US20030208789A1 - Wound-inducible expression in plants - Google Patents

Wound-inducible expression in plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030208789A1
US20030208789A1 US10/137,325 US13732502A US2003208789A1 US 20030208789 A1 US20030208789 A1 US 20030208789A1 US 13732502 A US13732502 A US 13732502A US 2003208789 A1 US2003208789 A1 US 2003208789A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
plant
protein
plants
promoter
expression
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US10/137,325
Inventor
Stefan Jansens
Miriam Hauben
Arlette Reynaerts
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bayer CropScience NV
Original Assignee
Bayer Bioscience NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bayer Bioscience NV filed Critical Bayer Bioscience NV
Priority to US10/137,325 priority Critical patent/US20030208789A1/en
Assigned to AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V. reassignment AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HAUBEN, MIRIAM, JENSENS, STEFAN, REYNAERTS, ARLETTE
Priority to ES03729979T priority patent/ES2287482T3/en
Priority to MXPA04010704A priority patent/MXPA04010704A/en
Priority to AT03729979T priority patent/ATE361987T1/en
Priority to DE60313770T priority patent/DE60313770T2/en
Priority to JP2004501619A priority patent/JP4527527B2/en
Priority to BRPI0309874A priority patent/BRPI0309874B1/en
Priority to PCT/EP2003/004699 priority patent/WO2003093483A1/en
Priority to CNB03810041XA priority patent/CN1308453C/en
Priority to EP03729979A priority patent/EP1504105B1/en
Priority to AU2003240601A priority patent/AU2003240601A1/en
Priority to ARP030101574A priority patent/AR039969A1/en
Priority to US10/428,843 priority patent/US7790960B2/en
Assigned to AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V. reassignment AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HAUBEN, MIRIAM, JANSENS, STEFAN, REYNAERTS, ARLETTE
Assigned to BAYER BIOSCIENCE N.V. reassignment BAYER BIOSCIENCE N.V. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V.
Publication of US20030208789A1 publication Critical patent/US20030208789A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8279Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance
    • C12N15/8286Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance for insect resistance
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/10Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
    • Y02A40/146Genetically Modified [GMO] plants, e.g. transgenic plants

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for producing plants in which expression of an insecticidal protein is regulated by the wound-inducible TR2′ promoter, to the chimeric genes used in this method and the plants obtained thereby.
  • the currently favored strategy is the combination of 100% toxicity of the transgenic plants to the target pest(s), obtained by high dose expression of a specific toxin and this during the full life-cycle of the pest, with the use of refuges of non-transgenic plants, which allow the maintenance of the target pest population (De Maagd et al. 1999).
  • the use of strong constitutive promoters in the engineering of insect-resistant plants has further been encouraged.
  • transgenic cabbage leaves transformed with the cry1Ab3 gene placed under the control of the inducible vspB promoter from soybean were as toxic to diamondback moth as those transformed with the same gene under control of the 35S promoter, but wound-inducibility was not demonstrated (Jin et al., 2000).
  • TR2′ promoter of the mannopine synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens originally considered to direct constitutive expression (Velten et al. 1984; Vaeck et al. 1987), has been used to direct wound-inducible expression of a native Cry1Ab gene in tomato, which led to relatively low expression and only moderate insect control (Reynaerts & Jansens, 1994). Though a possible broad application for expression of Bt proteins has been suggested (Peferoen et al. 1997), there appear to be discrepancies between the reports on the expression pattern of the TR2′ promoter in tobacco and other dicots (Ni et al. 1995).
  • the present invention describes how the TR2′ promoter can be used to direct wound-induced expression of an insecticidal protein in monocot plants to obtain insect resistance.
  • Such wound-inducible expression of the TR2′ promoter leads to a strong but localized increase of expression of the insecticidal protein.
  • the putative effect on plant vigor and growth, observed with high level expression of some Bt proteins particularly upon repeated inbreeding is likely to be reduced as the limited expression of the protein should minimize any burden on functions important for maintaining the agronomic qualities of the engineered crop. This is also an important factor when stacking of different traits (or different Bt proteins) is envisaged.
  • the present invention relates to a method for obtaining wound-induced expression of an insecticidal protein in a monocot plant, which method comprises introducing into the genome of the plant a foreign DNA which is a chimeric gene comprising a DNA sequence encoding the insecticidal protein under control of a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter.
  • the insecticidal protein is a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin.
  • the insecticidal protein is an insecticidal protein active against pests of monocot plants; most preferably, the insecticidal protein can be a Cry1Ab, Cry1F or Cry2Ab protein.
  • a preferred embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for obtaining insect resistance in plants, more particularly in monocotyledonous plants, especially in graminae, most particularly in corn, by providing the plants with a foreign DNA comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter.
  • the TR2′ promoter is used to increase expression of the insecticidal protein upon wounding, e.g. by insect feeding.
  • expression of the insecticidal protein in monocotyledonous plants preferably measured in the greenhouse, is low (i.e. below 0.005% total soluble protein) in leaves and most other plant tissues, in the absence of wounding or infestation and is increased, preferably at least doubled, most preferably increased 5-100 fold, in the wounded or infested tissues, within 24 hours.
  • a chimeric gene comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the wound-inducible TR2′ promoter is used to confer insect resistance to monocotyledonous plants, especially to gramineae, most particularly to corn, by directing local expression of the insecticidal protein at the site of insect feeding.
  • the invention relates to chimeric genes for obtaining wound-inducible expression in monocot plants.
  • expression of an insecticidal protein in the plants is such that, in the absence of wounding of the plant (e.g., when grown in the greenhouse) the insecticidal protein is expressed at low or undetectable levels (i.e. below 0.005% protein) in leaves, stalk, seed and pollen and, upon feeding by insects, is increased in the wounded tissue to a level which is sufficient to kill the feeding pest, preferably to a concentration of at least 0.01% soluble protein.
  • the TR2′ promoter is used in monocotyledonous plants to confer insect resistance by directing wound-inducible expression of an insecticidal protein which is a Bt toxin.
  • an insecticidal protein which is a Bt toxin. Examples of such DNA sequences encoding Bt toxins are well-known in the art and are described herein.
  • the present invention further relates to monocotyledonous plants that are resistant to insects while expressing very low basal levels of insecticidal protein in non-wounded leaves of the plant.
  • monocotyledonous plants, more particularly corn are obtained which combine efficient insect resistance with optimal agronomic characteristics, without penalty on agronomic performances due to expression of the insecticidal protein, as can be ascertained by assessing plant phenotype, segregation, emergence, vigor and agronomic ratings.
  • monocotyledonous plants particularly corn plants are provided, which are resistant to (a) target pest(s), but for which production of the insecticidal protein is low to undetectable in the absence of wounding, limiting exposure of non-target organisms to the insecticidal protein.
  • the plants with the characteristics described above are obtained by introduction into the genome of the plant of a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter which is demonstrated to function as wound-inducible promoter in monocotyledonous plants, more particularly in corn plants.
  • the term “gene” as used herein refers to any DNA sequence comprising several operably linked DNA fragments such as a promoter region, a 5′ untranslated region (the 5′UTR), a coding region (which may or may not code for a protein), and an untranslated 3′ region (3′UTR) comprising a polyadenylation site.
  • the 5′UTR, the coding region and the 3′UTR are transcribed into an RNA of which, in the case of a protein encoding gene, the coding region is translated into a protein.
  • a gene may include additional DNA fragments such as, for example, introns.
  • chimeric when referring to a gene or DNA sequence refers to a gene or DNA sequence which comprises at least two functionally relevant DNA fragments (such as promoter, 5′UTR, coding region, 3′UTR, intron) that are not naturally associated with each other and/or originate, for example, from different sources.
  • “Foreign” referring to a gene or DNA sequence with respect to a plant species is used to indicate that the gene or DNA sequence is not naturally found in that plant species, or is not naturally found in that genetic locus in that plant species.
  • foreign DNA will be used herein to refer to a DNA sequence as it has incorporated into the genome of a plant as a result of transformation in that plant or in a plant from which it is a progeny.
  • a “fragment” or “truncation” of a DNA molecule or protein sequence as used herein refers to a portion of the original DNA or protein sequence (nucleic acid or amino acid) referred to or a synthetic version thereof (such as a sequence which is adapted for optimal expression in plants), which can vary in length but of which the minimum size is sufficient to ensure the (encoded) protein to be biologically active, the maximum size not being critical.
  • a “variant” of a sequence is used herein to indicate a DNA molecule or protein of which the sequence (nucleic or amino acid) is essentially identical to the sequence to which the term refers.
  • Sequences which are “essentially identical” means that when two sequences are aligned, the percent sequence identity, i.e. the number of positions with identical nucleotides or amino acids divided by the number of nucleotides or amino acids in the shorter of the sequences, is higher than 70%-80%, preferably 81-85%, more preferably 86-90%, especially preferably 91-95%, most preferably 96-100%.
  • the alignment of two nucleotide sequences is performed by the algorithm as described by Wilbur and Lipmann (1983) using a window size of 20 nucleotides, a word length of 4 nucleotides, and a gap penalty of 4.
  • target insects are the pests of monocotyledonous plants, most particularly of corn, such as, but not limited to major lepidopteran pests, such as Ostrinia nubialis (European corn borer or ECB), Sesamia nonagroides (Mediterranean Stalk borer) and Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm), and major coleopteran pests, such as Diabrotica virgifera (Corn rootworm).
  • major lepidopteran pests such as Ostrinia nubialis (European corn borer or ECB), Sesamia nonagroides (Mediterranean Stalk borer) and Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm)
  • major coleopteran pests such as Diabrotica virgifera (Corn rootworm).
  • insecticidal protein or ‘toxin’ as used herein should be understood as a protein which is toxic to insects.
  • examples of such an insecticidal protein are the Bt Cry toxins (such as those reviewed by Höfte et al., 1989 and described in WO 00/26378, WO 97/40162, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,013), more particularly the Cry2Ab, Cry1F and Cry1Ab proteins.
  • insecticidal proteins are for instance the VIPs (Estruch et al., 1996, WO 96/10083), or the proteins encoded by the mis, war and sup sequences (WO98/18932, WO99/57282), the toxins isolated from Xhenorabdus and Photorabdus ssp. such as those produced by Photorabdus luminescens (Forst et al., 1997).
  • insecticidal proteins include, but are not limited to, the potato proteinase inhibitor I and II, the cowpea proteinase inhibitor, the cystein proteinase inhibitor of soybean (Zhao et al., 1996) or the cystatins such as those isolated from rice and corn (Irie et al., 1996), cholesterol oxidases, chitinases, and lectins.
  • An insecticidal protein can be a protoxin (i.e. the primary translation product of a full-length gene encoding an insecticidal protein). Also included are equivalents and variants, derivatives, truncations or hybrids of any of the above proteins that have insecticidal activity.
  • a Bt toxin as used herein refers to an insecticidal protein as previously defined which is directly or indirectly derived (e.g., modified so as to improve expression in plants or toxicity to insects) from a protein naturally produced by Bacillus thuringiensis and comprises a sequence that is essentially identical to the toxic fragment of a naturally produced Bt toxin.
  • a DNA encoding an insecticidal protein as used herein includes a truncated, modified, synthetic or naturally occurring DNA sequence, encoding an insecticidal protein.
  • the DNA encoding an insecticidal protein is a DNA sequence encoding a Bt toxin, more preferably a DNA sequence modified to increase expression of the insecticidal protein in plants.
  • the DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein is a modified cry1Ab DNA sequence which encodes at least part of the Cry1Ab5 protein described by Höfte et al. (1986), preferably a DNA sequence encoding a protein comprising the amino acids 1-28 to 607-725 thereof, most preferably comprising amino acids 1-616.
  • the encoded modified Cry1Ab protein has an insertion of an alanine codon (GCT) behind the ATG start codon (A1aAsp2 . . . Asp616).
  • the expression level of an insecticidal protein in plant material can be determined in a number of ways described in the art, such as by quantification of the mRNA encoding the insecticidal protein produced in the tissue using specific primers (such as described by Cornelissen & Vandewiele, 1989) or direct specific detection of the amount of insecticidal protein produced, e.g., by immunological detection methods. More particularly, according to the present invention the expression level of insecticidal protein is expressed as the percentage of soluble insecticidal protein as determined by immunospecific ELISA as described herein related to the total amount of soluble protein (as determined, e.g., by Bradford analysis).
  • a ‘wound-inducible’ promoter or a promoter directing an expression pattern which is wound-inducible as used herein means that, at least in the leaves, upon wounding expression of the coding sequence under control of the promoter is significantly increased, i.e. is at least doubled, preferably 5 times increased, most preferably 20 to 100 times increased.
  • wounding as used herein is intend to mean either mechanical damage or perforation of at least the plant epidermis or outer cell layer by any kind of insect feeding.
  • wound-inducible expression of an insecticidal protein in a plant means that basal expression (i.e.
  • the protein in the leaves of the plant at V4 stage is low, most preferably below 0.005% total soluble protein content (average value of multiple measurements taken from one plant), and, upon wounding rises to a level of 0.04% to 0.5% total soluble protein content or higher.
  • expression of the insecticidal protein at least in the wounded leaves rises to 0.1% total soluble protein content.
  • ‘High dose’ expression refers to a concentration of the insecticidal protein (as measured in percentage of total protein) which kills a developmental stage of the target insect which is significantly less susceptible, preferably between 25 to 100 times less susceptible to the toxin than the first larval stage of the insect and can thus can be expected to ensure full control of the target insect.
  • High dose when referring to ECB control as used herein refers to the production of insecticidal protein by the plant in mid-whorl stage in an amount that is toxic to ECB larvae of the L4 stage (European Corn Borer. Ecology and Management. 1996. North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 327. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa) as can be determined by toxicity assays with artificial infestation described herein, wherein mortality of at least to 90%, more preferably 97-100%, most preferably 99-100% of the L4 ECB larvae is obtained.
  • ‘wound-inducible’ expression is furthermore preferably characterized in that the effect of the promoter is local, i.e. is confined essentially to those tissues directly affected by wounding or immediately surrounding the wounded tissue.
  • the effect of the promoter is local, i.e. is confined essentially to those tissues directly affected by wounding or immediately surrounding the wounded tissue.
  • expression of the insecticidal protein in undamaged tissues of the plant is on average not more than 0.01% of the total soluble protein concentration, more preferably not more than 0.005% total soluble protein, as measured by ELISA (see above).
  • TR2′ promoter as used herein relates to any promoter comprising the TR2′ (or mas) functional part of the TR1-TR2 dual promoter element from Agrobacterium (Velten et al. 1984; Langridge et al. 1989). Thus this can comprise the TR2′ element either alone or in combination with the divergent TR1 element (Guevara-Garcia et al., 1998) or other (regulatory) elements.
  • the TR2′ promoter refers to a promoter region comprising a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 1 spanning from nucleotide 1-336 to nucleotide 483, preferably comprising the sequence of nucleotides 96 to 483 of SEQ ID NO: 1, most preferably comprising SEQ ID NO: 1 or a functional equivalent thereof, ie a modification thereof capable of directing wound-induced expression in plants, more particularly in monocotyledonous plants.
  • Such functional equivalents include sequences which are essentially identical to a nucleotide sequence comprising at least nucleotides 328 to 483 (comprising the TR2′ promoter element, Velten et al., 1984) of SEQ ID NO: 1.
  • Such sequences can be isolated from different Agrobacterium strains.
  • functional equivalents correspond to sequences which can be amplified using oligonucleotide primers comprising at least about 25, preferably at least about 50 or up to 100 consecutive nucleotides of nucleotides 328 to 483 of SEQ ID NO: 1 in a polymerase chain reaction.
  • Functional equivalents of the TR2′ promoter can also be obtained by substitution, addition or deletion of nucleotides of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 and includes hybrid promoters comprising the functional TR2′ part of SEQ ID NO: 1.
  • Such promoter sequence can be partly or completely synthesized.
  • the plants of the present invention are protected against insect pests, by the wound-inducible expression of a controlling amount of insecticidal protein.
  • a controlling amount of insecticidal protein By controlling is meant a toxic (lethal) or combative (sublethal) amount.
  • a high dose (as hereinbefore defined) is produced.
  • the plants should be morphologically normal and may be cultivated in a usual manner for consumption and/or production of products.
  • said plants should substantially obviate the need for chemical or biological insecticides (to insects targetted by the insecticidal protein).
  • Different assays can be used to measure the effect of the insecticidal protein expression in the plant. More particularly, the toxicity of the insecticidal protein produced in a corn plant to Ostrinia nubilalis or ECB (also referred to herein as ECB efficacy) can be assayed in vitro by testing of protein extracted from the plant in feeding bioassays with ECB larvae or by scoring mortality of larvae distributed on leaf material of transformed plants in a petri dish (both assays described by Jansens et al., 1997).
  • first brood ECB larvae (ECB1) infestation is evaluated based on leaf damage ratings (Guthrie, 1989) while evaluation of the total number of stalk tunnels per plant and stalk tunnel length are indicative of second brood ECB (ECB2) stalk feeding damage.
  • the plants of the present invention optionally also comprise in their genome a gene encoding herbicide resistance. More particularly, the herbicide resistance gene is the bar or the pat gene, which confers glufosinate tolerance to the plant, i.e. the plants are tolerant to the herbicide LibertyTM. Tolerance to LibertyTM can be tested in different ways. For instance, tolerance can be tested by LibertyTM spray application. Spray treatments should be made between the plant stages V2 and V6 for best results.
  • Tolerant plants are characterized by the fact that spraying of the plants with at least 200 grams active ingredient/hectare (g.a.i./ha), preferably 400 g.a.i./ha, and possibly up to 1600 g.a.i./ha (4 ⁇ the normal field rate), does not kill the plants.
  • a broadcast application should be applied at a rate of 28-34 oz LibertyTM+3# Ammonium Sulfate per acre. It is best to apply at a volume of 20 gallons of water per acre using a flat fan type nozzle while being careful not to direct spray applications directly into the whorl of the plants to avoid surfactant bum on the leaves.
  • the herbicide effect should appear within 48 hours and be clearly visible within 5-7 days.
  • herbicide resistance genes examples include the genes encoding resistance to phenmedipham (such as the pmph gene, U.S. Pat. No. 5,347,047; U.S. Pat. No. 5,543,306), the genes encoding resistance to glyphosate (such as the EPSPS genes, U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,471), genes encoding bromoxynil resistance (such as described in U.S. Pat. No.
  • genes encoding resistance to sulfonylurea such as described in EPA 0 360 750
  • genes encoding resistance to the herbicide dalapon such as described in WO 99/27116
  • genes encoding resistance to cyanamide such as described in WO 98/48023 and WO 98/56238
  • genes encoding resistance to glutamine synthetase inhibitors such as PPT (such as described in EP-A-0 242 236, EP-A-0 242 246, EP-A-0 257 542).
  • the chimeric gene comprising a DNA encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter can be introduced (simultaneously or sequentially) in combination with other chimeric genes into a plant, to obtain different traits in the plant (also referred to as ‘stacking’).
  • the plant of the invention comprising a foreign DNA comprising a DNA encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter is particularly suited for combination with other traits.
  • Such other traits include, but are not limited to traits such as those encoded by chimeric genes which confer insect resistance, herbicide resistance, stress or drought tolerance, or which modify other agronomic characteristics of the plant. Such a trait can also encompass the synthesis of a product to be recovered from the plant.
  • SEQ ID NO: 1 nucleotide sequence of a preferred embodiment of the TR2′ promoter
  • SEQ ID NO: 2 sequence of pTSVH0212
  • SEQ ID NO: 3 sequence of a modified cry1Ab coding sequence
  • a construct was made comprising a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter (Velten et al. 1984) directing the expression of a modified cry1Ab protein.
  • the plasmid pTSVH0212 containing the genes of interest placed between the T-DNA borders (also referred to as ‘TR2′-Cry1Ab’) was used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (WO 98/37212).
  • the structure of the PTSVH0212 construct is provided in Table 1.
  • transformations were performed with constructs comprising a DNA sequence encoding the modified Cry1Ab protein under control of either the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (Franck et al. 1980)(referred to as 35S-cry1Ab), or the promoter of the GOS2 gene from rice (de Pater et al., 1992) with the cab22 leader from Petunia (Harpster et al.
  • Synthetic polylinker sequence 316-56 Counter Fragment containing polyadenylation signals from the clockwise 3′untranslated region of the nopaline synthase gene from the T- DNA of pTiT37 (Depicker et al., 1982).
  • Synthetic polylinker sequence 887-336 Counter bar: the coding sequence of phosphinothricin acetyl transferase of clockwise Streptomyces hygroscopicus (Thompson et al., 1987) 1720-888
  • Counter P35S3 promoter region from the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S clockwise transcript (Odell et al., 1985).
  • Synthetic polylinker sequence 4470-4446 Counter Right Border sequence of TL-DNA of pTiB6S3 (Gielen et al., clockwise 1984).
  • the Agrobacterium transformants were checked for presence of vector sequence at the left border of the T-DNA. Southern blot analyses were performed with leaf material of the primary transformants (T0).
  • the basal level of expression of the modified Cry1Ab insecticidal protein was determined by a Cry1Ab sandwich ELISA with a polycondensated IgG fraction of a polyclonal rabbit antiserum against Cry1Ab as first antibody and a monoclonal antibody against Cry1Ab as second antibody.
  • Samples of leaves at V3 stage plants, pollen and leaf of R1 stage plants and leaves, stalk and pollen at harvest were taken of plants in the greenhouse.
  • samples were taken from plants transformed with the Gos/gos-cry1Ab constructs. Results are provided in Table 2. The mean value represents the average of 5 different samples taken from one plant.

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for producing plants in which expression of an insecticidal protein is regulated by the wound-inducible TR2′ promoter, to the chimeric genes used in this method and the plants obtained thereby.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a method for producing plants in which expression of an insecticidal protein is regulated by the wound-inducible TR2′ promoter, to the chimeric genes used in this method and the plants obtained thereby. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Most successful attempts to make plants that are resistant to insect attack have been obtained by, and are believed to be dependent on, high level expression of insecticidal toxins (Estruch et al., 1997; Witowsky & Siegfried, 1997). Most particularly for the Bt toxins, which as full-length proteins were found to be expressed poorly in plants, efforts have concentrated on increasing expression of these toxins in plants by use of strong constitutive promoters and by modification of the genes encoding them (Vaeck et al., 1987; Barton et al., 1987). More recently spatial regulation of expression of the insecticidal protein in those tissues susceptible to attack or triggered by feeding of the insect has been suggested as possibly providing advantages for resistance management (Peferoen & Van Rie, 1997). One of the major conditions for obtaining regulatory approval for transgenic insect resistant plants is the availability of an insect resistance management strategy. The currently favored strategy is the combination of 100% toxicity of the transgenic plants to the target pest(s), obtained by high dose expression of a specific toxin and this during the full life-cycle of the pest, with the use of refuges of non-transgenic plants, which allow the maintenance of the target pest population (De Maagd et al. 1999). In order to be able to comply with such a strategy, the use of strong constitutive promoters in the engineering of insect-resistant plants has further been encouraged. [0002]
  • Inducible expression of insect resistance has primarily been examined for the potato proteinase-inhibitor genes (pin1 and pin2), which are part of the natural defense system in plants and upon wounding, ensure the generation of a systemic signal throughout the plants (Green and Ryan, 1972; Hilder et al. 1987). Introduction of the pin2 gene in rice resulted in high-level accumulation of the protein in rice plants, which showed increased resistance to major pests (Duan et al., 1996). Breitler et al. (2001) describes the use of the C1 region of the maize proteinase inhibitor (MPI) gene to drive wound-inducible expression of the cry1B coding sequence in rice and the first transformants were found to effectively protect rice against stemborer attack. In a small-scale laboratory experiment, transgenic cabbage leaves transformed with the cry1Ab3 gene placed under the control of the inducible vspB promoter from soybean were as toxic to diamondback moth as those transformed with the same gene under control of the 35S promoter, but wound-inducibility was not demonstrated (Jin et al., 2000). [0003]
  • The TR2′ promoter of the mannopine synthase gene of [0004] Agrobacterium tumefaciens, originally considered to direct constitutive expression (Velten et al. 1984; Vaeck et al. 1987), has been used to direct wound-inducible expression of a native Cry1Ab gene in tomato, which led to relatively low expression and only moderate insect control (Reynaerts & Jansens, 1994). Though a possible broad application for expression of Bt proteins has been suggested (Peferoen et al. 1997), there appear to be discrepancies between the reports on the expression pattern of the TR2′ promoter in tobacco and other dicots (Ni et al. 1995). In general, the use of monocot promoters is preferred for optimal expression of genes in monocots (Shimamoto, 1994) and certain promoters have been found to have different cis-acting elements in monocots and dicots (Luan et al. 1992). The contribution of different elements of the TR2′ promoter on its activity was investigated in maize protoplast (Fox et al., 1992), but there have been no reports on the expression pattern of the TR2′ promoter in a monocotyledonous plant. Furthermore, the strongest deletion mutant was found to be 20 times less active than the CaMV 35S promoter (Fox et al., 1992).
  • The present invention describes how the TR2′ promoter can be used to direct wound-induced expression of an insecticidal protein in monocot plants to obtain insect resistance. Such wound-inducible expression of the TR2′ promoter leads to a strong but localized increase of expression of the insecticidal protein. The putative effect on plant vigor and growth, observed with high level expression of some Bt proteins particularly upon repeated inbreeding (such as reported in WO 00/26378 for Cry2Ab) is likely to be reduced as the limited expression of the protein should minimize any burden on functions important for maintaining the agronomic qualities of the engineered crop. This is also an important factor when stacking of different traits (or different Bt proteins) is envisaged. As high-dose expression levels are attained upon contact with the target pest, such plants should comply with current IRM strategies. Additionally, the combination of the specificity of the insect toxin produced with a spatially and temporally limited expression pattern (i.e. in tissues susceptible to wounding, upon wounding) is likely to reduce exposure of non-target organisms, which can be considered advantageous over constitutive production of the toxin by the plants. Thus, an effective system of regulated expression ensuring effective insect resistance for major crops such as corn and rice is of interest from both a regulatory and agricultural point of view. [0005]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for obtaining wound-induced expression of an insecticidal protein in a monocot plant, which method comprises introducing into the genome of the plant a foreign DNA which is a chimeric gene comprising a DNA sequence encoding the insecticidal protein under control of a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter. According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the insecticidal protein is a [0006] Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the insecticidal protein is an insecticidal protein active against pests of monocot plants; most preferably, the insecticidal protein can be a Cry1Ab, Cry1F or Cry2Ab protein.
  • Thus, a preferred embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for obtaining insect resistance in plants, more particularly in monocotyledonous plants, especially in graminae, most particularly in corn, by providing the plants with a foreign DNA comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter. According to the present invention the TR2′ promoter is used to increase expression of the insecticidal protein upon wounding, e.g. by insect feeding. Thus, according to a particular embodiment of the invention, expression of the insecticidal protein in monocotyledonous plants, preferably measured in the greenhouse, is low (i.e. below 0.005% total soluble protein) in leaves and most other plant tissues, in the absence of wounding or infestation and is increased, preferably at least doubled, most preferably increased 5-100 fold, in the wounded or infested tissues, within 24 hours. [0007]
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a chimeric gene comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the wound-inducible TR2′ promoter is used to confer insect resistance to monocotyledonous plants, especially to gramineae, most particularly to corn, by directing local expression of the insecticidal protein at the site of insect feeding. Thus, the invention relates to chimeric genes for obtaining wound-inducible expression in monocot plants. In a particular embodiment of the invention, expression (as measured in the greenhouse) is low or not detectable (<0.005% protein) in leaves of non-wounded, non-infected plants, and, upon infection, increased levels of insecticidal protein (>0.02% protein) are induced locally in the infected tissues, within 18 hours. According to this aspect of the invention, plants, more particularly monocotyledonous plants are provided that are insect resistant due to the presence in their genome of a foreign DNA comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein, under the control of the TR2′ promoter which ensures expression in wounded tissues. According to one embodiment of the invention, expression of an insecticidal protein in the plants is such that, in the absence of wounding of the plant (e.g., when grown in the greenhouse) the insecticidal protein is expressed at low or undetectable levels (i.e. below 0.005% protein) in leaves, stalk, seed and pollen and, upon feeding by insects, is increased in the wounded tissue to a level which is sufficient to kill the feeding pest, preferably to a concentration of at least 0.01% soluble protein. [0008]
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the TR2′ promoter is used in monocotyledonous plants to confer insect resistance by directing wound-inducible expression of an insecticidal protein which is a Bt toxin. Examples of such DNA sequences encoding Bt toxins are well-known in the art and are described herein. [0009]
  • According to one embodiment of the present invention use of the TR2′ promoter in corn to direct wound-inducible expression of a Bt toxin is particularly suited to engineer resistance of corn against the European Corn Borer (ECB), based on the local high-dose expression of the toxin in the plant upon feeding by target insects. The plants or plant parts (cells or tissues) of the present invention, comprising in their genome a foreign DNA comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under the control of the TR2′ promoter upon wounding produce levels of insecticidal protein that are toxic ECB, more particularly to ECB larvae of the fourth stage as can be determined by insect efficacy assays described herein. Preferably, mortality rates of ECB fourth instar larvae of 90 to 96%, more preferably 97-100%, most preferably 99-100% are obtained. [0010]
  • The present invention further relates to monocotyledonous plants that are resistant to insects while expressing very low basal levels of insecticidal protein in non-wounded leaves of the plant. According to a particular aspect of this invention, monocotyledonous plants, more particularly corn are obtained which combine efficient insect resistance with optimal agronomic characteristics, without penalty on agronomic performances due to expression of the insecticidal protein, as can be ascertained by assessing plant phenotype, segregation, emergence, vigor and agronomic ratings. [0011]
  • According to another aspect of this invention, monocotyledonous plants, particularly corn plants are obtained that are insect resistant and particularly suited for stacking with other traits (e.g. other types of insect resistance, herbicide resistance or agronomic traits). [0012]
  • According to another aspect of the invention, monocotyledonous plants, particularly corn plants are provided, which are resistant to (a) target pest(s), but for which production of the insecticidal protein is low to undetectable in the absence of wounding, limiting exposure of non-target organisms to the insecticidal protein. [0013]
  • According to the present invention, the plants with the characteristics described above are obtained by introduction into the genome of the plant of a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter which is demonstrated to function as wound-inducible promoter in monocotyledonous plants, more particularly in corn plants. [0014]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The term “gene” as used herein refers to any DNA sequence comprising several operably linked DNA fragments such as a promoter region, a 5′ untranslated region (the 5′UTR), a coding region (which may or may not code for a protein), and an untranslated 3′ region (3′UTR) comprising a polyadenylation site. Typically in plant cells, the 5′UTR, the coding region and the 3′UTR are transcribed into an RNA of which, in the case of a protein encoding gene, the coding region is translated into a protein. A gene may include additional DNA fragments such as, for example, introns. [0015]
  • The term “chimeric” when referring to a gene or DNA sequence refers to a gene or DNA sequence which comprises at least two functionally relevant DNA fragments (such as promoter, 5′UTR, coding region, 3′UTR, intron) that are not naturally associated with each other and/or originate, for example, from different sources. “Foreign” referring to a gene or DNA sequence with respect to a plant species is used to indicate that the gene or DNA sequence is not naturally found in that plant species, or is not naturally found in that genetic locus in that plant species. The term “foreign DNA” will be used herein to refer to a DNA sequence as it has incorporated into the genome of a plant as a result of transformation in that plant or in a plant from which it is a progeny. [0016]
  • A genome of a plant, plant tissue or plant cell, as used herein, refers to any genetic material in the plant, plant tissue or plant cell, and includes both the nuclear and the plastid and mitochondrial genome. [0017]
  • A “fragment” or “truncation” of a DNA molecule or protein sequence as used herein refers to a portion of the original DNA or protein sequence (nucleic acid or amino acid) referred to or a synthetic version thereof (such as a sequence which is adapted for optimal expression in plants), which can vary in length but of which the minimum size is sufficient to ensure the (encoded) protein to be biologically active, the maximum size not being critical. A “variant” of a sequence is used herein to indicate a DNA molecule or protein of which the sequence (nucleic or amino acid) is essentially identical to the sequence to which the term refers. [0018]
  • Sequences which are “essentially identical” means that when two sequences are aligned, the percent sequence identity, i.e. the number of positions with identical nucleotides or amino acids divided by the number of nucleotides or amino acids in the shorter of the sequences, is higher than 70%-80%, preferably 81-85%, more preferably 86-90%, especially preferably 91-95%, most preferably 96-100%. The alignment of two nucleotide sequences is performed by the algorithm as described by Wilbur and Lipmann (1983) using a window size of 20 nucleotides, a word length of 4 nucleotides, and a gap penalty of 4. [0019]
  • ‘Insecticidal’ is used herein to mean toxic to insects that are crop pests. More particularly, in the context of the present invention target insects are the pests of monocotyledonous plants, most particularly of corn, such as, but not limited to major lepidopteran pests, such as [0020] Ostrinia nubialis (European corn borer or ECB), Sesamia nonagroides (Mediterranean Stalk borer) and Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm), and major coleopteran pests, such as Diabrotica virgifera (Corn rootworm).
  • An ‘insecticidal protein’ or ‘toxin’ as used herein should be understood as a protein which is toxic to insects. Examples of such an insecticidal protein are the Bt Cry toxins (such as those reviewed by Höfte et al., 1989 and described in WO 00/26378, WO 97/40162, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,013), more particularly the Cry2Ab, Cry1F and Cry1Ab proteins. Other insecticidal proteins are for instance the VIPs (Estruch et al., 1996, WO 96/10083), or the proteins encoded by the mis, war and sup sequences (WO98/18932, WO99/57282), the toxins isolated from Xhenorabdus and [0021] Photorabdus ssp. such as those produced by Photorabdus luminescens (Forst et al., 1997). Other insecticidal proteins include, but are not limited to, the potato proteinase inhibitor I and II, the cowpea proteinase inhibitor, the cystein proteinase inhibitor of soybean (Zhao et al., 1996) or the cystatins such as those isolated from rice and corn (Irie et al., 1996), cholesterol oxidases, chitinases, and lectins. An insecticidal protein can be a protoxin (i.e. the primary translation product of a full-length gene encoding an insecticidal protein). Also included are equivalents and variants, derivatives, truncations or hybrids of any of the above proteins that have insecticidal activity. A Bt toxin as used herein refers to an insecticidal protein as previously defined which is directly or indirectly derived (e.g., modified so as to improve expression in plants or toxicity to insects) from a protein naturally produced by Bacillus thuringiensis and comprises a sequence that is essentially identical to the toxic fragment of a naturally produced Bt toxin. ‘A DNA encoding an insecticidal protein’ as used herein includes a truncated, modified, synthetic or naturally occurring DNA sequence, encoding an insecticidal protein.
  • In a particular embodiment of the present invention, the DNA encoding an insecticidal protein is a DNA sequence encoding a Bt toxin, more preferably a DNA sequence modified to increase expression of the insecticidal protein in plants. According to a particular embodiment of the present invention the DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein is a modified cry1Ab DNA sequence which encodes at least part of the Cry1Ab5 protein described by Höfte et al. (1986), preferably a DNA sequence encoding a protein comprising the amino acids 1-28 to 607-725 thereof, most preferably comprising amino acids 1-616. Most preferably, the encoded modified Cry1Ab protein has an insertion of an alanine codon (GCT) behind the ATG start codon (A1aAsp2 . . . Asp616). [0022]
  • The expression level of an insecticidal protein in plant material can be determined in a number of ways described in the art, such as by quantification of the mRNA encoding the insecticidal protein produced in the tissue using specific primers (such as described by Cornelissen & Vandewiele, 1989) or direct specific detection of the amount of insecticidal protein produced, e.g., by immunological detection methods. More particularly, according to the present invention the expression level of insecticidal protein is expressed as the percentage of soluble insecticidal protein as determined by immunospecific ELISA as described herein related to the total amount of soluble protein (as determined, e.g., by Bradford analysis). [0023]
  • A ‘wound-inducible’ promoter or a promoter directing an expression pattern which is wound-inducible as used herein means that, at least in the leaves, upon wounding expression of the coding sequence under control of the promoter is significantly increased, i.e. is at least doubled, preferably 5 times increased, most preferably 20 to 100 times increased. ‘Wounding’ as used herein is intend to mean either mechanical damage or perforation of at least the plant epidermis or outer cell layer by any kind of insect feeding. Preferably, according to the present invention, wound-inducible expression of an insecticidal protein in a plant means that basal expression (i.e. in the absence of wounding, preferably as measured in the greenhouse) of the protein in the leaves of the plant at V4 stage is low, most preferably below 0.005% total soluble protein content (average value of multiple measurements taken from one plant), and, upon wounding rises to a level of 0.04% to 0.5% total soluble protein content or higher. According to a particular embodiment of the invention, expression of the insecticidal protein at least in the wounded leaves rises to 0.1% total soluble protein content. [0024]
  • ‘High dose’ expression as used herein refers to a concentration of the insecticidal protein (as measured in percentage of total protein) which kills a developmental stage of the target insect which is significantly less susceptible, preferably between 25 to 100 times less susceptible to the toxin than the first larval stage of the insect and can thus can be expected to ensure full control of the target insect. High dose when referring to ECB control as used herein refers to the production of insecticidal protein by the plant in mid-whorl stage in an amount that is toxic to ECB larvae of the L4 stage (European Corn Borer. Ecology and Management. 1996. North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 327. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa) as can be determined by toxicity assays with artificial infestation described herein, wherein mortality of at least to 90%, more preferably 97-100%, most preferably 99-100% of the L4 ECB larvae is obtained. [0025]
  • According to the present invention ‘wound-inducible’ expression is furthermore preferably characterized in that the effect of the promoter is local, i.e. is confined essentially to those tissues directly affected by wounding or immediately surrounding the wounded tissue. This as opposed to a systemic effect, which directly or indirectly (through a cascade of reactions) ensures a widespread effect, more particularly wide-spread expression of proteins involved in the natural defence mechanisms of the plant. Preferably, expression of the insecticidal protein in undamaged tissues of the plant is on average not more than 0.01% of the total soluble protein concentration, more preferably not more than 0.005% total soluble protein, as measured by ELISA (see above). [0026]
  • The ‘TR2′ promoter’ as used herein relates to any promoter comprising the TR2′ (or mas) functional part of the TR1-TR2 dual promoter element from Agrobacterium (Velten et al. 1984; Langridge et al. 1989). Thus this can comprise the TR2′ element either alone or in combination with the divergent TR1 element (Guevara-Garcia et al., 1998) or other (regulatory) elements. Most particularly, the TR2′ promoter as used herein refers to a promoter region comprising a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 1 spanning from nucleotide 1-336 to nucleotide 483, preferably comprising the sequence of nucleotides 96 to 483 of SEQ ID NO: 1, most preferably comprising SEQ ID NO: 1 or a functional equivalent thereof, ie a modification thereof capable of directing wound-induced expression in plants, more particularly in monocotyledonous plants. Such functional equivalents include sequences which are essentially identical to a nucleotide sequence comprising at least nucleotides 328 to 483 (comprising the TR2′ promoter element, Velten et al., 1984) of SEQ ID NO: 1. Such sequences can be isolated from different Agrobacterium strains. Alternatively such functional equivalents correspond to sequences which can be amplified using oligonucleotide primers comprising at least about 25, preferably at least about 50 or up to 100 consecutive nucleotides of nucleotides 328 to 483 of SEQ ID NO: 1 in a polymerase chain reaction. Functional equivalents of the TR2′ promoter can also be obtained by substitution, addition or deletion of nucleotides of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 and includes hybrid promoters comprising the functional TR2′ part of SEQ ID NO: 1. Such promoter sequence can be partly or completely synthesized. [0027]
  • The plants of the present invention are protected against insect pests, by the wound-inducible expression of a controlling amount of insecticidal protein. By controlling is meant a toxic (lethal) or combative (sublethal) amount. Preferably, upon induction, a high dose (as hereinbefore defined) is produced. At the same time, the plants should be morphologically normal and may be cultivated in a usual manner for consumption and/or production of products. Furthermore, said plants should substantially obviate the need for chemical or biological insecticides (to insects targetted by the insecticidal protein). [0028]
  • Different assays can be used to measure the effect of the insecticidal protein expression in the plant. More particularly, the toxicity of the insecticidal protein produced in a corn plant to [0029] Ostrinia nubilalis or ECB (also referred to herein as ECB efficacy) can be assayed in vitro by testing of protein extracted from the plant in feeding bioassays with ECB larvae or by scoring mortality of larvae distributed on leaf material of transformed plants in a petri dish (both assays described by Jansens et al., 1997). In the field, first brood ECB larvae (ECB1) infestation is evaluated based on leaf damage ratings (Guthrie, 1989) while evaluation of the total number of stalk tunnels per plant and stalk tunnel length are indicative of second brood ECB (ECB2) stalk feeding damage.
  • The plants of the present invention optionally also comprise in their genome a gene encoding herbicide resistance. More particularly, the herbicide resistance gene is the bar or the pat gene, which confers glufosinate tolerance to the plant, i.e. the plants are tolerant to the herbicide Liberty™. Tolerance to Liberty™ can be tested in different ways. For instance, tolerance can be tested by Liberty™ spray application. Spray treatments should be made between the plant stages V2 and V6 for best results. Tolerant plants are characterized by the fact that spraying of the plants with at least 200 grams active ingredient/hectare (g.a.i./ha), preferably 400 g.a.i./ha, and possibly up to 1600 g.a.i./ha (4× the normal field rate), does not kill the plants. A broadcast application should be applied at a rate of 28-34 oz Liberty™+3# Ammonium Sulfate per acre. It is best to apply at a volume of 20 gallons of water per acre using a flat fan type nozzle while being careful not to direct spray applications directly into the whorl of the plants to avoid surfactant bum on the leaves. The herbicide effect should appear within 48 hours and be clearly visible within 5-7 days. Examples of other herbicide resistance genes are the genes encoding resistance to phenmedipham (such as the pmph gene, U.S. Pat. No. 5,347,047; U.S. Pat. No. 5,543,306), the genes encoding resistance to glyphosate (such as the EPSPS genes, U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,471), genes encoding bromoxynil resistance (such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,648) genes encoding resistance to sulfonylurea (such as described in EPA 0 360 750), genes encoding resistance to the herbicide dalapon (such as described in WO 99/27116), and genes encoding resistance to cyanamide (such as described in WO 98/48023 and WO 98/56238) and genes encoding resistance to glutamine synthetase inhibitors, such as PPT (such as described in EP-A-0 242 236, EP-A-0 242 246, EP-A-0 257 542). [0030]
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the chimeric gene comprising a DNA encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter can be introduced (simultaneously or sequentially) in combination with other chimeric genes into a plant, to obtain different traits in the plant (also referred to as ‘stacking’). Similarly, the plant of the invention comprising a foreign DNA comprising a DNA encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter, is particularly suited for combination with other traits. Such other traits include, but are not limited to traits such as those encoded by chimeric genes which confer insect resistance, herbicide resistance, stress or drought tolerance, or which modify other agronomic characteristics of the plant. Such a trait can also encompass the synthesis of a product to be recovered from the plant. [0031]
  • Introduction of a foreign DNA or a chimeric gene into the genome of a plant, cell or tissue can be achieved in different ways and is not critical to the present invention. Successful genetic transformation of monocots has been obtained by a number of methods including Agrobacterium infection (as described, for example for corn in U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,877 or U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,553), microprojectile bombardment (as described, for example by Chen et al., 1994), direct DNA uptake into protoplasts (as described, for example by Data et al. 1999; Poulsen, 1996) and electroporation (D'Halluin et al., 1992,). [0032]
  • The following non-limiting examples describe the construction of chimeric genes comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of the TR2′ promoter, for expression in plants and insect resistant plants obtained therewith. Unless stated otherwise in the Examples, all recombinant DNA techniques are carried out according to standard protocols as described in Sambrook and Russell (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Third Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, in Volumes 1 and 2 of Ausubel et al. (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Current Protocols, USA and in Volumes I and II of Brown (1998) Molecular Biology LabFax, Second Edition, Academic Press (UK). Standard materials and methods for plant molecular work are described in Plant Molecular Biology Labfax (1993) by R. D. D. Croy, jointly published by BIOS Scientific Publications Ltd (UK) and Blackwell Scientific Publications, UK. Standard materials and methods for polymerase chain reactions can be found in Dieffenbach and Dveksler (1995) PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, and in McPherson at al. (2000) PCR—Basics: From Background to Bench, First Edition, Springer Verlag, Germany. [0033]
  • Throughout the description and Examples, reference is made to the following sequences represented in the sequence listing: [0034]
    SEQ ID NO: 1: nucleotide sequence of a preferred embodiment of the
    TR2′ promoter
    SEQ ID NO: 2: sequence of pTSVH0212
    SEQ ID NO: 3: sequence of a modified cry1Ab coding sequence
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • Generation of Events With a Foreign Gene Under Control of the TR2′ Promoter [0035]
  • a) Development of Events [0036]
  • For the evaluation of wound-induced expression of a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal gene, a construct was made comprising a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter (Velten et al. 1984) directing the expression of a modified cry1Ab protein. The plasmid pTSVH0212 containing the genes of interest placed between the T-DNA borders (also referred to as ‘TR2′-Cry1Ab’) was used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (WO 98/37212). [0037]
    PTSVH0212 3′nos-bar-p35S3><Tr2-modcry1Ab- (SEQ ID NO: 2)
    3′ocs
  • The structure of the PTSVH0212 construct is provided in Table 1. For control plants with constitutive expression of the insecticidal protein, transformations were performed with constructs comprising a DNA sequence encoding the modified Cry1Ab protein under control of either the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (Franck et al. 1980)(referred to as 35S-cry1Ab), or the promoter of the GOS2 gene from rice (de Pater et al., 1992) with the cab22 leader from Petunia (Harpster et al. 1988)(also referred to as ‘Gos/cab-cry1Ab’) or the 5′ leader sequence of the GOS2 gene from rice, containing the second exon, the first intron and the first exon of the GOS transcript (de Pater et al., 1992)(referred to as ‘Gos/gos-cry1Ab’). All constructs included the 35S-bar gene. [0038]
    TABLE 1
    Nucleotide positions of the genetic elements in pTSVH0212 (TR2′-cry1Ab)
    Nt positions Direction Description and references
    25-1  Counter Left Border sequence of TL-DNA of pTiB6S3 (Gielen et al.,
    clockwise 1984).
    Synthetic polylinker sequence
    316-56  Counter Fragment containing polyadenylation signals from the
    clockwise 3′untranslated region of the nopaline synthase gene from the T-
    DNA of pTiT37 (Depicker et al., 1982).
    Synthetic polylinker sequence
    887-336 Counter bar: the coding sequence of phosphinothricin acetyl transferase of
    clockwise Streptomyces hygroscopicus (Thompson et al., 1987)
    1720-888  Counter P35S3: promoter region from the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S
    clockwise transcript (Odell et al., 1985).
    Synthetic polylinker sequence
    2252-1170 Counter TR2′ Promoter fragment derived from the right T-DNA of
    clockwise octopine type Agrobacterium strain ACH5 (Velten et al., 1984)
    Synthetic polylinker sequence
    2261-4114 Modified cry1Ab: The modified cry1Ab coding sequence encodes
    part of the Cry1Ab5 protein described by Höfte et al. (1986) and
    has an insertion of an alanine codon (GCT) 3′ of the ATG start
    codon (SEQ ID NO: 3).
    Synthetic polylinker sequence
    4128-4422 Fragment containing polyadenylation signals from the
    3′ untranslated region of the octopine synthase gene from the TL-
    DNA of pTiAch5 (De Greve et al., 1982).
    Synthetic polylinker sequence
    4470-4446 Counter Right Border sequence of TL-DNA of pTiB6S3 (Gielen et al.,
    clockwise 1984).
  • Regenerated plantlets were selected based on tolerance to Liberty. [0039]
  • b) Evaluation of Events [0040]
  • The Agrobacterium transformants were checked for presence of vector sequence at the left border of the T-DNA. Southern blot analyses were performed with leaf material of the primary transformants (T0). [0041]
  • Example 2
  • Wound-Induced Expression of an Insecticidal Protein [0042]
  • i) Basal Expression of the Insecticidal Protein [0043]
  • The basal level of expression of the modified Cry1Ab insecticidal protein was determined by a Cry1Ab sandwich ELISA with a polycondensated IgG fraction of a polyclonal rabbit antiserum against Cry1Ab as first antibody and a monoclonal antibody against Cry1Ab as second antibody. Samples of leaves at V3 stage plants, pollen and leaf of R1 stage plants and leaves, stalk and pollen at harvest were taken of plants in the greenhouse. As a comparison, samples were taken from plants transformed with the Gos/gos-cry1Ab constructs. Results are provided in Table 2. The mean value represents the average of 5 different samples taken from one plant. [0044]
    TABLE 2
    Expression of Cry1Ab protein in different tissues of plants transformed with the TR2′-
    cry1Ab and Gos/gos-cry1Ab constructs
    Cry1Ab in % soluble protein / total protein
    Event V3 stage R1 stage Harvest
    (construct) Leaf Leaf Pollen Leaf Stalk Pollen
    WI602-0402 mean 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000
    (TR2′-cry1Ab) st. dev. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.010
    WI604-1602 Mean 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000
    (TR2′-cry1Ab) st. dev. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000
    WI606-0802 Mean 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000
    (TR2′-cry1Ab) St. dev. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.000
    WI606-1206 Mean 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000
    (TR2′-cry1Ab) St. dev. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000
    WI600-0218 Mean 0 0 0.000
    (TR2′-cry1Ab) St. dev. 0 0 0.000
    WI602-0802 Mean 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.010
    (TR2′-cry1Ab) St. dev. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.010
    CE2168-0202 Mean 0.31 0.26 0.040 0.230 0.800 0.030
    (Gos/gos-cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.04 0.06 0.010 0.060 0.360 0.010
    CE2168-1602 Mean 0.34 0.23 0.050 0.270 0.870 0.030
    (Gos/gos-cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.04 0.05 0.020 0.150 1.450 0.010
  • For the plants obtained from transformation with the TR2′-cry1Ab construct, average values for the basal expression of the modified Cry1Ab protein was found to be below detection limit (0.005% soluble protein) in all leaf samples taken from plants at V3 stage, R1 stage or at harvest. Average basal expression of the insecticidal protein in the stalk was found to be around 0.01% total soluble protein content for most plants at harvest. Plants obtained with the Gos/gos-cry1Ab construct, expression of the Cry1Ab protein was above 0.2% in all leaf samples and up to more than 1% in some of the stalk samples taken at harvest. [0045]
  • ii) Wound-Induced Expression of the Insecticidal Protein [0046]
  • Studies were performed in the greenhouse to determine the expression of the insecticidal Cry1Ab protein upon mechanical damage in untransformed plants, plants obtained with the TR2′-cry1Ab construct and plants obtained with the Gos/cab-cry1Ab construct. Leaves and roots were damaged by cutting. Leaf samples were taken before and 18h after mechanical damage and Cry1Ab protein levels were measured by ELISA (Table 2). Means represent averages of 5 samples from one plant. [0047]
    TABLE 2
    expression of insecticidal protein in different plant parts before and after mechanical
    wounding
    Cry1Ab in % soluble protein / total protein
    V4 stage Flowering
    Event Leaf Leaf Root Harvest
    (construct) Leaf induced Leaf induced root induced Pollen Leaf Stalk Kernel
    WI600-0218 Mean 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.020 0.023 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
    (TR2′-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.007 0.008 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
    WI606-0406 Mean 0.005 0.046 0.000 0.007 0.012 0.008 0.000 \ 0.002 0.002
    (TR2′-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.006 0.009 0.009 0.000 0.004
    WI604-1602 Mean 0.002 0.104 0.001 0.020 0.020 0.024 0.000 0.004 0.004 0.001
    (TR2′-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.003 0.012 0.000 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.000 0.002 0.003 0.000
    WI606-0802 Mean 0.003 0.064 0.001 0.010 0.027 0.037 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.003
    (TR2′-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.004 0.000 0.009 0.012 0.020 0.000 0.001 0.003 0.001
    WI606-1206 Mean 0.001 0.081 0.000 0.022 0.032 0.024 0.000 0.004 0.002 0.001
    (TR2′-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.016 0.000 0.010 0.005 0.011 0.000 0.003 0.001 0.001
    CE048-2402 Mean 0.83 0.614 0.280 0.397 0.196 0.253 0.000 0.376 1.120 0.047
    (35S-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.108 0.111 0.027 0.133 0.083 0.000 0.098 0.175 0.014
    CE048-2602 Mean 0.636 0.527 0.007 0.006 0.087 0.045 0.000 0.106 0.040 0.015
    (35S-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.16 0.046 0.002 0.002 0.044 0.007 0.000 0.011 0.013 0.004
    Control 1 Mean 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.001 0
    (untransformed) st. dev. 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0
    Control 2 Mean 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    (untransformed) st. dev. 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    CE0104-0202 Mean 0.022 0.023 0.008 0.017 0.023 0.016 0.0001 \ \ \
    (Gos/cab-Cry1Ab) st. dev. 0.009 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.012 0.005 0.000
    CE1014-0402 Mean 0.025 0.017 0.007 0.010 0.028 0.034 0.000 0.010 0.040 0.002
    (Gos/cab-Cry1Ab) 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.017 0.013 0.000 0.003 0.020 0.001
  • Expression of the Cry1Ab protein was again either absent or around the detection limit in leaves, stalk and kernels of the different TR2′-cry1Ab events tested. No significant expression was found in leaves and pollen in V4 and flowering plant stage. Constitutive expression of around 0.02-0.03% total soluble protein was seen in the roots for these plants. When leaves are mechanically damaged, expression of the Cry1Ab protein is induced and goes up to 0.05-0.1%. The 35S-cry1Ab events showed constitutive expression of the Cry1Ab protein of around 0.5% in the leaves of V3 plants, irrespective of wounding. During flowering and harvest, expression levels of around 0.1-0.2% were measured before and after wounding. [0048]
  • Example 3
  • Insect Resistance of Plants With Wound-Inducible Expression [0049]
  • a) Efficacy Against Controlled Infestation With ECB Fourth Instar Larvae [0050]
  • Mid whorl corn plants were placed in a Plexiglas cylinder and infested with 10 or 15 fourth instar European corn borer larvae. After 10 days, plants were dissected and percentage survival of larvae was scored per plant. The results are provided in Table 3. [0051]
    TABLE 3
    Efficacy against fourth instar ECB larvae
    Number of plants Averaged percentage
    Event tested survival (s.d.)
    WI602-0402 6 0
    WI602-0802 6 0
    WI604-1602 6 0
    WI606-0802 6 0
    WI606-1206 6 0
    B73 control 9 49.6 (18.8)
  • The efficacy of the control of fourth instar ECB larvae in controlled infestation was found to be 100% for all TR2′-cry1Ab plants tested. Control plants showed around 50% mortality rates. As the fourth instar ECB larvae are believed to be between 25 and 100 times less susceptible to the modified Cry1Ab protein than first instar larvae, the level of protein produced in the TR2′-cry1Ab plants can be considered ‘high dose’. [0052]
  • b) Efficacy Against ECB [0053]
  • Fourteen events were evaluated for ECB efficacy in the greenhouse and in field trials (Table 4). Results are presented as average length of tunnels (with standard deviation value between brackets) over maximum length of tunnel for each plant (average (sd)/max length/pl). In the greenhouse, average length of tunnels were taken of measurements on 10 plants. In the field, ECB efficacy is expressed as the average of 3 values obtained for different groups of 10 plants. Four of the five single-copy events (indicated by an asterisk) gave total ECB2 control, determined as less than 3.5 cm average tunnel length. [0054]
    TABLE 4
    ECB Efficacy in greenhouse and field trials
    ECB efficacy ECB efficacy ECB efficacy
    Greenhouse Field 1 Field 2
    Event Average (sd)/max length/pl Average (sd)/max length/pl Average (sd)/max length/pl
    WI602-0402*  0.1 (0.31)/1 0.24 (0.41)/2 0.21 (0.01)/2
    WI604-1602*  0.2 (0.42)/1 0.05 (0.071)/1
    WI606-0406*  51.3 (73.5)/195 8.41 (1.8)/32 7.45 (0.07)/30
    WI606-0802*  3.3 (2.6)/8   0 (0)/0 0.05 (0.07)/1
    WI606-1206*  0.38 (0.74)/2 0.17 (0.29)/3  0.1 (0.14)/1
    WI600-0218  2.0 (1.87)/6
    WI600-1402  29.4 (45.8)/142 6.55 (2.47)/28
    WI602-0202 168.5 (26.9)/200 12.6 (3.8)/31
    WI604-0604 102.5 (83)/251  3.7 (2.0)/25
    WI602-0802    0 (0)/0 0.33 (0.15)/3
    WI602-0204   66 (68.2)/160
    WI602-1002 102.4 (63.4)/215
    WI606-0602  45.5 (52.8)/160
    WI600-0802  0.9 (1.44)/4 0.06 (0.11)/2   0 (0)/0
  • No penalty on agronomic performance was observed for the plants after second selfing (ear to row) of the different TR2′ events in any of the locations tested. [0055]
  • c) Efficacy Against [0056] Sesamia nonagroides
  • Five mid whorl corn plants comprising the TR2′-cry1Ab construct were each infested with 2 egg masses. Damage was scored after 14 days and numbers of larvae were counted. Damage ratings (expressed in plant height and length of tunnels per plant in cm) were averaged over the five plants. [0057]
    Event Number of larvae per plant Plant height in cm Cm tunnels per plant
    WI600-0802 0.6 (1.3) 198 (8.4) 0
    B73 Control 197.2 (14.0)   84 (5.5) 70 (9.4)
  • The results indicate that there is also good control of the Mediterranean stalk borer in the TR2′-cry1Ab plants tested. [0058]
  • References [0059]
  • Barton et al. 1987, Plant Physiol 85:1103-1109 [0060]
  • Breitler et al. 2001, Mol Breeding 7: 259-274 [0061]
  • Chen et al., 1994, Theor Appl Genet 88:187-192 [0062]
  • Cornelissen & Vandewiele, 1989, Nucleic Acids Research 17:19-23 [0063]
  • Datta et al., 1999, Methods Mol Biol 111:335-347 [0064]
  • De Block et al. 1989, Plant Physiol 914:694-701 [0065]
  • De Greve et al., 1983, J Mol Applied Gen: 499-511 [0066]
  • De maagd et al. 1999, Trends Plant Sci 4:9-13 [0067]
  • de Pater et al., 1992, Plant J 2:837-844 [0068]
  • Depicker et al., 1982, J Mol Appl Gen 1: 561-573 [0069]
  • D'Halluin et al., 1992, Plant Cell 4: 1495-1505 [0070]
  • Duan et al., 1996, Nature Biotech 14:494-498 [0071]
  • Estruch et al. 1996, Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:5389-5394 [0072]
  • Estruch et al. 1997, Nature Biotechn 15:137-140 [0073]
  • Forst et al., 1997, Ann Rev Microbiol 5:47-72 [0074]
  • Fox et al., 1992, Plant Mol Biol 20:219-233 [0075]
  • Franck et al. 1980, Cell 21: 285-294 [0076]
  • Gielen et al., 1984, EMBO J 3: 835-846 [0077]
  • Green and Ryan, 1972, Science 175:776-777 [0078]
  • Guevara-Garcia et al., 1998, Plant J 4(3):495-505 [0079]
  • Guthrie, 1989, Plant Breed Rev 6:209-243 [0080]
  • Hilder et al. 1987, Nature 300(12):160-163 [0081]
  • Höfte et al., 1986, Eur J Biochem 161:273-280 [0082]
  • Irie et al., 1996, Plant Mol Biol 30:149-157 [0083]
  • Jansens et al., 1997, Crop Science 37(5):1616-1624 [0084]
  • Jin et al., 2000, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol—Plant 36:231-237 [0085]
  • Langridge et al. 1989, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:3219-3223 [0086]
  • Luan et al. 1992, Plant Cell 1992, 4:971-981 [0087]
  • Ni et al. 1995, Plant J 7(4)661-676 [0088]
  • Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313: 810-812 [0089]
  • Peferoen & Van Rie, 1997, Chemistry of Plant Prot 13:125-156 [0090]
  • Peferoen 1997 in Advances in Insect Control, Taylor & Francis Ltd, London, 21-48 [0091]
  • Poulsen, 1996, Plant Breeding 115 :209-225 [0092]
  • Reynaerts & Jansens, 1994, Acta Horticulturae 376:347-352 [0093]
  • Shimamoto, 1994, Curr Opin Biotech 5:158-162 [0094]
  • Thompson et al., 1987, EMBO J 6: 2519-2523 [0095]
  • Vaeck et al., 1987, Nature 327(6125):33-37 [0096]
  • Velten et al. 1984, EMBO J. 12:2733-2730 [0097]
  • Wilbur and Lipmann, 1983, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 80:726 [0098]
  • Witowsky & Siegfried, 1997, PBI Bulletin 14-15 [0099]
  • Zhao et al., 1996, Plant Physiol 111:1299-1306 [0100]
  • [0101]
  • 1 3 1 483 DNA Agrobacterium tumefaciens 1 tttcacgtgt ggaagatatg aatttttttg agaaactaga taagattaat gaatatcggt 60 gttttggttt tttcttgtgg ccgtctttgt ttatattgag atttttcaaa tcagtgcgca 120 agacgtgacg taagtatccg agtcagtttt tatttttcta ctaatttggt cgtttatttc 180 ggcgtgtagg acatggcaac cgggcctgaa tttcgcgggt attctgtttc tattccaact 240 ttttcttgat ccgcagccat taacgacttt tgaatagata cgctgacacg ccaagcctcg 300 ctagtcaaaa gtgtaccaaa caacgcttta cagcaagaac ggaatgcgcg tgacgctcgc 360 ggtgacgcca tttcgccttt tcagaaatgg ataaatagcc ttgcttccta ttatatcttc 420 ccaaattacc aatacattac actagcatct gaatttcata accaatctcg atacaccaaa 480 tcg 483 2 13199 DNA Artificial Sequence Sequence of plasmid pTSVH0212 2 cggcaggata tattcaattg taaatggctc catggcgatc gctctagagg atctgcgatc 60 tagtaacata gatgacaccg cgcgcgataa tttatcctag tttgcgcgct atattttgtt 120 ttctatcgcg tattaaatgt ataattgcgg gactctaatc ataaaaaccc atctcataaa 180 taacgtcatg cattacatgt taattattac atgcttaacg taattcaaca gaaattatat 240 gataatcatc gcaagaccgg caacaggatt caatcttaag aaactttatt gccaaatgtt 300 tgaacgatct gcttcggatc ctagaacgcg tgatctcaga tctcggtgac gggcaggacc 360 ggacggggcg gtaccggcag gctgaagtcc agctgccaga aacccacgtc atgccagttc 420 ccgtgcttga agccggccgc ccgcagcatg ccgcgggggg catatccgag cgcctcgtgc 480 atgcgcacgc tcgggtcgtt gggcagcccg atgacagcga ccacgctctt gaagccctgt 540 gcctccaggg acttcagcag gtgggtgtag agcgtggagc ccagtcccgt ccgctggtgg 600 cggggggaga cgtacacggt cgactcggcc gtccagtcgt aggcgttgcg tgccttccag 660 gggcccgcgt aggcgatgcc ggcgacctcg ccgtccacct cggcgacgag ccagggatag 720 cgctcccgca gacggacgag gtcgtccgtc cactcctgcg gttcctgcgg ctcggtacgg 780 aagttgaccg tgcttgtctc gatgtagtgg ttgacgatgg tgcagaccgc cggcatgtcc 840 gcctcggtgg cacggcggat gtcggccggg cgtcgttctg ggtccatggt tatagagaga 900 gagatagatt tatagagaga gactggtgat ttcagcgtgt cctctccaaa tgaaatgaac 960 ttccttatat agaggaaggg tcttgcgaag gatagtggga ttgtgcgtca tcccttacgt 1020 cagtggagat gtcacatcaa tccacttgct ttgaagacgt ggttggaacg tcttcttttt 1080 ccacgatgct cctcgtgggt gggggtccat ctttgggacc actgtcggca gaggcatctt 1140 gaatgatagc ctttccttta tcgcaatgat ggcatttgta ggagccacct tccttttcta 1200 ctgtcctttc gatgaagtga cagatagctg ggcaatggaa tccgaggagg tttcccgaaa 1260 ttatcctttg ttgaaaagtc tcaatagccc tttggtcttc tgagactgta tctttgacat 1320 ttttggagta gaccagagtg tcgtgctcca ccatgttgac gaagattttc ttcttgtcat 1380 tgagtcgtaa aagactctgt atgaactgtt cgccagtctt cacggcgagt tctgttagat 1440 cctcgatttg aatcttagac tccatgcatg gccttagatt cagtaggaac taccttttta 1500 gagactccaa tctctattac ttgccttggt ttatgaagca agccttgaat cgtccatact 1560 ggaatagtac ttctgatctt gagaaatatg tctttctctg tgttcttgat gcaattagtc 1620 ctgaatcttt tgactgcatc tttaaccttc ttgggaaggt atttgatctc ctggagattg 1680 ttactcgggt agatcgtctt gatgagacct gctgcgtagg aacgcggccg ctgtacaggg 1740 cccgggcata tggcgcgcca tggttttggt ttcacgtgtg gaagatatga atttttttga 1800 gaaactagat aagattaatg aatatcggtg ttttggtttt ttcttgtggc cgtctttgtt 1860 tatattgaga tttttcaaat cagtgcgcaa gacgtgacgt aagtatccga gtcagttttt 1920 atttttctac taatttggtc gtttatttcg gcgtgtagga catggcaacc gggcctgaat 1980 ttcgcgggta ttctgtttct attccaactt tttcttgatc cgcagccatt aacgactttt 2040 gaatagatac gctgacacgc caagcctcgc tagtcaaaag tgtaccaaac aacgctttac 2100 agcaagaacg gaatgcgcgt gacgctcgcg gtgacgccat ttcgcctttt cagaaatgga 2160 taaatagcct tgcttcctat tatatcttcc caaattacca atacattaca ctagcatctg 2220 aatttcataa ccaatctcga tacaccaaat cgccaaaacc atggctgaca acaaccccaa 2280 catcaacgag tgcatcccct acaactgcct gagcaaccca gaggtggagg tgctgggtgg 2340 tgagaggatc gagaccggtt acacccccat cgacatcagc ctgagcctga cccagttcct 2400 gctgagcgag ttcgtgcctg gtgctggctt cgtgctggga ctagtggaca tcatctgggg 2460 catcttcggt cccagccagt gggatgcctt cctggtgcag atcgaacagt taattaacca 2520 aagaatagaa gaattcgcta ggaaccaagc catctctaga ctggagggcc tgagcaacct 2580 gtaccagatc tacgccgaga gcttccgcga gtgggaggct gaccccacca acccagccct 2640 gcgcgaggag atgcgcatcc agttcaacga catgaactct gccctgacca ccgccatccc 2700 actcttcgct gtccagaact accaggtccc tctcctgtct gtctatgtgc aagctgccaa 2760 cctccatctc agcgtccttc gcgacgtgag cgtctttggg cagaggtggg ggttcgacgc 2820 tgccaccatc aacagccgct acaacgacct gacgcgtctg atcggcaact acaccgacca 2880 cgcagtgaga tggtacaaca ctgggcttga gagggtctgg ggtcccgaca gccgcgactg 2940 gatcaggtac aaccagttca ggcgtgaact cactctcacc gtcttggata tcgtcagtct 3000 cttccccaac tacgacagca ggacctaccc tatccggact gtgagccagc tgacccgcga 3060 gatctacacc aaccccgtgc tggagaactt cgacggcagc ttcaggggct ctgcccaggg 3120 catcgagggc agcatccgca gcccccacct gatggacatc ctgaacagca tcaccatcta 3180 cactgacgcc cacaggggtg agtactactg gtctggccac cagatcatgg cttctcccgt 3240 gggcttcagc ggtcccgagt tcaccttccc cctgtacggc acaatgggca acgctgcccc 3300 acagcagagg atcgtggccc agctgggcca gggcgtgtac cgcaccctga gcagcaccct 3360 gtacaggagg cccttcaaca tcggcatcaa caaccagcag ctgagcgtgc tggatggcac 3420 cgagttcgcc tacggcacca gcagcaacct gcccagcgcc gtataccgca agagcggcac 3480 tgtggacagc ctggacgaga tcccacccca gaacaacaac gtgcccccta ggcaggggtt 3540 ctctcatcgc ctctcacacg tgagcatgtt ccgcagcggc ttcagcaaca gcagcgtgag 3600 catcatcagg gctcccatgt tcagctggat ccaccgcagc gctgagttca acaacatcat 3660 tccaagtagc cagatcactc agatcccact caccaagagc accaacctgg gctccgggac 3720 tagcgttgtc aagggaccag ggttcactgg aggcgacatc ctgaggagga ccagcccagg 3780 ccagatcagc accttaaggg tgaacatcac cgctcccctc agccaacgct acagggtcag 3840 gatcaggtac gcttccacca ccaacctgca gttccacacc agcatcgacg gcaggcccat 3900 caaccagggc aacttcagcg ccaccatgag cagcggcagc aacctgcaga gcggaagctt 3960 ccgcactgtg ggcttcacta ccccattcaa cttctccaac ggcagcagcg tgttcaccct 4020 gtctgcccac gtgttcaaca gcggcaacga ggtgtacatc gacaggatcg agtttgtccc 4080 agctgaggtg accttcgaag ctgagtacga ctgaggctag ctagagtcct gctttaatga 4140 gatatgcgag acgcctatga tcgcatgata tttgctttca attctgttgt gcacgttgta 4200 aaaaacctga gcatgtgtag ctcagatcct taccgccggt ttcggttcat tctaatgaat 4260 atatcacccg ttactatcgt atttttatga ataatattct ccgttcaatt tactgattgt 4320 accctactac ttatatgtac aatattaaaa tgaaaacaat atattgtgct gaataggttt 4380 atagcgacat ctatgataga gcgccacaat aacaaacaat tgcctgcagg tcgacggccg 4440 agtactggca ggatatatac cgttgtaatt tgtcgcgtgt gaataagtcg ctgtgtatgt 4500 ttgtttgatt gtttctgttg gagtgcagcc catttcaccg gacaagtcgg ctagattgat 4560 ttagccctga tgaactgccg aggggaagcc atcttgagcg cggaatggga atggatttcg 4620 ttgtacaacg agacgacaga acacccacgg gaccgagctt cgaatctggc aattccggtt 4680 cgcttgctgt ccataaaacc gcccagtcta gctatcgcca tgtaagccca ctgcaagcta 4740 cctgctttct ctttgcgctt gcgttttccg gatcttcttg agatcctttt tttctgcgcg 4800 taatctgctg cttgcaaaca aaaaaaccac cgctaccagc ggtggtttgt ttgccggatc 4860 aagagctacc aactcttttt ccgaaggtaa ctggcttcag cagagcgcag ataccaaata 4920 ctgtccttct agtgtagccg tagttaggcc accacttcaa gaactctgta gcaccgccta 4980 catacctcgc tctgctaatc ctgttaccag tggctgctgc cagtggcgat aagtcgtgtc 5040 ttaccgggtt ggactcaaga cgatagttac cggataaggc gcagcggtcg ggctgaacgg 5100 ggggttcgtg cacacagccc agcttggagc gaacgaccta caccgaactg agatacctac 5160 agcgtgagct atgagaaagc gccacgcttc ccgaagggag aaaggcggac aggtatccgg 5220 taagcggcag ggtcggaaca ggagagcgca cgagggagct tccaggggga aacgcctggt 5280 atctttatag tcctgtcggg tttcgccacc tctgacttga gcgtcgattt ttgtgatgct 5340 cgtcaggggg gcggagccta tggaaaaacg ccagcaacgc ggccttttta cggttcctgg 5400 ccttttgctg gccttttgct cacatgttct ttcctgcgtt atcccctgat tctgtggata 5460 accgtattac cgcctttgag tgagctgata ccgctcgccg cagccgaacg accgagcgca 5520 gcgagtcagt gagcgaggaa gcggaagagc gcctgatgcg gtattttctc cttacgcatc 5580 tgtgcggtat ttcacaccgc atatggtgca ctctcagtac aatctgctct gatgccgcat 5640 agttaagcca gtatacactc cgctatcgct acgtgactgg gtcatggctg cgccccgaca 5700 cccgccaaca cccgctgacg cgccctgacg ggcttgtctg ctcccggcat ccgcttacag 5760 acaagctgtg accgtctccg ggagctgcat gtgtcagagg ttttcaccgt catcaccgaa 5820 acgcgcgagg cagggtgcct tgatgtgggc gccggcggtc gagtggcgac ggcgcggctt 5880 gtccgcgccc tggtagattg cctggccgta ggccagccat ttttgagcgg ccagcggccg 5940 cgataggccg acgcgaagcg gcggggcgta gggagcgcag cgaccgaagg gtaggcgctt 6000 tttgcagctc ttcggctgtg cgctggccag acagttatgc acaggccagg cgggttttaa 6060 gagttttaat aagttttaaa gagttttagg cggaaaaatc gccttttttc tcttttatat 6120 cagtcactta catgtgtgac cggttcccaa tgtacggctt tgggttccca atgtacgggt 6180 tccggttccc aatgtacggc tttgggttcc caatgtacgt gctatccaca ggaaagagac 6240 cttttcgacc tttttcccct gctagggcaa tttgccctag catctgctcc gtacattagg 6300 aaccggcgga tgcttcgccc tcgatcaggt tgcggtagcg catgactagg atcgggccag 6360 cctgccccgc ctcctccttc aaatcgtact ccggcaggtc atttgacccg atcagcttgc 6420 gcacggtgaa acagaacttc ttgaactctc cggcgctgcc actgcgttcg tagatcgtct 6480 tgaacaacca tctggcttct gccttgcctg cggcgcggcg tgccaggcgg tagagaaaac 6540 ggccgatgcc gggatcgatc aaaaagtaat cggggtgaac cgtcagcacg tccgggttct 6600 tgccttctgt gatctcgcgg tacatccaat cagctagctc gatctcgatg tactccggcc 6660 gcccggtttc gctctttacg atcttgtagc ggctaatcaa ggcttcaccc tcggataccg 6720 tcaccaggcg gccgttcttg gccttcttcg tacgctgcat ggcaacgtgc gtggtgttta 6780 accgaatgca ggtttctacc aggtcgtctt tctgctttcc gccatcggct cgccggcaga 6840 acttgagtac gtccgcaacg tgtggacgga acacgcggcc gggcttgtct cccttccctt 6900 cccggtatcg gttcatggat tcggttagat gggaaaccgc catcagtacc aggtcgtaat 6960 cccacacact ggccatgccg gccggccctg cggaaacctc tacgtgcccg tctggaagct 7020 cgtagcggat cacctcgcca gctcgtcggt cacgcttcga cagacggaaa acggccacgt 7080 ccatgatgct gcgactatcg cgggtgccca cgtcatagag catcggaacg aaaaaatctg 7140 gttgctcgtc gcccttgggc ggcttcctaa tcgacggcgc accggctgcc ggcggttgcc 7200 gggattcttt gcggattcga tcagcggccg cttgccacga ttcaccgggg cgtgcttctg 7260 cctcgatgcg ttgccgctgg gcggcctgcg cggccttcaa cttctccacc aggtcatcac 7320 ccagcgccgc gccgatttgt accgggccgg atggtttgcg accgtcacgc cgattcctcg 7380 ggcttggggg ttccagtgcc attgcagggc cggcagacaa cccagccgct tacgcctggc 7440 caaccgcccg ttcctccaca catggggcat tccacggcgt cggtgcctgg ttgttcttga 7500 ttttccatgc cgcctccttt agccgctaaa attcatctac tcatttattc atttgctcat 7560 ttactctggt agctgcgcga tgtattcaga tagcagctcg gtaatggtct tgccttggcg 7620 taccgcgtac atcttcagct tggtgtgatc ctccgccggc aactgaaagt tgacccgctt 7680 catggctggc gtgtctgcca ggctggccaa cgttgcagcc ttgctgctgc gtgcgctcgg 7740 acggccggca cttagcgtgt ttgtgctttt gctcattttc tctttacctc attaactcaa 7800 atgagttttg atttaatttc agcggccagc gcctggacct cgcgggcagc gtcgccctcg 7860 ggttctgatt caagaacggt tgtgccggcg gcggcagtgc ctgggtagct cacgcgctgc 7920 gtgatacggg actcaagaat gggcagctcg tacccggcca gcgcctcggc aacctcaccg 7980 ccgatgcgcg tgcctttgat cgcccgcgac acgacaaagg ccgcttgtag ccttccatcc 8040 gtgacctcaa tgcgctgctt aaccagctcc accaggtcgg cggtggccca tatgtcgtaa 8100 gggcttggct gcaccggaat cagcacgaag tcggctgcct tgatcgcgga cacagccaag 8160 tccgccgcct ggggcgctcc gtcgatcact acgaagtcgc gccggccgat ggccttcacg 8220 tcgcggtcaa tcgtcgggcg gtcgatgccg acaacggtta gcggttgatc ttcccgcacg 8280 gccgcccaat cgcgggcact gccctgggga tcggaatcga ctaacagaac atcggccccg 8340 gcgagttgca gggcgcgggc tagatgggtt gcgatggtcg tcttgcctga cccgcctttc 8400 tggttaagta cagcgataac cttcatgcgt tccccttgcg tatttgttta tttactcatc 8460 gcatcatata cgcagcgacc gcatgacgca agctgtttta ctcaaataca catcaccttt 8520 ttagacggcg gcgctcggtt tcttcagcgg ccaagctggc cggccaggcc gccagcttgg 8580 catcagacaa accggccagg atttcatgca gccgcacggt tgagacgtgc gcgggcggct 8640 cgaacacgta cccggccgcg atcatctccg cctcgatctc ttcggtaatg aaaaacggtt 8700 cgtcctggcc gtcctggtgc ggtttcatgc ttgttcctct tggcgttcat tctcggcggc 8760 cgccagggcg tcggcctcgg tcaatgcgtc ctcacggaag gcaccgcgcc gcctggcctc 8820 ggtgggcgtc acttcctcgc tgcgctcaag tgcgcggtac agggtcgagc gatgcacgcc 8880 aagcagtgca gccgcctctt tcacggtgcg gccttcctgg tcgatcagct cgcgggcgtg 8940 cgcgatctgt gccggggtga gggtagggcg ggggccaaac ttcacgcctc gggccttggc 9000 ggcctcgcgc ccgctccggg tgcggtcgat gattagggaa cgctcgaact cggcaatgcc 9060 ggcgaacacg gtcaacacca tgcggccggc cggcgtggtg gtgtcggccc acggctctgc 9120 caggctacgc aggcccgcgc cggcctcctg gatgcgctcg gcaatgtcca gtaggtcgcg 9180 ggtgctgcgg gccaggcggt ctagcctggt cactgtcaca acgtcgccag ggcgtaggtg 9240 gtcaagcatc ctggccagct ccgggcggtc gcgcctggtg ccggtgatct tctcggaaaa 9300 cagcttggtg cagccggccg cgtgcagttc ggcccgttgg ttggtcaagt cctggtcgtc 9360 ggtgctgacg cgggcatagc ccagcaggcc agcggcggcg ctcttgttca tggcgtaatg 9420 tctccggttc tagtcgcaag tattctactt tatgcgacta aaacacgcga caagaaaacg 9480 ccaggaaaag ggcagggcgg cagcctgtcg cgtaacttag gacttgtgcg acatgtcgtt 9540 ttcagaagac ggctgcactg aacgtcagaa gccgactgca ctatagcagc ggaggggttg 9600 gatcgatccc tgctcgcgca ggctgggtgc caagctctcg ggtaacatca aggcccgatc 9660 cttggagccc ttgccctccc gcacgatgat cgtgccgtga tcgaaatcca gatccttgac 9720 ccgcagttgc aaaccctcac tgatccgtcg acgcgtttaa tgaccagcac agtcgtgatg 9780 gcaaggtcag aatagcgctg aggtctgcct cgtgaagaag gtgttgctga ctcataccag 9840 gcctgaatcg ccccatcatc cagccagaaa gtgagggagc cacggttgat gagagctttg 9900 ttgtaggtgg accagttggt gattttgaac ttttgctttg ccacggaacg gtctgcgttg 9960 tcgggaagat gcgtgatctg atccttcaac tcagcaaaag ttcgatttat tcaacaaagc 10020 cacgttgtgt ctcaaaatct ctgatgttac attgcacaag ataaaaatat atcatcatga 10080 acaataaaac tgtctgctta cataaacagt aatacaaggg gtgttatgag ccatattcaa 10140 cgggaaacgt cttgctcgag gccgcgatta aattccaaca tggatgctga tttatatggg 10200 tataaatggg ctcgcgataa tgtcgggcaa tcaggtgcga caatctatcg attgtatggg 10260 aagcccgatg cgccagagtt gtttctgaaa catggcaaag gtagcgttgc caatgatgtt 10320 acagatgaga tggtcagact aaactggctg acggaattta tgcctcttcc gaccatcaag 10380 cattttatcc gtactcctga tgatgcatgg ttactcacca ctgcgatccc cgggaaaaca 10440 gcattccagg tattagaaga atatcctgat tcaggtgaaa atattgttga tgcgctggca 10500 gtgttcctgc gccggttgca ttcgattcct gtttgtaatt gtccttttaa cagccgcgta 10560 tttcgtctcg ctcaggcgca atcacgaatg aataacggtt tggttgatgc gagtgatttt 10620 gatgacgagc gtaatggctg gcctgttgaa caagtctgga aagaaatgca taaacttttg 10680 ccattctcac cggattcagt cgtcactcat ggtgatttct cacttgataa ccttattttt 10740 gacgagggga aattaatagg ttgtattgat gttggacgag tcggaatcgc agaccgatac 10800 caggatcttg ccatcctatg gaactgcctc ggtgagtttt ctccttcatt acagaaacgg 10860 ctttttcaaa aatatggtat tgataatcct gatatgaata aattgcagtt tcatttgatg 10920 ctcgatgagt ttttctaatc agaattggtt aattggttgt aacactggca gagcattacg 10980 ctgacttgac gggacggcgg ctttgttgaa taaatcgaac ttttgctgag ttgaaggatc 11040 agatcacgca tcttcccgac aacgcagacc gttccgtggc aaagcaaaag ttcaaaatca 11100 ccaactggtc cacctacaac aaagctctca tcaaccgtgg ctccctcact ttctggctgg 11160 atgatggggc gattcaggcc tggtatgagt cagcaacacc ttcttcacga ggcagacctc 11220 agcgctattc tgaccttgcc atcacgactg tgctggtcat taaacgcgtc gacccgttcc 11280 atacagaagc tgggcgaaca aacgatgctc gccttccaga aaaccgagga tgcgaaccac 11340 ttcatccggg gtcagcacca ccggcaagcg cccggacggc cgaggtcttc cgatctcctg 11400 aagccagggc agatccgtgc acagcacttg ccgtagaaga acagcaaggc cgccaatgcc 11460 tgacgatgcg tggagaccga aaccttgcgc tcgttcgcca gccaggacag aaatgcctcg 11520 acttcgctgc tgcccaaggt tgccgggtga cgcacaccgt ggaaacggat gaaggcacga 11580 acccagtgga cataagcctg ttcggttcgt aagctgtaat gcaagtagcg tatgcgctca 11640 cgcaactggt ccagaacctt gaccgaacgc agcggtggta acggcgcagt ggcggttttc 11700 atggcttgtt atgactgttt ttttggggta cagtctatgc ctcgggcatc caagcagcaa 11760 gcgcgttacg ccgtgggtcg atgtttgatg ttatggagca gcaacgatgt tacgcagcag 11820 ggcagtcgcc ctaaaacaaa gttaaacatc atgagggaag cggtgatcgc cgaagtatcg 11880 actcaactat cagaggtagt tggcgtcatc gagcgccatc tcgaaccgac gttgctggcc 11940 gtacatttgt acggctccgc agtggatggc ggcctgaagc cacacagtga tattgatttg 12000 ctggttacgg tgaccgtaag gcttgatgaa acaacgcggc gagctttgat caacgacctt 12060 ttggaaactt cggcttcccc tggagagagc gagattctcc gcgctgtaga agtcaccatt 12120 gttgtgcacg acgacatcat tccgtggcgt tatccagcta agcgcgaact gcaatttgga 12180 gaatggcagc gcaatgacat tcttgcaggt atcttcgagc cagccacgat cgacattgat 12240 ctggctatct tgctgacaaa agcaagagaa catagcgttg ccttggtagg tccagcggcg 12300 gaggaactct ttgatccggt tcctgaacag gatctatttg aggcgctaaa tgaaacctta 12360 acgctatgga actcgccgcc cgactgggct ggcgatgagc gaaatgtagt gcttacgttg 12420 tcccgcattt ggtacagcgc agtaaccggc aaaatcgcgc cgaaggatgt cgctgccgac 12480 tgggcaatgg agcgcctgcc ggcccagtat cagcccgtca tacttgaagc tagacaggct 12540 tatcttggac aagaagaaga tcgcttggcc tcgcgcgcag atcagttgga agaatttgtc 12600 cactacgtga aaggcgagat caccaaggta gtcggcaaat aatgtctaac aattcgttca 12660 agccgacgcc gcttcgcggc gcggcttaac tcaagcgtta gatgcactaa gcacataatt 12720 gctcacagcc aaactatcag gtcaagtctg cttttattat ttttaagcgt gcataataag 12780 ccctacacaa attgggagat atatcatgaa aggctggctt tttcttgtta tcgcaatagt 12840 tggcgaagta atcgcaacat ccgcattaaa atctagcgag ggctttacta agctagcttg 12900 cttggtcgtt ccggtaccgt gaacgtcggc tcgattgtac ctgcgttcaa atactttgcg 12960 atcgtgttgc gcgcctgccc ggtgcgtcgg ctgatctcac ggatcgactg cttctctcgc 13020 aacgccatcc gacggatgat gtttaaaagt cccatgtgga tcactccgtt gccccgtcgc 13080 tcaccgtgtt ggggggaagg tgcacatggc tcagttctca atggaaatta tctgcctaac 13140 cggctcagtt ctgcgtagaa accaacatgc aagctccacc gggtgcaaag cggcagcgg 13199 3 1854 DNA Artificial sequence sequence encoding modified cry1Ab protein 3 atggctgaca acaaccccaa catcaacgag tgcatcccct acaactgcct gagcaaccca 60 gaggtggagg tgctgggtgg tgagaggatc gagaccggtt acacccccat cgacatcagc 120 ctgagcctga cccagttcct gctgagcgag ttcgtgcctg gtgctggctt cgtgctggga 180 ctagtggaca tcatctgggg catcttcggt cccagccagt gggatgcctt cctggtgcag 240 atcgaacagt taattaacca aagaatagaa gaattcgcta ggaaccaagc catctctaga 300 ctggagggcc tgagcaacct gtaccagatc tacgccgaga gcttccgcga gtgggaggct 360 gaccccacca acccagccct gcgcgaggag atgcgcatcc agttcaacga catgaactct 420 gccctgacca ccgccatccc actcttcgct gtccagaact accaggtccc tctcctgtct 480 gtctatgtgc aagctgccaa cctccatctc agcgtccttc gcgacgtgag cgtctttggg 540 cagaggtggg ggttcgacgc tgccaccatc aacagccgct acaacgacct gacgcgtctg 600 atcggcaact acaccgacca cgcagtgaga tggtacaaca ctgggcttga gagggtctgg 660 ggtcccgaca gccgcgactg gatcaggtac aaccagttca ggcgtgaact cactctcacc 720 gtcttggata tcgtcagtct cttccccaac tacgacagca ggacctaccc tatccggact 780 gtgagccagc tgacccgcga gatctacacc aaccccgtgc tggagaactt cgacggcagc 840 ttcaggggct ctgcccaggg catcgagggc agcatccgca gcccccacct gatggacatc 900 ctgaacagca tcaccatcta cactgacgcc cacaggggtg agtactactg gtctggccac 960 cagatcatgg cttctcccgt gggcttcagc ggtcccgagt tcaccttccc cctgtacggc 1020 acaatgggca acgctgcccc acagcagagg atcgtggccc agctgggcca gggcgtgtac 1080 cgcaccctga gcagcaccct gtacaggagg cccttcaaca tcggcatcaa caaccagcag 1140 ctgagcgtgc tggatggcac cgagttcgcc tacggcacca gcagcaacct gcccagcgcc 1200 gtataccgca agagcggcac tgtggacagc ctggacgaga tcccacccca gaacaacaac 1260 gtgcccccta ggcaggggtt ctctcatcgc ctctcacacg tgagcatgtt ccgcagcggc 1320 ttcagcaaca gcagcgtgag catcatcagg gctcccatgt tcagctggat ccaccgcagc 1380 gctgagttca acaacatcat tccaagtagc cagatcactc agatcccact caccaagagc 1440 accaacctgg gctccgggac tagcgttgtc aagggaccag ggttcactgg aggcgacatc 1500 ctgaggagga ccagcccagg ccagatcagc accttaaggg tgaacatcac cgctcccctc 1560 agccaacgct acagggtcag gatcaggtac gcttccacca ccaacctgca gttccacacc 1620 agcatcgacg gcaggcccat caaccagggc aacttcagcg ccaccatgag cagcggcagc 1680 aacctgcaga gcggaagctt ccgcactgtg ggcttcacta ccccattcaa cttctccaac 1740 ggcagcagcg tgttcaccct gtctgcccac gtgttcaaca gcggcaacga ggtgtacatc 1800 gacaggatcg agtttgtccc agctgaggtg accttcgaag ctgagtacga ctga 1854

Claims (19)

1. A monocotyledonous plant, which is an insect-resistant plant, or a cell or tissue thereof, comprising, stably integrated into its genome, a chimeric gene comprising a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein under control of a promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter.
2. The plant, cell or tissue of claim 1, wherein said insecticidal protein is a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin.
3. The plant, cell or tissue of claim 1, wherein said TR2′ promoter is the promoter of SEQ ID NO: 1.
4. A method for obtaining wound-induced expression of an insecticidal toxin in a monocot plant, said method comprising introducing into the plant a foreign DNA comprising a chimeric gene comprising:
a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein
a plant-expressible promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter.
5. A method for making an insect resistant monocotyledonous plant, said method comprising introducing into the genome of said plant a foreign DNA comprising a chimeric gene comprising:
a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein
a plant-expressible promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter.
6. A method for obtaining increased expression of an insecticidal protein in a monocot plant upon wounding, whereby expression in the leaves of said plant at stage V4 in the greenhouse, in the absence of wounding is 0.005% total soluble protein or less, and upon wounding increases to 0.04% total soluble protein, said method comprising introducing into the genome of said plant a foreign DNA comprising a chimeric gene comprising:
a DNA sequence encoding an insecticidal protein
a plant-expressible promoter region comprising the TR2′ promoter.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein said insecticidal protein is a Bt protein.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said Bt protein is selected from the group of Cry1Ab, Cry1F, Cry2Ab.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein said insecticidal protein is a Bt protein.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said Bt protein is selected from the group of Cry1Ab, Cry1F, Cry2Ab.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein said insecticidal protein is a Bt protein.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said Bt protein is selected from the group of Cry1Ab, Cry1F, Cry2Ab.
13. The plant of claim 1, wherein, in the absence of wounding, expression of said insecticidal protein is below 0.005% total soluble protein in leaves of V4 stage of said plants as measured in the greenhouse by an insecticidal protein-specific ELISA.
14. The plant, cell or tissue of claim 1 which is a graminae plant, cell or tissue.
15. The plant, cell or tissue of claim 1, which is a corn plant, cell or tissue.
16. The plant, cell or tissue of claim 2, wherein said protein is the protein encoded by SEQ ID NO: 3.
17. A chimeric gene for use in the method of claim 4.
18. A chimeric gene for use in the method of claim 5.
19. A chimeric gene for use in the method of claim 6.
US10/137,325 2002-05-03 2002-05-03 Wound-inducible expression in plants Pending US20030208789A1 (en)

Priority Applications (13)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/137,325 US20030208789A1 (en) 2002-05-03 2002-05-03 Wound-inducible expression in plants
AU2003240601A AU2003240601A1 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 Wound-inducible expression in plants
BRPI0309874A BRPI0309874B1 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 A method for obtaining wound-induced expression of an insecticidal toxin in a corn plant, for manufacturing an insect-resistant corn plant, and for obtaining increased expression of an insecticidal protein in a corn plant when wounded.
CNB03810041XA CN1308453C (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 Wound-inducible expression in plants
AT03729979T ATE361987T1 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 WOUND-INDUCABLE EXPRESSION IN PLANTS
DE60313770T DE60313770T2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 WOUND INDUCIBLE EXPRESSION IN PLANTS
JP2004501619A JP4527527B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 Wound-induced expression in plants
ES03729979T ES2287482T3 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 INDUCIBLE EXPRESSION FOR INJURY OF PLANTS.
PCT/EP2003/004699 WO2003093483A1 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 Wound-inducible expression in plants
MXPA04010704A MXPA04010704A (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 Wound-inducible expression in plants.
EP03729979A EP1504105B1 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-04-29 Wound-inducible expression in plants
US10/428,843 US7790960B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-05-05 Wound-inducible expression in plants
ARP030101574A AR039969A1 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-05-05 INDUCABLE EXPRESSION FOR INJURIES IN PLANTS

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/137,325 US20030208789A1 (en) 2002-05-03 2002-05-03 Wound-inducible expression in plants

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/428,843 Continuation-In-Part US7790960B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-05-05 Wound-inducible expression in plants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030208789A1 true US20030208789A1 (en) 2003-11-06

Family

ID=29269075

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/137,325 Pending US20030208789A1 (en) 2002-05-03 2002-05-03 Wound-inducible expression in plants
US10/428,843 Expired - Fee Related US7790960B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-05-05 Wound-inducible expression in plants

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/428,843 Expired - Fee Related US7790960B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-05-05 Wound-inducible expression in plants

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (2) US20030208789A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1504105B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4527527B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1308453C (en)
AR (1) AR039969A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE361987T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003240601A1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0309874B1 (en)
DE (1) DE60313770T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2287482T3 (en)
MX (1) MXPA04010704A (en)
WO (1) WO2003093483A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019099189A1 (en) * 2017-11-14 2019-05-23 Dow Agrosciences Llc Plant pathogenesis-related protein promoter for transgene expression
CN113151258A (en) * 2021-04-14 2021-07-23 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 Flanking sequence of exogenous insertion fragment of insect-resistant transgenic maize AM63 insertion site and application thereof

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007007147A2 (en) 2005-07-08 2007-01-18 Universidad Nacional Autonoma De Mexico Instituto De Biotecnologia Novel bacterial proteins with pesticidal activity
CN101679491B (en) * 2007-03-28 2013-11-06 先正达参股股份有限公司 Insecticidal proteins
WO2008151780A1 (en) * 2007-06-11 2008-12-18 Bayer Bioscience N.V. Insect resistant cotton plants comprising elite event ee-gh6 and methods for identifying same
BR102015000943A2 (en) * 2014-01-17 2016-06-07 Dow Agrosciences Llc increased protein expression in plant
WO2016103279A1 (en) * 2014-12-23 2016-06-30 Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research A wound inducible expression construct and a method of its preparation
CN106591352B (en) * 2016-11-21 2020-05-05 北京大北农科技集团股份有限公司 Insecticidal protein combinations and methods of managing insect resistance

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5989867A (en) * 1996-09-23 1999-11-23 Knappe; Andrea DNA encoding IL-10-like homologue; related reagents

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5428146A (en) * 1988-11-07 1995-06-27 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Wound-stimulated DNA-sequence from solanum tuberosum and its use
EP0400246A1 (en) * 1989-05-31 1990-12-05 Plant Genetic Systems, N.V. Prevention of Bt resistance development
ATE496135T1 (en) * 1989-08-10 2011-02-15 Bayer Bioscience Nv PLANTS WITH MODIFIED FLOWERS
US5684239A (en) * 1990-01-05 1997-11-04 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Monocot having dicot wound-inducible promoter
DE69132124T2 (en) * 1990-11-23 2000-11-23 Aventis Cropscience Nv METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING MONOCOTYLED PLANTS
UA48104C2 (en) * 1991-10-04 2002-08-15 Новартіс Аг Dna fragment including sequence that codes an insecticide protein with optimization for corn, dna fragment providing directed preferable for the stem core expression of the structural gene of the plant related to it, dna fragment providing specific for the pollen expression of related to it structural gene in the plant, recombinant dna molecule, method for obtaining a coding sequence of the insecticide protein optimized for corn, method of corn plants protection at least against one pest insect
CA2122261A1 (en) * 1991-10-30 1993-05-13 Marc Cornelissen Modified genes and their expression in plant cells
DE69333333T2 (en) * 1992-03-20 2004-09-23 Max Planck Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. CHIMAER GENE REACTING FUNGUS
US5530197A (en) * 1992-08-19 1996-06-25 Plant Genetic Systems, N.V. Control of ostrinia
US6291745B1 (en) 1993-04-02 2001-09-18 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Limonene and other downstream metabolites of geranyl pyrophosphate for insect control in plants
US5689052A (en) * 1993-12-22 1997-11-18 Monsanto Company Synthetic DNA sequences having enhanced expression in monocotyledonous plants and method for preparation thereof
US5673846A (en) * 1995-08-24 1997-10-07 International Business Machines Corporation Solder anchor decal and method
US5942664A (en) * 1996-11-27 1999-08-24 Ecogen, Inc. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C compositions toxic to lepidopteran insects and methods for making Cry1C mutants
US6468523B1 (en) 1998-11-02 2002-10-22 Monsanto Technology Llc Polypeptide compositions toxic to diabrotic insects, and methods of use
US20020166143A1 (en) * 2000-08-11 2002-11-07 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Sclerotinia-inducible genes and promoters and their uses
US6652870B2 (en) * 2001-04-23 2003-11-25 Dan L. Campbell Wildlife controllant and methods of using the same

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5989867A (en) * 1996-09-23 1999-11-23 Knappe; Andrea DNA encoding IL-10-like homologue; related reagents

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019099189A1 (en) * 2017-11-14 2019-05-23 Dow Agrosciences Llc Plant pathogenesis-related protein promoter for transgene expression
CN113151258A (en) * 2021-04-14 2021-07-23 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 Flanking sequence of exogenous insertion fragment of insect-resistant transgenic maize AM63 insertion site and application thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR0309874A (en) 2005-03-15
DE60313770D1 (en) 2007-06-21
BRPI0309874B1 (en) 2015-12-01
ATE361987T1 (en) 2007-06-15
DE60313770T2 (en) 2008-01-24
ES2287482T3 (en) 2007-12-16
AU2003240601A1 (en) 2003-11-17
WO2003093483A1 (en) 2003-11-13
JP2005524400A (en) 2005-08-18
CN1650019A (en) 2005-08-03
EP1504105B1 (en) 2007-05-09
US20030221216A1 (en) 2003-11-27
US7790960B2 (en) 2010-09-07
CN1308453C (en) 2007-04-04
JP4527527B2 (en) 2010-08-18
AR039969A1 (en) 2005-03-09
MXPA04010704A (en) 2005-02-17
EP1504105A1 (en) 2005-02-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
RU2234531C2 (en) Method for plant transformation for expression of bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin
EP2373153B1 (en) Corn event 5307
Yin et al. Expression of a Solanum sogarandinum SK3-type dehydrin enhances cold tolerance in transgenic cucumber seedlings
US20110138492A1 (en) Transgenic sugar beet plants
US20190136247A1 (en) Flowering time-regulating genes and related constructs and applications thereof
WO2001021821A2 (en) Insect-resistant rice plants
US20030208789A1 (en) Wound-inducible expression in plants
Bakhsh et al. A mini review: RuBisCo small subunit as a strong, green tissue-specific promoter
AU2016233479A1 (en) RNA polymerase ll33 nucleic acid molecules to control insect pests
JPH07500966A (en) Modified genes and their expression in plant cells
Manikandan et al. Transgenic rice plants expressing synthetic cry2AX1 gene exhibits resistance to rice leaffolder (Cnaphalocrosis medinalis)
EP1504104B1 (en) Insect resistant plants and methods for making the same
US20150211019A1 (en) Compositions and Methods for Increasing Pest Resistance in Plants
US10155959B2 (en) Bronze bug control agents
EP2451830B1 (en) Method for increasing the resistance of a plant or a part thereof to a pathogen, method for screening the resistance of a plant or part thereof to a pathogen, and use thereof
Li et al. Cell wall‐localized Bt protein endows rice high resistance to Lepidoptera pests
Khabbazi et al. Different Generations of Genetically Modified Crops for Insect Resistance
EP2291525B1 (en) Transgenic sugar beet plants
AU2012216482B2 (en) Polynucleotides and Polypeptides Involved in Plant Fiber Development and Methods of Using Same
CN114096669A (en) Synthetic nucleotide sequences encoding insecticidal crystal proteins and uses thereof
CN105037522A (en) Wheat leaf curl related protein TaMYB18 and related biological material and application thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V., BELGIUM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JENSENS, STEFAN;HAUBEN, MIRIAM;REYNAERTS, ARLETTE;REEL/FRAME:013142/0659

Effective date: 20020603

AS Assignment

Owner name: AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V., BELGIUM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JANSENS, STEFAN;HAUBEN, MIRIAM;REYNAERTS, ARLETTE;REEL/FRAME:014793/0198

Effective date: 20020603

Owner name: BAYER BIOSCIENCE N.V., BELGIUM

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE N.V.;REEL/FRAME:014786/0309

Effective date: 20020709