US20010032577A1 - Deployable net for control of watercraft - Google Patents

Deployable net for control of watercraft Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010032577A1
US20010032577A1 US09/785,732 US78573201A US2001032577A1 US 20010032577 A1 US20010032577 A1 US 20010032577A1 US 78573201 A US78573201 A US 78573201A US 2001032577 A1 US2001032577 A1 US 2001032577A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
net
vessel
rockets
winch
target vessel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US09/785,732
Other versions
US6394016B2 (en
Inventor
Terry Swartout
Kevin Gessner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Inc
Original Assignee
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Inc filed Critical General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Inc
Priority to US09/785,732 priority Critical patent/US6394016B2/en
Assigned to GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GESSNER, KEVIN, SWARTOUT, TERRY L.
Publication of US20010032577A1 publication Critical patent/US20010032577A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6394016B2 publication Critical patent/US6394016B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F41H13/0006Ballistically deployed systems for restraining persons or animals, e.g. ballistically deployed nets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B21/00Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
    • B63B21/56Towing or pushing equipment
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63GOFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    • B63G13/00Other offensive or defensive arrangements on vessels; Vessels characterised thereby

Definitions

  • This invention relates to water-borne vessels, and more particularly to capturing of one vessel by another.
  • Rocket-deployed net devices have been used for neutralization of mines in shallow water during amphibious assault operations.
  • General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc. (formerly Primex Technologies, Inc.) has developed such a system utilizing distributed explosive technology (DET).
  • Each self-contained DET system includes the distributed explosive net and the associated solid propellant rocket motors, a fire control system, launch rails, and a shipping and storage container.
  • the invention is directed to a system for permitting a first surface vessel to capture a second surface vessel.
  • the system is mounted on the first surface vessel and includes a net having an initial stowed condition.
  • a launcher projects the net from the stowed condition to a deployed condition ensnaring the second vessel at a first location.
  • a winch is coupled to the net via a tether to permit the net to draw the ensnared second vessel from the first location toward a location of the second vessel.
  • Such locations may be either absolute or relative depending upon the particular conditions involved.
  • the launcher may include first and second chemical rockets such as solid propellant rockets.
  • the rockets may be coupled to a distal portion of the net via a harness system.
  • the net may generally increase in width from a proximal portion to a distal portion when the net is in an unfurled condition.
  • the harness may include left and right portions respectively coupled to the first and second rockets and distributing force supplied by the rockets over a substantial portion of a net leading edge.
  • the net leading edge may bear a plurality of weights having a specific gravity in excess of one and effective to cause sinking of a distal portion of the net.
  • Exemplary material for the weights includes lead and various nontoxic lead substitutes.
  • the net preferably carries no explosive material and is advantageously reusable after deployment. More aggressive systems may have explosive or other offensive components.
  • the invention is directed to a method for the capture of a target surface vessel by a second vessel.
  • An aforementioned net system is provided on the second vessel.
  • the rockets are launched to deploy the net over the target vessel in a first location.
  • the winch is caused to draw in the tether then pull the target vessel toward the second vessel.
  • the method may include permitting a portion of the net located distally of the target vessel in the first location to sink so as to enhance entanglement of the target vessel in the net.
  • the method may include permitting the target vessel to move from the first position and override a portion of the sunken portion of the net.
  • the method may include permitting the overridden portion of the net to entangle and stop a propeller of the target vessel.
  • the method may further include returning the net to its stowed condition, unwinding the tether from the winch, and replacing or refueling the rockets so as to permit reuse of the system.
  • FIG. 1 is a functional diagram of an exemplary vessel capture system.
  • FIG. 2 is an operational sequence flow chart of an exemplary vessel capture system.
  • FIG. 3 is a view of structural portions of an exemplary storage and shipping container which may be adapted for use with a deployable net.
  • FIG. 4 is a view of a net in an intermediate stage of deployment from a command vessel over a target vessel.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic time lapse of various intermediate stages of deployment of an exemplary net.
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of an intermediate stage in deployment of a net over a target vessel.
  • FIG. 1 shows a functional diagram of a system 20 .
  • the system 20 includes a containment net 22 , a launch rail system 24 , a fire control system (FCS) 26 , a propulsion system 28 , a craft interface kit 30 , a storage and shipping container 32 , a restraint system 34 , and spare parts and logistic support equipment 36 .
  • FCS fire control system
  • the craft interface kit contains the hardware necessary to install the system on a particular command or capture vessel 50 (FIG. 4).
  • FIG. 4 also shows a target vessel 52 which is typically much smaller than the command vessel.
  • FIG. 6 shows the net 22 deployed over the target vessel by the command vessel.
  • the exemplary unfurled net 22 has a main net portion 56 diverging distally in a generally triangular form from a proximal vertex 58 to a distal leading edge 60 .
  • a tether or tension line 62 in the restraint system connects the net to a winch 64 which may be electrically powered and may be integrated with or located adjacent to the launch rail system.
  • the main net portion is connected to left and right harness wings 70 A and 70 B.
  • the harness wings contain a number of elements extending from the net leading edge to an associated left and right rocket motor 72 A and 72 B.
  • an array of weights 80 may be provided.
  • FIG. 2 An exemplary operational sequence is shown in FIG. 2. As shown, after the target vessel is encountered and identified, the fire control system (FCS) is activated.
  • the FCS provides feedback to the command vessel's pilot to enable him to position his vessel in position in order to launch the VCS.
  • the FCS provides data such as required command vessel heading and speed.
  • the fire control system will automatically fire the rocket motors when proper launch parameters are met, ensuring target vessel envelopment.
  • the traveling rockets extract the net and deliver it over the target vessel. The net envelopes the target vessel and, preferably ensnares the vessel and entangles its propellers to further disable the vessel.
  • the winch may then be activated to draw the target vessel toward the command vessel to allow for boarding or other actions.
  • FIG. 5 reflects an exemplary frame of reference of the command with both the command and target vessels moving at a given velocity from left to right.
  • the rocket motors are collectively referenced as 72 and the harness wings as 70 .
  • the first four involve progressive stages in rocket flight propelling the net.
  • the fifth stage shows the rocket motors falling into the water.
  • the net sinks Due to the density of the rocket motors and to the density of weights on the harness connecting the rockets to the net or on a distal portion of the net, the net sinks, allowing the velocity of the target vessel to cause the target vessel to override the net as shown in the sixth stage. Once overridden, the net may become entangled in the target vessel's propellers, causing shutdown of the target vessel's engine.
  • the containment net is preferably constructed of lightweight, high-strength materials to enable rocket motor or ballistic slug deployment and vessel capture and to be capable of enveloping the target vessel and preventing target vessel propulsion.
  • the net size may be optimized for target vessel capture.
  • the net, being significantly larger than the target vessel is deployed over such vessel.
  • the ballistically dense rocket motors will sink upon impacting the water. This causes the forward section of the harness and array to hang down in the water column. As the target vessel attempts to escape, the harness lines and array will then become wrapped around the vessel's hull and, if present, tangled in the propeller. This will cause the propeller to cease motion, rendering the target vessel unable to continue motion.
  • the net size will advantageously be a minimum of 250 ft (76 m) wide by 250 ft (76 m) long and will likely have a weight of 1000 to 3000 lbs (450 to 1360 kg), depending on target vessel requirements. Nets of this size have been successfully deployed from surface craft in distances in excess of 1500 ft (460 m).
  • Exemplary material for the net is aramid fiber reinforced with a core of stainless steel cable.
  • the cable provides the net with additional toughness to resist abrasion and damage such as that caused by entanglement with a target vessel propeller.
  • the tether material may be aramid fiber or similarly reinforced aramid fiber or may be formed of a relatively elastic material.
  • the integrated launch rail system may be used to support the rocket motors prior to launch and provide for desired rocket motor path during extraction. This system may provide for the adjustment of quadrant elevation and azimuth angle for required mission settings.
  • the launch rail components will advantageously be suited for long-term exposure to salt air.
  • the reusable launch rail system will advantageously be provided with a complete inventory of spare parts.
  • Each launch rail may be an exemplary 5 feet (1.5 m) long and is supported by a framework that interfaces with the shipping container and craft interface kit.
  • the fire control system will advantageously provide the capability to accurately deploy the containment net from the command vessel while experiencing pitch, roll, yaw, heave, sway, and forward motion.
  • this type of fire control system has been demonstrated as an effective accurate means of deploying nets using unguided solid propellant rocket motors.
  • the system will rely upon motion sensors, tailored deployment algorithms, and a display unit for the command vessel.
  • the fire control system will advantageously be self-supporting and will not rely on command ship resources other than electrical power.
  • MK 22 MOD 4 rocket motors may be used at least for purposes of a demonstration test. These motors are fully qualified for use on US Navy vessels and have passed all required explosive safety tests. Having been used to extract and deploy nets, these rocket motors are a low-risk approach to net propulsion. They can be safety operated in temperatures ranging from ⁇ 40° to +120° F. ( ⁇ 40° to +49° C.). Two launch lugs on each motor interface with the launch rail system. The rocket motors will provide adequate thrust to extract the net at speeds typically in excess of 200 ft/sec (61 m/sec). The entire event, from extraction to deployment over the target vessel is expected to take no more than 5 seconds.
  • the craft interface kit (CIK) provides for all required interfaces between the command vessel and the VCS. It includes mounting hardware, electrical connections, and special tools (if any).
  • the deployable portions of the VCS are advantageously loaded into the storage and shipping container providing protection during transportation and storage. It also serves as the support structure from which the net is deployed. Environmental protection is provided in this reusable container. The net is hung from the roof of the container. The installation loops are disengaged during net extraction and allow for high-rate reliable deployment.
  • the SSC preferably weighs approximately 500 lbs (227 kg) and is approximately 8 ⁇ 5 ⁇ 4 ft (2.4 ⁇ 1.5 ⁇ 1.2 m) high.
  • a winch system is preferably used to provide additional control.
  • a tension line or tether will be attached to the aft (proximal) end of the containment net. This tether will be attached to a winch installed on the command vessel. As desired, the target vessel can be winched toward the command vessel for subsequent boarding or other operations.
  • Target vessel attributes such as weight, length, speed, and depth considerations must be understood and characterized and will influence any particular implementation.
  • Target vessel studies will allow development of a system requirements document (SRD) to be used in optimization studies to assure that the system provides required functionality for the particular application (types of target and capture vessels, speeds and water conditions, etc.).
  • SRD system requirements document
  • the SRD may provide a roadmap for follow-on analysis, design optimization, and test efforts.
  • MCM rocket motor-deployed mine counter measures
  • ADAMS Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems
  • the ADAMS code has been used to model the deployment characteristics of several net systems with great success.
  • a six degree of freedom representation of the VCS may be used to solve for component acceleration, velocity, position, and internal loading during, deployment.
  • a verified baseline net deployment model may be made available for the minor modifications as required by the target vessel set.
  • This baseline model may also be used to conduct parametric studies to support fire control algorithm development. This model is believed capable of accommodating all environmental conditions such as heave, sway, pitch, roll, yaw, and wind.
  • the rocket motor, containment net, winch system, connectors, and harness may be represented using the ADAMS 6-DOF code.
  • the bridle may be represented by a number of bridle segments. Special attention may be paid to modeling the harness and high load areas to allow for accurate load and acceleration predictions at these components.
  • the rocket motor and bridle representation may allow for rocket motor rotation and translation in response to loads exerted by the payload. Since the payload exerts rotational forces that induce rocket motor pitching and yawing, this representation is useful to accurately predict system trajectory.
  • the simulated launch configuration will preferably match one-for-one the actual pre-launch configuration.
  • ADAMS models a mechanical system by solving the following first order Euler-Lagrange equations:
  • Rf j reaction force for the jth coordinate
  • V i velocity
  • ADAMS employs a multi-step predictor-corrector method to solve the IVP that improves accuracy made by explicit methods alone, such as the Runge-Kutta method of four. With the predictor-corrector method, an explicit method predicts an approximation to the solution and implicit method corrects this prediction. Additionally, ADAMS employs a variable step-size algorithm to further reduce integration error.
  • the predictor applies a BDF to each unknown in the system to provide an initial guess for the corrector.
  • the corrector is a modified Newton-Raphson algorithm that solves the Euler-Lagrange equations and the BDF equations.
  • the self-formulating ADAMS code requires the input of mass properties, dynamic material properties, initial position, and aerodynamic properties.
  • a 3-D aerodynamic representation of the system may be used to predict flight characteristics of the system. Aerodynamic lift and drag as a function of angle of attack and velocity will be included. The aerodynamic coefficients of the grenades, rocket motor, and fuzes will be based on theoretical data unless wind tunnel data is available.
  • Aerodynamic forces will be implemented assuming the following:
  • Drag force normal to apparent velocity (lbf or n)
  • Lift force tangent to apparent velocity (lbf or n)
  • air density (slug/ft 3 or kg/m 3 )
  • V apparent velocity (ft/sec or m/s)
  • Time varying rocket motor performance may be accounted for in the VCS deployment model. Worst-case rocket motor performance, yielding the highest dynamic loads, may be assumed. Rocket motor performance data may be taken from static firings and theoretical calculations.
  • Results from this analysis effort may also be used to develop fire control algorithms.
  • the fire control will advantageously incorporate a system of sensing craft 6-DOF motion and provisions made to account for the impact of launch rail position and motion effects on rocket motor trajectory.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Abstract

A system and method for the capture of a target surface vessel by a second vessel. The system includes an initially stowed deployable net, means for deploying the net, a tether coupled to the net, and a winch for drawing in the tether to pull the target vessel toward the second vessel.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This patent application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/183,587 entitled “DEPLOYABLE NET FOR CONTROL OF WATERCRAFT” that was filed on Feb. 18, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.[0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • (1) Field of the Invention [0002]
  • This invention relates to water-borne vessels, and more particularly to capturing of one vessel by another. [0003]
  • (2) Description of the Related Art [0004]
  • Rocket-deployed net devices have been used for neutralization of mines in shallow water during amphibious assault operations. General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc. (formerly Primex Technologies, Inc.) has developed such a system utilizing distributed explosive technology (DET). Each self-contained DET system includes the distributed explosive net and the associated solid propellant rocket motors, a fire control system, launch rails, and a shipping and storage container. [0005]
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • We have adapted this mine neutralization technology to use in capturing vessels. In one aspect, the invention is directed to a system for permitting a first surface vessel to capture a second surface vessel. The system is mounted on the first surface vessel and includes a net having an initial stowed condition. A launcher projects the net from the stowed condition to a deployed condition ensnaring the second vessel at a first location. A winch is coupled to the net via a tether to permit the net to draw the ensnared second vessel from the first location toward a location of the second vessel. Such locations may be either absolute or relative depending upon the particular conditions involved. [0006]
  • In implementations of the invention, the launcher may include first and second chemical rockets such as solid propellant rockets. The rockets may be coupled to a distal portion of the net via a harness system. The net may generally increase in width from a proximal portion to a distal portion when the net is in an unfurled condition. The harness may include left and right portions respectively coupled to the first and second rockets and distributing force supplied by the rockets over a substantial portion of a net leading edge. [0007]
  • The net leading edge may bear a plurality of weights having a specific gravity in excess of one and effective to cause sinking of a distal portion of the net. Exemplary material for the weights includes lead and various nontoxic lead substitutes. For nonlethal use, the net preferably carries no explosive material and is advantageously reusable after deployment. More aggressive systems may have explosive or other offensive components. [0008]
  • In another aspect, the invention is directed to a method for the capture of a target surface vessel by a second vessel. An aforementioned net system is provided on the second vessel. The rockets are launched to deploy the net over the target vessel in a first location. The winch is caused to draw in the tether then pull the target vessel toward the second vessel. The method may include permitting a portion of the net located distally of the target vessel in the first location to sink so as to enhance entanglement of the target vessel in the net. The method may include permitting the target vessel to move from the first position and override a portion of the sunken portion of the net. The method may include permitting the overridden portion of the net to entangle and stop a propeller of the target vessel. The method may further include returning the net to its stowed condition, unwinding the tether from the winch, and replacing or refueling the rockets so as to permit reuse of the system.[0009]
  • The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims. [0010]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a functional diagram of an exemplary vessel capture system. [0011]
  • FIG. 2 is an operational sequence flow chart of an exemplary vessel capture system. [0012]
  • FIG. 3 is a view of structural portions of an exemplary storage and shipping container which may be adapted for use with a deployable net. [0013]
  • FIG. 4 is a view of a net in an intermediate stage of deployment from a command vessel over a target vessel. [0014]
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic time lapse of various intermediate stages of deployment of an exemplary net. [0015]
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of an intermediate stage in deployment of a net over a target vessel. [0016]
  • Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements. [0017]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 shows a functional diagram of a [0018] system 20. The system 20 includes a containment net 22, a launch rail system 24, a fire control system (FCS) 26, a propulsion system 28, a craft interface kit 30, a storage and shipping container 32, a restraint system 34, and spare parts and logistic support equipment 36.
  • The craft interface kit contains the hardware necessary to install the system on a particular command or capture vessel [0019] 50 (FIG. 4). FIG. 4 also shows a target vessel 52 which is typically much smaller than the command vessel. FIG. 6 shows the net 22 deployed over the target vessel by the command vessel. The exemplary unfurled net 22 has a main net portion 56 diverging distally in a generally triangular form from a proximal vertex 58 to a distal leading edge 60. A tether or tension line 62 in the restraint system connects the net to a winch 64 which may be electrically powered and may be integrated with or located adjacent to the launch rail system.
  • At its leading edge, the main net portion is connected to left and [0020] right harness wings 70A and 70B. The harness wings contain a number of elements extending from the net leading edge to an associated left and right rocket motor 72A and 72B. At various locations along the net leading edge, an array of weights 80 may be provided.
  • An exemplary operational sequence is shown in FIG. 2. As shown, after the target vessel is encountered and identified, the fire control system (FCS) is activated. The FCS provides feedback to the command vessel's pilot to enable him to position his vessel in position in order to launch the VCS. The FCS provides data such as required command vessel heading and speed. Once the command to launch is provided by the pilot, the fire control system will automatically fire the rocket motors when proper launch parameters are met, ensuring target vessel envelopment. The traveling rockets extract the net and deliver it over the target vessel. The net envelopes the target vessel and, preferably ensnares the vessel and entangles its propellers to further disable the vessel. The winch may then be activated to draw the target vessel toward the command vessel to allow for boarding or other actions. [0021]
  • By flying in slightly divergent paths, the rocket motors, via the harnesses, spread the net laterally in addition to longitudinally (FIG. 6). Exemplary details of vessel envelopment are disclosed in the sequence view of FIG. 5. The view of FIG. 5 reflects an exemplary frame of reference of the command with both the command and target vessels moving at a given velocity from left to right. The rocket motors are collectively referenced as [0022] 72 and the harness wings as 70. Of the six illustrated stages, shown by numerals 100, 101, 102, 103, 104 and 105 referencing rocket motor position, the first four involve progressive stages in rocket flight propelling the net. The fifth stage shows the rocket motors falling into the water. Due to the density of the rocket motors and to the density of weights on the harness connecting the rockets to the net or on a distal portion of the net, the net sinks, allowing the velocity of the target vessel to cause the target vessel to override the net as shown in the sixth stage. Once overridden, the net may become entangled in the target vessel's propellers, causing shutdown of the target vessel's engine.
  • The containment net is preferably constructed of lightweight, high-strength materials to enable rocket motor or ballistic slug deployment and vessel capture and to be capable of enveloping the target vessel and preventing target vessel propulsion. The net size may be optimized for target vessel capture. The net, being significantly larger than the target vessel is deployed over such vessel. The ballistically dense rocket motors will sink upon impacting the water. This causes the forward section of the harness and array to hang down in the water column. As the target vessel attempts to escape, the harness lines and array will then become wrapped around the vessel's hull and, if present, tangled in the propeller. This will cause the propeller to cease motion, rendering the target vessel unable to continue motion. The net size will advantageously be a minimum of 250 ft (76 m) wide by 250 ft (76 m) long and will likely have a weight of 1000 to 3000 lbs (450 to 1360 kg), depending on target vessel requirements. Nets of this size have been successfully deployed from surface craft in distances in excess of 1500 ft (460 m). [0023]
  • Exemplary material for the net is aramid fiber reinforced with a core of stainless steel cable. The cable provides the net with additional toughness to resist abrasion and damage such as that caused by entanglement with a target vessel propeller. The tether material may be aramid fiber or similarly reinforced aramid fiber or may be formed of a relatively elastic material. [0024]
  • The integrated launch rail system may be used to support the rocket motors prior to launch and provide for desired rocket motor path during extraction. This system may provide for the adjustment of quadrant elevation and azimuth angle for required mission settings. The launch rail components will advantageously be suited for long-term exposure to salt air. The reusable launch rail system will advantageously be provided with a complete inventory of spare parts. Each launch rail may be an exemplary 5 feet (1.5 m) long and is supported by a framework that interfaces with the shipping container and craft interface kit. [0025]
  • The fire control system will advantageously provide the capability to accurately deploy the containment net from the command vessel while experiencing pitch, roll, yaw, heave, sway, and forward motion. Using sophisticated motion platforms for testing and algorithm development, computer codes, and instrumentation, this type of fire control system has been demonstrated as an effective accurate means of deploying nets using unguided solid propellant rocket motors. The system will rely upon motion sensors, tailored deployment algorithms, and a display unit for the command vessel. The fire control system will advantageously be self-supporting and will not rely on command ship resources other than electrical power. [0026]
  • Depending on desired range, air guns or solid propellant rocket motors can be used to extract the net and delivery it over the target vessel. [0027] MK 22 MOD 4 rocket motors may be used at least for purposes of a demonstration test. These motors are fully qualified for use on US Navy vessels and have passed all required explosive safety tests. Having been used to extract and deploy nets, these rocket motors are a low-risk approach to net propulsion. They can be safety operated in temperatures ranging from −40° to +120° F. (−40° to +49° C.). Two launch lugs on each motor interface with the launch rail system. The rocket motors will provide adequate thrust to extract the net at speeds typically in excess of 200 ft/sec (61 m/sec). The entire event, from extraction to deployment over the target vessel is expected to take no more than 5 seconds.
  • The craft interface kit (CIK) provides for all required interfaces between the command vessel and the VCS. It includes mounting hardware, electrical connections, and special tools (if any). [0028]
  • The deployable portions of the VCS are advantageously loaded into the storage and shipping container providing protection during transportation and storage. It also serves as the support structure from which the net is deployed. Environmental protection is provided in this reusable container. The net is hung from the roof of the container. The installation loops are disengaged during net extraction and allow for high-rate reliable deployment. The SSC preferably weighs approximately 500 lbs (227 kg) and is approximately 8×5×4 ft (2.4×1.5×1.2 m) high. [0029]
  • While the containment net alone will preferably be able to limit the target vessel's ability to navigate, a winch system is preferably used to provide additional control. A tension line or tether will be attached to the aft (proximal) end of the containment net. This tether will be attached to a winch installed on the command vessel. As desired, the target vessel can be winched toward the command vessel for subsequent boarding or other operations. [0030]
  • Target vessel attributes such as weight, length, speed, and depth considerations must be understood and characterized and will influence any particular implementation. Target vessel studies will allow development of a system requirements document (SRD) to be used in optimization studies to assure that the system provides required functionality for the particular application (types of target and capture vessels, speeds and water conditions, etc.). The SRD may provide a roadmap for follow-on analysis, design optimization, and test efforts. [0031]
  • Understanding and predicting the dynamic loading characteristics of deployable VCS components is advantageous before a structurally appropriate design is developed. In addition, the inter-relationship between important parameters such as range, net spread at impact, the effects of craft motion on accuracy, quadrant elevation, azimuth angle, net weight, and rocket motor thrust must be clearly understood and studied. Computer analysis tools have been developed for solving such deployment analysis problems. [0032]
  • Various rocket motor-deployed mine counter measures (MCM) Systems have been developed over the past ten years. In support of these efforts, computer simulation techniques have been developed and implemented. [0033]
  • The Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems (ADAMS) code (Mechanical Dynamics, Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.) may be used to analyze all important deployment characteristics. The ADAMS code has been used to model the deployment characteristics of several net systems with great success. A six degree of freedom representation of the VCS may be used to solve for component acceleration, velocity, position, and internal loading during, deployment. A verified baseline net deployment model may be made available for the minor modifications as required by the target vessel set. This baseline model may also be used to conduct parametric studies to support fire control algorithm development. This model is believed capable of accommodating all environmental conditions such as heave, sway, pitch, roll, yaw, and wind. The rocket motor, containment net, winch system, connectors, and harness, may be represented using the ADAMS 6-DOF code. The bridle may be represented by a number of bridle segments. Special attention may be paid to modeling the harness and high load areas to allow for accurate load and acceleration predictions at these components. The rocket motor and bridle representation may allow for rocket motor rotation and translation in response to loads exerted by the payload. Since the payload exerts rotational forces that induce rocket motor pitching and yawing, this representation is useful to accurately predict system trajectory. The simulated launch configuration will preferably match one-for-one the actual pre-launch configuration. [0034]
  • ADAMS models a mechanical system by solving the following first order Euler-Lagrange equations: [0035]
  • where:[0036]
  • m i a i −Fi−Σ m j=1 Rfj Φ xi=0
  • dxi/dt−V i=0
  • Φj=0
  • i=1,2,3 . . . n [0037]
  • m[0038] 1=mass of the ith coordinate
  • x[0039] 1=displacement of ith coordinate
  • F[0040] i=sum of applied forces acting on the ith coordinate
  • Rf[0041] j=reaction force for the jth coordinate
  • j=1,2,3 . . . m [0042]
  • a[0043] j=acceleration
  • V[0044] i=velocity
  • Initial conditions, backward differencing formula (BDF), and the Euler-Lagrange equations define the initial value problem (IVP) in ADAMS. ADAMS employs a multi-step predictor-corrector method to solve the IVP that improves accuracy made by explicit methods alone, such as the Runge-Kutta method of four. With the predictor-corrector method, an explicit method predicts an approximation to the solution and implicit method corrects this prediction. Additionally, ADAMS employs a variable step-size algorithm to further reduce integration error. [0045]
  • The predictor applies a BDF to each unknown in the system to provide an initial guess for the corrector. The corrector is a modified Newton-Raphson algorithm that solves the Euler-Lagrange equations and the BDF equations. The self-formulating ADAMS code requires the input of mass properties, dynamic material properties, initial position, and aerodynamic properties. [0046]
  • A 3-D aerodynamic representation of the system may be used to predict flight characteristics of the system. Aerodynamic lift and drag as a function of angle of attack and velocity will be included. The aerodynamic coefficients of the grenades, rocket motor, and fuzes will be based on theoretical data unless wind tunnel data is available. [0047]
  • Aerodynamic forces will be implemented assuming the following:[0048]
  • Drag=½Cd ρarea V2
  • Lift=½Cl ρarea V2
  • where: [0049]
  • Drag=force normal to apparent velocity (lbf or n) [0050]
  • Lift=force tangent to apparent velocity (lbf or n) [0051]
  • Cd coefficient of drag, as a function of angle of attack [0052]
  • Cl coefficient of lift, as a function of angle of attack [0053]
  • π=air density (slug/ft[0054] 3 or kg/m3)
  • area=reference area (ft[0055] 2 or m2)
  • V=apparent velocity (ft/sec or m/s) [0056]
  • Time varying rocket motor performance may be accounted for in the VCS deployment model. Worst-case rocket motor performance, yielding the highest dynamic loads, may be assumed. Rocket motor performance data may be taken from static firings and theoretical calculations. [0057]
  • Results from this analysis effort may also be used to develop fire control algorithms. [0058]
  • The greatest challenge in deploying a net from a small surface craft is accounting for potential craft motion while the rocket motors are travelling along the launch rails. Once the rocket motors have separated from the launch rails, craft motion has little impact on system trajectory. The fire control will advantageously incorporate a system of sensing craft 6-DOF motion and provisions made to account for the impact of launch rail position and motion effects on rocket motor trajectory. [0059]
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the nature of the target vessel and its capture environment will significantly influence preferred construction details. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. [0060]

Claims (12)

What is claimed is:
1. A system for permitting a first surface vessel (50) to capture a second surface vessel (52) comprising:
a net (56) having an initial stowed condition;
a launcher (24) for projecting the net from the stowed condition to a deployed condition ensnaring the second vessel at a first location;
a winch (64); and
at least one tension line (62) coupling the net to the winch.
2. The device of
claim 1
wherein the launcher comprises:
first and second chemical rockets (72A, 72B); and
a harness system (70A, 70B) coupling the first and second rockets to a distal portion of the net.
3. The device of
claim 2
wherein the net generally increases in width from a proximal portion to a distal portion in an unfurled condition.
4. The device of
claim 3
wherein the harness includes left and right portions, coupled to the first and second rockets respectively and distributing force applied by said rockets over a substantial portion of a net leading edge (60).
5. The device of
claim 4
wherein the net leading edge bears a plurality of weights (80) having a specific gravity substantially in excess of 1, effective to cause sinking of a distal portion of the net.
6. The device of
claim 1
wherein the net carries no explosive material.
7. The device of
claim 6
wherein the net is reusable after deployment.
8. The device of
claim 7
wherein in its stowed condition, the net is suspended within a storage container.
9. The device of
claim 1
wherein the net comprises aramid fiber reinforced with stainless steel cable.
10. A method for the capture of a target surface vessel by a second vessel comprising:
providing on the second vessel a deployable net system including:
an initially stowed net;
at least two chemical rockets coupled to the net
a winch; and
a tension line coupling the net to the winch;
launching the two chemical rockets to deploy the net over the target vessel in a first location; and
causing the winch to draw in the tension line and pull the target vessel toward the second vessel.
11. The method of
claim 10
further comprising:
permitting a portion of the net located distally of the target vessel to sink so as to enhance entanglement of the target vessel in the net;
permitting the target vessel to move from the first position and override a portion of the sunken portion of the net; and
permitting the overridden portion of the net to entangle and stop a propeller of the target vessel.
12. The method of
claim 10
further comprising:
returning the net to its stowed condition;
unwinding the tension line from the winch; and
replacing or refueling the rockets.
US09/785,732 2000-02-18 2001-02-16 Deployable net for control of watercraft Expired - Fee Related US6394016B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/785,732 US6394016B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2001-02-16 Deployable net for control of watercraft

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18358700P 2000-02-18 2000-02-18
US09/785,732 US6394016B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2001-02-16 Deployable net for control of watercraft

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010032577A1 true US20010032577A1 (en) 2001-10-25
US6394016B2 US6394016B2 (en) 2002-05-28

Family

ID=22673449

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/785,732 Expired - Fee Related US6394016B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2001-02-16 Deployable net for control of watercraft

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US6394016B2 (en)
JP (1) JP2003522933A (en)
AU (1) AU2001238510A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001060689A1 (en)

Cited By (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070017432A1 (en) * 2005-02-28 2007-01-25 Farinella Michael D Watercraft arresting system
US20070180983A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2007-08-09 Farinella Michael D Vehicle protection system
US20090266227A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2009-10-29 Farinella Michael D Vehicle and structure shield
US20100269675A1 (en) * 2009-04-28 2010-10-28 Lockheed Martin Corporation System for Disabling Small Water Craft
US20100294122A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2010-11-25 Hoadley David J Protection system including a net
US20100300346A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Gayton Richard J A Watercraft Immobilizing System
FR2955931A1 (en) * 2010-01-29 2011-08-05 Christian Cambon Individual or animal neutralizing device for use in defense field, has fibers, where end of one fiber opposite to end integrated with counterweight is integrated with storage medium or element that is integrated before and after ejection
US20110192014A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2011-08-11 Holmes Jr Robert G Net patching devices
US8245620B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2012-08-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Low breaking strength vehicle and structure shield net/frame arrangement
US8402894B1 (en) * 2010-06-09 2013-03-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Boat propeller entanglement apparatus and munition
US8443709B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-05-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield hard point
US8453552B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-06-04 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Method of designing an RPG shield
US8464627B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-06-18 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with improved hard points
US8468927B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-06-25 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with a cable frame
US8607685B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-12-17 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Load sharing hard point net
US8677882B2 (en) 2010-09-08 2014-03-25 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with flexible frame
US8733225B1 (en) 2008-04-16 2014-05-27 QinteiQ Nörth America, Inc. RPG defeat method and system
US8776710B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2014-07-15 Richard A. Gayton Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system
US8813631B1 (en) 2013-02-13 2014-08-26 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle and structure film/hard point shield
US9440718B1 (en) * 2015-04-17 2016-09-13 Rujing Tang System and methods of using unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) along with tethers and tethered devices
CN106288963A (en) * 2015-06-25 2017-01-04 株式会社迪思科 Small-sized pilotless aircraft beats back device
US20170356726A1 (en) * 2015-02-26 2017-12-14 Shawn M. Theiss Aerial arresting system for unmanned aerial vehicle
US10005556B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2018-06-26 Mohammad Rastgaar Aagaah Drone having drone-catching feature
US10364008B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2019-07-30 Richard J. A. Gayton Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system
US10724831B1 (en) * 2017-10-16 2020-07-28 Leidos, Inc. Fibrous occlusive interruption of lift
US11027845B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2021-06-08 Shawn M. Theiss Device and method to intercept an aerial vehicle

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10308166A1 (en) * 2003-02-20 2004-09-09 Klaus Kabella Process and arrangement for countering and combating pirates
IL162224A (en) * 2004-05-30 2011-03-31 Rafael Advanced Defense Sys Unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) deceleration system
US20060169832A1 (en) * 2005-01-06 2006-08-03 Glasson Richard O Rocket propelled barrier defense system
US8399816B2 (en) 2005-01-06 2013-03-19 Cpi Ip, Llc Rocket propelled barrier defense system
SG143078A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-06-27 Singapore Tech Dynamics Pte Diversion of sailing vessel by tethering method and apparatus therefor with harpoon means
US8100359B2 (en) * 2009-03-31 2012-01-24 Qasem Awadh Al-Qaffas Intercept system for falling bombs
IT1398665B1 (en) 2009-07-11 2013-03-08 Technological Service S R L METHOD AND ANTI-REPIRACY APPARATUS FOR SHIPS
WO2011031839A2 (en) * 2009-09-10 2011-03-17 International Maritime Security Corporation Watercraft, water diverter, entanglement system, and defense system for watercraft
IL205507A0 (en) * 2009-09-12 2010-12-30 Guy Gavish Apparatus and method for reducing the manuverability and speed of a moving ship
US8485475B2 (en) 2009-12-16 2013-07-16 Daniel W. Allen Debris removal management system and method of operation thereof
US9308970B1 (en) * 2012-04-18 2016-04-12 Sri International Net engagement with parachute slowdown (NEPS) system
US8714070B2 (en) * 2012-08-01 2014-05-06 Engineering Science Analysis Corp Non-lethal waterborne threat deterrent and immobilization device
US9091513B2 (en) * 2012-09-06 2015-07-28 Jason J. Shand Method and apparatus for guided missile and/or net shield
GB201416475D0 (en) * 2014-09-17 2014-10-29 Searle Matthew J Impeller cavitation system
US10926875B2 (en) * 2016-12-14 2021-02-23 Sanmina Corporation Devices and methods for facilitating capture of unmanned aerial vehicles
US12006067B2 (en) * 2019-05-30 2024-06-11 Launch On Demand Corporation Launch on demand
US11097839B2 (en) * 2019-10-09 2021-08-24 Kitty Hawk Corporation Hybrid power systems for different modes of flight

Family Cites Families (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1101580A (en) 1913-04-30 1914-06-30 Joseph A Steinmetz Bomb-shield for battleships.
US1240317A (en) 1914-12-15 1917-09-18 Ewen A Clark Torpedo-net.
US1226348A (en) 1915-01-30 1917-05-15 Arthur N Mcgray Submarine mine and propeller-entanglement.
US1145806A (en) 1915-02-11 1915-07-06 George May Selby Connection with duplex or multiple arrangement of torpedo-nets for facilitating the manipulation or brailing thereof.
US1249144A (en) 1917-06-18 1917-12-04 Israel Ludlow Submarine-trap.
FR655219A (en) 1927-06-21 1929-04-16 Giuseppe & Fratello Redaelli Net intended for defense against and capturing submarines as well as for twisting in the propellers of surface ships, and device for spinning and mooring the net
NL279858A (en) 1961-06-19
US3646847A (en) 1970-01-26 1972-03-07 Us Navy Slug-throwing deployment apparatus
US3722452A (en) * 1971-05-20 1973-03-27 Us Navy Submarine towing system
US4505179A (en) 1982-08-02 1985-03-19 Walker Limited Partnership Line throwing device
US4640179A (en) * 1984-06-25 1987-02-03 Cameron Robert W Composite metallic core line
US4724768A (en) 1986-07-18 1988-02-16 Robinson Wilfred R Rocket-type line throwing apparatus
US4784035A (en) 1986-11-24 1988-11-15 Fishfader Stanley S Remotely actuated tow line throwing device
US4753400A (en) * 1987-02-13 1988-06-28 Pioneer Systems, Incorporated Shipboard air vehicle retrieval apparatus
US4741243A (en) 1987-03-26 1988-05-03 Snider Billy G Line launcher
US4768417A (en) 1987-10-13 1988-09-06 Wright James E Detonator net weapon
US4912869A (en) 1987-11-02 1990-04-03 Tetra Industries Pty. Limited Net gun
US5069109A (en) 1990-11-08 1991-12-03 Loral Corporation Torpedo countermeasures
US5649466A (en) 1992-11-25 1997-07-22 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Method of rapidly deploying volume-displacement devices for restraining movement of objects
US5417139A (en) 1993-10-01 1995-05-23 Unisys Corporation Delivery system and method for flexible array
DE4409424C1 (en) 1994-03-18 1995-08-10 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Catchment device for flying objects
US5398587A (en) 1994-03-23 1995-03-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Gas-propelled line deployment system
US5396830A (en) 1994-06-17 1995-03-14 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Orthogonal line deployment device
US5750918A (en) 1995-10-17 1998-05-12 Foster-Miller, Inc. Ballistically deployed restraining net
US5898125A (en) 1995-10-17 1999-04-27 Foster-Miller, Inc. Ballistically deployed restraining net
US6325015B1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2001-12-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy System for arresting a seagoing vessel

Cited By (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7441511B2 (en) * 2005-02-28 2008-10-28 Foster-Miller, Inc. Watercraft arresting system
US20070017432A1 (en) * 2005-02-28 2007-01-25 Farinella Michael D Watercraft arresting system
US8042449B2 (en) 2006-02-09 2011-10-25 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle protection system
US20070180983A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2007-08-09 Farinella Michael D Vehicle protection system
US8539875B1 (en) 2006-02-09 2013-09-24 Foster-Miller, Inc. Protection system
US20100294122A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2010-11-25 Hoadley David J Protection system including a net
US8281702B2 (en) 2006-02-09 2012-10-09 Foster-Miller, Inc. Protection system
US20100319524A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2010-12-23 Farinella Michael D Vehicle protection system
US7866250B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2011-01-11 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle protection system
US7900548B2 (en) 2006-02-09 2011-03-08 Foster Miller, Inc. Protection system including a net
US8141470B1 (en) 2006-02-09 2012-03-27 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle protection method
US8443709B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-05-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield hard point
US9052167B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2015-06-09 Foster-Miller, Inc. RPG defeat method and system
US20110192014A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2011-08-11 Holmes Jr Robert G Net patching devices
US8011285B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2011-09-06 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield
US8910349B1 (en) 2008-04-16 2014-12-16 Foster Miller, Inc. Net patching devices
US8245620B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2012-08-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Low breaking strength vehicle and structure shield net/frame arrangement
US8245622B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2012-08-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield method
US8245621B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2012-08-21 Qinetiq North America Vehicle and structure shield
US8783156B1 (en) 2008-04-16 2014-07-22 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with a cable frame
US8733225B1 (en) 2008-04-16 2014-05-27 QinteiQ Nörth America, Inc. RPG defeat method and system
US8615851B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-12-31 Foster-Miller, Inc. Net patching devices
US8607685B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-12-17 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Load sharing hard point net
US8453552B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-06-04 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Method of designing an RPG shield
US8464627B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-06-18 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with improved hard points
US8468927B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2013-06-25 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with a cable frame
US20090266227A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2009-10-29 Farinella Michael D Vehicle and structure shield
US8256336B2 (en) * 2009-04-28 2012-09-04 Lockheed Martin Corporation System for disabling small water craft
US20100269675A1 (en) * 2009-04-28 2010-10-28 Lockheed Martin Corporation System for Disabling Small Water Craft
US20100300346A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Gayton Richard J A Watercraft Immobilizing System
US8776710B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2014-07-15 Richard A. Gayton Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system
US10364008B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2019-07-30 Richard J. A. Gayton Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system
US8176867B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2012-05-15 Richard J. A. Gayton Watercraft immobilizing system
FR2955931A1 (en) * 2010-01-29 2011-08-05 Christian Cambon Individual or animal neutralizing device for use in defense field, has fibers, where end of one fiber opposite to end integrated with counterweight is integrated with storage medium or element that is integrated before and after ejection
US8402894B1 (en) * 2010-06-09 2013-03-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Boat propeller entanglement apparatus and munition
US8677882B2 (en) 2010-09-08 2014-03-25 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with flexible frame
US9027457B1 (en) 2013-02-13 2015-05-12 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle and structure film/hard point shield
US8813631B1 (en) 2013-02-13 2014-08-26 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle and structure film/hard point shield
US20170356726A1 (en) * 2015-02-26 2017-12-14 Shawn M. Theiss Aerial arresting system for unmanned aerial vehicle
US9440718B1 (en) * 2015-04-17 2016-09-13 Rujing Tang System and methods of using unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) along with tethers and tethered devices
CN106288963A (en) * 2015-06-25 2017-01-04 株式会社迪思科 Small-sized pilotless aircraft beats back device
US10005556B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2018-06-26 Mohammad Rastgaar Aagaah Drone having drone-catching feature
US11027845B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2021-06-08 Shawn M. Theiss Device and method to intercept an aerial vehicle
US10724831B1 (en) * 2017-10-16 2020-07-28 Leidos, Inc. Fibrous occlusive interruption of lift

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2001238510A1 (en) 2001-08-27
JP2003522933A (en) 2003-07-29
WO2001060689A1 (en) 2001-08-23
US6394016B2 (en) 2002-05-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6394016B2 (en) Deployable net for control of watercraft
US5626310A (en) Space launch vehicles configured as gliders and towed to launch altitude by conventional aircraft
US7097136B2 (en) Immersible unmanned air vehicle and system for launch, recovery, and re-launch at sea
JP2016026125A5 (en)
Steltzner et al. Mars science laboratory entry, descent, and landing system development challenges
Taylor et al. Remove debris mission, from concept to orbit
Gallon et al. Low density supersonic decelerator parachute decelerator system
Sarigul-Klijn et al. Flight Testing of a Gravity Air Launch Method to Enable Responsive Space Acess
Sarigul-Klijn et al. Gravity air launching of earth-to-orbit space vehicles
Lyons et al. Ballute aerocapture trajectories at Neptune
Eriksson et al. Launch and recovery systems for unmannedvehicles onboard ships. A study and initialconcepts.
Dutta et al. Extraction of Space Debris Approach: Diminish the Threats from Outer Space
Sarigul-Klijn et al. Flight testing of a new earth-to-orbit air launch method
Itakura et al. Design, development and flight experiment of a small reusable rocket that glides using two-stage parachute
Jurczyk The prospect for the launche of a mini unmanned aerial vehicle from an unmanned surface vehicle
US11472576B2 (en) Center of gravity propulsion space launch vehicles
HALL The RemoveDEBRIS space harpoon
RU2096721C1 (en) Method of ground or water surface launch of rocket with control system and device for its realization
Bos et al. Post-flight 503 evaluation of the Ariane-5 booster recovery system
Callahan Structural dynamics aspects of the Gemini program.
Bown et al. Advanced airbag landing systems for planetary landers
RBSEARCH I..~ l! l'I1 «l ON SP~ CB VEHICLE LANnII «l AND
RU2543436C9 (en) Pseudo simulator of launch system
Steinmeyer et al. Total booster recovery concept for achieving a reusable propulsion system
Gravlee et al. Partial rocket reuse using mid-air recovery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, IN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SWARTOUT, TERRY L.;GESSNER, KEVIN;REEL/FRAME:011876/0049;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010510 TO 20010517

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20060528