US11454955B2 - Method and system for controlling a manufacturing plant with a manufacturing execution system - Google Patents
Method and system for controlling a manufacturing plant with a manufacturing execution system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US11454955B2 US11454955B2 US14/681,307 US201514681307A US11454955B2 US 11454955 B2 US11454955 B2 US 11454955B2 US 201514681307 A US201514681307 A US 201514681307A US 11454955 B2 US11454955 B2 US 11454955B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- plugin
- equipment
- workflow
- given
- objects
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 35
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010420 art technique Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007175 bidirectional communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009739 binding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006854 communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/41875—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by quality surveillance of production
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/41865—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by job scheduling, process planning, material flow
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/41845—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by system universality, reconfigurability, modularity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/31—From computer integrated manufacturing till monitoring
- G05B2219/31449—Monitor workflow, to optimize business, industrial processes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P80/00—Climate change mitigation technologies for sector-wide applications
- Y02P80/40—Minimising material used in manufacturing processes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process and to a system for controlling a manufacturing plant with an MES system, through the execution of a given workflow meeting given customer requirements.
- the Manufacturing Execution System is generally known as the IT layer that integrates the business systems (e.g. ERP) and production control systems.
- Siemens Corporation Siemens Aktiengesellschaft of Kunststoff, Germany
- SIMATIC® product family The applicant Siemens Corporation (Siemens Aktiengesellschaft of Kunststoff, Germany) offers a broad range of MES products, under its SIMATIC® product family.
- the MES system is a dynamic information system that drives effective execution of manufacturing operations”, by managing “production operations from point of order release into manufacturing to point of product delivery into finished goods” and by providing “mission critical information about production activities to others across the organization and supply chain via bi-directional communication.”
- the international standard for developing MES systems is commonly referred as ISA-95 or S95.
- an MES system usually includes resource allocation and status, dispatching production orders, data collection/acquisition, quality management, maintenance management, performance analysis, operations/detail scheduling, document control, labor management, process management and product tracking.
- the goal of MES systems developed by software suppliers is to provide manufacturing companies (the customers) with tools for measuring and controlling production activities with the aim of boosting profitability, increasing productivity, improving quality and process performance to manufacturing plants.
- a software application is a set of software components developed by software developers to perform some useful actions within an MES system, e.g. monitoring values coming from plant process or controlling a plant device.
- system engineers or system integrators flexibly customize MES applications according to the specific manufacturing plant requirements.
- MES applications are utilized by end-users who may be plant operators or line responsible personnel.
- logics intended as a set of operations that are running on the MES platform in order to control manufacturing plant operations.
- logics in the MES field, it is typically meant a set of functionalities or operations executed on the MES system.
- system engineers typically use an application, herein-after called plant designer, to represent the manufacturing plant in a digital manner.
- having a plant design phase is useful for classifying the physical equipment that will be used in the production logic of the workflow.
- the plant is modeled through an object oriented architecture where equipment objects are the MES entities virtually representing the equipment pieces of the plant. Moreover, the system engineers are required to define through the plant designer the needed plant logics through workflows or rule of production, where a logic is generically defined as an automated procedure for executing a given operation; e.g., logics for maintenance, automation logics (e.g. through PLCs), logics on the product material, logics for order management, logics for line automation and so on.
- a logic is generically defined as an automated procedure for executing a given operation; e.g., logics for maintenance, automation logics (e.g. through PLCs), logics on the product material, logics for order management, logics for line automation and so on.
- workflow means a set of ordered steps for executing a logical operation; where a step may be a logic performing a well-defined task or a call to another workflow.
- an equipment object is a collector of data without logics.
- an equipment object may be represented as a record of a database table where each of the record fields represents an equipment property, e.g. status, weight, dimension, temperature and other equipment characteristics.
- workflow and business rules can be created but they are distinct entities with respect to the plant and equipment management and thus they are, unfortunately, not organized according to the equipment structure.
- logics can be categorized based on the plant representation, e.g. by adding rules inside equipment objects. This advantageously enables logic characterization but, unfortunately, still has the drawback of not enabling equipment characterization, i.e. characterizing an equipment object with well-known characteristics.
- a method and a system for controlling a manufacturing plant with an MES system through the execution of a given workflow meeting given customer requirements.
- the invention comprising the following steps:
- an equipment object may preferably be a record of a database table.
- a plugin interface may additionally comprise an event element.
- the interaction is a call to the functionality.
- the interaction is an action of assessing the property.
- the interaction is an action of firing the event.
- a computer program element comprising non-transitory computer program code for performing steps according to the above mentioned process when loaded in a digital processor of a computing device.
- a computer program product stored on a computer usable medium comprising computer readable program code for causing a computing device to perform the mentioned process.
- equipment entities may be advantageously enriched with logics functionalities which can be called from a workflow.
- equipment objects can be designed with a set of specific capabilities, emulating an Object Oriented Programming (OOP) paradigm, where each equipment object has a well-defined set of functionalities.
- OOP Object Oriented Programming
- the plant design enables to enrich the equipment objects by adding plug-in based entities for performing actions on workflow scenarios.
- an equipment object can be seen as a complex object that can be adapted in order to meet a great number of requirements of manufacturing scenario and that can be used in the same way as a real OOP object.
- a set of equipment objects may advantageously be characterized by a given category of exposed functionalities and/or properties, e.g. a set of equipment objects for moving a given material, a set of equipment objects which require maintenance etc.
- the runtime logic and the plant model description defined at engineering time are associated in the same equipment object entities and have the same lifecycle and/or version.
- a system integrator may first define an equipment object and then a logic through a plugin. Once the plugin is associated to the equipment object, in software upgrades they are dealt together.
- the system engineer can develop a standalone module comprising a set of plugins for a specific customer project and she/he can conveniently reuse it in other projects without particular concern about integration and distribution issues.
- a plugin can be defined independently from a specific equipment object and can be used by several of them.
- Embodiments of the invention provide advantages in terms of the development process and in terms of work breakdown. In fact, thanks to its flexible level of granularity, from a work organization point of view the plug-in development can be adapted to the project needs.
- plugins may be provided within a coded library which may advantageously be developed in a performing programming language, improving performance and reducing the logic complexity.
- software developers and system engineers are enabled to design the plugin functionalities in a programming language, e.g. C#, C++ or JavaScript, in addition to the option of using a high-level design language such as workflows or business rules, which become burdensome when logics are complex and require a great amount of steps and actions.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram schematically illustrating, in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, how plugins may be placed inside a fragment of a plant model
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically illustrating, in an example embodiment of the present invention, how the functionality inside a plug-in can be executed from a workflow;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram schematically illustrating, in an example embodiment of the present invention, the execution of a plugin method and the subsequent raise of a plugin event.
- At least some embodiments of the present invention address the above described issue in which a manufacturing plant is controlled with an MES system, through the execution of a given workflow meeting given customer requirements.
- An application called plant designer, is provided for modeling a representation of the manufacturing plant through a set of equipment objects and through at least one workflow.
- An equipment object is a collector of information, preferably it may be in form of a record of a table of a database, where each field may conveniently define a given equipment property.
- a complex entity called plugin, is provided for expanding the characteristics of an equipment object.
- the plugin exposes an interface comprising a configuration, a set of property elements, a set of functionality elements and, optionally, a set of events.
- the configuration enables the system engineer to define the plug-in behavior, e.g. which functionalities, properties and/or events are exposed in the plugin;
- At engineering time, for at least one equipment object is associated at least one plugin.
- the given workflow comprises at least one interaction with at least one element of at least one plugin associated to an equipment object.
- the given workflow is executed and it is performed the at least interaction with the at least one element of the at least one plugin of the associated equipment object.
- the action of interacting or interaction with the at least one plugin element may be one of the following, according to the involved type of element of the plugin:
- the set of plugins may preferably be developed using a common programming language and/or they may conveniently be packaged as a library, e.g. in the Windows environment as Dynamic Library or Static Library. In this manner, it is enabled the optimization of the logic execution and the developers and system engineers are provided with a user friendly language.
- the plugin base structure may preferably be designed so as to be self-describing, meaning that the configuration, the properties, the functionalities and, optionally, the events may conveniently be not real elements but mere descriptors.
- having such structure compared to a hard-coded one, is characterized by a higher degree of flexibility, both from the developer side and the final integrator/system engineer side.
- a plug-in can conveniently be developed in order to evolve and change depending on the user request. For instance, adding a new property to the equipment object becomes a simple task, e.g. adding a property descriptor inside the list of properties exposed by the plugin.
- the equipment object is not an object class, it does not have functionalities. Its functionalities are called thorough the plugin associated to the equipment object.
- a plugin has advantageously a status, the state of all its property, and may optionally have a memory. Hence it is an entity that can change status and, in case a memory is present, it may remember such status changes, e.g. in a plugin for material movement, it can be tracked where the material was moved from.
- a real time representation of the plant may advantageously be achieved without needing to access the database, e.g. a representation of the bindings among PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers).
- PLCs Programmable Logic Controllers
- the status of each equipment, the state of all its properties may be updated using a plugin, called Automation plugin, which links it with the information exposed by an HMI (Human Machine Interface) working directly on the PLC Layer.
- HMI Human Machine Interface
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram schematically illustrating, in an example embodiment of the present invention, how plugins may be placed inside a fragment of a plant model.
- Block CELL-A represents an equipment object at “Cell” level, following ISA95 naming convention.
- the units UNIT-1, UNIT-2 and UNIT-3 represent equipment objects.
- To equipment object UNIT-3 are associated three plugins, one for “AUTOMATION MANAGEMENT,” one for “MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT” and one for “WHAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT.”
- the “MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT” plugin exposes an interface with following four elements: two methods or functionalities called “SearchitemById( ) and “MoveMaterialByName,” one property or attribute called “ItemsStored” and one event called “OnMovedMaterial”.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically illustrating in an example embodiment of the present invention how the functionality inside a plug-in can be executed from a workflow.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram schematically illustrating, in an example embodiment of the present invention, the execution of a plugin method and the subsequent raise of a plugin event.
- an equipment object representing a mixer piece may preferably be associated with an “Automation Field Management” plugin for enabling the communication with the relevant PLC.
- an “Automation Field Management” plugin for enabling the communication with the relevant PLC.
- a “Maintenance Management” plugin so as to enable the access to all the functionalities used in a typical maintenance situation.
- This equipment object, with all the plugins associated and configured, may then conveniently be used in the definition of higher-level logics, such as rules or workflows.
- Such configured equipment object exposes for example the method “CheckAndDoMaintenance”, which is called by a workflow each time the maintenance period is due, as follows:
- the maintenance plugin Since the maintenance plugin has a status, it can also be configured for example as status “Ready”, or as a property “To_be-maintained in 5 days”.
- a maintenance property needs not to be defined in the equipment objects since some objects may not require any maintenance.
- a plugin for maintenance may be conveniently associated to a given set of equipment objects.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Programmable Controllers (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
-
- a) providing an application for modeling a representation of the manufacturing plant through a set of equipment objects and through at least one workflow, said application hereinafter called plant designer; wherein an equipment object is a collector of information;
- b) providing a complex entity for expanding the characteristics of an equipment object, such complex entity hereinafter called plugin; the plugin exposing an interface comprising a configuration, a set of property elements, a set of functionality elements;
- the method further comprising the following steps to be performed at engineering time:
- c) designing a set of plugins usable by the set of equipment objects;
- d) for at least one equipment object, associating at least one plugin;
- e) through the plant designer, defining a given workflow according to given customer requirements, said given workflow comprising at least one interaction with at least one element of at least one plugin associated to an equipment object;
- the method further comprising the following step to be performed at runtime:
- f) executing the given workflow and performing the at least one interaction with the at least one element of the at least one plugin of the associated equipment object.
-
- the properties are the parameters to be used for runtime I/O operations;
- the functionalities represent the plugin capabilities, also called methods;
- the events may be used for detecting changes happening outside the plant environment or for notifying changes inside the plant.
-
- when the plugin element is a functionality, the interaction is the action of calling the functionality;
- when the plugin element is a property, the interaction is the action of assessing the property;
- when the plugin element is an event, the interaction is the action of firing the event;
-
- the engine executing the workflow, called Workflow Executer, starts the workflow until it encounters the interaction with the plugin element, the call the method or functionality “CheckAndDoMaintenance” of the “Maintenance” plugin, e.g. in a .NET environment via reflection.
- the “Maintenance” plugin connects to a maintenance service performing the required operation;
- at the operation completion, the maintenance service communicates the result to the maintenance plugin, which raises an event “OnMaintenanceCompleted”
- the workflow executor catches the event and, if the maintenance is successful, the workflow arrives to the end END.
Claims (11)
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14164027 | 2014-04-09 | ||
EP14164027.6A EP2930576A1 (en) | 2014-04-09 | 2014-04-09 | Controlling a manufacturing plant with a MES system |
EP14164027.6 | 2014-04-09 | ||
EP14186007 | 2014-09-23 | ||
EP14186007.2 | 2014-09-23 | ||
EP14186007.2A EP2930577A1 (en) | 2014-04-09 | 2014-09-23 | Controlling a manufacturing plant with a MES system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150293529A1 US20150293529A1 (en) | 2015-10-15 |
US11454955B2 true US11454955B2 (en) | 2022-09-27 |
Family
ID=50440584
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/681,307 Active 2038-05-18 US11454955B2 (en) | 2014-04-09 | 2015-04-08 | Method and system for controlling a manufacturing plant with a manufacturing execution system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11454955B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2930576A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN104977906B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3387590A1 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2018-10-17 | EMD Millipore Corporation | Interactive system and method of instrumenting a bio-manufacturing process |
CN105759773B (en) * | 2016-05-16 | 2018-08-21 | 石化盈科信息技术有限责任公司 | Petroleum chemical enterprise's plant model extended method based on object-oriented analysis |
CN108154297A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-06-12 | 深圳市智物联网络有限公司 | A kind of factory management system and information processing method |
CN109409760B (en) * | 2018-11-06 | 2021-05-11 | 广汽丰田汽车有限公司 | Sling maintenance method, device, computer readable storage medium and system |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6263255B1 (en) * | 1998-05-18 | 2001-07-17 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Advanced process control for semiconductor manufacturing |
US20040199925A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2004-10-07 | Mark Nixon | Module class objects in a process plant configuration system |
US20050159932A1 (en) * | 2002-02-19 | 2005-07-21 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Engineering method and system for industrial automation systems |
US20050262236A1 (en) * | 2004-04-22 | 2005-11-24 | Schachtely Alan T | Methods and systems for monitoring and diagnosing machinery |
CN1783129A (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-06-07 | 国际商业机器公司 | Enterprise factory control method and system |
US20060271223A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-11-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for integrating equipment integration software, equipment events, mes and rules databases |
US20100249978A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for Evaluating Key Production Indicators (KPI) in a Manufacturing Execution System (MES) |
CN102194159A (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-21 | 西门子公司 | Controlling a manufacturing process |
US20110258598A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2011-10-20 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Server side application integration framework |
CN102479348A (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2012-05-30 | 上海宝信软件股份有限公司 | Code reuse-oriented MES (manufacturing execution system) business modeling system and method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7127320B1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-10-24 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Render-resolve method of obtaining configurations and formatting it for use by semiconductor equipment interfaces |
US20120226786A1 (en) * | 2011-03-04 | 2012-09-06 | General Electric Company | System and method for porting of device software |
US20130131840A1 (en) * | 2011-11-11 | 2013-05-23 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Scalable automation system |
US8977707B2 (en) * | 2012-09-20 | 2015-03-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Delivering offers |
-
2014
- 2014-04-09 EP EP14164027.6A patent/EP2930576A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2014-09-23 EP EP14186007.2A patent/EP2930577A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2015
- 2015-04-08 US US14/681,307 patent/US11454955B2/en active Active
- 2015-04-09 CN CN201510166034.2A patent/CN104977906B/en active Active
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6263255B1 (en) * | 1998-05-18 | 2001-07-17 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Advanced process control for semiconductor manufacturing |
US20050159932A1 (en) * | 2002-02-19 | 2005-07-21 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Engineering method and system for industrial automation systems |
US20040199925A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2004-10-07 | Mark Nixon | Module class objects in a process plant configuration system |
US20050262236A1 (en) * | 2004-04-22 | 2005-11-24 | Schachtely Alan T | Methods and systems for monitoring and diagnosing machinery |
CN1783129A (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-06-07 | 国际商业机器公司 | Enterprise factory control method and system |
US7305278B2 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2007-12-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enterprise factory control method and system |
US20060271223A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-11-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for integrating equipment integration software, equipment events, mes and rules databases |
US20110258598A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2011-10-20 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Server side application integration framework |
US20100249978A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for Evaluating Key Production Indicators (KPI) in a Manufacturing Execution System (MES) |
CN102194159A (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-21 | 西门子公司 | Controlling a manufacturing process |
US8532805B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2013-09-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for controlling a manufacturing process |
CN102479348A (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2012-05-30 | 上海宝信软件股份有限公司 | Code reuse-oriented MES (manufacturing execution system) business modeling system and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2930577A1 (en) | 2015-10-14 |
US20150293529A1 (en) | 2015-10-15 |
CN104977906A (en) | 2015-10-14 |
EP2930576A1 (en) | 2015-10-14 |
CN104977906B (en) | 2020-03-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lu et al. | Current standards landscape for smart manufacturing systems | |
Ferreira et al. | Product lifecycle management in knowledge intensive collaborative environments: An application to automotive industry | |
Mertins et al. | Quality-oriented design of business processes | |
Berardinelli et al. | Model-driven systems engineering: Principles and application in the CPPS domain | |
CN105654225A (en) | Common plant model for modelling of physical plant items of production plant | |
US11454955B2 (en) | Method and system for controlling a manufacturing plant with a manufacturing execution system | |
US20130167050A1 (en) | Method and system for customizing a graphic user interface of a manufacturing execution system screen | |
Gerhard | Product lifecycle management challenges of CPPS | |
Krenczyk et al. | ERP, APS and simulation systems integration to support production planning and scheduling | |
Duda et al. | Product lifecycle management (PLM) in the context of industry 4.0 | |
Ciavotta et al. | Interoperable meta model for simulation-in-the-loop | |
Park et al. | Analyzing process-aware information system updates using digital twins of organizations | |
US10114622B2 (en) | Method and system for customizing a graphic user interface of a manufacturing execution system screen | |
Geyda | Dynamic capabilities indicators estimation of information technology usage in technological systems | |
Kulkarni et al. | Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): A Key Enabler in Implementation of Industry 4.0: A Key Enabler in Implementation of Industry 4.0 | |
US20130167051A1 (en) | Method and system for customizing a graphic user interface of a manfuacturing execution system screen | |
Steinbacher et al. | Modelling framework for reinforcement learning based scheduling applications | |
Muñoz et al. | Ontological framework for the enterprise from a process perspective | |
Poorkiany et al. | An explorative study on management and maintenance of systems for design and manufacture of customized products | |
Weckenmann et al. | Maturity Model for the development of new forming processes applied to the Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming | |
EP2819058A1 (en) | Accessing data of a database in a MES system | |
Aicher et al. | Consistent engineering information model for mechatronic components in production automation engineering | |
Barlas et al. | Towards automated simulation input data | |
Bikfalvi et al. | On some functions of the MES applications supporting production operations management | |
US9251200B2 (en) | Method and system for executing database insert calls in a MES system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BARDINI, MATTEO;CAMERA, FABRIZIO;REEL/FRAME:035406/0400 Effective date: 20150330 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: TC RETURN OF APPEAL |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |