US10404094B2 - System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system - Google Patents

System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US10404094B2
US10404094B2 US15/151,167 US201615151167A US10404094B2 US 10404094 B2 US10404094 B2 US 10404094B2 US 201615151167 A US201615151167 A US 201615151167A US 10404094 B2 US10404094 B2 US 10404094B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
inductors
power
load
pair
loads
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US15/151,167
Other versions
US20160336796A1 (en
Inventor
Terry D. Bush
Charles F. Blair
Gregg J. Nelson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vertiv Corp
Original Assignee
Vertiv Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vertiv Corp filed Critical Vertiv Corp
Priority to US15/151,167 priority Critical patent/US10404094B2/en
Priority to CN201680027082.6A priority patent/CN107580739B/en
Priority to PCT/US2016/031782 priority patent/WO2016183151A1/en
Priority to EP16724573.7A priority patent/EP3295535B1/en
Assigned to LIEBERT CORPORATION reassignment LIEBERT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BLAIR, CHARLES F., BUSH, TERRY D., NELSON, GREGG J.
Publication of US20160336796A1 publication Critical patent/US20160336796A1/en
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ASCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., AVOCENT CORPORATION, AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC, AVOCENT HUNTSVILLE, LLC, AVOCENT REDMOND CORP., EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC., LIEBERT CORPORATION, LIEBERT NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ASCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., AVOCENT CORPORATION, AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC, AVOCENT HUNTSVILLE, LLC, AVOCENT REDMOND CORP., EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC., LIEBERT CORPORATION, LIEBERT NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Assigned to Vertiv Corporation reassignment Vertiv Corporation CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LIEBERT CORPORATION
Assigned to THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. reassignment THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC., Vertiv Corporation, VERTIV ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC., VERTIV NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Publication of US10404094B2 publication Critical patent/US10404094B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to VERTIV CORPORATION (F/K/A EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC.), VERTIV CORPORATION (F/K/A LIEBERT CORPORATION), VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT CORPORATION), VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC), VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT HUNTSVILLE, LLC), VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT REDMOND CORP.) reassignment VERTIV CORPORATION (F/K/A EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC.) RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Assigned to Vertiv Corporation, VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC., ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC. reassignment Vertiv Corporation RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY N.A.
Assigned to CITIBANK, N.A. reassignment CITIBANK, N.A. SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC., ENERGY LABS, INC., Vertiv Corporation, VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC.
Assigned to UMB BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment UMB BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC., ENERGY LABS, INC., Vertiv Corporation, VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC.
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J9/00Circuit arrangements for emergency or stand-by power supply, e.g. for emergency lighting
    • H02J9/04Circuit arrangements for emergency or stand-by power supply, e.g. for emergency lighting in which the distribution system is disconnected from the normal source and connected to a standby source
    • H02J9/06Circuit arrangements for emergency or stand-by power supply, e.g. for emergency lighting in which the distribution system is disconnected from the normal source and connected to a standby source with automatic change-over, e.g. UPS systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/38Arrangements for parallely feeding a single network by two or more generators, converters or transformers

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to uninterruptible power supply (“UPS”) systems, and more particularly to a system and method for sharing power in a static, multiple UPS system that enables a bus fault, or a fault of one of the UPSs, to be isolated, while still enabling the remaining UPSs to power the load associated with the UPS that has failed.
  • UPS uninterruptible power supply
  • any load sharing system there must necessarily be a “common” electrical bus which provides the path for current to flow between UPS modules and their respective loads.
  • this common bus is a single electrical bus with an inductor connected between each of the UPS modules and the common bus. The inductor can accomplish two things.
  • a new load sharing system which provides both the ability to isolate the UPSs in the event of a fault on the common bus, as well as to still enable a load to be powered when a given one of the UPSs associated with the load fails, provided that the overall power capacity available from the remaining UPSs is not exceeded, would thus provide both of the above described important features in one load sharing system.
  • the present disclosure relates to a load sharing system comprising a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the plurality of power supplies is associated with at least one of the loads for powering its associated load.
  • the system further includes a power bus.
  • a plurality of inductors is connected to the power bus. Each one of the plurality of inductors is further connected to at least one of the loads and to at least one of the power supplies, such that each adjacent pair of the inductors is connected in parallel relative to at least one of the loads.
  • Each of the inductors has an inductance value sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus, each inductor operates to isolate the power supplies from the power bus.
  • the inductance value further is such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific pair of inductors coupled in parallel to the one of the loads associated with the failed power supply allows the one load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the specific pair of inductors.
  • the present disclosure relates to a load sharing system comprising a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the plurality of power supplies is associated with a given one of the loads for powering its associated load.
  • the system further comprises a first power bus and a second power bus.
  • a plurality of inductors is connected to the first and second power busses and to the loads.
  • the plurality of inductors is further configured in pairs such that each pair of inductors is coupled to an associated one of the loads and to an associated one of the power supplies.
  • Each pair of inductors forms a parallel coupled pair of inductors relative to its associated load and to its associated power supply.
  • Each of the inductors has an inductance value such that if a fault develops on the power bus, each inductor operates to isolate the power supplies from the power bus.
  • the inductance value further is such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific pair of inductors associated with the load of the failed power supply allows the load associated with the failed power supply to draw power from the power bus through the specific pair of inductors to power the load associated with the failed power supply.
  • the present disclosure relates to a method for load sharing that comprises using a plurality of power supplies to power a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the plurality of power supplies is associated with at least one of the loads for powering its associated load.
  • the method further involves using a power bus.
  • the method further involves configuring pairs of inductors in parallel relative to each load and relative to each power supply, and further such that each pair of inductors is associated with a given one of the loads and a given one of the power supplies.
  • the method further involves configuring the pairs of inductors to be in communication with the power bus and selecting a common value of inductance for each of the inductors.
  • the common value of inductance is selected to be sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus, at least one inductor of each pair of inductors operates to isolate its associated power supply from the power bus.
  • the inductance value is further such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the one pair of inductors coupled in parallel to the one of the loads associated with the failed power supply allows the one load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the one pair of inductors.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic showing a prior art load sharing system where a plurality of UPSs are each supplying power to a load, with each UPS being tied to a common bus, and with an inductor positioned between each UPS and the common bus;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing of one embodiment of a load sharing system in accordance with the present disclosure, and where the system incorporates a dual bus with pairs of inductors coupled between the busses and the input side of each load; and
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic drawing of another embodiment of a load sharing system in accordance with the present disclosure in which a plurality of inductors are arranged in a “ring” configuration, to segment a single common bus into a plurality of sections.
  • a static load sharing system 10 is shown in accordance with a first embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the UPS modules 16 a - 16 d connected to each common bus 12 and 14 with separate pairs of inductors 18 a 1 , 18 a 2 through 18 d 1 - 18 d 2 coupled in parallel to an input side of each load. If the inductor 18 a - 18 d value is chosen appropriately, a fault on either one of the common busses 12 or 14 will limit the fault current and avoid dropping the UPS load just as in the prior art design shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the common busses 12 and 14 are fully separate and independent busses, there will not be any additional fault current flowing through the inductor 18 a - 18 d connected to the other bus 12 or 14 .
  • an individual UPS module 16 a - 16 d fails and goes off line, current will flow from the remaining UPS modules through both of the inductors 18 associated with its load, and thus provide current to the load of the failed UPS.
  • UPS module 16 b was to fail, then current would flow from the remaining UPS modules through both busses 12 and 14 and through both inductors 18 b 1 and 18 b 2 to the load associated with UPS module 16 b .
  • each of the inductor pairs 18 a 1 / 18 a 2 , 18 b 1 / 18 b 2 , 18 c 1 / 18 c 2 and 18 d 1 / 18 d 2 is configured in parallel, relative to its associated load, and the resulting pair of inductors behaves like an inductor of 1 ⁇ 2 the impedance of either of its pair of inductors (e.g., 1 ⁇ 2 the impedance of either 18 b 1 or 18 b 2 in this example). This compensates for the inherent 2 to 1 difference between the two different desired inductor values of the prior art design ( FIG.
  • FIG. 3 shows a static load sharing system 100 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • a single common bus 102 is tied to each of the UPS modules 104 a - 104 d .
  • Inductors 106 a - 106 d are not connected between a given one of the UPS modules 104 a - 104 d and the common bus 102 , but rather are connected between each adjacent pair of UPS modules in a “ring” configuration. This is in contrast to the prior art design of FIG. 1 , which instead has the inductors connected in a “star” configuration.
  • inductors 106 a - 106 d there are typically two ones of the inductors 106 a - 106 d that provide a path for current to the load associated with the failed UPS. And since these two ones of the inductors 106 a - 106 d are effectively in parallel, they exhibit only 1 ⁇ 2 the impedance of a single inductor. For example, if UPS 104 b was to fail, then current would still be supplied to the load associated with UPS 104 b through inductors 106 a and 106 b . Since these two inductors 106 a and 106 b are effectively in parallel (as seen by the load), they will collectively present only 1 ⁇ 2 the impedance that each would otherwise provide by itself.
  • the common frequency droop method of power sharing may be implemented in analog or digital hardware circuitry or firmware in microprocessor or DSP based controls.
  • the common bus configuration shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 as well as the inductor components used in these embodiments, may be implemented using standard electrical components and standard power distribution equipment.
  • the various embodiments of the present disclosure provide a significant advantage over prior art methods of power sharing in static, multiple UPS systems.
  • the various embodiments can each simultaneously provide effective load sharing between multiple UPS modules, maintain all loads during loss of any one UPS module, provide isolation between UPS modules such that a fault on one UPS module does not affect proper operation of any other UPS, and provide isolation between UPS modules and the common load sharing bus so that no loads are lost during a fault on the common bus.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Inverter Devices (AREA)
  • Stand-By Power Supply Arrangements (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a load sharing system having a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the power supplies is associated with at least one of the loads. A power bus is also provided. A plurality of inductors is connected to the power bus. Each one of the inductors is further connected to at least one of the loads and to at least one of the power supplies, such that each adjacent pair of the inductors is connected in parallel relative to at least one of the loads. Each of the inductors has an inductance value sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus it serves to isolate the power supplies from the power bus. The inductance value further is such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific pair of inductors coupled in parallel to the load associated with the failed power supply allows the load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the specific pair of inductors.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/160,973, filed on May 13, 2015. The entire disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD
The present disclosure relates to uninterruptible power supply (“UPS”) systems, and more particularly to a system and method for sharing power in a static, multiple UPS system that enables a bus fault, or a fault of one of the UPSs, to be isolated, while still enabling the remaining UPSs to power the load associated with the UPS that has failed.
BACKGROUND
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Existing prior art UPS load sharing systems are typically designed to meet one of two important criteria, but not both. The first is that the load sharing system needs to provide an effective way to share load between UPS modules so that the failure of one UPS module does not allow any load in the system to be dropped. The second is that the load sharing system be designed so that it can provide an effective means of isolating UPS modules from each other, to thus ensure that a fault on the electrical distribution bus which the UPS modules are coupled to will not allow any load to be dropped. However, as noted above, present day load sharing systems cannot provide both of these features at the same time.
The above described limitation is illustrated in the prior art load sharing system shown in FIG. 1. In any load sharing system there must necessarily be a “common” electrical bus which provides the path for current to flow between UPS modules and their respective loads. There may also be a number of reactive impedance components connected between the UPS modules and the common bus. The reactive components allow current to flow therethrough based on an AC voltage phase difference between the UPS modules which is controlled by a well-known and understood “frequency droop” method of power load sharing between AC sources. In prior art load sharing systems, this common bus is a single electrical bus with an inductor connected between each of the UPS modules and the common bus. The inductor can accomplish two things. Firstly, in the event of a fault on the common bus, if the inductor impedance is large enough, it can provide sufficient isolation between the UPS modules so that the fault current does not cause the UPS to exceed its current limit and lose the output voltage to the load. Secondly, in the case of a failed UPS module that goes off line, if the inductor impedance is small enough, it can allow sufficient current flow from the remaining UPS modules to the failed UPS module bus to support the load. The unfortunate limitation of this system is that it cannot provide both features at the same time. If the inductor is large enough to provide the isolation required during a common bus fault, then its impedance will be too large to allow the current flow needed to support the load of a failed UPS module. In fact, there is approximately a 2 to 1 difference between the two desired inductor values. The user of this system must therefore decide which feature is more important. The only alternative with the prior art load sharing system of FIG. 1 is to severely limit the UPS load to a point where both features can eventually be obtained. But this choice comes at a great cost penalty since the UPS modules must be used far below their rated capacity.
A new load sharing system which provides both the ability to isolate the UPSs in the event of a fault on the common bus, as well as to still enable a load to be powered when a given one of the UPSs associated with the load fails, provided that the overall power capacity available from the remaining UPSs is not exceeded, would thus provide both of the above described important features in one load sharing system.
SUMMARY
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
In one aspect the present disclosure relates to a load sharing system comprising a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the plurality of power supplies is associated with at least one of the loads for powering its associated load. The system further includes a power bus. A plurality of inductors is connected to the power bus. Each one of the plurality of inductors is further connected to at least one of the loads and to at least one of the power supplies, such that each adjacent pair of the inductors is connected in parallel relative to at least one of the loads. Each of the inductors has an inductance value sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus, each inductor operates to isolate the power supplies from the power bus. The inductance value further is such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific pair of inductors coupled in parallel to the one of the loads associated with the failed power supply allows the one load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the specific pair of inductors.
In another aspect the present disclosure relates to a load sharing system comprising a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the plurality of power supplies is associated with a given one of the loads for powering its associated load. The system further comprises a first power bus and a second power bus. A plurality of inductors is connected to the first and second power busses and to the loads. The plurality of inductors is further configured in pairs such that each pair of inductors is coupled to an associated one of the loads and to an associated one of the power supplies. Each pair of inductors forms a parallel coupled pair of inductors relative to its associated load and to its associated power supply. Each of the inductors has an inductance value such that if a fault develops on the power bus, each inductor operates to isolate the power supplies from the power bus. The inductance value further is such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific pair of inductors associated with the load of the failed power supply allows the load associated with the failed power supply to draw power from the power bus through the specific pair of inductors to power the load associated with the failed power supply.
In still another aspect the present disclosure relates to a method for load sharing that comprises using a plurality of power supplies to power a plurality of corresponding loads. Each one of the plurality of power supplies is associated with at least one of the loads for powering its associated load. The method further involves using a power bus. The method further involves configuring pairs of inductors in parallel relative to each load and relative to each power supply, and further such that each pair of inductors is associated with a given one of the loads and a given one of the power supplies. The method further involves configuring the pairs of inductors to be in communication with the power bus and selecting a common value of inductance for each of the inductors. The common value of inductance is selected to be sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus, at least one inductor of each pair of inductors operates to isolate its associated power supply from the power bus. The inductance value is further such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the one pair of inductors coupled in parallel to the one of the loads associated with the failed power supply allows the one load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the one pair of inductors.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
FIG. 1 is a schematic showing a prior art load sharing system where a plurality of UPSs are each supplying power to a load, with each UPS being tied to a common bus, and with an inductor positioned between each UPS and the common bus;
FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing of one embodiment of a load sharing system in accordance with the present disclosure, and where the system incorporates a dual bus with pairs of inductors coupled between the busses and the input side of each load; and
FIG. 3 is a schematic drawing of another embodiment of a load sharing system in accordance with the present disclosure in which a plurality of inductors are arranged in a “ring” configuration, to segment a single common bus into a plurality of sections.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
Referring to FIG. 2, a static load sharing system 10 is shown in accordance with a first embodiment of the present disclosure. In the system 10 there are two individual common busses 12 and 14, with the UPS modules 16 a-16 d connected to each common bus 12 and 14 with separate pairs of inductors 18 a 1,18 a 2 through 18 d 1-18 d 2 coupled in parallel to an input side of each load. If the inductor 18 a-18 d value is chosen appropriately, a fault on either one of the common busses 12 or 14 will limit the fault current and avoid dropping the UPS load just as in the prior art design shown in FIG. 1. Furthermore, since the common busses 12 and 14 are fully separate and independent busses, there will not be any additional fault current flowing through the inductor 18 a-18 d connected to the other bus 12 or 14. However, if an individual UPS module 16 a-16 d fails and goes off line, current will flow from the remaining UPS modules through both of the inductors 18 associated with its load, and thus provide current to the load of the failed UPS. For example, if UPS module 16 b was to fail, then current would flow from the remaining UPS modules through both busses 12 and 14 and through both inductors 18 b 1 and 18 b 2 to the load associated with UPS module 16 b. Effectively, each of the inductor pairs 18 a 1/18 a 2, 18 b 1/18 b 2, 18 c 1/18 c 2 and 18 d 1/18 d 2 is configured in parallel, relative to its associated load, and the resulting pair of inductors behaves like an inductor of ½ the impedance of either of its pair of inductors (e.g., ½ the impedance of either 18 b 1 or 18 b 2 in this example). This compensates for the inherent 2 to 1 difference between the two different desired inductor values of the prior art design (FIG. 1) and allows implementation of both of the mutually exclusive “isolation” and “power sharing” features discussed in connection with the shortcomings of the prior art design shown in FIG. 1. In this example, assuming the overall capacity of the remaining UPS modules 16 a, 16 c and 16 d is not exceeded, then the load associated with the failed UPS module 16 b would remain fully powered by the remaining UPS modules 16 a, 16 c and 16 d.
FIG. 3 shows a static load sharing system 100 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure. In the system 100 a single common bus 102 is tied to each of the UPS modules 104 a-104 d. Inductors 106 a-106 d are not connected between a given one of the UPS modules 104 a-104 d and the common bus 102, but rather are connected between each adjacent pair of UPS modules in a “ring” configuration. This is in contrast to the prior art design of FIG. 1, which instead has the inductors connected in a “star” configuration. Note in the system 100 that there is no common point that will present a possible fault event to all UPS modules 104 a-104 d of the system, as there is in the prior art design shown in FIG. 1. A fault at any one node point in the ring (i.e., along the bus 102) is still isolated from the other UPS modules 104 a-104 d by one of the inductors 106 a-106 d. And again, if the inductor value is chosen appropriately, this will effectively isolate the other UPS modules 104 a-104 d from the fault and avoid losing the load(s) associated with one or more other ones of the UPSs 104 a-104 d. Additionally, in the event of an off-line UPS module event, there are typically two ones of the inductors 106 a-106 d that provide a path for current to the load associated with the failed UPS. And since these two ones of the inductors 106 a-106 d are effectively in parallel, they exhibit only ½ the impedance of a single inductor. For example, if UPS 104 b was to fail, then current would still be supplied to the load associated with UPS 104 b through inductors 106 a and 106 b. Since these two inductors 106 a and 106 b are effectively in parallel (as seen by the load), they will collectively present only ½ the impedance that each would otherwise provide by itself. The impedance of the parallel coupled inductors 106 a/106 b is therefore sufficiently small to allow the current flow to the load associated with the failed UPS 104 b. This demonstrates that the alternative “ring bus” configuration of the system 100 provides the same advantage of the “split common bus” system 10 of FIG. 2, but at an even lower cost, since only one half the number of inductors is required, and further since only one bus is required.
The common frequency droop method of power sharing may be implemented in analog or digital hardware circuitry or firmware in microprocessor or DSP based controls. The common bus configuration shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, as well as the inductor components used in these embodiments, may be implemented using standard electrical components and standard power distribution equipment.
The various embodiments of the present disclosure provide a significant advantage over prior art methods of power sharing in static, multiple UPS systems. The various embodiments can each simultaneously provide effective load sharing between multiple UPS modules, maintain all loads during loss of any one UPS module, provide isolation between UPS modules such that a fault on one UPS module does not affect proper operation of any other UPS, and provide isolation between UPS modules and the common load sharing bus so that no loads are lost during a fault on the common bus.
While various embodiments have been described, those skilled in the art will recognize modifications or variations which might be made without departing from the present disclosure. The examples illustrate the various embodiments and are not intended to limit the present disclosure. Therefore, the description and claims should be interpreted liberally with only such limitation as is necessary in view of the pertinent prior art.

Claims (5)

What is claimed is:
1. A load sharing system comprising:
a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads, each one of the plurality of power supplies being associated with at least one of the loads for powering its associated said load;
a power bus;
a plurality of inductors each connected to the power bus at first ends thereof, each one of the plurality of inductors further being connected at second ends to one another, and further coupled at the second ends to at least one of the loads and at least one of the power supplies, such that each adjacent pair of the inductors is connected in parallel relative to the at least one of the loads and to the at least one of the power supplies; and
each of the inductors having an inductance value sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus, each said inductor operates to isolate the power supplies from the power bus; and
the inductance value further being such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific adjacent pair of the inductors coupled in parallel to the one of the loads associated with the failed power supply allows the one load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the specific adjacent pair of the inductors.
2. The load sharing system of claim 1, wherein the power bus is comprised of first and second independent power busses.
3. The load sharing system of claim 2, wherein the inductors of each said adjacent pair of the inductors are connected at the first ends thereof so that a first one of the adjacent pair is connected at the first end thereof to the first power bus, and the first end of a second one of the adjacent pair is connected to the second power bus.
4. A load sharing system comprising:
a plurality of power supplies for powering a plurality of corresponding loads, each one of the plurality of power supplies being associated with a given one of the loads for powering its associated said load;
a first power bus;
a second power bus;
a plurality of inductors connected to the first and second power busses and to the loads;
the plurality of inductors further being configured in a plurality of pairs such that each said pair of inductors is coupled at a first end thereof to one or the other of the first and second power busses such that each said pair of inductors has a first inductor of the pair coupled to the first power bus at the first end thereof, and a second inductor of the pair is coupled to the second power bus at the first end thereof,
and each said pair of inductors further being coupled to one another at second ends thereof, and at the second ends thereof in parallel to an associated one of the loads, and further in parallel at the second ends thereof to an associated one of the power supplies;
each said pair of inductors forming a parallel coupled pair of inductors relative to its associated said load and to its associated said power supply;
each of the inductors having an inductance value such that if a fault develops on the power bus, each said inductor operates to isolate the power supplies from the power bus; and
the inductance value further being such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the specific pair of inductors associated with the load of the failed power supply allows the load associated with the failed power supply to draw power from the power bus through the specific pair of inductors to power the load associated with the failed power supply.
5. A method for load sharing, comprising:
using a plurality of power supplies to power a plurality of corresponding loads, each one of the plurality of power supplies being associated with at least one of the loads for powering its associated said load;
using a power bus having first and second busses;
configuring pairs of inductors such that each said pair of inductors is in communication with a separate one of the first and second busses at first ends thereof;
configuring the pairs of inductors in parallel relative to each said load and relative to each said power supply, and further such each said pair of inductors is coupled together at second ends thereof, and
further coupled at the second ends thereof to an associated with a given one of the loads, and
further coupled at the second ends thereof to a given one of the power supplies;
selecting a common value of inductance for each of the inductors, the common value of inductance being sufficient so that if a fault develops on the power bus, at least one said inductor of each said pair of inductors operates to isolate its associated said power supply from the power bus; and
the common value of inductance further being such that if any one of the power supplies fails, the one pair of inductors coupled in parallel to the one of the loads associated with the failed power supply allows the one load to draw power over the power bus from other ones of the power supplies through the one pair of inductors.
US15/151,167 2015-05-13 2016-05-10 System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system Active 2037-08-13 US10404094B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/151,167 US10404094B2 (en) 2015-05-13 2016-05-10 System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system
CN201680027082.6A CN107580739B (en) 2015-05-13 2016-05-11 System and method for power sharing in a multi-way UPS system
PCT/US2016/031782 WO2016183151A1 (en) 2015-05-13 2016-05-11 System and method for power sharing in a multiple ups system
EP16724573.7A EP3295535B1 (en) 2015-05-13 2016-05-11 System and method for power sharing in a multiple ups system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562160973P 2015-05-13 2015-05-13
US15/151,167 US10404094B2 (en) 2015-05-13 2016-05-10 System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160336796A1 US20160336796A1 (en) 2016-11-17
US10404094B2 true US10404094B2 (en) 2019-09-03

Family

ID=56069271

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/151,167 Active 2037-08-13 US10404094B2 (en) 2015-05-13 2016-05-10 System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US10404094B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3295535B1 (en)
CN (1) CN107580739B (en)
WO (1) WO2016183151A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109655698B (en) * 2019-02-01 2021-06-11 唐智科技湖南发展有限公司 Railway wagon fault diagnosis system based on power sharing
CN113602918B (en) * 2021-08-04 2023-08-25 广州广日电梯工业有限公司 Elevator control method, elevator control system and storage medium
CN113922486A (en) * 2021-09-07 2022-01-11 北京小马易行科技有限公司 Circuit and vehicle for providing backup power supply

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080034256A1 (en) * 2006-08-03 2008-02-07 Ccg Facilities Integration Incorporated Iso-parallel ups system configuration
US20150008745A1 (en) * 2013-07-08 2015-01-08 Eaton Corporation Ups systems and methods using variable configuration modules
US20160118847A1 (en) * 2014-10-23 2016-04-28 General Electric Company Protection methods and switches in uninterruptible power supply systems
US20160294214A1 (en) * 2015-04-01 2016-10-06 Isolated Parallel Inc. Direct current isolated-parallel uninterruptible power supply system

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004343908A (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Densei Lambda Kk Uninterruptible power supply system and parallel operation method for uninterruptible power supply device
FR2985392B1 (en) * 2011-12-30 2014-01-31 Thales Sa HETEROGENEOUS MULTIPLE INPUT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080034256A1 (en) * 2006-08-03 2008-02-07 Ccg Facilities Integration Incorporated Iso-parallel ups system configuration
US7459803B2 (en) 2006-08-03 2008-12-02 Isolated Parallel Inc. Iso-parallel UPS system configuration
US20150008745A1 (en) * 2013-07-08 2015-01-08 Eaton Corporation Ups systems and methods using variable configuration modules
US20160118847A1 (en) * 2014-10-23 2016-04-28 General Electric Company Protection methods and switches in uninterruptible power supply systems
US20160294214A1 (en) * 2015-04-01 2016-10-06 Isolated Parallel Inc. Direct current isolated-parallel uninterruptible power supply system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2016183151A1 (en) 2016-11-17
EP3295535B1 (en) 2022-07-06
EP3295535A1 (en) 2018-03-21
CN107580739A (en) 2018-01-12
CN107580739B (en) 2020-09-18
US20160336796A1 (en) 2016-11-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11159042B2 (en) Power systems and methods using voltage waveform signaling
CN107769364B (en) Power supply system and power supply method for machine room
US7911083B2 (en) Methods and systems for distributing load transfers in power supply systems
WO2014026840A2 (en) Electrical power distribution system for data centers
US11271407B2 (en) Power distribution system using AC/DC ring configuration
US10468909B2 (en) Data center power systems with dynamic source designation
CN102782981B (en) Power supplies for electronic devices
US9806561B2 (en) UPS systems and methods using dual mode rectifier/inverter
US10404094B2 (en) System and method for power sharing in a multiple UPS system
US11303121B2 (en) Modular direct current (DC) architectures
US20170353038A1 (en) Power System Comprising A Central Energy Storage System And A Method Of Controlling Power Transfer In A Power System
US20100141039A1 (en) High availability, high efficiency data center electrical distribution
US20150008745A1 (en) Ups systems and methods using variable configuration modules
US20070278020A1 (en) Power backup for single and multiple power grid systems
US20100066171A1 (en) Multiple power source power supply
WO2007015242A1 (en) Ups system
GB2411056A (en) Power distribution system having redundant sources
US20130057072A1 (en) Uninterrupted power supply apparatus and power-supplying method for the same
US10601245B2 (en) Power redundant system and operation method for the same
US20140191572A1 (en) Combinatorial power distribution systems and methods for configuring same
JP5584491B2 (en) Uninterruptible power supply system
JP2008172864A (en) Uninterruptible power supply facility and its extension method
US10263431B2 (en) Supply system for electronic boards of an electrical distribution system
EP2424065A1 (en) Electrical power supply unit and method of operating an electrical power supply unit
RU2690686C1 (en) Method of guaranteed power supply of two adjacent railway infrastructure facilities

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: LIEBERT CORPORATION, OHIO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUSH, TERRY D.;BLAIR, CHARLES F.;NELSON, GREGG J.;REEL/FRAME:039397/0895

Effective date: 20160617

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ASCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.;AVOCENT CORPORATION;AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:041944/0892

Effective date: 20170228

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ASCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.;AVOCENT CORPORATION;AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:041944/0892

Effective date: 20170228

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ASCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.;AVOCENT CORPORATION;AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:041941/0363

Effective date: 20170228

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NE

Free format text: ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ASCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.;AVOCENT CORPORATION;AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:041941/0363

Effective date: 20170228

AS Assignment

Owner name: VERTIV CORPORATION, OHIO

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:LIEBERT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:047013/0116

Effective date: 20180806

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., T

Free format text: SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC.;VERTIV CORPORATION;VERTIV NORTH AMERICA, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049415/0262

Effective date: 20190513

Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., TEXAS

Free format text: SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC.;VERTIV CORPORATION;VERTIV NORTH AMERICA, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049415/0262

Effective date: 20190513

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP, ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT FREMONT, LLC), OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052065/0757

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV CORPORATION (F/K/A EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC.), OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052065/0757

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT CORPORATION), OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052065/0757

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV CORPORATION (F/K/A LIEBERT CORPORATION), OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052065/0757

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT REDMOND CORP.), OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052065/0757

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC. (F/K/A AVOCENT HUNTSVILLE, LLC), OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052065/0757

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC., OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052071/0913

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC., OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052071/0913

Effective date: 20200302

Owner name: VERTIV CORPORATION, OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY N.A.;REEL/FRAME:052071/0913

Effective date: 20200302

AS Assignment

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC.;ENERGY LABS, INC.;VERTIV CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:052076/0874

Effective date: 20200302

AS Assignment

Owner name: UMB BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TEXAS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VERTIV CORPORATION;VERTIV IT SYSTEMS, INC.;ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:057923/0782

Effective date: 20211022

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4