US11288624B2 - Method and system for yard asset management - Google Patents
Method and system for yard asset management Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US11288624B2 US11288624B2 US16/100,146 US201816100146A US11288624B2 US 11288624 B2 US11288624 B2 US 11288624B2 US 201816100146 A US201816100146 A US 201816100146A US 11288624 B2 US11288624 B2 US 11288624B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- yard
- shipping
- asset
- computing device
- assets
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
-
- G06K9/00664—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
- G06Q10/043—Optimisation of two dimensional placement, e.g. cutting of clothes or wood
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
- G06V20/10—Terrestrial scenes
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to the transportation of goods, and in particular relates to utilization of storage yards in the transportation of goods.
- a shipping yard When transporting goods, shipping yards are often used for storage, as a starting point for goods, or as a destination for goods, among other purposes.
- a shipping yard may be a trailer yard, railyard or similar storage facility.
- Counting assets in a yard is challenging and knowing if such shipping yard is reaching full capacity is important. Specifically, when an asset approaches a yard, if there are no parking spots, a driver may circle the yard looking for a parking spot without any hope. This results in a waste of time, may create traffic issues by having a truck block the way when a driver does not know what to do, among other issues.
- a full yard may cause a driver that is currently in such yard to be relocated to another nearby empty yard. This wastes time and may cost more money for the shipping company.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example configuration of shipping containers in a container yard
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example image sensor apparatus capable of being used with the embodiments herein;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing communications between servers and shipping containers
- FIG. 4 is a process diagram showing a process at a network element for detecting current and future assets loading within a shipping yard;
- FIG. 5 is a process diagram showing a process at a network element for flagging problem shipping yards.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an example computing device capable of being used in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.
- the present disclosure provides a method at a computing device for determining future utilization of a shipping yard, the method comprising: detecting a number of assets within the shipping yard; determining, based on asset scheduling information, future yard activity; and correlating the number of assets within the shipping yard with the future yard activity to provide a predictive yard utilization.
- the present disclosure further provides a computing device configured for determining future utilization of a shipping yard, the computing device comprising: a processor; and a communications subsystem; wherein the computing device is configured to: detect a number of assets within the shipping yard; determine, based on asset scheduling information, future yard activity; and correlate the number of assets within the shipping yard with the future yard activity to provide a predictive yard utilization.
- the present disclosure further provides a computer readable medium for storing instruction code which, when executed by a processor of a computing device configured for determining future utilization of a shipping yard, cause the computing device to: detect a number of assets within the shipping yard; determine, based on asset scheduling information, future yard activity; and correlate the number of assets within the shipping yard with the future yard activity to provide a predictive yard utilization.
- the present disclosure relates to the management of assets within a shipping yard, and in particular, in the embodiments described below, a future anticipated utilization of a shipping yard may be predicted, and remedial action may be taken if the utilization of the yard, compared to the capacity of the yard, exceeds a threshold.
- a dispatcher may send an asset such as a truck or trailer to a particular shipping yard during normal shipping operations.
- yards may be very busy with many trucks going in and out. In this case, a yard may become full, which would cause a driver to be unable to find a spot to park or deposit a trailer.
- spots there may be a few spots available. For example, 2 out of 300 spots may be available. The yard might look full, but knowing that there are empty spots helps the driver to look for the few spots and not lose hope, give up and leave the yard in search of another place to park leading to the problems described above.
- the present disclosure provides for a yard management method and system which allows for future estimations of asset capacity within shipping yards by a fleet operator.
- FIG. 1 shows a simplified environment of a shipping yard 110 .
- Storage yard 110 includes a plurality of shipping containers 120 .
- the shipping containers 120 may be within a fenced area 130 .
- some containers, shown with reference 122 are outside of the fenced area 130 .
- shipping yard 110 may simply be too big to have a fenced area 130 .
- Fixed infrastructure points within the shipping yard 110 may exist.
- a building 140 or a fixed structure 150 such as a lamppost, security pole, or crane, among other options, may exist within the shipping yard 110 .
- Shipping containers 120 or 122 may be placed in rows, or stacked, or simply deposited in an empty location.
- a shipping yard may have fixed ingress or egress points 160 , which may allow for control of assets entering or exiting the yard and also may allow for a count of assets within the yard.
- all or a subset of the vehicles or trailers within the shipping yard may include a sensor apparatus.
- a subset of containers 120 or 122 may have associated therewith a sensor apparatus that can be triggered to obtain information about the trailer or vehicle and communicate the results to a centralized server.
- sensor systems may be included on the vehicle.
- a transportation company may have a plurality of sensor apparatuses operating remotely from a central monitoring station to provide remote sensor data to a management or monitoring hub.
- the sensors may be placed on a trailer, shipping container or similar product to provide a central station with information regarding the container.
- information may include, but is not limited to, information concerning the current location of the trailer or shipping container, the temperature inside the shipping container or trailer, operational parameters such as tire pressure or engine temperature, that the doors on the shipping container or trailer are closed, whether a sudden acceleration or deceleration event has occurred, the tilt angle of the trailer or shipping container, among other data.
- they sensor apparatus merely provides the location of the trailer, and no other sensor information is provided.
- the senor apparatus may be secured to a vehicle itself.
- vehicle can include any motorized vehicle such as a truck, tractor, car, boat, motorcycle, snow machine, among others, and can further include a trailer, shipping container or other such cargo moving container, whether attached to a motorized vehicle or not.
- a sensor apparatus may be any apparatus or computing device that is capable of providing data or information from sensors associated with the sensor apparatus to a central monitoring or control station.
- Sensors associated with the sensor apparatus may either be physically part of the sensor apparatus, for example a built-in global navigation satellite system (GNSS) chipset, or may be associated with the sensor apparatus through short range wired or wireless communications.
- GNSS global navigation satellite system
- a tire pressure monitor may provide information through a BluetoothTM Low Energy (BLE) signal from the tire to the sensor apparatus.
- BLE BluetoothTM Low Energy
- a camera may be part of the sensor apparatus or may communicate with a sensor apparatus through wired or wireless technologies. Other examples of sensors are possible.
- a central monitoring station may be any server or combination of servers that are remote from the sensor apparatus.
- the central monitoring station can receive data from a plurality of sensor apparatuses.
- Sensor apparatus 210 can be any computing device or network node.
- Such computing device or network node may include any type of electronic device, including but not limited to, mobile devices such as smartphones or cellular telephones. Examples can further include fixed or mobile devices, such as internet of things devices, endpoints, home automation devices, medical equipment in hospital or home environments, inventory tracking devices, environmental monitoring devices, energy management devices, infrastructure management devices, vehicles or devices for vehicles, fixed electronic devices, among others.
- Sensor apparatus 210 comprises a processor 220 and at least one communications subsystem 230 , where the processor 220 and communications subsystem 230 cooperate to perform the methods of the embodiments described herein.
- Communications subsystem 230 may, in some embodiments, comprise multiple subsystems, for example for different radio technologies.
- Communications subsystem 230 allows sensor apparatus 210 to communicate with other devices or network elements. Communications subsystem 230 may use one or more of a variety of communications types, including but not limited to cellular, satellite, BluetoothTM, BluetoothTM Low Energy, Wi-Fi, wireless local area network (WLAN), near field communications (NFC), ZigBee, wired connections such as Ethernet or fiber, among other options.
- Communications subsystem 230 may use one or more of a variety of communications types, including but not limited to cellular, satellite, BluetoothTM, BluetoothTM Low Energy, Wi-Fi, wireless local area network (WLAN), near field communications (NFC), ZigBee, wired connections such as Ethernet or fiber, among other options.
- sensor apparatus 210 may access data or programmable logic from an external storage medium, for example through communications subsystem 230 .
- sensor apparatus 210 may utilize a plurality of sensors, which may either be part of sensor apparatus 210 in some embodiments or may communicate with sensor apparatus 210 in other embodiments.
- processor 220 may receive input from a sensor subsystem 250 .
- sensors in the embodiment of FIG. 2 include a positioning sensor 251 , a RADAR sensor 252 , a LIDAR 253 , one or more image sensors 254 , accelerometer 255 , light sensors 256 , gyroscopic sensors 257 , and other sensors 258 .
- Other sensors may be any sensor that is capable of reading or obtaining data that may be useful for sensor apparatus 210 .
- the sensors shown in the embodiment of FIG. 2 are merely examples, and in other embodiments different sensors or a subset of sensors shown in FIG. 2 may be used. For example, in one embodiment of the present disclosure, only a positioning sensor is provided.
- the positioning sensor may use a positioning subsystem such as a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver which may be, for example, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver (e.g. in the form of a chip or chipset) for receiving GPS radio signals transmitted from one or more orbiting GPS satellites.
- GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
- GPS Global Positioning System
- References herein to “GPS” are meant to include Assisted GPS and Aided GPS.
- GPS Global Positioning System
- COMPASS Beidou
- GLONASS India's proposed Regional Navigational Satellite System
- IRNSS Japan's proposed QZSS regional system.
- Another sort of positioning subsystem may be used as well, e.g. a radiolocation subsystem that determines its current location using radiolocation techniques.
- the location of the device can be determined using triangulation of signals from in-range base towers, such as used for Wireless E911.
- Wireless Enhanced 911 services enable a cell phone or other wireless device to be located geographically using radiolocation techniques such as (i) angle of arrival (AOA) which entails locating the caller at the point where signals from two towers intersect; (ii) time difference of arrival (TDOA), which uses multilateration like GPS, except that the networks determine the time difference and therefore the distance from each tower; and (iii) location signature, which uses “fingerprinting” to store and recall patterns (such as multipath) which mobile phone signals exhibit at different locations in each cell.
- a Wi-FiTM Positioning System may also be used as a positioning subsystem. Radiolocation techniques and/or WPS may also be used in conjunction with GPS in a hybrid positioning system
- sensors may be external to the sensor apparatus 210 and communicate with the sensor apparatus 210 through, for example, communications subsystem 230 .
- Such other sensors are shown as sensors 260 and the embodiment of FIG. 2 .
- a tire pressure monitoring system may communicate over short range communications such as BluetoothTM Low Energy with communications subsystem 230 on the sensor apparatus 210 .
- Other examples of sensors 260 are possible.
- the sensor apparatus 210 of FIG. 2 may, in some embodiments, act as a gateway, and may communicate with other sensor apparatuses (not shown) on the trailer, where the other sensor apparatuses may act as hubs for a subset of the sensors on the vehicle or trailer.
- Communications between the various elements of sensor apparatus 210 may be through an internal bus 270 in one embodiment. However, other forms of communication are possible.
- Sensor apparatus 210 may be affixed to any fixed or portable platform.
- sensor apparatus 210 may be affixed to shipping containers, truck trailers, truck cabs in one embodiment.
- sensor apparatus 210 may be affixed to any vehicle, including motor vehicles (e.g., automobiles, cars, trucks, buses, motorcycles, etc.), aircraft (e.g., airplanes, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned aircraft systems, drones, helicopters, etc.), spacecraft (e.g., spaceplanes, space shuttles, space capsules, space stations, satellites, etc.), watercraft (e.g., ships, boats, hovercraft, submarines, etc.), railed vehicles (e.g., trains and trams, etc.), and other types of vehicles including any combinations of any of the foregoing, whether currently existing or after arising, among others.
- motor vehicles e.g., automobiles, cars, trucks, buses, motorcycles, etc.
- aircraft e.g., airplanes, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned aircraft
- sensor apparatus 210 could be carried by a user.
- sensor apparatus 210 may be a power limited device.
- sensor apparatus 210 could be a battery operated device that can be affixed to a shipping container or trailer in some embodiments.
- Other limited power sources could include any limited power supply, such as a small generator or dynamo, a fuel cell, solar power, among other options.
- sensor apparatus 210 may utilize external power, for example from the engine of a tractor pulling the trailer, from a land power source for example on a plugged in recreational vehicle or from a building power supply, among other options.
- External power may further allow for recharging of batteries to allow the sensor apparatus 210 to then operate in a power limited mode again.
- Recharging methods may also include other power sources, such as, but not limited to, solar, electromagnetic, acoustic or vibration charging.
- the sensor apparatus from FIG. 2 may be used in a variety of environments.
- One example environment in which the sensor apparatus may be used is shown with regard to FIG. 3 .
- sensor apparatus 310 three sensor apparatuses, namely sensor apparatus 310 , sensor apparatus 312 , and sensor apparatus 314 are provided.
- sensor apparatus 310 may communicate through a cellular base station 320 or through an access point 322 .
- Access point 322 may be any wireless communication access point.
- access point 322 may be a WiFi router or a private router network.
- a private router network may have a path from the access point name (APN) to a server, and may reduce network latency based on a location of the sensor apparatus in some embodiments.
- APN access point name
- sensor apparatus 310 could communicate through a wired access point such as Ethernet or fiber, among other options.
- the communication may then proceed over a wide area network such as Internet 330 and proceed to servers 340 or 342 .
- sensor apparatus 312 and sensor apparatus 314 may communicate with servers 340 or server 342 through one or both of the base station 320 or access point 322 , among other options for such communication.
- any one of sensors 310 , 312 or 314 may communicate through satellite communication technology. This, for example, may be useful if the sensor apparatus is travelling to areas that are outside of cellular coverage or access point coverage.
- sensor apparatus 312 may be out of range of access point 322 and may communicate with sensor apparatus 310 to allow sensor apparatus 310 to act as a relay for communications.
- Communication between sensor apparatus 310 and server 340 may be one directional or bidirectional. Thus, in one embodiment sensor apparatus 310 may provide information to server 340 but server 340 does not respond. In other cases, server 340 may issue commands to sensor apparatus 310 but data may be stored internally on sensor apparatus 310 until the sensor apparatus arrives at a particular location. In other cases, two-way communication may exist between sensor apparatus 310 and server 340 .
- a server, central server, processing service, endpoint, Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), Uniform Resource Locator (URL), back-end, and/or processing system may be used interchangeably in the descriptions herein.
- the server functionality typically represents data processing/reporting that are not closely tied to the location of movable image capture apparatuses 310 , 312 , 314 , etc.
- the server may be located essentially anywhere so long as it has network access to communicate with sensor apparatuses 310 , 312 , 314 , etc.
- Server 340 may, for example, be a fleet management centralized monitoring station.
- server 340 may receive information from sensor apparatuses associated with various trailers or cargo containers, providing information such as the location of such cargo containers, the temperature within such cargo containers, system information such as tire pressure or vibration sensor readings, any unusual events including sudden decelerations, temperature warnings when the temperature is either too high or too low, accelerometer events such as repeated starting and stopping, indicating a traffic jam, among other data.
- the server 340 may compile such information and store it for future reference. It may further alert an operator. For example, yard capacity warnings may be provided to an operator.
- server 340 may compile information regarding estimated arrival times or departure times at a shipping yard.
- server 340 Other examples of functionality for server 340 are possible.
- servers 340 and 342 may further have access to third-party information or information from other servers within the network.
- a data services provider 350 may provide information to server 340 .
- a data repository or database 360 may also provide information to server 340 .
- Data repository or database 360 may for example provide information such as image data associated with a particular location, aerial maps, low latency access point names, virtual SIM information, or other such information.
- data service provider 350 or the data repository or database 360 is not limited to the above examples and the information provided could be any data useful to server 340 .
- information from data service provider 350 or the data repository from database 360 can be provided to one or more of sensor apparatuses 310 , 312 , or 314 for processing at those sensor apparatuses.
- FIG. 4 The process of FIG. 4 starts at block 410 and proceeds to block 420 in which a current number of assets in a shipping yard is detected.
- an asset may be any item which may take up space in the shipping yard, and in includes containers, railcars, vehicles such as trucks, and/or a combination of the above, among other options.
- a geofence may exist around the yard, and each vehicle or trailer may be equipped with the sensor apparatus as described above with regard to FIG. 2 .
- the sensor apparatus may provide the positioning of the trailer or vehicle.
- a tally may be made of all trailers or vehicles within the geofence to provide an indication of how many vehicles are currently within the yard.
- a report may similarly be generated on a vehicle exiting the geofence, allowing in the tally of assets within the shipping yard to be updated accordingly.
- a capacity of the yard may be known ahead of time and the number of assets within the yard could be compared with the capacity of the yard.
- different sized assets may have different space requirements.
- the detection of the number of assets may include asset sizes.
- different areas may have nested geofences, and like sized assets could be placed in a specific nested geofence. In this case, the embodiment of FIG. 4 could be used with regards to each nested geofence.
- the current number of assets in a yard may be detected in other ways.
- a yard such as that described in FIG. 1 above may have a fixed number of entry or exit points 160 .
- the entry or exit points may further include sensors to tally vehicles entering or leaving the yard.
- sensors may be cameras which may then be connected to a computer having image recognition software to detect when a vehicle leaves or enters the yard.
- weight sensors, magnetic sensors, lasers, or other mechanisms for counting vehicles entering or exiting a yard may be utilized at the entrance and egress points of the yard to keep a tally of the number of assets within the yard.
- the number of vehicles in a yard may be compiled by a sensor apparatus on a second vehicle.
- the sensor apparatus on the second vehicle may include a camera which, when viewing the yard, may allow for a tally of the vehicles within the yard.
- the tally may be done by compiling image data at a server or other computing device from one or more vehicles with image capture devices.
- the second vehicle may be a shunt vehicle or other vehicle within the yard.
- the second vehicle may be another trailer or vehicle that is moving to a parking spot which may provide data back to a server.
- the second vehicle may be a plurality of vehicles that include the sensor apparatus and the tally may be a composite of data provided by the plurality of the vehicles.
- a fixed camera may be positioned, for example, on a pole or a crane, which may have a view of the yard or part of the yard and allow for image processing to determine the current number of vehicles in the yard or that part of the yard.
- the number of assets in the shipping yard may be found by getting the GPS locations of all assets located within the geofence of the yard.
- a yard tally may be entered by workers within the yard into a computing system.
- a computing system may be entered by workers within the yard into a computing system.
- a transportation management system may know when assets are scheduled to enter or leave a yard. Such information may be utilized to project future usage of the yard.
- the future information may, in some cases, include a buffer time around the scheduled arrival or departure. In this way, assets that arrive early or leave late for example can be included in the estimation for the yard loading.
- the future information may be correlated to sensor data on a vehicle or trailer. For example, an asset that is scheduled to arrive in two hours but is showing from its GPS positioning and that it is at least three hours away from the yard could allow for the calculation of the future loading of the art to be adjusted accordingly. Similarly, when an asset clears a border crossing more quickly than scheduled, this may bring forward the arrival time of the asset at the yard.
- the scheduling information can be used to project future departures.
- Sensor data from the vehicle or trailer may be used to update such schedule information.
- delays can always happen when an asset leaves a yard.
- the driver may be late, the asset may not be ready on time, among other factors.
- a geofence exit event may be used in some cases to correct the estimate based on the actual exiting of the asset from the art.
- Thresholds may be created to allow for warnings to be provided to operators if the usage of the yard is within a certain percentage of its capacity. For example, a first warning may be provided to an operator if the yard is scheduled to be operating at 90% or greater capacity within the foreseeable future. A second warning may be programmed, perhaps raising the warning level, if the usage is projected to be greater than 95% of the capacity of the yard.
- thresholds are merely provided for illustration and the specific number of warning thresholds and the threshold level for each warning could be customized based on the needs of the transportation management system.
- the process proceeds to block 430 and checks whether or not a warning situation exists.
- the warning situation may exist if certain thresholds are exceeded for estimated usage within a foreseeable time.
- the process may proceed from block 430 back to block 420 to again count the number of assets.
- a delay as shown at block 432 may be provided so that the process does not take up too many resources at the server or computing device. For example, the process may be run every five minutes. However, other values for the delay are possible.
- the process may wait for a change in status to trigger it to run again. For example, an entry/exit event, when an approaching asset is a predetermined time/distance away, among other options, may trigger the process to be run again.
- an alert may be provided it to an operator.
- the alert may be a warning message on a screen, a flashing light on a control panel, among other options.
- the alert may be sent to the operator using Short Message Service (SMS) messages, email, a phone call, among other options.
- SMS Short Message Service
- an overall system chart may be provided to operators.
- the problem yards can be identified to operators in a variety of ways.
- the problem yards can be provided in a chart with colors representing warning levels.
- the results may be presented on a map with geofence is colored by various warning levels seen at the yards. Other options are possible.
- An operator of the transportation management system may then take action to mitigate the alert situation. For example, the operator may reroute traffic that is in transit to different shipping yards in some cases. In other cases, the driver of vehicles arriving at the shipping yard may be asked to wait in a queue outside of the yard to avoid creating situations where the vehicle or trailer will be blocking traffic within the yard.
- the alert at block 440 may be provided at the entrance and to the yard to inform drivers that are arriving at the yard.
- the alert may indicate to drivers how many spots are left within the yard and therefore indicate to the driver whether the driver should enter the yard or not.
- the driver may further be provided, in some cases, with an indication of the location of at least one of the empty spots. This may be done through a dispatcher or an automatic system in some embodiments.
- the alert at block 440 can be provided to the drivers that are scheduled to arrive at the yard, for example utilizing a mobile device or vehicle console that can be viewed by the driver.
- Such alert may for example be provided by SMS, email, a phone call, among other options. This can cause the driver to for example, contact a dispatcher to obtain alternate routing, wait until there are spots available for entering the yard, among other actions.
- the yard usage information can also be stored and used by operators of the transportation management systems in order to provide for future planning with regard to routing and yard usage.
- FIG. 5 which starts at block 510 and proceeds to block 512 .
- a computing device or server may, at block 512 , compile historic usage data for each yard. Such compiling may involve storing information with regard to a current number of assets within a yard over a time period.
- problem yards may be flagged for operators of the system.
- the historic yard usage data could be compared to yard capacity for each yard and the yards which exceed a threshold percentage of capacity could be flagged.
- the flagging could occur if the yard is problematic over a time period. For example, if the yard is over a threshold percentage of capacity for greater than two hours on any given day, this may raise a flag.
- the flagging could occur if the yard reaches a threshold capacity greater than a threshold number of times over a time period. For example, if the yard exceeds the threshold capacity three times in any week, this may indicate a problem yard and cause the yard to be flagged.
- the threshold capacity in this case may be the same or may be different than the threshold used to raise an alert.
- the threshold may be 80% capacity. However, this is merely an example and the value of 80% could be changed based on the needs of the operator.
- the problem yards can be identified to operators in a variety of ways.
- the problem yards can be provided in a chart with colors representing warning levels.
- the results may be presented on a map with geofence is colored by various warning levels seen at the yards.
- graphs or charts providing utilization of each shipping yard could be provided and perhaps broken into time of day or day of week data. Other options for presenting such results are possible.
- An operator may review a report with the problem yards, and may take remedial action.
- the scheduling algorithms may be programmed to schedule less loads to be delivered to the problem yard.
- the scheduling may be relevant only to certain time periods in which the usage typically exceeds capacity thresholds.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 provide various functionality for a server, other functionally for the server would be apparent to those skilled in the art having regard to the present disclosure.
- server 610 includes a processor 620 and a communications subsystem 630 , where the processor 620 and communications subsystem 630 cooperate to perform the methods of the embodiments described herein.
- the processor 620 is configured to execute programmable logic, which may be stored, along with data, on the server 610 , and is shown in the example of FIG. 6 as memory 640 .
- the memory 640 can be any tangible, non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as optical (e.g., CD, DVD, etc.), magnetic (e.g., tape), flash drive, hard drive, or other memory known in the art.
- processor 620 may also be implemented entirely in hardware and not require any stored program to execute logic functions.
- the server 610 may access data or programmable logic from an external storage medium, for example through the communications subsystem 630 .
- the communications subsystem 630 allows the server 610 to communicate with other devices or network elements.
- Communications between the various elements of the server 610 may be through an internal bus 660 in one embodiment. However, other forms of communication are possible.
- Such operations may not be immediate or from the server directly. They may be synchronously or asynchronously delivered, from a server or other computing system infrastructure supporting the devices/methods/systems described herein. The foregoing steps may include, in whole or in part, synchronous/asynchronous communications to/from the device/infrastructure. Moreover, communication from the electronic device may be to one or more endpoints on a network. These endpoints may be serviced by a server, a distributed computing system, a stream processor, etc. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) may also provide may provide communication to an electronic device.
- CDNs Content Delivery Networks
- the server may also provision or indicate a data for content delivery network (CDN) to await download by the electronic device at a later time, such as a subsequent activity of electronic device.
- CDN content delivery network
- data may be sent directly from the server, or other infrastructure, such as a distributed infrastructure, or a CDN, as part of or separate from the system.
- storage mediums can include any or some combination of the following: a semiconductor memory device such as a dynamic or static random access memory (a DRAM or SRAM), an erasable and programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable and programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) and flash memory; a magnetic disk such as a fixed, floppy and removable disk; another magnetic medium including tape; an optical medium such as a compact disk (CD) or a digital video disk (DVD); or another type of storage device.
- a semiconductor memory device such as a dynamic or static random access memory (a DRAM or SRAM), an erasable and programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable and programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) and flash memory
- a magnetic disk such as a fixed, floppy and removable disk
- another magnetic medium including tape an optical medium such as a compact disk (CD) or a digital video disk (DVD); or another type of storage device.
- CD compact disk
- DVD
- Such computer-readable or machine-readable storage medium or media is (are) considered to be part of an article (or article of manufacture).
- An article or article of manufacture can refer to any manufactured single component or multiple components.
- the storage medium or media can be located either in the machine running the machine-readable instructions, or located at a remote site from which machine-readable instructions can be downloaded over a network for execution.
- a method at a computing device for determining future utilization of a shipping yard comprising: detecting a number of assets within the shipping yard; determining, based on asset scheduling information, future yard activity; and correlating the number of assets within the shipping yard with the future yard activity to provide a predictive yard utilization.
- a computing device configured for determining future utilization of a shipping yard, the computing device comprising: a processor; and a communications subsystem; wherein the computing device is configured to: detect a number of assets within the shipping yard; determine, based on asset scheduling information, future yard activity; and correlate the number of assets within the shipping yard with the future yard activity to provide a predictive yard utilization.
- NN The computing device of any one of clauses KK to MM, wherein the computing device is configured to detect using at least one image capture device within the shipping yard to capture images of the yard and further utilizes image processing to find the number of assets within the shipping yard.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/100,146 US11288624B2 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2018-08-09 | Method and system for yard asset management |
EP19187368.6A EP3608851B1 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2019-07-19 | Method and system for yard asset management |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/100,146 US11288624B2 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2018-08-09 | Method and system for yard asset management |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20200051005A1 US20200051005A1 (en) | 2020-02-13 |
US11288624B2 true US11288624B2 (en) | 2022-03-29 |
Family
ID=67438218
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/100,146 Active 2039-09-22 US11288624B2 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2018-08-09 | Method and system for yard asset management |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11288624B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3608851B1 (en) |
Citations (49)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5122959A (en) * | 1988-10-28 | 1992-06-16 | Automated Dispatch Services, Inc. | Transportation dispatch and delivery tracking system |
US5880958A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1999-03-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for freight transportation using a satellite navigation system |
WO1999038136A2 (en) | 1998-01-26 | 1999-07-29 | K & T Of Lorain, Ltd. | Container and inventory monitoring methods and systems |
US6415219B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2002-07-02 | Zakrytoye East Line-Handling | Technique of real-time tracking and management of land-based vehicles of the airport |
US20020084387A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-04 | William Matheson | Yard tracking system |
US20020161509A1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Fawcett David C. | System and method for tracking trailers |
US20030014288A1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2003-01-16 | Lloyd Clarke | System and method for managing transportation demand and capacity |
US20030040944A1 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Hileman Ryan M. | On-demand transportation system |
US20030069680A1 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2003-04-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | Multi-stage truck assignment system and method |
US6587738B1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2003-07-01 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, L.L.C. | Optimal locomotive assignment for a railroad network |
US20030233189A1 (en) * | 2002-06-13 | 2003-12-18 | Hsiao Victor K. | Mobile-trailer tracking system and method |
US6687583B1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2004-02-03 | Yacht Watchman International | Vessel monitoring system |
US20040024711A1 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2004-02-05 | Walt Camping | Method of and system for filing orders |
US20050002544A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2005-01-06 | Maryann Winter | Apparatus and method for sensing the occupancy status of parking spaces in a parking lot |
US6975997B1 (en) * | 1999-07-07 | 2005-12-13 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Method for efficient vehicle allocation in vehicle sharing system |
US20060059023A1 (en) * | 2002-08-02 | 2006-03-16 | Alex Mashinsky | Method system and apparatus for providing transportation services |
US20060206387A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Oracle International Corporation | Transportation planning with multi-level firming |
US20060261164A1 (en) * | 2002-04-29 | 2006-11-23 | Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. | System and Method for Tracking Freight |
US20070005200A1 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2007-01-04 | Wills Mitchell S | System and method for railyard planning |
US20070027593A1 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2007-02-01 | Baiju Shah | Predictive monitoring for vehicle efficiency and maintenance |
US20070150130A1 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2007-06-28 | Welles Kenneth B | Apparatus and method for locating assets within a rail yard |
US20070247282A1 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2007-10-25 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | System, method, and apparatus for capturing telematics data with an active rfid tag |
US20070291985A1 (en) * | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | Nils Oliver Krahnstoever | Intelligent railyard monitoring system |
US20080027772A1 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2008-01-31 | Gernega Boris | System and method for optimizing a transit network |
US20080154692A1 (en) * | 2006-03-14 | 2008-06-26 | Prescott Logan | System and method for rail yard process monitoring |
US20080294491A1 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2008-11-27 | Richard Hersh | Dynamic and Predictive Information System and Method for Shipping Assets and Transport |
US20080312820A1 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | Ajesh Kapoor | Method of driver assignment and scheduling segmented long-haul routes |
US20090082962A1 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-03-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Routing Drivers to Trailers Effectively |
US20090083091A1 (en) * | 2007-09-24 | 2009-03-26 | Katherine Kristin Rust | Method and apparatus for assigning material transport vehicle idle locations |
US20090099898A1 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-04-16 | I.D Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing work requests for mobile assets |
US7528715B2 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2009-05-05 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method for optimal multi-vehicle dispatch and system for the same |
US20090143927A1 (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 2009-06-04 | General Electric Company | System and method for dispatching by exception |
US20090157461A1 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2009-06-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | Vehicle deployment planning system |
US7561069B2 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2009-07-14 | Legalview Assets, Limited | Notification systems and methods enabling a response to change particulars of delivery or pickup |
US7567811B2 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2009-07-28 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Management and dispatching of mobile service vehicles |
US20090189788A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-07-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for sensing cargo loads and trailer movement |
US20090326991A1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2009-12-31 | E-Lantis Corporation | Gps and wireless integrated fleet management system and method |
US7898411B2 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2011-03-01 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US20110052001A1 (en) | 2009-09-01 | 2011-03-03 | Container Trac, Inc. | Automatic error detection for inventory tracking and management systems used at a shipping container yard |
US20110093306A1 (en) * | 2009-08-11 | 2011-04-21 | Certusview Technologies, Llc | Fleet management systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle-related information via local and remote complex event processing engines |
US20130062474A1 (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2013-03-14 | Central Signal, Llc | Train detection |
US20130113936A1 (en) * | 2010-05-10 | 2013-05-09 | Park Assist Llc. | Method and system for managing a parking lot based on intelligent imaging |
US20130325740A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2013-12-05 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and Method for Increasing Asset Utilization Using Satellite Aided Location Tracking |
US20160112837A1 (en) * | 2012-12-17 | 2016-04-21 | Apple Inc. | Monitoring a mobile device en route to destination |
US20160210851A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-07-21 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Mechatronics Systems, Ltd. | Operating management system, operating management method, and program |
US20170316690A1 (en) * | 2016-04-29 | 2017-11-02 | AssetWorks LLC | Systems and method for estimating and communicating parking lot utilization |
US20180308191A1 (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2018-10-25 | Lyft, Inc. | Dynamic autonomous vehicle servicing and management |
US20180315146A1 (en) * | 2017-04-27 | 2018-11-01 | Lyft, Inc. | Dynamic autonomous vehicle matching optimization |
US20180350157A1 (en) * | 2017-05-31 | 2018-12-06 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Parking management system, parking management method, and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program causing computer to execute processing |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9682481B2 (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2017-06-20 | X Development Llc | Communication of information regarding a robot using an optical identifier |
-
2018
- 2018-08-09 US US16/100,146 patent/US11288624B2/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-07-19 EP EP19187368.6A patent/EP3608851B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (54)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5122959A (en) * | 1988-10-28 | 1992-06-16 | Automated Dispatch Services, Inc. | Transportation dispatch and delivery tracking system |
US5880958A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1999-03-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for freight transportation using a satellite navigation system |
US20090143927A1 (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 2009-06-04 | General Electric Company | System and method for dispatching by exception |
WO1999038136A2 (en) | 1998-01-26 | 1999-07-29 | K & T Of Lorain, Ltd. | Container and inventory monitoring methods and systems |
US6975997B1 (en) * | 1999-07-07 | 2005-12-13 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Method for efficient vehicle allocation in vehicle sharing system |
US6687583B1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2004-02-03 | Yacht Watchman International | Vessel monitoring system |
US6415219B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2002-07-02 | Zakrytoye East Line-Handling | Technique of real-time tracking and management of land-based vehicles of the airport |
US6587738B1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2003-07-01 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, L.L.C. | Optimal locomotive assignment for a railroad network |
US20020084387A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-04 | William Matheson | Yard tracking system |
US20020161509A1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Fawcett David C. | System and method for tracking trailers |
US20030014288A1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2003-01-16 | Lloyd Clarke | System and method for managing transportation demand and capacity |
US20030040944A1 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Hileman Ryan M. | On-demand transportation system |
US20050002544A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2005-01-06 | Maryann Winter | Apparatus and method for sensing the occupancy status of parking spaces in a parking lot |
US20030069680A1 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2003-04-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | Multi-stage truck assignment system and method |
US20060261164A1 (en) * | 2002-04-29 | 2006-11-23 | Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. | System and Method for Tracking Freight |
US20030233189A1 (en) * | 2002-06-13 | 2003-12-18 | Hsiao Victor K. | Mobile-trailer tracking system and method |
US20040024711A1 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2004-02-05 | Walt Camping | Method of and system for filing orders |
US20060059023A1 (en) * | 2002-08-02 | 2006-03-16 | Alex Mashinsky | Method system and apparatus for providing transportation services |
US7561069B2 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2009-07-14 | Legalview Assets, Limited | Notification systems and methods enabling a response to change particulars of delivery or pickup |
US7898411B2 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2011-03-01 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US20070247282A1 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2007-10-25 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | System, method, and apparatus for capturing telematics data with an active rfid tag |
US20090030770A1 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2009-01-29 | Rentar Environmental Solutions, Inc. | Dynamic and predictive information system and method for shipping assets and transport |
US20080294491A1 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2008-11-27 | Richard Hersh | Dynamic and Predictive Information System and Method for Shipping Assets and Transport |
US20060206387A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Oracle International Corporation | Transportation planning with multi-level firming |
US20070005200A1 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2007-01-04 | Wills Mitchell S | System and method for railyard planning |
US7567811B2 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2009-07-28 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Management and dispatching of mobile service vehicles |
US20110130914A1 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2011-06-02 | Baiju Shah | Monitoring for equipment efficiency and maintenance |
US20070027593A1 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2007-02-01 | Baiju Shah | Predictive monitoring for vehicle efficiency and maintenance |
US20070150130A1 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2007-06-28 | Welles Kenneth B | Apparatus and method for locating assets within a rail yard |
US7528715B2 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2009-05-05 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method for optimal multi-vehicle dispatch and system for the same |
US20080154692A1 (en) * | 2006-03-14 | 2008-06-26 | Prescott Logan | System and method for rail yard process monitoring |
US20070291985A1 (en) * | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | Nils Oliver Krahnstoever | Intelligent railyard monitoring system |
US20080027772A1 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2008-01-31 | Gernega Boris | System and method for optimizing a transit network |
US20080312820A1 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | Ajesh Kapoor | Method of driver assignment and scheduling segmented long-haul routes |
US20090082962A1 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-03-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Routing Drivers to Trailers Effectively |
US8055533B2 (en) * | 2007-09-24 | 2011-11-08 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Method and apparatus for assigning material transport vehicle idle locations |
US20090083091A1 (en) * | 2007-09-24 | 2009-03-26 | Katherine Kristin Rust | Method and apparatus for assigning material transport vehicle idle locations |
US20090099898A1 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-04-16 | I.D Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing work requests for mobile assets |
US20090099897A1 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-04-16 | I.D. Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing mobile asset workload |
US20090157461A1 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2009-06-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | Vehicle deployment planning system |
US20090189788A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-07-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for sensing cargo loads and trailer movement |
US20090326991A1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2009-12-31 | E-Lantis Corporation | Gps and wireless integrated fleet management system and method |
US20130325740A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2013-12-05 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and Method for Increasing Asset Utilization Using Satellite Aided Location Tracking |
US20190005446A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2019-01-03 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and Method for Increasing Asset Utilization using Satellite Aided Location Tracking |
US20110093306A1 (en) * | 2009-08-11 | 2011-04-21 | Certusview Technologies, Llc | Fleet management systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle-related information via local and remote complex event processing engines |
US20110052001A1 (en) | 2009-09-01 | 2011-03-03 | Container Trac, Inc. | Automatic error detection for inventory tracking and management systems used at a shipping container yard |
US20130113936A1 (en) * | 2010-05-10 | 2013-05-09 | Park Assist Llc. | Method and system for managing a parking lot based on intelligent imaging |
US20130062474A1 (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2013-03-14 | Central Signal, Llc | Train detection |
US20160112837A1 (en) * | 2012-12-17 | 2016-04-21 | Apple Inc. | Monitoring a mobile device en route to destination |
US20160210851A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-07-21 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Mechatronics Systems, Ltd. | Operating management system, operating management method, and program |
US20170316690A1 (en) * | 2016-04-29 | 2017-11-02 | AssetWorks LLC | Systems and method for estimating and communicating parking lot utilization |
US20180308191A1 (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2018-10-25 | Lyft, Inc. | Dynamic autonomous vehicle servicing and management |
US20180315146A1 (en) * | 2017-04-27 | 2018-11-01 | Lyft, Inc. | Dynamic autonomous vehicle matching optimization |
US20180350157A1 (en) * | 2017-05-31 | 2018-12-06 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Parking management system, parking management method, and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program causing computer to execute processing |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
European Patent Office, extended European search report for Application No. 19187368.6, dated Jan. 13, 2020. |
European Patent Office, Office Action for Application No. 19187368.6, dated Oct. 18, 2021. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3608851A1 (en) | 2020-02-12 |
US20200051005A1 (en) | 2020-02-13 |
EP3608851B1 (en) | 2023-03-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3588143B1 (en) | Method and system for asset tracking | |
EP3598359B1 (en) | Method and system for asset tracking | |
US11521155B2 (en) | Method and system for detecting duration and cause of border delays | |
US11244565B2 (en) | Method and system for traffic behavior detection and warnings | |
US20190313204A1 (en) | Method and system for generation of geofence shape | |
US12096166B2 (en) | Method and system for moving status detection for a sensor apparatus | |
EP3554104B1 (en) | Method and system for detection and creation of geofences | |
US10949680B2 (en) | Method and system for rear status detection | |
EP3624031A1 (en) | Method and system for pool management of transportation assets | |
US11288624B2 (en) | Method and system for yard asset management | |
EP3624030B1 (en) | Method and system for bulk assets leasing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BLACKBERRY LIMITED, ONTARIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AYOUB, SAMEH;REEL/FRAME:046609/0120 Effective date: 20180809 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP., ISSUE FEE NOT PAID |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |