US20040008580A1 - Microseismic signal processing - Google Patents
Microseismic signal processing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040008580A1 US20040008580A1 US10/381,554 US38155403A US2004008580A1 US 20040008580 A1 US20040008580 A1 US 20040008580A1 US 38155403 A US38155403 A US 38155403A US 2004008580 A1 US2004008580 A1 US 2004008580A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reservoir
- seismic
- source
- microseismic
- signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 52
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 7
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007420 reactivation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008698 shear stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003325 tomography Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/01—Measuring or predicting earthquakes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
- G01V1/30—Analysis
- G01V1/306—Analysis for determining physical properties of the subsurface, e.g. impedance, porosity or attenuation profiles
Definitions
- the present invention relates to microseismic signal processing.
- Microearthquakes are known to be induced during hydrocarbon and geothermal fluid production operations. They typically, but not exclusively, result from shear-stress release on pre-existing geological structures (e.g. faults and fractures) due to production/injection induced perturbations to the local effective earth stress conditions. They might also be caused by rock failure through collapse (e.g. compaction) or through the propagation of failure planes through tensile fracture propagation (e.g. hydraulic fracturing). These induced microseismic events may be induced or triggered by reservoir processes such as depletion, flooding or stimulation, in other words the extraction or injection of fluids.
- the signals from these microseismic events can be detected in the form of elastic waves transmitted from the source location to remote sensors. These signals contain valuable information on the physical processes taking place within a reservoir. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these.
- microseismic monitoring hardware particularly related to geothermal and hydrocarbon reservoirs, are known and it is also known to use microseismic signals to monitor hydraulic fracturing and waste re-injection.
- microearthquakes microseismic activity
- This stress relaxation process takes place in all reservoirs, but in mature fields and fracture dominated reservoirs the pressure and stress changes tend to be more severe and the seismic activity more intense.
- Re-injection is a common approach to the disposal of waste from development and in-fill drilling, from increased solids and water production, and ultimately it may be used in seafloor waste recovery and disposal prior to decommissioning.
- the question-being asked by operators and regulators is how can this process of re-injection be managed and the size and shape of disposal domains monitored.
- Microseismic events are basically small earthquakes, typically, but not exclusively, Richter magnitude (M L ) ⁇ 3, and to date they have been detected and located at distances of over 1 km from the monitoring well in hydrocarbon reservoirs. They occur because the earth stresses acting within the reservoir are anisotropic. This causes shear stresses to build up on naturally occurring fracture surfaces that under normal conditions are locked together and when the in situ stresses are perturbed by reservoir production activity, such as changing fluid pressures, the fracture's shear producing small earthquakes (FIG. 1). The seismic signals from these microseismic events can be detected and located in space using high bandwidth borehole sensors. Microseismic activity has been successfully detected and located in rocks ranging from unconsolidated sands, to chalks to crystalline rocks.
- the present invention involves methods for estimating and deriving information on the physical processes taking place within hydrocarbon reservoirs from detected microseismic signals, using appropriate receivers such as seismic sensors, located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source.
- Examples of the present invention use microseismics to:
- microseismic event locations have previously been used to determine the position of structure (e.g. faults) in reservoirs (i.e. spatial information), they have not been used in any quantitative manner to obtain reservoir parameters, such as porosity, permeability, saturation (i.e. reservoir property information).
- reservoir parameters such as porosity, permeability, saturation (i.e. reservoir property information).
- the present invention involves methods for using information on physical processes taking place within a reservoir from microseismic signals detected using appropriate receivers (seismic sensors) located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these.
- the method can involve processes investigated at just one instance during operation of the hydrocarbon reservoir and/or through comparison with a similar process investigated at some prior or future instance (i.e. time-lapse).
- the method also includes the integration and correlation of the microseismic data with any other reservoir data type, including pressure, flow rate, geophysical logs and seismic reflection data obtain at one or more instance in time
- Specific reservoir properties of interest that can be estimated from microseismic data include:
- Rock strength parameters e.g. compressive strength
- a characteristic of a microseismic signal is used to investigate a process or property occurring at the source location of an individual microseismic event (as defined by a seismic source volume with a radius with the event located at the centre of the volume).
- the above method involves quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical or empirical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time, frequency or other domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir or seismic reflection image)
- some exploration method e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir or seismic reflection image
- a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein the spatial and temporal relationship and/or comparison of seismic waveforms between adjacent microseismic events is used to estimate a reservoir property in the region between and including the individual event locations.
- the method may involve quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir)
- some exploration method e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir
- a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein the microseismic signal is used to investigate a process occurring at any location between source and receiver locations at some point on the raypath of the wave travelling between source and receiver.
- the method may use some means of separating the effect of a reservoir property on the seismic waveform from some specified point on the raypath from the integrated effect of all other points on the raypath between source and receiver. Such analysis may be used to determine a reservoir parameter at some point (e.g. a seismic velocity) or to estimate a parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir).
- a reservoir parameter at some point e.g. a seismic velocity
- some exploration method e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir.
- a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal from one or more events is used to investigate a process or property occurring at a location remote from the source, but not necessarily on a raypath of a wave travelling between source and receiver.
- the method may involve the use of a single event to investigate a property or by considering the cumulative effect of many such events.
- the seismic waveforms can be used to define a discrete planar geological discontinuity that may represent a fault or fracture plane.
- At least 3 parameters can be derived from microseismic waveforms received at one or more receivers using various models of physical processes taking place at the source. 1) The source location in space and time. 2) The frequency content of the signal can be analysed to provide an estimate of equivalent radius of the fracture plane that generates the microseismic event. 3) Analysis of the polarity of the seismic signal and the relative amplitude of different seismic phases at one or more sensors allows the orientation of the failure plane in space to be determined.
- the method may also involve using the planar structures defiled by these 3 parameters to construct an intersecting network of fracture planes that control the magnitude and principal axes of the permeability tensor and hence fluid flow within a reservoir.
- This permeability information is then used as an input into a numerical model of fluid flow in the reservoir and used to make predictions of reservoir processes resulting from production or fluid injection wells.
- the example in FIG. 3 represents microseismic events (e.g. multiplets) occurring at times T1 to T1+n due to an increase in fluid pressure due to fluid injection, from a water injector well for example.
- the spatial distance between each event is given by L1 to L1+n ⁇ 1.
- the time at which each event occurs is related to the movement of fluid pressure through the reservoir. Therefore the spatial and temporal relationship of the microseismicity provides information on the pressure front velocity and fluid conductivity (K) using the general form of equation K ⁇ L1/(T1+1 ⁇ T1) for example. Estimates of conductivity obtained in this way can be used as input to reservoir models and used to make predictions of fluid flow in a reservoir, hence improving production.
- a volume containing seismic events can be divided into smaller discrete volumes or cells (e.g. cubes). These cells can be defined as seismically active or passive (quiet) based on the number of events occurring within the cell, the cumulative energy release or some other combination of parameters.
- the seismic events are due to fluid pressure increase, such as a programme of water injection to maintain reservoir pressure (e.g. from a waterflood), there is a finite probability that any two adjacent cells that are microseismically active are also connected hydraulically.
- connection can therefore be represented by a hydraulic pipe with a length and conductivity estimated from the spatial separation and the seismic parameters used to define the cells, respectively.
- a network of pipes that can provide an estimate of the hydraulic conductivity distribution in a reservoir volume.
- Cells with no activity represent areas with no hydraulic connection.
- the network of pipes forms a conductivity or permeability grid that can be input into a numerical reservoir model and used to male predictions for fluid flow and hence help improve reservoir management and recovery.
- microseismic events are used as sources for creating a tomographic image between wells.
- Each event produces a raypath from a source to a receiver.
- the waveform therefore expresses the integrated or averaged effect of this varying property over the whole seismic raypath length.
- Examples of such properties are velocity, attenuation or shear-wave birefringence.
- the travel time from source to receiver represents the integrated effect of the travel time over discrete unit length sections of the whole raypath. For a single raypath this gives an average velocity, but no information about discrete reservoir volumes can be determined. However if there are intersecting rays, the problem becomes over constrained/determined.
- V average velocity
- L cell length
- seismic waveforms can be used to define discrete planar geological discontinuities that may represent a fault or fracture plane (as in the first and second aspects of the invention).
- a further characteristic of the waveform could then be used to provide an estimate of shear displacement along the fault during the failure that produces the microseismic event.
- This information on these local properties could then be used to determine or constrain properties (such as the stress state) at remote locations either directly from the property or through the use of a mathematical model.
- stress tensor rotations around a fault structure could be determined or constrained by geomechanical models of the reservoir where an input or boundary condition to the model is the fault displacement determined from the microseismic event.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to microseismic signal processing.
- Microearthquakes (microseismic events) are known to be induced during hydrocarbon and geothermal fluid production operations. They typically, but not exclusively, result from shear-stress release on pre-existing geological structures (e.g. faults and fractures) due to production/injection induced perturbations to the local effective earth stress conditions. They might also be caused by rock failure through collapse (e.g. compaction) or through the propagation of failure planes through tensile fracture propagation (e.g. hydraulic fracturing). These induced microseismic events may be induced or triggered by reservoir processes such as depletion, flooding or stimulation, in other words the extraction or injection of fluids. The signals from these microseismic events can be detected in the form of elastic waves transmitted from the source location to remote sensors. These signals contain valuable information on the physical processes taking place within a reservoir. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these.
- Various forms of microseismic monitoring hardware, particularly related to geothermal and hydrocarbon reservoirs, are known and it is also known to use microseismic signals to monitor hydraulic fracturing and waste re-injection.
- Throughout the life of a hydrocarbon reservoir, the production process (including extraction and injection of fluids) induces physical changes within the reservoir. These changes result in perturbations to the in situ stress conditions and physical properties that propagate out through the reservoir from the source of the perturbations (i.e. injection or extraction boreholes).
- A direct consequence of these perturbations is the re-activation of pre-existing reservoir structures such as faults and fractures, which manifests itself as small earthquakes, referred to as microearthquakes or microseismic activity. This stress relaxation process takes place in all reservoirs, but in mature fields and fracture dominated reservoirs the pressure and stress changes tend to be more severe and the seismic activity more intense. The following are three situations in which induced microseismic activity is likely and has been demonstrated to occur.
- Reservoir depressurization can lead to localized reservoir compaction, or on a reservoir scale to compaction assisted or compaction driven production. In several North Sea fields where compaction is taking place, there are associated problems of wellbore stability and integrity. Large scale depressurization near fault sealed or fault compartmentalized reservoirs will lead to fault re-activation and the potential for pressure breakthrough into neighboring reservoir compartments or even fields.
- Enhanced recovery, particularly in mature fields, can require massive injection and flooding programmes aimed at pressure maintenance. Even in moderately fractured reservoirs the efficiency of these operations is known to be strongly affected by anisotropic or heterogeneous flood patterns.
- Re-injection is a common approach to the disposal of waste from development and in-fill drilling, from increased solids and water production, and ultimately it may be used in seafloor waste recovery and disposal prior to decommissioning. However, the question-being asked by operators and regulators is how can this process of re-injection be managed and the size and shape of disposal domains monitored.
- Microseismic events are basically small earthquakes, typically, but not exclusively, Richter magnitude (ML)<3, and to date they have been detected and located at distances of over 1 km from the monitoring well in hydrocarbon reservoirs. They occur because the earth stresses acting within the reservoir are anisotropic. This causes shear stresses to build up on naturally occurring fracture surfaces that under normal conditions are locked together and when the in situ stresses are perturbed by reservoir production activity, such as changing fluid pressures, the fracture's shear producing small earthquakes (FIG. 1). The seismic signals from these microseismic events can be detected and located in space using high bandwidth borehole sensors. Microseismic activity has been successfully detected and located in rocks ranging from unconsolidated sands, to chalks to crystalline rocks.
- The present invention involves methods for estimating and deriving information on the physical processes taking place within hydrocarbon reservoirs from detected microseismic signals, using appropriate receivers such as seismic sensors, located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source.
- Examples of the present invention use microseismics to:
- Identify fault structures that can result in reservoir compartmentalisation or act as flow channels and routes for premature water breakthrough.
- Image flow anisotropy associated with production from fracture dominated reservoirs.
- Provide real-time 3D monitoring of fluid pressure front movement, such as water flood fronts.
- Assist in targeting new producer/injector wells.
- Identify areas of reservoir compaction and potential wellbore instability.
- Provide input to and condition permeability and connectivity properties for reservoir simulation.
- The key to the invention is that, although microseismic event locations have previously been used to determine the position of structure (e.g. faults) in reservoirs (i.e. spatial information), they have not been used in any quantitative manner to obtain reservoir parameters, such as porosity, permeability, saturation (i.e. reservoir property information). Such parameters are key to the control of fluid extraction production processes and allow the planning of production and development plans for fields.
- The present invention involves methods for using information on physical processes taking place within a reservoir from microseismic signals detected using appropriate receivers (seismic sensors) located remote from the induced or triggered microseismic source. These processes can be mechanical, hydraulic or chemical in origin or are coupled processes involving one or more of these. The method can involve processes investigated at just one instance during operation of the hydrocarbon reservoir and/or through comparison with a similar process investigated at some prior or future instance (i.e. time-lapse). The method also includes the integration and correlation of the microseismic data with any other reservoir data type, including pressure, flow rate, geophysical logs and seismic reflection data obtain at one or more instance in time
- Specific reservoir properties of interest that can be estimated from microseismic data include:
- Porosity
- Permeability (including relative gas, oil water permeabilities)
- Fluid saturations (gas, oil water)
- Stress
- Seismic velocity
- Rock strength parameters (e.g. compressive strength)
- According to the present invention from a first aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal is used to investigate a process or property occurring at the source location of an individual microseismic event (as defined by a seismic source volume with a radius with the event located at the centre of the volume).
- The above method involves quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical or empirical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time, frequency or other domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir or seismic reflection image)
- According to the present invention from a second aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein the spatial and temporal relationship and/or comparison of seismic waveforms between adjacent microseismic events is used to estimate a reservoir property in the region between and including the individual event locations.
- As with the invention from the first aspect, the method may involve quantitative analysis of the seismic signal to obtain a reservoir parameter based on some theoretical model of the seismic source mechanism and/or estimation of a reservoir parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir)
- According to the present invention from a third aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir wherein the microseismic signal is used to investigate a process occurring at any location between source and receiver locations at some point on the raypath of the wave travelling between source and receiver.
- The method may use some means of separating the effect of a reservoir property on the seismic waveform from some specified point on the raypath from the integrated effect of all other points on the raypath between source and receiver. Such analysis may be used to determine a reservoir parameter at some point (e.g. a seismic velocity) or to estimate a parameter based on an empirical relationship relating a time or frequency domain characteristic of the seismic signal to a known or derived reservoir property determined through some exploration method (e.g. a borehole sampling the reservoir).
- According to the present invention from a fourth aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring a reservoir, wherein a characteristic of a microseismic signal from one or more events is used to investigate a process or property occurring at a location remote from the source, but not necessarily on a raypath of a wave travelling between source and receiver. The method may involve the use of a single event to investigate a property or by considering the cumulative effect of many such events.
- Referring to FIG. 2, in a method according to an example of the first aspect, the seismic waveforms can be used to define a discrete planar geological discontinuity that may represent a fault or fracture plane. At least 3 parameters can be derived from microseismic waveforms received at one or more receivers using various models of physical processes taking place at the source. 1) The source location in space and time. 2) The frequency content of the signal can be analysed to provide an estimate of equivalent radius of the fracture plane that generates the microseismic event. 3) Analysis of the polarity of the seismic signal and the relative amplitude of different seismic phases at one or more sensors allows the orientation of the failure plane in space to be determined.
- The method may also involve using the planar structures defiled by these 3 parameters to construct an intersecting network of fracture planes that control the magnitude and principal axes of the permeability tensor and hence fluid flow within a reservoir. This permeability information is then used as an input into a numerical model of fluid flow in the reservoir and used to make predictions of reservoir processes resulting from production or fluid injection wells.
- Referring to FIG. 3, in a method according to an example of the second aspect, it can be demonstrated that in certain cases there is a strong similarity in the characteristics of seismic events (e.g. similarity of waveforms, proximity in space and time). Such events are sometimes known as doublets (2 similar events) or multiplets (three or more similar events). The association of these events could, for example, be indicative of the passage of fluid between the source locations over a certain time and therefore the permeability of the intervening region.
- The example in FIG. 3 represents microseismic events (e.g. multiplets) occurring at times T1 to T1+n due to an increase in fluid pressure due to fluid injection, from a water injector well for example. The spatial distance between each event is given by L1 to L1+n−1. The time at which each event occurs is related to the movement of fluid pressure through the reservoir. Therefore the spatial and temporal relationship of the microseismicity provides information on the pressure front velocity and fluid conductivity (K) using the general form of equation K ∝ L1/(T1+1−T1) for example. Estimates of conductivity obtained in this way can be used as input to reservoir models and used to make predictions of fluid flow in a reservoir, hence improving production.
- Referring to FIG. 4, a volume containing seismic events can be divided into smaller discrete volumes or cells (e.g. cubes). These cells can be defined as seismically active or passive (quiet) based on the number of events occurring within the cell, the cumulative energy release or some other combination of parameters. In the case where the seismic events are due to fluid pressure increase, such as a programme of water injection to maintain reservoir pressure (e.g. from a waterflood), there is a finite probability that any two adjacent cells that are microseismically active are also connected hydraulically.
- The connection can therefore be represented by a hydraulic pipe with a length and conductivity estimated from the spatial separation and the seismic parameters used to define the cells, respectively. By examining each block in turn it is possible to construct a network of pipes that can provide an estimate of the hydraulic conductivity distribution in a reservoir volume. Cells with no activity represent areas with no hydraulic connection. The network of pipes forms a conductivity or permeability grid that can be input into a numerical reservoir model and used to male predictions for fluid flow and hence help improve reservoir management and recovery.
- Referring to FIG. 5, in a method according to an example of the third aspect, microseismic events are used as sources for creating a tomographic image between wells. Each event produces a raypath from a source to a receiver. The waveform therefore expresses the integrated or averaged effect of this varying property over the whole seismic raypath length. Examples of such properties are velocity, attenuation or shear-wave birefringence. For example, the travel time from source to receiver represents the integrated effect of the travel time over discrete unit length sections of the whole raypath. For a single raypath this gives an average velocity, but no information about discrete reservoir volumes can be determined. However if there are intersecting rays, the problem becomes over constrained/determined. In particular, it is possible to calculate information at points of intersection of raypaths in a manner known as tomography. For example, by dividing the reservoir into discrete cells and setting up a system of equations relating average velocity (V) to travel time over each cell (t) and cell length (L) (i.e. V=dt). The Inversion of the matrix of travel times and separations gives a grid of velocities. It is then possible to relate these velocities to reservoir properties such as permeability or porosity and use them to improve reservoir models.
- Referring to FIG. 6, in a method according to an example of the fourth aspect, seismic waveforms can be used to define discrete planar geological discontinuities that may represent a fault or fracture plane (as in the first and second aspects of the invention). A further characteristic of the waveform could then be used to provide an estimate of shear displacement along the fault during the failure that produces the microseismic event. This information on these local properties (such as displacement on a fault) could then be used to determine or constrain properties (such as the stress state) at remote locations either directly from the property or through the use of a mathematical model. In the example of FIG. 6 stress tensor rotations around a fault structure could be determined or constrained by geomechanical models of the reservoir where an input or boundary condition to the model is the fault displacement determined from the microseismic event.
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0119248A GB2379013B (en) | 2001-08-07 | 2001-08-07 | Microseismic signal processing |
GB0119248.3 | 2001-08-07 | ||
PCT/GB2002/003441 WO2003014768A1 (en) | 2001-08-07 | 2002-07-25 | Microseismic signal processing |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040008580A1 true US20040008580A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 |
US6947843B2 US6947843B2 (en) | 2005-09-20 |
Family
ID=9919958
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/381,554 Expired - Lifetime US6947843B2 (en) | 2001-08-07 | 2002-07-25 | Microseismic signal processing |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6947843B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1415180B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2456009C (en) |
GB (1) | GB2379013B (en) |
NO (1) | NO336838B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003014768A1 (en) |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080004847A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for updating a model of the earth using microseismic measurements |
US20080002523A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2008-01-03 | Spectraseis Ag | VH Reservoir Mapping |
US20080288173A1 (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2008-11-20 | Spectraseis Ag | Seismic attributes for reservoir localization |
US20090010104A1 (en) * | 2007-07-06 | 2009-01-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for processing microseismic data |
US7539578B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2009-05-26 | Spectraseis Ag | VH signal integration measure for seismic data |
WO2010073072A1 (en) * | 2008-12-23 | 2010-07-01 | Schlumberger Technology B.V. | Method of subsurface imaging using microseismic data |
US20100252268A1 (en) * | 2009-04-03 | 2010-10-07 | Hongren Gu | Use of calibration injections with microseismic monitoring |
US20110087473A1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2011-04-14 | Maria Alejandra Jimenez Chavez | Well simulation |
US20130100769A1 (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2013-04-25 | Global Microseismic Services, Inc. | Microseismic Data Acquisition Array and Corresponding Method |
WO2013188743A1 (en) * | 2012-06-15 | 2013-12-19 | Westerngeco Llc | Source acquisition with multiple frequency components |
US20140083681A1 (en) * | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | Stewart Thomas Taylor | Seismic monitoring system and method |
EP2818897A3 (en) * | 2013-06-26 | 2016-01-20 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for estimating a parameter of a subsurface volume |
WO2017027342A1 (en) * | 2015-08-07 | 2017-02-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of performing complex fracture operations at a wellsite having ledged fractures |
US9612359B2 (en) | 2013-06-12 | 2017-04-04 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Generation of fracture networks using seismic data |
US9945970B1 (en) * | 2011-08-29 | 2018-04-17 | Seismic Innovations | Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy |
US10197704B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-02-05 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Corrective scaling of interpreted fractures based on the microseismic detection range bias correction |
US10787887B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2020-09-29 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of performing integrated fracture and reservoir operations for multiple wellbores at a wellsite |
US10920538B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2021-02-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method integrating fracture and reservoir operations into geomechanical operations of a wellsite |
CN115616659A (en) * | 2022-10-10 | 2023-01-17 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Method and device for determining type of microseism event and electronic equipment |
US11578568B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2023-02-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Well management on cloud computing system |
US11774616B2 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2023-10-03 | Seismic Innovations | Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display |
Families Citing this family (87)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2403803B (en) * | 2003-07-05 | 2005-09-21 | Westerngeco Ltd | Processing seismic data |
US7391675B2 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2008-06-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Microseismic event detection and location by continuous map migration |
CA2625429C (en) * | 2005-11-03 | 2014-07-22 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Continuous reservoir monitoring for fluid pathways using 3d microseismic data |
US7486589B2 (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2009-02-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for predicting the hydrocarbon production of a well location |
US7663970B2 (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2010-02-16 | Microseismic, Inc. | Method for passive seismic emission tomography |
CA2663526A1 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2008-03-27 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Earth stress analysis method for hydrocarbon recovery |
WO2008036152A2 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2008-03-27 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Earth stress management and control process for hydrocarbon recovery |
WO2008036153A2 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2008-03-27 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Fluid injection management method for hydrocarbon recovery |
NZ575497A (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2011-08-26 | Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co | Iterative inversion of data from simultaneous geophysical sources |
US8548782B2 (en) | 2007-08-24 | 2013-10-01 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for modeling deformation in subsurface strata |
US8768672B2 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2014-07-01 | ExxonMobil. Upstream Research Company | Method for predicting time-lapse seismic timeshifts by computer simulation |
US8423337B2 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2013-04-16 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for multi-scale geomechanical model analysis by computer simulation |
CA2690992C (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2014-07-29 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for predicting well reliability by computer simulation |
CA2703588C (en) | 2007-12-12 | 2015-12-01 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method and apparatus for evaluating submarine formations |
US20090185448A1 (en) * | 2008-01-19 | 2009-07-23 | Duncan Peter M | Method for imaging the earth's subsurface using passive seismic sensing |
US7986587B2 (en) * | 2008-03-20 | 2011-07-26 | Microseismic, Inc. | Method for imaging the earth's subsurface using passive seismic sensing |
BRPI0908156A2 (en) | 2008-03-21 | 2015-08-11 | Exxonmobil Upstream Company | Methods for invoking measured geophysical data and for producing hydrocarbons from a subsurface region |
US8494777B2 (en) * | 2008-04-09 | 2013-07-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Continuous microseismic mapping for real-time 3D event detection and location |
US20090279387A1 (en) * | 2008-05-06 | 2009-11-12 | Pgs Geophysical As | Marine passive seismic method for direct hydrocarbon detection |
RU2503035C2 (en) * | 2008-08-11 | 2013-12-27 | Эксонмобил Апстрим Рисерч Компани | Estimation of soil properties using wave signals of seismic surface waves |
US20100238765A1 (en) * | 2009-03-20 | 2010-09-23 | Grechka Vladimir | Reservoir characterization from multicomponent microseismic data |
WO2010116236A2 (en) * | 2009-04-08 | 2010-10-14 | Schlumberger Technology B.V. | Methods and systems for microseismic mapping |
US8902710B2 (en) * | 2009-11-10 | 2014-12-02 | Microseismic, Inc. | Method for determining discrete fracture networks from passive seismic signals and its application to subsurface reservoir simulation |
US9410421B2 (en) | 2009-12-21 | 2016-08-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for microseismic analysis |
US8537638B2 (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2013-09-17 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Methods for subsurface parameter estimation in full wavefield inversion and reverse-time migration |
US8223587B2 (en) * | 2010-03-29 | 2012-07-17 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Full wavefield inversion using time varying filters |
US8694299B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2014-04-08 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Artifact reduction in iterative inversion of geophysical data |
US8756042B2 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2014-06-17 | Exxonmobile Upstream Research Company | Method and system for checkpointing during simulations |
US8767508B2 (en) | 2010-08-18 | 2014-07-01 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Using seismic P and S arrivals to determine shallow velocity structure |
CN103119552B (en) | 2010-09-27 | 2016-06-08 | 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 | Source code separates the actual solution as full wave field inversion with source simultaneously |
US8437998B2 (en) | 2010-09-27 | 2013-05-07 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Hybrid method for full waveform inversion using simultaneous and sequential source method |
WO2012074592A1 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2012-06-07 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Simultaneous source inversion for marine streamer data with cross-correlation objective function |
WO2012125558A2 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2012-09-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for performing microseismic fracture operations |
WO2015003028A1 (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2015-01-08 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events |
EP2691795A4 (en) | 2011-03-30 | 2015-12-09 | Convergence rate of full wavefield inversion using spectral shaping | |
CN103460074B (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2016-09-28 | 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 | Wavelet estimators and the method for many subwaves prediction in full wave field inversion |
CA2743611C (en) * | 2011-06-15 | 2017-03-14 | Engineering Seismology Group Canada Inc. | Methods and systems for monitoring and modeling hydraulic fracturing of a reservoir field |
CA2842398C (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2017-11-28 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Estimating fracture dimensions from microseismic data |
ES2640824T3 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2017-11-06 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Use of projection on convex assemblies to limit the inversion of the entire wave field |
US10422208B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2019-09-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stacked height growth fracture modeling |
AU2012332270A1 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2014-05-29 | Schlumberger Technology B.V. | Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks |
US9176930B2 (en) | 2011-11-29 | 2015-11-03 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Methods for approximating hessian times vector operation in full wavefield inversion |
KR102021752B1 (en) | 2012-03-08 | 2019-09-17 | 엑손모빌 업스트림 리서치 캄파니 | Orthogonal source and receiver encoding |
GB2503903B (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2015-08-26 | Schlumberger Holdings | Fracture monitoring and characterisation |
US20140126328A1 (en) * | 2012-11-06 | 2014-05-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and Systems for Improving Microseismic Event Detection and Location |
RU2598907C1 (en) | 2012-11-28 | 2016-10-10 | Эксонмобил Апстрим Рисерч Компани | Seismic reflection q-tomography |
MY169125A (en) | 2013-05-24 | 2019-02-18 | Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co | Multi-parameter inversion through offset dependent elastic fwi |
US10459117B2 (en) | 2013-06-03 | 2019-10-29 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Extended subspace method for cross-talk mitigation in multi-parameter inversion |
US9702998B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2017-07-11 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Full-wavefield inversion of primaries and multiples in marine environment |
EP3351972A1 (en) | 2013-08-23 | 2018-07-25 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Iterative inversion of field-encoded seismic data based on constructing pseudo super-source records |
US10036818B2 (en) | 2013-09-06 | 2018-07-31 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Accelerating full wavefield inversion with nonstationary point-spread functions |
US9910189B2 (en) | 2014-04-09 | 2018-03-06 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for fast line search in frequency domain FWI |
SG11201608175SA (en) | 2014-05-09 | 2016-11-29 | Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co | Efficient line search methods for multi-parameter full wavefield inversion |
US10185046B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2019-01-22 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for temporal dispersion correction for seismic simulation, RTM and FWI |
CA2947410A1 (en) | 2014-06-17 | 2015-12-30 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Fast viscoacoustic and viscoelastic full-wavefield inversion |
US10838092B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2020-11-17 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Estimating multiple subsurface parameters by cascaded inversion of wavefield components |
US10422899B2 (en) | 2014-07-30 | 2019-09-24 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Harmonic encoding for FWI |
US10386511B2 (en) | 2014-10-03 | 2019-08-20 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Seismic survey design using full wavefield inversion |
WO2016064462A1 (en) | 2014-10-20 | 2016-04-28 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Velocity tomography using property scans |
EP3234659A1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2017-10-25 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Scalable scheduling of parallel iterative seismic jobs |
US10520618B2 (en) | 2015-02-04 | 2019-12-31 | ExxohnMobil Upstream Research Company | Poynting vector minimal reflection boundary conditions |
WO2016130208A1 (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2016-08-18 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Efficient and stable absorbing boundary condition in finite-difference calculations |
EP3259620B1 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2020-03-11 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Multistage full wavefield inversion process that generates a multiple free data set |
US10416327B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2019-09-17 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for generating multiple free seismic images |
US10838093B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2020-11-17 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Krylov-space-based quasi-newton preconditioner for full-wavefield inversion |
KR102020759B1 (en) | 2015-10-02 | 2019-09-11 | 엑손모빌 업스트림 리서치 캄파니 | Q-compensated full wave field reversal |
US10914153B2 (en) | 2015-10-06 | 2021-02-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Systems and methods deriving hydraulic fracture growth from microseismicity analysis |
EP3362823B1 (en) | 2015-10-15 | 2019-10-09 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Fwi model domain angle stacks with amplitude preservation |
US10768324B2 (en) | 2016-05-19 | 2020-09-08 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method to predict pore pressure and seal integrity using full wavefield inversion |
WO2018204259A1 (en) | 2017-05-02 | 2018-11-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Synthetic source rocks |
US10684384B2 (en) | 2017-05-24 | 2020-06-16 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Systems and method for formation evaluation from borehole |
US11041976B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2021-06-22 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method and system for creating and using a subsurface model in hydrocarbon operations |
US10520407B2 (en) | 2018-03-01 | 2019-12-31 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Nano-indentation tests to characterize hydraulic fractures |
US11573159B2 (en) | 2019-01-08 | 2023-02-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Identifying fracture barriers for hydraulic fracturing |
WO2021016515A1 (en) | 2019-07-24 | 2021-01-28 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Oxidizing gasses for carbon dioxide-based fracturing fluids |
US11492541B2 (en) | 2019-07-24 | 2022-11-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Organic salts of oxidizing anions as energetic materials |
US11352548B2 (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2022-06-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Viscoelastic-surfactant treatment fluids having oxidizer |
WO2021138355A1 (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2021-07-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Viscoelastic-surfactant fracturing fluids having oxidizer |
US11339321B2 (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2022-05-24 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Reactive hydraulic fracturing fluid |
US11268373B2 (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2022-03-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Estimating natural fracture properties based on production from hydraulically fractured wells |
US11365344B2 (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2022-06-21 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation |
US11473009B2 (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2022-10-18 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation |
US11473001B2 (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2022-10-18 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation |
US11549894B2 (en) | 2020-04-06 | 2023-01-10 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Determination of depositional environments |
US11578263B2 (en) | 2020-05-12 | 2023-02-14 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Ceramic-coated proppant |
US11542815B2 (en) | 2020-11-30 | 2023-01-03 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Determining effect of oxidative hydraulic fracturing |
US11885790B2 (en) | 2021-12-13 | 2024-01-30 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Source productivity assay integrating pyrolysis data and X-ray diffraction data |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5377104A (en) * | 1993-07-23 | 1994-12-27 | Teledyne Industries, Inc. | Passive seismic imaging for real time management and verification of hydraulic fracturing and of geologic containment of hazardous wastes injected into hydraulic fractures |
US5963508A (en) * | 1994-02-14 | 1999-10-05 | Atlantic Richfield Company | System and method for determining earth fracture propagation |
US5996726A (en) * | 1998-01-29 | 1999-12-07 | Gas Research Institute | System and method for determining the distribution and orientation of natural fractures |
US6131658A (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 2000-10-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for permanent emplacement of sensors inside casing |
US6442489B1 (en) * | 1999-08-02 | 2002-08-27 | Edward Gendelman | Method for detection and monitoring of hydrocarbons |
US6462549B1 (en) * | 1999-04-21 | 2002-10-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and system for electroseismic monitoring of microseismicity |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5917160A (en) * | 1994-08-31 | 1999-06-29 | Exxon Production Research Company | Single well system for mapping sources of acoustic energy |
WO2000023821A1 (en) * | 1998-10-16 | 2000-04-27 | Strm, Llc | Method for 4d permeability analysis of geologic fluid reservoirs |
RU2161809C2 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2001-01-10 | Арутюнов Сергей Львович | Technique of search for hydrocarbons ( variants ), operational control over hydrocarbon field |
-
2001
- 2001-08-07 GB GB0119248A patent/GB2379013B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-07-25 US US10/381,554 patent/US6947843B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-07-25 CA CA2456009A patent/CA2456009C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-07-25 EP EP02755106.8A patent/EP1415180B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-07-25 WO PCT/GB2002/003441 patent/WO2003014768A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2003
- 2003-04-04 NO NO20031548A patent/NO336838B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5377104A (en) * | 1993-07-23 | 1994-12-27 | Teledyne Industries, Inc. | Passive seismic imaging for real time management and verification of hydraulic fracturing and of geologic containment of hazardous wastes injected into hydraulic fractures |
US5963508A (en) * | 1994-02-14 | 1999-10-05 | Atlantic Richfield Company | System and method for determining earth fracture propagation |
US5996726A (en) * | 1998-01-29 | 1999-12-07 | Gas Research Institute | System and method for determining the distribution and orientation of natural fractures |
US6131658A (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 2000-10-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for permanent emplacement of sensors inside casing |
US6462549B1 (en) * | 1999-04-21 | 2002-10-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and system for electroseismic monitoring of microseismicity |
US6442489B1 (en) * | 1999-08-02 | 2002-08-27 | Edward Gendelman | Method for detection and monitoring of hydrocarbons |
Cited By (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080002523A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2008-01-03 | Spectraseis Ag | VH Reservoir Mapping |
US7676326B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2010-03-09 | Spectraseis Ag | VH Reservoir Mapping |
US20100153015A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2010-06-17 | Spectraseis Ag | VH reservoir mapping |
US20080004847A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for updating a model of the earth using microseismic measurements |
US8600716B2 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2013-12-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for updating a model of the earth using microseismic measurements |
US7539578B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2009-05-26 | Spectraseis Ag | VH signal integration measure for seismic data |
US7590491B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2009-09-15 | Spectraseis Ag | Signal integration measure for seismic data |
US8219320B2 (en) | 2007-05-17 | 2012-07-10 | Spectraseis Ag | Seismic attributes for reservoir localization |
US20080288173A1 (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2008-11-20 | Spectraseis Ag | Seismic attributes for reservoir localization |
US20090010104A1 (en) * | 2007-07-06 | 2009-01-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for processing microseismic data |
US9229124B2 (en) | 2007-07-06 | 2016-01-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for processing microseismic data |
WO2010073072A1 (en) * | 2008-12-23 | 2010-07-01 | Schlumberger Technology B.V. | Method of subsurface imaging using microseismic data |
WO2010113141A1 (en) * | 2009-04-03 | 2010-10-07 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Use of calibration well injections with microseismic monitoring |
US20100252268A1 (en) * | 2009-04-03 | 2010-10-07 | Hongren Gu | Use of calibration injections with microseismic monitoring |
US20110087473A1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2011-04-14 | Maria Alejandra Jimenez Chavez | Well simulation |
US8849637B2 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2014-09-30 | Senergy Holdings Limited | Method of modeling production from a subterranean region |
US9945970B1 (en) * | 2011-08-29 | 2018-04-17 | Seismic Innovations | Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy |
US11774616B2 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2023-10-03 | Seismic Innovations | Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display |
US20130100769A1 (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2013-04-25 | Global Microseismic Services, Inc. | Microseismic Data Acquisition Array and Corresponding Method |
US9354336B2 (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2016-05-31 | Global Ambient Seismic, Inc. | Microseismic data acquisition array and corresponding method |
WO2013188743A1 (en) * | 2012-06-15 | 2013-12-19 | Westerngeco Llc | Source acquisition with multiple frequency components |
US9010484B2 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2015-04-21 | Westerngeco L.L.C. | Source acquisition with multiple frequency components |
US20140083681A1 (en) * | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | Stewart Thomas Taylor | Seismic monitoring system and method |
US9835017B2 (en) * | 2012-09-24 | 2017-12-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Seismic monitoring system and method |
US9612359B2 (en) | 2013-06-12 | 2017-04-04 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Generation of fracture networks using seismic data |
EP2818897A3 (en) * | 2013-06-26 | 2016-01-20 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for estimating a parameter of a subsurface volume |
US10197704B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-02-05 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Corrective scaling of interpreted fractures based on the microseismic detection range bias correction |
WO2017027342A1 (en) * | 2015-08-07 | 2017-02-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of performing complex fracture operations at a wellsite having ledged fractures |
US10787887B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2020-09-29 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of performing integrated fracture and reservoir operations for multiple wellbores at a wellsite |
US10794154B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2020-10-06 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of performing complex fracture operations at a wellsite having ledged fractures |
US10920538B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2021-02-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method integrating fracture and reservoir operations into geomechanical operations of a wellsite |
US11578568B2 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2023-02-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Well management on cloud computing system |
CN115616659A (en) * | 2022-10-10 | 2023-01-17 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Method and device for determining type of microseism event and electronic equipment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NO20031548L (en) | 2003-04-04 |
US6947843B2 (en) | 2005-09-20 |
GB0119248D0 (en) | 2001-10-03 |
EP1415180B1 (en) | 2016-01-06 |
GB2379013A (en) | 2003-02-26 |
EP1415180A1 (en) | 2004-05-06 |
GB2379013B (en) | 2005-04-20 |
NO20031548D0 (en) | 2003-04-04 |
CA2456009A1 (en) | 2003-02-20 |
NO336838B1 (en) | 2015-11-16 |
WO2003014768A1 (en) | 2003-02-20 |
CA2456009C (en) | 2013-12-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1415180B1 (en) | Microseismic signal processing | |
Maxwell et al. | The role of passive microseismic monitoring in the instrumented oil field | |
Schultz et al. | The Cardston earthquake swarm and hydraulic fracturing of the Exshaw Formation (Alberta Bakken play) | |
Ake et al. | Deep-injection and closely monitored induced seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado | |
Häring et al. | Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system | |
US20170205531A1 (en) | Geological modeling workflow | |
Dohmen et al. | Microseismic magnitudes and b-values for delineating hydraulic fracturing and depletion | |
CA2715725C (en) | Monitoring of reservoir fluid moving along flow pathways in a producing oil field using passive seismic emissions | |
RU2467171C1 (en) | Method of diagnosing dangerous situations in deep mining and forecasting parameters of fissuring zones formed by fracturing | |
Djuraev et al. | A review on conceptual and practical oil and gas reservoir monitoring methods | |
Igonin et al. | Seismic anisotropy reveals stress changes around a fault as it is activated by hydraulic fracturing | |
Verdon et al. | Monitoring carbon dioxide storage using passive seismic techniques | |
Talley et al. | Dynamic reservoir characterization of Vacuum Field | |
Ventura et al. | Slip tendency analysis of the Vesuvius faults: implications for the seismotectonic and volcanic hazard assessment | |
Lacazette et al. | Geomechanical and flow simulation of hydraulic fractures using high-resolution passive seismic images | |
Zeng et al. | The April 24, 2013 Changning M s 4.8 earthquake: a felt earthquake that occurred in Paleozoic sediment | |
Deflandre | Induced microseismicity: short overview, state of the art and feedback on source rock production | |
Reches et al. | Scientific drilling of active faults: Past and future | |
Jupe et al. | Microseismic monitoring of geomechanical reservoir processes and fracture-dominated fluid flow | |
Gichira et al. | Identification of Permeability Controls in a Geothermal System Using Gravity Method, Menengai Case Study | |
Qu et al. | Shale-gas geophysics in Sichuan Basin, China: Recent progress and road ahead | |
Bo et al. | Study on Artificial Fracture Monitoring Technology of Coalbed Methane Reservoir Based on Microseismic Events Attribute | |
Liu et al. | The application study of microseismic monitoring technology in borehole in reservoir reconstruction of multiple wells in Eastern Ordos Basin | |
Fuqiu et al. | Preliminary anisotropy research using S-wave velocity; An application of multiwave exploration data | |
Dasgupta | Monitoring Reservoir Fluids using Micro Earthquake Technology: Alternative to 4D Seismic |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FISHER, ANDREW;JONES, ROBERT HUGHES;JUPE, ANDREW;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014317/0539 Effective date: 20030328 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015878/0405 Effective date: 20040730 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VETCO GRAY CONTROLS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ABB OFFSHORE SYSTEMS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015552/0110 Effective date: 20040730 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHLUMBERGER HOLDINGS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:017706/0328 Effective date: 20060208 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |