US20030143501A1 - Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030143501A1 US20030143501A1 US10/346,008 US34600803A US2003143501A1 US 20030143501 A1 US20030143501 A1 US 20030143501A1 US 34600803 A US34600803 A US 34600803A US 2003143501 A1 US2003143501 A1 US 2003143501A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- sulfur
- conditioning
- solid
- dry
- molten
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J15/00—Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
- F23J15/02—Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material
- F23J15/022—Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material for removing solid particulate material from the gasflow
- F23J15/025—Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material for removing solid particulate material from the gasflow using filters
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J15/00—Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
- F23J15/003—Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes for supplying chemicals to fumes, e.g. using injection devices
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J2217/00—Intercepting solids
- F23J2217/10—Intercepting solids by filters
- F23J2217/102—Intercepting solids by filters electrostatic
Definitions
- Known systems for removing fly ash from the flue gases of fossil fuel combustion, for example coal often include an electrostatic precipitator.
- the fly ash arresting capability of an electrostatic precipitator may depend upon numerous variables, not the least of which is the surface resistivity of the ash. It is well known that a high sulfur content in coal favorably influences fly ash precipitation by reducing the surface resistivity of the ash.
- a sulfur content in coal favorably influences fly ash precipitation by reducing the surface resistivity of the ash.
- the combustion often does not form sufficient sulfur trioxide to reduce the resistivity of the fly ash to a level at which an electrostatic precipitator can function efficiently (approximately 5 times 10 to the 10th power ohm-cm).
- substantially the entire sulfur content of coal which may vary from less than 1% to approximately 6%, oxidizes to sulfur dioxide during combustion of the coal, and from 1% and 5% of such sulfur dioxide further oxidizes to sulfur trioxide.
- sulfur trioxide component of the flue gases combines with entrained moisture to form sulfuric acid which then condenses on the fly ash particulate as the flue gases cool.
- the sulfuric acid which condenses on the fly ash particulate generally dictates the electrical resistivity of such particulate.
- the electrical resistivity of the fly ash is relatively high.
- Sulfur trioxide is an extremely dangerous and expensive chemical to purchase, transport and store.
- the sulfur trioxide systems used for flue gas conditioning (FGC) manufacture gaseous sulfur trioxide on site, starting with either a source of sulfur (which is burned to produce sulfur dioxide), or a source of stored sulfur dioxide. The sulfur dioxide is then passed through a catalytic converter in a known manner to produce the required gaseous sulfur trioxide conditioning agent.
- FGC systems which start with an on-site sulfur dioxide source are used very little because of the expense of the sulfur dioxide, and the precautions necessary in handling and storing large quantities of this chemical. Accordingly, the vast majority of FGC systems of the type discussed herein all start with a basic sulfur feedstock.
- Sulfur feedstock for use in FGC systems was generally universally provided in molten sulfur form.
- the molten sulfur was transported via truck or rail, and then unloaded into on-site heated storage facilities.
- the molten sulfur was metered into a sulfur burner portion of the FGC system on a demand basis, and burned to form sulfur dioxide, which was then catalytically converted into sulfur trioxide to provide the requisite conditioning agent. While a molten sulfur feedstock was used in the majority of the prior art FGC systems, subsequent considerations indicated that, in some circumstances, the sulfur feedstock might be better supplied in a dry sulfur form.
- a still further attempt to arrive at a dry sulfur feed to a melter and thence to a sulfur burner used a manual loading, in conjunction with disposable bags containing dry sulfur.
- a worker would position the bags over an opening into a melter and open them to dump their contents into the melter.
- Such an arrangement has proven to be inefficient, very dangerous to the individual in close proximity to the melter opening, and expensive.
- the invention herein relates to FGC systems, and more particularly, to an improved method and apparatus for handling FGC systems which use a dry sulfur feed stock, and overcomes or, in the least, substantially alleviates the problems discussed hereinabove with respect to the prior systems.
- the present invention concerns a sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning system such as one for conditioning the flue gas from a boiler means and which may be similar in many respects to that described in the hereinabove referenced U.S. patent.
- a flue gas conditioning system is provided with an improved means for melting dry sulfur on site and then metering and feeding the resultant molten sulfur to the sulfur burner for combustion and the production of sulfur trioxide.
- This improved means includes a dry storage silo and a batch feed from the silo to a sulfur melter. After the batch feed, any open connection between the dry storage and the melter is disengaged or closed.
- the sulfur melter includes an accumulator or molten sulfur storage facility.
- Molten sulfur is metered on a continuous demand basis to the sulfur burner from the accumulator.
- the present invention permits using a dry sulfur feed stock and provides an arrangement for melting, storing, dosing and transporting the molten sulfur, while alleviating the disadvantages of the prior art systems described hereinabove.
- the system of the present invention incorporates a large capacity dry sulfur storage facility and does not rely on manual loading of sulfur into the melter/accunulator but, rather, the dry sulfur is batched fed from the dry storage facility, into the melter/accumulator and then the connection between dry storage and wet storage is discontinued.
- Another object and advantage of the present invention is to reduce the potential of moisture and contamination in the stored dry sulfur, thereby significantly alleviating clogging of the dry sulfur feed.
- a still further object and advantage of the present invention is to increase operator safety.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a flue gas conditioning system which is constructed and is operative in accordance with the principles of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a prior art sulfur feed portion of an FGC system, wherein the sulfur is stored and supplied in a molten form to the sulfur burner;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a prior art sulfur feed portion of an FGC system, wherein the sulfur is stored in dry form and is metered and supplied in a dry form to the sulfur burner;
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a prior art sulfur feed portion of an FGC system, wherein the sulfur is stored in dry form and is then metered and transferred to a melter for conversion to molten sulfur which is then sent to the burner. The latter two transfers are on a continuous basis.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a sulfur feed portion of an FGC system which is built in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 there is generally indicated at 10 a flue gas conditioning system which is constructed and is operative in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- a flue gas conditioning system comprises a highly complex assembly which is ordinarily adapted for, but is not necessarily limited to, sulfur trioxide conditioning of fly ash particulates entrained in flue gas streams which emerge from fossil fuel, primarily coal, burning boilers such as boiler 12 .
- the sulfur trioxide conditioning is completed prior to the flue gas stream entering an electrostatic precipitator and, hence, enhances removal of the fly ash by the electrostatic precipitator by conventional electrostatic precipitation techniques.
- the embodiment described is directed to sulfur trioxide conditioning of a gas stream emerging from coal burning boilers; however, this specific descriptive embodiment is not intended to unduly limit the scope of the invention described.
- the flue gas conditioning system 10 comprises, in part: an air intake fan 14 , the inlet of which communicates with ambient air via an inlet conduit 16 ; a conduit 18 which communicates between the fan 14 and a sulfur burner 20 ; a variable temperature primary heater 22 which is disposed within conduit 18 ; and, as shown, a conduit 24 which communicates between the sulfur burner 20 and a catalytic converter 26 .
- an air intake fan 14 the inlet of which communicates with ambient air via an inlet conduit 16 ; a conduit 18 which communicates between the fan 14 and a sulfur burner 20 ; a variable temperature primary heater 22 which is disposed within conduit 18 ; and, as shown, a conduit 24 which communicates between the sulfur burner 20 and a catalytic converter 26 .
- FIG. 1 illustrates a conduit 24 communicating between sulfur burner 20 and converter 26 .
- This sulfur dioxide—air mixture then passes to the catalytic converter 26 via conduit 24 for the production of sulfur trioxide for subsequent injection via conduit 28 into the gas stream flowing within boiler flue 13 .
- the specific means for injection of the sulfur trioxide into the boiler flue gas streams may be any suitable arrangement; for example, the industrial sulfur trioxide gas injection probe not shown herein, but which is fully illustrated and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,179,071.
- the injected sulfur trioxide combines with water vapor to form sulfuric acid, which then condenses on the fly ash particles to advantageously influence the surface resistivity of the ash.
- the system 10 additionally includes a sulfur storage/delivery portion of the present invention, which is schematically illustrated by block 32 in FIG. 1, and is described hereinafter in detail with respect to FIG. 5.
- a sulfur storage/delivery portion of the present invention which is schematically illustrated by block 32 in FIG. 1, and is described hereinafter in detail with respect to FIG. 5.
- the invention herein is primarily directed to the apparatus and method of the storage/delivery portion 32 of FGC system 10 , and the balance of system 10 is well known in the art, a further description of such known portions of system 10 is not deemed necessary for one skilled in the art to achieve a full understanding of the invention herein.
- FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 are representative, in schematic form, of prior art sulfur storage/delivery portions of systems 10 .
- FIG. 2 illustrates the first, and most popular, of a prior art sulfur storage/delivery system 32 (a) used heretofore and, as shown in block format comprises: a molten sulfur storage facility 34 , such as a tank, or in-ground pit; a continuous metered molten sulfur transfer facility 38 ; and a sulfur burner/converter 20 and 26 , respectively.
- the storage system 32 ( a ) has generally performed quite well in the past; however, for a number of reasons, including: safety; economics; lack of heating steam; inability to readily obtain molten sulfur; in instances where the FGC system 10 was only occasionally used; and the like, users preferred to have an on-site dry sulfur source as the basic feed stock to the FGC system 10 .
- FIG. 3 illustrates the first attempt of a mechanical (as differentiated from a manual) prior art dry sulfur storage/delivery system 32 ( b ) which, as shown in block format comprises: a dry sulfur storage facility 36 , such as a silo; a continuous metered dry sulfur transfer facility 40 ; and a sulfur burner/converter 21 and 26 , respectively.
- a dry sulfur storage facility 36 such as a silo
- a continuous metered dry sulfur transfer facility 40 such as a continuous metered dry sulfur transfer facility 40
- a sulfur burner/converter 21 and 26 respectively.
- the burner 21 differs from burner 20 to the extent prior art teachings concerning the differences in known construction when directly burning from a molten sulfur feedstock, as differentiated from the direct supply to the sulfur burner of a dry sulfur feedstock.
- dry sulfur storage/delivery systems such as systems 32 ( b ) which convey a dry sulfur feedstock directly into the burner 21 , have considerable problems, including, but not limited to: inconsistent production of sulfur dioxide at the burner due to puddling adjacent the initial deposit points of the dry sulfur in the burner 21 ; inconsistent metering of the dry sulfur; and because of the constant open communication between the meter/transfer facility 38 and the burner 21 , a tendency to accumulate heat, moisture and impurities and clogging in the facility 38 or storage facility 24 .
- FIG. 4 illustrates a prior art dry sulfur storage/delivery system 32 (c) which, recognized the deficiencies of system 32 ( b ) and, as shown in block format, comprises: a dry sulfur storage facility 36 , such as a silo; a continuous metered dry sulfur transfer facility 40 ; and a melter 44 , which melts the dry sulfur into a molten sulfur for immediate delivery of molten sulfur to the burner 20 .
- a dry sulfur storage facility 36 such as a silo
- a continuous metered dry sulfur transfer facility 40 such as a continuous metered dry sulfur transfer facility 40
- a melter 44 which melts the dry sulfur into a molten sulfur for immediate delivery of molten sulfur to the burner 20 .
- the melter 44 may be of any type suitable for and the necessary heat therefore may be provided by steam, electric heating coils, or the like.
- system 32 ( c ) While experience has shown that dry sulfur storage/delivery systems, such as systems 32 ( c ) have advantages over systems such as system 32 ( b ), system 32 ( c ) still suffers from operational problems, including, but not limited to: inconsistent metering of the dry sulfur; and because of the constant open communication between the meter/transfer facility 40 and the melter 40 , a tendency to accumulate heat, moisture and impurities and clogging in the facility 38 or storage facility 24 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates the dry sulfur storage/delivery system 32 of the present invention, which, recognizes the deficiencies of prior art systems 32 ( b ) and 32 ( c ) and, as shown in block format, comprises: a dry sulfur storage facility 36 , such as a silo; a dry sulfur batch transfer facility 42 ; a melter/accumulator 46 , which melts the dry sulfur into a molten sulfur, and accumulates it for demand delivery of molten sulfur to the burner 20 .
- the melter 46 may be of any type suitable for and the necessary heat therefore may be provided by steam, electric heating coils, or the like.
- melter/accumulator 46 contains sufficient volume therein to retain, in a molten state, a selected quantity of molten sulfur therewithin (i.e. one or two days supply). Furthermore, the batch transfer facility is not subject to critical metering of dry material, as is the case with meter transfer assemblies 40 . Still further, the system 32 is designed such that after a selected batch of dry sulfur is conveyed from facility 42 to melter/accumulator 46 , the communication between such elements is discontinued.
- the hereinabove mentioned problems with respect to systems 32 ( b ) and 32 ( c ) are overcome, or in the least, greatly alleviated.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
Abstract
A method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide conditioning of flue gas, to assist in the removal of flyash from flue gas exhaust streams containing such flyash. More particularly, such a method and apparatus, which introduces an improvement in the transportation of dry sulfur and the melting and storage of resultant melted sulfur. The melted sulfur is subsequently burned and thereafter catalytically converted to sulfur trioxide for injection into a flue gas for such aforesaid assistance in the removal of flyash therefrom.
Description
- Known systems for removing fly ash from the flue gases of fossil fuel combustion, for example coal, often include an electrostatic precipitator. The fly ash arresting capability of an electrostatic precipitator may depend upon numerous variables, not the least of which is the surface resistivity of the ash. It is well known that a high sulfur content in coal favorably influences fly ash precipitation by reducing the surface resistivity of the ash. However, when coal with a sulfur content of less than 1% is burned in a boiler, the combustion often does not form sufficient sulfur trioxide to reduce the resistivity of the fly ash to a level at which an electrostatic precipitator can function efficiently (approximately 5 times 10 to the 10th power ohm-cm).
- As an amplification of the above, substantially the entire sulfur content of coal, which may vary from less than 1% to approximately 6%, oxidizes to sulfur dioxide during combustion of the coal, and from 1% and 5% of such sulfur dioxide further oxidizes to sulfur trioxide. Typically, after combustion, the sulfur trioxide component of the flue gases combines with entrained moisture to form sulfuric acid which then condenses on the fly ash particulate as the flue gases cool. The sulfuric acid which condenses on the fly ash particulate generally dictates the electrical resistivity of such particulate. Thus, in instances where low sulfur coal is burned in the boiler, only relatively small quantities of sulfuric acid are generated and, hence, the electrical resistivity of the fly ash is relatively high. Accordingly, when burning low sulfur coal, collecting efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator may be degraded considerably, particularly in instances where the precipitator is designed to receive flue gases at temperatures corresponding generally to normal stack exit temperatures (i.e., 250 degree F. to 320 degree F.).
- Various systems have been developed in attempts to rectify the problems of high resistivity fly ash removal by electrostatic precipitators. Examples of such alternative systems have included utilizing: hot-side precipitators; enlarged cold side precipitators; bag houses; or flue gas conditioning in conjunction with smaller ESPs. In many instances experience has shown that the use of flue gas conditioning is the most satisfactory solution in terms of reliability, efficiency, cost, space requirements and versatility.
- In those instances of flue gas conditioning systems, the gas conditioning means and the method of the type illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 3,993,429 has proved to be an overwhelming success. For purposes of background the entire content of said U.S. Pat. No. 3,993,429 is hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference. In these and other systems, a controlled trace amount of sulfur trioxide is injected into the flue gas stream intermediate the boiler and the electrostatic precipitator to thus bring the surface resistivity of the fly ash into the desired range for efficient collection thereof by the precipitator.
- Sulfur trioxide is an extremely dangerous and expensive chemical to purchase, transport and store. As such, the sulfur trioxide systems used for flue gas conditioning (FGC) manufacture gaseous sulfur trioxide on site, starting with either a source of sulfur (which is burned to produce sulfur dioxide), or a source of stored sulfur dioxide. The sulfur dioxide is then passed through a catalytic converter in a known manner to produce the required gaseous sulfur trioxide conditioning agent. From a practical standpoint, FGC systems which start with an on-site sulfur dioxide source are used very little because of the expense of the sulfur dioxide, and the precautions necessary in handling and storing large quantities of this chemical. Accordingly, the vast majority of FGC systems of the type discussed herein all start with a basic sulfur feedstock.
- Sulfur feedstock for use in FGC systems was generally universally provided in molten sulfur form. The molten sulfur was transported via truck or rail, and then unloaded into on-site heated storage facilities. The molten sulfur was metered into a sulfur burner portion of the FGC system on a demand basis, and burned to form sulfur dioxide, which was then catalytically converted into sulfur trioxide to provide the requisite conditioning agent. While a molten sulfur feedstock was used in the majority of the prior art FGC systems, subsequent considerations indicated that, in some circumstances, the sulfur feedstock might be better supplied in a dry sulfur form. In such latter instances it was felt that: dry sulfur is easier and safer to handle; the difficulties and expenses associated with unloading of molten sulfur could be avoided; and in certain circumstances (i.e. seasonal usage, small requirements for FGC, spot market fuel purchases which might vary the need for FGC, and the like) it would be less expensive to provide means for using dry sulfur than heating of the entire feed stock supply, as it is with molten sulfur.
- One of the first dry feed FGC systems to be used as a substitute for providing molten sulfur basic feed stock, simply conveyed dry sulfur to the sulfur burner for direct combustion in the presence of air to produce sulfur dioxide (“dry to direct burn”). History has proved this dry to direct burn feed system to have significant problems at various parts of the feed, for example: accurate conveying and metering of the dry sulfur is extremely difficult, and subject to a number of consistency problems; and the sulfur fed to the burner would have a tendency to melt and “puddle”, thereby resulting in inconsistent and unreliable sulfur dioxide generation. A second dry system which has been utilized heretofore, metered solid sulfur to a melter and thence directly to the burner (“dry to melt to direct burn”). While this latter system alleviated the problem of puddling and inconsistent sulfur dioxide production, it still had metering problems because of the direct dry transfer to the melter and, further, continuous open communication was established between the dry sulfur and the melter, thereby increasing the risk of moisture and gaseous contamination in the metering of the dry sulfur and resultant clogging.
- A still further attempt to arrive at a dry sulfur feed to a melter and thence to a sulfur burner used a manual loading, in conjunction with disposable bags containing dry sulfur. With such an arrangement a worker would position the bags over an opening into a melter and open them to dump their contents into the melter. Such an arrangement has proven to be inefficient, very dangerous to the individual in close proximity to the melter opening, and expensive.
- The invention herein relates to FGC systems, and more particularly, to an improved method and apparatus for handling FGC systems which use a dry sulfur feed stock, and overcomes or, in the least, substantially alleviates the problems discussed hereinabove with respect to the prior systems.
- The present invention concerns a sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning system such as one for conditioning the flue gas from a boiler means and which may be similar in many respects to that described in the hereinabove referenced U.S. patent. According to the present invention such a flue gas conditioning system is provided with an improved means for melting dry sulfur on site and then metering and feeding the resultant molten sulfur to the sulfur burner for combustion and the production of sulfur trioxide. This improved means includes a dry storage silo and a batch feed from the silo to a sulfur melter. After the batch feed, any open connection between the dry storage and the melter is disengaged or closed. The sulfur melter includes an accumulator or molten sulfur storage facility. Molten sulfur is metered on a continuous demand basis to the sulfur burner from the accumulator. Thus the present invention permits using a dry sulfur feed stock and provides an arrangement for melting, storing, dosing and transporting the molten sulfur, while alleviating the disadvantages of the prior art systems described hereinabove. Furthermore, the system of the present invention incorporates a large capacity dry sulfur storage facility and does not rely on manual loading of sulfur into the melter/accunulator but, rather, the dry sulfur is batched fed from the dry storage facility, into the melter/accumulator and then the connection between dry storage and wet storage is discontinued.
- In view of the above, it can be seen that it is one object and advantage of the present invention to provide a safe and efficient means of storing dry sulfur and feeding such dry sulfur to a melter for the selective and metered supply of molten sulfur to a sulfur burner. This is accomplished without constant communication between the dry source of sulfur and the sulfur burner and/or the melter.
- Another object and advantage of the present invention is to reduce the potential of moisture and contamination in the stored dry sulfur, thereby significantly alleviating clogging of the dry sulfur feed.
- A still further object and advantage of the present invention is to increase operator safety.
- These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent upon a reading of the following description with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a flue gas conditioning system which is constructed and is operative in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a prior art sulfur feed portion of an FGC system, wherein the sulfur is stored and supplied in a molten form to the sulfur burner;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a prior art sulfur feed portion of an FGC system, wherein the sulfur is stored in dry form and is metered and supplied in a dry form to the sulfur burner;
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a prior art sulfur feed portion of an FGC system, wherein the sulfur is stored in dry form and is then metered and transferred to a melter for conversion to molten sulfur which is then sent to the burner. The latter two transfers are on a continuous basis.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a sulfur feed portion of an FGC system which is built in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- In FIG. 1 there is generally indicated at10 a flue gas conditioning system which is constructed and is operative in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in general a flue gas conditioning system comprises a highly complex assembly which is ordinarily adapted for, but is not necessarily limited to, sulfur trioxide conditioning of fly ash particulates entrained in flue gas streams which emerge from fossil fuel, primarily coal, burning boilers such as
boiler 12. The sulfur trioxide conditioning is completed prior to the flue gas stream entering an electrostatic precipitator and, hence, enhances removal of the fly ash by the electrostatic precipitator by conventional electrostatic precipitation techniques. For purposes of the description herein, the embodiment described is directed to sulfur trioxide conditioning of a gas stream emerging from coal burning boilers; however, this specific descriptive embodiment is not intended to unduly limit the scope of the invention described. - The flue gas conditioning system10 comprises, in part: an
air intake fan 14, the inlet of which communicates with ambient air via an inlet conduit 16; aconduit 18 which communicates between thefan 14 and asulfur burner 20; a variable temperatureprimary heater 22 which is disposed withinconduit 18; and, as shown, aconduit 24 which communicates between thesulfur burner 20 and acatalytic converter 26. It is to be noted that inpractice sulfur burner 20 andconverter 26 may be combined in a unitary staged assembly; however, for purposes of clarity FIG. 1 illustrates aconduit 24 communicating betweensulfur burner 20 andconverter 26. - The portion of the system10 which is described hereinabove is generally well known in the art and is fully described in the referenced U.S. Pat. No. 3,993,429. Broadly, such portion is operative by energizing
fan 14 to provide ambient air viaconduit 18 toheater 22 whereat, during start-up ofburner 20, the air is heated to a temperature of approximately 800 degree. to 850 degree F. The hot air is then directed to thesulfur burner 20 to heat up the interior thereof to thereby result in the ignition of the liquid sulfur being delivered toburner 20 by thepump 32. The ignited sulfur rapidly oxidizes to form a sulfur dioxide and air mixture containing, for example, 5% sulfur dioxide by volume. This sulfur dioxide—air mixture then passes to thecatalytic converter 26 viaconduit 24 for the production of sulfur trioxide for subsequent injection viaconduit 28 into the gas stream flowing withinboiler flue 13. The specific means for injection of the sulfur trioxide into the boiler flue gas streams may be any suitable arrangement; for example, the industrial sulfur trioxide gas injection probe not shown herein, but which is fully illustrated and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,179,071. In the flue, the injected sulfur trioxide combines with water vapor to form sulfuric acid, which then condenses on the fly ash particles to advantageously influence the surface resistivity of the ash. This resistivity adjustment assistsprecipitator 30, of a known type, in the removal of fly ash from the flue gas prior to the flue gas exiting the power plant through a suitable exhaust stack (not shown). The system 10 additionally includes a sulfur storage/delivery portion of the present invention, which is schematically illustrated byblock 32 in FIG. 1, and is described hereinafter in detail with respect to FIG. 5. Inasmuch as the invention herein is primarily directed to the apparatus and method of the storage/delivery portion 32 of FGC system 10, and the balance of system 10 is well known in the art, a further description of such known portions of system 10 is not deemed necessary for one skilled in the art to achieve a full understanding of the invention herein. Accordingly, for a further description of the elements described hereinabove, other thanportion 32, and the operation and interaction thereof, reference is hereby specifically made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,993,429, 4,179,071 and 4,333,746. - FIGS. 2, 3 and4 are representative, in schematic form, of prior art sulfur storage/delivery portions of systems 10.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the first, and most popular, of a prior art sulfur storage/delivery system32 (a) used heretofore and, as shown in block format comprises: a molten
sulfur storage facility 34, such as a tank, or in-ground pit; a continuous metered moltensulfur transfer facility 38; and a sulfur burner/converter - FIG. 3 illustrates the first attempt of a mechanical (as differentiated from a manual) prior art dry sulfur storage/delivery system32(b) which, as shown in block format comprises: a dry
sulfur storage facility 36, such as a silo; a continuous metered drysulfur transfer facility 40; and a sulfur burner/converter 21 and 26, respectively. It is noted that the burner 21 differs fromburner 20 to the extent prior art teachings concerning the differences in known construction when directly burning from a molten sulfur feedstock, as differentiated from the direct supply to the sulfur burner of a dry sulfur feedstock. Experience has shown that dry sulfur storage/delivery systems, such as systems 32(b) which convey a dry sulfur feedstock directly into the burner 21, have considerable problems, including, but not limited to: inconsistent production of sulfur dioxide at the burner due to puddling adjacent the initial deposit points of the dry sulfur in the burner 21; inconsistent metering of the dry sulfur; and because of the constant open communication between the meter/transfer facility 38 and the burner 21, a tendency to accumulate heat, moisture and impurities and clogging in thefacility 38 orstorage facility 24. - FIG. 4 illustrates a prior art dry sulfur storage/delivery system32 (c) which, recognized the deficiencies of system 32(b) and, as shown in block format, comprises: a dry
sulfur storage facility 36, such as a silo; a continuous metered drysulfur transfer facility 40; and amelter 44, which melts the dry sulfur into a molten sulfur for immediate delivery of molten sulfur to theburner 20. It is noted that themelter 44 may be of any type suitable for and the necessary heat therefore may be provided by steam, electric heating coils, or the like. While experience has shown that dry sulfur storage/delivery systems, such as systems 32(c) have advantages over systems such as system 32(b), system 32(c) still suffers from operational problems, including, but not limited to: inconsistent metering of the dry sulfur; and because of the constant open communication between the meter/transfer facility 40 and themelter 40, a tendency to accumulate heat, moisture and impurities and clogging in thefacility 38 orstorage facility 24. - FIG. 5 illustrates the dry sulfur storage/
delivery system 32 of the present invention, which, recognizes the deficiencies of prior art systems 32(b) and 32(c) and, as shown in block format, comprises: a drysulfur storage facility 36, such as a silo; a dry sulfurbatch transfer facility 42; a melter/accumulator 46, which melts the dry sulfur into a molten sulfur, and accumulates it for demand delivery of molten sulfur to theburner 20. It is noted that the melter 46 may be of any type suitable for and the necessary heat therefore may be provided by steam, electric heating coils, or the like. As differentiated frommelter 44, melter/accumulator 46 contains sufficient volume therein to retain, in a molten state, a selected quantity of molten sulfur therewithin (i.e. one or two days supply). Furthermore, the batch transfer facility is not subject to critical metering of dry material, as is the case withmeter transfer assemblies 40. Still further, thesystem 32 is designed such that after a selected batch of dry sulfur is conveyed fromfacility 42 to melter/accumulator 46, the communication between such elements is discontinued. Thus with an arrangement of elements such as is specified in hereinabove with respect tosystem 32, the hereinabove mentioned problems with respect to systems 32(b) and 32(c) are overcome, or in the least, greatly alleviated. For example, since there is no critical metering of dry sulfur, any problems associated with a finely measured transfer of dry sulfur is overcome. Furthermore, inasmuch as there is no constant communication between the stored dry sulfur and the molten sulfur, the problems associated with such communication are alleviated.
Claims (8)
1. In a sulfur trioxide conditioning apparatus wherein heated air flows from an inlet to an outlet, and from such outlet into a flue for conditioning of flue gases containing flyash by injecting a controlled amount of sulfur trioxide gaseous mixture to vary the electrical resistivity of such flyash, such heated air flow, as it flows from such inlet to such outlet, passes first through a burner means for burning elemental sulfur to produce an air and sulfur dioxide mixture and thereafter through a conversion means to produce a mixture containing air and sulfur trioxide for use in the conditioning of such flue gases, the improvement comprising:
an on-site storage assembly for the storage of solid sulfur;
first conveying means for conveying such solid sulfur to a second on-site storage assembly;
said second on-site storage assembly including a melter means incorporated therein to melt such solid sulfur conveyed thereto to molten sulfur and also being adapted to store such molten sulfur therein at a temperature above the freezing point thereof; and
second conveying means being operative to selectively convey variable amounts of such molten sulfur from said second on-site storage assembly to said sulfur burner, in response to signals indicative of sulfur trioxide conditioning demand.
2. A sulfur trioxide conditioning apparatus as specified in claim 1 wherein said first conveying means is selectively operable to transfer a predetermined batch of solid sulfur to said second on-site storage assembly.
3. A sulfur trioxide conditioning apparatus as specified in claim 2 , wherein such first conveying means is selectively operable is response to a transfer demand signal indicative of the volume of sulfur contained within said second storage assembly.
4. A sulfur trioxide conditioning apparatus as specified in claim 2 wherein the predetermined batch of solid sulfur is at least a one days supply of sulfur required for such sulfur trioxide conditioning.
5. In a method for producing an air and sulfur trioxide conditioning mixture by burning elemental sulfur in heated air to produce an air and sulfur dioxide flow, passing such flow through a catalytic converter to produce such a conditioning mixture for downstream use, the improvement comprising:
storing solid sulfur at a location upstream of such burning;
receiving a signal indicative of the requirements for solid sulfur and, in response thererto, transporting such stored solid sulfur from storage;
melting such transported solid sulfur to form molten sulfur;
storing such molten sulfur; and
selectively transporting such molten sulfur for such aforesaid burning and catalytic conversion.
6. A method as specified in claim 5 including the additional step of:
injecting such conditioning mixture into a flue gas stream containing flyash, for the conditioning of such flue gases to assist in the removal of such flyash therefrom, by electrostatic precipitation.
7. A method of conditioning as specified in claim 5 wherein such solid sulfur is transferred from storage on a predetermined batch basis.
8. A sulfur trioxide conditioning apparatus as specified in claim 7 wherein the predetermined batch of solid sulfur transferred is at least a one days supply of sulfur required to assist in such flyash removal.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/346,008 US20030143501A1 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2003-01-16 | Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US35398102P | 2002-01-31 | 2002-01-31 | |
US10/346,008 US20030143501A1 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2003-01-16 | Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030143501A1 true US20030143501A1 (en) | 2003-07-31 |
Family
ID=27616710
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/346,008 Abandoned US20030143501A1 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2003-01-16 | Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20030143501A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111232933A (en) * | 2020-03-11 | 2020-06-05 | 湖州益浩毛纺原料有限公司 | Prevent according to material state that it blocks up equipment to burn sulphur sublimation |
Citations (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3722178A (en) * | 1971-06-24 | 1973-03-27 | H Aaland | Sulfur trioxide vapor for dust conditioning |
US3993429A (en) * | 1974-10-29 | 1976-11-23 | Wahlco, Inc. | Gas conditioning means |
US4179071A (en) * | 1978-07-07 | 1979-12-18 | Wahlco, Inc. | Industrial sulfur trioxide gas injection probe and method of manufacture |
US4266512A (en) * | 1978-12-26 | 1981-05-12 | Outokumpu Oy | Apparatus for the vaporization of elemental sulfur by means of carrier gas |
US4333746A (en) * | 1981-04-24 | 1982-06-08 | Wahlco, Inc. | Gas conditioning means for a plurality of boilers |
US4466815A (en) * | 1982-05-03 | 1984-08-21 | Wahlco International Inc. | Gas conditioning apparatus |
US4738690A (en) * | 1985-03-29 | 1988-04-19 | Gus, Inc. | Method of removing entrained particles from flue gas and composition of matter |
US4770674A (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1988-09-13 | Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation | Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator |
US4931265A (en) * | 1987-02-04 | 1990-06-05 | Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft | Conditioning process for dust-containing waste gas |
US4966610A (en) * | 1989-06-05 | 1990-10-30 | Wahlco, Inc. | Conditioning of gas streams containing particulate |
US5011516A (en) * | 1989-11-06 | 1991-04-30 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash |
US5029535A (en) * | 1990-05-14 | 1991-07-09 | Wahlco, Inc. | Control of addition of conditioning agents to flue gas |
US5032154A (en) * | 1989-04-14 | 1991-07-16 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5196038A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1993-03-23 | Wright Robert A | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5240470A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1993-08-31 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | In-duct flue gas conditioning system |
US5244642A (en) * | 1992-06-18 | 1993-09-14 | The Chemithon Corporation | Method for conditioning flue gas |
US5288309A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1994-02-22 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning agent demand control apparatus |
US5350441A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1994-09-27 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5356597A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1994-10-18 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | In-duct flue gas conditioning system |
US5370720A (en) * | 1993-07-23 | 1994-12-06 | Welhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5503821A (en) * | 1990-03-23 | 1996-04-02 | Monsanto Company | Methods for recovering high grade process energy from a contact sulfuric acid process |
US5538539A (en) * | 1995-01-20 | 1996-07-23 | Wahlco, Inc. | Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning |
US5665142A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1997-09-09 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system and method using native SO2 feedstock |
US5707422A (en) * | 1993-03-01 | 1998-01-13 | Abb Flakt Ab | Method of controlling the supply of conditioning agent to an electrostatic precipitator |
US5935538A (en) * | 1996-03-11 | 1999-08-10 | University Of Central Florida | Apparatus and method for photocatalytic conditioning of flue gas fly-ash particles |
US5980610A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 1999-11-09 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Apparatus and method for improving electrostatic precipitator performance by plasma reactor conversion of SO2 to SO3 |
-
2003
- 2003-01-16 US US10/346,008 patent/US20030143501A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3722178A (en) * | 1971-06-24 | 1973-03-27 | H Aaland | Sulfur trioxide vapor for dust conditioning |
US3993429A (en) * | 1974-10-29 | 1976-11-23 | Wahlco, Inc. | Gas conditioning means |
US3993429B1 (en) * | 1974-10-29 | 1992-01-14 | Wahlco Int | |
US4179071A (en) * | 1978-07-07 | 1979-12-18 | Wahlco, Inc. | Industrial sulfur trioxide gas injection probe and method of manufacture |
US4266512A (en) * | 1978-12-26 | 1981-05-12 | Outokumpu Oy | Apparatus for the vaporization of elemental sulfur by means of carrier gas |
US4333746A (en) * | 1981-04-24 | 1982-06-08 | Wahlco, Inc. | Gas conditioning means for a plurality of boilers |
US4466815A (en) * | 1982-05-03 | 1984-08-21 | Wahlco International Inc. | Gas conditioning apparatus |
US4770674A (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1988-09-13 | Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation | Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator |
US4844723A (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1989-07-04 | Belco Pollution Control Corporation | Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator |
US4844723B2 (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1993-01-19 | Gas condititioning for an electrostatic precipitator | |
US4770674B2 (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1993-01-19 | Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator | |
US4770674B1 (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1992-07-28 | Wilhelm Env Tech Inc | |
US4844723B1 (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1992-07-21 | Lab Sa | |
US4738690A (en) * | 1985-03-29 | 1988-04-19 | Gus, Inc. | Method of removing entrained particles from flue gas and composition of matter |
US4931265A (en) * | 1987-02-04 | 1990-06-05 | Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft | Conditioning process for dust-containing waste gas |
US5032154A (en) * | 1989-04-14 | 1991-07-16 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US4966610A (en) * | 1989-06-05 | 1990-10-30 | Wahlco, Inc. | Conditioning of gas streams containing particulate |
US5011516A (en) * | 1989-11-06 | 1991-04-30 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash |
US5350441A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1994-09-27 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5196038A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1993-03-23 | Wright Robert A | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5261931A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1993-11-16 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5503821A (en) * | 1990-03-23 | 1996-04-02 | Monsanto Company | Methods for recovering high grade process energy from a contact sulfuric acid process |
US5029535A (en) * | 1990-05-14 | 1991-07-09 | Wahlco, Inc. | Control of addition of conditioning agents to flue gas |
US5240470A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1993-08-31 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | In-duct flue gas conditioning system |
US5288303A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1994-02-22 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5288309A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1994-02-22 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning agent demand control apparatus |
US5356597A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1994-10-18 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | In-duct flue gas conditioning system |
US5547495A (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1996-08-20 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5244642A (en) * | 1992-06-18 | 1993-09-14 | The Chemithon Corporation | Method for conditioning flue gas |
US5707422A (en) * | 1993-03-01 | 1998-01-13 | Abb Flakt Ab | Method of controlling the supply of conditioning agent to an electrostatic precipitator |
US5370720A (en) * | 1993-07-23 | 1994-12-06 | Welhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system |
US5665142A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1997-09-09 | Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. | Flue gas conditioning system and method using native SO2 feedstock |
US5538539A (en) * | 1995-01-20 | 1996-07-23 | Wahlco, Inc. | Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning |
US5540755A (en) * | 1995-01-20 | 1996-07-30 | Wahlco, Inc | Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning |
US5935538A (en) * | 1996-03-11 | 1999-08-10 | University Of Central Florida | Apparatus and method for photocatalytic conditioning of flue gas fly-ash particles |
US5980610A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 1999-11-09 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Apparatus and method for improving electrostatic precipitator performance by plasma reactor conversion of SO2 to SO3 |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111232933A (en) * | 2020-03-11 | 2020-06-05 | 湖州益浩毛纺原料有限公司 | Prevent according to material state that it blocks up equipment to burn sulphur sublimation |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3993429A (en) | Gas conditioning means | |
US5261931A (en) | Flue gas conditioning system | |
US4466815A (en) | Gas conditioning apparatus | |
US5288303A (en) | Flue gas conditioning system | |
JP5216783B2 (en) | Plant and method for dry recovery / cooling of heavy ash and combustion control of residues with high unburnt content | |
CA1166972A (en) | Gas conditioning means for a plurality of boilers | |
ZA200503508B (en) | Control system for controlling the feeding and burning of a pulverized fuel in a glass melting furnace | |
US20030143501A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning | |
AU597783B2 (en) | Process of conditioning dust-containing exhaust gases | |
GB2064742A (en) | Process and system for cooling sintered material | |
US4541572A (en) | Pulverizing, drying and transporting system for injecting a pulverized fuel into a blast furnace | |
EP0574611A1 (en) | Method for conditioning flue gas | |
US5196038A (en) | Flue gas conditioning system | |
US4211174A (en) | Wet oxidation of coal for generation of heat energy | |
CN1809714B (en) | Method and plant for the treatment of materials, in particular waste materials and refuse | |
CN105836810A (en) | Acid regeneration station ferric oxide powder cooling treatment system | |
US5350441A (en) | Flue gas conditioning system | |
CN110028224A (en) | For producing the kiln system of support plate glass | |
CN101224462A (en) | Methods for reclaiming and beneficiating fly ash particles and systems thereof | |
US6372016B1 (en) | Method for drying compacts | |
CN206881688U (en) | A kind of system for producing sulfur trioxide and maintaining its gaseous state | |
JPS6039607B2 (en) | Gas pipe transportation method for fine powder coal | |
CN204730188U (en) | A kind of Integrated Processing Unit of gasification furnace filter cake | |
US4137128A (en) | Battery of horizontal coke ovens and method for operating the same | |
KR101247214B1 (en) | Circulating fluidized bed combustion device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |