US20030191971A1 - Method of and system for controlling internet access - Google Patents

Method of and system for controlling internet access Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030191971A1
US20030191971A1 US10413971 US41397103A US2003191971A1 US 20030191971 A1 US20030191971 A1 US 20030191971A1 US 10413971 US10413971 US 10413971 US 41397103 A US41397103 A US 41397103A US 2003191971 A1 US2003191971 A1 US 2003191971A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
system
organization
member
access
requested resource
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10413971
Inventor
John Klensin
Rohit Khare
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc
Original Assignee
Verizon Business Global LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to network resources
    • H04L63/102Entity profiles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60Protecting data
    • G06F21/62Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
    • G06F21/6218Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting authentication of entities communicating through a packet data network
    • H04L63/083Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting authentication of entities communicating through a packet data network using passwords
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting authentication of entities communicating through a packet data network
    • H04L63/0853Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting authentication of entities communicating through a packet data network using an additional device, e.g. smartcard, SIM or a different communication terminal
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to network resources
    • H04L63/105Multiple levels of security
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2221/00Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/21Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/2113Multi-level security, e.g. mandatory access control

Abstract

A method of and system for controlling access to the Internet by members of an organization that includes at least one supervisor and at least one non-supervisor for which limited Internet access is desired. The system maintains for each member of the organization a session identifier. When the system establishes an Internet session between a member of the organization and the Internet, the system initially sets a user session identifier for said Internet session to a default session identifier, which is the session identifier for the lowers access level member of the organization. When the member requests a resource, the system determines if an access level rating for requested source is greater than the value of the access level field of the user session identifier. If so, the system blocks the resource and presents member with choices of logging on to the system as a specific member of the organization with a higher access level, or appealing the blocking to a supervisor.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates generally to computer networks, and more particularly to a method of and system for controlling access to the Internet or the world wide web by providing a filtering proxy server that accesses a policy provider for judgments as to the suitability of a particular resource for a particular user. [0001]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
  • The Internet and the world wide web have experienced explosive growth. Everyday, more content is added to the Internet and more users gain access to the Internet. The Internet enables more people to gain access to more information more quickly than ever before. [0002]
  • Almost everyone sees the tremendous educational, research, and entertainment value of the Internet. Children and other inquisitive people can explore new areas in ways that was never possible before. Similarly, employees and business professionals can explore industry trends, obtain information on competitors and their products, and generally expand their knowledge base. Accordingly, a substantially number of parents, educators, and business leaders provide Internet access to their children, students and employees and encourage them to use the Internet. [0003]
  • For all the information on the Internet that most people consider to be good and valuable, there is a substantial amount of information that some people find to be objectionable or inappropriate. Many sites contain adult material such as nudity, violence, and intolerance in various degrees of explicitness. While it is unlikely that anyone would want to prevent entirely their child or student from accessing information on the Internet, it is equally unlikely that anyone would want a young child to access scenes of explicit vulgarity or sites advocating violent or hateful action toward members of various groups. Less controversially, while there is nothing objectionable about Internet versions of mainstream newspapers and magazines, most businesses would prefer their employees not to spend their working time reading sports reports and comics. [0004]
  • Presently, the on-line services market is divided into quite separate camps. On one side are the on-line environments such as American Online, CompuServe, and Prodigy. Initially, these services provided their own content. Accordingly, on-line environments had virtually complete control over what was available. The other side of the on-line market is occupied by access providers, which provide little more than access to the Internet without an appreciable amount of their own content. Recently, on-line environments have begun to move toward the access provider side by providing gateways to the Internet. Increasingly, customers of on-line environments are using their service to access the public Internet rather than to obtain content created by the on-line environment provider. [0005]
  • The controversy about limiting access to objectionable material on the Internet, and particularly the world wide web, has put the spotlight squarely on the vacuum between these two service models. On-line environments claim to be “kid-safe”, but they cannot guarantee it, especially insofar as they provide gateways to the whole Internet. Access providers try to avoid any perception that they can control the content or applications their services deliver. Instead, access providers place the burden on parents to install and configure content filtering software, which may be complex or simplistic, on their own. [0006]
  • The platform for content selection (PICS) provides an infrastructure for controlling access to the Internet. PICS allows Internet sites, pages, or other resources to be classified with PICS labels. Each PICS label associated with an Internet site or page classifies the site or page according to the rating specified in the label. A rating provider assigns objective values to the PICS label for a resource. PICS products filter web content according to the PICS labels. [0007]
  • There are a number of shortcomings in presently available PICS products and services. Primarily, current products and services fail to personalize their filtering. Today's firewalls and proxy servers filter everyone's request against a single set of criteria. Thus, currently existing products and services do not recognize for the differences in maturity level and sensitivities of different members of an organization such as a family. Furthermore, the filtering criteria are either simplistic black lists or overly complex multi-dimensional content ratings. In the black list schemes, a binary approach is used to block or not block access by everyone to a particular resource based upon a rater's judgment. Examples of multi-dimensional systems are RSACi, which describes various levels of sex, nudity, violence, and harsh language, and SafeSurf, which provides twelve themes and nine levels within each theme. [0008]
  • The multi-dimensional systems provide great flexibility by which parents can tailor their filtering based upon their values and their children's maturity and sensitivity. However, the multi-dimensional systems tend to be too complex for the average parent to use. Moreover, multi-dimensional systems measure content against several categories but they do not necessarily evaluate the resource as a whole. [0009]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a method of and system for controlling access to the Internet by members of an organization that includes at least one supervisor and at least one non-supervisor for which limited Internet access is desired. The organization may be any commercial or non-commercial organization. In one of its aspects, the organization may be a family, with the supervisor being a parent and the non-supervisor being a child. In another of its aspects the organization may be a school, with the supervisor being a teacher and the non-supervisor being a student. The organization may also be a business, with the supervisor being a manager or a system administrator and the non-supervisor being a regular employee. [0010]
  • The system maintains a user session identifier for each member of the organization. Each user session identifier includes an access level field, which contains an access level set for the organization member, and a supervisor field, which indicates whether or not the organization member is a supervisor. The user session identifier may also include a field that specifies whether not unrated sites or resources are to be blocked. Where the non-supervisor members of the organization are children, the access level is preferably an age level. [0011]
  • When the system establishes an Internet session between a member of the organization and the Internet, the system initially sets a user session identifier for the session to a default user session identifier. The default user session identifier is the session identifier for the lowest access level member of the organization. When the member requests a resource, the system determines if the requested resource is suitable for an individual with the access level of the current user session identifier. Preferably, in the embodiment in which non-supervisory members are children, the access level is an age rating. The system determines if the access level rating for requested resource is greater than the value of the access level field of the user session identifier. If so, the system blocks the resource and presents the member with choices of logging on to the system as a specific member of the organization with a higher access level, or appealing the blocking to a supervisor. [0012]
  • If the member chooses to appeal the blocking, the locator for the blocked resource is placed in a list of sites awaiting supervisor review. If the member chooses to logon as a specific member of the organization, the system authenticates the logon and sets an updated user session identifier to the session identifier for the specific member of the organization. If the updated user session identifier indicates that the member is a supervisor, the system presents the supervisor with the list of sites awaiting supervisor review. If the supervisor believes that a blocked site is appropriate for access by the non-supervisor, the supervisor can place the blocked site on a exception list. The next time the non-supervisor logs on, the system advises the non-supervisor of the previously blocked sites placed on the exception list. [0013]
  • Whenever a member of the organization requests a resource, the system associates the current user session identifier with the request. In the preferred embodiment, a supervisor or parent has access to any site or resource. Accordingly, if the supervisor field identifies the requestor as a supervisor, the system forwards the requested resource to the requestor. If the requestor is not a supervisor, then the system determines if the requested resource is on the exception list for the requester, and if so, the system forwards the requested resource to the requestor. [0014]
  • If the requested resource is not on the exception list, then the system determines if the requested resource is appropriate for the user. The present invention introduces the concept of a policy provider. A policy provider provides a subjective judgment as to whether a particular resource is suitable for a particular user. A policy provider is thus different from a rating provider, which provides either (i) an objective binary suitable/not-suitable judgment for a particular resource regardless of the requester, or (ii) a set of ratings that a parent or supervisor may use in determining whether the resource is suitable for the user. [0015]
  • If the organization has designated a policy provider, the system queries the designated policy provider for a determination of the suitability of the requested resource for the user. In the embodiment in which the organization is a family the policy provider returns an age value, which the system compares to the age set for the user in the access level in the session identifier. [0016]
  • The system may also determine if the requested resource has a ratings label. Since many publishers and rating providers use rating systems based upon criteria other than age, the system of the present invention includes a policy interpreter or reifier that converts multi-variate and non-age-based ratings into an age rating. If the highest or most stringent rating is greater than the level access specified in the user session identifier, the system blocks the resource. Additionally, if the resource is unrated and the user session identifier indicates that unrated resources are to be blocked, the system blocks the resource. Otherwise, the system forwards the resource to the requestor. [0017]
  • In the preferred embodiment of the invention in which the non-supervisor members of the organization are children, the access level of a child is specified by an age value. The age value of the child's session identifier may be the child's actual chronological age, or it may be a “virtual age” selected by the parent based upon the maturity level of the child and the parent's experience with ratings provided by the policy provider.[0018]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a high level block diagram of a system according to the present invention. [0019]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a controlled access web service according to the present invention. [0020]
  • FIG. 3 is a high level flowchart of processing performed by the controlled access web service of the present invention. [0021]
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of policy evaluation according to the present invention. [0022]
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of block processing according to the present invention. [0023]
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart of appeal processing according to the present invention.[0024]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Referring now to the drawings, and first to FIG. 1, the Internet is designated generally by the numeral [0025] 11. The Internet comprises a plurality of web sites 13 and communications facilities, as is well known to those skilled in the art. Web sites 13 provide Internet content in response to requests from users.
  • In the system of the present invention, users access a plurality of policy providers [0026] 15. Policy providers 15 are services that make subject judgments as to the suitability of the content of particular Internet sites, pages, or other resources for particular individuals. Policy providers are different from the ratings providers 16 of the prior art, which give objective ratings to resources without regard to who is requesting the resource. In the preferred embodiment, in which the non-supervisory members are children, the policy provider gives each resource an age rating based upon the content of the resource as a whole. Internet users can use the services of a policy provider that appears to share the values and sensibilities of the user and in whose judgment the user trusts.
  • According to the present invention, a controlled access web service [0027] 17 provides access between a plurality of customers 19 and the Internet 11. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, in which customers 19 represent families using home personal computers, customers 19 use dial-up connections through a public switch telephone network 21 to establish Internet sessions through controlled access web service 17.
  • Typically, each customer [0028] 19 includes several users. In the family context, one or two of the users are parents and the other users are children. According to the present invention, a parent can use controlled access web service 17 to filter Internet content to each child individually.
  • Generally, and as will be explained in detail hereinafter, a user's path through the system according to the present invention includes several phases. First, a user dials up controlled access web service [0029] 17 through PSTN 21 and provides to controlled access web service a customer account identifier and password, as is well known. Controlled access web service 17 authenticates the customer account identifier and the password and establishes the Internet session. Thereafter, each web request is filtered through a proxy in controlled access web service 17 according to the policies set for the particular customer. If the access policy is violated, controlled access web service 17 manages an exception cycle, which includes blocking the violating web page, reporting the reason for the blocking and prompting the user either to upgrade to a higher access level or to appeal the blocking for later parental review.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, controlled access web service [0030] 17 includes a filtering proxy 23 and an authentication server 25. When a customer or family initially establishes a dial-up connection, authentication server 25 accesses an authenticator database 27, which contains authentication information. Authenticator database 27 also includes for each user associated with the customer, a session identifier. In the preferred family oriented embodiment of the present invention, each session identifier contains a parent field, which contains a bit that indicates whether or not the user is a parent, a block unrated field, which contains a bit that indicates whether or not to block unrated sites, and an access level field, which in the preferred embodiment contains the age of the user. The age may be either the actual chronological age of a child or a virtual age that may be greater than or less than the actual age of the child, depending upon the maturity level of the child and the parent's experience with the rating system. Authenticator database 27 also identifies the third party policy provider that the customer has selected.
  • Upon authentication of the initial logon, authentication server [0031] 25 passes to filtering proxy 23 session parameters and the Internet session is established. The session parameters include the identity of the third party policy provider and the session identifier for the user. Initially, the user session identifier is a default session identifier, which is the session identifier for the youngest member of the family.
  • During the session, filtering proxy [0032] 23 tags each request for a page or resource with the current user session identifier. Filtering proxy 23 fetches the requested resource and then forwards the resource to a policy evaluator 29 for an evaluation. In the preferred embodiment, a parent is entitled to view anything on the web. Accordingly, if the parent bit of the user session identifier is set to parent, the requested page is returned to filtering proxy 23 and forwarded to the customer. Initially, however, since the default user session identifier is the session identifier for the youngest child of the family, the parent bit is not set to parent.
  • Policy evaluator [0033] 29 accesses a database 31 of per household exception lists. An exception list contains, for each user, a list of pages or sites that would otherwise be blocked for the user but, upon parental review, have been determined to be appropriate for access by the user. If the requested page is not in the per household exception list, then the policy evaluator 29 accesses the appropriate third party policy provider 15. The policy provider returns a judgment as to the suitability of the requested resource for the user. In the preferred embodiment, the policy provider returns an age value, which policy evaluator 29 compares to the user session identifier. Policy evaluator 29 may cache the judgment received from policy provider 15 in a ratings database 33 for later reuse.
  • Optionally, the system may consult a ratings provider [0034] 16 for a conventional PICS label. Accordingly, controlled access web service 17 includes a PICS policy interpreter or reifier 35, which contains transfer functions that convert the rating received from ratings provider 16 to an age based rating. If the rating received by policy evaluator 29 is greater than the age of the user set forth in the user session identifier, policy evaluator 29 returns a “block” to filtering proxy 23. If policy evaluator 29 does not receive a rating, then policy evaluator 29 checks whether or not the current session identifier indicates that unrated sites should be blocked. If so, policy evaluator 29 returns a block to filtering proxy 23.
  • When filtering proxy [0035] 23 receives a block from policy evaluator 29, filtering proxy 23 forwards to the customer a page that indicates that the requested resource has been blocked. The page forwarded to the customer contains controls that enable the customer to logon at a higher access level, appeal the block, or accept the block. The processes of logging on at a higher access level or appealing are handled by authentication server 25.
  • If the user chooses to appeal the block, authentication server [0036] 25 passes the appeal to an appeals administrator 37, which adds the locator for the blocked site to a per household list of sites for parental review contained in a database 39. If the user chooses to logon as a specific user, then authentication server 25 invokes second level authentication and accesses authenticator database 27. Second level authentication may be by means of a specific user ID and password or, in the case of younger children with a smartcard or token system. If second level authentication is valid, then authentication server 25 passes the user session identifier for the authenticated user to filtering proxy server 23. If the specific user is a parent, then appeals administrator 37 fetches the pending list of sites for parental review from database 39 and forwards that list to the parent. The parent may review the list and the sites. The parent may either overrule the blocking, in which case the locator for the blocked site is placed in the appropriate per household exception list in database 31, or affirm the blocking. According to the present invention, the next time the customer initially logs on to controlled access web service 17, the customer is presented with a list of sites added to the per household exception list. If the parent finds that he or she consistently overrules the blocking of pages or sites, the parent may raise the age for the child or choose another policy provider.
  • Referring now to FIG. 3, there is shown a high level flow chart of the processing that occurs in controlled access web service [0037] 17. First, at block 41, upon initial logon to the account, the system sets the user session identifier to the default values. Then, the system sends to the customer a list of sites added to the exception list in the prior session, at block 43, and waits for a request at block 45. When the system receives the request, the system appends the user session identifier to the request and sends the request, at block 47. Then, the system waits for a response, at block 49. When the system receives the response, the system performs policy evaluation, indicated generally at block 51, and shown in detail with respect to FIG. 4. Policy evaluation returns either a “block” or “not block.” If, at decision block 53, policy evaluation returns a block, then the system performs block processing, indicated generally at block 55, and shown in detail with respect to FIG. 5. If, at decision block 53, policy evaluation returns not blocked, then the system sends the requested page to the customer, at block 57, and returns to block 45 to wait for another request.
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, there is shown details of policy evaluation processing. The system tests, at decision block [0038] 59, if the user session identifier indicates that the user is a parent. If so, the system returns not block, at terminator 60. If, on the other hand, the user session identifier indicates that the user is not a parent, then the system tests, at decision block 61 if the resource is in the exception list. If so, the system returns not block at terminator 62. If the requested resource is not in the exception list, then the system tests, at decision block 63, whether or not the requested resource is in the rating database. If so, the system tests, at decision block 64 if the rating in the database is greater than the user session identifier. If so, the system returns block at terminator 65. If, at decision block 63 the rating is not greater than the user session identifier, then the system returns not block at terminator 66.
  • If, at decision block [0039] 63, the resource is not in the rating database, then the system determines if the customer has designated a policy provider, at decision block 67. If so, the system queries the designated policy provider and implicitly waits at block 68. If, at decision block 69, the system receives a rating from the policy provider, then the system determines, at block 71, if the rating receive from the policy provider is greater than the user session identifier. If so, the system returns block at terminator 72. If, at decision block 71 the rating is not greater than the user session identifier, then the system returns not block at terminator 73.
  • If, at decision block [0040] 69, the customer has not designated a policy provider, then the system determines, at decision block 74, if there is a label in the resource. If so, the system tests, at decision block 75, if the label is an age. If so, the system inserts the rating in the rating database, at block 76. If the rating is not an age, then the system reifies label to an age rating, at block 77, and inserts the rating into the rating database, at block 76. Then, the system tests, at decision block 78 if the rating produced by the reifier is greater than the user session identifier. If so, the system returns block at terminator 79. If, the rating is not greater than the user session identifier, then the system returns not block at terminator 80.
  • If, at decision block [0041] 74, there is not label in the document, the system determines, at decision block 81, it the customer has designated a ratings provider. If so, the system If so, the system queries the designated ratings provider and implicitly waits at block 82. If, at decision block 83, the system receives a label from the ratings provider, the system tests, at decision block 85, if the label is an age. If so, the system inserts the rating in the rating database, at block 86. If the rating is not an age, then the system reifies label to an age rating, at block 87, and inserts the rating into the rating database, at block 86. Then, the system tests, at decision block 88 if the rating produced by the reifier is greater than the user session identifier. If so, the system returns block at terminator 89. If, the rating is not greater than the user session identifier, then the system returns not block at terminator 90.
  • If, at decision block [0042] 81, the customer has not designated a ratings provider, then the system tests, at decision block 91, if the current user session identifier indicates that unrated pages should be blocked. If not, the system returns not block at terminator 93. If, on the other hand, the current user session identifier is set to block unrated sites or resources, then the system returns block at terminator 95.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5, there is shown a flow chart of block processing. First, the system sends a “sorry” page, at block [0043] 101, and waits for a response, at block 103. The sorry page notifies the user that the requested resource has been blocked and includes controls that enable the user to logon at a higher level, appeal the block, or accept the block. If, at decision block 105, the user selects logon at a higher level, the system authenticates the higher level logon and updates the user session identifier, at block 107. Then, the system tests, at decision block 109, if the new user is a parent. If not, processing returns to block 45 of FIG. 3. If, at decision block 109, the new user is a parent, then the system performs appeal processing as indicated generally at block 111 and shown in detail with respect to FIG. 6.
  • If, at decision block [0044] 113 the user selects the appeal control from the sorry page, the system appends the request to the list of sites for parental review, at block 115 and returns. If, at decision block 117, the user accepts the block, by selecting an “OK” control, processing returns to block 45 of FIG. 3.
  • Referring now to FIG. 6, there is shown a flow chart of appeal processing according to the present invention. Upon determining that the new user is a parent, the system sends a list of sites for parental review, at block [0045] 119, and waits for a response, at block 121. The parent can review each site on the list if the parent so chooses. If the parent determines that he or she has no objection to the child viewing an appealed site, then the parent can select an unblock control on the list of sites, at decision block 123. If the parent does select the unblock control, then the system adds the site to the exception list and removes the site from the list of sites for parental review, at block 125. When the parent is finished with the list of sites for parental review, the parent can select an OK control at decision block 127. Selection of the OK control clears the list of sites for parental review, at block 129 and the system returns to block 45 of FIG. 3.
  • From the foregoing, it may be seen that the present invention provides a method and system that includes authentication components that identify individual end users and filtering tools that manage policy enforcement according to policy evaluations by third parties. With the present invention, Internet access providers can address not only the current objectionable content debate, but future debates over consumer privacy, intellectual property rights, and mobile code safety. Moreover, the present invention provides a flexible, secure, and easy to configure system that allows Internet access providers to provide content filtering to their customers without becoming censors. [0046]

Claims (16)

    What is claimed is:
  1. 1. A method for controlling access to the Internet, comprising the steps of:
    receiving a request to access a resource located on the Internet, by a member of an organization;
    associating a user session identifier with the request, wherein the user session identifier includes an access level;
    determining if the requested resource is appropriate for the member of the organization through the use of the access level;
    if the requested resource is determined to be appropriate for the member of the organization to view, providing the requested resource to the member of the organization, and
    if the requested resource is determined not to be appropriate for the member of the organization to view, indicating to the member of the organization that the requested resource is not able to be viewed.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining step further comprises:
    accessing a policy provider to obtain a rating for the requested resource.
  3. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the determining step further comprises:
    comparing the access level to the rating obtained from the policy provider.
  4. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the access level and the rating obtained from the policy provider are given on the basis of age.
  5. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the member of the organization is a child.
  6. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the member of the organization is an employee.
  7. 7. The method of claim 1, comprising the step of:
    determining if the requested resource is part of an exception list.
  8. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein if the requested resource is part of the exception list, providing access to the requested resource even if the access level of the user would not allow access to the resource.
  9. 9. A system for controlling access to the Internet, the system comprising:
    means for receiving a request to access a resource located on the Internet, by a member of an organization;
    means for associating a user session identifier with the request, wherein the user session identifier includes an access level;
    means for determining if the requested resource is appropriate for the member of the organization through the use of the access level;
    if the requested resource is determined to be appropriate for the member of the organization to view, providing the requested resource to the member of the organization, and
    if the requested resource is determined not to be appropriate for the member of the organization to view, indicating to the member of the organization that the requested resource is not able to be viewed.
  10. 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the means for determining further comprises:
    means for accessing a policy provider to obtain a rating for the requested resource.
  11. 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the means for determining further comprises:
    means for comparing the access level to the rating obtained from the policy provider.
  12. 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the access level and the rating obtained from the policy provider are given on the basis of age.
  13. 13. The system of claim 9, wherein the member of the organization is a child.
  14. 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the member of the organization is an employee.
  15. 15. The system of claim 9, further comprising:
    means for determining if the requested resource is part of an exception list.
  16. 16. The system of claim 15, wherein if the requested resource is part of the exception list, providing access to the requested resource even if the access level of the user would not allow access to the resource.
US10413971 1998-12-23 2003-04-15 Method of and system for controlling internet access Abandoned US20030191971A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09219411 US6564327B1 (en) 1998-12-23 1998-12-23 Method of and system for controlling internet access
US10413971 US20030191971A1 (en) 1998-12-23 2003-04-15 Method of and system for controlling internet access

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10413971 US20030191971A1 (en) 1998-12-23 2003-04-15 Method of and system for controlling internet access

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09219411 Continuation US6564327B1 (en) 1998-12-23 1998-12-23 Method of and system for controlling internet access

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030191971A1 true true US20030191971A1 (en) 2003-10-09

Family

ID=22819167

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09219411 Active US6564327B1 (en) 1998-12-23 1998-12-23 Method of and system for controlling internet access
US10413971 Abandoned US20030191971A1 (en) 1998-12-23 2003-04-15 Method of and system for controlling internet access

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09219411 Active US6564327B1 (en) 1998-12-23 1998-12-23 Method of and system for controlling internet access

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6564327B1 (en)

Cited By (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020194079A1 (en) * 2001-06-19 2002-12-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method for monitoring and restricting online purchases
US20050044181A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-02-24 Lg Electronics Inc. System and method for monitoring internet connections
US20050060412A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-17 Chebolu Anil Kumar Synchronizing automatic updating of client
US20050066290A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-24 Chebolu Anil Kumar Pop-up capture
US20050114514A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-05-26 Bostrom Kevin L. Advising a network component for control of communication session connection through employment of one or more communication session restrictions
US20050216467A1 (en) * 2004-03-23 2005-09-29 Yasutaka Urakawa Access control system and access control method
US20060069683A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Braddy Ricky G Method and apparatus for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
WO2006038987A2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-13 Citrix Systems, Inc. A method and apparatus for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
EP1657616A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2006-05-17 International Business Machines Corporation A method for determining access rights to it resources
US7181513B1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2007-02-20 America Online, Inc. Restricting access to requested resources
US20070061459A1 (en) * 2005-09-12 2007-03-15 Microsoft Corporation Internet content filtering
US20070073888A1 (en) * 2005-09-26 2007-03-29 Ajay Madhok System and method to control transactions on communication channels based on universal identifiers
FR2893731A1 (en) * 2005-11-24 2007-05-25 Bertrand Issard Multimedia e.g. text, content access controlling and solicitation message filtering system, has database comprising age of user, access level of user to type of contents and/or desire or non desire of user to be solicited by messages
US20070220154A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2007-09-20 Microsoft Corporation Authentication and authorization of extranet clients to a secure intranet business application in a perimeter network topology
US20080148340A1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2008-06-19 Mci, Llc. Method and system for providing network enforced access control
US20080217402A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2008-09-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Maturity Rating Enforcement Via Rf-Tags
US7575163B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2009-08-18 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Interactive management of storefront purchases
US20090278654A1 (en) * 2008-05-07 2009-11-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method of and System for Controlling Access to an Automated Media Library
US7779034B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2010-08-17 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
US20100229228A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2010-09-09 Timothy Ernest Simmons Method and apparatus for associating tickets in a ticket hierarchy
US20100262624A1 (en) * 2009-04-14 2010-10-14 Microsoft Corporation Discovery of inaccessible computer resources
US7870153B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-01-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for executing, by a virtual machine, an application program requested by a client machine
US7900240B2 (en) 2003-05-28 2011-03-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Multilayer access control security system
US20110145825A1 (en) * 2009-12-15 2011-06-16 Fujitsu Limited Information processing apparatus, computer-readable recording medium configured to store command execution determination program, and command execution determination method
US8024568B2 (en) 2005-01-28 2011-09-20 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for verification of an endpoint security scan
US20110247073A1 (en) * 2008-12-08 2011-10-06 FnF Group Pty Ltd System and method for adapting an internet and intranet filtering system
US8042120B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-10-18 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US8090797B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8095940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2012-01-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US8131825B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US8171479B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US8171483B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US20130031191A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Ross Bott Mobile device usage control in a mobile network by a distributed proxy system
US8533846B2 (en) 2006-11-08 2013-09-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for dynamically associating access rights with a resource
US9015199B1 (en) * 2004-05-24 2015-04-21 Sonicwall, Inc. Method and an apparatus to request web pages and content rating information thereof
US9199152B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2015-12-01 Landon K. Phillips Golf swing trainer
US9239800B2 (en) 2011-07-27 2016-01-19 Seven Networks, Llc Automatic generation and distribution of policy information regarding malicious mobile traffic in a wireless network
US9247019B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2016-01-26 Seven Networks, Llc Mobile application traffic optimization
US9369539B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2016-06-14 Seven Networks, Llc Method and device for power saving for downloading files
US9401906B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2016-07-26 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing authorized remote access to application sessions
US9602539B1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2017-03-21 Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Externally defined objects in security policy
US9712986B2 (en) 2008-01-11 2017-07-18 Seven Networks, Llc Mobile device configured for communicating with another mobile device associated with an associated user
US9830191B2 (en) 2013-04-15 2017-11-28 Seven Networks, Llc Temporary or partial offloading of mobile application functions to a cloud-based environment

Families Citing this family (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6564327B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2003-05-13 Worldcom, Inc. Method of and system for controlling internet access
US6286001B1 (en) * 1999-02-24 2001-09-04 Doodlebug Online, Inc. System and method for authorizing access to data on content servers in a distributed network
US6606659B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-08-12 Websense, Inc. System and method for controlling access to internet sites
DE60103625T2 (en) * 2000-03-17 2005-06-09 America Online, Inc. home network
WO2001071523A1 (en) * 2000-03-20 2001-09-27 Hotlens.Com Inc. Transparent user and session management for web applications
US20060288212A1 (en) * 2001-03-20 2006-12-21 Gutenberg Printing Llc Transparent user and session management for web applications
US7200863B2 (en) * 2000-05-16 2007-04-03 Hoshiko Llc System and method for serving content over a wide area network
US20050120113A1 (en) * 2000-06-28 2005-06-02 Accountability International, Inc. System and method for monitoring application utilization
US7380007B1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2008-05-27 Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company Automatic user session
US9107030B2 (en) 2000-12-13 2015-08-11 Thomas E. Coverstone Communication system for sending advertisements based on location determination and previously specified user selections
US20020178365A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2002-11-28 Shingo Yamaguchi Method and system for controlling access to network resources based on connection security
US7194464B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2007-03-20 Websense, Inc. System and method for adapting an internet filter
US7149219B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2006-12-12 The Directtv Group, Inc. System and method for content filtering using static source routes
US8590013B2 (en) 2002-02-25 2013-11-19 C. S. Lee Crawford Method of managing and communicating data pertaining to software applications for processor-based devices comprising wireless communication circuitry
US20030217287A1 (en) * 2002-05-16 2003-11-20 Ilya Kruglenko Secure desktop environment for unsophisticated computer users
US20030233580A1 (en) * 2002-05-29 2003-12-18 Keeler James D. Authorization and authentication of user access to a distributed network communication system with roaming features
US7302488B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2007-11-27 Microsoft Corporation Parental controls customization and notification
US7454508B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2008-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Consent mechanism for online entities
US7383339B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2008-06-03 Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company Local proxy server for establishing device controls
US7313760B2 (en) * 2002-12-19 2007-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Contact picker
US7418663B2 (en) * 2002-12-19 2008-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Contact picker interface
US8468578B1 (en) * 2002-12-30 2013-06-18 Aol Inc. Establishing access controls in a premise-based environment
US7428413B2 (en) * 2003-03-11 2008-09-23 Wayport, Inc. Method and system for providing network access and services using access codes
US7185015B2 (en) 2003-03-14 2007-02-27 Websense, Inc. System and method of monitoring and controlling application files
US7529754B2 (en) 2003-03-14 2009-05-05 Websense, Inc. System and method of monitoring and controlling application files
US7966400B2 (en) * 2003-04-03 2011-06-21 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, system and method of delivering alternate web pages based on browsers' content filter settings
US20040210532A1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2004-10-21 Tomoyoshi Nagawa Access control apparatus
US8108916B2 (en) * 2003-05-21 2012-01-31 Wayport, Inc. User fraud detection and prevention of access to a distributed network communication system
US8028059B1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2011-09-27 Aol Inc. Page views for proxy servers
US20050015442A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2005-01-20 O'laughlen Eric Page views for proxy servers
US20040267929A1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2004-12-30 Servgate Technologies, Inc Method, system and computer program products for adaptive web-site access blocking
US7549125B2 (en) * 2003-10-23 2009-06-16 Microsoft Corporation Information picker
US7953759B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2011-05-31 Microsoft Corporation Simplifying application access to schematized contact data
US7257973B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2007-08-21 Newfrey, Llc Chassis for a lock set
US20050261970A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Wayport, Inc. Method for providing wireless services
US7430719B2 (en) 2004-07-07 2008-09-30 Microsoft Corporation Contact text box
GB2418037B (en) * 2004-09-09 2007-02-28 Surfcontrol Plc System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access
US20060150240A1 (en) * 2005-01-03 2006-07-06 Jason Robinson Application-specific network access management system
US8601475B2 (en) 2005-08-02 2013-12-03 Aol Inc. Download and upload of email messages using control commands in a client/server web application
US8819659B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-08-26 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile search service instant activation
US20070288427A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-12-13 Jorey Ramer Mobile pay-per-call campaign creation
US8311888B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-11-13 Jumptap, Inc. Revenue models associated with syndication of a behavioral profile using a monetization platform
US7702318B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-04-20 Jumptap, Inc. Presentation of sponsored content based on mobile transaction event
US9058406B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2015-06-16 Millennial Media, Inc. Management of multiple advertising inventories using a monetization platform
US8666376B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-03-04 Millennial Media Location based mobile shopping affinity program
US20070060114A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Predictive text completion for a mobile communication facility
US9201979B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2015-12-01 Millennial Media, Inc. Syndication of a behavioral profile associated with an availability condition using a monetization platform
US8103545B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-01-24 Jumptap, Inc. Managing payment for sponsored content presented to mobile communication facilities
US8503995B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2013-08-06 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile dynamic advertisement creation and placement
US8509750B2 (en) 2005-11-05 2013-08-13 Jumptap, Inc. System for targeting advertising content to a plurality of mobile communication facilities
US8688671B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-04-01 Millennial Media Managing sponsored content based on geographic region
US8989718B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2015-03-24 Millennial Media, Inc. Idle screen advertising
US7912458B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2011-03-22 Jumptap, Inc. Interaction analysis and prioritization of mobile content
US8175585B2 (en) 2005-11-05 2012-05-08 Jumptap, Inc. System for targeting advertising content to a plurality of mobile communication facilities
US10038756B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2018-07-31 Millenial Media LLC Managing sponsored content based on device characteristics
US8660891B2 (en) 2005-11-01 2014-02-25 Millennial Media Interactive mobile advertisement banners
US8156128B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-04-10 Jumptap, Inc. Contextual mobile content placement on a mobile communication facility
US9471925B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2016-10-18 Millennial Media Llc Increasing mobile interactivity
US8615719B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2013-12-24 Jumptap, Inc. Managing sponsored content for delivery to mobile communication facilities
US8229914B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-07-24 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile content spidering and compatibility determination
US20070118533A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-05-24 Jorey Ramer On-off handset search box
US8364540B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2013-01-29 Jumptap, Inc. Contextual targeting of content using a monetization platform
US20070061198A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Mobile pay-per-call campaign creation
US7660581B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-02-09 Jumptap, Inc. Managing sponsored content based on usage history
US8027879B2 (en) 2005-11-05 2011-09-27 Jumptap, Inc. Exclusivity bidding for mobile sponsored content
US7676394B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2010-03-09 Jumptap, Inc. Dynamic bidding and expected value
US7577665B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2009-08-18 Jumptap, Inc. User characteristic influenced search results
US8209344B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-06-26 Jumptap, Inc. Embedding sponsored content in mobile applications
US8364521B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2013-01-29 Jumptap, Inc. Rendering targeted advertisement on mobile communication facilities
US8812526B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-08-19 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile content cross-inventory yield optimization
US8195133B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-06-05 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile dynamic advertisement creation and placement
US9703892B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2017-07-11 Millennial Media Llc Predictive text completion for a mobile communication facility
US8805339B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-08-12 Millennial Media, Inc. Categorization of a mobile user profile based on browse and viewing behavior
US8131271B2 (en) 2005-11-05 2012-03-06 Jumptap, Inc. Categorization of a mobile user profile based on browse behavior
US9076175B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2015-07-07 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile comparison shopping
US8302030B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-10-30 Jumptap, Inc. Management of multiple advertising inventories using a monetization platform
US8832100B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-09-09 Millennial Media, Inc. User transaction history influenced search results
US7752209B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-07-06 Jumptap, Inc. Presenting sponsored content on a mobile communication facility
US7860871B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-12-28 Jumptap, Inc. User history influenced search results
US8290810B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-10-16 Jumptap, Inc. Realtime surveying within mobile sponsored content
US7769764B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-08-03 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile advertisement syndication
US8238888B2 (en) 2006-09-13 2012-08-07 Jumptap, Inc. Methods and systems for mobile coupon placement
US8571999B2 (en) 2005-11-14 2013-10-29 C. S. Lee Crawford Method of conducting operations for a social network application including activity list generation
US8453243B2 (en) 2005-12-28 2013-05-28 Websense, Inc. Real time lockdown
US8615800B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2013-12-24 Websense, Inc. System and method for analyzing web content
US8020206B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2011-09-13 Websense, Inc. System and method of analyzing web content
US20080082832A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Mcdougal Monty D Configurable Data Access Application For Highly Secure Systems
US20080082960A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Mcdougal Monty D Method and System For Controlling The Release of Data For Multiple-Level Security Systems
US9654495B2 (en) 2006-12-01 2017-05-16 Websense, Llc System and method of analyzing web addresses
FR2915337B1 (en) * 2007-04-19 2009-06-05 Bouygues Telecom Sa Method and internal access security system of mobile telephone, mobile telephone and the corresponding terminal.
US8261327B2 (en) 2007-07-12 2012-09-04 Wayport, Inc. Device-specific authorization at distributed locations
US8443106B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-05-14 Gary Stephen Shuster Content restriction compliance using reverse DNS lookup
EP2318955A1 (en) 2008-06-30 2011-05-11 Websense, Inc. System and method for dynamic and real-time categorization of webpages
CA3010378A1 (en) * 2009-07-07 2011-01-13 Netsweeper (Barbados) Inc. System and method for providing customized response messages based on requested website
US9270760B2 (en) * 2012-10-15 2016-02-23 Google Inc. Cross-platform child mode for applications

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6052688A (en) * 1995-01-26 2000-04-18 Hans Verner Thorsen Computer-implemented control of access to atomic data items
US20010001863A1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2001-05-24 Brian Shuster Method, apparatus and system for directing access to content on a computer network
US6282542B1 (en) * 1997-08-06 2001-08-28 Tachyon, Inc. Distributed system and method for prefetching objects
US6286034B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-09-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Communication apparatus, a communication system and a communication method
US6564327B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2003-05-13 Worldcom, Inc. Method of and system for controlling internet access

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5825283A (en) * 1996-07-03 1998-10-20 Camhi; Elie System for the security and auditing of persons and property
US6052730A (en) * 1997-01-10 2000-04-18 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method for monitoring and/or modifying web browsing sessions
US6161107A (en) * 1997-10-31 2000-12-12 Iota Industries Ltd. Server for serving stored information to client web browser using text and raster images
US6192403B1 (en) * 1997-12-23 2001-02-20 At&T Corp Method and apparatus for adaptive monitor and support system

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6052688A (en) * 1995-01-26 2000-04-18 Hans Verner Thorsen Computer-implemented control of access to atomic data items
US6286034B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-09-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Communication apparatus, a communication system and a communication method
US6282542B1 (en) * 1997-08-06 2001-08-28 Tachyon, Inc. Distributed system and method for prefetching objects
US20030120658A1 (en) * 1997-08-06 2003-06-26 Carneal Bruce L. Satellite-based internet access system with remote prefetching of inline objects of web pages
US20010001863A1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2001-05-24 Brian Shuster Method, apparatus and system for directing access to content on a computer network
US6389458B2 (en) * 1998-10-30 2002-05-14 Ideaflood, Inc. Method, apparatus and system for directing access to content on a computer network
US6564327B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2003-05-13 Worldcom, Inc. Method of and system for controlling internet access

Cited By (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020194079A1 (en) * 2001-06-19 2002-12-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method for monitoring and restricting online purchases
US7181513B1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2007-02-20 America Online, Inc. Restricting access to requested resources
US7636777B1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2009-12-22 Aol Llc Restricting access to requested resources
US8528047B2 (en) 2003-05-28 2013-09-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Multilayer access control security system
US7900240B2 (en) 2003-05-28 2011-03-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Multilayer access control security system
US20050044181A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-02-24 Lg Electronics Inc. System and method for monitoring internet connections
US7577995B2 (en) 2003-09-16 2009-08-18 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Controlling user-access to computer applications
US20050065935A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-24 Chebolu Anil Kumar Client comparison of network content with server-based categorization
US8166560B2 (en) 2003-09-16 2012-04-24 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Remote administration of computer access settings
US20050066290A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-24 Chebolu Anil Kumar Pop-up capture
US20050060565A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-17 Chebolu Anil Kumar Controlling user-access to computer applications
US20050060566A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-17 Chebolu Anil Kumar Online user-access reports with authorization features
US20050060412A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-03-17 Chebolu Anil Kumar Synchronizing automatic updating of client
US20050114514A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-05-26 Bostrom Kevin L. Advising a network component for control of communication session connection through employment of one or more communication session restrictions
US8161068B2 (en) 2004-03-23 2012-04-17 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Access control system
US20090293105A1 (en) * 2004-03-23 2009-11-26 Yasutaka Urakawa Access control system and access control method
US7725458B2 (en) * 2004-03-23 2010-05-25 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Access control system and access control method
US20050216467A1 (en) * 2004-03-23 2005-09-29 Yasutaka Urakawa Access control system and access control method
US10033830B2 (en) * 2004-05-24 2018-07-24 Sonicwall Inc. Requesting web pages and content rating information
US9405839B2 (en) * 2004-05-24 2016-08-02 Dell Software Inc. Requesting web pages and content rating information
US20150178398A1 (en) * 2004-05-24 2015-06-25 Sonicwall, Inc. Requesting web pages and content rating information
US9015199B1 (en) * 2004-05-24 2015-04-21 Sonicwall, Inc. Method and an apparatus to request web pages and content rating information thereof
US8042120B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-10-18 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US8352606B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2013-01-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
JP2008515085A (en) * 2004-09-30 2008-05-08 サイトリックス システムズ, インコーポレイテッド METHOD AND APPARATUS assigning access control level in providing access to network content file
US8132176B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method for accessing, by application programs, resources residing inside an application isolation scope
US9311502B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2016-04-12 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
US8352964B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2013-01-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US9401906B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2016-07-26 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing authorized remote access to application sessions
WO2006038987A3 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-07-20 Citrix Systems Inc A method and apparatus for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
US7711835B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-05-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing disclosure of proprietary data in a networked environment
WO2006038987A2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-13 Citrix Systems, Inc. A method and apparatus for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
US8302101B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-10-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for accessing, by application programs, resources provided by an operating system
US20100229228A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2010-09-09 Timothy Ernest Simmons Method and apparatus for associating tickets in a ticket hierarchy
US8286230B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2012-10-09 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for associating tickets in a ticket hierarchy
US7865603B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-01-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
US7870294B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-01-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing policy-based document control
US8171479B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US20060069683A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Braddy Ricky G Method and apparatus for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
US8065423B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-11-22 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for assigning access control levels in providing access to networked content files
US20080155687A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2008-06-26 Simon Keith Lambourn Dtermination of access rights to information technology resources
US7529873B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2009-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation Determination of access rights to information technology resources
US7366812B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2008-04-29 International Business Machines Corporation Determination of access rights to information technology resources
EP1657616A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2006-05-17 International Business Machines Corporation A method for determining access rights to it resources
US8024568B2 (en) 2005-01-28 2011-09-20 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for verification of an endpoint security scan
US8312261B2 (en) 2005-01-28 2012-11-13 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for verification of an endpoint security scan
US20070061459A1 (en) * 2005-09-12 2007-03-15 Microsoft Corporation Internet content filtering
US8095940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2012-01-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US20070073888A1 (en) * 2005-09-26 2007-03-29 Ajay Madhok System and method to control transactions on communication channels based on universal identifiers
US20080217402A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2008-09-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Maturity Rating Enforcement Via Rf-Tags
US8131825B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US7779034B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2010-08-17 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
FR2893731A1 (en) * 2005-11-24 2007-05-25 Bertrand Issard Multimedia e.g. text, content access controlling and solicitation message filtering system, has database comprising age of user, access level of user to type of contents and/or desire or non desire of user to be solicited by messages
US8117314B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2012-02-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for providing remote access to a computing environment provided by a virtual machine
US7949677B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-05-24 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for providing authorized remote access to a computing environment provided by a virtual machine
US7870153B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-01-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for executing, by a virtual machine, an application program requested by a client machine
US8341270B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2012-12-25 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for providing access to a computing environment
US8010679B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-08-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for providing access to a computing environment provided by a virtual machine executing in a hypervisor executing in a terminal services session
US8051180B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-11-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and servers for establishing a connection between a client system and a virtual machine executing in a terminal services session and hosting a requested computing environment
US7954150B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-05-31 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for assigning access control levels in providing access to resources via virtual machines
US8355407B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2013-01-15 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for interacting, via a hypermedium page, with a virtual machine executing in a terminal services session
US8341732B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2012-12-25 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting a method for execution, by a virtual machine, of an application program
US8171538B2 (en) * 2006-03-17 2012-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Authentication and authorization of extranet clients to a secure intranet business application in a perimeter network topology
US20070220154A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2007-09-20 Microsoft Corporation Authentication and authorization of extranet clients to a secure intranet business application in a perimeter network topology
US7575163B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2009-08-18 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Interactive management of storefront purchases
US9619791B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2017-04-11 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods, systems, and products for ordering items
US8794519B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2014-08-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods, systems, and products for ordering items
US9342847B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2016-05-17 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods, systems, and products for ordering items
US20080148340A1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2008-06-19 Mci, Llc. Method and system for providing network enforced access control
US8533846B2 (en) 2006-11-08 2013-09-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for dynamically associating access rights with a resource
US9401931B2 (en) 2006-11-08 2016-07-26 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for dynamically associating access rights with a resource
US8171483B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9009721B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9009720B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9021494B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-28 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9712986B2 (en) 2008-01-11 2017-07-18 Seven Networks, Llc Mobile device configured for communicating with another mobile device associated with an associated user
US20090278654A1 (en) * 2008-05-07 2009-11-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method of and System for Controlling Access to an Automated Media Library
US8230501B2 (en) 2008-05-07 2012-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Controlling access to an automated media library
US20090282461A1 (en) * 2008-05-07 2009-11-12 Nils Haustein Method of and system for controlling access to an automated media library
US9049227B2 (en) * 2008-12-08 2015-06-02 Janet Surasathian System and method for adapting an internet and intranet filtering system
US20110247073A1 (en) * 2008-12-08 2011-10-06 FnF Group Pty Ltd System and method for adapting an internet and intranet filtering system
US20100262624A1 (en) * 2009-04-14 2010-10-14 Microsoft Corporation Discovery of inaccessible computer resources
US8090797B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8326943B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-12-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8578158B2 (en) * 2009-12-15 2013-11-05 Fujitsu Limited Information processing apparatus, computer-readable recording medium configured to store command execution determination program, and command execution determination method
US20110145825A1 (en) * 2009-12-15 2011-06-16 Fujitsu Limited Information processing apparatus, computer-readable recording medium configured to store command execution determination program, and command execution determination method
US9516129B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2016-12-06 Seven Networks, Llc Mobile application traffic optimization
US9369539B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2016-06-14 Seven Networks, Llc Method and device for power saving for downloading files
US9247019B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2016-01-26 Seven Networks, Llc Mobile application traffic optimization
US9239800B2 (en) 2011-07-27 2016-01-19 Seven Networks, Llc Automatic generation and distribution of policy information regarding malicious mobile traffic in a wireless network
US20130031191A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Ross Bott Mobile device usage control in a mobile network by a distributed proxy system
US9602539B1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2017-03-21 Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Externally defined objects in security policy
US20170195369A1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2017-07-06 Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Externally defined objects in security policy
US9199152B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2015-12-01 Landon K. Phillips Golf swing trainer
US9830191B2 (en) 2013-04-15 2017-11-28 Seven Networks, Llc Temporary or partial offloading of mobile application functions to a cloud-based environment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US6564327B1 (en) 2003-05-13 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Barkley et al. Role based access control for the world wide web
US6826692B1 (en) Method and apparatus to permit automated server determination for foreign system login
Singh et al. Community-based service location
US7350229B1 (en) Authentication and authorization mapping for a computer network
US7562304B2 (en) Indicating website reputations during website manipulation of user information
US6393468B1 (en) Data access control
US5867667A (en) Publication network control system using domain and client side communications resource locator lists for managing information communications between the domain server and publication servers
US7444519B2 (en) Access control for federated identities
US5884035A (en) Dynamic distributed group registry apparatus and method for collaboration and selective sharing of information
US6035404A (en) Concurrent user access control in stateless network computing service system
US6947985B2 (en) Filtering techniques for managing access to internet sites or other software applications
US7640336B1 (en) Supervising user interaction with online services
US6732178B1 (en) Forced network portal
US6366950B1 (en) System and method for verifying users' identity in a network using e-mail communication
US20040002878A1 (en) Method and system for user-determined authentication in a federated environment
US20040243678A1 (en) Systems and methods for automatically updating electronic mail access lists
US20060253578A1 (en) Indicating website reputations during user interactions
US7194764B2 (en) User authentication
US20020112185A1 (en) Intrusion threat detection
US6845448B1 (en) Online repository for personal information
US7062511B1 (en) Method and system for portal web site generation
US6292904B1 (en) Client account generation and authentication system for a network server
US20030061515A1 (en) Capability-enabled uniform resource locator for secure web exporting and method of using same
US20050027810A1 (en) Universal peer-to-peer internet messaging
US20060021009A1 (en) Authorization and authentication based on an individual's social network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: WORLDCOM, INC., MISSISSIPPI

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MCI WORLDCOM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028030/0615

Effective date: 20000501

Owner name: VERIZON BUSINESS GLOBAL LLC, NEW JERSEY

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MCI, LLC;REEL/FRAME:028030/0673

Effective date: 20061120

Owner name: MCI WORLDCOM, INC., MISSISSIPPI

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KLENSIN, JOHN;KHARE, ROHIT;REEL/FRAME:028028/0876

Effective date: 19991110

Owner name: MCI, INC., VIRGINIA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:WORLDCOM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028029/0084

Effective date: 20040419

Owner name: MCI, LLC, VIRGINIA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:MCI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028029/0165

Effective date: 20060106

AS Assignment

Owner name: VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VERZIZON BUSINESS GLOBAL LLC;REEL/FRAME:031538/0972

Effective date: 20131104

AS Assignment

Owner name: VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VERIZON BUSINESS GLOBAL LLC;REEL/FRAME:032734/0502

Effective date: 20140409

AS Assignment

Owner name: VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 032734 FRAME: 0502. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:VERIZON BUSINESS GLOBAL LLC;REEL/FRAME:044626/0088

Effective date: 20140409