US20070038537A1 - Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing - Google Patents
Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070038537A1 US20070038537A1 US11/202,194 US20219405A US2007038537A1 US 20070038537 A1 US20070038537 A1 US 20070038537A1 US 20219405 A US20219405 A US 20219405A US 2007038537 A1 US2007038537 A1 US 2007038537A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- facility
- financing
- architecture
- equipment
- entity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000009418 renovation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 31
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 18
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000002747 voluntary effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000007596 consolidation process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003032 molecular docking Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000348 solid-phase epitaxy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000994 depressogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000029305 taxis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0645—Rental transactions; Leasing transactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/16—Real estate
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to financing structures/architectures associated with bond financing.
- a process and architecture may be implemented to initially structure or restructure bond financing for facilities construction and/or renovation to improve the economic and legal terms for involved or interested parties.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an existing, conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” financing architecture.
- FIG. 2 illustrates various operations performed in connection with restructuring financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3 illustrates various operations performed in connection with restructuring financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a restructured financing architecture provided in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an existing, conventional “ground lease plus loan” financing architecture.
- FIG. 6 illustrates various operations performed in connection with restructuring financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a restructured financing architecture provided in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 8 illustrates various operations performed in connection with structuring of financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 9 illustrates various operations performed in connection with structuring of financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.
- invention embodiments are disclosed herein in the context of financing or refinancing airport related facilities, it should be understood that the invention may be implemented in connection with the financing or refinancing of any infrastructure facility for public and/or multiple private user benefit.
- An example of a further application of the invention is in connection with the construction of port docking facilities for cargo ships affiliated with various cargo lines and cruise ships affiliated with various cruise lines.
- invention embodiments may be implemented in connection with the financing or refinancing of all manner of transportation-related facilities including, but not limited to air, rail, port, and road.
- utility is provided by invention embodiments in any business scenario wherein single or multiple transportation facilities are constructed or renovated for use by the public and/or multiple private entities using funds obtained through the issuance of taxable or tax-exempt bonds.
- the inventive concept may be implemented to perform airport facilities financing to avoid or partially or fully remedy problems associated with declining credit ratings of airlines.
- the invention applies to so-called “single facilities revenue bond financings”, in which the financing for a facility is supported by the credit of one or more sponsoring airlines.
- the process and architecture apply both to new and existing financings, and may be implemented to assist in insulating financing from a bankruptcy of the sponsoring airline(s).
- a key to any such financing or refinancing situations is that the revenue-producing potential of a facilities improvement, e.g., a new or renovated terminal, should be well recognized. If there is sufficient potential demand for use of such facilities by parties other than the sponsoring airline, the demand may provide a better credit than that of the individual airline whose payments initially support the bonds.
- asset-backed financing techniques may be applied to finance or refinance the facility on a basis that is supported only by the credit of a Single Purpose Entity (SPE), which is able to sublet the facility to the airline or other carriers or users. That SPE would have rights to any present and potential revenues of the facility, e.g., an airline terminal.
- Transactions would be structured to provide financing that would be remote, or insulated, from the bankruptcy of the airline(s) or other users of the terminal.
- This new financing process and architecture is applicable to new facilities improvements and also the refinancing of existing airline facilities improvements, including but not limited to equipment and/or improvements for airport facilities including terminal(s), cargo-handling, maintenance, parking, concession areas, car rental services, baggage, security and other facilities. It is also applicable to port docking facilities, which are also, in some locations, typically in demand by a variety of cargo companies and cruise lines.
- a conventional “package ground lease” architecture involves a government owner leasing ground directly to an airline and undertaking to, itself, issue bonds to finance the facilities or facilities improvements. Lease revenue compensates not only for the use of the land but also the use of the improvement and provides amounts to cover debt service on the bonds.
- the Denver airport special facility revenue bonds for United Airlines were issued in this manner.
- a conventional “ground lease plus loan” architecture involves a government owner leasing ground to an airline and having the same or another government agency undertake to issue the bonds and loan the proceeds to the airline to cover the costs of the construction of facilities or facilities improvements.
- the bond lien if any, does not encumber the ground lease, and the ground lease typically does not provide for default in the event of a default under the loan.
- Such an ambiguity can enable a bankrupt airline to stop making loan repayments (putting the bonds in default) while still retaining possession of the facility under the ground lease.
- a conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” architecture involves a government owner leasing ground to an airline and the airline partially assigning ground lease rights to a separate government agency bond issuer.
- the government agency bond issuer issues bonds to finance construction of the facilities and subleases the partially assigned ground lease rights and facilities back to airline in return for sublease rent on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes.
- the sublease is keyed to the maturity of the bonds; the ground lease partial assignment is coterminous with the sublease. Additionally, both the sublease and the partial ground lease assignment terminate on prepayment of bonds. As a result, the purported issuer/sublessor has no residual interest in financed facilities that survives retirement of the bonds.
- invention embodiments apply common asset-backed financing techniques to issue bonds, or to refinance existing bonds, on a basis supported by the creditworthiness of a facility.
- common asset-backed financing techniques may be applied to isolate the revenue stream through use of a single purpose entity (“SPE”) from a possible bankruptcy of the affected airline.
- this inventive architecture and its associated creation process could significantly lower the effective costs associated with financing the facility.
- this inventive architecture and process could generate restructuring fees and lower or eliminate their exposure to airline credit ratings and associated issues.
- this architecture and process could provide an opportunity for new transactions and refinancing existing bond transactions providing meaningful benefits to airlines and their existing credit-support providers.
- this architecture and process could provide a mechanism to insulate their successful operations from potential credit exposure to the bankruptcy risks associated with major legacy carriers.
- FIG. 1 A first example of a potential implementation of the above described embodiments is now provided.
- a city 110 has entered into a ground lease 115 at airport 120 to airline 125 .
- Airline 125 has partially assigned 130 the ground lease 115 to bond issuer 135 (e.g., an agency or instrunentality of city 110 ) for which the issuer 135 may assume a portion of the ground lease rents.
- issuer 135 has issued revenue bonds 140 to finance the construction of facilities 145 , e.g., improvements at a terminal at the airport 120 .
- Issuer 135 has used the bond proceeds 195 to construct the facilities 145 , and has then subleased 150 the assigned ground lease 130 and the associated improvements built thereon to airline 125 in exchange for the undertaking of airline 125 to pay sublease rent payments 155 equal in aggregate amount to a portion of the related ground lease rent payments 160 (if any), the debt service 165 on the bonds 140 , and administrative expenses 170 relating to the bonds 140 .
- the balance of such sublease rents 155 is provided to the revenue bond trustee 190 to pay administrative expenses 170 and the debt service on the bonds 140 .
- Debt service payments 165 are directed to the revenue bond trustee to be disbursed to bond holders.
- the facilities 145 may be, for example, a terminal, or a related concourse, or fuel storage and supply facilities, cargo or baggage handling facilities, foreign inspection service (customs) facilities, personnel training facilities, aircraft maintenance and repair facilities, car rental facilities or cruise/cargo docking facilities or some or all of the above.
- Airline 125 makes available a portion of the facilities 145 (by way of sub-sublease 175 ) to other airlines and concessionaires 180 on a profitable basis in return for sub-sublease rent payments. It is reasonable to expect that airline 125 could make substantially all of the facilities 145 available on a profitable basis, to the extent that airline 125 did not itself make use of them. However, if airline 125 is presently using substantially all of the facilities 145 itself, that same credit judgment may be more difficult to make, but still may be possible, on appropriate facts.
- airline 125 might undertake restructuring transactions as described with reference to FIG. 2 .
- the airline may form an SPE and elect to treat that SPE as a “disregarded entity” for federal income tax purposes.
- the airline may cause the SPE formation documents to include various customary and standard provisions for maintaining “separateness” from the airline appropriate for bankruptcy-remote status including, for example, establishment of a board of managers including at least two “independent managers,” unrelated to the airline, and providing that SPE is not authorized to take certain actions (for example, to liquidate or to file in bankruptcy, to dispose of substantial assets or to amend its formation documents) without the approval of all its managers, including the independent managers, etc. (as discussed herein)
- the airline may contribute the airline's interest in the ground lease and in the facilities sublease to the SPE.
- the contributed facilities sublease interest may include the constructed facilities and the airline's interests in all sub-subleases to other airlines and other parties.
- the airline may then, at 220 , cause the SPE to assume the obligations of the ground lease, the facilities sublease, and all other sub-subleases.
- the airline may enter into a sub-sublease of the facilities with the SPE for the airline's own use of the facilities. That sub-sublease may entail, for example, terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. All rights and revenues of the SPE including sublease rental amounts paid by the airline may then be pledged to secure the SPE's assumed sublease obligations, and thus, the bonds (and the obligations to the credit support provider, if applicable).
- FIG. 2 is merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated in FIG. 2 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the airline.
- an SPE which may be, for example, any business entity such as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) or a Business Trust organized in any jurisdiction that enables favorable treatments for the purposes of bankruptcy and tax (e.g., Delaware).
- LLC Limited Liability Company
- a Business Trust organized in any jurisdiction that enables favorable treatments for the purposes of bankruptcy and tax (e.g., Delaware).
- the SPE may not be vulnerable to unrestricted voluntary liquidation or dissolution in the event of a bankruptcy of the airline, or subject to substantive consolidation in such a bankruptcy.
- the SPE's formation documents may provide for a managing board including at least two independent managers, to be appointed by a party other than the airline (e.g., it could be a credit-support provider, a company providing corporate trust services, the airport or the city, if applicable).
- the SPE formation documents may further provide that the SPE could not take certain actions (for example, to file in bankruptcy or undergo a voluntary liquidation or dissolution, dispose of substantial assets, or to amend its formation documents) without the approving vote of its managers, including the independent managers.
- the SPE should establish its “separateness” from the airline based on various customary standards that have been outlined by the rating agencies involved (e.g., Standard & Poors). These standards would be incorporated into its formation documents, which control its operation—e.g., the SPE will restrict its activities to only those necessary or incidental to its leasehold interests, management and operation of the facilities, and not engage in other businesses or activities, the SPE will hold itself out to the public as a legal entity separate and apart from its members or any other person, having its own assets, liabilities and operations—not constituting a branch or division of any of its members, affiliates or any other person, and not being liable for the debts of any such person.
- rating agencies involved e.g., Standard & Poors
- SPE SPE undertaking (e.g., in the formation documents of the SPE) that SPE will act to (i) segregate its funds, property and other assets from those of any member or any other person and hold them in its own name, and not commingle them with those of any member or any other person; (ii) make any investments solely in its own name; (iii) not form any subsidiaries; (iv) act solely in its legal name in the conduct of its business, and conduct its business so as not to mislead others as to the identity of the entity or assets with which they are concerned; (v) keep and maintain separate records, books of account, bank accounts and financial statements; (vi) ensure that its capitalization is adequate in light of its business and purpose; (vii) not (a) guarantee, become obligated for, or otherwise hold itself out as being liable for, the debts and obligations of any member or any other person; (b) pledge its assets for the benefit of any other person; (c) make loans or advances to any person other than in the ordinary course of
- (ix) maintain an arm's-length relationship with its members and any affiliates; (x) allocate fairly and reasonably any overhead including for office space and employees shared with any member; (xi) use its own separate stationery, invoices, checks and other business forms and have its own telephone number, facsimile number and Internet domain; (xii) take commercially reasonable steps to correct any known misunderstanding regarding its separate identity; (xiii) file its own tax returns, if applicable, as may be required under applicable law; (xiv) pay its liabilities out of its own funds, including the salaries of its own employees, if any; and (xv) not engage in any dissolution, liquidation, consolidation, merger or sale of assets.
- any sub-sublease of a portion of the facilities from the SPE back to the airline may be on an “arms-length” basis. From an economic standpoint, an airline may undertake to make payments on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. As noted below, it appears that there should be no adverse federal income tax effect of such a restructured architecture. Additionally, apart from any cash that might need to be accumulated at the SPE in support of its credit, there would appear to be no adverse economic effect to the airline of such payments. It would, therefore, seem that such an arrangement could be effected on a basis that would be viewed as representing a “true lease.”
- various actions may be taken, as illustrated in FIG. 3 .
- an issuer could then refinance the bonds, supported only by the SPE obligations and the pledge of its rights to leases and revenue associated with use and occupancy of the facility.
- SPE is substituted for the airline on any related credit-support arrangements for the bonds.
- a determination may then be made, at 315 , as to whether the SPE should reserve some portion of its revenues in a lease reserve fund to provide greater assurance of its ability to pay sublease rent payments on a timely basis, e.g., to cover rental payments during any relet period.
- FIG. 3 is merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated in FIG. 3 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the party identified above.
- this restructured architecture might permit the bonds 140 to be refinanced on the strength of the demand for the facility and credit and resources of the SPE 485 .
- the bonds 140 could be subject to the exposure of a possible bankruptcy of the SPE 485 (the risk of which could be evaluated by the rating agencies, bondholders or the credit-support provider, if applicable), the bonds 140 should be sufficiently remote from a bankruptcy of airline 125 as to be priced and rated on the demand for the facilities 145 , and the rights and revenue and the credit of the SPE and not the airline 125 .
- the SPE 485 has acquired the airline's interest in the ground lease and in the facilities sublease.
- the contributed facilities sublease interest may include the constructed facilities and may also permit the SPE to sub-sublease interests to other airlines.
- the SPE 485 has assumed the obligations of the facilities sublease (and the ground lease).
- the airline 125 has entered into a sub-sublease of the facilities 450 with the SPE 485 for the airline's own use of the facilities 145 .
- the sub-sublease by the airline for facilities may entail, for example, the airline agreeing to pay a rent on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. All rights and revenues of the SPE may then be pledged to secure the bonds (and the credit support provider, if applicable). To the extent permitted by the transaction documents and applicable law, the SPE could make periodic distribution of surplus revenues to the airline.
- a second example is provided regarding how at least one embodiment of the invention may be used to restructure a conventional “ground lease plus loan” architecture.
- FIG. 5 consider an existing, conventional “ground lease plus loan” financing architecture 500 , wherein city 510 has entered into a ground lease 590 at airport 520 to airline 525 in return for ground lease rent payments 595 ; a city airport authority 535 undertakes to issue revenue bonds 540 to finance the construction of the facilities 545 , with the bond proceeds 550 loaned to airline 525 under a loan agreement 565 .
- airline 525 For federal income tax reasons, airline 525 must elect to forego tax depreciation deductions for the facilities 545 . As a result, a second loop arrangement is included in the architecture.
- the airline 525 conveys ownership 575 of the facilities 545 to the city 510 .
- the airline 525 takes back a facilities lease 580 (in return also for facilities lease rent payments 585 ), with a term equal to the term of the bonds 540 .
- the rent payments 585 under the facilities lease 580 include basic rent and additional rent.
- Basic rent is considered prepaid by the facilities conveyance to be applied ratably over the term of the facilities lease. Additional rent is equal to annual property taxes and other annual airport charges, and costs.
- the loan agreement 565 to airline 525 may be unsecured.
- the loan obligation of airline 525 to the bond issuer may be secured by a pledge of its facilities lease 580 interest (e.g., a “leasehold mortgage”).
- the ground lease interest of the airline 525 may not need to be pledged.
- the ground lease payments 595 may be fairly modest.
- the ground lease 590 may include a cross-default provision, under which a default of airline 525 under its loan agreement 565 with the city airport authority 530 is automatically an event of default under its ground lease 590 even if payments under that agreement are current.
- the authority 535 might eventually receive some restructured monetary amount in settlement of its loan claim, on the resolution of airline's 525 bankruptcy proceeding; the airline's 525 possessory leasehold interests might then be sold off to another airline, which might assume such rights on payment of some amounts in respect of unpaid ground lease rents and facilities lease rents.
- an airline 525 files in bankruptcy, and stops performing its obligations under the loan agreement 565 (resulting, after the exhaustion of any operating cost or debt service reserves, in a default in payments on the bonds 540 of the authority 530 ), it may, in some instances, at the same time retain its possession and use of the financed facilities 545 . This would suspend any recovery rights of the bondholders (pending the eventual resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings), and in the meantime block the exercise by the city 510 or the bond trustee (e.g., the authority 535 ) of any right to dispossess the airline 525 and make the facilities 545 available to other airlines that might be willing and able to pay for usage rights to the facilities 545 in amounts sufficient to provide for current payments of debt service on the bonds 540 .
- the bond trustee e.g., the authority 535
- airline 525 might undertake restructuring transactions as described with reference to FIG. 6 .
- the airline may form an SPE of which it is a member, and in some situations, be its only member.
- the airline would then assign to the newly created SPE, its rights under the ground lease and the facilities lease (including its rights to any rent prepayment credits thereunder, and any existing sublease agreements it might have with other airlines, or other parties); the SPE would then assume all of the airline's obligations under these agreements and the loan agreement at 615 .
- the SPE would enter into a sub-sublease agreement with the airline, covering the airline's usage of the facilities.
- the sub-sublease rent from the airline would be on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. Subject to the transaction documents and applicable law, the airline would be entitled to periodic distributions of surplus revenue from the SPE.
- the formation documents of the SPE would be drafted to include provisions for at least two independent managers (appointed by the bond trustee, a credit support provider, if applicable, or a named neutral party, e.g., a trust company), and would include provisions precluding the SPE from taking certain actions including a voluntary filing in bankruptcy or a dissolution or liquidation, disposing of substantial assets, or amending its formation documents without the affirmative approval of the independent managers.
- Those formation documents may also include a requirement that the SPE maintain compliance with various customary standard “separateness” characteristics (as explained above).
- FIG. 6 is merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated in FIG. 6 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the party identified above.
- this restructured architecture might permit the bonds 540 to be refinanced on the strength of the demand for the facility leased, revenues of the facility and projected credit of the SPE 705 .
- the airline 525 is a member, and may be, in some situations, the only member of the SPE 705 .
- the rights under the ground lease and the facilities lease are assigned to the SPE 705 by the airline 525 .
- the SPE 705 assumes all of the airline's obligations under the ground lease 790 , the facilities lease 780 and the loan agreement 765 .
- the SPE 705 enters into a sublease agreement 755 with the airline 525 , covering the airline's usage of the facilities (in return for sublease rent payments 760 ).
- the SPE may pledge 715 all of its rights and revenues under this sublease and other sources to secure its assumed obligations under the loan agreement 565 (and the SPE's obligation to the credit support provider, if applicable).
- the sublease rent payments 760 from airline 525 plus any revenues derived by the SPE 705 with respect to the facilities 545 from other sources include amounts sufficient, in the aggregate, to cover the SPE's cost of operation of the facilities, including any administrative expenses, the SPE's continuing obligations under the ground lease 790 and facilities lease 780 and the SPE's assumed obligations under the loan agreement 765 .
- the SPE may pledge 715 all of its rights and revenues to secure its obligations under the loan agreement 565 (and the SPE's obligations to the credit support provider, if applicable).
- the formation documents of the SPE 705 may include provisions for at least two independent managers (appointed by, e.g., the bond trustee, a credit support provider, if applicable, or a named neutral party, e.g., a trust company), and provisions precluding the SPE 705 from taking certain actions (including a voluntary filing in bankruptcy or a dissolution or liquidation, disposition of substantial assets, or amendment of its formation documents), without the affirmative approval of the independent managers.
- the formation documents may also include a requirement that the SPE 705 maintain compliance with various, customary standard “separateness” characteristics (as explained above).
- this restructured architecture should warrant a conclusion that the SPE 705 would be restricted from filing bankruptcy itself without the approval of its independent managers and “remote” from any substantive consolidation risk in a bankruptcy of the airline 525 .
- the SPE 705 could not be dissolved and liquidated into bankruptcy without the approval of its independent managers.
- the SPE 705 (at the direction of its independent managers, the authority, the bond trustee, or any credit-support provider for the bonds, if applicable, as specified in the SPE's formation documents) should be entitled to demand that the airline 525 assume and perform its sublease 755 obligations to the SPE 705 in accordance with the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or reject the sublease 755 and relinquish rights (e.g., possession) under the ground lease 790 and the facilities lease 780 in favor of the SPE 705 . In the latter case, the SPE 705 should then be in a position to make the ground lease 790 and facilities lease 780 available to other airlines, on a basis that may enable the SPE 705 to continue making payments under the assumed loan agreement 765 .
- the debt documents will obligate the SPE to enforce its rights against the lessee. And, if the SPE 705 fails for some reason to enforce these rights, and the SPE's assumed obligations under the loan agreement 765 are supported by leasehold mortgages on the SPE's interest in the ground lease 790 and facilities lease 780 , the bond trustee should be able to foreclose on such mortgages because the SPE is not in bankruptcy, free of any “automatic stay” restrictions imposed by the bankruptcy of the airline 525 , and either sell the leasehold interests or re-sublease the ground and facilities to other airlines and users on a potentially profitable basis, for the benefit of the bondholders.
- an airline and other interested parties might also undertake structured financing for new money in such a way as to provide a financing architecture that corresponds to a conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” financing architecture (see, e.g., architecture 100 in FIG. 1 ) but with the benefits associated with providing a bankruptcy-remote organization responsible for issued revenue bonds.
- a financing architecture that corresponds to a conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” financing architecture (see, e.g., architecture 100 in FIG. 1 ) but with the benefits associated with providing a bankruptcy-remote organization responsible for issued revenue bonds.
- such actions may be performed as illustrated with reference to FIG. 8 .
- an SPE may be formed and be treated as a “disregarded entity” by the airline for federal income tax purposes.
- the SPE's formation documents may include provisions for maintaining “separateness” from the airline appropriate for bankruptcy-remote status, and preventing certain actions from being taken without the approval of its independent managers (as explained above).
- the SPE enters into a ground lease and a facilities sublease with the relevant parties (e.g., the city and/or city airport authority).
- the airline may enter into a sub-sublease of the facilities with the SPE for the airline's own use of the facilities.
- the SPE also enters into sub-subleases of the facilities with other airlines and other interested parties as well.
- Those sub-subleases may entail, for example, the airlines and other interested parties agreeing to pay a rent sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. Then, at 830 , all rights and revenues of the SPE may be pledged to secure its lease obligations supporting the bonds (and the obligations to the credit support provider, if applicable).
- an issuer issues the bonds, supported only by the SPE obligations.
- the SPE may then, at 840 , be identified as solely responsible on any related credit-support arrangements for the bonds.
- FIG. 8 is merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated in FIG. 8 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it is not necessary that the SPE be organized in a particular jurisdiction. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the party identified above.
- an airline and other interested parties might undertake structuring financing transactions in such a way as to provide a financing architecture that corresponds to a conventional “ground lease plus loan” financing architecture (see, e.g., architecture in FIG. 5 ) but with the benefits associated with providing for a bankruptcy-remote organization to be the ground lessee and the borrower under the loan agreement responsible for repayment of the revenue bonds.
- such actions may be performed towards such an end as illustrated with reference to FIG. 9 .
- an SPE is formed of which the airline may be the only member.
- the SPE enters into the ground lease, facilities lease and loan agreement with the appropriate parties (e.g., city and/or city airport authority).
- the leases may include rights to any rent prepayment credits thereunder.
- the SPE enters into a sublease agreement with the airline, covering the airline's usage of the facilities.
- the sublease rent from the airline together with any revenues derived by the SPE with respect to the facilities from other sources, including other sublease rental income from other airlines and other service parties (e.g., concessionaires, etc.) would, in the aggregate, be on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes.
- the formation documents of the SPE are drafted to include provisions for at least two independent managers (appointed by the bond trustee, a credit support provider, if applicable, or a named neutral party, e.g., a trust company), and include provisions precluding the SPE from taking certain actions (including a voluntary filing in bankruptcy or a dissolution or liquidation, a disposition of substantial assets, or an amendment to its formation documents) without the affirmative approval of the independent managers.
- the formation documents may also include a requirement that the SPE maintain compliance with various, customary standard “separateness” characteristics (as explained above).
- the bonds are financed on the strength of the credit of the SPE.
- a financing architecture may be provided as illustrated in FIG. 7 , or the like.
- FIG. 9 is merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated in FIG. 9 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or by the party identified above.
- An assignment of the rights of the airline under the ground lease and facilities sublease to the SPE should have no federal income tax effect, because the SPE is meant to be treated in effect as a mere branch of the airline (if the airline is the only member), or a partnership (if two or more airlines are members) for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the assignments should not be treated as a taxable transaction.
- any particular restructuring along the lines herein disclosed may require evaluation of relevant state or local income or other tax issues.
- structuring or restructuring financing architectures in accordance with various embodiments of the invention depends, in each case, on the potential demand for use of the facilities by others.
- the structuring or restructuring of financing architectures cannot guarantee a successful result; that structuring or restructuring may only enable such a result to happen.
- the financing processes and architectures provided in accordance with embodiments of the invention may effectively prevent a ground lease and a facilities lease from being frozen in a possible bankruptcy of an airline, while associated bonds are in default.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention generally relates to financing structures/architectures associated with bond financing.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- Conventionally, in facilities revenue bond financing, bonds issued to finance the construction or renovation of facilities, for example, airport terminal facilities, have been either of two types: (1) bonds supported by the revenues of the airport commonly referred to as General Airport Revenue Bonds or “GARBs,” or (2) special facilities revenue bonds, supported by the credit of, typically, one or more airline(s), which are the principal user(s) of the facility. Historically, GARBs supported by the revenues of the airport have not been subject to default, i.e., failure to pay principal or interest when due. However, due to various U.S. and global events and economic trends, special facilities revenue bonds associated with facilities utilized by the airline industry are more often the subject of default; this is because an airline whose payment obligations support the payment of principal and interest on the bond may be unable to timely repay its obligations due to economic woes. Therefore, as fuel and labor costs continue to escalate in the U.S. domestic airline industry, the frequency of airline bankruptcies has increased; thus, it is likely that the incidence of special facilities bond defaults will continue to increase.
- In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a process and architecture may be implemented to initially structure or restructure bond financing for facilities construction and/or renovation to improve the economic and legal terms for involved or interested parties.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an existing, conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” financing architecture. -
FIG. 2 illustrates various operations performed in connection with restructuring financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 3 illustrates various operations performed in connection with restructuring financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 4 illustrates a restructured financing architecture provided in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 5 illustrates an existing, conventional “ground lease plus loan” financing architecture. -
FIG. 6 illustrates various operations performed in connection with restructuring financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 7 illustrates a restructured financing architecture provided in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 8 illustrates various operations performed in connection with structuring of financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 9 illustrates various operations performed in connection with structuring of financing architectures in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. - Although various invention embodiments are disclosed herein in the context of financing or refinancing airport related facilities, it should be understood that the invention may be implemented in connection with the financing or refinancing of any infrastructure facility for public and/or multiple private user benefit. An example of a further application of the invention is in connection with the construction of port docking facilities for cargo ships affiliated with various cargo lines and cruise ships affiliated with various cruise lines. Invention embodiments may be implemented in connection with the financing or refinancing of all manner of transportation-related facilities including, but not limited to air, rail, port, and road. Thus, it should be understood that utility is provided by invention embodiments in any business scenario wherein single or multiple transportation facilities are constructed or renovated for use by the public and/or multiple private entities using funds obtained through the issuance of taxable or tax-exempt bonds.
- In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, the inventive concept may be implemented to perform airport facilities financing to avoid or partially or fully remedy problems associated with declining credit ratings of airlines. In that particular implementation, the invention applies to so-called “single facilities revenue bond financings”, in which the financing for a facility is supported by the credit of one or more sponsoring airlines. In such an implementation, the process and architecture apply both to new and existing financings, and may be implemented to assist in insulating financing from a bankruptcy of the sponsoring airline(s).
- A key to any such financing or refinancing situations, is that the revenue-producing potential of a facilities improvement, e.g., a new or renovated terminal, should be well recognized. If there is sufficient potential demand for use of such facilities by parties other than the sponsoring airline, the demand may provide a better credit than that of the individual airline whose payments initially support the bonds. In such instances, asset-backed financing techniques may be applied to finance or refinance the facility on a basis that is supported only by the credit of a Single Purpose Entity (SPE), which is able to sublet the facility to the airline or other carriers or users. That SPE would have rights to any present and potential revenues of the facility, e.g., an airline terminal. Transactions would be structured to provide financing that would be remote, or insulated, from the bankruptcy of the airline(s) or other users of the terminal.
- This new financing process and architecture is applicable to new facilities improvements and also the refinancing of existing airline facilities improvements, including but not limited to equipment and/or improvements for airport facilities including terminal(s), cargo-handling, maintenance, parking, concession areas, car rental services, baggage, security and other facilities. It is also applicable to port docking facilities, which are also, in some locations, typically in demand by a variety of cargo companies and cruise lines.
- To provide some context so as to better understand the nature of the innovation provided by the invention, the state of conventional financing practices will now be explained. Conventionally, there are generally three common architectures that have been used for special facility bond financing of airport facilities.
- A conventional “package ground lease” architecture involves a government owner leasing ground directly to an airline and undertaking to, itself, issue bonds to finance the facilities or facilities improvements. Lease revenue compensates not only for the use of the land but also the use of the improvement and provides amounts to cover debt service on the bonds. The Denver airport special facility revenue bonds for United Airlines were issued in this manner.
- A conventional “ground lease plus loan” architecture involves a government owner leasing ground to an airline and having the same or another government agency undertake to issue the bonds and loan the proceeds to the airline to cover the costs of the construction of facilities or facilities improvements. The bond lien, if any, does not encumber the ground lease, and the ground lease typically does not provide for default in the event of a default under the loan. As a result, it is unclear whether default on the loan can result in default under the ground lease, provided the ground lease payments are otherwise being made. Such an ambiguity can enable a bankrupt airline to stop making loan repayments (putting the bonds in default) while still retaining possession of the facility under the ground lease.
- A conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” architecture involves a government owner leasing ground to an airline and the airline partially assigning ground lease rights to a separate government agency bond issuer. The government agency bond issuer issues bonds to finance construction of the facilities and subleases the partially assigned ground lease rights and facilities back to airline in return for sublease rent on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. The sublease is keyed to the maturity of the bonds; the ground lease partial assignment is coterminous with the sublease. Additionally, both the sublease and the partial ground lease assignment terminate on prepayment of bonds. As a result, the purported issuer/sublessor has no residual interest in financed facilities that survives retirement of the bonds.
- Recently, various bankruptcy court decisions (see United Airlines, Inc. v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 04-4209 (7th Cir. Jul. 26, 2005) rev'g HSBC Bank USA v. United Air Lines, Inc., 317 B.R. 335 (N.D. Ill. 2005) (San Francisco International Airport) and In re UAL Corp., 307 B.R. 618 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2004) aff'd in part by UnitedAir Lines, Inc. v. HSBC Bank USA, 322 B.R. 347 (N.D. Ill. 2005) (Denver International Airport) and by The Bank ofNew York v. United Air Lines, Inc., No. 04-2838 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 16, 2005) (JFK International Airport)) have held that a “package ground lease,” as utilized at the Denver airport, was a true lease whereas “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” architectures of the type described above were merely disguised debt financings, allowing an airline to remain in possession and relegating the bondholders to the status of creditors in the airline's bankruptcy, rather than having the benefit of the more favorable lessor position. These decisions have cast a cloud of ambiguity around the creditworthiness of the “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” architectures in the event of a bankruptcy of an airline (although not involved in the United Airlines cases above, the “ground lease plus loan” architecture seems subject to the same risk).
- This perceived deficiency affects both the attractiveness and plausibility of both new single facility revenue bond financings and existing special facility revenue bond financings structured as a ground lease/lease assignment and leaseback, where an existing financing requires a new credit judgment (e.g., on a proposed refinancing of the bonds, or on replacement of an expiring credit support facility).
- With this business context understood, invention embodiments apply common asset-backed financing techniques to issue bonds, or to refinance existing bonds, on a basis supported by the creditworthiness of a facility. Thus, in a scenario involving either the “ground lease plus loan” or “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” architectures, if the revenue-producing potential of the facility may provide a superior credit risk than the airline utilizing the improvements, common asset-backed financing techniques may be applied to isolate the revenue stream through use of a single purpose entity (“SPE”) from a possible bankruptcy of the affected airline.
- For affected airlines, this inventive architecture and its associated creation process could significantly lower the effective costs associated with financing the facility. For credit-enhancement providers on existing bond financings, this inventive architecture and process could generate restructuring fees and lower or eliminate their exposure to airline credit ratings and associated issues. For bond underwriters, this architecture and process could provide an opportunity for new transactions and refinancing existing bond transactions providing meaningful benefits to airlines and their existing credit-support providers. For airports or the like, this architecture and process could provide a mechanism to insulate their successful operations from potential credit exposure to the bankruptcy risks associated with major legacy carriers.
- A first example of a potential implementation of the above described embodiments is now provided. With reference to
FIG. 1 , consider an existing, conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” financing architecture, wherein acity 110 has entered into aground lease 115 atairport 120 toairline 125.Airline 125 has partially assigned 130 theground lease 115 to bond issuer 135 (e.g., an agency or instrunentality of city 110) for which theissuer 135 may assume a portion of the ground lease rents.Issuer 135 has issuedrevenue bonds 140 to finance the construction offacilities 145, e.g., improvements at a terminal at theairport 120.Issuer 135 has used the bond proceeds 195 to construct thefacilities 145, and has then subleased 150 the assigned ground lease 130 and the associated improvements built thereon toairline 125 in exchange for the undertaking ofairline 125 to paysublease rent payments 155 equal in aggregate amount to a portion of the related ground lease rent payments 160 (if any), thedebt service 165 on thebonds 140, and administrative expenses 170 relating to thebonds 140. After application to pay related ground lease rents 160, the balance of such sublease rents 155 is provided to the revenue bond trustee 190 to pay administrative expenses 170 and the debt service on thebonds 140.Debt service payments 165 are directed to the revenue bond trustee to be disbursed to bond holders. - The
facilities 145 may be, for example, a terminal, or a related concourse, or fuel storage and supply facilities, cargo or baggage handling facilities, foreign inspection service (customs) facilities, personnel training facilities, aircraft maintenance and repair facilities, car rental facilities or cruise/cargo docking facilities or some or all of the above.Airline 125 makes available a portion of the facilities 145 (by way of sub-sublease 175) to other airlines andconcessionaires 180 on a profitable basis in return for sub-sublease rent payments. It is reasonable to expect thatairline 125 could make substantially all of thefacilities 145 available on a profitable basis, to the extent thatairline 125 did not itself make use of them. However, ifairline 125 is presently using substantially all of thefacilities 145 itself, that same credit judgment may be more difficult to make, but still may be possible, on appropriate facts. - In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention,
airline 125 might undertake restructuring transactions as described with reference toFIG. 2 . As illustrated in that figure, at 205, the airline may form an SPE and elect to treat that SPE as a “disregarded entity” for federal income tax purposes. Subsequently, at 210, the airline may cause the SPE formation documents to include various customary and standard provisions for maintaining “separateness” from the airline appropriate for bankruptcy-remote status including, for example, establishment of a board of managers including at least two “independent managers,” unrelated to the airline, and providing that SPE is not authorized to take certain actions (for example, to liquidate or to file in bankruptcy, to dispose of substantial assets or to amend its formation documents) without the approval of all its managers, including the independent managers, etc. (as discussed herein) Subsequently, at 215, the airline may contribute the airline's interest in the ground lease and in the facilities sublease to the SPE. The contributed facilities sublease interest may include the constructed facilities and the airline's interests in all sub-subleases to other airlines and other parties. The airline may then, at 220, cause the SPE to assume the obligations of the ground lease, the facilities sublease, and all other sub-subleases. Subsequently, or concurrently, at 225, the airline may enter into a sub-sublease of the facilities with the SPE for the airline's own use of the facilities. That sub-sublease may entail, for example, terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. All rights and revenues of the SPE including sublease rental amounts paid by the airline may then be pledged to secure the SPE's assumed sublease obligations, and thus, the bonds (and the obligations to the credit support provider, if applicable). - It should be understood that the actions performed in
FIG. 2 are merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated inFIG. 2 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the airline. - Moreover, throughout the explanation of various invention embodiments, reference is made to an SPE, which may be, for example, any business entity such as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) or a Business Trust organized in any jurisdiction that enables favorable treatments for the purposes of bankruptcy and tax (e.g., Delaware).
- To establish a higher credit rating (e.g., investment grade) and, therefore markedly more favorable financing terms, the SPE may not be vulnerable to unrestricted voluntary liquidation or dissolution in the event of a bankruptcy of the airline, or subject to substantive consolidation in such a bankruptcy. For the former purpose, the SPE's formation documents may provide for a managing board including at least two independent managers, to be appointed by a party other than the airline (e.g., it could be a credit-support provider, a company providing corporate trust services, the airport or the city, if applicable). The SPE formation documents may further provide that the SPE could not take certain actions (for example, to file in bankruptcy or undergo a voluntary liquidation or dissolution, dispose of substantial assets, or to amend its formation documents) without the approving vote of its managers, including the independent managers.
- To avoid substantive consolidation in bankruptcy, the SPE should establish its “separateness” from the airline based on various customary standards that have been outlined by the rating agencies involved (e.g., Standard & Poors). These standards would be incorporated into its formation documents, which control its operation—e.g., the SPE will restrict its activities to only those necessary or incidental to its leasehold interests, management and operation of the facilities, and not engage in other businesses or activities, the SPE will hold itself out to the public as a legal entity separate and apart from its members or any other person, having its own assets, liabilities and operations—not constituting a branch or division of any of its members, affiliates or any other person, and not being liable for the debts of any such person.
- Other such provisions may include the SPE undertaking (e.g., in the formation documents of the SPE) that SPE will act to (i) segregate its funds, property and other assets from those of any member or any other person and hold them in its own name, and not commingle them with those of any member or any other person; (ii) make any investments solely in its own name; (iii) not form any subsidiaries; (iv) act solely in its legal name in the conduct of its business, and conduct its business so as not to mislead others as to the identity of the entity or assets with which they are concerned; (v) keep and maintain separate records, books of account, bank accounts and financial statements; (vi) ensure that its capitalization is adequate in light of its business and purpose; (vii) not (a) guarantee, become obligated for, or otherwise hold itself out as being liable for, the debts and obligations of any member or any other person; (b) pledge its assets for the benefit of any other person; (c) make loans or advances to any person other than in the ordinary course of its business; and (d) acquire obligations or securities of any member; (viii) not enter into any transaction with any member, except upon terms and conditions that are intrinsically fair and substantially similar to those that would be available on an arms length basis with unrelated third parties. (ix) maintain an arm's-length relationship with its members and any affiliates; (x) allocate fairly and reasonably any overhead including for office space and employees shared with any member; (xi) use its own separate stationery, invoices, checks and other business forms and have its own telephone number, facsimile number and Internet domain; (xii) take commercially reasonable steps to correct any known misunderstanding regarding its separate identity; (xiii) file its own tax returns, if applicable, as may be required under applicable law; (xiv) pay its liabilities out of its own funds, including the salaries of its own employees, if any; and (xv) not engage in any dissolution, liquidation, consolidation, merger or sale of assets.
- Further, in order to establish and maintain “separateness”, it may be important that any sub-sublease of a portion of the facilities from the SPE back to the airline be on an “arms-length” basis. From an economic standpoint, an airline may undertake to make payments on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. As noted below, it appears that there should be no adverse federal income tax effect of such a restructured architecture. Additionally, apart from any cash that might need to be accumulated at the SPE in support of its credit, there would appear to be no adverse economic effect to the airline of such payments. It would, therefore, seem that such an arrangement could be effected on a basis that would be viewed as representing a “true lease.”
- Assuming that the facts would support the creditworthiness of the actions illustrated in
FIG. 2 , various actions may be taken, as illustrated inFIG. 3 . For example, at 305, an issuer could then refinance the bonds, supported only by the SPE obligations and the pledge of its rights to leases and revenue associated with use and occupancy of the facility. Subsequently, at 310, SPE is substituted for the airline on any related credit-support arrangements for the bonds. A determination may then be made, at 315, as to whether the SPE should reserve some portion of its revenues in a lease reserve fund to provide greater assurance of its ability to pay sublease rent payments on a timely basis, e.g., to cover rental payments during any relet period. If it is determined that such a fund should be created, associated actions would be performed at 320 and operations would continue at 325. That practice may, however, be subject to arbitrage yield restrictions applicable to pledged funds. For that purpose, it may be sufficient simply to debit the fund to pay operating costs, if needed. If it is determined that no such lease reserve fund is necessary, the appropriate documentation of the actions performed inFIGS. 2 and 3 may be made at 325. - Again, it should be understood that the actions performed in
FIG. 3 are merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated inFIG. 3 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the party identified above. - As illustrated in
FIG. 4 , subject to appropriate documentation, this restructured architecture might permit thebonds 140 to be refinanced on the strength of the demand for the facility and credit and resources of theSPE 485. Additionally, although thebonds 140 could be subject to the exposure of a possible bankruptcy of the SPE 485 (the risk of which could be evaluated by the rating agencies, bondholders or the credit-support provider, if applicable), thebonds 140 should be sufficiently remote from a bankruptcy ofairline 125 as to be priced and rated on the demand for thefacilities 145, and the rights and revenue and the credit of the SPE and not theairline 125. - In
FIG. 4 , theSPE 485 has acquired the airline's interest in the ground lease and in the facilities sublease. The contributed facilities sublease interest may include the constructed facilities and may also permit the SPE to sub-sublease interests to other airlines. TheSPE 485 has assumed the obligations of the facilities sublease (and the ground lease). Theairline 125 has entered into a sub-sublease of thefacilities 450 with theSPE 485 for the airline's own use of thefacilities 145. The sub-sublease by the airline for facilities may entail, for example, the airline agreeing to pay a rent on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. All rights and revenues of the SPE may then be pledged to secure the bonds (and the credit support provider, if applicable). To the extent permitted by the transaction documents and applicable law, the SPE could make periodic distribution of surplus revenues to the airline. - As a result of such a restructured architecture, there should be a corresponding reduction in the interest charges for which the
SPE 485 is responsible, through its facilities sublease debt service payments to the issuer 130. Alternatively, if thebonds 140 are supported by a letter of credit, bond insurance or other credit support, this restructured architecture should result in a substantial reduction in the charges of the credit-support provider. - A second example is provided regarding how at least one embodiment of the invention may be used to restructure a conventional “ground lease plus loan” architecture. With reference to
FIG. 5 , consider an existing, conventional “ground lease plus loan” financing architecture 500, whereincity 510 has entered into aground lease 590 atairport 520 toairline 525 in return for groundlease rent payments 595; a city airport authority 535 undertakes to issuerevenue bonds 540 to finance the construction of thefacilities 545, with the bond proceeds 550 loaned toairline 525 under aloan agreement 565. - For federal income tax reasons,
airline 525 must elect to forego tax depreciation deductions for thefacilities 545. As a result, a second loop arrangement is included in the architecture. Theairline 525 conveysownership 575 of thefacilities 545 to thecity 510. In return, theairline 525 takes back a facilities lease 580 (in return also for facilities lease rent payments 585), with a term equal to the term of thebonds 540. Therent payments 585 under the facilities lease 580 include basic rent and additional rent. Basic rent is considered prepaid by the facilities conveyance to be applied ratably over the term of the facilities lease. Additional rent is equal to annual property taxes and other annual airport charges, and costs. - It is possible that the
loan agreement 565 toairline 525 may be unsecured. Alternatively, the loan obligation ofairline 525 to the bond issuer may be secured by a pledge of its facilities lease 580 interest (e.g., a “leasehold mortgage”). In this architecture, the ground lease interest of theairline 525 may not need to be pledged. Theground lease payments 595 may be fairly modest. In some cases, theground lease 590 may include a cross-default provision, under which a default ofairline 525 under itsloan agreement 565 with the city airport authority 530 is automatically an event of default under itsground lease 590 even if payments under that agreement are current. - In the event of a bankruptcy of
airline 525, this architecture is likely to suffer unacceptable events. In particular, if theairline 525 files in bankruptcy and ceases making payments underloan agreement 565, the bond trustee would be delayed from foreclosing on any leasehold mortgage interest in the facilities lease 580 by the “automatic stay” rules. Thus, even though the city airport authority 535 would be a secured creditor in airline's 525 bankruptcy, it would be unable to compel a sale of the facilities lease interest to other potential users of thefacilities 545. The authority 535 might eventually receive some restructured monetary amount in settlement of its loan claim, on the resolution of airline's 525 bankruptcy proceeding; the airline's 525 possessory leasehold interests might then be sold off to another airline, which might assume such rights on payment of some amounts in respect of unpaid ground lease rents and facilities lease rents. - Additionally, if the Airline assumes the facilities lease and
ground lease annual payments city 510 to evict theairline 525 and make thefacilities 545 available to some other solvent party (which could also assume the loan payment obligations 570). Further, it is questionable whether an automatic cross-default provision in the facilities lease or theground lease 580, 590 (if it were triggered by a default under the airline'sloan agreement 565 based solely on the airline's bankruptcy) would be enforceable. It may be that the cross-default provision would be a violation of the “ipso facto” rule, and therefore unenforceable, or would be subject to the “automatic stay” provisions of the bankruptcy law. - If an
airline 525 files in bankruptcy, and stops performing its obligations under the loan agreement 565 (resulting, after the exhaustion of any operating cost or debt service reserves, in a default in payments on thebonds 540 of the authority 530), it may, in some instances, at the same time retain its possession and use of the financedfacilities 545. This would suspend any recovery rights of the bondholders (pending the eventual resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings), and in the meantime block the exercise by thecity 510 or the bond trustee (e.g., the authority 535) of any right to dispossess theairline 525 and make thefacilities 545 available to other airlines that might be willing and able to pay for usage rights to thefacilities 545 in amounts sufficient to provide for current payments of debt service on thebonds 540. - In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention,
airline 525 might undertake restructuring transactions as described with reference toFIG. 6 . As illustrated in that figure, at 605, the airline may form an SPE of which it is a member, and in some situations, be its only member. Subsequently, at 610, the airline would then assign to the newly created SPE, its rights under the ground lease and the facilities lease (including its rights to any rent prepayment credits thereunder, and any existing sublease agreements it might have with other airlines, or other parties); the SPE would then assume all of the airline's obligations under these agreements and the loan agreement at 615. Next, at 620, the SPE would enter into a sub-sublease agreement with the airline, covering the airline's usage of the facilities. - The sub-sublease rent from the airline would be on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. Subject to the transaction documents and applicable law, the airline would be entitled to periodic distributions of surplus revenue from the SPE.
- At 625, the formation documents of the SPE would be drafted to include provisions for at least two independent managers (appointed by the bond trustee, a credit support provider, if applicable, or a named neutral party, e.g., a trust company), and would include provisions precluding the SPE from taking certain actions including a voluntary filing in bankruptcy or a dissolution or liquidation, disposing of substantial assets, or amending its formation documents without the affirmative approval of the independent managers. Those formation documents may also include a requirement that the SPE maintain compliance with various customary standard “separateness” characteristics (as explained above).
- Again, it should be understood that the actions performed in
FIG. 6 are merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated inFIG. 6 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the party identified above. - As illustrated in
FIG. 7 , subject to appropriate documentation, this restructured architecture might permit thebonds 540 to be refinanced on the strength of the demand for the facility leased, revenues of the facility and projected credit of theSPE 705. Theairline 525 is a member, and may be, in some situations, the only member of theSPE 705. The rights under the ground lease and the facilities lease are assigned to theSPE 705 by theairline 525. TheSPE 705 assumes all of the airline's obligations under theground lease 790, the facilities lease 780 and theloan agreement 765. TheSPE 705 enters into asublease agreement 755 with theairline 525, covering the airline's usage of the facilities (in return for sublease rent payments 760). The SPE may pledge 715 all of its rights and revenues under this sublease and other sources to secure its assumed obligations under the loan agreement 565 (and the SPE's obligation to the credit support provider, if applicable). - The
sublease rent payments 760 fromairline 525 plus any revenues derived by theSPE 705 with respect to thefacilities 545 from other sources include amounts sufficient, in the aggregate, to cover the SPE's cost of operation of the facilities, including any administrative expenses, the SPE's continuing obligations under theground lease 790 and facilities lease 780 and the SPE's assumed obligations under theloan agreement 765. The SPE may pledge 715 all of its rights and revenues to secure its obligations under the loan agreement 565 (and the SPE's obligations to the credit support provider, if applicable). - The formation documents of the
SPE 705 may include provisions for at least two independent managers (appointed by, e.g., the bond trustee, a credit support provider, if applicable, or a named neutral party, e.g., a trust company), and provisions precluding theSPE 705 from taking certain actions (including a voluntary filing in bankruptcy or a dissolution or liquidation, disposition of substantial assets, or amendment of its formation documents), without the affirmative approval of the independent managers. The formation documents may also include a requirement that theSPE 705 maintain compliance with various, customary standard “separateness” characteristics (as explained above). - Assuming compliance with the “separateness” provisions, this restructured architecture should warrant a conclusion that the
SPE 705 would be restricted from filing bankruptcy itself without the approval of its independent managers and “remote” from any substantive consolidation risk in a bankruptcy of theairline 525. In addition, theSPE 705 could not be dissolved and liquidated into bankruptcy without the approval of its independent managers. As a result, in the event of a bankruptcy ofairline 525, and a default in payment of the airline's sublease rent obligations, the SPE 705 (at the direction of its independent managers, the authority, the bond trustee, or any credit-support provider for the bonds, if applicable, as specified in the SPE's formation documents) should be entitled to demand that theairline 525 assume and perform itssublease 755 obligations to theSPE 705 in accordance with the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or reject thesublease 755 and relinquish rights (e.g., possession) under theground lease 790 and the facilities lease 780 in favor of theSPE 705. In the latter case, theSPE 705 should then be in a position to make theground lease 790 and facilities lease 780 available to other airlines, on a basis that may enable theSPE 705 to continue making payments under the assumedloan agreement 765. - Additionally, the debt documents will obligate the SPE to enforce its rights against the lessee. And, if the
SPE 705 fails for some reason to enforce these rights, and the SPE's assumed obligations under theloan agreement 765 are supported by leasehold mortgages on the SPE's interest in theground lease 790 and facilities lease 780, the bond trustee should be able to foreclose on such mortgages because the SPE is not in bankruptcy, free of any “automatic stay” restrictions imposed by the bankruptcy of theairline 525, and either sell the leasehold interests or re-sublease the ground and facilities to other airlines and users on a potentially profitable basis, for the benefit of the bondholders. - It should be understood that various embodiments of the invention enable the structuring of a financing architecture for new money as well as the restructuring of an existing financing architecture. Thus, the structuring of a new financing architecture such as those illustrated in
FIGS. 4 and 7 or the like, is described. - In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, an airline and other interested parties might also undertake structured financing for new money in such a way as to provide a financing architecture that corresponds to a conventional “ground lease/lease assignment/subleaseback” financing architecture (see, e.g.,
architecture 100 inFIG. 1 ) but with the benefits associated with providing a bankruptcy-remote organization responsible for issued revenue bonds. For example, such actions may be performed as illustrated with reference toFIG. 8 . As illustrated in that figure, at 805, an SPE may be formed and be treated as a “disregarded entity” by the airline for federal income tax purposes. Subsequently, at 810, the SPE's formation documents may include provisions for maintaining “separateness” from the airline appropriate for bankruptcy-remote status, and preventing certain actions from being taken without the approval of its independent managers (as explained above). Subsequently, at 815, the SPE enters into a ground lease and a facilities sublease with the relevant parties (e.g., the city and/or city airport authority). Then, at 820, the airline may enter into a sub-sublease of the facilities with the SPE for the airline's own use of the facilities. At 825, the SPE also enters into sub-subleases of the facilities with other airlines and other interested parties as well. Those sub-subleases may entail, for example, the airlines and other interested parties agreeing to pay a rent sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes. Then, at 830, all rights and revenues of the SPE may be pledged to secure its lease obligations supporting the bonds (and the obligations to the credit support provider, if applicable). - Subsequently, at 835, an issuer issues the bonds, supported only by the SPE obligations. The SPE may then, at 840, be identified as solely responsible on any related credit-support arrangements for the bonds.
- A determination may then be made, at 845, as to whether the SPE should reserve some portion of its revenues in a lease reserve fund to provide greater assurance of its ability to pay sublease rent payments on a timely basis, e.g., create a lease reserve fund to cover rental payments during any relet period. If it is determined that such a fund should be created, associated actions would be performed at 850 and continue to be performed at 855. That practice may, however, be subject to arbitrage yield restrictions applicable to pledged funds. If it was determined that no such fund is necessary, the appropriate documentation of the actions performed in
FIG. 8 would be made at 855. As a result, of such actions, a financing architecture may be provided as illustrated inFIG. 4 . - It should be understood that the actions performed in
FIG. 8 are merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated inFIG. 8 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it is not necessary that the SPE be organized in a particular jurisdiction. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or that those operations be performed specifically by the party identified above. - Similarly, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, an airline and other interested parties might undertake structuring financing transactions in such a way as to provide a financing architecture that corresponds to a conventional “ground lease plus loan” financing architecture (see, e.g., architecture in
FIG. 5 ) but with the benefits associated with providing for a bankruptcy-remote organization to be the ground lessee and the borrower under the loan agreement responsible for repayment of the revenue bonds. For example, such actions may be performed towards such an end as illustrated with reference toFIG. 9 . As illustrated in that figure, at 905, an SPE is formed of which the airline may be the only member. Subsequently, at 910, the SPE enters into the ground lease, facilities lease and loan agreement with the appropriate parties (e.g., city and/or city airport authority). The leases may include rights to any rent prepayment credits thereunder. - At 915, the SPE enters into a sublease agreement with the airline, covering the airline's usage of the facilities. The sublease rent from the airline together with any revenues derived by the SPE with respect to the facilities from other sources, including other sublease rental income from other airlines and other service parties (e.g., concessionaires, etc.) would, in the aggregate, be on terms sufficient to support the creditworthiness of the arrangement and to permit the conclusion that the sub-sublease is a “true lease” for federal bankruptcy purposes.
- At 920, the formation documents of the SPE are drafted to include provisions for at least two independent managers (appointed by the bond trustee, a credit support provider, if applicable, or a named neutral party, e.g., a trust company), and include provisions precluding the SPE from taking certain actions (including a voluntary filing in bankruptcy or a dissolution or liquidation, a disposition of substantial assets, or an amendment to its formation documents) without the affirmative approval of the independent managers. The formation documents may also include a requirement that the SPE maintain compliance with various, customary standard “separateness” characteristics (as explained above). At 925, the bonds are financed on the strength of the credit of the SPE.
- As a result, of such actions, a financing architecture may be provided as illustrated in
FIG. 7 , or the like. - Again it should be understood that the actions performed in
FIG. 9 are merely illustrative of particular implementation options in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is not necessary that the actions be performed in the order illustrated inFIG. 9 ; rather, each of those actions may be performed in various orders including simultaneously. Moreover, it should be understood that practice of the invention may not require performing all of the operations set forth in that figure or by the party identified above. - As alluded to above, it should be understood that various embodiments of the invention have been disclosed herein and interrelated issues and factors are worth consideration by one of ordinary skill.
- From a tax standpoint, there may be a number of federal income tax issues relevant to structuring or restructuring performed in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Potential issues seem to arise in three areas: (1) consequences of the structured/restructured transaction; (2) consequences of operations under the resulting financing architecture; and (3) implications for an existing or new tax-exempt bond financing of the facilities.
- An assignment of the rights of the airline under the ground lease and facilities sublease to the SPE should have no federal income tax effect, because the SPE is meant to be treated in effect as a mere branch of the airline (if the airline is the only member), or a partnership (if two or more airlines are members) for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the assignments should not be treated as a taxable transaction.
- There may be some instances in which the facilities are presently jointly-operated by two or more airlines, either as a joint venture or through some common legal entity. In such a situation, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, contributing existing rights to a conduit SPE, or contributing interests in an ownership entity to one or more SPEs may achieve the federal income tax effect noted above.
- In the case of a single-member SPE, if the SPE is a “disregarded entity” of the airline, its operations, revenue and expenses should have no different federal income tax effect to the airline as a result of the restructure architecture, even if the contractual arrangements between the entities involve a sub-sublease payment obligation from the airline to the SPE. However, if multiple airlines are the sponsor parties, further analysis would be required to determine the effects of restructuring the financing architecture as described above; nevertheless, the potential for partnership treatment of an interposed SPE (or for interposed SPEs of each participating airline) is possible under federal income tax regulations.
- In the case of the structuring of a financing architecture for new money, it does not appear that methods and architectures designed in accordance with the invention would involve any significantly different tax-exempt financing considerations than a financing for the direct benefit of the airline. However, when an existing, outstanding tax-exempt issue is involved, other considerations may be relevant. In particular, the form of a restructured architecture designed in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention may involve a refunding of any existing, outstanding bonds.
- In general, if the existing bonds were issued after 1986, the refunding may not present any new or different federal income tax issues for tax-exempt purposes.
- If, however, the existing bonds were issued before the effective date of the 1986 Tax Reform Act, there may be a question whether the refunding bonds qualify under transition rules of the 1986 Act, without regard to the new standards for airport facilities financings that were first imposed by that Act. This conclusion might be more easily reached if the SPE is a single-member entity of the airline, rather than a common entity of more than one airline; however, if any change occurs through the interposition of entities above that level, there may be no basis for a distinction.
- On the other hand, if the refunding of a pre-1986 bond issue would not be eligible for transition-rule protection, evaluation may need to be performed by bond counsel in light of the changes that have since occurred.
- Beyond these tax implications, there may be additional issues posed by the structuring or restructuring of a financing architecture and associated processes. In particular, for example, if a restructured financing architecture requires some accumulation of revenues/contributions at the level of the SPE, for the better assurance of the credit of the bonds (or the credit-support provider, if applicable), care may need to be exercised to assure either that such funds do not constitute “replacement proceeds” of the bonds, subject to an investment yield limitation not greater than the yield of the bonds, or that they comply with such limitations. It is possible that such limitations could be avoided by providing that any such accumulated funds are not pledged for payment of sublease rent, and are at all times subject to debit, if necessary, to pay operating costs of the SPE. If depressed yields are available for temporary investments, this may not be a practical problem, but a method of assuring compliance may need to be considered.
- In addition, and wholly apart from the above, any particular restructuring along the lines herein disclosed may require evaluation of relevant state or local income or other tax issues.
- Further, it should be understood that the effect of structuring or restructuring financing architectures in accordance with various embodiments of the invention depends, in each case, on the potential demand for use of the facilities by others. Thus, the structuring or restructuring of financing architectures cannot guarantee a successful result; that structuring or restructuring may only enable such a result to happen.
- Nevertheless, the financing processes and architectures provided in accordance with embodiments of the invention may effectively prevent a ground lease and a facilities lease from being frozen in a possible bankruptcy of an airline, while associated bonds are in default.
- While the embodiments of the present invention may have been explained with regard to particular examples of implementation of various embodiments of the invention, it should be understood that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention, as set forth above, are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
- For example, although implementations of particular embodiments of the invention have been described in connection with a single airline, it should be understood that the invention may be practiced in connection with the financing or refinancing of facilities for more than one airline, for example, a group or consortium of airlines.
Claims (28)
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/202,194 US20070038537A1 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2005-08-12 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
PCT/US2006/031358 WO2007021921A2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2006-08-11 | Facilities revenue bond financing through spe |
US11/681,166 US7840497B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2007-03-01 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
US12/506,857 US7945521B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2009-07-21 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings |
US12/624,361 US8095473B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2009-11-23 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
US12/753,264 US7953672B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2010-04-02 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings |
US12/883,866 US20110145135A1 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2010-09-16 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings |
US12/912,509 US20110153491A1 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2010-10-26 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/202,194 US20070038537A1 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2005-08-12 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/031358 Continuation WO2007021921A2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2006-08-11 | Facilities revenue bond financing through spe |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070038537A1 true US20070038537A1 (en) | 2007-02-15 |
Family
ID=37743702
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/202,194 Abandoned US20070038537A1 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2005-08-12 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
US11/681,166 Expired - Fee Related US7840497B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2007-03-01 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/681,166 Expired - Fee Related US7840497B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2007-03-01 | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20070038537A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007021921A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030110127A1 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-06-12 | Sabella Richard J. | Systems and methods for conveying common law estates in property using disregarded entities |
CN117474640A (en) * | 2023-12-27 | 2024-01-30 | 广州研趣信息科技有限公司 | Deposit-free leasing device and method |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8548829B1 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2013-10-01 | David Eichenblatt | System and method for loan guarantee insurance |
US20110125675A1 (en) * | 2009-08-20 | 2011-05-26 | Cooley Jr Donald Ray | Method and System for Securitizing Revenue From Transactions That Do Not Involve Credit |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4218034A (en) * | 1978-02-02 | 1980-08-19 | Magill John W | Industrial and urban airport complex with special cargo-handling facilities |
US6154730A (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2000-11-28 | Adams; Edward S. | Facility-based financing system |
US20020156709A1 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2002-10-24 | Pearl Street Financial Group Ltd. | Debt financing for companies |
US20030130865A1 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-07-10 | James Fitzgibbon | Method to achieve off-balance sheet treatment via bifurcated sale and leases |
US20050119962A1 (en) * | 2002-07-03 | 2005-06-02 | Bowen Christopher K. | Method and system for securitizing contracts valued on an index |
US20050289036A1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2005-12-29 | General Motors Corporation | Method for securitizing retail lease assets |
US20060122930A1 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2006-06-08 | Jariwala Atit M | Method for maximizing the return on securitized franchise fee cash flow |
US7346572B2 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2008-03-18 | Clhsm, Llc | Brownfields investing |
US7620593B1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2009-11-17 | Fultz Leigh S | Method for capital creation for tax-exempt organizations |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6460021B1 (en) * | 1993-09-28 | 2002-10-01 | William E. Kirksey | Collaterally secured debt obligation and method of creating same |
WO2002029517A2 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2002-04-11 | International Projects Consultancy Services, Inc. | Automated loan processing system and method |
US6654727B2 (en) * | 2001-11-29 | 2003-11-25 | Lynn Tilton | Method of securitizing a portfolio of at least 30% distressed commercial loans |
US20040199440A1 (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2004-10-07 | Mcdaniel James Mark | System and method for the sale and lease-back of governmental assets to private entities |
-
2005
- 2005-08-12 US US11/202,194 patent/US20070038537A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-08-11 WO PCT/US2006/031358 patent/WO2007021921A2/en active Application Filing
-
2007
- 2007-03-01 US US11/681,166 patent/US7840497B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4218034A (en) * | 1978-02-02 | 1980-08-19 | Magill John W | Industrial and urban airport complex with special cargo-handling facilities |
US6154730A (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2000-11-28 | Adams; Edward S. | Facility-based financing system |
US7346572B2 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2008-03-18 | Clhsm, Llc | Brownfields investing |
US20020156709A1 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2002-10-24 | Pearl Street Financial Group Ltd. | Debt financing for companies |
US20050289036A1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2005-12-29 | General Motors Corporation | Method for securitizing retail lease assets |
US20030130865A1 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-07-10 | James Fitzgibbon | Method to achieve off-balance sheet treatment via bifurcated sale and leases |
US7620593B1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2009-11-17 | Fultz Leigh S | Method for capital creation for tax-exempt organizations |
US20050119962A1 (en) * | 2002-07-03 | 2005-06-02 | Bowen Christopher K. | Method and system for securitizing contracts valued on an index |
US20060122930A1 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2006-06-08 | Jariwala Atit M | Method for maximizing the return on securitized franchise fee cash flow |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030110127A1 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-06-12 | Sabella Richard J. | Systems and methods for conveying common law estates in property using disregarded entities |
CN117474640A (en) * | 2023-12-27 | 2024-01-30 | 广州研趣信息科技有限公司 | Deposit-free leasing device and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2007021921A2 (en) | 2007-02-22 |
US20070226098A1 (en) | 2007-09-27 |
WO2007021921A3 (en) | 2007-05-24 |
US7840497B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7840497B2 (en) | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing | |
US7953672B2 (en) | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings | |
US8095473B2 (en) | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financing | |
US20110153491A1 (en) | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings | |
Murray | Off-balance-sheet financing: Synthetic leases | |
US7945521B2 (en) | Process and architecture for structuring facilities revenue bond financings | |
Farle et al. | German taxation of inbound real estate investments | |
UGANDA | THE REPORT | |
Schachat | LIKE KIND EXCHANGES UNDER SECTION 1031 | |
Regalia | Receivers in California Litigation Involving Real Property | |
Mark Aquilio CPA | Former Marine not entitled to exclude foreign earned income | |
Bank et al. | Business Guide Russia | |
Boss | Selected Real Estate Aspects of Corporate Acquisitions | |
Sharkey | Tax Credits Basics & Update--Historic Tax Credits and New Markets Tax Credits (PowerPoint) | |
Budd | Making sense of political risk insurance policies | |
Tucker | Recent Developments Affecting Real Estate and Partnerships | |
Spiotto | Tax‐exempt airport finance: Tales from the friendly skies | |
Baxter | Sources and Factors of Real Estate Financing | |
AGREEMENT | FOR APPROVAL IN FORM | |
Alden | Leasehold Financing Checklist | |
Berman et al. | Real Estate Taxes | |
Aronzon et al. | UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA | |
Cary | Current Problems in Sale, or Gift, and Lease-Back Transactions | |
Weller et al. | Real Estate Taxes | |
Linder Jr | Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1997-Part I |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW, ET AL., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WILLIAMS, LINDA GRANT;DOUGAN, HUGH M.;DOUGAN, JANE W.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016892/0187 Effective date: 20050810 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILLIAMS, LINDA GRANT, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP;REEL/FRAME:018043/0304 Effective date: 20060410 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILLIAMS, LINDA GRANT, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP;REEL/FRAME:021078/0377 Effective date: 20060410 Owner name: PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WILLIAMS, LINDA GRANT;DOUGAN, HUGH M;DOUGAN, JANE W;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:021078/0314 Effective date: 20050812 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |