US1932435A

US1932435A - Transmission network

Info

Publication number: US1932435A
Application number: US581118A
Authority: US
Inventors: Charles B Aiken; Joseph E Corbin
Original assignee: Bell Telephone Laboratories Inc
Current assignee: AT&T Corp
Priority date: 1931-12-15
Filing date: 1931-12-15
Publication date: 1933-10-31
Anticipated expiration: 1950-10-31

Description

Oct. 31, 1933'. c B. AlKEN ET AL TRANSMISSION NETWORK Filed Dec. 15, 1931 2 Sheets-Sheet l G B AIKEN INVENTORS A T TORNEV Oct. 31, 1933. c B. AlKEN AL 1,932,435

TRANSMISSION NETWORK Filed Dec. 15, 1951 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 900 IOIOO FREQUENCY m KILOCYCLES I 1 I l I 1 F q N O W T N O a :2- 8

'80 Nl NOISSBUddnS 6.8.Al/(E'N lNl/ENTORS A TTORNEV Patented Oct. 31, 1933 r UETED STATES FFICE PATENT 1,932,435 I v TRANSMISSION NETWORK Telephone Laboratories,

Incorporated, New

York, N. Y., a corporation of New York Application December 15, 1931 Serial No. 581,118

5 Claims.

\ line.

A problem which is of frequent occurrence in the reception of radio broadcast signals is that of tuning out the very strong signals received from near-by transmitting stations. In many cases there may be several of such stations having frequencies at different points in the broadcast range and for mostefiicient reception it is desirable that their signal strengths should be diminished effectively to a value more comparable to that of the other stationsit is desired to receive. For this purpose selective wave-traps have been used, but when more than one is required, it is found that the signals from other stations may be unduly attenuated by the traps.

In accordance with the present invention, a low-pass filter or a broad-band filter adapted to transmit the whole range of signals to be received is inserted in the high frequency circuit between an antenna and a receiving set and suppression of very strong signals in this range is effected by the use of wave-traps loosely coupled to impedances in each filter section. The degree of suppression is preferably controlled by adjustment of the coupling between the wave-trap and the filter section, but control may also be had by adjustment of a resistance in the trap circuit. The several traps may be tuned to the frequencies of different stationaor two or more may be tuned to the same station depending upon the degree of attenuation desired. The traps may comprise simple, closed tuned circuits or a band suppression effect can be obtained by using coupled circuit arrangements.

The invention is described in detail hereinafter with reference to the drawings in which:

Fig. 1 shows a radiofrequency distribution and receiving system embodying the invention;

Fig. 2 shows an alternative form of the network of the invention; and,

Fig. 3 is a graph showing operating results with and without the use of the invention.

In Fig. 1 the network 10 is a low-pass filter of the conventional type comprising a plurality of sections. This network serves to transmit signals between a high frequency transmission line 11 and an antenna 13 and one or more

radio receiving sets

12, 12. It is designed to transmit the whole range of signal frequencies to which the receivers can be tuned, for example,

.frequencies up to 1500 kilocycles including the radio broadcast range. Wave-

traps

14, 15 and 16 are coupled to the series inductances of the respective filter sections by variable mutual inductive couplings as at 17, 17. Wave-traps 14,

14 comprise simple, closed tuned circuits each including a fixed inductance 18, a variable resistance 19 and a variable capacity 20.

Traps

15 and 16 comprise coupled circuit arrangements having adjustable tuning elements.

Filter section 21 is separable from the remainder of network if) and in combination with wave-trap 14 constitutes'a unitary transmission device. A number of these units may be assembled to form a complete system such as network 10. g

In the operation of the system shown in Fig. 1, the wave-

traps

14, 14, 15, 16 are tuned in the usual manner to resonate with any incoming signals which it is desirable to attenuate or suppress. The several traps may be tuned to different stations or two or more may be tuned to the same'station. Coupled circuit arrangements such as 15, 16 are used in place of the simple circuit 1% when it is necessary to avoid unequal suppression of the carrier and the side-bands. A band suppression effect can also be obtained by slightly staggering the tuning of several simple traps such as 1 1, 1 4. 7

The degree of attenuation or suppression may be controlled by adjustment of the coupling between the trap and the filter section, or by adjustment of the trap circuit resistance. To promote good selectivity the resistance is preferably kept small and the adjustment effected by varying the coupling. Adjustment of the resistance ad is also effective to modify the shape of the resonant curve of the section. Bymeans of the resistance sharply resonant peaks may be rounded off to effect a more nearly uniform suppression characteristic throughout the region of resonance.

It has been found that as long as the mutual couplings at 1'7, 17 are kept fairly small, the wavetraps have a negligible disturbing effect upon the transmission characteristics of the filter or network 10 except at the suppression frequen- 1 cies. This result is well illustrated by the curves of Fig. 3, in which the heavy curve 24 is secured with a system comprising four sections of the type of section 21, each tuned to a different frequency in the broadcasting range. The light curve 25 is secured with the same system modified by removing the shunt condensers from the filter 10 leaving the wave-traps coupled to the series inductances. The heavy curve shows a I considerable reduction in the transmission loss 1 10 between the suppression frequencies. The coupling may be varied within a considerable range of low values thereby correspondingly varying the degree of supression without measurably affecting either the transmission of the filter 10, in the regions between suppression frequencies or disturbing the tuning of the individual traps.

In many receiving locations it is the case that very strong signals are impressed upon the re: ceiving antenna from one or more especially poweri'ul or close-by transmitting stations. A plu rality of wave-traps may be required and it may be desirable to attenuate the various signals to different degrees. For this purpose one or more of the wave-

traps

14, 15, 16 are particularly useful and are adapted to be associated together without interfering with the reception of signals from other stations. The transmission characteristic of the filter 10 insures a small or negligible attenuation for all signals except those for which one or mere traps tuned. Because of the substantial independence of the filter from the action of the wave-traps, there is no material increase in the attenuation of desired signals due to the presence of Wave-traps tuned for otherv frequencies.

Fig. 2 shows a section 22 of a broad-band filter to which a simple wave-trap 14 is coupled capacitatively by the

coupling condensers

23, 23. The section 22 may .be substituted for any section such as 21 of filter 10. The broad-band filter is designed to transmit the whole range of signals to be received. The degree of coupling between section 22 and trap 14. can be varied by adjustment of the

coupling condensers

23, 23. The entire filter 10 may be replaced by units such as that disclosed in Fig. 2 and the trap 14 may be replaced by any other type of wave-trap

circuit including traps

15 and 16 as shown in Fig. 1.

What is claimed is:

1. A transmission network comprising a lowpass filter having a plurality of sections, each containing an inductive series component, a plurality of tuned suppression circuits, inductive coupling means for associating each suppression circuit with one of said inductive series components, and means for independently adjusting a plurality of said coupling means to control the degree of suppression exertedby the suppression circuit associated with the respective coupling means.

characteristic of the filter otherwise substantially unaffected.

3. An input circuit for a radio receiver comprising a filter having a plurality of sections each including a series reactance and a shunt reactance, said filter being designed to provide a broad transmission band, a plurality of tuned circuits loosely coupled to the respective sections of said filter to provide attenuation of individual frequencies within said band while maintaining the transmission characteristic of the filter otherwise substantially unaffected, and means for varying the coupling of an individual tuned circuit to adjust the degree of attenuation of the corresponding frequency.

4. An input circuit for a radio receiving system comprising a filter having a plurality of sections each including a series reactance and a shunt reactance, the components of said filter being proportioned to provide a broad transmission band, and a plurality of tuned circuits each loosely coupled to a section of said filter and each coupled with a different degree of coupling to provide unequal attenuation of a plurality of individual frequencies within the transmission band while maintaining the transmission characteristic of the filter otherwise substantially unafiected.

5. An input circuit for a radio receiving system comprising a low pass filter having a plurality of sections, each section containing aseries inductance and a shunt capacity, said inductances and capacities being proportioned to provide a broad transmission range, and a plurality of tuned circuits each coupled by loose inductive coupling to the series inductance of a section of said filter to provide suppression of individual frequencies within the transmission range of the filter while maintaining the filter characteristic otherwise substantially unaifected.

CHARLES B. AIKEN. JOSEPH E. CORBIN.