US20010021535A1 - Mass spectrometric immunoassay - Google Patents
Mass spectrometric immunoassay Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010021535A1 US20010021535A1 US09/808,314 US80831401A US2001021535A1 US 20010021535 A1 US20010021535 A1 US 20010021535A1 US 80831401 A US80831401 A US 80831401A US 2001021535 A1 US2001021535 A1 US 2001021535A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- addition
- mass
- affinity reagent
- mass spectrometric
- antibody
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000003018 immunoassay Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 82
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 257
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 251
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 251
- 238000001819 mass spectrum Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 113
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 claims description 221
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 143
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 97
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 96
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims description 94
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 64
- 238000003795 desorption Methods 0.000 claims description 51
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 51
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 48
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 239000013566 allergen Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000013074 reference sample Substances 0.000 claims 24
- 230000003100 immobilizing effect Effects 0.000 claims 11
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 239000012491 analyte Substances 0.000 abstract description 179
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 abstract description 41
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 117
- 101710086426 Myotoxin Proteins 0.000 description 77
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 27
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 27
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 24
- 150000002500 ions Chemical group 0.000 description 24
- 239000002435 venom Substances 0.000 description 23
- 231100000611 venom Toxicity 0.000 description 23
- 210000001048 venom Anatomy 0.000 description 23
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 22
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 22
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 22
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 19
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 19
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 14
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 14
- 239000000538 analytical sample Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 11
- 102000008100 Human Serum Albumin Human genes 0.000 description 10
- 108091006905 Human Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 229940027941 immunoglobulin g Drugs 0.000 description 10
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 9
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 208000026935 allergic disease Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 description 8
- 108010055359 alpha-cobratoxin Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 7
- BVGLZNQZEYAYBJ-QWZQWHGGSA-N α-cobratoxin Chemical compound NC(=O)C[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)CC)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)CC)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCCN)NC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1C(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCCN)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCCN)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(C)C)[C@@H](C)O)[C@@H](C)O)[C@@H](C)O)[C@@H](C)O)[C@@H](C)O)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 BVGLZNQZEYAYBJ-QWZQWHGGSA-N 0.000 description 7
- WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetonitrile Chemical compound CC#N WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 6
- FVAUCKIRQBBSSJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium iodide Chemical compound [Na+].[I-] FVAUCKIRQBBSSJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- 101000662009 Homo sapiens UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102100037921 UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 241000004512 Vulpicida viridis Species 0.000 description 5
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 229920000936 Agarose Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 241000271541 Crotalus scutulatus Species 0.000 description 4
- 206010020751 Hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 102000012404 Orosomucoid Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010061952 Orosomucoid Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 241000093644 Scotophaeus scutulatus Species 0.000 description 4
- GSEJCLTVZPLZKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Triethanolamine Chemical compound OCCN(CCO)CCO GSEJCLTVZPLZKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- DTQVDTLACAAQTR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Trifluoroacetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C(F)(F)F DTQVDTLACAAQTR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000007815 allergy Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 3
- 108060003951 Immunoglobulin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 3
- 102000018358 immunoglobulin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 238000003127 radioimmunoassay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004252 FT/ICR mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010085682 Hemoglobin A Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000007513 Hemoglobin A Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010054147 Hemoglobins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000001554 Hemoglobins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 2
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lysine Natural products NCCCCC(N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- LRHXBHUTQWIZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N dimethyl heptanediimidate;dihydrochloride Chemical compound Cl.Cl.COC(=N)CCCCCC(=N)OC LRHXBHUTQWIZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- -1 drugs Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010049074 hemoglobin B Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000001509 sodium citrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- NLJMYIDDQXHKNR-UHFFFAOYSA-K sodium citrate Chemical compound O.O.[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]C(=O)CC(O)(CC([O-])=O)C([O-])=O NLJMYIDDQXHKNR-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- 235000009518 sodium iodide Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000001488 sodium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910000162 sodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000011008 sodium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K trisodium phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 7553-56-2 Chemical compound [I] ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000023308 Acca Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 244000036975 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003129 Ambrosia artemisiifolia var elatior Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102000004506 Blood Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010017384 Blood Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000271532 Crotalus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000271554 Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000271556 Crotalus viridis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000271454 Crotalus viridis viridis Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100030497 Cytochrome c Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010075031 Cytochromes c Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000053602 DNA Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- ZRALSGWEFCBTJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Guanidine Chemical group NC(N)=N ZRALSGWEFCBTJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010001336 Horseradish Peroxidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000102542 Kara Species 0.000 description 1
- QUOGESRFPZDMMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N L-Homoarginine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCCCNC(N)=N QUOGESRFPZDMMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QUOGESRFPZDMMT-YFKPBYRVSA-N L-homoarginine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCNC(N)=N QUOGESRFPZDMMT-YFKPBYRVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000010445 Lactoferrin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010063045 Lactoferrin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020004682 Single-Stranded DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000003484 annual ragweed Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012620 biological material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007853 buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000006263 bur ragweed Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015271 coagulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005345 coagulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000003488 common ragweed Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007865 diluting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010828 elution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000984 immunochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940072221 immunoglobulins Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001990 intravenous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052740 iodine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011630 iodine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005040 ion trap Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002605 large molecules Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000003588 lysine group Chemical group [H]N([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 229920002521 macromolecule Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007620 mathematical function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001840 matrix-assisted laser desorption--ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- RMAHPRNLQIRHIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N methyl carbamimidate Chemical compound COC(N)=N RMAHPRNLQIRHIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000035118 modified proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091005573 modified proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000403 monosodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019799 monosodium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009871 nonspecific binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940043515 other immunoglobulins in atc Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011236 particulate material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012857 radioactive material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009736 ragweed Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000009342 ragweed pollen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012488 sample solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- PCMORTLOPMLEFB-ONEGZZNKSA-N sinapic acid Chemical compound COC1=CC(\C=C\C(O)=O)=CC(OC)=C1O PCMORTLOPMLEFB-ONEGZZNKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PCMORTLOPMLEFB-UHFFFAOYSA-N sinapinic acid Natural products COC1=CC(C=CC(O)=O)=CC(OC)=C1O PCMORTLOPMLEFB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000003384 small molecules Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- AJPJDKMHJJGVTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium dihydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].OP(O)([O-])=O AJPJDKMHJJGVTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000000527 sonication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001196 time-of-flight mass spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000001493 tyrosinyl group Chemical group [H]OC1=C([H])C([H])=C(C([H])=C1[H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 238000005199 ultracentrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- AFVLVVWMAFSXCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C(C#N)=CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 AFVLVVWMAFSXCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N24/00—Investigating or analyzing materials by the use of nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance or other spin effects
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
- C12Q1/6816—Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6869—Methods for sequencing
- C12Q1/6872—Methods for sequencing involving mass spectrometry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
- G01N33/5302—Apparatus specially adapted for immunological test procedures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
- G01N33/543—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals
- G01N33/54366—Apparatus specially adapted for solid-phase testing
- G01N33/54373—Apparatus specially adapted for solid-phase testing involving physiochemical end-point determination, e.g. wave-guides, FETS, gratings
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
- G01N33/6803—General methods of protein analysis not limited to specific proteins or families of proteins
- G01N33/6848—Methods of protein analysis involving mass spectrometry
- G01N33/6851—Methods of protein analysis involving laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10T436/24—Nuclear magnetic resonance, electron spin resonance or other spin effects or mass spectrometry
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a new and useful immunoassay and more specifically to new and improved mass spectrometric immunoassay processes for the detection and/or quantification of one or more antigens or antibodies in a single determining immunoassay.
- singular terms are intended to include plural.
- Immunoassay techniques first came into wide usage with the development of radioimmunoassay (RIA) in which the specificity of antigen-antibody binding was coupled with the high sensitivity of nuclear particle detection to detect and quantify antibody-antigen binding in the presence of a large background of non-specific material.
- enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) immunoassays coupled the specificity of antigen-antibody binding with the sensitivity of enzyme chemical reactions to detect and quantify an antigen-antibody binding by producing colored, fluorescent, bio- or chemiluminescent chromophore.
- EIA and ELISA exhibited an amplification factor as high as 10 8 , allowing sensitivities competitive with RIA without the disadvantages of radioactivity.
- Typical ELISA diagnostics relied on an antigen having at least one epitope to which an enzyme-linked antibody could bind with a high affinity.
- An antigen was affinity-isolated from its biological system and allowed to interact with the enzyme-linked antibody.
- the enzyme of choice was generally alkaline phosphatase or horseradish peroxidase, both of which generated a colored product upon digestion of appropriate substrates.
- a further limitation of the traditional immunoassays employing optical detection was caused by the limited number of clearly resolvable colored enzyme products, at most two or three, which limited the possibility for an immunoassay to screen for multiple antigens in a single sample.
- Multiple antigen immunoassays usually focused on a number of separate immunoassays in an array of well plates each requiring its own sample which clearly reduced the utility of this approach.
- the ideal multi-antigen immunoassay would detect a large number of discrete antigens with high specificity in a single specimen, would cover a large dynamic range, be quantifiable over that range, and could be performed rapidly, that is, in minutes rather than hours, for critical clinical situations and high general throughput.
- MALDI matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
- SEAC surface-enhanced affinity capture mass spectrometry
- the present invention relates generally to the fields of immunoassay and mass spectrometry and more particularly to a new and useful mass spectrometric immunoassay methodology for unequivocally detecting and/or quantifying one or more antigens or antibodies from a specimen within the limits of detection.
- the present invention combines and exploits the specificity of antibody-antigen binding and the ability of the mass spectrometer to unequivocally identify molecules in various qualitative and quantitative strategies to analyze one or more antigens or antibodies in a specimen within the limit of detection.
- Both qualitative and quantification strategies utilize an antibody or antigen to capture and isolate another antigen or antibody, respectively, from its surroundings, and thereafter mass spectrometrically analyze the isolated antibody or antigen after release from the capturing agent.
- the specificity of the antibody-antigen reaction coupled with the ability of the mass spectrometer to separate and unequivocally identify the captured and isolated antibody or antigen by its mass-to-charge ratio from other molecules that may accompany it lends two dimensions of specificity to the present invention.
- the mass spectrometric immunoassay under the present invention is an improvement over existing immunoassays in several ways.
- the present invention does not require monoclonal antibodies as a reagent, polyclonal antibodies produce equally reliable results.
- radioactive materials are not required at all.
- the presence of other substances not the subject of the immunoassay do not interfere with either detecting or quantifying the targeted antigen or antibody.
- an accurate multiplex immunoassay clearly detecting and/or quantifying virtually any combination of different antigens or antibodies is possible.
- a further object of the present invention is to provide a novel and unique immunoassay for determining what specific antigens and/or antibodies are present in a given specimen.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a new and improved immunoassay for determining how much detected antigen or antibody is present in a specimen.
- FIG. 1 is a depiction of the general scheme of a multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay under the present invention showing affinity capture and isolation of two antigen analytes and a modified variant of one of the antigen analytes, denoted with a star, and showing the resulting mass spectrum which distinctly resolves each antigen analyte and modified variant;
- FIG. 2 is a mass spectrum resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom-laced human blood sample for the antigen, myotoxin a, showing a distinct mass spectrometric response for singly charged myotoxin a at the mass/charge (m/z) ratio corresponding to the molecular weight of myotoxin a at 4,822 Da, and a second distinct response at the m/z ratio corresponding to 5,242 Da, which is the molecular weight of the modified variant H-myotoxin a, used as an internal reference species.;
- FIG. 3 is a mass spectrum resulting from mass spectrometric analysis, without affinity capture and isolation, of a venom laced human blood sample for the antigen, myotoxin a, showing no distinct mass spectrometric response at the molecular weight of myotoxin a, but rather showing a mass spectrometric response for singly charged hemoglobin A and B at the mass/charge (m/z) ratios corresponding to their respective molecular weights of about 16,000 Da.;
- FIG. 4 is a working curve relationship between the concentration of myotoxin a in venom laced human blood samples and the magnitude of mass spectrometric immunoassay responses for myotoxin a, normalized with the modified variant, H-myotoxin a, and demonstrating the working curve quantification strategy for quantifying myotoxin a;
- FIG. 5 is a mass spectrum resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom laced human blood sample containing four modified variants of myotoxin a, demonstrating the bargraph quantitative strategy for quantifying the antigen, myotoxin a;
- FIG. 6 is a mass spectrum resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom laced human blood sample containing the modified variant, H-myotoxin a, demonstrating the relative limit signal quantitative strategy for quantifying myotoxin a;
- FIG. 7 is a mass spectrum resulting from the multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom laced human blood sample for myotoxin a and Mojave toxin showing distinct mass spectral signals for myotoxin a and Mojave toxin located at their respective molecular weights;
- FIG. 8 results from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of six preparation samples containing various concentrations of the antigen, ⁇ -1-acid glycoprotein (A1AG), and a constant concentration of the internal reference species, human serum albumin (HSA) and is a mass spectrum of one of these preparation samples, showing distinct signals for A1Ag at m/z ⁇ 37,000 and for HSA at m/z ⁇ 67,000;
- A1AG ⁇ -1-acid glycoprotein
- HSA human serum albumin
- FIG. 9 is a working curve relationship between the concentration of ⁇ -1-acid glycoprotein (A1AG) in a specimen and the magnitude of the mass spectrometric response for ⁇ -1-acid glycoprotein, normalized with the internal reference species, human serum albumin;
- A1AG ⁇ -1-acid glycoprotein
- FIG. 10 results from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of the rattlesnake toxin, myotoxin a, in human blood containing the venom of the Mojave rattlesnake, and to which various aliquots of purified myotoxin a have been added to allow quantification by the standard addition strategy, and shows a mass spectrum of a sample in which the concentration of myotoxin a was increased by 1250 nM over the intrinsic level;
- FIG. 11 is the standard addition line defining the relationship between added myotoxin a and the mass spectral responses for myotoxin a, normalized to the mass spectral response for another venom component, Mojave toxin, which is present in the blood sample at a constant concentration and consequently may be used as an internal reference species;
- FIG. 12 is a mass spectrum of a venom laced blood sample containing five modified variants of myotoxin a resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention in Example 7, demonstrating a bargraph quantification strategy;
- FIG. 13 is a mass spectrum resulting from mass spectrometric analysis of the preparation made of multiple antigen species in Example 7 showing responses at various m/z ratios characteristic of the various antigens;
- FIG. 14 is the mass spectrum of Example 7, showing a mass spectral response for the single antigen, ⁇ -cobratoxin, and demonstrating the third qualitative mass spectrometric immunoassay strategy of the present invention for inferentially detecting the antibody to ⁇ -cobratoxin in a specimen by capturing the antibody for ⁇ -cobratoxin and utilizing this antibody in the affinity reagent.
- the present invention relates to a new mass spectrometric immunoassay and more specifically to new and improved processes for the detection and/or quantification of one or more antigens or antibodies in a single immunoassay.
- the present invention can be utilized to detect and/or quantify single or multiple antigens or antibodies in a specimen.
- Single terms as used herein are meant to include plural.
- the present invention involves two phases: capture and isolation of an antibody analyte or antigen analyte, followed by mass spectrometric analysis of the captured antigen analyte or antibody analyte.
- the present invention can be used for qualitative and/or quantitative purposes. That is, the present invention- can be used to determine whether a certain antibody or antigen is present in a specimen (qualitative), and/or to measure the amount of the antigen or antibody present in a specimen (quantitative).
- affinity reagent is the antibody and/or antigen which is used to make the affinity reagent.
- an affinity reagent to analyze for antigens will be made with one or several types of antibody.
- an affinity reagent to analyze for antibodies will be made with one or several different antigens.
- all quantitative analyses in the present invention require the affinity reagent to capture at least two different types of molecule, one of which is the analyte, the other molecule acting as an internal reference species.
- the analyte may be an antibody and the internal reference species an antigen, or vice versa. Where this is so, it would be necessary for the affinity reagent to contain both an antibody and an antigen.
- the affinity reagent needs to contain an immobilized antibody having a specific affinity for that protein, in addition to an immobilized antigen having a specific affinity for the antibody analyte.
- Affinity is the ability of a molecule to bind with another molecule having proper fitting conformation.
- Affinity reagent is a type of antigen or antibody immobilized to a solid substrate.
- immobilization is obtained by covalently linking the antigen or antibody to the solid substrate, although non-covalent linkage may be acceptable.
- the antibody or antigen can be directly linked to the solid substance surface, or can be indirectly attached to the solid substrate by linking the antibody or antigen to a coating on the solid substrate.
- allergen is a particulate material capable of stimulating an allergic response in susceptible individuals.
- allergens include dusts, pollens, molds, spores, and particles of insect and animal detrita.
- Each type of material may carry on its surface, many different kinds of proteins capable of stimulating an allergic response.
- the allergic response is characterized in the human body by the production of elevated levels of an immunoglobulin, IgE, molecular weight ⁇ 170,000 Da, which is distinguishable from other immunoglobulins such as IgG which have a different molecular weight (IgG: ⁇ 150,000 Da).
- analyte is an antibody or antigen that is captured, isolated and mass spectrometrically analyzed for the qualitative purpose of detecting whether a specimen contains a certain antibody or certain antigen.
- the analyte may be the certain antibody or certain antigen being looked for in the specimen, or may be another antibody or antigen used to indirectly detect the certain antibody or certain antigen.
- Antibody is a protein that specifically binds with another molecule that possesses one or more unique antigenic sites.
- Antigen is any molecule having an antigenic site that can bind to an antibody. It is apparent that the categories of molecules that may be considered antigens under this definition is broad, essentially any molecule that can bind with an antibody qualifies as an antigen including an allergen.
- Counterpart when used to describe an antibody or antigen, is an antibody or antigen which has a molecular weight indistinguishable in the mass spectrum from that of the analyte, and which gives a response identical to that of the analyte when both are subjected to mass spectrometric immunoassay from specimens of identical concentration.
- Disassociation agent is any active cause which disassociates or unbinds a captured analyte from the affinity reagent.
- a laser desorption/ionization agent may also act as a disassociation agent.
- Examples of a disassociation agent include but are not limited to: addition of a buffer solution, heating, sonication, application of an electric potential, or addition of a MALDI matrix.
- affinity reagent is that amount necessary to capture an adequate quantity of the analyte (and internal reference species where relevant) to achieve the desired result.
- Internal reference species is an antibody or antigen whose specific affinity for another antibody or antigen is exploited in the mass spectrometric immunoassay for quantitative purposes.
- the internal reference species is captured, isolated and mass spectrometrically analyzed alongside the analyte.
- Laser desorption/ionization agent is any active cause which enables an analyte to be laser desorped/ionized.
- An example of a laser desorption/ionization agent is the addition of a MALDI matrix.
- Mass spectrometrically analyzed is analyzing the antigen analyte or antibody analyte with a mass spectrometer resulting in a mass spectrometric response.
- a mass spectrometer is an instrument designed to determine the mass-to-charge ratio of ions. For this process, it is necessary for the analyte molecules to be volatilized, and ionized. The ionized molecules are then accelerated by an electric field into the analyzing device, which separates the ions by virtue of a property dependent on the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z).
- Mass spectrometric mixture is a mixture containing an antibody or antigen which can be laser desorped/ionized by a mass spectrometer.
- Mass spectrometric response is the response received from a mass spectrometer indicating whether or when an ion struck the mass spectrometer's detector and whether or when no ion struck the detector.
- a non-zero response at a given mass-to-charge ratio indicates that the material mass spectrometrically analyzed contained a given molecule that gave rise to the ion corresponding to the response at that charge-to mass ratio. It is apparent that a zero mass spectrometric response would indicate that the material mass spectrometrically analyzed either did not contain that molecule, or contained that molecule in levels below the limit of detection.
- the mass spectrometric response is defined as a change in the level of the signal measured at the mass spectrometer detector, not simply the absolute level of that signal.
- mass spectrometer and particularly in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometers, there is a detectable signal, resulting in a non-zero baseline, throughout the mass spectrum arising from such causes as background noise and the arrival of ions at the detector at times non-specific to their mass/charge ratio.
- the mass spectrometric response for an ion species at a specific mass/charge ratio is defined as the change in the mass spectrometer signal above this baseline signal level.
- Detection of an ion at a given setting of electric and magnetic field strengths, or at a given time after the ion is accelerated, is controlled by the mass-to-charge (mass/charge) ratio of that ion thereby providing an accurate means of identifying the molecule that gave rise to that ion by the molecule's mass-to-charge ratio.
- the number of ions that strike the detector at a given setting, or at a given time, is indicated by the magnitude of the mass spectrometric response.
- a “mass spectrum” is a collection of mass spectrometric responses over a range of mass-to-charge ratios.
- a mass spectrum is commonly expressed graphically in terms of relative intensity against mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). Where an ion arises from a molecule present in the material being mass spectrometrically analyzed at or above the limit of detection, the response is expressed as mass spectral signals or peaks (signal, or peak) at the relative mass-to-charge ratio of the ion. Where the ion charge is +1, the mass-to-charge ratio for that ion is equivalent to the molecular weight of the ion. Molecular weight is expressed in Daltons (Da.) and may be used interchangeably with the term mass-to-charge ratio for singly charged ions.
- the magnitude of a mass spectrometric response can be measured in terms of “intensity”, height of the response, or “integral”, the area under the response. It is apparent that mass spectrometric response can be expressed in a variety of tangible and intangible forms including but not limited to signals, charts, electronic data and electric currents.
- a zero response, a response without magnitude, at a given mass-to-charge ratio indicates the material being mass spectrometrically analyzed either did not contain a molecule that could give rise to an ion of the given mass-to-charge ratio, or did not contain that molecule at a level at or above the level of detection.
- Modified variant is an internal reference species which is made from an antibody or antigen analyte or a counterpart thereof, has affinity for the same antigen or antibody as does the analyte, and produces a mass spectrometric response relative to the analyte which is fixed and readily determinable, but has a different molecular weight such that it is resolvable in the mass spectrum from the analyte.
- Non-specific affinity is the strongly attractive interaction with a broad range of antibody or antigen species.
- the substance Protein A has a strong affinity for all antibodies of the IgG family.
- Normalize or any form of the word, is that procedure for correcting mass spectra for differences in instrument performance during mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple analytical systems. In essence, normalization provides for accurate results when two immunoassays are compared in the quantitative strategies of the present invention. Normalization is preferably achieved with the assistance of an internal reference species, but conceivably can be achieved without the assistance of an internal reference species if instrument parameters are carefully controlled so as to be identical in the mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple analytical systems. Alternatively, if the dependence on the instrument parameters of the mass spectrometric response to a given analyte concentration is sufficiently well known, the mass spectrometric response may be corrected for the effects of changing instrument parameters.
- Post-combination affinity reagent is an affinity reagent which has been allowed to bind with its target antigen or antibody.
- Preparation is an operator created substance or material and used for a particular purpose in the mass spectrometric immunoassay. The term is used to distinguish it from the specimen.
- material containing a counterpart antigen is created for the purpose of determining whether a certain antibody species is present in a specimen, such as antiserum, and is termed the “preparation” to distinguish it from the specimen and avoid confusion in describing the method.
- a material containing a counterpart antigen or antibody is created and termed the “preparation” and used in the quantification methods.
- Solid substrate is defined as any physically separable solid to which an antibody or antigen can be directly or indirectly attached including but not limited to agarose beads, nylon metals, glass, silicon, and organic membranes.
- “Specific affinity” is the strongly attractive interaction between specific antigens and their corresponding antibodies.
- the selective attraction between an antigen and its corresponding antibody occurs between the antigenic site, or epitope, of the antigen and a recognition region in the antibody.
- An antibody may similarly be modified without eliminating its specific affinity for its antigen.
- the high specific affinity between antigens and antibodies is the key to the selective capture and isolation of a specified antigen or antibody in an immunoassay.
- specimen is any material which is the focus of the mass spectrometric immunoassay. Frequently the specimen will be of biological origin, for example a blood sample, and contain analytes that are similarly of biological origin, for example peptides, proteins and antibodies. However, it is possible that the specimen may be non-biological in origin, for example a groundwater specimen, and the analyte similarly may be of non-biological origin, for example a pesticide. All that is necessary for a successful immunoassay is that it should be possible to prepare an antibody having a specific affinity for that analyte.
- the “mass spectrometrically immunoassay” is that procedure in which a specimen is incubated with an affinity reagent which will specifically capture an analyte, for a time sufficient for the affinity reagent to bind a detectable fraction of the analyte, creating a post-combination affinity reagent.
- the post-combination affinity reagent is then separated from the unbound remainder of the specimen sample to isolate the captured antigen from the unbound remainder.
- the isolated post combination affinity reagent is then washed to remove any unbound remainder adhering to the isolated affinity reagent.
- a laser desorption/ionization agent is then added to isolated post combination affinity reagent to unbind any antigen bound to the affinant and form a mass spectrometric mixture from which the unbound antigen is then mass spectrometrically analyzed. If the specimen contained the certain antigen at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, the resulting mass spectrum will show a mass spectral signal at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of the certain antigen. If the specimen did not contain the certain antigen at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, no such signal will be evident.
- Such a mass spectrometric immunoassay procedure can result in a qualitative or a quantitative analysis, depending on whether or not a quantification method is used.
- the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention is very sensitive and requires only very small quantities of analyte and/or small volumes of analyte containing samples.
- the detection limit is approximately between 1 ⁇ 10 9 and 1 ⁇ 10 10 analyte molecules in about 200 ⁇ L (microliters) of sample.
- the first qualitative strategy is designed to determine whether one or more antigens are present in or are absent from a specimen.
- Antibodies to each antigen to be detected are immobilized on a solid substrate creating the affinity reagent.
- the affinity reagent is then incubated with the specimen to screen the specimen for any antigen present in the specimen that has an affinity for the affinant-antibody immobilized on the affinity reagent. Screening in this context means to combine the specimen and affinity reagent for enough time to allow the affinant-antibody to combine with a detectable amount of antigen for which it has a specific affinity.
- the affinity reagent will capture some or all of the antigen present in the specimen, if any.
- the post-combination affinity reagent is then separated from the unbound remainder of the specimen to isolate the captured antigen from the unbound remainder.
- the isolated post-combination affinity reagent is then washed to remove any unbound remainder adhering to the isolated affinity reagent.
- a disassociation agent is applied to the post-combination affinity reagent to disrupt the antibody-antigen binding and produce a solution containing free antigen which can be separated from the solid affinity reagent by filtering.
- MALDI matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
- the sample must be combined with an excess amount of a laser desorption/ionization agent (known otherwise as a “MALDI matrix”) and allowed to crystallize by drying.
- MALDI matrix materials which are effective laser desorption/ionization agents are also remarkably effective disassociation agents, and disassociation using these materials is preferred, in particular because the process of disassociation and creation of a mass spectrometric mixture is thereby made simple and rapid.
- the solution resulting from the disassociation step may be mass spectrometrically analyzed. If the solution is to be analyzed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry, it must first be combined with a MALDI matrix if such a matrix material was not used as a disassociation agent. If the specimen contained one or more of the antigen species for which the affinity reagent has a specific affinity, at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, the resulting mass spectrum will show a mass spectral signal at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of the certain antigen.
- This strategy may be used to screen specimens for as many discrete antigen species as can be distinguished from each other in a single mass spectrum. In the event that more antigens must be searched for than can be distinguished in a single mass spectrum, two or more affinity reagents must be created, each having affinities to different sets of distinguishable antigens.
- the procedures for the second qualitative strategy under the present invention are similar to the first except the affinity reagent is made with antigens seeking antibodies.
- the analyte is an antibody.
- An antigen known to have a specific affinity for the antibody analyte is immobilized to a solid subtrate.
- the affinity reagent is incubated with the specimen being assayed for the desired antibody and allowed to capture the antibody for which it has a specific affinity. After washing the reagent any captured antibody is isolated from the specimen environment.
- a disassociation agent then a laser desorption/ionization is added to the isolated antibody to free it from the substrate and facilitate ionization prior to mass spectrometric analysis.
- the laser desorption/ionization agent can be added without the disassociation agent to the isolated antibody analyte.
- a mass spectral response at the molecular weight (same as single charged m/z) of the target antibody evidences the presence of the antibody in the specimen.
- impure antigens to capture classes of antibodies.
- impure antigens may be covalently anchored to a solid substrate, or even used without such anchoring if the particles are sufficiently large to be separated by filtering may be used to search for elevated levels of an antibody, IgE, which is produced as part of the allergic response.
- IgE has a molecular weight of ⁇ 170,000 Da, sufficiently different from that of IgG, another major antigenic antibody class with a molecular weight ⁇ 150,000 Da, that IgE and IgG are distinguishable in a mass spectrometer.
- individual types of IgE molecules are not resolvable from each other. Accordingly, determination of which of several possible allergens has a specific affinity for IgE in a blood sample would necessarily use a single species of allergen, for example, the pollen of a specific plant, such as ragweed, to screen a specimen for IgE characteristic of allergy to ragweed pollen, and separate screening procedures would be carried out for each specific allergen.
- IgG immunoglobulin G
- a different strategy must be adopted to screen a specimen for specific types of similar antibodies, for example, antibodies belonging to the IgG class.
- detection of a specific antibody is indirect.
- a specimen is combined with a solid substrate having a broad non-specific affinity for antibodies.
- a representative sample of the antibody population in the specimen will bind with the solid substrate creating an affinity reagent.
- the affinity reagent is then incubated with a screening preparation made with an antigen or antigens known to have a specific affinity for the antibody or antibodies to be searched for.
- affinity reagent If a certain antibody is a member of the antibody population on the affinity reagent, and the specific antigen to that antibody is present in the screening preparation, then that antibody will capture its specific known antigen from the preparation.
- the affinity reagent is then separated from the preparation leaving behind the unbound remainder.
- the isolated affinity reagent is washed to remove any unbound remainder adhering thereto.
- a laser desorption/ionization agent is then applied to the isolated affinity reagent to unbind any antigen bound to the affinant-antibody forming a mass spectrometric mixture from which the unbound antigen is then mass spectrometrically analyzed.
- a mass spectral signal at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of a known antigen indicates the antibody specific for that antigen was present in the specimen. Absence of a mass spectral signal indicates that the certain antibody was not present in the specimen at or above the detectable limit.
- incubation can be stationary (combining the affinity reagent and sample then agitating), flowing (one-time or repetitive flowing of sample over the affinity reagent), or accelerated by the application of an electrical potential across the sample solution. Because the use of an internal reference species serves to calibrate variables in the incubation process as well as in the mass spectrometric analysis, it is not necessary to ensure that incubation proceeds to equilibrium to achieve accurate analyses. Rapid incubations and consequently rapid analyses are therefore possible under the present invention.
- the disassociation agent and laser desorption/ionization agent chosen is arrived at empirically, however, the preferred agent is often the addition of any material commonly referred to as a “MALDI matrix” by those in the field of mass spectrometry.
- MALDI matrix materials can be found in: Fan Xiang and Ronald C. Beavis, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry , vol. 8, pp. 199-204, 1994 and in Ronald C. Beavis, Organic Mass Spectrometry , vol. 27, pp. 653-659, 1992.
- an unbound antigen analyte or unbound antibody analyte is typically too large a molecule to be ionized, the unbound analyte cannot ordinarily be mass spectrally analyzed without additional preparatory techniques.
- matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) techniques enable mass spectrometric analysis of the analyte. Standard MALDI protocols can be found in Ronald C. Beavis, Organic Mass Spectrometry, vol. 27, pp. 653-659, 1992.
- the mass spectrometer used in the present invention can be any mass spectrometer that will analyze the analytes including a magnetic sector mass spectrometer, a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) mass spectrometer, a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer and any time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer. Of these the TOF mass spectrometer is preferred.
- FTICR Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance
- TOF time-of-flight
- Mass spectrometric analysis of the captured, isolated and unbound analyte results in an analyte mass spectral signal at the mass-to-charge ratio characteristic of the analyte.
- the location of the signal on the mass spectrum is dependent on the molecular weight of the analyte, thereby providing a reliable means for identifying the analyte.
- the mass spectral signal also has magnitude.
- the magnitude of the signal is indicative of the amount of analyte that is ionized and detected by the mass spectrometer.
- Mass spectrometric signal magnitude has at least two dimensions that are directly measurable, intensity or height of the signal, and integral or the area under the signal; Either the intensity or the integral can be used to quantify.
- the mass spectrometric immunoassay process can also be designed to quantify an antibody or antigen present in a specimen. All such quantitative analyses utilize standard preparations containing known concentrations of the analyte for calibration. In addition, because it is difficult to control the analytical conditions sufficiently well to ensure a constant absolute mass spectrometric response for a constant analyte concentration in different samples, quantitative analysis using the present invention relies on the presence of or the introduction of at least one internal reference species in the analytical system prior to incubation with the affinity reagent. The internal reference species can be added to the analytical system being assayed, or be intrinsic thereto. It is captured, isolated and mass spectrometrically analyzed simultaneously with the analyte, thereby serving to calibrate the analytical conditions from one analysis to another because both analyte and internal reference species respond identically to changes in these conditions.
- the affinity reagent must contain an affinant that will specifically capture or bind with the internal reference species. It is essential that the internal reference species have a molecular weight sufficiently different from that of the analyte or analytes that it can be resolved in the mass spectrum from the signals arising from the analyte or analytes. However, the molecular weight difference is preferably the minimum necessary for resolution in the mass spectrum, because analytes differing very greatly in mass may not respond identically to changes in the mass spectrometer operating conditions.
- the internal reference species is a modified variant of the analyte.
- an affinant that can capture the analyte can usually also capture the modified variant because the modification shifts the molecular weight of the antibody or antigen without destroying its affinity.
- the internal reference species is a not a modified variant of the analyte
- another immunochemical affinity group must be present in the affinity reagent in order to simultaneously capture and isolate that internal reference species alongside the analyte. It is possible, and may be desirable, for a protein that is not an antibody to be used as an internal reference standard in an analysis of an antibody species. In such a situation, the affinity reagent would be prepared with two classes of molecules, an antibody specific for the protein and an antigen for which the analyte is specific.
- the number of internal reference species employed also depends on the quantification method employed.
- the working curve or single point quantification approaches require at least one internal reference species present in the analytical system.
- the bargraph quantification approach requires several internal reference species.
- the internal reference species in a quantification method serves two roles: 1) the role of a normalizer, and 2) the role of a concentration indicator. There is more than one possible strategy or method for quantification of an antigen or antibody under each of these roles.
- the internal reference species serves to correct for differences in affinity reagent activity or concentration, for differences in incubation times for different samples, and for differences in mass spectrometer performance during the mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple samples, thereby ensuring accurate quantification.
- this internal reference species signal also serves as a concentration indicator, that is, the internal reference species signal for a given concentration of that species is calibrated by various strategies so as to indicate a given concentration of the analyte species.
- Quantification strategies all involve mass spectrometric immunoassay of at least two separate analytical systems.
- one analytical system contains the specimen, and the other a preparation containing the antibody or antigen analyte or a counterpart thereof in known concentration, or in a concentration which has been altered by a known amount by adding a known amount of the analyte where both the specimen and the preparation contain the same internal reference species in known concentration, preferably the same.
- Normalizing with an internal reference species can be accomplished in two basic ways, that is, during mass spectrometric analysis or after. Both methods require the analytical samples to contain the same internal reference species.
- the mass spectrometer is adjusted so as to bring the internal reference species signals of each immunoassay to a value proportional to the concentration of the internal reference species.
- the internal reference species concentrations in all the analytical samples are the same, and the mass spectrometer is adjusted to bring all internal reference species signals to the same value.
- the mass spectrum for each assay is divided or multiplied by an appropriate factor, again to bring the internal reference species mass spectral responses to a value proportional to the concentration of the internal reference species.
- the second procedure is preferred.
- the result is to normalize all mass spectral responses or signals, and all affinity capture procedures to one standard thereby artificially, or in practice, making instrument performance and affinity capture procedures in each of the immunoassays the same.
- the working curve strategy, standard addition strategy, single point calibration strategy, and the bargraph strategy are all quantification strategies under the present invention that employ one or more internal reference species as both a normalizer and a concentration indicator.
- the mass spectral signal for I-A is adjusted to fit an intensity of one (normalized intensity)
- the other mass spectral signals in A's mass spectrum are also adjusted so as to be in the same original proportion (in intensity) to the adjusted I-A signal as they were for the initial I-A signal.
- the concentration of I-B is half the concentration of I-A
- the mass spectral signal for I-B then adjusted to fit a normalized intensity of 0.5.
- the other mass spectral signals in B's spectrum are also adjusted so as to be in the same original proportion (in intensity) to the adjusted I-B signal as they were for the initial I-B signal.
- all spectra adjustments are accomplished with the aid of computer data manipulation software such as LABCALC, produced by Galactic Industries, Salem, N.H.
- the absolute amplitudes of the mass spectrometric signals for the analyte and internal reference species should be similar. If these two signals differ by a large factor, for example by a factor of several hundred, it will not be possible to measure both signals accurately in the same mass spectrum because the detection system cannot respond accurately to signals differing by so large a factor, i.e., the dynamic range is limited.
- the signal from the mass spectrometer must typically be digitized, that is, converted to a binary number suitable for transfer to a computer memory, at successive time intervals as short as 5-10 nanoseconds.
- the digitization circuitry typically converts the signal to a binary number having a value between 0 and 256. If a 1 volt signal, for example, corresponded to the digital value of 256, then all signals larger than 1 volt would also be registered as 256 and the system would have no ability to measure any such signals accurately.
- the absolute amplitudes of the mass spectrometric signals for the analyte and internal reference species should differ by less than a factor of ten, and the mass spectrometer is adjusted to bring the more intense signal near the allowable maximum.
- the mass spectral signal of an internal reference species is typically used to directly quantify an analyte by comparing the internal reference species signal to the analyte signal, after the internal reference species signal has been calibrated by a working curve or standard addition approach.
- quantification strategies can be employed to quantify multiple antigens or antibodies in the same specimen. It is also apparent that it is possible to employ multiple quantification strategies in a given assay to quantify single or multiple antibodies or antigens.
- All analyte signals are therefore determined as ratios to the respective IRS signals.
- it is possible also to calibrate the analysis by determining the analyte/IRS signal ratio for a known concentration ratio of analyte and IRS in an analytical sample.
- the methods for accomplishing this calibration are known as the working curve approach, the standard addition approach, and the single point calibration approach, and are used here exactly as in standard analytical chemistry procedures.
- analyte/IRS concentration ratio is accurately linear. Then, for example, if the analyte/IRS signal ratio is 2:1 for equal concentrations of analyte and IRS, an analyte/IRS signal ratio of 4:1 signals an analyte concentration exactly twice the known IRS concentration in the sample. It is usually safe to assume that such a linear assumption may hold, with an accuracy of approximately 10% or better, for analyte/IRS concentration ratios between approximately 1 ⁇ 3 and 3 times the ratio at which the original calibration was performed (i.e., over about a factor of 10 in concentration). When this assumption of linearity is valid, the relationship between analyte concentration and internal reference mass spectrometric response may be determined using a single calibration sample and this approach is known herein as the single point calibration method.
- the concentration of B corresponding to a signal magnitude of 7.2 units in the above example would be 720/2 units, or 360 units.
- the specimens are each mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with an affinity reagent having an affinity for each antigen or antibody being looked for in the relevant specimen, and for the internal reference species.
- the resulting mass spectra are normalized using the internal reference species signals then the signal of the analyte of unknown concentration is calibrated against the signal of the analyte of known concentration as described in the hypothetical example above.
- the relationship between analyte/IRS concentration ratio and analyte/IRS signal ratio may be determined over as large a range as desired by making a series of preparations with varying analyte/IRS concentration ratios in which the analyte concentrations span the expected analyte concentration range. The greater the number of preparations, the more accurately the relationship between analyte/IRS signal ratio and analyte concentration will be determined.
- the antibody or antigen analyte used to make the preparations is generically termed the preparation analyte, or specifically termed the preparation antigen or preparation antibody.
- the preparations either contain the same internal reference species in the same concentration as the specimen, or a concentration known relative to that in the specimen.
- the ratios of the analyte mass spectrometric responses to the corresponding internal reference species mass spectrometric responses are plotted as a function of the known ratios of the analyte/internal reference species concentrations for each sample.
- the resulting relationship, or working curve may be expressed in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to, a graph, a mathematical relationship or computerized data.
- the analyte (antigen or antibody) is present in the specimen, as evidenced by an analyte mass spectral signal on the specimen mass spectrum, then the analyte can be quantified by locating the point on the working curve relationship (ultimately a mathematical relationship) appertaining to the magnitude of the analyte/IRS signal ratio and determining the analyte concentration that corresponds to that point, given the known IRS concentration.
- a unique bargraph quantification method may be used.
- the bargraph quantification method requires the presence of several distinct internal reference species in the analytical sample, each at a different and known concentration and differing in mass from the certain antigen or antibody and each other sufficiently to be distinguishable in the mass spectrum. Because the concentrations of the internal reference species must be known, the internal reference species are typically added to the specimen, not intrinsic thereto.
- Mass spectrometric immunoassay of the specimen is then executed using an affinity reagent having specific affinity for each internal reference species and for the certain antibody or certain antigen being looked for in the specimen.
- the resulting mass spectrum will contain a mass spectral signal for each internal reference species and a mass spectral signal for the certain antigen or certain antibody, if present.
- the internal reference species are all modified variants of the analyte being mass spectrometrically immunoassayed so that the internal reference species are capable of being captured by a single affinant, and the mass spectral signals all neighbor one another on the mass spectrum.
- Each distinct internal reference species must have a molecular weight sufficiently different from the other internal reference species so as to be resolvable in a single mass spectrum.
- the range of concentrations covered by the internal reference species span the concentration range in which the analyte is reasonably expected to be found.
- the different internal reference species be captured by the affinity reagent with the same efficiency as either the analyte or each other; the different internal reference species are each simply added to the analytical sample at concentrations which produce mass spectral signals that have the same amplitude as the signal that would be produced by a known concentration of the analyte.
- the analyte can be quantified in at least three ways: 1) by interpolating the analyte's mass spectral signal magnitude to the magnitude of the internal reference species mass spectral signal immediately above and below the analyte mass spectral signal, normally assuming a linear relationship between signal and concentration in this range, or 2) by estimating the analyte concentration by simple visual comparison of the analyte mass spectral signal and the nearest internal reference species signal (in magnitude) without computation, or 3) by certifying that the analyte signal, and therefore the analyte concentration, is above or below the signal level due to a reference species corresponding to a previously determined analyte concentration.
- analyte concentration may be chosen to specify the presence or absence of a specific disease or condition. Since, under the bargraph strategy, the analyte is the certain antigen or certain antibody present in the specimen, the quantification of the analyte directly quantifies the certain antibody or certain antigen.
- the advantage of the bargraph approach is apparent in that the calibration scale is built into the mass spectrum giving exceptional immunity to instrumental and sample variations, and extremely rapid direct readout.
- the accuracy of this approach may be improved as necessary either by choosing the internal reference species concentrations to produce mass spectral signals which are closely spaced and near the analyte mass spectral signal, or by calibrating the analyte concentration range between those analyte concentration values specified by the internal reference species signals by using a number of standard preparations containing analyte concentrations within the concentration range to be calibrated.
- the standard addition approach is another strategy for determining the relationship between the analyte/IRS signal ratio and the analyte/IRS concentration ratio.
- this approach separate calibration preparations are not required. Instead the effect on the analyte/IRS signal ratio of changing the concentration of the analyte in the analytical sample by a known amount is determined.
- the analytical sample to which an internal reference species has been added, is divided into several divided samples, at a minimum two. The first divided sample is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed and an analyte/IRS signal ratio determined from the resulting addition-absent mass spectrum.
- the analyte/IRS signal ratios in the addition-present mass spectra are then used to determine the analyte concentration in the addition-absent sample. This is preferably done by using the addition-present analyte/IRS signal ratios closest in magnitude to the addition-absent analyte/IRS signal ratio to establish a mathematical relationship between changes in magnitude of the analyte/IRS signal ratio and the corresponding concentration change in the antibody or antigen due to the standard addition.
- This mathematical relationship may be expressed in a variety of ways, including but not limited to a line, a mathematical function, a graph, or computerized data.
- the standard addition mathematical relationship is then extrapolated to the intercept point for zero mass spectrometric response.
- the intercept point's value for standard addition concentration will be in negative units.
- the absolute value of this value inferentially represents the concentration of the analyte in the specimen.
- a standard addition analysis may be performed in serial fashion without dividing the original sample.
- the analytical sample, to which an internal reference species has been added is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed using an incubation procedure designed to capture only a small fraction (for example, less than 5%) of the analyte and IRS, and an analyte/IRS signal ratio determined for this addition-absent sample.
- a known amount of analyte, or an analyte counterpart is added to the original sample, increasing the concentration of the analyte, or analyte counterpart, by a known amount, and again the sample is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed using an incubation procedure designed to capture only a small fraction (for example, less than 5%) of the analyte and IRS.
- An analyte/IRS signal ratio is similarly determined for this addition-present sample.
- Further addition-present samples may be prepared by increasing the concentration of the analyte or analyte counterpart by further known amounts and these samples may be similarly mass spectrometrically immunoassayed to determine further analyte/IRS signal ratios.
- the analyte/IRS signal ratios in the addition-present mass spectral signals are then used to determine the analyte concentration in the addition-absent sample exactly as in the parallel standard addition approach. Since mass spectrometric immunoassay of each addition-present sample serves to calibrate a sample in which the concentration of the analyte differs from the analyte concentration in the addition-free sample by an amount which depends on the amounts of analyte captured in the preceding mass spectrometric immunoassays, it is apparent that the accuracy of this procedure will only be acceptable if the amount of analyte captured in each successive step is small, for example if 5% of the analyte is captured in the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the addition-free sample and mass spectrometric immunoassay of a single addition-present sample is performed, the analyte concentration determined thereby would be in error by 5%
- the relative signal approach compares two analyte signals to each other where the concentrations of the analytes in the specimens are unknown. Often times the precise concentration of an antibody or antigen is not the information needed. Rather, knowing whether the antibody or antigen is present in levels at, below, or above the level of another antibody or antigen is what is needed. It is irrelevant whether a numerical figure is reached because only the relative relationship matters.
- the relative signal and simple ratio quantification methods share some similarities. Both compare the mass spectral signals of one analyte to another analyte.
- the two analytes can originate from one specimen, thus involving only one mass spectrum, or can each originate from separate specimens, thus involving two mass spectra. It is not necessary that the analytes have identical molar responses, i.e., affinity constants and desorption/ionization efficiencies.
- both the simple ratio and relative signal quantification methods require that an internal reference species be present in each specimen sample in the same concentration to normalize the mass spectra. If one specimen is used, signals for the two analytes must be distinguishable in the mass spectrum, and no normalizing internal reference species is necessary. It is apparent that the two analytes whose mass spectral signals are being compared in a single sample are used to quantify either or both of the analytes and are essentially acting as analyte and an internal reference species, i.e., in qualitative and quantitative capacities at the same time.
- inter reference species is used in connection with the relative signal and simple ratio quantification methods to mean the antibody or antigen occupying the normalizer role.
- An “analyte” is used to mean the antigen or antibody acting in both a qualitative and quantitative role.
- the specimens are each mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with an affinity reagent having an affinity for each antigen or antibody being looked for in that specimen.
- the resulting spectra are normalized, then a comparison of the analyte signals made to determine which analyte is of greater or lesser concentration.
- Affinity reagent having an affinity for antigen X would be used in the mass spectrometric immunoassay of both samples.
- the two mass spectra would each show a mass spectral signal for antigen X and the internal reference species. After normalizing the spectra, the two antigen X signals could be compared to see if the level of antigen X had dropped or risen in the intervening time between taking the samples.
- the absolute concentration of X in either sample can not be determined without further calibration, but the amplitude of the relative change may be determined.
- the specimen is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with an affinity reagent having an affinity for each antigen or antibody being looked for in that specimen.
- the resulting mass spectrum will contain a signal for each analyte which was present in the specimen. Where two signals result, calibration of the magnitude of the signal corresponding to the analyte of known concentration to the magnitude of the signal of the analyte of unknown concentration determines the concentration of the other.
- myotoxin a a single analyte, myotoxin a, was detected in human whole blood using the affinant, anti-myotoxin a, as a constituent of the affinity reagent, and then quantified using a working curve strategy.
- Myotoxin a is one toxin found in the venom of the prairie rattlesnake, Crotalus viridis viridis ( C. v. viridis ).
- the antibody, anti-myotoxin a immunoglobulin IgG affinity purified from rabbit antiserum was used to prepare the affinity reagent as follows.
- One milliliter of antibody solution (the solution contained the antibody at 5 mg/mL in 0.01M tris[Hydroxymethyl] aminomethane, pH 8.2 (tris)) was incubated for two hours (gentle agitation at room temperature) with 1 mL of slurried 6% agarose beads on which protein A was supported.
- the beads were washed (3 ⁇ 1 mL tris) and allowed to react at room temperature with 500 ⁇ L of 0.02 M dimethylpimelimidate dihydrochloride prepared in 0.2 M triethanolamine (pH 8.2). The reaction was stopped after one hour by washing (3 ⁇ 1 mL) with 0.2 M triethanolamine followed by one milliliter 0.2 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.8). The reagent was finally washed (3 ⁇ 1 mL) with tris and resuspended in 500 ⁇ L of the same buffer.
- An internal reference species for the quantification of myotoxin a was prepared by lysine conversion of myotoxin a to homoarginine (H-myotoxin a).
- the resulting solution was lyophilized and stored for future use in a desiccator at ⁇ 20° C.
- the modification resulted in the conversion of each of the ten lysine residues to a guanidinium group, giving a total shift in mass of 420 Da.
- Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the dried material on the mass spectrometer probe tip was then performed on a linear time-of-flight mass spectrometer.
- the instrument consisted of a 30 kilovolt two-stage acceleration source followed by a 1.4-meter field free drift region containing a particle wire guide.
- a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG (355 nm) laser (Lumonics HY 400) was used for desorption/ionization.
- Ion signals were detected using a hybrid microchannel plate/discrete dynode electron multiplier and recorded using a 500 MS/s transient recorder (TEKTRONIX TDS 520A) capable of fast signal averaging.
- Time-of-flight spectrum was generated by signal averaging 50 laser shots into a single spectrum and transferring the data to an IBM compatible personal computer. Data was processed using the commercially available software, LABCALC (Galactic Industries). The time-of-flight mass spectrum was obtained in the positive ion mode and externally calibrated with a calibration equation generated using horse heart cytochrome c (molecular weight (MW) of 12,360 Da).
- the myotoxin a in the first specimen above containing 0.002 mg/mL of whole venom and 40 nM H-myotoxin a was then quantified using a working curve strategy.
- Six preliminary samples which consisted of 50 ⁇ L SB, 150 ⁇ L tris, and 2 ⁇ L ⁇ 0.02 mg/mL of the H-myotoxin a internal reference (40 nM in each sample) were prepared.
- a six-point normal working curve was generated from the mass spectra data of the preliminary samples.
- the mass spectra of the specimen and all six preliminary samples were normalized to the signal intensity of the H-myotoxin a.
- the relative signal intensity of the myotoxin a in the preliminary samples was then plotted as a function of myotoxin a concentration thereby generating a six point working curve.
- FIG. 4 shows the working curve which relates the concentration of purified myotoxin a with the normalized signal intensity of the myotoxin a. Indicated at - 5 - is the normalized intensity observed for the specimen.
- the concentration of myotoxin a in the specimen was determined to be 25 nM.
- Myotoxin a present in a blood sample containing 0.002 mg/mL of C. v. viridis venom was quantified employing the bargraph quantification strategy. Introduced into the sample were multiple internal reference species of myotoxin a which had been iodinated (at the tyrosine residues) using the following procedure: Iodobeads (Pierce) were washed two times with 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.0, then incubated for five minutes with 0.4 M sodium iodide in a 0.1 M sodium phosphate solution at pH 7.0.
- the internal reference species comprising the bargraph were calibrated against known concentrations of purified myotoxin a (using the calibration procedure described in Example 1). Once the relationships between the signal intensities of the myotoxin a and the internal reference species was established, the concentration of myotoxin a present in the sample could be determined, at a glance, by correlation with the internal reference peaks of closest intensity. For the example shown in FIG. 5, concentrations of 20, 100, 130 and 30 nM are indicated by the signal intensities of the first through fourth MV, -D-, -E-, -F-, and -G-, respectively. As the intensity of the myotoxin a signal -H- is observed to be between that of the first and fourth MV, it is determined that the myotoxin a concentration is in the range of 20 to 30 nM.
- FIG. 6 demonstrates a single-point relative signal strategy for quantifying and detecting myotoxin a in human blood.
- a human blood sample containing an unknown concentration of myotoxin a and a 30 nM concentration of H-myotoxin a was prepared then mass spectrometrically immunoassayed according to the protocols of Example 1 above.
- the resulting mass spectrum shows mass spectral signals for myotoxin a, -I-, and H-myotoxin a, -J-, at their respective molecular weights.
- the relative mass spectrometric responses of myotoxin a and H-myotoxin a may be determined from the mass spectrum of FIG.
- the concentrations of both species are known (25 nM myotoxin a, from the working curve calibration, and 40 nM H-myotoxin a). From this calibration it may be determined that equal concentrations of the two analytes give a 10% lower signal for H-myotoxin a.
- the myotoxin a signal is 3.5 times the H-myotoxin a signal for a known 30 nM concentration of H-myotoxin a. Therefore the myotoxin a concentration is calculated to be (30 nM ⁇ 3.5/1.1) or 95 nM.
- a multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay was performed to simultaneously detect the presence of myotoxin a and Mojave toxin in human blood.
- Example 1 The protocols of Example 1 above were followed with two exceptions. First, anti-myotoxin a and anti-Mojave toxin basic subunit immunoglobulins IgG were immobilized on 6% agarose beads resulting in an affinity reagent containing antibodies towards both myotoxin a and Mojave toxin. Second, the specimens of human blood contained 0.002 mg/mL of the whole venom of the Mojave rattlesnake, Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus ( C.s. scutulatus ), rather than the venom of C. v. viridis, and the specimens did not contain the internal reference species, H-myotoxin a. The venom of the C.s.scutulatus contains both myotoxin a and Mojave toxin.
- Example 5 demonstrates the detection and quantification of the blood serum protein ⁇ -1-acid glycoprotein (hence A1AG) using a mass spectrometric immunoassay in which the internal reference species is intrinsic to the biological system was performed.
- the internal reference species in this example is human serum albumin (hence HSA), another blood serum protein.
- HSA human serum albumin
- a working-curve method was employed. The example was performed, to demonstrate principle, in a solution of normal saline.
- a venom-laced blood sample was first divided equally amongst five separate containers. Aliquots of purified myotoxin a were added to each container, resulting in the samples possessing myotoxin a concentrations of 0, 180, 540, 890 and 1250 nM over that intrinsic to the sample. All five samples were then mass spectrometrically immunoassayed according to the protocols of Example 4 and the resulting mass spectra normalized to the Mojave toxin signals.
- FIG. 10 reproduces the results from the standard addition analysis in which myotoxin a was added at a concentration of 1250 nM over the intrinsic level. The signals for myotoxin a and Mojave toxin are observed at -P- and -Q-, respectively.
- the normalized myotoxin a signals were then plotted as a function of the concentration of myotoxin a (added), and the points fit with a straight line as shown in FIG. 11.
- the standard addition line was then extrapolated to the baseline (concentration of added myotoxin a).
- the intercept point, -R- indicated the concentration of myotoxin a intrinsic to the specimen to be 190 nM.
- a multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay was performed to detect myotoxin a and Mojave toxin in human blood.
- the myotoxin a was then quantified using the bargraph approach and the Mojave toxin was quantified using a working curve in which the doubly-iodinated species serves as an internal reference species.
- a venom laced blood sample and affinity reagent were prepared according to the protocols outlined in Example 1 with two exceptions: 1) the venom used to lace a human blood sample was that of C.s. scutulatus, and 2) two antibodies, anti-myotoxin a and anti-Mojave basic subunit, were present in the antibody solution used to prepare the affinity reagent.
- Example 1 The mass spectrometric immunoassay proceeded as outlined in Example 1 with the iodinated modified variants of myotoxin a described in Example 2 introduced into the sample as internal reference species. Calibration of the bargraph was as in Example 2 and the working curve as in Example 6 with the doubly-iodinated species of myotoxin a serving as the internal reference.
- the mass spectrum resulting from the analytical sample containing 0.001 mg/mL C.s. scutulatus is shown in FIG. 12. Mass spectral signals are observed at 4,822 Da, -S-, indicating the presence of myotoxin a, and 14,175 Da, -T-, indicating the presence of Mojave toxin basic subunit.
- the iodinated myotoxin a signals are also observed at ⁇ 4,950-5,320 Da, -U-.
- the myotoxin a signal registered between that of the 1st and 4th iodinated species indicating a concentration between 2 and 3 nM. From the working curve it was determined that the Mojave toxin basic subunit concentration was 15 nM+2.5 nM.
- the mass spectrometric immunoassay method of determining the presence of one or more specific antibodies in sera was performed. The method involves retrieval of a portion of the general antibody population present in a sample, and use of this portion to construct the affinity reagent. The affinity reagent is then screened with specific antigens. Antigens are retained by the affinity reagent if the specific antibody is present in the original sample, and will register in the mass spectrum (indicating the presence of the specific antibody).
- the specimen was that of blood serum drawn from a rabbit immunized against the toxin, ⁇ -cobratoxin.
- the affinity reagent was prepared by mixing 25 ⁇ L of protein A supported on 6% agarose beads with a solution containing 50 ⁇ L of the serum and 50 ⁇ L of 0.01M tris[Hydroxymethyl] aminomethane, pH 8.2 (tris)) and incubated for two hours (gentle agitation at room temperature). Following incubation, the beads were washed (3 ⁇ 100 ⁇ L tris) and allowed to react at room temperature with 50 ⁇ L of 0.02 M dimethylpimelimidate dihydrochloride prepared in 0.2 M triethanolamine (pH 8.2).
- the reaction was stopped after one hour by washing (3 ⁇ 100 ⁇ L) with 0.2 M triethanolamine followed by 100 ⁇ L of 0.2 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.8).
- the affinity reagent was finally washed (3 ⁇ 100 ⁇ L) with tris and resuspended in 50 ⁇ L of the same buffer.
- a preparation containing multiple antigen species was prepared and MALDI mass spectrometrically analyzed.
- the resulting mass spectrum in FIG. 13 shows multiple signals corresponding to multiple antigens in the preparation.
- the singly charged signal for ⁇ -cobratoxin is identified at -V- at the molecular weight of 7,822 Da.
- the affinity reagent was then incubated with the preparation following similar mass spectrometric immunoassay protocols already described to see which of the antigen species from the preparation of screening antigens were retained.
- the resulting mass spectrum is shown in FIG. 14.
- a signal at the mass-to-charge ratio of ⁇ -cobratoxin at 7,822 m/z (molecular weight 7,822 Da), -W-, indicates the retention of ⁇ -cobratoxin by the affinity reagent, which in turn indicates the presence of anti- ⁇ -cobratoxin present in the serum from which the affinity reagent was made.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
- Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
Abstract
Rapid mass spectrometric immunoassay methods for detecting and/or quantifying antibody and antigen analytes utilizing affinity capture to isolate the analytes and internal reference species (for quantification) followed by mass spectrometric analysis of the isolated analyte/internal reference species. Quantification is obtained by normalizing and calibrating obtained mass spectrum against the mass spectrum obtained for an antibody/antigen of known concentration.
Description
- [0001] The present invention relates to a new and useful immunoassay and more specifically to new and improved mass spectrometric immunoassay processes for the detection and/or quantification of one or more antigens or antibodies in a single determining immunoassay. Hereinafter, singular terms are intended to include plural.
- [0002] Financial Assistance for some of the work reported herein was provided by the United States Department of Energy under Grant number DEFG02-91ER61127. The United States government may have certain rights to this invention.
- Immunoassay techniques first came into wide usage with the development of radioimmunoassay (RIA) in which the specificity of antigen-antibody binding was coupled with the high sensitivity of nuclear particle detection to detect and quantify antibody-antigen binding in the presence of a large background of non-specific material. Later, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) immunoassays coupled the specificity of antigen-antibody binding with the sensitivity of enzyme chemical reactions to detect and quantify an antigen-antibody binding by producing colored, fluorescent, bio- or chemiluminescent chromophore. EIA and ELISA exhibited an amplification factor as high as 108, allowing sensitivities competitive with RIA without the disadvantages of radioactivity.
- Typical ELISA diagnostics relied on an antigen having at least one epitope to which an enzyme-linked antibody could bind with a high affinity. An antigen was affinity-isolated from its biological system and allowed to interact with the enzyme-linked antibody. The enzyme of choice was generally alkaline phosphatase or horseradish peroxidase, both of which generated a colored product upon digestion of appropriate substrates. Although detection of attomole levels of an enzyme has been demonstrated, so that it was, in principle, possible to detect attomole levels of an antigen, traditional immunoassays did not operate at that level of detection because all were limited by non-specific binding of the enzyme-linked antibody to surfaces in the reaction well or vial. This produced a background response which restricted the detection limit of the technique which could not be discriminated against because detection was indirect.
- A further limitation of the traditional immunoassays employing optical detection was caused by the limited number of clearly resolvable colored enzyme products, at most two or three, which limited the possibility for an immunoassay to screen for multiple antigens in a single sample. Multiple antigen immunoassays usually focused on a number of separate immunoassays in an array of well plates each requiring its own sample which clearly reduced the utility of this approach. The ideal multi-antigen immunoassay would detect a large number of discrete antigens with high specificity in a single specimen, would cover a large dynamic range, be quantifiable over that range, and could be performed rapidly, that is, in minutes rather than hours, for critical clinical situations and high general throughput.
- The sensitivity of EIA and ELISA relied on the specificity of the affinants used to bind with the antigen or antibody being detected. Expensive and hard to produce monoclonal antibodies were usually the reagent of choice because the specificity of monoclonal antibodies is very high. Polyclonal antibodies whose specificity is low could be used in theory but were not a practical choice for a reagent because polyclonal antibodies bind with several species of antigens making the detection of the resulting antibody-antigen complex less specific for a single given antigen species.
- Yet another restriction to EIA and ELISA is that they required the antigen-antibody binding to reach an equilibrium for quantification, making the immunoassay take several hours to perform.
- Until about 1988, mass spectrometry of proteins and peptides was thought difficult or impossible. At that time Karas and Hillenkamp (Analytical Chemistry, vol. 60, pp. 2299-2301, 1988) demonstrated that proteins could be ejected into the gas phase by embedding them into an organic matrix which was then literally exploded using a pulsed laser beam. This technique is commonly referred to as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). When MALDI was coupled to a time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer, a new field of biological mass spectrometry was opened.
- While the new MALDI techniques opened the field biomolecular mass spectrometry, the mass spectrometric analysis of complex biological materials was not possible because of matrix overloading. Recently, Hutchens et al. (Hutchens, T. W. and Yip, T.),Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry,
vol 7, 1993, pp. 576-580.) demonstrated the utilization of affinity capture methods to quasi-purify proteins in a specimen prior to MALDI mass spectrometry. By quasi-purifying the specimen being assayed Hutchens et al. effectively overcame the primary limitation of MALDI mass spectrometry, namely, the suppression of ion signal due to overloading of the matrix. They named their technique “surface-enhanced affinity capture mass spectrometry (SEAC)”. They further demonstrated their technique by using single stranded DNA which they immobilized on the mass spectrometer probe tip to quasi-isolate the protein lactoferrin from preterm infant urine. - More recently Hutchens, T. W. and Yip, T., in an international patent application which was published Dec. 8, 1994 (WO 94/28418), described a method and apparatus for using affinity capture to improve mass spectrometric characterization of biomolecules.
- Presently, there is no mass spectrometric immunoassay which is capable of qualitatively and quantitatively determining the presence of single or multiple antigen or antibody species in a specimen. It is toward the fulfillment of that need that the present invention is directed.
- The present invention relates generally to the fields of immunoassay and mass spectrometry and more particularly to a new and useful mass spectrometric immunoassay methodology for unequivocally detecting and/or quantifying one or more antigens or antibodies from a specimen within the limits of detection.
- The present invention combines and exploits the specificity of antibody-antigen binding and the ability of the mass spectrometer to unequivocally identify molecules in various qualitative and quantitative strategies to analyze one or more antigens or antibodies in a specimen within the limit of detection. Both qualitative and quantification strategies utilize an antibody or antigen to capture and isolate another antigen or antibody, respectively, from its surroundings, and thereafter mass spectrometrically analyze the isolated antibody or antigen after release from the capturing agent. The specificity of the antibody-antigen reaction coupled with the ability of the mass spectrometer to separate and unequivocally identify the captured and isolated antibody or antigen by its mass-to-charge ratio from other molecules that may accompany it lends two dimensions of specificity to the present invention.
- Because detection using mass spectrometry lends an added dimension of unequivocal specificity, the mass spectrometric immunoassay under the present invention is an improvement over existing immunoassays in several ways. First, the present invention does not require monoclonal antibodies as a reagent, polyclonal antibodies produce equally reliable results. Second, radioactive materials are not required at all. Third, the presence of other substances not the subject of the immunoassay do not interfere with either detecting or quantifying the targeted antigen or antibody. Fourth, an accurate multiplex immunoassay clearly detecting and/or quantifying virtually any combination of different antigens or antibodies is possible.
- In addition, the rapid ease by which the mass spectrometer can detect an antigen or antibody regardless of whether the antigen-antibody binding has reached equilibrium grants to the present invention an immunoassay that produces results in a short period of time, minutes rather than hours.
- An article by Nelson, R., et al., published inAnalytical Chemistry, vol. 67, pp 1153-1158, on or about Mar. 31, 1995, describes certain portions of the present invention in detail and is herein incorporated by reference.
- Accordingly it is a prime object of the present invention to provide a new and improved mass spectrometric immunoassay for determining whether one or more designated antigens and/or antibodies are present in a specimen.
- A further object of the present invention is to provide a novel and unique immunoassay for determining what specific antigens and/or antibodies are present in a given specimen.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a new and improved immunoassay for determining how much detected antigen or antibody is present in a specimen.
- These and still further objects as shall hereinafter appear are readily fulfilled by the present invention in a remarkably unexpected manner as will be readily discerned from the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment thereof especially when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which like parts bear like numerals throughout the several views.
- In the drawing:
- FIG. 1 is a depiction of the general scheme of a multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay under the present invention showing affinity capture and isolation of two antigen analytes and a modified variant of one of the antigen analytes, denoted with a star, and showing the resulting mass spectrum which distinctly resolves each antigen analyte and modified variant;
- FIG. 2 is a mass spectrum resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom-laced human blood sample for the antigen, myotoxin a, showing a distinct mass spectrometric response for singly charged myotoxin a at the mass/charge (m/z) ratio corresponding to the molecular weight of myotoxin a at 4,822 Da, and a second distinct response at the m/z ratio corresponding to 5,242 Da, which is the molecular weight of the modified variant H-myotoxin a, used as an internal reference species.;
- FIG. 3 is a mass spectrum resulting from mass spectrometric analysis, without affinity capture and isolation, of a venom laced human blood sample for the antigen, myotoxin a, showing no distinct mass spectrometric response at the molecular weight of myotoxin a, but rather showing a mass spectrometric response for singly charged hemoglobin A and B at the mass/charge (m/z) ratios corresponding to their respective molecular weights of about 16,000 Da.;
- FIG. 4 is a working curve relationship between the concentration of myotoxin a in venom laced human blood samples and the magnitude of mass spectrometric immunoassay responses for myotoxin a, normalized with the modified variant, H-myotoxin a, and demonstrating the working curve quantification strategy for quantifying myotoxin a;
- FIG. 5 is a mass spectrum resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom laced human blood sample containing four modified variants of myotoxin a, demonstrating the bargraph quantitative strategy for quantifying the antigen, myotoxin a;
- FIG. 6 is a mass spectrum resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom laced human blood sample containing the modified variant, H-myotoxin a, demonstrating the relative limit signal quantitative strategy for quantifying myotoxin a;
- FIG. 7 is a mass spectrum resulting from the multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of a venom laced human blood sample for myotoxin a and Mojave toxin showing distinct mass spectral signals for myotoxin a and Mojave toxin located at their respective molecular weights;
- FIG. 8 results from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of six preparation samples containing various concentrations of the antigen, α-1-acid glycoprotein (A1AG), and a constant concentration of the internal reference species, human serum albumin (HSA) and is a mass spectrum of one of these preparation samples, showing distinct signals for A1Ag at m/z ˜37,000 and for HSA at m/z ˜67,000;
- FIG. 9 is a working curve relationship between the concentration of α-1-acid glycoprotein (A1AG) in a specimen and the magnitude of the mass spectrometric response for α-1-acid glycoprotein, normalized with the internal reference species, human serum albumin;
- FIG. 10 results from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention of the rattlesnake toxin, myotoxin a, in human blood containing the venom of the Mojave rattlesnake, and to which various aliquots of purified myotoxin a have been added to allow quantification by the standard addition strategy, and shows a mass spectrum of a sample in which the concentration of myotoxin a was increased by 1250 nM over the intrinsic level;
- FIG. 11 is the standard addition line defining the relationship between added myotoxin a and the mass spectral responses for myotoxin a, normalized to the mass spectral response for another venom component, Mojave toxin, which is present in the blood sample at a constant concentration and consequently may be used as an internal reference species;
- FIG. 12 is a mass spectrum of a venom laced blood sample containing five modified variants of myotoxin a resulting from the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention in Example 7, demonstrating a bargraph quantification strategy;
- FIG. 13 is a mass spectrum resulting from mass spectrometric analysis of the preparation made of multiple antigen species in Example 7 showing responses at various m/z ratios characteristic of the various antigens; and
- FIG. 14 is the mass spectrum of Example 7, showing a mass spectral response for the single antigen, α-cobratoxin, and demonstrating the third qualitative mass spectrometric immunoassay strategy of the present invention for inferentially detecting the antibody to α-cobratoxin in a specimen by capturing the antibody for α-cobratoxin and utilizing this antibody in the affinity reagent.
- The present invention relates to a new mass spectrometric immunoassay and more specifically to new and improved processes for the detection and/or quantification of one or more antigens or antibodies in a single immunoassay.
- The present invention can be utilized to detect and/or quantify single or multiple antigens or antibodies in a specimen. Single terms as used herein are meant to include plural.
- In its simplest context, the present invention involves two phases: capture and isolation of an antibody analyte or antigen analyte, followed by mass spectrometric analysis of the captured antigen analyte or antibody analyte. The present invention can be used for qualitative and/or quantitative purposes. That is, the present invention- can be used to determine whether a certain antibody or antigen is present in a specimen (qualitative), and/or to measure the amount of the antigen or antibody present in a specimen (quantitative).
- A more detailed description of the several facets of this invention appears hereafter utilizing the following lexicon.
- “Affinant” is the antibody and/or antigen which is used to make the affinity reagent. Usually, an affinity reagent to analyze for antigens will be made with one or several types of antibody. Similarly, an affinity reagent to analyze for antibodies will be made with one or several different antigens. However, all quantitative analyses in the present invention require the affinity reagent to capture at least two different types of molecule, one of which is the analyte, the other molecule acting as an internal reference species. Sometimes, the analyte may be an antibody and the internal reference species an antigen, or vice versa. Where this is so, it would be necessary for the affinity reagent to contain both an antibody and an antigen. For example, because the number of resolvable types of antibody is small, a protein that is not an antibody may make a useful internal reference species for an antibody, because it has a resolvable mass and a specific antibody is readily available for it. In such a case, the affinity reagent needs to contain an immobilized antibody having a specific affinity for that protein, in addition to an immobilized antigen having a specific affinity for the antibody analyte.
- “Affinity” is the ability of a molecule to bind with another molecule having proper fitting conformation.
- “Affinity reagent” is a type of antigen or antibody immobilized to a solid substrate. Preferably, immobilization is obtained by covalently linking the antigen or antibody to the solid substrate, although non-covalent linkage may be acceptable. The antibody or antigen can be directly linked to the solid substance surface, or can be indirectly attached to the solid substrate by linking the antibody or antigen to a coating on the solid substrate.
- “Allergen” is a particulate material capable of stimulating an allergic response in susceptible individuals. Typically, allergens include dusts, pollens, molds, spores, and particles of insect and animal detrita. Each type of material may carry on its surface, many different kinds of proteins capable of stimulating an allergic response. The allergic response is characterized in the human body by the production of elevated levels of an immunoglobulin, IgE, molecular weight ˜170,000 Da, which is distinguishable from other immunoglobulins such as IgG which have a different molecular weight (IgG: ˜150,000 Da).
- “Analyte” except as otherwise defined, is an antibody or antigen that is captured, isolated and mass spectrometrically analyzed for the qualitative purpose of detecting whether a specimen contains a certain antibody or certain antigen. Depending on the qualitative method employed, the analyte may be the certain antibody or certain antigen being looked for in the specimen, or may be another antibody or antigen used to indirectly detect the certain antibody or certain antigen.
- “Antibody” is a protein that specifically binds with another molecule that possesses one or more unique antigenic sites.
- “Antigen” is any molecule having an antigenic site that can bind to an antibody. It is apparent that the categories of molecules that may be considered antigens under this definition is broad, essentially any molecule that can bind with an antibody qualifies as an antigen including an allergen.
- “Counterpart” when used to describe an antibody or antigen, is an antibody or antigen which has a molecular weight indistinguishable in the mass spectrum from that of the analyte, and which gives a response identical to that of the analyte when both are subjected to mass spectrometric immunoassay from specimens of identical concentration.
- “Disassociation agent” is any active cause which disassociates or unbinds a captured analyte from the affinity reagent. A laser desorption/ionization agent may also act as a disassociation agent. Examples of a disassociation agent include but are not limited to: addition of a buffer solution, heating, sonication, application of an electric potential, or addition of a MALDI matrix.
- “Effective amount” of affinity reagent is that amount necessary to capture an adequate quantity of the analyte (and internal reference species where relevant) to achieve the desired result.
- “Internal reference species” is an antibody or antigen whose specific affinity for another antibody or antigen is exploited in the mass spectrometric immunoassay for quantitative purposes. The internal reference species is captured, isolated and mass spectrometrically analyzed alongside the analyte.
- “Laser desorption/ionization agent” is any active cause which enables an analyte to be laser desorped/ionized. An example of a laser desorption/ionization agent is the addition of a MALDI matrix.
- “Mass spectrometrically analyzed” is analyzing the antigen analyte or antibody analyte with a mass spectrometer resulting in a mass spectrometric response. Generally, a mass spectrometer is an instrument designed to determine the mass-to-charge ratio of ions. For this process, it is necessary for the analyte molecules to be volatilized, and ionized. The ionized molecules are then accelerated by an electric field into the analyzing device, which separates the ions by virtue of a property dependent on the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). Among these properties are: deflection in a magnetic field, velocity after acceleration through a fixed electric potential drop, cyclotron orbital frequency in a magnetic field, and trajectory in a radio frequency quadrupole field. Because antigens and antibodies are usually relatively large molecules and cannot be volatilized under ordinary mass spectrometric procedures, volatilization and ionization of the antibody or antigen usually involves some kind of assistance. One common procedure of assistance is known as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, or MALDI. Therefore, “mass spectrometric analysis” is intended to include techniques that assist the mass spectrometer in volatilizing and ionizing the antibody or antigen molecules when such assistance is needed.
- “Mass spectrometric mixture” is a mixture containing an antibody or antigen which can be laser desorped/ionized by a mass spectrometer.
- “Mass spectrometric response” (or “Response”) is the response received from a mass spectrometer indicating whether or when an ion struck the mass spectrometer's detector and whether or when no ion struck the detector. A non-zero response at a given mass-to-charge ratio indicates that the material mass spectrometrically analyzed contained a given molecule that gave rise to the ion corresponding to the response at that charge-to mass ratio. It is apparent that a zero mass spectrometric response would indicate that the material mass spectrometrically analyzed either did not contain that molecule, or contained that molecule in levels below the limit of detection.
- It is important to realize that the mass spectrometric response is defined as a change in the level of the signal measured at the mass spectrometer detector, not simply the absolute level of that signal. In some types of mass spectrometer, and particularly in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometers, there is a detectable signal, resulting in a non-zero baseline, throughout the mass spectrum arising from such causes as background noise and the arrival of ions at the detector at times non-specific to their mass/charge ratio. Thus, the mass spectrometric response for an ion species at a specific mass/charge ratio is defined as the change in the mass spectrometer signal above this baseline signal level.
- Detection of an ion at a given setting of electric and magnetic field strengths, or at a given time after the ion is accelerated, is controlled by the mass-to-charge (mass/charge) ratio of that ion thereby providing an accurate means of identifying the molecule that gave rise to that ion by the molecule's mass-to-charge ratio. The number of ions that strike the detector at a given setting, or at a given time, is indicated by the magnitude of the mass spectrometric response. A “mass spectrum” is a collection of mass spectrometric responses over a range of mass-to-charge ratios.
- A mass spectrum is commonly expressed graphically in terms of relative intensity against mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). Where an ion arises from a molecule present in the material being mass spectrometrically analyzed at or above the limit of detection, the response is expressed as mass spectral signals or peaks (signal, or peak) at the relative mass-to-charge ratio of the ion. Where the ion charge is +1, the mass-to-charge ratio for that ion is equivalent to the molecular weight of the ion. Molecular weight is expressed in Daltons (Da.) and may be used interchangeably with the term mass-to-charge ratio for singly charged ions.
- The magnitude of a mass spectrometric response can be measured in terms of “intensity”, height of the response, or “integral”, the area under the response. It is apparent that mass spectrometric response can be expressed in a variety of tangible and intangible forms including but not limited to signals, charts, electronic data and electric currents. A zero response, a response without magnitude, at a given mass-to-charge ratio indicates the material being mass spectrometrically analyzed either did not contain a molecule that could give rise to an ion of the given mass-to-charge ratio, or did not contain that molecule at a level at or above the level of detection.
- “Modified variant” is an internal reference species which is made from an antibody or antigen analyte or a counterpart thereof, has affinity for the same antigen or antibody as does the analyte, and produces a mass spectrometric response relative to the analyte which is fixed and readily determinable, but has a different molecular weight such that it is resolvable in the mass spectrum from the analyte.
- “Non-specific affinity” is the strongly attractive interaction with a broad range of antibody or antigen species. By way of example only, the substance Protein A has a strong affinity for all antibodies of the IgG family.
- “Normalize” or any form of the word, is that procedure for correcting mass spectra for differences in instrument performance during mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple analytical systems. In essence, normalization provides for accurate results when two immunoassays are compared in the quantitative strategies of the present invention. Normalization is preferably achieved with the assistance of an internal reference species, but conceivably can be achieved without the assistance of an internal reference species if instrument parameters are carefully controlled so as to be identical in the mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple analytical systems. Alternatively, if the dependence on the instrument parameters of the mass spectrometric response to a given analyte concentration is sufficiently well known, the mass spectrometric response may be corrected for the effects of changing instrument parameters.
- “Post-combination affinity reagent” is an affinity reagent which has been allowed to bind with its target antigen or antibody.
- “Preparation” is an operator created substance or material and used for a particular purpose in the mass spectrometric immunoassay. The term is used to distinguish it from the specimen. Under one method of the present invention, material containing a counterpart antigen is created for the purpose of determining whether a certain antibody species is present in a specimen, such as antiserum, and is termed the “preparation” to distinguish it from the specimen and avoid confusion in describing the method. Under several quantitative methods, a material containing a counterpart antigen or antibody is created and termed the “preparation” and used in the quantification methods.
- “Solid substrate” is defined as any physically separable solid to which an antibody or antigen can be directly or indirectly attached including but not limited to agarose beads, nylon metals, glass, silicon, and organic membranes.
- “Specific affinity” is the strongly attractive interaction between specific antigens and their corresponding antibodies. The selective attraction between an antigen and its corresponding antibody occurs between the antigenic site, or epitope, of the antigen and a recognition region in the antibody. As such, it may be possible to modify an antigen by altering its molecular weight, without noticeably altering the epitope, so that the modified antigen also has a specific affinity for the same antibody as the unmodified antigen. An antibody may similarly be modified without eliminating its specific affinity for its antigen. The high specific affinity between antigens and antibodies is the key to the selective capture and isolation of a specified antigen or antibody in an immunoassay.
- “Specimen” is any material which is the focus of the mass spectrometric immunoassay. Frequently the specimen will be of biological origin, for example a blood sample, and contain analytes that are similarly of biological origin, for example peptides, proteins and antibodies. However, it is possible that the specimen may be non-biological in origin, for example a groundwater specimen, and the analyte similarly may be of non-biological origin, for example a pesticide. All that is necessary for a successful immunoassay is that it should be possible to prepare an antibody having a specific affinity for that analyte.
- “Unbound remainder” is whatever is left after the affinity reagent screens the specimen.
- The “mass spectrometrically immunoassay” is that procedure in which a specimen is incubated with an affinity reagent which will specifically capture an analyte, for a time sufficient for the affinity reagent to bind a detectable fraction of the analyte, creating a post-combination affinity reagent. The post-combination affinity reagent is then separated from the unbound remainder of the specimen sample to isolate the captured antigen from the unbound remainder. Preferably, the isolated post combination affinity reagent is then washed to remove any unbound remainder adhering to the isolated affinity reagent.
- A laser desorption/ionization agent is then added to isolated post combination affinity reagent to unbind any antigen bound to the affinant and form a mass spectrometric mixture from which the unbound antigen is then mass spectrometrically analyzed. If the specimen contained the certain antigen at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, the resulting mass spectrum will show a mass spectral signal at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of the certain antigen. If the specimen did not contain the certain antigen at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, no such signal will be evident.
- Such a mass spectrometric immunoassay procedure can result in a qualitative or a quantitative analysis, depending on whether or not a quantification method is used.
- A multitude of qualitative and quantitative methods are possible using the present invention. Below three qualitative methods are discussed in detail, followed by a detailed discussion of six quantification methods. The mass spectrometric immunoassay of the present invention is very sensitive and requires only very small quantities of analyte and/or small volumes of analyte containing samples. The detection limit is approximately between 1×109 and 1×1010 analyte molecules in about 200 μL (microliters) of sample.
- The first qualitative strategy is designed to determine whether one or more antigens are present in or are absent from a specimen. Antibodies to each antigen to be detected are immobilized on a solid substrate creating the affinity reagent. The affinity reagent is then incubated with the specimen to screen the specimen for any antigen present in the specimen that has an affinity for the affinant-antibody immobilized on the affinity reagent. Screening in this context means to combine the specimen and affinity reagent for enough time to allow the affinant-antibody to combine with a detectable amount of antigen for which it has a specific affinity. The affinity reagent will capture some or all of the antigen present in the specimen, if any. The post-combination affinity reagent is then separated from the unbound remainder of the specimen to isolate the captured antigen from the unbound remainder. Preferably, the isolated post-combination affinity reagent is then washed to remove any unbound remainder adhering to the isolated affinity reagent.
- A disassociation agent is applied to the post-combination affinity reagent to disrupt the antibody-antigen binding and produce a solution containing free antigen which can be separated from the solid affinity reagent by filtering. If the mass spectrometric analysis is to be performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), the sample must be combined with an excess amount of a laser desorption/ionization agent (known otherwise as a “MALDI matrix”) and allowed to crystallize by drying. In general the MALDI matrix materials which are effective laser desorption/ionization agents are also remarkably effective disassociation agents, and disassociation using these materials is preferred, in particular because the process of disassociation and creation of a mass spectrometric mixture is thereby made simple and rapid.
- The solution resulting from the disassociation step may be mass spectrometrically analyzed. If the solution is to be analyzed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry, it must first be combined with a MALDI matrix if such a matrix material was not used as a disassociation agent. If the specimen contained one or more of the antigen species for which the affinity reagent has a specific affinity, at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, the resulting mass spectrum will show a mass spectral signal at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of the certain antigen. If the specimen did not contain the certain antigen at a level above the detection limit of the mass spectrometric immunoassay process for that antigen, no such signal will be evident. This strategy may be used to screen specimens for as many discrete antigen species as can be distinguished from each other in a single mass spectrum. In the event that more antigens must be searched for than can be distinguished in a single mass spectrum, two or more affinity reagents must be created, each having affinities to different sets of distinguishable antigens.
- The procedures for the second qualitative strategy under the present invention are similar to the first except the affinity reagent is made with antigens seeking antibodies. The analyte is an antibody. The same general protocols apply. An antigen known to have a specific affinity for the antibody analyte is immobilized to a solid subtrate. The affinity reagent is incubated with the specimen being assayed for the desired antibody and allowed to capture the antibody for which it has a specific affinity. After washing the reagent any captured antibody is isolated from the specimen environment. A disassociation agent then a laser desorption/ionization is added to the isolated antibody to free it from the substrate and facilitate ionization prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Alternately, only the laser desorption/ionization agent can be added without the disassociation agent to the isolated antibody analyte. A mass spectral response at the molecular weight (same as single charged m/z) of the target antibody evidences the presence of the antibody in the specimen.
- In addition to using pure antigens to capture specific antibodies, it can also be useful to use impure antigens to capture classes of antibodies. Such a situation arises in testing for allergies, in whiich whole allergen particles, such as dusts, pollens, molds, spores and particles of insect and animal detrita, may be covalently anchored to a solid substrate, or even used without such anchoring if the particles are sufficiently large to be separated by filtering may be used to search for elevated levels of an antibody, IgE, which is produced as part of the allergic response. IgE has a molecular weight of ˜170,000 Da, sufficiently different from that of IgG, another major antigenic antibody class with a molecular weight ˜150,000 Da, that IgE and IgG are distinguishable in a mass spectrometer. However, like other antibodies, individual types of IgE molecules are not resolvable from each other. Accordingly, determination of which of several possible allergens has a specific affinity for IgE in a blood sample would necessarily use a single species of allergen, for example, the pollen of a specific plant, such as ragweed, to screen a specimen for IgE characteristic of allergy to ragweed pollen, and separate screening procedures would be carried out for each specific allergen. Small molecules, such as drugs, do not stimulate an allergic response when present alone, but do so effectively when bound to proteins to form conjugates. Screening for life-threatening sensitivity to drugs therefore would necessarily use affinity reagents in which the drug molecules in question were attached to proteins incorporated in the affinity reagent.
- The advantage of such screening over the conventional skin and patch tests for allergy is not only its enhanced speed but, equally important, the ability to avoid a potentially catastrophic hyperallergenic reaction that could occur when the patient is used as an allergy detector.
- Because antibodies within a certain class, such as immunoglobulin G (IgG) do not vary in molecular weight by a sufficient amount to be distinguishable mass spectrometrically, a different strategy must be adopted to screen a specimen for specific types of similar antibodies, for example, antibodies belonging to the IgG class. In this strategy detection of a specific antibody is indirect. A specimen is combined with a solid substrate having a broad non-specific affinity for antibodies. A representative sample of the antibody population in the specimen will bind with the solid substrate creating an affinity reagent. The affinity reagent is then incubated with a screening preparation made with an antigen or antigens known to have a specific affinity for the antibody or antibodies to be searched for. If a certain antibody is a member of the antibody population on the affinity reagent, and the specific antigen to that antibody is present in the screening preparation, then that antibody will capture its specific known antigen from the preparation. The affinity reagent is then separated from the preparation leaving behind the unbound remainder. Preferably, the isolated affinity reagent is washed to remove any unbound remainder adhering thereto.
- A laser desorption/ionization agent is then applied to the isolated affinity reagent to unbind any antigen bound to the affinant-antibody forming a mass spectrometric mixture from which the unbound antigen is then mass spectrometrically analyzed. A mass spectral signal at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of a known antigen indicates the antibody specific for that antigen was present in the specimen. Absence of a mass spectral signal indicates that the certain antibody was not present in the specimen at or above the detectable limit.
- The preferred incubation method for all three qualitative methods is arrived at empirically and depends on the given analytical system. Generally, incubation can be stationary (combining the affinity reagent and sample then agitating), flowing (one-time or repetitive flowing of sample over the affinity reagent), or accelerated by the application of an electrical potential across the sample solution. Because the use of an internal reference species serves to calibrate variables in the incubation process as well as in the mass spectrometric analysis, it is not necessary to ensure that incubation proceeds to equilibrium to achieve accurate analyses. Rapid incubations and consequently rapid analyses are therefore possible under the present invention.
- Preferably, the disassociation agent and laser desorption/ionization agent chosen is arrived at empirically, however, the preferred agent is often the addition of any material commonly referred to as a “MALDI matrix” by those in the field of mass spectrometry. Examples of commonly used MALDI matrix materials can be found in: Fan Xiang and Ronald C. Beavis,Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 8, pp. 199-204, 1994 and in Ronald C. Beavis, Organic Mass Spectrometry, vol. 27, pp. 653-659, 1992.
- Because an unbound antigen analyte or unbound antibody analyte is typically too large a molecule to be ionized, the unbound analyte cannot ordinarily be mass spectrally analyzed without additional preparatory techniques. Preferably, matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) techniques enable mass spectrometric analysis of the analyte. Standard MALDI protocols can be found in Ronald C. Beavis,Organic Mass Spectrometry, vol. 27, pp. 653-659, 1992.
- The mass spectrometer used in the present invention can be any mass spectrometer that will analyze the analytes including a magnetic sector mass spectrometer, a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) mass spectrometer, a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer and any time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer. Of these the TOF mass spectrometer is preferred.
- Mass spectrometric analysis of the captured, isolated and unbound analyte results in an analyte mass spectral signal at the mass-to-charge ratio characteristic of the analyte. The location of the signal on the mass spectrum is dependent on the molecular weight of the analyte, thereby providing a reliable means for identifying the analyte. The mass spectral signal also has magnitude. The magnitude of the signal is indicative of the amount of analyte that is ionized and detected by the mass spectrometer. Mass spectrometric signal magnitude has at least two dimensions that are directly measurable, intensity or height of the signal, and integral or the area under the signal; Either the intensity or the integral can be used to quantify.
- The mass spectrometric immunoassay process can also be designed to quantify an antibody or antigen present in a specimen. All such quantitative analyses utilize standard preparations containing known concentrations of the analyte for calibration. In addition, because it is difficult to control the analytical conditions sufficiently well to ensure a constant absolute mass spectrometric response for a constant analyte concentration in different samples, quantitative analysis using the present invention relies on the presence of or the introduction of at least one internal reference species in the analytical system prior to incubation with the affinity reagent. The internal reference species can be added to the analytical system being assayed, or be intrinsic thereto. It is captured, isolated and mass spectrometrically analyzed simultaneously with the analyte, thereby serving to calibrate the analytical conditions from one analysis to another because both analyte and internal reference species respond identically to changes in these conditions.
- The affinity reagent must contain an affinant that will specifically capture or bind with the internal reference species. It is essential that the internal reference species have a molecular weight sufficiently different from that of the analyte or analytes that it can be resolved in the mass spectrum from the signals arising from the analyte or analytes. However, the molecular weight difference is preferably the minimum necessary for resolution in the mass spectrum, because analytes differing very greatly in mass may not respond identically to changes in the mass spectrometer operating conditions. Preferably, the internal reference species is a modified variant of the analyte. Where a modified variant is used as the internal reference species, an affinant that can capture the analyte can usually also capture the modified variant because the modification shifts the molecular weight of the antibody or antigen without destroying its affinity. Where the internal reference species is a not a modified variant of the analyte, another immunochemical affinity group must be present in the affinity reagent in order to simultaneously capture and isolate that internal reference species alongside the analyte. It is possible, and may be desirable, for a protein that is not an antibody to be used as an internal reference standard in an analysis of an antibody species. In such a situation, the affinity reagent would be prepared with two classes of molecules, an antibody specific for the protein and an antigen for which the analyte is specific.
- The number of internal reference species employed also depends on the quantification method employed. The working curve or single point quantification approaches require at least one internal reference species present in the analytical system. The bargraph quantification approach requires several internal reference species.
- The internal reference species in a quantification method serves two roles: 1) the role of a normalizer, and 2) the role of a concentration indicator. There is more than one possible strategy or method for quantification of an antigen or antibody under each of these roles.
- The internal reference species serves to correct for differences in affinity reagent activity or concentration, for differences in incubation times for different samples, and for differences in mass spectrometer performance during the mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple samples, thereby ensuring accurate quantification. However, because all mass spectrometric responses are thereby determined relative to the internal reference species response, this internal reference species signal also serves as a concentration indicator, that is, the internal reference species signal for a given concentration of that species is calibrated by various strategies so as to indicate a given concentration of the analyte species.
- Quantification strategies all involve mass spectrometric immunoassay of at least two separate analytical systems. In most of the quantitative strategies, one analytical system contains the specimen, and the other a preparation containing the antibody or antigen analyte or a counterpart thereof in known concentration, or in a concentration which has been altered by a known amount by adding a known amount of the analyte where both the specimen and the preparation contain the same internal reference species in known concentration, preferably the same.
- Normalizing with an internal reference species can be accomplished in two basic ways, that is, during mass spectrometric analysis or after. Both methods require the analytical samples to contain the same internal reference species. For normalizing during mass spectrometric analyses, the mass spectrometer is adjusted so as to bring the internal reference species signals of each immunoassay to a value proportional to the concentration of the internal reference species. Most conveniently, the internal reference species concentrations in all the analytical samples are the same, and the mass spectrometer is adjusted to bring all internal reference species signals to the same value. For normalizing after mass spectrometric analyses, the mass spectrum for each assay is divided or multiplied by an appropriate factor, again to bring the internal reference species mass spectral responses to a value proportional to the concentration of the internal reference species. The second procedure is preferred. The result is to normalize all mass spectral responses or signals, and all affinity capture procedures to one standard thereby artificially, or in practice, making instrument performance and affinity capture procedures in each of the immunoassays the same. The working curve strategy, standard addition strategy, single point calibration strategy, and the bargraph strategy are all quantification strategies under the present invention that employ one or more internal reference species as both a normalizer and a concentration indicator.
- Although it is preferred that the normalization of mass spectra be achieved where the internal reference species concentration in each analytical sample being mass spectrometrically assayed is the same in each analytical sample, it is possible to normalize multiple mass spectra with analytical samples containing the same internal reference species in different, but known concentrations. To normalize under these conditions a scale is determined for the magnitude of that internal reference species mass spectral response and that scale is used to normalize the other mass spectra. By way of illustration only, suppose sample A contains the internal reference species, I-A, in concentration of 100, and sample B contains the same internal reference species, termed I-B to distinguish from A's internal reference species, in concentration of 50. After mass spectrometric immunoassay of A and B, the mass spectral signal for I-A is adjusted to fit an intensity of one (normalized intensity), the other mass spectral signals in A's mass spectrum are also adjusted so as to be in the same original proportion (in intensity) to the adjusted I-A signal as they were for the initial I-A signal. Because the concentration of I-B is half the concentration of I-A, the mass spectral signal for I-B then adjusted to fit a normalized intensity of 0.5. The other mass spectral signals in B's spectrum are also adjusted so as to be in the same original proportion (in intensity) to the adjusted I-B signal as they were for the initial I-B signal. Preferably, all spectra adjustments are accomplished with the aid of computer data manipulation software such as LABCALC, produced by Galactic Industries, Salem, N.H.
- For accurate normalization and/or calibration using an internal reference species the absolute amplitudes of the mass spectrometric signals for the analyte and internal reference species should be similar. If these two signals differ by a large factor, for example by a factor of several hundred, it will not be possible to measure both signals accurately in the same mass spectrum because the detection system cannot respond accurately to signals differing by so large a factor, i.e., the dynamic range is limited. For example, in the time-of-flight mass spectrometers which are the preferred devices for obtaining mass spectra of laser-desorped ions in the present invention, the signal from the mass spectrometer must typically be digitized, that is, converted to a binary number suitable for transfer to a computer memory, at successive time intervals as short as 5-10 nanoseconds. The digitization circuitry typically converts the signal to a binary number having a value between 0 and 256. If a 1 volt signal, for example, corresponded to the digital value of 256, then all signals larger than 1 volt would also be registered as 256 and the system would have no ability to measure any such signals accurately. Conversely, in the absence of any electronic noise, all signals lower than 1/256 volts would be registered as 0 and again the measurement would be inaccurate. Low signals above 1/256 volt are also measured inaccurately because the binary scale is coarse and because of noise effects. Preferably, the absolute amplitudes of the mass spectrometric signals for the analyte and internal reference species should differ by less than a factor of ten, and the mass spectrometer is adjusted to bring the more intense signal near the allowable maximum.
- The mass spectral signal of an internal reference species is typically used to directly quantify an analyte by comparing the internal reference species signal to the analyte signal, after the internal reference species signal has been calibrated by a working curve or standard addition approach.
- It is apparent that given the high specificity of affinity capture and isolation, and of mass spectrometry, quantification strategies can be employed to quantify multiple antigens or antibodies in the same specimen. It is also apparent that it is possible to employ multiple quantification strategies in a given assay to quantify single or multiple antibodies or antigens.
- Below is a detailed description of each of the quantification strategies as employed with the first and second qualitative mass spectrometric immunoassay methods.
- It is apparent that, because analytical parameters may vary, including differences in affinity reagent activity or concentration, differences in incubation times for different samples, differences in elution efficiency, and differences in mass spectrometer performance during the mass spectrometric immunoassay of multiple specimens, therefore the absolute intensity of the mass spectrometric response for a given analyte in a given analysis cannot be used to derive a concentration for that analyte. Instead, an internal reference species (IRS), which is preferably captured by the same affinity reagent during the same incubation time, eluted under identical conditions and mass spectrometrically analyzed under identical conditions, serves to calibrate all of these variables at one time. All analyte signals are therefore determined as ratios to the respective IRS signals. When this is done it is possible also to calibrate the analysis by determining the analyte/IRS signal ratio for a known concentration ratio of analyte and IRS in an analytical sample. The methods for accomplishing this calibration are known as the working curve approach, the standard addition approach, and the single point calibration approach, and are used here exactly as in standard analytical chemistry procedures.
- The working curve approach is developed in anticipation of the fact that generally the analyte concentration encountered in an analysis will not be identical to the analyte concentration used to calibrate the IRS signal. There are two possible approaches.
- a) It may be assumed that the relationship between analyte/IRS concentration ratio and analyte/IRS signal ratio is accurately linear. Then, for example, if the analyte/IRS signal ratio is 2:1 for equal concentrations of analyte and IRS, an analyte/IRS signal ratio of 4:1 signals an analyte concentration exactly twice the known IRS concentration in the sample. It is usually safe to assume that such a linear assumption may hold, with an accuracy of approximately 10% or better, for analyte/IRS concentration ratios between approximately ⅓ and 3 times the ratio at which the original calibration was performed (i.e., over about a factor of 10 in concentration). When this assumption of linearity is valid, the relationship between analyte concentration and internal reference mass spectrometric response may be determined using a single calibration sample and this approach is known herein as the single point calibration method.
- By way of illustration, suppose signal A for analyte A of known
concentration 1000 has a magnitude of 10 units, and signal B for analyte B of unknown concentration has a magnitude of 7.2 units, and it is known from prior calibration that equal concentrations of both analytes will yield equal mass spectral signals. In calibrating A's signal, each unit of A's magnitude represents a concentration of 1000/10 or 100. Analyte B's concentration is therefore 7.2×100 or 720 units. If equal concentrations of A and B yield different mass spectral responses the calibration must include the ratio of the mass spectral responses. For example, if the mass spectral signal for a given concentration of A were ½ the mass spectral signal for the same concentration of B, then the concentration of B corresponding to a signal magnitude of 7.2 units in the above example would be 720/2 units, or 360 units. - For simple ratio quantification of analytes in separate specimens, the specimens (with internal reference species present) are each mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with an affinity reagent having an affinity for each antigen or antibody being looked for in the relevant specimen, and for the internal reference species. The resulting mass spectra are normalized using the internal reference species signals then the signal of the analyte of unknown concentration is calibrated against the signal of the analyte of known concentration as described in the hypothetical example above.
- b) For situations where the analyte/IRS concentration ratio is expected to vary over more than a factor of 10, or where the relationship is expected to be non-linear, or where greater accuracy is required, the relationship between analyte/IRS concentration ratio and analyte/IRS signal ratio may be determined over as large a range as desired by making a series of preparations with varying analyte/IRS concentration ratios in which the analyte concentrations span the expected analyte concentration range. The greater the number of preparations, the more accurately the relationship between analyte/IRS signal ratio and analyte concentration will be determined. The antibody or antigen analyte used to make the preparations is generically termed the preparation analyte, or specifically termed the preparation antigen or preparation antibody. The preparations either contain the same internal reference species in the same concentration as the specimen, or a concentration known relative to that in the specimen. After subjecting each sample to mass spectrometric immunoassay, the ratios of the analyte mass spectrometric responses to the corresponding internal reference species mass spectrometric responses are plotted as a function of the known ratios of the analyte/internal reference species concentrations for each sample. The resulting relationship, or working curve, may be expressed in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to, a graph, a mathematical relationship or computerized data.
- If the analyte (antigen or antibody) is present in the specimen, as evidenced by an analyte mass spectral signal on the specimen mass spectrum, then the analyte can be quantified by locating the point on the working curve relationship (ultimately a mathematical relationship) appertaining to the magnitude of the analyte/IRS signal ratio and determining the analyte concentration that corresponds to that point, given the known IRS concentration.
- As an alternative to the generation of a working curve spanning a wide range of analyte concentrations, over which the working curve relationship might be expected to be non-linear, or for extremely rapid determination of analyte concentrations directly from the mass spectrum, a unique bargraph quantification method may be used. The bargraph quantification method requires the presence of several distinct internal reference species in the analytical sample, each at a different and known concentration and differing in mass from the certain antigen or antibody and each other sufficiently to be distinguishable in the mass spectrum. Because the concentrations of the internal reference species must be known, the internal reference species are typically added to the specimen, not intrinsic thereto. Mass spectrometric immunoassay of the specimen is then executed using an affinity reagent having specific affinity for each internal reference species and for the certain antibody or certain antigen being looked for in the specimen. The resulting mass spectrum will contain a mass spectral signal for each internal reference species and a mass spectral signal for the certain antigen or certain antibody, if present.
- Preferably, the internal reference species are all modified variants of the analyte being mass spectrometrically immunoassayed so that the internal reference species are capable of being captured by a single affinant, and the mass spectral signals all neighbor one another on the mass spectrum. Each distinct internal reference species must have a molecular weight sufficiently different from the other internal reference species so as to be resolvable in a single mass spectrum. In addition, it is preferable that the range of concentrations covered by the internal reference species span the concentration range in which the analyte is reasonably expected to be found. It is not necessary that the different internal reference species be captured by the affinity reagent with the same efficiency as either the analyte or each other; the different internal reference species are each simply added to the analytical sample at concentrations which produce mass spectral signals that have the same amplitude as the signal that would be produced by a known concentration of the analyte.
- With this bargraph mass spectrum, the analyte can be quantified in at least three ways: 1) by interpolating the analyte's mass spectral signal magnitude to the magnitude of the internal reference species mass spectral signal immediately above and below the analyte mass spectral signal, normally assuming a linear relationship between signal and concentration in this range, or 2) by estimating the analyte concentration by simple visual comparison of the analyte mass spectral signal and the nearest internal reference species signal (in magnitude) without computation, or 3) by certifying that the analyte signal, and therefore the analyte concentration, is above or below the signal level due to a reference species corresponding to a previously determined analyte concentration. This previously determined analyte concentration may be chosen to specify the presence or absence of a specific disease or condition. Since, under the bargraph strategy, the analyte is the certain antigen or certain antibody present in the specimen, the quantification of the analyte directly quantifies the certain antibody or certain antigen. The advantage of the bargraph approach is apparent in that the calibration scale is built into the mass spectrum giving exceptional immunity to instrumental and sample variations, and extremely rapid direct readout. For the most accurate analysis strategy (1) above is used, and the accuracy of this approach may be improved as necessary either by choosing the internal reference species concentrations to produce mass spectral signals which are closely spaced and near the analyte mass spectral signal, or by calibrating the analyte concentration range between those analyte concentration values specified by the internal reference species signals by using a number of standard preparations containing analyte concentrations within the concentration range to be calibrated.
- The standard addition approach is another strategy for determining the relationship between the analyte/IRS signal ratio and the analyte/IRS concentration ratio. In this approach, separate calibration preparations are not required. Instead the effect on the analyte/IRS signal ratio of changing the concentration of the analyte in the analytical sample by a known amount is determined. Most directly, the analytical sample, to which an internal reference species has been added, is divided into several divided samples, at a minimum two. The first divided sample is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed and an analyte/IRS signal ratio determined from the resulting addition-absent mass spectrum. To the other divided sample or samples various known amounts of the analyte, or an analyte counterpart, are added to increase the concentrations of the analyte, or the analyte counterpart, by various known amounts. These samples similarly are mass spectrometrically immunoassayed resulting in a series of addition-present mass spectra from which the analyte/IRS signal ratios are determined.
- The analyte/IRS signal ratios in the addition-present mass spectra are then used to determine the analyte concentration in the addition-absent sample. This is preferably done by using the addition-present analyte/IRS signal ratios closest in magnitude to the addition-absent analyte/IRS signal ratio to establish a mathematical relationship between changes in magnitude of the analyte/IRS signal ratio and the corresponding concentration change in the antibody or antigen due to the standard addition. This mathematical relationship may be expressed in a variety of ways, including but not limited to a line, a mathematical function, a graph, or computerized data. The standard addition mathematical relationship is then extrapolated to the intercept point for zero mass spectrometric response. The intercept point's value for standard addition concentration will be in negative units. The absolute value of this value inferentially represents the concentration of the analyte in the specimen.
- Less preferably, a standard addition analysis may be performed in serial fashion without dividing the original sample. In this approach, the analytical sample, to which an internal reference species has been added, is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed using an incubation procedure designed to capture only a small fraction (for example, less than 5%) of the analyte and IRS, and an analyte/IRS signal ratio determined for this addition-absent sample. A known amount of analyte, or an analyte counterpart, is added to the original sample, increasing the concentration of the analyte, or analyte counterpart, by a known amount, and again the sample is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed using an incubation procedure designed to capture only a small fraction (for example, less than 5%) of the analyte and IRS. An analyte/IRS signal ratio is similarly determined for this addition-present sample. Further addition-present samples may be prepared by increasing the concentration of the analyte or analyte counterpart by further known amounts and these samples may be similarly mass spectrometrically immunoassayed to determine further analyte/IRS signal ratios.
- The analyte/IRS signal ratios in the addition-present mass spectral signals are then used to determine the analyte concentration in the addition-absent sample exactly as in the parallel standard addition approach. Since mass spectrometric immunoassay of each addition-present sample serves to calibrate a sample in which the concentration of the analyte differs from the analyte concentration in the addition-free sample by an amount which depends on the amounts of analyte captured in the preceding mass spectrometric immunoassays, it is apparent that the accuracy of this procedure will only be acceptable if the amount of analyte captured in each successive step is small, for example if 5% of the analyte is captured in the mass spectrometric immunoassay of the addition-free sample and mass spectrometric immunoassay of a single addition-present sample is performed, the analyte concentration determined thereby would be in error by 5%
- The relative signal approach compares two analyte signals to each other where the concentrations of the analytes in the specimens are unknown. Often times the precise concentration of an antibody or antigen is not the information needed. Rather, knowing whether the antibody or antigen is present in levels at, below, or above the level of another antibody or antigen is what is needed. It is irrelevant whether a numerical figure is reached because only the relative relationship matters. To compare two or more analyte concentrations to each other by means of their mass spectrometric immunoassay responses, it is necessary only to know the relative response of the analytical process to each analyte, i.e., the relative amplitude of the mass spectrometric signals when each analyte is present in a calibration sample at identical concentrations (or at a concentration ratio which is known). In this strategy, a separate internal reference species is not required because each analyte serves to normalize the other, i.e., both analytes are subjected to identical affinity capture procedures and to identical mass spectrometric procedures.
- The relative signal and simple ratio quantification methods share some similarities. Both compare the mass spectral signals of one analyte to another analyte. The two analytes can originate from one specimen, thus involving only one mass spectrum, or can each originate from separate specimens, thus involving two mass spectra. It is not necessary that the analytes have identical molar responses, i.e., affinity constants and desorption/ionization efficiencies.
- It is apparent that either approach can be used for the quantification of more than two analytes and/or involve more than two specimens. It is also apparent that the analytes from multiple samples may be the same type of analyte, or different. Therefore, the following descriptions are meant to include multiple specimens and/or multiple analyte immunoassays.
- When two or more specimens are involved, both the simple ratio and relative signal quantification methods require that an internal reference species be present in each specimen sample in the same concentration to normalize the mass spectra. If one specimen is used, signals for the two analytes must be distinguishable in the mass spectrum, and no normalizing internal reference species is necessary. It is apparent that the two analytes whose mass spectral signals are being compared in a single sample are used to quantify either or both of the analytes and are essentially acting as analyte and an internal reference species, i.e., in qualitative and quantitative capacities at the same time. Therefore, to avoid confusion of terms, “internal reference species” is used in connection with the relative signal and simple ratio quantification methods to mean the antibody or antigen occupying the normalizer role. An “analyte” is used to mean the antigen or antibody acting in both a qualitative and quantitative role.
- For relative signal quantification of analytes in separate specimens, the specimens (with internal reference species present) are each mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with an affinity reagent having an affinity for each antigen or antibody being looked for in that specimen. The resulting spectra are normalized, then a comparison of the analyte signals made to determine which analyte is of greater or lesser concentration. By way of illustration only, suppose two blood samples from the same person taken at different times are mass spectrometrically immunoassayed to determine whether there is a change in the level of antigen X. Affinity reagent having an affinity for antigen X would be used in the mass spectrometric immunoassay of both samples. The two mass spectra would each show a mass spectral signal for antigen X and the internal reference species. After normalizing the spectra, the two antigen X signals could be compared to see if the level of antigen X had dropped or risen in the intervening time between taking the samples. The absolute concentration of X in either sample can not be determined without further calibration, but the amplitude of the relative change may be determined.
- In the simple ratio quantification strategy, two analyte mass spectral signals are compared where one of the analyte signals originates from a specimen where that analyte's concentration is known. Unlike the relative signal method above, a numerical quantification results. The unknown concentration analyte signal is calibrated against the known analyte mass spectral signal to determine the concentration of the unknown analyte in that specimen.
- For simple ratio quantification of two analytes in the same specimen, the specimen is mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with an affinity reagent having an affinity for each antigen or antibody being looked for in that specimen. The resulting mass spectrum will contain a signal for each analyte which was present in the specimen. Where two signals result, calibration of the magnitude of the signal corresponding to the analyte of known concentration to the magnitude of the signal of the analyte of unknown concentration determines the concentration of the other.
- To further aid in the understanding of the present invention, and not by way of limitation, the following examples are presented:
- In one practice of the present invention, a single analyte, myotoxin a, was detected in human whole blood using the affinant, anti-myotoxin a, as a constituent of the affinity reagent, and then quantified using a working curve strategy. Myotoxin a is one toxin found in the venom of the prairie rattlesnake,Crotalus viridis viridis (C. v. viridis).
- The antibody, anti-myotoxin a immunoglobulin IgG affinity purified from rabbit antiserum, was used to prepare the affinity reagent as follows. One milliliter of antibody solution (the solution contained the antibody at 5 mg/mL in 0.01M tris[Hydroxymethyl] aminomethane, pH 8.2 (tris)) was incubated for two hours (gentle agitation at room temperature) with 1 mL of slurried 6% agarose beads on which protein A was supported. Following incubation, the beads were washed (3×1 mL tris) and allowed to react at room temperature with 500 μL of 0.02 M dimethylpimelimidate dihydrochloride prepared in 0.2 M triethanolamine (pH 8.2). The reaction was stopped after one hour by washing (3×1 mL) with 0.2 M triethanolamine followed by one milliliter 0.2 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.8). The reagent was finally washed (3×1 mL) with tris and resuspended in 500 μL of the same buffer.
- Stock human blood (SB) was prepared after intravenous retrieval by immediately diluting to ten times volume with normal saline to prevent coagulation. Three specimens were prepared from this diluted stock blood by combining 50 μL SB, 150 μL tris and 2 μL aliquot ofC.v.viridis venom at a concentration of 0.2 mg/Ml (resulting after dilution in a concentration of 0.002 mg/mL venom).
- An internal reference species for the quantification of myotoxin a was prepared by lysine conversion of myotoxin a to homoarginine (H-myotoxin a). The lysine modification was carried out as follows: myotoxin a (final concentration=10 mg/mL) was dissolved in 0.5 M O-methylisourea, which was adjusted to pH 11.0 with 8.0 M NaOH. The solution was incubated at 4° C. for 120 hours. The reaction was stopped by addition of an equal volume of 1 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate at pH 5.0. The mixture was then desalted with an Amicon ultracentrifugation device fitted with a PM-2 membrane filter at 4° C. The resulting solution was lyophilized and stored for future use in a desiccator at −20° C. The modification resulted in the conversion of each of the ten lysine residues to a guanidinium group, giving a total shift in mass of 420 Da.
- Three microliter aliquots of slurried affinity reagent were incubated for 45 minutes with a 200 μL volume of the specimen containing 0.002 mg/mL whole venom and 40 nM (nanomolar) H-myotoxin a. The affinity reagent, now containing myotoxin a affinity bound to the retained anti-myotoxin a, was then physically separated from the specimen by forcing the entire 200 μL (microliter) volume through the backside of a P-10, 10 μL filter pipette tip thereby retaining the affinity reagent on the filter. The affinity reagent was then washed by forcing rinses (2×1 mL 0.1% Triton X-100, 2×1 mL tris, 1 mL triply-distilled water) through the P-10 tip.
- After the final rinse, four microliters of the MALDI matrix, ACCA (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid saturated in 1:2, acetonitrile:1.33% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid), was drawn through the P-10 tips and over the retained affinity reagent thereby disassociating and enabling laser desorption/ionization of the myotoxin a and H-myotoxin a. The whole volume was then immediately driven out of the P-10 tip and placed directly onto a mass spectrometer probe tip and allowed to air-dry before insertion into the vacuum system of the mass spectrometer. The time required for sample preparation was approximately one hour.
- Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the dried material on the mass spectrometer probe tip was then performed on a linear time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The instrument consisted of a 30 kilovolt two-stage acceleration source followed by a 1.4-meter field free drift region containing a particle wire guide. A frequency-tripled Nd:YAG (355 nm) laser (Lumonics HY 400) was used for desorption/ionization. Ion signals were detected using a hybrid microchannel plate/discrete dynode electron multiplier and recorded using a 500 MS/s transient recorder (TEKTRONIX TDS 520A) capable of fast signal averaging. The laser irradiance was adjusted during signal averaging while monitoring the mass spectra on a sampling oscilloscope (TEKTRONIX TDS 310), in order to achieve optimum ion signal (significant signal versus maximum resolution). Time-of-flight spectrum was generated by signal averaging 50 laser shots into a single spectrum and transferring the data to an IBM compatible personal computer. Data was processed using the commercially available software, LABCALC (Galactic Industries). The time-of-flight mass spectrum was obtained in the positive ion mode and externally calibrated with a calibration equation generated using horse heart cytochrome c (molecular weight (MW) of 12,360 Da).
- The resulting mass spectrum is reproduced in FIG. 2, clearly showing a mass spectral signal for myotoxin a at MW=4,822 Da., -A-, and a mass spectral signal for the modified variant H-myotoxin a, at MW=5,242 Da., -B-.
- A 200 μL volume of a second specimen containing 0.002 mg/mL of whole venom in human whole blood and 40 nM H-myotoxin like the first sample above, was mixed with the MALDI matrix, sinapinic acid (acyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid saturated in 1:2, acetonitrile:1.33% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid), and placed on a mass spectrometric probe tip. After drying, the sample was then placed in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer and MALDI mass spectrometrically analyzed. The resulting mass spectrum is reproduced in FIG. 3 showing no signals for either of the myotoxin a species, rather, the mass spectrum is dominated by signals due to hemoglobin, i.e., hemoglobin A and B chain signals are observed at ˜16,000 Da (and doubly-charged at ˜8,000 Da). This example demonstrates the necessity of affinity capture and isolation prior to MALDI mass spectrometric analysis to detect myotoxin a.
- The myotoxin a in the first specimen above containing 0.002 mg/mL of whole venom and 40 nM H-myotoxin a, was then quantified using a working curve strategy. Six preliminary samples which consisted of 50 μL SB, 150 μL tris, and 2 μL×0.02 mg/mL of the H-myotoxin a internal reference (40 nM in each sample) were prepared.
- To each preliminary sample an aliquot of either 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 μL of a purified myotoxin a solution (0.002 mg/mL) was added, resulting in a myotoxin a concentration range of 10 nM to 100 nM. Each preliminary sample was then mass spectrometrically immunoassayed as was the first specimen except that three 50-laser shot mass spectra were acquired for each sample rather than one. A specimen containing 2 μL aliquot ofC. v. viridis venom at a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL (resulting after dilution in a concentration of 0.002 mg/mL) was treated in the same manner.
- A six-point normal working curve was generated from the mass spectra data of the preliminary samples. The mass spectra of the specimen and all six preliminary samples were normalized to the signal intensity of the H-myotoxin a. The relative signal intensity of the myotoxin a in the preliminary samples (the average of the three spectra) was then plotted as a function of myotoxin a concentration thereby generating a six point working curve. FIG. 4 shows the working curve which relates the concentration of purified myotoxin a with the normalized signal intensity of the myotoxin a. Indicated at -5- is the normalized intensity observed for the specimen. The concentration of myotoxin a in the specimen was determined to be 25 nM.
- Myotoxin a present in a blood sample containing 0.002 mg/mL ofC. v. viridis venom was quantified employing the bargraph quantification strategy. Introduced into the sample were multiple internal reference species of myotoxin a which had been iodinated (at the tyrosine residues) using the following procedure: Iodobeads (Pierce) were washed two times with 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.0, then incubated for five minutes with 0.4 M sodium iodide in a 0.1 M sodium phosphate solution at pH 7.0. An equal volume of myotoxin a, 2 mg/mL in buffer, was added to the sodium iodide/Iodobead solution. Two Iodobeads were used for each milligram of myotoxin a. The mixture was incubated overnight (−10 hours) at room temperature, after which the reaction was stopped by removal of the Iodobeads. The modified protein was desalted and stored as described above. The reaction resulted in the production of four distinct iodinated species, with each addition incrementing the molecular weight of myotoxin a by 126 Da (the difference between the atomic weight of iodine and the atomic weight of the displaced proton). Immunoassay and mass spectral procedures were the same as described in Example 1.
- The internal reference species comprising the bargraph were calibrated against known concentrations of purified myotoxin a (using the calibration procedure described in Example 1). Once the relationships between the signal intensities of the myotoxin a and the internal reference species was established, the concentration of myotoxin a present in the sample could be determined, at a glance, by correlation with the internal reference peaks of closest intensity. For the example shown in FIG. 5, concentrations of 20, 100, 130 and 30 nM are indicated by the signal intensities of the first through fourth MV, -D-, -E-, -F-, and -G-, respectively. As the intensity of the myotoxin a signal -H- is observed to be between that of the first and fourth MV, it is determined that the myotoxin a concentration is in the range of 20 to 30 nM.
- FIG. 6 demonstrates a single-point relative signal strategy for quantifying and detecting myotoxin a in human blood. A human blood sample containing an unknown concentration of myotoxin a and a 30 nM concentration of H-myotoxin a was prepared then mass spectrometrically immunoassayed according to the protocols of Example 1 above. The resulting mass spectrum shows mass spectral signals for myotoxin a, -I-, and H-myotoxin a, -J-, at their respective molecular weights. The relative mass spectrometric responses of myotoxin a and H-myotoxin a may be determined from the mass spectrum of FIG. 2 in which the concentrations of both species are known (25 nM myotoxin a, from the working curve calibration, and 40 nM H-myotoxin a). From this calibration it may be determined that equal concentrations of the two analytes give a 10% lower signal for H-myotoxin a. The myotoxin a signal is 3.5 times the H-myotoxin a signal for a known 30 nM concentration of H-myotoxin a. Therefore the myotoxin a concentration is calculated to be (30 nM×3.5/1.1) or 95 nM.
- A multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay was performed to simultaneously detect the presence of myotoxin a and Mojave toxin in human blood.
- The protocols of Example 1 above were followed with two exceptions. First, anti-myotoxin a and anti-Mojave toxin basic subunit immunoglobulins IgG were immobilized on 6% agarose beads resulting in an affinity reagent containing antibodies towards both myotoxin a and Mojave toxin. Second, the specimens of human blood contained 0.002 mg/mL of the whole venom of the Mojave rattlesnake,Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus (C.s. scutulatus), rather than the venom of C. v. viridis, and the specimens did not contain the internal reference species, H-myotoxin a. The venom of the C.s.scutulatus contains both myotoxin a and Mojave toxin.
- The mass spectrum resulting from the complete mass spectrometric immunoassay of a specimen is reproduced in FIG. 7, clearly showing a mass spectral signal for myotoxin a at MW=4,822 Da., -K-, and Mojave toxin at MW=14,175 Da., -L-. Also observed in the mass spectrum are signals due to the hemoglobin present in the blood sample (A- and B-chains at MW of ˜16,000 Da). These did not prove a serious complication to the assay as the toxin signals are clearly observed at resolved values.
- Mere MALDI mass spectrometric analysis of another identical specimen without affinity capture and isolation of myotoxin a and Mojave toxin yielded a mass spectrum with no discernable signals for the toxins similar to that shown in FIG. 3.
- Example 5 demonstrates the detection and quantification of the blood serum protein α-1-acid glycoprotein (hence A1AG) using a mass spectrometric immunoassay in which the internal reference species is intrinsic to the biological system was performed. The internal reference species in this example is human serum albumin (hence HSA), another blood serum protein. A working-curve method was employed. The example was performed, to demonstrate principle, in a solution of normal saline.
- Five preliminary samples were prepared containing a constant concentration of HSA to serve as the internal reference species, and also containing A1AG in the range of 2.5 nM to 27.5 nM. Each preliminary preparation was mass spectrometrically immunoassayed with a separate affinity reagent made of both an immobilized antibody to HSA and an immobilized antibody to A1AG. The resulting mass spectrum from one of the preliminary preparations (containing 27.5 nM A1AG) is shown in FIG. 8 with the HSA signal at -N- and the A1AG signal at -M-. All resulting mass spectra in this example were normalized to the HSA signal, and the normalized signal intensities of the A1AG were then used to construct the working curve depicted in FIG. 9.
- An analytical sample, known to contain 12.5 nM A1AG was mass spectrometrically immunoassayed under similar conditions for the preparations above. The resulting A1AG signal was within that represented on the 5-point working curve of FIG. 9 and is shown at point -O- corresponding to an A1AG concentration of ˜12.5 nM which verifies the accuracy of the working curve quantification method
- The use of mass spectrometric immunoassay and the standard addition quantification strategy to detect and quantify myotoxin a in human blood laced with the venom of the Mojave rattlesnake,C.s.scutulus was performed. The venom of the Mojave rattlesnake contains both myotoxin a and Mojave toxin. The Mojave toxin intrinsic to the specimen is used in this example as an internal reference species to quantify myotoxin a.
- A venom-laced blood sample was first divided equally amongst five separate containers. Aliquots of purified myotoxin a were added to each container, resulting in the samples possessing myotoxin a concentrations of 0, 180, 540, 890 and 1250 nM over that intrinsic to the sample. All five samples were then mass spectrometrically immunoassayed according to the protocols of Example 4 and the resulting mass spectra normalized to the Mojave toxin signals. FIG. 10 reproduces the results from the standard addition analysis in which myotoxin a was added at a concentration of 1250 nM over the intrinsic level. The signals for myotoxin a and Mojave toxin are observed at -P- and -Q-, respectively.
- The normalized myotoxin a signals were then plotted as a function of the concentration of myotoxin a (added), and the points fit with a straight line as shown in FIG. 11. The standard addition line was then extrapolated to the baseline (concentration of added myotoxin a). The intercept point, -R-, indicated the concentration of myotoxin a intrinsic to the specimen to be 190 nM.
- A multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay was performed to detect myotoxin a and Mojave toxin in human blood. The myotoxin a was then quantified using the bargraph approach and the Mojave toxin was quantified using a working curve in which the doubly-iodinated species serves as an internal reference species. A venom laced blood sample and affinity reagent were prepared according to the protocols outlined in Example 1 with two exceptions: 1) the venom used to lace a human blood sample was that ofC.s. scutulatus, and 2) two antibodies, anti-myotoxin a and anti-Mojave basic subunit, were present in the antibody solution used to prepare the affinity reagent.
- The mass spectrometric immunoassay proceeded as outlined in Example 1 with the iodinated modified variants of myotoxin a described in Example 2 introduced into the sample as internal reference species. Calibration of the bargraph was as in Example 2 and the working curve as in Example 6 with the doubly-iodinated species of myotoxin a serving as the internal reference. The mass spectrum resulting from the analytical sample containing 0.001 mg/mLC.s. scutulatus is shown in FIG. 12. Mass spectral signals are observed at 4,822 Da, -S-, indicating the presence of myotoxin a, and 14,175 Da, -T-, indicating the presence of Mojave toxin basic subunit. The iodinated myotoxin a signals are also observed at ˜4,950-5,320 Da, -U-.
- The myotoxin a signal registered between that of the 1st and 4th iodinated species indicating a concentration between 2 and 3 nM. From the working curve it was determined that the Mojave toxin basic subunit concentration was 15 nM+2.5 nM.
- The mass spectrometric immunoassay method of determining the presence of one or more specific antibodies in sera was performed. The method involves retrieval of a portion of the general antibody population present in a sample, and use of this portion to construct the affinity reagent. The affinity reagent is then screened with specific antigens. Antigens are retained by the affinity reagent if the specific antibody is present in the original sample, and will register in the mass spectrum (indicating the presence of the specific antibody).
- The specimen was that of blood serum drawn from a rabbit immunized against the toxin, α-cobratoxin. The affinity reagent was prepared by mixing 25 μL of protein A supported on 6% agarose beads with a solution containing 50 μL of the serum and 50 μL of 0.01M tris[Hydroxymethyl] aminomethane, pH 8.2 (tris)) and incubated for two hours (gentle agitation at room temperature). Following incubation, the beads were washed (3×100 μL tris) and allowed to react at room temperature with 50 μL of 0.02 M dimethylpimelimidate dihydrochloride prepared in 0.2 M triethanolamine (pH 8.2). The reaction was stopped after one hour by washing (3×100 μL) with 0.2 M triethanolamine followed by 100 μL of 0.2 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.8). The affinity reagent was finally washed (3×100 μL) with tris and resuspended in 50 μL of the same buffer.
- A preparation containing multiple antigen species was prepared and MALDI mass spectrometrically analyzed. The resulting mass spectrum in FIG. 13 shows multiple signals corresponding to multiple antigens in the preparation. The singly charged signal for α-cobratoxin is identified at -V- at the molecular weight of 7,822 Da.
- The affinity reagent was then incubated with the preparation following similar mass spectrometric immunoassay protocols already described to see which of the antigen species from the preparation of screening antigens were retained. The resulting mass spectrum is shown in FIG. 14. A signal at the mass-to-charge ratio of α-cobratoxin at 7,822 m/z (molecular weight 7,822 Da), -W-, indicates the retention of α-cobratoxin by the affinity reagent, which in turn indicates the presence of anti-α-cobratoxin present in the serum from which the affinity reagent was made.
- From the foregoing, it is readily apparent that new useful embodiments of the present invention have been herein described and illustrated which fulfills all of the aforestated objectives in a remarkably unexpected fashion. It is of course understood that such modifications, alterations and adaptations as may readily occur to the artisan confronted with this disclosure are intended within the spirit of this disclosure which is limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Claims (30)
1. A method for simultaneously determining whether a specimen contains any of one or more certain antigen species, comprising the steps of:
means for capturing and isolating each of said certain antigen species from said specimen, said capturing and isolating means involving the use of an affinity reagent having a specific affinity for each said certain antigen species; and
means for detecting the presence of said isolated certain antigen species involving the use of a mass spectrometer to determine whether each said certain antigen species was present in said specimen.
2. The method of , further including the steps of:
claim 1
immobilizing at least one antibody onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen until said affinity reagent binds with each of said certain antigen species that is present in said specimen to produce a post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating said post-combination affinity reagent from said unbound remainder to form an isolated post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent to form a mass spectrometric mixture; and
mass spectrometrically analyzing said mass spectrometric mixture to produce a mass spectrum, said mass spectrum indicating whether said specimen contained each said certain antigen species by exhibiting a mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each said certain antigen species.
3. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 2
4. A method for determining how much of one or more certain antigens are present in a specimen, comprising the steps of:
adding an internal reference species to said specimen where said specimen does not already contain one;
means for capturing and isolating said certain antigen or antigens and said internal reference species from said specimen, said capturing and isolating means involving the use of an affinity reagent having a specific affinity for said certain antigen or antigens and said internal reference species; and
means for quantifying said certain antigen or antigens, wherein said quantifying means involves mass spectrometric analysis of said isolated certain antigens and said isolated internal reference species.
5. The method of , further including the steps of:
claim 4
making at least one standard addition preparation, each containing a known concentration of each said certain antigen or a counterpart of said certain antigen species;
dividing said specimen to form a first divided sample and at least one remainder sample;
adding a known amount of each said certain antigen species or said counterpart to each said remainder sample to produce at least one addition-present sample wherein the increase in concentration of each said added certain antigen or each said counterpart is known;
immobilizing at least one antibody onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said first divided sample to produce an addition-free post-combination affinity reagent and a first unbound remainder;
separating said addition-free affinity reagent from said first unbound remainder to form an isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent to form an addition-free mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said addition-free mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-free mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-free mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each said certain antigen when said certain antigen is present in said specimen;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with each said addition-present sample each combining step producing an addition-present post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating each said addition present post-combination affinity reagent from each of said unbound remainder to form at least one isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to each said isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent to form an addition-present mass spectrometric mixture therewith;
mass spectrometrically analyzing each said addition-present mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-present mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-present mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratios of each said certain antigen;
normalizing each said addition-present mass spectrum and each said addition-free mass spectrum with the respected said internal reference species mass spectrometric response to produce an addition-free normalized antigen mass spectrometric response for the addition-free sample, and addition-present normalized mass spectrometric response for each said addition-present sample;
determining a set of changes between said addition-free normalized antigen mass spectrometric response and each said addition-present normalized antigen mass spectrometric response for each said certain antigen by subtracting said addition-free normalized antigen mass spectrometric response from each said addition-present normalized antigen mass spectrometric response for each said certain antigen in each said addition-present sample;
determining the relationship between said set of changes and each of the corresponding changes in concentration for each said standard addition antigen in each said addition-present sample resulting from the addition of said standard addition antigen preparation; and
quantifying each said certain antigen detected in said specimen using said addition-free and addition-present normalized mass spectrometric responses and said determined relationship.
6. The method of further including the steps of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated addition-free affinity reagent and to each of said isolated addition-present affinity reagents prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 5
7. The method of , further including the steps of:
claim 4
making a standard addition preparation, containing a known concentration of each said certain antigen or a counterpart thereof;
immobilizing at least one antibody onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce an addition-free post-combination affinity reagent and a first unbound remainder, said first unbound remainder containing the majority of each said certain antigen;
separating said addition-free post-combination affinity reagent from said first unbound remainder to form an isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent to form an addition-free mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said addition-free mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-free mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-free mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each said certain antigen present in said specimen;
adding a known quantity of said standard addition preparation to said first unbound remainder to produce an addition-present first unbound remainder in which the concentration of each said certain antigen or said counterpart has been increased by a known amount;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said addition-present first unbound remainder to produce a addition-present post-combination affinity reagent and a second unbound remainder, said second unbound remainder containing the majority of each said certain antigen or said counterpart;
separating said addition-present post-combination affinity reagent from said second unbound remainder to form an isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent to form a addition-present mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said addition-present mass spectrometric mixture to produce a addition-present mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-present mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each said certain antigen when said certain antigen is present in said specimen;
normalizing each said addition-present antigen mass spectrum and each said addition-free mass spectrum with the respective said internal reference species mass spectrometric response to produce an addition-free normalized antigen mass spectrometric response for the addition-free sample and an addition-present normalized mass spectrometric response for each said addition-present sample;
determining a set of changes between each said addition-free normalized antigen mass spectrometric response and each said addition-present normalized antigen mass spectrometric response for each said antigen by subtracting said addition-free normalized antigen mass spectrometric response from each said addition-present normalized antigen mass spectrometric response for each said antigen in each said addition-present sample;
determining the relationship between each said set of changes and each of the corresponding changes in concentration of standard addition in each said addition-present sample resulting from the addition of said standard addition antigen preparation; and
quantifying each said certain antigen detected in said specimen using said addition-free and addition-present normalized antigen mass spectrometric responses and said determined relationship.
8. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to each said isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent, and to each said isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 7
9. The method of , further including:
claim 4
immobilizing at least one antibody onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce a post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating said post-combination affinity reagent from said unbound remainder to form an isolated post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent to form a post-combination affinity reagent mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said post-combination affinity reagent mass spectrometric mixture to produce a post-combination affinity reagent mass spectrum, having a mass spectrometric response for said internal reference species located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an antigen mass spectrometric response for each said certain antigen species located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each of said certain antigen species when said specimen contained a relevant species of said certain antigen species thereby detecting said certain antigen species and no mass spectrometric response corresponding to the mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antigen species when said specimen contains no detectable amount of said antigen species;
making a plurality of preparations, each of said preparations containing a preparation antigen or counterpart thereof which is the same as a certain antigen being sought in said specimen wherein the concentration of said preparation antigen is varied between said plurality of preparations in known amounts;
adding sufficient said internal reference species to each said preparation so that the concentration of said internal reference species is the same or is known for each said preparation and said specimen;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent to each of said preparations to produce a post-combination preparation affinity reagent and an unbound preparation remainder;
separating each said post-combination preparation affinity reagent from said unbound preparation remainder to form isolated post-combination preparation affinity reagents;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to each said isolated post-combination preparation affinity reagent to form preparation mass spectrometric mixtures;
mass spectrometrically analyzing each said preparation mass spectrometric mixture, each mass spectrometric analysis to produce a preparation mass spectrum, each of said preparation mass spectra containing a mass spectrometric response for said internal reference species located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species and a preparation antigen mass spectrometric response for each said preparation antigen present in said preparation mass spectrometric mixture, said preparation antigen mass spectrometric response being located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of the relevant said preparation antigen;
normalizing said specimen mass spectrum and each of said preparation mass spectra to the mass spectrometric response obtained for each said internal reference species to obtain a produce normalized antigen mass spectrometric response and a normalized preparation antigen mass spectrometric response;
for each said preparation antigen, determining a mathematical relationship between the relevant said normalized preparation antigen mass spectrometric response and the relevant said preparation antigen concentration;
locating on said mathematical relationship the points which respectively pertain to each said normalized antigen mass spectral responses in said specimen mass spectrum; and
determining the concentration that corresponds to each of said point, thereby quantifying each of said certain antigen species, respectively.
10. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 9
11. The method of , wherein a plurality of distinctive internal reference species are added to said specimen in varied and known concentrations, each said concentration being chosen to produce a different mass spectrometric response after mass spectrometric immunoassay which is characteristic of the mass spectrometric response produced by known concentrations of each said certain antigen after mass spectrometric immunoassay, said method further including:
claim 4
immobilizing at least one antibody onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen until said affinity reagent binds with each of said internal reference species and each of said certain antigen species that is present in said specimen to produce a post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating said post-combination affinity reagent from said unbound remainder to form an isolated post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent to form a mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said mass spectrometric mixture to produce a mass spectrum, said mass spectrum indicating whether said specimen contained any of said certain antigen species by exhibiting an antigen species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each of said certain antigen species, said mass spectrum also having a mass spectrometric response for each of said internal reference species; and
interpolating each said antigen species mass spectrometric response to the internal reference species mass spectrometric response immediately above and below in magnitude of each of said antigen species mass spectrometric response to quantify each said certain antigen species in said specimen.
12. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 11
13. The method of , further including the steps of:
claim 4
making a single reference sample containing a known concentration of a reference antigen for each said certain antigen wherein each said reference antigen is said certain antigen or a counterpart thereof;
adding said internal reference species to said reference sample such that the ratio of the concentration of said internal reference species in said reference sample to the concentration of said internal reference species in said specimen is known;
immobilizing at least one antibody on a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce a specimen post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating said specimen post-combination affinity reagent from said unbound remainder to form an isolated specimen post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated specimen post-combination affinity reagent to form a specimen mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said specimen mass spectrometric mixture to produce a specimen mass spectrum having a mass spectrometric response for each of said certain antigen species present in said specimen located at the respective unique mass-to-charge ratio of each said certain antigen species, and a specimen internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said single reference sample to produce a reference sample post-combination affinity reagent and a second unbound remainder;
separating said post-combination affinity reagent from said second reference sample unbound remainder to form an isolated reference sample affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated reference sample affinity reagent to form a single reference sample mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said single reference sample mass spectrometric mixture to produce a single reference sample mass spectrum having a mass spectrometric response for each said reference antigen contained therein; each said mass spectrometric response being located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each of said reference antigens, and a reference sample internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species;
normalizing said specimen mass spectrum and said single reference sample mass spectrum using each said specimen and said reference sample internal reference species mass spectrometric responses; and
equating the ratio of each said certain antigen normalized mass spectrometric response and said reference antigen normalized mass spectrometric response to the ratio of the known concentration of said reference antigen to the unknown concentration of said certain antigen to determine the concentration os said certain antigen.
14. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to each of said first and second isolated affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 13
15. A method for determining whether a specimen contains any of one or more certain antibody species, comprising the steps of:
means for capturing and isolating each of said certain antibody species from said specimen, said capturing and isolating means involving the use of an affinity reagent having a specific affinity for a different one of said certain antibody species; and
means for detecting the presence of any of said isolated certain antibody species, involving the use of a mass spectrometer, to determine whether each said certain antibody species was present in said specimen.
16. The method of , further comprising the steps of:
claim 15
immobilizing at least one antigen onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce a post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating each said post-combination affinity reagent from each said unbound remainder to form an isolated post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to each said isolated post-combination affinity reagent to form a mass spectrometric mixture therewith; and
mass spectrometrically analyzing said mass spectrometric mixture to produce a mass spectrum indicating whether said specimen contained each said certain antibody species by exhibiting a mass spectral signal located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of each said certain antibody species.
17. The method of , wherein said antigen is an allergen.
claim 16
18. The method of , further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to each said isolated post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 16
19. The method of , wherein said antigen is an allergen.
claim 18
20. A method for determining the amount of a certain antibody present in a specimen, comprising the steps of:
adding an internal reference species to said specimen when said specimen does not already contain one;
means for capturing and isolating said certain antibody and said internal reference species from said specimen, said capturing and isolating means involving the use of an affinity reagent having a specific affinity for said certain antibody and said internal reference species; and
means for quantifying said certain antibody, wherein said quantifying means involves mass spectrometric analysis of said isolated certain antibody and said internal reference species.
21. The method of , further comprising the steps of:
claim 20
making at least one standard addition preparation, each containing a known concentration of said certain antibody or a counterpart of said certain antibody;
dividing said specimen to form a first divided sample and at least one remainder sample;
adding a known amount of said certain antibody or said counterpart of said certain antibody to each said remainder sample to produce at least one addition-present sample wherein the increase in concentration of said added certain antibody or said counterpart is known;
immobilizing at least one affinant onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said first divided sample to produce an addition-free post-combination affinity reagent and a first unbound remainder;
separating said addition-free affinity reagent from said first unbound remainder to form an isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent to form an addition-free mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said addition-free mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-free mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-free antibody mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antibody present in said specimen;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with each said addition-present samples each combination producing an addition-present post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating each said addition-present post-combination affinity reagent from each said unbound remainder to form at least one isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to each of said isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent to form at least one addition-present mass spectrometric mixture therewith;
mass spectrometrically analyzing each said addition-present mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-present mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-present antibody mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antibody;
normalizing each said addition-present antibody mass spectrum and each said addition-free antibody mass spectrum with the respective said internal reference species to produce an addition-free normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for said addition-free sample, and an addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for each said addition-present sample;
determining a set of changes between said addition-free normalized antibody mass spectrometric response and each said addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for said certain antibody species by subtracting said addition-free normalized antibody mass spectrometric response from each said addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for each of said addition-present sample;
determining the relationship between said set of changes and each of the corresponding changes in concentration of said standard addition antibody in each said addition-present sample resulting from the addition of said standard addition antibody preparation; and
quantifying said certain antibody detected in said specimen using said addition-free and addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric responses and said determined relationship.
22. The method of further including the steps of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated addition-free affinity reagent and each of said isolated post-combination addition-present affinity reagents prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 21
23. The method of , further including the steps of:
claim 20
making a standard addition preparation, containing a known concentration of a standard addition antibody, said standard addition antibody being said certain antibody or a counterpart thereof;
immobilizing at least one affinant onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce an addition-free post-combination affinity reagent and a first unbound remainder, said first unbound remainder containing the majority of said certain antibody;
separating said addition-free post-combination affinity reagent from said first unbound remainder to form an isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent to form an addition-free mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said addition-free mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-free mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species, and an addition-free antibody mass spectrometric response at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antibody present in said specimen;
adding a known quantity of said standard addition preparation to said first unbound remainder sample to produce an addition-present first unbound remainder sample in which the concentration of said standard addition antibody or said counterpart has been increased by a known amount;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said addition-present first unbound remainder sample to produce an addition-present post-combination affinity reagent and a second unbound remainder, said second unbound remainder containing the majority of said certain antibody;
separating said addition-present post-combination affinity reagent from said second unbound remainder to form a isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent to form an addition-present mass spectrometric mixture therewith;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said addition-present mass spectrometric mixture to produce an addition-present mass spectrum having an internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species and an addition-present antibody mass spectrometric response at the mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antibody when said certain antibody is present in said specimen;
normalizing each said addition-present antibody mass spectrum and said addition-free antibody mass spectrum with the respective said internal reference species mass spectrometric response to produce an addition-free normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for the addition-free sample and an addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for each said addition-present sample;
determining a set of changes between said addition-free normalized antibody mass spectrometric response and each said addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for said certain antibody by subtracting said addition-free normalized antibody mass spectrometric response from each said addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric response for said certain antigen in each said addition-present sample;
determining the relationship between said set of changes and each of the corresponding changes in concentration of standard addition in each said addition-present sample resulting from the addition of said standard addition antibody preparation; and
quantifying said certain antibody detected in said specimen using said addition-free and addition-present normalized antibody mass spectrometric responses and said determined relationship.
24. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated addition-free post-combination affinity reagent, and each said isolated addition-present post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 23
25. The method of , further comprising the steps of:
claim 20
immobilizing at least one affinant onto a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce a post-combination affinity reagent and an unbound remainder;
separating said post-combination affinity reagent from said unbound remainder to form an isolated post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent to form a post-combination affinity reagent mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said post-combination affinity reagent mass spectrometric mixture to produce a post-combination affinity reagent mass spectrum, having a mass spectrometric response for said internal reference species located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species and a mass spectrometric response for said certain antibody located at the mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antibody and no mass spectrometric response corresponding to the mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antigen species when said specimen contains no detectable amount of said antibody species;
making a plurality of preparations containing a preparation antibody which is said certain antibody being quantified in said specimen or a counterpart thereof, wherein said preparation antibody concentration varies in known fashion between said preparations;
adding sufficient said internal reference species to said preparations so that the concentration of said internal reference species is the same or is known for each of said preparations and said specimen;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with each of said preparations each combination to produce a post-combination preparation affinity reagent and an unbound preparation remainder;
separating each said post-combination preparation affinity reagent from said unbound preparation remainder to form an isolated post-combination preparation affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to each said isolated post-combination preparation affinity reagents to form a preparation mass spectrometric mixtures;
mass spectrometrically analyzing each said preparation mass spectrometric mixture, each mass spectrometric analysis to produce a preparation mass spectrum, each of said preparation mass spectra having a mass spectrometric response for said internal reference species located at the mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species and a mass spectrometric response for said preparation antibody located at the mass-to-charge ratio of said preparation antibody;
normalizing said specimen mass spectrum and each of said preparation mass spectra to the mass spectrometric responses obtained for each said internal reference species obtain a normalized certain antibody mass spectrometric response and normalized preparation antibody mass spectrometric response;
determining the mathematical relationship between said normalized preparation antibody mass spectrometric responses and said preparation antibody concentrations;
locating a point on said mathematical relationship which appertains to said normalized certain antibody mass spectral response; and
determining the concentration that corresponds to said point, thereby quantifying said certain antibody.
26. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 25
27. The method of , further including the steps of:
claim 20
preparing a single reference sample containing a known concentration of a reference antibody, wherein said reference antibody is said certain antibody or a counterpart thereof;
immobilizing at least one affinant on a solid substrate to produce said affinity reagent;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said specimen to produce a specimen post-combination affinity reagent and a first unbound remainder;
separating said specimen post-combination affinity reagent from said first unbound remainder to form a first isolated specimen post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said first isolated specimen post-combination affinity reagent to form a specimen mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said specimen mass spectrometric mixture to produce a specimen mass spectrum having a mass spectrometric response for said certain antibody at the mass-to-charge ratio of said certain antibody, and also having a specimen internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species;
combining an effective amount of said affinity reagent with said single reference sample to produce a reference sample post-combination affinity reagent and a second unbound remainder;
separating said reference sample post-combination affinity reagent from said second unbound remainder to form an isolated reference sample post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated reference sample post-combination affinity reagent to form a single reference sample mass spectrometric mixture;
mass spectrometrically analyzing said single reference sample mass spectrometric mixture to produce a single reference sample mass spectrum having a mass spectrometric response for said reference antibody located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of said reference antibody, and a second internal reference species mass spectrometric response located at the mass-to-charge ratio of said internal reference species;
normalizing said specimen mass spectrum and said single reference sample mass spectrum using said first and second internal reference species mass spectrometric responses; and
equating the ratio of the magnitudes of said certain antibody mass spectrometric response and said reference antibody mass spectrometric response to the ratio of the known concentration of said counterpart antibody and the unknown concentration of said certain antibody to determine the concentration of said certain antibody.
28. The method of further comprising the step of adding a disassociation agent to each of said first and second isolated affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 27
29. A method of simultaneously determining whether an antibody population contained in a specimen contains one or more certain antibody species, comprising the steps of:
combining said specimen with a solid substrate having a non-specific affinity for antibodies to immobilize said antibody population onto said solid substrate and produce an affinity reagent;
placing said affinity reagent into a preparation containing at least one known antigen, each said known antigen having a specific affinity for one of said certain antibodies to produce a post-combination affinity reagent and a screened preparation;
separating said post-combination affinity reagent from said screened preparation to form an isolated post-combination affinity reagent;
adding a laser desorption/ionization agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent to form a mass spectrometric mixture; and
mass spectrometrically analyzing said mass spectrometric mixture to produce a mass spectrum, said mass spectrum indicating whether said antiserum contained each of said certain antibody species by exhibiting a mass spectrometric response located at the unique mass-to-charge ratio of the relevant said known antigen which has a specific affinity for that said certain antibody species.
30. The method of further including the step of adding a disassociation agent to said isolated post-combination affinity reagent prior to said adding laser desorption/ionization agent step.
claim 29
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/808,314 US20010021535A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2001-03-14 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US10/756,100 US20080064044A9 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2004-01-12 | Analysis of insulin-like growth factors from biological fluids by the use of affinity-based mass spectrometric methods |
US11/459,471 US7303888B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-07-24 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US11/462,504 US20060270062A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-08-04 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US12/208,168 US20090197284A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2008-09-10 | Analysis of Proteins from Biological Fluids Using Mass Spectrometric Immunoassay |
US12/826,618 US20100267069A1 (en) | 1995-07-11 | 2010-06-29 | Analysis of proteins from biological fluids using mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US13/421,633 US8486713B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2012-03-15 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US44990395A | 1995-05-23 | 1995-05-23 | |
US2498898A | 1998-02-17 | 1998-02-17 | |
US09/808,314 US20010021535A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2001-03-14 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US2498898A Continuation | 1995-05-23 | 1998-02-17 |
Related Child Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/188,178 Continuation-In-Part US20030027216A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2002-07-02 | Analysis of proteins from biological fluids using mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US10/756,100 Continuation-In-Part US20080064044A9 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2004-01-12 | Analysis of insulin-like growth factors from biological fluids by the use of affinity-based mass spectrometric methods |
US11/459,471 Continuation US7303888B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-07-24 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US11/462,504 Continuation US20060270062A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-08-04 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010021535A1 true US20010021535A1 (en) | 2001-09-13 |
Family
ID=23785951
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/808,275 Expired - Fee Related US6974704B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2001-03-14 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US09/808,314 Abandoned US20010021535A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2001-03-14 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US10/904,467 Expired - Fee Related US7399641B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2004-11-11 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US11/459,471 Expired - Fee Related US7303888B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-07-24 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US11/462,504 Abandoned US20060270062A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-08-04 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US13/421,633 Expired - Fee Related US8486713B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2012-03-15 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/808,275 Expired - Fee Related US6974704B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2001-03-14 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
Family Applications After (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/904,467 Expired - Fee Related US7399641B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2004-11-11 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US11/459,471 Expired - Fee Related US7303888B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-07-24 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US11/462,504 Abandoned US20060270062A1 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2006-08-04 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US13/421,633 Expired - Fee Related US8486713B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2012-03-15 | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US6974704B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996037777A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040059530A1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2004-03-25 | Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc. | Method for analyzing mass spectra |
US20040072251A1 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-04-15 | Anderson Norman L. | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US20040127357A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-07-01 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US20050181398A1 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2005-08-18 | Fung Eric T. | Specific detection of host response protein clusters |
US20060024757A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Robert Hussa | Detection of oncofetal fibronectin for selection of concepti |
US20060154318A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2006-07-13 | Anderson Norman L | Stable isotope labeled polypeptide standards for protein quantitation |
US20060177870A1 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2006-08-10 | Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc | Immunoassays |
US20110315871A1 (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2011-12-29 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of forming mass image |
Families Citing this family (84)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020037517A1 (en) | 1993-05-28 | 2002-03-28 | Hutchens T. William | Methods for sequencing biopolymers |
US6020208A (en) * | 1994-05-27 | 2000-02-01 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Systems for surface-enhanced affinity capture for desorption and detection of analytes |
CA2512290C (en) | 1993-05-28 | 2010-02-02 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Method and apparatus for desorption and ionization of analytes |
DE69630881T2 (en) * | 1995-04-25 | 2004-09-02 | Discovery Partners International, Inc., San Diego | REMOTE PROGRAMMABLE MATRICES WITH STORAGE AND USES THEREOF |
US20020164818A1 (en) * | 1995-05-23 | 2002-11-07 | Gruber Karl F. | Mass spectrometric immunoassay analysis of specific proteins and variants present in various biological fluids |
US20030027216A1 (en) * | 2001-07-02 | 2003-02-06 | Kiernan Urban A. | Analysis of proteins from biological fluids using mass spectrometric immunoassay |
WO1996037777A1 (en) * | 1995-05-23 | 1996-11-28 | Nelson Randall W | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
EP0881494A1 (en) * | 1997-04-29 | 1998-12-02 | Roche Diagnostics GmbH | Method of simultaneous determination of proteins and their derivatives |
NZ516848A (en) | 1997-06-20 | 2004-03-26 | Ciphergen Biosystems Inc | Retentate chromatography apparatus with applications in biology and medicine |
US7297554B2 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2007-11-20 | Microdiagnostics, Inc. | Immunoassay system |
EP1048950A1 (en) * | 1999-04-26 | 2000-11-02 | ScreenTec B.V. | Identification of ligands for orphan receptors using on-line coupling of mass spectrometry to continuous-flow separation techniques |
US6687395B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2004-02-03 | Surromed, Inc. | System for microvolume laser scanning cytometry |
US20080280771A1 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2008-11-13 | Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Protein MicroarraySystem |
US20020072064A1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-06-13 | Naki Donald P. | Detecting polymers and polymer fragments |
US6787761B2 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2004-09-07 | Surromed, Inc. | Median filter for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data |
WO2002044715A1 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2002-06-06 | Surromed, Inc. | Methods for efficiently minig broad data sets for biological markers |
WO2002048671A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-20 | Australian Institute Of Marine Science | Assay for paralytic shellfish toxin |
AU2002307090A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-10-21 | Surromed, Inc. | Methods and reagents for multiplexed analyte capture, surface array self-assembly, and analysis of complex biological samples |
GB0112428D0 (en) * | 2001-05-22 | 2001-07-11 | Secr Defence Brit | Identifying micro-organisms |
DE10125258A1 (en) | 2001-05-23 | 2003-01-09 | November Ag Molekulare Medizin | Method for determining the binding behavior of ligands that specifically bind to target molecules |
US6873915B2 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2005-03-29 | Surromed, Inc. | Peak selection in multidimensional data |
US20050037437A1 (en) * | 2001-09-14 | 2005-02-17 | Reinhard Zeidler | Identification of antigen by xenogenic, allogenic or autologous antibody-mediated precipitation |
US20030078739A1 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2003-04-24 | Surromed, Inc. | Feature list extraction from data sets such as spectra |
US6835927B2 (en) * | 2001-10-15 | 2004-12-28 | Surromed, Inc. | Mass spectrometric quantification of chemical mixture components |
US20040018519A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2004-01-29 | Wright ,Jr. George L | Methods and devices for quantitative detection of prostate specific membrane antigen and other prostatic markers |
WO2003095978A2 (en) * | 2002-05-09 | 2003-11-20 | Surromed, Inc. | Methods for time-alignment of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data |
US8068990B2 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2011-11-29 | Hologic, Inc. | Diagnosis of intra-uterine infection by proteomic analysis of cervical-vaginal fluids |
US7191068B2 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2007-03-13 | Proteogenix, Inc. | Proteomic analysis of biological fluids |
US8101429B2 (en) * | 2003-06-03 | 2012-01-24 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Native analyte as a reference in lateral flow assays |
JP2007518062A (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2007-07-05 | バイオサイト インコーポレイテッド | Method for diagnosing sepsis and composition for diagnosing |
US20050148029A1 (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2005-07-07 | Biosite, Inc. | Methods and compositions for determining treatment regimens in systemic inflammatory response syndromes |
US20050164409A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-07-28 | Kiernan Urban A. | Method and apparatus for mass spectrometric immunoassay analysis of specific biological fluid proteins |
DE102004007005A1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-09-08 | Bruker Daltonik Gmbh | Mass spectrometric frequency determinations of proteins |
US20050181513A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-08-18 | Viorica Lopez-Avila | Methods and compositions for assessing a sample by MAILDI mass spectrometry |
US20050178959A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-08-18 | Viorica Lopez-Avila | Methods and compositions for assessing a sample by maldi mass spectrometry |
US7248360B2 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2007-07-24 | Ppd Biomarker Discovery Sciences, Llc | Polychronic laser scanning system and method of use |
CA2596518A1 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-10 | Insilicos, Llc | Methods of identification of biomarkers with mass spectrometry techniques |
ES2310431B1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2009-11-16 | Consejo Superior Investig. Cientificas | PROCEDURE FOR TYPING HAPTOGLOBIN IN HUMAN SERUM. |
US8409411B2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2013-04-02 | State Of Oregon Acting By And Through The State Board Of Higher Education On Behalf Of Portland State University | Nano-porous membrane based sensors |
KR20150038395A (en) | 2006-04-04 | 2015-04-08 | 더 리젠트스 오브 더 유니이버시티 오브 캘리포니아 | Kinase antagonists |
US8084734B2 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2011-12-27 | The George Washington University | Laser desorption ionization and peptide sequencing on laser induced silicon microcolumn arrays |
US7879622B1 (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2011-02-01 | University Of South Florida | Barrier-permeable proxy reporter analysis |
GB0617429D0 (en) | 2006-09-05 | 2006-10-18 | Electrophoretics Ltd | Markers of renal transplant rejection and renal damage |
EP2930512B1 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2018-01-31 | Metabolon, Inc. | Biomarkers for fatty liver disease and methods using the same |
US8193182B2 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2012-06-05 | Intellikine, Inc. | Substituted isoquinolin-1(2H)-ones, and methods of use thereof |
EP3613743B1 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2022-03-16 | Intellikine, LLC | Processes for the preparation of 1h-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amine derivatives |
US9482677B2 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2016-11-01 | Scios Inc. | Method, composition and device for sampling natriuretic peptides in a biological fluid |
WO2010006072A2 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2010-01-14 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Mtor modulators and uses thereof |
EP2346508B1 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2016-08-24 | Intellikine, LLC | Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors |
ES2570429T3 (en) | 2008-10-16 | 2016-05-18 | Univ California | Condensed Ring Heteroaryl Kinase Inhibitors |
US8110796B2 (en) | 2009-01-17 | 2012-02-07 | The George Washington University | Nanophotonic production, modulation and switching of ions by silicon microcolumn arrays |
US9490113B2 (en) * | 2009-04-07 | 2016-11-08 | The George Washington University | Tailored nanopost arrays (NAPA) for laser desorption ionization in mass spectrometry |
CA2760791C (en) | 2009-05-07 | 2017-06-20 | Intellikine, Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
US9049617B2 (en) | 2009-09-23 | 2015-06-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Signaling-less dynamic call setup and teardown by utilizing observed session state information |
WO2011047384A2 (en) | 2009-10-16 | 2011-04-21 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Methods of inhibiting ire1 |
WO2011083391A2 (en) | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-14 | Pfizer Inc. | Biomarkers for anti-igf-ir cancer therapy |
JP5951600B2 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2016-07-13 | インフィニティー ファーマシューティカルズ, インコーポレイテッド | Compounds, compositions and methods for kinase regulation |
US10088460B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2018-10-02 | Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy | Automated system for sample preparation and analysis |
US8901133B2 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2014-12-02 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
TWI659956B (en) | 2011-01-10 | 2019-05-21 | 美商英菲尼提製藥股份有限公司 | Processes for preparing isoquinolinones and solid forms of isoquinolinones |
CN103930422A (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2014-07-16 | 无限药品股份有限公司 | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
WO2013012918A1 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-24 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
CA2846431A1 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2013-03-07 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
EP2751112B1 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2019-10-09 | The Regents of The University of California | Substituted pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines and uses thereof |
KR101950561B1 (en) * | 2011-10-17 | 2019-02-20 | 에프. 호프만-라 로슈 아게 | Troponin and bnp based diagnosis of risk patients and cause of stroke |
US9220733B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2015-12-29 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Solubilization of antigen components for removal from tissues |
US8940742B2 (en) | 2012-04-10 | 2015-01-27 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
US8828998B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2014-09-09 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Treatment of lupus, fibrotic conditions, and inflammatory myopathies and other disorders using PI3 kinase inhibitors |
KR20150061651A (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2015-06-04 | 더 리젠츠 오브 더 유니버시티 오브 캘리포니아 | Modulation of ire1 |
US9404900B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2016-08-02 | Thermo Finnigan Llc | System for analysis of phase-I and phase-II metabolites and parent compounds without hydrolysis |
US9481667B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-11-01 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Salts and solid forms of isoquinolinones and composition comprising and methods of using the same |
US9797910B2 (en) * | 2013-06-19 | 2017-10-24 | Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. | Assay for determining endogenous levels of analyte in vivo |
SG11201602445SA (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2016-04-28 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
WO2015051241A1 (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2015-04-09 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
WO2015143012A1 (en) | 2014-03-19 | 2015-09-24 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds for use in the treatment of pi3k-gamma mediated disorders |
US20150320755A1 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2015-11-12 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Combination therapies |
US9708348B2 (en) | 2014-10-03 | 2017-07-18 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Trisubstituted bicyclic heterocyclic compounds with kinase activities and uses thereof |
NZ740616A (en) | 2015-09-14 | 2023-05-26 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc | Solid forms of isoquinolinone derivatives, process of making, compositions comprising, and methods of using the same |
WO2017161116A1 (en) | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-21 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Isotopologues of isoquinolinone and quinazolinone compounds and uses thereof as pi3k kinase inhibitors |
US10919914B2 (en) | 2016-06-08 | 2021-02-16 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Heterocyclic compounds and uses thereof |
BR112018077021A2 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2019-04-02 | Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | combination therapies |
CA3042506A1 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2018-05-11 | Berg Llc | Filamin a binding proteins and uses thereof |
US11899020B2 (en) | 2017-03-31 | 2024-02-13 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Shotgun proteomic antigen identification |
GB202008887D0 (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2020-07-29 | Binding Site Group Ltd | A method of identifying or characterising an immune response in a subject |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3770337A (en) * | 1970-06-17 | 1973-11-06 | Ass Elect Ind | Mass spectrometry |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3125335A1 (en) * | 1981-06-27 | 1983-01-13 | Alfred Prof. Dr. 4400 Münster Benninghoven | METHOD FOR ANALYZING GASES AND LIQUIDS |
US4990458A (en) * | 1982-04-13 | 1991-02-05 | Mcmaster University | Derivatization of organic compounds during their analysis or determination |
US5094941A (en) * | 1987-12-31 | 1992-03-10 | Zymogenetics, Inc. | Monoclonal antibodies to PDGF |
US5042502A (en) | 1989-09-18 | 1991-08-27 | La Mina Ltd. | Urine testing module with cytology cup |
US5079170A (en) | 1989-05-18 | 1992-01-07 | Quidel Corporation | Method of sample transfer using a filter applicator |
US5437979A (en) * | 1989-07-24 | 1995-08-01 | Beckman Instruments, Inc. | Solid phase system for sequential reactions |
US5403745A (en) | 1990-04-27 | 1995-04-04 | Genzyme Corporation | Determination of analytes in biological fluids in the presence of substances interfering with assays therefor |
US5135870A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1992-08-04 | Arizona Board Of Regents | Laser ablation/ionizaton and mass spectrometric analysis of massive polymers |
US5171537A (en) | 1991-05-06 | 1992-12-15 | Richard E. MacDonald | Activated immunodiagnostic pipette tips |
CA2105962A1 (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 1994-03-19 | Margaret Patricia Raybuck | Device and method for affinity separation |
US5605798A (en) * | 1993-01-07 | 1997-02-25 | Sequenom, Inc. | DNA diagnostic based on mass spectrometry |
AU6360994A (en) | 1993-03-08 | 1994-09-26 | Steven H Boyd | Aligned fiber diagnostic chromatography |
CA2512290C (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 2010-02-02 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Method and apparatus for desorption and ionization of analytes |
WO1995009688A1 (en) * | 1993-10-04 | 1995-04-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Sample preparation system and method |
US5538897A (en) * | 1994-03-14 | 1996-07-23 | University Of Washington | Use of mass spectrometry fragmentation patterns of peptides to identify amino acid sequences in databases |
US5595653A (en) | 1994-07-15 | 1997-01-21 | Cera, Inc. | Microcolumn for extraction of analytes from liquids |
WO1996037777A1 (en) * | 1995-05-23 | 1996-11-28 | Nelson Randall W | Mass spectrometric immunoassay |
US20020164818A1 (en) * | 1995-05-23 | 2002-11-07 | Gruber Karl F. | Mass spectrometric immunoassay analysis of specific proteins and variants present in various biological fluids |
-
1996
- 1996-05-23 WO PCT/US1996/007522 patent/WO1996037777A1/en active Application Filing
-
2001
- 2001-03-14 US US09/808,275 patent/US6974704B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-03-14 US US09/808,314 patent/US20010021535A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-11-11 US US10/904,467 patent/US7399641B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-07-24 US US11/459,471 patent/US7303888B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-08-04 US US11/462,504 patent/US20060270062A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2012
- 2012-03-15 US US13/421,633 patent/US8486713B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3770337A (en) * | 1970-06-17 | 1973-11-06 | Ass Elect Ind | Mass spectrometry |
Cited By (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040059530A1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2004-03-25 | Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc. | Method for analyzing mass spectra |
US7027933B2 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2006-04-11 | Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc. | Method for analyzing mass spectra |
US20040072251A1 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-04-15 | Anderson Norman L. | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US10345293B2 (en) | 2002-10-03 | 2019-07-09 | Anderson Forschung Group Llc | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US9746464B2 (en) | 2002-10-03 | 2017-08-29 | Anderson Forschung Group, Llc. | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US9581589B2 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2017-02-28 | Anderson Forschung Group Llc | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US9164089B2 (en) | 2002-10-03 | 2015-10-20 | Anderson Forschung Group Llc | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US20100143938A1 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2010-06-10 | Anderson Norman L | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US7632686B2 (en) | 2002-10-03 | 2009-12-15 | Anderson Forschung Group | High sensitivity quantitation of peptides by mass spectrometry |
US7354750B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2008-04-08 | Promega Corporation | Methods for separating molecules |
US20060009355A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2006-01-12 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US7112552B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2006-09-26 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US7304016B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2007-12-04 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US7304015B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2007-12-04 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US20080193996A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2008-08-14 | Promega Corporation | Methods for separating molecules |
US20040127357A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-07-01 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US20060199732A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2006-09-07 | Promega Corporation | Compositions for separating molecules |
US20040185545A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-09-23 | Promega Corporation | Methods for separating molecules |
US20060177870A1 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2006-08-10 | Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc | Immunoassays |
US20050181398A1 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2005-08-18 | Fung Eric T. | Specific detection of host response protein clusters |
US20060154318A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2006-07-13 | Anderson Norman L | Stable isotope labeled polypeptide standards for protein quantitation |
US7943294B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2011-05-17 | Hologic, Inc. | Methods for detecting oncofetal fibronectin |
US9513298B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2016-12-06 | Hologic, Inc. | Methods for detecting oncofetal fibronectin |
US8372581B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2013-02-12 | Cytyc Corporation | Methods for detecting oncofetal fibronectin |
US20060024757A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Robert Hussa | Detection of oncofetal fibronectin for selection of concepti |
US8569690B2 (en) | 2009-04-10 | 2013-10-29 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of forming mass image |
US8384021B2 (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2013-02-26 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of forming mass image |
US20110315871A1 (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2011-12-29 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of forming mass image |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7399641B2 (en) | 2008-07-15 |
US20010019829A1 (en) | 2001-09-06 |
US7303888B2 (en) | 2007-12-04 |
US20060246514A1 (en) | 2006-11-02 |
US20050170526A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 |
US6974704B2 (en) | 2005-12-13 |
US20060270062A1 (en) | 2006-11-30 |
US20120171782A1 (en) | 2012-07-05 |
WO1996037777A1 (en) | 1996-11-28 |
US8486713B2 (en) | 2013-07-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8486713B2 (en) | Mass spectrometric immunoassay | |
Nelson et al. | Mass spectrometric immunoassay | |
Lewis et al. | Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry in peptide and protein analysis | |
Krone et al. | BIA/MS: interfacing biomolecular interaction analysis with mass spectrometry | |
US7767407B2 (en) | Elemental analysis of tagged biologically active materials | |
EP2286237B1 (en) | Mass spectrometric analysis | |
US4454233A (en) | Method of tagged immunoassay | |
JP2020052056A (en) | Quantification of insulin by mass spectrometry | |
WO2014186874A1 (en) | Methods and compositions for enzyme linked immuno and hybridization mass spectrometric assay | |
US4436826A (en) | Tagged immunoassay | |
US8323983B2 (en) | Mass spectrometric analysis method | |
CN112505322A (en) | Alzheimer disease marker p-Tau217 detection kit and manufacturing method thereof | |
Florentinus-Mefailoski et al. | Linear quantification of a streptavidin–alkaline phosphatase probe for enzyme-linked immuno mass spectrometric assay | |
Krone et al. | Mass spectrometric immunoassay | |
US20120074308A1 (en) | Immunosuppressant monitoring by maldi mass spectrometry | |
US6844543B2 (en) | Quantitation of absorbed or deposited materials on a substrate that measures energy deposition | |
WO2002046772A1 (en) | Detection of compounds such as thyroxine | |
Nelson et al. | Intrinsic Bioprobes, Inc.(Tempe, AZ) | |
CN115561355B (en) | Method for detecting neutralizing antibody of carboxypeptidase G2 and detection system based on LC-MS/MS | |
Yip et al. | Affinity Mass Spectrometry: Probes with Surfaces Enhanced for Affinity Capture (SEAC) of Lactoferrin | |
US20240168015A1 (en) | Method for the detection of organ derived extracellular vesicles | |
Sun et al. | Use of nitrocellulose films for affinity‐directed mass spectrometry for the analysis of antibody/antigen interactions | |
Delcourt et al. | High‐Throughput Equine Doping Controls on a Trapped Ion Mobility Quadrupole‐Time‐of‐Flight Mass Spectrometer: Technical Considerations of dia/slice/prmPASEF Applied to the Long‐Term Detection of Monoclonal Antibodies | |
Abraham et al. | Protein Analysis in the Clinical Immunology Laboratory | |
Bachiet et al. | Toxins by Proteomics Approaches |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTRINSIC BIOPROBES, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NELSON, RANDALL W.;WILLIAMS, PETER;KRONE, JENNIFER REEVE;REEL/FRAME:015501/0555 Effective date: 20040521 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |