US20030203247A1 - Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system - Google Patents
Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030203247A1 US20030203247A1 US10/134,669 US13466902A US2003203247A1 US 20030203247 A1 US20030203247 A1 US 20030203247A1 US 13466902 A US13466902 A US 13466902A US 2003203247 A1 US2003203247 A1 US 2003203247A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- model
- fuel
- oxidant
- signal
- delivered
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/04—Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
- H01M8/04298—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems
- H01M8/04313—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems characterised by the detection or assessment of variables; characterised by the detection or assessment of failure or abnormal function
- H01M8/04537—Electric variables
- H01M8/04544—Voltage
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/04—Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
- H01M8/04082—Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration
- H01M8/04089—Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration of gaseous reactants
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/04—Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
- H01M8/04298—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems
- H01M8/04313—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems characterised by the detection or assessment of variables; characterised by the detection or assessment of failure or abnormal function
- H01M8/0438—Pressure; Ambient pressure; Flow
- H01M8/04388—Pressure; Ambient pressure; Flow of anode reactants at the inlet or inside the fuel cell
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/04—Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
- H01M8/04298—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems
- H01M8/04313—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems characterised by the detection or assessment of variables; characterised by the detection or assessment of failure or abnormal function
- H01M8/0438—Pressure; Ambient pressure; Flow
- H01M8/04395—Pressure; Ambient pressure; Flow of cathode reactants at the inlet or inside the fuel cell
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/04—Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
- H01M8/04298—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems
- H01M8/04694—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems characterised by variables to be controlled
- H01M8/04858—Electric variables
- H01M8/04895—Current
- H01M8/0491—Current of fuel cell stacks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/04—Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
- H01M8/04298—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems
- H01M8/04694—Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems characterised by variables to be controlled
- H01M8/04858—Electric variables
- H01M8/04925—Power, energy, capacity or load
- H01M8/0494—Power, energy, capacity or load of fuel cell stacks
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/50—Fuel cells
Definitions
- the present invention relates to fuel cells, and more particularly to fuel cell power (or current) control systems.
- FCPM fuel cell power module
- FCPM fuel cell power module
- the system requests various power (or current) levels from the FCPM to satisfy a load condition. For example, a load condition in a vehicle increases when the driver depresses an accelerator and decreases when the vehicle is traveling on a downhill grade.
- the system preferably knows the available power (or current) output of the FCPM. If the load is too low relative to supplied fuel and oxidant, the FCPM passes too much fuel out of the stack, which is inefficient and may damage downstream components. If the load is too high relative to the supplied fuel and oxidant, the fuel cell stack may be damaged.
- Designing a closed loop control system for a fuel cell requires knowledge of both system loads (such as vehicle loads) and the fuel cell. A significant amount of calibration and tuning of the closed loop control system is typically required to obtain efficient operation. When inevitable design changes are made to the system or to the fuel cell, the closed loop control system must be recalibrated and retuned. This recalibration requirement reduces the flexibility of the fuel cell system, makes the fuel cell system less modular, and may require both the system and the fuel cell to be designed together.
- Another control approach employs a closed loop control system that is based on a desired fuel cell output such as current or power.
- the fuel and oxidant inputs are modified until a desired output is achieved.
- Another approach commands fuel (such as H 2 , natural gas, gasoline, liquid propane, methanol, etc.) and oxidant (such as oxygen or air). The input commands are then adjusted based on a resulting power output.
- a control system and method controls an output of a fuel cell.
- a fuel cell stack controller receives an output request signal and generates an oxidant request signal and a fuel request signal using a first inverse model.
- a fuel delivery controller receives the fuel request signal, generates a fuel command using a second inverse model and generates a delivered fuel signal using a first model.
- An oxidant delivery controller receives the oxidant request signal, generates an oxidant command using a third inverse model and generates a delivered oxidant signal using a second model.
- the fuel cell stack controller receives the delivered oxidant signal from the second model and the delivered fuel signal from the first model and calculates a power available signal using a third model.
- the first inverse model is an anode/cathode stack inverse model.
- the second inverse model is a fuel delivery inverse model.
- the third inverse model is an oxidant delivery inverse model.
- the first model is a fuel delivery model.
- the second model is an oxidant delivery model.
- the third model is an anode/cathode stack model.
- the oxidant delivered signal and the fuel delivered signal are input to the first inverse model.
- a fuel actuator receives the fuel command from the fuel delivery controller.
- An oxidant actuator that receives the oxidant command from the oxidant delivery controller.
- a system controller sends the output request and receives the power available signal.
- the controlled output of the fuel cell is power or current.
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a fuel cell control system according to the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the fuel cell control system of FIG. 1 in further detail
- FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of an anode/cathode stack inverse model for the fuel cell stack controller
- FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram of an anode/cathode stack model for the fuel cell stack controller.
- FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of an alternate fuel cell stack controller.
- the fuel cell control system controls inputs to a fuel cell power module (FCPM) using an accurate, flexible, and modular approach.
- FCPM fuel cell power module
- the present invention allows the FCPM to be used in different applications or systems without requiring changes or modifications to the fuel cell control system.
- power and current can be used interchangeably.
- a fuel cell power module (FCPM) 10 includes a fuel cell stack controller 12 , an oxidant delivery controller 16 , and a fuel delivery controller 20 .
- a power request from a system controller is made to the FCPM 10 as indicated at 22 .
- the fuel cell stack controller 12 receives the request 22 and determines required fuel and oxidant as shown at 24 and 28 .
- the fuel delivery controller 20 and the oxidant delivery controller 16 respond by delivering fuel such as H 2 or reformate and oxidant such as air or oxygen (O 2 ).
- the fuel delivery controller 20 and the oxidant delivery controller 16 generate delivered fuel and oxidant measurements as shown at 32 and 34 .
- the fuel cell stack controller 12 includes an anode/cathode stack inverse model 50 that determines the oxidant and fuel requests 24 and 28 based on the current or power request 22 .
- a model predicts the outputs based on a given set of inputs.
- An inverse model predicts the inputs based on a given set of outputs.
- the anode/cathode stack inverse model 50 sends the fuel request 28 to the fuel delivery controller 20 , such as a H 2 tank controller, a fuel processor controller, etc.
- the anode/cathode stack inverse model 50 sends the oxidant request 24 to the oxidant delivery controller 16 , such as a compressor.
- the oxidant delivery controller 16 processes the oxidant request 24 using an oxidant delivery inverse model 60 , which generates an oxidant command at 64 that is output to one or more actuators 66 .
- the fuel delivery controller 20 processes the fuel request 28 using a fuel delivery inverse model 70 , which generates a fuel command at 74 that is output to one or more actuators 76 .
- actual data (such as temperature, pressure, flow, and/or other operating parameters) is input to an oxidant delivery model 80 of the oxidant delivery controller 16 using one or more sensors 82 .
- the oxidant delivery model 80 calculates the actual oxidant delivered 34 to the fuel cell stack. Dynamics, such as transport delay of gases, thermal time delays, and/or other factors are inherently included in this information if included in the oxidant delivery model 80 .
- actual data (such as temperature, pressure, flow, and/or other operating parameters) is input to a fuel delivery model 90 of the fuel delivery controller 20 using one or more sensors 92 (which may be the same as sensors 82 ).
- the fuel delivery model 90 calculates the actual fuel delivered 32 to the fuel cell stack. Dynamics, such as transport delay of gases, thermal time delays, and/or other factors are inherently included in this information if included in the fuel delivery model 90 .
- Fuel and oxidant delivered values 32 and 34 and/or sensor data from sensors 82 and/or 92 are fed back to an anode/cathode stack model 100 , which calculates a power available signal at 102 .
- the power available signal 102 is sent to a system controller 104 .
- FIG. 5 a modified fuel cell stack controller 12 ′ is shown.
- a modified anode/cathode stack inverse model 50 ′ receives fuel delivered and oxidant delivered as shown at 110 and 114 , which are then used to calculate the fuel request at 28 and the oxidant request at 24 .
- the fuel cell stack controller 12 also calculates any additional control quantities that are required such as anode air bleed. Dynamics such as transport delay of gases and thermal time delays are inherently included in this information if included in the models. Any system degradation is also inherently accounted for in the information streams.
- the information is model-based and utilizes actual sensor inputs, the information is also used to determine state transitions/requests to further simplify the interfaces. For example, the vehicle controller does not need to know the state of the FCPM 10 because the vehicle controller only needs a power available signal from the FCPM 10 .
- This control method allows for more efficient FCPM operation by balancing the anode and cathode flows. If either the cathode or anode side cannot deliver the appropriate amount of flow, the other side is lowered as well. For example, if catalyst degradation of a 60 kW system only permits 55 kW worth of anode flow, the air is not allowed to flow at a 60 kW level. The reduced anode flow is reported in the stack oxidant request 24 and the oxidant flow is adjusted to a new 55 kW level. This reduces the parasitic losses of the air compressor. Likewise, reduced oxidant performance reduces the anode flow to balance both anode and cathode.
- FCPM 10 FCPM 10
- the interface is very simple and requires minimal interfacing between modules, which is critical for a modular system and software approaches.
- the design offers a precise, accurate, safer, and faster delivery of the fuel cell power to the load.
- the present invention allows improved acceleration and more controlled deceleration.
- the present invention offers improved system efficiency by avoiding excess oxidant or fuel that the fuel cell stack is unable to utilize.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Fuel Cell (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to fuel cells, and more particularly to fuel cell power (or current) control systems.
- Fuel cells are being used to power systems such as vehicles and stationary power plants. A fuel cell power module (FCPM) is often used to control power (or current) of the fuel cell. During operation, the system requests various power (or current) levels from the FCPM to satisfy a load condition. For example, a load condition in a vehicle increases when the driver depresses an accelerator and decreases when the vehicle is traveling on a downhill grade.
- The system preferably knows the available power (or current) output of the FCPM. If the load is too low relative to supplied fuel and oxidant, the FCPM passes too much fuel out of the stack, which is inefficient and may damage downstream components. If the load is too high relative to the supplied fuel and oxidant, the fuel cell stack may be damaged.
- Designing a closed loop control system for a fuel cell requires knowledge of both system loads (such as vehicle loads) and the fuel cell. A significant amount of calibration and tuning of the closed loop control system is typically required to obtain efficient operation. When inevitable design changes are made to the system or to the fuel cell, the closed loop control system must be recalibrated and retuned. This recalibration requirement reduces the flexibility of the fuel cell system, makes the fuel cell system less modular, and may require both the system and the fuel cell to be designed together.
- One conventional control approach commands fuel and oxidant to the fuel cell and varies the load to accept the output of the fuel cell. This control approach severely restricts the architecture and operation of the system incorporating the fuel cell. For example, this approach was found to be unacceptable for vehicles. For consumer acceptance of fuel cell vehicles, fuel cells must respond more quickly and accurately to driver input. This control approach is better suited to components and subsystems where the load is not as critical.
- Another control approach employs a closed loop control system that is based on a desired fuel cell output such as current or power. The fuel and oxidant inputs are modified until a desired output is achieved. Another approach commands fuel (such as H2, natural gas, gasoline, liquid propane, methanol, etc.) and oxidant (such as oxygen or air). The input commands are then adjusted based on a resulting power output.
- A control system and method according to the present invention controls an output of a fuel cell. A fuel cell stack controller receives an output request signal and generates an oxidant request signal and a fuel request signal using a first inverse model. A fuel delivery controller receives the fuel request signal, generates a fuel command using a second inverse model and generates a delivered fuel signal using a first model. An oxidant delivery controller receives the oxidant request signal, generates an oxidant command using a third inverse model and generates a delivered oxidant signal using a second model. The fuel cell stack controller receives the delivered oxidant signal from the second model and the delivered fuel signal from the first model and calculates a power available signal using a third model.
- In other features, the first inverse model is an anode/cathode stack inverse model. The second inverse model is a fuel delivery inverse model. The third inverse model is an oxidant delivery inverse model. The first model is a fuel delivery model. The second model is an oxidant delivery model. The third model is an anode/cathode stack model.
- In yet other features, the oxidant delivered signal and the fuel delivered signal are input to the first inverse model. A fuel actuator receives the fuel command from the fuel delivery controller. An oxidant actuator that receives the oxidant command from the oxidant delivery controller. A system controller sends the output request and receives the power available signal. The controlled output of the fuel cell is power or current.
- Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
- The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a fuel cell control system according to the present invention;
- FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the fuel cell control system of FIG. 1 in further detail;
- FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of an anode/cathode stack inverse model for the fuel cell stack controller;
- FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram of an anode/cathode stack model for the fuel cell stack controller; and
- FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of an alternate fuel cell stack controller.
- The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numerals will be used in the FIGS. to identify similar elements.
- The fuel cell control system according to the present invention controls inputs to a fuel cell power module (FCPM) using an accurate, flexible, and modular approach. The present invention allows the FCPM to be used in different applications or systems without requiring changes or modifications to the fuel cell control system. In the foregoing description, power and current can be used interchangeably.
- Referring now to FIG. 1, a fuel cell power module (FCPM)10 according to the present invention is shown and includes a fuel
cell stack controller 12, anoxidant delivery controller 16, and afuel delivery controller 20. A power request from a system controller (not shown) is made to the FCPM 10 as indicated at 22. The fuelcell stack controller 12 receives therequest 22 and determines required fuel and oxidant as shown at 24 and 28. Thefuel delivery controller 20 and theoxidant delivery controller 16 respond by delivering fuel such as H2 or reformate and oxidant such as air or oxygen (O2). Thefuel delivery controller 20 and theoxidant delivery controller 16 generate delivered fuel and oxidant measurements as shown at 32 and 34. - Referring now to FIGS. 2, 3 and4, the FCPM 10 is illustrated in further detail. The fuel
cell stack controller 12 includes an anode/cathode stackinverse model 50 that determines the oxidant andfuel requests power request 22. As used herein, a model predicts the outputs based on a given set of inputs. An inverse model predicts the inputs based on a given set of outputs. The anode/cathode stackinverse model 50 sends thefuel request 28 to thefuel delivery controller 20, such as a H2 tank controller, a fuel processor controller, etc. The anode/cathode stackinverse model 50 sends theoxidant request 24 to theoxidant delivery controller 16, such as a compressor. Theoxidant delivery controller 16 processes theoxidant request 24 using an oxidantdelivery inverse model 60, which generates an oxidant command at 64 that is output to one ormore actuators 66. Thefuel delivery controller 20 processes thefuel request 28 using a fueldelivery inverse model 70, which generates a fuel command at 74 that is output to one ormore actuators 76. - As the
actuator 66 that is associated with theoxidant delivery controller 16 implements the oxidant commands 64, actual data (such as temperature, pressure, flow, and/or other operating parameters) is input to anoxidant delivery model 80 of theoxidant delivery controller 16 using one ormore sensors 82. Theoxidant delivery model 80 calculates the actual oxidant delivered 34 to the fuel cell stack. Dynamics, such as transport delay of gases, thermal time delays, and/or other factors are inherently included in this information if included in theoxidant delivery model 80. - As the
actuator 76 that is associated with thefuel delivery controller 20 implements the fuel command, actual data (such as temperature, pressure, flow, and/or other operating parameters) is input to afuel delivery model 90 of thefuel delivery controller 20 using one or more sensors 92 (which may be the same as sensors 82). Thefuel delivery model 90 calculates the actual fuel delivered 32 to the fuel cell stack. Dynamics, such as transport delay of gases, thermal time delays, and/or other factors are inherently included in this information if included in thefuel delivery model 90. Fuel and oxidant deliveredvalues sensors 82 and/or 92 are fed back to an anode/cathode stack model 100, which calculates a power available signal at 102. The poweravailable signal 102 is sent to asystem controller 104. - Further improvements can be made by providing the fuel delivered
signal 32 and oxidant deliveredsignal 34 to the anode/cathode stackinverse model 50 of the fuelcell stack controller 12. Referring now to FIG. 5, a modified fuelcell stack controller 12′ is shown. A modified anode/cathode stackinverse model 50′ receives fuel delivered and oxidant delivered as shown at 110 and 114, which are then used to calculate the fuel request at 28 and the oxidant request at 24. - The fuel
cell stack controller 12 also calculates any additional control quantities that are required such as anode air bleed. Dynamics such as transport delay of gases and thermal time delays are inherently included in this information if included in the models. Any system degradation is also inherently accounted for in the information streams. - Because the information is model-based and utilizes actual sensor inputs, the information is also used to determine state transitions/requests to further simplify the interfaces. For example, the vehicle controller does not need to know the state of the
FCPM 10 because the vehicle controller only needs a power available signal from theFCPM 10. - This control method allows for more efficient FCPM operation by balancing the anode and cathode flows. If either the cathode or anode side cannot deliver the appropriate amount of flow, the other side is lowered as well. For example, if catalyst degradation of a 60 kW system only permits 55 kW worth of anode flow, the air is not allowed to flow at a 60 kW level. The reduced anode flow is reported in the
stack oxidant request 24 and the oxidant flow is adjusted to a new 55 kW level. This reduces the parasitic losses of the air compressor. Likewise, reduced oxidant performance reduces the anode flow to balance both anode and cathode. - Systems incorporating the present invention are much more robust. Instead of shutting down for a cathode or anode problem, the system adjusts and continues to run. The present invention schedules inputs to the
FCPM 10 with an accurate, flexible, and modular approach. The present invention allows theFCPM 10 to be used in different applications without requiring changes or modifications to the interface between thesystem controller 104 and theFCPM 10. The interface is very simple and requires minimal interfacing between modules, which is critical for a modular system and software approaches. The design offers a precise, accurate, safer, and faster delivery of the fuel cell power to the load. In the case of a fuel cell vehicle, the present invention allows improved acceleration and more controlled deceleration. The present invention offers improved system efficiency by avoiding excess oxidant or fuel that the fuel cell stack is unable to utilize. - Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention has been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/134,669 US7432005B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2002-04-29 | Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system |
PCT/US2003/010208 WO2003094274A1 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2003-04-04 | Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system |
DE10392582T DE10392582T5 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2003-04-04 | A model-based feedforward system for power (or power) in a fuel cell system |
JP2004502394A JP2005524213A (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2003-04-04 | Model-based feedforward control system for power (or current) in fuel cell systems |
AU2003222187A AU2003222187A1 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2003-04-04 | Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/134,669 US7432005B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2002-04-29 | Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030203247A1 true US20030203247A1 (en) | 2003-10-30 |
US7432005B2 US7432005B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 |
Family
ID=29249274
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/134,669 Expired - Fee Related US7432005B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2002-04-29 | Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7432005B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2005524213A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003222187A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE10392582T5 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003094274A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040161643A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-08-19 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Method for controlling flow rate of oxidizer in fuel cell system |
US20050056661A1 (en) * | 2003-08-19 | 2005-03-17 | Hydrogenics Corporation | Method and system for distributing hydrogen |
US8478470B1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2013-07-02 | Caterpillar Inc. | Drivetrain system having rate-limited feedforward fueling |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10593971B1 (en) | 2018-11-06 | 2020-03-17 | Nuvera Fuel Cells, LLC | Methods and systems for controlling water imbalance in an electrochemical cell |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4839246A (en) * | 1987-05-20 | 1989-06-13 | Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | Generator system utilizing a fuel cell |
US5780981A (en) * | 1995-11-02 | 1998-07-14 | Daimler-Benz Ag | Process for dynamically adjusting the power for a vehicle having a fuel cell |
US5925089A (en) * | 1996-07-10 | 1999-07-20 | Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha | Model-based control method and apparatus using inverse model |
US6265092B1 (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2001-07-24 | General Motors Corporation | Method of controlling injection of oxygen into hydrogen-rich fuel cell feed stream |
US6280865B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2001-08-28 | Plug Power Inc. | Fuel cell system with hydrogen purification subsystem |
US6393354B1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-05-21 | Utc Fuel Cells, Llc | Predictive control arrangement for load-following fuel cell-powered applications |
US20020182467A1 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-05 | Plug Power | Method and apparatus for controlling a combined heat and power fuel cell system |
-
2002
- 2002-04-29 US US10/134,669 patent/US7432005B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-04-04 WO PCT/US2003/010208 patent/WO2003094274A1/en active Application Filing
- 2003-04-04 DE DE10392582T patent/DE10392582T5/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-04-04 AU AU2003222187A patent/AU2003222187A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-04-04 JP JP2004502394A patent/JP2005524213A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4839246A (en) * | 1987-05-20 | 1989-06-13 | Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | Generator system utilizing a fuel cell |
US5780981A (en) * | 1995-11-02 | 1998-07-14 | Daimler-Benz Ag | Process for dynamically adjusting the power for a vehicle having a fuel cell |
US5925089A (en) * | 1996-07-10 | 1999-07-20 | Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha | Model-based control method and apparatus using inverse model |
US6265092B1 (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2001-07-24 | General Motors Corporation | Method of controlling injection of oxygen into hydrogen-rich fuel cell feed stream |
US6280865B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2001-08-28 | Plug Power Inc. | Fuel cell system with hydrogen purification subsystem |
US6393354B1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-05-21 | Utc Fuel Cells, Llc | Predictive control arrangement for load-following fuel cell-powered applications |
US20020182467A1 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-05 | Plug Power | Method and apparatus for controlling a combined heat and power fuel cell system |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040161643A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-08-19 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Method for controlling flow rate of oxidizer in fuel cell system |
US6815104B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-11-09 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Method for controlling flow rate of oxidizer in fuel cell system |
US20050056661A1 (en) * | 2003-08-19 | 2005-03-17 | Hydrogenics Corporation | Method and system for distributing hydrogen |
US8478470B1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2013-07-02 | Caterpillar Inc. | Drivetrain system having rate-limited feedforward fueling |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2003094274A1 (en) | 2003-11-13 |
US7432005B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 |
JP2005524213A (en) | 2005-08-11 |
DE10392582T5 (en) | 2005-05-12 |
AU2003222187A1 (en) | 2003-11-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107437627B (en) | Fuel cell vehicle with multiple selectable operating modes | |
EP1966846B9 (en) | Fuel cell system, moving object equipped with fuel cell system, and abnormality judgment method for fuel cell system | |
US8277990B2 (en) | Fuel cell system | |
JP5041272B2 (en) | Fuel cell system and moving body | |
US6651761B1 (en) | Temperature control system for fuel cell electric vehicle cooling circuit | |
US5771476A (en) | Power control system for a fuel cell powered vehicle | |
US7291412B2 (en) | Control apparatus and control method of fuel cell system | |
US8470485B2 (en) | Fuel cell system | |
US20030022034A1 (en) | Apparatus for controlling electric power from fuel cell | |
US20100248061A1 (en) | Fuel cell system | |
WO2008069111A1 (en) | Fuel cell system | |
US20070184319A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling the differential pressure in a fuel cell | |
US7432005B2 (en) | Model-based feed-forward control system for power (or current) in a fuel cell system | |
US6680592B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for producing current values dependent on the position of the accelerator pedal for the purpose of controlling the power of one or more drives in a mobile device with a fuel cell for supplying energy | |
US20050118467A1 (en) | Fuel cell system and control method for fuel cell | |
US11152633B2 (en) | Fuel cell system and method of controlling the same | |
JP4863052B2 (en) | Fuel cell system and moving body | |
US20030203257A1 (en) | Air supply pressure setpoint determination for a fuel cell power module | |
US6656619B2 (en) | Fuel cell system and method for operating a fuel cell | |
JP2004220794A (en) | Control device of fuel cell | |
JP2006109650A (en) | Vehicle control unit and vehicle control method | |
JP2002231278A (en) | Fuel cell system | |
JP2017091625A (en) | Abnormality detection method for sensor for fuel battery system | |
JP2008004320A (en) | Fuel cell system, and mobile unit | |
JP2006324187A (en) | Fuel cell system, its control device, control method, and computer program |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KESKULA, DONALD H.;CLINGERMAN, BRUCE J.;REEL/FRAME:013050/0904;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020424 TO 20020430 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022092/0737 Effective date: 20050119 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022092/0737 Effective date: 20050119 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547 Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547 Effective date: 20081231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399 Effective date: 20090409 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399 Effective date: 20090409 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470 Effective date: 20090709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273 Effective date: 20090814 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273 Effective date: 20090814 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST,MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST;REEL/FRAME:025311/0725 Effective date: 20101026 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:025245/0347 Effective date: 20100420 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025327/0222 Effective date: 20101027 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025780/0795 Effective date: 20101202 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:034183/0680 Effective date: 20141017 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20201007 |