US20040008580A1 - Microseismic signal processing - Google Patents

Microseismic signal processing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040008580A1
US20040008580A1 US10/381,554 US38155403A US2004008580A1 US 20040008580 A1 US20040008580 A1 US 20040008580A1 US 38155403 A US38155403 A US 38155403A US 2004008580 A1 US2004008580 A1 US 2004008580A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
reservoir
seismic
source
microseismic
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/381,554
Other versions
US6947843B2 (en
Inventor
Andrew Fisher
Robert Jones
Andrew Jupe
Stephen Wilson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Baker Hughes International Treasury Services Ltd
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Original Assignee
ABB Offshore Systems Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ABB Offshore Systems Ltd filed Critical ABB Offshore Systems Ltd
Assigned to ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED reassignment ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FISHER, ANDREW, JONES, ROBERT HUGHES, JUPE, ANDREW, WILSON, STEPHEN
Publication of US20040008580A1 publication Critical patent/US20040008580A1/en
Assigned to VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED reassignment VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED
Assigned to VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED reassignment VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6947843B2 publication Critical patent/US6947843B2/en
Assigned to SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION reassignment SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SCHLUMBERGER HOLDINGS LIMITED
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/01Measuring or predicting earthquakes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
    • G01V1/30Analysis
    • G01V1/306Analysis for determining physical properties of the subsurface, e.g. impedance, porosity or attenuation profiles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to microseismic signal processing.
  • Microearthquakes are known to be induced during hydrocarbon and geothermal fluid production operations. They typically, but not exclusively, result from shear-stress release on pre-existing geological structures (e.g. faults and fractures) due to production/injection induced perturbations to the local effective earth stress conditions. They might also be caused by rock failure through collapse (e.g. compaction) or through the propagation of failure planes through tensile fracture propagation (e.g. hydraulic fracturing). These induced microseismic events may be induced or triggered by reservoir processes such as depletion, flooding or stimulation, in other words the extraction or injection of fluids.
  • the signals from these microseismic events can be detected in the form of elastic waves transmitted from the source location to remote sensors. These signals contain valuable information on the physical processes taking place within a reservoir. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these.
  • microseismic monitoring hardware particularly related to geothermal and hydrocarbon reservoirs, are known and it is also known to use microseismic signals to monitor hydraulic fracturing and waste re-injection.
  • microearthquakes microseismic activity
  • This stress relaxation process takes place in all reservoirs, but in mature fields and fracture dominated reservoirs the pressure and stress changes tend to be more severe and the seismic activity more intense.
  • Re-injection is a common approach to the disposal of waste from development and in-fill drilling, from increased solids and water production, and ultimately it may be used in seafloor waste recovery and disposal prior to decommissioning.
  • the question-being asked by operators and regulators is how can this process of re-injection be managed and the size and shape of disposal domains monitored.
  • Microseismic events are basically small earthquakes, typically, but not exclusively, Richter magnitude (M L ) ⁇ 3, and to date they have been detected and located at distances of over 1 km from the monitoring well in hydrocarbon reservoirs. They occur because the earth stresses acting within the reservoir are anisotropic. This causes shear stresses to build up on naturally occurring fracture surfaces that under normal conditions are locked together and when the in situ stresses are perturbed by reservoir production activity, such as changing fluid pressures, the fracture's shear producing small earthquakes (FIG. 1). The seismic signals from these microseismic events can be detected and located in space using high bandwidth borehole sensors. Microseismic activity has been successfully detected and located in rocks ranging from unconsolidated sands, to chalks to crystalline rocks.
  • the present invention involves methods for estimating and deriving information on the physical processes taking place within hydrocarbon reservoirs from detected microseismic signals, using appropriate receivers such as seismic sensors, located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source.
  • Examples of the present invention use microseismics to:
  • microseismic event locations have previously been used to determine the position of structure (e.g. faults) in reservoirs (i.e. spatial information), they have not been used in any quantitative manner to obtain reservoir parameters, such as porosity, permeability, saturation (i.e. reservoir property information).
  • reservoir parameters such as porosity, permeability, saturation (i.e. reservoir property information).
  • the present invention involves methods for using information on physical processes taking place within a reservoir from microseismic signals detected using appropriate receivers (seismic sensors) located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these.
  • the method can involve processes investigated at just one instance during operation of the hydrocarbon reservoir and/or through comparison with a similar process investigated at some prior or future instance (i.e. time-lapse).
  • the method also includes the integration and correlation of the microseismic data with any other reservoir data type, including pressure, flow rate, geophysical logs and seismic reflection data obtain at one or more instance in time
  • Specific reservoir properties of interest that can be estimated from microseismic data include:
  • Rock strength parameters e.g. compressive strength
  • a characteristic of a microseismic signal is used to investigate a process or property occurring at the source location of an individual microseismic event (as defined by a seismic source volume with a radius with the event located at the centre of the volume).
  • the above method involves quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical or empirical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time, frequency or other domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir or seismic reflection image)
  • some exploration method e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir or seismic reflection image
  • a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein the spatial and temporal relationship and/or comparison of seismic waveforms between adjacent microseismic events is used to estimate a reservoir property in the region between and including the individual event locations.
  • the method may involve quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir)
  • some exploration method e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir
  • a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein the microseismic signal is used to investigate a process occurring at any location between source and receiver locations at some point on the raypath of the wave travelling between source and receiver.
  • the method may use some means of separating the effect of a reservoir property on the seismic waveform from some specified point on the raypath from the integrated effect of all other points on the raypath between source and receiver. Such analysis may be used to determine a reservoir parameter at some point (e.g. a seismic velocity) or to estimate a parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir).
  • a reservoir parameter at some point e.g. a seismic velocity
  • some exploration method e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir.
  • a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal from one or more events is used to investigate a process or property occurring at a location remote from the source, but not necessarily on a raypath of a wave travelling between source and receiver.
  • the method may involve the use of a single event to investigate a property or by considering the cumulative effect of many such events.
  • the seismic waveforms can be used to define a discrete planar geological discontinuity that may represent a fault or fracture plane.
  • At least 3 parameters can be derived from microseismic waveforms received at one or more receivers using various models of physical processes taking place at the source. 1) The source location in space and time. 2) The frequency content of the signal can be analysed to provide an estimate of equivalent radius of the fracture plane that generates the microseismic event. 3) Analysis of the polarity of the seismic signal and the relative amplitude of different seismic phases at one or more sensors allows the orientation of the failure plane in space to be determined.
  • the method may also involve using the planar structures defiled by these 3 parameters to construct an intersecting network of fracture planes that control the magnitude and principal axes of the permeability tensor and hence fluid flow within a reservoir.
  • This permeability information is then used as an input into a numerical model of fluid flow in the reservoir and used to make predictions of reservoir processes resulting from production or fluid injection wells.
  • the example in FIG. 3 represents microseismic events (e.g. multiplets) occurring at times T1 to T1+n due to an increase in fluid pressure due to fluid injection, from a water injector well for example.
  • the spatial distance between each event is given by L1 to L1+n ⁇ 1.
  • the time at which each event occurs is related to the movement of fluid pressure through the reservoir. Therefore the spatial and temporal relationship of the microseismicity provides information on the pressure front velocity and fluid conductivity (K) using the general form of equation K ⁇ L1/(T1+1 ⁇ T1) for example. Estimates of conductivity obtained in this way can be used as input to reservoir models and used to make predictions of fluid flow in a reservoir, hence improving production.
  • a volume containing seismic events can be divided into smaller discrete volumes or cells (e.g. cubes). These cells can be defined as seismically active or passive (quiet) based on the number of events occurring within the cell, the cumulative energy release or some other combination of parameters.
  • the seismic events are due to fluid pressure increase, such as a programme of water injection to maintain reservoir pressure (e.g. from a waterflood), there is a finite probability that any two adjacent cells that are microseismically active are also connected hydraulically.
  • connection can therefore be represented by a hydraulic pipe with a length and conductivity estimated from the spatial separation and the seismic parameters used to define the cells, respectively.
  • a network of pipes that can provide an estimate of the hydraulic conductivity distribution in a reservoir volume.
  • Cells with no activity represent areas with no hydraulic connection.
  • the network of pipes forms a conductivity or permeability grid that can be input into a numerical reservoir model and used to male predictions for fluid flow and hence help improve reservoir management and recovery.
  • microseismic events are used as sources for creating a tomographic image between wells.
  • Each event produces a raypath from a source to a receiver.
  • the waveform therefore expresses the integrated or averaged effect of this varying property over the whole seismic raypath length.
  • Examples of such properties are velocity, attenuation or shear-wave birefringence.
  • the travel time from source to receiver represents the integrated effect of the travel time over discrete unit length sections of the whole raypath. For a single raypath this gives an average velocity, but no information about discrete reservoir volumes can be determined. However if there are intersecting rays, the problem becomes over constrained/determined.
  • V average velocity
  • L cell length
  • seismic waveforms can be used to define discrete planar geological discontinuities that may represent a fault or fracture plane (as in the first and second aspects of the invention).
  • a further characteristic of the waveform could then be used to provide an estimate of shear displacement along the fault during the failure that produces the microseismic event.
  • This information on these local properties could then be used to determine or constrain properties (such as the stress state) at remote locations either directly from the property or through the use of a mathematical model.
  • stress tensor rotations around a fault structure could be determined or constrained by geomechanical models of the reservoir where an input or boundary condition to the model is the fault displacement determined from the microseismic event.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

Signals from microseismic events are used to obtain a parameter of reservoir such as porosity, permeability or saturation.

Description

  • The present invention relates to microseismic signal processing. [0001]
  • Microearthquakes (microseismic events) are known to be induced during hydrocarbon and geothermal fluid production operations. They typically, but not exclusively, result from shear-stress release on pre-existing geological structures (e.g. faults and fractures) due to production/injection induced perturbations to the local effective earth stress conditions. They might also be caused by rock failure through collapse (e.g. compaction) or through the propagation of failure planes through tensile fracture propagation (e.g. hydraulic fracturing). These induced microseismic events may be induced or triggered by reservoir processes such as depletion, flooding or stimulation, in other words the extraction or injection of fluids. The signals from these microseismic events can be detected in the form of elastic waves transmitted from the source location to remote sensors. These signals contain valuable information on the physical processes taking place within a reservoir. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these. [0002]
  • Various forms of microseismic monitoring hardware, particularly related to geothermal and hydrocarbon reservoirs, are known and it is also known to use microseismic signals to monitor hydraulic fracturing and waste re-injection. [0003]
  • Throughout the life of a hydrocarbon reservoir, the production process (including extraction and injection of fluids) induces physical changes within the reservoir. These changes result in perturbations to the in situ stress conditions and physical properties that propagate out through the reservoir from the source of the perturbations (i.e. injection or extraction boreholes). [0004]
  • A direct consequence of these perturbations is the re-activation of pre-existing reservoir structures such as faults and fractures, which manifests itself as small earthquakes, referred to as microearthquakes or microseismic activity. This stress relaxation process takes place in all reservoirs, but in mature fields and fracture dominated reservoirs the pressure and stress changes tend to be more severe and the seismic activity more intense. The following are three situations in which induced microseismic activity is likely and has been demonstrated to occur. [0005]
  • Reservoir depressurization can lead to localized reservoir compaction, or on a reservoir scale to compaction assisted or compaction driven production. In several North Sea fields where compaction is taking place, there are associated problems of wellbore stability and integrity. Large scale depressurization near fault sealed or fault compartmentalized reservoirs will lead to fault re-activation and the potential for pressure breakthrough into neighboring reservoir compartments or even fields. [0006]
  • Enhanced recovery, particularly in mature fields, can require massive injection and flooding programmes aimed at pressure maintenance. Even in moderately fractured reservoirs the efficiency of these operations is known to be strongly affected by anisotropic or heterogeneous flood patterns. [0007]
  • Re-injection is a common approach to the disposal of waste from development and in-fill drilling, from increased solids and water production, and ultimately it may be used in seafloor waste recovery and disposal prior to decommissioning. However, the question-being asked by operators and regulators is how can this process of re-injection be managed and the size and shape of disposal domains monitored. [0008]
  • Microseismic events are basically small earthquakes, typically, but not exclusively, Richter magnitude (M[0009] L)<3, and to date they have been detected and located at distances of over 1 km from the monitoring well in hydrocarbon reservoirs. They occur because the earth stresses acting within the reservoir are anisotropic. This causes shear stresses to build up on naturally occurring fracture surfaces that under normal conditions are locked together and when the in situ stresses are perturbed by reservoir production activity, such as changing fluid pressures, the fracture's shear producing small earthquakes (FIG. 1). The seismic signals from these microseismic events can be detected and located in space using high bandwidth borehole sensors. Microseismic activity has been successfully detected and located in rocks ranging from unconsolidated sands, to chalks to crystalline rocks.
  • The present invention involves methods for estimating and deriving information on the physical processes taking place within hydrocarbon reservoirs from detected microseismic signals, using appropriate receivers such as seismic sensors, located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source.[0010]
  • Examples of the present invention use microseismics to: [0011]
  • Identify fault structures that can result in reservoir compartmentalisation or act as flow channels and routes for premature water breakthrough. [0012]
  • Image flow anisotropy associated with production from fracture dominated reservoirs. [0013]
  • Provide real-time 3D monitoring of fluid pressure front movement, such as water flood fronts. [0014]
  • Assist in targeting new producer/injector wells. [0015]
  • Identify areas of reservoir compaction and potential wellbore instability. [0016]
  • Provide input to and condition permeability and connectivity properties for reservoir simulation. [0017]
  • The key to the invention is that, although microseismic event locations have previously been used to determine the position of structure (e.g. faults) in reservoirs (i.e. spatial information), they have not been used in any quantitative manner to obtain reservoir parameters, such as porosity, permeability, saturation (i.e. reservoir property information). Such parameters are key to the control of fluid extraction production processes and allow the planning of production and development plans for fields. [0018]
  • The present invention involves methods for using information on physical processes taking place within a reservoir from microseismic signals detected using appropriate receivers (seismic sensors) located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these. The method can involve processes investigated at just one instance during operation of the hydrocarbon reservoir and/or through comparison with a similar process investigated at some prior or future instance (i.e. time-lapse). The method also includes the integration and correlation of the microseismic data with any other reservoir data type, including pressure, flow rate, geophysical logs and seismic reflection data obtain at one or more instance in time [0019]
  • Specific reservoir properties of interest that can be estimated from microseismic data include: [0020]
  • Porosity [0021]
  • Permeability (including relative gas, oil water permeabilities) [0022]
  • Fluid saturations (gas, oil water) [0023]
  • Stress [0024]
  • Seismic velocity [0025]
  • Rock strength parameters (e.g. compressive strength) [0026]
  • According to the present invention from a first aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal is used to investigate a process or property occurring at the source location of an individual microseismic event (as defined by a seismic source volume with a radius with the event located at the centre of the volume). [0027]
  • The above method involves quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical or empirical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time, frequency or other domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir or seismic reflection image) [0028]
  • According to the present invention from a second aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein the spatial and temporal relationship and/or comparison of seismic waveforms between adjacent microseismic events is used to estimate a reservoir property in the region between and including the individual event locations. [0029]
  • As with the invention from the first aspect, the method may involve quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir) [0030]
  • According to the present invention from a third aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein the microseismic signal is used to investigate a process occurring at any location between source and receiver locations at some point on the raypath of the wave travelling between source and receiver. [0031]
  • The method may use some means of separating the effect of a reservoir property on the seismic waveform from some specified point on the raypath from the integrated effect of all other points on the raypath between source and receiver. Such analysis may be used to determine a reservoir parameter at some point (e.g. a seismic velocity) or to estimate a parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir). [0032]
  • According to the present invention from a fourth aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal from one or more events is used to investigate a process or property occurring at a location remote from the source, but not necessarily on a raypath of a wave travelling between source and receiver. The method may involve the use of a single event to investigate a property or by considering the cumulative effect of many such events. [0033]
  • Referring to FIG. 2, in a method according to an example of the first aspect, the seismic waveforms can be used to define a discrete planar geological discontinuity that may represent a fault or fracture plane. At least 3 parameters can be derived from microseismic waveforms received at one or more receivers using various models of physical processes taking place at the source. 1) The source location in space and time. 2) The frequency content of the signal can be analysed to provide an estimate of equivalent radius of the fracture plane that generates the microseismic event. 3) Analysis of the polarity of the seismic signal and the relative amplitude of different seismic phases at one or more sensors allows the orientation of the failure plane in space to be determined. [0034]
  • The method may also involve using the planar structures defiled by these 3 parameters to construct an intersecting network of fracture planes that control the magnitude and principal axes of the permeability tensor and hence fluid flow within a reservoir. This permeability information is then used as an input into a numerical model of fluid flow in the reservoir and used to make predictions of reservoir processes resulting from production or fluid injection wells. [0035]
  • Referring to FIG. 3, in a method according to an example of the second aspect, it can be demonstrated that in certain cases there is a strong similarity in the characteristics of seismic events (e.g. similarity of waveforms, proximity in space and time). Such events are sometimes known as doublets (2 similar events) or multiplets (three or more similar events). The association of these events could, for example, be indicative of the passage of fluid between the source locations over a certain time and therefore the permeability of the intervening region. [0036]
  • The example in FIG. 3 represents microseismic events (e.g. multiplets) occurring at times T1 to T1+n due to an increase in fluid pressure due to fluid injection, from a water injector well for example. The spatial distance between each event is given by L1 to L1+n−1. The time at which each event occurs is related to the movement of fluid pressure through the reservoir. Therefore the spatial and temporal relationship of the microseismicity provides information on the pressure front velocity and fluid conductivity (K) using the general form of equation K ∝ L1/(T1+1−T1) for example. Estimates of conductivity obtained in this way can be used as input to reservoir models and used to make predictions of fluid flow in a reservoir, hence improving production. [0037]
  • Referring to FIG. 4, a volume containing seismic events can be divided into smaller discrete volumes or cells (e.g. cubes). These cells can be defined as seismically active or passive (quiet) based on the number of events occurring within the cell, the cumulative energy release or some other combination of parameters. In the case where the seismic events are due to fluid pressure increase, such as a programme of water injection to maintain reservoir pressure (e.g. from a waterflood), there is a finite probability that any two adjacent cells that are microseismically active are also connected hydraulically. [0038]
  • The connection can therefore be represented by a hydraulic pipe with a length and conductivity estimated from the spatial separation and the seismic parameters used to define the cells, respectively. By examining each block in turn it is possible to construct a network of pipes that can provide an estimate of the hydraulic conductivity distribution in a reservoir volume. Cells with no activity represent areas with no hydraulic connection. The network of pipes forms a conductivity or permeability grid that can be input into a numerical reservoir model and used to male predictions for fluid flow and hence help improve reservoir management and recovery. [0039]
  • Referring to FIG. 5, in a method according to an example of the third aspect, microseismic events are used as sources for creating a tomographic image between wells. Each event produces a raypath from a source to a receiver. The waveform therefore expresses the integrated or averaged effect of this varying property over the whole seismic raypath length. Examples of such properties are velocity, attenuation or shear-wave birefringence. For example, the travel time from source to receiver represents the integrated effect of the travel time over discrete unit length sections of the whole raypath. For a single raypath this gives an average velocity, but no information about discrete reservoir volumes can be determined. However if there are intersecting rays, the problem becomes over constrained/determined. In particular, it is possible to calculate information at points of intersection of raypaths in a manner known as tomography. For example, by dividing the reservoir into discrete cells and setting up a system of equations relating average velocity (V) to travel time over each cell (t) and cell length (L) (i.e. V=dt). The Inversion of the matrix of travel times and separations gives a grid of velocities. It is then possible to relate these velocities to reservoir properties such as permeability or porosity and use them to improve reservoir models. [0040]
  • Referring to FIG. 6, in a method according to an example of the fourth aspect, seismic waveforms can be used to define discrete planar geological discontinuities that may represent a fault or fracture plane (as in the first and second aspects of the invention). A further characteristic of the waveform could then be used to provide an estimate of shear displacement along the fault during the failure that produces the microseismic event. This information on these local properties (such as displacement on a fault) could then be used to determine or constrain properties (such as the stress state) at remote locations either directly from the property or through the use of a mathematical model. In the example of FIG. 6 stress tensor rotations around a fault structure could be determined or constrained by geomechanical models of the reservoir where an input or boundary condition to the model is the fault displacement determined from the microseismic event. [0041]

Claims (9)

1. A method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal is used to investigate a process or property occurring at the source location of an individual microseismic event (as defined by a seismic source volume with a radius with the event located at the centre of the volume).
2. A method according to claim 1, involving quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on a theoretical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through an exploration method.
3. A method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein the spatial and temporal relationship and/or comparison of seismic waveforms between adjacent microseismic events is used to estimate a reservoir property in the region between and including the individual event locations.
4. A method according to claim 3, involving quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on a theoretical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through an exploration method.
5. A method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein a microseismic signal is used to investigate a process occurring at any location between source and receiver locations at some point on the raypath of the wave travelling between source and receiver.
6. A method according to claim 5, which uses a means of separating the effect of a reservoir property on the seismic waveform from some specified point on the raypath from the integrated effect of all other points on the raypath between source and receiver.
7. A method according to claim 6, used to determine a reservoir parameter at some point or to estimate a parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through an exploration method.
8. A method of monitoring a hydrocarbon reservoir wherein a microseismic signal from one or more events is used to investigate a process occurring at location remote from the seismic event and not necessarily on the raypath between the source and receiver.
9. A method according to claim 8, which involves the use of a single event to investigate a property or by considering the cumulative effect of many such events.
US10/381,554 2001-08-07 2002-07-25 Microseismic signal processing Expired - Lifetime US6947843B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0119248A GB2379013B (en) 2001-08-07 2001-08-07 Microseismic signal processing
GB0119248.3 2001-08-07
PCT/GB2002/003441 WO2003014768A1 (en) 2001-08-07 2002-07-25 Microseismic signal processing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040008580A1 true US20040008580A1 (en) 2004-01-15
US6947843B2 US6947843B2 (en) 2005-09-20

Family

ID=9919958

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/381,554 Expired - Lifetime US6947843B2 (en) 2001-08-07 2002-07-25 Microseismic signal processing

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6947843B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1415180B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2456009C (en)
GB (1) GB2379013B (en)
NO (1) NO336838B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003014768A1 (en)

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080004847A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for updating a model of the earth using microseismic measurements
US20080002523A1 (en) * 2006-06-09 2008-01-03 Spectraseis Ag VH Reservoir Mapping
US20080288173A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-11-20 Spectraseis Ag Seismic attributes for reservoir localization
US20090010104A1 (en) * 2007-07-06 2009-01-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for processing microseismic data
US7539578B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2009-05-26 Spectraseis Ag VH signal integration measure for seismic data
WO2010073072A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-07-01 Schlumberger Technology B.V. Method of subsurface imaging using microseismic data
US20100252268A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Hongren Gu Use of calibration injections with microseismic monitoring
US20110087473A1 (en) * 2009-10-09 2011-04-14 Maria Alejandra Jimenez Chavez Well simulation
US20130100769A1 (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-04-25 Global Microseismic Services, Inc. Microseismic Data Acquisition Array and Corresponding Method
WO2013188743A1 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Westerngeco Llc Source acquisition with multiple frequency components
US20140083681A1 (en) * 2012-09-24 2014-03-27 Stewart Thomas Taylor Seismic monitoring system and method
EP2818897A3 (en) * 2013-06-26 2016-01-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for estimating a parameter of a subsurface volume
WO2017027342A1 (en) * 2015-08-07 2017-02-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of performing complex fracture operations at a wellsite having ledged fractures
US9612359B2 (en) 2013-06-12 2017-04-04 Baker Hughes Incorporated Generation of fracture networks using seismic data
US9945970B1 (en) * 2011-08-29 2018-04-17 Seismic Innovations Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy
US10197704B2 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-02-05 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Corrective scaling of interpreted fractures based on the microseismic detection range bias correction
US10787887B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2020-09-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of performing integrated fracture and reservoir operations for multiple wellbores at a wellsite
US10920538B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2021-02-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method integrating fracture and reservoir operations into geomechanical operations of a wellsite
CN115616659A (en) * 2022-10-10 2023-01-17 中国矿业大学(北京) Method and device for determining type of microseism event and electronic equipment
US11578568B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2023-02-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Well management on cloud computing system
US11774616B2 (en) 2011-08-29 2023-10-03 Seismic Innovations Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display

Families Citing this family (87)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2403803B (en) * 2003-07-05 2005-09-21 Westerngeco Ltd Processing seismic data
US7391675B2 (en) * 2004-09-17 2008-06-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Microseismic event detection and location by continuous map migration
CA2625429C (en) * 2005-11-03 2014-07-22 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Continuous reservoir monitoring for fluid pathways using 3d microseismic data
US7486589B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2009-02-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and apparatus for predicting the hydrocarbon production of a well location
US7663970B2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2010-02-16 Microseismic, Inc. Method for passive seismic emission tomography
CA2663526A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Earth stress analysis method for hydrocarbon recovery
WO2008036152A2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Earth stress management and control process for hydrocarbon recovery
WO2008036153A2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Fluid injection management method for hydrocarbon recovery
NZ575497A (en) 2006-09-28 2011-08-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Iterative inversion of data from simultaneous geophysical sources
US8548782B2 (en) 2007-08-24 2013-10-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for modeling deformation in subsurface strata
US8768672B2 (en) * 2007-08-24 2014-07-01 ExxonMobil. Upstream Research Company Method for predicting time-lapse seismic timeshifts by computer simulation
US8423337B2 (en) * 2007-08-24 2013-04-16 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for multi-scale geomechanical model analysis by computer simulation
CA2690992C (en) * 2007-08-24 2014-07-29 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for predicting well reliability by computer simulation
CA2703588C (en) 2007-12-12 2015-12-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and apparatus for evaluating submarine formations
US20090185448A1 (en) * 2008-01-19 2009-07-23 Duncan Peter M Method for imaging the earth's subsurface using passive seismic sensing
US7986587B2 (en) * 2008-03-20 2011-07-26 Microseismic, Inc. Method for imaging the earth's subsurface using passive seismic sensing
BRPI0908156A2 (en) 2008-03-21 2015-08-11 Exxonmobil Upstream Company Methods for invoking measured geophysical data and for producing hydrocarbons from a subsurface region
US8494777B2 (en) * 2008-04-09 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Continuous microseismic mapping for real-time 3D event detection and location
US20090279387A1 (en) * 2008-05-06 2009-11-12 Pgs Geophysical As Marine passive seismic method for direct hydrocarbon detection
RU2503035C2 (en) * 2008-08-11 2013-12-27 Эксонмобил Апстрим Рисерч Компани Estimation of soil properties using wave signals of seismic surface waves
US20100238765A1 (en) * 2009-03-20 2010-09-23 Grechka Vladimir Reservoir characterization from multicomponent microseismic data
WO2010116236A2 (en) * 2009-04-08 2010-10-14 Schlumberger Technology B.V. Methods and systems for microseismic mapping
US8902710B2 (en) * 2009-11-10 2014-12-02 Microseismic, Inc. Method for determining discrete fracture networks from passive seismic signals and its application to subsurface reservoir simulation
US9410421B2 (en) 2009-12-21 2016-08-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for microseismic analysis
US8537638B2 (en) * 2010-02-10 2013-09-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods for subsurface parameter estimation in full wavefield inversion and reverse-time migration
US8223587B2 (en) * 2010-03-29 2012-07-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Full wavefield inversion using time varying filters
US8694299B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2014-04-08 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Artifact reduction in iterative inversion of geophysical data
US8756042B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2014-06-17 Exxonmobile Upstream Research Company Method and system for checkpointing during simulations
US8767508B2 (en) 2010-08-18 2014-07-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Using seismic P and S arrivals to determine shallow velocity structure
CN103119552B (en) 2010-09-27 2016-06-08 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 Source code separates the actual solution as full wave field inversion with source simultaneously
US8437998B2 (en) 2010-09-27 2013-05-07 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Hybrid method for full waveform inversion using simultaneous and sequential source method
WO2012074592A1 (en) 2010-12-01 2012-06-07 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Simultaneous source inversion for marine streamer data with cross-correlation objective function
WO2012125558A2 (en) * 2011-03-11 2012-09-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for performing microseismic fracture operations
WO2015003028A1 (en) 2011-03-11 2015-01-08 Schlumberger Canada Limited Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events
EP2691795A4 (en) 2011-03-30 2015-12-09 Convergence rate of full wavefield inversion using spectral shaping
CN103460074B (en) 2011-03-31 2016-09-28 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 Wavelet estimators and the method for many subwaves prediction in full wave field inversion
CA2743611C (en) * 2011-06-15 2017-03-14 Engineering Seismology Group Canada Inc. Methods and systems for monitoring and modeling hydraulic fracturing of a reservoir field
CA2842398C (en) 2011-08-23 2017-11-28 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Estimating fracture dimensions from microseismic data
ES2640824T3 (en) 2011-09-02 2017-11-06 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Use of projection on convex assemblies to limit the inversion of the entire wave field
US10422208B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2019-09-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Stacked height growth fracture modeling
AU2012332270A1 (en) 2011-11-04 2014-05-29 Schlumberger Technology B.V. Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks
US9176930B2 (en) 2011-11-29 2015-11-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods for approximating hessian times vector operation in full wavefield inversion
KR102021752B1 (en) 2012-03-08 2019-09-17 엑손모빌 업스트림 리서치 캄파니 Orthogonal source and receiver encoding
GB2503903B (en) 2012-07-11 2015-08-26 Schlumberger Holdings Fracture monitoring and characterisation
US20140126328A1 (en) * 2012-11-06 2014-05-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and Systems for Improving Microseismic Event Detection and Location
RU2598907C1 (en) 2012-11-28 2016-10-10 Эксонмобил Апстрим Рисерч Компани Seismic reflection q-tomography
MY169125A (en) 2013-05-24 2019-02-18 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Multi-parameter inversion through offset dependent elastic fwi
US10459117B2 (en) 2013-06-03 2019-10-29 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Extended subspace method for cross-talk mitigation in multi-parameter inversion
US9702998B2 (en) 2013-07-08 2017-07-11 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Full-wavefield inversion of primaries and multiples in marine environment
EP3351972A1 (en) 2013-08-23 2018-07-25 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Iterative inversion of field-encoded seismic data based on constructing pseudo super-source records
US10036818B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2018-07-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Accelerating full wavefield inversion with nonstationary point-spread functions
US9910189B2 (en) 2014-04-09 2018-03-06 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for fast line search in frequency domain FWI
SG11201608175SA (en) 2014-05-09 2016-11-29 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Efficient line search methods for multi-parameter full wavefield inversion
US10185046B2 (en) 2014-06-09 2019-01-22 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for temporal dispersion correction for seismic simulation, RTM and FWI
CA2947410A1 (en) 2014-06-17 2015-12-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Fast viscoacoustic and viscoelastic full-wavefield inversion
US10838092B2 (en) 2014-07-24 2020-11-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Estimating multiple subsurface parameters by cascaded inversion of wavefield components
US10422899B2 (en) 2014-07-30 2019-09-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Harmonic encoding for FWI
US10386511B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2019-08-20 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Seismic survey design using full wavefield inversion
WO2016064462A1 (en) 2014-10-20 2016-04-28 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Velocity tomography using property scans
EP3234659A1 (en) 2014-12-18 2017-10-25 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Scalable scheduling of parallel iterative seismic jobs
US10520618B2 (en) 2015-02-04 2019-12-31 ExxohnMobil Upstream Research Company Poynting vector minimal reflection boundary conditions
WO2016130208A1 (en) 2015-02-13 2016-08-18 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Efficient and stable absorbing boundary condition in finite-difference calculations
EP3259620B1 (en) 2015-02-17 2020-03-11 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Multistage full wavefield inversion process that generates a multiple free data set
US10416327B2 (en) 2015-06-04 2019-09-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for generating multiple free seismic images
US10838093B2 (en) 2015-07-02 2020-11-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Krylov-space-based quasi-newton preconditioner for full-wavefield inversion
KR102020759B1 (en) 2015-10-02 2019-09-11 엑손모빌 업스트림 리서치 캄파니 Q-compensated full wave field reversal
US10914153B2 (en) 2015-10-06 2021-02-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Systems and methods deriving hydraulic fracture growth from microseismicity analysis
EP3362823B1 (en) 2015-10-15 2019-10-09 ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Fwi model domain angle stacks with amplitude preservation
US10768324B2 (en) 2016-05-19 2020-09-08 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method to predict pore pressure and seal integrity using full wavefield inversion
WO2018204259A1 (en) 2017-05-02 2018-11-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Synthetic source rocks
US10684384B2 (en) 2017-05-24 2020-06-16 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Systems and method for formation evaluation from borehole
US11041976B2 (en) 2017-05-30 2021-06-22 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for creating and using a subsurface model in hydrocarbon operations
US10520407B2 (en) 2018-03-01 2019-12-31 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Nano-indentation tests to characterize hydraulic fractures
US11573159B2 (en) 2019-01-08 2023-02-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Identifying fracture barriers for hydraulic fracturing
WO2021016515A1 (en) 2019-07-24 2021-01-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Oxidizing gasses for carbon dioxide-based fracturing fluids
US11492541B2 (en) 2019-07-24 2022-11-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Organic salts of oxidizing anions as energetic materials
US11352548B2 (en) 2019-12-31 2022-06-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Viscoelastic-surfactant treatment fluids having oxidizer
WO2021138355A1 (en) 2019-12-31 2021-07-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Viscoelastic-surfactant fracturing fluids having oxidizer
US11339321B2 (en) 2019-12-31 2022-05-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Reactive hydraulic fracturing fluid
US11268373B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-03-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Estimating natural fracture properties based on production from hydraulically fractured wells
US11365344B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-06-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation
US11473009B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-10-18 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation
US11473001B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-10-18 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation
US11549894B2 (en) 2020-04-06 2023-01-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determination of depositional environments
US11578263B2 (en) 2020-05-12 2023-02-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Ceramic-coated proppant
US11542815B2 (en) 2020-11-30 2023-01-03 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determining effect of oxidative hydraulic fracturing
US11885790B2 (en) 2021-12-13 2024-01-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Source productivity assay integrating pyrolysis data and X-ray diffraction data

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5377104A (en) * 1993-07-23 1994-12-27 Teledyne Industries, Inc. Passive seismic imaging for real time management and verification of hydraulic fracturing and of geologic containment of hazardous wastes injected into hydraulic fractures
US5963508A (en) * 1994-02-14 1999-10-05 Atlantic Richfield Company System and method for determining earth fracture propagation
US5996726A (en) * 1998-01-29 1999-12-07 Gas Research Institute System and method for determining the distribution and orientation of natural fractures
US6131658A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-10-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method for permanent emplacement of sensors inside casing
US6442489B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Edward Gendelman Method for detection and monitoring of hydrocarbons
US6462549B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2002-10-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system for electroseismic monitoring of microseismicity

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5917160A (en) * 1994-08-31 1999-06-29 Exxon Production Research Company Single well system for mapping sources of acoustic energy
WO2000023821A1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2000-04-27 Strm, Llc Method for 4d permeability analysis of geologic fluid reservoirs
RU2161809C2 (en) * 1998-11-30 2001-01-10 Арутюнов Сергей Львович Technique of search for hydrocarbons ( variants ), operational control over hydrocarbon field

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5377104A (en) * 1993-07-23 1994-12-27 Teledyne Industries, Inc. Passive seismic imaging for real time management and verification of hydraulic fracturing and of geologic containment of hazardous wastes injected into hydraulic fractures
US5963508A (en) * 1994-02-14 1999-10-05 Atlantic Richfield Company System and method for determining earth fracture propagation
US5996726A (en) * 1998-01-29 1999-12-07 Gas Research Institute System and method for determining the distribution and orientation of natural fractures
US6131658A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-10-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method for permanent emplacement of sensors inside casing
US6462549B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2002-10-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system for electroseismic monitoring of microseismicity
US6442489B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Edward Gendelman Method for detection and monitoring of hydrocarbons

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080002523A1 (en) * 2006-06-09 2008-01-03 Spectraseis Ag VH Reservoir Mapping
US7676326B2 (en) 2006-06-09 2010-03-09 Spectraseis Ag VH Reservoir Mapping
US20100153015A1 (en) * 2006-06-09 2010-06-17 Spectraseis Ag VH reservoir mapping
US20080004847A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for updating a model of the earth using microseismic measurements
US8600716B2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2013-12-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for updating a model of the earth using microseismic measurements
US7539578B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2009-05-26 Spectraseis Ag VH signal integration measure for seismic data
US7590491B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2009-09-15 Spectraseis Ag Signal integration measure for seismic data
US8219320B2 (en) 2007-05-17 2012-07-10 Spectraseis Ag Seismic attributes for reservoir localization
US20080288173A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-11-20 Spectraseis Ag Seismic attributes for reservoir localization
US20090010104A1 (en) * 2007-07-06 2009-01-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for processing microseismic data
US9229124B2 (en) 2007-07-06 2016-01-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for processing microseismic data
WO2010073072A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-07-01 Schlumberger Technology B.V. Method of subsurface imaging using microseismic data
WO2010113141A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Schlumberger Canada Limited Use of calibration well injections with microseismic monitoring
US20100252268A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Hongren Gu Use of calibration injections with microseismic monitoring
US20110087473A1 (en) * 2009-10-09 2011-04-14 Maria Alejandra Jimenez Chavez Well simulation
US8849637B2 (en) * 2009-10-09 2014-09-30 Senergy Holdings Limited Method of modeling production from a subterranean region
US9945970B1 (en) * 2011-08-29 2018-04-17 Seismic Innovations Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy
US11774616B2 (en) 2011-08-29 2023-10-03 Seismic Innovations Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display
US20130100769A1 (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-04-25 Global Microseismic Services, Inc. Microseismic Data Acquisition Array and Corresponding Method
US9354336B2 (en) * 2011-10-19 2016-05-31 Global Ambient Seismic, Inc. Microseismic data acquisition array and corresponding method
WO2013188743A1 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Westerngeco Llc Source acquisition with multiple frequency components
US9010484B2 (en) 2012-06-15 2015-04-21 Westerngeco L.L.C. Source acquisition with multiple frequency components
US20140083681A1 (en) * 2012-09-24 2014-03-27 Stewart Thomas Taylor Seismic monitoring system and method
US9835017B2 (en) * 2012-09-24 2017-12-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Seismic monitoring system and method
US9612359B2 (en) 2013-06-12 2017-04-04 Baker Hughes Incorporated Generation of fracture networks using seismic data
EP2818897A3 (en) * 2013-06-26 2016-01-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for estimating a parameter of a subsurface volume
US10197704B2 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-02-05 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Corrective scaling of interpreted fractures based on the microseismic detection range bias correction
WO2017027342A1 (en) * 2015-08-07 2017-02-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of performing complex fracture operations at a wellsite having ledged fractures
US10787887B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2020-09-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of performing integrated fracture and reservoir operations for multiple wellbores at a wellsite
US10794154B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2020-10-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of performing complex fracture operations at a wellsite having ledged fractures
US10920538B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2021-02-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method integrating fracture and reservoir operations into geomechanical operations of a wellsite
US11578568B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2023-02-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Well management on cloud computing system
CN115616659A (en) * 2022-10-10 2023-01-17 中国矿业大学(北京) Method and device for determining type of microseism event and electronic equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20031548L (en) 2003-04-04
US6947843B2 (en) 2005-09-20
GB0119248D0 (en) 2001-10-03
EP1415180B1 (en) 2016-01-06
GB2379013A (en) 2003-02-26
EP1415180A1 (en) 2004-05-06
GB2379013B (en) 2005-04-20
NO20031548D0 (en) 2003-04-04
CA2456009A1 (en) 2003-02-20
NO336838B1 (en) 2015-11-16
WO2003014768A1 (en) 2003-02-20
CA2456009C (en) 2013-12-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1415180B1 (en) Microseismic signal processing
Maxwell et al. The role of passive microseismic monitoring in the instrumented oil field
Schultz et al. The Cardston earthquake swarm and hydraulic fracturing of the Exshaw Formation (Alberta Bakken play)
Ake et al. Deep-injection and closely monitored induced seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado
Häring et al. Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system
US20170205531A1 (en) Geological modeling workflow
Dohmen et al. Microseismic magnitudes and b-values for delineating hydraulic fracturing and depletion
CA2715725C (en) Monitoring of reservoir fluid moving along flow pathways in a producing oil field using passive seismic emissions
RU2467171C1 (en) Method of diagnosing dangerous situations in deep mining and forecasting parameters of fissuring zones formed by fracturing
Djuraev et al. A review on conceptual and practical oil and gas reservoir monitoring methods
Igonin et al. Seismic anisotropy reveals stress changes around a fault as it is activated by hydraulic fracturing
Verdon et al. Monitoring carbon dioxide storage using passive seismic techniques
Talley et al. Dynamic reservoir characterization of Vacuum Field
Ventura et al. Slip tendency analysis of the Vesuvius faults: implications for the seismotectonic and volcanic hazard assessment
Lacazette et al. Geomechanical and flow simulation of hydraulic fractures using high-resolution passive seismic images
Zeng et al. The April 24, 2013 Changning M s 4.8 earthquake: a felt earthquake that occurred in Paleozoic sediment
Deflandre Induced microseismicity: short overview, state of the art and feedback on source rock production
Reches et al. Scientific drilling of active faults: Past and future
Jupe et al. Microseismic monitoring of geomechanical reservoir processes and fracture-dominated fluid flow
Gichira et al. Identification of Permeability Controls in a Geothermal System Using Gravity Method, Menengai Case Study
Qu et al. Shale-gas geophysics in Sichuan Basin, China: Recent progress and road ahead
Bo et al. Study on Artificial Fracture Monitoring Technology of Coalbed Methane Reservoir Based on Microseismic Events Attribute
Liu et al. The application study of microseismic monitoring technology in borehole in reservoir reconstruction of multiple wells in Eastern Ordos Basin
Fuqiu et al. Preliminary anisotropy research using S-wave velocity; An application of multiwave exploration data
Dasgupta Monitoring Reservoir Fluids using Micro Earthquake Technology: Alternative to 4D Seismic

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FISHER, ANDREW;JONES, ROBERT HUGHES;JUPE, ANDREW;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014317/0539

Effective date: 20030328

AS Assignment

Owner name: VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015878/0405

Effective date: 20040730

AS Assignment

Owner name: VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015552/0110

Effective date: 20040730

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHLUMBERGER HOLDINGS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:017706/0328

Effective date: 20060208

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12