US20030178162A1 - Process for biological deinking of office waste paper - Google Patents

Process for biological deinking of office waste paper Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030178162A1
US20030178162A1 US10/103,840 US10384002A US2003178162A1 US 20030178162 A1 US20030178162 A1 US 20030178162A1 US 10384002 A US10384002 A US 10384002A US 2003178162 A1 US2003178162 A1 US 2003178162A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
pulp
paper
diluted
deinking
radiance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/103,840
Inventor
Chandralata Raghukumar
C. Mohandass
Telma Oliviera
Seshagiri Raghukumar
D. Chandramohan
P.A. Bharathi
Shanta Nair
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/103,840 priority Critical patent/US20030178162A1/en
Assigned to COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH reassignment COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BHARATHI, P.A. LOKA, CHANDRAMOHAN, D., MOHANDASS, C., NAIR, SHANTHA, OLIVIERA, TELMA, RAGHUKUMAR, SAESHGIRI, RAGHUKUMAR, CHANDRALATHA
Assigned to COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH reassignment COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH RE-RECORD TO CORRECT THEASSIGNEORS LAST NAME AND ZIP CODED PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 013246/0221. Assignors: CHANDRAMOHAN, D., MOHANDASS, C., NAIR, SHANTA, OLIVIERA, TELMA, RAGHUKUMAR, SAESHGIRI, BHARATHI, P.A. LOKA, RAGHUKUMAR, CHANDRALATA
Publication of US20030178162A1 publication Critical patent/US20030178162A1/en
Priority to US11/301,207 priority patent/US7645358B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C5/00Other processes for obtaining cellulose, e.g. cooking cotton linters ; Processes characterised by the choice of cellulose-containing starting materials
    • D21C5/02Working-up waste paper
    • D21C5/025De-inking
    • D21C5/027Chemicals therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P1/00Preparation of compounds or compositions, not provided for in groups C12P3/00 - C12P39/00, by using microorganisms or enzymes
    • C12P1/04Preparation of compounds or compositions, not provided for in groups C12P3/00 - C12P39/00, by using microorganisms or enzymes by using bacteria
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C5/00Other processes for obtaining cellulose, e.g. cooking cotton linters ; Processes characterised by the choice of cellulose-containing starting materials
    • D21C5/005Treatment of cellulose-containing material with microorganisms or enzymes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/50Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
    • Y02W30/64Paper recycling

Abstract

This invention relates to a biological process for deinking of office waste paper and more particularly, the present invention relates to a biological process for deinking of xerographic and inkjet printed paper using a gram-negative coccoid bacterium deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to decolorization of office waste paper using microorganisms from marine habitats. More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for biological deinking of photocopied and inkjet-printed paper or toner photocopied paper pulp using a gram-negative coccoid bacterium deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Paper manufacturing is a major industry and a continuously growing one. Increased production of paper imposes a severe demand on plant raw material and thus harms the environment. Recycling of used paper is an alternative that can alleviate the stress that is exercised on the environment. The three major sources of raw material for such recycling are newsprint, photocopied paper and inkjet—printed papers. Recycling of paper requires the removal of the printing ink from the used paper, called deinking, so that the processed material is brighter. Printing on paper is accomplished by using two types of inks, the impact and the non-impact inks. In impact inks, used for newsprints, the ink does not fuse with the paper and is, therefore, easy to remove or disperse during the deinking, or recycling process. Such recycling is now well known and has been carried out for years. On the contrary, non-impact inks used in photocopying, ink-jet printing and laser printing results in the ink fusing with the paper and makes it non-dispersible, thus rendering the deinking process much more difficult (Jeffries, 2002). The toners used for photocopying generally contain iron oxide (about 55%), olefins (about 5%) and plastic or polymer (Website:http://www.eng-tips.com). [0002]
  • Various hydrolytic enzymes such as cellulase, lipase, amylase of bacterial or fungal origin, individually or in combination have been used for deinking of office waste paper. [0003]
  • (i) A reference may be made to a publication wherein, a method for deinking of xerographic and printed paper, collectively called office waste, includes applying deinking solution to the paper to be deinked, the deinking solution being composed of a cleaning solution and a surfactant, abrading the paper to remove the ink from paper, and washing the paper to remove the deinking solution from the paper (U.S. Pat. No. 6,022,423 Bhatia, S. 1996 Method for deinking paper dtd 2000-02-08). However, this patent involves using a special device for deinking of whole sheets and cannot be used on pulp. [0004]
  • (ii) Another reference may be made to wherein, a monocomponent cellulase is used for removal of ink and toners from printed paper (U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,193 Neal, E., Steven, B. E., Hans, H. C. 1994. Use of monocomponent cellulase for removing inks, coatings and toners from printed paper). The technique of isolating monocomponent cellulase from microorganisms by various purifications, chromatographic steps is time consuming and expensive. [0005]
  • (iii) A reference may be made to a publication wherein, endogluconases and hemicellulases from several fungi are used effectively for deinking of xerox and laser-printed paper (Gubitz, G. M., Mansfield, S. D., Bohm, D. Saddler, J. N. 1998. Effect of endoglucanases and hemicellulases in magnetic and flotation deinking of xerographic and laser-printed papers. Journal of Biotechnology. 65:209-215). As mentioned above the enzyme technology is still an expensive one for using on a large scale. [0006]
  • (iv) A reference may be made to a publication, wherein deinking of laser printed or xerographic paper is done using enzyme containing a resistant binder. Enzyme is added in the specified form to improve speck removal (Landley, J. G. Stockwell, J. O. 1997. Enzyme deinking of paper. Patent Number. GB 2304741 dated 26.03.97). As with the above references, the technology to produce enzymes, their purification and application is an expensive process. [0007]
  • (v) A reference may be made to a publication, wherein deinking of office waste paper is carried out by contacting the pulp with a deinking agent containing enzymes cellulase, preferably active at [0008] pH 4 to 8. The treated paper is used in the production of newsprint and high quality paper (Jobbins, J. M. Asbrand, Jr. G. R. 1996. Composition and process for deinking office waste paper. Patent number: EP 717144 dated 19.06.96). As with the above references, the technology to produce enzymes, their purification and application is an expensive process.
  • (vi) A reference may be made to a publication, wherein deinking of waste paper is achieved by incubating the paper pulp with cellulase at 40° C. for 1 hour under pressure. Following dissociation of ink particles, the resulting washed pulp is brighter (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. 1994. Deinking of waste paper. Patent number: JP06346390 dated 20.12.94). As with the above references, the technology to produce enzymes, their purification and application is an expensive process. [0009]
  • (vii) A reference may be made to a publication, wherein deinking is achieved by using lipase to remove ink from used paper. The procedure is carried out under neutral or alkaline conditions which produces regenerated pulp having enhanced brightness (Novo. 1990. Removing ink from used paper. Patent number: JP2160984 dated 20.06.90). [0010]
  • (viii) A reference may be made to a publication, wherein deinking of waste paper is done by using the yeast [0011] Hansenula polymorpha, which degrades the ink-based resin (Jeonju-Paper. 1993. Waste-paper deinking. Patent number: KR 9303705 dated 08.05.93). However, the ink floats on the surface and the pulp has to be extensively washed to remove the detached ink.
  • (ix) A reference may be made to a publication, wherein decolorization of Indian ink is achieved by using thermostable alkaline cellulase from a Bacillus sp (Kao. 1998. A microbiologically produced thermostable alkaline cellulase and a process for its preparation. Patent number: JP 10313859) [0012]
  • OBJECTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • The main object of the present invention is to provide a process for decolorization of waste paper. [0013]
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for biological deinking of photocopied and inkjet-printed paper pulp using a gram-negative coccoid bacterium deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______. [0014]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a process for decolorization of paper pulp and more particularly, the present invention relates to a process for biological deinking of photocopied and inkjet-printed paper pulp using a gram negative coccoid bacteria deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______. [0015]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for biological deinking of office waste paper inclusive of xerographic and inkjet-printed paper printed with non-impact and non-dispersible ink, said process comprises: [0016]
  • (a) growing coccoid bacterial isolate deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______, in a nutrient broth containing beef extract, peptic digest of animal tissue and salinity ranging between 30 to 35 parts per thousand for at least 4 days; [0017]
  • (b) adding the resulting biomass of step (a) at 20% concentration to inoculate paper pulp diluted to at least 6% consistency suspended in sea water with salinity diluted to 50%; [0018]
  • (c) incubating the inoculated pulp for a minimum period of 96 hours followed by diluting the pulp tenfold; [0019]
  • (d) adding 1% by wt. of a surfactant and aerating for at least 10 minutes with compressed air to let the stray residual ink particles and contaminants flow out of the container, and [0020]
  • (e) filtering the pulp of step (d) over a funnel under suction, to get a sheet of pulp with uniform thickness and reading the brightness by radiance measurement. [0021]
  • In an embodiment of the present invention, wherein in step (a), the bacterium is grown for a minimum of 4 days in nutrient broth containing beef extract and peptic digest of animal tissue in sea water with salinity diluted to 50%. [0022]
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, wherein in step (b), the resulting bacterial biomass is concentrated by centrifugation and diluted to get final optical density of 1.0 measured at 660 nm in a spectrophotometer. [0023]
  • In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the diluted bacterial culture is inoculated to at least 6% pulp suspended in seawater with salinity diluted to 50% and incubated for a minimum period of 4 days within to completely beach the pulp. [0024]
  • In still another embodiment of the present invention, the resulting bleached pulp is diluted tenfold, to which 1% surfactant is added, aerated using compressed air, and any free residual ink particles and contaminants are allowed to flow out of the solution. [0025]
  • In a further embodiment of the present invention, wherein after step (d) the xerographic or inkjet-printed paper is soaked in hot water for 1-2 hours and macerated after adding 1% surfactant to pulp. [0026]
  • In one more embodiment of the present invention, the paper is macerated using conventional mixers. [0027]
  • In one another embodiment of the present invention, wherein in step (e), the washed pulp is filtered over a Buchner funnel under suction to get a pulp sheet of uniform thickness. [0028]
  • In an embodiment of the present invention, the pulp sheet is pressed at 60° C. for a minimum of 4-5 hours to make it uniform and dried. [0029]
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the radiance of the resultant sheet is read from 412 to 684 nm and the radiance expressed as Lux units (LU) {wherein one LU is equivalent to μW/cm[0030] 2/nm/Sr}.
  • In still another embodiment of the present invention, the pulp sheet made out of recycled paper is used as a reference. [0031]
  • In yet another embodiment of the present invention, wherein in steps (a) and (b), pure water containing 1.5% by wt of sodium chloride can be used in the place of sea water. [0032]
  • Deinking of paper is a limiting factor in recycling of paper. Newsprint and office waste paper is generally deinked using chemicals which go into the effluent and cause pollution of the water bodies. The newsprint or offset printing is done using dispersible or non-impact ink whereas laser, xerographic and ink-jet printer ink does not disperse and is also called impact ink. There are several patents describing various methods of deinking by using hydrolytic enzymes such as cellulase, hemicellulase and lipase of microbial origin which release toner particles from fibers. However, enzyme action is affected by the paper constituents in the deinking condition. The chemically pulped fibers are more susceptible than mechanically pulped fibers. Office waste paper is high in laser and toner content and the technology for taking the toner particles out is not very good at the moment (Jefferies, 2002). [0033]
  • In the present invention, the Applicants report a process for deinking of office waste paper comprising xerographic and ink-jet printed paper by a bacterium isolated from marine sediment of an estuary in Goa, India. The salinity of the water at the time of isolation was around 15 parts per thousand which is equivalent to half-strength sea water. [0034]
  • The present invention provides a process for biological deinking of office waste paper comprising xerographed, ink-jet printed, and similar other non-impact ink printed papers. The process is achieved by using a coccoid bacterium deposited National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______, said culture may be grown in nutrient broth containing beef extract, and peptic digest of animal tissue and prepared with sea water with its salinity diluted to 50%. [0035]
  • The present invention more particularly provides a process wherein the aforesaid pre-grown bacterial culture is inoculated onto the office pulp suspended in seawater with its salinity diluted to 50% and incubated for a minimum period of 4 days to decolorize the paper pulp. [0036]
  • The paper pulp becomes brighter, the black ink is totally decolorized and the supernatant water remains clear. The water needs to be simply drained to recover the deinked pulp. The pulp can be diluted tenfold Optionally to remove any free residual ink particles and other contaminants. Conventional surfactant at 1% concentration may be added to the diluted paper pulp, aerated for at least 10 minutes by which the particles float and go out of the pulp slurry. The washed pulp can be filtered over a large funnel under suction and dried at 60° C. for at least 6 hours to obtain decolorized paper pulp. [0037]
  • The organism given in the present invention is a gram-negative, coccoid bacterium isolated from coastal marine sediment. The coccoid bacterium has been deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______ and also deposited at Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India having accession No. ______. Said bacterium can be grown in nutrient broth containing beef extract, peptic digest of animal tissue, prepared with sea water with salinity diluted to 50% and having a pH of at least 7.5. The bacterium when grown in nutrient agar medium appears as circular colonies off-white in colour, having 2 mm diameter colonies in the beginning and growing to a size of 5 mm within 3-4 days. The bacterium is capable of producing lipase and amylase in the presence of Tween 80 and starch respectively. It is fermentative and catalase-negative bacterium. The bacterium is grown at room temperature (30° C.) for about 4 days, the bacterial cells are collected by centrifugation under sterile conditions, diluted appropriately to get optical density of 1 at 660 nm. Xerographic, ink-jet printed paper and other papers having printed with impact ink are pulped by soaking in hot water for a minimum of 2 hrs, macerated in a domestic mixer with surfactant such as Tween 80. An example for the process for deinking involves suspending such a pulp at least at 6% consistency in seawater with salinity diluted to 50%, inoculating with 20% bacterial suspension prepared as described above and incubating at room temperature for a minimum of 4 days to get completely decolorized pulp and the ink is disappeared from water also. The pulp can be diluted, aerated from bottom to remove free contaminating particles, salts and bacterial cells. A surfactant such as Tween 80 can be added at 1% concentration for flotation of any residual ink particles. The pulp is filtered over a Buchner funnel under suction, pressed with flat stainless steel plates to make the pulp sheet uniform in thickness. The radiance of the resultant sheet is read from 412 to 684 nm and the radiance expressed in Lux units (Lu). One LU is equivalent to μW/cm[0038] 2/nm/Sr. The ratio of radiance between recycled paper purchased from the market and biologically deinked paper is taken as a measure of brightness.
  • In a typical example plain toner powder of xerox machine suspended in seawater with its salinity diluted to 50% also became completely colorless within 7 days after inoculating it with the said bacterial suspension. [0039]
  • Most of the organisms used for biological deinking release ink particles from the fibers and they need to be subsequently washed off from the pulp. In the process described in the present invention, this problem does not arise as the ink and toner particles are totally decolorized. The method is very cost effective as the only step involved is raising the bacterial inoculum in any conventional nutrient broth containing assimilable carbon and nitrogen source. A comparative statement given in Table 1 explains the novelty of our invention in comparison with prior art known in this field. [0040]
    TABLE 1
    Comparative statement
    Type of
    Reference paper or Source of
    (Prior art) ink deinking agent Remarks
    Patent Impact Chemical & a surfactant, Not
    US6022423 ink and abrading the practical on
    office paper and washing a large
    waste the deinked paper scale
    using a special device
    to put whole sheet
    US5525193 Toner, Monocomponent cellulase Enzyme
    impact purified from technology is
    ink cellulolytic enzymes expensive
    from of various
    mixed microorganisms
    office or genetically
    waste engineered
    orgainsm which
    produces only
    monocomponent
    cellulase
    Gubitz et al. Xerox and Endogluconases and Enzyme
    1998 laser- hemicellulases technology is
    printed from fungi expensive.
    paper
    GB2304741 Laser- Enzyme containing Purification
    printed or a resistant and
    xerographic binder application
    paper of enzyme
    technology
    is still
    expensive
    Patent Office Cellulase Expensive
    EP 717144 waste enzyme
    paper technology
    JP06346390 Office Contacting with Enzyme high
    waste cellulase at temperature
    paper 40° C. 1 h and pressure
    under pressure will make
    the cost of
    technology
    not very
    practical.
    JP2160984 Office Contacting Adjustment of
    waste pulp with pH and enzyme
    paper lipase technology
    enzyme under will not
    neutral or make it very
    alkaline practical.
    conditions
    KR9303705 Office Contacting The ink floats
    waste pulp with the on the surface
    paper culture of the and the pulp
    yeast Hansenula has to be
    polymorpha extensively
    which degrades washed
    the ink-
    based resin.
    JP10313859 For Thermostable Recommen-ded
    decolor- alkaline for surfactant
    ization on cellulase composition, as
    of Indian from a a fiber treat-
    ink bacterium ment agent and
    as an Indian
    ink decolor-
    ization agent.
    Our For Xerox Direct contact No enzyme, no
    invention and inkjet- of pulp temp-erature or
    printed slurry with pH adjustment,
    paper pulp the bacterium the pulp and
    NIO/DI/32 the water are
    for 72 h to clear and
    get complete washing is
    decolorization only optional.
    of the pulp and
    clear water
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
  • In the drawings accompanying the specification, [0041]
  • FIG. 1 shows the radiance of Xerox paper pulp (XP) is lowest in comparison with that of recycled paper pulp (RP) and biologically deinked pulp (BP); [0042]
  • FIG. 2 shows the ratio of radiance of biologically deinked paper to that of recycled paper; [0043]
  • FIG. 3 compares the deinking done by the present invention on papers of three different photocopier machines; [0044]
  • FIG. 4 compares the radiance of decolorized paper pulp after 4 days at different concentration of inoculum; [0045]
  • FIG. 5 compares the reflectance ratio of the deinked paper pulp by at different concentrations of inoculum; [0046]
  • FIG. 6 compares the radiance ratio of the deinked paper pulp with the number of days; [0047]
  • FIG. 7 shows the ratio of radiance between recycled paper and deinked paper; [0048]
  • FIG. 8 shows that with an inoculam concentration of 2 ml, maximum brightness is achieved after 72 hours and [0049]
  • FIG. 9 shows that with an inoculum concentration of 10 ml, maximum brightness is achieved by 72 hours. [0050]
  • The present invention is further described with reference to the accompanying examples, which are given by way of illustration and therefore, should not be construed to limit the scope of the present invention in any manner. [0051]
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • The bacterial isolate NIO/DI/32 was isolated from the coastal esturine sediment, Dona Paula, Goa, India in nutrient agar medium containing beef extract and peptic digest of animal tissue and agar in sea water with its salinity diluted to 50%. The culture was maintained in the slants of nutrient agar medium for all further experiments. [0052]
  • The said bacterium can be grown in nutrient broth containing beef extract, peptic digest of animal tissue in sea water with its salinity diluted to 50%. The bacterium is grown at room temperature (30° C.) for about 4 days, the bacterial cells are collected by centrifugation under sterile conditions, diluted appropriately to get optical density of 1 at 660 nm using a spectrophotometer. Xerographic paper printed with impact ink from HP machine are pulped by soaking in hot water for a minimum of 2 hrs, macerated in a conventional domestic mixer with surfactant such as Tween 80. An example for the process for deinking involves suspending such a pulp at least at 6% consistency (6 g wet pulp in 100 ml of water) in sea water with its salinity diluted to 50%, inoculating with 20% bacterial suspension prepared as described above and incubating at room temperature for a minimum of 4 days to get completely bleached pulp with the ink totally disappearing from the supernatant water. The pulp can be diluted, aerated from bottom to remove free contaminating particles, salts and bacterial cells. A surfactant such as Tween 80 can be added at 1% concentration for flotation of any residual ink particles. The pulp is filtered over a Buchner funnel under suction, pressed with flat stainless steel plates to make the pulp sheet uniform in thickness. The radiance of the resultant sheet is read from 412 to 684 nm and the radiance expressed in Lux units (Lu). One LU is equivalent to μW/cm[0053] 2/nm/Sr. The ratio of radiance between recycled paper available in any stationery shop and biologically deinked paper is taken as a measure of brightness.
  • Accordingly, FIG. 1 shows the radiance of Xerox paper pulp (XP) is lowest in comparison with that of recycled paper pulp (RP) and biologically deinked pulp (BP). This brightness was achieved 4 days after inoculation with the said bacterium. As the target was to achieve brightness of recycled paper, the Applicants have shown the same data as ratio of radiance of Xerox paper to recycled paper and similarly, the ratio of radiance of biologically deinked paper to that of recycled paper is shown in FIG. 2. [0054]
  • Xerographic printed paper obtained from various Xerox machines were compared for their efficiency in being deinked by the said bacterium. Accordingly FIG. 3 shows that out of 3 different machines, Xerox paper obtained from Lanier machine were deinked effectively by the process described in the present invention. [0055]
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • As seen in the previous example, the bacterium could grow in the plain paper pulp suspended in water, and bleach the pulp in 4 days, the Xerox toner (HP make) at 1% concentration was suspended in sterile sea water and inoculated with the said bacterial suspension and incubated at room temperature for 15 days. The control flask did not receive any bacterial inoculum. The contents of experimental flask and the control flask were filtered over pre-weighed filter paper, rinsed with sterile distilled water to remove salts and dried to a constant weight at 60° C. The difference in weight of residual toner powder was compared in the two sets. [0056]
  • Accordingly, in the experimental flask after 15 days the dry weight was 143 mg whereas, in the control flask it was 220 mg. Thus, almost 65% toner was degraded in the inoculated flasks. Besides, the water in the experimental flask became almost colorless. [0057]
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • The ability of the bacterial isolate having accession number NIO/DI/32 (also being deposited at an international depository) to deink ink-jet printed paper was tried as follows: [0058]
  • The inkjet printed-paper was prepared into pulp as described in Example 1 and inoculated with the said bacterium as described in Example 1. However, the inoculum dose varied from 2 ml to 10 ml with the increment of 2 ml. The other procedures used were the same as described n the Example 1. [0059]
  • Accordingly, FIG. 4 shows radiance of decolorized paper pulp after 4 days in comparison with Xerox and recycled paper. The radiance of biologically deinked paper was more than the recycled paper and there was not much difference between inoculum concentration of 6 to 10 ml in the final radiance achieved. [0060]
  • FIG. 5 shows the ratio of reflectance between Xerox paper to recycled paper in comparison with paper pulp deinked using different concentrations of the said bacterial suspension. The brightness achieved by using 8 ml or 10 ml inoculum was almost similar. [0061]
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • The deinking of inkjet-printed paper in relation to time of incubation (in days) was carried out as follows: [0062]
  • The preparation of pulp, inoculum and experimental set up were same as in the previous example, but the inoculum concentration used here was 10 ml and radiance of the pulp was tested on [0063] day 2, 4, 6 and 8 days after incubating the pulp with the said bacterial culture.
  • Accordingly, FIG. 6 shows that by [0064] day 6 maximum brightness is achieved and here also the radiance of biologically deinked pulp was slightly greater than that of recycled paper purchased from the market. The control was the inkjet printed paper pulp.
  • FIG. 7 shows the ratio of radiance between recycled paper and deinked paper. The control was the ink-jet printed paper pulp which showed lowest radiance ratio. [0065]
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • Ability of the said bacterium to deink the inkjet—printed paper with two concentrations of the inoculum at varying incubation period was compared to arrive at a combination where deinking is achieved in a shortest time. [0066]
  • Accordingly FIG. 8 shows that with an inoculam concentration of 2 ml, maximum brightness is achieved after 72 hours. [0067]
  • FIG. 9 also shows that with an inoculum concentration of 10 ml, maximum brightness is achieved by 72 hours. [0068]

Claims (12)

1. A process for biological deinking of office waste paper inclusive of xerographic and inkjet-printed paper printed with non-impact and non-dispersible ink, said process comprises:
(a) growing coccoid bacterial isolate deposited at National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403 043, India having accession No. NIO/DI/32 and being deposited at an international depository ______ having accession number ______, in a nutrient broth containing beef extract, peptic digest of animal tissue and salinity ranging between 30 to 35 parts per thousand for at least 4 days;
(b) adding the resulting biomass of step (a) at 20% concentration to inoculate paper pulp diluted to at least 6% consistency suspended in sea water with salinity diluted to 50%;
(c) incubating the inoculated pulp for a minimum period of 96 hours followed by diluting the pulp tenfold;
(d) adding 1% by wt. of a surfactant and aerating for at least 10 minutes with compressed air to let the stray residual ink particles and contaminants flow out of the container, and
(e) filtering the pulp of step (d) over a funnel under suction, to get a sheet of pulp with uniform thickness and reading the brightness by radiance measurement.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step (a), the bacterium is grown for a minimum of 4 days in nutrient broth containing beef extract and peptic digest of animal tissue in sea water with salinity diluted to 50%.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step (b), the resulting bacterial biomass is concentrated by centrifugation and diluted to get final optical density of 1.0 measured at 660 nm in a spectrophotometer.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the diluted bacterial culture is inoculated to at least 6% pulp suspended in seawater with salinity diluted to 50% and incubated for a minimum period of 4 days within to completely beach the pulp.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the resulting bleached pulp is diluted tenfold, to which 1% surfactant is added, aerated using compressed air, and any free residual ink particles and contaminants are allowed to flow out of the solution.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein after step (d) the xerographic or inkjet-printed paper is soaked in hot water for 1-2 hours and macerated after adding 1% surfactant to pulp.
7. A process as claimed in claim 6, wherein the paper is macerated using conventional mixers.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step (e), the washed pulp is filtered over a Buchner funnel under suction to get a pulp sheet of uniform thickness.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the pulp sheet is pressed at 60° C. for a minimum of 4-5 hours to make it uniform and dried.
10. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the radiance of the resultant sheet is read from 412 to 684 nm and the radiance expressed as Lux units (LU) {wherein one LU is equivalent to μW/cm2/nm/Sr}.
11. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the pulp sheet made out of recycled paper is used as a reference.
12. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein in steps (a) and (b), pure water containing 1.5% by wt of sodium chloride can be used in the place of sea water.
US10/103,840 2002-03-25 2002-03-25 Process for biological deinking of office waste paper Abandoned US20030178162A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/103,840 US20030178162A1 (en) 2002-03-25 2002-03-25 Process for biological deinking of office waste paper
US11/301,207 US7645358B2 (en) 2002-03-25 2005-12-12 Process for biological deinking of office waste paper

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/103,840 US20030178162A1 (en) 2002-03-25 2002-03-25 Process for biological deinking of office waste paper

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/301,207 Continuation-In-Part US7645358B2 (en) 2002-03-25 2005-12-12 Process for biological deinking of office waste paper

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030178162A1 true US20030178162A1 (en) 2003-09-25

Family

ID=28040472

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/103,840 Abandoned US20030178162A1 (en) 2002-03-25 2002-03-25 Process for biological deinking of office waste paper

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20030178162A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060260772A1 (en) * 2002-03-25 2006-11-23 Chandralatha Raghukumar Process for biological deinking of office waste paper
WO2007017889A1 (en) * 2005-08-05 2007-02-15 Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research A process for enzymatic deinking of printed papers
WO2008011325A2 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-01-24 Sonoco Development, Inc. Infrared-absorbing ticket stock and method of making same
WO2011030003A1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2011-03-17 Upm-Kymmene Corporation Method of deinking inkjet ink-containing suspensions

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5525193A (en) * 1994-10-26 1996-06-11 Novo Nordisk A/S Use of monocomponent cellulase for removing inks, coatings, and toners from printed paper
US6022423A (en) * 1996-05-23 2000-02-08 Imagex Technologies, Inc. Method for deinking paper

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5525193A (en) * 1994-10-26 1996-06-11 Novo Nordisk A/S Use of monocomponent cellulase for removing inks, coatings, and toners from printed paper
US6022423A (en) * 1996-05-23 2000-02-08 Imagex Technologies, Inc. Method for deinking paper

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060260772A1 (en) * 2002-03-25 2006-11-23 Chandralatha Raghukumar Process for biological deinking of office waste paper
US7645358B2 (en) * 2002-03-25 2010-01-12 Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research Process for biological deinking of office waste paper
WO2007017889A1 (en) * 2005-08-05 2007-02-15 Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research A process for enzymatic deinking of printed papers
WO2008011325A2 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-01-24 Sonoco Development, Inc. Infrared-absorbing ticket stock and method of making same
WO2008011325A3 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-07-03 Sonoco Dev Inc Infrared-absorbing ticket stock and method of making same
WO2011030003A1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2011-03-17 Upm-Kymmene Corporation Method of deinking inkjet ink-containing suspensions
CN102498182A (en) * 2009-09-11 2012-06-13 芬欧汇川集团公司 Method of deinking inkjet ink-containing suspensions

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Maity et al. Xylanase isozymes from the newly isolated Bacillus sp. CKBx1D and optimization of its deinking potentiality
Morii et al. Isolation of a lignin-decolorizing bacterium
Sadhasivam et al. Deployment of Trichoderma harzianum WL1 laccase in pulp bleaching and paper industry effluent treatment
Sridevi et al. Biobleaching of paper pulp with xylanase produced by Trichoderma asperellum
Emtiazi et al. Biodegradation of lignocellulosic waste by Aspergillus terreus
JP3042718B2 (en) Use of a single component cellulase to remove ink, coatings and toner from printed paper
US6576083B2 (en) Deinking of waste paper
US7645358B2 (en) Process for biological deinking of office waste paper
D’Souza-Ticlo et al. Effect of nutrient nitrogen on laccase production, its isozyme pattern and effluent decolorization by the fungus NIOCC# 2a, isolated from mangrove wood
US5702940A (en) Cellulase producing microorganism ATCC 55702
US20030178162A1 (en) Process for biological deinking of office waste paper
Mohandass et al. Biological deinking of inkjet-printed paper using Vibrio alginolyticus and its enzymes
Selvam et al. Decolourization of azo dyes and dye industry effluents by lignin degrading fungus Trametes versicolor
US20060060316A1 (en) Biopulp for non-woody fiber plants and biopulping method thereof
EP1471181B1 (en) Biopulp for non-woody fiber plants and biopulping method thereof
US20080073042A1 (en) Process for enzymatic deinking of printed papers
WO1997010352A1 (en) Processing of cellulosic materials by cellulase producing bacteria
EP0631621A1 (en) THERMOSTABLE XYLANASES FROM $i(THERMOTOGA)
Desai Isolation and characterization of Laccase producing bacteria from contaminated sites
WO2000053843A1 (en) A process and an enzyme preparation with steryl esterase activity for controlling pitch during paper manufacture
CA2434304A1 (en) Neutral deinking with a deinking composition comprising a lipase and a fatty acid ester
EP1621609B1 (en) PVA-decomposing bacteria and method for decomposing PVA
OWS BIOREMOVAL OF INKJET INK AND BIOD
Ejaz et al. Bioaugmentation for Lignin Removal from the Paper Industry
Prabhu et al. Enhanced production of laccase by microparticle induced cultivation of Basidiomycetes and evaluation of its efficiency as deinking agent

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, IND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAGHUKUMAR, CHANDRALATHA;MOHANDASS, C.;OLIVIERA, TELMA;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013246/0221;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020207 TO 20020531

AS Assignment

Owner name: COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, IND

Free format text: RE-RECORD TO CORRECT THEASSIGNEORS LAST NAME AND ZIP CODED PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 013246/0221.;ASSIGNORS:RAGHUKUMAR, CHANDRALATA;MOHANDASS, C.;OLIVIERA, TELMA;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013620/0768;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020207 TO 20020531

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION