater than 2 mg/L, expressed as chlorine).
  • the most common method of ameliorating this problem is to periodically change the disinfectant within the reticulation system from chloramines to free chlorine. This is achieved by the introduction of chlorine into the water. This has the effect of destroying the biofilm.
  • the present invention attempts to overcome at least in part some of the aforementioned propensity of chloramines in treated water to decay.
  • a method of treating water containing chloramines as a disinfectant characterised in that the method comprises the step of introducing copper ions to the water.
  • the dissolved copper ions restrict microbial growth in the water, whilst being held in solution by complexing with ammonia
  • copper is added in the concentration range of 0.1 to 2 mg/L, more preferably in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L.
  • a method of substantially eliminating a biofilm formed in bodies of water or vessels or pipes containing bodies of water characterised in that the method comprises the steps of introducing chlorine, ammonia and copper into the water.
  • FIG. 1 is a chart showing the results of the experiment detailed in Example 1.
  • FIG. 2 is a chart showing the results of the experiment detailed in Example 2.
  • Copper ions are used to control and eliminate a number of microorganisms in water. Previously, it has only been possible to use copper ions in localised environments such as for the control of algae in reservoirs and swimming pools.
  • Copper ions are not used for the treatment of reticulated drinking water as copper precipitates from water.
  • the present invention relies on the combination of ammonia, chlorine and copper ions within reticulated water.
  • the three substances interrelate to provide a useful result.
  • the ammonia and chlorine combine with the water as per the above equation to produce monochloramine.
  • the monochloramine acts to disinfect the water.
  • the copper ions act to restrict microbial growth in the water and in pipes. This in turn reduces the nitrification of the ammonia.
  • the copper ions combine with the ammonia to form complex ions. This has the effect of maintaining the copper in solution, and restricts the propensity for the copper to precipitate out of the water as copper hydroxide or other insoluble compounds.
  • the combined effect of the chemical combination is that required monochloramine and ammonia levels can be maintained in reticulated water supplies for considerably longer periods, and over larger distances through water reticulation systems.
  • the present invention has been the subject of significant research, as detailed below.
  • a chloraminated water bulk sample was dosed with excess ammonia to achieve 1.50 mg/L ammonia-N concentration.
  • the bulk sample was dosed with ammonia oxidising bacteria, cultured from a chloraminated system.
  • the results of this experimented showed the ammonia level beginning to fall after about five days, and falling to a base of level of about 0.1 mg/L after about 10 days, for each of the samples not containing copper. Where 0.1 mg/L of copper was present, these were extended to about seven and 12 days. Where 0.2 mg/L of copper was present, the ammonia level was maintained for about 15 days, and the base level reached after 19 days. Where 0.3 mg/L of copper was present, the ammoina level was maintained for 34 days, with the base level being reached after 40 days.
  • the dosage of zinc with copper is less effective than the dosage of copper alone. Nonetheless, it is believed that the combination of copper with other metal ions such as silver or tin may prove efficacious.
  • a combination of chlorine, ammonia and copper ions can be added to water having a biofilm in order to substantially eliminate the biofilm.
  • the biofilm may be located of a surface of a body of water, or on an inner surface of vessels or pipes containing bodies of water.

Abstract

A method of treating chloraminated water by adding copper ions is disclosed. The addition of copper ions inhibits microbial action in the water, thus reducing nitrification of ammonia and maintaining chloramine levels.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method of treating chloraminated water.
  • BACKGROUND TO THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • It is known to treat reticulated water with chlorine and ammonia in order to produce chloramines, principally monochloramine. Monochloramine is used as a disinfectant within the water. Monochloramine is produced according to the following reactions:
    Cl2+H2O═HOCl+HCl
    NH3+HOCL═NH2Cl+H2O
  • The ration of chlorine:ammonia-nitrogen in the above reactions is approximately 5:1. The reactions may take place in the presence of excess aqueous ammonia, for instance in a concentration of about 0.2 mg/L.
  • One problem which arises in the use of chloramines in water is that the chloramines have a propensity to decay. This decay can be a simple chemical decay, causing the equilibrium in the second equation above to move to the left. This chemical decay is very slow, and free ammonia is formed as chlorine levels are being reduced. Tests have revealed that this decay can reach extremely high levels, due to nitrification of ammonia. Nitrification occurs when ammonia is oxidised to nitrite by microbiological organisms, either within the water or on an inner surface of pipes. The nitrite is then further oxidised to nitrate by other organisms.
  • The microbiological organisms generally form a biofilm. Once a biofilim is established, nitrification can continue, even in the presence of high levels of monochloramine (levels greater than 2 mg/L, expressed as chlorine).
  • The most common method of ameliorating this problem is to periodically change the disinfectant within the reticulation system from chloramines to free chlorine. This is achieved by the introduction of chlorine into the water. This has the effect of destroying the biofilm.
  • Several problems are associated with this method. These include the presence in the newly chlorinated water of an undesirable level of disinfectant by-products, in addition to a noticeable change in the taste and smell of the water. Should the quantity of added chlorine not be sufficient, it can actually reduce the effective chlorine in the water, resulting in inadequate disinfection.
  • Further, where water is being reticulated over a long distance, a periodic change from chloramination disinfection to free chlorine disinfection requires the presence of significant treating infrastructure at locations along the distance.
  • Other methods have been proposed in order to ameliorate the problem of nitrification. They include the addition of chlorite ions and also significantly increasing pH. None of these solutions have thus far proved satisfactory.
  • Consequently, it is currently necessary to retreat chloraminated water being reticulated over long distances at various stages along the reticulation path. This requires the addition of farther chlorine and/or ammonia to bring the amount of chloramines or chlorine in the water back to effective levels.
  • The present invention attempts to overcome at least in part some of the aforementioned propensity of chloramines in treated water to decay.
  • SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of treating water containing chloramines as a disinfectant, characterised in that the method comprises the step of introducing copper ions to the water. Advantageously, the dissolved copper ions restrict microbial growth in the water, whilst being held in solution by complexing with ammonia
  • Preferably, copper is added in the concentration range of 0.1 to 2 mg/L, more preferably in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L.
  • In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of substantially eliminating a biofilm formed in bodies of water or vessels or pipes containing bodies of water, characterised in that the method comprises the steps of introducing chlorine, ammonia and copper into the water.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a chart showing the results of the experiment detailed in Example 1; and
  • FIG. 2 is a chart showing the results of the experiment detailed in Example 2.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Copper ions are used to control and eliminate a number of microorganisms in water. Previously, it has only been possible to use copper ions in localised environments such as for the control of algae in reservoirs and swimming pools.
  • Copper ions are not used for the treatment of reticulated drinking water as copper precipitates from water.
  • The present invention relies on the combination of ammonia, chlorine and copper ions within reticulated water. The three substances interrelate to provide a useful result.
  • The ammonia and chlorine combine with the water as per the above equation to produce monochloramine. The monochloramine acts to disinfect the water.
  • The copper ions act to restrict microbial growth in the water and in pipes. This in turn reduces the nitrification of the ammonia.
  • The copper ions combine with the ammonia to form complex ions. This has the effect of maintaining the copper in solution, and restricts the propensity for the copper to precipitate out of the water as copper hydroxide or other insoluble compounds.
  • The combined effect of the chemical combination is that required monochloramine and ammonia levels can be maintained in reticulated water supplies for considerably longer periods, and over larger distances through water reticulation systems.
  • The present invention has been the subject of significant research, as detailed below.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • After the elimination of chlorine, a chloraminated water bulk sample was dosed with excess ammonia to achieve 1.50 mg/L ammonia-N concentration. The bulk sample was dosed with ammonia oxidising bacteria, cultured from a chloraminated system.
  • The bulk sample was then subsampled into 9 separate portions. These portions were dosed as follows:
  • 1. no dosage
  • 2. 0.1 mg/L copper
  • 3. 0.2 mg/L copper
  • 4. 0.3 mg/L copper
  • 5. 0.2 mg/L zinc
  • 6. 0.4 mg/L zinc
  • 7. 0.2 mg/L copper, 0.1 mg/L zinc
  • 8. 0.1 mg/L copper, 0.2 mg/L zinc
  • 9. 0.2 mg/L copper, 0.4 mg/L zinc.
  • The samples were measured over subsequent days to determine the ammonia levels. The results are shown in FIG. 1.
  • The results of this experimented showed the ammonia level beginning to fall after about five days, and falling to a base of level of about 0.1 mg/L after about 10 days, for each of the samples not containing copper. Where 0.1 mg/L of copper was present, these were extended to about seven and 12 days. Where 0.2 mg/L of copper was present, the ammonia level was maintained for about 15 days, and the base level reached after 19 days. Where 0.3 mg/L of copper was present, the ammoina level was maintained for 34 days, with the base level being reached after 40 days.
  • The presence of zinc in conjunction with the copper appeared to decrease the efficacy of the copper dose.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • In a field trial, a reservoir having a floating cover, and a water detention period of 3.5 days, was dosed with copper sulphate to achieve a copper level of about 0.25 mg/L for a period of six weeks. The levels of ammonia, nitrite and nitrate were measured both at reservoir inlet and outlet. The results are shown in FIG. 2.
  • The field trial results demonstrated a substantial reduction in both nitrate and nitrite levels at the reservoir outlet, and a substantial increase in the percentage of ammonia “surviving” from inlet to outlet. These results were maintained for a period of 6 to 12 weeks following the substantial exit of copper ions from the water. This suggests a residual effect, caused perhaps by copper which has precipitated or perhaps by a lag time in the re-establishment of a biofilm.
  • Testing revealed a significant reduction in microbiological activity following the dosing with copper.
  • Further experimentation has suggested that the nitrification process is temperature dependent. These results suggest that a periodic dosage regime during warm periods of the year may be sufficient to control nitrification, dependant on the ambient conditions.
  • Current research indicates that concentration of copper in the range of 0.1 to 0.5 mg/L will be complexed by the ammonia present in the water, and will successfully reduce the effects of nitrification. It will be appreciated that copper dosage up to the current Australian Drinking Water Guideline limit of 2 mg/L may be used. This copper may be supplied by the addition of copper salts such as copper sulphate (as described above) or by the use of electrolysis.
  • As detailed above, it is considered that the dosage of zinc with copper is less effective than the dosage of copper alone. Nonetheless, it is believed that the combination of copper with other metal ions such as silver or tin may prove efficacious.
  • It is believed that the principal mechanism causing the beneficial effect described above is the action of copper on the biofilm. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, a combination of chlorine, ammonia and copper ions can be added to water having a biofilm in order to substantially eliminate the biofilm. The biofilm may be located of a surface of a body of water, or on an inner surface of vessels or pipes containing bodies of water.
  • Modifications and variations as would be apparent to a skilled addressee are deemed to be within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (11)

1. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant, characterised in that the method comprises the step of introducing copper ions to the water.
2. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the copper ions are introduced by the addition of a copper salt.
3. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the copper ions are introduced by electrolysis of metallic copper.
4. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the concentration of copper ions in the water is in the range of 0.1 mg/L to 2.0 mg/L.
5. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 4, characterised in that the concentration of copper ions in the water is in the range of 0.2 mg/L to 0.5 mg/L.
6. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 5, characterised in that the concentration of copper ions in the water is in the range of 0.2 mg/L to 0.3 mg/L.
7. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the copper ions are continually introduced into the water so as to maintain a predetermined copper concentration.
8. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the copper ions are periodically introduced into the water so as to bring the copper ion concentration in the water to a predetermined level for a predetermined period of time.
9. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the method comprises the further step of introducing silver ions into the water.
10. A method of treating water containing chloramine as a disinfectant as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the method comprises the further step of introducing tin ions into the water.
11. A method of substantially eliminating biofilm formed in bodies of water or vessels or pipes containing bodies of water, characterised in that the method comprises the steps of introducing chlorine, ammonia and copper ions into the water.
US10/565,268 2003-07-25 2004-07-09 Treatment of chloraminated water Expired - Fee Related US7465401B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003903858 2003-07-25
AU2003903858A AU2003903858A0 (en) 2003-07-25 2003-07-25 Treatment of chloraminated water
PCT/AU2004/000925 WO2005012189A1 (en) 2003-07-25 2004-07-09 Treatment of chloraminated water

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070065333A1 true US20070065333A1 (en) 2007-03-22
US7465401B2 US7465401B2 (en) 2008-12-16

Family

ID=31983489

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/565,268 Expired - Fee Related US7465401B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2004-07-09 Treatment of chloraminated water

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US7465401B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2003903858A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2005012189A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2004299043B2 (en) * 2003-12-16 2007-09-20 William C. Betts Composition and method for cleaning contained bodies of water

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1989380A (en) * 1934-06-15 1935-01-29 Isabella B Romans Prevention and removal of slime formations
US3702298A (en) * 1970-09-10 1972-11-07 Eco Sciences Inc Method of disinfecting with divalent and trivalent metal germicide
US4614595A (en) * 1984-09-05 1986-09-30 Coral, Inc. Method of water treatment
US5373025A (en) * 1992-02-24 1994-12-13 Olin Corporation Sanitizer for swimming pools, spas, and hot tubs
US5858246A (en) * 1997-01-14 1999-01-12 Fountainhead Technologies, Inc. Method of water purification with oxides of chlorine
US5954939A (en) * 1994-05-31 1999-09-21 Toto, Ltd. Electrolyzing apparatus and electrolyzing method for electrolyzing flowing water containing chlorine ions
US6093422A (en) * 1998-01-23 2000-07-25 Zodiac Pool Care, Inc. Biocidal compositions for treating water
US20020125196A1 (en) * 2001-03-08 2002-09-12 Cdg Technology, Inc. Methods of treating water using combinations of chlorine dioxide, chlorine and ammonia
US6565893B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2003-05-20 Worldwide Pure Water, Inc. Process for preparing a disinfectant containing suspended metals
US6824794B2 (en) * 2001-06-01 2004-11-30 Innovative Water Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for preventing bacteria and algae growth in water
US20050211643A1 (en) * 2002-07-16 2005-09-29 Phillips Joseph D Pathogen reduction using chloramines
US7311878B2 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-12-25 Hercules Incorporated Method and apparatus for producing synergistic biocide

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1571204A (en) 1977-05-27 1980-07-09 Interox Chemicals Ltd Disinfection

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1989380A (en) * 1934-06-15 1935-01-29 Isabella B Romans Prevention and removal of slime formations
US3702298A (en) * 1970-09-10 1972-11-07 Eco Sciences Inc Method of disinfecting with divalent and trivalent metal germicide
US4614595A (en) * 1984-09-05 1986-09-30 Coral, Inc. Method of water treatment
US5373025A (en) * 1992-02-24 1994-12-13 Olin Corporation Sanitizer for swimming pools, spas, and hot tubs
US5954939A (en) * 1994-05-31 1999-09-21 Toto, Ltd. Electrolyzing apparatus and electrolyzing method for electrolyzing flowing water containing chlorine ions
US5858246A (en) * 1997-01-14 1999-01-12 Fountainhead Technologies, Inc. Method of water purification with oxides of chlorine
US6093422A (en) * 1998-01-23 2000-07-25 Zodiac Pool Care, Inc. Biocidal compositions for treating water
US6565893B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2003-05-20 Worldwide Pure Water, Inc. Process for preparing a disinfectant containing suspended metals
US20020125196A1 (en) * 2001-03-08 2002-09-12 Cdg Technology, Inc. Methods of treating water using combinations of chlorine dioxide, chlorine and ammonia
US6824794B2 (en) * 2001-06-01 2004-11-30 Innovative Water Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for preventing bacteria and algae growth in water
US20050211643A1 (en) * 2002-07-16 2005-09-29 Phillips Joseph D Pathogen reduction using chloramines
US7311878B2 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-12-25 Hercules Incorporated Method and apparatus for producing synergistic biocide

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005012189A1 (en) 2005-02-10
AU2003903858A0 (en) 2003-08-07
US7465401B2 (en) 2008-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7875191B2 (en) Biocide
US20160096752A1 (en) Wastewater treatment
EP0637914B1 (en) Compositions and methods for controlling the growth of microbes in aqueous media
US8444860B2 (en) Method and apparatus for disinfecting hot water
US5614528A (en) Compositions and methods for inhibiting the formation of chloramines and trihalomethanes in aqueous media
US20210084894A1 (en) Ion enhancement
WO2008085499A1 (en) Ion enhancement
RU2291836C2 (en) Hypobromous acid stabilized solutions
US7465401B2 (en) Treatment of chloraminated water
AU2004261305B2 (en) Treatment of chloraminated water
US7097773B1 (en) Process for treating water
US4786434A (en) Agent for the elimination of active chlorine compounds from water
US9975791B2 (en) Ion enhancement
US20210317014A1 (en) Methods and systems for controlling bacteria in biofilms
RU2182126C1 (en) Method of water disinfection using silver complex compounds
RU2182129C1 (en) Method of water treatment using silver complex compound
JPS6038198B2 (en) Stabilization method for residual chlorine
US20140134267A1 (en) Ion enhancement
JPH06246276A (en) Water purifying device
EP0723396A1 (en) Compositions and methods for inhibiting the formation of chloramines and trihalomethanes in aqueous media

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: WATER CORPORATION, AUSTRALIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KOSKA, LASZLO;REEL/FRAME:018133/0459

Effective date: 20060223

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20121216