US1760770A - Coke oven - Google Patents

Coke oven Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US1760770A
US1760770A US248235A US24823528A US1760770A US 1760770 A US1760770 A US 1760770A US 248235 A US248235 A US 248235A US 24823528 A US24823528 A US 24823528A US 1760770 A US1760770 A US 1760770A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
walls
oven
running
binding
thickness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US248235A
Inventor
Otto Carl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US1760770A publication Critical patent/US1760770A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10BDESTRUCTIVE DISTILLATION OF CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS FOR PRODUCTION OF GAS, COKE, TAR, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS
    • C10B29/00Other details of coke ovens
    • C10B29/02Brickwork, e.g. casings, linings, walls

Definitions

  • the invention relates to coke ovens, particularly to those havin gated coking chambers t e heating walls of which are subdivided so as to form vertical hairpin iiues.
  • Now m invention is based upon the perception o the subdivision of the heating lues into vertical twin lues affording the possibility to take'up by said so-called binding walls the entire load of the oven cover including the weights resting thereon, and to thus completely discharge the so-called running walls from the load.
  • each alternate or second binding Wall extends throughout the entire height of the heating wall
  • series of piers or columns may be established within the heating iiues by suitably diminishing the sectional area of the binding 4b walls, which piers are able to support the weights entering into consideration.
  • Figure 1 is a vertical section ofa coke oven on the line 1-1 of Figure 3, showing the decreased thiclmess of the running walls.
  • Figure 2 is a longitudinal section on the line 2 ⁇ 2 of Figure 3, and shows the greater thickness of the binder walls with relation to the running walls of Fig. 1.
  • Figure 3 is a horizontal section showing horizontally elon- 4each pair of runner walls.
  • the binder walls are spaced apart in the direction of the oven chamber, and each alternate binding wall of the series extends vertically to the oven cover (5).
  • the binder walls thus provide vertical hairpin nues (4) which extend in a single row. in the direction of the chambers.
  • the running walls 1 freed in this way from this load may be made much weaker than hitherto usual, as they must only have a minimum thickness that depends on the structure itself and on the required resistibility to the stresses occurring for examplewhen the coke cakes are pushed out of the chambers.
  • the individual running wall bricks have groove and feather joints, in order'to avoid straight oints, as the danger of mutual transsitions of gas taking place is naturally much greater withstraight joints than with bent. joints.
  • This configuration however, 'of the bricksl having groove and feather joints, of itselr ⁇ provides a minimum thickness of the f' running walls for construction reasons, this thickness in practice being not less than 65 mm. This thickness is quite suicient to take up the stresses occurring upon pushing the coke cakes; Of course, account has to be taken of the height of the heating wall. Generally a somewhat greater thickness of the .running wall bricks will be provided for with increasing height of the heating wall.
  • each alternate binding wall 2 extends throughout the, entire 'hei ht of the oven wall to the oven cover (see igure 2).
  • Each alternate binding wall thus acts as a supporting column for su porting thel load of the cover 5.
  • the binding walls always serve as struts for the running walls against the/ pressures exerted from t e oven chambers and must be made rather thick for this purpose. According to the invention this property of the binding walls is fully utilized by a suitable stone bond, and the running wall bricks are discharged as far' as possible from this load also.
  • each of said heating walls comprising a pair.

Description

May 27, 1930.
C. OTTO COKE OVEN Filed Jan. 20, 1928 INVENTOR CMX @M Patented May 27, `1930 UNITED STATES CARL OTTO, F ESSEN-BURR, GERMANY COKE AOVEN' Application filed* January 20, 1928, Serial No. 248,285, and in Germany November 16, 1928.
The invention relates to coke ovens, particularly to those havin gated coking chambers t e heating walls of which are subdivided so as to form vertical hairpin iiues. A
With chamber ovens of this type the brickwork of the heating walls must be able to support the entire weight of the oven coverI chamber, the so-called running walls, and of partitions arranged normally transverse thereto, the so-called binding walls, which subdivide the heating walls into the individual heating fines. This brickwork, composed of the runningl and binding walls, of the heating walls must thus be able to support the above-mentioned load and must therefore have a corresponding total sectional area.
Now m invention is based upon the perception o the subdivision of the heating lues into vertical twin lues affording the possibility to take'up by said so-called binding walls the entire load of the oven cover including the weights resting thereon, and to thus completely discharge the so-called running walls from the load.
For, as with the arrangement of twin lues each alternate or second binding Wall extends throughout the entire height of the heating wall, series of piers or columns may be established within the heating iiues by suitably diminishing the sectional area of the binding 4b walls, which piers are able to support the weights entering into consideration.
.Referring to the drawings:
Figure 1 is a vertical section ofa coke oven on the line 1-1 of Figure 3, showing the decreased thiclmess of the running walls.
Figure 2, is a longitudinal section on the line 2` 2 of Figure 3, and shows the greater thickness of the binder walls with relation to the running walls of Fig. 1.
Figure 3, is a horizontal section showing horizontally elon- 4each pair of runner walls. The binder walls are spaced apart in the direction of the oven chamber, and each alternate binding wall of the series extends vertically to the oven cover (5). The binder walls thus provide vertical hairpin nues (4) which extend in a single row. in the direction of the chambers. v
Now, according to my invention and as shown by the drawing, the running walls 1 freed in this way from this load, may be made much weaker than hitherto usual, as they must only have a minimum thickness that depends on the structure itself and on the required resistibility to the stresses occurring for examplewhen the coke cakes are pushed out of the chambers. As the running walls have to'form at the same time a gas-tight 35 partition between oven chamber and heating filles, the individual running wall bricks have groove and feather joints, in order'to avoid straight oints, as the danger of mutual transsitions of gas taking place is naturally much greater withstraight joints than with bent. joints. This configuration, however, 'of the bricksl having groove and feather joints, of itselr` provides a minimum thickness of the f' running walls for construction reasons, this thickness in practice being not less than 65 mm. This thickness is quite suicient to take up the stresses occurring upon pushing the coke cakes; Of course, account has to be taken of the height of the heating wall. Generally a somewhat greater thickness of the .running wall bricks will be provided for with increasing height of the heating wall.
Furthermore account has to be taken of the material -of the bricks for the binding and running walls, in particular of the point of fusion of the material. The above-mentioned minimum thickness of 65 mm. holds good of a medium oven height and best silica material having a fusion point lying far above 1550 10 I o ed in the chamber oven, this additional stress of the bricks of the running and binding walls must be compensated for by a pard 1lgrecs C. In case a very windy coal is to be c 5 ticularly careful selection of the stone bond of the chamber, the great economical impor- `/tance of the invention is evident, as it not only permits of a large quantity of bricks to be saved, but also of the carbonizing period to be notably shortened.
In contradistinction to the decreased runner wall thiclmess of 65 to 100 mm. to be employed in accordance with my invention (see Figures 1 and 3), the former Wall thicknesses of the running walls even of low ovens 1 were generally 130 to 150 mm. and only in specia cases 120 mm. Hence afsaving of '25 bricks of nearly 50 per cent is obtained by my invention.
Althou h the binding walls have to take up accor ing to my invention the entire weight of the oven cover and the load rest- 3'0 ing thereon, their thickness generally needs not to be increased, in comparison with the thickness hitherto employed of 130-150 mm. Experience has proved that such, a thickness of the binding wall bricks 2 will serve for the practical realization of my invention.
Walls of this thickness have been employed and have even been surpassed in many cases to a considerable extent. This at first sight surprising feature is due to the fact, that the greater part of the former chamber ovens were provided with a horizontal heating passage extending above all the heating flues, and that the binding walls separating the individual heating flutes thus did not extend up to the oven cover and'thus had to take up only indirectly, through the somewhat projecting running wall bricks that surround said horizontal passage, a certain fraction of the load of the cover 5. By my invention each alternate binding wall 2, extends throughout the, entire 'hei ht of the oven wall to the oven cover (see igure 2).
Each alternate binding wall thus acts as a supporting column for su porting thel load of the cover 5. The binding walls always serve as struts for the running walls against the/ pressures exerted from t e oven chambers and must be made rather thick for this purpose. According to the invention this property of the binding walls is fully utilized by a suitable stone bond, and the running wall bricks are discharged as far' as possible from this load also. v
What I claim and desire to secure by Letters Patent is 1. In a coke oven havin l a row of alternate horizontally elongate oven chambers and parallel heatingwalls therefor arran ed side by side, andl an oven cover there or,
each of said heating walls comprising a pair.,
of separated runner Walls running in thedir rection of the oven chambers, and a series of parallel faced transverse binder walls extending between each of the pairs of runner walls, the binder walls in each of said series being spaced apart in the direction of the chambers, the alternate. binder walls in each ofsaid series extending vertically to the oven cover, and 'theintermediate binder w'alls extending to a lesser height providing vertical hairpin lines extending in a row in the direction of the chambers, the binder walls forming the two end faces of the flues; said alternate binder walls consti-.
tuting supporting columns and being of material y greater thickness than the maximum thickness of the runner walls, so as to su port the major part of the weight of t e cover and loads resting thereon, and enabling the thickness of the runner walls to be decreased to permit uick transmission of heat, the thickness of t e runner walls being bers, the alternate binder walls in each of said series extending vertically to the oven cover, and the intermediate binder walls extending to a lesser height, providing vertical hairpin lues extending in a row in the direction of the chambers, the binder walls forming the two end faces of the lues; said alternate binder walls constitutin supporting columns and being one and a' alf to twice -as thick'as the maximum thickness ofthe runner walls, so as to support the major part of the weight of the cover and loads resting thereon, and enabling the thickness of the runner walls to be decreased to ermit uick transmission of heat, the thic ess ol v the runner walls bein suiiicient to resist transverse stresses pro uced in coke pushing.
Intestimony whereof, I have signed my name to this specication.
CARL OTTO.
US248235A 1926-11-16 1928-01-20 Coke oven Expired - Lifetime US1760770A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE1760770X 1926-11-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US1760770A true US1760770A (en) 1930-05-27

Family

ID=7742178

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US248235A Expired - Lifetime US1760770A (en) 1926-11-16 1928-01-20 Coke oven

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US1760770A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4059885A (en) * 1975-03-19 1977-11-29 Dr. C. Otto & Comp. G.M.B.H. Process for partial restoration of a coke oven battery
DE2914387A1 (en) * 1979-04-10 1980-10-23 Still Carl Gmbh Co Kg TRAINING OF THE HEATING WALLS FOR HORIZONTAL CHAMBER COCING OVENS WITH VERTICAL HEATING
US5423152A (en) * 1990-02-09 1995-06-13 Tonawanda Coke Corporation Large size cast monolithic refractory repair modules and interfitting ceiling repair modules suitable for use in a coke over repair

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4059885A (en) * 1975-03-19 1977-11-29 Dr. C. Otto & Comp. G.M.B.H. Process for partial restoration of a coke oven battery
DE2914387A1 (en) * 1979-04-10 1980-10-23 Still Carl Gmbh Co Kg TRAINING OF THE HEATING WALLS FOR HORIZONTAL CHAMBER COCING OVENS WITH VERTICAL HEATING
US5423152A (en) * 1990-02-09 1995-06-13 Tonawanda Coke Corporation Large size cast monolithic refractory repair modules and interfitting ceiling repair modules suitable for use in a coke over repair

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US1429346A (en) Retort for gas furnaces
US1760770A (en) Coke oven
US2665242A (en) Coke oven heating walls
US2376718A (en) Regenerative coke oven
US2158139A (en) Regenerator of a coke oven battery
US3496067A (en) Horizontal coke oven having plural types of brick linings for heating walls
US2129658A (en) Coking retort oven
US1860368A (en) Checkerwork supporting and holding means for blast stoves
US2018223A (en) Refractory brick
US2088532A (en) Coke oven battery construction
US2839453A (en) Coking retort oven with graduated liner wall
US4376677A (en) Coke oven heating wall
US2460324A (en) Combination vertical flued coke
US1928595A (en) Coke oven battery
US2077842A (en) Coke oven and like furnace
US1150808A (en) Retort-furnace.
US2162834A (en) Coke oven
SU42969A1 (en) Continuously operating coke oven
US3170850A (en) Double divided gun flue horizontal coking retort oven
US2068292A (en) Checker brickwork construction for regenerators
US2194404A (en) Coke oven
US2637685A (en) Coke oven construction
US1707427A (en) op pittsbtfbgh
US1973015A (en) Coke oven
US1294828A (en) Regenerator for coke-ovens.