US20050010570A1 - System and method of query transformation - Google Patents

System and method of query transformation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050010570A1
US20050010570A1 US10/856,748 US85674804A US2005010570A1 US 20050010570 A1 US20050010570 A1 US 20050010570A1 US 85674804 A US85674804 A US 85674804A US 2005010570 A1 US2005010570 A1 US 2005010570A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
query
nested
aggregate
transformation
aggregates
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/856,748
Inventor
Michael Styles
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Business Machines Corp
Original Assignee
Cognos Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cognos Inc filed Critical Cognos Inc
Publication of US20050010570A1 publication Critical patent/US20050010570A1/en
Assigned to COGNOS INCORPORATED reassignment COGNOS INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: STYLES, MICHAEL E.
Assigned to IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV reassignment IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COGNOS ULC
Assigned to COGNOS ULC reassignment COGNOS ULC CERTIFICATE OF AMALGAMATION Assignors: COGNOS INCORPORATED
Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2453Query optimisation
    • G06F16/24534Query rewriting; Transformation
    • G06F16/24547Optimisations to support specific applications; Extensibility of optimisers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/242Query formulation
    • G06F16/2433Query languages
    • G06F16/244Grouping and aggregation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/28Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
    • G06F16/283Multi-dimensional databases or data warehouses, e.g. MOLAP or ROLAP
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/953Organization of data
    • Y10S707/954Relational
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99934Query formulation, input preparation, or translation
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99935Query augmenting and refining, e.g. inexact access

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to data access middleware, and in particular to a system and method of query transformation.
  • a typical data access environment has a multi-tier architecture. For description purposes, it can be separated into three distinct tiers:
  • the web server contains a firewall and one or more gateways. All web communication is performed through a gateway.
  • a gateway is responsible for passing on requests to the application server, in tier 2 . for execution.
  • the applications Tier contains one or more application servers.
  • the application server runs requests, such as reports and queries that are forwarded by a gateway running on the web server.
  • a query engine which is data access middleware that provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems.
  • the query engine formulates queries (typically SQL) and passes them on to the data tier, through a native database API (such as ODBC) for execution.
  • the data tier contains database management systems (DBMS), which manage raw data stored in a database.
  • DBMS database management systems
  • Examples of such systems include Oracle, DB2, and Microsoft SQL Server.
  • a multi-tier architecture can be configured in several different ways, a typical configuration places each tier on a separate computer (server).
  • a database server is typically a “high end” server, and thus can process queries at a relatively fast speed.
  • An application server cannot generally process queries as quickly as a database server.
  • a query engine may generate SQL queries that utilize the SQL/OLAP technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard.
  • SQL queries would have to be performed by the query engine on the application server that is generally slower than the database server. It is desirable to have as much processing performed on the database server.
  • a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query.
  • the query transformation system comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • a method of nested aggregate transformation comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • a method of nested aggregate transformation comprises the steps of generating a derived table to compute aggregates, extracting nested aggregates and moving nested aggregates into a select list of the derived table, and determining whether the transformation is to be performed.
  • the step of determining includes the steps of detecting nested aggregates, detecting framed aggregates and report aggregates, performing the transformation if nested aggregates are detected, and adding expressions to the inner select list of the derived table.
  • the step of performing includes the steps of marking a nested aggregate for insertion into an inner select list, marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present, and detecting framed aggregates.
  • a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave and representing sequences of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of nested aggregate transformation.
  • the method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • a computer-readable medium having computer readable code embodied therein for use in the execution in a computer of a method of nested aggregate transformation.
  • the method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • a computer program product for use in the execution in a computer of a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query.
  • the computer program product comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment.
  • FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system.
  • FIG. 4 shows in a flowchart another example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system.
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment 10 for processing data.
  • data is stored in a database 11 .
  • a database management system (DBMS) running on a database server 12 accesses the raw data stored in the database 11 .
  • a query engine 15 running on a report server (or application server) 13 is used to generate reports on the raw data and instruct the DBMS on the database server 12 to obtain information pertaining to the raw data in the database 11 .
  • the query engine 15 provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems.
  • An end user uses a client application 14 , running on a client workstation, to facilitate application server 13 operations.
  • a query engine 15 In order To solve many business questions, a query engine 15 generates SQL queries that utilize the SQL/online analytical programming (OLAP) technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. These SQL queries include SQL/OLAP functions (windowed aggregates). However, many database systems 12 do not support this technology. In order to prevent or reduce the amount of local (application server) processing required to process these types of queries, the query engine 15 attempts to generate semantically equivalent queries that can be processed on the database server 12 by the target database system. These semantically equivalent queries included standard aggregate functions and a GROUP BY operator.
  • OLAP online analytical programming
  • SQL Structured Query Language
  • SQL/OLAP Online Analytical Programming
  • FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system 20 for generating a query with no nested OLAP functions that is semantically equivalent to a query having nested OLAP functions.
  • the nested aggregate transformation system 20 comprises a nested aggregate analysis module 21 for analyzing SQL/OLAP queries containing nested OLAP functions that are not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module 22 for transforming these SQL/OLAP queries into semantically equivalent queries that are supported by the target database system.
  • the nested aggregate analysis module 21 may include a nested aggregate detection unit for traversing a query and detecting a nested aggregate in the query, and a nested aggregate tagging unit for traversing a query and tagging the nested aggregate.
  • the nested aggregate transformation module may include a derived table for storing a copy of the tagged nested aggregate, and a query editor for inserting the tagged nested aggregate into a query that is supported by a target database system.
  • the nested aggregate transformation system 20 may be implemented as a sub-system of the query engine 15 in the data access environment 10 .
  • This transformation 20 may generate queries that can be processed in their entirety on the database server 12 , or queries that require processing on both the application server 13 and the database server 12 .
  • FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation ( 30 ), in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system 20 .
  • the method ( 30 ) begins with analyzing a query containing a nested aggregate functions that is not supported by a target database system ( 31 ). Next, the query is transformed into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system ( 32 ). The method ( 30 ) is done ( 33 ).
  • the nested aggregate transformation system 20 eases the task of generating SQL by eliminating the need to analyze all aggregation required by the report, and by eliminating the need to generate nested derived tables. Furthermore, the nested aggregate transformation system 20 allows the query engine 15 to only perform the transformation if necessary.
  • Framed OLAP fruitions contain a window frame specification (ROWS or RANGE) and an ORDER BY clause. Through window frames, capabilities such as cumulative (running) sums and moving averages can be supported. Report functions do not contain a window frame specification, and produce the same value for each row in a partition.
  • a nested aggregate/OLAP function is any aggregate/OLAP function appearing inside the specification of another aggregate/OLAP function. These aggregates /OLAP functions may appear in the operand, the PARTITION BY clause, the AT (compute break) clause, or the ORDER BY clause. Nested aggregates are computed prior to the parent aggregate being computed. Framed OLAP functions are given special attention when performing the nested aggregate transformation 20 due to the presence of the ORDER BY clause.
  • FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation ( 40 ), in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system 20 .
  • the method ( 40 ) begins with searching for nested aggregates and framed aggregates in a select list ( 41 ). If nested aggregates are not found ( 42 ), then the method is done ( 46 ). If nested aggregates are found ( 42 ), then the select list is traversed again with tags added to appropriate aggregates ( 43 ). A derived table is created ( 44 ). Once again, the select list is traversed and simple column references and tagged aggregates are added to the select list of the derived table ( 45 ). The method ( 40 ) is done ( 46 ).
  • the nested aggregate transformation system 20 generates a derived table to compute these aggregates. Nested aggregates are extracted and moved into the select list of the derived Table. This process may be repeated several times, depending on the level of nesting.
  • each expression in the select list is analyzed to detect the presence (if any) of nested aggregates ( 31 ). This analysis comprises the following:
  • the transformation performs a second analysis of the select list to determine how the transformation should be performed. This analysis comprises:
  • a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of another OLAP function, so the query must be transformed.
  • the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand.
  • a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list.
  • a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function.
  • the same nested OLAP function appears on its own in the select list. This query must be transformed.
  • the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand.
  • a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list. Note also that a small optimization is performed with respect to the. first OLAP function (SUM) in the select list of the original query, since it is identical to the operand of the MAX function.
  • SUM first OLAP function
  • a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function.
  • the nested OLAP function itself contains a nested OLAP function in its PARTITION BY clause. This query must be transformed.
  • the original query will result in an error since the OLAP functions SUM and MAX contain nested OLAP functions.
  • This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM function is pushed into a derived table to eliminate all nested aggregation in the top-level select list. The second pass, required since the SUM function contains a nested AVG function in its PARTITION BY clause, results in the AVG function being moved into another derived table.
  • a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function.
  • the select list contains a framed aggregate That computes a cumulative SUM. This query must be transformed.
  • the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand.
  • This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM and MAX functions are pushed into a derived table since the main select list contains a framed aggregate. The framed aggregate is left in the main select list since it requires the data to be ordered a specific way to compute the value. If this aggregate was pushed into the inner select list, any sorting required to compute aggregates in the main select may disrupt the ordering of values produced by the framed aggregate.
  • the second pass required since the MAX function contains a nested SUM function in its operand, results in the SUM function being moved into another derived table.
  • the systems and methods according to the present invention may be implemented by any hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software having the functions described above.
  • the software code either in its entirety or a part thereof, may be stored in a computer readable memory.
  • a computer data signal representing the software code that may be embedded in a carrier wave may be transmitted via a communication networks
  • Such a computer readable memory and a computer data signal are also within the scope of the present invention, as well as the hardware, software and the combination thereof.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

A query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query is provided. The query transformation system comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates generally to data access middleware, and in particular to a system and method of query transformation.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • A typical data access environment has a multi-tier architecture. For description purposes, it can be separated into three distinct tiers:
      • a Web server
      • Applications
      • Data
        The tiers are based on business function, and are typically separated by fireballs. Client software, such as a browser or a report-authoring tool, sits above the tiers.
  • The web server contains a firewall and one or more gateways. All web communication is performed through a gateway. A gateway is responsible for passing on requests to the application server, in tier 2. for execution.
  • The applications Tier contains one or more application servers. The application server runs requests, such as reports and queries that are forwarded by a gateway running on the web server. Typically, one of the components of the applications tier is a query engine, which is data access middleware that provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems. The query engine formulates queries (typically SQL) and passes them on to the data tier, through a native database API (such as ODBC) for execution.
  • The data tier contains database management systems (DBMS), which manage raw data stored in a database. Examples of such systems include Oracle, DB2, and Microsoft SQL Server.
  • Although a multi-tier architecture can be configured in several different ways, a typical configuration places each tier on a separate computer (server). A database server is typically a “high end” server, and thus can process queries at a relatively fast speed. An application server cannot generally process queries as quickly as a database server.
  • In order to solve many business questions, a query engine may generate SQL queries that utilize the SQL/OLAP technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. However, many database systems do not support this technology. Thus, the SQL queries would have to be performed by the query engine on the application server that is generally slower than the database server. It is desirable to have as much processing performed on the database server.
  • There is a need to prevent or reduce the amount of local (application server) processing required to process a query. In the past, the application would be responsible for generating SQL that contained no nested OLAP functions. Quite often, generating this type of SQL is more difficult since it is more complex.
  • One way of overcoming this problem is for the query engine to generate a simple base query for collecting the data, and then process the remainder of the query (including OLAP functions) to produce the desired result. Unfortunately, this solution requires extensive processing time on the application server. It is desirable to have a way of transforming the query into a form that minimizes the processing Time on the application server. Ideally, the transformed query would be processed by the DBMS in its entirety.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of nested aggregate transformation in a database system that supports SQL/OLAP, but does not support nested OLAP functions.
  • In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query. The query transformation system comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of generating a derived table to compute aggregates, extracting nested aggregates and moving nested aggregates into a select list of the derived table, and determining whether the transformation is to be performed. The step of determining includes the steps of detecting nested aggregates, detecting framed aggregates and report aggregates, performing the transformation if nested aggregates are detected, and adding expressions to the inner select list of the derived table. The step of performing includes the steps of marking a nested aggregate for insertion into an inner select list, marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present, and detecting framed aggregates.
  • In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave and representing sequences of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable medium having computer readable code embodied therein for use in the execution in a computer of a method of nested aggregate transformation. The method comprises the steps of analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer program product for use in the execution in a computer of a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query. The computer program product comprises a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment.
  • FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system.
  • FIG. 4 shows in a flowchart another example of a method of a nested aggregate transformation, in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical data access environment 10 for processing data. Typically, data is stored in a database 11. A database management system (DBMS) running on a database server 12 accesses the raw data stored in the database 11. A query engine 15, running on a report server (or application server) 13 is used to generate reports on the raw data and instruct the DBMS on the database server 12 to obtain information pertaining to the raw data in the database 11. The query engine 15 provides universal data access to a variety of heterogeneous database systems. An end user uses a client application 14, running on a client workstation, to facilitate application server 13 operations.
  • In order To solve many business questions, a query engine 15 generates SQL queries that utilize the SQL/online analytical programming (OLAP) technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. These SQL queries include SQL/OLAP functions (windowed aggregates). However, many database systems 12 do not support this technology. In order to prevent or reduce the amount of local (application server) processing required to process these types of queries, the query engine 15 attempts to generate semantically equivalent queries that can be processed on the database server 12 by the target database system. These semantically equivalent queries included standard aggregate functions and a GROUP BY operator.
  • In order to solve many business questions, SQL (Structured Query Language) queries are generated that utilize the SQL/OLAP (Online Analytical Programming) technology introduced in the SQL: 1999 standard. Quite often, these queries contain OLAP functions whose arguments and/or window specifications contain other (nested) OLAP functions. The SQL: 1999 standard (and most databases with a SQL/OLAP capability) does not permit this.
  • FIG. 2 shows a nested aggregate transformation system 20 for generating a query with no nested OLAP functions that is semantically equivalent to a query having nested OLAP functions. The nested aggregate transformation system 20 comprises a nested aggregate analysis module 21 for analyzing SQL/OLAP queries containing nested OLAP functions that are not supported by a target database system, and a nested aggregate transformation module 22 for transforming these SQL/OLAP queries into semantically equivalent queries that are supported by the target database system. The nested aggregate analysis module 21 may include a nested aggregate detection unit for traversing a query and detecting a nested aggregate in the query, and a nested aggregate tagging unit for traversing a query and tagging the nested aggregate. The nested aggregate transformation module may include a derived table for storing a copy of the tagged nested aggregate, and a query editor for inserting the tagged nested aggregate into a query that is supported by a target database system.
  • The nested aggregate transformation system 20 may be implemented as a sub-system of the query engine 15 in the data access environment 10. This transformation 20 may generate queries that can be processed in their entirety on the database server 12, or queries that require processing on both the application server 13 and the database server 12.
  • FIG. 3 shows in a flowchart an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation (30), in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system 20. The method (30) begins with analyzing a query containing a nested aggregate functions that is not supported by a target database system (31). Next, the query is transformed into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system (32). The method (30) is done (33).
  • Advantageously, the nested aggregate transformation system 20 eases the task of generating SQL by eliminating the need to analyze all aggregation required by the report, and by eliminating the need to generate nested derived tables. Furthermore, the nested aggregate transformation system 20 allows the query engine 15 to only perform the transformation if necessary.
  • There are two types of OLAP functions: framed frictions and report functions. Framed OLAP fruitions contain a window frame specification (ROWS or RANGE) and an ORDER BY clause. Through window frames, capabilities such as cumulative (running) sums and moving averages can be supported. Report functions do not contain a window frame specification, and produce the same value for each row in a partition.
  • A nested aggregate/OLAP function is any aggregate/OLAP function appearing inside the specification of another aggregate/OLAP function. These aggregates /OLAP functions may appear in the operand, the PARTITION BY clause, the AT (compute break) clause, or the ORDER BY clause. Nested aggregates are computed prior to the parent aggregate being computed. Framed OLAP functions are given special attention when performing the nested aggregate transformation 20 due to the presence of the ORDER BY clause.
  • FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of an example of a method of nested aggregate transformation (40), in accordance with an embodiment of the nested aggregate transformation system 20. The method (40) begins with searching for nested aggregates and framed aggregates in a select list (41). If nested aggregates are not found (42), then the method is done (46). If nested aggregates are found (42), then the select list is traversed again with tags added to appropriate aggregates (43). A derived table is created (44). Once again, the select list is traversed and simple column references and tagged aggregates are added to the select list of the derived table (45). The method (40) is done (46).
  • The nested aggregate transformation system 20 generates a derived table to compute these aggregates. Nested aggregates are extracted and moved into the select list of the derived Table. This process may be repeated several times, depending on the level of nesting.
  • To determine whether the transformation must be performed, each expression in the select list is analyzed to detect the presence (if any) of nested aggregates (31). This analysis comprises the following:
      • Detection of nested aggregates.
      • Detection of framed aggregates (nRAggregates) and report aggregates (nXAggregates).
        If nested aggregates are detected (32), the transformation is performed.
  • The transformation performs a second analysis of the select list to determine how the transformation should be performed. This analysis comprises:
      • Marking a nested aggregate for insertion into the inner select list.
      • Marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present (nRAggregates >0).
      • Detection of framed aggregates
        Once this is complete, the select list is traversed again, with the following types of expressions being added To the inner select list:
      • 1. Simple column references.
      • 2. Aggregates marked for insertion. For all other aggregates, the AT, PARTITION BY, and ORDER BY clauses are processed according to the rules outlined here.
      • 3. Expressions that do not contain nested aggregates or framed aggregates.
  • All other expressions are traversed, and processed according to the rules outlined here.
  • Once the nested aggregate transformation is performed, other query transformations can be performed as required.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of another OLAP function, so the query must be transformed.
  • Original Query
    SELECT MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ))
    OVER ( )
    FROM SUPPLY
  • Transformed Query
    SELECT MAX(C0) OVER ( )
    FROM ( SELECT SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C0
      FROM SUPPLY ) T1

    Explanation
  • Against Oracle, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand. To eliminate the nesting, a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function. As well, the same nested OLAP function appears on its own in the select list. This query must be transformed.
  • Original Query
    SELECT SNO, PNO, SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ),
      MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO )) OVER ( )
    FROM SUPPLY
  • Transformed Query
    SELECT C0, C1, C2, MAX( C2 ) OVER ( )
    FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1,
        SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C2
      FROM SUPPLY ) T1

    Explanation
  • Against Oracle, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand. To eliminate the nesting, a derived table T1 is created, and the SUM function is pushed into the select list. Note also that a small optimization is performed with respect to the. first OLAP function (SUM) in the select list of the original query, since it is identical to the operand of the MAX function. The SUM function only needs to be computed once.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function. As well, the nested OLAP function itself contains a nested OLAP function in its PARTITION BY clause. This query must be transformed.
  • Original Query
    SELECT SNO, PNO,
      SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY
        AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO )),
      MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY
        AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO ))) OVER ( )
    FROM SUPPLY
  • Transformed Query
    Pass 1
    SELECT C0, C1, C2, MAX( C2 ) OVER ( )
    FROM ( SELECT C0, C1,
        SUM( C2 ) OVER ( PARTITION BY
          AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO ) ) C2
      FROM SUPPLY ) T0
    Pass 2
    SELECT C0, C1, C2, MAX( C2 ) OVER ( )
    FROM ( SELECT C0, C1, SUM( C2 ) OVER ( PARTITION BY C3 ) C2
      FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, QTY C2,
          AVG( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY JNO ) C3
        FROM SUPPLY ) T0 ) T1

    Explanation
  • Against Oracle9i, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP functions SUM and MAX contain nested OLAP functions. This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM function is pushed into a derived table to eliminate all nested aggregation in the top-level select list. The second pass, required since the SUM function contains a nested AVG function in its PARTITION BY clause, results in the AVG function being moved into another derived table.
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • In this example, a nested OLAP function appears in the operand of an OLAP function. As well, the select list contains a framed aggregate That computes a cumulative SUM. This query must be transformed.
  • Original Query
    SELECT SNO, PNO,
     SUM( QTY ) OVER(
      ORDER BY SNO, PNO ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ),
      SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ),
      MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) OVER ( )
    FROM SUPPLY
  • Transformed Query
    Pass 1
    SELECT C0, C1,
      SUM( C2 ) OVER(
        ORDER BY C1, C2 ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ) C2,
      C3, C4
    FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, QTY C2
          SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C3,
          MAX( SUM( QTY ) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO )
              OVER ( ) C4
      FROM  SUPPLY ) T0
    Pass 2
    SELECT C0, C1,
      SUM( C2 ) OVER( ORDER BY C1, C2
          ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ) C2,
      C3, C4
    FROM ( SELECT C0, C1, C2, C3, MAX( C3 ) OVER( ) C4
      FROM ( SELECT SNO C0, PNO C1, QTY C2,
            SUM( QTY) OVER ( PARTITION BY SNO ) C3
          FROM  SUPPLY ) T0 ) T1

    Explanation
  • Against Oracle9i, the original query will result in an error since the OLAP function MAX contains a nested SUM function in its operand. This particular example requires 2 passes. In the first pass, the SUM and MAX functions are pushed into a derived table since the main select list contains a framed aggregate. The framed aggregate is left in the main select list since it requires the data to be ordered a specific way to compute the value. If this aggregate was pushed into the inner select list, any sorting required to compute aggregates in the main select may disrupt the ordering of values produced by the framed aggregate. The second pass, required since the MAX function contains a nested SUM function in its operand, results in the SUM function being moved into another derived table.
  • The systems and methods according to the present invention may be implemented by any hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software having the functions described above. The software code, either in its entirety or a part thereof, may be stored in a computer readable memory. Further, a computer data signal representing the software code that may be embedded in a carrier wave may be transmitted via a communication networks Such a computer readable memory and a computer data signal are also within the scope of the present invention, as well as the hardware, software and the combination thereof.
  • While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, changes and modifications may be made to such embodiments without departing from the true scope of the invention.

Claims (10)

1. A query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query, the query transformation system comprising:
a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system; and
a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
2. The query transformation system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the nested aggregate analysis module includes:
a nested aggregate detection unit for traversing a query and detecting a nested aggregate in the query; and
a nested aggregate tagging unit for traversing a query and tagging the nested aggregate.
3. The query transformation system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the nested aggregate transformation module includes:
a derived table for storing a copy of a tagged nested aggregate; and
a query editor for inserting the tagged nested aggregate into a query that is supported by a target database system.
4. A method of nested aggregate transformation, the method comprising the steps of:
analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system; and
transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the step of analysing includes the steps of:
detecting a nested aggregate in a select list of a query; and
adding a tag to the nested aggregate.
6. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the step of analysing includes the steps of:
creating a derived table;
adding a column reference to a select list in the derived table; and
adding the tagged nested aggregate to the select list of the derived table.
7. A method of nested aggregate transformation, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a derived table to compute aggregates;
extracting nested aggregates and moving nested aggregates into a select list of the derived table; and
determining whether the transformation is to be performed, including the steps of:
detecting nested aggregates; and
detecting framed aggregates and report aggregates;
if nested aggregates are detected, performing the transformation, including the steps of:
marking a nested aggregate for insertion into an inner select list;
marking a report aggregate for insertion into the inner select list if it does not contain a nested aggregate or there are framed aggregates present; and
detecting framed aggregates; and
adding expressions to the inner select list of the derived table.
8. A computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave and representing sequences of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of nested aggregate transformation, the method comprising the steps of:
analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system; and
transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
9. A computer-readable medium having computer readable code embodied therein for use in the execution in a computer of a method of nested aggregate transformation, the method comprising the steps of:
analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system; and
transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
10. A computer program product for use in the execution in a computer of a query transformation system for transforming nested aggregates in a query, the computer program product comprising:
a nested aggregate analysis module for analysing a query that is not supported by a target database system; and
a nested aggregate transformation module for transforming the query into a semantically equivalent query that is supported by the target database system.
US10/856,748 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of query transformation Abandoned US20050010570A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002429910A CA2429910A1 (en) 2003-05-27 2003-05-27 System and method of query transformation
CA2,429,910 2003-05-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050010570A1 true US20050010570A1 (en) 2005-01-13

Family

ID=33102849

Family Applications (7)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/855,078 Active 2025-09-02 US7318058B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of processing queries
US10/854,638 Active 2025-12-26 US7765222B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 Query transformation
US10/856,748 Abandoned US20050010570A1 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of query transformation
US10/856,747 Abandoned US20050010569A1 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of query transformation
US10/856,305 Active 2030-03-08 US8676821B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 Summary filter transformation
US10/856,306 Active 2025-04-29 US7428532B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of client server aggregate transformation
US12/283,194 Expired - Fee Related US8108415B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2008-09-09 Query transformation

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/855,078 Active 2025-09-02 US7318058B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of processing queries
US10/854,638 Active 2025-12-26 US7765222B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 Query transformation

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/856,747 Abandoned US20050010569A1 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of query transformation
US10/856,305 Active 2030-03-08 US8676821B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 Summary filter transformation
US10/856,306 Active 2025-04-29 US7428532B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2004-05-27 System and method of client server aggregate transformation
US12/283,194 Expired - Fee Related US8108415B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2008-09-09 Query transformation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (7) US7318058B2 (en)
EP (5) EP1482424A3 (en)
CA (1) CA2429910A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050010569A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-01-13 Cognos Incorporated System and method of query transformation
US20070033178A1 (en) * 2005-06-23 2007-02-08 Cognos Incorporated Quality of service feedback for technology-neutral data reporting
US20070074112A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Business Objects Apparatus and method for consolidating reporting formulas
US20090311976A1 (en) * 2008-06-17 2009-12-17 Vanderaa Joel D Form factor and electromagnetic interference protection for process device wireless adapters
US20090319501A1 (en) * 2008-06-24 2009-12-24 Microsoft Corporation Translation of streaming queries into sql queries
US20120215810A1 (en) * 2011-02-11 2012-08-23 Prometheus Research, LLC Database query mechanism using links as an aggregate base
US9183254B1 (en) * 2012-05-04 2015-11-10 Paraccel Llc Optimizing database queries using subquery composition
CN110781211A (en) * 2018-07-31 2020-02-11 网宿科技股份有限公司 Data analysis method and device

Families Citing this family (52)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7729789B2 (en) 2004-05-04 2010-06-01 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process plant monitoring based on multivariate statistical analysis and on-line process simulation
US7464084B2 (en) * 2006-01-30 2008-12-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method for performing an inexact query transformation in a heterogeneous environment
CN101093495B (en) * 2006-06-22 2011-08-17 国际商业机器公司 Data processing method and system based on network relation dimension
US20080065590A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Microsoft Corporation Lightweight query processing over in-memory data structures
US9740735B2 (en) * 2007-11-07 2017-08-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Programming language extensions in structured queries
US9910892B2 (en) 2008-07-05 2018-03-06 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Managing execution of database queries
US20100082599A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Goetz Graefe Characterizing Queries To Predict Execution In A Database
US8498996B2 (en) 2008-11-03 2013-07-30 Sas Institute Inc. Computer-implemented method and system for handling and transforming database queries in a fourth generation language
US20100241893A1 (en) 2009-03-18 2010-09-23 Eric Friedman Interpretation and execution of a customizable database request using an extensible computer process and an available computing environment
US9665620B2 (en) 2010-01-15 2017-05-30 Ab Initio Technology Llc Managing data queries
US9116955B2 (en) 2011-05-02 2015-08-25 Ab Initio Technology Llc Managing data queries
US9098312B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2015-08-04 Ptc Inc. Methods for dynamically generating an application interface for a modeled entity and devices thereof
US9576046B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2017-02-21 Ptc Inc. Methods for integrating semantic search, query, and analysis across heterogeneous data types and devices thereof
US8909641B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2014-12-09 Ptc Inc. Method for analyzing time series activity streams and devices thereof
JP6285010B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-02-28 ピーティーシー インコーポレイテッド Method and apparatus for managing applications using semantic modeling and tagging
US9575819B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2017-02-21 Sap Se Local buffers for event handlers
US9619552B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2017-04-11 Sap Se Core data services extensibility for entity-relationship models
US9361407B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-06-07 Sap Se SQL extended with transient fields for calculation expressions in enhanced data models
US9354948B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-05-31 Sap Se Data models containing host language embedded constraints
US9430523B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-08-30 Sap Se Entity-relationship model extensions using annotations
US9639572B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2017-05-02 Sap Se SQL enhancements simplifying database querying
US9442977B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-09-13 Sap Se Database language extended to accommodate entity-relationship models
US9176801B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2015-11-03 Sap Se Advanced data models containing declarative and programmatic constraints
CA3092699C (en) 2013-12-06 2023-07-25 Ab Initio Technology Llc Source code translation
US10025942B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2018-07-17 Ptc Inc. System and method of establishing permission for multi-tenancy storage using organization matrices
US10313410B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2019-06-04 Ptc Inc. Systems and methods using binary dynamic rest messages
US9467533B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2016-10-11 Ptc Inc. System and method for developing real-time web-service objects
US9560170B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2017-01-31 Ptc Inc. System and method of abstracting communication protocol using self-describing messages
US9961058B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2018-05-01 Ptc Inc. System and method of message routing via connection servers in a distributed computing environment
US9350791B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2016-05-24 Ptc Inc. System and method of injecting states into message routing in a distributed computing environment
US9462085B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2016-10-04 Ptc Inc. Chunk-based communication of binary dynamic rest messages
US9350812B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2016-05-24 Ptc Inc. System and method of message routing using name-based identifier in a distributed computing environment
WO2015143416A1 (en) 2014-03-21 2015-09-24 Ptc Inc. Systems and methods for developing and using real-time data applications
US9762637B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2017-09-12 Ptc Inc. System and method of using binary dynamic rest messages
US9633070B2 (en) * 2014-03-31 2017-04-25 International Business Machines Corporation Increase database performance by reducing required communications and information transfers
US9846724B2 (en) * 2014-11-13 2017-12-19 Sap Se Integration of calculation models into SQL layer
US10437819B2 (en) 2014-11-14 2019-10-08 Ab Initio Technology Llc Processing queries containing a union-type operation
US10417281B2 (en) * 2015-02-18 2019-09-17 Ab Initio Technology Llc Querying a data source on a network
JP2018514044A (en) * 2015-03-26 2018-05-31 カスウィル コーポレイション System and method for querying a data source
US9946781B2 (en) * 2015-06-02 2018-04-17 Sap Se System and method of implementing table aliases
WO2017015792A1 (en) * 2015-07-24 2017-02-02 Cai Yongcheng Eddy Sql performance recommendations and scoring
US10089356B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2018-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Processing window partitioning and ordering for on-line analytical processing (OLAP) functions
CN106547781B (en) * 2015-09-21 2021-06-11 南京中兴新软件有限责任公司 Method and device for realizing distributed transaction and database server
US9846725B2 (en) 2016-05-06 2017-12-19 InsightSoftware.com International SQL double counting resolver
US11347796B2 (en) 2016-08-11 2022-05-31 Sisense Ltd. Eliminating many-to-many joins between database tables
US10452652B2 (en) * 2016-09-15 2019-10-22 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Recommendation platform for structured queries
CN107193957A (en) * 2017-05-23 2017-09-22 努比亚技术有限公司 Generation method, terminal and the computer-readable recording medium of SQL
CN110020333A (en) * 2017-07-27 2019-07-16 北京嘀嘀无限科技发展有限公司 Data analysing method and device, electronic equipment, storage medium
US11093223B2 (en) 2019-07-18 2021-08-17 Ab Initio Technology Llc Automatically converting a program written in a procedural programming language into a dataflow graph and related systems and methods
CN111143397B (en) * 2019-12-10 2021-04-13 跬云(上海)信息科技有限公司 Hybrid data query method and device and storage medium
US11212370B1 (en) * 2020-08-07 2021-12-28 Sap Se Context aware capabilities
CN113609141B (en) * 2021-10-11 2021-12-24 武大吉奥信息技术有限公司 Non-invasive cross-database data fusion method based on API splicing

Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5963936A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Query processing system that computes GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, and CUBE with a reduced number of GROUP BYs in a query graph model
US6009432A (en) * 1998-07-08 1999-12-28 Required Technologies, Inc. Value-instance-connectivity computer-implemented database
US20010037345A1 (en) * 2000-03-21 2001-11-01 International Business Machines Corporation Tagging XML query results over relational DBMSs
US6341281B1 (en) * 1998-04-14 2002-01-22 Sybase, Inc. Database system with methods for optimizing performance of correlated subqueries by reusing invariant results of operator tree
US6345272B1 (en) * 1999-07-27 2002-02-05 Oracle Corporation Rewriting queries to access materialized views that group along an ordered dimension
US6370524B1 (en) * 1999-04-02 2002-04-09 Oracle Corp. System and method for processing queries having an inner query block containing a grouping operator
US20020059203A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-05-16 Andrew Witkowski Performing spreadsheet-like calculations in a database system
US20020087524A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-07-04 Burton Leathers Partial delegation of complex OLAP queries with application to zero suppression condition evaluation
US20020107840A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-08-08 Rishe Naphtali David Database querying system and method
US6438537B1 (en) * 1999-06-22 2002-08-20 Microsoft Corporation Usage based aggregation optimization
US6460027B1 (en) * 1998-09-14 2002-10-01 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance
US20020188600A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2002-12-12 International Business Machines Corporation Outerjoin and antijoin reordering using extended eligibility lists
US6519604B1 (en) * 2000-07-19 2003-02-11 Lucent Technologies Inc. Approximate querying method for databases with multiple grouping attributes
US20030066051A1 (en) * 2001-07-25 2003-04-03 Michael Karr Function values in computer programming languages having dynamic types and overloading
US6567802B1 (en) * 2000-09-06 2003-05-20 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Systematic approach to query optimization
US20030101169A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2003-05-29 Sybase, Inc. Relational database system providing XML query support
US20030115194A1 (en) * 2001-08-01 2003-06-19 Pitts Theodore H. Method and apparatus for processing a query to a multi-dimensional data structure
US6609123B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2003-08-19 Cognos Incorporated Query engine and method for querying data using metadata model
US6611838B1 (en) * 2000-09-01 2003-08-26 Cognos Incorporated Metadata exchange
US6651055B1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2003-11-18 Lawson Software, Inc. OLAP query generation engine
US6684204B1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method for conducting a search on a network which includes documents having a plurality of tags
US6714928B1 (en) * 1999-03-19 2004-03-30 Sybase, Inc. Development system providing HTML database control object
US20040133567A1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2004-07-08 Oracle International Corporation Run-time optimizations of queries with SQL spreadsheet
US20040181537A1 (en) * 2003-03-14 2004-09-16 Sybase, Inc. System with Methodology for Executing Relational Operations Over Relational Data and Data Retrieved from SOAP Operations
US20050010569A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-01-13 Cognos Incorporated System and method of query transformation
US6847962B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2005-01-25 International Business Machines Corporation Analyzing, optimizing and rewriting queries using matching and compensation between query and automatic summary tables
US7120645B2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2006-10-10 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for rewriting XML queries directed to relational database constructs
US7133865B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2006-11-07 Torben Bach Pedersen Method and systems for making OLAP hierarchies summarisable
US7315849B2 (en) * 2000-02-28 2008-01-01 Hyperroll Israel, Ltd. Enterprise-wide data-warehouse with integrated data aggregation engine

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5742806A (en) 1994-01-31 1998-04-21 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Apparatus and method for decomposing database queries for database management system including multiprocessor digital data processing system
US6339775B1 (en) 1997-11-07 2002-01-15 Informatica Corporation Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing
US6199063B1 (en) 1998-03-27 2001-03-06 Red Brick Systems, Inc. System and method for rewriting relational database queries
US6128612A (en) 1998-06-30 2000-10-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for translating an ad-hoc query language using common table expressions
US7167853B2 (en) 1999-05-20 2007-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Matching and compensation tests for optimizing correlated subqueries within query using automatic summary tables
US7185016B1 (en) 2000-09-01 2007-02-27 Cognos Incorporated Methods and transformations for transforming metadata model
EP1081611A3 (en) 1999-09-03 2003-11-26 Cognos Incorporated Query engine and method for Querying data using metadata model
US6370541B1 (en) 1999-09-21 2002-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Design and implementation of a client/server framework for federated multi-search and update across heterogeneous datastores
US6766330B1 (en) 1999-10-19 2004-07-20 International Business Machines Corporation Universal output constructor for XML queries universal output constructor for XML queries
US6735587B2 (en) 2000-07-28 2004-05-11 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining pre-computed aggregate views incrementally in the presence of non-minimal changes
US6574623B1 (en) 2000-08-15 2003-06-03 International Business Machines Corporation Query transformation and simplification for group by queries with rollup/grouping sets in relational database management systems
US7373597B2 (en) 2001-10-31 2008-05-13 University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of New Jersey Conversion of text data into a hypertext markup language
DE10217300C1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2003-11-20 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung Location-dependent information reproduction with adaptation of a geographical selection parameter
CA2418163A1 (en) 2003-01-31 2004-07-31 Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee Method of query transformation using window aggregation
US7759769B2 (en) * 2006-07-20 2010-07-20 System General Corp. Semiconductor structure of a high side driver
US7917463B2 (en) 2008-10-10 2011-03-29 Business.Com, Inc. System and method for data warehousing and analytics on a distributed file system

Patent Citations (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5963936A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Query processing system that computes GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, and CUBE with a reduced number of GROUP BYs in a query graph model
US6341281B1 (en) * 1998-04-14 2002-01-22 Sybase, Inc. Database system with methods for optimizing performance of correlated subqueries by reusing invariant results of operator tree
US6009432A (en) * 1998-07-08 1999-12-28 Required Technologies, Inc. Value-instance-connectivity computer-implemented database
US6460027B1 (en) * 1998-09-14 2002-10-01 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance
US6714928B1 (en) * 1999-03-19 2004-03-30 Sybase, Inc. Development system providing HTML database control object
US6370524B1 (en) * 1999-04-02 2002-04-09 Oracle Corp. System and method for processing queries having an inner query block containing a grouping operator
US6847962B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2005-01-25 International Business Machines Corporation Analyzing, optimizing and rewriting queries using matching and compensation between query and automatic summary tables
US6438537B1 (en) * 1999-06-22 2002-08-20 Microsoft Corporation Usage based aggregation optimization
US7133865B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2006-11-07 Torben Bach Pedersen Method and systems for making OLAP hierarchies summarisable
US6345272B1 (en) * 1999-07-27 2002-02-05 Oracle Corporation Rewriting queries to access materialized views that group along an ordered dimension
US6609123B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2003-08-19 Cognos Incorporated Query engine and method for querying data using metadata model
US7315849B2 (en) * 2000-02-28 2008-01-01 Hyperroll Israel, Ltd. Enterprise-wide data-warehouse with integrated data aggregation engine
US6934712B2 (en) * 2000-03-21 2005-08-23 International Business Machines Corporation Tagging XML query results over relational DBMSs
US20010037345A1 (en) * 2000-03-21 2001-11-01 International Business Machines Corporation Tagging XML query results over relational DBMSs
US6684204B1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method for conducting a search on a network which includes documents having a plurality of tags
US20020059203A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-05-16 Andrew Witkowski Performing spreadsheet-like calculations in a database system
US6519604B1 (en) * 2000-07-19 2003-02-11 Lucent Technologies Inc. Approximate querying method for databases with multiple grouping attributes
US6611838B1 (en) * 2000-09-01 2003-08-26 Cognos Incorporated Metadata exchange
US6567802B1 (en) * 2000-09-06 2003-05-20 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Systematic approach to query optimization
US20020107840A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-08-08 Rishe Naphtali David Database querying system and method
US20020087524A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-07-04 Burton Leathers Partial delegation of complex OLAP queries with application to zero suppression condition evaluation
US6651055B1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2003-11-18 Lawson Software, Inc. OLAP query generation engine
US20020188600A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2002-12-12 International Business Machines Corporation Outerjoin and antijoin reordering using extended eligibility lists
US20040133567A1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2004-07-08 Oracle International Corporation Run-time optimizations of queries with SQL spreadsheet
US20030101169A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2003-05-29 Sybase, Inc. Relational database system providing XML query support
US20030066051A1 (en) * 2001-07-25 2003-04-03 Michael Karr Function values in computer programming languages having dynamic types and overloading
US20030115194A1 (en) * 2001-08-01 2003-06-19 Pitts Theodore H. Method and apparatus for processing a query to a multi-dimensional data structure
US7120645B2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2006-10-10 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for rewriting XML queries directed to relational database constructs
US20040181537A1 (en) * 2003-03-14 2004-09-16 Sybase, Inc. System with Methodology for Executing Relational Operations Over Relational Data and Data Retrieved from SOAP Operations
US20050038782A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-02-17 Styles Michael E. System and method of summary filter transformation
US20050015369A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-01-20 Styles Michael E. System and method of query transformation
US20050010569A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-01-13 Cognos Incorporated System and method of query transformation
US7318058B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2008-01-08 Cognos Incorporated System and method of processing queries
US7428532B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2008-09-23 International Business Machines Corporation System and method of client server aggregate transformation

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050015369A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-01-20 Styles Michael E. System and method of query transformation
US20050038782A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-02-17 Styles Michael E. System and method of summary filter transformation
US20050010569A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2005-01-13 Cognos Incorporated System and method of query transformation
US8676821B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2014-03-18 Sap Ag Summary filter transformation
US8108415B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2012-01-31 International Business Machines Corporation Query transformation
US7765222B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2010-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation Query transformation
US7844601B2 (en) * 2005-06-23 2010-11-30 International Business Machines Corporation Quality of service feedback for technology-neutral data reporting
US20070033178A1 (en) * 2005-06-23 2007-02-08 Cognos Incorporated Quality of service feedback for technology-neutral data reporting
US20070074112A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Business Objects Apparatus and method for consolidating reporting formulas
US20090311976A1 (en) * 2008-06-17 2009-12-17 Vanderaa Joel D Form factor and electromagnetic interference protection for process device wireless adapters
US20090319501A1 (en) * 2008-06-24 2009-12-24 Microsoft Corporation Translation of streaming queries into sql queries
US20120215810A1 (en) * 2011-02-11 2012-08-23 Prometheus Research, LLC Database query mechanism using links as an aggregate base
US9183254B1 (en) * 2012-05-04 2015-11-10 Paraccel Llc Optimizing database queries using subquery composition
US9582539B1 (en) 2012-05-04 2017-02-28 Paraccel, Inc. Optimizing database queries using reusable subqueries
US9665619B1 (en) * 2012-05-04 2017-05-30 Actian Corporation Optimizing database queries using subquery composition
CN110781211A (en) * 2018-07-31 2020-02-11 网宿科技股份有限公司 Data analysis method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1482427A2 (en) 2004-12-01
US20050015369A1 (en) 2005-01-20
EP1482425A3 (en) 2005-12-14
EP1482426A3 (en) 2005-09-21
EP1482424A2 (en) 2004-12-01
EP1482429A2 (en) 2004-12-01
US20050038778A1 (en) 2005-02-17
US7318058B2 (en) 2008-01-08
US20050038782A1 (en) 2005-02-17
CA2429910A1 (en) 2004-11-27
US20090063441A1 (en) 2009-03-05
EP1482426A2 (en) 2004-12-01
EP1482425A2 (en) 2004-12-01
US20050010569A1 (en) 2005-01-13
EP1482429A3 (en) 2005-09-21
US8676821B2 (en) 2014-03-18
US8108415B2 (en) 2012-01-31
EP1482424A3 (en) 2005-09-21
EP1482427A3 (en) 2005-09-21
US7428532B2 (en) 2008-09-23
US7765222B2 (en) 2010-07-27
US20050015393A1 (en) 2005-01-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20050010570A1 (en) System and method of query transformation
Souibgui et al. Data quality in ETL process: A preliminary study
US6253200B1 (en) Structured query language to IMS transaction mapper
JP5721818B2 (en) Use of model information group in search
US9507848B1 (en) Indexing and querying semi-structured data
US20120246154A1 (en) Aggregating search results based on associating data instances with knowledge base entities
US7676453B2 (en) Partial query caching
US8086593B2 (en) Dynamic filters for relational query processing
US20090222426A1 (en) Computer-Implemented System And Method For Analyzing Search Queries
US9959326B2 (en) Annotating schema elements based on associating data instances with knowledge base entities
US20080140637A1 (en) Environment taxonomy
US20080065592A1 (en) Method, system and computer-readable media for software object relationship traversal for object-relational query binding
US7085760B2 (en) Data query differential analysis
CN114385763A (en) Data blood margin analysis method, device and system and readable storage medium
Hassanzadeh et al. Helix: Online enterprise data analytics
CN117407414A (en) Method, device, equipment and medium for processing structured query statement
CN117076742A (en) Data blood edge tracking method and device and electronic equipment
US20160371329A1 (en) Prepared execution plans for joins with partitioned tables
US8312030B2 (en) Efficient evaluation of XQuery and XPath full text extension
CA2468617C (en) System and method of query transformation
US20060101045A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for interval query indexing
US20050071326A1 (en) Method, system, and program for predicate processing by iterator functions
CA2468398C (en) System and method of query transformation
CN115309772A (en) Data query statement modification method, device, medium and equipment
CN116243925A (en) Code analysis and evaluation method, apparatus, device, medium and program product

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: COGNOS INCORPORATED, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STYLES, MICHAEL E.;REEL/FRAME:015626/0343

Effective date: 20040903

AS Assignment

Owner name: COGNOS ULC, CANADA

Free format text: CERTIFICATE OF AMALGAMATION;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:021387/0813

Effective date: 20080201

Owner name: IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV, NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS ULC;REEL/FRAME:021387/0837

Effective date: 20080703

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV;REEL/FRAME:021398/0001

Effective date: 20080714

Owner name: COGNOS ULC,CANADA

Free format text: CERTIFICATE OF AMALGAMATION;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:021387/0813

Effective date: 20080201

Owner name: IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV,NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COGNOS ULC;REEL/FRAME:021387/0837

Effective date: 20080703

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,NEW YO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IBM INTERNATIONAL GROUP BV;REEL/FRAME:021398/0001

Effective date: 20080714

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION