US20010014137A1 - Sheet detection system - Google Patents
Sheet detection system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010014137A1 US20010014137A1 US09/184,629 US18462998A US2001014137A1 US 20010014137 A1 US20010014137 A1 US 20010014137A1 US 18462998 A US18462998 A US 18462998A US 2001014137 A1 US2001014137 A1 US 2001014137A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ray
- detection system
- sheet
- detector
- ray scanner
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010894 electron beam technology Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010408 sweeping Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 15
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 229920005479 Lucite® Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 3
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ZPUCINDJVBIVPJ-LJISPDSOSA-N cocaine Chemical compound O([C@H]1C[C@@H]2CC[C@@H](N2C)[C@H]1C(=O)OC)C(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 ZPUCINDJVBIVPJ-LJISPDSOSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IHQKEDIOMGYHEB-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium dimethylarsinate Chemical class [Na+].C[As](C)([O-])=O IHQKEDIOMGYHEB-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chlorine atom Chemical compound [Cl] ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GVGLGOZIDCSQPN-PVHGPHFFSA-N Heroin Chemical compound O([C@H]1[C@H](C=C[C@H]23)OC(C)=O)C4=C5[C@@]12CCN(C)[C@@H]3CC5=CC=C4OC(C)=O GVGLGOZIDCSQPN-PVHGPHFFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052801 chlorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960003920 cocaine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960002069 diamorphine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- WQYVRQLZKVEZGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N hypochlorite Chemical compound Cl[O-] WQYVRQLZKVEZGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003325 tomography Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G01V5/22—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
- G01N23/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
-
- G01V5/224—
Definitions
- This invention relates to a detection system for detecting thin sheets of material, and more particular to a system for detecting sheets of organic material including contraband materials such as drugs and explosives.
- contraband such as drugs or explosive materials are sought to be detected by discerning their densities and/or atomic number using dual energy approaches.
- the dual energy atomic number approach relies on the fact that when an X-ray beam strikes material the energy of the beam is diminished either because of absorption (the photoelectric effect pe) or because of scattering (the Compton scattering effect ⁇ cs ) and that the probability of the photoelectric effect, ⁇ pe , changes markedly with increased energy while the compton scattering, ⁇ cs , does not.
- ⁇ pe is a function of atomic number/energy and ⁇ es is a function of atomic number
- these expressions can be solved for atomic number by using two different X-ray energy levels, e.g., 40 Kev and 90 Kev.
- the materials sought are organic, containing carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, and have an atomic number of around 7.
- Heavier metals such as iron and chromium often found in luggage have atomic numbers of 28 or higher, and aluminum and chlorine have atomic numbers of around 12. Therefore, there is a comfortable margin for detection of the organic explosives. See “Device and Method for Inspection of Baggage and Other Objects”, Krug et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,319,547.
- Density is also used to detect explosives because they typically have a density of 1.2-1.9 gm/cm 3 for military and 1-1.4 gm/cm 3 for commercial grade explosives which are well separated from the densities of other materials commonly found in luggage. Since a single dimension X-ray system can only produce a two dimensional or areal density, that is, weight per unit area related to the projected area of an object, it is not entirely reliable: the projected density is a composite of all densities in the line of the X-ray beam and one material can mask another. To overcome this and other shortcomings a three-dimensional scanner was developed. See “Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Based on a Limited Number of X-Ray Projections”, Bjorkholn et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,442,672.
- a sheet imaged on edge i.e., aligned with a scanning beam
- a sheet imaged on edge is highly contrasted and detectable but when it is crosswise or wholly perpendicular to the scanning beam its thin dimension gives a very low areal density, e.g., less than 1 gm/cm, easily obscured when combined with the other objects in the line of sight.
- Such sheets of material are most likely to be disposed or secreted in the broad sides of a suitcase, not in the narrower ends or top and bottom, so they are not likely to be seen on edge.
- the only present technique for detecting these sheets with good reliability are computerized axial tomography systems which are large, complex and expensive.
- the invention results from the realization that a truly effective detection system capable of exposing even a thin sheet of contraband such as explosives or drugs hidden density in a container can be achieved by shifting the X-ray source as it scans so that at at least one point the X-ray beam will align with a contraband sheet in one of its possible orientations in the container producing a high contrast, highly detectable edge-on view.
- contraband such as explosives or drugs hidden density in a container
- This invention features a detection system for detecting sheets of material.
- the X-ray scanner may include an X-ray source and a spaced detector and the means for shifting may include a movable member for supporting the source and the detector.
- the X-ray scanner may include an X-ray source and a spaced detector and may include the means for shifting may include a movable member for supporting the source.
- the X-ray scanner may include an X-ray source including a plurality of individual sources and said means for shifting may include means for sequentially enabling the individual sources.
- the X-ray scanner may include a linear X-ray anode and said means for shifting may include means for sweeping an electron beam across the anode for generating a series of X-ray scanning beams.
- the X-ray scanner may include a detector for detecting X-ray energy transmitted by the sheet.
- the X-ray scanner may include means for determining whether the X-ray energy detected from the sheet represents an areal density within a target envelope of areal densities.
- the X-ray scanner may include a threshold detector for determining whether the areal density representative of the sheet exceeds a predetermined level.
- the detector may include a dual energy detector for detecting high and low X-ray energies.
- the means for determining may include a look-up table of stored areal densities within the target envelope.
- the X-ray scanner may include a storage device for storing areal densities representing a set of scans of the sheet.
- the X-ray scanner may include an envelope comparator for determining whether the areal density which exceeds the threshold represents an atomic number indicative of a sheet of the particular material sought.
- the X-ray scanner may include an angular response circuit for determining the angular response of a set of scans.
- the angular response circuit may include means for determining symmetry in the areal density of scans surrounding a scan which exceeds the threshold level to confirm the presence of a sheet.
- the angular response circuit may include means for determining the slope of the angular response of the areal densities of a set of scans indicative of the presence of a sheet of material.
- the X-ray scanner may provide a fan beam of X-ray energy.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic side elevational view of a suitcase harboring a sheet of material being imaged by an X-ray scan generally perpendicular to the sheet, wherein detection is unlikely;
- FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 with the sheet being imaged end-on by the X-ray scan where detection is most likely;
- FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 and 2 with the sheet being imaged at an angle to two differently oriented X-ray scans wherein detection is unlikely;
- FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 - 3 in which the X-ray source is moved to align at some point the X-ray beam with the sheet, according to this invention
- FIG. 5 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 - 4 illustrating the spacing between scans to ensure interception of a sheet material
- FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 - 5 illustrating the timing considerations to insure sheet interception of the X-ray scan with the movable X-ray scanner according to this invention
- FIG. 7 is a schematic end view of a sheet detection system according to this invention in which both the X-ray source and the detectors are moved;
- FIG. 8 is a functional block diagram of a sheet detection system according to this invention.
- FIG. 9 is an illustration of the low energy and high energy output waveforms of the dual energy detector of FIG. 8;
- FIG. 10 is a graphical illustration of projected or areal densities in the target envelope stored in the look up table of FIG. 8;
- FIG. 11 is an illustration of the variation in areal density over a number of scans of a compact mass of material sought to be detected
- FIG. 12 is an illustration of the variation in areal density over a number of scans of a sheet of material sought to be detected
- FIG. 13 is an illustration of the variation of amplitude with scan angle for a set of scans comprising a frame
- FIG. 14 is a view similar to FIG. 7 in which the detectors are stationary and the X-ray source is movable;
- FIG. 15 is a view similar to FIGS. 7 and 14 in which the detectors are stationary and a plurality of X-ray sources are fired in sequence to move the X-ray scanning beam origin;
- FIG. 16 is a view similar to FIGS. 7, 14 and 15 in which the detectors are stationary and an X-ray anode is sequentially energized by a sweeping electron beam to move the scanning X-ray beam origin.
- FIG. 1 There is shown in FIG. 1 a typical suitcase 10 having two hingeably connected halves 12 and 14 , a handle 16 and feet 18 .
- Contained in suitcase 10 is a sheet of material 20 which is to be detected.
- Sheet 20 which may be drugs or an explosive, would typically have a projected or areal organic thickness of less than 0.8 gm/cm 2 when viewed by beam 22 oriented perpendicularly or at least transversely to sheet 20 .
- Normally a suitcase would have approximately 10 gm/cm 2 organic material or more and there would be large variations.
- the low areal density which occurs when thin sheet 20 is viewed by a transverse X-ray beam 22 is easily hidden amongst the other material in the suitcase and is not likely to be detected.
- the conveyor carrying the suitcases will move at a rate of 20-40 cm/sec as shown by arrow 31 , FIG. 5.
- the reciprocating motion of source 26 , FIG. 4, in the direction 28 must occur frequently enough so that at least one scan of sheet 20 will occur before the suitcase gets past the vertically reciprocating source. For example, scans occurring at 36 and 38 , FIG. 5, would suffice.
- the criteria for determining this is shown in FIG. 6 where the path 40 of source 26 is shown as a sawtooth when viewed by the suitcase 10 which is passing by source 26 . In that case, if sheet 20 has a length l then the maximum length between scans across the width of the suitcase l max can be no more than the length of the sheet l sheet .
- a detection system 50 includes some means, such as conveyor 52 driven by motor 54 for moving a container or suitcase 10 along a path past an X-ray scanner.
- the X-ray scanner may include a source 26 which provides a fan-shaped beam 30 and a detector 56 which includes a plurality of individual detector elements 58 .
- Source 26 and detector elements 58 are both mounted on a support or frame 60 which has some means for shifting or moving frame 60 up and down, for example, a rack 62 engaged with pinion 64 driven by motor 66 . In this way, at some point in the reciprocating motion 28 of frame 60 a beam of X-ray energy from source 26 will align with sheet 20 .
- detector 56 is a dual energy detector 56 a, FIG. 8, as is known which detects two different energy levels of incoming X-rays, for example, one at 40 Kev and one at 90 Kev, which are provided on lines 70 and 72 . These two signals would appear as low energy 74 and high energy 76 waveforms, FIG. 9, which are composed of, for example, 512 data points 78 from 512 individual detector cells 58 .
- the low energy 70 and high energy 72 signals are presented to look-up table 80 , FIG. 8, which in turn produces an organic areal density corresponding to those energy levels if they are within a target envelope.
- the target envelope 90 which defines the values stored in look-up table 80 , is the area 92 between the organic boundary 94 obtained empirically by passing X-rays through a lucite sample, and an inorganic boundary 96 obtained by passing X-rays through an iron sample. All values between these two extremes can be considered to be a combination of some amount of lucite with some amount of iron. This is called basis vector decomposition as explained in Alvarez et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,019,963.Low energy level 98 and high energy level 100 define a point 102 which represents the total transmitted energy of the object.
- the line connecting points 104 and 106 and intersecting 102 represent all of the low energy and high energy signals which have the same sum (low plus high or total energy transmitted). However, each point on this line represents a different amount of overlapping lucite and iron.
- Point 104 represents a low energy and high energy combination that can only be reached by a totally organic target.
- Point 106 can only be reached by a totally iron target.
- Point 102 can only be reached by a combination of lucite and iron.
- the output values at each location in the look-up table are those projected amounts of iron and lucite that can make up that combination of high energy and low energy.
- the output of 80 that goes to the threshold detector 116 of FIG. 8 is simply the lucite component and is referred to as the projected organic density.
- Look Up Table 80 has for each point an effective atomic number which is another equivalent representation of the high energy and low energy signals.
- the atomic number of the material increases from the organic boundary to the inorganic boundary as indicated by vector 108 and an increasing thickness of the material detected increases generally parallel to the organic boundary 94 as indicated by vector 110 .
- the cross-hatched area 112 represents plastic explosives whereas section 114 represents hypochloride based drugs such as cocaine and heroin.
- this value is delivered to threshold detector 116 , FIG. 8, which determines whether the value exceeds a predetermined threshold. If it does, a threshold alarm is provided at output 118 .
- Another alarm can be derived by determining whether the atomic number of the material detected matches that of a particular contraband or material sought to be detected.
- envelope comparator 119 can be triggered upon the detection of an areal organic density exceeding a predetermined threshold to provide a comparison between the effective atomic number of that thresholded signal with that of the atomic numbers in the explosive sector 112 , FIG. 10. This is accomplished by using the store frame equivalent atomic number circuit 122 which stores the equivalent atomic number output from look-up table 80 for each scan in the frame.
- a signal on line 124 causes envelope comparator 119 to compare the equivalent atomic number of the signal that exceeded the threshold with the explosive sector 112 of FIG. 10.
- an atomic number alarm is provided on line 126 .
- the measured atomic number will need to be corrected for the background on either spatial side of the thresholded peak. This can be done because the store frame circuit contains the full scan.
- a third alarm can be generated using an angular response circuit 130 , FIG. 8.
- a scan symmetry comparator 132 compares the signal from each scan in a frame, where a frame includes all the scans for one excursion of the source movable with frame 60 , FIG. 7.
- a massive explosive in the form of a ball or a lump FIG. 11, has a similar areal density profile along the pixels of the detector for each of the scans.
- a frame including seven scans shows an areal density profile 134 - 1 through 134 - 7 for each scan.
- the detector when the explosive is in the form of a sheet the detector produces a profile which begins low and broad 136 - 1 , becomes somewhat narrower and taller 136 - 2 in the second scan, even taller and narrower in the third scan 136 - 3 , and finally peaks sharply 136 - 4 when the edge-on view occurs. Then as the source continues to move and the edge-on view dissipates, the profile begins to drop and broaden as shown at 136 - 5 , 136 - 6 and 136 - 7 so that the leading and lagging scans appear generally symmetrical.
- Scan symmetry comparator 132 compares these profiles 136 - 1 , 136 - 2 and 136 - 3 with profiles 136 - 7 , 136 - 6 and 136 - 5 , respectively, and if symmetry is found a symmetry alarm is provided on line 138 .
- a separate alarm can be generated by angular response circuit 130 using the thresholded scan slope circuit 140 .
- Thresholded scan slope circuit 140 calculates the slope of the scans 136 - 1 through 136 - 7 as shown in FIG. 13, where the characteristic 142 of amplitude versus scan angle is shown.
- slope alarm signal is provided on line 148 .
- the slope alarm and symmetry alarm may be used conjunctively by means of AND circuit 150 to provide an angular response alarm on line 152 when both the slope and symmetry alarms are present.
- Scan symmetry comparator 132 and thresholded scan slope circuit 140 may be triggered to operate only upon the receipt of a signal on line 124 indicating that a signal has exceeded the threshold as determined by threshold detector 116 .
- the means for shifting the scanner to move the origin has been shown as including a frame which moves both the detectors and the source, this is not a necessary limitation of the invention.
- the detector 56 may be stationary and frame 60 a may contain only the X-ray source 26 which is driven by means of a rack 160 and pinion 162 operated by motor 164 .
- the detector 56 can be stationary and the X-ray source 26 may be composed of a number of individual X-ray sources 26 a - n, FIG. 15, which are fired in sequence (shifted) by firing circuit 170 operated by timer 172 .
- detector 56 and X-Ray source 26 ′ may be stationary and source 26 ′ may be implemented using a linear anode 180 in the face of an electron beam scanner such as CRT 182 which provides a vertically scanning electron beam 184 driven (shifted) by coils 186 operated by sweep circuit 188 .
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to a detection system for detecting thin sheets of material, and more particular to a system for detecting sheets of organic material including contraband materials such as drugs and explosives.
- There are a number of different techniques for detecting objects in closed containers such as suitcases and boxes carried by airplanes which involve conveying the suitcases past an X-ray scanner. In particular, contraband such as drugs or explosive materials are sought to be detected by discerning their densities and/or atomic number using dual energy approaches. The dual energy atomic number approach relies on the fact that when an X-ray beam strikes material the energy of the beam is diminished either because of absorption (the photoelectric effect pe) or because of scattering (the Compton scattering effect μcs) and that the probability of the photoelectric effect, μpe, changes markedly with increased energy while the compton scattering, μcs, does not. Since μpe is a function of atomic number/energy and μes is a function of atomic number, these expressions can be solved for atomic number by using two different X-ray energy levels, e.g., 40 Kev and 90 Kev. In the case of explosives the materials sought are organic, containing carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, and have an atomic number of around 7. Heavier metals such as iron and chromium often found in luggage have atomic numbers of 28 or higher, and aluminum and chlorine have atomic numbers of around 12. Therefore, there is a comfortable margin for detection of the organic explosives. See “Device and Method for Inspection of Baggage and Other Objects”, Krug et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,319,547.
- Density is also used to detect explosives because they typically have a density of 1.2-1.9 gm/cm3 for military and 1-1.4 gm/cm3 for commercial grade explosives which are well separated from the densities of other materials commonly found in luggage. Since a single dimension X-ray system can only produce a two dimensional or areal density, that is, weight per unit area related to the projected area of an object, it is not entirely reliable: the projected density is a composite of all densities in the line of the X-ray beam and one material can mask another. To overcome this and other shortcomings a three-dimensional scanner was developed. See “Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Based on a Limited Number of X-Ray Projections”, Bjorkholn et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,442,672.
- But even this approach is subject to failure when thin sheets of explosive or other contraband are imaged perpendicularly or transversely relative to the sheet. A sheet imaged on edge, i.e., aligned with a scanning beam, is highly contrasted and detectable but when it is crosswise or wholly perpendicular to the scanning beam its thin dimension gives a very low areal density, e.g., less than 1 gm/cm, easily obscured when combined with the other objects in the line of sight. Such sheets of material are most likely to be disposed or secreted in the broad sides of a suitcase, not in the narrower ends or top and bottom, so they are not likely to be seen on edge. The only present technique for detecting these sheets with good reliability are computerized axial tomography systems which are large, complex and expensive.
- It is therefore an object of this invention to provide an improved detection system which can detect thin sheets of material.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such a detection system which can detect thin sheets of organic material.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such a detection system which can detect thin sheets even when they are aligned in the broad sides of a container or luggage.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such a detection system which is simple and inexpensive and requires no complicated solutions.
- The invention results from the realization that a truly effective detection system capable of exposing even a thin sheet of contraband such as explosives or drugs hidden density in a container can be achieved by shifting the X-ray source as it scans so that at at least one point the X-ray beam will align with a contraband sheet in one of its possible orientations in the container producing a high contrast, highly detectable edge-on view.
- This invention features a detection system for detecting sheets of material. There are means for moving along a path a container which can harbor a sheet of material and an X-ray scanner having a scanning beam for scanning across the path of the container through a predetermined angle. There are means for shifting the origin of the scanning beam to align during at least a portion of the scan the scanning beam with the sheet for producing a high projected density contrasted with its surroundings.
- In a preferred embodiment the X-ray scanner may include an X-ray source and a spaced detector and the means for shifting may include a movable member for supporting the source and the detector. Alternatively, the X-ray scanner may include an X-ray source and a spaced detector and may include the means for shifting may include a movable member for supporting the source. The X-ray scanner may include an X-ray source including a plurality of individual sources and said means for shifting may include means for sequentially enabling the individual sources. The X-ray scanner may include a linear X-ray anode and said means for shifting may include means for sweeping an electron beam across the anode for generating a series of X-ray scanning beams. The X-ray scanner may include a detector for detecting X-ray energy transmitted by the sheet. The X-ray scanner may include means for determining whether the X-ray energy detected from the sheet represents an areal density within a target envelope of areal densities. The X-ray scanner may include a threshold detector for determining whether the areal density representative of the sheet exceeds a predetermined level. The detector may include a dual energy detector for detecting high and low X-ray energies. The means for determining may include a look-up table of stored areal densities within the target envelope. The X-ray scanner may include a storage device for storing areal densities representing a set of scans of the sheet. The X-ray scanner may include an envelope comparator for determining whether the areal density which exceeds the threshold represents an atomic number indicative of a sheet of the particular material sought. The X-ray scanner may include an angular response circuit for determining the angular response of a set of scans. The angular response circuit may include means for determining symmetry in the areal density of scans surrounding a scan which exceeds the threshold level to confirm the presence of a sheet. The angular response circuit may include means for determining the slope of the angular response of the areal densities of a set of scans indicative of the presence of a sheet of material. The X-ray scanner may provide a fan beam of X-ray energy.
- Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
- FIG. 1 is a schematic side elevational view of a suitcase harboring a sheet of material being imaged by an X-ray scan generally perpendicular to the sheet, wherein detection is unlikely;
- FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 with the sheet being imaged end-on by the X-ray scan where detection is most likely;
- FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 and 2 with the sheet being imaged at an angle to two differently oriented X-ray scans wherein detection is unlikely;
- FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIGS.1-3 in which the X-ray source is moved to align at some point the X-ray beam with the sheet, according to this invention;
- FIG. 5 is a view similar to FIGS.1-4 illustrating the spacing between scans to ensure interception of a sheet material;
- FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIGS.1-5 illustrating the timing considerations to insure sheet interception of the X-ray scan with the movable X-ray scanner according to this invention;
- FIG. 7 is a schematic end view of a sheet detection system according to this invention in which both the X-ray source and the detectors are moved;
- FIG. 8 is a functional block diagram of a sheet detection system according to this invention;
- FIG. 9 is an illustration of the low energy and high energy output waveforms of the dual energy detector of FIG. 8;
- FIG. 10 is a graphical illustration of projected or areal densities in the target envelope stored in the look up table of FIG. 8;
- FIG. 11 is an illustration of the variation in areal density over a number of scans of a compact mass of material sought to be detected;
- FIG. 12 is an illustration of the variation in areal density over a number of scans of a sheet of material sought to be detected;
- FIG. 13 is an illustration of the variation of amplitude with scan angle for a set of scans comprising a frame;
- FIG. 14 is a view similar to FIG. 7 in which the detectors are stationary and the X-ray source is movable;
- FIG. 15 is a view similar to FIGS. 7 and 14 in which the detectors are stationary and a plurality of X-ray sources are fired in sequence to move the X-ray scanning beam origin; and
- FIG. 16 is a view similar to FIGS. 7, 14 and15 in which the detectors are stationary and an X-ray anode is sequentially energized by a sweeping electron beam to move the scanning X-ray beam origin.
- There is shown in FIG. 1 a
typical suitcase 10 having two hingeably connectedhalves handle 16 andfeet 18. Contained insuitcase 10 is a sheet ofmaterial 20 which is to be detected.Sheet 20, which may be drugs or an explosive, would typically have a projected or areal organic thickness of less than 0.8 gm/cm2 when viewed bybeam 22 oriented perpendicularly or at least transversely tosheet 20. Normally a suitcase would have approximately 10 gm/cm2 organic material or more and there would be large variations. Thus the low areal density which occurs whenthin sheet 20 is viewed by atransverse X-ray beam 22 is easily hidden amongst the other material in the suitcase and is not likely to be detected. However, if anX-ray beam 24, FIG. 2, is oriented so that it is end-on tosheet 20, then the projected density could be more than 30 gm/cm2 which would likely result in a detection. However, this is a very low probability occurrence even when the X-ray scanning system is a three-dimensional or Z-axis scanning system such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,542,672, forsheet 20 may not always be oriented parallel to the broad flat sides of the suitcase but may be inclined as shown in FIG. 3 so that both X-ray beams 22 and 24 strike it transversely and neither produces the end-on high contrast view which is likely to be detected. - In accordance with this invention, as
suitcase 10, FIG. 4, moves along an axis either into or out of the paper, andsource 26 is shifted or moved up and down in the direction ofarrow 28, at some point a beam ofenergy 32 fromsource 26 will align for an end-on view withsheet 20. The typical threshold detection level is around 15 gm/cm2; the typical X-ray beam power is from 40-150 Kev and the scan beam is typically 90°. - Typically the conveyor carrying the suitcases will move at a rate of 20-40 cm/sec as shown by
arrow 31, FIG. 5. Thus the reciprocating motion ofsource 26, FIG. 4, in thedirection 28 must occur frequently enough so that at least one scan ofsheet 20 will occur before the suitcase gets past the vertically reciprocating source. For example, scans occurring at 36 and 38, FIG. 5, would suffice. The criteria for determining this is shown in FIG. 6 where thepath 40 ofsource 26 is shown as a sawtooth when viewed by thesuitcase 10 which is passing bysource 26. In that case, ifsheet 20 has a length l then the maximum length between scans across the width of the suitcase lmax can be no more than the length of the sheet lsheet. - which typically turns out to be about 1 cycle per second for the reciprocation of the source for a conveyor that is moving at approximately 20-40 cm/sec.
- A
detection system 50, FIG. 7, according to this invention includes some means, such asconveyor 52 driven bymotor 54 for moving a container orsuitcase 10 along a path past an X-ray scanner. The X-ray scanner may include asource 26 which provides a fan-shapedbeam 30 and adetector 56 which includes a plurality ofindividual detector elements 58.Source 26 anddetector elements 58 are both mounted on a support orframe 60 which has some means for shifting or movingframe 60 up and down, for example, arack 62 engaged withpinion 64 driven bymotor 66. In this way, at some point in thereciprocating motion 28 offrame 60 a beam of X-ray energy fromsource 26 will align withsheet 20. - Typically
detector 56 is adual energy detector 56 a, FIG. 8, as is known which detects two different energy levels of incoming X-rays, for example, one at 40 Kev and one at 90 Kev, which are provided onlines low energy 74 andhigh energy 76 waveforms, FIG. 9, which are composed of, for example, 512data points 78 from 512individual detector cells 58. Thelow energy 70 andhigh energy 72 signals are presented to look-up table 80, FIG. 8, which in turn produces an organic areal density corresponding to those energy levels if they are within a target envelope. - The
target envelope 90, FIG. 10, which defines the values stored in look-up table 80, is thearea 92 between theorganic boundary 94 obtained empirically by passing X-rays through a lucite sample, and aninorganic boundary 96 obtained by passing X-rays through an iron sample. All values between these two extremes can be considered to be a combination of some amount of lucite with some amount of iron. This is called basis vector decomposition as explained in Alvarez et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,019,963.Low energy level 98 andhigh energy level 100 define apoint 102 which represents the total transmitted energy of the object. Theline connecting points Point 104 represents a low energy and high energy combination that can only be reached by a totally organic target. Point 106 can only be reached by a totally iron target. Point 102 can only be reached by a combination of lucite and iron. The output values at each location in the look-up table are those projected amounts of iron and lucite that can make up that combination of high energy and low energy. The output of 80 that goes to thethreshold detector 116 of FIG. 8 is simply the lucite component and is referred to as the projected organic density. In addition Look Up Table 80 has for each point an effective atomic number which is another equivalent representation of the high energy and low energy signals. Withintarget envelope 90 the atomic number of the material increases from the organic boundary to the inorganic boundary as indicated byvector 108 and an increasing thickness of the material detected increases generally parallel to theorganic boundary 94 as indicated byvector 110. Withintarget envelope 90 different define specific materials. For example, thecross-hatched area 112 represents plastic explosives whereassection 114 represents hypochloride based drugs such as cocaine and heroin. - Having determined the particular areal density, this value is delivered to
threshold detector 116, FIG. 8, which determines whether the value exceeds a predetermined threshold. If it does, a threshold alarm is provided atoutput 118. - Another alarm can be derived by determining whether the atomic number of the material detected matches that of a particular contraband or material sought to be detected. For example,
envelope comparator 119 can be triggered upon the detection of an areal organic density exceeding a predetermined threshold to provide a comparison between the effective atomic number of that thresholded signal with that of the atomic numbers in theexplosive sector 112, FIG. 10. This is accomplished by using the store frame equivalentatomic number circuit 122 which stores the equivalent atomic number output from look-up table 80 for each scan in the frame. Thus whenthreshold detector 116 indicates that it has seen a threshold exceeded, a signal on line 124 causesenvelope comparator 119 to compare the equivalent atomic number of the signal that exceeded the threshold with theexplosive sector 112 of FIG. 10. If the effective atomic number of that detected signal is within the explosive sector then an atomic number alarm is provided online 126. In some cases the measured atomic number will need to be corrected for the background on either spatial side of the thresholded peak. This can be done because the store frame circuit contains the full scan. - A third alarm can be generated using an
angular response circuit 130, FIG. 8. Ascan symmetry comparator 132 compares the signal from each scan in a frame, where a frame includes all the scans for one excursion of the source movable withframe 60, FIG. 7. Typically a massive explosive in the form of a ball or a lump, FIG. 11, has a similar areal density profile along the pixels of the detector for each of the scans. For example, a frame including seven scans, shows an areal density profile 134-1 through 134-7 for each scan. However, when the explosive is in the form of a sheet the detector produces a profile which begins low and broad 136-1, becomes somewhat narrower and taller 136-2 in the second scan, even taller and narrower in the third scan 136-3, and finally peaks sharply 136-4 when the edge-on view occurs. Then as the source continues to move and the edge-on view dissipates, the profile begins to drop and broaden as shown at 136-5, 136-6 and 136-7 so that the leading and lagging scans appear generally symmetrical.Scan symmetry comparator 132 compares these profiles 136-1, 136-2 and 136-3 with profiles 136-7, 136-6 and 136-5, respectively, and if symmetry is found a symmetry alarm is provided online 138. A separate alarm can be generated byangular response circuit 130 using the thresholdedscan slope circuit 140. Thresholdedscan slope circuit 140 calculates the slope of the scans 136-1 through 136-7 as shown in FIG. 13, where the characteristic 142 of amplitude versus scan angle is shown. If the slope at 144 as determined byslope comparator 146 has a predetermined value, for example, 1/sinθ, then a slope alarm signal is provided online 148. The slope alarm and symmetry alarm may be used conjunctively by means of ANDcircuit 150 to provide an angular response alarm online 152 when both the slope and symmetry alarms are present.Scan symmetry comparator 132 and thresholdedscan slope circuit 140 may be triggered to operate only upon the receipt of a signal on line 124 indicating that a signal has exceeded the threshold as determined bythreshold detector 116. - Although thus far the means for shifting the scanner to move the origin has been shown as including a frame which moves both the detectors and the source, this is not a necessary limitation of the invention. For example, as shown in FIG. 14, the
detector 56 may be stationary andframe 60 a may contain only theX-ray source 26 which is driven by means of arack 160 andpinion 162 operated bymotor 164. Thedetector 56 can be stationary and theX-ray source 26 may be composed of a number ofindividual X-ray sources 26 a-n, FIG. 15, which are fired in sequence (shifted) by firingcircuit 170 operated bytimer 172. In anotherconstruction detector 56 andX-Ray source 26′ may be stationary andsource 26′ may be implemented using a linear anode 180 in the face of an electron beam scanner such asCRT 182 which provides a vertically scanningelectron beam 184 driven (shifted) bycoils 186 operated bysweep circuit 188. - Although specific features of this invention are shown in some drawings and not others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention.
- Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims:
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/184,629 US6301326B2 (en) | 1998-11-02 | 1998-11-02 | Sheet detection system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/184,629 US6301326B2 (en) | 1998-11-02 | 1998-11-02 | Sheet detection system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010014137A1 true US20010014137A1 (en) | 2001-08-16 |
US6301326B2 US6301326B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 |
Family
ID=22677700
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/184,629 Expired - Fee Related US6301326B2 (en) | 1998-11-02 | 1998-11-02 | Sheet detection system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6301326B2 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040066887A1 (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2004-04-08 | Jeffrey Garfinkle | Cargo security method and apparatus |
WO2007118461A2 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-25 | Grohmann Technologies Gmbh | Radiographic scanner |
FR2901660A1 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-30 | Univ Tsinghua | DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISCRIMINATION OF X-RAY MATERIAL |
US20070291283A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2007-12-20 | Tanita Corporation | Linear measurement apparatus |
JP2015057606A (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2015-03-26 | 同方威視技術股▲分▼有限公司 | Apparatus and method for ray scanning imaging |
US20150332448A1 (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2015-11-19 | Nuctech Company Limited | Object detection methods, display methods and apparatuses |
CN107631746A (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2018-01-26 | 绵阳同成智能装备股份有限公司 | The real-time detection of the upper following dislocation of QCS system dollies and auto-correction method |
US20190346379A1 (en) * | 2018-05-10 | 2019-11-14 | Voti Inc. | X-ray screening system and method |
US11885752B2 (en) | 2021-06-30 | 2024-01-30 | Rapiscan Holdings, Inc. | Calibration method and device therefor |
Families Citing this family (70)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002082125A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-10-17 | L-3 Communications Security & Detection Systems | X-ray inspection system |
US8275091B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2012-09-25 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Compact mobile cargo scanning system |
US9958569B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2018-05-01 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Mobile imaging system and method for detection of contraband |
US8503605B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2013-08-06 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Four sided imaging system and method for detection of contraband |
US7963695B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2011-06-21 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Rotatable boom cargo scanning system |
US7369643B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2008-05-06 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Single boom cargo scanning system |
US7783004B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2010-08-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Cargo scanning system |
US7486768B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2009-02-03 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Self-contained mobile inspection system and method |
US7322745B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2008-01-29 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Single boom cargo scanning system |
KR20050083718A (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2005-08-26 | 리빌 이미징 테크놀로지스, 인코포레이티드 | Folded array ct baggage scanner |
US7224765B2 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2007-05-29 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Computed tomography system |
US7317782B2 (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2008-01-08 | Varian Medical Systems Technologies, Inc. | Radiation scanning of cargo conveyances at seaports and the like |
US6768421B1 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2004-07-27 | Veritainer Corporation | Container crane radiation detection systems and methods |
US6954515B2 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2005-10-11 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc., | Radiation sources and radiation scanning systems with improved uniformity of radiation intensity |
US8451974B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2013-05-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items |
US8837669B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-09-16 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system |
US20050058242A1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2005-03-17 | Peschmann Kristian R. | Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects |
US7949101B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2011-05-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners and X-ray sources therefor |
US9113839B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-08-25 | Rapiscon Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
US8243876B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2012-08-14 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners |
US8223919B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2012-07-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection systems for the identification of specific target items |
GB0525593D0 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2006-01-25 | Cxr Ltd | X-ray tomography inspection systems |
US6928141B2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2005-08-09 | Rapiscan, Inc. | Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting commercial vehicles and cargo containers |
US7856081B2 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2010-12-21 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for rapid detection of concealed objects using fluorescence |
US7039154B1 (en) * | 2003-10-02 | 2006-05-02 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Folded array CT baggage scanner |
CN101019042B (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2010-05-12 | 瓦润医药系统公司 | Object examination by dual energy radiation scanning and delayed neutron detection |
SG150553A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2009-03-30 | Varian Med Sys Tech Inc | Object examination by dual energy radiation scanning and delayed neutron detection |
US7809109B2 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2010-10-05 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Multiple image collection and synthesis for personnel screening |
US7762760B2 (en) * | 2004-06-24 | 2010-07-27 | Paceco Corp. | Method of operating a cargo container scanning crane |
GB2423687B (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2010-04-28 | Rapiscan Security Products Ltd | X-ray security inspection machine |
US7471764B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2008-12-30 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | X-ray imaging system having improved weather resistance |
US8213570B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-07-03 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray security inspection machine |
US7526064B2 (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2009-04-28 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Multiple pass cargo inspection system |
US8137976B2 (en) * | 2006-07-12 | 2012-03-20 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Dual angle radiation scanning of objects |
US8576982B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-11-05 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel screening system |
US8995619B2 (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2015-03-31 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel screening system |
US8638904B2 (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2014-01-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel screening system |
GB0803640D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanning systems |
GB0803643D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Mobile scanning systems |
GB0803642D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Drive-through scanning systems |
GB0803641D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanning systems |
US9036779B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2015-05-19 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Dual mode X-ray vehicle scanning system |
GB0809110D0 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2008-06-25 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Gantry scanner systems |
GB0809109D0 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2008-06-25 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanner systems |
GB0809107D0 (en) * | 2008-05-20 | 2008-06-25 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scannign systems |
GB0810638D0 (en) | 2008-06-11 | 2008-07-16 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Photomultiplier and detection systems |
US8963094B2 (en) | 2008-06-11 | 2015-02-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Composite gamma-neutron detection system |
US20090312953A1 (en) * | 2008-06-17 | 2009-12-17 | Veritainer Corporation | Mitigation of Nonlinear Background Radiation During Real Time Radiation Monitoring of Containers at a Quayside Crane |
US8183801B2 (en) * | 2008-08-12 | 2012-05-22 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Interlaced multi-energy radiation sources |
US9310323B2 (en) | 2009-05-16 | 2016-04-12 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for high-Z threat alarm resolution |
JP2013522622A (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2013-06-13 | ラピスカン システムズ、インコーポレイテッド | Beam forming device |
US8903046B2 (en) | 2011-02-08 | 2014-12-02 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Covert surveillance using multi-modality sensing |
US9218933B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2015-12-22 | Rapidscan Systems, Inc. | Low-dose radiographic imaging system |
US9057679B2 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2015-06-16 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Combined scatter and transmission multi-view imaging system |
US10670740B2 (en) | 2012-02-14 | 2020-06-02 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Spectral discrimination using wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled scintillation detectors |
US8768032B2 (en) | 2012-07-06 | 2014-07-01 | Morpho Detection, Llc | Method for correction of artifacts from edge detectors in compact geometry CT |
US9417340B2 (en) | 2012-07-06 | 2016-08-16 | Morpho Detection, Llc | Compact geometry CT system |
GB2523520B (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2018-05-23 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | X-ray scanner with partial energy discriminating detector array |
MX350070B (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-08-25 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Portable security inspection system. |
US9557427B2 (en) | 2014-01-08 | 2017-01-31 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Thin gap chamber neutron detectors |
US11280898B2 (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2022-03-22 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Radar-based baggage and parcel inspection systems |
MX361149B (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2018-11-28 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Ultra wide band detectors. |
AU2015353439A1 (en) | 2014-11-25 | 2017-06-29 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Intelligent security management system |
JP6746603B2 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2020-08-26 | ラピスカン システムズ、インコーポレイテッド | Handheld portable backscatter inspection system |
US10345479B2 (en) | 2015-09-16 | 2019-07-09 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable X-ray scanner |
US10720300B2 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2020-07-21 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | X-ray source for 2D scanning beam imaging |
US10830911B2 (en) | 2018-06-20 | 2020-11-10 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Wavelength-shifting sheet-coupled scintillation detectors |
US11175245B1 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2021-11-16 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Scatter X-ray imaging with adaptive scanning beam intensity |
US11340361B1 (en) | 2020-11-23 | 2022-05-24 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | Wireless transmission detector panel for an X-ray scanner |
US11796489B2 (en) | 2021-02-23 | 2023-10-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for eliminating cross-talk signals in one or more scanning systems having multiple X-ray sources |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4029963A (en) * | 1976-07-30 | 1977-06-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Junior University | X-ray spectral decomposition imaging system |
DE2658533A1 (en) * | 1976-12-23 | 1978-06-29 | Siemens Ag | DEVICE FOR REPRESENTING LIGHTING BODY LAYER IMAGES |
US5319547A (en) | 1990-08-10 | 1994-06-07 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects |
NZ237767A (en) * | 1992-04-09 | 1994-09-27 | Inst Geolog Nuclear Sciences | Luggage scanning by fast neutrons and gamma radiation |
US5237598A (en) * | 1992-04-24 | 1993-08-17 | Albert Richard D | Multiple image scanning X-ray method and apparatus |
US5442672A (en) | 1993-03-31 | 1995-08-15 | Bjorkholm; Paul J. | Three-dimensional reconstruction based on a limited number of X-ray projections |
US5642393A (en) * | 1995-09-26 | 1997-06-24 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Detecting contraband by employing interactive multiprobe tomography |
EP0816873B1 (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 2002-10-09 | Analogic Corporation | Quadrature transverse computed tomography detection system |
US5838759A (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 1998-11-17 | Advanced Research And Applications Corporation | Single beam photoneutron probe and X-ray imaging system for contraband detection and identification |
US5638420A (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 1997-06-10 | Advanced Research And Applications Corporation | Straddle inspection system |
US5970113A (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 1999-10-19 | Analogic Corporation | Computed tomography scanning apparatus and method with temperature compensation for dark current offsets |
US6026143A (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-02-15 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for detecting sheet objects in computed tomography data |
US6035014A (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-03-07 | Analogic Corporation | Multiple-stage apparatus and method for detecting objects in computed tomography data |
US6088423A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2000-07-11 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Multiview x-ray based system for detecting contraband such as in baggage |
US6167113A (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2000-12-26 | Pilot Industries, Inc. | X-ray imaging system for determining area density of low density samples |
-
1998
- 1998-11-02 US US09/184,629 patent/US6301326B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040066887A1 (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2004-04-08 | Jeffrey Garfinkle | Cargo security method and apparatus |
US6982643B2 (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2006-01-03 | Freight Glove Technologies, Llc | Cargo security method and apparatus |
US20060115045A1 (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2006-06-01 | Jeffrey Garfinkle | Cargo security method and apparatus |
WO2007118461A3 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2008-03-06 | Dirk Dragon | Radiographic scanner |
WO2007118461A2 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-25 | Grohmann Technologies Gmbh | Radiographic scanner |
US20090147913A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2009-06-11 | Grohmann Technologies Gmbh | X-ray scanner |
FR2901660A1 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-30 | Univ Tsinghua | DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISCRIMINATION OF X-RAY MATERIAL |
US20070291283A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2007-12-20 | Tanita Corporation | Linear measurement apparatus |
US7684057B2 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2010-03-23 | Tanita Corporation | Linear measurement apparatus |
JP2015057606A (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2015-03-26 | 同方威視技術股▲分▼有限公司 | Apparatus and method for ray scanning imaging |
US20150332448A1 (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2015-11-19 | Nuctech Company Limited | Object detection methods, display methods and apparatuses |
US10013750B2 (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2018-07-03 | Tsinghua University | Object detection methods, display methods and apparatuses |
CN107631746A (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2018-01-26 | 绵阳同成智能装备股份有限公司 | The real-time detection of the upper following dislocation of QCS system dollies and auto-correction method |
US20190346379A1 (en) * | 2018-05-10 | 2019-11-14 | Voti Inc. | X-ray screening system and method |
US11885752B2 (en) | 2021-06-30 | 2024-01-30 | Rapiscan Holdings, Inc. | Calibration method and device therefor |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6301326B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6301326B2 (en) | Sheet detection system | |
EP1690115B1 (en) | Adaptive scanning of materials using nuclear resonance fluorescence imaging | |
EP2526410B1 (en) | Multi-view cargo scanner | |
US4756866A (en) | Nitrogen detection | |
US5557108A (en) | Integrated substance detection and identification system | |
AU639556B2 (en) | Contraband detection system using direct imaging pulsed fast neutrons | |
EP0986745B1 (en) | Single beam photoneutron probe and x-ray imaging system for contraband detection and identification | |
US6269142B1 (en) | Interrupted-fan-beam imaging | |
US5910973A (en) | Rapid X-ray inspection system | |
US7924979B2 (en) | Scatter attenuation tomography | |
USRE37899E1 (en) | Tomographic method of x-ray imaging | |
US7869566B2 (en) | Integrated multi-sensor systems for and methods of explosives detection | |
US8041007B2 (en) | Methods and systems for determining the average atomic number and mass of materials | |
EP2344909B1 (en) | System and method for x-ray diffraction imaging | |
US7630474B2 (en) | Radiation scanning with photon tagging | |
EP2227709B1 (en) | System and method for inspecting containers for target material | |
US8331525B2 (en) | Characteristic X-ray computed laminography system for home made explosives (HME) detection | |
Tumer et al. | Three-dimensional container and cargo inspection system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EG&G ASTROPHYSICS, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DJORKHOLM, PAUL J.;REEL/FRAME:009566/0511 Effective date: 19981023 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PERKINELMER DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:PERKINELMER INSTRUMENTS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012023/0745 Effective date: 20000619 Owner name: PERKINELMER INSTRUMENTS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:EG&G ASTROPHYSICS;REEL/FRAME:012027/0747 Effective date: 19991217 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PERKINELMER DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF ASSIGNEE'S ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:PERKINELMER DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012261/0201 Effective date: 20010131 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:PERKINELMER DETECTIONS SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015355/0671 Effective date: 20020712 Owner name: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:PERKINELMER DETECTIONS SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015355/0681 Effective date: 20020712 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20131009 |