US20070039954A1 - Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container - Google Patents

Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070039954A1
US20070039954A1 US11/429,821 US42982106A US2007039954A1 US 20070039954 A1 US20070039954 A1 US 20070039954A1 US 42982106 A US42982106 A US 42982106A US 2007039954 A1 US2007039954 A1 US 2007039954A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
connecting member
frame
blast
connection device
panel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/429,821
Inventor
Ming-Jong Wang
Chao-Chyun An
Buh-Shiuh Teng
Chuang-Chieh Hsu
Feng-Ho Wang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI
Original Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/444,615 external-priority patent/US20030230589A1/en
Application filed by Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI filed Critical Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI
Priority to US11/429,821 priority Critical patent/US20070039954A1/en
Assigned to INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE reassignment INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AN, CHAO-CHYUN, HSU, CHUANG-CHIEH, TENG, BUH-SHIUH, WANG, FENG-HO, WANG, MING-JONG
Publication of US20070039954A1 publication Critical patent/US20070039954A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D88/00Large containers
    • B65D88/02Large containers rigid
    • B65D88/12Large containers rigid specially adapted for transport
    • B65D88/14Large containers rigid specially adapted for transport by air
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D90/00Component parts, details or accessories for large containers
    • B65D90/02Wall construction
    • B65D90/08Interconnections of wall parts; Sealing means therefor
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D90/00Component parts, details or accessories for large containers
    • B65D90/22Safety features
    • B65D90/32Arrangements for preventing, or minimising the effect of, excessive or insufficient pressure
    • B65D90/325Arrangements for preventing, or minimising the effect of, excessive or insufficient pressure due to explosion, e.g. inside the container

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a connection device of a container, and more particularly to a connection device for use with the blast-resistant container.
  • the present invention connect one frame to its adjacent panels in this container, and it can not only transmit strong membrane force between two panels to meet the connection requirement of a blast-resistant container, but also especially admits one of which two panels relatively moving to the other one along the longitudinal direction of the frame.
  • a container is usually a box-shaped or nearly box-shaped structure.
  • the blast-resistant container need to undertake the blast pressure much greater than the payloads of the conventional container overall.
  • the container will deform tending to spherical shape unavoidably if its weight is limited for real use.
  • it is a much more serious problem if we want to connect two adjacent panels through a rigid frame when one panel of those adjacent panels cannot be expanded freely.
  • the present invention is mainly to solve those important problems of a blast-resistant container.
  • an air cargo container must comprise strong and rigid enough frames, which can undertake the side restraint loadings for fixing the container on the deck of an airplane, on the perimeter of its bottom panel.
  • the bottom perimeter frames are also a connection device between side panels and bottom panel of the container. And its bottom panel is strongly supported by the deck on an airplane, but the other panels of the container can expand freely.
  • the air cargo container does not have a strengthened design about the bottom perimeter frames connecting the side panels and bottom panel to resist an explosive blast, it is very easy to failure for the bottom panel separating with its adjacent side panels under the explosive blast. Even all the panels of the air cargo container are high membrane strength enough! There are two reasons to induce the former description. Firstly, the higher rigidity of bottom perimeter frames causes the difficult of relative rotation between the frame and side panel. Secondly, the explosive pressure cause all panels but bottom panel deform to outside, because it can be transmitted to the deck of an airplane or ground directly. Therefore, even one strengthened connection device, which can transmit membrane forces effectively between panels (except bottom panel and its adjacent panels), may not work well for bottom panel and its adjacent panels.
  • some blast-resistant container uses the connecting members which extends upward some length directly from bottom perimeter frames to combine with the side panels of this container. It is a possible way to solve this problem; because the directly extended connecting members may soften the rotation stiffness between the bottom perimeter frames and the down edges of side panels. But it is not a reliable mechanism. Because the magnitude of the most seriously bending strain in the connecting member, which may cause the failure of a blast-resistant container, is not under control and the site of maximum strain is also random.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,853,238 is related to a container composed of side panels interconnected to one another via multiple snap latches located slightly inboard of the rear edges of the panels.
  • Each of the latches is received by a housing in one of the side panels and is normally urged to an extended position by means of a spring. That is, movement of the latches is limited by a tab formed on a side of the housing so as to position the latch. After the latches are positioned, the side panels are secured.
  • FIG. 12 of the disclosure two adjacent side panels are connected to one another via two snap latches spaced apart from each other. In the other words, the connection between two adjacent side panels depends only on the “point-to-point” engagement between the two side panels. This kind of engaging force to secure the engagement between two adjacent side panels can not withstand an explosion force inside the container constructed by multiple mutually connected side panels.
  • the present invention tends to provide an improved, more reliable continuous (not point-to-point) connection device that can control both the site and magnitude of maximum (plastic) strain in the connecting member to mitigate and obviate the aforementioned problems.
  • connection device invention use a connecting member that is separated with a rigid frame, not extending directly from the rigid frame, such that the maximum strain of the plastic hinge in the connecting member, including the site of plastic hinge, can be controlled by the curvature of an arcuate surface formed on the frame under an explosive blast.
  • this connection device can transmit strong membrane force between each two panels of a container and meet the connection requirement of a blast-resistant container.
  • the blast-resistant air cargo container comprises bottom perimeter frames which are connectors of bottom panel and its adjacent side panels and must be strong and rigid enough to undertake the side restraint loadings for fixing the container on the deck of an airplane.
  • the present connection device includes bottom perimeter frame and a connecting member for connecting down edge of the side panel to the bottom panel.
  • the bottom perimeter frame has a recess and an arcuate surface formed outside the recess.
  • connection device is able to confine the blast within the container for that the maximum strain of the plastic hinge in the connecting member can be controlled by the curvature of that arcuate surface formed on the frame.
  • the side panel above this frame can be used as a sliding door for a blast-resistant container.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the connection device applied to an air cargo blast-resistant container
  • FIG. 2 is a side plan view of the large-curvature bottom perimeter frame corresponding to the head of L shaped extended outwardly;
  • FIG. 2A is a partially perspective view of the bottom perimeter frame of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the engagement between the bottom perimeter frame in FIG. 2 and distal edges of side panels before and after the blast;
  • FIG. 4 is a side plan view of the small-curvature bottom perimeter frame corresponding to the head of L shaped extended outwardly;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing the engagement between the bottom perimeter frame in FIG. 4 and distal edges of side panels before and after the blast;
  • FIG. 6 is a side plan view of the bottom perimeter frame corresponding to the head of a L shaped extended inwardly;
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing the engagement between the bottom perimeter frame in FIG. 6 and distal edges of side panels before and after the blast.
  • an air cargo blast-resistant container includes bottom perimeter frames ( 10 ) formed on a peripheral edge of a bottom panel (not shown) of the blast-resistant container.
  • the bottom perimeter frames ( 10 ) are used to connect the bottom panel to side panels ( 30 ).
  • Each of the side panels ( 30 ) has a connecting member ( 20 ) formed on a lower portion of the side panel ( 30 ) to connect with the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ).
  • the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) has a recess ( 12 ).
  • An arcuate surface ( 122 ) is formed the outside of the opening ( 120 ) of the recess ( 12 ).
  • the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) has an engaging portion ( 126 ) extending from a side of the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) to connect with the bottom panel of the blast-resistant container.
  • multiple reinforced ribs ( 128 ) are formed inside the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) instead of the solid frame.
  • the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) is combined with the side panel ( 30 ) through a connecting member ( 20 ).
  • One edge of the connecting member ( 20 ) connects to side panel ( 30 ), and the other edge of this connecting member ( 20 ) is formed a head to be held in the recess ( 12 ).
  • the head of the connecting member can be L shaped, T shaped (not shown), or the like which is embedded in the recess ( 120 ). Then the “soft connection” is formed.
  • connection there are three connections altogether in this device, i.e., between the connecting member ( 20 ) and the side panel ( 30 ), between the connecting member ( 20 ) and the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) and between the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) and the bottom panel ( 40 ). They all three connections must cooperatively transmit great tensile force therein.
  • two connections used the conventional connecting methods.
  • the conventional connecting methods the using of high strength bolts is preferable.
  • the arrangement of the bolts is the same as conventional method and well known in the art. Detailed description thereof is omitted hereinafter.
  • the head of the connecting member is held in the recess ( 12 ) by the interference mechanism between the head and the extended segment on the opening of the recess ( 12 ) of the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ).
  • the connecting member ( 20 ) and the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) is securely connected in all directions except in the longitudinal direction of the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ).
  • the frame and connecting member can be manufactured by extrusion.
  • the frame is made of metal; aluminum alloy is preferred for lightweight.
  • the connecting member is made of high toughness metal, like stainless steel, aluminum alloy with high toughness, for it must be able to take loading under a long-range plastic state without failure until its maximum strain over its elongation strength.
  • the curvatures of the arcuate surfaces ( 122 ) on the bottom perimeter frames ( 10 ) would be different.
  • the radius of the arcuate surface ( 122 ) of the frame ( 10 ) is depends on the strength of the blast and which material the connecting member ( 20 ) is made of. The stronger of a blast, the more thick of connecting member ( 20 ) is needed to take the greater tensile force.
  • FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 show the connecting member ( 20 ) uses highly elongation stainless steel and the curvature of the arcuate surface ( 122 ) of the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ) is obviously greater than the design of aluminum with smaller elongation strength, shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 .
  • the head in the FIGS. 3 , 5 , 7 has to be held in the recess ( 12 , 12 ′, 12 ′′) and keeps the connecting member away from failure. Therefore, the design of the head is very important.
  • the head is L shaped with a lip and the lip of the L shaped extends outwardly from its elbow. This is because when the blast is happened, the pressure faces outward and makes the upper of L shaped deform to outward and that lets the tip of the lip contact the bottom of the recess tighter and tighter. This avoids the head to be stretched straightly automatically and the head would be kept in the recess safely.
  • the elbow of the connecting member would be pulled up to contact the upper of the recess by the great tensile force transmitted from a side panel. Comparing two contact forces: the upper contact force is with smaller arm and greater magnitude of force, the direction of the lower contact force is on the contrary with the upper contact force, results that the bending moment in the neighbour of elbow is not very great. Therefore, the thickness of the lip is not necessary great and can be designed nearly the thickness of its upper of L shaped. With reference to FIGS. 6 and 7 , when the head is L shaped which lip is extended inwardly, it would be drawn out without strengthened design. Because the lip extends inwardly, the blasting pressure would pull the connecting member ( 20 ′′) straightly, like a wire, which makes the connecting member drawn out.
  • the lip has to become a big block, shown in FIG. 7 , which is much thicker than original design in order to avoid to be stretched straightly.
  • This block can help the connecting member to securely hold in the recess.
  • This type of head would not touch the bottom of the recess, rather than L outwardly type, when the blast is happened. Because the great membrane forces of panels will pull up the connecting member and the head will contact tightly to the upper of the recess. Therefore, it is allowable, for example, to install roller assemblies (not shown) on the bottom of the recess ( 12 ′′) of the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ′′). And the side panel ( 30 ′′) above the bottom perimeter frame ( 10 ′′) can slide on this frame in its longitudinal direction and can be used as a door.
  • connection between the distal edges of the side panels (through the connecting members ( 20 , 20 ′, 20 ′′) ) and the bottom perimeter frame ( 12 , 12 ′, 12 ′′) provides a clearance and low rotation stiffness of the connecting member, due to a mechanism of controlled plastic hinge, to allow the side panel to rotate relatively to the rigid frame when experiencing a blast. Therefore, damage from the rotation destruction is prevented.
  • the adaptable deformable plastic hinge of the connecting member avoids the direct failure of over stress (including the bending stress) due to the overly stiffness of rotation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Rigid Containers With Two Or More Constituent Elements (AREA)

Abstract

A connection device for use with a blast-resistant container comprises a frame with a recess, and a connecting member. An arcuate surface is formed on the outside of the opening of the recess. The connecting member is connected to the frame at one end with a head engaged in the recess and connected to a side panel at the other end. Thus, this connection device can transmit strong membrane force between each two panels of a container and meet the connection requirement of a blast-resistant container. When there is a blast, the connection device is able to confine the blast within the container in that the maximum strain of the plastic hinge in the connecting member can be controlled by the curvature of that arcuate surface formed on the frame.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE
  • This is a continuation-in-part application of the co-pending application with the application Ser. No. 10/444,615, filed on May 23, 2003 by the same applicant. The content thereof is hereinafter incorporated.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a connection device of a container, and more particularly to a connection device for use with the blast-resistant container. The present invention connect one frame to its adjacent panels in this container, and it can not only transmit strong membrane force between two panels to meet the connection requirement of a blast-resistant container, but also especially admits one of which two panels relatively moving to the other one along the longitudinal direction of the frame.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • Over a decade, airplanes have become a primary target for terrorist attack, and many people have lost their lives in plane crashes due to terrorist bombs attached in checked baggage. To prevent those tragedies from happening, a lot of efforts have been made in the field of blast-resistant containers. Recently, because of the bomb threat to the airliners by terrorists and the 911 suicide attack to the Twin Tower in New York City, U.S.A. Countries are devoting their researches on flight safety. Hence, a blast-resistant container becomes important and is extremely popular in the market. This kind of blast resistant container is also popular in the transportation and the storage business.
  • According to the blast test of a blast-resistant air cargo container, it is one of the typical failure modes for the bottom panel separating with its adjacent side panels under the explosive blast.
  • A container is usually a box-shaped or nearly box-shaped structure. According to analysis and experiments, the blast-resistant container need to undertake the blast pressure much greater than the payloads of the conventional container overall. When the explosives explode inside, the container will deform tending to spherical shape unavoidably if its weight is limited for real use. Hence, it is very important in the design of a blast-resistant container with both the behaviours of “the extremely using the membrane strength of all panels of the container” and “the allowing of the relative rotation between two adjacent panels from original 90 degree angle to near 180 degree angle without failure under a blast”. Especially, it is a much more serious problem if we want to connect two adjacent panels through a rigid frame when one panel of those adjacent panels cannot be expanded freely. The present invention is mainly to solve those important problems of a blast-resistant container.
  • For example, an air cargo container must comprise strong and rigid enough frames, which can undertake the side restraint loadings for fixing the container on the deck of an airplane, on the perimeter of its bottom panel. The bottom perimeter frames are also a connection device between side panels and bottom panel of the container. And its bottom panel is strongly supported by the deck on an airplane, but the other panels of the container can expand freely.
  • However, if the air cargo container does not have a strengthened design about the bottom perimeter frames connecting the side panels and bottom panel to resist an explosive blast, it is very easy to failure for the bottom panel separating with its adjacent side panels under the explosive blast. Even all the panels of the air cargo container are high membrane strength enough! There are two reasons to induce the former description. Firstly, the higher rigidity of bottom perimeter frames causes the difficult of relative rotation between the frame and side panel. Secondly, the explosive pressure cause all panels but bottom panel deform to outside, because it can be transmitted to the deck of an airplane or ground directly. Therefore, even one strengthened connection device, which can transmit membrane forces effectively between panels (except bottom panel and its adjacent panels), may not work well for bottom panel and its adjacent panels.
  • In order to overcome such problem, some blast-resistant container (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,112,913 and 6,237,793) uses the connecting members which extends upward some length directly from bottom perimeter frames to combine with the side panels of this container. It is a possible way to solve this problem; because the directly extended connecting members may soften the rotation stiffness between the bottom perimeter frames and the down edges of side panels. But it is not a reliable mechanism. Because the magnitude of the most seriously bending strain in the connecting member, which may cause the failure of a blast-resistant container, is not under control and the site of maximum strain is also random.
  • Furthermore, the structure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,853,238 is related to a container composed of side panels interconnected to one another via multiple snap latches located slightly inboard of the rear edges of the panels. Each of the latches is received by a housing in one of the side panels and is normally urged to an extended position by means of a spring. That is, movement of the latches is limited by a tab formed on a side of the housing so as to position the latch. After the latches are positioned, the side panels are secured. However, it is noted from FIG. 12 of the disclosure, two adjacent side panels are connected to one another via two snap latches spaced apart from each other. In the other words, the connection between two adjacent side panels depends only on the “point-to-point” engagement between the two side panels. This kind of engaging force to secure the engagement between two adjacent side panels can not withstand an explosion force inside the container constructed by multiple mutually connected side panels.
  • To overcome those shortcomings, the present invention tends to provide an improved, more reliable continuous (not point-to-point) connection device that can control both the site and magnitude of maximum (plastic) strain in the connecting member to mitigate and obviate the aforementioned problems.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • For the blast-resistant container, the present connection device invention use a connecting member that is separated with a rigid frame, not extending directly from the rigid frame, such that the maximum strain of the plastic hinge in the connecting member, including the site of plastic hinge, can be controlled by the curvature of an arcuate surface formed on the frame under an explosive blast. Thus, this connection device can transmit strong membrane force between each two panels of a container and meet the connection requirement of a blast-resistant container.
  • For example, the blast-resistant air cargo container comprises bottom perimeter frames which are connectors of bottom panel and its adjacent side panels and must be strong and rigid enough to undertake the side restraint loadings for fixing the container on the deck of an airplane. The present connection device includes bottom perimeter frame and a connecting member for connecting down edge of the side panel to the bottom panel. The bottom perimeter frame has a recess and an arcuate surface formed outside the recess.
  • By means of these, we provide a “soft connection” between the side panels and the bottom panel which can be “opened” by the mechanism of plastic hinge on the connecting member under a blast. When the blast-resistant container is experiencing a blast, the connection device is able to confine the blast within the container for that the maximum strain of the plastic hinge in the connecting member can be controlled by the curvature of that arcuate surface formed on the frame.
  • Besides, being a connection device between side panels and bottom panel, it can not only transmit strong membrane force between them to meet the connection requirement of a blast-resistant container, but also especially admits side panel sliding along the bottom frame. Hence, base on this feature, the side panel above this frame can be used as a sliding door for a blast-resistant container.
  • Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the connection device applied to an air cargo blast-resistant container;
  • FIG. 2 is a side plan view of the large-curvature bottom perimeter frame corresponding to the head of L shaped extended outwardly;
  • FIG. 2A is a partially perspective view of the bottom perimeter frame of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the engagement between the bottom perimeter frame in FIG. 2 and distal edges of side panels before and after the blast;
  • FIG. 4 is a side plan view of the small-curvature bottom perimeter frame corresponding to the head of L shaped extended outwardly;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing the engagement between the bottom perimeter frame in FIG. 4 and distal edges of side panels before and after the blast;
  • FIG. 6 is a side plan view of the bottom perimeter frame corresponding to the head of a L shaped extended inwardly; and
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing the engagement between the bottom perimeter frame in FIG. 6 and distal edges of side panels before and after the blast.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • With reference to FIG. 1, an air cargo blast-resistant container includes bottom perimeter frames (10) formed on a peripheral edge of a bottom panel (not shown) of the blast-resistant container. The bottom perimeter frames (10) are used to connect the bottom panel to side panels (30). Each of the side panels (30) has a connecting member (20) formed on a lower portion of the side panel (30) to connect with the bottom perimeter frame (10).
  • With reference to FIGS. 2 and 2A, the bottom perimeter frame (10) has a recess (12). An arcuate surface (122) is formed the outside of the opening (120) of the recess (12). Besides, the bottom perimeter frame (10) has an engaging portion (126) extending from a side of the bottom perimeter frame (10) to connect with the bottom panel of the blast-resistant container. In order to keep the same stiffness and reduce the weight of the connection device, multiple reinforced ribs (128) are formed inside the bottom perimeter frame (10) instead of the solid frame.
  • With reference to FIG. 3, the bottom perimeter frame (10) is combined with the side panel (30) through a connecting member (20). One edge of the connecting member (20) connects to side panel (30), and the other edge of this connecting member (20) is formed a head to be held in the recess (12). The head of the connecting member can be L shaped, T shaped (not shown), or the like which is embedded in the recess (120). Then the “soft connection” is formed. Actually there are three connections altogether in this device, i.e., between the connecting member (20) and the side panel (30), between the connecting member (20) and the bottom perimeter frame (10) and between the bottom perimeter frame (10) and the bottom panel (40). They all three connections must cooperatively transmit great tensile force therein. In which, two connections (the connections between the connecting member (20) and the side panel (30), and between the bottom perimeter frame (10) and the bottom panel (40)) used the conventional connecting methods. In the conventional connecting methods, the using of high strength bolts is preferable. The arrangement of the bolts is the same as conventional method and well known in the art. Detailed description thereof is omitted hereinafter. In the “soft connection”, due to the geometric interference constraint of pair match, the head of the connecting member is held in the recess (12) by the interference mechanism between the head and the extended segment on the opening of the recess (12) of the bottom perimeter frame (10). Thus, the connecting member (20) and the bottom perimeter frame (10) is securely connected in all directions except in the longitudinal direction of the bottom perimeter frame (10). The frame and connecting member can be manufactured by extrusion. The frame is made of metal; aluminum alloy is preferred for lightweight. The connecting member is made of high toughness metal, like stainless steel, aluminum alloy with high toughness, for it must be able to take loading under a long-range plastic state without failure until its maximum strain over its elongation strength.
  • When the blast-resistant container is experiencing a blast and the side panel (30) is deformed relative to a bottom panel (40), the blast pressure (P1) applied on a top surface of the bottom panel (40) is counterbalanced by a counter-reaction force (P2) on a bottom surface of the bottom panel (40). The side panel (30) and the connecting member (20) will be rapidly pushed outwardly by the blast pressure (P3) inside the container to engage with the arcuate surface (122) and the connecting member (20) is stamped on and plastically bent according to the arcuate surface (122) of the bottom perimeter frame (10). A plastic hinge is thus formed on controlled position and the maximum deformation is controlled to prevent destruction of overly bending. After the plastic deformation of the connecting member, the membrane force between two panels on different sides of connector, including bottom perimeter frame and connecting member, can be transmit effectively.
  • When either different materials or different thicknesses are used on the connecting members (20), the curvatures of the arcuate surfaces (122) on the bottom perimeter frames (10) would be different. The smaller the material elongation strength or the greater the thickness of the connecting member (20), the smaller the curvature on the bottom perimeter frame (10) is needed for correspondence the bending strain behaviour of the connecting member. And doing that can avoid the failure happened. The radius of the arcuate surface (122) of the frame (10) is depends on the strength of the blast and which material the connecting member (20) is made of. The stronger of a blast, the more thick of connecting member (20) is needed to take the greater tensile force. So, the smaller curvature or the larger curvature radius of the arcuate surface (122) is needed. The maximum elongation (allowable strain) of stainless steel is above 40%. The maximum elongation of aluminum alloy with high toughness is about 15%. And a little more thickness is needed for aluminum alloy than for stainless steel to take same tensile force. Therefore, FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 show the connecting member (20) uses highly elongation stainless steel and the curvature of the arcuate surface (122) of the bottom perimeter frame (10) is obviously greater than the design of aluminum with smaller elongation strength, shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5.
  • The head in the FIGS. 3,5,7 has to be held in the recess (12, 12′, 12″) and keeps the connecting member away from failure. Therefore, the design of the head is very important. With reference to FIGS. 3,5, the head is L shaped with a lip and the lip of the L shaped extends outwardly from its elbow. This is because when the blast is happened, the pressure faces outward and makes the upper of L shaped deform to outward and that lets the tip of the lip contact the bottom of the recess tighter and tighter. This avoids the head to be stretched straightly automatically and the head would be kept in the recess safely. Besides, the elbow of the connecting member would be pulled up to contact the upper of the recess by the great tensile force transmitted from a side panel. Comparing two contact forces: the upper contact force is with smaller arm and greater magnitude of force, the direction of the lower contact force is on the contrary with the upper contact force, results that the bending moment in the neighbour of elbow is not very great. Therefore, the thickness of the lip is not necessary great and can be designed nearly the thickness of its upper of L shaped. With reference to FIGS. 6 and 7, when the head is L shaped which lip is extended inwardly, it would be drawn out without strengthened design. Because the lip extends inwardly, the blasting pressure would pull the connecting member (20″) straightly, like a wire, which makes the connecting member drawn out. In order to avoid this problem, the lip has to become a big block, shown in FIG. 7, which is much thicker than original design in order to avoid to be stretched straightly. This block can help the connecting member to securely hold in the recess. This type of head would not touch the bottom of the recess, rather than L outwardly type, when the blast is happened. Because the great membrane forces of panels will pull up the connecting member and the head will contact tightly to the upper of the recess. Therefore, it is allowable, for example, to install roller assemblies (not shown) on the bottom of the recess (12″) of the bottom perimeter frame (10″). And the side panel (30″) above the bottom perimeter frame (10″) can slide on this frame in its longitudinal direction and can be used as a door.
  • It is concluded from the foregoing that the connection between the distal edges of the side panels (through the connecting members (20, 20′, 20″) ) and the bottom perimeter frame (12, 12′, 12″) provides a clearance and low rotation stiffness of the connecting member, due to a mechanism of controlled plastic hinge, to allow the side panel to rotate relatively to the rigid frame when experiencing a blast. Therefore, damage from the rotation destruction is prevented. I.e., the adaptable deformable plastic hinge of the connecting member avoids the direct failure of over stress (including the bending stress) due to the overly stiffness of rotation.
  • It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.

Claims (8)

1. A connection device for use with a blast-resistant container comprises:
a first panel having an edge;
a connecting member which can be plastically bent and securely connects to said panel edge at one edge of itself, a head being formed at the other edge of this connecting member;
a frame having a recess which is formed with an extended segment on its opening and can hold said head of said connecting member such that the connecting member can be securely connected to the frame in all directions except the longitudinal direction of the frame, the outside opening of said recess being shaped as an arcuate surface such that the connecting member can be bent according to said arcuate surface when said first panel is pushed outwardly; and
a second panel having an edge which securely connects to said frame,
thereby when the blast is happened inside a container, said first panel and the connecting member will be rapidly pushed outwardly by the blast pressure and the connecting member will be stamped on and deformed according to said arcuate surface such that a plastic hinge is thus formed on a controlled position and the maximum strain is controlled by the curvature of said arcuate surface to prevent the destruction of overly bending near the edge of a container panel.
2. The connection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said frame uses reinforced ribs in its excavated cross section to reduce the weight with its main stiffness being kept.
3. The connection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said connecting member is L shaped and has a head and a lip extending from an elbow of this connecting member.
4. The connection device as claimed in claim 3, wherein said lip of said L shaped connecting member is extended outwardly from the elbow of said connecting member and its thickness is nearly the same as other portion of L shaped connecting member without a strengthened design.
5. The connection device as claimed in claim 3, wherein said lip of said L shaped connecting member is extended inwardly from the elbow of said connecting member and its thickness is much greater than other portion of L shaped connecting member with a strengthened design.
6. The connection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein additional roller assemblies are installed to the bottom of said recess of said frame such that the first panel can slide on said frame in its longitudinal direction smoothly and can be used as a door.
7. The connection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the connecting member is made of stainless steel for using associated with the case that the curvature of said arcuate surface of said frame is great.
8. The connection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the connecting member is made of aluminum alloy with high toughness for using associated with the case that the curvature of said arcuate surface of said frame is moderate.
US11/429,821 2003-05-23 2006-05-08 Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container Abandoned US20070039954A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/429,821 US20070039954A1 (en) 2003-05-23 2006-05-08 Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/444,615 US20030230589A1 (en) 2002-05-27 2003-05-23 Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container
US11/429,821 US20070039954A1 (en) 2003-05-23 2006-05-08 Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/444,615 Continuation-In-Part US20030230589A1 (en) 2002-05-27 2003-05-23 Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070039954A1 true US20070039954A1 (en) 2007-02-22

Family

ID=37766522

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/429,821 Abandoned US20070039954A1 (en) 2003-05-23 2006-05-08 Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20070039954A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100102056A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2010-04-29 Bellehumeur Alexander R Collapasible Storage Container
US20100270318A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 Dagher Habib J Panel assembly for cargo containers
US8344885B2 (en) 2008-01-22 2013-01-01 Angel Secure Networks Inc. Container with interior enclosure of composite material having embedded security element
US20140151254A1 (en) * 2011-06-07 2014-06-05 Telair International Gmbh Cargo Holding Device in Particular for Loading Aircraft, and Method for the Production of a Cargo Holding Device
US9045280B2 (en) 2006-01-05 2015-06-02 Alex Bellehumeur Collapsible storage container
US20180016093A1 (en) * 2015-02-13 2018-01-18 Driessen Aerospace Group N.V. Cargo container closure systems
CN113924828A (en) * 2019-06-13 2022-01-11 R.施塔尔开关设备有限责任公司 Explosion-proof housing with reinforcing frame

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3853238A (en) * 1972-09-05 1974-12-10 Gentex Corp Smooth operating cargo box
US4325488A (en) * 1979-08-23 1982-04-20 The Boeing Company Lightweight cargo container and fittings
US4923076A (en) * 1988-12-09 1990-05-08 Air Cargo Equipment Corporation Cargo container apparatus with thermally expanding panels
US5185193A (en) * 1991-01-04 1993-02-09 Case Designers Corporation Interlockable structural members and foldable double wall containers assembled therefrom
US5312182A (en) * 1991-12-26 1994-05-17 Jaycor Hardened aircraft unit load device
US5398831A (en) * 1991-06-25 1995-03-21 Lite Flite Limited Air cargo containers
US6112913A (en) * 1997-09-03 2000-09-05 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Support arrangement for furniture system
US6237793B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2001-05-29 Century Aero Products International, Inc. Explosion resistant aircraft cargo container
US7165484B2 (en) * 2002-09-05 2007-01-23 Industrial Technology Research Institute Blast-resistant cargo container

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3853238A (en) * 1972-09-05 1974-12-10 Gentex Corp Smooth operating cargo box
US4325488A (en) * 1979-08-23 1982-04-20 The Boeing Company Lightweight cargo container and fittings
US4923076A (en) * 1988-12-09 1990-05-08 Air Cargo Equipment Corporation Cargo container apparatus with thermally expanding panels
US5185193A (en) * 1991-01-04 1993-02-09 Case Designers Corporation Interlockable structural members and foldable double wall containers assembled therefrom
US5398831A (en) * 1991-06-25 1995-03-21 Lite Flite Limited Air cargo containers
US5312182A (en) * 1991-12-26 1994-05-17 Jaycor Hardened aircraft unit load device
US6112913A (en) * 1997-09-03 2000-09-05 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Support arrangement for furniture system
US6237793B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2001-05-29 Century Aero Products International, Inc. Explosion resistant aircraft cargo container
US7165484B2 (en) * 2002-09-05 2007-01-23 Industrial Technology Research Institute Blast-resistant cargo container

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100102056A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2010-04-29 Bellehumeur Alexander R Collapasible Storage Container
US8113372B2 (en) * 2006-01-05 2012-02-14 Alex Bellehumeur, Trustee of the Alex Bellehumeur Family Trust Collapsible storage container
US8783489B2 (en) 2006-01-05 2014-07-22 Alex Bellehumeur Collapsible storage container
US9045280B2 (en) 2006-01-05 2015-06-02 Alex Bellehumeur Collapsible storage container
US8344885B2 (en) 2008-01-22 2013-01-01 Angel Secure Networks Inc. Container with interior enclosure of composite material having embedded security element
US8917177B2 (en) 2008-01-22 2014-12-23 Angel Secure Networks, Inc. Security structure of composite material having embedded security elements
US20100270318A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 Dagher Habib J Panel assembly for cargo containers
WO2010124278A2 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 University Of Maine System Board Of Trustees Panel assembly for cargo containers
WO2010124278A3 (en) * 2009-04-24 2011-02-17 University Of Maine System Board Of Trustees Panel assembly for cargo containers
US20140151254A1 (en) * 2011-06-07 2014-06-05 Telair International Gmbh Cargo Holding Device in Particular for Loading Aircraft, and Method for the Production of a Cargo Holding Device
US20180016093A1 (en) * 2015-02-13 2018-01-18 Driessen Aerospace Group N.V. Cargo container closure systems
CN113924828A (en) * 2019-06-13 2022-01-11 R.施塔尔开关设备有限责任公司 Explosion-proof housing with reinforcing frame

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070039954A1 (en) Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container
JP4804541B2 (en) Deformable forward pressure bulkhead for aircraft
US20130313036A1 (en) Vehicle door latch mechanism
US5769257A (en) Method and apparatus for minimizing blast damage caused by an explosion in aircraft cargo bay
CN109573115A (en) Radome fairing opening device
US20160144822A1 (en) Rupturable type hood hinge device
US7380755B2 (en) Frangible pneumatic latch
US8800797B2 (en) Heat and explosion resistant cargo container
US8356541B2 (en) Vehicle protective structure
US11319079B2 (en) Assembly for an aircraft comprising a primary structure for an attachment pylon secured to a wing box by means of fittings that are more compact in the leading edge region
US20020145078A1 (en) System for the synchronized locking of the doors of a thrust reverser
EP2777992A1 (en) Releasable hood hinge with positive reset
US10589868B2 (en) Nacelle cowl tangential restraint
US6918501B2 (en) Strengthened door for a blast-resistant cargo container
US20180297707A1 (en) Separable vehicle cabin privacy partition assemblies which allow for emergency egress
US7448656B1 (en) Dual action structural latch
US7165484B2 (en) Blast-resistant cargo container
US20030230589A1 (en) Connection device for use with a blast-resistant container
CN111377048B (en) Escape shelter cover structure and shelter cover separation bolt throwing method
CN106223808A (en) A kind of explosion relief door
US7635105B2 (en) Ejection device, ejectable hatch and aircraft having at least one ejectable hatch
US20060256513A1 (en) Structure for the display module of a portable computer
US20130170119A1 (en) Electronic apparatus
CN106246026A (en) A kind of hinge spring boosting mechanism and automobile
CN205977003U (en) Let out and explode door

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, TAIWAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WANG, MING-JONG;AN, CHAO-CHYUN;TENG, BUH-SHIUH;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017869/0133

Effective date: 20060502

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION