US20060200741A1 - Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources - Google Patents
Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060200741A1 US20060200741A1 US11/415,710 US41571006A US2006200741A1 US 20060200741 A1 US20060200741 A1 US 20060200741A1 US 41571006 A US41571006 A US 41571006A US 2006200741 A1 US2006200741 A1 US 2006200741A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- component
- data
- view
- user
- builder
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
Definitions
- the present invention relates to collecting, modeling, and providing access to information.
- An organization's various back-end data sources may contain different types and formats of data, including relational data, point data, time-series data, and object data.
- Relational data comprise data from multiple tables of multiple fields. The tables may be related to each other through indexes.
- Point data is single-type data typically associated with manufacturing systems. For example, a data system may continuously collect a motor's operating speed and operating temperature as point data. Unlike relational data, point data typically are not comprised of multiple tables.
- Time-series data are data that store the change in data value over time.
- Object data are data represented by objects. The concepts of object, object-oriented design, object-oriented programming and object- oriented databases are known to those skilled in the art.
- Data warehouse products and more custom database approaches typically collect data from back-end data sources and deposit the data into a new data warehouse (or data mart) for data analysis and presentation.
- Some data mining processes operate on data warehouses to provide detailed analysis such as marketing and sales trends, and to test hypotheses such as customer buying patterns.
- those analyses are usually only available to a few analysts and executives in an organization.
- a data warehouse usually stores historical data for long term analysis, but is not suitable for real time or near real time applications.
- Application packages such as Intellution Dynamics Package by Intellution, Inc. of Foxborough, Mass. and InTouch by Wonderware Corporation of Irvine, Calif. provide for visualization of plant operational data in some manufacturing systems. These packages have very limited abilities to retrieve and present relational data typically associated with other manufacturing systems and non-manufacturing systems such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.
- ERP enterprise resource planning
- the major limitations include an inability to monitor relational data as it changes over time, navigate the relational data for more detailed monitoring or status, and to find supporting details. Because they do not provide access to both point data and relational data, enterprises often have to use multiple systems to provide data visualization, navigation and analysis of various types and formats of data. Using multiple systems often results in high financial and computing expenses and programming and administrative complexity.
- Some systems convert back-end data into relational data stored in a relational database for selection, analysis and visual presentation.
- a relational database typically needs to be managed by a database administrator in order to handle the complexity of a relational database comprising multiple tables and indexes. This is especially true when data has to be converted and acquired from different back-end systems.
- those systems cannot utilize the advantages of object data.
- Some systems convert point data and relational data from back-end data sources into point data to present to users. Since the back-end data are converted into point data, those systems cannot utilize the advantages of object data and also lose any benefits associated with relational data.
- One aspect of the invention involves the use of a class-based component and view model to collect and display data from multiple sources.
- the class-based component and view model is preferably embodied within a system that uses reusable components and views to monitor the operation of a business entity, such as but not limited to a business entity that has manufacturing facilities or plants in various locations.
- the data that is collected and displayed by the system may, for example, include relational data, point data and/or time-series data.
- the system also preferably includes development tools for creating and deploying the reusable components and views to generate an information model for monitoring the business entity.
- reusable components are initially defined for each type of business element or data source to be monitored.
- a “plant” component may be generated that represents the general structure of a manufacturing or processing plant, and a “pump” component may be generated to represent a type of pump.
- a given component may include one or more other components as members.
- the associated plant component may include multiple pump components.
- the task of generating the reusable components is performed in the preferred embodiment using a component builder tool.
- one or more reusable views may be defined for a given component to specify how data collected by that component is to be displayed.
- Each such view is generally a graphical representation of a corresponding component, and may include graphs, charts, animations, and/or other types of graphical elements to represent the associated data collected by that component.
- a first view associated with the first component may optionally be inserted into a second view associated with the second component, such that the first view is automatically displayed as a subset of the second view.
- the task of generating the reusable views is performed in the preferred embodiment using a view builder tool.
- the system preferably allows multiple views to be defined for the same component, and thus allows users or developers to build different views of varying levels of detail corresponding to the same component. This is advantageous because different people within a business organization may demand different views that connect to the same data. For example, a plant foreman may want views that show the operating temperature, speed and production numbers of machines. The plant supervisor may want views that show the production numbers of machines. The company executive may want views that show the production totals of each plant. Some prefer to have data displayed in tables while others prefer charts.
- a solution builder tool may be used to generate an informational model or “solution” for a business entity.
- This task involves creating instances of specific components, and connecting these instances to respective back end data sources. For example, if a given business entity has physical plants in Chicago, Milwaukee and Cleveland, three separate instances of the “plant” component may be created, one for each physical plant. Each such component instance would also be connected to the corresponding back end data source or sources (point data sources, databases, etc.) associated with its respective physical plant. As part of this process, different data collection frequencies and other data connection parameters may be specified for different instances of the same component.
- the task of creating a solution from a set of preexisting components can advantageously be performed by a person having little or no knowledge of the structure of the associated components. If changes are made to a particular component or its view(s) over time, the changes may be propagated automatically to all instances of the associated component.
- the solution or model may be navigated in the preferred embodiment using a navigation tree in which each instance of each component is represented by a respective node or icon within an expandable tree.
- a navigation tree in which each instance of each component is represented by a respective node or icon within an expandable tree.
- a user can select a node (component instance) and view the associated data collected by that instance. If multiple views have been defined for an associated component (e.g., basic view, detailed view, etc.), the user can also select between these alternative views.
- users can access the navigation tree using an ordinary web browser.
- FIG. 1 illustrates components and environments that use one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a representation of modules of an application environment and a development environment in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 illustrates the tree-style solution display and navigation structure of the preferred embodiment.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of the data communication between the application environment and the back-end data environment.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of the data communication between the application environment and the browsing environment.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a component.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a global collection.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a solution.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a view.
- FIG. 10 is an example screen display of the component builder of FIG. 2 illustrating a user interface for adding an existing component member to a component.
- FIG. 11 illustrates a screen display of the solution builder of FIG. 2 , showing an example solution tree on the left hand side.
- FIG. 12 illustrates a user interface through which a user of the solution builder can select from a list of views that are available for a selected component/component instance in the solution tree.
- FIG. 13 illustrates a connection tab screen of the solution builder.
- FIG. 14 is an example screen display of the solution builder illustrating the process of connecting a collection component to a global collection called “Customers.”
- FIG. 15 is an example screen display of the view builder of FIG. 2 illustrating the process of inserting one view into another view.
- FIG. 16 illustrates a browser-based view of a solution, with the solution tree shown in the left panel and a populated view of the selected component instance in the right panel.
- FIG. 1 illustrates components and environments according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- a back-end data environment 100 comprises various data sources, such as plant floor production systems 102 , enterprise resource planning data systems 104 , and other data systems 106 .
- Such data sources contain data of various formats, such as relational data, point data, time-series data, object data, or a combination thereof.
- the various data sources from the back-end data environment 100 are connected to an application environment 200 .
- the term connected means directly or indirectly capable of communicating over a direct wired, network or wireless connection.
- the application environment 200 comprises an enterprise server 202 , a web server 204 , and one or more solution servers 206 .
- the application environment 200 is connected to a development environment 201 .
- the development environment 201 comprises one or more development clients 210 .
- the enterprise server, solution servers and development clients comprise application programs in Java and/or C++and running under Windows NT.
- the application environment 200 is connected to a browsing environment 300 .
- the browsing environment 300 comprises one or more browsing terminals 302 .
- Each browsing terminal 302 comprises a communication program such as a web browser.
- the browsing terminals 302 are connected to the application environment 200 through the Internet using web browsers such as Netscape Communicator or Internet Explorer launched from the browsing terminals 302 .
- the browsing terminals 302 are connected to the application environment 200 through an Intranet.
- the system provides options for a developer or user to specify the frequency at which data is to be fetched from the back-end environment 100 into the application environment 200 . If data were fetched too frequently, it would be a waste on system resources and may adversely affect system performance. On the other hand, if the data were not fetched frequently enough, a user could end up viewing data that is unacceptably out-dated. By fine-tuning the fetching frequency, a developer or user can ensure that users view data that is sufficiently timely.
- the system and method for specifying the data fetch frequencies are known to those skilled in the art.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a representation of modules of the application environment 200 , and the development environment 201 . While the preferred embodiment may comprise multiple solution servers and multiple development clients, only one solution server 206 and only one development client 210 are shown on FIG. 2 for ease of illustration.
- the enterprise server 202 comprises a component table 222 that stores component definitions.
- a component is a reusable software resource that contains and represents the information associated with a data source, such as a business entity.
- a component may represent a customer, a shipping route, or a credit check process.
- a component can represent a collection, for example, yesterday's customer orders from a back-end relational database.
- a component is made up of one or more members. Each member can be a number, a date, a text string, a Boolean logical value, or another component.
- a “customer” component may be comprised of members such as name, identification number and address.
- a run-time usage of a component is called a component instance.
- a component instance When a component is reused, a unique instance of that component is created, with a unique name. Different instances of the same component can follow different instructions on where, when, how and how often to retrieve back-end data.
- the component table 222 also stores definitions of views associated with that component. By storing all component and view definitions on the enterprise server 202 , the system ensures that all developers and users across the enterprise can utilize and inherit the same component and view definitions.
- the enterprise server 202 also comprises a solution table 226 that stores the names, descriptions and locations of solutions, and a connector table 228 that stores the name, description and configuration code of all connectors.
- the connection process configurations are stored in the solution servers 206 in the connection processes module.
- the connection processes that execute commands to acquire component instance data and global collection data from back-end data sources are located on the solution servers 206 .
- a solution is a component instance with a defined connection to a back-end data.
- a connector comprises program code for connecting a component instance or a global collection to a back-end data source.
- a global collection represents multiple instances of the same class of data, such as “all orders,” “all customers,” or “all customers from the East Region.”
- the web server 204 comprises an animation module 252 which displays views with animation effects and manages user interaction with the views, a trend module 254 which displays trends of component instance data change as data change over time, a navigation module 256 which manages the tree-structure navigation of views, and a support module 258 which supports data communication between the application environment 200 and the browsing environment 300 .
- the animation module 252 , the trend module 254 , the navigation module 256 and the support module 258 comprise one or more Java applets.
- the web server 204 also comprises a router 260 as the data communication gateway between the browsing terminals 302 and the application environment 200 .
- the solution server 206 comprises an object storage 232 , a time-series historian 234 , a component instance table 236 , a connection group table 238 and a connection processes module 240 .
- the object storage 232 receives data from the back-end data environment 100 and stores such data.
- the object storage 232 stores some objects in memory and commits other objects to disk to allow for storing large quantities of data.
- objects may be stored entirely in memory or on disk or on other media, and the present invention is not limited by the type of media used to store objects.
- the data Even if users want the same data, the data only needs to be retrieved from the back-end environment 100 once, and can then be transmitted from the object storage 232 to one or many users who request it. Since the data are stored directly in memory or disk, and not in a relational database, the data administration task is typically simpler than a relational database.
- the time-series historian 234 is a database preferably optimized for storing time-centric data.
- the time series historian 234 stores time-stamped data values received from the back-end data environment 100 .
- the time-series historian 234 can be an independent third-party product or can be custom-designed. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill that a flat file system or database may be used to implement the time-series historian 234 .
- the component instance table 236 stores the connection configurations for each component instance within the solution held by that solution server 206 .
- the connection configurations comprise a connection group to connect to the back-end data, or a program command to select a subset of a global collection, as described in connection with FIG. 7 .
- a connection group comprises a connection process and a connector.
- a connection process is the program command that starts the execution of the connector.
- the connection group table 238 stores connection groups.
- the connection processes module 240 comprises a table storing connection processes and their respective locations.
- the connection processes module 240 uses connection processes to retrieve data from the back-end data environment 100 , and sends the retrieved data to the object storage 232 . If a user or developer selects, for example, in the solution builder 248 , an option to store data in time-series historian, the connection processes module 240 sends the retrieved data to the time-series historian 234 for storing.
- the development client 210 comprises a catalog application 242 , a component builder 244 , a view builder 246 , a solution builder 248 , and a connector builder 250 .
- Components and views are created or modified within the development client 210 and sent to the enterprise server 202 to be stored in the component table 222 .
- the catalog application 242 is an interface that includes and provides access to a list of components. Each component is represented by a component name and an icon. When a developer or user selects a component from the list for modification or starts to create a new component, the developer/user is directed from the catalog application 242 to the component builder 244 .
- the component builder 244 allows a developer or user to create and edit components.
- the developer/user may select the menu option “create new view” to create a new view for that component, or may select the menu option “edit view” to edit a view for that component.
- the developer/user will then be directed from the catalog application 242 to the view builder 246 .
- the view builder 246 allows a developer or user to create and edit views to attach to existing components.
- the solution builder 248 allows a developer or user to create or modify a solution, and to specify how to connect the solution to back-end data sources.
- the present invention supports Microsoft's Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) protocol and Microsoft's Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) application programming interface for connecting to back-end data sources.
- DDE Dynamic Data Exchange
- ODBC Open Database Connectivity
- An example screen display of one embodiment of the solution builder 248 is shown in FIG. 11 , with a solution tree shown on the left hand side.
- Another example screen display is shown in FIG. 12 , which shows how a user of the solution builder 248 can select from a list of views that are available for a selected component instance to view data collected by that instance.
- the connector builder 250 allows a developer or user to add, modify or delete a connector.
- a connector is the program code that connects to back-end data.
- the created or modified connector definitions are transmitted from the connector builder 250 to the enterprise server 202 and stored in the connector table 228 .
- Each connector has an associated connector type such as ODBC, DDE, Oracle or MS-SQL.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a tree style navigation and display structure representing solutions.
- the top node solution “enterprise” 402 comprises several member solutions representing plants in Chicago, Indianapolis, and Milwaukee.
- the Chicago plant 404 , the Indianapolis plant 406 , the Milwaukee plant 408 and the Cleveland plant 410 are solutions each corresponding to a “plant” component, but with different connections to back-end data.
- the component “plant” comprises the members “bottling line,” “can line,” “human resource,” and “maintenance,” each such member being a component. Therefore, the Chicago plant 404 has a bottling line 412 , a can line 414 , a human resource department 416 and a maintenance department 418 .
- the other plants have the same members but may connect to different back-end data.
- a tree branch may comprise sub-branches, as a component may comprise member components.
- solutions may also be displayed using other presentation and navigation structures.
- Programming controls such as the Visual Basic Tree View control, are known to those of ordinary skill, and can be used to generate navigable displays representing hierarchical relationships between objects by a visual arrangement of labels and/or icons associated with represented objects. See, for example, Microsoft Visual Basic —Professional Features, Microsoft Corp., 1995 .
- a solution represents an instance of a corresponding component.
- a developer or user can define and modify the run-time attributes of a solution component instance, such as name, description, and connection characteristics.
- connection characteristics may include what data sources to connect to, when to connect, the program code or system command to connect to a data source and retrieve data, and how frequently to retrieve data.
- a developer or user may update the solution through a menu option. This action updates the solution to include the latest changes to the components.
- a node “global collections” and a sub-node “customers” are displayed at the bottom of the solution tree in FIG. 3 .
- the global collection section will be described in connection with FIG. 7 .
- FIG. 4 illustrates the back-end data environment 100 connected to the application environment 200 , through solution server 206 . While multiple solution servers may be connected to the back-end data environment 100 , only one solution server 206 is shown for ease of illustration.
- the connection processes module 240 retrieves data from the back-end data environment 100 and sends the retrieved data to the object storage 232 . If specified in the solution builder 248 to be stored in the time-series historian 234 , then the retrieved data is also stored in the time-series historian 234 .
- the object storage 232 receives and stores relational data and point data.
- Point data is retrieved by the connection processes module 240 from the back-end data environment 100 to the object storage 232 , when a view corresponding to such point data is displayed on a browsing terminal 302 .
- This run-time retrieval of point data retrieves only the set or subset of point data that is requested by the displaying view, and only when requested.
- Relational data and other collection data are retrieved by the connection processes module 240 from the back-end data environment 100 , to the object storage 232 , when a solution connects such relational data to the solution using a connection group.
- a solution can also connect to back-end data by selecting a subset of a global collection that connects to back-end data.
- a process connected to the relational data source in the back-end data environment 100 automatically detects changes and sends changes to the back-end data as change records to the object storage 232 and the recorded changes are applied to the data in the object storage 232 . This method of applying changes reduces the quantity of data needed to be retrieved from the back-end data environment 100 .
- the back-end data environment 100 does not create change records, and data from the back-end data environment are transmitted to the object storage 232 according to the data retrieval frequency specified in the connection group.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the browsing terminals 302 and the web server 204 .
- the browsing terminals 302 connect to the web server 204 through a computer network by launching a web browser such as Microsoft Internet Explorer or Netscape Communicator.
- the applet or applets comprising the modules 252 , 254 , 256 & 258 are downloaded from the web server 204 to the browsing terminals 302 .
- the browsing terminals 302 display the views defined in the enterprise server 202 representing component instances in solution servers 206 .
- users can select one or more existing views for display, but cannot update components, views or solutions. If users are given access, they can create and edit components, views and solutions from the development clients 210 .
- An example screen display showing how solutions may be viewed within a web browser is shown in FIG. 16 , with the solution tree shown in the left panel and a populated view of the selected component instance in the right panel.
- the router 260 is the data communication gateway between the browsing terminals 302 and the application environment 200 .
- the router 260 retrieves view definitions and component definitions from the component table 222 in the enterprise server 202 .
- Data and component instances requested by the browsing terminals 302 are transmitted from the solution servers 206 through the router 260 to the browsing terminals 302 .
- a user/developer can use the animation module 252 to pick a data display field within a view, and select a “show trend” option to display the change of data over time for the component member represented by that data display field.
- the trend module 254 then provides a graphic representation of data change over time for the component member.
- Historical data is retrieved from the time-series historian 234 or the back-end time-series historian.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a component.
- a user or developer selects the menu option “create new component” in the catalog application 242 , he/she is then directed to the component builder 244 and prompted to enter a name for the new component in step 502 .
- the new component name must be different from existing component names.
- the user/developer is also prompted to enter a text description for the new component.
- the user/developer is then prompted to assign a graphic icon to the new component in step 504 .
- the user/developer is presented a list of icons or allowed to search for icon files.
- the user/developer is prompted to assign two icons to a new component, including one small icon and one large icon for various display of the component.
- the user/developer is then prompted to define members of the component.
- the user/developer is prompted to define the name of the member in step 506 , and to select the data type of the member in step 508 .
- the data type can be a primitive type such as integer, decimal number, Boolean logical value, text string or date, or an existing component.
- An example screen display illustrating the process of adding an existing component as a member is shown in FIG. 10 .
- the user/developer continues adding members to the component, until he/she indicates at step 510 that all members have been added. In the preferred embodiment the user/developer makes this indication by selecting a “save component definition” menu option.
- step 512 the client development client 210 updates the catalog application 242 to include the name and icon of the view component.
- the development client 210 also sends the new component definition to the component table 222 in the enterprise server 202 .
- the user or developer starts the process of creating a component in the component builder 244 .
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the process of creating a global collection.
- a global collection represents multiple instances of the same class of data, such as “all orders,” “all customers,” or “all customers from the East Regional Database.”
- a component member designated a collection member is connected to back-end data through “filtering” a global collection, i.e., selecting a subset of a global collection.
- a component member representing multiple instances of the same type is preferably designated a collection member.
- a member not designated a collection member connects to back-end data through a connection group, as described above. For example, a component member “customers” of a “sales organization” component may contain a collection of more than one customer.
- a component member can be connected to back-end data as all or a subset of the global collection. For example, once a global collection of “all customers” is created and its connection to back-end data defined, a component of “active customers” can be connected to back-end data as a subset of the global collection. Components of “inactive customers” or “preferred customers” can also be connected as a subset of the global collection.
- An example screen display illustrating the process of connecting a collection component to the global collection “Customers” is shown in FIG. 14 .
- Relational data records with multiple fields may be designated collection members. Members representing programmatic data, i.e, data structures returned from API (Application Programming Interface) calls, can also be designated collection members.
- the term “relational data” comprises data structures returned from API calls.
- step 520 a user or developer selects a menu option of “create global collection” in the solution builder 248 , and enters a name for the global collection.
- the user/developer is then prompted in step 522 to select a component from a list of existing components to correspond to the new global collection. This defines the type of data that is associated with and managed by the global collection.
- the user/developer is then prompted in step 524 to select a connection group from a list of existing connection groups to connect the global connection to back-end data. For example, an “Oracle” connection group connects to a back-end Oracle database, and an “MS-SQL” connection group connects to a Microsoft SQL database.
- the user/developer addresses the new global collection. Addressing a global collection provides information needed to acquire the desired collection data from the back-end environment 100 .
- the user/developer enters program commands and configurations to associate the members of the selected component with back-end data items.
- the user/developer addresses the new global collection by entering a query statement specifying the back-end data items to select data from, and maps the specified back-end data items to the members of the selected component.
- the solution builder 248 updates the global collection list. In the preferred embodiment the updated global collection list is displayed at the bottom of the solution tree.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a solution.
- a top-node component must first be identified to build a hierarchical object model for display, navigation and data collection.
- a tree-style display is one form of display of the hierarchical object model.
- the user or developer selects a component as the top-level component in step 602 in the solution builder 248 .
- the developer is then prompted in step 604 to enter a top-node solution name and description.
- the solution builder 248 displays a solution tree with the selected component at the top node, its members as branches of the tree, and sub-members as sub-branches. In one embodiment only component members are shown as branches of the tree.
- steps 602 through 606 are preformed using a system administration module.
- a user or developer proceeds from step 608 within the solution builder 248 .
- a user or developer selects a component represented by a node on the solution tree, and selects the “create solution” option to connect back-end data (i.e., a back end data source) to an instance of the selected component.
- back-end data i.e., a back end data source
- the user/developer is prompted in step 610 to select a member of the selected component for connecting to back-end data.
- the user/developer determines whether to designate the selected member as a collection data member.
- the user/developer is prompted in step 614 to select a global collection from a list of existing global collections.
- step 622 if the user/developer indicates he/she has completed connecting members to back-end data, then the solution builder 248 proceeds to step 624 . Otherwise the solution builder 248 returns to step 610 to select another member for connection. In step 624 the solution builder 248 transmits the solution definition to the enterprise server 202 and solution server 206 .
- the connection specification for each component member of the solution is stored in the component instance table 236 , and_the name and description of the solution are stored in the solution table 226 .
- connection groups each comprising a connection process.
- Each connection process comprises the program command to execute a connector.
- Connectors can be independent third party packages or custom programmed for the system.
- One embodiment uses a connector toolkit developed by the applicant that allows developers to build connectors in Java, and optionally in C or C++.
- a developer or user can create different connection groups that use the same connector. For example, one connection group connects to production data for last year; another connection group connects to production data for the current month, contained in the same back-end data source.
- One connection group may scan for data at a frequency of every second, while another connection group may scan for data, using the same connector, at a frequency of every minute.
- connection group acquires back-end data using a connection process, which comprises the program command for running a connector.
- An example screen display showing a connection tab screen of the solution builder 248 is shown in FIG. 13 .
- the solution builder 248 allows a user or developer to add, modify or delete a connection process.
- the user/developer selects the option “add a connection process,” and is prompted to enter a name and description for the new connection process.
- the user/developer is then prompted to enter a program command for the connection process.
- a developer typically performs the task of entering a program command.
- the solution builder 248 also allows a user or developer to add, modify or delete a connection group.
- the user/developer selects the option “add a connection group,” and is prompted to enter a name and description for the new connection group.
- the user/developer is then prompted to select a connection process from a list of connection processes and a connector type from a list of connector types.
- a connector type is the type of a connector defined in the connector builder 250 .
- the selected connection process is the connection process that corresponds to the new connection group.
- the user/developer is then allowed to specify the data scanning frequency of the connection group.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a view.
- a developer or user selects a component from the catalog application 242 , and selects the menu option “create new view” to create a new view corresponding to the selected component.
- the user/developer is then directed to the view builder 246 and prompted to enter a name for that view, in step 704 .
- the user/developer is also prompted to enter a description for that view in step 704 .
- step 706 the user/developer is prompted to select a graphic tool.
- Graphic representations are created using graphic tools, which comprise tools for drawing tables, charts, lines, animations, etc.
- the view builder 246 has a set of drawing tools for presenting titles, charts, tables, backgrounds graphics, and other graphical elements.
- the view builder 246 also allows a developer or user to create and edit animations. Animation characteristics, such as fill color and size, change based on fluctuations in back-end data. Animations contain references to component members that are linked through a solution to collect data from back-end data sources.
- the view builder 246 also allows the creation and editing of views as web hyperlinks to URLs (Uniform Resource Locators).
- URLs Uniform Resource Locators
- step 708 proceeds to step 714 . If the selected tool is not a tool for inserting a view inside a view, then step 708 proceeds to step 710 .
- a view-in-view tool allows a user/developer to insert, within a view representing a component, a sub-view representing a component member of that component at a location determined by the user/developer.
- An example view builder screen display illustrating the process of inserting one view into another view is shown in FIG. 15 .
- step 710 the user/developer creates graphic representation using the selected tool.
- the graphic representation may comprise an animation.
- the graphic representation also may comprise program commands for associating data values with the graphic effects. For example, a user/developer can use the selected graphic tool to represent a “pump temperature” field as a blue rectangle, and enter a program command to fill the rectangle with red color or flashing red color when temperature exceed five hundred degrees. The user/developer then is directed to step 722 .
- step 714 the user/developer is prompted to select a member of the selected component. Since a view representing the selected member is to be inserted to the newly created view representing the selected component, the selected member is a component itself. In one embodiment the user/developer is prompted to select from a list of component members of the selected component. The user/developer is prompted to select a view from the existing views of the member component, in step 716 . The user/developer uses the view-in-view tool to place the selected member view inside the newly created component view.
- the view builder 246 determines in step 718 if the selected member is designated as a collection member. If the selected member is a collection member, then the user/developer is prompted in step 720 to determine the number of views to be displayed for the collection member. In one embodiment the user/developer is prompted to enter the number of rows and columns to be displayed for the collection member.
- step 722 the user/developer can opt to return to step 706 to continue preparation of the graphic representation of the selected component. If the user/developer indicates that the view is complete, the view builder 246 transmits the created view definition to enterprise server 202 to be stored in the component table 222 (step 724 ).
- a default view is defined for each component that has one or more views associated with the component.
- the first view created for that component is defined as the default view.
- a user/developer can define the default view by selecting the component in the catalog application 242 and entering a “update component—update default view” option. This embodiment can be achieved by having a “default view? Yes or No” logical field within the view definition, or by having a “default view” field within the component definition containing the name of the default view.
- the sub-view representing the component member is also displayed.
- the default view representing the component member is displayed. For example, within a view representing a plant operation is displayed a view representing a motor. When the view representing the motor is selected, the default view representing the motor is displayed, which is typically a detailed view of the motor. A user/developer is thus allowed to “drill down” to further details. A user/developer can also select another view of the component member, preferably by right-clicking on the sub-view to bring up a list of views corresponding to the component member and selecting one of the views from the list.
- data is retrieved through connections defined in a solution, and displayed using a view associated with the component that is associated with the solution.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,430, filed Dec. 3, 2003, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/704,471, filed Nov. 1, 2000, claims the priority date of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/162,975, filed Nov. 1, 1999, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to collecting, modeling, and providing access to information.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- A number of attempts have been made to retrieve data from a business organization's various data sources (called back-end data sources) and to present that data to users. An organization's various back-end data sources may contain different types and formats of data, including relational data, point data, time-series data, and object data. Relational data comprise data from multiple tables of multiple fields. The tables may be related to each other through indexes. Point data is single-type data typically associated with manufacturing systems. For example, a data system may continuously collect a motor's operating speed and operating temperature as point data. Unlike relational data, point data typically are not comprised of multiple tables. Time-series data are data that store the change in data value over time. Object data are data represented by objects. The concepts of object, object-oriented design, object-oriented programming and object- oriented databases are known to those skilled in the art.
- Data warehouse products and more custom database approaches typically collect data from back-end data sources and deposit the data into a new data warehouse (or data mart) for data analysis and presentation. Some data mining processes operate on data warehouses to provide detailed analysis such as marketing and sales trends, and to test hypotheses such as customer buying patterns. However, those analyses are usually only available to a few analysts and executives in an organization. In addition, a data warehouse usually stores historical data for long term analysis, but is not suitable for real time or near real time applications.
- Application packages such as Intellution Dynamics Package by Intellution, Inc. of Foxborough, Mass. and InTouch by Wonderware Corporation of Irvine, Calif. provide for visualization of plant operational data in some manufacturing systems. These packages have very limited abilities to retrieve and present relational data typically associated with other manufacturing systems and non-manufacturing systems such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Typically, the major limitations include an inability to monitor relational data as it changes over time, navigate the relational data for more detailed monitoring or status, and to find supporting details. Because they do not provide access to both point data and relational data, enterprises often have to use multiple systems to provide data visualization, navigation and analysis of various types and formats of data. Using multiple systems often results in high financial and computing expenses and programming and administrative complexity.
- Some systems convert back-end data into relational data stored in a relational database for selection, analysis and visual presentation. Such a relational database typically needs to be managed by a database administrator in order to handle the complexity of a relational database comprising multiple tables and indexes. This is especially true when data has to be converted and acquired from different back-end systems. In addition, those systems cannot utilize the advantages of object data.
- Some systems convert point data and relational data from back-end data sources into point data to present to users. Since the back-end data are converted into point data, those systems cannot utilize the advantages of object data and also lose any benefits associated with relational data.
- Other systems convert back-end data into object data, but fail to provide access to the object data using a class-based representation model. What is needed is a system and method providing access to back-end data in object form, in real time, and using a class-based component and view model.
- One aspect of the invention involves the use of a class-based component and view model to collect and display data from multiple sources. The class-based component and view model is preferably embodied within a system that uses reusable components and views to monitor the operation of a business entity, such as but not limited to a business entity that has manufacturing facilities or plants in various locations. The data that is collected and displayed by the system may, for example, include relational data, point data and/or time-series data. The system also preferably includes development tools for creating and deploying the reusable components and views to generate an information model for monitoring the business entity.
- To generate a model in a preferred embodiment, reusable components are initially defined for each type of business element or data source to be monitored. For example, a “plant” component may be generated that represents the general structure of a manufacturing or processing plant, and a “pump” component may be generated to represent a type of pump. A given component may include one or more other components as members. For example, if each plant within the business entity includes multiple pumps, the associated plant component may include multiple pump components. The task of generating the reusable components is performed in the preferred embodiment using a component builder tool.
- In addition to defining reusable components, one or more reusable views may be defined for a given component to specify how data collected by that component is to be displayed. Each such view is generally a graphical representation of a corresponding component, and may include graphs, charts, animations, and/or other types of graphical elements to represent the associated data collected by that component. If a first component is a member of a second component, a first view associated with the first component may optionally be inserted into a second view associated with the second component, such that the first view is automatically displayed as a subset of the second view. The task of generating the reusable views is performed in the preferred embodiment using a view builder tool.
- The system preferably allows multiple views to be defined for the same component, and thus allows users or developers to build different views of varying levels of detail corresponding to the same component. This is advantageous because different people within a business organization may demand different views that connect to the same data. For example, a plant foreman may want views that show the operating temperature, speed and production numbers of machines. The plant supervisor may want views that show the production numbers of machines. The company executive may want views that show the production totals of each plant. Some prefer to have data displayed in tables while others prefer charts.
- Once one or more reusable components and associated views have been generated, a solution builder tool may be used to generate an informational model or “solution” for a business entity. This task involves creating instances of specific components, and connecting these instances to respective back end data sources. For example, if a given business entity has physical plants in Chicago, Milwaukee and Cleveland, three separate instances of the “plant” component may be created, one for each physical plant. Each such component instance would also be connected to the corresponding back end data source or sources (point data sources, databases, etc.) associated with its respective physical plant. As part of this process, different data collection frequencies and other data connection parameters may be specified for different instances of the same component. The task of creating a solution from a set of preexisting components can advantageously be performed by a person having little or no knowledge of the structure of the associated components. If changes are made to a particular component or its view(s) over time, the changes may be propagated automatically to all instances of the associated component.
- The solution or model may be navigated in the preferred embodiment using a navigation tree in which each instance of each component is represented by a respective node or icon within an expandable tree. Using the navigation tree, a user can select a node (component instance) and view the associated data collected by that instance. If multiple views have been defined for an associated component (e.g., basic view, detailed view, etc.), the user can also select between these alternative views. In one embodiment, users can access the navigation tree using an ordinary web browser.
- Neither this summary nor the following detailed description purports to define the invention. The invention is defined by the claims.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates components and environments that use one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a representation of modules of an application environment and a development environment in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 illustrates the tree-style solution display and navigation structure of the preferred embodiment. -
FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of the data communication between the application environment and the back-end data environment. -
FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of the data communication between the application environment and the browsing environment. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a component. -
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a global collection. -
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a solution. -
FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a view. -
FIG. 10 is an example screen display of the component builder ofFIG. 2 illustrating a user interface for adding an existing component member to a component. -
FIG. 11 illustrates a screen display of the solution builder ofFIG. 2 , showing an example solution tree on the left hand side. -
FIG. 12 illustrates a user interface through which a user of the solution builder can select from a list of views that are available for a selected component/component instance in the solution tree. -
FIG. 13 illustrates a connection tab screen of the solution builder. -
FIG. 14 is an example screen display of the solution builder illustrating the process of connecting a collection component to a global collection called “Customers.” -
FIG. 15 is an example screen display of the view builder ofFIG. 2 illustrating the process of inserting one view into another view. -
FIG. 16 illustrates a browser-based view of a solution, with the solution tree shown in the left panel and a populated view of the selected component instance in the right panel. -
FIG. 1 illustrates components and environments according to one embodiment of the present invention. A back-end data environment 100 comprises various data sources, such as plantfloor production systems 102, enterprise resourceplanning data systems 104, andother data systems 106. Such data sources contain data of various formats, such as relational data, point data, time-series data, object data, or a combination thereof. The various data sources from the back-end data environment 100 are connected to anapplication environment 200. As used herein, the term connected means directly or indirectly capable of communicating over a direct wired, network or wireless connection. - The
application environment 200 comprises anenterprise server 202, aweb server 204, and one ormore solution servers 206. Theapplication environment 200 is connected to adevelopment environment 201. Thedevelopment environment 201 comprises one ormore development clients 210. In the preferred embodiment, the enterprise server, solution servers and development clients comprise application programs in Java and/or C++and running under Windows NT. - The
application environment 200 is connected to abrowsing environment 300. Thebrowsing environment 300 comprises one ormore browsing terminals 302. Eachbrowsing terminal 302 comprises a communication program such as a web browser. In the preferred embodiment thebrowsing terminals 302 are connected to theapplication environment 200 through the Internet using web browsers such as Netscape Communicator or Internet Explorer launched from thebrowsing terminals 302. In another embodiment, thebrowsing terminals 302 are connected to theapplication environment 200 through an Intranet. - The system provides options for a developer or user to specify the frequency at which data is to be fetched from the back-
end environment 100 into theapplication environment 200. If data were fetched too frequently, it would be a waste on system resources and may adversely affect system performance. On the other hand, if the data were not fetched frequently enough, a user could end up viewing data that is unacceptably out-dated. By fine-tuning the fetching frequency, a developer or user can ensure that users view data that is sufficiently timely. The system and method for specifying the data fetch frequencies are known to those skilled in the art. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a representation of modules of theapplication environment 200, and thedevelopment environment 201. While the preferred embodiment may comprise multiple solution servers and multiple development clients, only onesolution server 206 and only onedevelopment client 210 are shown onFIG. 2 for ease of illustration. - The
enterprise server 202 comprises a component table 222 that stores component definitions. A component is a reusable software resource that contains and represents the information associated with a data source, such as a business entity. Thus, for example, a component may represent a customer, a shipping route, or a credit check process. A component can represent a collection, for example, yesterday's customer orders from a back-end relational database. By using components to represent business elements, the system facilitates user understanding in terms of the business process. A component is made up of one or more members. Each member can be a number, a date, a text string, a Boolean logical value, or another component. For example, a “customer” component may be comprised of members such as name, identification number and address. A run-time usage of a component is called a component instance. When a component is reused, a unique instance of that component is created, with a unique name. Different instances of the same component can follow different instructions on where, when, how and how often to retrieve back-end data. - For each component represented in the component table 222, the component table 222 also stores definitions of views associated with that component. By storing all component and view definitions on the
enterprise server 202, the system ensures that all developers and users across the enterprise can utilize and inherit the same component and view definitions. Theenterprise server 202 also comprises a solution table 226 that stores the names, descriptions and locations of solutions, and a connector table 228 that stores the name, description and configuration code of all connectors. The connection process configurations are stored in thesolution servers 206 in the connection processes module. The connection processes that execute commands to acquire component instance data and global collection data from back-end data sources are located on thesolution servers 206. A solution is a component instance with a defined connection to a back-end data. A connector comprises program code for connecting a component instance or a global collection to a back-end data source. A global collection represents multiple instances of the same class of data, such as “all orders,” “all customers,” or “all customers from the East Region.” - The
web server 204 comprises ananimation module 252 which displays views with animation effects and manages user interaction with the views, atrend module 254 which displays trends of component instance data change as data change over time, anavigation module 256 which manages the tree-structure navigation of views, and asupport module 258 which supports data communication between theapplication environment 200 and thebrowsing environment 300. In one embodiment, theanimation module 252, thetrend module 254, thenavigation module 256 and thesupport module 258 comprise one or more Java applets. Theweb server 204 also comprises arouter 260 as the data communication gateway between thebrowsing terminals 302 and theapplication environment 200. - The
solution server 206 comprises anobject storage 232, a time-series historian 234, a component instance table 236, a connection group table 238 and a connection processesmodule 240. Theobject storage 232 receives data from the back-end data environment 100 and stores such data. Theobject storage 232 stores some objects in memory and commits other objects to disk to allow for storing large quantities of data. Those of ordinary skill will appreciate that objects may be stored entirely in memory or on disk or on other media, and the present invention is not limited by the type of media used to store objects. - Even if users want the same data, the data only needs to be retrieved from the back-
end environment 100 once, and can then be transmitted from theobject storage 232 to one or many users who request it. Since the data are stored directly in memory or disk, and not in a relational database, the data administration task is typically simpler than a relational database. - The time-
series historian 234 is a database preferably optimized for storing time-centric data. Thetime series historian 234 stores time-stamped data values received from the back-end data environment 100. The time-series historian 234 can be an independent third-party product or can be custom-designed. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill that a flat file system or database may be used to implement the time-series historian 234. - The component instance table 236 stores the connection configurations for each component instance within the solution held by that
solution server 206. The connection configurations comprise a connection group to connect to the back-end data, or a program command to select a subset of a global collection, as described in connection withFIG. 7 . - A connection group comprises a connection process and a connector. A connection process is the program command that starts the execution of the connector. The connection group table 238 stores connection groups.
- The connection processes
module 240 comprises a table storing connection processes and their respective locations. The connection processesmodule 240 uses connection processes to retrieve data from the back-end data environment 100, and sends the retrieved data to theobject storage 232. If a user or developer selects, for example, in thesolution builder 248, an option to store data in time-series historian, the connection processesmodule 240 sends the retrieved data to the time-series historian 234 for storing. - The
development client 210 comprises acatalog application 242, acomponent builder 244, aview builder 246, asolution builder 248, and aconnector builder 250. Components and views are created or modified within thedevelopment client 210 and sent to theenterprise server 202 to be stored in the component table 222. Thecatalog application 242 is an interface that includes and provides access to a list of components. Each component is represented by a component name and an icon. When a developer or user selects a component from the list for modification or starts to create a new component, the developer/user is directed from thecatalog application 242 to thecomponent builder 244. Thecomponent builder 244 allows a developer or user to create and edit components. - When a developer/user selects a component from the
catalog application 242, the developer/user may select the menu option “create new view” to create a new view for that component, or may select the menu option “edit view” to edit a view for that component. The developer/user will then be directed from thecatalog application 242 to theview builder 246. Theview builder 246 allows a developer or user to create and edit views to attach to existing components. - The
solution builder 248 allows a developer or user to create or modify a solution, and to specify how to connect the solution to back-end data sources. In one embodiment, the present invention supports Microsoft's Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) protocol and Microsoft's Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) application programming interface for connecting to back-end data sources. An example screen display of one embodiment of thesolution builder 248 is shown inFIG. 11 , with a solution tree shown on the left hand side. Another example screen display is shown inFIG. 12 , which shows how a user of thesolution builder 248 can select from a list of views that are available for a selected component instance to view data collected by that instance. - The
connector builder 250 allows a developer or user to add, modify or delete a connector. A connector is the program code that connects to back-end data. The created or modified connector definitions are transmitted from theconnector builder 250 to theenterprise server 202 and stored in the connector table 228. Each connector has an associated connector type such as ODBC, DDE, Oracle or MS-SQL. -
FIG. 3 illustrates a tree style navigation and display structure representing solutions. AsFIG. 3 illustrates, the top node solution “enterprise” 402 comprises several member solutions representing plants in Chicago, Indianapolis, and Milwaukee. TheChicago plant 404, theIndianapolis plant 406, theMilwaukee plant 408 and theCleveland plant 410 are solutions each corresponding to a “plant” component, but with different connections to back-end data. In one embodiment of the present invention, the component “plant” comprises the members “bottling line,” “can line,” “human resource,” and “maintenance,” each such member being a component. Therefore, theChicago plant 404 has abottling line 412, a can line 414, ahuman resource department 416 and amaintenance department 418. The other plants have the same members but may connect to different back-end data. - The tree style display and navigation structure is preferred because it is visually intuitive. A tree branch may comprise sub-branches, as a component may comprise member components. However, solutions may also be displayed using other presentation and navigation structures. Programming controls, such as the Visual Basic Tree View control, are known to those of ordinary skill, and can be used to generate navigable displays representing hierarchical relationships between objects by a visual arrangement of labels and/or icons associated with represented objects. See, for example, Microsoft Visual Basic —Professional Features, Microsoft Corp., 1995.
- At run time, a solution represents an instance of a corresponding component. A developer or user can define and modify the run-time attributes of a solution component instance, such as name, description, and connection characteristics. Such connection characteristics may include what data sources to connect to, when to connect, the program code or system command to connect to a data source and retrieve data, and how frequently to retrieve data. When one or more components that make up a solution have been changed, i.e., when members are added to, modified, or deleted from a component, or the name or icon of the component has been changed, a developer or user may update the solution through a menu option. This action updates the solution to include the latest changes to the components.
- A node “global collections” and a sub-node “customers” are displayed at the bottom of the solution tree in
FIG. 3 . The global collection section will be described in connection withFIG. 7 . -
FIG. 4 illustrates the back-end data environment 100 connected to theapplication environment 200, throughsolution server 206. While multiple solution servers may be connected to the back-end data environment 100, only onesolution server 206 is shown for ease of illustration. The connection processesmodule 240 retrieves data from the back-end data environment 100 and sends the retrieved data to theobject storage 232. If specified in thesolution builder 248 to be stored in the time-series historian 234, then the retrieved data is also stored in the time-series historian 234. - The
object storage 232 receives and stores relational data and point data. Point data is retrieved by the connection processesmodule 240 from the back-end data environment 100 to theobject storage 232, when a view corresponding to such point data is displayed on abrowsing terminal 302. This run-time retrieval of point data retrieves only the set or subset of point data that is requested by the displaying view, and only when requested. - Relational data and other collection data are retrieved by the connection processes
module 240 from the back-end data environment 100, to theobject storage 232, when a solution connects such relational data to the solution using a connection group. A solution can also connect to back-end data by selecting a subset of a global collection that connects to back-end data. In one embodiment, a process connected to the relational data source in the back-end data environment 100 automatically detects changes and sends changes to the back-end data as change records to theobject storage 232 and the recorded changes are applied to the data in theobject storage 232. This method of applying changes reduces the quantity of data needed to be retrieved from the back-end data environment 100. In another embodiment, the back-end data environment 100 does not create change records, and data from the back-end data environment are transmitted to theobject storage 232 according to the data retrieval frequency specified in the connection group. -
FIG. 5 illustrates thebrowsing terminals 302 and theweb server 204. Thebrowsing terminals 302 connect to theweb server 204 through a computer network by launching a web browser such as Microsoft Internet Explorer or Netscape Communicator. The applet or applets comprising themodules web server 204 to thebrowsing terminals 302. Using the downloaded applet(s), thebrowsing terminals 302 display the views defined in theenterprise server 202 representing component instances insolution servers 206. From thebrowsing terminals 302, users can select one or more existing views for display, but cannot update components, views or solutions. If users are given access, they can create and edit components, views and solutions from thedevelopment clients 210. An example screen display showing how solutions may be viewed within a web browser is shown inFIG. 16 , with the solution tree shown in the left panel and a populated view of the selected component instance in the right panel. - The
router 260 is the data communication gateway between thebrowsing terminals 302 and theapplication environment 200. Therouter 260 retrieves view definitions and component definitions from the component table 222 in theenterprise server 202. Data and component instances requested by thebrowsing terminals 302 are transmitted from thesolution servers 206 through therouter 260 to thebrowsing terminals 302. - A user/developer can use the
animation module 252 to pick a data display field within a view, and select a “show trend” option to display the change of data over time for the component member represented by that data display field. Thetrend module 254 then provides a graphic representation of data change over time for the component member. Historical data is retrieved from the time-series historian 234 or the back-end time-series historian. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a component. When a user or developer selects the menu option “create new component” in thecatalog application 242, he/she is then directed to thecomponent builder 244 and prompted to enter a name for the new component instep 502. The new component name must be different from existing component names. In one embodiment the user/developer is also prompted to enter a text description for the new component. The user/developer is then prompted to assign a graphic icon to the new component instep 504. The user/developer is presented a list of icons or allowed to search for icon files. In the preferred embodiment the user/developer is prompted to assign two icons to a new component, including one small icon and one large icon for various display of the component. - The user/developer is then prompted to define members of the component. The user/developer is prompted to define the name of the member in
step 506, and to select the data type of the member instep 508. The data type can be a primitive type such as integer, decimal number, Boolean logical value, text string or date, or an existing component. An example screen display illustrating the process of adding an existing component as a member is shown inFIG. 10 . The user/developer continues adding members to the component, until he/she indicates atstep 510 that all members have been added. In the preferred embodiment the user/developer makes this indication by selecting a “save component definition” menu option. Instep 512 theclient development client 210 updates thecatalog application 242 to include the name and icon of the view component. Instep 512 thedevelopment client 210 also sends the new component definition to the component table 222 in theenterprise server 202. In another embodiment, the user or developer starts the process of creating a component in thecomponent builder 244. -
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the process of creating a global collection. A global collection represents multiple instances of the same class of data, such as “all orders,” “all customers,” or “all customers from the East Regional Database.” A component member designated a collection member is connected to back-end data through “filtering” a global collection, i.e., selecting a subset of a global collection. A component member representing multiple instances of the same type is preferably designated a collection member. A member not designated a collection member connects to back-end data through a connection group, as described above. For example, a component member “customers” of a “sales organization” component may contain a collection of more than one customer. - Once a global collection is created, a component member can be connected to back-end data as all or a subset of the global collection. For example, once a global collection of “all customers” is created and its connection to back-end data defined, a component of “active customers” can be connected to back-end data as a subset of the global collection. Components of “inactive customers” or “preferred customers” can also be connected as a subset of the global collection. An example screen display illustrating the process of connecting a collection component to the global collection “Customers” is shown in
FIG. 14 . Relational data records with multiple fields may be designated collection members. Members representing programmatic data, i.e, data structures returned from API (Application Programming Interface) calls, can also be designated collection members. In this specification,the term “relational data” comprises data structures returned from API calls. - In
step 520, a user or developer selects a menu option of “create global collection” in thesolution builder 248, and enters a name for the global collection. The user/developer is then prompted instep 522 to select a component from a list of existing components to correspond to the new global collection. This defines the type of data that is associated with and managed by the global collection. The user/developer is then prompted instep 524 to select a connection group from a list of existing connection groups to connect the global connection to back-end data. For example, an “Oracle” connection group connects to a back-end Oracle database, and an “MS-SQL” connection group connects to a Microsoft SQL database. - In
step 526, the user/developer addresses the new global collection. Addressing a global collection provides information needed to acquire the desired collection data from the back-end environment 100. The user/developer enters program commands and configurations to associate the members of the selected component with back-end data items. In one embodiment, the user/developer addresses the new global collection by entering a query statement specifying the back-end data items to select data from, and maps the specified back-end data items to the members of the selected component. Instep 528 thesolution builder 248 updates the global collection list. In the preferred embodiment the updated global collection list is displayed at the bottom of the solution tree. - Connecting a component as a subset of an already defined global collection typically requires less technical skill than connecting a component directly to back-end data. Therefore, the method of creating a global collection first, then connecting components as a subset of the created global collection eases the technical burden on users and developers. Once the global collection is defined correctly, users or developers who connect components as a subset of the global collection will not connect the components to the wrong back-end data sources. The word “subset,” as used in the specification and the claims, comprises “a part of” and “all of.”
-
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a solution. A top-node component must first be identified to build a hierarchical object model for display, navigation and data collection. A tree-style display is one form of display of the hierarchical object model. The user or developer selects a component as the top-level component in step 602 in thesolution builder 248. The developer is then prompted in step 604 to enter a top-node solution name and description. In step 606 thesolution builder 248 then displays a solution tree with the selected component at the top node, its members as branches of the tree, and sub-members as sub-branches. In one embodiment only component members are shown as branches of the tree. - In one embodiment, steps 602 through 606 are preformed using a system administration module. When an object model has been created and displayed as a solution tree, a user or developer proceeds from step 608 within the
solution builder 248. In step 608 a user or developer selects a component represented by a node on the solution tree, and selects the “create solution” option to connect back-end data (i.e., a back end data source) to an instance of the selected component. The user/developer is prompted in step 610 to select a member of the selected component for connecting to back-end data. In step 612 the user/developer determines whether to designate the selected member as a collection data member. - If the selected member is designated a collection data member, then the user/developer is prompted in step 614 to select a global collection from a list of existing global collections. The user/developer is then prompted in step 616 to filter the selected global collection, by selecting a subset of said global collection. For example, for a component member “active customers,” the user/developer selects a global collection “all customers,” and in one embodiment selects a subset of the global collection by entering program code “select from all-customers where customer-status =active.” If the selected member is not designated a collection data member then the user/developer connects the member to back-end data by selecting a connection group from a list of existing connection groups in step 618, and then addressing the member in step 620. The user/developer addresses the selected member in step 620 by specifying the back-end data item that the member corresponds to.
- In step 622, if the user/developer indicates he/she has completed connecting members to back-end data, then the
solution builder 248 proceeds to step 624. Otherwise thesolution builder 248 returns to step 610 to select another member for connection. In step 624 thesolution builder 248 transmits the solution definition to theenterprise server 202 andsolution server 206. The connection specification for each component member of the solution is stored in the component instance table 236, and_the name and description of the solution are stored in the solution table 226. - As indicated above, a developer or user may specify a solution's connection to back-end data sources through connection groups, each comprising a connection process. Each connection process comprises the program command to execute a connector. Connectors can be independent third party packages or custom programmed for the system. One embodiment uses a connector toolkit developed by the applicant that allows developers to build connectors in Java, and optionally in C or C++. A developer or user can create different connection groups that use the same connector. For example, one connection group connects to production data for last year; another connection group connects to production data for the current month, contained in the same back-end data source. One connection group may scan for data at a frequency of every second, while another connection group may scan for data, using the same connector, at a frequency of every minute. The system allows a user or developer to specify the data scanning frequency. A connection group acquires back-end data using a connection process, which comprises the program command for running a connector. An example screen display showing a connection tab screen of the
solution builder 248 is shown inFIG. 13 . - The
solution builder 248 allows a user or developer to add, modify or delete a connection process. To add a connection process, the user/developer selects the option “add a connection process,” and is prompted to enter a name and description for the new connection process. The user/developer is then prompted to enter a program command for the connection process. A developer typically performs the task of entering a program command. - The
solution builder 248 also allows a user or developer to add, modify or delete a connection group. To add a connection group, the user/developer selects the option “add a connection group,” and is prompted to enter a name and description for the new connection group. The user/developer is then prompted to select a connection process from a list of connection processes and a connector type from a list of connector types. A connector type is the type of a connector defined in theconnector builder 250. The selected connection process is the connection process that corresponds to the new connection group. In one embodiment, the user/developer is then allowed to specify the data scanning frequency of the connection group. -
FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a process of creating a view. Instep 702, a developer or user selects a component from thecatalog application 242, and selects the menu option “create new view” to create a new view corresponding to the selected component. The user/developer is then directed to theview builder 246 and prompted to enter a name for that view, instep 704. In one embodiment the user/developer is also prompted to enter a description for that view instep 704. - In
step 706, the user/developer is prompted to select a graphic tool. Graphic representations are created using graphic tools, which comprise tools for drawing tables, charts, lines, animations, etc. Theview builder 246 has a set of drawing tools for presenting titles, charts, tables, backgrounds graphics, and other graphical elements. Theview builder 246 also allows a developer or user to create and edit animations. Animation characteristics, such as fill color and size, change based on fluctuations in back-end data. Animations contain references to component members that are linked through a solution to collect data from back-end data sources. Theview builder 246 also allows the creation and editing of views as web hyperlinks to URLs (Uniform Resource Locators). In one embodiment, the user or developer starts the process of creating a view from theview builder 246. - If the user/developer selects a view-in-view tool, i.e. a tool for inserting a view inside a view, then step 708 proceeds to step 714. If the selected tool is not a tool for inserting a view inside a view, then step 708 proceeds to step 710. A view-in-view tool allows a user/developer to insert, within a view representing a component, a sub-view representing a component member of that component at a location determined by the user/developer. An example view builder screen display illustrating the process of inserting one view into another view is shown in
FIG. 15 . - In
step 710 the user/developer creates graphic representation using the selected tool. The graphic representation may comprise an animation. The graphic representation also may comprise program commands for associating data values with the graphic effects. For example, a user/developer can use the selected graphic tool to represent a “pump temperature” field as a blue rectangle, and enter a program command to fill the rectangle with red color or flashing red color when temperature exceed five hundred degrees. The user/developer then is directed to step 722. - If the user/developer selects a view-in-view tool, then in
step 714 the user/developer is prompted to select a member of the selected component. Since a view representing the selected member is to be inserted to the newly created view representing the selected component, the selected member is a component itself. In one embodiment the user/developer is prompted to select from a list of component members of the selected component. The user/developer is prompted to select a view from the existing views of the member component, instep 716. The user/developer uses the view-in-view tool to place the selected member view inside the newly created component view. - The
view builder 246 then determines instep 718 if the selected member is designated as a collection member. If the selected member is a collection member, then the user/developer is prompted instep 720 to determine the number of views to be displayed for the collection member. In one embodiment the user/developer is prompted to enter the number of rows and columns to be displayed for the collection member. - In
step 722, the user/developer can opt to return to step 706 to continue preparation of the graphic representation of the selected component. If the user/developer indicates that the view is complete, theview builder 246 transmits the created view definition toenterprise server 202 to be stored in the component table 222 (step 724). - In one embodiment, a default view is defined for each component that has one or more views associated with the component. When a component has no corresponding views, the first view created for that component is defined as the default view. When a component has one or more corresponding views, a user/developer can define the default view by selecting the component in the
catalog application 242 and entering a “update component—update default view” option. This embodiment can be achieved by having a “default view? Yes or No” logical field within the view definition, or by having a “default view” field within the component definition containing the name of the default view. When a view representing a component having a component member is displayed, the sub-view representing the component member is also displayed. When a user/developer selects the sub-view, preferably by highlighting or double-clicking with a mouse, the default view representing the component member is displayed. For example, within a view representing a plant operation is displayed a view representing a motor. When the view representing the motor is selected, the default view representing the motor is displayed, which is typically a detailed view of the motor. A user/developer is thus allowed to “drill down” to further details. A user/developer can also select another view of the component member, preferably by right-clicking on the sub-view to bring up a list of views corresponding to the component member and selecting one of the views from the list. - At run time, data is retrieved through connections defined in a solution, and displayed using a view associated with the component that is associated with the solution.
- The provisional application on which this application is based, including its attached “Indx XHQ User's Guide,” is hereby incorporated into the specification.
- Although the foregoing has been a description and illustration of specific embodiments of the invention, various modifications and changes can be made thereto by persons skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (16)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/415,710 US20060200741A1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2006-05-01 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16297599P | 1999-11-01 | 1999-11-01 | |
US09/704,471 US6700590B1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2000-11-01 | System and method for retrieving and presenting data using class-based component and view model |
US10/726,430 US7069514B2 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-12-03 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
US11/415,710 US20060200741A1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2006-05-01 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/726,430 Continuation US7069514B2 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-12-03 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060200741A1 true US20060200741A1 (en) | 2006-09-07 |
Family
ID=31720115
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/704,471 Expired - Lifetime US6700590B1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2000-11-01 | System and method for retrieving and presenting data using class-based component and view model |
US10/726,430 Expired - Lifetime US7069514B2 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-12-03 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
US11/415,710 Abandoned US20060200741A1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2006-05-01 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/704,471 Expired - Lifetime US6700590B1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2000-11-01 | System and method for retrieving and presenting data using class-based component and view model |
US10/726,430 Expired - Lifetime US7069514B2 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-12-03 | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6700590B1 (en) |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050143969A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Indx Software Corporation, A Siemens Company | Tag modeling within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US20060031250A1 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2006-02-09 | Henigman Timothy J | Data mart generation and use in association with an operations intelligence platform |
US20060067334A1 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2006-03-30 | Ougarov Andrei V | System and methods for dynamic generation of point / tag configurations |
US20060123019A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Nguyen Thomas N | Management of component members using tag attributes |
US20060218131A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | Mario Brenes | Interface chaining to populate a class-based model |
US20060218116A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | O'hearn James E | Pass-through interface queries to populate a class-based model |
US20090327212A1 (en) * | 2006-01-09 | 2009-12-31 | Trevor Bell | Efficient SQL access to point data and relational data |
US20110035732A1 (en) * | 2009-08-06 | 2011-02-10 | Wynne Crisman | Method and apparatus for defining and compiling or converting language and user interface system agnostic view definitions to runnable code |
US8260783B2 (en) | 2007-02-27 | 2012-09-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Storage of multiple, related time-series data streams |
US20130073614A1 (en) * | 2011-09-21 | 2013-03-21 | Actian Corporation | Method and apparatus for the development, delivery and deployment of action-oriented business applications supported by a cloud based action server platform |
US8442938B2 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2013-05-14 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Child data structure update in data management system |
US20130179422A1 (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2013-07-11 | Kanumuru Rahul Raju | Global value networks |
US20170103470A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Kanumuru Rahul Raju | Real time digital value nodes and networks |
US9922090B1 (en) | 2012-03-27 | 2018-03-20 | Actian Netherlands, B.V. | System and method for automatic vertical decomposition of a table for improving input/output and memory utilization in a database |
US10152504B2 (en) | 2009-03-11 | 2018-12-11 | Actian Netherlands B.V. | Column-store database architecture utilizing positional delta tree update system and methods |
US11507574B1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2022-11-22 | Actian Netherlands B.V. | Adaptive selection of a processing method based on observed performance for improved and robust system efficiency |
US11836069B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2023-12-05 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for assessing functional validation of software components comparing source code and feature documentation |
US11836202B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2023-12-05 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for dynamic search listing ranking of software components |
US11853745B2 (en) | 2021-02-26 | 2023-12-26 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for automated open source software reuse scoring |
US11893385B2 (en) | 2021-02-17 | 2024-02-06 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for automated software natural language documentation |
US11921763B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-03-05 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems to parse a software component search query to enable multi entity search |
US11947530B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-04-02 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems to automatically generate search queries from software documents to validate software component search engines |
US11960492B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-04-16 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for display of search item scores and related information for easier search result selection |
US12106094B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-10-01 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for auto creation of software component reference guide from multiple information sources |
Families Citing this family (56)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6947903B1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2005-09-20 | Elcommerce.Com.Inc. | Method and system for monitoring a supply-chain |
US6700590B1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2004-03-02 | Indx Software Corporation | System and method for retrieving and presenting data using class-based component and view model |
WO2001086882A2 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2001-11-15 | @ Hand Corporation | System and method for extending an enterprise network to mobile devices |
DE10025050A1 (en) * | 2000-05-23 | 2001-12-06 | Deutsche Telekom Mobil | Information processing system and method for its operation |
US7003517B1 (en) | 2000-05-24 | 2006-02-21 | Inetprofit, Inc. | Web-based system and method for archiving and searching participant-based internet text sources for customer lead data |
US7120629B1 (en) | 2000-05-24 | 2006-10-10 | Reachforce, Inc. | Prospects harvester system for providing contact data about customers of product or service offered by business enterprise extracting text documents selected from newsgroups, discussion forums, mailing lists, querying such data to provide customers who confirm to business profile data |
US7082427B1 (en) | 2000-05-24 | 2006-07-25 | Reachforce, Inc. | Text indexing system to index, query the archive database document by keyword data representing the content of the documents and by contact data associated with the participant who generated the document |
US7096220B1 (en) | 2000-05-24 | 2006-08-22 | Reachforce, Inc. | Web-based customer prospects harvester system |
US7330850B1 (en) | 2000-10-04 | 2008-02-12 | Reachforce, Inc. | Text mining system for web-based business intelligence applied to web site server logs |
US7043531B1 (en) | 2000-10-04 | 2006-05-09 | Inetprofit, Inc. | Web-based customer lead generator system with pre-emptive profiling |
US7089290B2 (en) * | 2001-08-04 | 2006-08-08 | Kontiki, Inc. | Dynamically configuring network communication parameters for an application |
US7072900B2 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2006-07-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for developing topography based management systems |
US7146351B2 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2006-12-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for analyzing software components using calibration factors |
US7062756B2 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2006-06-13 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic object usage pattern learning and efficient caching |
US8195714B2 (en) * | 2002-12-11 | 2012-06-05 | Leaper Technologies, Inc. | Context instantiated application protocol |
US8315972B2 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2012-11-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Method for maintaining databases information about multiple instances of an activity generating, updating virtual OLAP cube based on modified star-schema |
US7363279B2 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2008-04-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for calculating importance of a block within a display page |
US7827499B2 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2010-11-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Hierarchical dataset dashboard view |
US7464376B2 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2008-12-09 | Sap Ag | Solution resources determination and provisioning |
US20060206346A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Arthur Grand | Activity forms for automated business processes |
US7714876B1 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2010-05-11 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for creating visualizations |
US7720953B2 (en) * | 2005-04-18 | 2010-05-18 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method of data source detection |
US7720904B2 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2010-05-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Entity projection |
US20060271384A1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2006-11-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Reference data aggregate service population |
US7738973B2 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2010-06-15 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Distributed historian architecture and interfaces |
US7627385B2 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2009-12-01 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Historian module for use in an industrial automation controller |
US7831317B2 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2010-11-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Distributed historian architecture |
US20070244910A1 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2007-10-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Business process meta-model |
US8015547B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2011-09-06 | Augusta Systems, Inc. | Reconfigurable, hierarchical component-based architecture and framework and methods for rapidly developing sensor device-enabling software applications |
US20080005721A1 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2008-01-03 | Augusta Systems, Inc. | Method and System for Rapidly Developing Sensor-Enabled Software Applications |
US7735060B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2010-06-08 | Augusta Systems, Inc. | Method and system for rapidly developing and deploying sensor-enabled software applications |
US8095923B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2012-01-10 | Augusta Systems, Inc. | System and method for deploying and managing intelligent nodes in a distributed network |
US20080263141A1 (en) | 2007-04-20 | 2008-10-23 | Demesa Jesse | Systems and Methods to Generate Web Server Files From Generic View Definitions |
US8566781B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2013-10-22 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Model-based view parts and reusable data source configurations |
US20090248722A1 (en) * | 2008-03-27 | 2009-10-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Clustering analytic functions |
US9363143B2 (en) * | 2008-03-27 | 2016-06-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selective computation using analytic functions |
US20110185342A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2011-07-28 | Whirlpool Corporation | Appliance development toolkit |
DE102008038968A1 (en) * | 2008-08-13 | 2010-02-18 | Schad Gmbh | System for monitoring, control and data acquisition of technical processes |
US20100070461A1 (en) * | 2008-09-12 | 2010-03-18 | Shon Vella | Dynamic consumer-defined views of an enterprise's data warehouse |
US7904363B2 (en) * | 2008-09-24 | 2011-03-08 | Morgan Stanley | Database for financial market data storage and retrieval |
US20100169132A1 (en) * | 2008-12-29 | 2010-07-01 | Tobias Hoppe-Boeken | Executing a business transaction in an enterprise system using business data obtained from heterogeneous sources |
US20110202384A1 (en) * | 2010-02-17 | 2011-08-18 | Rabstejnek Wayne S | Enterprise Rendering Platform |
US9189873B2 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2015-11-17 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method and apparatus for indicating historical analysis chronicle information |
US8406458B2 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2013-03-26 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for indicating an analysis criteria |
US8996451B2 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2015-03-31 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining an analysis chronicle |
US8560544B2 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2013-10-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Clustering of analytic functions |
US8583678B2 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2013-11-12 | Sap Portals Israel Ltd | Graphical exploration of a database |
US8725763B2 (en) * | 2011-11-23 | 2014-05-13 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with spatial indexing |
US9665403B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-05-30 | Miosoft Corporation | Executing algorithms in parallel |
US9613112B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-04-04 | Miosoft Corporation | Structuring data |
US10089336B2 (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2018-10-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Collection frequency based data model |
US10614632B2 (en) | 2015-04-23 | 2020-04-07 | Siemens Industry Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with a product lifecycle management system |
US10628456B2 (en) * | 2015-10-30 | 2020-04-21 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | Universal analytical data mart and data structure for same |
US10419304B2 (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2019-09-17 | Servicenow, Inc. | Indicator value aggregation in a multi-instance computing environment |
BE1026611B9 (en) * | 2018-09-13 | 2020-05-18 | Pieter Devloo | Methods and systems for data visualization and related applications |
CN113342317B (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2022-05-31 | 武汉华莘科技有限公司 | Development multi-service dynamic combination method and system based on Android componentization |
Citations (118)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5315709A (en) * | 1990-12-03 | 1994-05-24 | Bachman Information Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transforming objects in data models |
US5412774A (en) * | 1990-08-29 | 1995-05-02 | At&T Corp. | Apparatus for and method of displaying a data item of a database using the display function of a selected data item |
US5414809A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1995-05-09 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Graphical display of data |
US5487141A (en) * | 1994-01-21 | 1996-01-23 | Borland International, Inc. | Development system with methods for visual inheritance and improved object reusability |
US5519866A (en) * | 1993-06-28 | 1996-05-21 | Taligent, Inc. | Method and apparatus of incrementally linking components of a modeled computer program |
US5566330A (en) * | 1991-08-20 | 1996-10-15 | Powersoft Corporation | Method for forming a reusable and modifiable database interface object |
US5627979A (en) * | 1994-07-18 | 1997-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a graphical user interface for mapping and accessing objects in data stores |
US5632022A (en) * | 1991-11-13 | 1997-05-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Encyclopedia of software components |
US5760770A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-06-02 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for defining a view to display data |
US5764226A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1998-06-09 | International Business Machine Corp. | Reusable and modifiable data entry interface part |
US5787283A (en) * | 1995-10-27 | 1998-07-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Framework for manufacturing logistics decision support |
US5832496A (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 1998-11-03 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for performing intelligent analysis of a computer database |
US5864862A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-01-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | System and method for creating reusable components in an object-oriented programming environment |
US5872973A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1999-02-16 | Viewsoft, Inc. | Method for managing dynamic relations between objects in dynamic object-oriented languages |
US5907489A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1999-05-25 | Msx International Business Systems, Inc. | Automated fixture builder system |
US5907704A (en) * | 1995-04-03 | 1999-05-25 | Quark, Inc. | Hierarchical encapsulation of instantiated objects in a multimedia authoring system including internet accessible objects |
US5917498A (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1999-06-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multi-object views in an object modeling tool |
US5930779A (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 1999-07-27 | Mci Communications Corporation | Web based system and method to automate storage of power plant data and calculation of battery reserves |
US5956728A (en) * | 1996-07-17 | 1999-09-21 | Next Software, Inc. | Object graph editing context and methods of use |
US5958012A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 1999-09-28 | Computer Associates International, Inc. | Network management system using virtual reality techniques to display and simulate navigation to network components |
US5970476A (en) * | 1996-09-19 | 1999-10-19 | Manufacturing Management Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for industrial data acquisition and product costing |
US5982362A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1999-11-09 | Control Technology Corporation | Video interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems |
US5980096A (en) * | 1995-01-17 | 1999-11-09 | Intertech Ventures, Ltd. | Computer-based system, methods and graphical interface for information storage, modeling and stimulation of complex systems |
US5991535A (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 1999-11-23 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Visual composition tool for constructing application programs using distributed objects on a distributed object network |
US5991534A (en) * | 1997-06-03 | 1999-11-23 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for editing a software component |
US5999940A (en) * | 1997-05-28 | 1999-12-07 | Home Information Services, Inc. | Interactive information discovery tool and methodology |
US6003039A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-12-14 | Platinum Technology, Inc. | Data repository with user accessible and modifiable reuse criteria |
US6003036A (en) * | 1998-02-12 | 1999-12-14 | Martin; Michael W. | Interval-partitioning method for multidimensional data |
US6002853A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1999-12-14 | Wegener Internet Projects Bv | System for generating graphics in response to a database search |
US6014138A (en) * | 1994-01-21 | 2000-01-11 | Inprise Corporation | Development system with methods for improved visual programming with hierarchical object explorer |
US6061515A (en) * | 1994-07-18 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a high level language for mapping and accessing objects in data stores |
US6108662A (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2000-08-22 | Allen-Bradley Company, Llc | System method and article of manufacture for integrated enterprise-wide control |
US6122664A (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 2000-09-19 | Bull S.A. | Process for monitoring a plurality of object types of a plurality of nodes from a management node in a data processing system by distributing configured agents |
US6167406A (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2000-12-26 | Allen-Bradley Company, Llc | System, method and article of manufacture for building an enterprise-wide data model |
US6178362B1 (en) * | 1998-09-24 | 2001-01-23 | Silicon Energy Corp. | Energy management system and method |
US6198480B1 (en) * | 1998-10-07 | 2001-03-06 | Wonderware Corporation | Object-oriented tag browser |
US6223182B1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2001-04-24 | Oracle Corporation | Dynamic data organization |
US20010001851A1 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2001-05-24 | Piety Kenneth R. | Database wizard |
US6247020B1 (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 2001-06-12 | Borland Software Corporation | Development system with application browser user interface |
US6246410B1 (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 2001-06-12 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method and system for database access |
US6263339B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2001-07-17 | Informix Software, Inc. | Dynamic object visualization and code generation |
US6262729B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2001-07-17 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for binding user interface objects to application objects |
US6268853B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2001-07-31 | Rockwell Technologies, L.L.C. | Data structure for use in enterprise controls |
US6301584B1 (en) * | 1997-08-21 | 2001-10-09 | Home Information Services, Inc. | System and method for retrieving entities and integrating data |
US6307546B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2001-10-23 | Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P. | Telecommunications system craft interface device with parser having object-oriented state machine |
US20010040591A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2001-11-15 | Abbott Kenneth H. | Thematic response to a computer user's context, such as by a wearable personal computer |
US6336138B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2002-01-01 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Template-driven approach for generating models on network services |
US6341289B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2002-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object identity and partitioning for user defined extents |
US6343265B1 (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2002-01-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for mapping a design model to a common repository with context preservation |
US6366922B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2002-04-02 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Multi-dimensional data management system |
US6381605B1 (en) * | 1999-05-29 | 2002-04-30 | Oracle Corporation | Heirarchical indexing of multi-attribute data by sorting, dividing and storing subsets |
US6397203B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2002-05-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Defining object classes to match corresponding specialized data types in a relational database |
US6407761B1 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2002-06-18 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for the visual customization of business object interfaces |
US20020099499A1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2002-07-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for presenting navigation information based on instructions described in a script |
US6429882B1 (en) * | 1999-03-15 | 2002-08-06 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | User interface component |
US6430565B1 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2002-08-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Path compression for records of multidimensional database |
US6480836B1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2002-11-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for determining and generating candidate views for a database |
US20020169867A1 (en) * | 1999-01-04 | 2002-11-14 | Joe Mann | Remote system administration and seamless service integration of a data communication network management system |
US6487713B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2002-11-26 | Phoenix Technologies Ltd. | Software development system that presents a logical view of project components, facilitates their selection, and signals missing links prior to compilation |
US6490719B1 (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2002-12-03 | Gary Thomas | System and method for configuring and executing a flexible computer program comprising component structures |
US20020184610A1 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2002-12-05 | Kelvin Chong | System and method for building multi-modal and multi-channel applications |
US20020186248A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2002-12-12 | Venkatesh Ramanathan | Method and apparatus for pattern based generation of graphical user interfaces (GUI) |
US6499036B1 (en) * | 1998-08-12 | 2002-12-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Method and apparatus for data item movement between disparate sources and hierarchical, object-oriented representation |
US6505246B1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2003-01-07 | Candle Distributed Solutions, Inc. | User interface for system management applications |
US20030020703A1 (en) * | 1997-08-25 | 2003-01-30 | Holub Richard A. | System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites |
US20030055832A1 (en) * | 1999-10-25 | 2003-03-20 | Oracle Corporation | Storing multidimensional data in a relational database management system |
US20030058277A1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2003-03-27 | Bowman-Amuah Michel K. | A view configurer in a presentation services patterns enviroment |
US6543046B1 (en) * | 1995-07-20 | 2003-04-01 | Accenture Llp | Apparatus and method for navigating objects within a computer-implemented object environment |
US20030105857A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Yury Kamen | Dynamic object usage pattern learning and efficient caching |
US20030131007A1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2003-07-10 | Schirmer Andrew L | Object type relationship graphical user interface |
US20030139968A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-24 | Ebert Peter S. | Context-aware and real-time tracking |
US6609123B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2003-08-19 | Cognos Incorporated | Query engine and method for querying data using metadata model |
US20030163329A1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2003-08-28 | David Bolene | Method for defining an executable business model |
US6628305B1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 2003-09-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Architecture and definition of an extensible, object-oriented graphical user interface framework for managing and administering heterogenous digital library datastores |
US6633889B2 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2003-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mapping persistent data in multiple data sources into a single object-oriented component |
US6681229B1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2004-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a relational database backend |
US20040036716A1 (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2004-02-26 | Jordahl Jena J. | Data storage, retrieval, manipulation and display tools enabling multiple hierarchical points of view |
US6700590B1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2004-03-02 | Indx Software Corporation | System and method for retrieving and presenting data using class-based component and view model |
US6704743B1 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2004-03-09 | Copernus, Inc. | Selective inheritance of object parameters in object-oriented computer environment |
US20040059436A1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2004-03-25 | Anderson Mark Stephen | Data processing architecture |
US6721713B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2004-04-13 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Business alliance identification in a web architecture framework |
US6751657B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2004-06-15 | Worldcom, Inc. | System and method for notification subscription filtering based on user role |
US20040162834A1 (en) * | 2002-02-15 | 2004-08-19 | Masaki Aono | Information processing using a hierarchy structure of randomized samples |
US20040215626A1 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-10-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for improving performance of database queries |
US20040220972A1 (en) * | 2003-04-29 | 2004-11-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for space management of multidimensionally clustered tables |
US20040243281A1 (en) * | 2002-03-15 | 2004-12-02 | Masahiro Fujita | Robot behavior control system, behavior control method, and robot device |
US6842774B1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2005-01-11 | Robert L. Piccioni | Method and system for situation tracking and notification |
US20050021622A1 (en) * | 2002-11-26 | 2005-01-27 | William Cullen | Dynamic subscription and message routing on a topic between publishing nodes and subscribing nodes |
US20050044097A1 (en) * | 2003-08-19 | 2005-02-24 | Jaime Singson | Method and apparatus for facilitating data stewardship for metadata in an ETL and data warehouse system |
US20050065910A1 (en) * | 2003-08-08 | 2005-03-24 | Caleb Welton | Method and apparatus for storage and retrieval of information in compressed cubes |
US20050071749A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Bjoern Goerke | Developing and using user interfaces with views |
US20050143969A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Indx Software Corporation, A Siemens Company | Tag modeling within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US20050172306A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2005-08-04 | Agarwal Manoj K. | Systems, methods and computer programs for determining dependencies between logical components in a data processing system or network |
US20050182709A1 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2005-08-18 | Babcock & Brown Lp, A Delaware Limited Partnership | Automated financial scenario modeling and analysis tool having an intelligent graphical user interface |
US20050216555A1 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2005-09-29 | English Arthur V | Platform independent model-based framework for exchanging information in the justice system |
US6952705B2 (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 2005-10-04 | Mci, Inc. | Method, system and program product that utilize a hierarchical conceptual framework to model an environment containing a collection of items |
US20050246627A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2005-11-03 | Sayed Omar F | System and method for creating and maintaining a web site |
US20050251571A1 (en) * | 2004-05-05 | 2005-11-10 | Karstens Christopher K | Methods, systems and computer program products for disseminating status information to users of computer resources |
US6996566B1 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2006-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for an object model with embedded metadata and mapping information |
US20060031250A1 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2006-02-09 | Henigman Timothy J | Data mart generation and use in association with an operations intelligence platform |
US20060067334A1 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2006-03-30 | Ougarov Andrei V | System and methods for dynamic generation of point / tag configurations |
US20060074505A1 (en) * | 2004-09-27 | 2006-04-06 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Automated systems and methods employing attribute-based binding and configurable rules for selection of run time equipment |
US20060116994A1 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-01 | Oculus Info Inc. | System and method for interactive multi-dimensional visual representation of information content and properties |
US20060123019A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Nguyen Thomas N | Management of component members using tag attributes |
US20060136583A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-22 | Helmstetter Barry F | Notification management for monitoring system |
US20060161597A1 (en) * | 2005-01-14 | 2006-07-20 | Ougarov Andrei V | Child data structure update in data management system |
US7085739B1 (en) * | 1999-10-20 | 2006-08-01 | Accenture Llp | Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace |
US20060218131A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | Mario Brenes | Interface chaining to populate a class-based model |
US20060218116A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | O'hearn James E | Pass-through interface queries to populate a class-based model |
US7133865B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2006-11-07 | Torben Bach Pedersen | Method and systems for making OLAP hierarchies summarisable |
US20060294199A1 (en) * | 2005-06-24 | 2006-12-28 | The Zeppo Network, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Providing A Foundational Web Platform |
US20070118599A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2007-05-24 | Envoyworldwide, Inc. | System and method for service specific notification |
US20070124209A1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2007-05-31 | Walker Jay S | System and method for tracking and establishing a progressive discount based upon a customer's visits to a retail establishment |
US20070208574A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2007-09-06 | Zhiyu Zheng | System and method for managing master data information in an enterprise system |
US7275024B2 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2007-09-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic generation of a dimensional model for business analytics from an object model for online transaction processing |
US20080103786A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Liang-Jie Zhang | Method and Apparatus for Representing and Configuring Flexible and Extensible Presentation Patterns |
US7523111B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2009-04-21 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Labelling of secret information |
US20100223296A1 (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2010-09-02 | Kalido Limited | Data Processing System |
-
2000
- 2000-11-01 US US09/704,471 patent/US6700590B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-12-03 US US10/726,430 patent/US7069514B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2006
- 2006-05-01 US US11/415,710 patent/US20060200741A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (123)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5412774A (en) * | 1990-08-29 | 1995-05-02 | At&T Corp. | Apparatus for and method of displaying a data item of a database using the display function of a selected data item |
US5315709A (en) * | 1990-12-03 | 1994-05-24 | Bachman Information Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transforming objects in data models |
US5566330A (en) * | 1991-08-20 | 1996-10-15 | Powersoft Corporation | Method for forming a reusable and modifiable database interface object |
US5632022A (en) * | 1991-11-13 | 1997-05-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Encyclopedia of software components |
US5414809A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1995-05-09 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Graphical display of data |
US5519866A (en) * | 1993-06-28 | 1996-05-21 | Taligent, Inc. | Method and apparatus of incrementally linking components of a modeled computer program |
US5487141A (en) * | 1994-01-21 | 1996-01-23 | Borland International, Inc. | Development system with methods for visual inheritance and improved object reusability |
US6014138A (en) * | 1994-01-21 | 2000-01-11 | Inprise Corporation | Development system with methods for improved visual programming with hierarchical object explorer |
US5627979A (en) * | 1994-07-18 | 1997-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a graphical user interface for mapping and accessing objects in data stores |
US6061515A (en) * | 1994-07-18 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a high level language for mapping and accessing objects in data stores |
US5980096A (en) * | 1995-01-17 | 1999-11-09 | Intertech Ventures, Ltd. | Computer-based system, methods and graphical interface for information storage, modeling and stimulation of complex systems |
US5907704A (en) * | 1995-04-03 | 1999-05-25 | Quark, Inc. | Hierarchical encapsulation of instantiated objects in a multimedia authoring system including internet accessible objects |
US6543046B1 (en) * | 1995-07-20 | 2003-04-01 | Accenture Llp | Apparatus and method for navigating objects within a computer-implemented object environment |
US5832496A (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 1998-11-03 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for performing intelligent analysis of a computer database |
US5872973A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1999-02-16 | Viewsoft, Inc. | Method for managing dynamic relations between objects in dynamic object-oriented languages |
US6002853A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1999-12-14 | Wegener Internet Projects Bv | System for generating graphics in response to a database search |
US5787283A (en) * | 1995-10-27 | 1998-07-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Framework for manufacturing logistics decision support |
US5764226A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1998-06-09 | International Business Machine Corp. | Reusable and modifiable data entry interface part |
US6246410B1 (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 2001-06-12 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method and system for database access |
US5760770A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-06-02 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for defining a view to display data |
US5982362A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1999-11-09 | Control Technology Corporation | Video interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems |
US6122664A (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 2000-09-19 | Bull S.A. | Process for monitoring a plurality of object types of a plurality of nodes from a management node in a data processing system by distributing configured agents |
US5991535A (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 1999-11-23 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Visual composition tool for constructing application programs using distributed objects on a distributed object network |
US5956728A (en) * | 1996-07-17 | 1999-09-21 | Next Software, Inc. | Object graph editing context and methods of use |
US5958012A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 1999-09-28 | Computer Associates International, Inc. | Network management system using virtual reality techniques to display and simulate navigation to network components |
US5970476A (en) * | 1996-09-19 | 1999-10-19 | Manufacturing Management Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for industrial data acquisition and product costing |
US5864862A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-01-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | System and method for creating reusable components in an object-oriented programming environment |
US5917498A (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1999-06-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multi-object views in an object modeling tool |
US5907489A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1999-05-25 | Msx International Business Systems, Inc. | Automated fixture builder system |
US6952705B2 (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 2005-10-04 | Mci, Inc. | Method, system and program product that utilize a hierarchical conceptual framework to model an environment containing a collection of items |
US5930779A (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 1999-07-27 | Mci Communications Corporation | Web based system and method to automate storage of power plant data and calculation of battery reserves |
US6262729B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2001-07-17 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for binding user interface objects to application objects |
US5999940A (en) * | 1997-05-28 | 1999-12-07 | Home Information Services, Inc. | Interactive information discovery tool and methodology |
US5991534A (en) * | 1997-06-03 | 1999-11-23 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for editing a software component |
US6003039A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-12-14 | Platinum Technology, Inc. | Data repository with user accessible and modifiable reuse criteria |
US6301584B1 (en) * | 1997-08-21 | 2001-10-09 | Home Information Services, Inc. | System and method for retrieving entities and integrating data |
US20030020703A1 (en) * | 1997-08-25 | 2003-01-30 | Holub Richard A. | System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites |
US6247020B1 (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 2001-06-12 | Borland Software Corporation | Development system with application browser user interface |
US6307546B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2001-10-23 | Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P. | Telecommunications system craft interface device with parser having object-oriented state machine |
US6003036A (en) * | 1998-02-12 | 1999-12-14 | Martin; Michael W. | Interval-partitioning method for multidimensional data |
US20070124209A1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2007-05-31 | Walker Jay S | System and method for tracking and establishing a progressive discount based upon a customer's visits to a retail establishment |
US6480836B1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2002-11-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for determining and generating candidate views for a database |
US6167406A (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2000-12-26 | Allen-Bradley Company, Llc | System, method and article of manufacture for building an enterprise-wide data model |
US6108662A (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2000-08-22 | Allen-Bradley Company, Llc | System method and article of manufacture for integrated enterprise-wide control |
US6223182B1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2001-04-24 | Oracle Corporation | Dynamic data organization |
US6343265B1 (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2002-01-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for mapping a design model to a common repository with context preservation |
US6499036B1 (en) * | 1998-08-12 | 2002-12-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Method and apparatus for data item movement between disparate sources and hierarchical, object-oriented representation |
US6336138B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2002-01-01 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Template-driven approach for generating models on network services |
US6263339B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2001-07-17 | Informix Software, Inc. | Dynamic object visualization and code generation |
US20100223296A1 (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2010-09-02 | Kalido Limited | Data Processing System |
US20010001851A1 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2001-05-24 | Piety Kenneth R. | Database wizard |
US6178362B1 (en) * | 1998-09-24 | 2001-01-23 | Silicon Energy Corp. | Energy management system and method |
US6397203B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2002-05-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Defining object classes to match corresponding specialized data types in a relational database |
US6366922B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2002-04-02 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Multi-dimensional data management system |
US6198480B1 (en) * | 1998-10-07 | 2001-03-06 | Wonderware Corporation | Object-oriented tag browser |
US6628305B1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 2003-09-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Architecture and definition of an extensible, object-oriented graphical user interface framework for managing and administering heterogenous digital library datastores |
US20020099499A1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2002-07-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for presenting navigation information based on instructions described in a script |
US20010040591A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2001-11-15 | Abbott Kenneth H. | Thematic response to a computer user's context, such as by a wearable personal computer |
US6505246B1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2003-01-07 | Candle Distributed Solutions, Inc. | User interface for system management applications |
US20020169867A1 (en) * | 1999-01-04 | 2002-11-14 | Joe Mann | Remote system administration and seamless service integration of a data communication network management system |
US20050182709A1 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2005-08-18 | Babcock & Brown Lp, A Delaware Limited Partnership | Automated financial scenario modeling and analysis tool having an intelligent graphical user interface |
US6429882B1 (en) * | 1999-03-15 | 2002-08-06 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | User interface component |
US6341289B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2002-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object identity and partitioning for user defined extents |
US6407761B1 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2002-06-18 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for the visual customization of business object interfaces |
US6721713B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2004-04-13 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Business alliance identification in a web architecture framework |
US6505205B1 (en) * | 1999-05-29 | 2003-01-07 | Oracle Corporation | Relational database system for storing nodes of a hierarchical index of multi-dimensional data in a first module and metadata regarding the index in a second module |
US6381605B1 (en) * | 1999-05-29 | 2002-04-30 | Oracle Corporation | Heirarchical indexing of multi-attribute data by sorting, dividing and storing subsets |
US6430565B1 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2002-08-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Path compression for records of multidimensional database |
US7133865B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2006-11-07 | Torben Bach Pedersen | Method and systems for making OLAP hierarchies summarisable |
US6490719B1 (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2002-12-03 | Gary Thomas | System and method for configuring and executing a flexible computer program comprising component structures |
US20030058277A1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2003-03-27 | Bowman-Amuah Michel K. | A view configurer in a presentation services patterns enviroment |
US6609123B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2003-08-19 | Cognos Incorporated | Query engine and method for querying data using metadata model |
US6704743B1 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2004-03-09 | Copernus, Inc. | Selective inheritance of object parameters in object-oriented computer environment |
US20030163329A1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2003-08-28 | David Bolene | Method for defining an executable business model |
US6487713B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2002-11-26 | Phoenix Technologies Ltd. | Software development system that presents a logical view of project components, facilitates their selection, and signals missing links prior to compilation |
US6268853B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2001-07-31 | Rockwell Technologies, L.L.C. | Data structure for use in enterprise controls |
US7085739B1 (en) * | 1999-10-20 | 2006-08-01 | Accenture Llp | Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace |
US20030055832A1 (en) * | 1999-10-25 | 2003-03-20 | Oracle Corporation | Storing multidimensional data in a relational database management system |
US6700590B1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2004-03-02 | Indx Software Corporation | System and method for retrieving and presenting data using class-based component and view model |
US7069514B2 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2006-06-27 | Indx Software Corp. | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
US20040117393A1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2004-06-17 | Demesa Jesse G | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources |
US6751657B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2004-06-15 | Worldcom, Inc. | System and method for notification subscription filtering based on user role |
US20030131007A1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2003-07-10 | Schirmer Andrew L | Object type relationship graphical user interface |
US6842774B1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2005-01-11 | Robert L. Piccioni | Method and system for situation tracking and notification |
US6681229B1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2004-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a relational database backend |
US20070118599A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2007-05-24 | Envoyworldwide, Inc. | System and method for service specific notification |
US6996566B1 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2006-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for an object model with embedded metadata and mapping information |
US6633889B2 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2003-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mapping persistent data in multiple data sources into a single object-oriented component |
US20020184610A1 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2002-12-05 | Kelvin Chong | System and method for building multi-modal and multi-channel applications |
US20040059436A1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2004-03-25 | Anderson Mark Stephen | Data processing architecture |
US20020186248A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2002-12-12 | Venkatesh Ramanathan | Method and apparatus for pattern based generation of graphical user interfaces (GUI) |
US20030105857A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Yury Kamen | Dynamic object usage pattern learning and efficient caching |
US20030139968A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-24 | Ebert Peter S. | Context-aware and real-time tracking |
US20040162834A1 (en) * | 2002-02-15 | 2004-08-19 | Masaki Aono | Information processing using a hierarchy structure of randomized samples |
US20040243281A1 (en) * | 2002-03-15 | 2004-12-02 | Masahiro Fujita | Robot behavior control system, behavior control method, and robot device |
US20040036716A1 (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2004-02-26 | Jordahl Jena J. | Data storage, retrieval, manipulation and display tools enabling multiple hierarchical points of view |
US20070239741A1 (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2007-10-11 | Jordahl Jena J | Data storage, retrieval, manipulation and display tools enabling multiple hierarchical points of view |
US20070208574A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2007-09-06 | Zhiyu Zheng | System and method for managing master data information in an enterprise system |
US20050021622A1 (en) * | 2002-11-26 | 2005-01-27 | William Cullen | Dynamic subscription and message routing on a topic between publishing nodes and subscribing nodes |
US7523111B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2009-04-21 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Labelling of secret information |
US7275024B2 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2007-09-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic generation of a dimensional model for business analytics from an object model for online transaction processing |
US20040215626A1 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-10-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for improving performance of database queries |
US20040220972A1 (en) * | 2003-04-29 | 2004-11-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for space management of multidimensionally clustered tables |
US20050065910A1 (en) * | 2003-08-08 | 2005-03-24 | Caleb Welton | Method and apparatus for storage and retrieval of information in compressed cubes |
US20050044097A1 (en) * | 2003-08-19 | 2005-02-24 | Jaime Singson | Method and apparatus for facilitating data stewardship for metadata in an ETL and data warehouse system |
US20050071749A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Bjoern Goerke | Developing and using user interfaces with views |
US20050172306A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2005-08-04 | Agarwal Manoj K. | Systems, methods and computer programs for determining dependencies between logical components in a data processing system or network |
US20050144154A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Indx Software Corporatin, A Siemens Company | Tag management within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US20050143969A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Indx Software Corporation, A Siemens Company | Tag modeling within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US20050216555A1 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2005-09-29 | English Arthur V | Platform independent model-based framework for exchanging information in the justice system |
US20050246627A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2005-11-03 | Sayed Omar F | System and method for creating and maintaining a web site |
US20050251571A1 (en) * | 2004-05-05 | 2005-11-10 | Karstens Christopher K | Methods, systems and computer program products for disseminating status information to users of computer resources |
US20060031250A1 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2006-02-09 | Henigman Timothy J | Data mart generation and use in association with an operations intelligence platform |
US20060067334A1 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2006-03-30 | Ougarov Andrei V | System and methods for dynamic generation of point / tag configurations |
US20060074505A1 (en) * | 2004-09-27 | 2006-04-06 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Automated systems and methods employing attribute-based binding and configurable rules for selection of run time equipment |
US20060116994A1 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-01 | Oculus Info Inc. | System and method for interactive multi-dimensional visual representation of information content and properties |
US20060123019A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Nguyen Thomas N | Management of component members using tag attributes |
US20060136583A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-22 | Helmstetter Barry F | Notification management for monitoring system |
US20060161597A1 (en) * | 2005-01-14 | 2006-07-20 | Ougarov Andrei V | Child data structure update in data management system |
US20060218116A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | O'hearn James E | Pass-through interface queries to populate a class-based model |
US20060218131A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | Mario Brenes | Interface chaining to populate a class-based model |
US20060294199A1 (en) * | 2005-06-24 | 2006-12-28 | The Zeppo Network, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Providing A Foundational Web Platform |
US20080103786A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Liang-Jie Zhang | Method and Apparatus for Representing and Configuring Flexible and Extensible Presentation Patterns |
Cited By (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050144154A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Indx Software Corporatin, A Siemens Company | Tag management within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US20050143969A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Indx Software Corporation, A Siemens Company | Tag modeling within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US7689579B2 (en) | 2003-12-03 | 2010-03-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Tag modeling within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US7698292B2 (en) | 2003-12-03 | 2010-04-13 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Tag management within a decision, support, and reporting environment |
US7840607B2 (en) | 2004-08-06 | 2010-11-23 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Data mart generation and use in association with an operations intelligence platform |
US20060031250A1 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2006-02-09 | Henigman Timothy J | Data mart generation and use in association with an operations intelligence platform |
US20060067334A1 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2006-03-30 | Ougarov Andrei V | System and methods for dynamic generation of point / tag configurations |
US8700671B2 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2014-04-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | System and methods for dynamic generation of point / tag configurations |
US20060123019A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Nguyen Thomas N | Management of component members using tag attributes |
US7814123B2 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2010-10-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Management of component members using tag attributes |
US8442938B2 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2013-05-14 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Child data structure update in data management system |
US8700559B2 (en) | 2005-03-28 | 2014-04-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Interface chaining to populate a class-based model |
US20060218116A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | O'hearn James E | Pass-through interface queries to populate a class-based model |
US20060218131A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | Mario Brenes | Interface chaining to populate a class-based model |
US8078598B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2011-12-13 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Efficient SQL access to point data and relational data |
US20090327212A1 (en) * | 2006-01-09 | 2009-12-31 | Trevor Bell | Efficient SQL access to point data and relational data |
US8260783B2 (en) | 2007-02-27 | 2012-09-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Storage of multiple, related time-series data streams |
US10152504B2 (en) | 2009-03-11 | 2018-12-11 | Actian Netherlands B.V. | Column-store database architecture utilizing positional delta tree update system and methods |
US10853346B2 (en) | 2009-03-11 | 2020-12-01 | Actian Netherlands B.V. | High-performance database engine implementing a positional delta tree update system |
US11914568B2 (en) | 2009-03-11 | 2024-02-27 | Actian Corporation | High-performance database engine implementing a positional delta tree update system |
US20110035732A1 (en) * | 2009-08-06 | 2011-02-10 | Wynne Crisman | Method and apparatus for defining and compiling or converting language and user interface system agnostic view definitions to runnable code |
US9218399B2 (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2015-12-22 | Kanumuru Rahul Raju | Global value networks |
US20130179422A1 (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2013-07-11 | Kanumuru Rahul Raju | Global value networks |
US20130073614A1 (en) * | 2011-09-21 | 2013-03-21 | Actian Corporation | Method and apparatus for the development, delivery and deployment of action-oriented business applications supported by a cloud based action server platform |
US9934027B2 (en) * | 2011-09-21 | 2018-04-03 | Actian Corporation | Method and apparatus for the development, delivery and deployment of action-oriented business applications supported by a cloud based action server platform |
US9922090B1 (en) | 2012-03-27 | 2018-03-20 | Actian Netherlands, B.V. | System and method for automatic vertical decomposition of a table for improving input/output and memory utilization in a database |
US11507574B1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2022-11-22 | Actian Netherlands B.V. | Adaptive selection of a processing method based on observed performance for improved and robust system efficiency |
US10679305B2 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2020-06-09 | Kanumuru Rahul Raju | Real time digital value nodes and networks |
US20170103470A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Kanumuru Rahul Raju | Real time digital value nodes and networks |
US11893385B2 (en) | 2021-02-17 | 2024-02-06 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for automated software natural language documentation |
US11836069B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2023-12-05 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for assessing functional validation of software components comparing source code and feature documentation |
US11836202B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2023-12-05 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for dynamic search listing ranking of software components |
US11921763B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-03-05 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems to parse a software component search query to enable multi entity search |
US11947530B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-04-02 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems to automatically generate search queries from software documents to validate software component search engines |
US11960492B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-04-16 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for display of search item scores and related information for easier search result selection |
US12106094B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2024-10-01 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for auto creation of software component reference guide from multiple information sources |
US11853745B2 (en) | 2021-02-26 | 2023-12-26 | Open Weaver Inc. | Methods and systems for automated open source software reuse scoring |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6700590B1 (en) | 2004-03-02 |
US20040117393A1 (en) | 2004-06-17 |
US7069514B2 (en) | 2006-06-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7069514B2 (en) | Modeling system for retrieving and displaying data from multiple sources | |
US7418459B2 (en) | Object oriented based, business class methodology for performing data metric analysis | |
US7660820B2 (en) | Context-based heterogeneous information integration system | |
US7171455B1 (en) | Object oriented based, business class methodology for generating quasi-static web pages at periodic intervals | |
US5710900A (en) | System and method for generating reports from a computer database | |
US5692181A (en) | System and method for generating reports from a computer database | |
US6240412B1 (en) | Integration of link generation, cross-author user navigation, and reuse identification in authoring process | |
US6401096B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating user profile reports using a content menu | |
US9075859B2 (en) | Parameterized database drill-through | |
US6076091A (en) | Method and system for providing a flexible and extensible database interactive on-line electronic catalog | |
US7640548B1 (en) | Task based user interface | |
US7836103B2 (en) | Exchanging project-related data between software applications | |
EP0982669A2 (en) | Property based context portals | |
JP2005302029A (en) | Method, system and computer readable medium for providing parameterized queries | |
US20040122699A1 (en) | Method and system for integrating workflow management with business intelligence | |
US7243106B2 (en) | Static drill-through modelling | |
US20170315784A1 (en) | Generating applications based on data definition language (ddl) query view and application page template | |
US6915298B1 (en) | User-defined relationships for diagramming user-defined database relations | |
US5940820A (en) | GUI apparatus for generating an object-oriented database application | |
US20040210468A1 (en) | System and method for providing a territory management tool | |
US7574329B1 (en) | Object model for decision and issue tracking | |
US20140136257A1 (en) | In-memory analysis scenario builder | |
Bingley et al. | A design platform for the NELSIS CAD framework | |
Frenkel et al. | Supporting information access rights and visibility levels in virtual enterprises | |
US20100011019A1 (en) | Database Business Components Code Generator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INDX SOFTWARE CORPORATION, A SIEMENS COMPANY, CALI Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:INDX SOFTWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:018191/0276 Effective date: 20040108 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020704/0827 Effective date: 20080318 Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020704/0827 Effective date: 20080318 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:INDX SOFTWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020807/0587 Effective date: 20060928 Owner name: SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.,GEORGIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:INDX SOFTWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020807/0587 Effective date: 20060928 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |