US11099271B2 - Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor - Google Patents

Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US11099271B2
US11099271B2 US16/378,911 US201916378911A US11099271B2 US 11099271 B2 US11099271 B2 US 11099271B2 US 201916378911 A US201916378911 A US 201916378911A US 11099271 B2 US11099271 B2 US 11099271B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
radar
sensor
frequency
sub
switching
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US16/378,911
Other versions
US20190331787A1 (en
Inventor
Marcel Mayer
Klaus Baur
Michael Schoor
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Assigned to ROBERT BOSCH GMBH reassignment ROBERT BOSCH GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MAYER, MARCEL, SCHOOR, MICHAEL, BAUR, KLAUS
Publication of US20190331787A1 publication Critical patent/US20190331787A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11099271B2 publication Critical patent/US11099271B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/023Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/87Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/93Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
    • G01S13/931Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/023Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
    • G01S7/0232Avoidance by frequency multiplex
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/36Means for anti-jamming, e.g. ECCM, i.e. electronic counter-counter measures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/41Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and to a radar sensor system which includes a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor.
  • Radar sensors are currently installed in many motor vehicles.
  • the radar sensors can determine the distance between one motor vehicle and another motor vehicle located in front of said motor vehicle and/or the velocity of the motor vehicle.
  • the radar sensors can examine and detect the environment of the motor vehicle.
  • the motor vehicles often have more than one radar sensor.
  • a problem in the conventional radar sensors in motor vehicles is that the switching frequency at which a switching controller for the supply of the radar sensors is operated in a motor vehicle may lead to interference signals in the radar signals.
  • the interference signals could result in incorrect assumptions about the environment of the motor vehicle inasmuch as the interference signals could be interpreted as reflections of (supposedly present) objects in the environment of the motor vehicle (also known as ghost targets).
  • Specific example embodiments of the present invention may advantageously provide a method and a system by which, or in which, a plurality of radar sub-sensors is able to be operated and interference signals may be efficiently suppressed.
  • a method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, in particular in a motor vehicle includes the following steps: Operating the first switching controller at a first switching frequency; and operating the second switching controller at a second switching frequency, the first switching frequency differing from the second switching frequency.
  • interference signals that are created by the respective switching controller are technically easily identifiable because the interference signals occur at frequencies that differ from one another.
  • the environment e.g., the presence of objects in the environment of the vehicle, the velocity and/or the distance of objects from the vehicle, is able to be detected in an especially reliable manner with the aid of the two radar sub-sensors.
  • additional ghost targets caused by the switching controller principle are able to be effectively detected.
  • a radar sensor system which includes a first radar sub-sensor, a second radar sub-sensor, a first switching controller for the supply of voltage to the first radar sub-sensor, and a second switching controller for the supply of voltage to the second radar sub-sensor, the first switching controller being operable at a first switching frequency and the second switching controller being operable at a second switching frequency, the first switching frequency differing from the second switching frequency.
  • interference signals generated by the switching controllers are able to be identified in a technically uncomplicated manner with the aid of the radar sensor system, because the interference signals occur at frequencies that differ from one another.
  • the environment e.g., the presence of objects in the environment of the vehicle, the velocity, and/or the distance of objects from the vehicle, is able to be detected in a particularly reliable manner with the aid of the radar sensor system.
  • additional ghost targets caused by the switching controller principle are able to be effectively detected and/or suppressed.
  • received signals from the radar sub-sensors are subdivided into a plurality of frequency ranges, and the difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is such that the first switching frequency lies in a first frequency range of the frequency ranges and the second switching frequency lies in a second frequency range of the frequency ranges, which differs from the first frequency range.
  • a first radar signal of a first range is received by the first radar sub-sensor
  • a second radar signal of a second range which at least partially overlaps with the first range
  • the second radar sub-sensor receives a newly calculated signal from the first radar signal and the second radar signal
  • the newly calculated signal having a measured value only in frequency ranges in which both the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value.
  • a first radar signal is initially transmitted using the first radar sub-sensor, and a second radar signal is then emitted using the second radar sub-sensor, and one frequency or multiple frequencies that is/are not in agreement, and in particular is/are unequal to a carrier frequency of the radar sub-sensors, may be detected as interference frequencies during the transmission by the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor.
  • This offers the advantage that the interference signals are detectable in a technically particularly simple manner during the transmission of radar signals using the two radar sub-sensors, the reason being that the interference signals, which occur in the evaluated spectrum in what is termed side lines, exhibit a temporal offset from one another at different frequencies.
  • the first radar signal and the second radar signal may have an identical frequency swing.
  • the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency are derived from a shared clock source. This allows the present method to be carried out in a technically even simpler and particularly cost-effective manner.
  • the first switching frequency and/or the second switching frequency is/are varied over time.
  • the interference signals may be identified as interference signals even more easily, for instance because the differentiation between reflections of actually existing objects and interference signals is able to be carried out in a more reliable manner.
  • received signals of the radar sub-sensors are subdivided into a plurality of frequency ranges, and the difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is such that the first switching frequency lies in a first frequency range of the frequency ranges and the second switching frequency lies in a second frequency range of the frequency ranges, which differs from the first frequency range.
  • the interference signals are detectable in a technically especially simple and rapid manner.
  • the radar sensor system furthermore has a clock source, and both the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency are derived from the clock source. This makes it possible to develop the radar sensor system in a technically particularly simple manner.
  • the radar sensor system also includes an analysis device; the analysis device is developed to generate a newly calculated signal from the received signals of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor in order to cancel interference signals to the effect that the newly calculated signal has a measured value only in frequency ranges in which both the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value.
  • the newly calculated signal represents the environment that was detected by the radar sub-sensors in a particularly reliable manner. More specifically, ghost targets caused by the switching controller principle are effectively identifiable.
  • a measured value may particularly be a measured value that is not equal to zero.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a specific embodiment of the radar sensor system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of the first radar sub-sensor of the radar sensor system from FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of the second radar sub-sensor of the radar sensor system from FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a specific embodiment of radar sensor system 10 according to the present invention.
  • Radar sensor system 10 includes a first radar sub-sensor 30 and a second radar sub-sensor 50 .
  • First radar sub-sensor 30 includes two first high-frequency components 35 , 36 .
  • Second radar sub-sensor 50 includes two second high-frequency components 55 , 56 .
  • the two radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 may be sub-sensors of a larger radar sensor.
  • the two radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 are situated on a shared circuit board.
  • radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 are two radar sensors which are situated on different circuit boards.
  • radar sensor system 10 includes a first switching controller 20 and a second switching controller 40 .
  • radar sensor system 10 includes an analysis device 60 , which is able to receive signals from the two radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 and possibly from switching controllers 20 , 40 .
  • Switching controllers 20 , 40 supply voltage to the two radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 .
  • First switching controller 20 supplies voltage to first radar sub-sensor 30 .
  • Second switching controller 40 supplies voltage to second radar sub-sensor 50 .
  • First switching controller 20 and/or second switching controller 40 may be buck controllers or step-down controllers.
  • Switching controllers 20 , 40 may have 12V as the input voltage and 5V as the output voltage.
  • First switching controller 20 is operated or switched at a first switching frequency.
  • Second switching controller 40 is operated or switched at a second switching frequency.
  • first switching controller 20 is operated at a switching frequency of 1.8 MHz and second switching controller 40 is operated at a switching frequency of 1.7 MHz, or vice versa.
  • a radar signal emitted by respective radar sub-sensor 30 , 50 has a predefined frequency bandwidth.
  • the received signal or baseband receive signal received by radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 is subdivided or split up into a plurality of frequency ranges, e.g., 100 or 10.
  • FIG. 2 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of first radar sub-sensor 30 of radar sensor system 10 of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of second radar sub-sensor 50 of radar sensor system 10 of FIG. 1 .
  • the received data are reflection data, in particular.
  • the x-axis in FIGS. 2 and 3 indicates the respective frequency range, and lower numbers indicate a lower frequency and higher numbers indicate a higher frequency.
  • the frequency ranges are disjunctive and directly abut each other.
  • the y-axis in FIGS. 2 and 3 indicates the strength of the respective measured value.
  • the magnitude of the measured values in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 are of equal size. However, this is only for illustrative purposes.
  • Target signal 70 i.e., the signal or the measured value of an actually present target or object, normally has a considerably higher or stronger measured value than interference signals 80 , 81 , 82 .
  • Interference signals 80 , 81 , 82 or the measured values of interference signals 80 , 81 , 82 usually have a deviation of ⁇ 30 dB, for example, compared to target signal 70 or the measured value of target signal 70 .
  • First radar sub-sensor 30 whose received signal can be seen in FIG. 2 , is operated or supplied with voltage by first switching controller 20 , first switching controller 20 being driven or actuated using the first switching frequency, which lies in frequency range 1.
  • First radar sensor 30 therefore has an interference signal 80 in frequency range 1.
  • the object or target that is actually present and generates a target signal 70 in FIG. 2 is measured or detected in frequency range 10.
  • interference signals 81 , 82 or measured values occur around target signal 70 , i.e. at a distance from the frequency range of target signal 70 , the distance corresponding to the frequency range in which the frequency at which first switching controller 20 is operated lies.
  • Second radar sub-sensor 50 whose received signal can be seen in FIG. 3 , is supplied with voltage by second switching controller 40 , second switching controller 40 being driven or actuated using a second switching frequency that differs from the first switching frequency.
  • the second switching frequency has a frequency that lies in frequency range 2.
  • the target or object is the same, which means that target signal 70 lies in frequency range 10 again.
  • interference signals 80 , 81 , 82 are easy to detect and remove. It may therefore be easily determined that the only target or object lies in frequency range 10.
  • the newly calculated signal which is generated by analysis device 60 from the data of first radar sub-sensor 30 and second radar sub-sensor 50 , for instance, may have a measured value (unequal to zero) only in the particular frequency ranges in which both the first radar sub-sensor 30 and the second radar sub-sensor 50 measures or detects a measured value.
  • the difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is at least such that the switching frequencies lie in different frequency ranges (also known as bins) of radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 .
  • the first switching frequency and/or the second switching frequency may be varied over time. This makes it possible to obtain further information from the received signals or the data of radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 .
  • first radar sub-sensor 30 and second radar sub-sensor 50 overlaps at least partially and in particular completely, so that the same object or target is detected by both radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 .
  • Interference signals 80 , 81 , 82 are also able to be detected during a transmission with the aid of the two radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 .
  • first radar sub-sensor 30 initially emits a radar signal and then a radar signal is emitted by second radar sub-sensor 50 .
  • Interference signals 80 , 81 , 82 now have different frequencies on or in the transmitted signals of the two radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 , in particular different frequencies that lie in different frequency ranges of respective radar sub-sensors 30 , 50 .
  • First switching controller 20 and second switching controller 40 may be supplied by a common clock source 90 .
  • radar sensor system 10 may be developed in a particularly cost-effective manner.
  • radar sensor system 10 may be used in a motor vehicle such as a car, a motorcycle, a bus, a ship and/or a truck.
  • radar sensor system 10 may be used for the highly automated driving or driverless driving.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, in particular in a motor vehicle, the first radar sub-sensor being supplied with voltage by a first switching controller, and the second radar sub-sensor being supplied with voltage by a second switching controller, and the method includes the following steps: Operating the first switching controller at a first switching frequency; and operating the second switching controller at a second switching frequency, the first switching frequency differing from the second switching frequency.

Description

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of German Patent Application No. DE 102018206532.2 filed on Apr. 27, 2018, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference it its entirety.
FIELD
The present invention relates to a method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and to a radar sensor system which includes a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Radar sensors are currently installed in many motor vehicles. For example, the radar sensors can determine the distance between one motor vehicle and another motor vehicle located in front of said motor vehicle and/or the velocity of the motor vehicle. In addition, the radar sensors can examine and detect the environment of the motor vehicle.
The motor vehicles often have more than one radar sensor. A problem in the conventional radar sensors in motor vehicles is that the switching frequency at which a switching controller for the supply of the radar sensors is operated in a motor vehicle may lead to interference signals in the radar signals. The interference signals could result in incorrect assumptions about the environment of the motor vehicle inasmuch as the interference signals could be interpreted as reflections of (supposedly present) objects in the environment of the motor vehicle (also known as ghost targets).
SUMMARY
Specific example embodiments of the present invention may advantageously provide a method and a system by which, or in which, a plurality of radar sub-sensors is able to be operated and interference signals may be efficiently suppressed.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, a method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, in particular in a motor vehicle, is provided, the first radar sub-sensor being supplied with voltage by a first switching controller and the second radar sub-sensor being supplied with voltage by a second switching controller, and the present method includes the following steps: Operating the first switching controller at a first switching frequency; and operating the second switching controller at a second switching frequency, the first switching frequency differing from the second switching frequency.
One advantage of this is that interference signals that are created by the respective switching controller are technically easily identifiable because the interference signals occur at frequencies that differ from one another. As a result, the environment, e.g., the presence of objects in the environment of the vehicle, the velocity and/or the distance of objects from the vehicle, is able to be detected in an especially reliable manner with the aid of the two radar sub-sensors. More specifically, additional ghost targets caused by the switching controller principle, are able to be effectively detected.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, a radar sensor system is provided which includes a first radar sub-sensor, a second radar sub-sensor, a first switching controller for the supply of voltage to the first radar sub-sensor, and a second switching controller for the supply of voltage to the second radar sub-sensor, the first switching controller being operable at a first switching frequency and the second switching controller being operable at a second switching frequency, the first switching frequency differing from the second switching frequency.
This offers the advantage that interference signals generated by the switching controllers are able to be identified in a technically uncomplicated manner with the aid of the radar sensor system, because the interference signals occur at frequencies that differ from one another. Thus, the environment, e.g., the presence of objects in the environment of the vehicle, the velocity, and/or the distance of objects from the vehicle, is able to be detected in a particularly reliable manner with the aid of the radar sensor system. More specifically, additional ghost targets caused by the switching controller principle are able to be effectively detected and/or suppressed.
Ideas in connection with specific embodiments of the present invention may be considered to be based on, among others, the ideas and realizations described in the following text.
According to one specific embodiment of the present method, received signals from the radar sub-sensors are subdivided into a plurality of frequency ranges, and the difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is such that the first switching frequency lies in a first frequency range of the frequency ranges and the second switching frequency lies in a second frequency range of the frequency ranges, which differs from the first frequency range. This makes it possible to detect the interference signals in a technically especially uncomplicated and rapid manner.
According to one specific embodiment of the present method, a first radar signal of a first range is received by the first radar sub-sensor, and a second radar signal of a second range, which at least partially overlaps with the first range, is received by the second radar sub-sensor, a newly calculated signal being generated from the first radar signal and the second radar signal, and the newly calculated signal having a measured value only in frequency ranges in which both the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value. This is advantageous insofar as the interference signals are particularly easy to detect during the receiving with the aid of the two radar sub-sensors, since the interference signals occur or are present in different frequency ranges (also called bins).
According to one specific embodiment of the present method, a first radar signal is initially transmitted using the first radar sub-sensor, and a second radar signal is then emitted using the second radar sub-sensor, and one frequency or multiple frequencies that is/are not in agreement, and in particular is/are unequal to a carrier frequency of the radar sub-sensors, may be detected as interference frequencies during the transmission by the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor. This offers the advantage that the interference signals are detectable in a technically particularly simple manner during the transmission of radar signals using the two radar sub-sensors, the reason being that the interference signals, which occur in the evaluated spectrum in what is termed side lines, exhibit a temporal offset from one another at different frequencies. The first radar signal and the second radar signal may have an identical frequency swing.
According to one specific embodiment of the present invention, the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency are derived from a shared clock source. This allows the present method to be carried out in a technically even simpler and particularly cost-effective manner.
According to one specific embodiment of the present invention, the first switching frequency and/or the second switching frequency is/are varied over time. One advantage of this is that the interference signals may be identified as interference signals even more easily, for instance because the differentiation between reflections of actually existing objects and interference signals is able to be carried out in a more reliable manner.
According to one specific embodiment of the radar sensor system, received signals of the radar sub-sensors are subdivided into a plurality of frequency ranges, and the difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is such that the first switching frequency lies in a first frequency range of the frequency ranges and the second switching frequency lies in a second frequency range of the frequency ranges, which differs from the first frequency range. In this way, the interference signals are detectable in a technically especially simple and rapid manner.
According to one specific embodiment of the radar sensor system, the radar sensor system furthermore has a clock source, and both the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency are derived from the clock source. This makes it possible to develop the radar sensor system in a technically particularly simple manner.
According to one specific embodiment of the radar sensor system, the radar sensor system also includes an analysis device; the analysis device is developed to generate a newly calculated signal from the received signals of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor in order to cancel interference signals to the effect that the newly calculated signal has a measured value only in frequency ranges in which both the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value. This makes it possible in a technically simple manner to generate the newly calculated signal in which only few or even no interference signals are present any longer. Thus, the newly calculated signal represents the environment that was detected by the radar sub-sensors in a particularly reliable manner. More specifically, ghost targets caused by the switching controller principle are effectively identifiable.
A measured value may particularly be a measured value that is not equal to zero.
It is pointed out that a few of the possible features and advantages of the present invention have been described here with reference to different specific embodiments of the present method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor or the radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor. One skilled in the art will understand that the features are able to be suitably combined, adapted or exchanged in order to arrive at further specific embodiments of the present invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Below, specific embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the figures, and neither the figures nor the description are to be interpreted as a limitation of the present invention.
FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a specific embodiment of the radar sensor system according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of the first radar sub-sensor of the radar sensor system from FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of the second radar sub-sensor of the radar sensor system from FIG. 1.
The figures are merely schematic and not true to scale. Matching reference numerals in the figures denote identical features or features that have the same effect.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a specific embodiment of radar sensor system 10 according to the present invention. Radar sensor system 10 includes a first radar sub-sensor 30 and a second radar sub-sensor 50. First radar sub-sensor 30 includes two first high- frequency components 35, 36. Second radar sub-sensor 50 includes two second high- frequency components 55, 56.
The two radar sub-sensors 30, 50 may be sub-sensors of a larger radar sensor. For example, the two radar sub-sensors 30, 50 are situated on a shared circuit board. However, it is also possible that radar sub-sensors 30, 50 are two radar sensors which are situated on different circuit boards.
In addition, radar sensor system 10 includes a first switching controller 20 and a second switching controller 40. Moreover, radar sensor system 10 includes an analysis device 60, which is able to receive signals from the two radar sub-sensors 30, 50 and possibly from switching controllers 20, 40.
Switching controllers 20, 40 supply voltage to the two radar sub-sensors 30, 50. First switching controller 20 supplies voltage to first radar sub-sensor 30. Second switching controller 40 supplies voltage to second radar sub-sensor 50.
First switching controller 20 and/or second switching controller 40 may be buck controllers or step-down controllers. Switching controllers 20, 40, for example, may have 12V as the input voltage and 5V as the output voltage.
First switching controller 20 is operated or switched at a first switching frequency. Second switching controller 40 is operated or switched at a second switching frequency.
The two switching frequencies differ from each other, i.e. they have values that differ from each other. For example, first switching controller 20 is operated at a switching frequency of 1.8 MHz and second switching controller 40 is operated at a switching frequency of 1.7 MHz, or vice versa.
A radar signal emitted by respective radar sub-sensor 30, 50 has a predefined frequency bandwidth. The received signal or baseband receive signal received by radar sub-sensors 30, 50 is subdivided or split up into a plurality of frequency ranges, e.g., 100 or 10.
FIG. 2 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of first radar sub-sensor 30 of radar sensor system 10 of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 shows a diagram of data received with the aid of second radar sub-sensor 50 of radar sensor system 10 of FIG. 1. The received data are reflection data, in particular.
The x-axis in FIGS. 2 and 3 indicates the respective frequency range, and lower numbers indicate a lower frequency and higher numbers indicate a higher frequency. The frequency ranges are disjunctive and directly abut each other.
The y-axis in FIGS. 2 and 3 indicates the strength of the respective measured value. The magnitude of the measured values in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 are of equal size. However, this is only for illustrative purposes. Target signal 70, i.e., the signal or the measured value of an actually present target or object, normally has a considerably higher or stronger measured value than interference signals 80, 81, 82. Interference signals 80, 81, 82 or the measured values of interference signals 80, 81, 82 usually have a deviation of −30 dB, for example, compared to target signal 70 or the measured value of target signal 70.
First radar sub-sensor 30, whose received signal can be seen in FIG. 2, is operated or supplied with voltage by first switching controller 20, first switching controller 20 being driven or actuated using the first switching frequency, which lies in frequency range 1. First radar sensor 30 therefore has an interference signal 80 in frequency range 1.
The object or target that is actually present and generates a target signal 70 in FIG. 2, is measured or detected in frequency range 10. In addition, interference signals 81, 82 or measured values occur around target signal 70, i.e. at a distance from the frequency range of target signal 70, the distance corresponding to the frequency range in which the frequency at which first switching controller 20 is operated lies.
This means that the first switching frequency lies in frequency range 1, that an interference signal 81, 82 or a measured value of interference signal 81, 82 occurs in frequency range 9 (=10−1) and in frequency range 11 (=10+1).
Second radar sub-sensor 50, whose received signal can be seen in FIG. 3, is supplied with voltage by second switching controller 40, second switching controller 40 being driven or actuated using a second switching frequency that differs from the first switching frequency. The second switching frequency has a frequency that lies in frequency range 2.
The target or object is the same, which means that target signal 70 lies in frequency range 10 again. As described above, interference signals 81, 82 or the measured values of interference signals 81, 82, occur at a distance from the frequency range of target signal 70 in which the second switching frequency lies. This means that, because the second switching frequency lies in frequency range 2, interference signals 81, 82 occur in frequency ranges 8 (=10−2) and 12 (=10+2).
Through an analysis of the received signals from first radar sub-sensor 30 and second radar sub-sensor 50 and the determination of the frequency ranges in which a measured value is present in each case, e.g., with the aid of an analysis device 60, interference signals 80, 81, 82 are easy to detect and remove. It may therefore be easily determined that the only target or object lies in frequency range 10.
The newly calculated signal, which is generated by analysis device 60 from the data of first radar sub-sensor 30 and second radar sub-sensor 50, for instance, may have a measured value (unequal to zero) only in the particular frequency ranges in which both the first radar sub-sensor 30 and the second radar sub-sensor 50 measures or detects a measured value. In the process, it is particularly also possible to consider the strength of the respective measured value and, for example, to consider only frequency ranges whose measured values lie above a minimum threshold value.
The difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is at least such that the switching frequencies lie in different frequency ranges (also known as bins) of radar sub-sensors 30, 50.
The first switching frequency and/or the second switching frequency may be varied over time. This makes it possible to obtain further information from the received signals or the data of radar sub-sensors 30, 50.
The range that is monitored or detected by first radar sub-sensor 30 and second radar sub-sensor 50 overlaps at least partially and in particular completely, so that the same object or target is detected by both radar sub-sensors 30, 50.
Interference signals 80, 81, 82 are also able to be detected during a transmission with the aid of the two radar sub-sensors 30, 50. Toward this end, first radar sub-sensor 30 initially emits a radar signal and then a radar signal is emitted by second radar sub-sensor 50. Interference signals 80, 81, 82 now have different frequencies on or in the transmitted signals of the two radar sub-sensors 30, 50, in particular different frequencies that lie in different frequency ranges of respective radar sub-sensors 30, 50.
First switching controller 20 and second switching controller 40 may be supplied by a common clock source 90.
Since it is at least partly and in particular completely possible to use the same digital lines for the supply of the first switching frequency to first switching controller 20 and for the supply of the second switching frequency to second switching controller 40, radar sensor system 10 may be developed in a particularly cost-effective manner.
For example, radar sensor system 10 may be used in a motor vehicle such as a car, a motorcycle, a bus, a ship and/or a truck. In particular, radar sensor system 10 may be used for the highly automated driving or driverless driving.
In closing, it should be mentioned that the expressions such as “have”, “includes”, etc. do not exclude other elements or steps, and terms such as “a” or “an” do not exclude a plurality. Reference numerals in the claims are not to be interpreted as a limitation.

Claims (8)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor of a radar sensor system in a motor vehicle, the method comprising:
operating a first switching controller of the radar sensor system at a first switching frequency, wherein the first radar sub-sensor is supplied with voltage by the first switching controller; and
operating a second switching controller of the radar sensor system at a second switching frequency, wherein the second radar sub-sensor is supplied with voltage by the second switching controller; and
generating a newly calculated signal from the received signals of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor for a cancelation of interference signals such that the newly calculated signal has a measured value only in frequency ranges in which both the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value;
wherein the first switching frequency differs from the second switching frequency, and
wherein the first switching frequency and the second frequency are derived from a clock source in the radar sensor system, and
wherein the interference signals are detectable during a transmission with the two radar sub-sensors, wherein the first radar sub-sensor initially emits a radar signal and then a radar signal is emitted by the second radar sub-sensor, so that the interference signals have different frequencies on or in the transmitted signals of the two radar sub-sensors, and wherein different frequencies lie in different frequency ranges of the respective radar sub-sensors, and
wherein it is determined that a target or object lies in the frequency range.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein received signals of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor are subdivided into a plurality of frequency ranges, and a difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is so great that the first switching frequency lies in a first frequency range of the frequency ranges and the second switching frequency lies in a second frequency range of the frequency ranges that differs from the first frequency range.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein a first radar signal of a first range is received with the first radar sub-sensor, and a second radar signal of a second range, which at least partially overlaps with the first range, is received with the second radar sub-sensor, and a newly calculated signal is generated from the first radar signal and the second radar signal, the newly calculated signal having a measured value only in frequency ranges in which the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value.
4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein a first radar signal is initially output with the first radar sub-sensor, and then a second radar signal is output with the second radar sub-sensor, and at least one frequency that is not in agreement, which is unequal to a carrier frequency of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor, is detected as an interference frequency during transmission of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the clock source is a shared clock source.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first switching frequency and/or the second switching frequency is varied over time.
7. A radar sensor system, comprising:
a first radar sub-sensor;
a second radar sub-sensor;
a first switching controller to supply voltage to the first radar sub-sensor;
a second switching controller to supply voltage to the second radar sub-sensor;
an analysis device to generate a newly calculated signal from the received signals of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor for a cancelation of interference signals such that the newly calculated signal has a measured value only in frequency ranges in which both the first radar signal and the second radar signal have a measured value; and
a clock source;
wherein the first switching controller is operable at a first switching frequency, and the second switching controller is operable at a second switching frequency, and
wherein the first switching frequency differs from the second switching frequency,
wherein the first switching frequency and the second frequency are derived from the clock source of the radar sensor system,
wherein the interference signals are detectable during a transmission with the two radar sub-sensors, wherein the first radar sub-sensor initially emits a radar signal and then a radar signal is emitted by the second radar sub-sensor, so that the interference signals have different frequencies on or in the transmitted signals of the two radar sub-sensors, and wherein different frequencies lie in different frequency ranges of the respective radar sub-sensors, and
wherein it is determined that a target or object lies in the frequency range.
8. The radar sensor system as recited in claim 7, wherein received signals of the first radar sub-sensor and the second radar sub-sensor are subdivided into a plurality of frequency ranges in each case, and a difference between the first switching frequency and the second switching frequency is such that the first switching frequency lies in a first frequency range of the frequency ranges, and the second switching frequency lies in a second frequency range of the frequency ranges that differs from the first frequency range.
US16/378,911 2018-04-27 2019-04-09 Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor Active 2040-01-30 US11099271B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102018206532.2A DE102018206532A1 (en) 2018-04-27 2018-04-27 A method of operating a first radar part sensor and a second radar part sensor and radar sensor system comprising a first radar part sensor and a second radar part sensor
DE102018206532.2 2018-04-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190331787A1 US20190331787A1 (en) 2019-10-31
US11099271B2 true US11099271B2 (en) 2021-08-24

Family

ID=68205468

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/378,911 Active 2040-01-30 US11099271B2 (en) 2018-04-27 2019-04-09 Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US11099271B2 (en)
CN (1) CN110412517B (en)
DE (1) DE102018206532A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102018206532A1 (en) * 2018-04-27 2019-10-31 Robert Bosch Gmbh A method of operating a first radar part sensor and a second radar part sensor and radar sensor system comprising a first radar part sensor and a second radar part sensor

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7012560B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2006-03-14 Robert Bosch Gmbh Object sensing apparatus
US20080084346A1 (en) * 2006-10-05 2008-04-10 Jurgen Minichshofer Radar system having a plurality of range measurement zones
US20080278370A1 (en) * 2007-05-09 2008-11-13 Rudolf Lachner Rf-frontend for a radar system
US20090251356A1 (en) * 2008-04-04 2009-10-08 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. Dual-band antenna array and rf front-end for automotive radars
US20130257643A1 (en) * 2012-04-03 2013-10-03 Honda Elesys Co., Ltd. Radar apparatus, on-board radar system, and program
US20160131740A1 (en) * 2014-11-12 2016-05-12 Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for controlling power of vehicle radar
US20170153315A1 (en) * 2014-05-26 2017-06-01 Denso Corporation In-vehicle radar apparatus
US20180149735A1 (en) * 2016-11-28 2018-05-31 Mando Corporation Radar apparatus with multi-input multi-output antenna
US20180284258A1 (en) * 2017-04-04 2018-10-04 Infineon Technologies Ag Method and device for processing radar signals
US20190056477A1 (en) * 2017-08-18 2019-02-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Efficient non-interfering multi-radar transmission scheme
US20190086509A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Synchronization of multiple radars start up time for interference mitigation
US20190331787A1 (en) * 2018-04-27 2019-10-31 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor
US20210072364A1 (en) * 2018-05-29 2021-03-11 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method and device for determining vehicle parameters

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2808545C2 (en) * 1978-02-28 1984-10-25 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Combined radar and communications equipment
FR2757639B1 (en) * 1996-12-20 1999-03-26 Thomson Csf RADAR FOR DETECTING OBSTACLES IN PARTICULAR FOR MOTOR VEHICLES
DE102012209870A1 (en) * 2012-06-13 2013-12-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh DETERMINATION OF A CROSS-REFERENCE INDICATOR FOR AN OBJECT
DE102012212888A1 (en) * 2012-07-23 2014-01-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Detection of radar objects with a radar sensor of a motor vehicle
KR102137932B1 (en) * 2013-06-12 2020-07-27 현대모비스 주식회사 Apparatus for canceling frequency interference by switching frequency of SMPS
DE102015119482A1 (en) * 2015-11-11 2017-05-11 Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. radar sensor
DE102016004305A1 (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 Audi Ag Motor vehicle with a plurality of radar sensors arranged at different installation positions and method for operating a plurality of radar sensors arranged at different installation positions of a motor vehicle

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7012560B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2006-03-14 Robert Bosch Gmbh Object sensing apparatus
US20080084346A1 (en) * 2006-10-05 2008-04-10 Jurgen Minichshofer Radar system having a plurality of range measurement zones
US20080278370A1 (en) * 2007-05-09 2008-11-13 Rudolf Lachner Rf-frontend for a radar system
US20090251356A1 (en) * 2008-04-04 2009-10-08 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. Dual-band antenna array and rf front-end for automotive radars
US20130257643A1 (en) * 2012-04-03 2013-10-03 Honda Elesys Co., Ltd. Radar apparatus, on-board radar system, and program
US20170153315A1 (en) * 2014-05-26 2017-06-01 Denso Corporation In-vehicle radar apparatus
US20160131740A1 (en) * 2014-11-12 2016-05-12 Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for controlling power of vehicle radar
US20180149735A1 (en) * 2016-11-28 2018-05-31 Mando Corporation Radar apparatus with multi-input multi-output antenna
US20180284258A1 (en) * 2017-04-04 2018-10-04 Infineon Technologies Ag Method and device for processing radar signals
US20190056477A1 (en) * 2017-08-18 2019-02-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Efficient non-interfering multi-radar transmission scheme
US20190086509A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Synchronization of multiple radars start up time for interference mitigation
US20190331787A1 (en) * 2018-04-27 2019-10-31 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor
US20210072364A1 (en) * 2018-05-29 2021-03-11 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method and device for determining vehicle parameters

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110412517B (en) 2024-05-17
US20190331787A1 (en) 2019-10-31
CN110412517A (en) 2019-11-05
DE102018206532A1 (en) 2019-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11079471B2 (en) Apparatus and method for cancelling interference signals
US11085994B2 (en) Radar signal processing
US10379201B2 (en) Radar interference mitigation and collaborative operation
CN103245946B (en) Trailer-mounted radar device
US10234541B2 (en) FMCW radar device
US8130138B2 (en) Object detecting apparatus
JP2017003347A (en) Object detection device and object detection method
CN106537182B (en) Vehicle-mounted radar device and reporting system
JP4931956B2 (en) In-vehicle radio wave radar system
US9134417B2 (en) Obstacle determination device
US20170363712A1 (en) Radar signal processing device and method
CN111257880B (en) Radar and target detection method
WO2010143513A1 (en) Object detection method
US20100225521A1 (en) Object detecting apparatus for vehicle
US11099271B2 (en) Method for operating a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor, and radar sensor system including a first radar sub-sensor and a second radar sub-sensor
US10585182B2 (en) Velocity measurement with asymmetric doppler spectrum
US9647648B2 (en) Signal processor
US20170242098A1 (en) Radar Apparatus
US8188909B2 (en) Observation signal processing apparatus
JP2013221893A (en) Radar control device
US20210311164A1 (en) Radar system with balancing of the receiving channels over a plurality of radar chips
JP2007093542A (en) Method and instrument for measuring position
KR102216134B1 (en) CFAR detector method and radar system for applying to the CFAR detector
JP2014145709A (en) Pulse radar device
WO2023058559A1 (en) Information processing device, object tracking device, tracking method, and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAYER, MARCEL;BAUR, KLAUS;SCHOOR, MICHAEL;SIGNING DATES FROM 20190703 TO 20190725;REEL/FRAME:050179/0667

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE