US20050010570A1 - System and method of query transformation - Google Patents
System and method of query transformation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050010570A1 US20050010570A1 US10/856,748 US85674804A US2005010570A1 US 20050010570 A1 US20050010570 A1 US 20050010570A1 US 85674804 A US85674804 A US 85674804A US 2005010570 A1 US2005010570 A1 US 2005010570A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- query
- nested
- aggregate
- transformation
- aggregates
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2453—Query optimisation
- G06F16/24534—Query rewriting; Transformation
- G06F16/24547—Optimisations to support specific applications; Extensibility of optimisers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/242—Query formulation
- G06F16/2433—Query languages
- G06F16/244—Grouping and aggregation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/28—Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
- G06F16/283—Multi-dimensional databases or data warehouses, e.g. MOLAP or ROLAP
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/953—Organization of data
- Y10S707/954—Relational
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99933—Query processing, i.e. searching
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99933—Query processing, i.e. searching
- Y10S707/99934—Query formulation, input preparation, or translation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99933—Query processing, i.e. searching
- Y10S707/99935—Query augmenting and refining, e.g. inexact access
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to data access middleware, and in particular to a system and method of query transformation.
- a typical data access environment has a multi-tier architecture. For description purposes, it can be separated into three distinct tiers:
- the web server contains a firewall and one or more gateways. All web communication is performed through a gateway.
- a gateway is responsible for passing on requests to the application server, in tier 2 . for execution.
- the applications Tier contains one or more application servers.
- the application server runs requests, such as reports and queries that are forwarded by a gateway running on the web server.
- a query engine which is data access middleware that provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems.
- the query engine formulates queries (typically SQL) and passes them on to the data tier, through a native database API (such as ODBC) for execution.
- the data tier contains database management systems (DBMS), which manage raw data stored in a database.
- DBMS database management systems
- Examples of such systems include Oracle, DB2, and Microsoft SQL Server.
- a multi-tier architecture can be configured in several different ways, a typical configuration places each tier on a separate computer (server).
- a database server is typically a “high end” server, and thus can process queries at a relatively fast speed.
- An application server cannot generally process queries as quickly as a database server.
- a query engine may generate SQL queries that utilize the SQL/OLAP technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard.
- SQL queries would have to be performed by the query engine on the application server that is generally slower than the database server. It is desirable to have as much processing performed on the database server.
- a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query.
- the query transformation system comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- a method of nested aggregate transformation comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- a method of nested aggregate transformation comprises the steps of generating a derived table to compute aggregates, extracting nested aggregates and moving nested aggregates into a select list of the derived table, and determining whether the transformation is to be performed.
- the step of determining includes the steps of detecting nested aggregates, detecting framed aggregates and report aggregates, performing the transformation if nested aggregates are detected, and adding expressions to the inner select list of the derived table.
- the step of performing includes the steps of marking a nested aggregate for insertion into an inner select list, marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present, and detecting framed aggregates.
- a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave and representing sequences of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of nested aggregate transformation.
- the method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- a computer-readable medium having computer readable code embodied therein for use in the execution in a computer of a method of nested aggregate transformation.
- the method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- a computer program product for use in the execution in a computer of a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query.
- the computer program product comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment.
- FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system.
- FIG. 4 shows in a flowchart another example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system.
- FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment 10 for processing data.
- data is stored in a database 11 .
- a database management system (DBMS) running on a database server 12 accesses the raw data stored in the database 11 .
- a query engine 15 running on a report server (or application server) 13 is used to generate reports on the raw data and instruct the DBMS on the database server 12 to obtain information pertaining to the raw data in the database 11 .
- the query engine 15 provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems.
- An end user uses a client application 14 , running on a client workstation, to facilitate application server 13 operations.
- a query engine 15 In order To solve many business questions, a query engine 15 generates SQL queries that utilize the SQL/online analytical programming (OLAP) technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. These SQL queries include SQL/OLAP functions (windowed aggregates). However, many database systems 12 do not support this technology. In order to prevent or reduce the amount of local (application server) processing required to process these types of queries, the query engine 15 attempts to generate semantically equivalent queries that can be processed on the database server 12 by the target database system. These semantically equivalent queries included standard aggregate functions and a GROUP BY operator.
- OLAP online analytical programming
- SQL Structured Query Language
- SQL/OLAP Online Analytical Programming
- FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system 20 for generating a query with no nested OLAP functions that is semantically equivalent to a query having nested OLAP functions.
- the nested aggregate transformation system 20 comprises a nested aggregate analysis module 21 for analyzing SQL/OLAP queries containing nested OLAP functions that are not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module 22 for transforming these SQL/OLAP queries into semantically equivalent queries that are supported by the target database system.
- the nested aggregate analysis module 21 may include a nested aggregate detection unit for traversing a query and detecting a nested aggregate in the query, and a nested aggregate tagging unit for traversing a query and tagging the nested aggregate.
- the nested aggregate transformation module may include a derived table for storing a copy of the tagged nested aggregate, and a query editor for inserting the tagged nested aggregate into a query that is supported by a target database system.
- the nested aggregate transformation system 20 may be implemented as a sub-system of the query engine 15 in the data access environment 10 .
- This transformation 20 may generate queries that can be processed in their entirety on the database server 12 , or queries that require processing on both the application server 13 and the database server 12 .
- FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation ( 30 ), in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system 20 .
- the method ( 30 ) begins with analyzing a query containing a nested aggregate functions that is not supported by a target database system ( 31 ). Next, the query is transformed into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system ( 32 ). The method ( 30 ) is done ( 33 ).
- the nested aggregate transformation system 20 eases the task of generating SQL by eliminating the need to analyze all aggregation required by the report, and by eliminating the need to generate nested derived tables. Furthermore, the nested aggregate transformation system 20 allows the query engine 15 to only perform the transformation if necessary.
- Framed OLAP fruitions contain a window frame specification (ROWS or RANGE) and an ORDER BY clause. Through window frames, capabilities such as cumulative (running) sums and moving averages can be supported. Report functions do not contain a window frame specification, and produce the same value for each row in a partition.
- a nested aggregate/OLAP function is any aggregate/OLAP function appearing inside the specification of another aggregate/OLAP function. These aggregates /OLAP functions may appear in the operand, the PARTITION BY clause, the AT (compute break) clause, or the ORDER BY clause. Nested aggregates are computed prior to the parent aggregate being computed. Framed OLAP functions are given special attention when performing the nested aggregate transformation 20 due to the presence of the ORDER BY clause.
- FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation ( 40 ), in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system 20 .
- the method ( 40 ) begins with searching for nested aggregates and framed aggregates in a select list ( 41 ). If nested aggregates are not found ( 42 ), then the method is done ( 46 ). If nested aggregates are found ( 42 ), then the select list is traversed again with tags added to appropriate aggregates ( 43 ). A derived table is created ( 44 ). Once again, the select list is traversed and simple column references and tagged aggregates are added to the select list of the derived table ( 45 ). The method ( 40 ) is done ( 46 ).
- the nested aggregate transformation system 20 generates a derived table to compute these aggregates. Nested aggregates are extracted and moved into the select list of the derived Table. This process may be repeated several times, depending on the level of nesting.
- each expression in the select list is analyzed to detect the presence (if any) of nested aggregates ( 31 ). This analysis comprises the following:
- the transformation performs a second analysis of the select list to determine how the transformation should be performed. This analysis comprises:
- a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of another OLAP function, so the query must be transformed.
- the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand.
- a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list.
- a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function.
- the same nested OLAP function appears on its own in the select list. This query must be transformed.
- the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand.
- a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list. Note also that a small optimization is performed with respect to the. first OLAP function (SUM) in the select list of the original query, since it is identical to the operand of the MAX function.
- SUM first OLAP function
- a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function.
- the nested OLAP function itself contains a nested OLAP function in its PARTITION BY clause. This query must be transformed.
- the original query will result in an error since the OLAP functions SUM and MAX contain nested OLAP functions.
- This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM function is pushed into a derived table to eliminate all nested aggregation in the top-level select list. The second pass, required since the SUM function contains a nested AVG function in its PARTITION BY clause, results in the AVG function being moved into another derived table.
- a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function.
- the select list contains a framed aggregate That computes a cumulative SUM. This query must be transformed.
- the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand.
- This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM and MAX functions are pushed into a derived table since the main select list contains a framed aggregate. The framed aggregate is left in the main select list since it requires the data to be ordered a specific way to compute the value. If this aggregate was pushed into the inner select list, any sorting required to compute aggregates in the main select may disrupt the ordering of values produced by the framed aggregate.
- the second pass required since the MAX function contains a nested SUM function in its operand, results in the SUM function being moved into another derived table.
- the systems and methods according to the present invention may be implemented by any hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software having the functions described above.
- the software code either in its entirety or a part thereof, may be stored in a computer readable memory.
- a computer data signal representing the software code that may be embedded in a carrier wave may be transmitted via a communication networks
- Such a computer readable memory and a computer data signal are also within the scope of the present invention, as well as the hardware, software and the combination thereof.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates generally to data access middleware, and in particular to a system and method of query transformation.
- A typical data access environment has a multi-tier architecture. For description purposes, it can be separated into three distinct tiers:
-
- a Web server
- Applications
- Data
The tiers are based on business function, and are typically separated by fireballs. Client software, such as a browser or a report-authoring tool, sits above the tiers.
- The web server contains a firewall and one or more gateways. All web communication is performed through a gateway. A gateway is responsible for passing on requests to the application server, in tier 2. for execution.
- The applications Tier contains one or more application servers. The application server runs requests, such as reports and queries that are forwarded by a gateway running on the web server. Typically, one of the components of the applications tier is a query engine, which is data access middleware that provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems. The query engine formulates queries (typically SQL) and passes them on to the data tier, through a native database API (such as ODBC) for execution.
- The data tier contains database management systems (DBMS), which manage raw data stored in a database. Examples of such systems include Oracle, DB2, and Microsoft SQL Server.
- Although a multi-tier architecture can be configured in several different ways, a typical configuration places each tier on a separate computer (server). A database server is typically a “high end” server, and thus can process queries at a relatively fast speed. An application server cannot generally process queries as quickly as a database server.
- In order to solve many business questions, a query engine may generate SQL queries that utilize the SQL/OLAP technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. However, many database systems do not support this technology. Thus, the SQL queries would have to be performed by the query engine on the application server that is generally slower than the database server. It is desirable to have as much processing performed on the database server.
- There is a need to prevent or reduce the amount of local (application server) processing required to process a query. In the past, the application would be responsible for generating SQL that contained no nested OLAP functions. Quite often, generating this type of SQL is more difficult since it is more complex.
- One way of overcoming this problem is for the query engine to generate a simple base query for collecting the data, and then process the remainder of the query (including OLAP functions) to produce the desired result. Unfortunately, this solution requires extensive processing time on the application server. It is desirable to have a way of transforming the query into a form that minimizes the processing Time on the application server. Ideally, the transformed query would be processed by the DBMS in its entirety.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of nested aggregate transformation in a database system that supports SQL/OLAP, but does not support nested OLAP functions.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query. The query transformation system comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of generating a derived table to compute aggregates, extracting nested aggregates and moving nested aggregates into a select list of the derived table, and determining whether the transformation is to be performed. The step of determining includes the steps of detecting nested aggregates, detecting framed aggregates and report aggregates, performing the transformation if nested aggregates are detected, and adding expressions to the inner select list of the derived table. The step of performing includes the steps of marking a nested aggregate for insertion into an inner select list, marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present, and detecting framed aggregates.
- In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave and representing sequences of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable medium having computer readable code embodied therein for use in the execution in a computer of a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
- In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer program product for use in the execution in a computer of a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query. The computer program product comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
-
FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment. -
FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system. -
FIG. 4 shows in a flowchart another example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system. -
FIG. 1 shows a typicaldata access environment 10 for processing data. Typically, data is stored in adatabase 11. A database management system (DBMS) running on adatabase server 12 accesses the raw data stored in thedatabase 11. Aquery engine 15, running on a report server (or application server) 13 is used to generate reports on the raw data and instruct the DBMS on thedatabase server 12 to obtain information pertaining to the raw data in thedatabase 11. Thequery engine 15 provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems. An end user uses aclient application 14, running on a client workstation, to facilitateapplication server 13 operations. - In order To solve many business questions, a
query engine 15 generates SQL queries that utilize the SQL/online analytical programming (OLAP) technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. These SQL queries include SQL/OLAP functions (windowed aggregates). However,many database systems 12 do not support this technology. In order to prevent or reduce the amount of local (application server) processing required to process these types of queries, thequery engine 15 attempts to generate semantically equivalent queries that can be processed on thedatabase server 12 by the target database system. These semantically equivalent queries included standard aggregate functions and a GROUP BY operator. - In order to solve many business questions, SQL (Structured Query Language) queries are generated that utilize the SQL/OLAP (Online Analytical Programming) technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. Quite often, these queries contain OLAP functions whose arguments and/or window specifications contain other (nested) OLAP functions. The SQL: 1999 standard (and most databases with a SQL/OLAP capability) does not permit this.
-
FIG. 2 shows a nestedaggregate transformation system 20 for generating a query with no nested OLAP functions that is semantically equivalent to a query having nested OLAP functions. The nestedaggregate transformation system 20 comprises a nestedaggregate analysis module 21 for analyzing SQL/OLAP queries containing nested OLAP functions that are not supported by a target database system, and a nestedaggregate transformation module 22 for transforming these SQL/OLAP queries into semantically equivalent queries that are supported by the target database system. The nestedaggregate analysis module 21 may include a nested aggregate detection unit for traversing a query and detecting a nested aggregate in the query, and a nested aggregate tagging unit for traversing a query and tagging the nested aggregate. The nested aggregate transformation module may include a derived table for storing a copy of the tagged nested aggregate, and a query editor for inserting the tagged nested aggregate into a query that is supported by a target database system. - The nested
aggregate transformation system 20 may be implemented as a sub-system of thequery engine 15 in thedata access environment 10. Thistransformation 20 may generate queries that can be processed in their entirety on thedatabase server 12, or queries that require processing on both theapplication server 13 and thedatabase server 12. -
FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation (30), in accordance with an embodiment of the nestedaggregate transformation system 20. The method (30) begins with analyzing a query containing a nested aggregate functions that is not supported by a target database system (31). Next, the query is transformed into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system (32). The method (30) is done (33). - Advantageously, the nested
aggregate transformation system 20 eases the task of generating SQL by eliminating the need to analyze all aggregation required by the report, and by eliminating the need to generate nested derived tables. Furthermore, the nestedaggregate transformation system 20 allows thequery engine 15 to only perform the transformation if necessary. - There are two types of OLAP functions: framed frictions and report functions. Framed OLAP fruitions contain a window frame specification (ROWS or RANGE) and an ORDER BY clause. Through window frames, capabilities such as cumulative (running) sums and moving averages can be supported. Report functions do not contain a window frame specification, and produce the same value for each row in a partition.
- A nested aggregate/OLAP function is any aggregate/OLAP function appearing inside the specification of another aggregate/OLAP function. These aggregates /OLAP functions may appear in the operand, the PARTITION BY clause, the AT (compute break) clause, or the ORDER BY clause. Nested aggregates are computed prior to the parent aggregate being computed. Framed OLAP functions are given special attention when performing the nested
aggregate transformation 20 due to the presence of the ORDER BY clause. -
FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation (40), in accordance with an embodiment of the nestedaggregate transformation system 20. The method (40) begins with searching for nested aggregates and framed aggregates in a select list (41). If nested aggregates are not found (42), then the method is done (46). If nested aggregates are found (42), then the select list is traversed again with tags added to appropriate aggregates (43). A derived table is created (44). Once again, the select list is traversed and simple column references and tagged aggregates are added to the select list of the derived table (45). The method (40) is done (46). - The nested
aggregate transformation system 20 generates a derived table to compute these aggregates. Nested aggregates are extracted and moved into the select list of the derived Table. This process may be repeated several times, depending on the level of nesting. - To determine whether the transformation must be performed, each expression in the select list is analyzed to detect the presence (if any) of nested aggregates (31). This analysis comprises the following:
-
- Detection of nested aggregates.
- Detection of framed aggregates (nRAggregates) and report aggregates (nXAggregates).
If nested aggregates are detected (32), the transformation is performed.
- The transformation performs a second analysis of the select list to determine how the transformation should be performed. This analysis comprises:
-
- Marking a nested aggregate for insertion into the inner select list.
- Marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present (nRAggregates >0).
- Detection of framed aggregates
Once this is complete, the select list is traversed again, with the following types of expressions being added To the inner select list: - 1. Simple column references.
- 2. Aggregates marked for insertion. For all other aggregates, the AT, PARTITION BY, and ORDER BY clauses are processed according to the rules outlined here.
- 3. Expressions that do not contain nested aggregates or framed aggregates.
- All other expressions are traversed, and processed according to the rules outlined here.
- Once the nested aggregate transformation is performed, other query transformations can be performed as required.
- In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of another OLAP function, so the query must be transformed.
- Original Query
SELECT MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO )) OVER ( ) FROM SUPPLY - Transformed Query
SELECT MAX(C0) OVER ( ) FROM ( SELECT SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C0 FROM SUPPLY ) T1
Explanation - Against Oracle, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand. To eliminate the nesting, a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list.
- In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function. As well, the same nested OLAP function appears on its own in the select list. This query must be transformed.
- Original Query
SELECT SNO, PNO, SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ), MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO )) OVER ( ) FROM SUPPLY - Transformed Query
SELECT C0, C1, C2, MAX( C2 ) OVER ( ) FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C2 FROM SUPPLY ) T1
Explanation - Against Oracle, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand. To eliminate the nesting, a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list. Note also that a small optimization is performed with respect to the. first OLAP function (SUM) in the select list of the original query, since it is identical to the operand of the MAX function. The SUM function only needs to be computed once.
- In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function. As well, the nested OLAP function itself contains a nested OLAP function in its PARTITION BY clause. This query must be transformed.
- Original Query
SELECT SNO, PNO, SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO )), MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO ))) OVER ( ) FROM SUPPLY - Transformed Query
Pass 1 SELECT C0, C1, C2, MAX( C2 ) OVER ( ) FROM ( SELECT C0, C1, SUM( C2 ) OVER ( PARTITION BY AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO ) ) C2 FROM SUPPLY ) T0 Pass 2 SELECT C0, C1, C2, MAX( C2 ) OVER ( ) FROM ( SELECT C0, C1, SUM( C2 ) OVER ( PARTITION BY C3 ) C2 FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, QTY C2, AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO ) C3 FROM SUPPLY ) T0 ) T1
Explanation - Against Oracle9i, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP functions SUM and MAX contain nested OLAP functions. This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM function is pushed into a derived table to eliminate all nested aggregation in the top-level select list. The second pass, required since the SUM function contains a nested AVG function in its PARTITION BY clause, results in the AVG function being moved into another derived table.
- In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function. As well, the select list contains a framed aggregate That computes a cumulative SUM. This query must be transformed.
- Original Query
SELECT SNO, PNO, SUM( QTY ) OVER( ORDER BY SNO, PNO ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ), SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ), MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) OVER ( ) FROM SUPPLY - Transformed Query
Pass 1 SELECT C0, C1, SUM( C2 ) OVER( ORDER BY C1, C2 ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ) C2, C3, C4 FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, QTY C2 SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C3, MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) OVER ( ) C4 FROM SUPPLY ) T0 Pass 2 SELECT C0, C1, SUM( C2 ) OVER( ORDER BY C1, C2 ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ) C2, C3, C4 FROM ( SELECT C0, C1, C2, C3, MAX( C3 ) OVER( ) C4 FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, QTY C2, SUM( QTY) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C3 FROM SUPPLY ) T0 ) T1
Explanation - Against Oracle9i, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand. This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM and MAX functions are pushed into a derived table since the main select list contains a framed aggregate. The framed aggregate is left in the main select list since it requires the data to be ordered a specific way to compute the value. If this aggregate was pushed into the inner select list, any sorting required to compute aggregates in the main select may disrupt the ordering of values produced by the framed aggregate. The second pass, required since the MAX function contains a nested SUM function in its operand, results in the SUM function being moved into another derived table.
- The systems and methods according to the present invention may be implemented by any hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software having the functions described above. The software code, either in its entirety or a part thereof, may be stored in a computer readable memory. Further, a computer data signal representing the software code that may be embedded in a carrier wave may be transmitted via a communication networks Such a computer readable memory and a computer data signal are also within the scope of the present invention, as well as the hardware, software and the combination thereof.
- While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, changes and modifications may be made to such embodiments without departing from the true scope of the invention.
Claims (10)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002429910A CA2429910A1 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2003-05-27 | System and method of query transformation |
CA2,429,910 | 2003-05-27 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050010570A1 true US20050010570A1 (en) | 2005-01-13 |
Family
ID=33102849
Family Applications (7)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/855,078 Active 2025-09-02 US7318058B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of processing queries |
US10/854,638 Active 2025-12-26 US7765222B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | Query transformation |
US10/856,748 Abandoned US20050010570A1 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of query transformation |
US10/856,747 Abandoned US20050010569A1 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of query transformation |
US10/856,305 Active 2030-03-08 US8676821B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | Summary filter transformation |
US10/856,306 Active 2025-04-29 US7428532B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of client server aggregate transformation |
US12/283,194 Expired - Fee Related US8108415B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2008-09-09 | Query transformation |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/855,078 Active 2025-09-02 US7318058B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of processing queries |
US10/854,638 Active 2025-12-26 US7765222B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | Query transformation |
Family Applications After (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/856,747 Abandoned US20050010569A1 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of query transformation |
US10/856,305 Active 2030-03-08 US8676821B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | Summary filter transformation |
US10/856,306 Active 2025-04-29 US7428532B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-05-27 | System and method of client server aggregate transformation |
US12/283,194 Expired - Fee Related US8108415B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2008-09-09 | Query transformation |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (7) | US7318058B2 (en) |
EP (5) | EP1482424A3 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2429910A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050010569A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-01-13 | Cognos Incorporated | System and method of query transformation |
US20070033178A1 (en) * | 2005-06-23 | 2007-02-08 | Cognos Incorporated | Quality of service feedback for technology-neutral data reporting |
US20070074112A1 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2007-03-29 | Business Objects | Apparatus and method for consolidating reporting formulas |
US20090311976A1 (en) * | 2008-06-17 | 2009-12-17 | Vanderaa Joel D | Form factor and electromagnetic interference protection for process device wireless adapters |
US20090319501A1 (en) * | 2008-06-24 | 2009-12-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Translation of streaming queries into sql queries |
US20120215810A1 (en) * | 2011-02-11 | 2012-08-23 | Prometheus Research, LLC | Database query mechanism using links as an aggregate base |
US9183254B1 (en) * | 2012-05-04 | 2015-11-10 | Paraccel Llc | Optimizing database queries using subquery composition |
CN110781211A (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-11 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Data analysis method and device |
Families Citing this family (52)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7729789B2 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2010-06-01 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Process plant monitoring based on multivariate statistical analysis and on-line process simulation |
US7464084B2 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2008-12-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for performing an inexact query transformation in a heterogeneous environment |
CN101093495B (en) * | 2006-06-22 | 2011-08-17 | 国际商业机器公司 | Data processing method and system based on network relation dimension |
US20080065590A1 (en) * | 2006-09-07 | 2008-03-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Lightweight query processing over in-memory data structures |
US9740735B2 (en) * | 2007-11-07 | 2017-08-22 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Programming language extensions in structured queries |
US9910892B2 (en) | 2008-07-05 | 2018-03-06 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Managing execution of database queries |
US20100082599A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-01 | Goetz Graefe | Characterizing Queries To Predict Execution In A Database |
US8498996B2 (en) | 2008-11-03 | 2013-07-30 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented method and system for handling and transforming database queries in a fourth generation language |
US20100241893A1 (en) | 2009-03-18 | 2010-09-23 | Eric Friedman | Interpretation and execution of a customizable database request using an extensible computer process and an available computing environment |
US9665620B2 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2017-05-30 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data queries |
US9116955B2 (en) | 2011-05-02 | 2015-08-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data queries |
US9098312B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2015-08-04 | Ptc Inc. | Methods for dynamically generating an application interface for a modeled entity and devices thereof |
US9576046B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2017-02-21 | Ptc Inc. | Methods for integrating semantic search, query, and analysis across heterogeneous data types and devices thereof |
US8909641B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2014-12-09 | Ptc Inc. | Method for analyzing time series activity streams and devices thereof |
JP6285010B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-02-28 | ピーティーシー インコーポレイテッド | Method and apparatus for managing applications using semantic modeling and tagging |
US9575819B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2017-02-21 | Sap Se | Local buffers for event handlers |
US9619552B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2017-04-11 | Sap Se | Core data services extensibility for entity-relationship models |
US9361407B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2016-06-07 | Sap Se | SQL extended with transient fields for calculation expressions in enhanced data models |
US9354948B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2016-05-31 | Sap Se | Data models containing host language embedded constraints |
US9430523B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2016-08-30 | Sap Se | Entity-relationship model extensions using annotations |
US9639572B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2017-05-02 | Sap Se | SQL enhancements simplifying database querying |
US9442977B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2016-09-13 | Sap Se | Database language extended to accommodate entity-relationship models |
US9176801B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2015-11-03 | Sap Se | Advanced data models containing declarative and programmatic constraints |
CA3092699C (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2023-07-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Source code translation |
US10025942B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2018-07-17 | Ptc Inc. | System and method of establishing permission for multi-tenancy storage using organization matrices |
US10313410B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2019-06-04 | Ptc Inc. | Systems and methods using binary dynamic rest messages |
US9467533B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2016-10-11 | Ptc Inc. | System and method for developing real-time web-service objects |
US9560170B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2017-01-31 | Ptc Inc. | System and method of abstracting communication protocol using self-describing messages |
US9961058B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2018-05-01 | Ptc Inc. | System and method of message routing via connection servers in a distributed computing environment |
US9350791B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2016-05-24 | Ptc Inc. | System and method of injecting states into message routing in a distributed computing environment |
US9462085B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2016-10-04 | Ptc Inc. | Chunk-based communication of binary dynamic rest messages |
US9350812B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2016-05-24 | Ptc Inc. | System and method of message routing using name-based identifier in a distributed computing environment |
WO2015143416A1 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2015-09-24 | Ptc Inc. | Systems and methods for developing and using real-time data applications |
US9762637B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2017-09-12 | Ptc Inc. | System and method of using binary dynamic rest messages |
US9633070B2 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2017-04-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Increase database performance by reducing required communications and information transfers |
US9846724B2 (en) * | 2014-11-13 | 2017-12-19 | Sap Se | Integration of calculation models into SQL layer |
US10437819B2 (en) | 2014-11-14 | 2019-10-08 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Processing queries containing a union-type operation |
US10417281B2 (en) * | 2015-02-18 | 2019-09-17 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Querying a data source on a network |
JP2018514044A (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2018-05-31 | カスウィル コーポレイション | System and method for querying a data source |
US9946781B2 (en) * | 2015-06-02 | 2018-04-17 | Sap Se | System and method of implementing table aliases |
WO2017015792A1 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-02-02 | Cai Yongcheng Eddy | Sql performance recommendations and scoring |
US10089356B2 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2018-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Processing window partitioning and ordering for on-line analytical processing (OLAP) functions |
CN106547781B (en) * | 2015-09-21 | 2021-06-11 | 南京中兴新软件有限责任公司 | Method and device for realizing distributed transaction and database server |
US9846725B2 (en) | 2016-05-06 | 2017-12-19 | InsightSoftware.com International | SQL double counting resolver |
US11347796B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2022-05-31 | Sisense Ltd. | Eliminating many-to-many joins between database tables |
US10452652B2 (en) * | 2016-09-15 | 2019-10-22 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Recommendation platform for structured queries |
CN107193957A (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2017-09-22 | 努比亚技术有限公司 | Generation method, terminal and the computer-readable recording medium of SQL |
CN110020333A (en) * | 2017-07-27 | 2019-07-16 | 北京嘀嘀无限科技发展有限公司 | Data analysing method and device, electronic equipment, storage medium |
US11093223B2 (en) | 2019-07-18 | 2021-08-17 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Automatically converting a program written in a procedural programming language into a dataflow graph and related systems and methods |
CN111143397B (en) * | 2019-12-10 | 2021-04-13 | 跬云(上海)信息科技有限公司 | Hybrid data query method and device and storage medium |
US11212370B1 (en) * | 2020-08-07 | 2021-12-28 | Sap Se | Context aware capabilities |
CN113609141B (en) * | 2021-10-11 | 2021-12-24 | 武大吉奥信息技术有限公司 | Non-invasive cross-database data fusion method based on API splicing |
Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5963936A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query processing system that computes GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, and CUBE with a reduced number of GROUP BYs in a query graph model |
US6009432A (en) * | 1998-07-08 | 1999-12-28 | Required Technologies, Inc. | Value-instance-connectivity computer-implemented database |
US20010037345A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2001-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Tagging XML query results over relational DBMSs |
US6341281B1 (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2002-01-22 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methods for optimizing performance of correlated subqueries by reusing invariant results of operator tree |
US6345272B1 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2002-02-05 | Oracle Corporation | Rewriting queries to access materialized views that group along an ordered dimension |
US6370524B1 (en) * | 1999-04-02 | 2002-04-09 | Oracle Corp. | System and method for processing queries having an inner query block containing a grouping operator |
US20020059203A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2002-05-16 | Andrew Witkowski | Performing spreadsheet-like calculations in a database system |
US20020087524A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Burton Leathers | Partial delegation of complex OLAP queries with application to zero suppression condition evaluation |
US20020107840A1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2002-08-08 | Rishe Naphtali David | Database querying system and method |
US6438537B1 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2002-08-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Usage based aggregation optimization |
US6460027B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-10-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance |
US20020188600A1 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2002-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Outerjoin and antijoin reordering using extended eligibility lists |
US6519604B1 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2003-02-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Approximate querying method for databases with multiple grouping attributes |
US20030066051A1 (en) * | 2001-07-25 | 2003-04-03 | Michael Karr | Function values in computer programming languages having dynamic types and overloading |
US6567802B1 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2003-05-20 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Systematic approach to query optimization |
US20030101169A1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2003-05-29 | Sybase, Inc. | Relational database system providing XML query support |
US20030115194A1 (en) * | 2001-08-01 | 2003-06-19 | Pitts Theodore H. | Method and apparatus for processing a query to a multi-dimensional data structure |
US6609123B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2003-08-19 | Cognos Incorporated | Query engine and method for querying data using metadata model |
US6611838B1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2003-08-26 | Cognos Incorporated | Metadata exchange |
US6651055B1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2003-11-18 | Lawson Software, Inc. | OLAP query generation engine |
US6684204B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2004-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for conducting a search on a network which includes documents having a plurality of tags |
US6714928B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2004-03-30 | Sybase, Inc. | Development system providing HTML database control object |
US20040133567A1 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2004-07-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Run-time optimizations of queries with SQL spreadsheet |
US20040181537A1 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2004-09-16 | Sybase, Inc. | System with Methodology for Executing Relational Operations Over Relational Data and Data Retrieved from SOAP Operations |
US20050010569A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-01-13 | Cognos Incorporated | System and method of query transformation |
US6847962B1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2005-01-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Analyzing, optimizing and rewriting queries using matching and compensation between query and automatic summary tables |
US7120645B2 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2006-10-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for rewriting XML queries directed to relational database constructs |
US7133865B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2006-11-07 | Torben Bach Pedersen | Method and systems for making OLAP hierarchies summarisable |
US7315849B2 (en) * | 2000-02-28 | 2008-01-01 | Hyperroll Israel, Ltd. | Enterprise-wide data-warehouse with integrated data aggregation engine |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5742806A (en) | 1994-01-31 | 1998-04-21 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for decomposing database queries for database management system including multiprocessor digital data processing system |
US6339775B1 (en) | 1997-11-07 | 2002-01-15 | Informatica Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing |
US6199063B1 (en) | 1998-03-27 | 2001-03-06 | Red Brick Systems, Inc. | System and method for rewriting relational database queries |
US6128612A (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2000-10-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for translating an ad-hoc query language using common table expressions |
US7167853B2 (en) | 1999-05-20 | 2007-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Matching and compensation tests for optimizing correlated subqueries within query using automatic summary tables |
US7185016B1 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2007-02-27 | Cognos Incorporated | Methods and transformations for transforming metadata model |
EP1081611A3 (en) | 1999-09-03 | 2003-11-26 | Cognos Incorporated | Query engine and method for Querying data using metadata model |
US6370541B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2002-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Design and implementation of a client/server framework for federated multi-search and update across heterogeneous datastores |
US6766330B1 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2004-07-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Universal output constructor for XML queries universal output constructor for XML queries |
US6735587B2 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2004-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Maintaining pre-computed aggregate views incrementally in the presence of non-minimal changes |
US6574623B1 (en) | 2000-08-15 | 2003-06-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query transformation and simplification for group by queries with rollup/grouping sets in relational database management systems |
US7373597B2 (en) | 2001-10-31 | 2008-05-13 | University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of New Jersey | Conversion of text data into a hypertext markup language |
DE10217300C1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2003-11-20 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Location-dependent information reproduction with adaptation of a geographical selection parameter |
CA2418163A1 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2004-07-31 | Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee | Method of query transformation using window aggregation |
US7759769B2 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2010-07-20 | System General Corp. | Semiconductor structure of a high side driver |
US7917463B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2011-03-29 | Business.Com, Inc. | System and method for data warehousing and analytics on a distributed file system |
-
2003
- 2003-05-27 CA CA002429910A patent/CA2429910A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-05-27 EP EP04012613A patent/EP1482424A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-05-27 US US10/855,078 patent/US7318058B2/en active Active
- 2004-05-27 EP EP04076566A patent/EP1482429A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-05-27 EP EP04012614A patent/EP1482425A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-05-27 US US10/854,638 patent/US7765222B2/en active Active
- 2004-05-27 EP EP04012635A patent/EP1482427A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-05-27 US US10/856,748 patent/US20050010570A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-05-27 US US10/856,747 patent/US20050010569A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-05-27 US US10/856,305 patent/US8676821B2/en active Active
- 2004-05-27 EP EP04012615A patent/EP1482426A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-05-27 US US10/856,306 patent/US7428532B2/en active Active
-
2008
- 2008-09-09 US US12/283,194 patent/US8108415B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5963936A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query processing system that computes GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, and CUBE with a reduced number of GROUP BYs in a query graph model |
US6341281B1 (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2002-01-22 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methods for optimizing performance of correlated subqueries by reusing invariant results of operator tree |
US6009432A (en) * | 1998-07-08 | 1999-12-28 | Required Technologies, Inc. | Value-instance-connectivity computer-implemented database |
US6460027B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-10-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance |
US6714928B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2004-03-30 | Sybase, Inc. | Development system providing HTML database control object |
US6370524B1 (en) * | 1999-04-02 | 2002-04-09 | Oracle Corp. | System and method for processing queries having an inner query block containing a grouping operator |
US6847962B1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2005-01-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Analyzing, optimizing and rewriting queries using matching and compensation between query and automatic summary tables |
US6438537B1 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2002-08-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Usage based aggregation optimization |
US7133865B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2006-11-07 | Torben Bach Pedersen | Method and systems for making OLAP hierarchies summarisable |
US6345272B1 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2002-02-05 | Oracle Corporation | Rewriting queries to access materialized views that group along an ordered dimension |
US6609123B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2003-08-19 | Cognos Incorporated | Query engine and method for querying data using metadata model |
US7315849B2 (en) * | 2000-02-28 | 2008-01-01 | Hyperroll Israel, Ltd. | Enterprise-wide data-warehouse with integrated data aggregation engine |
US6934712B2 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2005-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Tagging XML query results over relational DBMSs |
US20010037345A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2001-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Tagging XML query results over relational DBMSs |
US6684204B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2004-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for conducting a search on a network which includes documents having a plurality of tags |
US20020059203A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2002-05-16 | Andrew Witkowski | Performing spreadsheet-like calculations in a database system |
US6519604B1 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2003-02-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Approximate querying method for databases with multiple grouping attributes |
US6611838B1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2003-08-26 | Cognos Incorporated | Metadata exchange |
US6567802B1 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2003-05-20 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Systematic approach to query optimization |
US20020107840A1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2002-08-08 | Rishe Naphtali David | Database querying system and method |
US20020087524A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Burton Leathers | Partial delegation of complex OLAP queries with application to zero suppression condition evaluation |
US6651055B1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2003-11-18 | Lawson Software, Inc. | OLAP query generation engine |
US20020188600A1 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2002-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Outerjoin and antijoin reordering using extended eligibility lists |
US20040133567A1 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2004-07-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Run-time optimizations of queries with SQL spreadsheet |
US20030101169A1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2003-05-29 | Sybase, Inc. | Relational database system providing XML query support |
US20030066051A1 (en) * | 2001-07-25 | 2003-04-03 | Michael Karr | Function values in computer programming languages having dynamic types and overloading |
US20030115194A1 (en) * | 2001-08-01 | 2003-06-19 | Pitts Theodore H. | Method and apparatus for processing a query to a multi-dimensional data structure |
US7120645B2 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2006-10-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for rewriting XML queries directed to relational database constructs |
US20040181537A1 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2004-09-16 | Sybase, Inc. | System with Methodology for Executing Relational Operations Over Relational Data and Data Retrieved from SOAP Operations |
US20050038782A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-02-17 | Styles Michael E. | System and method of summary filter transformation |
US20050015369A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-01-20 | Styles Michael E. | System and method of query transformation |
US20050010569A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-01-13 | Cognos Incorporated | System and method of query transformation |
US7318058B2 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2008-01-08 | Cognos Incorporated | System and method of processing queries |
US7428532B2 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2008-09-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of client server aggregate transformation |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050015369A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-01-20 | Styles Michael E. | System and method of query transformation |
US20050038782A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-02-17 | Styles Michael E. | System and method of summary filter transformation |
US20050010569A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2005-01-13 | Cognos Incorporated | System and method of query transformation |
US8676821B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2014-03-18 | Sap Ag | Summary filter transformation |
US8108415B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2012-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query transformation |
US7765222B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2010-07-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query transformation |
US7844601B2 (en) * | 2005-06-23 | 2010-11-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Quality of service feedback for technology-neutral data reporting |
US20070033178A1 (en) * | 2005-06-23 | 2007-02-08 | Cognos Incorporated | Quality of service feedback for technology-neutral data reporting |
US20070074112A1 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2007-03-29 | Business Objects | Apparatus and method for consolidating reporting formulas |
US20090311976A1 (en) * | 2008-06-17 | 2009-12-17 | Vanderaa Joel D | Form factor and electromagnetic interference protection for process device wireless adapters |
US20090319501A1 (en) * | 2008-06-24 | 2009-12-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Translation of streaming queries into sql queries |
US20120215810A1 (en) * | 2011-02-11 | 2012-08-23 | Prometheus Research, LLC | Database query mechanism using links as an aggregate base |
US9183254B1 (en) * | 2012-05-04 | 2015-11-10 | Paraccel Llc | Optimizing database queries using subquery composition |
US9582539B1 (en) | 2012-05-04 | 2017-02-28 | Paraccel, Inc. | Optimizing database queries using reusable subqueries |
US9665619B1 (en) * | 2012-05-04 | 2017-05-30 | Actian Corporation | Optimizing database queries using subquery composition |
CN110781211A (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-11 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Data analysis method and device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1482427A2 (en) | 2004-12-01 |
US20050015369A1 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
EP1482425A3 (en) | 2005-12-14 |
EP1482426A3 (en) | 2005-09-21 |
EP1482424A2 (en) | 2004-12-01 |
EP1482429A2 (en) | 2004-12-01 |
US20050038778A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 |
US7318058B2 (en) | 2008-01-08 |
US20050038782A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 |
CA2429910A1 (en) | 2004-11-27 |
US20090063441A1 (en) | 2009-03-05 |
EP1482426A2 (en) | 2004-12-01 |
EP1482425A2 (en) | 2004-12-01 |
US20050010569A1 (en) | 2005-01-13 |
EP1482429A3 (en) | 2005-09-21 |
US8676821B2 (en) | 2014-03-18 |
US8108415B2 (en) | 2012-01-31 |
EP1482424A3 (en) | 2005-09-21 |
EP1482427A3 (en) | 2005-09-21 |
US7428532B2 (en) | 2008-09-23 |
US7765222B2 (en) | 2010-07-27 |
US20050015393A1 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20050010570A1 (en) | System and method of query transformation | |
Souibgui et al. | Data quality in ETL process: A preliminary study | |
US6253200B1 (en) | Structured query language to IMS transaction mapper | |
JP5721818B2 (en) | Use of model information group in search | |
US9507848B1 (en) | Indexing and querying semi-structured data | |
US20120246154A1 (en) | Aggregating search results based on associating data instances with knowledge base entities | |
US7676453B2 (en) | Partial query caching | |
US8086593B2 (en) | Dynamic filters for relational query processing | |
US20090222426A1 (en) | Computer-Implemented System And Method For Analyzing Search Queries | |
US9959326B2 (en) | Annotating schema elements based on associating data instances with knowledge base entities | |
US20080140637A1 (en) | Environment taxonomy | |
US20080065592A1 (en) | Method, system and computer-readable media for software object relationship traversal for object-relational query binding | |
US7085760B2 (en) | Data query differential analysis | |
CN114385763A (en) | Data blood margin analysis method, device and system and readable storage medium | |
Hassanzadeh et al. | Helix: Online enterprise data analytics | |
CN117407414A (en) | Method, device, equipment and medium for processing structured query statement | |
CN117076742A (en) | Data blood edge tracking method and device and electronic equipment | |
US20160371329A1 (en) | Prepared execution plans for joins with partitioned tables | |
US8312030B2 (en) | Efficient evaluation of XQuery and XPath full text extension | |
CA2468617C (en) | System and method of query transformation | |
US20060101045A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for interval query indexing | |
US20050071326A1 (en) | Method, system, and program for predicate processing by iterator functions | |
CA2468398C (en) | System and method of query transformation | |
CN115309772A (en) | Data query statement modification method, device, medium and equipment | |
CN116243925A (en) | Code analysis and evaluation method, apparatus, device, medium and program product |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: COGNOS INCORPORATED, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STYLES, MICHAEL E.;REEL/FRAME:015626/0343 Effective date: 20040903 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: COGNOS ULC, CANADA Free format text: CERTIFICATE OF AMALGAMATION;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:021387/0813 Effective date: 20080201 Owner name: IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV, NETHERLANDS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS ULC;REEL/FRAME:021387/0837 Effective date: 20080703 Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV;REEL/FRAME:021398/0001 Effective date: 20080714 Owner name: COGNOS ULC,CANADA Free format text: CERTIFICATE OF AMALGAMATION;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:021387/0813 Effective date: 20080201 Owner name: IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV,NETHERLANDS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS ULC;REEL/FRAME:021387/0837 Effective date: 20080703 Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,NEW YO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV;REEL/FRAME:021398/0001 Effective date: 20080714 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |