US20020083805A1 - Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby - Google Patents
Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020083805A1 US20020083805A1 US10/006,713 US671301A US2002083805A1 US 20020083805 A1 US20020083805 A1 US 20020083805A1 US 671301 A US671301 A US 671301A US 2002083805 A1 US2002083805 A1 US 2002083805A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- oscillatory motion
- damping force
- damping
- tool
- phase
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 26
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 title claims description 17
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 8
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 title claims description 8
- 230000003534 oscillatory effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000013017 mechanical damping Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 17
- 230000001172 regenerating effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000004606 Fillers/Extenders Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000007514 turning Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000018199 S phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003467 diminishing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011089 mechanical engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
- B23Q17/09—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool
- B23Q17/0952—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool during machining
- B23Q17/0971—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool during machining by measuring mechanical vibrations of parts of the machine
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q11/00—Accessories fitted to machine tools for keeping tools or parts of the machine in good working condition or for cooling work; Safety devices specially combined with or arranged in, or specially adapted for use in connection with, machine tools
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23B—TURNING; BORING
- B23B27/00—Tools for turning or boring machines; Tools of a similar kind in general; Accessories therefor
- B23B27/002—Tools for turning or boring machines; Tools of a similar kind in general; Accessories therefor with vibration damping means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23B—TURNING; BORING
- B23B29/00—Holders for non-rotary cutting tools; Boring bars or boring heads; Accessories for tool holders
- B23B29/02—Boring bars
- B23B29/022—Boring bars with vibration reducing means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23C—MILLING
- B23C5/00—Milling-cutters
- B23C5/003—Milling-cutters with vibration suppressing means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q11/00—Accessories fitted to machine tools for keeping tools or parts of the machine in good working condition or for cooling work; Safety devices specially combined with or arranged in, or specially adapted for use in connection with, machine tools
- B23Q11/0032—Arrangements for preventing or isolating vibrations in parts of the machine
- B23Q11/0039—Arrangements for preventing or isolating vibrations in parts of the machine by changing the natural frequency of the system or by continuously changing the frequency of the force which causes the vibration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
- B23Q17/09—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool
- B23Q17/0952—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool during machining
- B23Q17/0971—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool during machining by measuring mechanical vibrations of parts of the machine
- B23Q17/0976—Detection or control of chatter
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16F—SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION
- F16F15/00—Suppression of vibrations in systems; Means or arrangements for avoiding or reducing out-of-balance forces, e.g. due to motion
- F16F15/005—Suppression of vibrations in systems; Means or arrangements for avoiding or reducing out-of-balance forces, e.g. due to motion using electro- or magnetostrictive actuation means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23B—TURNING; BORING
- B23B2250/00—Compensating adverse effects during turning, boring or drilling
- B23B2250/16—Damping of vibrations
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23B—TURNING; BORING
- B23B2260/00—Details of constructional elements
- B23B2260/108—Piezoelectric elements
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23B—TURNING; BORING
- B23B2260/00—Details of constructional elements
- B23B2260/128—Sensors
- B23B2260/1285—Vibration sensors
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23C—MILLING
- B23C2250/00—Compensating adverse effects during milling
- B23C2250/16—Damping vibrations
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S82/00—Turning
- Y10S82/904—Vibrating method or tool
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T408/00—Cutting by use of rotating axially moving tool
- Y10T408/76—Tool-carrier with vibration-damping means
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T409/00—Gear cutting, milling, or planing
- Y10T409/10—Gear cutting
- Y10T409/101431—Gear tooth shape generating
- Y10T409/105883—Using rotary cutter
- Y10T409/10636—On reciprocating carriage
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T409/00—Gear cutting, milling, or planing
- Y10T409/30—Milling
- Y10T409/304312—Milling with means to dampen vibration
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T82/00—Turning
- Y10T82/10—Process of turning
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T82/00—Turning
- Y10T82/25—Lathe
- Y10T82/2593—Work rest
- Y10T82/2595—Work rest with noise or vibration dampener
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the damping of feed-back vibrations generated by a metal cutting tool during the chip-removing machining of metal.
- the invention relates to a method of such damping which involves:
- the invention also relates to a vibration damper and a mechanical apparatus for performing the method.
- Regenerative vibration is so named because of the closed-loop nature of the dynamic cutting process.
- Each tool pass leaves disturbances in the form of undulations on the workpiece due to the vibrations of the tool and workpiece, and those disturbances produce mechanical feedback vibrations in subsequent passes of the tool.
- regenerative vibration can be described as a small transient wave that is machined into the workpiece. That small wave will become the driving force, causing the system to vibrate increasingly again in subsequent passes, i.e., the vibrations from one pass are amplified by those of the next pass. Unstable conditions can cause a small wavelet to develop and increase around the circumference, giving non-acceptable machining results.
- Damping of vibration in tools for chip removing machining has previously been achieved by pure mechanical damping, i.e., the tool shaft being formed with a cavity in which is disposed a counter-oscillating mass of, for instance, heavy metal.
- the weight and location of the mass is tuned in order to provide damping of oscillations within a certain range of frequencies.
- the cavity is then filled with a viscous liquid, e.g. oil, and is plugged.
- this technique works passably only in those cases where the overhang of the shaft from a fastening device is approx. 4-10 times longer than the diameter thereof.
- the pure mechanical damping has an obvious disadvantage in that the range of frequencies within which the damping acts, is very limited. An additional inconvenience consists of the strength-wise weakening of the shaft resulting from the presence of that cavity.
- a piezo element consists of a material, most often of a ceramic type, which when compressed or elongated in a certain direction (the direction of polarization), generates an electric field in the same direction.
- the piezo element usually has the shape of a rectangular plate having a direction of polarization, which is parallel to the major axis of the plate.
- Electric resistive components included in the control module will generate heat according to known physics. In doing so, vibration energy is converted to thermal energy, whereby a passively damping, but not damping effect on the vibrations is obtained.
- shunts selected frequencies can be brought to be damped with particular efficiency.
- such frequencies are the so-called “own-frequencies” of the exposed “own-modes” of the object, which are those preferably being excited.
- a piezo element may be compressed or elongated by an electric voltage being applied over the piezo element, during which the same may be used as a control or operating device (actuator).
- actuator an electric voltage being applied over the piezo element
- This can be used for active vibration control by selecting the polarity of the applied electric voltage in such a way that the mechanical stress of the operating device acts in the opposite direction, as an external, mechanical stress.
- the emergence of vibrations is suppressed by the fact that another kinetic energy, for instance rotation energy, is prevented from being converted to vibration energy.
- the synchronization of the applied electric voltage relative to the external mechanical stress takes place by supplying a feedback signal from a deformation sensitive sensor to a control means in the form of a logical control circuit, e.g. a programmable micro-processor.
- the processor processes the signal to control the electric voltage applied over the operating device.
- the control function i.e. the relation between the input signal from the sensor and the output voltage, may, in that connection, be made very complex. For instance, a self-learning system for adaptation to varying conditions is feasible.
- the sensor may consist of a separate, deformation sensitive device, e.g. a second piezo element, or be common with the operating device.
- This type of vibration damper is not suitable for force-induced vibrations, but only for regenerative, i.e. feed-back vibrations, which, e.g., arise in a tool during mechanical machining when a small disturbance gives a mechanical feed-back in the tool.
- feed-back vibrations e.g., arise in a tool during mechanical machining when a small disturbance gives a mechanical feed-back in the tool.
- Such a mechanical feed-back may cause an increasing oscillatory motion, and thereby an undesired uneven surface of the machined blank and reduced service life of the tool.
- extenders are used, which frequently causes bending vibrations which not only lead to impaired dimensional accuracy and irregularities in the workpiece, but also to reduced service life of the tool and the cutting inserts or machining elements thereof.
- the purpose of the present invention is to improve the control of a vibration-damping device for cutting tools having a regenerative oscillatory motion.
- the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 60°-120° alternatively 240°-300° in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 70°-110° alternatively 250°-290° in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 80°-100° alternatively 260°-280° in relation to the oscillatory motion. In this way, a faster damping of the oscillatory motion is obtained. Best results are achieved when the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 90° alternatively 270° in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- a co-directed force should be given when the same is imposed out of phase between 60° and 120° in relation to the oscillatory motion, while a counter directed force should be imposed out of phase between 240° and 300° in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- control device is arranged to give a damping force in the area of 50-1500 Hz.
- the vibration-damping device may be a hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder or an electromagnetic device.
- said mechanical structure comprises a tool for chip removing machining.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic side view of a long narrow body in the form of a tool shaft during bending, deformation at oscillation (1 st resonance frequency).
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the bending torque in the body.
- FIG. 3 a side view of a cut end portion of the body in connection with a fastening end so as to illustrate the stress in the body during bending deformation proportional to elongation.
- FIG. 4 is a transparent perspective view of a tool shaft.
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a bar extender for milling tools formed with a circular cross-section.
- FIGS. 6 - 8 are perspective views of respective tool shafts having a square cross-section and in different alternative embodiments, wherein FIG. 6 shows a piezo element mounted in a countersink of a tool draft; FIG. 7 shows the countersink of FIG. 6 covered by a lid; FIG. 8 shows a piezo element mounted on the outside of the shaft.
- FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a tool for active vibration damping mounted in a carrier.
- FIG. 10 is an analogous perspective view of an alternative embodiment for passive vibration damping.
- FIG. 11 shows schematically the damping of an oscillatory motion by means of a counter force in phase with the oscillation.
- FIGS. 12 - 13 show schematically the damping of an oscillatory motion according to the invention, wherein FIG. 12 shows the application of a constant-amplitude damping force, whereas FIG. 13 discloses the application of a damping force having a gradually diminishing amplitude.
- FIG. 1 a long narrow body in the form of a bar or a shaft 1 of a tool is illustrated, which is intended to carry one or more (cutting) inserts of the tool during turning or milling.
- the body 1 has a fastening end 2 and a free, external end 3 .
- the body has an external surface 4 , which may be cylindrical or comprise a plurality of plane surfaces if the body has a polygonal, e.g. rectangular cross-section shape.
- the body 1 may have an arbitrary cross-section shape, however, most commonly circular or rectangular.
- numeral 5 designates a part in which the body 1 is fastened, the body extending cantilever-like from the fastening part.
- the body 1 is shown in a state when the same has been deformed in a first self-bending state or “own-mode.”
- FIG. 2 a graph is shown which illustrates how the bending torque M b in this case varies along the body. As is seen in the graph, a maximum bending moment arises, and thus a maximum axial elongation, at or near the fastening end 2 . The same is valid for all lower modes, which are normally energy-wise dominant during bending vibrations of tools for chip removing machining.
- FIG. 3 a portion of the body 1 deformed by bending in FIG. 1 is shown in the area of the fastening end.
- the elongation at bending deformation varies in the cross-direction of the body (the elongation is strongly exaggerated for illustrative reasons) is illustrated.
- the maximum elongations are obtained at the envelope surface or external surface 4 of the body.
- FIG. 4 a fundamental design of a bar or a shaft 1 is schematically shown in which two plate-formed, rectangular piezo elements 8 are fastened on opposite, longitudinal plane surfaces 4 of the shaft of rectangular cross-section.
- the piezo elements 8 are placed in the area near the fastening end 2 of the shaft.
- the shaft has a machining element in the form of a cutting insert 9 .
- the piezo elements 8 are positioned in an area where the maximum axial elongation occurs during bending deformation. Although this location is preferred, also other locations are feasible.
- the piezo elements 8 are oriented with the major faces thereof essentially parallel to the plane surfaces 4 of the bar or shaft 1 and with the major axes essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the shaft or bar 1 , at which the piezo elements 8 at bending vibration will be deformed while retaining the rectangular shape.
- the body 1 consists of a cylindrical bar extender intended for a milling tool.
- a chip forming machining element 9 in the form of a cutting edge is formed adjacent to a chip pocket 10 at the free end 3 of the bar extender.
- a piezo element 8 is attached on the envelope surface 4 of the bar extender in an area near the fastening end 2 .
- the major axis of the piezo element is parallel to the length extension of the bar extender. Consequently, with this orientation, the piezo element 9 acts also here most efficiently for the damping of bending vibration.
- the shaft of the tool is advantageously formed with a plurality of piezo elements, some of which being oriented with the long sides thereof essentially parallel to the length extension of the shaft, while others are oriented at approximately a 45° angle.
- one or more piezo elements are provided having different respective orientations.
- Piezo elements are usually fragile, particularly such of the ceramic type. Therefore, in demanding environments, the same should have some form of protection in order to achieve art acceptable service life.
- FIGS. 6 - 8 tool shafts having a rectangular cross-section are shown, the piezo element 8 being attached and protected in alternative ways. In all cases, the piezo elements are placed in an area near the fastening part 5 (which part may consist of a conventional clamping unit in which the tool is detachably mounted).
- the piezo element 8 is mounted in a countersink 11 and advantageously covered by a protection layer, for instance of the epoxy type.
- the piezo clement is assumed to be mounted in the countersink 11 and covered by a stiff lid 12 .
- the piezo element 8 is mounted to, e.g. glued on, the outside of the shaft.
- These alternatives should only be seen as examples, those of which shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 being preferred. It should be understood that the same type of protection for the piezo elements is independent of the cross-section shape of the tool shaft.
- the piezo elements co-operate with means for electric control or guiding of the same.
- FIGS. 9 and 10 examples are shown of how the tool 1 has been formed with such control means.
- the tool is mounted in a carrier 13 .
- a control means for damping is shown in the form of a control means 14 formed near the fastening end 2 and an electric connection 15 , via which one or more piezo elements 8 are connected to the control module 14 for separate or common control of respective piezo elements.
- This module 14 comprises at least electric resistive components.
- the control module 14 also comprises one or more shunts, at which selected frequencies may be damped particularly efficiently.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a control means for active damping in the form of a free-standing logical control circuit 16 , e.g. a programmable microprocessor, for separate or common control of (via the schematically illustrated electric connection 15 ) voltages applied over the piezo elements 8 .
- the connection 15 may in this case comprise collector shoes or the like.
- the piezo elements 8 in the embodiment exemplified in FIG. 10 for active damping simultaneously act as both operating devices and sensors, it is feasible to realise the same two functions by separate operating devices and sensors, wherein the sensors do not need to consist of piezo elements.
- the depicted locations of the control module 14 and logic control circuit 16 are preferred, other locations are feasible.
- it is feasible, as in the case of the logic control circuit 16 to arrange the control module 14 freestanding from the tool.
- the advantage of placing the control module 14 in the vicinity of the fastening end is that the module becomes simple to connect to the piezo elements, whereas the advantage of arranging it at a freestanding position is that it becomes easier to protect the module against harmful mechanical effects.
- FIG. 11 shows schematically how damping of an undesired oscillatory motion in a mechanical structure generally comes about according to afore-mentioned U.S. Ser. No. 09/913,271. If a damping force 20 is counter-directed to, and in phase with, the oscillatory motion 22 , the motion is quickly dampened. However, this requires a very large accuracy as regards phase correctness. If a phase error arises between the damping force and the oscillatory motion, the counter-directed dampening force will be partly co-directed with the oscillatory motion, which may lead to the oscillatory motion not being quenched to the desired degree.
- FIG. 12 shows schematically the damping of the oscillatory motion of the mechanical structure according to the invention.
- the sensor detects the oscillatory motion 22 .
- the signal is transferred to the control device, which processes the signal and determines the oscillatory motion's phase by defining positive and negative, respectively, zero crossing,
- the control device also calculates the amplitude and frequency of the oscillation.
- the control device then sends out a control signal to the vibration damper (actuator), which generates a force 20 ′ counter-directed relative to the tool's velocity 24 .
- the phase is displaced a quarter of, alternatively three-quarters of, a wavelength in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- the damping force Since the damping force is applied in counter-direction to the velocity of the oscillatory motion, the damping force will tend to deform the tool in that counter direction. Accordingly, regenerative vibration can be damped without a risk that the damping force will amplify the vibration, e.g., the result of an unbalanced relationship therebetween.
- the invention thus eliminates a need for a high degree of accuracy between the phases of the damping force frequency and the regenerative vibration frequency.
- FIG. 13 it is shown how a counter force 20 ′′ directed in the opposite direction to that of the tool's oscillatory motion 22 can be imposed at gradually decreasing oscillation amplitude (in lieu of constant amplitude) to avoid a new generation of vibrations, and is thereby easier to control.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Auxiliary Devices For Machine Tools (AREA)
- Automatic Control Of Machine Tools (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
- Turning (AREA)
- Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
- Constituent Portions Of Griding Lathes, Driving, Sensing And Control (AREA)
- Cutting Tools, Boring Holders, And Turrets (AREA)
- Machine Tool Sensing Apparatuses (AREA)
Abstract
Feed back vibrations of a metallic tool generated during the machining of metallic workpieces are damped by detecting an oscillatory motion of the tool, identifying a frequency of the oscillatory motion and generating a mechanical camping force having the same frequency as the oscillatory motion and applied to the tool in counter-direction to a velocity of the oscillatory motion. The damping force can be of constant amplitude or gradually decreasing amplitude.
Description
- This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119 and/or 365 to patent application Ser. No. 0004540-1, filed in Sweden on Dec. 8, 2000, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- The present invention relates to the damping of feed-back vibrations generated by a metal cutting tool during the chip-removing machining of metal. In particular, the invention relates to a method of such damping which involves:
- detecting the tool's oscillatory motion by means of a sensor device associated with a control device,
- identifying the oscillatory motion's frequency, amplitude and phase by means of the control device, and
- by means of the control device, actuating a vibration damping device, so that the same renders a mechanical damping force with substantially the same frequency as the tool's oscillatory motion.
- The invention also relates to a vibration damper and a mechanical apparatus for performing the method.
- Metallic tools for chip-forming machining can be exposed to vibrations induced by either forces or regenerative oscillations (i.e., feed-back vibrations); see “Metal Cutting Theory and Practice” by Stephenson and Agapiou; publisher Marcel Dekker Inc.; ISBN: 0-8247-9579-2. According to this document, vibrations induced by forces are generated by transient cutting forces, whereas regenerative vibrations (also called chatter or oscillations) occur because the dynamic cutting process forms a closed loop. The present invention relates to the damping of only regenerative oscillations (also called self-induced vibrations or feedback vibrations).
- Regenerative vibration is so named because of the closed-loop nature of the dynamic cutting process. Each tool pass leaves disturbances in the form of undulations on the workpiece due to the vibrations of the tool and workpiece, and those disturbances produce mechanical feedback vibrations in subsequent passes of the tool. Thus, regenerative vibration can be described as a small transient wave that is machined into the workpiece. That small wave will become the driving force, causing the system to vibrate increasingly again in subsequent passes, i.e., the vibrations from one pass are amplified by those of the next pass. Unstable conditions can cause a small wavelet to develop and increase around the circumference, giving non-acceptable machining results.
- Damping of vibration in tools for chip removing machining has previously been achieved by pure mechanical damping, i.e., the tool shaft being formed with a cavity in which is disposed a counter-oscillating mass of, for instance, heavy metal. The weight and location of the mass is tuned in order to provide damping of oscillations within a certain range of frequencies. The cavity is then filled with a viscous liquid, e.g. oil, and is plugged. However, this technique works passably only in those cases where the overhang of the shaft from a fastening device is approx. 4-10 times longer than the diameter thereof. In addition to this limitation, the pure mechanical damping has an obvious disadvantage in that the range of frequencies within which the damping acts, is very limited. An additional inconvenience consists of the strength-wise weakening of the shaft resulting from the presence of that cavity.
- In entirely other areas of technology, the development of more efficient, adaptive damping techniques based on the utilization of, among other things, piezo elements has been started. A piezo element consists of a material, most often of a ceramic type, which when compressed or elongated in a certain direction (the direction of polarization), generates an electric field in the same direction. The piezo element usually has the shape of a rectangular plate having a direction of polarization, which is parallel to the major axis of the plate. By connecting the piezo element to an electric circuit, including a control module, and compressing or elongating the piezo element in the direction of polarization, an electric current will be generated and flow in the circuit. Electric resistive components included in the control module will generate heat according to known physics. In doing so, vibration energy is converted to thermal energy, whereby a passively damping, but not damping effect on the vibrations is obtained. Moreover, by forming the control module with a suitable combination of resistive and reactive components, so-called shunts, selected frequencies can be brought to be damped with particular efficiency. Advantageously, such frequencies are the so-called “own-frequencies” of the exposed “own-modes” of the object, which are those preferably being excited.
- Conversely, a piezo element may be compressed or elongated by an electric voltage being applied over the piezo element, during which the same may be used as a control or operating device (actuator). This can be used for active vibration control by selecting the polarity of the applied electric voltage in such a way that the mechanical stress of the operating device acts in the opposite direction, as an external, mechanical stress. The emergence of vibrations is suppressed by the fact that another kinetic energy, for instance rotation energy, is prevented from being converted to vibration energy. In doing so, the synchronization of the applied electric voltage relative to the external mechanical stress, the effect of which is to be counteracted, takes place by supplying a feedback signal from a deformation sensitive sensor to a control means in the form of a logical control circuit, e.g. a programmable micro-processor. The processor processes the signal to control the electric voltage applied over the operating device. The control function, i.e. the relation between the input signal from the sensor and the output voltage, may, in that connection, be made very complex. For instance, a self-learning system for adaptation to varying conditions is feasible. The sensor may consist of a separate, deformation sensitive device, e.g. a second piezo element, or be common with the operating device.
- Examples of practical applications and present development areas for the utilization of piezo elements for vibration damping purposes, are described in Mechanical Engineering, Nov. 1995, p. 76-81. Thus, skis for alpine skiing (K2 Four ski, K2 Corp., USA) have been equipped with piezo elements for the purpose of suppressing undesired vibrations, which otherwise decrease the contact with the ground, and thereby reduce the skier's prospects of a stable and controlled skiing. Furthermore, applications such as increased wing stability of aeroplanes, improved comfort in motor vehicles, suppression of vibrations in helicopter rotor blades and shafts, vibration control of process platforms for flexible manufacture, and increased accuracy of military weapons are mentioned. In information documents from Active Control experts (ACX) Inc., USA (a manufacturer of piezo elements), the vibration control of snowboards is also mentioned.
- A method of the kind described in the introduction, as well as such a vibration damper and such a mechanical structure, respectively, is known from SE-A-9900441-8 (corresponding to U.S. application Ser. No. 09/913,271, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein).
- This type of vibration damper is not suitable for force-induced vibrations, but only for regenerative, i.e. feed-back vibrations, which, e.g., arise in a tool during mechanical machining when a small disturbance gives a mechanical feed-back in the tool. Such a mechanical feed-back may cause an increasing oscillatory motion, and thereby an undesired uneven surface of the machined blank and reduced service life of the tool.
- While SE-A-9900441-8 does not explicitly describe how to apply the damping force to the mechanical structure, the hitherto known way to dampen an oscillatory motion has been to generate a counter force in phase with the oscillatory motion. This procedure works well as long as low frequencies are concerned. At higher frequencies, i.e. above approximately 500 Hz, it is difficult to apply a counter force without phase errors. If a phase error arises, there is a risk of the oscillatory motion and the damping force ending up in an unbalanced state, and thereby partly amplifying each other, which in turn may lead to the oscillatory motion not being quenched to the desired degree. Thus, a presumption for such a vibration damping to work is that the counter-directed force is in phase with the oscillatory motion with a high degree of accuracy.
- Other piezoelectric dampers are described in SE-A-9803605-6, SE-A98003606-4,SE-A-9803607-2, US-A-4 849 668, DE-A-199 25 193, EP-A-0 196 502, US-A-5 485 053 and JP-A-63180401.
- During chip removing machining, such as turning or drilling, it is not unrare for problems with vibrations to arise, particularly in cases in which the length of the shaft or tool outside the fastening device (a so-called overhang) is at least 3 times larger than the diameter thereof. One type of vibration is bending vibration, the shaft being curved to and fro and submitted to bending deformations. This phenomenon constitutes a common problem, for instance during turning, especially internal turning, where the shaft in the form of a boring bar has to be long in order to reach the area in the workpiece which is to be machined, at the same time as the diameter of the bar is limited by the dimension of the bore in which machining is carried out. During such drilling, turning and milling operations, where the distance to the workpiece is large, extenders are used, which frequently causes bending vibrations which not only lead to impaired dimensional accuracy and irregularities in the workpiece, but also to reduced service life of the tool and the cutting inserts or machining elements thereof.
- The purpose of the present invention is to improve the control of a vibration-damping device for cutting tools having a regenerative oscillatory motion.
- This has been attained by a method and a vibration damper, respectively, according to the kind described in the introduction, the control device of which being arranged to generate a damping force directed opposite to the cutting tool's oscillatory velocity. This means that the damping force gives the tool a deformation directed in the opposite direction to that of the tool's oscillatory motional velocity.
- In this way, a damping of the regenerative motion is obtained without risk that the oscillations end up in imbalance, and thereby amplify the oscillatory motion. The invention does not require a high degree of accuracy as regards the phase relationship between the frequencies of the vibration and the imposed damping force, i.e. the damping force should constantly resist the velocity and in order to obtain a maximum damping effect, a maximum damping force is imposed all the time. However, it is of minor importance with a maximum force at the oscillatory motion's end points, since the velocity there is low. Thus, it is important that the damping effect is greater than the contribution from the cutting process so that the regenerative oscillation is damped out and a smooth cutting process is obtained by means of the mechanical structure, e.g. a turning shaft or a boring bar.
- Preferably, the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 60°-120° alternatively 240°-300° in relation to the oscillatory motion. Suitably, the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 70°-110° alternatively 250°-290° in relation to the oscillatory motion. Preferably, the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 80°-100° alternatively 260°-280° in relation to the oscillatory motion. In this way, a faster damping of the oscillatory motion is obtained. Best results are achieved when the control device is arranged to impose the damping force out of phase by 90° alternatively 270° in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- A co-directed force should be given when the same is imposed out of phase between 60° and 120° in relation to the oscillatory motion, while a counter directed force should be imposed out of phase between 240° and 300° in relation to the oscillatory motion.
- Preferably, the control device is arranged to give a damping force in the area of 50-1500 Hz.
- Suitably, at least one piezoelectric element is included in the vibration-damping device. Alternatively, the vibration-damping device may be a hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder or an electromagnetic device.
- Preferably, said mechanical structure comprises a tool for chip removing machining.
- In the following, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described in detail, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, where:
- FIG. 1 is a schematic side view of a long narrow body in the form of a tool shaft during bending, deformation at oscillation (1st resonance frequency).
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the bending torque in the body.
- FIG. 3 a side view of a cut end portion of the body in connection with a fastening end so as to illustrate the stress in the body during bending deformation proportional to elongation.
- FIG. 4 is a transparent perspective view of a tool shaft.
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a bar extender for milling tools formed with a circular cross-section.
- FIGS.6-8 are perspective views of respective tool shafts having a square cross-section and in different alternative embodiments, wherein FIG. 6 shows a piezo element mounted in a countersink of a tool draft; FIG. 7 shows the countersink of FIG. 6 covered by a lid; FIG. 8 shows a piezo element mounted on the outside of the shaft.
- FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a tool for active vibration damping mounted in a carrier.
- FIG. 10 is an analogous perspective view of an alternative embodiment for passive vibration damping.
- FIG. 11 shows schematically the damping of an oscillatory motion by means of a counter force in phase with the oscillation.
- FIGS.12-13 show schematically the damping of an oscillatory motion according to the invention, wherein FIG. 12 shows the application of a constant-amplitude damping force, whereas FIG. 13 discloses the application of a damping force having a gradually diminishing amplitude.
- In FIG. 1, a long narrow body in the form of a bar or a
shaft 1 of a tool is illustrated, which is intended to carry one or more (cutting) inserts of the tool during turning or milling. Thebody 1 has afastening end 2 and a free,external end 3. The body has anexternal surface 4, which may be cylindrical or comprise a plurality of plane surfaces if the body has a polygonal, e.g. rectangular cross-section shape. Thebody 1 may have an arbitrary cross-section shape, however, most commonly circular or rectangular. In FIG. 1,numeral 5 designates a part in which thebody 1 is fastened, the body extending cantilever-like from the fastening part. In FIG. 1, thebody 1 is shown in a state when the same has been deformed in a first self-bending state or “own-mode.” - Furthermore, in FIG. 2 a graph is shown which illustrates how the bending torque Mb in this case varies along the body. As is seen in the graph, a maximum bending moment arises, and thus a maximum axial elongation, at or near the
fastening end 2. The same is valid for all lower modes, which are normally energy-wise dominant during bending vibrations of tools for chip removing machining. - In FIG. 3, a portion of the
body 1 deformed by bending in FIG. 1 is shown in the area of the fastening end. In this connection, how the elongation at bending deformation varies in the cross-direction of the body (the elongation is strongly exaggerated for illustrative reasons) is illustrated. As is seen in the figure, the maximum elongations are obtained at the envelope surface orexternal surface 4 of the body. - In FIG. 4, a fundamental design of a bar or a
shaft 1 is schematically shown in which two plate-formed, rectangularpiezo elements 8 are fastened on opposite,longitudinal plane surfaces 4 of the shaft of rectangular cross-section. Thepiezo elements 8 are placed in the area near thefastening end 2 of the shaft. At theexternal end 3 thereof, the shaft has a machining element in the form of a cutting insert 9. Thus, thepiezo elements 8 are positioned in an area where the maximum axial elongation occurs during bending deformation. Although this location is preferred, also other locations are feasible. Furthermore, thepiezo elements 8 are oriented with the major faces thereof essentially parallel to the plane surfaces 4 of the bar orshaft 1 and with the major axes essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the shaft orbar 1, at which thepiezo elements 8 at bending vibration will be deformed while retaining the rectangular shape. - In FIG. 5, an embodiment is shown in which the
body 1 consists of a cylindrical bar extender intended for a milling tool. In this case, a chip forming machining element 9 in the form of a cutting edge is formed adjacent to achip pocket 10 at thefree end 3 of the bar extender. Apiezo element 8 is attached on theenvelope surface 4 of the bar extender in an area near thefastening end 2. The major axis of the piezo element is parallel to the length extension of the bar extender. Consequently, with this orientation, the piezo element 9 acts also here most efficiently for the damping of bending vibration. - For simultaneous damping of bending and torsional vibrations, the shaft of the tool is advantageously formed with a plurality of piezo elements, some of which being oriented with the long sides thereof essentially parallel to the length extension of the shaft, while others are oriented at approximately a 45° angle. Alternatively, one or more piezo elements are provided having different respective orientations.
- Piezo elements are usually fragile, particularly such of the ceramic type. Therefore, in demanding environments, the same should have some form of protection in order to achieve art acceptable service life.
- In FIGS.6-8, tool shafts having a rectangular cross-section are shown, the
piezo element 8 being attached and protected in alternative ways. In all cases, the piezo elements are placed in an area near the fastening part 5 (which part may consist of a conventional clamping unit in which the tool is detachably mounted). - In FIG. 6, the
piezo element 8 is mounted in acountersink 11 and advantageously covered by a protection layer, for instance of the epoxy type. - In FIG. 7, the piezo clement is assumed to be mounted in the
countersink 11 and covered by astiff lid 12. - In FIG. 8, the
piezo element 8 is mounted to, e.g. glued on, the outside of the shaft. These alternatives should only be seen as examples, those of which shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 being preferred. It should be understood that the same type of protection for the piezo elements is independent of the cross-section shape of the tool shaft. - The piezo elements co-operate with means for electric control or guiding of the same. In FIGS. 9 and 10, examples are shown of how the
tool 1 has been formed with such control means. In these cases, the tool is mounted in acarrier 13. In FIG. 10, a control means for damping is shown in the form of a control means 14 formed near thefastening end 2 and anelectric connection 15, via which one or morepiezo elements 8 are connected to thecontrol module 14 for separate or common control of respective piezo elements. Thismodule 14 comprises at least electric resistive components. Preferably, thecontrol module 14 also comprises one or more shunts, at which selected frequencies may be damped particularly efficiently. - FIG. 9 illustrates a control means for active damping in the form of a free-standing
logical control circuit 16, e.g. a programmable microprocessor, for separate or common control of (via the schematically illustrated electric connection 15) voltages applied over thepiezo elements 8. In practice, theconnection 15 may in this case comprise collector shoes or the like. - Also, if the
piezo elements 8 in the embodiment exemplified in FIG. 10 for active damping simultaneously act as both operating devices and sensors, it is feasible to realise the same two functions by separate operating devices and sensors, wherein the sensors do not need to consist of piezo elements. Although the depicted locations of thecontrol module 14 andlogic control circuit 16, respectively, are preferred, other locations are feasible. For instance, it is feasible, as in the case of thelogic control circuit 16, to arrange thecontrol module 14 freestanding from the tool. The advantage of placing thecontrol module 14 in the vicinity of the fastening end is that the module becomes simple to connect to the piezo elements, whereas the advantage of arranging it at a freestanding position is that it becomes easier to protect the module against harmful mechanical effects. - Through the usage of piezo elements as vibration dampers, a robust tool for chip removing machining is obtained having a possibility of active damping of bending vibrations over a wide range of frequencies. Furthermore, a tool is provided which on one hand has a longer service life for the tool in itself as well as the cutting or machining elements thereof, and on the other hand provides increased quality of the surface on the machined workpiece. In addition, an improved working environment is attained by the reduction of high frequency noise compared with previously known tools.
- FIG. 11 shows schematically how damping of an undesired oscillatory motion in a mechanical structure generally comes about according to afore-mentioned U.S. Ser. No. 09/913,271. If a damping
force 20 is counter-directed to, and in phase with, theoscillatory motion 22, the motion is quickly dampened. However, this requires a very large accuracy as regards phase correctness. If a phase error arises between the damping force and the oscillatory motion, the counter-directed dampening force will be partly co-directed with the oscillatory motion, which may lead to the oscillatory motion not being quenched to the desired degree. - FIG. 12 shows schematically the damping of the oscillatory motion of the mechanical structure according to the invention. The sensor detects the
oscillatory motion 22. The signal is transferred to the control device, which processes the signal and determines the oscillatory motion's phase by defining positive and negative, respectively, zero crossing, The control device also calculates the amplitude and frequency of the oscillation. - The control device then sends out a control signal to the vibration damper (actuator), which generates a
force 20′ counter-directed relative to the tool'svelocity 24. The phase is displaced a quarter of, alternatively three-quarters of, a wavelength in relation to the oscillatory motion. - Since the damping force is applied in counter-direction to the velocity of the oscillatory motion, the damping force will tend to deform the tool in that counter direction. Accordingly, regenerative vibration can be damped without a risk that the damping force will amplify the vibration, e.g., the result of an unbalanced relationship therebetween. The invention thus eliminates a need for a high degree of accuracy between the phases of the damping force frequency and the regenerative vibration frequency.
- In FIG. 13, it is shown how a
counter force 20″ directed in the opposite direction to that of the tool'soscillatory motion 22 can be imposed at gradually decreasing oscillation amplitude (in lieu of constant amplitude) to avoid a new generation of vibrations, and is thereby easier to control. - Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Claims (32)
1. A method for damping feed-back vibrations of a metallic tool during the chip removing machining of a metal workpiece comprising the steps of:
A. causing a sensor device to detect an oscillatory motion of the tool;
B. causing a control device to identify the frequency of the oscillatory motion detected in step A; and
C. causing a vibration damping device to generate a mechanical damping force having substantially the same frequency as the frequency identified in step B and applied to the tool in counter-direction to a velocity of the oscillatory motion.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 60°-120° relative to the oscillatory motion.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 240°-300° relative to the oscillatory motion.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 70°-110 ° relative to the oscillatory motion.
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 250°-290° relative to the oscillatory motion.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 80°-100° relative to the oscillatory motion.
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 260°-280° relative to the oscillatory motion.
8. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 90° relative to the oscillatory motion.
9. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes applying the damping force to the tool out of phase by 270° relative to the oscillatory motion.
10. the method according to claim 1 wherein the damping force generated in step C is in the range of 50-1500 Hz.
11. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes causing a piezo element of the mechanical damping device to generate the damping force.
12. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes causing a hydraulic cylinder of the mechanical damping device to generate the damping force.
13. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes causing a pneumatic cylinder of the mechanical damping device to generate the damping force.
14. The method according to claim 1 wherein step C includes causing an electromagnetic device of the mechanical damping device to generate the damping force.
15. The method according to claim 1 wherein step B further includes causing the control device to identify an amplitude of the oscillatory motion, and wherein the mechanical damping force generated by the vibration damping device is of gradually decreasing amplitude.
16. A vibration damping system for damping feed-back vibrations of a mechanical tool during the chip-removing machining of metal workpieces, the apparatus comprising:
a sensor device for detecting an oscillatory motion of the tool during a machining operation;
a control device operably connected to the sensor device for identifying a frequency of the oscillatory motion sensed by the sensor device; and
a vibration damping device for generating a mechanical damping force having substantially the same frequency as the oscillatory motion and a counter-direction relative to the direction of the velocity of the oscillatory motion.
17. The vibration system according to claim 16 wherein the control device identifies an amplitude of the oscillatory motion, and the vibration damping device generates a damping force of gradually decreasing amplitude.
18. A metal cutting apparatus for the chip removing machining of metal workpieces, the apparatus comprising:
a metal-cutting tool; and
a vibration damping system operably connected to the tool and comprising:
a sensor device for detecting an oscillatory motion of the tool during a machining operation;
a control device operably connected to the sensor device for identifying a frequency of the oscillatory motion sensed by the sensor device, and
a vibration damping device for generating a mechanical damping force having substantially the same frequency as the oscillatory motion and applied to the tool shaft in counter-direction to a velocity of the oscillatory motion.
19. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 60°-120° relative to the oscillatory motion.
20. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 240°-300° relative to the oscillatory motion.
21. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 70°-110 relative to the oscillatory motion.
22. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 250°-290° relative to the oscillatory motion.
23. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 80°-100° relative to the oscillatory motion.
24. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 260°-280° relative to the oscillatory motion.
25. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 90° relative to the oscillatory motion.
26. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is applied to the tool out of phase by 270 °relative to the oscillatory motion.
27. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the damping force is in the range of 50-1500 Hz.
28. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein a piezo element of the mechanical damping device generated the damping force.
29. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein a hydraulic cylinder of the mechanical damping device generates the damping force.
30. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein a pneumatic cylinder of the mechanical damping device generates the damping force.
31. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein an electromagnetic device of the mechanical damping device generates the damping force.
32. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the control device identifies an amplitude of the oscillatory motion, and the vibration damping device generates a mechanical damping force of gradually decreasing amplitude.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/851,099 US20040240955A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2004-05-24 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
US11/178,335 US7647853B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2005-07-12 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE0004540A SE517878C2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2000-12-08 | Method and apparatus for vibration damping of metallic tools for chip separating machining and tools comprising such a device |
SE0004540-1 | 2000-12-08 |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/851,099 Continuation US20040240955A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2004-05-24 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020083805A1 true US20020083805A1 (en) | 2002-07-04 |
Family
ID=20282150
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/006,713 Abandoned US20020083805A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-12-10 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
US10/851,099 Abandoned US20040240955A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2004-05-24 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
US11/178,335 Expired - Fee Related US7647853B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2005-07-12 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/851,099 Abandoned US20040240955A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2004-05-24 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
US11/178,335 Expired - Fee Related US7647853B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2005-07-12 | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20020083805A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1339516B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2004515371A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100844095B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1236884C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE367234T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60129458T2 (en) |
SE (1) | SE517878C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002045891A1 (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020119021A1 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-29 | Eiji Shamoto | Method of controlling elliptical vibrator |
EP1422440A1 (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2004-05-26 | Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG | Device and method for active control of vibrations of an element |
US20050109182A1 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2005-05-26 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Vibration-suppressing cutting tool |
US20050114431A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-05-26 | Singh Uma K. | System and method for a generic mobile synchronization framework |
EP1566481A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-24 | Voith Paper Patent GmbH | Damping of a doctor |
US20060291973A1 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2006-12-28 | Ingvar Claesson | Device and a method for preventing or reducing vibrations in a cutting tool |
US20070056414A1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2007-03-15 | Martin Saeterbo | Arrangement for damping of vibrations and defection in a tool holder |
DE102005060779A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2007-06-21 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Force generator for inducing controllable oscillation forces into e.g. helicopter, has controller arranged to bend bending arm by controlling transducers and to move inertial mass, such that oscillation forces are induced into structure |
US7591209B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2009-09-22 | Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp. | Vibration suppressing cutting tool |
US20130236254A1 (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2013-09-12 | Techspace Aero S.A. | Two-material one-piece cutting tool |
EP3241647B1 (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2019-02-06 | Soraluce, S.Coop. | Machine tool with active damping system |
US10254104B2 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2019-04-09 | Kennametal Inc | Method and apparatus for center height alignment of a boring bar |
EP3511112A1 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2019-07-17 | Soraluce, S.Coop. | Machine tool with active damping |
US10500648B1 (en) * | 2018-06-12 | 2019-12-10 | Iscar, Ltd. | Tool holder having integrally formed anti-vibration component and cutting tool provided with tool holder |
US10744567B2 (en) * | 2015-09-10 | 2020-08-18 | Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. | Control device for machine tool and machine tool |
CN112935295A (en) * | 2021-01-22 | 2021-06-11 | 山东大学 | Embedded damping vibration attenuation lathe tool bar and method for deep cavity machining |
Families Citing this family (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE50304635D1 (en) | 2002-07-18 | 2006-09-28 | P&L Gmbh & Co Kg | Active vibration damping in a machine tool |
DE102006001556A1 (en) * | 2006-01-04 | 2007-07-05 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Holder for tools for machining, has sensitive or active element arranged or accommodated with forces, ways or moments detected or exercised on tool |
DE102007005221A1 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2007-08-23 | Ceramtec Ag Innovative Ceramic Engineering | Use of piezoceramic transducers to control the machining of workpieces |
DE102007005222A1 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2007-08-09 | Ceramtec Ag Innovative Ceramic Engineering | Use of piezoceramic transducers to control the machining of workpieces |
CN100443256C (en) * | 2006-10-20 | 2008-12-17 | 宁波大学 | Active vibration-damping device for cutting equipment, and control method thereof |
JP5563581B2 (en) | 2008-10-09 | 2014-07-30 | ニューカッスル イノベイション リミテッド | Positioning system and method |
NO335949B1 (en) * | 2010-05-10 | 2015-03-30 | Teeness Asa | Rod-shaped tool holder for attaching inserts at a junction |
US8734070B2 (en) | 2010-10-20 | 2014-05-27 | Kennametal Inc. | Toolholder with externally-mounted dynamic absorber |
JP5742312B2 (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2015-07-01 | 株式会社ジェイテクト | Chatter vibration detection method |
CN102179534B (en) * | 2011-04-19 | 2013-01-09 | 上海理工大学 | Magnetorheological vibration reduction system based on shearing work mode for cylindrical turning vibrations |
JP5908342B2 (en) * | 2012-05-17 | 2016-04-26 | オークマ株式会社 | Machining vibration suppression method and machining vibration suppression device for machine tool |
FR3003486B1 (en) | 2013-03-25 | 2015-05-22 | Ct Tech De L Ind Du Decolletage | PLATE HOLDER FOR MACHINE TOOL |
DE102013105829A1 (en) | 2013-06-06 | 2014-12-11 | Bilz Werkzeugfabrik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Tool clamping system |
CN105436981B (en) * | 2015-09-28 | 2018-02-16 | 上海诺倬力机电科技有限公司 | Flutter Control method and numerical control processing apparatus based on vibration monitoring |
CN105290434B (en) * | 2015-11-02 | 2017-10-24 | 宁波大学 | A kind of turning flutter forecasting procedure based on power flow |
WO2017083120A1 (en) * | 2015-11-12 | 2017-05-18 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Acoustic and vibration sensing apparatus and method for monitoring cutting tool operation |
CN106077726B (en) * | 2016-08-24 | 2018-07-27 | 广东工业大学 | Numerically-controlled machine tool and its all-around intelligent damping tools |
EP3292930B1 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2023-03-01 | Sandvik Intellectual Property AB | Cutting tool and method for estimation of deflection of the cutting edge |
DE102017116326A1 (en) | 2017-07-19 | 2019-01-24 | Wohlhaupter Gmbh | Damping device and tool holding device with such a damping device |
CN109759888B (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2020-11-27 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Quenching steel die splicing area acoustic-electric mixed field milling device and pre-return control method |
EP3708295B1 (en) | 2019-03-15 | 2021-07-14 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Machine tool with optimised orientation of vibration dampers |
WO2021049429A1 (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2021-03-18 | 京セラ株式会社 | Cutting structure, data collection system, and cutting tool |
CN111015346B (en) * | 2019-12-28 | 2021-03-26 | 苏州大学 | Cutter cutting chatter control method, device and equipment |
FR3109903B1 (en) * | 2020-05-07 | 2022-04-15 | Hutchinson | Boring bar fitted with electrodynamic actuators to counter vibrations and machine tool fitted with such a bar. |
EP3967449A1 (en) * | 2020-09-09 | 2022-03-16 | Hartmetall-Werkzeugfabrik Paul Horn GmbH | Tool holder and tool system provided with such a tool holder |
IT202000031043A1 (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2022-06-16 | Nuovo Pignone Tecnologie Srl | ACTIVE PIEZOELECTRIC TOOL, ACTIVE PIEZOELECTRIC DEVICE AND ACTIVE PIEZOELECTRIC TOOL OPERATION METHOD. |
CN116161213B (en) * | 2023-04-24 | 2023-07-21 | 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳空气动力研究所 | Wing flutter suppression device and method based on piezoelectric energy harvesting module |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3967515A (en) * | 1974-05-13 | 1976-07-06 | Purdue Research Foundation | Apparatus for controlling vibrational chatter in a machine-tool utilizing an updated synthesis circuit |
US4849668A (en) * | 1987-05-19 | 1989-07-18 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Embedded piezoelectric structure and control |
US5239789A (en) * | 1988-10-06 | 1993-08-31 | Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. | Vibration damping system |
US5485053A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1996-01-16 | Univ America Catholic | Method and device for active constrained layer damping for vibration and sound control |
US5558477A (en) * | 1994-12-02 | 1996-09-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Vibration damping system using active negative capacitance shunt circuit with piezoelectric reaction mass actuator |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH541376A (en) * | 1971-08-25 | 1973-09-15 | Tiefbohr Technik Gmbh | Device for damping vibrations when machining workpieces |
DE2605476A1 (en) * | 1976-02-12 | 1977-08-18 | Johann Prof Dr I Kleinwaechter | Vibration damper with out of phase resistance - has vibration sensors producing functional signals linked to analogue computer |
DE3509240A1 (en) | 1985-03-14 | 1986-09-18 | Traub GmbH Maschinenfabrik, 7313 Reichenbach | DRIVE DEVICE FOR A TOOL CUTTER |
JPS63180401A (en) | 1987-01-19 | 1988-07-25 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | Cutting tool having active vibration isolating function |
JP2568560B2 (en) * | 1987-07-02 | 1997-01-08 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Control type anti-vibration device |
US5416597A (en) * | 1992-11-23 | 1995-05-16 | Mubaslat; Saed M. | System and technique for damping engraving head rings |
US5913955A (en) * | 1998-02-12 | 1999-06-22 | Sandia Corporation | Vibration damping method and apparatus |
US6241435B1 (en) * | 1998-03-25 | 2001-06-05 | Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. | Universal adaptive machining chatter control fixture |
SE514525E (en) | 1998-10-22 | 2010-02-16 | Staffansboda Cie Ab | Device and method for controlling vibration and tool holders |
SE519487C2 (en) | 1998-10-22 | 2003-03-04 | Rolf Zimmergren | Method and apparatus for vibration control in drilling turning and tool holder for drilling turning |
SE515157C2 (en) | 1998-10-22 | 2001-06-18 | Ingvar Claesson | Method and apparatus for controlling turning operation |
SE517790C2 (en) | 1999-02-10 | 2002-07-16 | Sandvik Ab | Chip separation tool |
DE19925193B4 (en) | 1999-04-14 | 2007-11-22 | Gühring, Jörg, Dr. | Piezoelectric adjustment mechanism |
US6443673B1 (en) * | 2000-01-20 | 2002-09-03 | Kennametal Inc. | Tunable boring bar for suppressing vibrations and method thereof |
JP3806603B2 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2006-08-09 | Towa株式会社 | Oval vibration device and control method of elliptic vibration device |
-
2000
- 2000-12-08 SE SE0004540A patent/SE517878C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2001
- 2001-12-04 WO PCT/SE2001/002677 patent/WO2002045891A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-12-04 KR KR1020037007470A patent/KR100844095B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-12-04 EP EP01999451A patent/EP1339516B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-04 CN CNB018198678A patent/CN1236884C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-12-04 DE DE60129458T patent/DE60129458T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-04 JP JP2002547660A patent/JP2004515371A/en active Pending
- 2001-12-04 AT AT01999451T patent/ATE367234T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-12-10 US US10/006,713 patent/US20020083805A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-05-24 US US10/851,099 patent/US20040240955A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2005
- 2005-07-12 US US11/178,335 patent/US7647853B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3967515A (en) * | 1974-05-13 | 1976-07-06 | Purdue Research Foundation | Apparatus for controlling vibrational chatter in a machine-tool utilizing an updated synthesis circuit |
US4849668A (en) * | 1987-05-19 | 1989-07-18 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Embedded piezoelectric structure and control |
US5239789A (en) * | 1988-10-06 | 1993-08-31 | Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. | Vibration damping system |
US5485053A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1996-01-16 | Univ America Catholic | Method and device for active constrained layer damping for vibration and sound control |
US5558477A (en) * | 1994-12-02 | 1996-09-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Vibration damping system using active negative capacitance shunt circuit with piezoelectric reaction mass actuator |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6776563B2 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2004-08-17 | Eiji Shamoto | Method of controlling elliptical vibrator |
US20020119021A1 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-29 | Eiji Shamoto | Method of controlling elliptical vibrator |
EP1422440A1 (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2004-05-26 | Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG | Device and method for active control of vibrations of an element |
US20070056414A1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2007-03-15 | Martin Saeterbo | Arrangement for damping of vibrations and defection in a tool holder |
US7908947B2 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2011-03-22 | Teeness Asa | Arrangement for damping of vibrations and defection in a tool holder |
US20050114431A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-05-26 | Singh Uma K. | System and method for a generic mobile synchronization framework |
US7591209B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2009-09-22 | Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp. | Vibration suppressing cutting tool |
US20050109182A1 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2005-05-26 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Vibration-suppressing cutting tool |
US7490536B2 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2009-02-17 | Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp. | Vibration-suppressing cutting tool |
EP1566481A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-24 | Voith Paper Patent GmbH | Damping of a doctor |
US20060291973A1 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2006-12-28 | Ingvar Claesson | Device and a method for preventing or reducing vibrations in a cutting tool |
US7234379B2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2007-06-26 | Ingvar Claesson | Device and a method for preventing or reducing vibrations in a cutting tool |
DE102005060779B4 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2008-07-10 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | power generator |
DE102005060779A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2007-06-21 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Force generator for inducing controllable oscillation forces into e.g. helicopter, has controller arranged to bend bending arm by controlling transducers and to move inertial mass, such that oscillation forces are induced into structure |
US20130236254A1 (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2013-09-12 | Techspace Aero S.A. | Two-material one-piece cutting tool |
US10744567B2 (en) * | 2015-09-10 | 2020-08-18 | Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. | Control device for machine tool and machine tool |
US10254104B2 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2019-04-09 | Kennametal Inc | Method and apparatus for center height alignment of a boring bar |
EP3241647B1 (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2019-02-06 | Soraluce, S.Coop. | Machine tool with active damping system |
EP3511112A1 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2019-07-17 | Soraluce, S.Coop. | Machine tool with active damping |
US10500648B1 (en) * | 2018-06-12 | 2019-12-10 | Iscar, Ltd. | Tool holder having integrally formed anti-vibration component and cutting tool provided with tool holder |
CN112935295A (en) * | 2021-01-22 | 2021-06-11 | 山东大学 | Embedded damping vibration attenuation lathe tool bar and method for deep cavity machining |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050262975A1 (en) | 2005-12-01 |
SE0004540D0 (en) | 2000-12-08 |
SE517878C2 (en) | 2002-07-30 |
ATE367234T1 (en) | 2007-08-15 |
US20040240955A1 (en) | 2004-12-02 |
US7647853B2 (en) | 2010-01-19 |
KR100844095B1 (en) | 2008-07-04 |
EP1339516B1 (en) | 2007-07-18 |
SE0004540L (en) | 2002-06-09 |
KR20030061836A (en) | 2003-07-22 |
CN1478006A (en) | 2004-02-25 |
DE60129458D1 (en) | 2007-08-30 |
EP1339516A1 (en) | 2003-09-03 |
DE60129458T2 (en) | 2008-04-17 |
WO2002045891A1 (en) | 2002-06-13 |
JP2004515371A (en) | 2004-05-27 |
CN1236884C (en) | 2006-01-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7647853B2 (en) | Metal cutting apparatus and method for damping feed-back vibrations generated thereby | |
US6694213B2 (en) | Method and a device for vibration control | |
US7340985B2 (en) | Method and device for vibration control | |
US5913955A (en) | Vibration damping method and apparatus | |
US6349600B1 (en) | Device for stable speed determination in machining | |
JP2001328022A (en) | Vibration damping tool | |
US6661157B1 (en) | Active anti-vibration system for cutting tools utilizing piezo-electric elements | |
CN111251019B (en) | Clamping device and clamping system using same | |
US20240024965A1 (en) | Active piezoelectric tool, active piezoelectric device and operating method of the active piezoelectric tool | |
AU2021403442B2 (en) | Active piezoelectric tool, active piezoelectric device and operating method of the active piezoelectric tool | |
New et al. | “Chatter-Proof” Overhang Boring Bars—Stability Criteria and Design Procedure for a New Type of Damped Boring Bar | |
Redmond et al. | A bi-axial active boring tool for chatter mitigation | |
Bo et al. | A novel method of suppressing machining vibration in robotic milling using magneto-rheological foam damper | |
SE523267C2 (en) | Vibration control device for cutting machine, especially lathe, has control unit connectable to actuator for applying force to cutting tool holder | |
Yan et al. | Feasibility of using an active actuator for two-dimensional vibration abatement in a turning process | |
Redmond et al. | A biaxial actively damped boring bar for chatter mitigation | |
Özer et al. | Tool chatter in turning with a two-link robotic arm | |
Wang et al. | Design of Pendulum Absorbers for Transverse Vibration Attenuation of Rotating Beams |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SANDVIK AKTIEBOLAG, SWEDEN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LUNDBLAD, MIKAEL;REEL/FRAME:012627/0976 Effective date: 20020222 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |