UA151405U - A way to control the unwanted weed - Google Patents

Abstract

A method of controlling an undesirable weed is claimed, wherein the following is applied to the undesirable weed or to an area located in the vicinity of the weed, or applied to the soil, or applied to a crop, in combination a) at least one triazolone-based herbicide; b) at least one second herbicide selected from the following group: a photosystem II inhibitor, and c) at least one third herbicide selected from the following group: a 4-HPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

Description

A useful model belongs to herbicide combinations for the control of harmful unwanted plants. More specifically, this useful model relates to a synergistic combination of herbicides.

Prerequisites for creating a useful model

Weeds are unwanted plants that can cause serious damage to crop yields. Usually, farmers fight these plants at the pre-sowing stage, as well as after the completion of sowing operations. Modern herbicides are used to either control these unwanted plants or completely suppress their growth so that the planted crops receive a greater share of nutrients.

Current practice includes a combination of herbicides with different mechanisms of action, which provides a wider spectrum of control of weeds and their resistance. Nevertheless, the combinations known today are not enough to fight against resistant and constantly regenerating weeds.

Farmers are increasingly faced with complex weed situations that cannot be solved with just one herbicide.

Combinations of herbicides are used to control a wider range of weeds. However, the combination of herbicides does not always provide the desired effect. A combination of herbicides can have an additive effect or an antagonistic effect. It can also be phytotoxic to crops, making it an undesirable combination. Therefore, agronomists must carefully select herbicides that can be combined to provide a synergistic effect that will control weeds without creating a phytotoxic effect on the crop, and will also reduce the possibility of the development of herbicide-resistant weeds.

US Patent No. 058785351 describes a herbicide combination containing bentazone, an acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor, and an acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor. Sulfonylureas are indicated as a potential long list of acetolactate synthase inhibitors, while some protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors are indicated only as possible additional herbicides among an equally large number of herbicides. This description is general in nature and does not contain specific recommendations for the presented combinations.

Therefore, there is a need to develop such combinations that have beneficial properties, e.g

A herbicide combination that is synergistic helps fight resistance, reduces the dose of herbicide used, resulting in minimal environmental damage and creates a herbicide combination that has excellent residual effects.

Thus, practical implementations of this utility model may address one or more of the aforementioned problems.

The essence of a useful model

Thus, in one aspect, this useful model may provide a herbicide combination comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone, or thiencarbazone; (B) at least one inhibitor of photosystem Ii, which can be selected from the group of herbicides, which include: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (its) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide; as well as (my) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor (4-GFPD inhibitor), a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a biosynthesis inhibitor cellulose

In another aspect, the utility model may provide a method of controlling weeds at a locus, the method comprising applying to the locus a herbicide combination comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of: amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide; (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor (4-GFPD inhibitor), a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a biosynthesis inhibitor cellulose

In one aspect, this useful model may provide a herbicide composition comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone, or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on photosystem II inhibitor, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor (4-GFPD inhibitor), a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor ; and (4) at least one agrochemically acceptable excipient.

Another aspect of this utility model may provide a method of increasing the yield of an agricultural crop, the method comprising applying to the agricultural crop a herbicide combination comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone , flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide which can be selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor herbicide, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an inhibitor

ALS, microtubule assembly inhibitor or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

Another aspect of this utility model may provide a method of improving the health of a plant, the method comprising administering to a plant or to a locus in which said plant is already growing or in which said plant is growing, a combination comprising: (a) at least one a triazolone herbicide selected from the following group: amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide which can be selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor herbicide, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an inhibitor

ALS, microtubule assembly inhibitor or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

Detailed description of the utility model

The term "herbicide" in the context of this document means an active ingredient that kills weeds, regulates the growth of weeds, or adversely affects the process of their growth in some other way. In the context of this document, the term "effective amount of an ingredient in terms of herbicidal effect" or the term "amount of an ingredient that regulates plant vegetation" means a certain amount of an active ingredient that produces a "herbicidal effect", that is, an effect that has a certain negative effect and contains deviations from normal processes of natural plant development, destruction, regulation, dehydration, growth retardation. The terms "plants" and "plant vegetation" include, among other things: seeds, substances that promote the germination of plants; sprouting seedlings; plants that sprout from vegetative buds; as well as existing greenery and plants. The term "locus" in the context of this document means the immediate area around the relevant desired agricultural plant within which it is desirable to provide control over the spread of the weed (usually selective control). The locus contains the nearest space around the respective desired crop plant within which weed infestation has already started or will start in the near future. The term "agricultural crop" refers to a large number of relevant agricultural plants or to any individual "agricultural plant" as it grows in a particular locus.

In any aspect or embodiment of this utility model described below, the phrase "which(a/e) comprises" may be replaced by the following phrases: "which(a/e) consists of" or "which(a/e) ) mainly consists of 3". In such aspects or embodiments of this utility model and combination or composition described below, "comprises" or contains, or "consists of" or "mainly consists of" or "consists substantially of" those specific components that are specified in this document, but this statement does not apply to fungicides, insecticides, herbicides, those preparations that promote plant growth, or those adjuvants or excipients not specifically mentioned in this document.

The term "synergy" in principle can be defined as a certain combination of two elements that are such that the result of the influence of such a combination is higher than the sum of the results that these components could have separately from each other. It is an unexpected result that can only be achieved if there is contact between these components, and as a result, such a result cannot be predicted, planned or proposed in advance. The term "Plants" includes germinating seeds, seedlings, petioles, germinating seedlings, as well as existing greenery and plants, including roots and those parts of plants that are above ground level, such as leaves, stems, flowers , fruits, branches, twigs, roots, etc.

The term "plant of agricultural interest" shall be understood to mean plants of any kind intended for commercial consumption and which may be plants of the edible or non-edible type, floral or non-floral plants, trees or grasses, weeds, which quickly reproduce with the help of roots; medicinal plants or herbs). The term "Weeds", according to the provisions given in the work of I Ogepli (2014), is any plants that grow in those places where they are undesirable, where they directly or indirectly create obstacles for the growth of those crops, in relation to which there is some interest from an agricultural point of view, causing a significant reduction in the overall yield of these agricultural crops. The term "biotic factors" can be understood as the sum of all those factors caused by organisms in the corresponding ecosystem, which determine the density of plant populations forming this ecosystem; in this version of the implementation, the term "organisms" should be understood as weeds. The term "agrochemical products", also known as

Insecticides, pesticides, biocides, plant pharmaceuticals or plant sanitary products are general terms for various chemical preparations used in agricultural production.

The authors of this useful model unexpectedly came to the conclusion that the real effectiveness of a herbicide based on triazolinone can be enhanced with the creation of a synergistic effect in the presence of at least one other inhibitor of photosystem II, as well as a third non-specific herbicide.

The authors of this useful model do not wish to be bound by a particular theory because they believe that the triazolinone herbicide acts as an inhibitor of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPG oxidase or "Protoke"), an enzyme of chlorophyll and heme biosynthesis that catalyzes the oxidation of protoporphyrinogen IX (PPG IX ) to protoporphyrin IX (PP IX).

Inhibition of Protox leads to the accumulation of PP IX, which is the first light-absorbing precursor of chlorophyll. Apparently, as a result of PP IX light absorption, it turns into PP IX in the triplet state, which interacts with oxygen in the ground state, forming singlet oxygen. Both triplet PP IH and singlet oxygen can extract hydrogen from unsaturated fatty acids, thereby creating a lipid radical and thereby initiating a chain reaction of lipid peroxidation. Lipids and proteins are attacked, oxidized, which leads to the loss of chlorophyll and carotenoids, therefore, as stated in the work of YuiKe (1991), opportunities for rapid drying and disintegration of cells and cell organelles are created in leaky membranes.

This activity is enhanced synergistically in the presence of at least two other herbicides (in addition to the triazolone herbicide), at least one of which leads to the formation of triplet chlorophyll and singlet oxygen, thereby enhancing the first pathway of herbicidal action, while the third herbicide is nonspecific and provides singlet oxygen synergy for herbicidal activity through at least one other pathway.

Therefore, the second herbicide of the herbicide combination acts as an inhibitor of photosystem II, which inhibits photosynthesis by binding to the OB binding niche on protein O1 of the photosystem II complex in chloroplast thylakoid membranes. Failure to ensure re-oxidation of OA contributes to the formation of chlorophyll in the triplet state, which interacts with oxygen in the ground state, thus creating singlet oxygen. Both triplet chlorophyll and singlet oxygen can extract hydrogen from unsaturated fatty acids, creating a lipid radical and initiating a chain reaction of lipid peroxidation, as a result of which the activity of the triazolinone-based herbicide is simultaneously enhanced in a synergistic manner. Lipids and proteins are attacked, oxidized, which leads to the loss of chlorophyll and carotenoids, and in leaky membranes, opportunities are created for rapid drying and disintegration of cells and cell organelles.

The principle of action of the third herbicide in this combination is provided by the following inhibitors: 4-GFPD inhibitor, bleaching inhibitor, cell division inhibitor, PPO inhibitor, ALS inhibitor, microtubule assembly inhibitor, or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

Thus, in one aspect, this utility model provides a herbicide combination comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone, or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on photosystem II inhibitor is used as a second herbicide, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone-based herbicides additionally provide ALS inhibitor activity, which contributes to the achievement of additional synergistic enhancement, when the second herbicide is an inhibitor of the HER photosystem and the third herbicide is another ALS inhibitor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone-based herbicide is amicarbazone.

In one version of the implementation of this useful model, the triazolone-based herbicide is

From bencarbazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide is carfentrazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone-based herbicide is flucarbazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide is ipfencarbazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide is sulfentrazone.

According to one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (a) at least one herbicide based on triazolone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenyl carbamate; (i) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (m) herbicide based on nitrile and (my) herbicide based on urea; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide combinations of this utility model contain one herbicide from these three classes of herbicides.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide combinations also contain at least one herbicide antidote.

In one version of this useful model, antidotes for herbicides intended for agricultural crops can be chemically divided into the following groups:

1) naphthopyranones; 2) dichloroacetamides;

C) dichloromethyl acetals and ketals; 4) oxime ethers; 5) derivatives of 2,4-disubstituted 5-thiazodicarboxylates; 6) substituted phenylpyrimidines; 7) substituted phenylpyrazoles; 8) quinolyloxycarboxylic acid esters; 9) thiol carbamates; 10) diaryl ketones; 11) haloalkylaryl sulfonates.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, an antidote for herbicides can be selected from the following group: isoxadifen ethyl, cloquintocet mexyl, mefenpyr diethyl, naphthalic anhydride, oxabetrinil, benzenesulfonamide, M-(aminocarbonyl)-2-chlorobenzenesulfonamide (2-HBSA) . ciometrinil, flurazole, dimepiperate, methoxyphenone, cloquintocet-mexyl (ССА-185072), 1-dichloroacetylhexahydro-3,3,va-trimethyl-pyrrolo|1,2-

Phipyrimidine-6-(2H-one) (BA5-145138), dichloromethyl-1,3-dioxolane (MO-191), quinolinyloxyacetate compounds or agriculturally acceptable salts, esters or mixtures thereof.

In another embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide composition that contains: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone, or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group:

Zo (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (i) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor; and (a) at least one agrochemically acceptable excipient.

In another aspect, this useful model may include a method for controlling weeds at a locus, wherein the method involves applying a herbicide combination to that locus.

Therefore, in this aspect, this useful model can include a method for controlling weeds at a locus, and the method includes applying to the locus an appropriate herbicide combination that contains: (a) at least one herbicide based on triazolone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (i) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (m) herbicide based on nitrile and (my) herbicide based on urea; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In another aspect, the utility model includes a method for increasing the yield of an agricultural crop by applying any combination of the utility model.

Still another aspect of this useful model may include a method of increasing the yield of an agricultural crop by applying a combination comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (i) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In another aspect, the utility model may include a method of improving plant health using a combination of the utility model.

Another aspect of this useful model may include a method of improving the health of a plant, the method comprising introducing into the locus a combination comprising: (a) at least one herbicide based on triazolone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (i) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide;

Zo (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (m) herbicide based on nitrile and (my) herbicide based on urea; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide combinations of this utility model contain one herbicide from these three classes of herbicides.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the inhibitor of photosystem II is a herbicide based on phenylcarbamate.

In one embodiment of this utility model, a phenylcarbamate herbicide can be selected from the following group: barban, VSRS, carbasulam, carbetamide, SERS, chlorbupham, chlorpropham, SRRS, desmedipham, phenizofam, fenmedipham, phenmedipham-ethyl, profam, and swep.

In one embodiment of this utility model, a phenylcarbamate herbicide may be selected from the following group: chlorpropham, desmedipham, fenmedipham, and phenmedipham-ethyl.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the phenylcarbamate herbicide is chlorpropham.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the phenylcarbamate herbicide is desmedifam.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the phenylcarbamate herbicide is phenmedipham.

In one version of this utility model, the phenylcarbamate herbicide is phenmedipham-ethyl.

In one embodiment of this useful model, the photosystem II inhibitor is a triazine-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazine-based herbicide may be selected from the following group: dipropethrin, fucaojing, trihydroxytriazine, atrazine, chlorazine, 60 cyanazine, cyprazine, eglinazine, ipazine, mesoprazine, procyazine, proglinazine, propazine,

sebuthylazine, simazine, terbuthylazine, trietazine, indaziflam, triaziflam, atraton, methometon, prometon, secbumeton, simeton, terbumeton, ametryn, aziprothrin, cyanathrin, desmethrin, dimethamethrin, methoprothrin, promethrin, simethrin, and terbutrin.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazine herbicide is atrazine.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazine herbicide is ametryn.

In one of the implementation variants of this useful model, the inhibitor of photosystem II is a triazinon-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazinon-based herbicide can be selected from the following group: ametridione, amibuzin, ethiosin, hexazinon, isomethiosin, metamitron, metribuzin, and triphrudimoxazin.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazinon-based herbicide is hexazinone.

In one version of this utility model, the triazinon-based herbicide is metamitron.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazinon-based herbicide is metribuzin.

In one implementation of this useful model, the photosystem II inhibitor is a uracil-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the uracil-based herbicide may be selected from the following group: benzphendisone, bromacil, butafenacil, flupropacil, isocyl, lenacil, safluphenacil, terbacil, and thiafenacil.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the uracil-based herbicide is bromacil.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the uracil-based herbicide is saflufenacil.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the photosystem II inhibitor is a benzothiazole-based herbicide or a benzothiadiazole-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, such a benzothiazole-based herbicide can be selected from the following group: benazolin, benzthiazuron, fenthiaprop, mefenacet, and metabenzthiazuron.

In one version of this useful model, the photosystem II inhibitor is a benzothiadiazole-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the benzothiadiazole herbicide is bentazone or bentazone sodium.

In one implementation of this useful model, the photosystem II inhibitor is a nitrile-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the nitrile-based herbicide may be selected from the following group: bromobonyl, bromoxynil, chloroxynil, cyclopyranil, dichlobenil, iodobonyl, ioxynil, and pyraclonil.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the nitrile-based herbicide is bromoxynil.

In one implementation of this useful model, the photosystem II inhibitor is a urea-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the urea herbicide is a phenylurea herbicide.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, a herbicide based on phenylurea can be selected from the following group: anisuron, buturon, chlorbromuron, chloreturon, chlorotoluron, chloroxuron, daimuron, difenoxuron, dimefuron, diuron, phenuron, fluometuron, fluotiuron, isoproturon, linuron, methiuron , methyldimron, metobenzuron, metobromuron, metoxuron, monolinuron, monuron, neburon, parafluron, phenobenzuron, siduron, tetrafluron and thidiazuron.

In one implementation of this utility model, the phenylurea-based herbicide is diuron.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the phenylurea herbicide is linuron.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the photosystem II inhibitor can be selected from the following group: chlorpropham, desmedipham, phenmedipham, phenmedipham-ethyl, atrazine,

hexazinone, metamitron, metribuzin, bromacil, safluphenacil, bentazone, bentazone sodium, bromoxynil, diuron and linuron.

In one embodiment of this useful model, the third herbicide can be selected from the following group: 4-GFPD inhibitor, bleaching inhibitor, cell division inhibitor, PPO inhibitor, inhibitor

ALS, microtubule assembly inhibitor or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor may be selected from the group consisting of isoxazole, pyrazolone, and triketone or calistemon.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is an isoxazole-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is a pyrazolone-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is a triketone herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is a callistemon-based herbicide.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor can be selected from the following group: benzobicyclone, benzofenap, bicycloperone, phenquinotrione, isoxachlortol, isoxaflutol, mesotrione, pyrasulfotol, pyrazolinate, pyrazoxifene, sulcotrione, tefuryltrione, tembotrione, tolpiralate, topramesone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is fenquinotrione.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is mesotrione. In one implementation of this useful model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is sulcotrione.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is tembotrione. In one implementation of this useful model, the 4-GFPD inhibitor is topramesone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the PPO inhibitor can be selected from the following group: diphenyl ether, M-phenylphthalimide, phenylpyrazole oxadiazole, thiadiazole, triazolinone, oxazolidinedione, and pyrimidinedione.

In one version of this utility model, the PPO inhibitor is a diphenyl ether.

In one version of this useful model, the PPO inhibitor is M-phenylphthalimide.

In one of the variants of implementation of this useful model, the PPO inhibitor is aryltriazinone. In one version of this useful model, the PPO inhibitor is a pyrimidinedione.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the PPO inhibitor can be selected from the following group: acifluorfen, fomesafen, lactofen, flumiclorac, flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, carfentrazone, fluthiacet-ethyl and saflufenacil, azafenidine, benzphendizone, bifenox, butafenacil, carfentrazone, carfentrazone-ethyl ) , trifludimoxazin and thiafenacil.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the microtubule assembly inhibitor may be selected from the group consisting of benzamide, benzoic acid, dinitroaniline, and pyridine.

In another embodiment of this utility model, the microtubule assembly inhibitor may be selected from the group consisting of benzamide, benzoic acid, dinitroaniline, phosphoroamidate, amiprophos, and pyridine.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the microtubule assembly inhibitor can be selected from the group of dinitroaniline-based herbicides, for example: benfluralin, butralin, dinitramine, trifluralin, propizamide, DHFC (dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), pendimethalin, ethalfluralin, oryzalin, trifluralin, prodiamine, dithiopyr , thiazopyr or methyl-butamiphos.

Another version of the implementation of this useful model - the cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor can be chosen from the following group: alkylazine, benzamide and nitrile, triazole-carboxamide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor can be selected from the following group: dichlobenil, chlorothiamide, indaziflam, isoxaben, and flupoxam.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the cell division inhibitor may be selected from the group consisting of chloracetamide, acetamide, oxyacetamide, and tetrazolinone.

In one embodiment of this useful model, the cell division inhibitor can be selected from the following group: acetochlor, alachlor, butachlor, dimetachlor, dimethenamid, metazachlor, metolachlor, 5-metolachlor, pentaxamide, pretilachlor, propisochlor, tenichlor, diphenamide, napropamide, O- napropamide, napropamide-M, naproanilide, Flufenacet, mefenacet, fentrazamide, propachlor, anilophos, cafenestrol, piperophos, disodium methylarsonate (DNMA) and monomethylsodium arsenate (MMNA).

In one embodiment of this utility model, the bleaching inhibitor may be selected from the following group: triazole, triketone, isoxazole, pyrazole, pyridazinone, pyridinecarboxamide, isoxazolidinone, urea, diphenyl ether, amitrole, mesotrione, sulcotrione, isoxazole, isoxachlorotol, isoxaflutol, benzofenap, pyrazolinate, pyrazoxifene, pyridazinone, norflurazon, pyridinecarboxamide, diflufenican, picolinafen, isoxazolidinone, clomazone, fluometuron, aclonifen, beflubutamide, fluridone, flurochloridone, flurtamone, bromobutide (chloro)-flurenol, cinmethylin, cumiluron, dazomet, dimron, methyl-disanmuron, etobenid , fosamine, indanophan, metham, oxacyclomefon, oleic acid, pelargonic acid and pyributycarb.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the ALSO inhibitor can be selected from the following group: (i) imidazolinone-based herbicide; (i) herbicide based on sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinone; (ii) herbicide based on sulfonylurea; (im) herbicide based on pyrazole; (m) herbicide based on triazolpyramidine; and (m) herbicide based on triazolone;

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor is an imidazolinone herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the imidazolinone herbicide may be selected from the following group: imazametabenz, imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr, imazaquin, and imazethapyr.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the imidazolinone herbicide is imazamox.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the imidazolinone herbicide is imazapic.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the imidazolinone herbicide is imazapyr.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the imidazolinone herbicide is imazethapir.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor is a triazolone-based herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide is a herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone, and thiencarbazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide is carfentrazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone-based herbicide is flucarbazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide is sulfentrazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone-based herbicide is amicarbazone.

In one version of the implementation of this useful model, when a herbicide that acts as an inhibitor

ALS, a triazolone-based herbicide will be selected, combinations in this utility model may contain at least two triazolone-based herbicides that are not the same.

Thus, in one embodiment of this utility model, when the triazolone-based herbicide is amicarbazone, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor will be a herbicide that does not contain amicarbazone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor is a sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinone herbicide.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, flucarbazone is a herbicide based on sulfonylaminocarbonyltriazolinone.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, flucarbazone-sodium is a herbicide based on sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinone.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor is a sulfonylurea herbicide.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, a herbicide based on sulfonylurea can be selected from the following group: amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, bensulfuron, chlorimuron, cyclosulfamuron, ethoxysulfuron, flasasulfuron, flucetosulfuron, bo flupirsulfuron, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron, imazosulfuron, mesosulfuron,

метазосульфурон, метіопірісульфурон, моносульфурон, нікосульфурон, ортосульфамурон, оксасульфурон, прімісульфурон, пропірісульфурон, ніпазосульфурон, рімсульфурон, сульфометурон, сульфосульфурон, трифлоксисульфурон, зуоміхуанлун, хлорсульфурон, циносульфурон, етаметсульфурон, йодосульфурон, іофенсульфурон, метсульфурон, просульфурон, тіфенсульфурон, триасульфурон, трибенурон, трифлусульфурон - / and tritosulfuron.

In one implementation of this useful model, the special sulfonylurea herbicide is bensulfuron.

In one implementation of this useful model, a special sulfonylurea herbicide is halosulfuron.

In one implementation of this useful model, a special sulfonylurea herbicide is nipazosulfuron.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, a special herbicide based on sulfonylurea is nipazosulfuron ethyl.

In one of the implementations of this useful model, a special herbicide based on a sulfonylurea is sulfosulfuron.

In one implementation of this useful model, a special sulfonylurea herbicide is trifloxysulfuron.

In one implementation of this useful model, a special sulfonylurea herbicide is metsulfuron.

In one of the implementations of this useful model, the special sulfonylurea herbicide is flazasulfuron.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor is a pyrazole-based herbicide.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, a pyrazole-based herbicide can be selected from the following group: azimsulfuron, cyclopyranil, difenzoquat, halosulfuron, flasasulfuron, metazachlor, metazosulfuron, nipazosulfuron, nipazosulfuron ethyl, pyraclonil, pyroxasulfone, benzofenap, pyrasulfotol, pyrazolinate, pyrazoxifene, tolpiralate, topramesone, fluazolate, nipiraclofen, pinoxaden and pyraflufen.

In one implementation of this utility model, the pyrazole-based herbicide is metazachlor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the pyrazole-based herbicide is pinoxaden.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the pyrazole-based herbicide is pyraflufen.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that acts as an ALS inhibitor is a triazolopyramidine herbicide.

In one embodiment of this utility model, a suitable triazolopyrimidine herbicide can be selected from the following group: cloransulam, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, penoxulam, and piroxulam.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the appropriate triazolopyramidine herbicide is diclosulam.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the appropriate tr, azolopyramidine herbicide is penoxulam.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide that is an ALS inhibitor can be selected from the following group: imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr, imazetapyr, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, sulfentrazone, flucarbazone, amicarbazone, flucarbazone-sodium, bensulfuron, halosulfuron, nipasosulfuron, nipazosulfuron ethyl, flazasulfuron, sulfosulfuron, trifloxysulfuron, metsulfuron, metazachlor, pinoxaden, pyraflufen, diclosulam and penoxulam.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the triazolone herbicide, the photosystem II inhibitor, and the third herbicide are not the same. In this embodiment of this utility model, the three appropriate herbicides are selected in such a way that the selected herbicides are different from each other.

In one embodiment of this utility model, combinations that are created based on this utility model contain at least three different herbicides.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the combinations that are created based on this utility model contain only those three different herbicides whose presence is defined in the formula of this utility model. In this embodiment of this utility model, any other fungicides,

herbicides, insecticides or any other agrochemical products are not included in the relevant combination.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the utility model includes preferred combinations, compositions, and methods of implementing them. Methods of this utility model include a method for controlling weeds at a locus by applying to that locus a suitable combination or composition; a method of increasing the yield of an agricultural crop by introducing a combination or composition; a method of improving the health of a plant by introducing a combination or composition into the locus. The embodiments of this utility model described herein describe preferred embodiments of all of these possible combinations, compositions, and methods of this utility model.

According to one of the implementation options, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) herbicide based on phenyl carbamate; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: () amicarbazone; (i) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) triazinon-based herbicide; (ii) at least one third herbicide, which can be selected from the following group: 4-GFPD inhibitor,

Z is an inhibitor of bleaching, an inhibitor of cell division, an inhibitor of PPO, an inhibitor of ALS, an inhibitor of microtubule assembly, or an inhibitor of cellulose biosynthesis.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) herbicide based on uracil; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) nitrile-based herbicide; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: () amicarbazone; (i) urea-based herbicide; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

According to one of the implementation options, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (ii) chlorpropham; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: () amicarbazone; (i) desmedifam; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) fenmedifam; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (iii) phenmedifam-ethyl; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination that

Zo contains: (i) amicarbazone; (iii) atrazine; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) ametrine; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: () amicarbazone; (i) hexazinone; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (ii) metamitron; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (ii) metribuzin;

(iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) bromacil; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (iii) saflufenacil; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (ii) bromoxynil; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (I) diuron; (ii) at least one third herbicide which can be selected from the group consisting of: 4-GFPD inhibitor, bleaching inhibitor, cell division inhibitor, PPO inhibitor, ALS inhibitor, assembly inhibitor

From microtubules or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (i) amicarbazone; (i) linuron; (iii) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an ALS inhibitor, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, or a cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the herbicide combination is preferably chosen from the following groups: Atrazine (im) Amicarbazone i- Sulfentrazone i Ametrin/Diuron (m) Amicarbazone i Halosulfuron-methyl «t Diuron (m) Amicarbazone «i Imazapic - Ametrin/Diuron (mi) Amicarbazone - Trifloxysulfuron sodium «t Diuron (mii) Amicarbazone i Pendimethalin i- Ametrin/Diuron (i) Amicarbazone «t Napropamide i Ametrin/dDiuron and (x) Amicarbazone i- O-Napropamide i Ametrin/Diuron. (xi) Amicarbazone and Mesotrione and Ametrin/Diuron/Atrazine (xi) Amicarbazone and Tembotrion and Ametrin/Diuron/Atrazine and (xii) Amicarbazone and Indaziflam and Ametrin/dDiuron

In one embodiment, this useful model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (I) Amicarbazone; (ii) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem and (ii) Flumioxazin

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination that contains: 60 (I) Amicarbazone

(i) Propisochlor (ii) terbuthylazine

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination comprising: (I) Amicarbazone(s) Isoxaflutol(s) Atrazine

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination comprising: (I) Amicarbazone(s) Clomazone(s) Diuron

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination comprising: (I) Amicarbazone(s) Sulfentrazone(s) Diuron

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination that contains: (I) Amicarbazone(s) 5-metolachlor(s) Atrazine

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination comprising: (I) Amicarbazone(s) Mesotrione(s) Ametrine

In one embodiment, this utility model includes a herbicide combination comprising:

Zo (I) Amicarbazone (ii) Metribuzin (ii) Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl

In one embodiment of this utility model, each individual row appearing in the table below represents combinations in an embodiment of this utility model.

In one embodiment of this utility model, this utility model may provide a combination consisting of the three herbicides that are defined above in the table.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the utility model may provide a composition consisting of the three herbicides defined above in the table, as well as at least one agrochemically acceptable adjuvant.

These combinations can be applied to the weed locus provided that a herbicidally effective amount of the active ingredient is applied.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the combination according to this utility model may be combined with at least one other active ingredient, such as one that can be selected from, among others, the following group: herbicide, insecticide, fungicide, biological preparation, growth promoter plants, mineral fertilizers or their combinations.

So, in an embodiment of this utility model, the combination according to this utility model can be combined with another herbicide. Examples of herbicides that can be combined with a combination according to this useful model can be selected from, among others, herbicides belonging to, for example, the following classes: EPSHF synthase (enolpyruvyl shikimate-3-phosphate synthase) inhibitors, synthetic auxins (hormones plant growth), auxin transport inhibitors, glutamate synthase inhibitors, GFPD inhibitors, lipid synthesis inhibitors, long-chain fatty acid inhibitors, as well as herbicides with an unknown principle of action. Specifically, this group includes, among others, the following herbicides: topramesone, orthosulfamuron, pinoxaden, methamifop, pyrimisulfan, tembotrione, thiencarbazone methyl, flucetosulfuron, aminopyralid, pyrasulfotol, saflufenacil, piroxulam, pyroxasulfone, pyraclonil, indaziflam, phenquinotrione, florpyroxifen-benzyl, thiaphenacil, cinmethylin, lancotrione sodium, bixiozone, trifludimoxazin, cyclopyrimorate, methiozoline, aminocyclopyrachlor, metazosulfuron, ipfencarbazone, phenoxasulfone, bicycloperone, triafamone, haloxifene methyl, tolpiralate, or combinations of these ingredients.

In one embodiment of this useful model, the total amount of triazolone-based herbicide in the composition ranges from 0.1 to 99 95 by weight, and preferably from 0.2 to 90 95 by weight.

In one embodiment of this useful model, the amount of triazolone-based herbicide ranges from 50 g to 1000 g ai/ha (grams of active ingredient per hectare).

In one embodiment of this utility model, the amount of triazolone-based herbicide ranges from 50 g to 500 g ai/ha.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the total amount of the inhibitor of the HER photosystem in the composition can lie in the range from 0.1 to 99 95 by weight, and in a preferred option - from 0.2 to 90 95 by weight.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the total amount of ALS inhibitor in the composition may range from 0.1 to 99% by weight.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the total amount of chlorophyll biosynthesis inhibitor and heme in combination may range from 0.1 to 9995 by weight.

In one embodiment of this useful model, the three herbicides in the herbicide combination according to this useful model can be mixed with each other in the ratio (1-80): (1-80): (1-80), respectively.

A combination of herbicides in this useful pattern can be used to treat target weeds to be controlled, including in crops such as corn, rice, wheat, barley, oats, rye, sorghum, cotton, soybeans, peanuts, buckwheat, beets, rapeseed, sunflower, sugar cane, tobacco, etc.; vegetables: vegetable crops of the nightshade family, such as eggplant, tomato, capsicum, paprika, potato, etc.; vegetable crops of the gourd family, such as cucumber, pumpkin, zucchini, watermelon, melon, etc.; cruciferous vegetables such as radishes, turnips, horseradish, kohlrabi, Chinese cabbage, cabbage, mustard, asparagus, broccoli, cauliflower, etc.; vegetable crops of the aster family, such as burdock, chrysanthemum, artichoke, lettuce, etc.; vegetable crops of the lily family, such as green onions, onions, garlic and asparagus; vegetable crops of the umbrella family, such as carrots, parsley, celery, parsnips, etc.; vegetable crops of the chenopodium family, such as spinach, beetroot, Swiss chard, etc.; vegetable crops of the St. Nettle family, such as annual burdock, mint, basil, etc.; strawberries, sweet potatoes, Diosocrea japonica, colocasia, etc.; flowers, leaves, turf, fruits: seed fruits such as apple, pearl, quince, etc.; fruits with stones, such as peach, plum, nectarine, house plum, cherry, apricot, prune, etc.; citrus fruits such as orange, lemon, grapefruit, etc.; nuts such as chestnuts, walnuts, hazelnuts, almonds, pistachios, cashews, Australian macadamia nuts, etc. berries such as blueberries, blueberries, cranberries, blackberries, raspberries, etc.; grapes, persimmons, olives, plums, bananas, coffee, date palms, coconuts, etc.; trees that are not fruit trees; tea, mulberry, flowering plants, flowering trees such as ash, birch, dogwood, eucalyptus, ginkgo biloba, lilac, maple, oak, poplar, lilac, amber tree, sycamore, holly, Japanese thuja, fir, hemlock, juniper , pine, fir and pointed yew, etc

In one preferred embodiment of this utility model, the crop is selected from a group of plants that includes: cereals, rice, corn, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, turf, cereals, barley, potatoes, sweet potatoes, sunflowers, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soy, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava.

In one embodiment, the composition according to this useful model may contain agriculturally acceptable adjuvants, carriers, solvents, emulsifiers, fertilizer fillers, antifoams, thickeners, antifreezes, antifreezes, etc. These compositions may be solid or liquid. The solid ones include, for example: powders, granules, water-soluble granules, microcapsules or wetting powders, the liquid ones - emulsified concentrates, solutions, emulsions or suspensions, mixed preparation forms of CS and SC. In addition, they can be created as a ready-to-use mixture or as a mixture for preparation in mixing tanks directly on site.

Agriculturally acceptable adjuvants and carriers can be, among others, the following components: oil concentrates; various types of methylated oil, emulsified methylated oil, nonylphenol ethoxylate; quaternary ammonium salt of benzyl-coco-alkyldimethyl; a mixture of petroleum hydrocarbon, alkyl ethers, organic acid and anionic surfactant; C9-C11 alkyl polyglycoside; ethoxylate of phosphoric acid and alcohol; natural primary alcohol ethoxylate (C12-C16); block copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide (EO-PO), as well as di-sec-butylphenol; polysiloxane with terminal blocking methyl groups; nonylphenol ethoxylate, a mixture of urea amicate and ammonium nitrate;

ethoxylate of tridecyl alcohol (synthetic) (BEC); tall amine ethoxylate; REF(400) dioleate-99, alkyl sulfates such as diethanolammonium lauryl sulfate; alkylarylsulfonic acid salts such as calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate; calcium salts of alkylaryl sulfonic acid and ethoxylate of fatty alcohols, alkylphenol addition products to alkylene oxide, such as oxyethylated alkylphenol-C18; products of the connection of alkylene oxide and alcohol, such as tridecyl alcohol-C16 ethoxylate; detergents such as sodium stearate; alkylnaphthalene salts of sulfonic acid, such as sodium butyl naphthalene sulfonate; dialkyl ethers of sulfosuccinate salts, such as sodium di(2-ethylhexyl)usulfosuccinate; sorbitol esters such as sorbitol oleate; quaternary amines such as lauryltrimethylammonium chloride; polyethylene glycol esters of fatty acids, such as polyethylene glycol stearate; acrylic copolymer, for example, the preparation 7erpgut RO 3315-I 23-(MM), block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide; butyl block copolymer, for example Ayaz drug (-50021-I 0, antifoam emulsion, such as silicone emulsion, for example, can be chosen from the following group of drugs: заАОа-10; БАС-1000АР; 5БАС-1529; 5АС-1538; 5БАС- 1571; 5BAS-1572; BAS-1575; BAS-2001; 5BAY-220; 5АС-290; 5АС-30; 5BAS-ZOE; 5АО-330; 5АС-47; 5АС-5440; 5АС-7133 and 5АО-770, mono- and dialkyl phosphate salts; vegetable oils or other oils such as: soybean oil, rapeseed/canola oil, olive oil, castor oil, sunflower oil, coconut oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil; linseed oil, palm oil oil, peanut oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, tung oil, etc.; in addition, esters of those vegetable oils listed above, as well as (in some embodiments of this utility model) complex methyl esters.

Acceptable liquid carriers that may be included in the composition of this utility model may include water or organic solvents. Such organic solvents include, among others, the following components: petroleum distillates or hydrocarbons such as mineral oil, aromatic solvents, paraffin greases/oils, etc.; vegetable oils such as: soybean oil, canola oil/canola oil, olive oil, castor oil, sunflower oil, coconut oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil; linseed oil, palm oil, peanut oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, tung oil, etc.; ethers of those vegetable oils, which are mentioned above in the list of vegetable oils; esters of monoalcohols or esters of monohydric alcohols or dihydric, trihydric or other lower polyhydric alcohols (polyalcohols) (number of hydroxy groups: from 4 to 6), such as 2-ethylhexyl stearate, n-butyl oleate, isopropyl myristate, propylene glycol dioleate, di-octyl succinate, dibutyl adipate, dioctyl phthalate, etc.; esters of mono-, di- and polybasic carboxylic acids, etc. Organic solvents include, among others, toluene, xylene, naphtha fraction, oily concentrate, acetone methyl ethyl ketone, cyclohexanone, trichlorethylene, perchlorethylene, ethyl acetate, amyl acetate, butyl acetate, propylene glycol monomethyl ether and diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, amyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerin, M-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, M.M-dimethylalkylamides, dimethylsulfoxide.

Solid carriers that may be included in the composition of this useful model may include, but are not limited to, attapulgite clay, pyrophyllite clay, silica, kaolin clay, kieselguhr, chalk, diatomaceous earth, lime, calcium carbonate, bentonite clay, fuller's earth, husk cottonseed, wheat flour, soy flour, pumice, wood flour, nut shell flour, lignin, cellulosic materials, etc.

Said formulations can be prepared using well-known methods, for example, by mixing the active ingredients with at least one conventional excipient. According to this useful model, such a combination can already be a composition in itself. The ready-to-use composition is prepared by mixing those substances which are the active substances and the carrier, as well as by adding a surfactant and/or other auxiliary substance for the preparation form, for example, a filler, and by preparing the desired form of the mixture.

According to this useful model, it is possible to use compositions in the following forms: encapsulated suspension, dispersed concentrate, emulsified concentrate, water-in-oil emulsion, oil-in-water emulsion, microemulsion, concentrated suspension, emulsion-like preparation, soluble granules, soluble concentrate, soluble powder, tablet, tablet for immediate use, tablet for dissolution in water, tablet for dispersion in water, dispersible granules, wettable powder, briquette, concentrated gel in paste, emulsified gel, water soluble gel, emulsified granule, emulsified powder, dispersion in oil or suspension concentrated in oil, dispersed or miscible suspension concentrated in oil, miscible solution in oil, powder dispersed in oil, encapsulated granules, dry bo powder, electrostatic/electrodynamic spray liquid, granules, spray oil/ spraying, suspension with particles ultra-low volume, microgranules, fine powder, fine granules, contact herbicide, direct application tablet, liquid or contact gel, direct application concentrate suspension, other direct application liquids, other powders, dry seed treatment powder, treatment emulsion seeds, concentrated suspension for seed treatment, solution for seed treatment, soluble powder for seed treatment, powder for the preparation of fungicide paste in oil, powder for the preparation of fungicide paste in water, suspension in the appropriate capsule for seed treatment, gel for seed treatment, aerosol, fumigant, fumigant injector, fumigant candle, cartridge for fumigants, firedrop for spraying with fumigants, fumigant tablet, fumigant granule, liquefied gas under pressure, gas generator, concentrate for spraying the active substance in a warm state, concentrate for spraying the active substance in a cold state, cellulose varnish, brandspo plant sprayer, fungicide paste, bait, grain bait, briquette bait, pellet bait, plate bait, piece bait, steam generator, oil paste fungicide, special bag, adjuvant, spreader and application device adhesive substance.

Other typical additional additives that can be used in the compositions described herein include the following components, among others: at least one of possible compatibilizers, antifoam agents, sequestrants, neutralizing agents and buffers, corrosion inhibitors, dyes, aromatics, drugs, that enhance the spreading of substances, auxiliary preparations that promote the infiltration of substances, preparations that enhance the ability of chemicals to adhere, dispersing substances, preparations that contribute to the thickening of substances, preparations that contribute to lowering the solidification temperature of substances, antimicrobial agents, etc.

In another aspect, the compositions according to this useful model additionally contain at least one adjuvant or at least one herbicide antidote.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the combinations of this utility model can be applied to a locus simultaneously or alternately, such that the three herbicides can be applied as tank mixes directly on site or as

From a pre-mixed composition.

Accordingly, in this aspect, this useful embodiment includes an on-site compounding combination comprising: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide which can be selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor herbicide, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an inhibitor

ALS, microtubule assembly inhibitor or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment of the utility model, the utility model can include at least one herbicide antidote that can be applied either pre-emergence or post-emergence. The advantage of this combination is that it provides surprisingly good residual effects when applied before emergence, and rapid knockdown when applied after emergence, providing rapid control of weed growth. In another implementation, this useful model can be used for rapid weed control. Another advantage is a quick knockdown in case of extermination.

In specific embodiments of this utility model, there is a synergistic effect from the effect on the target weeds of the combinations or compositions according to this utility model, both before emergence and after emergence.

In practice, weed control, according to this useful model, can be done by spraying the weeds with the proposed mixtures (which are intended to be prepared directly on site), or individual herbicides can be formulated as kits of various individual components that can be mixed, according to the relevant instructions, before starting to spray.

This utility model also offers a way to practically use combinations of herbicides that provide synergistic effects, which is the subject of this utility model, for the control of 60 weeds in fields.

This method includes the following actions:

A) selection of a site within agricultural land;

C) application in sufficiently effective volumes of the appropriate herbicide composition according to this useful model or application of the herbicide product according to this useful model to each plant or to the environment.

This composition can be applied directly to any part of the agricultural crop or ensure the effect of compounds in the environment. The application of such a composition or finished product can be carried out in a variety of ways, for example, by dipping, spraying, vaporizing, creating a mist, directly applying to seeds, as well as applying directly to the soil, on parts of leaves, on straw on the soil, in addition to other possibilities .

Target weeds can be selected from the list below: AiIoresygi5 Tuozygoide5 Nyav5. (mousetail foxtail, AGOMU), Atagapipis raitegi (palmeri shrike, AMARA)

Atagapiyivz migidiz (green scotch, AMAMI), Amepa Hasha (all-round, AMEEA), Vgaspiagia desitrep

Stapf/zgari. or Ogospioa desitbep5 (Stapph/egar?), Vgaspiagia Bgilapipa or Ogospisa Bgigapina,

Vgaspiaga riaiurpuMna (Sgozer.) (Nash/Ma5p) or Ogospioa riaiurpuia (brachiaria broad-leaved,

VEARR), Vgaspiagia riapiadipea or Ogospioa riapiadipea (Alexandrian grass, VKARI),

Sepspgy5 espipaiy5 (Cenchrus small-flowered, SEMES), Oidiagia Pohygopia|y5 UM. (Jamaican crabgrass SISN), Oidigia ip5ciagi5 (island dewdrop, TESIM), Oidnagia zapodtsipaii5 (blood-red dewdrop, SIS5A), Espipospiioa sgiz-daiii (common gorse, ESNSOS), Espipospioa soiopyt (Christian reaper, ESNSO), Eivyzipe ipadisa ( Gertner/Zavgyp.) (Eleusis Indian EI EEIM),

Hoisht tiyShogit (Lambert/ at.) (Italian ryegrass, GOM), Rapisit aispoiotjtogit (Micho/Misph.) (double-flowered millet, RAMOI), Rapisit tiyaseit G.. (ordinary millet, RAMMI),

Zezrapia echinaa (sesbania large, BEWEH), Zeiagia Tabegi Neittt. (giant foxtail, ZETEA), Zeyagia mygdie (green bristly, ZETMI), Zoguopyt Paierepze (Johnson grass, BOKNA), Zogopyt bBisoiog, Moepsi 55r., Agypaipasensht (grass sorghum, BOKM), Suregy5 ezsshepishv5 (ground almond, SURE5) .

From rziosiiaspua OS. (ambrosia holomethylchata, AMVR5), Atrbgovzia igida (giant ambrosia,

AMVTRE), Apoda sgisiaia (combed anode, AMMSRK), AusiIeriah 5ugiasa (Syrian cottonwood,

ABSZU), Videp5 riyuza (hairy herd, VIORI), Voitegia 5resie5 (VOI55), Voitegia aiaia or

Zregtasose aiyya A!Yeri. or Breptasose Iaiyoya (spermacoccus foliata, VOYII R),

Speporodisht aiIrit GG. (common trillium, SNEAM), Sigzisht agyepze (pink thistle, SIKAK),

Sotteiipa repodpaIepzie (balsa tree, SOMVE), Oaishga 5igatopisht (ordinary dope,

BrAT5T), Juaisivs sagoia (common carrot, ODOSA), Eirpogria PeiegorpuMya (wild poinsettia,

ERNNI), Eyrpogria pipa or Spataevzuse Ppiia (garden milkweed, ERNNI), Eyrpogria depiaga (Micho/Mysych.) (toothed milkweed, ERNOE), Aegidegop Bopagiepoiz or Sopua bBopagiepvib (Buenosaire small-petaled plant, EKIVO), Aegidegop sapadepbzie or Sopula sapadepvi5 (Canadian small-petaled plant , EKISA), Sopua 5y|iptaigepvi5 (tall small-petaled, EKIRI),

Neiiapipi5 oappiiz (common sunflower, NEGAM), Chasdietopia iatpioia (jacumontia tamnifolia, ILOTA), Irotoea Ppedegasea (leaved morning glory, IRONE), Irotoea Iasiposa (white morning glory, IROG A), Gasiisa zeitioia (wild lettuce, GASZE), Rogishasa oiIegasea ( garden purslane, ROKOI), Kispagaia z5resiye5 (dandur, KSN5Z5), Zai5oia yigadih5 (Russian saltwort, ZAZKK),

Zida zresie5 (Rhombus-leaved seed, 5055), Zida 5riposa (Prickly seed, ZIOZR), Zipari5 aguepvib (field mustard, ZIMAK), Zoiapyt riuspapiytsht (Oriental black nightshade, ZOY RT), Tgidakh rgositbrep5 (small-petal dwarf, TKORE), Kiteh depiayshe ( KOMOE) or Hapipisht 5igitagiit (common gorse, ХАМ5Т).

In another version of the implementation of this useful model, weeds from the following list: the family of creeping weeds (Oidiagia Pogigopiyii5, Oidnagia pyda and others), Guinea grass (Rapsisit tahitit), Surinam grass (Vgaspiagia desitbrepv), ivy-like morning glory (Irotoea adgapaiioia, Irotoea pii, Tirotoea diatosii, Irotoea rygrigea, Irotoea Pedegigiia, Megtetia si55oide5 and Meitetia aeduria), common rowan (Viaeps riiosa), Javanese grass or round sieve (Suregi5 goishpatsv5 and

Suregi5 5rr), Indian prickly marigold or dactylosthenium (Eyeshizipe ipais), southern gertneria (Sepspgy5 espipaysh5), velvet bean or burning mucuna (Mysypa rgygiep5), wild poinsettia or spotted milkweed (Eprpogria PeiegorpuMya), Paraguay thistle (Asapipozregtit ashzigaie), graceful amaranth (Atagapipyv5 migidia), Alexandrian grass (Vgaspigia riapiadipea), Bengal blue-eye (Sotteiipa bBepodpaiepviv), emilia flaminna lilac (Etya 5opspioia), wild poinsettia or spotted milkweed (Esrpogbia neiegornuia), small-flowered gladiolus (Saiogalapzoda), port or garden purslane (Rogisasa oIegasea), Brazilian richardia (Rispagaia Bgaziiepvie), diamond-leaved syda (Zida sogaioia), southern syda (5ida dialiomi, zZida gpotrioIia), buttonwood or broad-leaved buttonwood (breptasose Iaiioii ia).

According to one of the preferred options for the practical implementation of this useful model, weeds are selected from the group that includes: Atagapipihyh, Suregi5, as well as Vgaspiagia desitbrepv,

Sepsngiv espipaiiv5, Eivyvipe ipdisa, Oidiagia ip5zshagiv, Irotoea agapaioiia, Eirpogbria Negegorpuia,

Sotteiipa repaNaiepvi5, Atagapiyiv migpdiye, Atagapipyv 5ripozyv, Asa)urna ipaiisa, Sotteiinpa sottipiv, Oidega aguepviv,

Ecrpogbria depisshaye, Roptshasa oIegasea, Rapypepisht Puvziegorpgoih, / RpuPapipyv5 tadegazraipeziv, Vgasopygia zrr, Oasiuiosiepisth aderiiziap and EEspipospisa soiopyt.

In another version of the implementation of this useful model, the method of introducing a herbicide combination includes the following steps: a) selection of a certain area of agricultural crops;

B) introduction of a sufficiently effective amount of the specified product on the relevant plants and/or directly in the surroundings / to the location of the plants / in the soil.

In another version of the implementation of this useful model, the combination is introduced at the stage of processing before emergence of seedlings or at the stage of processing after emergence of seedlings. In one of the preferred options for the implementation of this useful model, the rate of application of this composition to agricultural crops is assumed at the level of 0.01 kg/ha to 10 kg/ha.

In another embodiment of this utility model, the utility model includes the use of herbicide combinations or compositions of the utility model to prepare a herbicidal product to be used in the control of weeds present in cropland.

As a rule, the use of combinations/compositions according to this useful model provides synergistic control of the spread of one or more weed species.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the utility model includes the use of a set of separate components that include: (a) at least one triazolone herbicide selected from the group consisting of amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone,

With sulfentrazone or thiencarbazone; (5) at least one herbicide based on an inhibitor of the HER photosystem, which can be selected from the following group: (i) herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) triazinon-based herbicide; (im) herbicide based on uracil; (m) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and (mii) urea-based herbicide; and (c) at least one third herbicide selected from the group consisting of a 4-GFPD inhibitor herbicide, a bleaching inhibitor, a cell division inhibitor, a PPO inhibitor, an inhibitor

ALS, microtubule assembly inhibitor or cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor.

In one embodiment of this utility model, such a set of individual components includes a specific instruction manual, and said instruction manual contains instructions for the user to mix the various components prior to use.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the components of this utility model can be packaged in such a way that the photosystem I inhibitor, the ALS inhibitor, and the chlorophyll and heme biosynthesis inhibitor can be packaged separately from each other and then tank-mixed directly in situ before starting spraying.

In another embodiment of this utility model, the components of this utility model may be packaged in such a way that the triazolone-based herbicide, photosystem inhibitor

II, at least one third herbicide can be packaged separately from each other, while other additional additives can also be packaged separately from each other, so that the two components can be mixed in mixing tanks directly on site during spraying.

In another embodiment of this utility model, the components of this utility model can be packaged as a particular composition in such a way that the triazolone herbicide, the photosystem II inhibitor, at least one third herbicide will be formulated as a single composition, while the other additional additives will packaged separately from each other, so that the two components can be mixed in mixing tanks directly on site during spraying.

Herbicidal compositions of this useful model can be formulated in any form useful for conventional agriculture. They can be formulated in the form of solid substances (for example, as powders, granules, granules dispersed in water, because microcapsules or wetting powders) or in the form of liquids (for example, emulsified concentrates, solutions, emulsions or suspensions, mixed preparative forms of CS and SC) . They can also be provided, for example, in ready-to-use form or as preparations for the preparation of mixtures in mixing tanks directly on site.

In one aspect, the individual components of the combination of this utility model can be applied to the locus simultaneously or in sequence, and the corresponding co-herbicide can be applied as a ready-mix in mixing tanks directly on site or as a premixed composition.

In one embodiment of this utility model, for tank mixing, the appropriate preparative formulation of the herbicide combination is tank mixed prior to application in an appropriate ratio to ensure that the target weight ratio of active ingredients is achieved.

In one embodiment of this utility model, the herbicide combinations of this utility model are mixtures designed to be prepared in mixing tanks directly on site.

Application rates of compositions or active ingredients formulated separately and intended for tank mixing will vary depending on prevailing conditions, such as, for example, target weeds, degree of infestation, weather conditions, soil conditions, crop type, method and timing of herbicide application.

In one of the implementation options of this useful model, the rate of application of the composition according to this useful model can lie in the range from 1 to 5000 g/ha, but in the preferred version, this rate lies in the range from 5 to 1000 g/ha.

The herbicidal product described above has herbicidal efficacy.

This utility model includes a method of controlling unwanted plants, and the method includes applying to the unwanted plants or to their locus a herbicidally effective amount of the compositions according to this utility model.

The method of applying agrochemical products depends on the choice and the mechanism of action of the active ingredient. Application of PPG (protoporphyrinogen) is usually carried out for volatile active ingredients.

The authors of this useful model unexpectedly found that a herbicide based on triazolone,

Of the HER photosystem inhibitor, at least one third herbicide in this utility model was ineffective in weed control when applied separately, but showed excellent synergistic weed control when applied together. This combination provided both preemergence and postemergence weed control. As will be demonstrated in the following examples, the combination of herbicides synergistically controlled the growth of broadleaf weeds as well as grasses and sedges at the locus. Thus, this useful model provides useful methods of weed control during both preemergence and postemergence. In addition, this method provides a wider range of weed control agents, which helps manage resistance to prevent weeds from developing resistance to one of the herbicides, while providing a wider range of action while reducing application rates.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Preparation form 1

Ingredients i

Butyl block monopolymer.d ////////Y77777777168СсС21С and ethoxylate of fatty alcohols

Preparation of premix "A" 1) First, a part of the required water is poured into the receiving tank, and monopropylene glycol, butyl block copolymer, acrylic copolymer solution and 2/3 of silicone emulsion are placed. After that, add amicarbazone and terbuthylazine. This premix is evenly distributed and homogenized using a colloidal mill. This premix is ball milled to 050 particles (3 micrometers or less).

Preparation of premix "B" 2) Propisochlor, calcium salts of alkylarylsulfonic acid, ethoxylate of fatty alcohols and 1/3 of silicone emulsion are placed in the second receiving tank, then water is added to this mixture. The mixture is homogenized by stirring. After that, the EMU premix is prepared using a stirrer with a high shear force and a "nga yishtah" dispersant.

The procedure for preparing the preparative form of ZE

C) Premix "B" is added to premix "A", then the rest of the water is added. The mixture is homogenized by stirring until the desired preparation form is obtained.

Example 2

Field studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of combinations of three active ingredients in this useful model. The results of determining their effectiveness are presented below in the tables.

Table 1 . Names of weeds (95 controls)

Ordinal Processing Atrbgozia Hapiiit number by: apetivioia zygitatit

Propisochlore Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/gah3bog/a|8 63 | 60

Propisochlor-Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/lav400g/a| 63 | 733

Propisochlor «Terbuthylazine Amicarbazone -

From 115 l/ha l/ha 400 g/ha 96.3 100

Propisochlor - 2.5 l/ha

Table 2 number

Weed (Espiposnisa sgizdaiyi

Propisochlorka Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/ha-360 g/ha

Propisochlor-TerbuthylazineAmicarbazone -1.5 l/ha1.3 l/ha360 g/ha

Propisochlor-Terbuthylazine Amicarbazone -1.5 l/ha l/ha 400 g/ha

Propisochlor - 2.5 l/ha

Amicarbazone - 400 g/ha

Table C

Weed

Ordinal processing (90 control) number Espipospiosa sgizdaiii

Propisochlorka Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/ha-360 g/ha

Propisochlor-Terbuthylazine Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/ha1.3 l/ha360 g/ha

Propisochlor-Terbuthylazine Amicarbazone -1.5 l/ha l/ha 400 g/ha

Propisochlor - 2.5 l/ha 666 "(

Amicarbazone - 400 g/ha

Table 4

Weed

Serial processing (before control) number of Espipospiosa sgizdaiyi

Additional trials of combinations/compositions of this useful model were conducted to evaluate the effects of treatments with these herbicides on corn yield.

Table 5 en pe

Processing "yield, quintal/ha quintal

Unprocessed 71111111 Y11169 1-0

Propisochlore Amicarbazone 1.5 l/gae3bo gla. |11169 1111350 (PropizochloreTerbutylazine-Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/gas!, Z l/ha3bog/a| 69 | 59 (PropizochloreTerbuthylazine-Amicarbazone - 1.5 l/gas1.0 l/ha 400g/a| 69 | 58

Claims (14)

USEFUL MODEL FORMULA 1. A method of controlling an unwanted weed, in which a combination of: a) at least one herbicide based on triazolone is applied to the unwanted weed or to the area located near the weed, or applied to the soil, or applied to the crop Y) at least one second herbicide that can be selected from the following group: photosystem II inhibitor, and c) at least one third herbicide that can be selected from the following group: 4-GFPD inhibitor, bleaching inhibitor, cell division inhibitor, PPO inhibitor, ALS inhibitor , an inhibitor of microtubule assembly or an inhibitor of cellulose biosynthesis. 2. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the triazolone-based herbicide is selected from the following group: amicarbazone, bencarbazone, carfentrazone, flucarbazone, ipfencarbazone, propoxycarbazone, sulfentrazone or thiencarbazone. 3. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the triazolone-based herbicide is amicarbazone. 4. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the agricultural crop is selected from the following group of plants: cereal plants, rice, corn, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, turf, barley, potatoes, sweet potatoes, sunflower, rye, oats , wheat, soy, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava. 5. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the photosystem II inhibitor is selected from the following group: () herbicide based on phenylcarbamate; (ii) herbicide based on triazine; (iii) herbicide based on benthiadiazole; (mi) nitrile-based herbicide and urea-based herbicide, 6. The method according to claim 5, which differs in that the inhibitor of photosystem II is a triazine-based herbicide, preferably terbuthylazine. 7. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the third herbicide is a cell division inhibitor, preferably propisochlor. 8. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that a combination of amicarbazone, propisochlor and terbuthylazine is used to control weeds on cropland. 9. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the herbicides are present in the range from 1.0 to 99.0 Fo by weight of the entire combination. 10. The method according to claim 1, which is characterized by the fact that the combination provides a synergistic effect in the fight against one or more types of weeds. 11. The method according to claim 10, which is characterized in that the weed is selected from the group of weeds, which includes Атагапу, Сурегив, Вгаспіага деситбрепв, Сепспги5 еспіпайив5, ЕіІвивіпе іпадіса, Оідйагіа іпвиїагів, Іротоєа агапайоїїа, Енирпогріа НеіегорпуПа, Соттеїїпа БепдНаїепвіз, Атагапу мігідії, Атагапу 5ріпозив, Асаїурга іпаіса, Соттеїїпа соттипів, Оідега агу/епвів, Еирпогбіа депісціаіїе, Ропшаса оІегасеа, Райпепішт Пузіегорпгои5 . 12. The method according to claim 1, which is characterized by the fact that the combination is applied in the period of processing before emergence of seedlings or in the period of processing after emergence of seedlings, or in the early stages of processing after emergence of seedlings. 13. The method according to claim 1, which differs in that the combination is applied to the crop according to the application rate in the range from 0.01 to 10 kg/ha. 14. The method according to claim 1, which is characterized by the fact that the combination is an emulsion formulation.