US20070039963A1 - Helmeted lock ring for a sender module closure system for a fuel tank - Google Patents
Helmeted lock ring for a sender module closure system for a fuel tank Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070039963A1 US20070039963A1 US11/197,282 US19728205A US2007039963A1 US 20070039963 A1 US20070039963 A1 US 20070039963A1 US 19728205 A US19728205 A US 19728205A US 2007039963 A1 US2007039963 A1 US 2007039963A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- lock
- ring
- helmet
- finger
- boss
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
- B60K15/00—Arrangement in connection with fuel supply of combustion engines or other fuel consuming energy converters, e.g. fuel cells; Mounting or construction of fuel tanks
- B60K15/03—Fuel tanks
- B60K15/04—Tank inlets
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
- B60K15/00—Arrangement in connection with fuel supply of combustion engines or other fuel consuming energy converters, e.g. fuel cells; Mounting or construction of fuel tanks
- B60K15/03—Fuel tanks
- B60K15/04—Tank inlets
- B60K15/0406—Filler caps for fuel tanks
Definitions
- the present invention relates to automotive fuel tanks, particularly the closure system used for sealingly interfacing therewith the sender module, and more particularly to a helmeted lock ring therefor.
- Automotive fuel tanks have an access port at an upper wall thereof through which fuel passes and various components are placed, as for example a fuel depth sensor and a fuel pump. Supporting the various components at the access port in sealing relation with the fuel tank is a sender module, which is commonly of plastic construction.
- FIGS. 1 through 15 A known fuel tank sender module closure system which has proven extremely successful in this regard is depicted at FIGS. 1 through 15 .
- the prior art sender module closure system 100 is interfaced with respect to a fuel tank 102 , and a sender module 104 .
- the fuel tank 102 is of a multi-layer polyethylene construction, and has a circular access port 106 . Adjacent the access port 106 is a seal seat groove 108 having a floor 108 F upon which a resilient seal 110 seatably rests.
- the sender module 104 is of plastic construction and carries numerous components which access the interior of the fuel tank 102 .
- the sender module 104 has an annular flange 114 which lies flatly over the resilient seal 110 , and further has an annular lip 116 which is received by the access port 106 and serves to abuttably locate the sender module with respect to the perimeter of the access port.
- the annular flange 114 of the sender module 104 is pressed toward the fuel tank so as to compress the resilient seal 110 sealably between the floor 108 F and the annular flange 114 by action of a mutually interfacing ring set 118 composed of a base ring 120 and a lock ring 122 .
- the base ring 120 has a plurality of upstanding lock fingers 124 spaced equally therearound, each lock finger having a laterally oriented lip 126 projecting radially inward toward a center of the base ring. As seen at FIG. 3 , each lip 126 has a prestage ramp 128 , a staging boss 130 , a staging socket 132 and an over-travel boss 134 .
- the base ring 120 further has an anchor portion 136 which is permanently attached to the fuel tank 102 during blow molding of the polyethylene during forming of the fuel tank.
- a preferred shape of the anchor portion 136 is an “S” shape, as shown at FIG.
- the lower section 136 L is laterally oriented
- the middle section 136 M is upwardly oriented and has a plurality of embedment holes 138 (see FIG. 3 )
- the upper section 136 U rests laterally in a base ring groove 140 .
- a plurality of tabs 136 T extend laterally outward and are embedded in the polyethylene of the fuel tank.
- the aforementioned lock fingers 124 upwardly extend from the upper section 136 U so as to be upstanding in relation to the seal seat groove 108 and the fuel tank 102 .
- the lock ring 122 (depicted at FIG. 4 ) is an independent component which is separate from the fuel tank.
- the lock ring 122 has a plurality of finger apertures 142 , one for receiving each lock finger 124 .
- Each finger aperture 142 has an entry portion 142 E for passing a respective lock finger therethrough and a lock portion 142 L at which the lip 126 of the respective lock finger interferingly overhangs a lock shelf 144 of the lock ring 122 .
- each lock shelf 144 tangentially adjoins the lock portion 142 L of its corresponding finger aperture 142 , and has a medially located lock boss 146 .
- An upstanding annular lug 150 is provided at the inner periphery 152 of the lock ring for stiffening, as well as for aiding location with respect to the sender module 104 .
- the sender module 104 is placed into the access port 106 such that the periphery thereof abuts the annular lip 116 .
- the lock ring 122 With the resilient seal 110 seated at its seal seat groove 108 , and the annular flange 114 resting upon the resilient seal, the lock ring 122 is placed thereover via the lock fingers 124 being received through the entry portion 142 E of the finger apertures 142 .
- the lock ring 122 is then rotated so that the flat 144 F of each lock shelf 144 (see FIG. 12 ) is prestaged interferingly under its respective lock finger prestage ramp 128 .
- the outer perimeter 122 P of the lock ring 122 has a plurality of tool engagement features in the preferred form of notches 148 into which are interfaced with bosses 154 a of a bossed service tool 154 so as to effect the aforesaid rotation and/or to effect further rotation of the lock ring 122 relative to the base ring 120 .
- each lock boss 146 slides along its respective staging boss 130 and seats at its respective staging socket 132 .
- the seating of the lock bosses 146 in the respective staging sockets 132 causes the lock ring 122 to move toward the fuel tank 102 .
- the resilient seal 110 is compressed (i.e., a compression of about 25 percent) so as to cause the resilient seal to seal between the floor 108 F of the seal seat groove 108 and the annular flange 114 of the sender module 104 .
- Over-travel is not permitted by the lock finger 124 abutting the end 142 S (see FIG.
- each lock boss 146 tends to center at its staging socket 132 by cooperative action of the over-travel boss 134 and the staging boss 130 with respect to the lock boss 146 situated therebetween.
- the bossed service tool 154 may be again interfaced with the notches 148 so as to effect reverse rotation of the lock ring 122 (referred to as “camming off”) so that the sender module may be removed from the fuel tank.
- the base ring 120 is composed of rigid galvanized and annealed (galvannealed) steel having a thickness of 2.0 mm and a protective coating, such as paint.
- the inner diameter D 1 is 145.0 mm
- each of the lips 126 is embossed to provide the prestage ramp 128 , the staging boss 130 , the staging socket 132 and the over-travel boss 134 .
- the width W of the lock finger is 27.61 mm, which corresponds to a tangential angle A 2 of 18.0 degrees; the angle A 3 of the staging boss is 20.0 degrees; the angle A 4 of the over-travel boss is 17.2 degrees; the angle A 5 of the staging boss side of the staging socket is 18.3 degrees; the distance S 1 between the apex of the staging boss and the center of the staging socket is 2.70 mm; the distance S 2 between the center of the staging socket and the apex of the over-travel boss is 4.70 mm; the staging ramp has a height H 1 of 8.80 mm; the staging boss has a height H 2 at its apex of 7.85 mm; the staging socket has a height H 3 at its center of 8.45 mm; and the over-travel boss has a height H 4 at its apex of
- the lock ring 122 is composed of rigid galvanized and annealed (galvannealed) steel having a thickness of 2.5 mm and a protective coating, such as paint.
- the inner perimeter diameter D 2 is 125.25 mm
- there are seven finger apertures 142 having a tangential elongation angle A 7 of 37.56 degrees, with the lock portion thereof having a tangential elongation angle A 8 of 18.0 degrees.
- the radial cross-section C 1 of the entry portion of each finger aperture is 9 mm and the radial cross-section C 2 of the lock portion is 4 mm.
- the lock boss has a fore angle A 9 of 22 degrees; an aft angle A 10 of 45 degrees, and a height H 5 of 4.3 mm.
- the lock boss is located a distance S 4 of about 4 mm from the end of the aforementioned lock shelf 144 (at the entry portion 142 E), thereby defining a flat 144 F (see FIG. 12 ).
- FIG. 12 shows the interaction between the staging socket 132 and the lock boss 146 when the lock ring 122 is locked relative to the base ring 120 , as well as showing the relative placement of the prestage ramp 128 , the staging boss 130 and the over-travel boss 134 . It is seen that the lock boss 146 is seatingly positioned in the staging socket 132 akin to a “ball-and-socket” arrangement, in the sense that the “socket” is defined by the concave shape between the staging and over-travel bosses and the “ball” is defined by the convex shape of the lock boss.
- FIG. 13A depicts the lock ring 122 “prestaged” with respect to the base ring 120 .
- the flat 144 F of the lock shelf 144 is slipped abuttingly (interferingly) under the prestage ramp 128 .
- This position may be obtained by hand movement of the lock ring 122 or via the bossed service tool 154 .
- FIG. 13B shows the lock boss “staged” whereat the lock boss 146 is seated into the staging socket 132 .
- rotation of the lock ring 122 from the prestaged position to the staged position involves the lock bosses causing the lock ring to move vertically toward the fuel tank. This movement causes the above mentioned sealing compression of the resilient seal between the annular flange and the fuel tank.
- FIGS. 14 and 15 depict further aspects of the locking of the lock ring 122 onto the base ring 120 .
- the lip 126 interferingly overhangs the lock shelf 144 .
- over travel of the lock boss 146 with respect to the staging socket 132 is prevented by each lock finger 124 striking the end 142 S of the lock portion 142 E of its respective finger aperture 142 .
- each lock boss engages its respective over-travel boss, which engagement tends to center each lock boss into its respective staging socket.
- the contact location of the lock ring 122 with respect to the base ring 120 occurs with respect to a portion of the lock boss and the staging socket which is radially nearest the lock aperture (ie., about 4 mm radially inward from the lock portion 142 L).
- the base ring 120 has seven lock fingers 18 degrees wide, and the lock ring 122 has seven symmetrically spaced lock bosses so that: a) load is dissipated into the anchor portion of the base, b) the lock ring 122 is cammed on without the lock fingers flexing, and c) there is a minimum distance between the prestage and staged positions.
- the lock ring material thickness of 2.5 mm eliminates a phenomenon termed “potato chipping,” which refers to a ring bending between its engagement spokes.
- the annular lug 150 of the lock ring runs out 2.5 mm for eliminating a phenomenon termed “tee pee,” which refers to a ring bending up or down at the inside diameter relative to the outside diameter.
- the lock ring notches 148 are minimized so as to eliminate potato chipping and tee pee.
- the base ring material has a thickness of 2.0 mm so as to eliminate “ring flexing” between or at the lock fingers.
- the shape of the lock fingers is a balance between three critical items: a) maximum strength, b) the allowance for an anti-reverse rotation feature, and c) the allowance for a “solid” discernable stop.
- the “offset” W-shape associated with the staging boss, staging socket and over-travel boss of the lips is provided by two post-strikes which are put in during the finalization of the part, wherein a “lead” strike provides the staging boss, and a “follow” strike provides the over-travel boss, and wherein the position of these features relative to the center of the lip allows for two 17 to 18 degree angles which increase strength due to material processing.
- a 1.0 mm radius on the underside of the base ring lock fingers prevents “finger flex” (a condition noted when the lock finger is bent up greater than 5 degrees), wherein if this radius is too large then installation torque increases will be noticed, and if this radius is 0 mm, then a stress riser will exist within in the part.
- the size and placement of the base ring embedment holes play a significant role in ring strength, wherein the size and locations thereof are selected as a balance between three critical operational modes: a) base ring anchored embedment (encapsulation) into the polyethylene of the fuel tank, b) base ring strength during fuel tank flex, and c) base ring strength during lock ring installation.
- the tangential length of the lock ring finger apertures is designed to only allow a 1 degree of over-travel before a “dead stop” occurs.
- the shape, position, arc length, radius, and number of bossed service tool boss interface notches 148 of the lock ring 122 are a balance between five critical factors: a) need for interfacing with the bossed service tool, b) need for the bossed service tool to provide lock ring installation (“camming on”), c) need for the bossed service tool to effect removal of the lock ring (“camming off”), d) elimination of inclusion of a stress riser, thus preventing ring potato chipping, and e) multiple bossed service tool orientation options.
- the present invention is an improved sender module closure system for providing a reliable, sealed interface between the sender module and the fuel tank at the access port thereof, wherein the improvement resides in the lock ring thereof, wherein the conventional lock ring is replaced by a helmeted lock ring so as to provide, among a range of attributes, strength and protection for the sender module.
- the improved sender closure module system includes a mutually interfacing ring set composed of a base ring and a helmeted lock ring.
- the base ring is conventional, being permanently connected to the fuel tank at the access port, as for example by encapsulation of an anchor portion thereof by the polyethylene of the fuel tank during its manufacture.
- the base ring has a plurality of upstanding lock fingers spaced equally therearound, each lock finger having a lip. Each lip has a prestage ramp, a staging boss, a staging socket and an over-travel boss.
- the helmeted lock ring is a separate piece, composed of a lock ring component and a helmet component.
- the lock ring component is configured to mimic a conventional lock ring, having a plurality of finger apertures, one for receiving each lock finger.
- Each finger aperture has an entry portion for passing a respective lock finger therethrough and a lock portion at which the lip interferingly overhangs a lock shelf of the lock ring member.
- Each lock shelf adjoins the lock portion of its corresponding finger aperture, and has a medially located lock boss.
- the helmet component is connected with the lock ring component at the inner periphery thereof, preferably integrally as a single piece construction.
- the helmet component is composed of a helmet sidewall in upstanding relation to the lock ring component at the inner periphery thereof, and a helmet cover wall integrally formed with the helmet sidewall.
- One or more helmet apertures are formed in the helmet component to provide access for components of the sender module and yet provide a protective covering of the sender module.
- the periphery of the access port of the fuel tank has a seal seat groove which is concentrically disposed relative to the lock fingers.
- a resilient seal is located at the seal seat groove.
- the sender module is located at the access port, wherein an annular flange of the sender module rests upon the resilient seal.
- the helmeted lock ring is placed over the sender module so that the components of the sender module have access through the one or more helmet apertures.
- the finger apertures of the lock ring component now receive the lock fingers, and the helmeted lock ring is thereafter rotated by hand or with use of a bossed service tool so that each lock shelf is prestaged interferingly under its respective lock finger prestage ramp.
- the conventional bossed service tool is then used to rotate the helmeted lock ring so that each lock boss slides along its respective staging boss and then seats at its respective staging socket.
- the helmeted lock ring As each lock boss slides along its staging boss and then seats in its staging socket, the helmeted lock ring is moved toward the fuel tank, which movement causes the resilient seal to be compressed sealingly between the fuel tank at the seal seat groove and the annular flange of the sender module.
- Over-travel is not permitted by the lock finger abutting the end of its respective finger aperture, and each lock boss tends to center at its staging socket by cooperative action of the over-travel and staging bosses with respect to the lock boss situated therebetween.
- the sender module is protected by the helmet component, and the helmeted lock ring has strength to resist shears and forces as may be at some later time applied to the improved sender module closure system.
- an object of the present invention to provide an improved sender module closure system for providing a reliable, sealed interface between the sender module and the fuel tank at the access port thereof, wherein the improvement resides in a helmeted lock ring which provides, among various attributes, inherent strength as well as protection for the sender module.
- FIG. 1 is a plan view of a fuel tank, showing a sender module sealingly interfaced thereto by a prior art sender module closure system.
- FIG. 2 is a broken-away partly sectional side view of the prior art sender module closure system interfaced with the fuel tank and sender module as in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a base ring of a ring set according to the prior art sender module closure system.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a lock ring of the ring set according to the prior art sender module closure system.
- FIG. 5 is a top plan view of the base ring of FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 6 is a side view of the base ring, seen along line 6 - 6 of FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 7 is a detail top view of a lock finger of the base ring of FIG. 3 , seen at circle 7 of FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 8 is a partly sectional, broken away view, seen along line 8 - 8 of FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 9 is a top plan view of the prior art lock ring of FIG. 4 .
- FIG. 10 is a side view of the prior art lock ring, seen along line 10 - 10 of FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 11 is a detail sectional view, seen along line 11 - 11 of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 12 is a sectional, broken away view showing a lock boss of the prior art lock ring seated at its respective staging socket of a lock finger of the base ring.
- FIG. 13A is a first operational view, depicting a lock boss prestaged on its respective prestage ramp.
- FIG. 13B is a second operational view, depicting the lock boss now seated at its respective staging socket.
- FIG. 14 is a perspective view of the prior art lock ring interferingly interfaced with the base ring.
- FIG. 15 is a partly sectional top plan view of a lock finger interferingly located at a lock shelf adjacent the lock portion of its respective finger opening according to the prior art sender module closure system.
- FIG. 16 is a perspective view of an improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention.
- FIG. 17 is a top plan view of the improved sender module closure system, wherein the improvement resides in a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention.
- FIG. 18 is a broken-away partly sectional side view of the improved sender module closure system with helmeted lock ring according to the present invention interfaced with a fuel tank and a sender module.
- FIG. 19 is a partly sectional top plan view of a lock finger interferingly located at a lock shelf adjacent the lock portion of its respective finger opening of the improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention.
- FIG. 20A is a first operational view, depicting a lock boss prestaged on its respective prestage ramp of the improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention.
- FIG. 20B is a second operational view, depicting the lock boss now seated at its respective staging socket of the improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention.
- FIGS. 21A and 21B are perspective views showing a bossed service tool being interfaced with notches of the helmeted lock ring according to the present invention.
- the present invention is a helmeted lock ring 222 , as shown at FIGS. 16 through 21 B, which is structured to replace the hereinabove described prior art lock ring 122 to thereby improve the hereinabove described sender module closure system 100 .
- the helmeted lock ring 222 has a lock ring component 222 R which is structurally and functionally the same as the aforementioned prior art lock ring 122 , wherein one may be substituted for the other in the aforesaid sender module closure system. Therefore, the description hereinabove with respect to FIGS. 1 through 15 is applicable to the lock ring component 222 R exactly as it is applicable to the prior art lock ring 122 , so that the description and reference to FIGS.
- the lock ring component 222 R of the helmeted lock ring 222 has a plurality of finger apertures 142 , one for receiving each lock finger 124 (see FIG. 19 ).
- Each finger aperture 142 has an entry portion 142 E for passing a respective lock finger 124 therethrough and a lock portion 142 L at which the lip 126 of the respective lock finger interferingly overhangs a lock shelf 144 of the lock ring component 222 R.
- Each lock shelf 144 tangentially adjoins the lock portion 142 L of its corresponding finger aperture 142 , and has a medially located lock boss 146 .
- a helmet component 222 H of the helmeted lock ring 222 is connected with the lock ring component 222 R, preferably integrally as a single piece construction.
- a helmet sidewall 250 connects to the inner periphery 152 of the lock ring component 222 R.
- a helmet cover wall 260 is integrally connected with the helmet sidewall 250 in generally perpendicular relation to the helmet sidewall (ie., parallel to the orientation of the lock ring component).
- One or more helmet apertures 270 are provided in the helmet component 222 H, provided in the helmet cover wall, the helmet sidewall or both the helmet cover wall and sidewall, so as to allow external access to components 280 of the sender module 104 .
- An upstanding lug 240 (which may be low-rise or high-rise depending on the placement of the helmet aperture) spans each of the helmet apertures formed in the helmet sidewall at the inner periphery 152 of the lock ring component 222 R.
- the sender module 104 is placed into the access port 106 such that the periphery thereof abuts the annular lip 116 .
- the helmeted lock ring 222 is placed thereover, wherein the helmet aperture or apertures 270 provide external access to the sender module components 280 .
- the lock fingers 124 are received through the entry portion 142 E of the finger apertures 142 .
- the helmeted lock ring 122 is then rotated so that the flat 144 F of each lock shelf 144 , as shown by FIG.
- the outer perimeter 122 P of the lock ring component 222 R has a plurality of tool engagement features in the preferred form of notches 148 into which are interfaced with bosses 154 a of a bossed service tool 154 so as to effect the aforesaid rotation and/or to effect further rotation of the helmeted lock ring 222 relative to the base ring 120 .
- the conventional bossed service tool 154 is able to interface with the lock ring component 222 R and avoid interfering contact with the helmet component 222 H.
- the service sequence normally involves removal of hoses (at quick-connects) and wiring (at harness connectors), then installation/removal of the helmeted lock ring.
- each lock boss 146 slides along its respective staging boss 130 and seats at its respective staging socket 132 , as shown at FIG. 20B .
- the seating of the lock bosses 146 in the respective staging sockets 132 causes the lock ring 122 to move toward the fuel tank 102 (in the manner progressively shown by FIGS. 20A and 20B ).
- the resilient seal 110 is compressed (ie., a compression of about 25 percent) so as to cause the resilient seal to seal between the floor of the seal seat groove 108 and the annular flange 114 of the sender module 104 .
- the shape of the lock fingers is a balance between three critical items: a) maximum strength, b) the allowance for an anti-reverse rotation feature, and c) the allowance for a “solid” discernable stop.
- the “offset” W-shape associated with the staging boss, staging socket and over-travel boss of the lips is provided by two post-strikes which are put in during the finalization of the part, wherein a “lead” strike provides the staging boss, and a “follow” strike provides the over-travel boss, and wherein the position of these features relative to the center of the lip allows for two 17 to 18 degree angles which increase strength due to material processing.
- helmeted lock ring 222 serves as a lock ring in the manner of the prior art lock ring 122 , while another function is to provide a protective shield for the sender module 104 , inclusive of its component interfaces.
- the criteria for strength of the helmeted lock ring are: a) providing uniform vertical “pull up” strength evenly distributed through the seven equally spaced load transfer points of the lock finger and lock boss interface locations; b) providing horizontal ring displacement with respect to the helmeted lock ring with respect to the base ring, so as to distribute load displacements through same load centerline; c) providing vertical “push down” of the lock ring component to prevent “kink down” between the encapsulated ring tabs; and d) providing helmet component structural integrity against collapse.
- a helmeted lock ring material thickness of between 3.0 and 2.4 mm is required. A material thicker than this cannot be formed to achieve the dimensional tolerances required, and if thinner, the material will be weaker in kink resistance.
- the material type selected (Galvannealed per GMW2M-ST-S-CR1C) is extremely critical to helmeted lock ring strength and durability.
- the critical sub-component of the material is carbon percentage.
- the helmeted lock ring primary “engagement” to its mating part occurs through the “top dead center” of the seven equally spaced load transfer points of the lock finger and lock boss interface locations.
- the actual radial engagement is 3.75+/ ⁇ 0.50 mm. Smaller dimensions than this run the risk of “disengagement” due to lateral (radial) movements of the ring set (i.e., offset of the ring centerlines). Any dimension larger than this, and the risk of “false torque stalls” exists during ring set tightening (i.e., inability of the bossed service tool to install the helmeted lock ring).
- the helmeted lock ring is a one-piece lock ring and helmet components combination.
- the deep drawn helmet component has three purposes. The first purpose is to function as a secondary piloting feature for the sender module. The second purpose is to add significant kink resistance to the lock ring component in both vertical directions. The third purpose is to shield against sender unit crush due to contact with the underbody or displacement caused by an external load, such as might occur during a crash.
- the helmeted lock ring interfaces with the base ring at the seven equally spaced load transfer points of the lock finger and lock boss interface locations.
- the interfacing shapes and how each is formed is critical.
- Each interface location has four unique attributes which provide strength, durability, and the perception of “lock-up engagement”.
- the first feature is the “prestage”, involving the “landing area” where the ring set temporarily sits before final lock-up, whereat rotation of the helmeted lock ring can be accomplished manually.
- the second attribute is the “cam ramp”, wherein the angle of the ramp is a balance between smooth torque transition, amount of rotation required before “lock-up”, and the ability to process the material.
- the third attribute is referred to as the “top dead center” of the interface locations, whereat the ring set officially “locks-up”, wherein to further add strength and ensure the interface locations do not get “washed-out” a 2.0 mm. “post-coin” operation is added.
- the fourth attribute is referred to as the “over-travel” stop, which is the primary structural aspect preventing the helmeted lock ring from “over caming” past the “top-dead center” lock-up.
- the anticipated torque loads handled by the helmeted lock ring is expected to be on the order of 300 ft/lbs. To withstand this torque without interface location “collapse” or “washout” each interface location has been transitioned into the ring inner periphery at the helmet sidewall.
- the helmeted lock ring interfaces as described hereinabove with the encapsulated base ring.
- To lock the helmeted lock ring to the base ring requires a relative rotation of about twelve degrees.
- the lock portion of the finger apertures of the helmeted lock ring in which the lock fingers of the base ring relatively travel has been narrowed. This width accommodates a 2.0 mm thick base ring. Narrowing the finger apertures may increase strength but will provide for the opportunity of “cam binding”. Increasing will allow the base ring to shift relative to the helmeted lock ring, thus resulting in a non-uniform load distribution.
- the helmeted lock ring is a separate component of the sender module closure system which needs to be installed and removed. This operation is typically conducted by usage of a bossed service tool and, for example, a manufacturing tool.
- the helmet component has, for example, three specific helmet apertures in areas that offer the maximum protection without sacrificing strength.
- the electrical component access portion of the helmet apertures are, for example, formed through the helmet sidewall.
- the service sequence is to take the connectors off first and then install/remove the helmeted lock ring.
- the fuel line component access portion of the helmet apertures are, for example, formed in the helmet sidewall and cover wall.
- the service sequence is to remove the quick connects and then install/remove the helmeted lock ring.
- helmeted lock ring be a one piece design which is targeted to fit all sender modules, both in terms of improved strength and reduced assembly cost.
- the above described preferred embodiment may be subject to change or modification.
- the base ring could be adapted to attach to a metal fuel tank.
- Such change or modification can be carried out without departing from the scope of the invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Cooling, Air Intake And Gas Exhaust, And Fuel Tank Arrangements In Propulsion Units (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to automotive fuel tanks, particularly the closure system used for sealingly interfacing therewith the sender module, and more particularly to a helmeted lock ring therefor.
- Automotive fuel tanks have an access port at an upper wall thereof through which fuel passes and various components are placed, as for example a fuel depth sensor and a fuel pump. Supporting the various components at the access port in sealing relation with the fuel tank is a sender module, which is commonly of plastic construction.
- Historically, the integrity of the seal of the sender module with respect to the fuel tank has been a matter of continuing engineering interest. One of the driving forces behind this interest is ever tightening government vapor emissions rules, wherein emissions concerns may be amplified by manufacturing tolerance variations. An additional cause for engineering interest is the need to increase the cross-sectional size of the access port as additional components are added to the list of components carried by the sender module (ie., from a typical 95 mm to 130 mm). As the size of the access port increases, issues of reliable sealing become more critical, especially in view of crashworthiness vis-a-vis the fuel tank. An interesting added feature to the foregoing considerations is the direction the industry is taking to replace metal fuel tanks with polyethylene fuel tanks.
- Accordingly, what has been needed in the art is a closure system for providing a reliable, sealed interface between the sender module and the fuel tank at the access port thereof. A known fuel tank sender module closure system which has proven extremely successful in this regard is depicted at
FIGS. 1 through 15 . - Referring firstly to
FIGS. 1 through 4 , an overview, in general terms, of the structural and operational facets of the prior art sendermodule closure system 100 will be discussed. The prior art sendermodule closure system 100 is interfaced with respect to afuel tank 102, and asender module 104. Thefuel tank 102 is of a multi-layer polyethylene construction, and has acircular access port 106. Adjacent theaccess port 106 is aseal seat groove 108 having afloor 108F upon which aresilient seal 110 seatably rests. Thesender module 104 is of plastic construction and carries numerous components which access the interior of thefuel tank 102. Thesender module 104 has anannular flange 114 which lies flatly over theresilient seal 110, and further has anannular lip 116 which is received by theaccess port 106 and serves to abuttably locate the sender module with respect to the perimeter of the access port. Theannular flange 114 of thesender module 104 is pressed toward the fuel tank so as to compress theresilient seal 110 sealably between thefloor 108F and theannular flange 114 by action of a mutually interfacingring set 118 composed of abase ring 120 and alock ring 122. - The
base ring 120 has a plurality ofupstanding lock fingers 124 spaced equally therearound, each lock finger having a laterally orientedlip 126 projecting radially inward toward a center of the base ring. As seen atFIG. 3 , eachlip 126 has aprestage ramp 128, astaging boss 130, astaging socket 132 and an over-travelboss 134. Thebase ring 120 further has ananchor portion 136 which is permanently attached to thefuel tank 102 during blow molding of the polyethylene during forming of the fuel tank. A preferred shape of theanchor portion 136 is an “S” shape, as shown atFIG. 2 , wherein thelower section 136L is laterally oriented, themiddle section 136M is upwardly oriented and has a plurality of embedment holes 138 (seeFIG. 3 ), and theupper section 136U rests laterally in abase ring groove 140. A plurality oftabs 136T extend laterally outward and are embedded in the polyethylene of the fuel tank. Theaforementioned lock fingers 124 upwardly extend from theupper section 136U so as to be upstanding in relation to theseal seat groove 108 and thefuel tank 102. - While the
base ring 120 is an integrated component of thefuel tank 102, the lock ring 122 (depicted atFIG. 4 ) is an independent component which is separate from the fuel tank. Thelock ring 122 has a plurality offinger apertures 142, one for receiving eachlock finger 124. Eachfinger aperture 142 has anentry portion 142E for passing a respective lock finger therethrough and alock portion 142L at which thelip 126 of the respective lock finger interferingly overhangs alock shelf 144 of thelock ring 122. As shown atFIG. 2 , eachlock shelf 144 tangentially adjoins thelock portion 142L of itscorresponding finger aperture 142, and has a medially locatedlock boss 146. An upstandingannular lug 150 is provided at theinner periphery 152 of the lock ring for stiffening, as well as for aiding location with respect to thesender module 104. - Referring now primarily to
FIG. 2 , operation of the prior art sendermodule closure system 100 will be generally described. - The
sender module 104 is placed into theaccess port 106 such that the periphery thereof abuts theannular lip 116. With theresilient seal 110 seated at itsseal seat groove 108, and theannular flange 114 resting upon the resilient seal, thelock ring 122 is placed thereover via thelock fingers 124 being received through theentry portion 142E of thefinger apertures 142. Thelock ring 122 is then rotated so that the flat 144F of each lock shelf 144 (seeFIG. 12 ) is prestaged interferingly under its respective lockfinger prestage ramp 128. Theouter perimeter 122P of thelock ring 122 has a plurality of tool engagement features in the preferred form ofnotches 148 into which are interfaced withbosses 154 a of abossed service tool 154 so as to effect the aforesaid rotation and/or to effect further rotation of thelock ring 122 relative to thebase ring 120. - As the rotation ensues (referred to as “camming on”), each
lock boss 146 slides along itsrespective staging boss 130 and seats at itsrespective staging socket 132. The seating of thelock bosses 146 in therespective staging sockets 132 causes thelock ring 122 to move toward thefuel tank 102. Accordingly, theresilient seal 110 is compressed (i.e., a compression of about 25 percent) so as to cause the resilient seal to seal between thefloor 108F of theseal seat groove 108 and theannular flange 114 of thesender module 104. Over-travel is not permitted by thelock finger 124 abutting theend 142S (seeFIG. 4 ) of itsrespective finger aperture 142, and eachlock boss 146 tends to center at itsstaging socket 132 by cooperative action of the over-travelboss 134 and thestaging boss 130 with respect to thelock boss 146 situated therebetween. Thebossed service tool 154 may be again interfaced with thenotches 148 so as to effect reverse rotation of the lock ring 122 (referred to as “camming off”) so that the sender module may be removed from the fuel tank. - Referring now additionally to
FIGS. 5 through 15 , further illustrative aspects of the prior art sendermodule closure system 100 will be detailed. - The
base ring 120, seen atFIGS. 5 through 8 and labeled as described hereinabove, is composed of rigid galvanized and annealed (galvannealed) steel having a thickness of 2.0 mm and a protective coating, such as paint. As shown atFIG. 5 , the inner diameter D1 is 145.0 mm, and there are sevenlock fingers 124, wherein thelips 126 thereof are all laterally oriented and project radially and laterally toward the center of the base ring, and wherein theedge 126E of the lips has an angle A1 of 90.0 degrees relative to a radiant (seeFIG. 7 ). - Each of the
lips 126 is embossed to provide theprestage ramp 128, thestaging boss 130, thestaging socket 132 and the over-travelboss 134. As shown atFIG. 8 , the width W of the lock finger is 27.61 mm, which corresponds to a tangential angle A2 of 18.0 degrees; the angle A3 of the staging boss is 20.0 degrees; the angle A4 of the over-travel boss is 17.2 degrees; the angle A5 of the staging boss side of the staging socket is 18.3 degrees; the distance S1 between the apex of the staging boss and the center of the staging socket is 2.70 mm; the distance S2 between the center of the staging socket and the apex of the over-travel boss is 4.70 mm; the staging ramp has a height H1 of 8.80 mm; the staging boss has a height H2 at its apex of 7.85 mm; the staging socket has a height H3 at its center of 8.45 mm; and the over-travel boss has a height H4 at its apex of 7.25 mm. Each lock finger has an upward taper at an angle A6 of 4.15 degrees, and the lip thereof has a lateral (radial) overhang distance S3 of 3.5 mm. - The
lock ring 122, seen atFIGS. 9 through 11 and labeled as described hereinabove, is composed of rigid galvanized and annealed (galvannealed) steel having a thickness of 2.5 mm and a protective coating, such as paint. As shown atFIG. 9 , the inner perimeter diameter D2 is 125.25 mm, and there are sevenfinger apertures 142, having a tangential elongation angle A7 of 37.56 degrees, with the lock portion thereof having a tangential elongation angle A8 of 18.0 degrees. The radial cross-section C1 of the entry portion of each finger aperture is 9 mm and the radial cross-section C2 of the lock portion is 4 mm. The lock boss has a fore angle A9 of 22 degrees; an aft angle A10 of 45 degrees, and a height H5 of 4.3 mm. The lock boss is located a distance S4 of about 4 mm from the end of the aforementioned lock shelf 144 (at theentry portion 142E), thereby defining a flat 144F (seeFIG. 12 ). -
FIG. 12 shows the interaction between thestaging socket 132 and thelock boss 146 when thelock ring 122 is locked relative to thebase ring 120, as well as showing the relative placement of theprestage ramp 128, thestaging boss 130 and the over-travelboss 134. It is seen that thelock boss 146 is seatingly positioned in thestaging socket 132 akin to a “ball-and-socket” arrangement, in the sense that the “socket” is defined by the concave shape between the staging and over-travel bosses and the “ball” is defined by the convex shape of the lock boss. -
FIG. 13A depicts thelock ring 122 “prestaged” with respect to thebase ring 120. In this regard, the flat 144F of thelock shelf 144 is slipped abuttingly (interferingly) under theprestage ramp 128. This position may be obtained by hand movement of thelock ring 122 or via thebossed service tool 154.FIG. 13B shows the lock boss “staged” whereat thelock boss 146 is seated into thestaging socket 132. As can be seen by comparison betweenFIGS. 13A and 13B , rotation of thelock ring 122 from the prestaged position to the staged position involves the lock bosses causing the lock ring to move vertically toward the fuel tank. This movement causes the above mentioned sealing compression of the resilient seal between the annular flange and the fuel tank. -
FIGS. 14 and 15 depict further aspects of the locking of thelock ring 122 onto thebase ring 120. As can be best seen atFIG. 14 , thelip 126 interferingly overhangs thelock shelf 144. As can be best seen atFIG. 15 , over travel of thelock boss 146 with respect to thestaging socket 132 is prevented by eachlock finger 124 striking theend 142S of thelock portion 142E of itsrespective finger aperture 142. At this position, each lock boss engages its respective over-travel boss, which engagement tends to center each lock boss into its respective staging socket. It is preferable that the contact location of thelock ring 122 with respect to the base ring 120 (when the lock ring is at the staged position) occurs with respect to a portion of the lock boss and the staging socket which is radially nearest the lock aperture (ie., about 4 mm radially inward from thelock portion 142L). - The following comments amplify upon the above recounted illustration.
- The
base ring 120 has seven lock fingers 18 degrees wide, and thelock ring 122 has seven symmetrically spaced lock bosses so that: a) load is dissipated into the anchor portion of the base, b) thelock ring 122 is cammed on without the lock fingers flexing, and c) there is a minimum distance between the prestage and staged positions. - The lock ring material thickness of 2.5 mm eliminates a phenomenon termed “potato chipping,” which refers to a ring bending between its engagement spokes. The
annular lug 150 of the lock ring runs out 2.5 mm for eliminating a phenomenon termed “tee pee,” which refers to a ring bending up or down at the inside diameter relative to the outside diameter. Thelock ring notches 148 are minimized so as to eliminate potato chipping and tee pee. The base ring material has a thickness of 2.0 mm so as to eliminate “ring flexing” between or at the lock fingers. - When the
lock ring 122 is cammed on into the staged position, a “ball and socket” arrangement transpires, entailing a critical manufacturing of both a 2.5 mm radius “socket” and a 2.0 mm radius “ball.” The entire load dissipation of the ring set at the staged position occurs through the seven lock bosses which are equally spaced apart by 53.4 degrees (also referred to as “top dead center” of the “ball” locking into the “socket”), wherein the critical linear load carrying distance for this interface is 4.0 mm radially inward from thelock portion 142L of the finger aperture. To ensure maximum load transfer between thelock ring 122 and thelock fingers 124, the lock ring finger apertures are toleranced and narrowed so as to be as small as possible. - The shape of the lock fingers is a balance between three critical items: a) maximum strength, b) the allowance for an anti-reverse rotation feature, and c) the allowance for a “solid” discernable stop.
- The “offset” W-shape associated with the staging boss, staging socket and over-travel boss of the lips is provided by two post-strikes which are put in during the finalization of the part, wherein a “lead” strike provides the staging boss, and a “follow” strike provides the over-travel boss, and wherein the position of these features relative to the center of the lip allows for two 17 to 18 degree angles which increase strength due to material processing.
- A 1.0 mm radius on the underside of the base ring lock fingers prevents “finger flex” (a condition noted when the lock finger is bent up greater than 5 degrees), wherein if this radius is too large then installation torque increases will be noticed, and if this radius is 0 mm, then a stress riser will exist within in the part.
- The size and placement of the base ring embedment holes play a significant role in ring strength, wherein the size and locations thereof are selected as a balance between three critical operational modes: a) base ring anchored embedment (encapsulation) into the polyethylene of the fuel tank, b) base ring strength during fuel tank flex, and c) base ring strength during lock ring installation.
- The tangential length of the lock ring finger apertures is designed to only allow a 1 degree of over-travel before a “dead stop” occurs.
- The shape, position, arc length, radius, and number of bossed service tool
boss interface notches 148 of thelock ring 122 are a balance between five critical factors: a) need for interfacing with the bossed service tool, b) need for the bossed service tool to provide lock ring installation (“camming on”), c) need for the bossed service tool to effect removal of the lock ring (“camming off”), d) elimination of inclusion of a stress riser, thus preventing ring potato chipping, and e) multiple bossed service tool orientation options. - While the aforementioned prior art sender
module closure system 100 has provided exemplar service, it would be very beneficial if somehow it could be strengthened and provide protection for the sender module while yet being able to be interfaced as described above by the bossed service tool. - The present invention is an improved sender module closure system for providing a reliable, sealed interface between the sender module and the fuel tank at the access port thereof, wherein the improvement resides in the lock ring thereof, wherein the conventional lock ring is replaced by a helmeted lock ring so as to provide, among a range of attributes, strength and protection for the sender module.
- The improved sender closure module system according to the present invention includes a mutually interfacing ring set composed of a base ring and a helmeted lock ring.
- The base ring is conventional, being permanently connected to the fuel tank at the access port, as for example by encapsulation of an anchor portion thereof by the polyethylene of the fuel tank during its manufacture. The base ring has a plurality of upstanding lock fingers spaced equally therearound, each lock finger having a lip. Each lip has a prestage ramp, a staging boss, a staging socket and an over-travel boss.
- The helmeted lock ring is a separate piece, composed of a lock ring component and a helmet component.
- The lock ring component is configured to mimic a conventional lock ring, having a plurality of finger apertures, one for receiving each lock finger. Each finger aperture has an entry portion for passing a respective lock finger therethrough and a lock portion at which the lip interferingly overhangs a lock shelf of the lock ring member. Each lock shelf adjoins the lock portion of its corresponding finger aperture, and has a medially located lock boss.
- The helmet component is connected with the lock ring component at the inner periphery thereof, preferably integrally as a single piece construction. The helmet component is composed of a helmet sidewall in upstanding relation to the lock ring component at the inner periphery thereof, and a helmet cover wall integrally formed with the helmet sidewall. One or more helmet apertures are formed in the helmet component to provide access for components of the sender module and yet provide a protective covering of the sender module.
- In operation, as is the conventional practice known in the art, the periphery of the access port of the fuel tank has a seal seat groove which is concentrically disposed relative to the lock fingers. A resilient seal is located at the seal seat groove. The sender module is located at the access port, wherein an annular flange of the sender module rests upon the resilient seal.
- Now, according to the present invention, the helmeted lock ring is placed over the sender module so that the components of the sender module have access through the one or more helmet apertures. The finger apertures of the lock ring component now receive the lock fingers, and the helmeted lock ring is thereafter rotated by hand or with use of a bossed service tool so that each lock shelf is prestaged interferingly under its respective lock finger prestage ramp. The conventional bossed service tool is then used to rotate the helmeted lock ring so that each lock boss slides along its respective staging boss and then seats at its respective staging socket. As each lock boss slides along its staging boss and then seats in its staging socket, the helmeted lock ring is moved toward the fuel tank, which movement causes the resilient seal to be compressed sealingly between the fuel tank at the seal seat groove and the annular flange of the sender module. Over-travel is not permitted by the lock finger abutting the end of its respective finger aperture, and each lock boss tends to center at its staging socket by cooperative action of the over-travel and staging bosses with respect to the lock boss situated therebetween. Now the sender module is protected by the helmet component, and the helmeted lock ring has strength to resist shears and forces as may be at some later time applied to the improved sender module closure system.
- Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved sender module closure system for providing a reliable, sealed interface between the sender module and the fuel tank at the access port thereof, wherein the improvement resides in a helmeted lock ring which provides, among various attributes, inherent strength as well as protection for the sender module.
- This and additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become clearer from the following specification of a preferred embodiment.
-
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a fuel tank, showing a sender module sealingly interfaced thereto by a prior art sender module closure system. -
FIG. 2 is a broken-away partly sectional side view of the prior art sender module closure system interfaced with the fuel tank and sender module as inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a base ring of a ring set according to the prior art sender module closure system. -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a lock ring of the ring set according to the prior art sender module closure system. -
FIG. 5 is a top plan view of the base ring ofFIG. 3 . -
FIG. 6 is a side view of the base ring, seen along line 6-6 ofFIG. 5 . -
FIG. 7 is a detail top view of a lock finger of the base ring ofFIG. 3 , seen at circle 7 ofFIG. 5 . -
FIG. 8 is a partly sectional, broken away view, seen along line 8-8 ofFIG. 5 . -
FIG. 9 is a top plan view of the prior art lock ring ofFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 10 is a side view of the prior art lock ring, seen along line 10-10 ofFIG. 5 . -
FIG. 11 is a detail sectional view, seen along line 11-11 ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 12 is a sectional, broken away view showing a lock boss of the prior art lock ring seated at its respective staging socket of a lock finger of the base ring. -
FIG. 13A is a first operational view, depicting a lock boss prestaged on its respective prestage ramp. -
FIG. 13B is a second operational view, depicting the lock boss now seated at its respective staging socket. -
FIG. 14 is a perspective view of the prior art lock ring interferingly interfaced with the base ring. -
FIG. 15 is a partly sectional top plan view of a lock finger interferingly located at a lock shelf adjacent the lock portion of its respective finger opening according to the prior art sender module closure system. -
FIG. 16 is a perspective view of an improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention. -
FIG. 17 is a top plan view of the improved sender module closure system, wherein the improvement resides in a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention. -
FIG. 18 is a broken-away partly sectional side view of the improved sender module closure system with helmeted lock ring according to the present invention interfaced with a fuel tank and a sender module. -
FIG. 19 is a partly sectional top plan view of a lock finger interferingly located at a lock shelf adjacent the lock portion of its respective finger opening of the improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention. -
FIG. 20A is a first operational view, depicting a lock boss prestaged on its respective prestage ramp of the improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention. -
FIG. 20B is a second operational view, depicting the lock boss now seated at its respective staging socket of the improved sender module closure system having a helmeted lock ring according to the present invention. -
FIGS. 21A and 21B are perspective views showing a bossed service tool being interfaced with notches of the helmeted lock ring according to the present invention. - The present invention is a
helmeted lock ring 222, as shown atFIGS. 16 through 21 B, which is structured to replace the hereinabove described priorart lock ring 122 to thereby improve the hereinabove described sendermodule closure system 100. In this regard, thehelmeted lock ring 222 has alock ring component 222R which is structurally and functionally the same as the aforementioned priorart lock ring 122, wherein one may be substituted for the other in the aforesaid sender module closure system. Therefore, the description hereinabove with respect toFIGS. 1 through 15 is applicable to thelock ring component 222R exactly as it is applicable to the priorart lock ring 122, so that the description and reference toFIGS. 1 through 15 in the hereinabove Background of the Invention is fully applicable to the structure and function of thelock ring component 222R with respect to the sendermodule closure system 100. Accordingly, like components and features as discussed hereinabove will be designated hereinbelow using the same numerals used inFIGS. 1 through 15 . - The
lock ring component 222R of thehelmeted lock ring 222 has a plurality offinger apertures 142, one for receiving each lock finger 124 (seeFIG. 19 ). Eachfinger aperture 142 has anentry portion 142E for passing arespective lock finger 124 therethrough and alock portion 142L at which thelip 126 of the respective lock finger interferingly overhangs alock shelf 144 of thelock ring component 222R. Eachlock shelf 144 tangentially adjoins thelock portion 142L of itscorresponding finger aperture 142, and has a medially locatedlock boss 146. - A
helmet component 222H of thehelmeted lock ring 222 is connected with thelock ring component 222R, preferably integrally as a single piece construction. In this regard, ahelmet sidewall 250 connects to theinner periphery 152 of thelock ring component 222R. Ahelmet cover wall 260 is integrally connected with thehelmet sidewall 250 in generally perpendicular relation to the helmet sidewall (ie., parallel to the orientation of the lock ring component). One ormore helmet apertures 270 are provided in thehelmet component 222H, provided in the helmet cover wall, the helmet sidewall or both the helmet cover wall and sidewall, so as to allow external access tocomponents 280 of thesender module 104. An upstanding lug 240 (which may be low-rise or high-rise depending on the placement of the helmet aperture) spans each of the helmet apertures formed in the helmet sidewall at theinner periphery 152 of thelock ring component 222R. - Operationally, in analogous manner to that respecting
FIGS. 1 through 15 , thesender module 104 is placed into theaccess port 106 such that the periphery thereof abuts theannular lip 116. With theresilient seal 110 seated at itsseal seat groove 108, and theannular flange 114 resting upon the resilient seal, thehelmeted lock ring 222 is placed thereover, wherein the helmet aperture orapertures 270 provide external access to thesender module components 280. Now, thelock fingers 124 are received through theentry portion 142E of thefinger apertures 142. Thehelmeted lock ring 122 is then rotated so that the flat 144F of eachlock shelf 144, as shown byFIG. 20A , is prestaged interferingly under its respective lockfinger prestage ramp 128. As can be understood fromFIGS. 21A and 21B , theouter perimeter 122P of thelock ring component 222R has a plurality of tool engagement features in the preferred form ofnotches 148 into which are interfaced withbosses 154 a of a bossedservice tool 154 so as to effect the aforesaid rotation and/or to effect further rotation of thehelmeted lock ring 222 relative to thebase ring 120. In this regard, as best shown atFIG. 21 , the conventional bossedservice tool 154 is able to interface with thelock ring component 222R and avoid interfering contact with thehelmet component 222H. The service sequence normally involves removal of hoses (at quick-connects) and wiring (at harness connectors), then installation/removal of the helmeted lock ring. - As the rotation ensues (referred to as “camming on”), each
lock boss 146 slides along itsrespective staging boss 130 and seats at itsrespective staging socket 132, as shown atFIG. 20B . The seating of thelock bosses 146 in therespective staging sockets 132 causes thelock ring 122 to move toward the fuel tank 102 (in the manner progressively shown byFIGS. 20A and 20B ). Accordingly, as shown atFIG. 18 , theresilient seal 110 is compressed (ie., a compression of about 25 percent) so as to cause the resilient seal to seal between the floor of theseal seat groove 108 and theannular flange 114 of thesender module 104. Over-travel is not permitted by thelock finger 124 abutting theend 142S, as shown atFIG. 19 , of itsrespective finger aperture 142, and eachlock boss 146 tends to center at itsstaging socket 132 by cooperative action of theover-travel boss 134 and the stagingboss 130 with respect to thelock boss 146 situated therebetween. Subsequently, thebosses 154 a of the bossedservice tool 154 may be again interfaced with thenotches 148 so as to effect reverse rotation of the helmeted lock ring 222 (referred to as “camming off”) so that thesender module 104 may be removed from thefuel tank 102. - When the
helmeted lock ring 222 is cammed on into the staged position, a “ball and socket” arrangement transpires, entailing a critical manufacturing of both a 2.5 mm radius “socket” and a 2.0 mm radius “ball.” The entire load dissipation of the ring set composed of the base ring and the helmeted lock ring, at the staged position occurs through the seven lock bosses which are equally spaced apart by 53.4 degrees (also referred to as “top dead center” of the “ball” locking into the “socket”), wherein the critical linear load carrying distance for this interface is 4.0 mm radially inward from thelock portion 142L of the finger aperture. To ensure maximum load transfer between thelock ring component 222R and thelock fingers 124, the lock ring finger apertures are toleranced and narrowed so as to be as small as possible. - As mentioned hereinabove with respect to the base ring, the shape of the lock fingers is a balance between three critical items: a) maximum strength, b) the allowance for an anti-reverse rotation feature, and c) the allowance for a “solid” discernable stop. Further, the “offset” W-shape associated with the staging boss, staging socket and over-travel boss of the lips is provided by two post-strikes which are put in during the finalization of the part, wherein a “lead” strike provides the staging boss, and a “follow” strike provides the over-travel boss, and wherein the position of these features relative to the center of the lip allows for two 17 to 18 degree angles which increase strength due to material processing.
- One function of the
helmeted lock ring 222 is to serve as a lock ring in the manner of the priorart lock ring 122, while another function is to provide a protective shield for thesender module 104, inclusive of its component interfaces. - There are a number of concerns with regard to vehicle architecture vis-a-vis the sender module closure system. These concerns include: a) the vehicle body or underbody components adversely contacting the sender module, and/or damaging external connectors of the sender module during a crash event; b) certain crash events possibly involving situations in which a crash pulse and liquid response dynamics of the fuel tends to force the sender module toward the vehicle underbody; c) certain crash pulses possibly creating a torque in the area of the sender module which tends to cause “bottle cap” opening of the interface between the flange and the seal; d) certain crash events possibly involving folding of the fuel tank across the sender module and involving the fuel tank access port; e) certain crash events possibly causing the sender module access port of the fuel tank being distorted in the horizontal plane (ovality); and f) certain crash events possibly causing the vehicle underbody to fold down onto the sender module access opening in the fuel tank. Any of these untoward events can cause, for example, a crack in the sender module flange or cause a momentary relief of seal compression between the seal, the flange, and/or the fuel tank groove.
- These vehicle architecture concerns may be assuaged by the sender module closure system including the
helmeted lock ring 222, as discussed hereinbelow. - For reference, the criteria for strength of the helmeted lock ring are: a) providing uniform vertical “pull up” strength evenly distributed through the seven equally spaced load transfer points of the lock finger and lock boss interface locations; b) providing horizontal ring displacement with respect to the helmeted lock ring with respect to the base ring, so as to distribute load displacements through same load centerline; c) providing vertical “push down” of the lock ring component to prevent “kink down” between the encapsulated ring tabs; and d) providing helmet component structural integrity against collapse.
- There are a number of documented critical features of the helmeted lock ring when simultaneously incorporated in a sender module closure system, as follows.
- 1. A helmeted lock ring material thickness of between 3.0 and 2.4 mm is required. A material thicker than this cannot be formed to achieve the dimensional tolerances required, and if thinner, the material will be weaker in kink resistance.
- 2. The material type selected (Galvannealed per GMW2M-ST-S-CR1C) is extremely critical to helmeted lock ring strength and durability. The critical sub-component of the material is carbon percentage.
- 3. The helmeted lock ring primary “engagement” to its mating part (i.e., the base ring) occurs through the “top dead center” of the seven equally spaced load transfer points of the lock finger and lock boss interface locations. The actual radial engagement is 3.75+/−0.50 mm. Smaller dimensions than this run the risk of “disengagement” due to lateral (radial) movements of the ring set (i.e., offset of the ring centerlines). Any dimension larger than this, and the risk of “false torque stalls” exists during ring set tightening (i.e., inability of the bossed service tool to install the helmeted lock ring).
- 4. The helmeted lock ring is a one-piece lock ring and helmet components combination. The deep drawn helmet component has three purposes. The first purpose is to function as a secondary piloting feature for the sender module. The second purpose is to add significant kink resistance to the lock ring component in both vertical directions. The third purpose is to shield against sender unit crush due to contact with the underbody or displacement caused by an external load, such as might occur during a crash.
- 5. The helmeted lock ring interfaces with the base ring at the seven equally spaced load transfer points of the lock finger and lock boss interface locations. The interfacing shapes and how each is formed is critical. Each interface location has four unique attributes which provide strength, durability, and the perception of “lock-up engagement”. The first feature is the “prestage”, involving the “landing area” where the ring set temporarily sits before final lock-up, whereat rotation of the helmeted lock ring can be accomplished manually. The second attribute is the “cam ramp”, wherein the angle of the ramp is a balance between smooth torque transition, amount of rotation required before “lock-up”, and the ability to process the material. The third attribute is referred to as the “top dead center” of the interface locations, whereat the ring set officially “locks-up”, wherein to further add strength and ensure the interface locations do not get “washed-out” a 2.0 mm. “post-coin” operation is added. The fourth attribute is referred to as the “over-travel” stop, which is the primary structural aspect preventing the helmeted lock ring from “over caming” past the “top-dead center” lock-up.
- 6. The anticipated torque loads handled by the helmeted lock ring is expected to be on the order of 300 ft/lbs. To withstand this torque without interface location “collapse” or “washout” each interface location has been transitioned into the ring inner periphery at the helmet sidewall.
- 7. During the “cam over” process, a tremendous amount of force exists. If the ring set slips over the “top dead center” and gets lodged, then the helmeted lock ring will be in a position in which there is an inappropriate sender module seal compression. Therefore, to prevent this “over cam” from happening, a secondary stop has been built into the helmeted lock ring.
- 8. The helmeted lock ring interfaces as described hereinabove with the encapsulated base ring. To lock the helmeted lock ring to the base ring requires a relative rotation of about twelve degrees. To achieve maximum strength, the lock portion of the finger apertures of the helmeted lock ring in which the lock fingers of the base ring relatively travel has been narrowed. This width accommodates a 2.0 mm thick base ring. Narrowing the finger apertures may increase strength but will provide for the opportunity of “cam binding”. Increasing will allow the base ring to shift relative to the helmeted lock ring, thus resulting in a non-uniform load distribution.
- 9. The helmeted lock ring is a separate component of the sender module closure system which needs to be installed and removed. This operation is typically conducted by usage of a bossed service tool and, for example, a manufacturing tool. In addition, the helmet component has, for example, three specific helmet apertures in areas that offer the maximum protection without sacrificing strength. The electrical component access portion of the helmet apertures are, for example, formed through the helmet sidewall. The service sequence is to take the connectors off first and then install/remove the helmeted lock ring. The fuel line component access portion of the helmet apertures are, for example, formed in the helmet sidewall and cover wall. The service sequence is to remove the quick connects and then install/remove the helmeted lock ring.
- 10. An important structural consideration is that the helmeted lock ring be a one piece design which is targeted to fit all sender modules, both in terms of improved strength and reduced assembly cost.
- To those skilled in the art to which this invention appertains, the above described preferred embodiment may be subject to change or modification. For example, the base ring could be adapted to attach to a metal fuel tank. Such change or modification can be carried out without departing from the scope of the invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/197,282 US20070039963A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 | 2005-08-04 | Helmeted lock ring for a sender module closure system for a fuel tank |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/197,282 US20070039963A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 | 2005-08-04 | Helmeted lock ring for a sender module closure system for a fuel tank |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070039963A1 true US20070039963A1 (en) | 2007-02-22 |
Family
ID=37766526
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/197,282 Abandoned US20070039963A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 | 2005-08-04 | Helmeted lock ring for a sender module closure system for a fuel tank |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070039963A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20180178643A1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Daniel Ray Enyeart | Fuel tank cap and mounting bracket apparatus |
US10738745B2 (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2020-08-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicle fuel pump cover assembly and method |
US20200300467A1 (en) * | 2017-10-11 | 2020-09-24 | Nunziatini VILARDI | Firelighter Cage |
US11280305B2 (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2022-03-22 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicle fuel pump cover assembly and method |
US11371478B2 (en) * | 2018-03-14 | 2022-06-28 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Systems and methods for a fuel delivery module helmet of hybrid vehicle |
US11614095B2 (en) * | 2020-01-07 | 2023-03-28 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Fuel pump cover |
USD995395S1 (en) * | 2021-04-12 | 2023-08-15 | RB Distribution, Inc. | Fuel tank repair ring |
US12012915B2 (en) | 2021-02-09 | 2024-06-18 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Pump cover attachment system |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4332331A (en) * | 1980-06-03 | 1982-06-01 | Fawley Norman | Rotatable valve protector for compressed gas cylinder |
US20050194796A1 (en) * | 2004-03-04 | 2005-09-08 | Patrick Powell | Retention plate for fuel pump module |
US7069643B2 (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2006-07-04 | Spx Corporation | Fuel sending unit lock ring tool |
US7341047B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2008-03-11 | Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc. | Vehicle fuel tank assembly |
-
2005
- 2005-08-04 US US11/197,282 patent/US20070039963A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4332331A (en) * | 1980-06-03 | 1982-06-01 | Fawley Norman | Rotatable valve protector for compressed gas cylinder |
US7069643B2 (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2006-07-04 | Spx Corporation | Fuel sending unit lock ring tool |
US20050194796A1 (en) * | 2004-03-04 | 2005-09-08 | Patrick Powell | Retention plate for fuel pump module |
US7341047B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2008-03-11 | Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc. | Vehicle fuel tank assembly |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20180178643A1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Daniel Ray Enyeart | Fuel tank cap and mounting bracket apparatus |
US10308110B2 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2019-06-04 | Daniel Ray Enyeart | Fuel tank cap and mounting bracket apparatus |
US20200300467A1 (en) * | 2017-10-11 | 2020-09-24 | Nunziatini VILARDI | Firelighter Cage |
US11371478B2 (en) * | 2018-03-14 | 2022-06-28 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Systems and methods for a fuel delivery module helmet of hybrid vehicle |
US10738745B2 (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2020-08-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicle fuel pump cover assembly and method |
US11280305B2 (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2022-03-22 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicle fuel pump cover assembly and method |
US11614095B2 (en) * | 2020-01-07 | 2023-03-28 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Fuel pump cover |
US12012915B2 (en) | 2021-02-09 | 2024-06-18 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Pump cover attachment system |
USD995395S1 (en) * | 2021-04-12 | 2023-08-15 | RB Distribution, Inc. | Fuel tank repair ring |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20070039963A1 (en) | Helmeted lock ring for a sender module closure system for a fuel tank | |
US4256240A (en) | Container closure | |
US4871052A (en) | Conveyor ball unit | |
US7114853B2 (en) | Suspension thrust bearing device | |
CN103025568B (en) | For the assembly parts of seat | |
JPS6220076B2 (en) | ||
EP3097315B1 (en) | Locking nut and washer | |
US10696456B2 (en) | Cap assembly having integrated inner liner and shell | |
US20160245280A1 (en) | Device interlocking with a compartment | |
CN101166910A (en) | Device for fastening at least one object to a supporting part provided with a fastening bolt | |
CN114810793A (en) | Levelable lining | |
US10876569B2 (en) | Locking nut or bolt and washer | |
US9789836B2 (en) | Ring bracket for snap-lock engagement verification | |
US4467937A (en) | Filler cap assembly | |
CN111712439B (en) | Plug closure with valve device for plug container | |
EP1726852B1 (en) | Coverpan gasket | |
CN1085175C (en) | A can with a pressure lid | |
US10308110B2 (en) | Fuel tank cap and mounting bracket apparatus | |
US11398320B2 (en) | Container for radioactive waste comprising L-shaped grooves for fixedly connecting cover without welds | |
US11913487B2 (en) | Sealing nut for electric vehicles | |
US4222331A (en) | Resilient center plate assembly | |
US20150114251A1 (en) | Cable return pulley and cable transportation system comprising such a pulley | |
US7069643B2 (en) | Fuel sending unit lock ring tool | |
CN106166918A (en) | A kind of wheel disk fixed structure | |
US11359657B2 (en) | Fitting for attachment to a part and associated assembly and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KRENTZ, RICHAR H.;BETZ II, GERARD G.;GADEN, DALE D.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016842/0037;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050623 TO 20050721 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022195/0334 Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022195/0334 Effective date: 20081231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0493 Effective date: 20090409 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0493 Effective date: 20090409 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0519 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0519 Effective date: 20090709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0402 Effective date: 20090814 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0402 Effective date: 20090814 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |