US20040101098A1 - Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040101098A1 US20040101098A1 US10/717,360 US71736003A US2004101098A1 US 20040101098 A1 US20040101098 A1 US 20040101098A1 US 71736003 A US71736003 A US 71736003A US 2004101098 A1 US2004101098 A1 US 2004101098A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- information
- prescanner
- scanner
- scan
- ray
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 238000002591 computed tomography Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 101
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 abstract description 55
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 55
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- YLJREFDVOIBQDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N tacrine Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(N)=C(CCCC3)C3=NC2=C1 YLJREFDVOIBQDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001685 tacrine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
- G01N23/06—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption
- G01N23/083—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption the radiation being X-rays
- G01N23/087—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption the radiation being X-rays using polyenergetic X-rays
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
- G01N23/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
- G01N23/046—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material using tomography, e.g. computed tomography [CT]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V5/00—Prospecting or detecting by the use of ionising radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity
- G01V5/20—Detecting prohibited goods, e.g. weapons, explosives, hazardous substances, contraband or smuggled objects
- G01V5/22—Active interrogation, i.e. by irradiating objects or goods using external radiation sources, e.g. using gamma rays or cosmic rays
- G01V5/224—Multiple energy techniques using one type of radiation, e.g. X-rays of different energies
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V5/00—Prospecting or detecting by the use of ionising radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity
- G01V5/20—Detecting prohibited goods, e.g. weapons, explosives, hazardous substances, contraband or smuggled objects
- G01V5/22—Active interrogation, i.e. by irradiating objects or goods using external radiation sources, e.g. using gamma rays or cosmic rays
- G01V5/226—Active interrogation, i.e. by irradiating objects or goods using external radiation sources, e.g. using gamma rays or cosmic rays using tomography
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
- G01N2223/40—Imaging
- G01N2223/402—Imaging mapping distribution of elements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
- G01N2223/40—Imaging
- G01N2223/419—Imaging computed tomograph
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
- G01N2223/40—Imaging
- G01N2223/421—Imaging digitised image, analysed in real time (recognition algorithms)
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to the field of X-ray detection systems.
- One embodiment of the invention is directed to a method or apparatus for analyzing an object in which a dual energy X-ray prescanner performs a prescan of the object to determine prescan information about the object. Then, a CT scanner performs a CT scan on at least one plane of the object based on the prescan information. If the CT scan of the object includes or is in the vicinity of metal, then metal artifact correction of a reconstructed image from the CT scan may be performed using the prescan and CT scan information.
- Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method or apparatus for analyzing an object in which a prescanner, which need not be a dual energy prescanner, performs a prescan of the object to determine prescan information. Then, a CT scanner performs a CT scan of the object to determine CT information. A processor analyzes the CT information and the prescan information to determine whether to update the prescan information based on the CT information.
- CT scanner While the description and claims herein recite use of a CT scanner, such term is intended to cover any device that measures at least density of an object scanned by the device.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus for transmitting information from a prescanner device to a CT scanner device according to one embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an apparatus for transmitting information from a CT scanner device to a prescanner device according to one embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus for transmitting information between a CT scanner device and a prescanner device according to one embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for transmitting information between a CT scanner device and a prescanner device according to one embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a grid for performing CT scans at intervals
- FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating reference coordinates for a scanned item.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for obtaining a CT image and predicting and correcting metal artifacts of the CT image according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the present invention relates to a system or method in which a prescanner X-ray device and a downstream (of the prescanner) computed tomography (CT) device scan an object.
- the object may be located within a piece of baggage, a manufactured product, the human body, or some other item penetrable by X-rays.
- Information collected on the object may be transmitted from the prescanner to the CT scanner and/or from the CT scanner to the prescanner.
- FIG. 1 One embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 1, is directed to a method and apparatus for transmitting information from a prescanner device 1 to a downstream CT scanner device 3 . This can be accomplished in any of numerous ways, and the present invention is not limited to any particular one of such ways.
- information from prescanner device 1 is transmitted from prescanner device 1 to a processor 5 via a data link 7 .
- Data link 7 and any other data link described herein, is not limited to any particular type of link and may be implemented using any suitable means for transmitting information, such as an Ethernet link.
- Processor 5 may process the information transmitted from the prescanner device, and transmit the processed information, or a control signal with instructions based on the processed information, to CT scanner device 3 via a data link 9 .
- Processor 5 may be located external or internal to CT scanner device.
- FIG. 1 illustrates both a direct communication link, such as data link 11 , and an indirect communication link via a processor, such as data links 7 and 9 , both communications links are not required.
- Prescanner device 1 may be any of numerous multiple energy X-ray devices.
- prescanner device 1 may be a single or multi-view dual energy line scanning X-ray device, a dual energy CT scanner device, or any other device capable of measuring effective atomic number characteristics of an object, the significance of which will be appreciated from the forthcoming discussion.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,838,758 (Krug), which is hereby incorporated by reference, teaches dual energy X-ray inspection systems, any of which may be employed as the prescanner device according to an embodiment of the invention.
- CT scanner device 3 may be any of numerous devices for performing computed tomography or, more generally, may be any device capable of measuring density characteristics of an object.
- Prescanner device 1 and CT scanner device 3 may be implemented as separate units, as shown in FIG. 1, or as a single unit having both prescanning and CT scanning functionalities.
- Target objects may include, but are not limited to, concealed objects (e.g., explosive devices or other weapons) inside a container (e.g., baggage), defects (e.g., cracks, air bubbles, or impurities) in articles of manufacture (e.g., commercial products), and areas of interest (e.g., tumors or other masses, including masses located near bone, metal, or another high-density material from which artifacts may result) within the body.
- concealed objects e.g., explosive devices or other weapons
- defects e.g., cracks, air bubbles, or impurities
- articles of manufacture e.g., commercial products
- areas of interest e.g., tumors or other masses, including masses located near bone, metal, or another high-density material from which artifacts may result
- the invention described herein may be used, for example, in settings such as airports, manufacturing plants, and hospitals, and other settings in the travel, commercial, and medical industries.
- I x is the intensity of the X-ray radiation after passing through a material
- I 0 is the intensity of the X-ray radiation before passing through a material
- ⁇ / ⁇ is the mass attenuation coefficient
- x is obtained by multiplying the thickness of the material by its density.
- prescanner device 1 performs an initial scan of an item, and CT scanner device 3 then may perform a subsequent scan of one or more areas of interest within the item, which are determined based on the initial scan.
- Prescanner device 1 may “feedforward” information relating to possible target object areas determined during the initial prescan to the CT scanner device 3 so that CT scanner device 3 scans only those slices that are located in regions where target objects may exist.
- This method reduces the number of slices necessary to be taken by the CT scanner, including the number of slices taken through metal, to detect a target object and increases the accuracy with which target objects are detected.
- a CT scanner device employed alone to scan an item performs CT scans of planes (or “slices”) of the item and provides information on the three dimensional spatial configurations of objects therein. While this technique is useful in identifying target objects within the scanned item, each CT scan is time consuming and has a limited image quality. Numerous of these time-consuming scans are required to ensure no target area is missed.
- prescanner device 1 upstream of the CT scanner, according to one embodiment of the present invention, possible target objects and their two-dimensional locations are determined in a quick (relative to a CT scan) prescan.
- a significant advantage lies in reducing the number of slices, and thereby reducing the scan time, for an item.
- the feeding forward of information from prescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 may increase the accuracy of the CT scan images.
- the fedforward information can be used to perform metal artifact correction, thereby increasing the accuracy of any reconstructed image from the CT scan and ability to detect target objects.
- FIG. 2 Another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 2, is directed to a method or apparatus for transmitting information from CT scanner device 3 to prescanner device 1 .
- information relating to a potential target object scanned by CT scanner device 3 is transmitted (“fedback”) to a processor to determine whether to update information collected by prescanner device 1 relating to the potential target object.
- information collected by the prescanner device relating to the effective atomic number and mass of a potential target object, may be inaccurate for areas of the scan where the potential target object overlaps with another object or objects.
- a CT scan of a region including the potential target object by obtaining density information through scans of slices in different orientations, can distinguish the potential target object from background objects, and thereby determine the precise boundaries of the target object.
- This fedback information is analyzed by the processor to determine whether to update and improve the accuracy of the information (e.g., effective atomic number and mass) collected by prescanner device 1 .
- the processor is located internal to prescanner device 1 , and information from CT scanner device 3 is transmitted to the processor in prescanner device 1 .
- the information may be transmitted in any of numerous ways, and the present invention is not limited to any particular one of such ways.
- information from CT scanner device 3 may be transmitted from CT scanner device 3 to a processor 5 via data link 11 .
- Processor 5 may process the information transmitted from CT scanner device 3 , and transmit the processed information to prescanner device 1 via a data link 13 .
- information may be transmitted directly from CT scanner device 3 to prescanner device 1 via a data link 15 .
- the information from CT scanner device 3 is not transmitted to prescanner device 1 , but rather is transmitted to a processor located external to prescanner device 1 .
- information may be transmitted to a processor located in CT scanner device 3 or to a processor in an external computing system.
- FIG. 3 Another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 3, is directed to transmitting information from prescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 , referred to as the “feedforward mode”, and from CT scanner device 3 to prescanner device 1 , referred to as the “feedbackwards mode.”
- This embodiment combines the embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2, above.
- information relating to a two-dimensional location of a potential target object is transferred from prescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 (or a processor coupled to CT scanner 3 ) to determine locations for CT slices to be performed, thereby reducing the CT scan time.
- prescanner device 1 information relating to the effective atomic number and mass of potential target objects is transferred from prescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 (or a processor coupled to CT scanner 3 ) to increase the accuracy of the CT images, particularly for those slices that are in the vicinity of metal.
- density information collected by CT scanner device 3 is transmitted to prescanner 1 (or a processor coupled to prescanner 1 ) to enable the prescanner to update and improve the accuracy of the effective atomic number and mass information collected by prescanner device 1 .
- information from prescanner device 1 is transmitted to CT scanner device 3 via data link 17
- information from CT scanner device 3 is transmitted to prescanner device 1 via a data link 19
- Data link 17 and data link 19 may be separate data paths or may be implemented as a single data path, such that information is transmitted for both of the data links via a single medium.
- data link 17 and data link 19 may be direct links or may pass through another device, such as a processor.
- Data processing may occur in an external processor, or may occur internal to each of prescanner device 1 and CT scanner device 3 .
- prescanner device 1 and CT scanner device 3 are illustrated separately in FIG. 3, it is not necessary that each be implemented as a separate unit. Rather, prescanner device 1 and CT scanner device 3 may be implemented as a single unit having both prescanning and CT scanning functionalities.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram according to one embodiment in which information may be transmitted from prescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 in the feedforward mode, and from CT scanner device 3 to prescanner device 1 in the feedbackwards mode. It should be appreciated that, as discussed above, the feedforward and feedbackwards modes need not be implemented in the same screening system and that each may be implemented independently in a separate system.
- the flow diagram of FIG. 4 shows both information (i.e., data) flow (in phantom lines) and process flow (in solid lines).
- an item e.g., an article of baggage
- the item is scanned and analyzed using the prescanner device 1 .
- the prescanner device 1 may be a line scanner, such as one of the VIS series offered by PerkinElmer Detection Systems, the assignee herein.
- the item is initially loaded into the prescanner device 1 for scanning. For example, a human operator may place the item on a conveyor which, with the aid of a motion controller, moves the item through prescanner device 1 .
- prescanner device 1 has at least two X-ray sources for generating X-ray beams and may have one or more X-ray detectors for receiving X-ray beams.
- the X-ray image resulting from the scan consists of a two-dimensional array of pixels representing a view of the three-dimensional item from one angle.
- a processor either internal or external to prescanner device 1 , calculates the attenuation of the generated X-rays penetrating the item for each pixel.
- alternate pulses of high energy X-rays e.g., 150 kV
- low energy X-rays e.g., 75 kV
- the processor calculates the attenuation for each pixel of the image resulting from the respective high energy and low energy beams.
- a table (Table A) is generated containing atomic number and mass characteristics for each object.
- Table A may be stored electronically by a memory (not shown) coupled to a processor. Both the processor and the memory may be either internal or external to prescanner device 1 .
- An object may be defined as any region having similar atomic number and mass characteristics.
- the calculated attenuation of the high energy and low energy beam pulses for each pixel of the scanned item are used to determine the effective atomic number of all objects. To derive the effective atomic number of each object based on the attenuation, the attenuation of X-rays at each different energy level is analyzed. One method for doing so is described in U.S. Pat. No.
- the effective atomic number of each object may be determined by analyzing the attenuation of low and high energy X-rays by each pixel. To determine the effective atomic number for a particular object, all pixels within the object are compared to pixels surrounding the object and a histogram is created, where the mode (peak of the histogram) represents the effective atomic number.
- Table A may also contain mass information for each object.
- the mass for each pixel may also be determined based on the X-ray attenuation of both the high and low energy X-rays.
- the relationship between X-ray attenuation and material mass (i.e., thickness) is logarithmic; X-ray radiation decreases logarithmically as the material thickness increases.
- mass may be estimated by analyzing the attenuation of X-rays of all energies by materials within an item. To determine the mass for a particular object, mass values for all pixels within an object are added.
- Table A also contains confidence values for the effective atomic number and mass values for each object. Confidence values for the effective atomic number and mass values represent a probability or range of probabilities that the atomic number and mass data are correct. To determine a confidence level for the effective atomic number value or mass value of a particular object, a feature vector denoting properties such as compactness, connectiveness, gradients, histogram spread and other features may be used.
- Machine vision technology includes: (1) segmenting a group of picture elements from their background, (2) describing that group of picture elements by a set of features, and (3) using the resulting feature vector to classify the picture elements.
- a target object such as an explosive
- a particular range of mass values will be characteristic of a target object.
- a list of objects warranting further study i.e., objects of interest
- the atomic number characteristics of Table A can be used to differentiate potential target objects from the background, since different objects will generally have different effective atomic numbers.
- a potential target object may comprise a collection of pixels in close proximity having atomic number values that fall within a certain range.
- a weapon or explosive may comprise a collection of pixels having high effective atomic number values that fall within a particular range.
- two-dimensional coordinates e.g., x 1 -x 2 , z 1 -z 2 in FIG. 6
- a CT scan of the object or region of interest may be performed.
- Locations of slices i.e., two-dimensional planes
- Some target objects such as explosives, are typically found near metal objects (e.g., wires, batteries).
- Metal due in part to its high density, may cause artifacts in an image in the region surrounding the metal.
- a potential target object is located near metal, it is preferable to choose a slice that includes the target object, but that is not in the vicinity of the metal.
- a metal artifact correction is performed to correct for the image artifacts, as will be described in step 35 .
- step 25 If, after step 25 , there are no objects warranting further study, a decision may be made as to an appropriate course of action, based on the prescan information (FIG. 4, step 27 ). For example, an operator of an X-ray system in an airport may decide to return the baggage to the passenger, search the baggage by hand, or call the bomb squad. Alternatively, an algorithm may be used to automatically determine an appropriate course of action.
- the item e.g., baggage
- the item may or may not be transferred to the CT scanner device.
- the item may be transferred to the CT scanner device when no objects warranting further study have been detected so that undetected objects (e.g., sheet explosives) may be screened for.
- step 31 CT images are generated for the item cross-sections identified in step 25 , if any.
- a finely collimated beam of radiation is passed through the item in the desired slice plane, and the attenuation is measured.
- the process is repeated and a set of projections is acquired as the X-ray beam is passed through the object at different angles.
- a reconstructed image of the two-dimensional distribution of the linear attenuation coefficient, ⁇ (x,y) may be obtained from these projections.
- the result would be a continuous set of projections. Displayed as a two-dimensional function, the continuous set of projections is referred to as the sinogram.
- An image may be reconstructed from the sinogram by implementing any of a number of well-known reconstruction techniques including, but not limited to, back projection, iteration, Fourier transform, and filtered back projection.
- a CT image of a slice results in a two-dimensional image of a cross-sectional plane of the scanned item.
- the image consists of an array of pixels (e.g., 900 pixels ⁇ 512 pixels).
- CT scanner device 3 performs scans at locations along a grid 61 , such that slices are imaged at predetermined intervals 63 a - c along the length of the item. For example, an article of baggage may be imaged every distance x along its length.
- a first slice 65 is imaged at z 1 cm
- the imaging points on the grid coincide with the objects warranting further study identified in step 25 .
- the first and third slices in FIG. 5 intersect objects 71 a,b . If not all objects of interest are accommodated by the grid, additional slices may be taken. Further, the grid is preferably positioned to avoid taking slices of metal objects, for the reasons discussed previously.
- step 33 it is determined whether any imaged object of interest is in the vicinity of a metal object. Additionally, it may be determined whether the image of the object of interest is likely to be distorted by metal artifacts caused by the metal object. For example, although a metal object is in close proximity to the object of interest, it may be determined that the size of the metal object relative to the object of interest renders it unlikely that the metal object will have a significant negative effect on the image of the object of interest (e.g., if the metal object is much smaller than the object of interest).
- a metal artifact correction is performed on the slice containing the metal artifacts, according to one aspect (feedforward mode) of the invention described herein.
- step 33 If it is determined in step 33 that a potential target object is in the vicinity of a metal object, information fed forward from the prescanner device is used to predict the type and shape of metal responsible for the metal artifacts in step 35 .
- the mass information and effective atomic number information from Table A are used to identify the metal type and perform a metal artifact correction specific to the type and shape of the metal.
- the metal artifact correction algorithm is described in detail below in connection with FIG. 7.
- the scanned CT images are analyzed.
- the density, area, and three-dimensional coordinates are determined for each target object, for example using image processing algorithms (e.g., region growing).
- the area of each target object is specified by a range of two-dimensional (e.g., x 1 -x 2 , y 1 -y 2 in FIG. 6) coordinates that delimit a region where the density of each pixel falls within a certain range.
- a confidence level is determined for the density and area values associated with each pixel. Each confidence level represents a probability that the density or area data corresponding to that pixel is correct.
- a table (Table B) is generated containing the density, area, and three-dimensional coordinates for each target object, and a confidence level for each characteristic of each target object.
- Table B may be stored electronically by a memory (not shown) coupled to a processor and may, along with or separate from the processor, be either internal or external to CT scanner device 3 .
- the three-dimensional coordinates for each target object are transmitted (“fed back”) to prescanner device 1 in step 41 .
- this information from Table B may be used to augment Table A.
- the processor coupled to the memory that stores Table A, considers the fedback information and the information in Table A in determining whether to update any of the information in Table A.
- prescanner device 1 images the item from only one view, the prescanner device may not be able to discern whether an identified object is a single object or a plurality of objects, as objects that overlap when imaged from a particular perspective may appear as a single merged object. If the prescanner device cannot differentiate a plurality of overlapping objects, it may determine a mass value for an object that is actually the mass values of two or more objects combined.
- the three-dimensional coordinate information provided in Table B can be used to differentiate objects, and thereby correct erroneous effective atomic number values and mass values of Table A. If the mass of an object changes, the object may no longer be of interest or, conversely, may become interesting.
- the mass value will be erroneously high, and may fall within the range corresponding to a target object.
- the individual objects may no longer be of interest if the mass value falls below a minimum mass associated with potential target objects.
- the information fedback from Table B by the CT scanner device allows for more accurate determinations of the effective atomic number and mass of each object, as listed in Table A, by the prescanner device.
- superior detection by the prescanner device and a lower false alarm rate may be achieved by feeding back information from the CT scanner device to the prescanner device.
- multiple feedforward/feedbackwards loops are possible, whereby information generated by the prescanner device 1 and CT scanner device 3 is alternately transmitted between the two devices.
- the information from Table B need not be transmitted to the prescanner device. Rather, the CT scanner device or an external computer may implement an algorithm, similar to that which may be implemented by the prescanner, to augment Table A based on the Table B information.
- step 27 a decision is made based on the information in Tables A and B as to an appropriate course of action.
- possible actions include returning the baggage to the passenger, searching the baggage by hand, or calling the bomb squad.
- An algorithm may be used to synthesize the information of the two tables to determine an appropriate action.
- the algorithm may consider the effective atomic number, density, and associated confidence levels for each, as well as the thickness of the potential target object and the proximity of the potential target object to metal. Based on the information, a likelihood is determined that an identified object is a target object.
- The-likelihood is derived from a histogram representing, for example, the probability that an object having a given effective atomic number, density, thickness, mass, and proximity to metal is a target object, and may be represented as a probability that the object is a target object or as an absolute indication that the object is/is not a target object. It should be appreciated that any of the automated decisions or actions described above may alternatively be performed by a human operator.
- FIG. 7 illustrates by flow diagram a method for obtaining a CT image and predicting and correcting metal artifacts of the CT image, most steps of which, as illustrated, correspond to step 35 described above in connection with FIG. 4.
- the flow diagram of FIG. 7 shows both information (i.e., data) flow (in phantom lines) and process flow (in solid lines).
- a CT image is generated.
- Uncorrected CT images may contain metal artifacts when a scan is performed within a certain proximity to metal, which may result in inaccuracies.
- beam hardening artifacts cause inaccuracies in the estimation of attenuation coefficients for pixels associated with x-rays that traverse highly attenuating structures.
- Streaky shadows or star patterns of streaks may result near high density objects in regions of pixels where essentially no attenuation information exists.
- Scatter artifacts may result from the dispersion of X-ray photons by the atoms within the item, and may cause noise in the CT image.
- step 45 the image is clipped so that the image contains only the metal that accounts for the artifacts of the image.
- the region to be clipped is identified by considering the effective atomic number information of Table A. Each pixel in the image of the metal will have an effective atomic number that falls within a range corresponding to the effective atomic number of the metal.
- the clipped image contains only the image of the metal, and does not contain the object of interest or artifacts.
- step 47 the type of metal and thickness of the metal in the image are identified based on the information in Table A.
- the effective atomic number information of Table A is used to identify the type of metal and the mass information of Table A is used to determine the thickness of the metal.
- a sinogram of the clipped image is generated in step 49 .
- a single sinogram contains the information about a particular slice from all angles, with the information from each angle in its own row.
- a table (Table C) is generated that contains beam hardening, noise, and scatter correction parameters.
- the correction parameters are determined according to algorithms well-known in the art for compensating for beam hardening, noise, and scatter, based on the type and thickness of metal responsible for the artifacts.
- step 53 artifacts are introduced into the sinogram of the clipped image using the table (Table C) generated in step 51 .
- the sinogram is corrupted using beam hardening and scatter effects based on the shape and type of the metal responsible for the artifacts, determined in step 47 .
- the sinogram of the image of the metal and artifacts is reconstructed in step 55 .
- step 57 the reconstructed artifact image generated in step 55 is subtracted from the sum of the original CT image generated in step 43 and the clipped image generated in step 45 .
- the result of the image subtraction is a metal artifact corrected image 59 .
- the image will result in a more accurate determination as to whether the object of interest represents a target object.
- the artifact image may also used as a map for determining whether the CT values read in the image are accurate.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Pulmonology (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
Abstract
A method or apparatus for analyzing an object includes an X-ray prescanner that performs a prescan of the object to determine prescan information about the object. Then, a CT scanner performs a CT scan on at least one plane of the object based on the prescan information to determine CT information. In one embodiment, if the CT scan of the object includes or is in the vicinity of metal, then metal artifact correction of a reconstructed image from the CT scan is performed based on the prescan information. In another embodiment, a processor analyzes the CT information and the prescan information to determine whether to update the prescan information based on the CT information
Description
- The present invention is directed to the field of X-ray detection systems.
- There exists a need for improved systems and methods of screening baggage for explosives, weapons, and other contraband. Some existing systems employ X-ray scanners, computed tomography (CT) scanners, or other imaging devices to detect concealed objects. In some such systems, a CT scanner is preceded by an X-ray scanner, which performs a “prescanning” function to determine initial information on the contents of an article of baggage. Existing X-ray based systems provide differing degrees of sophistication in terms of their ability to analyze baggage based on the X-ray data obtained. Some, for example, balance the speed of the baggage screening with the accuracy and reliability with which contraband is detected. While the prescanning function discussed above may increase the accuracy and reliability with which contraband is detected, there exists a need for improved systems and methods of screening baggage.
- One embodiment of the invention is directed to a method or apparatus for analyzing an object in which a dual energy X-ray prescanner performs a prescan of the object to determine prescan information about the object. Then, a CT scanner performs a CT scan on at least one plane of the object based on the prescan information. If the CT scan of the object includes or is in the vicinity of metal, then metal artifact correction of a reconstructed image from the CT scan may be performed using the prescan and CT scan information.
- Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method or apparatus for analyzing an object in which a prescanner, which need not be a dual energy prescanner, performs a prescan of the object to determine prescan information. Then, a CT scanner performs a CT scan of the object to determine CT information. A processor analyzes the CT information and the prescan information to determine whether to update the prescan information based on the CT information.
- While the description and claims herein recite use of a CT scanner, such term is intended to cover any device that measures at least density of an object scanned by the device.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus for transmitting information from a prescanner device to a CT scanner device according to one embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an apparatus for transmitting information from a CT scanner device to a prescanner device according to one embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus for transmitting information between a CT scanner device and a prescanner device according to one embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for transmitting information between a CT scanner device and a prescanner device according to one embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a grid for performing CT scans at intervals;
- FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating reference coordinates for a scanned item; and
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for obtaining a CT image and predicting and correcting metal artifacts of the CT image according to one embodiment of the invention.
- The present invention relates to a system or method in which a prescanner X-ray device and a downstream (of the prescanner) computed tomography (CT) device scan an object. The object may be located within a piece of baggage, a manufactured product, the human body, or some other item penetrable by X-rays. Information collected on the object may be transmitted from the prescanner to the CT scanner and/or from the CT scanner to the prescanner.
- One embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 1, is directed to a method and apparatus for transmitting information from a
prescanner device 1 to a downstreamCT scanner device 3. This can be accomplished in any of numerous ways, and the present invention is not limited to any particular one of such ways. - In accordance with one illustrative embodiment, information from
prescanner device 1 is transmitted fromprescanner device 1 to aprocessor 5 via adata link 7.Data link 7, and any other data link described herein, is not limited to any particular type of link and may be implemented using any suitable means for transmitting information, such as an Ethernet link. -
Processor 5 may process the information transmitted from the prescanner device, and transmit the processed information, or a control signal with instructions based on the processed information, toCT scanner device 3 via adata link 9.Processor 5 may be located external or internal to CT scanner device. - It should be appreciated that while FIG. 1 illustrates both a direct communication link, such as
data link 11, and an indirect communication link via a processor, such asdata links -
Prescanner device 1 may be any of numerous multiple energy X-ray devices. For example,prescanner device 1 may be a single or multi-view dual energy line scanning X-ray device, a dual energy CT scanner device, or any other device capable of measuring effective atomic number characteristics of an object, the significance of which will be appreciated from the forthcoming discussion. U.S. Pat. No. 5,838,758 (Krug), which is hereby incorporated by reference, teaches dual energy X-ray inspection systems, any of which may be employed as the prescanner device according to an embodiment of the invention. -
CT scanner device 3 may be any of numerous devices for performing computed tomography or, more generally, may be any device capable of measuring density characteristics of an object.Prescanner device 1 andCT scanner device 3 may be implemented as separate units, as shown in FIG. 1, or as a single unit having both prescanning and CT scanning functionalities. - The screening systems described herein may be used in a variety of applications to recognize and detect target objects of interest. Target objects may include, but are not limited to, concealed objects (e.g., explosive devices or other weapons) inside a container (e.g., baggage), defects (e.g., cracks, air bubbles, or impurities) in articles of manufacture (e.g., commercial products), and areas of interest (e.g., tumors or other masses, including masses located near bone, metal, or another high-density material from which artifacts may result) within the body. Thus, the invention described herein may be used, for example, in settings such as airports, manufacturing plants, and hospitals, and other settings in the travel, commercial, and medical industries.
- Certain characteristics of target objects discussed above can be determined mathematically based on the absorption of X-ray radiation by the object. The absorption of X-ray radiation by a material in an item is proportional to the degree of X-ray attenuation and is dependent on the energy of the X-ray radiation and the following material parameters: thickness, density, and atomic number. The relationship between these values can be described by Equation 1:
- I x =I 0exp[−(μ/ρ)x] (1)
- where, Ix is the intensity of the X-ray radiation after passing through a material, I0 is the intensity of the X-ray radiation before passing through a material, μ/ρ is the mass attenuation coefficient; and x is obtained by multiplying the thickness of the material by its density. It should be appreciated that since X-ray absorption by a material is dependent on the thickness, density, and atomic number of the material, absorption and attenuation may be most accurately determined when all three parameters of a material are known. The scanning devices described herein can accurately determine the thickness, density, and/or atomic number of an object, and these parameters may be used to determine whether an object is a target object.
- In the embodiment of FIG. 1,
prescanner device 1 performs an initial scan of an item, andCT scanner device 3 then may perform a subsequent scan of one or more areas of interest within the item, which are determined based on the initial scan.Prescanner device 1 may “feedforward” information relating to possible target object areas determined during the initial prescan to theCT scanner device 3 so thatCT scanner device 3 scans only those slices that are located in regions where target objects may exist. - This method reduces the number of slices necessary to be taken by the CT scanner, including the number of slices taken through metal, to detect a target object and increases the accuracy with which target objects are detected. A CT scanner device employed alone to scan an item performs CT scans of planes (or “slices”) of the item and provides information on the three dimensional spatial configurations of objects therein. While this technique is useful in identifying target objects within the scanned item, each CT scan is time consuming and has a limited image quality. Numerous of these time-consuming scans are required to ensure no target area is missed. By employing
prescanner device 1 upstream of the CT scanner, according to one embodiment of the present invention, possible target objects and their two-dimensional locations are determined in a quick (relative to a CT scan) prescan. A significant advantage lies in reducing the number of slices, and thereby reducing the scan time, for an item. - In addition to reducing the scan time of the CT scanner device, the feeding forward of information from
prescanner device 1 toCT scanner device 3 may increase the accuracy of the CT scan images. For example, as will be described in greater detail below, for those slices that are in the vicinity of metal, the fedforward information can be used to perform metal artifact correction, thereby increasing the accuracy of any reconstructed image from the CT scan and ability to detect target objects. - Another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 2, is directed to a method or apparatus for transmitting information from
CT scanner device 3 toprescanner device 1. According to this embodiment, information relating to a potential target object scanned byCT scanner device 3 is transmitted (“fedback”) to a processor to determine whether to update information collected byprescanner device 1 relating to the potential target object. For example, information collected by the prescanner device, relating to the effective atomic number and mass of a potential target object, may be inaccurate for areas of the scan where the potential target object overlaps with another object or objects. A CT scan of a region including the potential target object, by obtaining density information through scans of slices in different orientations, can distinguish the potential target object from background objects, and thereby determine the precise boundaries of the target object. This fedback information is analyzed by the processor to determine whether to update and improve the accuracy of the information (e.g., effective atomic number and mass) collected byprescanner device 1. - According to one embodiment of the invention (FIG. 2), the processor is located internal to
prescanner device 1, and information fromCT scanner device 3 is transmitted to the processor inprescanner device 1. The information may be transmitted in any of numerous ways, and the present invention is not limited to any particular one of such ways. For example, information fromCT scanner device 3 may be transmitted fromCT scanner device 3 to aprocessor 5 viadata link 11.Processor 5 may process the information transmitted fromCT scanner device 3, and transmit the processed information toprescanner device 1 via adata link 13. Alternatively, information may be transmitted directly fromCT scanner device 3 toprescanner device 1 via adata link 15. According to another embodiment of the invention, the information fromCT scanner device 3 is not transmitted toprescanner device 1, but rather is transmitted to a processor located external toprescanner device 1. For example, information may be transmitted to a processor located inCT scanner device 3 or to a processor in an external computing system. - Another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 3, is directed to transmitting information from
prescanner device 1 toCT scanner device 3, referred to as the “feedforward mode”, and fromCT scanner device 3 toprescanner device 1, referred to as the “feedbackwards mode.” This embodiment combines the embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2, above. As discussed previously, in the feedforward mode, information relating to a two-dimensional location of a potential target object is transferred fromprescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 (or a processor coupled to CT scanner 3) to determine locations for CT slices to be performed, thereby reducing the CT scan time. Further in the feedforward mode, information relating to the effective atomic number and mass of potential target objects is transferred fromprescanner device 1 to CT scanner device 3 (or a processor coupled to CT scanner 3) to increase the accuracy of the CT images, particularly for those slices that are in the vicinity of metal. In the feedback mode, density information collected byCT scanner device 3 is transmitted to prescanner 1 (or a processor coupled to prescanner 1) to enable the prescanner to update and improve the accuracy of the effective atomic number and mass information collected byprescanner device 1. - In the embodiment of FIG. 3, information from
prescanner device 1 is transmitted toCT scanner device 3 viadata link 17, and information fromCT scanner device 3 is transmitted toprescanner device 1 via adata link 19.Data link 17 and data link 19 may be separate data paths or may be implemented as a single data path, such that information is transmitted for both of the data links via a single medium. Further,data link 17 and data link 19 may be direct links or may pass through another device, such as a processor. Data processing may occur in an external processor, or may occur internal to each ofprescanner device 1 andCT scanner device 3. As discussed above, thoughprescanner device 1 andCT scanner device 3 are illustrated separately in FIG. 3, it is not necessary that each be implemented as a separate unit. Rather,prescanner device 1 andCT scanner device 3 may be implemented as a single unit having both prescanning and CT scanning functionalities. - FIG. 4 is a flow diagram according to one embodiment in which information may be transmitted from
prescanner device 1 toCT scanner device 3 in the feedforward mode, and fromCT scanner device 3 toprescanner device 1 in the feedbackwards mode. It should be appreciated that, as discussed above, the feedforward and feedbackwards modes need not be implemented in the same screening system and that each may be implemented independently in a separate system. The flow diagram of FIG. 4 shows both information (i.e., data) flow (in phantom lines) and process flow (in solid lines). - Beginning with
step 20, an item (e.g., an article of baggage) to be screened is loaded into a machine of the invention. Instep 21, the item is scanned and analyzed using theprescanner device 1. Theprescanner device 1 may be a line scanner, such as one of the VIS series offered by PerkinElmer Detection Systems, the assignee herein. The item is initially loaded into theprescanner device 1 for scanning. For example, a human operator may place the item on a conveyor which, with the aid of a motion controller, moves the item throughprescanner device 1. In one embodiment,prescanner device 1 has at least two X-ray sources for generating X-ray beams and may have one or more X-ray detectors for receiving X-ray beams. The X-ray image resulting from the scan consists of a two-dimensional array of pixels representing a view of the three-dimensional item from one angle. A processor, either internal or external to prescannerdevice 1, calculates the attenuation of the generated X-rays penetrating the item for each pixel. According to one embodiment of the invention, alternate pulses of high energy X-rays (e.g., 150 kV) and low energy X-rays (e.g., 75 kV) are respectively generated by dual X-ray sources, and the processor calculates the attenuation for each pixel of the image resulting from the respective high energy and low energy beams. - In a
step 23, a table (Table A) is generated containing atomic number and mass characteristics for each object. Table A may be stored electronically by a memory (not shown) coupled to a processor. Both the processor and the memory may be either internal or external to prescannerdevice 1. An object may be defined as any region having similar atomic number and mass characteristics. The calculated attenuation of the high energy and low energy beam pulses for each pixel of the scanned item are used to determine the effective atomic number of all objects. To derive the effective atomic number of each object based on the attenuation, the attenuation of X-rays at each different energy level is analyzed. One method for doing so is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,838,758 (Krug), incorporated by reference herein. It is known that materials with a high effective atomic number (e.g., metals) absorb low energy X-ray radiation more strongly, whereas materials with a low effective atomic number (e.g., organic materials) absorb high energy X-ray radiation more strongly. Thus, the effective atomic number of each object may be determined by analyzing the attenuation of low and high energy X-rays by each pixel. To determine the effective atomic number for a particular object, all pixels within the object are compared to pixels surrounding the object and a histogram is created, where the mode (peak of the histogram) represents the effective atomic number. - In addition to effective atomic number information, Table A may also contain mass information for each object. The mass for each pixel may also be determined based on the X-ray attenuation of both the high and low energy X-rays. The relationship between X-ray attenuation and material mass (i.e., thickness) is logarithmic; X-ray radiation decreases logarithmically as the material thickness increases. Thus, mass may be estimated by analyzing the attenuation of X-rays of all energies by materials within an item. To determine the mass for a particular object, mass values for all pixels within an object are added.
- In an embodiment, Table A also contains confidence values for the effective atomic number and mass values for each object. Confidence values for the effective atomic number and mass values represent a probability or range of probabilities that the atomic number and mass data are correct. To determine a confidence level for the effective atomic number value or mass value of a particular object, a feature vector denoting properties such as compactness, connectiveness, gradients, histogram spread and other features may be used.
- Numerous known procedures are available for determining the confidence level. One such procedure uses machine vision technology for object classification. Machine vision technology includes: (1) segmenting a group of picture elements from their background, (2) describing that group of picture elements by a set of features, and (3) using the resulting feature vector to classify the picture elements.
- One software tool available for such object classification is Image Process and Analysis Software offered by Data Translation, Inc. as SP0550. Other software packages that provide similar tools for algorithm development include: Checkpoint® by Cognex Corporation of Natick, Mass., Framework® by DVT of Woodcliff Lake, N.J., and the Powervision® family of products of RVSI of Canton, Mass. The invention need not be limited to the features found in the exemplary software packages mentioned. There are numerous other approaches as described, for examples, in the following textbooks:
- 1. Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithms, Practicalities (Signal Processing and its Applications Series), by E. R. Davies;
- 2. Computer Vision and Image Processing: A Practical Approach Using CVIPTools (BK/CD-ROM), by Scott E. Umbaugh;
- 3. Algorithms for Image Processing and Computer Vision, by James R. Parker; and
- 4. Feature Extraction in Computer Vision and Image Processing, by Mark Nixon and Alberto Aguado.
- A target object, such as an explosive, has a typical effective atomic number and mass value. Further, for a particular range of atomic number values, a particular range of mass values will be characteristic of a target object. Thus, it is useful to consider both atomic number and mass values in determining whether a target object is present.
- In a
step 25, a list of objects warranting further study (i.e., objects of interest), including the locations for the objects, is generated. The atomic number characteristics of Table A can be used to differentiate potential target objects from the background, since different objects will generally have different effective atomic numbers. A potential target object may comprise a collection of pixels in close proximity having atomic number values that fall within a certain range. For example, a weapon or explosive may comprise a collection of pixels having high effective atomic number values that fall within a particular range. Thus, it is possible to determine two-dimensional coordinates (e.g., x1-x2, z1-z2 in FIG. 6) of a potential target object based on effective atomic number and mass information. - While the list of objects warranting further study and two-dimensional coordinates associated with each object may be generated automatically, it is also possible that a human operator may manually determine the information. For example, an operator may view an X-ray image to determine objects of interest and their respective locations in two dimensions. Thus, the prescan analysis may be performed automatically or manually, and the invention is not limited to either method of analysis.
- Once a location of an object of interest, or a region thereof, has been determined, a CT scan of the object or region of interest may be performed. Locations of slices (i.e., two-dimensional planes) in the item to be scanned are chosen to coincide with a potential target object. Some target objects, such as explosives, are typically found near metal objects (e.g., wires, batteries). Metal, due in part to its high density, may cause artifacts in an image in the region surrounding the metal. Thus, if a potential target object is located near metal, it is preferable to choose a slice that includes the target object, but that is not in the vicinity of the metal. However, if a slice near metal is chosen, according to one aspect of the invention, a metal artifact correction is performed to correct for the image artifacts, as will be described in
step 35. - If, after
step 25, there are no objects warranting further study, a decision may be made as to an appropriate course of action, based on the prescan information (FIG. 4, step 27). For example, an operator of an X-ray system in an airport may decide to return the baggage to the passenger, search the baggage by hand, or call the bomb squad. Alternatively, an algorithm may be used to automatically determine an appropriate course of action. If, instep 29, there are objects warranting further study, the item (e.g., baggage) is transferred to the CT scanner device, for example via the conveyor. If there are no objects warranting further study, the item may or may not be transferred to the CT scanner device. According to one aspect of the invention, the item may be transferred to the CT scanner device when no objects warranting further study have been detected so that undetected objects (e.g., sheet explosives) may be screened for. - In
step 31, CT images are generated for the item cross-sections identified instep 25, if any. To form a CT image of a cross-section (i.e., slice) of an item, a finely collimated beam of radiation is passed through the item in the desired slice plane, and the attenuation is measured. The process is repeated and a set of projections is acquired as the X-ray beam is passed through the object at different angles. A reconstructed image of the two-dimensional distribution of the linear attenuation coefficient, μ(x,y), may be obtained from these projections. If the projections could be acquired with an infinitely narrow X-ray beam, and the angular increment at which the X-ray beam is passed was negligible, the result would be a continuous set of projections. Displayed as a two-dimensional function, the continuous set of projections is referred to as the sinogram. An image may be reconstructed from the sinogram by implementing any of a number of well-known reconstruction techniques including, but not limited to, back projection, iteration, Fourier transform, and filtered back projection. - As discussed above, a CT image of a slice results in a two-dimensional image of a cross-sectional plane of the scanned item. The image consists of an array of pixels (e.g., 900 pixels×512 pixels). According to one illustrative embodiment shown in FIG. 5,
CT scanner device 3 performs scans at locations along agrid 61, such that slices are imaged at predetermined intervals 63 a-c along the length of the item. For example, an article of baggage may be imaged every distance x along its length. In FIG. 5, afirst slice 65 is imaged at z1 cm, asecond slice 67 is imaged z2 cm=(z1+x) cm, and athird slice 69 is imaged at Z3 cm=(Z1+2x) cm. Performing scans according to a grid pattern ensures that potential target objects that may not have been identified as warranting further investigation instep 25 are imaged. For example, sheet explosives may evade identification by the prescanner device because they are thin in profile and minimally attenuate X-rays. The CT scanner, on the other hand, may image a number of planes transecting the sheet explosive, and thus may more readily detect the sheet explosive. Preferably, the imaging points on the grid, discussed above, coincide with the objects warranting further study identified instep 25. For example, the first and third slices in FIG. 5 intersect objects 71 a,b. If not all objects of interest are accommodated by the grid, additional slices may be taken. Further, the grid is preferably positioned to avoid taking slices of metal objects, for the reasons discussed previously. - In
step 33, it is determined whether any imaged object of interest is in the vicinity of a metal object. Additionally, it may be determined whether the image of the object of interest is likely to be distorted by metal artifacts caused by the metal object. For example, although a metal object is in close proximity to the object of interest, it may be determined that the size of the metal object relative to the object of interest renders it unlikely that the metal object will have a significant negative effect on the image of the object of interest (e.g., if the metal object is much smaller than the object of interest). If a potential target object is in the vicinity of a metal object, such that the image of the object is likely to be distorted by metal artifacts, a metal artifact correction is performed on the slice containing the metal artifacts, according to one aspect (feedforward mode) of the invention described herein. - If it is determined in
step 33 that a potential target object is in the vicinity of a metal object, information fed forward from the prescanner device is used to predict the type and shape of metal responsible for the metal artifacts instep 35. In particular, the mass information and effective atomic number information from Table A are used to identify the metal type and perform a metal artifact correction specific to the type and shape of the metal. The metal artifact correction algorithm is described in detail below in connection with FIG. 7. - In
step 37, the scanned CT images are analyzed. According to one embodiment, the density, area, and three-dimensional coordinates are determined for each target object, for example using image processing algorithms (e.g., region growing). The area of each target object is specified by a range of two-dimensional (e.g., x1-x2, y1-y2 in FIG. 6) coordinates that delimit a region where the density of each pixel falls within a certain range. Further, a confidence level is determined for the density and area values associated with each pixel. Each confidence level represents a probability that the density or area data corresponding to that pixel is correct. - In
step 39, a table (Table B) is generated containing the density, area, and three-dimensional coordinates for each target object, and a confidence level for each characteristic of each target object. Table B may be stored electronically by a memory (not shown) coupled to a processor and may, along with or separate from the processor, be either internal or external toCT scanner device 3. The three-dimensional coordinates for each target object are transmitted (“fed back”) toprescanner device 1 instep 41. According to one aspect (feedback mode) of the invention, this information from Table B may be used to augment Table A. The processor, coupled to the memory that stores Table A, considers the fedback information and the information in Table A in determining whether to update any of the information in Table A. - Since
prescanner device 1 images the item from only one view, the prescanner device may not be able to discern whether an identified object is a single object or a plurality of objects, as objects that overlap when imaged from a particular perspective may appear as a single merged object. If the prescanner device cannot differentiate a plurality of overlapping objects, it may determine a mass value for an object that is actually the mass values of two or more objects combined. The three-dimensional coordinate information provided in Table B can be used to differentiate objects, and thereby correct erroneous effective atomic number values and mass values of Table A. If the mass of an object changes, the object may no longer be of interest or, conversely, may become interesting. For example, if an original mass determination is based on two merged non-target objects, the mass value will be erroneously high, and may fall within the range corresponding to a target object. When the two merged objects are differentiated and their masses are determined separately, the individual objects may no longer be of interest if the mass value falls below a minimum mass associated with potential target objects. - In sum, the information fedback from Table B by the CT scanner device allows for more accurate determinations of the effective atomic number and mass of each object, as listed in Table A, by the prescanner device. Hence, superior detection by the prescanner device and a lower false alarm rate may be achieved by feeding back information from the CT scanner device to the prescanner device. It should be appreciated that multiple feedforward/feedbackwards loops are possible, whereby information generated by the
prescanner device 1 andCT scanner device 3 is alternately transmitted between the two devices. It should be appreciated that the information from Table B need not be transmitted to the prescanner device. Rather, the CT scanner device or an external computer may implement an algorithm, similar to that which may be implemented by the prescanner, to augment Table A based on the Table B information. - In
step 27, a decision is made based on the information in Tables A and B as to an appropriate course of action. As discussed above, possible actions include returning the baggage to the passenger, searching the baggage by hand, or calling the bomb squad. An algorithm may be used to synthesize the information of the two tables to determine an appropriate action. For each potential target object, the algorithm may consider the effective atomic number, density, and associated confidence levels for each, as well as the thickness of the potential target object and the proximity of the potential target object to metal. Based on the information, a likelihood is determined that an identified object is a target object. The-likelihood is derived from a histogram representing, for example, the probability that an object having a given effective atomic number, density, thickness, mass, and proximity to metal is a target object, and may be represented as a probability that the object is a target object or as an absolute indication that the object is/is not a target object. It should be appreciated that any of the automated decisions or actions described above may alternatively be performed by a human operator. - FIG. 7 illustrates by flow diagram a method for obtaining a CT image and predicting and correcting metal artifacts of the CT image, most steps of which, as illustrated, correspond to step35 described above in connection with FIG. 4. Like FIG. 4, the flow diagram of FIG. 7 shows both information (i.e., data) flow (in phantom lines) and process flow (in solid lines).
- In
step 43, a CT image is generated. Uncorrected CT images may contain metal artifacts when a scan is performed within a certain proximity to metal, which may result in inaccuracies. For example, beam hardening artifacts cause inaccuracies in the estimation of attenuation coefficients for pixels associated with x-rays that traverse highly attenuating structures. Streaky shadows or star patterns of streaks may result near high density objects in regions of pixels where essentially no attenuation information exists. Scatter artifacts may result from the dispersion of X-ray photons by the atoms within the item, and may cause noise in the CT image. - In
step 45, the image is clipped so that the image contains only the metal that accounts for the artifacts of the image. The region to be clipped is identified by considering the effective atomic number information of Table A. Each pixel in the image of the metal will have an effective atomic number that falls within a range corresponding to the effective atomic number of the metal. The clipped image contains only the image of the metal, and does not contain the object of interest or artifacts. - The use of dual energy levels in the prescanner device makes it possible to determine the characteristics of the metal in the image. In
step 47, the type of metal and thickness of the metal in the image are identified based on the information in Table A. In particular, the effective atomic number information of Table A is used to identify the type of metal and the mass information of Table A is used to determine the thickness of the metal. - A sinogram of the clipped image is generated in
step 49. As discussed above, a single sinogram contains the information about a particular slice from all angles, with the information from each angle in its own row. - In
step 51, a table (Table C) is generated that contains beam hardening, noise, and scatter correction parameters. The correction parameters are determined according to algorithms well-known in the art for compensating for beam hardening, noise, and scatter, based on the type and thickness of metal responsible for the artifacts. - In
step 53, artifacts are introduced into the sinogram of the clipped image using the table (Table C) generated instep 51. In particular, the sinogram is corrupted using beam hardening and scatter effects based on the shape and type of the metal responsible for the artifacts, determined instep 47. The sinogram of the image of the metal and artifacts is reconstructed instep 55. - In
step 57, the reconstructed artifact image generated instep 55 is subtracted from the sum of the original CT image generated instep 43 and the clipped image generated instep 45. The result of the image subtraction is a metal artifact correctedimage 59. The image will result in a more accurate determination as to whether the object of interest represents a target object. - In an embodiment, the artifact image may also used as a map for determining whether the CT values read in the image are accurate.
- Having described several embodiments of the invention in detail, various modifications and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such modifications and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended as limiting. The invention is limited only as defined by the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Claims (10)
1. An explosive detection system comprising:
a device that scans an object and generates information about the object from the scan; and
an external computer, located remotely from the device, that receives the information and implements an algorithm to make a threat determination about the object.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the device includes a CT scanner.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the device includes a dual energy X-ray scanner.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the device includes a combination dual energy X-ray and CT scanner.
5. The system of any of claims 1-4 wherein the information includes that from which a density and a mass of the object can be determined by the computer.
6. A method for making a threat determination about an object comprising:
scanning the object with an explosive detection device;
generating information about the object from the scan;
transmitting the information to an external computer, located remotely from the device; and
with the computer, implementing an algorithm to make a threat determination about the object.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of scanning includes the step of performing a computed tomography scan with a CT scanner.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of scanning includes the step of performing a high energy and a low energy scan using a dual energy X-ray scanner.
9. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of scanning includes performing a high and low energy X-ray scan and a computed tomography scan using a combination dual energy X-ray and CT scanner.
10. The method of any of the previous claims 6-9 wherein the information includes that from which a density and a mass of the object can be determined by the computer.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/717,360 US20040101098A1 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-19 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/068,459 US6816571B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2002-02-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/717,360 US20040101098A1 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-19 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/068,459 Continuation US6816571B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2002-02-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040101098A1 true US20040101098A1 (en) | 2004-05-27 |
Family
ID=27659041
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/068,459 Expired - Lifetime US6816571B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2002-02-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/702,814 Expired - Fee Related US6944264B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/702,362 Expired - Fee Related US6788761B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/717,360 Abandoned US20040101098A1 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-19 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/717,051 Expired - Lifetime US7023957B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-19 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US11/018,078 Expired - Fee Related US7308077B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2004-12-20 | Method and apparatus for target transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/068,459 Expired - Lifetime US6816571B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2002-02-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/702,814 Expired - Fee Related US6944264B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US10/702,362 Expired - Fee Related US6788761B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-06 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/717,051 Expired - Lifetime US7023957B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2003-11-19 | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US11/018,078 Expired - Fee Related US7308077B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2004-12-20 | Method and apparatus for target transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US6816571B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1472524A4 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003212956B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2467567A1 (en) |
IL (2) | IL162409A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003067770A2 (en) |
Cited By (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020186862A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-12-12 | Mcclelland Keith M. | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US20050198226A1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2005-09-08 | Delia Paul | Security system with distributed computing |
US20060274916A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2006-12-07 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems | Remote data access |
US20070280502A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2007-12-06 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Networked security system |
US20080006282A1 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2008-01-10 | Predrag Sukovic | Medical imaging exchange network |
US20080304622A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2008-12-11 | Edward James Morton | X-Ray Tomography Inspection Systems |
US20100011863A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2010-01-21 | The Secretary Of State For Home Affairs | Method and apparatus for computed tomography |
US20100322514A1 (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2010-12-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V. | Apparatus, method and computer program for producing a corrected image of a region of interest from acquired projection data |
US20110060426A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2011-03-10 | Edward James Morton | Scanning Systems |
US8837669B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-09-16 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system |
US8885794B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-11-11 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items |
US9020095B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-04-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners |
US9048061B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2015-06-02 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners and X-ray sources therefor |
US9052403B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2015-06-09 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Compact mobile cargo scanning system |
US9113839B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-08-25 | Rapiscon Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
US9218933B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2015-12-22 | Rapidscan Systems, Inc. | Low-dose radiographic imaging system |
US9223049B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2015-12-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Cargo scanning system with boom structure |
US9223050B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2015-12-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray imaging system having improved mobility |
US9285498B2 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2016-03-15 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting commercial vehicles and cargo containers |
US9332624B2 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2016-05-03 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Gantry scanner systems |
US9429530B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2016-08-30 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning systems |
US9632206B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2017-04-25 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing |
US9791590B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-10-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable security inspection system |
US10302807B2 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2019-05-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo |
US10591424B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2020-03-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection systems for the identification of specific target items |
Families Citing this family (110)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7050536B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2006-05-23 | Invision Technologies, Inc. | Nonintrusive inspection system |
US6968034B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2005-11-22 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system |
US6721387B1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2004-04-13 | Analogic Corporation | Method of and system for reducing metal artifacts in images generated by x-ray scanning devices |
DE10149254B4 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2006-04-20 | Smiths Heimann Gmbh | Method and device for detecting a specific material in an object by means of electromagnetic radiation |
US6816571B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2004-11-09 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems Corporation Delaware | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
US7486768B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2009-02-03 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Self-contained mobile inspection system and method |
US9958569B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2018-05-01 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Mobile imaging system and method for detection of contraband |
US7322745B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2008-01-29 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Single boom cargo scanning system |
US7369643B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2008-05-06 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Single boom cargo scanning system |
US7783004B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2010-08-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Cargo scanning system |
US8503605B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2013-08-06 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Four sided imaging system and method for detection of contraband |
US6928142B2 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2005-08-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Non-invasive plaque detection using combined nuclear medicine and x-ray system |
US7031425B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2006-04-18 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Methods and apparatus for generating CT scout images |
EP1585995A1 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2005-10-19 | Reveal Imaging Technologies Inc. | System and method for ct scanning of baggage |
CN100339727C (en) * | 2003-02-24 | 2007-09-26 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Automatic material discrimination by using computer tomography |
WO2004090576A2 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2004-10-21 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | System and method for detection of explosives in baggage |
GB0309379D0 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2003-06-04 | Cxr Ltd | X-ray scanning |
GB0309385D0 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2003-06-04 | Cxr Ltd | X-ray monitoring |
US20050058242A1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2005-03-17 | Peschmann Kristian R. | Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects |
US8804899B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-08-12 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Imaging, data acquisition, data transmission, and data distribution methods and systems for high data rate tomographic X-ray scanners |
US7856081B2 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2010-12-21 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for rapid detection of concealed objects using fluorescence |
US20050080576A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2005-04-14 | Dickerson Robert T. | Method and system for frequency domain time correlation |
US7120226B2 (en) * | 2003-11-24 | 2006-10-10 | Passport Systems, Inc. | Adaptive scanning of materials using nuclear resonance fluorescence imaging |
US8180019B2 (en) * | 2003-11-24 | 2012-05-15 | Passport Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for computer tomography of nuclear isotopes using nuclear resonance fluorescence |
US7609807B2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2009-10-27 | General Electric Company | CT-Guided system and method for analyzing regions of interest for contraband detection |
US7257188B2 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2007-08-14 | Varian Medical Systems Technologies, Inc. | Dual energy radiation scanning of contents of an object |
WO2005119297A2 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2005-12-15 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Contraband detection systems using a large-angle cone beam ct system |
US20060022140A1 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2006-02-02 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for detection of contraband using terahertz radiation |
JP5054518B2 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2012-10-24 | パスポート システムズ, インク. | Method and system for determining the average atomic number and mass of a substance |
US7233682B2 (en) * | 2004-08-02 | 2007-06-19 | Levine Michael C | Security screening system and method |
US7254211B2 (en) * | 2004-09-14 | 2007-08-07 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for performing computed tomography |
US7991243B2 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2011-08-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Radial adaptive filter for metal artifact correction |
US8173970B2 (en) * | 2005-02-04 | 2012-05-08 | Dan Inbar | Detection of nuclear materials |
US7820977B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2010-10-26 | Steve Beer | Methods and apparatus for improved gamma spectra generation |
US7847260B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2010-12-07 | Dan Inbar | Nuclear threat detection |
CA2597731A1 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2007-08-02 | Passport Systems, Inc. | Use of nearly monochromatic and tunable photon sources with nuclear resonance fluorescence in non-intrusive inspection of containers for material detection and imaging |
GB2423687B (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2010-04-28 | Rapiscan Security Products Ltd | X-ray security inspection machine |
DE102005011054A1 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2006-09-14 | Smiths Heimann Gmbh | Method and device for checking carry-on luggage and other items carried along |
DE102005020567A1 (en) * | 2005-04-30 | 2006-11-09 | Katz, Elisabeth | Method and apparatus for the on-line determination of the ash content of a substance promoted on a bait and apparatus for conducting an on-line analysis |
US20070083414A1 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2007-04-12 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Scalable, low-latency network architecture for multiplexed baggage scanning |
CN101305343A (en) * | 2005-11-09 | 2008-11-12 | 护照系统公司 | Methods and systems for active non-intrusive inspection and verification of cargo and goods |
US7983457B2 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2011-07-19 | General Electric Company | Method and system for automatically determining regions in a scanned object |
US8213570B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-07-03 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray security inspection machine |
US20070237287A1 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2007-10-11 | Predrag Sukovic | Ct scanner with automatic determination of volume of interest |
US7526064B2 (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2009-04-28 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Multiple pass cargo inspection system |
CN101071110B (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2011-05-11 | 清华大学 | Cargo safety inspection method based on spiral scanning stereo imaging |
JP2007300964A (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2007-11-22 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc | Radiographic equipment and radiography method |
JP4855141B2 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2012-01-18 | 富士フイルム株式会社 | Medical image part recognition device and medical image part recognition program |
US8137976B2 (en) * | 2006-07-12 | 2012-03-20 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Dual angle radiation scanning of objects |
CN101501530A (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2009-08-05 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | System and method for acquiring image data |
CN101622523A (en) * | 2006-10-09 | 2010-01-06 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Imaging of a turbid medium |
US20080135772A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | General Electric Company | Method and system for special nuclear material detection |
JP4784943B2 (en) * | 2007-05-23 | 2011-10-05 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Control device for premixed compression ignition engine |
US8094874B2 (en) * | 2007-05-29 | 2012-01-10 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Material context analysis |
US7809103B2 (en) * | 2007-05-31 | 2010-10-05 | General Electric Company | Method for detecting the presence of high atomic number elements |
US7742568B2 (en) * | 2007-06-09 | 2010-06-22 | Spectrum San Diego, Inc. | Automobile scanning system |
US20090106275A1 (en) * | 2007-10-22 | 2009-04-23 | Liyun Zhang | Method and system for screening items for transport |
JP5274812B2 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2013-08-28 | ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー | X-ray CT apparatus and image processing apparatus |
CN101470082B (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2011-03-30 | 同方威视技术股份有限公司 | Article detection apparatus and detection method thereof |
US7839971B2 (en) * | 2007-12-31 | 2010-11-23 | Morpho Detection, Inc. | System and method for inspecting containers for target material |
GB0803643D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Mobile scanning systems |
GB0803640D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanning systems |
GB0803642D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Drive-through scanning systems |
US9036779B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2015-05-19 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Dual mode X-ray vehicle scanning system |
US7885380B2 (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2011-02-08 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Generating a representation of an object of interest |
US8633445B2 (en) * | 2008-05-19 | 2014-01-21 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Multi-energy X-ray imaging |
GB0809109D0 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2008-06-25 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanner systems |
GB0809107D0 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2008-06-25 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scannign systems |
GB0810638D0 (en) | 2008-06-11 | 2008-07-16 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Photomultiplier and detection systems |
US8963094B2 (en) | 2008-06-11 | 2015-02-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Composite gamma-neutron detection system |
DE102008037347A1 (en) | 2008-08-12 | 2010-02-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and control device for controlling a sectional image recording system |
US8311181B2 (en) * | 2008-11-28 | 2012-11-13 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and method of visualizing multi-energy imaging data |
US20100135564A1 (en) * | 2008-11-28 | 2010-06-03 | Brian William Thomsen | Apparatus for and method of selecting material triplets for a multi-material decomposition |
US9459216B2 (en) * | 2009-01-05 | 2016-10-04 | En'urga, Inc. | Method for characterizing flame and spray structures in windowless chambers |
US9310323B2 (en) | 2009-05-16 | 2016-04-12 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for high-Z threat alarm resolution |
US8416919B2 (en) * | 2009-08-20 | 2013-04-09 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Apparatus to facilitate capturing samples as pertain to an object to be imaged and corresponding method |
US8290120B2 (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2012-10-16 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Dual energy radiation scanning of contents of an object based on contents type |
US8363917B2 (en) * | 2009-10-14 | 2013-01-29 | General Electric Company | System and method of image artifact reduction in fast kVp switching CT |
US8314394B1 (en) | 2009-11-04 | 2012-11-20 | Science Applications International Corporation | System and method for three-dimensional imaging using scattering from annihilation coincidence photons |
US8705688B2 (en) * | 2010-10-13 | 2014-04-22 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Medical image processing apparatus, X-ray computed tomography apparatus, and medical image processing method |
US8903046B2 (en) | 2011-02-08 | 2014-12-02 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Covert surveillance using multi-modality sensing |
US20140376686A1 (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2014-12-25 | Smiths Heimann Gmbh | System and method for multi-scanner x-ray inspection |
EP2678668A4 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2017-04-05 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
US10194874B2 (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2019-02-05 | Ge Sensing & Inspection Technologies Gmbh | Computed tomography method, computer software, computing device and computed tomography system for determining a volumetric representation of a sample |
DE102012201406A1 (en) * | 2012-02-01 | 2013-08-01 | Smiths Heimann Gmbh | X-ray inspection system for the detection of certain materials in a test object |
EP2810296A4 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2015-12-30 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Combined scatter and transmission multi-view imaging system |
US10670740B2 (en) | 2012-02-14 | 2020-06-02 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Spectral discrimination using wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled scintillation detectors |
DE102012216003A1 (en) * | 2012-09-10 | 2014-03-13 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Flexible inspection of components using X-rays |
CN103901489B (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2017-07-21 | 清华大学 | Check method, display methods and the equipment of object |
GB2523520B (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2018-05-23 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | X-ray scanner with partial energy discriminating detector array |
GB201308876D0 (en) * | 2013-05-16 | 2013-07-03 | Ibex Innovations Ltd | X-Ray imaging apparatus and methods |
EP3025148A1 (en) * | 2013-07-25 | 2016-06-01 | Analogic Corporation | Generation of diffraction signature of item within object |
FR3015681B1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2016-04-22 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | METHOD OF MEASURING THE EFFECTIVE ATOMIC NUMBER OF A MATERIAL |
US9557427B2 (en) | 2014-01-08 | 2017-01-31 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Thin gap chamber neutron detectors |
DE102014200679A1 (en) | 2014-01-16 | 2015-07-16 | Smiths Heimann Gmbh | Method and X-ray inspection system, in particular for nondestructive inspection of objects |
CN105277578B (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2018-06-12 | 北京君和信达科技有限公司 | A kind of method and system for improving dual-energy radiation system material recognition capability |
MX2017012069A (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2018-06-27 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Hand-held portable backscatter inspection system. |
CN106353828B (en) * | 2015-07-22 | 2018-09-21 | 清华大学 | The method and apparatus that checked property body weight is estimated in safe examination system |
US10345479B2 (en) | 2015-09-16 | 2019-07-09 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable X-ray scanner |
WO2017102887A1 (en) | 2015-12-15 | 2017-06-22 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Streak artifact prediction |
JP6780948B2 (en) * | 2016-03-28 | 2020-11-04 | キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 | X-ray CT device |
KR200491390Y1 (en) * | 2016-10-28 | 2020-03-31 | 칼 짜이스 엑스-레이 마이크로스코피, 인크. | Apparatus for segmentation and spectrum based metal artifact reduction and ct system |
US10761038B2 (en) * | 2016-11-29 | 2020-09-01 | Laitram, L.L.C. | Multi-energy x-ray absorption imaging for detecting foreign objects on a conveyor |
US10585206B2 (en) | 2017-09-06 | 2020-03-10 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Method and system for a multi-view scanner |
US10830911B2 (en) | 2018-06-20 | 2020-11-10 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Wavelength-shifting sheet-coupled scintillation detectors |
US11039808B2 (en) * | 2019-02-13 | 2021-06-22 | Analogic Corporation | Scanning systems configured to inspect conveyed objects and related systems and methods |
US11212902B2 (en) | 2020-02-25 | 2021-12-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Multiplexed drive systems and methods for a multi-emitter X-ray source |
US11175245B1 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2021-11-16 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Scatter X-ray imaging with adaptive scanning beam intensity |
US11340361B1 (en) | 2020-11-23 | 2022-05-24 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Wireless transmission detector panel for an X-ray scanner |
GB2618277A (en) | 2021-02-23 | 2023-11-01 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Systems and methods for eliminating cross-talk in scanning systems having multiple x-ray sources |
Citations (46)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4020346A (en) * | 1973-03-21 | 1977-04-26 | Dennis Donald A | X-ray inspection device and method |
US4064440A (en) * | 1976-06-22 | 1977-12-20 | Roder Frederick L | X-ray or gamma-ray examination device for moving objects |
US4217641A (en) * | 1978-04-28 | 1980-08-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Correction for polychromatic X-ray distortion in CT images |
US4247774A (en) * | 1978-06-26 | 1981-01-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health, Education And Welfare | Simultaneous dual-energy computer assisted tomography |
US4539648A (en) * | 1982-09-29 | 1985-09-03 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Detection of agricultural contraband in baggage |
US4580219A (en) * | 1983-05-02 | 1986-04-01 | General Electric Company | Method for reducing image artifacts due to projection measurement inconsistencies |
US4590558A (en) * | 1981-12-30 | 1986-05-20 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for removing objects from CT images |
US4709333A (en) * | 1986-01-03 | 1987-11-24 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for imaging in the presence of multiple high density objects |
US4759047A (en) * | 1985-08-29 | 1988-07-19 | Heimann Gmbh | Baggage inspection system |
US4788704A (en) * | 1985-03-04 | 1988-11-29 | Heimann Gmbh | X-ray scanner & detector signal processing system |
US4941162A (en) * | 1988-06-22 | 1990-07-10 | The State Of Israel, Atomic Energy Commission, Soreq Nuclear Research Center | Method and system for detection of nitrogenous explosives by using nuclear resonance absorption |
US4957250A (en) * | 1988-08-11 | 1990-09-18 | Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh | Device for intercepting and retaining of cargo in a transport cabin |
US5070519A (en) * | 1990-10-04 | 1991-12-03 | Hologic, Inc. | Selective equalization radiography |
US5109691A (en) * | 1989-12-08 | 1992-05-05 | Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. | Explosive detection screening system |
US5125015A (en) * | 1990-01-26 | 1992-06-23 | The State Of Israel Atomic Energy Commission, Soreq Nuclear Research Center | Method and system for determining a lower-bound density of a body |
US5162652A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1992-11-10 | Pcp, Inc. | Method and apparatus for rapid detection of contraband and toxic materials by trace vapor detection using ion mobility spectrometry |
US5182764A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1993-01-26 | Invision Technologies, Inc. | Automatic concealed object detection system having a pre-scan stage |
US5243664A (en) * | 1991-09-16 | 1993-09-07 | Picker International, Inc. | Post-processing technique for reducing metallic clip artifacts in CT images |
US5319547A (en) * | 1990-08-10 | 1994-06-07 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects |
US5323004A (en) * | 1989-05-08 | 1994-06-21 | Scientific Innovations, Inc. | Nuclear resonances in activation analysis, and particularly, its application to detection of nitrogen based explosives in luggage |
US5367552A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1994-11-22 | In Vision Technologies, Inc. | Automatic concealed object detection system having a pre-scan stage |
US5600303A (en) * | 1993-01-15 | 1997-02-04 | Technology International Incorporated | Detection of concealed explosives and contraband |
US5600700A (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1997-02-04 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Detecting explosives or other contraband by employing transmitted and scattered X-rays |
US5642393A (en) * | 1995-09-26 | 1997-06-24 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Detecting contraband by employing interactive multiprobe tomography |
US5805660A (en) * | 1993-07-30 | 1998-09-08 | Europ Scan S.A. | Method and device for carrying out detection of at least one non-visible object containing a given material |
US5933471A (en) * | 1997-02-26 | 1999-08-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for reducing reconstruction artifacts in computed tomography images |
US5953444A (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 1999-09-14 | University Of Pennsylvania | Method for improved correction of spectrum hardening artifacts in computed tomography images |
US6018562A (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 2000-01-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Apparatus and method for automatic recognition of concealed objects using multiple energy computed tomography |
US6026143A (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-02-15 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for detecting sheet objects in computed tomography data |
US6076400A (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-06-20 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for classifying objects in computed tomography data using density dependent mass thresholds |
US6088423A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2000-07-11 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Multiview x-ray based system for detecting contraband such as in baggage |
US6094472A (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2000-07-25 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | X-ray backscatter imaging system including moving body tracking assembly |
US6118850A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 2000-09-12 | Rutgers, The State University | Analysis methods for energy dispersive X-ray diffraction patterns |
US6125193A (en) * | 1998-06-01 | 2000-09-26 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and system for high absorption object artifacts reduction and superposition |
US6163591A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 2000-12-19 | The Imperial College Of Science | Screening apparatus and method |
US6198795B1 (en) * | 1998-03-19 | 2001-03-06 | Heimann Systems Gmbh | Method of processing images for material recognition by X-rays |
US6218943B1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2001-04-17 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Contraband detection and article reclaim system |
US6256404B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2001-07-03 | Analogic Corporation | Computed tomography scanning apparatus and method using adaptive reconstruction window |
US6272230B1 (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2001-08-07 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for optimizing detection of objects in computed tomography data |
US6298112B1 (en) * | 1998-07-01 | 2001-10-02 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co. Llc | Methods and apparatus for helical multi-frame image reconstruction in a computed tomography fluoro system including data communications over a network |
US6345113B1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2002-02-05 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for processing object data in computed tomography data using object projections |
US6359961B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2002-03-19 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and methods for stereo radiography including remote control via a network |
US6437656B1 (en) * | 1999-10-25 | 2002-08-20 | Electro-Tec Corp. | Broadband high data rate analog and digital communication link |
US20020186862A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-12-12 | Mcclelland Keith M. | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US20030085163A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2003-05-08 | Chan Chin F. | Remote data access |
US6735272B1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-05-11 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Method and system for a customized patient report in imaging systems |
Family Cites Families (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4029963A (en) * | 1976-07-30 | 1977-06-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Junior University | X-ray spectral decomposition imaging system |
DE69329073T2 (en) * | 1992-03-23 | 2001-01-18 | Georgetown University Washingt | TAXOL ENCLOSED IN LIPOSOMES AND METHOD OF USE |
US5440056A (en) * | 1992-04-17 | 1995-08-08 | Abbott Laboratories | 9-deoxotaxane compounds |
FR2697752B1 (en) * | 1992-11-10 | 1995-04-14 | Rhone Poulenc Rorer Sa | Antitumor compositions containing taxane derivatives. |
BE1007766A3 (en) * | 1993-11-10 | 1995-10-17 | Philips Electronics Nv | Method and apparatus for computer tomography. |
US5919816A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1999-07-06 | Bionumerik Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Formulations and methods of reducing toxicity of antineoplastic agents |
US5763625A (en) * | 1995-04-25 | 1998-06-09 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Synthesis and use of β-lapachone analogs |
DE19523090C1 (en) * | 1995-06-26 | 1996-08-29 | Siemens Ag | Medical X=ray CT investigation appts. |
US6245807B1 (en) * | 1995-08-24 | 2001-06-12 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Treatment of human prostate disease |
US5807888A (en) * | 1995-12-13 | 1998-09-15 | Xechem International, Inc. | Preparation of brominated paclitaxel analogues and their use as effective antitumor agents |
US5760072A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1998-06-02 | Pharmachemie B.V. | Paclitaxel prodrugs, method for preparation as well as their use in selective chemotherapy |
US5824700A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1998-10-20 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Ortho-quinone derivatives novel synthesis therefor and their use in the inhibition of neoplastic cell growth |
US5773461A (en) * | 1996-06-06 | 1998-06-30 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 7-deoxy-6-substituted paclitaxels |
US5661774A (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 1997-08-26 | Analogic Corporation | Dual energy power supply |
EP0825457A3 (en) * | 1996-08-19 | 2002-02-13 | Analogic Corporation | Multiple angle pre-screening tomographic systems and methods |
IL121773A0 (en) * | 1997-09-15 | 1998-02-22 | Elscint Ltd | Method for improving CT images having high attenuation objects |
CA2245029A1 (en) * | 1998-03-13 | 1999-09-13 | University Of British Columbia | Granulatimide compounds as g2 checkpoint inhibitors |
WO2000033058A2 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2000-06-08 | Invision Technologies, Inc. | A nonintrusive inspection system |
ES2273688T3 (en) * | 1999-04-14 | 2007-05-16 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | PROCEDURE AND COMPOSITION FOR CANCER TREATMENT. |
US6418189B1 (en) * | 2000-01-24 | 2002-07-09 | Analogic Corporation | Explosive material detection apparatus and method using dual energy information of a scan |
DE10051462A1 (en) * | 2000-10-17 | 2002-04-25 | Siemens Ag | Method for beam hardening correction for a computer tomography device in which a number of images are obtained from an output image by re-projection of the pixels which are then used to correct for beam hardening |
AU2002248229B2 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2006-11-30 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Method of treating hematologic tumors and cancers using beta lapachone |
US6458974B1 (en) * | 2001-01-25 | 2002-10-01 | Cyclis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Synthesis of β-lapachone and its intermediates |
US6968034B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2005-11-22 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system |
US6816571B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2004-11-09 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems Corporation Delaware | Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner |
AU2003228666A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2003-11-10 | Case Western Reserve University | Lapachone delivery systems, compositions and uses related thereto |
US6928142B2 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2005-08-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Non-invasive plaque detection using combined nuclear medicine and x-ray system |
-
2002
- 2002-02-06 US US10/068,459 patent/US6816571B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-02-06 AU AU2003212956A patent/AU2003212956B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2003-02-06 WO PCT/US2003/003721 patent/WO2003067770A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-02-06 EP EP03708999A patent/EP1472524A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-02-06 CA CA002467567A patent/CA2467567A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-02-06 EP EP12175383A patent/EP2508872A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-02-06 IL IL16240903A patent/IL162409A0/en unknown
- 2003-11-06 US US10/702,814 patent/US6944264B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-11-06 US US10/702,362 patent/US6788761B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-11-19 US US10/717,360 patent/US20040101098A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-11-19 US US10/717,051 patent/US7023957B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-06-08 IL IL162409A patent/IL162409A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-12-20 US US11/018,078 patent/US7308077B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (51)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4020346A (en) * | 1973-03-21 | 1977-04-26 | Dennis Donald A | X-ray inspection device and method |
US4064440A (en) * | 1976-06-22 | 1977-12-20 | Roder Frederick L | X-ray or gamma-ray examination device for moving objects |
US4217641A (en) * | 1978-04-28 | 1980-08-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Correction for polychromatic X-ray distortion in CT images |
US4247774A (en) * | 1978-06-26 | 1981-01-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health, Education And Welfare | Simultaneous dual-energy computer assisted tomography |
US4590558A (en) * | 1981-12-30 | 1986-05-20 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for removing objects from CT images |
US4539648A (en) * | 1982-09-29 | 1985-09-03 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Detection of agricultural contraband in baggage |
US4580219A (en) * | 1983-05-02 | 1986-04-01 | General Electric Company | Method for reducing image artifacts due to projection measurement inconsistencies |
US4788704A (en) * | 1985-03-04 | 1988-11-29 | Heimann Gmbh | X-ray scanner & detector signal processing system |
US4759047A (en) * | 1985-08-29 | 1988-07-19 | Heimann Gmbh | Baggage inspection system |
US4709333A (en) * | 1986-01-03 | 1987-11-24 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for imaging in the presence of multiple high density objects |
US4941162A (en) * | 1988-06-22 | 1990-07-10 | The State Of Israel, Atomic Energy Commission, Soreq Nuclear Research Center | Method and system for detection of nitrogenous explosives by using nuclear resonance absorption |
US4957250A (en) * | 1988-08-11 | 1990-09-18 | Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh | Device for intercepting and retaining of cargo in a transport cabin |
US5323004A (en) * | 1989-05-08 | 1994-06-21 | Scientific Innovations, Inc. | Nuclear resonances in activation analysis, and particularly, its application to detection of nitrogen based explosives in luggage |
US5109691A (en) * | 1989-12-08 | 1992-05-05 | Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. | Explosive detection screening system |
US5125015A (en) * | 1990-01-26 | 1992-06-23 | The State Of Israel Atomic Energy Commission, Soreq Nuclear Research Center | Method and system for determining a lower-bound density of a body |
US5319547A (en) * | 1990-08-10 | 1994-06-07 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects |
US5490218A (en) * | 1990-08-10 | 1996-02-06 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects |
US5838758A (en) * | 1990-08-10 | 1998-11-17 | Vivid Technologies | Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects |
US5070519A (en) * | 1990-10-04 | 1991-12-03 | Hologic, Inc. | Selective equalization radiography |
US5162652A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1992-11-10 | Pcp, Inc. | Method and apparatus for rapid detection of contraband and toxic materials by trace vapor detection using ion mobility spectrometry |
US5243664A (en) * | 1991-09-16 | 1993-09-07 | Picker International, Inc. | Post-processing technique for reducing metallic clip artifacts in CT images |
US5182764A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1993-01-26 | Invision Technologies, Inc. | Automatic concealed object detection system having a pre-scan stage |
US5367552A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1994-11-22 | In Vision Technologies, Inc. | Automatic concealed object detection system having a pre-scan stage |
US5600303A (en) * | 1993-01-15 | 1997-02-04 | Technology International Incorporated | Detection of concealed explosives and contraband |
US5805660A (en) * | 1993-07-30 | 1998-09-08 | Europ Scan S.A. | Method and device for carrying out detection of at least one non-visible object containing a given material |
US5600700A (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1997-02-04 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Detecting explosives or other contraband by employing transmitted and scattered X-rays |
US5642393A (en) * | 1995-09-26 | 1997-06-24 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Detecting contraband by employing interactive multiprobe tomography |
US6018562A (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 2000-01-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Apparatus and method for automatic recognition of concealed objects using multiple energy computed tomography |
US6163591A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 2000-12-19 | The Imperial College Of Science | Screening apparatus and method |
US5933471A (en) * | 1997-02-26 | 1999-08-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for reducing reconstruction artifacts in computed tomography images |
US6118850A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 2000-09-12 | Rutgers, The State University | Analysis methods for energy dispersive X-ray diffraction patterns |
US6256404B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2001-07-03 | Analogic Corporation | Computed tomography scanning apparatus and method using adaptive reconstruction window |
US5953444A (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 1999-09-14 | University Of Pennsylvania | Method for improved correction of spectrum hardening artifacts in computed tomography images |
US6272230B1 (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2001-08-07 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for optimizing detection of objects in computed tomography data |
US6026143A (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-02-15 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for detecting sheet objects in computed tomography data |
US6076400A (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-06-20 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for classifying objects in computed tomography data using density dependent mass thresholds |
US6198795B1 (en) * | 1998-03-19 | 2001-03-06 | Heimann Systems Gmbh | Method of processing images for material recognition by X-rays |
US6218943B1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2001-04-17 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Contraband detection and article reclaim system |
US6094472A (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2000-07-25 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | X-ray backscatter imaging system including moving body tracking assembly |
US6125193A (en) * | 1998-06-01 | 2000-09-26 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and system for high absorption object artifacts reduction and superposition |
US6088423A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2000-07-11 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Multiview x-ray based system for detecting contraband such as in baggage |
US6298112B1 (en) * | 1998-07-01 | 2001-10-02 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co. Llc | Methods and apparatus for helical multi-frame image reconstruction in a computed tomography fluoro system including data communications over a network |
US6345113B1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2002-02-05 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for processing object data in computed tomography data using object projections |
US6359961B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2002-03-19 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and methods for stereo radiography including remote control via a network |
US6437656B1 (en) * | 1999-10-25 | 2002-08-20 | Electro-Tec Corp. | Broadband high data rate analog and digital communication link |
US20020186862A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-12-12 | Mcclelland Keith M. | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US6707879B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2004-03-16 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US20050008119A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2005-01-13 | L-3 Communications Security And Detections Systems | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US20050031076A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2005-02-10 | L-3 Communications Security And Detections System | Remote baggage screening method |
US20030085163A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2003-05-08 | Chan Chin F. | Remote data access |
US6735272B1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-05-11 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Method and system for a customized patient report in imaging systems |
Cited By (58)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050008119A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2005-01-13 | L-3 Communications Security And Detections Systems | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US20020186862A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-12-12 | Mcclelland Keith M. | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US7139406B2 (en) | 2001-04-03 | 2006-11-21 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US20070195994A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2007-08-23 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems | Remote baggage screening system, software and method |
US8031903B2 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2011-10-04 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Networked security system |
US20060274916A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2006-12-07 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems | Remote data access |
US20070280502A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2007-12-06 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Networked security system |
US10670769B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2020-06-02 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Compact mobile cargo scanning system |
US9223049B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2015-12-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Cargo scanning system with boom structure |
US9052403B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2015-06-09 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Compact mobile cargo scanning system |
US10007019B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2018-06-26 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Compact mobile cargo scanning system |
US9020095B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-04-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners |
US10901112B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2021-01-26 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system with stationary x-ray sources |
US11796711B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2023-10-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Modular CT scanning system |
US10175381B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2019-01-08 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners having source points with less than a predefined variation in brightness |
US9675306B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2017-06-13 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system |
US8837669B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-09-16 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system |
US8885794B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-11-11 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items |
US9618648B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2017-04-11 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners |
US10591424B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2020-03-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection systems for the identification of specific target items |
US9442082B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2016-09-13 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
US9113839B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-08-25 | Rapiscon Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
US9285498B2 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2016-03-15 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting commercial vehicles and cargo containers |
US7734066B2 (en) | 2003-11-19 | 2010-06-08 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Security system with distributed computing |
US20050198226A1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2005-09-08 | Delia Paul | Security system with distributed computing |
US9223050B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2015-12-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray imaging system having improved mobility |
US20080304622A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2008-12-11 | Edward James Morton | X-Ray Tomography Inspection Systems |
US10976271B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2021-04-13 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Stationary tomographic X-ray imaging systems for automatically sorting objects based on generated tomographic images |
US9048061B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2015-06-02 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners and X-ray sources therefor |
US7876879B2 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2011-01-25 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomography inspection systems |
US10295483B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2019-05-21 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Data collection, processing and storage systems for X-ray tomographic images |
US9638646B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2017-05-02 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners and X-ray sources therefor |
US20080006282A1 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2008-01-10 | Predrag Sukovic | Medical imaging exchange network |
US20100011863A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2010-01-21 | The Secretary Of State For Home Affairs | Method and apparatus for computed tomography |
US8582855B2 (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2013-11-12 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Apparatus, method and computer program for producing a corrected image of a region of interest from acquired projection data |
US20100322514A1 (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2010-12-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V. | Apparatus, method and computer program for producing a corrected image of a region of interest from acquired projection data |
US9429530B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2016-08-30 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning systems |
US9223052B2 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2015-12-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning systems |
US20110060426A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2011-03-10 | Edward James Morton | Scanning Systems |
US11768313B2 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2023-09-26 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Multi-scanner networked systems for performing material discrimination processes on scanned objects |
US20220229204A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2022-07-21 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning Systems |
US11275194B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2022-03-15 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning systems |
US10585207B2 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2020-03-10 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning systems |
US20160274267A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2016-09-22 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Scanning Systems |
US10098214B2 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2018-10-09 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Detector support structures for gantry scanner systems |
US9332624B2 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2016-05-03 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Gantry scanner systems |
US9218933B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2015-12-22 | Rapidscan Systems, Inc. | Low-dose radiographic imaging system |
US10422919B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2019-09-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing |
US10830920B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2020-11-10 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Distributed analysis X-ray inspection methods and systems |
US10509142B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2019-12-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Distributed analysis x-ray inspection methods and systems |
US11099294B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2021-08-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Distributed analysis x-ray inspection methods and systems |
US9632206B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2017-04-25 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing |
US10317566B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2019-06-11 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable security inspection system |
US11550077B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2023-01-10 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable vehicle inspection portal with accompanying workstation |
US9791590B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-10-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable security inspection system |
US10768338B2 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2020-09-08 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo |
US11287391B2 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2022-03-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo |
US10302807B2 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2019-05-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2003067770A2 (en) | 2003-08-14 |
US7023957B2 (en) | 2006-04-04 |
AU2003212956A1 (en) | 2003-09-02 |
IL162409A0 (en) | 2005-11-20 |
US6788761B2 (en) | 2004-09-07 |
IL162409A (en) | 2010-11-30 |
AU2003212956B2 (en) | 2009-01-29 |
US6944264B2 (en) | 2005-09-13 |
US20050053184A1 (en) | 2005-03-10 |
EP1472524A4 (en) | 2010-03-24 |
US7308077B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 |
US20040101102A1 (en) | 2004-05-27 |
WO2003067770A3 (en) | 2004-06-10 |
EP1472524A2 (en) | 2004-11-03 |
US20050094765A1 (en) | 2005-05-05 |
US6816571B2 (en) | 2004-11-09 |
US20030147489A1 (en) | 2003-08-07 |
EP2508872A1 (en) | 2012-10-10 |
CA2467567A1 (en) | 2003-08-14 |
US20050111619A1 (en) | 2005-05-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7308077B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for target transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner | |
US9772426B2 (en) | Systems and methods for automated, rapid detection of high-atomic-number materials | |
CA2979932C (en) | Automated quality control and selection | |
US9042511B2 (en) | Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects | |
US6813374B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for automatic image quality assessment | |
US7539337B2 (en) | Method of and system for splitting compound objects in multi-energy computed tomography images | |
US7801348B2 (en) | Method of and system for classifying objects using local distributions of multi-energy computed tomography images | |
EP2676128B1 (en) | System and method for multi-scanner x-ray inspection | |
US20050058242A1 (en) | Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects | |
US20050117700A1 (en) | Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects | |
US20090304145A1 (en) | Computer tomography apparatus | |
US7474786B2 (en) | Method of and system for classifying objects using histogram segment features of multi-energy computed tomography images | |
EP1875276B1 (en) | Energy distribution reconstruction in ct | |
US8009883B2 (en) | Method of and system for automatic object display of volumetric computed tomography images for fast on-screen threat resolution | |
US20140078257A1 (en) | Method for visualization of three-dimensional objects on a person | |
JP2024071997A (en) | X-ray device and material classification method using X-rays |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |