US20030235113A1 - Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays - Google Patents
Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030235113A1 US20030235113A1 US10/174,766 US17476602A US2003235113A1 US 20030235113 A1 US20030235113 A1 US 20030235113A1 US 17476602 A US17476602 A US 17476602A US 2003235113 A1 US2003235113 A1 US 2003235113A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- acoustic
- orientation
- casing
- vector
- signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 7
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 7
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010420 art technique Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011900 installation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010408 sweeping Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
- G01V1/44—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging using generators and receivers in the same well
- G01V1/46—Data acquisition
Definitions
- the preferred embodiments of the present invention are directed to determining the orientation of vector sensors in well bores. More particularly, the preferred embodiments are directed to determining orientation of a series of vector sensors after installation or after movement, as well as determining calibration of the vector sensors over time.
- acoustic sensors are used to create three-dimensional and four-dimensional surveys of the hydrocarbon producing formation of interest.
- the acoustic sensors are typically physically attached to a cable, and are periodically spaced along the cable. More particularly, acoustic sensors are typically housed in groups of three, with each acoustic sensor in the housing or pod responsive to acoustic signals along orthogonal axis—hence the term “vector sensors.” FIG.
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary set of orthogonal axis, as well as an exemplary set of acoustic receivers 2 A-C lying along those axis. If an acoustic signal is generated in the plane created by the XY axis, with no corresponding Z component, then only the acoustic sensors 2 B and 2 C receive a signal in response thereto.
- FIG. 2 exemplifies this situation.
- FIG. 2 shows that at an arrival time (indicated by the dashed line through all three acoustic response graphs), the signal received along the X axis (by receiver 2 C) and the signal received along the Y axis (by receiver 2 B) are the only axis in which acoustic signals are received.
- FIG. 2 exemplifies that the source of the acoustic energy (not shown) was more closely orientated to the X axis than the Y axis as shown by the greater amplitude of the signal received along the X axis than that received along the Y axis.
- vector sensors have the ability to detect the orientation of an incoming signal. If the orientation of the vector sensors is known, then the orientation of the incoming signal may be calculated. Thus, knowing the orientation of each sensor pod is needed for correct operation of an acoustic or seismic system.
- FIG. 3 shows a sensor cable 4 having a plurality of sensor pods 6 A-E attached thereto disposed within a well bore 8 .
- the related art technique to determine the orientation of the sensor pods is to induce seismic or acoustic energy into the earth by a source 10 on the surface of the earth 12 .
- the ray path of the acoustic energy created by the source 10 is confined to a plane containing both the source 10 and each respective receiver 6 A-E, as indicated by the series of lines or rays 14 of FIG. 3.
- FIG. 4 shows an overhead view of the assumption shown in FIG.
- FIG. 5 exemplifies that various subsurface anomalies, such as non-horizontal formations, affect the ray paths in at least the vertical plane shown, but also in the horizontal plane.
- FIG. 6 shows an overhead view of the situation of FIG. 5.
- FIG. 6 shows that the ray path from the source 10 may shift in the horizontal plane due to subsurface anomalies.
- FIG. 6 also shows some subsurface formations exhibit a property known as anisotropy.
- anisotropic environments acoustic waves are broken into two orthogonal components each having slightly different propagation speeds.
- the propagating acoustic wave may be broken down into two orthogonal components, indicated by dashed lines 16 A and 16 B. Degradation of the test signal into orthogonal components exasperates the orientation determination process.
- a signal-generating mechanism produces an acoustic signal along the casing of the well bore.
- the acoustic signal is detected by sensor pods and is used to determine the orientation of the sensor pods relative to the acoustic signal. If the acoustic signal does not reach all sensor pods, additional acoustic signals are generated with some overlap of sensor pods, so that their relative orientations may be determined. In this way, the absolute orientation of only one sensor pod, or the absolute orientation of only one acoustic signal in the casing, needs to be known to ascertain the orientation of all the sensor pods in the array.
- each acoustic sensor in each sensor pod may be the signal generating mechanism that produces the signal detected above or below the acoustic sensor operated in this manner.
- the calibration or sensitivity of acoustic sensors in each sensor pod may be tested over time. That is, the sensor pods coupling to the casing, as well as the sensitivity of the sensor pods in general, and the acoustic sensing devices within each sensor pod, may change over time. If these changes are not accounted for in the acoustic and seismic measurements, they may lead to incorrect assumptions about the state of the hydrocarbon formation monitored.
- a baseline sensor pod response is created either simultaneously with the orientation determination, or as an independent test. At later times, the same tests may be run again to determine an amount of change in responsiveness of each sensor pod or particular sensing device. In this way, the data collected in subsequent acoustic surveys may be correspondingly corrected for any change in physical characteristics of the sensor pod or the individual sensing devices, such that these errors are not attributed to changes in formation properties.
- FIG. 1 shows a set of orthogonal axis and a corresponding set of orthogonally placed acoustic receivers
- FIG. 2 shows an exemplary set of received signals by the acoustic receivers of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 shows the prior art technique for determining the orientation of downhole acoustic sensors
- FIG. 4 shows an overhead view of the system of FIG. 3
- FIG. 5 shows how subsurface anomalies affect assumptions made in prior art determinations of orientation of sensor pods
- FIG. 6 shows an overhead view of the exemplary system of FIG. 5;
- FIG. 7 shows a cross-sectional elevational view of an exemplary borehole containing a sensor string of the preferred embodiments
- FIG. 8 shows an embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods
- FIG. 9 shows another embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods
- FIG. 10 shows another embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods
- FIG. 11 shows yet another embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods using dedicated acoustic transmitters.
- Couple or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct electrical or mechanical connection, depending on the context. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect connection via other devices and connections.
- seismic signals While technically there may be some distinction between seismic signals and acoustic signals, the technical distinction being based generally upon the frequency or wavelength of such signals, for purposes of this specification, and in the claims, the term “seismic” and “acoustic” may be used interchangeably to denote energy propagating through earth formations.
- the preferred embodiments of the present invention are directed to determining the orientation of permanently or semi-permanently installed acoustic or seismic sensors in downhole hydrocarbon producing systems.
- the systems and related methods described are applicable to any downhole device for which an absolute orientation needs to be known, for example, the initial placement of a wipstock or muleshoe.
- the preferred embodiments described below are in the context of determining the orientation of acoustic vector sensors, the discussion should not be read as a limitation as to the breadth of the claims.
- FIG. 7 shows a cross-section of an exemplary borehole to provide context for a description of the preferred embodiments.
- a metallic casing 20 preferably extends into and provides a lining for a borehole. While the casing 20 is shown to be vertical, the system and related methods described herein could likewise be practices in a deviated borehole.
- FIG. 7 also shows the cross-section of a portion of production tubing 22 within the casing 20 , thus producing a space 24 . In such systems, it is within this space 24 that the vector sensors of the preferred embodiment are installed.
- the vector sensors of the preferred embodiment need not be installed in a producing well, and thus the presence of the space 24 between the casing 20 and production tubing 22 is not a requirement. Indeed, the vector sensors of the preferred embodiments could likewise be installed in any borehole, such as a dedicated survey well.
- the vector sensors of the preferred embodiment in FIG. 7 shown as sensors 26 A-E, preferably couple to the surface 28 by way of an electrical cable 30 .
- the cable 30 preferably couples to a surface computer 31 which receives electrical signals responsive to measured downhole energy, and which also in the preferred embodiments controls creation of energy for determining orientations of the various sensors (discussed more fully below).
- the vector sensors 26 A-E are in physical contact with the casing 20 , or if a casing is not present, the wall of the borehole. In this way, acoustic energy propagating along the casing or borehole wall may be detected, in the vector sense, by each of the sensor pods 26 A-E.
- FIG. 8 shows one embodiment for determining orientation of the various sensor pods 26 A-E.
- the embodiment of FIG. 8 shows a sensor pod 32 which is relatively close to the surface, and whose orientation is known.
- this sensor pod 32 acts as an acoustic source inducing a shear wave in the casing (not shown) in which the sensor string 33 is placed.
- the acoustic wave propagates along the casing and is detected by one or more of the sensor pods 26 below sensor pod 32 .
- FIG. 8 shows that only sensor pod 26 A (and any sensor pods between sensor pod 26 A and 32 ) receive the acoustic signal generated by sensor pod 32 .
- any sensor pod which receives the acoustic signal generated by sensor pod 32 may have its orientation determined because the orientation of the acoustic energy created by sensor pod 32 is known.
- FIG. 8 further shows that, in the case where the acoustic energy created by sensor pod 32 cannot propagate the entire borehole (which is dependent upon the casing or tubing material upon which the shear wave is induced), sensor pods further down the line may act as acoustic sources (discussed below) to create acoustic energy to propagate down the casing.
- sensor pod 26 A which received acoustic energy generated by sensor pod 32 , acts as an acoustic source and propagates energy to sensor pods 26 B and 26 C.
- FIG. 8 shows only sensor pod 26 A inducing enough acoustic energy to reach sensor pods 26 B and 26 C, it must be understood that many sensor pods may be within the range of any particular sensor pod acting in an acoustic transmitter mode. Likewise, FIG. 8 shows sensor pod 26 C acting as an acoustic transmitter and transmitting acoustic energy to sensor pods 26 D and 26 E.
- each sensor pod which receives the acoustic signal or signals generated by sensor pod 32 may calculate an orientation. Once the orientation of a sensor pod is known, for example calculated based on receiving a signal of known orientation (even if the calculation is not immediately performed), that sensor pod creates acoustic energy which propagates to lower sensor pods, as shown in FIG. 8, until each sensor pod has a reference signal. In this way, the absolute orientation of each sensor pod in the string may be determined.
- FIG. 9 shows yet another embodiment for determining the absolute orientation of the sensor pods in the string.
- the lowest or deepest sensor pod 26 E induces a shear wave in the casing which propagates to sensor pods 26 D and 26 C.
- the system shown in FIG. 9 where sensor pod 26 E can create acoustic energy only sufficient to reach 26 D and 26 C is only exemplary, and, depending on the propagation characteristics of the casing, it is possible that one sensor may have the ability to propagate an acoustic shear wave that may reach every sensor pod in the system.
- each sensor pod acting as a transmitter only has a limited range
- at least one of the sensor pods that was reached by the shear wave then acts as a transmitter and propagates the shear wave energy again.
- 26C likewise propagates energy to sensor pods 26 B and 26 A.
- Sensor pod 26 A continues the process, eventually reaching the uppermost sensor pod 32 for which an absolute orientation is known. From this absolute orientation, the orientation of each of the sensor pods 26 A-E may be determined.
- FIG. 8 shows propagating acoustic energy of known orientation from the top of the string, near the surface 28 to the bottom.
- FIG. 9 shows propagating acoustic energy of an unknown orientation from the bottom of the string, at sensor 26 E, to the top of the string, sensor 32 , and then determining the orientation of all the lower sensor pods based on the known orientation of the sensor 32 .
- the process need not necessarily start near the surface or at the bottom of the string.
- FIG. 10 shows an embodiment where a medial sensor pod initially creates the acoustic energy.
- sensor pod 26 B creates acoustic energy which propagates in both directions, reaching both sensor pods 26 A and 26 C.
- FIG. 10 shows that the downward going acoustic signal is received by sensor pod 26 C and repeated for 26 D, and likewise sensor pod 26 D receives acoustic energy and repeats that downward for sensor pod 26 E.
- sensor pod 26 A receives the acoustic energy created by sensor pod 26 B and repeats that toward the surface until eventually the acoustic energy is received at sensor pod 32 , which in the embodiment of FIG. 10 has a known orientation.
- the relative orientation of the sensor pods may be determined based on the upward and downward signals (that is, their orientations relative to each other), and their absolute orientations may be determined from the known orientation of sensor pod 32 .
- the sensor pod 32 is of known orientation because it is close to the surface and may be observed, or even have its orientation adjusted; however, the sensor pod with a known orientation need not necessarily be at the surface, and other techniques may exist for establishing the absolute orientation of one of the sensor pods at any location within the borehole, which may then be used as a reference to determine the orientations of the remaining sensor pods in the string.
- the sensor pods of the preferred embodiment are acoustic vector sensor arrays, called pods because each pod contains three orthogonally situated acoustic sensors.
- the acoustic sensors of the preferred embodiments operate on the principle of having an inertial mass which vibrates in response to acoustic energy polarized along its axis. Vibration of the inertial mass in response to the acoustic energy thus creates an electrical signal representative of the frequency and amplitude.
- these acoustic sensors may likewise be used as acoustic sources.
- electrical signals of particular frequencies may be applied to the acoustic sensor, which in turn vibrates the inertial mass. Vibrating of the inertial mass induces acoustic energy into the casing for use in determining the relative orientation of the sensor pods as discussed above.
- each acoustic sensor within the pod generates acoustic energy sequentially.
- the acoustic sensors receiving the acoustic energy for orientation purposes receive acoustic energy sequentially in three polarization or orientation directions, thus increasing the accuracy of the orientation determination.
- acoustic sensors capable of performing this dual function of both receiving and acting as a source may be purchased from Geospace L.P., 7334 Gessner, Houston, Tex. 77040; Input/Output Inc., 11104 West Airport Boulevard, Houston, Tex. 77477. While acoustic sensors from these manufacturers are preferred, the sensors from any manufacturer may be used, and likewise any sensing device within inertial mass, such as a geophone or an accelerometer, may equivalently be used.
- FIG. 11 shows an alternative embodiment in which dedicated acoustic sources 34 A-C are periodically spaced among the sensor pods 26 A-E.
- the dedicated source 34 A induces acoustic energy into the casing (not shown in FIG. 11) at a known orientation, and the acoustic energy propagates to one or more of the acoustic transmitters 26 .
- FIG. 11 shows an alternative embodiment in which dedicated acoustic sources 34 A-C are periodically spaced among the sensor pods 26 A-E.
- the dedicated source 34 A induces acoustic energy into the casing (not shown in FIG. 11) at a known orientation, and the acoustic energy propagates to one or more of the acoustic transmitters 26 .
- the second dedicated acoustic source 34 B creates acoustic energy which propagates both up to sensor pod 26 A, as well as down to sensor pods 26 B and 26 C.
- a corresponding arrangement is shown with respect to dedicated acoustic transmitter 34 C and sensor pods 26 D-E.
- all the sensor pods between the dedicated sources 34 A and 34 B may have their orientations determined by detecting the acoustic energy transmitted in the known orientations by acoustic transmitter 34 A.
- the transmitter 34 B transmitting acoustic energy to sensor pod 26 A, the orientation between sensor pod 26 A and transmitter 34 B may be determined, and thus all the orientations of sensor pods 26 B and 26 C may be determined.
- FIG. 11 shows that there is no overlap in the acoustic range of the dedicated acoustic transmitters 34 A-C
- determining the orientation of the various transmitters and therefor sensor pods need not work from near the surface 28 toward the bottom, but may likewise may start at the bottom and work toward the surface, or may start from a medial portion, working both directions in sequence or simultaneously.
- the preferred embodiments of the present invention may also be used to determine the sensitivity or characteristics of the sensor string over time.
- the sensor string 33 of the preferred embodiments is permanently or semi-permanently placed in a casing 20 .
- the string 33 may be used in a first instance to perform a three-dimensional seismic or acoustic survey.
- the same string 33 may be used again to perform a second instance of a three-dimensional seismic or acoustic survey, which when combined with the first instance creates a four-dimensional survey.
- the test is not necessarily to determine the orientation of the various sensor pods 26 A-E (although if there has been a change, this should be noted), but instead the test is to determine the differences in received signals from previous orientation tests, such that the differences in coupling and acoustic signal receiving sensitivity may be accounted for in the seismic or acoustic survey.
- the techniques described above may be used to determine orientation of other downhole devices. That is, the orientation of many downhole devices needs to be known for proper drilling and operation of the hydrocarbon producing well. For example, it is common in the industry to drill a single relatively vertical well bore, and then drill a plurality of lateral wells off the vertical well bore to reach the hydrocarbon producing zones. Generally speaking, a wipstock, is used to direct a drill string equipment into a particular lateral. Thus, the absolute orientation of this wipstock needs to be known. The methods described above with regard to determining the orientation of the various sensor pods may likewise be utilized in determining the orientation of such downhole devices.
- a sensor pod may be coupled to the wipstock, either permanently or possibly only for initial installation.
- its orientation may be tested using the techniques described above. More particularly, the sensor pod on the wipstock could create seismic energy which propagates to a sensor pod having a known orientation; conversely, a sensor pod or acoustic source having a known orientation could create acoustic energy which is detected by the sensor pod on the wipstock.
- the absolute orientation of the wipstock could be determined.
- any number of sensor pods or acoustic transmitters could be used to sequentially propagate and receive the acoustic energy along the casing to determine the orientation of the wipstock. It is noted again that the wipstock is presented only for purposes of example. The orientation of any number of downhole devices may be critical to operation or creation of a hydrocarbon producing well, and any such device could use the methods described herein.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- None.
- Not applicable.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The preferred embodiments of the present invention are directed to determining the orientation of vector sensors in well bores. More particularly, the preferred embodiments are directed to determining orientation of a series of vector sensors after installation or after movement, as well as determining calibration of the vector sensors over time.
- 1. Background of the Invention
- It is common in the oil and gas industry to install a series of acoustic sensing devices inside the well bore, yet outside the production tubing in a hydrocarbon producing well. These acoustic sensors are used to create three-dimensional and four-dimensional surveys of the hydrocarbon producing formation of interest. The acoustic sensors are typically physically attached to a cable, and are periodically spaced along the cable. More particularly, acoustic sensors are typically housed in groups of three, with each acoustic sensor in the housing or pod responsive to acoustic signals along orthogonal axis—hence the term “vector sensors.” FIG. 1 shows an exemplary set of orthogonal axis, as well as an exemplary set of acoustic receivers2A-C lying along those axis. If an acoustic signal is generated in the plane created by the XY axis, with no corresponding Z component, then only the
acoustic sensors 2B and 2C receive a signal in response thereto. FIG. 2 exemplifies this situation. In particular, FIG. 2 shows that at an arrival time (indicated by the dashed line through all three acoustic response graphs), the signal received along the X axis (by receiver 2C) and the signal received along the Y axis (byreceiver 2B) are the only axis in which acoustic signals are received. Moreover, FIG. 2 exemplifies that the source of the acoustic energy (not shown) was more closely orientated to the X axis than the Y axis as shown by the greater amplitude of the signal received along the X axis than that received along the Y axis. Thus, vector sensors have the ability to detect the orientation of an incoming signal. If the orientation of the vector sensors is known, then the orientation of the incoming signal may be calculated. Thus, knowing the orientation of each sensor pod is needed for correct operation of an acoustic or seismic system. - FIG. 3 shows a sensor cable4 having a plurality of
sensor pods 6A-E attached thereto disposed within awell bore 8. Because of the flexibility of the cable 4, the orientation of thepods 6A-E relative to each other is not known, and indeed may change during the installation process. The related art technique to determine the orientation of the sensor pods is to induce seismic or acoustic energy into the earth by asource 10 on the surface of theearth 12. In theory, the ray path of the acoustic energy created by thesource 10 is confined to a plane containing both thesource 10 and eachrespective receiver 6A-E, as indicated by the series of lines orrays 14 of FIG. 3. FIG. 4 shows an overhead view of the assumption shown in FIG. 3, indicating that the orientation of eachray 14 with respect to the borehole is assumed to be straight and known. The acoustic sensors in the sensor pods downhole receive the test signal originating from some distance from the borehole, with known orientation, and thus the orientation of the sensor pods may be calculated - However, the assumption that the ray path between the
source 10 and eachreceiver 6A-E lies in a plane is, in most instances, incorrect. FIG. 5 exemplifies that various subsurface anomalies, such as non-horizontal formations, affect the ray paths in at least the vertical plane shown, but also in the horizontal plane. FIG. 6 shows an overhead view of the situation of FIG. 5. In particular, FIG. 6 shows that the ray path from thesource 10 may shift in the horizontal plane due to subsurface anomalies. FIG. 6 also shows some subsurface formations exhibit a property known as anisotropy. In anisotropic environments, acoustic waves are broken into two orthogonal components each having slightly different propagation speeds. In the exemplary system shown in FIG. 6, the propagating acoustic wave may be broken down into two orthogonal components, indicated bydashed lines 16A and 16B. Degradation of the test signal into orthogonal components exasperates the orientation determination process. - Thus, what is needed in the art is a method and related system to determine the orientation of sensor pods that is not affected by subsurface anomalies and characteristics.
- The problems noted above are solved in large part by a method and related system of determining the orientation of sensor pods placed in well bores that is not affected by subsurface anomalies and characteristics. Preferably, a signal-generating mechanism produces an acoustic signal along the casing of the well bore. The acoustic signal is detected by sensor pods and is used to determine the orientation of the sensor pods relative to the acoustic signal. If the acoustic signal does not reach all sensor pods, additional acoustic signals are generated with some overlap of sensor pods, so that their relative orientations may be determined. In this way, the absolute orientation of only one sensor pod, or the absolute orientation of only one acoustic signal in the casing, needs to be known to ascertain the orientation of all the sensor pods in the array.
- Most acoustic sensing devices, as well as seismic devices generally, have as their sensing mechanism a spring loaded inertial mass. The mass in the sensing mechanism moves responsive to received energy, and the movement correspondingly creates an electric signal. In the preferred embodiments, the acoustic sensor is used in reverse, and an electric signal is applied which in turn causes the inertial mass to oscillate. This, in turn, creates an acoustic signal. Thus, each acoustic sensor in each sensor pod may be the signal generating mechanism that produces the signal detected above or below the acoustic sensor operated in this manner.
- In a second aspect of the preferred embodiments, the calibration or sensitivity of acoustic sensors in each sensor pod may be tested over time. That is, the sensor pods coupling to the casing, as well as the sensitivity of the sensor pods in general, and the acoustic sensing devices within each sensor pod, may change over time. If these changes are not accounted for in the acoustic and seismic measurements, they may lead to incorrect assumptions about the state of the hydrocarbon formation monitored. In the preferred embodiments, a baseline sensor pod response is created either simultaneously with the orientation determination, or as an independent test. At later times, the same tests may be run again to determine an amount of change in responsiveness of each sensor pod or particular sensing device. In this way, the data collected in subsequent acoustic surveys may be correspondingly corrected for any change in physical characteristics of the sensor pod or the individual sensing devices, such that these errors are not attributed to changes in formation properties.
- The disclosed devices and methods comprise a combination of features and advantages which enable it to overcome the deficiencies of the prior art devices. The various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
- For a detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
- FIG. 1 shows a set of orthogonal axis and a corresponding set of orthogonally placed acoustic receivers;
- FIG. 2 shows an exemplary set of received signals by the acoustic receivers of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 shows the prior art technique for determining the orientation of downhole acoustic sensors;
- FIG. 4 shows an overhead view of the system of FIG. 3;
- FIG. 5 shows how subsurface anomalies affect assumptions made in prior art determinations of orientation of sensor pods;
- FIG. 6 shows an overhead view of the exemplary system of FIG. 5;
- FIG. 7 shows a cross-sectional elevational view of an exemplary borehole containing a sensor string of the preferred embodiments;
- FIG. 8 shows an embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods;
- FIG. 9 shows another embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods;
- FIG. 10 shows another embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods; and
- FIG. 11 shows yet another embodiment for determining the orientation of the sensor pods using dedicated acoustic transmitters.
- Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function.
- In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to. . . ”.
- Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct electrical or mechanical connection, depending on the context. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect connection via other devices and connections.
- While technically there may be some distinction between seismic signals and acoustic signals, the technical distinction being based generally upon the frequency or wavelength of such signals, for purposes of this specification, and in the claims, the term “seismic” and “acoustic” may be used interchangeably to denote energy propagating through earth formations.
- The preferred embodiments of the present invention are directed to determining the orientation of permanently or semi-permanently installed acoustic or seismic sensors in downhole hydrocarbon producing systems. As one of ordinary skill in the art will realize after reading the following discussion, the systems and related methods described are applicable to any downhole device for which an absolute orientation needs to be known, for example, the initial placement of a wipstock or muleshoe. Thus, while the preferred embodiments described below are in the context of determining the orientation of acoustic vector sensors, the discussion should not be read as a limitation as to the breadth of the claims.
- FIG. 7 shows a cross-section of an exemplary borehole to provide context for a description of the preferred embodiments. In particular, a
metallic casing 20 preferably extends into and provides a lining for a borehole. While thecasing 20 is shown to be vertical, the system and related methods described herein could likewise be practices in a deviated borehole. FIG. 7 also shows the cross-section of a portion ofproduction tubing 22 within thecasing 20, thus producing aspace 24. In such systems, it is within thisspace 24 that the vector sensors of the preferred embodiment are installed. Before proceeding, it must be understood, however, that the vector sensors of the preferred embodiment need not be installed in a producing well, and thus the presence of thespace 24 between thecasing 20 andproduction tubing 22 is not a requirement. Indeed, the vector sensors of the preferred embodiments could likewise be installed in any borehole, such as a dedicated survey well. - The vector sensors of the preferred embodiment, in FIG. 7 shown as
sensors 26A-E, preferably couple to thesurface 28 by way of an electrical cable 30. The cable 30 preferably couples to asurface computer 31 which receives electrical signals responsive to measured downhole energy, and which also in the preferred embodiments controls creation of energy for determining orientations of the various sensors (discussed more fully below). Preferably, thevector sensors 26A-E are in physical contact with thecasing 20, or if a casing is not present, the wall of the borehole. In this way, acoustic energy propagating along the casing or borehole wall may be detected, in the vector sense, by each of thesensor pods 26A-E. - FIG. 8 shows one embodiment for determining orientation of the
various sensor pods 26A-E. In particular, the embodiment of FIG. 8 shows asensor pod 32 which is relatively close to the surface, and whose orientation is known. As will be discussed more fully below, preferably thissensor pod 32 acts as an acoustic source inducing a shear wave in the casing (not shown) in which thesensor string 33 is placed. The acoustic wave propagates along the casing and is detected by one or more of the sensor pods 26 belowsensor pod 32. For purposes of illustration only, and not as a limitation, FIG. 8 shows thatonly sensor pod 26A (and any sensor pods betweensensor pod 26A and 32) receive the acoustic signal generated bysensor pod 32. Thus, any sensor pod which receives the acoustic signal generated bysensor pod 32 may have its orientation determined because the orientation of the acoustic energy created bysensor pod 32 is known. - FIG. 8 further shows that, in the case where the acoustic energy created by
sensor pod 32 cannot propagate the entire borehole (which is dependent upon the casing or tubing material upon which the shear wave is induced), sensor pods further down the line may act as acoustic sources (discussed below) to create acoustic energy to propagate down the casing. As shown in FIG. 8,sensor pod 26A, which received acoustic energy generated bysensor pod 32, acts as an acoustic source and propagates energy tosensor pods 26B and 26C. Although FIG. 8 shows onlysensor pod 26A inducing enough acoustic energy to reachsensor pods 26B and 26C, it must be understood that many sensor pods may be within the range of any particular sensor pod acting in an acoustic transmitter mode. Likewise, FIG. 8 shows sensor pod 26C acting as an acoustic transmitter and transmitting acoustic energy tosensor pods 26D and 26E. - Because the orientation of
sensor pod 32 is known in the embodiment of FIG. 8, each sensor pod which receives the acoustic signal or signals generated bysensor pod 32 may calculate an orientation. Once the orientation of a sensor pod is known, for example calculated based on receiving a signal of known orientation (even if the calculation is not immediately performed), that sensor pod creates acoustic energy which propagates to lower sensor pods, as shown in FIG. 8, until each sensor pod has a reference signal. In this way, the absolute orientation of each sensor pod in the string may be determined. - FIG. 9 shows yet another embodiment for determining the absolute orientation of the sensor pods in the string. In particular, in the system shown in FIG. 9, the lowest or
deepest sensor pod 26E induces a shear wave in the casing which propagates to sensor pods 26D and 26C. Again, however, the system shown in FIG. 9 wheresensor pod 26E can create acoustic energy only sufficient to reach 26D and 26C is only exemplary, and, depending on the propagation characteristics of the casing, it is possible that one sensor may have the ability to propagate an acoustic shear wave that may reach every sensor pod in the system. In the case, however, where each sensor pod acting as a transmitter only has a limited range, at least one of the sensor pods that was reached by the shear wave then acts as a transmitter and propagates the shear wave energy again. In FIG. 9, 26C likewise propagates energy tosensor pods Sensor pod 26A continues the process, eventually reaching theuppermost sensor pod 32 for which an absolute orientation is known. From this absolute orientation, the orientation of each of thesensor pods 26A-E may be determined. - FIG. 8 shows propagating acoustic energy of known orientation from the top of the string, near the
surface 28 to the bottom. FIG. 9 shows propagating acoustic energy of an unknown orientation from the bottom of the string, atsensor 26E, to the top of the string,sensor 32, and then determining the orientation of all the lower sensor pods based on the known orientation of thesensor 32. However, the process need not necessarily start near the surface or at the bottom of the string. FIG. 10 shows an embodiment where a medial sensor pod initially creates the acoustic energy. In particular, FIG. 10 shows thatsensor pod 26B creates acoustic energy which propagates in both directions, reaching bothsensor pods 26A and 26C. With the same caveat regarding the number of sensor pods that may be reached by any acoustic energy transmission, FIG. 10 shows that the downward going acoustic signal is received by sensor pod 26C and repeated for 26D, and likewise sensor pod 26D receives acoustic energy and repeats that downward forsensor pod 26E. In the upward direction,sensor pod 26A receives the acoustic energy created bysensor pod 26B and repeats that toward the surface until eventually the acoustic energy is received atsensor pod 32, which in the embodiment of FIG. 10 has a known orientation. Thus, the relative orientation of the sensor pods may be determined based on the upward and downward signals (that is, their orientations relative to each other), and their absolute orientations may be determined from the known orientation ofsensor pod 32. One of ordinary skill in the art, having now been exposed to the embodiments described, could easily calculate the orientations of the various sensor pods in relation to the known orientation ofsensor pod 32 for the various embodiments described. Before proceeding, it must be understood that in the embodiments shown in FIGS. 8-10, thesensor pod 32 is of known orientation because it is close to the surface and may be observed, or even have its orientation adjusted; however, the sensor pod with a known orientation need not necessarily be at the surface, and other techniques may exist for establishing the absolute orientation of one of the sensor pods at any location within the borehole, which may then be used as a reference to determine the orientations of the remaining sensor pods in the string. - The sensor pods of the preferred embodiment are acoustic vector sensor arrays, called pods because each pod contains three orthogonally situated acoustic sensors. The acoustic sensors of the preferred embodiments operate on the principle of having an inertial mass which vibrates in response to acoustic energy polarized along its axis. Vibration of the inertial mass in response to the acoustic energy thus creates an electrical signal representative of the frequency and amplitude. However, these acoustic sensors may likewise be used as acoustic sources. That is, rather than simply sensing electrical signals created by movement of inertial mass, electrical signals of particular frequencies, preferably a signal sweeping a band of frequencies, may be applied to the acoustic sensor, which in turn vibrates the inertial mass. Vibrating of the inertial mass induces acoustic energy into the casing for use in determining the relative orientation of the sensor pods as discussed above. Preferably, when a sensor pod is used as an acoustic transmitter, each acoustic sensor within the pod generates acoustic energy sequentially. Thus, the acoustic sensors receiving the acoustic energy for orientation purposes receive acoustic energy sequentially in three polarization or orientation directions, thus increasing the accuracy of the orientation determination. One of ordinary skill in the art, however, could devise an equivalent system utilizing only one or two acoustic sensor in a sensor pod to create the reference acoustic energy. Acoustic devices capable of performing this dual function of both receiving and acting as a source may be purchased from Geospace L.P., 7334 Gessner, Houston, Tex. 77040; Input/Output Inc., 11104 West Airport Boulevard, Houston, Tex. 77477. While acoustic sensors from these manufacturers are preferred, the sensors from any manufacturer may be used, and likewise any sensing device within inertial mass, such as a geophone or an accelerometer, may equivalently be used.
- If, however, a particular installation of acoustic sensors requires the use of sensing devices that do not have an inertial mass, the principles of the embodiments above may still be utilized. In particular, FIG. 11 shows an alternative embodiment in which dedicated
acoustic sources 34A-C are periodically spaced among thesensor pods 26A-E. In the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 11, thededicated source 34A induces acoustic energy into the casing (not shown in FIG. 11) at a known orientation, and the acoustic energy propagates to one or more of the acoustic transmitters 26. FIG. 11 shows that the second dedicatedacoustic source 34B creates acoustic energy which propagates both up tosensor pod 26A, as well as down tosensor pods 26B and 26C. A corresponding arrangement is shown with respect to dedicated acoustic transmitter 34C and sensor pods 26D-E. Thus, all the sensor pods between thededicated sources acoustic transmitter 34A. Upon thetransmitter 34B transmitting acoustic energy tosensor pod 26A, the orientation betweensensor pod 26A andtransmitter 34B may be determined, and thus all the orientations ofsensor pods 26B and 26C may be determined. The same result follows with respect to the orientation of the transmitter 34C and thesensor pods 26D and 26E. While FIG. 11 shows that there is no overlap in the acoustic range of the dedicatedacoustic transmitters 34A-C, one of ordinary skill in the art, now understanding how to use the dedicated acoustic transmitters along with the sensor pods, could easily devise equivalent systems in which transmitting of acoustic energy from one dedicated acoustic transmitter may overlap other acoustic transmitters such that there would be no need for sensor pods above any particular transmitter to receive the acoustic energy from below to determine their orientations. As mentioned with respect to FIGS. 8-10, determining the orientation of the various transmitters and therefor sensor pods need not work from near thesurface 28 toward the bottom, but may likewise may start at the bottom and work toward the surface, or may start from a medial portion, working both directions in sequence or simultaneously. - While the various embodiments described above indicate the need for having at least one sensor or transmitter for which an orientation is known, in yet another embodiment, this need not necessarily be the case. Indeed, so long as the relative orientation of each of the sensor pods is determined, even if that determination is not made with regard to an absolute surface or geologic reference prior to obtaining acoustic or seismic readings, the data from the seismic measurement may still be correlated to some other known location, such as a subsurface anomaly whose absolute orientation has been previously established.
- In addition to being capable of determining the orientation of various sensor pods in permanently or semi-permanently installed seismic systems, the preferred embodiments of the present invention may also be used to determine the sensitivity or characteristics of the sensor string over time. In particular, and as discussed with respect to FIG. 7, the
sensor string 33 of the preferred embodiments is permanently or semi-permanently placed in acasing 20. Thus, thestring 33 may be used in a first instance to perform a three-dimensional seismic or acoustic survey. At a later time, thesame string 33 may be used again to perform a second instance of a three-dimensional seismic or acoustic survey, which when combined with the first instance creates a four-dimensional survey. However, over time, responsiveness of particular sensors in a sensor pod, or the coupling of the sensor pod to the casing, may change, which thus affects the amplitudes of the signals received by the sensor pods. If this degradation of the coupling of the sensor pods, or degradation of the sensors themselves, is not compensated for, then seismic data obtained will inaccurately show changes in the subsurface structures. In the preferred embodiments, prior to running an acoustic or seismic survey using thestring 33 andsensor pods 26A-E, the orientation test is run again. At this time, however, the test is not necessarily to determine the orientation of thevarious sensor pods 26A-E (although if there has been a change, this should be noted), but instead the test is to determine the differences in received signals from previous orientation tests, such that the differences in coupling and acoustic signal receiving sensitivity may be accounted for in the seismic or acoustic survey. - In yet another embodiment, the techniques described above may be used to determine orientation of other downhole devices. That is, the orientation of many downhole devices needs to be known for proper drilling and operation of the hydrocarbon producing well. For example, it is common in the industry to drill a single relatively vertical well bore, and then drill a plurality of lateral wells off the vertical well bore to reach the hydrocarbon producing zones. Generally speaking, a wipstock, is used to direct a drill string equipment into a particular lateral. Thus, the absolute orientation of this wipstock needs to be known. The methods described above with regard to determining the orientation of the various sensor pods may likewise be utilized in determining the orientation of such downhole devices. In the exemplary case of the wipstock, a sensor pod may be coupled to the wipstock, either permanently or possibly only for initial installation. Once the wipstock has been placed, its orientation may be tested using the techniques described above. More particularly, the sensor pod on the wipstock could create seismic energy which propagates to a sensor pod having a known orientation; conversely, a sensor pod or acoustic source having a known orientation could create acoustic energy which is detected by the sensor pod on the wipstock. Thus, in much the same way as described above, the absolute orientation of the wipstock could be determined. It is noted that any number of sensor pods or acoustic transmitters could be used to sequentially propagate and receive the acoustic energy along the casing to determine the orientation of the wipstock. It is noted again that the wipstock is presented only for purposes of example. The orientation of any number of downhole devices may be critical to operation or creation of a hydrocarbon producing well, and any such device could use the methods described herein.
- The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Claims (36)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/174,766 US6661738B1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2002-06-19 | Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays |
PCT/US2003/018405 WO2004001351A2 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2003-06-11 | Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays |
AU2003237990A AU2003237990A1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2003-06-11 | Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/174,766 US6661738B1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2002-06-19 | Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6661738B1 US6661738B1 (en) | 2003-12-09 |
US20030235113A1 true US20030235113A1 (en) | 2003-12-25 |
Family
ID=29711186
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/174,766 Expired - Fee Related US6661738B1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2002-06-19 | Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6661738B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003237990A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004001351A2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150323700A1 (en) * | 2013-01-26 | 2015-11-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | In-Situ System Calibration |
WO2018106229A1 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2018-06-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole communication network |
WO2018106231A1 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2018-06-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole leak monitor system |
US10253622B2 (en) * | 2015-12-16 | 2019-04-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Data transmission across downhole connections |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8457614B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2013-06-04 | Clearone Communications, Inc. | Wireless multi-unit conference phone |
US11108471B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2021-08-31 | Ali Abdi | System and method for data transmission via acoustic channels |
WO2011133478A2 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2011-10-27 | Ali Abdi | System and method for data transmission via acoustic channels |
US10274621B2 (en) * | 2011-11-25 | 2019-04-30 | Westerngeco L.L.C. | Seismic receivers as seismic sources |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4381610A (en) * | 1980-10-31 | 1983-05-03 | The Brunton Company | Self-contained downhole compass |
US5089989A (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1992-02-18 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring the quality of a cement to a casing bond |
US5302782A (en) * | 1992-06-15 | 1994-04-12 | Southwest Research Institute | Three-component borehole wall-locking seismic detector |
US6430150B1 (en) * | 1996-02-14 | 2002-08-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Communication node, restoration method and communication network |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9812006D0 (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 1998-07-29 | Concept Systems Limited | Sensor apparatus |
-
2002
- 2002-06-19 US US10/174,766 patent/US6661738B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-06-11 AU AU2003237990A patent/AU2003237990A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-06-11 WO PCT/US2003/018405 patent/WO2004001351A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4381610A (en) * | 1980-10-31 | 1983-05-03 | The Brunton Company | Self-contained downhole compass |
US5089989A (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1992-02-18 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring the quality of a cement to a casing bond |
US5302782A (en) * | 1992-06-15 | 1994-04-12 | Southwest Research Institute | Three-component borehole wall-locking seismic detector |
US6430150B1 (en) * | 1996-02-14 | 2002-08-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Communication node, restoration method and communication network |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150323700A1 (en) * | 2013-01-26 | 2015-11-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | In-Situ System Calibration |
US10253622B2 (en) * | 2015-12-16 | 2019-04-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Data transmission across downhole connections |
WO2018106229A1 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2018-06-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole communication network |
WO2018106231A1 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2018-06-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole leak monitor system |
US10895150B2 (en) | 2016-12-07 | 2021-01-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole communication network |
US11359482B2 (en) | 2016-12-07 | 2022-06-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole leak monitor system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2003237990A8 (en) | 2004-01-06 |
WO2004001351A3 (en) | 2004-03-04 |
WO2004001351A2 (en) | 2003-12-31 |
AU2003237990A1 (en) | 2004-01-06 |
US6661738B1 (en) | 2003-12-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7675816B2 (en) | Enhanced noise cancellation in VSP type measurements | |
US6131694A (en) | Vertical seismic profiling in a drilling tool | |
US10364664B2 (en) | Downhole acoustic mapping | |
US20100157737A1 (en) | Microhydraulic fracturing with downhole acoustic measurement | |
US5753812A (en) | Transducer for sonic logging-while-drilling | |
CA2663368C (en) | Electromagnetic-seismic logging system and method | |
CA2579982C (en) | Anisotropy measurement while drilling | |
US8194497B2 (en) | Reduction of tool eccentricity effects on acoustic measurements | |
US20070285274A1 (en) | Multi-Physics Inversion Processing to Predict Pore Pressure ahead of the Drill Bit | |
EP1064567A1 (en) | Formation stress identification and estimation using borehole monopole and cross-dipole acoustic measurements | |
AU632653B2 (en) | Method of acoustic well logging | |
WO2014088786A1 (en) | Calibration of a well acoustic sensing system | |
US9494704B2 (en) | Estimating formation stresses using sonic data | |
JPH08254578A (en) | Stratum-velocity measuring instrument and method thereof | |
CN104215934A (en) | Method for performing hydraulic-fracturing microseismic monitoring by utilizing uphole geophones | |
WO2009004333A1 (en) | Method of locating a receiver in a well | |
US6661738B1 (en) | Orientation and calibration of acoustic vector sensor arrays | |
US8401796B2 (en) | Methods and systems for acoustically monitoring formations | |
US5010976A (en) | Characterization of the full elastic effect of the near surface on seismic waves | |
CA3063119C (en) | Multi-frequency acoustic interrogation for azimuthal orientation of downhole tools | |
CN110785680B (en) | Attenuating tool-generated noise acquired in downhole sonic tool measurements | |
GB2459365A (en) | Investigating subterranean formations using electromagnetic and seismic measurements obtained simultaneously using an EM receiver for both measurements |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DE OLIVEIRA DASILVA, TACIO;CORNISH, BRUCE E.;REEL/FRAME:013268/0173;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020806 TO 20020903 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DASILVA, TACIO JOSE DE OLIVEIRA;CORNISH, BRUCE E.;REEL/FRAME:014072/0968;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020806 TO 20020903 |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20151209 |