US20040249642A1  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits  Google Patents
Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits Download PDFInfo
 Publication number
 US20040249642A1 US20040249642A1 US10/453,396 US45339603A US2004249642A1 US 20040249642 A1 US20040249642 A1 US 20040249642A1 US 45339603 A US45339603 A US 45339603A US 2004249642 A1 US2004249642 A1 US 2004249642A1
 Authority
 US
 United States
 Prior art keywords
 time segment
 uncertainty
 growth rate
 benefit
 time
 Prior art date
 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
 Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications

 G—PHYSICS
 G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
 G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
 G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
 G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models

 G—PHYSICS
 G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
 G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
 G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
 G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading, distribution or shipping; Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
 G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement, balancing against orders

 G—PHYSICS
 G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
 G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
 G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
Abstract
Systems, methods and computer program products are provided for modeling future benefits. According to the method, modeling future benefits begins by defining a growth rate for the good for each time segment of a period of time, where the period of time includes a plurality of time segments. An uncertainty for the good is then determined for each time segment. Next, a benefit distribution is determined at an end of each time segment based upon the growth rate and uncertainty for the respective time segment. Finally, a benefit value is selected at the end of each time segment by randomly selecting each benefit value based upon a respective benefit distribution to thereby model future benefits over the period of time. The method therefore allows the growth rate and/or the uncertainty to very between time segments. The method can also account for contingencies at the end of previous time segments.
Description
 The present invention relates generally to systems, methods and computer program products for modeling future benefits and, more particularly, to systems, methods and computer program products for modeling the future benefits over time where the benefits are subject to uncertainty.
 In many industries, decisions that have future consequences generally attempt to account for an amount of uncertainty in the future consequence. For example, when manufacturers decide whether to start a project for the development, manufacture and sale of a good, those manufacturers try to account for future benefits associated with the good, such as future profits or revenues generated by the good, and/or units of the good produced. For example, the future revenues generated by a good can depend in large part on a number of factors, including an amount of uncertainty that can result in those future revenues actually being represented over a range of possible values.
 Traditionally, manufacturers have not been capable of reliably quantifying a forecast of future revenues for projects when a significant amount of uncertainty exists. In this regard, techniques such as the price path formulation associated with Brownian motion and lattice techniques, have been developed to model uncertainty, sometimes referred to as a “cone of uncertainty,” with the path of future revenues modeled within the cone. Whereas such techniques adequately model uncertainty and future revenues, they have shortcomings in certain, but crucial, applications. For example, such techniques are typically unable to easily incorporate changes in uncertainty over time. Also, for example, such techniques are typically unable to easily account for contingent decisions that may occur during a given time period.
 Both Brownian motion and lattice techniques typically operate by defining a constant amount of uncertainty and a constant amount of growth in revenues over a period of time, and do not account for contingencies such as internal and/or external activities or endeavors. It will be appreciated, however, that in many actual instances, uncertainty and/or growth rate can vary from time segment to time segment over a period of time. In addition, in many actual instances, uncertainty and/or growth rate can take into account internal and external activities or endeavors, which may or may not be conditional, such as the payout of a dividend, entry of a competitor into the market, change in governmental regulations, or agreement for revenue sharing. Thus, conventional techniques such as the Brownian motion and lattice techniques do not provide adequate flexibility to thereby accurately model uncertainty for future revenues.
 In light of the foregoing background, embodiments of the present invention provide systems, methods and computer program products for modeling future benefits over a period of time, such as future profits, revenues, units or the like, where the future benefits are subject to an amount of growth and/or uncertainty that can vary. The systems, methods and computer program products of embodiments of the present invention permit rapid modeling of uncertain benefits of a project with minimal inputs, and allow the uncertainty of the benefits to be tailored according to forecasted business conditions, which can change over the course of time. The systems, methods and computer program products of embodiments of the present invention also allow for visualization of the benefits within bounds of uncertainty, referred to herein as the “cone of uncertainty.” By modeling the uncertain future benefits, the systems, methods and computer program products of embodiments of the present invention are also capable of generating a business case based upon the modeled future benefits.
 According to one aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for modeling future benefits. The method begins by determining a benefit distribution at an end of each time segment of a period of time based upon a growth rate and an uncertainty for the respective time segment. In this regard, the benefit distribution can be determined at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity, such as a contingent dividend payment paid, at the end of at least one previous time segment. Then, after determining the benefit distributions, a benefit value is selected at the end of each time segment by randomly selecting each benefit value based upon a respective benefit distribution to thereby model future benefits of the good over the period of time. Before determining the benefit distribution, a growth rate associated with the benefit can be defined for each time segment. Advantageously, the growth rate for each time segment can be defined such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment. In addition to defining the growth rate, an uncertainty associated with the benefit can be determined for each time segment. In this regard, like the growth rate, the uncertainty for each time segment can advantageously be defined such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment. Further, a growth rate for each time segment can be defined independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and vice versa.
 In one embodiment, the method includes repeatedly selecting a different benefit value at the end of each time segment to thereby repeatedly model future benefits. Also, in one embodiment, the method further includes modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits. In this embodiment, the bounds of uncertainty can be modeled by determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit for each time segment, and modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the mean value and standard deviation to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty.
 More particularly as to modeling the bounds of uncertainty, another aspect of the present invention provides a method of modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits. The method begins by determining a mean value and standard deviation of the good for each time segment, where the mean value is determined based upon a growth rate of the good for the respective time segment, and the standard deviation is determined based upon an uncertainty for the good for the respective time segment. In this regard, before determining the mean value and standard deviation, a growth rate can be defined, and an uncertainty determined, for each time segment, as such may be defined and determined according to above. In one embodiment, the mean value for at least one time segment of the period of time is determined further based upon execution of a contingent activity, such as payment of a dividend, at the end of at least one previous time segment.
 Finally, an upper and lower bound of uncertainty are modeled based upon the mean value and standard deviation for each time segment to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty. More particularly, the method can further include normalizing the mean value for each time segment based upon the standard deviation and normalizing the standard deviation for each time segment based upon the mean value. In such instances, the upper and lower bound of uncertainty can be modeled for each time segment based upon the normalized mean value and normalized standard deviation. Also, the upper and lower bound of uncertainty can be modeled further based upon an inverse of a standard normal cumulative distribution, where the standard normal cumulative distribution is defined by a probability. In this regard, the upper and lower bound can be modeled by further selecting a lower probability associated with the lower bound and an upper probability associated with the upper bound. Advantageously, the lower probability can be selected higher than zero, and the higher probability can be selected higher probability lower than one.
 In addition, according to various embodiments of the present invention, the future benefits and/or bounds of uncertainty are capable of being modeled with a processing element operating a spreadsheet software program. In such embodiments, the future benefit model and/or the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty can be presented on a display coupled to the processing element. More particularly, the future benefit model or upper and lower bounds of uncertainty can be presented as a plot of the selected future benefits or the upper and lower bounds, respectively, and associated time segments.
 Systems and computer program products for modeling future benefits of a good are also provided. Therefore, embodiments of the present invention provide systems, methods and computer program products for modeling future benefits of a good over a period of time, where the future benefits are subject to an amount of growth and uncertainty that can vary. In this regard, the systems, methods and computer program products of embodiments of the present invention allow the uncertainty of the benefits to be tailored according to forecasted business conditions, which can change over the course of time.
 Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
 FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the operations performed by the system, method and computer program product of one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of future benefits such being subject to a contingent activity, such as a dividend payout;
 FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of a revenue distribution for one time segment, according to one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 4 is a graphical plot of future revenues of a good as a function of time according to one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 5 is another flow chart illustrating the operations performed by the system, method and computer program product of one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 6 is a graphical plot of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty plotted against the future revenues of FIG. 4 as well as the mean values of the good according to one embodiment of the present invention, where the upper and lower bounds, the future revenues and mean values are plotted as a function of time;
 FIG. 7 is a graphical plot of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty over all time segments and future revenues, along with upper and lower bounds of uncertainty for each time segment, according to one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 8 is a chart illustrating a business case created according to one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 9A is a graphical plot illustrating future aircraft fares according to one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 9B is a graphical plot illustrating future aircraft seat capacity according to one embodiment of the present invention;
 FIG. 9C is a graphical plot illustrating future demand for aircraft seats as a function of fares for years 1, 10 and 19 according to the graphical plots of FIGS. 9A and 9B, according to one embodiment of the present invention; and
 FIG. 10 is a schematic block diagram of the system of one embodiment of the present invention embodied by a computer.
 The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
 According to embodiments of the present invention, a future benefit is modeled over a period of time, where the period of time includes a plurality of time segments that each begin and end with a point in time. The benefit can be any of a number of different values subject to an amount of future uncertainty and growth. For example, the benefit can comprise future numbers of units of a good. Alternatively, for example, the benefit can comprise future profits in the sale of a good. Further, for example, the benefit can comprise the future price for which a good is sold. As described herein, the benefit comprises future revenues of a good. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of modeling future revenues of a good is but one example of a benefit capable of being modeled according to embodiments of the present invention, and in no way should be taken to limit the scope of the present invention.
 Referring to FIG. 1, a method of modeling future revenues of a good (benefits) over a period of time according to one embodiment of the present invention begins by defining the period of time, as shown in block10. In this regard, the period of time can begin at t=0 and extend to t=T. The period of time can then be divided into a number of different time segments. In one embodiment, the time period T is defined such that each time segment can be represented as an integer divisor of T, i.e., t=0, 1, 2, . . . T. Thus, for example, the period of time can be defined as a number of years (i.e., T=30), where the period of time is divided into a number of oneyear time segments which, including the original time t=0, totals the number of years plus one time segment (i.e., t=0, 1, 2, . . . 30). As used herein, each time segment begins at point in time t and ends at point in time t+1 (presuming the time segment is an integer divisor of T), and is defined by the beginning point in time t. Thus, time segment t=1 extends from point in time t=1 to point in time t=2. Similarly, time segment t=2 extends from points t=2 to t=3.
 Either before, during or after defining the time period, the mean market value of the good is defined for time segment t=0, as shown in block12. After defining the time period, then, the growth rate of the good can be defined over the time period, as shown in block 14. The mean market value of the good can be defined in any of a number of different manners. For example, in one embodiment, the mean market value can be defined as the maximum gross profitability in a forecasted market including an optimal number of units of the good purchased for an optimal price. For a description of one technique of determining the maximum gross profitability, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled: Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products for Modeling Demand and Associated Profitability of A Good, filed concurrently herewith, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
 The growth rate can be determined according to any of a number of different techniques, such as according to market forecasts. Advantageously, and in contrast to the price path formulation associated with the BlackScholes method, the growth rate can vary from time segment to time segment over the time period, typically beginning at time segment t=1. Thus, for example, the growth rate for time segment t=1 can equal 20%, while the growth rate for time segment t=2 can equal 20% or, alternatively, any value greater than or less than 20%.
 Either during or after defining the growth rate, the uncertainty in the market including the good can be determined for each time segment, typically beginning with t=1, as shown in block16. In this regard, the uncertainty can be determined according to any of a number of different techniques. In one embodiment, for example, the uncertainty is determined based upon a model of returns, or growth rate, versus risk, or uncertainty. More particularly, in one embodiment for example, the returns are modeled from two risk values and associated return values, as such may be determined by an estimator or the like.
 Then, assuming a typical linear relationship between risk and return, the risk can be modeled as a linear function of returns based upon the two risk values and associated return values. For example, according to one embodiment, two risk values may comprise 20% and 30%, with associated return values comprising 10.0% and 12.5%, respectively. With such values, risk can be modeled as a linear function of return as follows:
 Risk(Return)=4×(Return−5)
 where return and risk are expressed as percentages. For a further description of modeling risk as a function of returns, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled: Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products for Modeling A Monetary Measure for A Good Based Upon Technology Maturity Levels, filed concurrently herewith, the contents of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. For an example of the uncertainty associated with various growth rates, as such may have been determined according to the above, see Table 1.
TABLE 1 Growth Rate Uncertainty 10.0% 20% 12.5% 30% 15.0% 40% 17.5% 50% 20.0% 60% 22.5% 70% 25.0% 80% 27.5% 90% 30.0% 100%  It should be noted that whereas a linear relationship between risk and return has been assumed above, risk and return need not have such a relationship. In this regard, a linear relationship between risk and return is approximately reflective of current the capital market relationship of risk and return, embodied in the wellknown Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) theory. In many instances, however, risk and return may not have a linear relationship. For example, some goods may have a high projected return with corresponding low risk when compared to CAPM.
 After the growth rate has been defined and the uncertainty has been determined for each time segment in the time period, the revenue for each time segment can be modeled based upon a revenue distribution for each time segment. Each revenue distribution can be determined in any of a number of different manners but, in one embodiment, each revenue distribution can determined based upon the standard deviation in time for the respective time segment and the mean value of the good for the time segment, as shown in block18. And whereas the mean value of the good for each time segment can be determined in any of a number of different manners, in one embodiment the mean value of the good for each time segment is determined as follows:
$\begin{array}{cc}{\mu}_{t}=\left(1+\frac{G\ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{R}_{t}}{100}\right)\times {\mu}_{t1}& \left(1\right)\end{array}$  in equation (1), μ_{t }represents the mean value of the good for the current time segment, μ_{t1 }represents the mean value of the good at the immediately preceding time segment, and GR_{t }represents the growth rate for the current time segment, where the growth rate is expressed in terms of a percentage.
 Like the mean value of the good for each time segment, the standard deviation for each segment can be determined in any of a number of different manners. In one embodiment, for example, the standard deviation can be determined as follows:
 σ_{t}=μ_{t}×{square root}{square root over (e^{σ} ^{ avgt } ^{ 2 } ^{×1}−1)} (2)

 where U_{i }represents the uncertainty for the ith time segment, and i=1, 2, . . . t. For an example of the values of the growth rate, mean value of the good, uncertainty and standard deviation for each time segment in a period of 30 years, where each time segment represents one year, see Table 2 below.
TABLE 2 Growth Time (t) Rate (GR_{t}) Mean (μ_{t}) Uncertainty(U_{i}) Std. Dev. (σ_{t}) 0 — $500 — — 1 20% $600 60% $395 2 20% $720 60% $739 3 20% $864 60% $1,205 4 20% $1,037 60% $1,861 5 20% $1,244 60% $2,796 6 20% $1,493 60% $4,135 7 20% $1,792 60% $6,057 8 20% $2,150 60% $8,816 9 20% $2,580 60% $12,779 10 20% $3,096 60% $18,471 11 18% $3,653 52% $25,034 12 16% $4,238 44% $32,051 13 14% $4,831 36% $39,026 14 12% $5,411 28% $45,483 15 10% $5,952 20% $51,056 16 8% $6,428 20% $56,269 17 6% $6,813 20% $60,866 18 4% $7,086 20% $64,595 19 2% $7,228 20% $67,234 20 0% $7,228 20% $68,608 21 −2% $7,083 20% $68,609 22 −4% $6,800 20% $67,209 23 −6% $6,392 20% $64,466 24 −8% $5,880 20% $60,518 25 −10% $5,292 20% $55,577 26 −12% $4,657 28% $50,880 27 −14% $4,005 36% $46,710 28 −16% $3,364 44% $43,253 29 −18% $2,759 52% $40,631 30 −20% $2,207 60% $38,942  As will be appreciated, future benefits such as revenues can be subject to a contingent activity, or event, which can impact the future benefits (mean and uncertainty values) for subsequent time segments. For example, revenues over a time segment can be subject to a contingent dividend payment, which diverts of a portion of revenues, as shown in FIG. 2 at time t=3. By diverting a portion of the revenues, the mean value of the good (i.e., μ_{t1}) is lowered in the determination of the mean value over a subsequent time segment (i.e., μ_{t}). An analogous situation, for example, is a contingent revenue sharing agreement with a supplier, or the impact of a competitor entering the market and diverting revenues. As will also be appreciated, the contingent activity can itself be represented as a probability distribution. For example, the contingent activity comprising payment of a dividend can be represented by a value of the dividend if executed, and an associated probability of the dividend being executed at the respective value. Thus, as the mean value and standard deviation are determined, any contingent activities to which the revenues for the respective time segment are subject can be accounted for to adjust the growth rate, uncertainly, mean value and/or standard deviation accordingly. By linking each time segment to the outcome of the prior time segment, embodiments of the present invention can advantageously provide the flexibility to incorporate contingent activities or endeavors or decisions that may occur at the transition between time segments.
 After determining the mean value of the good and standard deviation over each time segment, a revenue distribution can be determined for each time segment by defining each revenue distribution according to the respective mean value of the good and standard deviation. The revenue distribution can be represented as any of a number of different types of distributions but, in one embodiment, the revenue distribution is defined as a lognormal distribution. In this regard, FIG. 3 illustrates the revenue distribution defined at time t=1 for the example in Table 2.
 Thus, to model the future revenues for the good, a revenue value for each time segment is selected from the revenue distribution for the respective time segment, as shown in block20 of FIG. 1. Advantageously, the revenue value can be selected according to a method for randomly selecting the revenue value, such as the Monte Carlo method. As known to those skilled in the art, the Monte Carlo method is a method of randomly generating values for uncertain variables to simulate a model. In this regard, the Monte Carlo method is applied to the revenue distributions to select a revenue value for each time segment. The model of future revenues can be represented in any one of a number of manners but, in one embodiment, the model of future revenues is represented by plotting the revenue values for the time segments over the period of time, such as is shown in FIG. 4 where the revenue distributions are based upon the mean values of the good and standard deviations, as well as the forecasted revenue values, of Table 4 (described below). And as also described below, by repeatedly selecting different revenue values for one or more time segments, corresponding future revenues for the good can be modeled for each selected set of revenue values.
 As will be appreciated, the values (e.g., mean and standard deviation) determined above for each time segment can be determined in any manner and any order. For example, each respective value for all time segments in time be determined at one time, with the remaining values for all time segments determined thereafter. Alternatively, all values for each time segment in time can be determined at one time, with all the values for the remaining time segments determined thereafter. In other terms, the values can be determined on a valuebyvalue basis or on a time segmentbytime segment basis, for example.
 In addition to modeling uncertain revenues for a good, aspects of the present invention are also capable of modeling the uncertain revenues within bounds of uncertainty, referred to herein as the “cone of uncertainty.” It will be appreciated, however, that at the lowest bounds of possible revenues, goods are typically dropped or rescoped into different goods. Similarly, at the highest bounds of possible revenues, several factors, such as competitors entering the market and reaching capacity of the market, act to limit the revenues. In this regard, whereas the cone can be determined to define the range of possible revenues for each time segment, in one embodiment the cone is determined by truncating the lowest and highest bounds, such as by truncating the each bound by a predefined percentage (e.g., 2.5%), so that the cone is determined to define the rage of most likely revenues for each time segment.
 With reference now to FIG. 5, the cone of uncertainty, or lower and upper bounds, can be determined by initially, as before, defining the period of time, defining the mean market value of the good is defined for time t=0, defining the growth rate of the good over the time period, and determining the uncertainty in the market including the good for each time segment, as shown in blocks22, 24, 26 and 28, respectively. Then, the mean value of the good μ and the standard deviation σ for each time segment t within the time period can be determined, such as is described above and shown in block 30. It will be appreciated, however, that at the inception of the good (i.e., t=0), no revenues will be generated and, as such, the lower and upper bounds at t=0 will typically be zero. After determining the mean value of the good and the standard deviation for each time segment, the mean and standard deviations can be normalized based on one another, as shown in block 32. The mean and standard deviations can be normalized in any of a number of different manners, but in one embodiment, the mean value of the good for each time segment can be normalized to μ_{log t }as follows:
$\begin{array}{cc}{\mu}_{l\ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e\mathrm{og}\ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89et}=\frac{1}{2}\times \mathrm{ln}\ue8a0\left(\left({\left({\sigma}_{t}/{\mu}_{t}\right)}^{2}+1\right)/{\mu}_{t}^{2}\right)& \left(4\right)\end{array}$  Similarly, in one embodiment, the standard deviation for each time segment can be normalized to σ_{log t }as follows:
 σ_{log t}={square root}{square root over (ln((σ_{t}/μ_{t})^{2}+1))} (5)
 After normalizing the mean value of the good and the standard deviation for each time segment, the lower and upper bounds of uncertainty, defining the cone of uncertainty, can be determined, as shown in block34. In this regard, the bounds can be determined based upon the normalized mean values and standard deviations. Further, the bounds can be determined based upon an inverse of a standard normal cumulative distribution, where the distribution is defined by a probability and has a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. The lower and upper bounds can be defined in any of a number of different manners, but in one embodiment, the lower and upper bounds can be determined according to the following equations (6) and (7), respectively:
 LBound_{t} =e ^{μ} ^{ log t } ^{+σ} ^{ log t } ^{×NormsInv(p} ^{ t } ^{) } (6)
 UBound_{t} =e ^{μ} ^{ log t } ^{+σ} ^{ log t } ^{×NormsInv(p} ^{ u } ^{) } (7)
 In equations (6) and (7), NormsInv(p) represents the inverse of the standard normal cumulative distribution for a defined probability, or percentage p.
 As the bounds define the lower and upper bounds of revenues, the lower percentage p_{l }can be set at 0% (i.e., probability of 0.0) for the lower bound, and the upper percentage p_{u }set at 100% (i.e., probability of 1.0) for the upper bound. But as indicated above, in one embodiment the bounds of the cone are truncated by a predefined percentage (or probability) so that the cone is determined to define the rage of most likely revenues for each time segment. As such, the lower percentage p_{l }can be set at a value above 0%, such as at 2.5%. Similarly, the upper percentage p_{u }can be set at a value below 100%, such as 97.5%. For an example of the lower and upper bounds, defined at 2.5% and 97.5%, respectively, and determined based upon the mean values of the good and standard deviations in the example of Table 2, see Table 3 below.
TABLE 3 Time (t) 2.5% Min 97.5% Max 0 — — 1 $155 $1,624 2 $95 $2,650 3 $66 $3,860 4 $48 $5,302 5 $36 $7,015 6 $28 $9,037 7 $23 $11,409 8 $18 $14,177 9 $15 $17,386 10 $12 $21,091 11 $11 $24,935 12 $11 $28,880 13 $11 $32,848 14 $11 $36,722 15 $12 $40,350 16 $12 $43,528 17 $12 $46,081 18 $12 $47,861 19 $12 $48,748 20 $12 $48,675 21 $11 $47,626 22 $10 $45,645 23 $9 $42,831 24 $8 $39,333 25 $7 $35,332 26 $6 $30,970 27 $4 $26,444 28 $3 $21,946 29 $2 $17,648 30 $1 $13,695  The cone of uncertainty can be represented in any one of a number of manners. In one embodiment, shown in FIG. 6, the cone of uncertainty is represented by plotting the lower bounds (designated line40) and the upper bounds (designated line 42) for the times segments over the period of time where, as shown, the bounds are determined based upon the mean values of the good and standard deviations of Table 2. The cone can then be defined as the crosshatched region 44 between the lower and upper bounds, and can be plotted against the model of future revenues (designated line 46) as well as the mean values of the good (designated line 48). As shown, one or more of the times segments can have a revenue that exceeds the upper bound and, although not shown, one or more of the time segments can have a revenue below the lower bound. In this regard, it will be appreciated that the bounds define the range of most likely revenues and, as such, the bounds are defined to not include a number of possible revenue values.
 Just as the growth rate, mean value of the good, uncertainty and standard deviation for each time segment in a period of 30 years can be modeled over all time segments, each time segment can have its own distribution, contingent on the distribution parameters of the prior time segment. Referring now to FIG. 7, according to one embodiment, the bounds of uncertainty for time segment t (i.e., between point in time t and time t+1) can be modeled by first selecting a future revenue for point in time t, such as from the revenue distribution for time segment t, as described above. As will be appreciated, as the future revenue at time t has been selected, no uncertainty is associated with the revenues at time t.
 From the future revenue at time t, a mean value at point in time t=t+1 can be determined, such as according to equation (1) above where μ_{l1 }represents the future revenue for time t, μ_{t }represents the mean value at time t=t+1, and GR_{t }represents the growth rate for time t=t+1. After determining the mean value at time t=t+1, the standard deviation at time t=t+1 can be determined, such as according to equation (2) above, where σ_{t }represents the standard deviation at time t=t+1, t represents the time at t=t+1, and σ_{avgt }represents a running average of the uncertainty values from t=1 to time t=t+1 (see equation (3)). As can be seen, then, the mean and standard deviation values define a distribution. Thereafter, the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty at time t=t+1 can be determined, such as in a manner described above in conjunction with equations (4) through (7). As shown in FIG. 7, then, the upper and lower bounds at time t=t+1 appear as points 51 a and 51 b, respectively, at the respective point in time.
 The bounds of uncertainty between time t and time t=t+1 can then be modeled by connecting the bounds of uncertainty at time t (i.e., the selected revenue value at time t) with the bounds of uncertainty at time t=t+1. As shown, and as will be appreciated, at time progresses, the uncertainty associated with a future benefit, such as revenues, increases outwardly. For an example of the values of the growth rate, mean value of the good, uncertainty, standard deviation and forecasted revenue for each time segment in a period of 30 years where each time segment has its own distribution, see Table 4 below.
TABLE 4 Un Forecasted Time Growth certainty Std. Dev. Revenue (t) Rate (GR_{t}) Mean (μ_{t}) (U_{i}) (σ_{t}) (μ_{t−1}) 0 — $500,000 — — — 1 20% $418,748 60% $329,139 $348,957 2 20% $551,432 60% $275,652 $459,526 3 20% $623,987 60% $362,995 $519,989 4 20% $424,238 60% $410,757 $353,532 5 20% $264,392 60% $279,266 $220,327 6 20% $580,200 60% $174,044 $483,500 7 20% $1,049,674 60% $381,933 $874,729 8 20% $1,780,455 60% $690,977 $1,483,712 9 20% $4,733,620 60% $1,172,033 $3,944,683 10 20% $2,926,677 60% $3,116,036 $2,480,235 11 18% $3,974,778 52% $1,630,788 $3,426,533 12 16% $4,246,647 44% $1,837,065 $3,725,129 13 14% $3,237,536 36% $1,579,689 $2,890,657 14 12% $2,785,884 28% $924,571 $2,532,622 15 10% $2,683,323 20% $562,795 $2,484,558 16 8% $3,127,509 20% $542,076 $2,950,481 17 6% $3,234,680 20% $631,809 $3,110,269 18 4% $2,745,234 20% $653,460 $2,691,406 19 2% $3,003,969 20% $554,583 $3,003,969 20 0% $2,230,074 20% $606,852 $2,275,586 21 −2% $1,931,483 20% $450,512 $2,011,961 22 −4% $1,931,148 20% $390,192 $2,054,413 23 −6% $1,714,646 20% $390,124 $1,863,746 24 −8% $1,609,526 20% $346,387 $1,788,362 25 −10% $1,597,992 20% $325,151 $1,815,900 26 −12% $1,150,298 28% $456,353 $1,337,556 27 −14% $1,029,353 36% $427,894 $1,225,420 28 −16% $764,977 44% $475,747 $932,898 29 −18% $339,436 52% $426,256 $424,295 30 −20% $500,000 60% $223,443 $847,962  At this point it should be made clear that the model of uncertain future revenues up to this point has been tied to one forecasted revenue for each time segment selected according to a method for randomly selecting a predefined number of units of the good, such as the Monte Carlo method. As such, after modeling the future revenues including a selected revenue for each time segment, the method can then be repeated a plurality of times by selecting different forecasted revenues for each time segment. Then, if so desired, the forecasted revenues for each time segment can be organized into a distribution for the respective time segment. The distributions can then be defined, such as by a curve type and a mean and associated standard deviation. In one possible implementation of such a technique, termed meanreverting, the path of forecasted revenues will exhibit a tendency to return to forecasted mean values for each time segment.
 From the distributions, then, a business case for the good can be created. For example, the business case can receive the distributions for the future revenue for each time segment. Based upon the distributions, then, the market value of the project can be determined and plotted over time, as shown in FIG. 8. As shown, the business case can plot the nonrecurring costs associated with the project (shown below zero for years three through five). Additionally, the business case can plot the profit associated with the project, which can be determined as described above. As described, the business case can be created from distributions organized from selecting different future revenues for the time segments by repeating the method a plurality of times. It will be appreciated, however, that the business case can be created from performing the method once to select one forecasted revenue for each time segment.
 As described above, the benefit can be any of a number of different values subject to an amount of future uncertainty and growth, including future numbers of units of a good and the future price for which a good is sold. Thus, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, future numbers of units of a good can be modeled over a period of time, as shown in FIG. 9A for future seating capacity onboard aircraft. Also, the future price for which the good is sold can be modeled over the period of time, as shown in FIG. 9B for future fares associated with aircraft flights. With such models, then, future demand for aircraft seats as a function of fares can be modeled, as shown in FIG. 9C for years 1, 10 and 19. For more information on a method by which such demand can be modeled, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled: Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products for Modeling Demand and Associated Profitability of A Good, filed concurrently herewith.
 In addition to creating a business case and modeling future numbers of units of a good, cost of the good and/or demand for the good, the method of the present invention can be performed to draw any of a number of different conclusions, and can additionally be utilized in conjunction with other similar methods to formulate a more complex financial modeling tool. For example, in one embodiment, a contingent claim can be valued and thereafter input into the model of uncertain future benefits, such as the mean value of the good, number of units of the good (e.g., seats on an aircraft, number of aircraft, etc.) or the like, for time segment t=0. Whereas the contingent claim can be valued in any of a number of different manners, in one embodiment, the contingent claim is valued by initially determining the present value distribution of contingent future benefits that is attributable to the exercise of a contingent claim. In this regard, the distribution of contingent future benefits can be discounted according to a first discount rate, such as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The present value of a contingent future investment required to exercise the contingent claim is also determined based upon another appropriate discount rate, such as a riskfree rate of discounting. An average of the difference between the present value distribution of contingent future benefits and the present value of the contingent future investment can be determined. For more information on such a method of valuing a contingent claim, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/902,021 entitled: Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products for Performing A Generalized Contingent Claim Valuation, filed Jul. 10, 2001; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ entitled: Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products for Performing A Contingent Claim Valuation, filed Dec. 4, 2002, the contents of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
 Therefore, embodiments of the present invention provide systems, methods and computer program products for modeling future revenues of a good over a period of time, where the future revenues are subject to an amount of growth and uncertainty that can vary. In this regard, the systems, methods and computer program products of embodiments of the present invention allow the uncertainty of the revenues to be tailored according to forecasted business conditions, which can change over the course of time. As such, embodiments of the present invention also allow for visualization of the revenues within bounds of uncertainty, referred to herein as the “cone of uncertainty.”
 As shown in FIG. 10, the system of the present invention is typically embodied by a processing element and an associated memory device, both of which are commonly comprised by a computer41 or the like. In this regard, as indicated above, the method of embodiments of the present invention can be performed by the processing element manipulating data stored by the memory device with any one of a number of commercially available computer software programs. In one embodiment, the method can be performed with data that is capable of being manipulated and/or presented in spreadsheet form. For example, the method can be performed by the processing element manipulating data stored by the memory device with Excel, a spreadsheet software program distributed by the Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., including Crystal Ball, a Monte Carlo simulation software program distributed by Decisioneering, Inc. of Denver, Colo. The computer can include a display 42 for presenting information relative to performing embodiments of the method of the present invention, including the various distributions, models and/or conclusions as determined according to embodiments of the present invention. To plot information relative to performing embodiments of the method of the present invention, the computer can further include a printer 44.
 Also, the computer41 can include a means for locally or remotely transferring the information relative to performing embodiments of the method of the present invention. For example, the computer can include a facsimile machine 46 for transmitting information to other facsimile machines, computers or the like. Additionally, or alternatively, the computer can include a modem 48 to transfer information to other computers or the like. Further, the computer can include an interface (not shown) to a network, such as a local area network (LAN), and/or a wide area network (WAN). For example, the computer can include an Ethernet Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA) card configured to transmit and receive information to and from a LAN, WAN or the like.
 In one advantageous technique applicable to embodiments of the present invention, the methods according to embodiments of the present invention may be embodied in a software or data module, component, portfolio or the like, that can be manipulated or otherwise operated within a spreadsheet software program such as Excel. Such a technique may be advantageous in a number of different contexts, such as in the context of financial modeling and analysis. In this regard, modules, components and/or portfolio that perform various financial modeling functions can be combined to gain a more complete understanding of a financial context. A brief description of such a technique as such may be applied to the present invention will now be described below.
 According to such a technique, data capable of being manipulated to perform at least a portion of the methods of the present invention can be embodied in a module, which can thereafter be linked or otherwise associated with other portions of the methods of the present invention embodied in other modules so as to formulate a component. Then, if so desired, the component can be linked or otherwise associated with other components capable of performing other related methods to thereby form a portfolio. For example, methods of modeling future revenues according to embodiments of the present invention can be embodied in one module while methods of modeling nonrecurring cost according to embodiments of the present invention can be embodied in another module. The two modules can then be linked or otherwise associated with one another to formulate a component capable of generating a business case capable of modeling the market value of the good based upon the future revenues and the nonrecurring cost. Then, if so desired, the component for generating the business case can be linked or otherwise associated with another component to perform another function.
 According to one aspect of the present invention, the system of the present invention generally operates under control of a computer program product. The computer program product for performing the methods of embodiments of the present invention includes a computerreadable storage medium, such as the nonvolatile storage medium, and computerreadable program code portions, such as a series of computer instructions, embodied in the computerreadable storage medium. It should be understood that the computerreadable program code portions may include separate executable portions for performing distinct functions to accomplish methods of embodiments of the present invention. Additionally, or alternatively, one or more of the computerreadable program portions may include one or more executable portions for performing more than one function to thereby accomplish methods of embodiments of the present invention.
 In this regard, FIGS. 1 and 4 are a flowchart of methods, systems and program products according to the invention. It will be understood that each block or step of the flowchart, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be loaded onto a computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block(s) or step(s). These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computerreadable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computerreadable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart block(s) or step(s). The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block(s) or step(s).
 Accordingly, blocks or steps of the flowchart support combinations of means for performing the specified functions, combinations of steps for performing the specified functions and program instruction means for performing the specified functions. It will also be understood that each block or step of the flowchart, and combinations of blocks or steps in the flowchart, can be implemented by special purpose hardwarebased computer systems which perform the specified functions or steps, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
 Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. By way of but one example, the contingent claims valued by the system, method and computer program product of the present invention may be American style calls, as opposed to the European style calls referenced in the abovedescribed examples. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
Claims (69)
1. A method of modeling future benefits comprising:
determining a benefit distribution at an end of each time segment of a period of time based upon a growth rate and an uncertainty for the respective time segment; and
selecting a benefit value at the end of each time segment by randomly selecting each benefit value based upon a respective benefit distribution to thereby model future benefits over the period of time.
2. A method according to claim 1 further comprising defining a growth rate for each time segment before determining a benefit distribution.
3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein defining a growth rate for each time segment comprises defining a growth rate for each time segment such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment.
4. A method according to claim 2 , wherein defining a growth rate for each time segment comprises defining a growth rate for each time segment independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the method further comprises determining an uncertainty for each time segment independent of a growth rate for the respective time segment.
5. A method according to claim 1 further comprising determining an uncertainty for each time segment such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment.
6. A method according to claim 1 , wherein selecting a benefit value comprises repeatedly selecting a different benefit value at the end of each time segment to thereby repeatedly model future benefits.
7. A method according to claim 1 further comprising modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits, wherein modeling the bounds of uncertainty comprises determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit at the end of each time segment, and modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the mean value and standard deviation to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty.
8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein modeling the future benefits comprises modeling the future benefits with a processing element operating a spreadsheet software program, and wherein the method further comprises presenting a display of the future benefit model on a display coupled to the processing element.
9. A method according to claim 7 , wherein presenting the display comprises presenting a display of the future benefit model comprising a plot of the selected future benefit values and associated time segments.
10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein determining a benefit distribution comprises determining a benefit distribution at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity.
11. A method according to claim 10 , wherein determining a benefit distribution comprises determining a benefit distribution at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity at the end of at least one previous time segment.
12. A method of modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits comprising:
determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit for each time segment, wherein the mean value is determined based upon a growth rate associated with the benefit for the respective time segment, and wherein the standard deviation is determined based upon an uncertainty for the good for the respective time segment; and
modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty based upon the mean value and standard deviation for each time segment to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty.
13. A method according to claim 12 further comprising defining a growth rate for the good for each time segment before determining the mean value.
14. A method according to claim 13 , wherein defining a growth rate for each time segment comprises defining a growth rate for each time segment such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment.
15. A method according to claim 13 , wherein defining a growth for each time segment comprises defining a growth rate for each time segment independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the method further comprises determining an uncertainty for each time segment independent of a growth rate for the respective time segment.
16. A method according to claim 12 further comprising determining an uncertainty for each time segment such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment.
17. A method according to claim 12 , wherein modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty comprises modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty further based upon an inverse of a standard normal cumulative distribution, and wherein the standard normal cumulative distribution is defined by a probability.
18. A method according to claim 17 , wherein modeling an upper and lower bound further comprises selecting a lower probability associated with the lower bound and an upper probability associated with the upper bound, wherein selecting the lower probability comprises selecting a lower probability higher than zero, and wherein selecting a higher probability comprises selecting a higher probability lower than one.
19. A method according to claim 12 further comprising normalizing the mean value for each time segment based upon the standard deviation and normalizing the standard deviation for each time segment based upon the mean value, wherein modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty comprises modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the normalized mean value and normalized standard deviation.
20. A method according to claim 12 , wherein modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits comprises modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits with a processing element operating a spreadsheet software program, and wherein the method further comprises presenting a display of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty on a display coupled to the processing element.
21. A method according to claim 20 , wherein presenting the display comprises presenting a display of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty comprising a plot of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty and associated time segments.
22. A method according to claim 12 , wherein determining a mean value comprises determining a mean value for at least one time segment of the period of time further based upon execution of a contingent activity.
23. A method according to claim 22 , wherein determining a mean value comprises determining a mean value for at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity at an end of at least one previous time segment.
24. A system for modeling future benefits comprising:
a processing element capable of determining a benefit distribution at an end of each time segment of a period of time based upon a growth rate and an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the processing element is further capable of selecting a benefit value at the end of each time segment by randomly selecting each benefit value based upon a respective benefit distribution to thereby model future benefits over the period of time.
25. A system according to claim 24 , wherein the processing element is also capable of defining a growth rate for each time segment.
26. A system according to claim 25 , wherein the processing element is capable of defining a growth rate for each time segment such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment.
27. A system according to claim 25 , wherein the processing element is capable of defining a growth rate for each time segment independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the processing element is capable of determining an uncertainty for each time segment independent of a growth rate for the respective time segment.
28. A system according to claim 24 , wherein the processing element is also capable of determining an uncertainty for each time segment such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment.
29. A system according to claim 24 , wherein the processing element is capable of repeatedly selecting a different benefit value at the end of each time segment to thereby repeatedly model future benefits.
30. A system according to claim 24 , wherein the processing element is also capable of modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits by determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit at the end of each time segment, and thereafter modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the mean value and standard deviation.
31. A system according to claim 24 , wherein the processing element is capable of modeling the future benefits by operating at least one function within a spreadsheet software program, and wherein the system further comprises:
a display coupled to the processing element, wherein the display is capable of presenting the future benefit model.
32. A system according to claim 31 , wherein the display is capable of presenting the future benefit model as a plot of the selected future benefit values and associated time segments.
33. A system according to claim 24 , wherein the processing element is capable of determining a benefit distribution at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity.
34. A system according to claim 33 , wherein the processing element is capable of determining a benefit distribution comprises at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity at the end of at least one previous time segment.
35. A system for modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits comprising:
a processing element capable of determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit for each time segment, wherein the processing element determines the mean value based upon a growth rate associated with the benefit for the respective time segment, wherein the processing element determines the standard deviation based upon an uncertainty for the good for the respective time segment, and wherein the processing element is capable of modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty based upon the mean value and standard deviation for each time segment to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty.
36. A system according to claim 35 , wherein the processing element is also capable of defining a growth rate for the good for each time segment before determining the mean value.
37. A system according to claim 36 , wherein the processing element is capable of defining a growth for each time segment independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the processing element is capable of determining an uncertainty for each time segment independent of a growth rate for the respective time segment.
38. A system according to claim 36 , wherein the processing element is capable of defining a growth rate for each time segment such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment.
39. A system according to claim 35 , wherein the processing element is capable of determining an uncertainty for each time segment such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment.
40. A system according to claim 35 , wherein the processing element is capable of modeling the upper and lower bound of uncertainty further based upon an inverse of a standard normal cumulative distribution, and wherein the standard normal cumulative distribution is defined by a probability.
41. A system according to claim 40 , wherein the processing element is capable of modeling an upper and lower bound by further selecting a lower probability associated with the lower bound and an upper probability associated with the upper bound, wherein the processing element is capable of selecting a lower probability higher than zero, and wherein the processing element is capable of selecting a higher probability lower than one.
42. A system according to claim 35 , wherein the processing element is also capable of normalizing the mean value for each time segment based upon the standard deviation and normalizing the standard deviation for each time segment based upon the mean value, wherein the processing element is capable of modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty by modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the normalized mean value and normalized standard deviation.
43. A system according to claim 35 , wherein the processing element is capable of operating at least one function within a spreadsheet software program to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty of future benefits, and wherein the system further comprises:
a display capable of presenting the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty.
44. A system according to claim 43 , wherein the display is capable of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty as a plot of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty and associated time segments.
45. A system according to claim 35 , wherein the processing element is capable of determining a mean value for at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity.
46. A system according to claim 45 , wherein the processing element is capable of determining a mean value for at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity at an end of at least one previous time segment.
47. A computer program product for modeling future benefits, the computer program product comprising a computerreadable storage medium having computerreadable program code portions stored therein, the computerreadable program portions comprising:
a first executable portion for determining a benefit distribution at an end of each time segment of a period of time based upon a growth rate and an uncertainty for the respective time segment; and
a second executable portion for selecting a benefit value at the end of each time segment by randomly selecting each benefit value based upon a respective benefit distribution to thereby model future benefits over the period of time.
48. A computer program product according to claim 47 further comprising a third executable portion for defining a growth rate for the good for each time segment.
49. A computer program product according to claim 48 , wherein the third executable portion defines a growth rate for each time segment such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment.
50. A computer program product according to claim 48 , wherein the third executable portion defines a growth rate for each time segment independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the computer program product further comprises a fourth executable portion for determining an uncertainty for each time segment independent of a growth rate for the respective time segment.
51. A computer program product according to claim 47 further comprising a third executable portion for determining an uncertainty for each time segment such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment.
52. A computer program product according to claim 47 , wherein the second executable portion repeatedly selects a different benefit value at the end of each time segment to thereby repeatedly model future benefits.
53. A computer program product according to claim 47 further comprising a third executable portion for modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits, wherein the third executable portion models the bounds of uncertainty by determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit at the end of each time segment, and modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the mean value and standard deviation to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty.
54. A computer program product according to claim 47 further comprising a third executable portion for generating a display of the future benefit model.
55. A computer program product according to claim 54 , wherein the third executable portion generates a display of the future benefit model comprising a plot of the selected future benefit values and associated time segments.
56. A computer program product according to claim 47 , wherein the first executable portion determines a benefit distribution at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity.
57. A computer program product according to claim 56 , wherein the first executable portion determines a benefit distribution at the end of at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity at the end of at least one previous time segment.
58. A computer program product for modeling bounds of uncertainty of future benefits, the computer program product comprising a computerreadable storage medium having computerreadable program code portions stored therein, the computerreadable program portions comprising:
a first executable portion for determining a mean value and standard deviation associated with the benefit for each time segment, wherein the first executable portion determines the mean value based upon a growth rate associated with the benefit for the respective time segment, and wherein the first executable portion determines the standard deviation based upon an uncertainty for the good for the respective time segment; and
a second executable portion for modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty based upon the mean value and standard deviation for each time segment to thereby model the bounds of uncertainty.
59. A computer program product according to claim 58 further comprising a third executable portion for defining a growth rate for the good for each time segment.
60. A computer program product according to claim 59 , wherein the third executable portion defines a growth rate for each time segment such that the growth rate for at least one time segment differs from the growth rate of at least one other time segment.
61. A computer program product according to claim 59 , wherein the third executable portion defines a growth rate for each time segment independent of an uncertainty for the respective time segment, and wherein the computer program product further comprises a fourth executable portion for determining an uncertainty for each time segment independent of a growth rate for the respective time segment.
62. A computer program product according to claim 58 further comprising a third executable portion for determining an uncertainty for each time segment such that the uncertainty for at least one time segment differs from the uncertainty of at least one other time segment.
63. A computer program product according to claim 58 , wherein the fourth executable portion models an upper and lower bound of uncertainty further based upon an inverse of a standard normal cumulative distribution, and wherein the standard normal cumulative distribution is defined by a probability.
64. A computer program product according to claim 63 , wherein the fourth executable portion models an upper and lower bound further by selecting a lower probability associated with the lower bound and an upper probability associated with the upper bound, wherein the fourth executable portion selects the lower probability higher than zero, and wherein the fourth executable selects a higher probability lower than one.
65. A computer program product according to claim 58 further comprising a fifth executable portion for normalizing the mean value for each time segment based upon the standard deviation and normalizing the standard deviation for each time segment based upon the mean value, wherein the fourth executable portion models an upper and lower bound of uncertainty by modeling an upper and lower bound of uncertainty for each time segment based upon the normalized mean value and normalized standard deviation.
66. A computer program product according to claim 58 further comprising a fifth executable portion for generating a display of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty.
67. A computer program product according to claim 66 , wherein the fifth executable portion generates a display of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty comprising a plot of the upper and lower bounds of uncertainty and associated time segments.
68. A computer program product according to claim 58 , wherein the first executable portion determines a mean value for at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity.
69. A computer program product according to claim 68 , wherein the first executable portion determines a mean value for at least one time segment further based upon execution of a contingent activity at an end of at least one previous time segment.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US10/453,396 US20040249642A1 (en)  20030603  20030603  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
Applications Claiming Priority (17)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US10/453,396 US20040249642A1 (en)  20030603  20030603  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
EP04753973A EP1636667A4 (en)  20030603  20040601  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
PCT/US2004/017258 WO2004111770A2 (en)  20030603  20040601  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
CN 200480019992 CN101410859A (en)  20030603  20040601  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
JP2006515063A JP2007526529A (en)  20030603  20040601  System for modeling uncertain future benefits, methods and computer program products 
US11/190,684 US7739166B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in a differentiated market 
US11/190,638 US7725376B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US11/190,711 US7769628B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
US11/613,967 US7747504B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/613,959 US7761361B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a combination option 
US11/613,979 US7676412B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/614,009 US7698189B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/613,941 US7747503B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/613,929 US7752113B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a multistage option 
US11/613,954 US7739176B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of an earlylaunch option 
US11/613,993 US7676413B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US13/487,965 US8645249B2 (en)  20030603  20120604  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date  

US10/309,659 ContinuationInPart US7676416B2 (en)  20010710  20021204  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation  
US10/453,727 ContinuationInPart US7627495B2 (en)  20030603  20030603  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
Related Child Applications (13)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US09/902,021 ContinuationInPart US6862579B2 (en)  20010710  20010710  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a generalized contingent claim valuation 
US11/190,711 ContinuationInPart US7769628B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
US11/190,684 ContinuationInPart US7739166B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in a differentiated market 
US11/190,638 ContinuationInPart US7725376B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US11/613,967 ContinuationInPart US7747504B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/614,009 ContinuationInPart US7698189B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/613,979 ContinuationInPart US7676412B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/613,959 ContinuationInPart US7761361B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a combination option 
US11/613,954 ContinuationInPart US7739176B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of an earlylaunch option 
US11/613,941 ContinuationInPart US7747503B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US11/613,929 ContinuationInPart US7752113B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a multistage option 
US11/613,993 ContinuationInPart US7676413B2 (en)  20010710  20061220  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US13/487,965 Division US8645249B2 (en)  20030603  20120604  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
Publications (1)
Publication Number  Publication Date 

US20040249642A1 true US20040249642A1 (en)  20041209 
Family
ID=33489535
Family Applications (3)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US10/453,396 Abandoned US20040249642A1 (en)  20030603  20030603  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
US11/190,638 Active 20240930 US7725376B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US13/487,965 Active US8645249B2 (en)  20030603  20120604  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US11/190,638 Active 20240930 US7725376B2 (en)  20030603  20050727  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US13/487,965 Active US8645249B2 (en)  20030603  20120604  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
Country Status (5)
Country  Link 

US (3)  US20040249642A1 (en) 
EP (1)  EP1636667A4 (en) 
JP (1)  JP2007526529A (en) 
CN (1)  CN101410859A (en) 
WO (1)  WO2004111770A2 (en) 
Cited By (12)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US20030078870A1 (en) *  20010710  20030424  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation 
US20050262012A1 (en) *  20030603  20051124  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in a differentiated market 
US20050273415A1 (en) *  20030603  20051208  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US20050273379A1 (en) *  20030603  20051208  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
US20060184400A1 (en) *  20050217  20060817  Sabre Inc.  System and method for realtime pricing through advertising 
US20070112661A1 (en) *  20010710  20070517  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US20070150390A1 (en) *  20010710  20070628  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a multistage option 
US20070150391A1 (en) *  20010710  20070628  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of an earlylaunch option 
US20070150393A1 (en) *  20010710  20070628  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US20100042480A1 (en) *  20030603  20100218  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling costs and profitability of a good 
US8204775B2 (en)  20030603  20120619  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling a monetary measure for a good based upon technology maturity levels 
US8768812B2 (en)  20110502  20140701  The Boeing Company  System, method and computerreadable storage medium for valuing a performance option 
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US8311896B2 (en)  19990512  20121113  Ewinwin, Inc.  Multiple criteria buying and selling model 
US8626605B2 (en)  19990512  20140107  Ewinwin, Inc.  Multiple criteria buying and selling model 
US7693748B1 (en)  19910603  20100406  Ewinwin, Inc.  Method and system for configuring a set of information including a price and volume schedule for a product 
US8140402B1 (en)  20010806  20120320  Ewinwin, Inc.  Social pricing 
WO2000070424A2 (en)  19990512  20001123  Ewinwin, Inc.  Multiple criteria buying and selling model, and system for managing open offer sheets 
US8290824B1 (en)  19990512  20121016  Ewinwin, Inc.  Identifying incentives for a qualified buyer 
US8732018B2 (en)  19990512  20140520  Ewinwin, Inc.  Realtime offers and dynamic price adjustments presented to mobile devices 
US20110213648A1 (en)  19990512  20110901  Ewinwin, Inc.  eCOMMERCE VOLUME PRICING 
US7818212B1 (en)  19991022  20101019  Ewinwin, Inc.  Multiple criteria buying and selling model 
US7181419B1 (en)  20010913  20070220  Ewinwin, Inc.  Demand aggregation system 
US7899707B1 (en)  20020618  20110301  Ewinwin, Inc.  DAS predictive modeling and reporting function 
US7689463B1 (en)  20020828  20100330  Ewinwin, Inc.  Multiple supplier system and method for transacting business 
US7364086B2 (en)  20030616  20080429  Ewinwin, Inc.  Dynamic discount card tied to price curves and group discounts 
US8590785B1 (en)  20040615  20131126  Ewinwin, Inc.  Discounts in a mobile device 
US7593871B1 (en)  20040614  20090922  Ewinwin, Inc.  Multiple price curves and attributes 
US20080040231A1 (en)  20060810  20080214  Medcom Solutions, Inc.  System and method for uniformly pricing items 
US20100138273A1 (en) *  20081201  20100603  Arash Bateni  Repeatability index to enhance seasonal product forecasting 
US20110178839A1 (en) *  20100120  20110721  Adra Hosni I  Method and system for evaluating a consumer product based on websearchable criteria 
JP2012129979A (en) *  20101124  20120705  Jvc Kenwood Corp  Segment creation apparatus, segment creation method and segment creation program 
US20130166337A1 (en) *  20111226  20130627  John MacGregor  Analyzing visual representation of data 
US10176437B2 (en) *  20160429  20190108  International Business Machines Corporation  Method and apparatus to analytically support parts provision for hardware maintenance service 
Citations (33)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US5377095A (en) *  19910712  19941227  Hitachi, Ltd.  Merchandise analysis system with sales data table and various functions for predicting the sale by item 
US5692233A (en) *  19920528  19971125  Financial Engineering Associates, Inc.  Integrated system and method for analyzing derivative securities 
US5710578A (en) *  19871209  19980120  International Business Machines Corporation  Computer program product for utilizing fast polygon fill routines in a graphics display system 
US5960407A (en) *  19961008  19990928  Vivona; Robert G.  Automated market price analysis system 
US6061662A (en) *  19970815  20000509  Options Technology Company, Inc.  Simulation method and system for the valuation of derivative financial instruments 
US6078901A (en) *  19970403  20000620  Ching; Hugh  Quantitative supply and demand model based on infinite spreadsheet 
US6078893A (en) *  19980521  20000620  Khimetrics, Inc.  Method for stabilized tuning of demand models 
US6157918A (en) *  19950707  20001205  Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty Ltd.  Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of investment contracts 
US6205431B1 (en) *  19981029  20010320  Smart Software, Inc.  System and method for forecasting intermittent demand 
US20010041996A1 (en) *  19970106  20011115  Eder Jeffrey Scott  Method of and system for valuing elements of a business enterprise 
US6321205B1 (en) *  19951003  20011120  Value Miner, Inc.  Method of and system for modeling and analyzing business improvement programs 
US6321212B1 (en) *  19990721  20011120  Longitude, Inc.  Financial products having a demandbased, adjustable return, and trading exchange therefor 
US20020010667A1 (en) *  19970821  20020124  Elaine Kant  System and method for financial instrument modeling and using monte carlo simulation 
US6381586B1 (en) *  19981210  20020430  International Business Machines Corporation  Pricing of options using importance sampling and stratification/ QuasiMonte Carlo 
US6393406B1 (en) *  19951003  20020521  Value Mines, Inc.  Method of and system for valving elements of a business enterprise 
US20020116348A1 (en) *  20000519  20020822  Phillips Robert L.  Dynamic pricing system 
US20030014337A1 (en) *  20010710  20030116  Mathews Scott H.  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a generalized contingent claim valuation 
US20030115128A1 (en) *  19990721  20030619  Jeffrey Lange  Derivatives having demandbased, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor 
US6629082B1 (en) *  19990615  20030930  W.R. Hambrecht & Co.  Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation 
US20040068455A1 (en) *  20021003  20040408  Jacobus Greg C.  Graphical user interface for procurement risk management system 
US20040098327A1 (en) *  20021114  20040520  Seaman David A.  Contingent convertible securities instrument and method of providing, trading and using the same 
US6810332B2 (en) *  20030131  20041026  Chevron U.S.A. Inc.  Method for computing complexity, confidence and technical maturity indices for reservoir evaluations 
US6853952B2 (en) *  20030513  20050208  Pa Knowledge Limited  Method and systems of enhancing the effectiveness and success of research and development 
US6910017B1 (en) *  19990305  20050621  Profitlogic, Inc.  Inventory and price decision support 
US6963854B1 (en) *  19990305  20051108  Manugistics, Inc.  Target pricing system 
US7085734B2 (en) *  20010706  20060801  Grant D Graeme  Price decision support 
US7110956B1 (en) *  19960528  20060919  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Capability predictor 
US20070022031A1 (en) *  20050719  20070125  Real Estate Equity Exchange Cayman, Inc.  Transfering financial interest 
US20070050282A1 (en) *  20050825  20070301  Sas Institute Inc.  Financial risk mitigation optimization systems and methods 
US7197474B1 (en) *  20010712  20070327  Vignette Corporation  Method of modeling product demand subject to a large number of interactions 
US7315842B1 (en) *  20010806  20080101  Wang Shaun S  Computer system and method for pricing financial and insurance risks with historicallyknown or computergenerated probability distributions 
US7349878B1 (en) *  19960816  20080325  Options Technology Company, Inc.  Simulation method and system for the valuation of derivative financial instruments 
US7398221B1 (en) *  20010330  20080708  Rapt, Inc.  Method and apparatus for component plan analysis under uncertainty 
Family Cites Families (36)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US8126794B2 (en)  19990721  20120228  Longitude Llc  Replicated derivatives having demandbased, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor 
US7552076B1 (en)  19990827  20090623  Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba  System for evaluating price risk of financial product or its financial derivative, dealing system and recorded medium 
JP2001357189A (en)  20000614  20011226  Nomura Securities Co Ltd  Decisionmaking support device for market participation 
WO2002003225A2 (en)  20000615  20020110  Xis Incorporated  Method and system for product lifecycle management 
WO2002001442A1 (en) *  20000627  20020103  Kbmj Inc.  Information supply system 
AU1161902A (en)  20001006  20020415  I2 Technologies Inc  Generating an optimized price schedule for a product 
US20040236673A1 (en)  20001017  20041125  Eder Jeff Scott  Collaborative risk transfer system 
US20020143604A1 (en)  20010202  20021003  Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation  Method for forecasting the effects of trade policies and supply and demand conditions on the world dairy sector 
US7739176B2 (en)  20010710  20100615  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of an earlylaunch option 
US7747504B2 (en)  20010710  20100629  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US7752113B2 (en)  20010710  20100706  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a multistage option 
US7676412B2 (en)  20010710  20100309  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US7676413B2 (en)  20010710  20100309  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US7698189B2 (en)  20010710  20100413  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US7761361B2 (en)  20010710  20100720  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a combination option 
US7747503B2 (en)  20010710  20100629  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US20030144897A1 (en)  20020130  20030731  Burruss James W.  Finite life cycle demand forecasting 
US20080015871A1 (en)  20020418  20080117  Jeff Scott Eder  Varr system 
US20040128221A1 (en)  20021209  20040701  Pandher Gurupdesh S.  Option valuation method and apparatus 
US7627494B2 (en)  20030603  20091201  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling a monetary measure for a good based upon technology maturity levels 
US7627495B2 (en)  20030603  20091201  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
US20040249642A1 (en)  20030603  20041209  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
US20050102213A1 (en)  20031107  20050512  Serkan Savasoglu  Systems and methods for accreting remarketable convertible securities 
US7346485B2 (en)  20031111  20080318  The Boeing Company  Modeling an event using linked component modules provided in a spreadsheet environment 
US20050125318A1 (en)  20031129  20050609  Joel Jameson  Methods and systems for accurately representing corporate financial results in light of equitybased compensation and contingent transactions 
US20070299753A1 (en)  20031219  20071227  Michael Averbuch  Participatory equity appreciation contract ("PEAC") 
US20090043683A1 (en)  20050204  20090212  Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware  Virtual world reversion rights 
US8566111B2 (en)  20050204  20131022  The Invention Science Fund I, Llc  Disposition of component virtual property rights 
US7574394B2 (en)  20050216  20090811  Sri, Inc.  Systems and methods for implementing the structuring, pricing, quotation, and trading of financial instruments 
US20060253355A1 (en)  20050504  20061109  Chicago Board Options Exchange  System and method for creating and trading a digital derivative investment instrument 
US20070011065A1 (en)  20050707  20070111  Santosh Sreenivasan  Method and system for prefunding with merger call flexibility 
US7937314B2 (en)  20051021  20110503  The Invention Science Fund I  Disposition of component virtual property rights 
US20080109341A1 (en)  20051103  20080508  Genworth Financial Inc.  System and Method For Providing A Deferred Premium Annuity 
US20080167984A1 (en)  20070105  20080710  Matthew Courey  Zero recovery credit default swap indices 
US20090030822A1 (en)  20070312  20090129  Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.  System and Method for Contingent Equity Return Forward to Hedge Foreign Exchange Risk in Investments Having Varying Exit Parameters 
US7801804B2 (en)  20071010  20100921  The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University  Convex parimutuel contingent claim market mechanism 

2003
 20030603 US US10/453,396 patent/US20040249642A1/en not_active Abandoned

2004
 20040601 JP JP2006515063A patent/JP2007526529A/en active Pending
 20040601 WO PCT/US2004/017258 patent/WO2004111770A2/en active Application Filing
 20040601 CN CN 200480019992 patent/CN101410859A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
 20040601 EP EP04753973A patent/EP1636667A4/en not_active Withdrawn

2005
 20050727 US US11/190,638 patent/US7725376B2/en active Active

2012
 20120604 US US13/487,965 patent/US8645249B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (36)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US5710578A (en) *  19871209  19980120  International Business Machines Corporation  Computer program product for utilizing fast polygon fill routines in a graphics display system 
US5377095A (en) *  19910712  19941227  Hitachi, Ltd.  Merchandise analysis system with sales data table and various functions for predicting the sale by item 
US5692233A (en) *  19920528  19971125  Financial Engineering Associates, Inc.  Integrated system and method for analyzing derivative securities 
US6157918A (en) *  19950707  20001205  Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty Ltd.  Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of investment contracts 
US6393406B1 (en) *  19951003  20020521  Value Mines, Inc.  Method of and system for valving elements of a business enterprise 
US6321205B1 (en) *  19951003  20011120  Value Miner, Inc.  Method of and system for modeling and analyzing business improvement programs 
US7110956B1 (en) *  19960528  20060919  Texas Instruments Incorporated  Capability predictor 
US7349878B1 (en) *  19960816  20080325  Options Technology Company, Inc.  Simulation method and system for the valuation of derivative financial instruments 
US5960407A (en) *  19961008  19990928  Vivona; Robert G.  Automated market price analysis system 
US20010041996A1 (en) *  19970106  20011115  Eder Jeffrey Scott  Method of and system for valuing elements of a business enterprise 
US6078901A (en) *  19970403  20000620  Ching; Hugh  Quantitative supply and demand model based on infinite spreadsheet 
US6061662A (en) *  19970815  20000509  Options Technology Company, Inc.  Simulation method and system for the valuation of derivative financial instruments 
US20020010667A1 (en) *  19970821  20020124  Elaine Kant  System and method for financial instrument modeling and using monte carlo simulation 
US6078893A (en) *  19980521  20000620  Khimetrics, Inc.  Method for stabilized tuning of demand models 
US6205431B1 (en) *  19981029  20010320  Smart Software, Inc.  System and method for forecasting intermittent demand 
US6381586B1 (en) *  19981210  20020430  International Business Machines Corporation  Pricing of options using importance sampling and stratification/ QuasiMonte Carlo 
US6910017B1 (en) *  19990305  20050621  Profitlogic, Inc.  Inventory and price decision support 
US6963854B1 (en) *  19990305  20051108  Manugistics, Inc.  Target pricing system 
US6629082B1 (en) *  19990615  20030930  W.R. Hambrecht & Co.  Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation 
US6321212B1 (en) *  19990721  20011120  Longitude, Inc.  Financial products having a demandbased, adjustable return, and trading exchange therefor 
US20030115128A1 (en) *  19990721  20030619  Jeffrey Lange  Derivatives having demandbased, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor 
US20020116348A1 (en) *  20000519  20020822  Phillips Robert L.  Dynamic pricing system 
US7133848B2 (en) *  20000519  20061107  Manugistics Inc.  Dynamic pricing system 
US7398221B1 (en) *  20010330  20080708  Rapt, Inc.  Method and apparatus for component plan analysis under uncertainty 
US7085734B2 (en) *  20010706  20060801  Grant D Graeme  Price decision support 
US6862579B2 (en) *  20010710  20050301  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a generalized contingent claim valuation 
US20030078870A1 (en) *  20010710  20030424  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation 
US20030014337A1 (en) *  20010710  20030116  Mathews Scott H.  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a generalized contingent claim valuation 
US7197474B1 (en) *  20010712  20070327  Vignette Corporation  Method of modeling product demand subject to a large number of interactions 
US7315842B1 (en) *  20010806  20080101  Wang Shaun S  Computer system and method for pricing financial and insurance risks with historicallyknown or computergenerated probability distributions 
US20040068455A1 (en) *  20021003  20040408  Jacobus Greg C.  Graphical user interface for procurement risk management system 
US20040098327A1 (en) *  20021114  20040520  Seaman David A.  Contingent convertible securities instrument and method of providing, trading and using the same 
US6810332B2 (en) *  20030131  20041026  Chevron U.S.A. Inc.  Method for computing complexity, confidence and technical maturity indices for reservoir evaluations 
US6853952B2 (en) *  20030513  20050208  Pa Knowledge Limited  Method and systems of enhancing the effectiveness and success of research and development 
US20070022031A1 (en) *  20050719  20070125  Real Estate Equity Exchange Cayman, Inc.  Transfering financial interest 
US20070050282A1 (en) *  20050825  20070301  Sas Institute Inc.  Financial risk mitigation optimization systems and methods 
Cited By (26)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US7676416B2 (en) *  20010710  20100309  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation 
US8204814B2 (en)  20010710  20120619  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation 
US7752113B2 (en)  20010710  20100706  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a multistage option 
US7747504B2 (en)  20010710  20100629  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US7747503B2 (en)  20010710  20100629  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US20070112661A1 (en) *  20010710  20070517  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US20070150390A1 (en) *  20010710  20070628  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of a multistage option 
US20070150391A1 (en) *  20010710  20070628  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of an earlylaunch option 
US20070150393A1 (en) *  20010710  20070628  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for determining a minimum asset value for exercising a contingent claim of an option 
US7739176B2 (en)  20010710  20100615  The Boeing Company  System, method and computer program product for performing a contingent claim valuation of an earlylaunch option 
US20100131401A1 (en) *  20010710  20100527  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation 
US20030078870A1 (en) *  20010710  20030424  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for performing a contingent claim valuation 
US7725376B2 (en)  20030603  20100525  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US20100042479A1 (en) *  20030603  20100218  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling costs and profitability of a good 
US7739166B2 (en)  20030603  20100615  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in a differentiated market 
US20100042480A1 (en) *  20030603  20100218  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling costs and profitability of a good 
US8645249B2 (en)  20030603  20140204  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future benefits 
US20050273379A1 (en) *  20030603  20051208  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
US20050273415A1 (en) *  20030603  20051208  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in an aggregate market 
US7769628B2 (en)  20030603  20100803  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling uncertain future demand, supply and associated profitability of a good 
US8099319B2 (en)  20030603  20120117  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling costs and profitability of a good 
US8204775B2 (en)  20030603  20120619  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling a monetary measure for a good based upon technology maturity levels 
US20050262012A1 (en) *  20030603  20051124  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling demand, supply and associated profitability of a good in a differentiated market 
US8265982B2 (en)  20030603  20120911  The Boeing Company  Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling costs and profitability of a good 
US20060184400A1 (en) *  20050217  20060817  Sabre Inc.  System and method for realtime pricing through advertising 
US8768812B2 (en)  20110502  20140701  The Boeing Company  System, method and computerreadable storage medium for valuing a performance option 
Also Published As
Publication number  Publication date 

US7725376B2 (en)  20100525 
US20050273415A1 (en)  20051208 
EP1636667A4 (en)  20100707 
CN101410859A (en)  20090415 
WO2004111770A2 (en)  20041223 
WO2004111770A3 (en)  20090416 
US20120245977A1 (en)  20120927 
JP2007526529A (en)  20070913 
EP1636667A2 (en)  20060322 
US8645249B2 (en)  20140204 
Similar Documents
Publication  Publication Date  Title 

Schwartz et al.  Real options and investment under uncertainty: classical readings and recent contributions  
Herroelen et al.  Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments  
US8412621B2 (en)  System and method for estimating and optimizing transaction costs  
US8606688B2 (en)  System and method of implementing massive early terminations of long term financial contracts  
US7693748B1 (en)  Method and system for configuring a set of information including a price and volume schedule for a product  
Mak et al.  Using risk analysis to determine construction project contingencies  
US7337137B2 (en)  Investment portfolio optimization system, method and computer program product  
US8600854B2 (en)  Method and system for evaluating customers of a financial institution using customer relationship value tags  
US7899725B2 (en)  Enhanced business reporting methodology  
US6912510B1 (en)  Methods of exchanging an obligation  
US8185486B2 (en)  Segmented predictive model system  
US7930195B2 (en)  Strategic management and budgeting tools  
US8200557B2 (en)  Systems and methods for providing migration and performance matrices  
Yeo et al.  The value of management flexibility—a real option approach to investment evaluation  
JP4557933B2 (en)  System and method for providing financial planning and advice  
US7873567B2 (en)  Value and risk management system  
US7991675B2 (en)  Method and system for financial advising  
Sullivan et al.  Software design as an investment activity: a real options perspective  
US20080154792A1 (en)  User interface for a financial advisory system  
US5884287A (en)  System and method for generating and displaying risk and return in an investment portfolio  
US20160239919A1 (en)  Predictive model development system applied to organization management  
US7398240B2 (en)  Future valve analytics  
US20080015871A1 (en)  Varr system  
US20110173050A1 (en)  Strategic Planning And Valuation  
US7693733B2 (en)  Method of and system for analyzing, modeling and valuing elements of a business enterprise 
Legal Events
Date  Code  Title  Description 

AS  Assignment 
Owner name: BOEING COMPANY, THE, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MATHEWS, SCOTT H.;DATAR, VINAY T.;FORGIE, CHRISTOPHER A.;REEL/FRAME:014147/0802;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030509 TO 20030519 

STCB  Information on status: application discontinuation 
Free format text: ABANDONED  AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION 