TWI744343B - A questionnaire generation platform - Google Patents

A questionnaire generation platform Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI744343B
TWI744343B TW106120811A TW106120811A TWI744343B TW I744343 B TWI744343 B TW I744343B TW 106120811 A TW106120811 A TW 106120811A TW 106120811 A TW106120811 A TW 106120811A TW I744343 B TWI744343 B TW I744343B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
questionnaire
question
module
answer
occurrences
Prior art date
Application number
TW106120811A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201905780A (en
Inventor
金仁
陳裕昌
謝佩君
林昆模
張凱閔
洪維均
Original Assignee
全球華人股份有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 全球華人股份有限公司 filed Critical 全球華人股份有限公司
Priority to TW106120811A priority Critical patent/TWI744343B/en
Publication of TW201905780A publication Critical patent/TW201905780A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI744343B publication Critical patent/TWI744343B/en

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention is used to provide questionnaires for the user to investigate the market information or service status, greatly reduce the time of the questionnaire production, and enhance the smoothness of the fillers. The present invention can be used for the questionnaires to be selected or filled in by the questioner according to the database in which the plurality of problems have been stored or the question type modules classified according to the problem type. The questionnaire generating platform of the invention comprises a questionnaire generator, a questionnaire generating interface, a plurality of problem selecting interfaces, a sequential adjustment module, a questionnaire modification module, a communication database, a questionnaire sending module, a data analysis module with a report generation unit. Which can help users to quickly generate a questionnaire, and directly to the questionnaire and information statistics, conducive to the relevant information obtained.

Description

問卷產生平台 Questionnaire generation platform

本發明係為一種問卷產生平台,尤指一種可對應作答者的答題經驗所自動生成的問卷內容。 The present invention is a questionnaire generation platform, especially a questionnaire content that can be automatically generated corresponding to the answering experience of the respondent.

按,問卷調查是透過一套相同的問卷,交由一群符合目標對象填答者所得的反應(或答案),據以推估全體對於某特定問題的態度或行為反應。此種方法大量地運用在學術研究、民意調查、消費者意見蒐集、行銷調查等各種應用領域。因此,問卷調查是提供企業判斷市場訊息或是服務狀態最直接的方式,雖然需要花費較多的時間與較多的人力成本,但仍為廣泛運用。 According to the questionnaire, the response (or answer) of a group of respondents who meet the target audience is given to a group of people who meet the target audience through a set of the same questionnaire, based on which the attitude or behavioral response of the whole group to a specific question can be estimated. This method is widely used in various application fields such as academic research, public opinion surveys, consumer opinion gathering, and marketing surveys. Therefore, questionnaire surveys are the most direct way for companies to judge market information or service status. Although they require more time and labor costs, they are still widely used.

但由於問卷調查已有相當久的歷史,大多數的受訪者都已有被訪問數次的經驗,尤其是相同類型的問題已經作答數次,當受訪者在回覆相同問題時,易產生煩燥感,導致答案有可能非正確答案,喪失問卷調查的目的。 However, since the questionnaire survey has a long history, most of the interviewees have been interviewed several times, especially if the same type of question has been answered several times. When the interviewee responds to the same question, it is easy to produce A sense of irritability, leading to the possibility of incorrect answers, losing the purpose of the questionnaire survey.

再者,問卷的題目在設計上有諸多不易,尤其是在於題目的設計,如何在題目中獲取需要的資訊,並判斷該筆答題資訊的有效性,實為現今使用者在題目設計上的困擾。 Furthermore, there are many difficulties in the design of the questionnaire, especially in the design of the question. How to obtain the required information from the question and judge the validity of the answer information is actually a problem for current users in the design of the question. .

為克服上述狀況,本發明係提供一種可協助使用者完成問卷以及問卷的產生平台。本發明可依據已儲存有複數筆問題的資料庫或是依問題類型分類的題型模組進行問卷的產生,以供答題者進行答案的選擇或填寫。 In order to overcome the above situation, the present invention provides a platform that can assist users to complete questionnaires and questionnaire generation. The present invention can generate a questionnaire based on a database that has stored a plurality of questions or a question type module classified according to the question type, so that the answerer can choose or fill in the answer.

本發明之一種問卷產生平台,係包括:一問卷產生器、一問卷產生介面、複數個問題選擇介面、一順序調整模組、一問卷修改模組、一通訊資料庫、一問卷發送模組、一資料分析模組與一報告產生單元。 A questionnaire generation platform of the present invention includes: a questionnaire generator, a questionnaire generation interface, a plurality of question selection interfaces, a sequence adjustment module, a questionnaire modification module, a communication database, a questionnaire sending module, A data analysis module and a report generation unit.

其中,問卷產生器儲存於一網路伺服器內,其包括:一問卷產生介面與複數個問題。問卷產生介面可供使用者自使用者端的裝置連線操作。複數個問題選擇介面係分別依問題類型被分類形成數個題型模組,此些題型模組皆儲存於該網路伺服器內。順序調整模組對該些題型模組或是該些問題進行排序。問卷修改模組係對該些問題進行修改。以及,通訊資料庫包括一使用者資料庫與一外部資料庫,其皆儲存於該網路伺服器或是另一網路伺服器內,供使用者選擇欲發送的對象。問卷發送模組係依照所擇的對象進行發送。資料分析模組依照回傳的結果執行下列模組,包括:報告產生單元,係用以產生發送後的相關資訊。 Among them, the questionnaire generator is stored in a web server, and includes: a questionnaire generating interface and a plurality of questions. The questionnaire generation interface allows the user to connect to the device from the user side. The multiple question selection interfaces are classified into several question type modules according to the question types, and these question type modules are all stored in the web server. The order adjustment module sorts the question type modules or the questions. The questionnaire modification module is to modify these questions. And, the communication database includes a user database and an external database, both of which are stored in the network server or another network server for the user to select the object to be sent. The questionnaire sending module is sent according to the selected object. The data analysis module executes the following modules according to the returned results, including: a report generating unit, which is used to generate relevant information after sending.

藉由上述之問卷產生平台,可協助使用者產生問卷,並進行問卷發送與資訊的統計,利於進行相關訊息的取得。 The questionnaire generation platform mentioned above can help users generate questionnaires, and perform questionnaire sending and information statistics, which facilitates the acquisition of relevant information.

於實施例中進一步包括一問卷發放樣本結構調控模組,根 據已收到的問卷數量進行分析,並再根據結果調整對應族群的問卷發送量,藉以供問卷調查的結果分析用。 The embodiment further includes a questionnaire distribution sample structure control module, root Analyze the number of questionnaires that have been received, and then adjust the number of questionnaires sent by the corresponding ethnic group based on the results for the analysis of the results of the questionnaire survey.

於實施例中進一步提及本發明包括一推薦模組,透過推薦模組建議問題出現順序。 It is further mentioned in the embodiments that the present invention includes a recommendation module, through which the order of occurrence of problems is suggested.

於實施例提及該推薦模組可進一步執行下列演算式來判斷推薦順序:先計算一出現頻率,係由被選擇的題目出現總次數除以被選擇的題目計算在同一類別所出現的次數總合。當出現頻率高於0.1時,則一推薦分數的計算式即為:(在該問題內同一類別中出現的次數除以該問題出現的總次數)*2+頻率。當出現頻率小於或等於0.1時,則一推薦分數的計算式即為(在該問題內同一類別中出現的次數除以該問題出現的總次數)+頻率。 It is mentioned in the embodiment that the recommendation module can further execute the following calculation formula to determine the recommendation order: first calculate a frequency of occurrence, which is calculated by dividing the total number of times the selected question appears by the selected question and the total number of times the same category appears combine. When the frequency of occurrence is higher than 0.1, the calculation formula of a recommended score is: (the number of occurrences in the same category in the question divided by the total number of occurrences of the question)*2+frequency. When the frequency of occurrence is less than or equal to 0.1, the calculation formula of a recommendation score is (the number of occurrences in the same category in the question divided by the total number of occurrences of the question) + frequency.

於實施例中提及進一步於平台設置一關鍵字檢索系統,以供使用者進行問題的搜尋。 In the embodiment, it is mentioned that a keyword search system is further provided on the platform for users to search for questions.

本發明實施例係進一步包括一題目簡省模組,用以判斷同一答題者或是曾與答題者任職於相同公司的其他答題者是否在一指定時間內回答過相同問題,若有,則在問卷發送前,將相同問題刪除後或是將相同問題所對應的答案帶入後再發出。藉此可精簡答題的數量,減少答題者所需的時間。 The embodiment of the present invention further includes a question simplification module to determine whether the same answerer or other answerers who have worked for the same company as the answerer have answered the same question within a specified period of time. If so, then Before sending the questionnaire, delete the same question or bring in the answer corresponding to the same question before sending it out. This can simplify the number of answers and reduce the time required for answerers.

本發明實施例提及該資料分析模組進一步包括一答題配合度分析單元,將答題者回答進行驗證分析確認回答品質,並且依此品質結果作為配合度之判斷,若品質結果好,則判斷此答題者為配合度高,並記錄於該網路伺服器內。 According to the embodiment of the present invention, the data analysis module further includes an answer cooperation degree analysis unit, which verifies and analyzes the answerer’s answers to confirm the answer quality, and uses the quality result as the judgment of the degree of cooperation. If the quality result is good, judge this Respondents have a high degree of cooperation and are recorded in the web server.

本發明實施例提及該資料分析模組進一步包括一答題配合度分析單元,其係於挑選答題者時,若答題者無先前答題品質可參考,則依據其前一公司同事的答題品質作為判斷。 According to the embodiment of the present invention, the data analysis module further includes an answer coordination degree analysis unit, which is used to select answerers. If the answerers have no previous answer quality to refer to, the answer quality of the previous company colleague will be used as the judgment. .

本發明實施例提及進一步於該資料分析模組包括一得分還原單元,係由該網路伺服器依照一算式進行取得還原得分,算式為:原始得分+[(評估標準/原始得分)-1]=還原得分;其中,該評估標準係為預設值或是由提問者選擇。 The embodiment of the present invention mentions that the data analysis module further includes a score restoration unit, and the network server obtains the restoration score according to a calculation formula: original score + [(evaluation standard/original score)-1 ]=Recovery score; among them, the evaluation standard is a preset value or selected by the questioner.

根據上述諸多優點,並為使審查委員對本能進一步的瞭解,故揭露一較佳之實施方式如下,配合圖式、圖號,將本發明之構成內容及其所達成的功效詳細說明如後: Based on the above-mentioned many advantages, and in order to further understand the instinct of the examiner, a preferred embodiment is disclosed as follows. With the drawings and figure numbers, the composition of the present invention and the effects achieved by it are described in detail as follows:

P:問卷產生平台 P: Questionnaire generation platform

1:問卷產生器 1: Questionnaire generator

2:問卷產生介面 2: Questionnaire generation interface

3:問題選擇介面 3: Question selection interface

4:順序調整模組 4: Sequence adjustment module

5:問卷修改模組 5: Questionnaire modification module

6:通訊資料庫 6: Communication database

61:使用者資料庫 61: User database

62:外部資料庫 62: External database

7:問卷發送模組 7: Questionnaire sending module

8:資料分析模組 8: Data analysis module

81:答題配合度分析單元 81: Analysis Unit of Answer Coordination

82:得分還原單元 82: score reduction unit

9:報告產生單元 9: report generation unit

10:推薦模組 10: Recommended modules

11:關鍵字檢索系統 11: Keyword retrieval system

12:題目簡省模組 12: Short title module

13:問卷發放樣本結構調控模組 13: Questionnaire distribution sample structure control module

Si:已回收樣本數 Si: Number of recovered samples

Ni:可行銷名單數 Ni: Number of viable sales lists

Pi:目標比例 Pi: target ratio

AdNi:調控發送數 AdNi: Regulate the number of sent

S:網路伺服器 S: Web server

D:使用者裝置 D: User device

(有闕漏,煩請補上) (There are faults, please fill in)

第1圖係為本實施例問卷產生平台之單元示意圖。 Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the units of the questionnaire generation platform of this embodiment.

第2圖係為本實施例方法流程示意圖。 Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the method flow of this embodiment.

第3圖係為另一實施例問卷產生平台之單元示意圖。 Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of units of a questionnaire generation platform according to another embodiment.

第4圖係為關鍵字標籤說明之示意圖。 Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the keyword label description.

第5A圖係為學校表現得分差異的折線比較圖。 Figure 5A is a line comparison chart of the differences in school performance scores.

第5B圖係為企業評估標準差異的折線比較圖。 Figure 5B is a line comparison chart of the differences in corporate assessment standards.

第5C圖係為學校表現得分還原得分後之折線比較圖。 Figure 5C is the line comparison chart after the school performance score has been restored.

第6圖係為問卷發放樣本結構調控模組之設定與計算結果示意圖。 Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of the setting and calculation results of the questionnaire distribution sample structure control module.

請參閱第1圖所示,本實施例之一種問卷產生平台P包括:一問卷產生器1、一問卷產生介面2、問題選擇介面3、一順序調整模組4、一問卷修改模組5、一通訊資料庫6、一問卷發送模組7、一資料分析模組8與一報告產生單元9。 As shown in Figure 1, a questionnaire generation platform P of this embodiment includes: a questionnaire generator 1, a questionnaire generation interface 2, a question selection interface 3, a sequence adjustment module 4, a questionnaire modification module 5. A communication database 6, a questionnaire sending module 7, a data analysis module 8 and a report generation unit 9.

問卷產生器1儲存於一網路伺服器S內,其包括一問卷產生介面2與問題選擇介面3。問卷產生介面2可供使用者自使用者端的使用者裝置D連線操作,用以提供相關操作介面引導使用者完成問卷。問題選擇介面3係分別依問題類型,將數題問題分類形成數個題型模組,此些題型模組皆儲存於該網路伺服器S內。所述類型可包括校友基本資料、職場意見(如實習意見、招募標準)、學習意見(如證照、科系)、初次尋職狀況、學習狀況、學習成效、課程意見、企業資料、學生資料、表現滿意度等。 The questionnaire generator 1 is stored in a web server S, which includes a questionnaire generating interface 2 and a question selection interface 3. The questionnaire generation interface 2 allows the user to connect and operate from the user device D on the user side, and is used to provide a relevant operation interface to guide the user to complete the questionnaire. The question selection interface 3 is to categorize the number of questions into several question type modules according to the question types, and these question type modules are all stored in the network server S. The types can include basic information of alumni, workplace opinions (such as internship opinions, recruitment standards), learning opinions (such as licenses, departments), initial job search status, learning status, learning effectiveness, course opinions, corporate information, student information, Performance satisfaction, etc.

順序調整模組4用以對該些題型模組或是該些問題或是答案的順序進行排序,以使問卷在進行填寫時,可以進行資訊的交錯確認,達到有效性的確認。 The order adjustment module 4 is used to sort the question type modules or the order of the questions or answers, so that when the questionnaire is filled out, information can be interleaved and confirmed to achieve validity confirmation.

問卷修改模組5係對該些問題進行修改,可供使用者透過使用者裝置D對問題內容進行編修,以符合使用者詢問內容的正確性。 The questionnaire modification module 5 modifies these questions, and allows the user to edit the content of the question through the user device D to meet the correctness of the content of the user's inquiry.

通訊資料庫6包括一使用者資料庫61與一外部資料庫62,其皆儲存於該網路伺服器S或是另一網路伺服器內,供使用者選擇欲發送的對象。於使用者資料庫61中,儲存有複數筆由使用者自行收集、儲存的答題者資料。外部資料庫62則是儲存有其他的使用者收集或是平台營運商所 持有的答題者資料。 The communication database 6 includes a user database 61 and an external database 62, both of which are stored in the network server S or another network server for the user to select the object to be sent. In the user database 61, there are stored a plurality of respondent data collected and stored by the user. The external database 62 stores other user collections or platform operators’ Respondent information held.

問卷發送模組5係供使用者選擇在通訊資料庫6裡的答題者資料,經由電子郵件系統或是行動通訊系統或是無線通訊系統進行問卷發送,答題者可經由電腦裝置或是行動裝置開啟對應網站或是應用程式來進行作答,接著,資料分析模組8依照回傳的結果執行報告產生單元9,報告產生單元9可用以產生發送後的相關資訊。 The questionnaire sending module 5 is for the user to select the respondent data in the communication database 6, and send the questionnaire through an email system, a mobile communication system or a wireless communication system, and the respondent can open it through a computer device or a mobile device Responding to the website or application program, then the data analysis module 8 executes the report generating unit 9 according to the returned result, and the report generating unit 9 can be used to generate related information after sending.

本發明之問卷產生平台P可協助使用者產生問卷,並進行問卷發送與資訊的統計,使得問卷的製作、發送以及填寫完成後的資料整理等作業,皆可透過本實施例完成。其中,可應用的調查包括雇主滿意度調查、畢業生流向調查、學生學習成效調查、實習滿意度調查等。 The questionnaire generation platform P of the present invention can assist users in generating questionnaires, and perform questionnaire sending and information statistics, so that the preparation, sending, and data sorting of completed questionnaires can all be completed by this embodiment. Among them, applicable surveys include employer satisfaction surveys, graduate flow surveys, student learning effectiveness surveys, and internship satisfaction surveys.

進者,如第3圖所示,所述之伺服器S進一步包括一推薦模組10,透過推薦模組10建議問題出現的順序。該推薦模組31可進一步執行下列演算式計算出推薦分數後來判斷推薦順序。首先,先計算出一出現頻率:一出現頻率=被選擇的題目的總出現次數 除以 被選擇的所有題目之總出現次數的總合。 Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 3, the server S further includes a recommendation module 10, through which the recommendation module 10 suggests the order of occurrence of problems. The recommendation module 31 can further execute the following calculation formula to calculate the recommendation score and then determine the recommendation order. First of all, first calculate an appearance frequency: an appearance frequency = the total number of appearances of the selected item divided by the sum of the total number of appearances of all the selected items.

當經由上述算式計算而得的出現頻率高於0.1時,則一推薦分數的計算式即為:一推薦分數=(該問題在同一類別中出現的次數除以該問題在各類別出現的總次數)*2+出現頻率。 When the frequency of occurrence calculated by the above formula is higher than 0.1, the calculation formula of a recommendation score is: a recommendation score = (the number of times the question appears in the same category divided by the total number of times the question appears in each category )*2+ Frequency of appearance.

當經由算式計算得到的出現頻率小於或等於0.1時,則一推薦分數的計算式即為: 一推薦分數=(在該問題內同一類別中出現的次數除以該問題出現的總次數)+出現頻率。 When the frequency of occurrence calculated by the formula is less than or equal to 0.1, the formula for a recommended score is: A recommendation score = (the number of occurrences in the same category in the question divided by the total number of occurrences of the question) + frequency of occurrence.

為使上述算式意義更清楚,係提供一例子作為參考:例如:甲校欲進行雇主滿意度調查(A類),以下有三道題要推薦給甲校,其推薦順序計算如下:

Figure 106120811-A0305-02-0009-1
In order to make the meaning of the above formula more clear, the department provides an example as a reference: For example: School A wants to conduct an employer satisfaction survey (Type A), the following three questions should be recommended to School A, and the recommendation order is calculated as follows:
Figure 106120811-A0305-02-0009-1

計算式:Recommendation 1=Importance*2+Frequency =(40/90)*2+90/(90+50+10) =0.89+0.6 =1.49 Calculation formula: Recommendation 1=Importance*2+Frequency =(40/90)*2+90/(90+50+10) =0.89+0.6 =1.49

Recommendation 2=Importance*2+Frequency =(40/50)*2+40/(90+50+10) =1.6+0.27 =1.87 Recommendation 2=Importance*2+Frequency =(40/50)*2+40/(90+50+10) =1.6+0.27 =1.87

Recommendation 3=Importance+Frequency =(10/10)+10/(90+50+10) =1+0.07 =1.07 Recommendation 3=Importance+Frequency =(10/10)+10/(90+50+10) =1+0.07 =1.07

由上述算式中,可清楚得到結果的順序為2>1>3,換言之,推薦順序即為2、1、3,藉此可快速地完成問卷調查的分析結果。 From the above formula, it is clear that the order of the results is 2>1>3. In other words, the recommended order is 2, 1, 3, so that the analysis results of the questionnaire can be completed quickly.

於實施例中提及進一步於平台P設置一關鍵字檢索系統11,以供使用者進行問題的搜尋,藉此可供使用者快速找到所需問題。即如第4圖所示,將各問題設置相關的文字標籤(可由系統進行人工輸入或是系統自行切詞與尋找同義詞再置入),當使用者搜尋文字時,即可自標籤中尋找 對應的問題,以加速使用者尋找問題的方式。 In the embodiment, it is mentioned that a keyword search system 11 is further provided on the platform P for users to search for questions, so that the users can quickly find the required questions. That is, as shown in Figure 4, set relevant text labels for each question (either manually input by the system or the system can cut words and find synonyms and then insert them). When users search for text, they can search from the labels. Corresponding problems to speed up the way users find problems.

本發明實施例係進一步包括一題目簡省模組12,用以判斷同一答題者或是曾與答題者任職於相同公司的其他答題者是否在一指定時間內回答過相同問題,若有,則在問卷發送前,將相同問題刪除後再發出。藉此可精簡答題的數量,減少答題者所需的時間。其中,判斷是否在指定時間內答過相同問題的方式係由平台P或是問卷發送模組7根據發送記錄所記載的資料進行比對確認,即在完成問卷發送後,平台P會將發送記錄儲存,以供未來進行比對使用。 The embodiment of the present invention further includes a question shortening module 12 for judging whether the same answerer or other answerers who have worked in the same company as the answerer have answered the same question within a specified period of time, if so, then Before sending the questionnaire, delete the same question before sending it out. This can simplify the number of answers and reduce the time required for answerers. Among them, the way to determine whether the same question has been answered within the specified time is by the platform P or the questionnaire sending module 7 to compare and confirm the data recorded in the sending record, that is, after completing the questionnaire sending, the platform P will send the record Save it for future comparison.

又,所述之進一步包括一答題配合度分析單元81,將答題者回答進行驗證分析確認回答品質,即針對回答的正確性或是用心程度進行分類,並且依此品質結果作為配合度之判斷,如果正確性高或是用心程度高,即定義為品質好,反之即定義為品質差。當品質結果是好的狀態時,即判斷此答題者為配合度高,並記錄於該網路伺服器內。再進一步地說明,在問卷的設計上可把握「針對問卷進行反向題以及相同題目以相反方式詢問,進行使用者認真與否的初步篩選」、「針對填答分布狀況與填答時間進行分析,將分析結果為離群值之填答者標記為不認真之填答者」、「針對過去問卷開放性題目如簡答題等進行文字探勘,建立問卷不配合詞彙資料庫,當使用者填寫的開放性題目包含多次問卷不配合詞彙即篩選為不認真之填答者」等方式,即可作為配合度判斷用的方式。依照過往填答狀況分析,取得各公司填寫狀況,以利後續挑選填寫問卷後選公司之依據。另依照公司行業別、公司員工數、公司資本額、填寫者歲數、性別、職階等背景因素進行分析,挑出在何種背景下的填寫者填寫意願較高, 再者,該答題配合度分析單元81係於挑選答題者時,若答題者無先前答題品質可參考,則可依據被挑選之答題者的前一公司同事的答題品質作為判斷。即平台會根據答題者的相關資料尋找出答題者的前一任職公司,再於資料庫中比對尋找其前同事(可由系統限制是否為同一時期或是同一部門等條件),經由其前同事的答題結果作為判斷此次欲邀請答題的對象是否符合品質條件之要求。 In addition, the above further includes an answer coordination degree analysis unit 81, which validates and analyzes the answers of the respondent to confirm the answer quality, that is, classifies the correctness of the answers or the degree of care, and uses the quality results as the judgment of the degree of coordination. If the accuracy is high or the intention is high, it is defined as good quality, otherwise it is defined as poor quality. When the quality result is good, the answerer is judged to have a high degree of cooperation and recorded in the web server. To further explain, in the design of the questionnaire, it is possible to grasp the "reverse questions for the questionnaire and the same question in the opposite way, and the preliminary screening of whether the user is serious or not", "analysis of the distribution of the answers and the time of the answers , Mark the answerers whose analysis results are outliers as inconscientious answerers", "for open questionnaires in the past, such as short answer questions, etc., conduct text exploration, create a questionnaire that does not cooperate with the vocabulary database, when the user fills in Open questions include multiple questionnaires that do not match the vocabulary, which means they are screened as unserious answerers, etc., which can be used as a method for judging the degree of cooperation. According to the analysis of the past answering situation, obtain the filling status of each company to facilitate the subsequent selection of the basis for selecting the company after filling in the questionnaire. In addition, analyze the background factors such as the company’s industry category, the number of company employees, the amount of company’s capital, the age, gender, and rank of the applicant, and select the background under which the applicant is more willing to fill in. Furthermore, the answer coordination degree analysis unit 81 is used to select answerers. If the answerer has no previous answer quality to refer to, it can be judged based on the answer quality of the colleague of the previous company of the selected answerer. That is to say, the platform will find the respondent’s previous company based on the respondent’s relevant information, and then compare it in the database to find his former colleague (can be restricted by the system whether it is the same period or the same department, etc.), through his former colleague The result of answering the question is used to judge whether the object to be invited to answer the question meets the requirements of the quality condition.

又,該資料分析模組8包括一得分還原單元82,係由該網路伺服器S或平台P依照下列算式取得還原得分,算式為:原始得分+[(評估標準/原始得分)-1]=還原得分;其中,該評估標準係為預設值或是由提問者選擇。 In addition, the data analysis module 8 includes a score restoration unit 82, which is obtained by the network server S or platform P according to the following formula: original score + [(evaluation standard/original score)-1] =Recovery score; among them, the evaluation standard is a preset value or selected by the questioner.

請配合第5A圖、第5B圖與第5C圖說明還原得分之使用方式。第5A圖為得分差異的比較,於圖中可發現各校得分差異不大,再自第5B圖所示,可得知企業對於國立台灣大學的畢業生要求的水準較高,但是這是無法自分數反應出各校的實際狀況。透過還原得分的計算後,即如第5C圖所示,若以其中的「實務應用能力」來計算,其算式如下:中原大學還原得分=4.15+[(4.3/4.15)-1]=4.15+0.04=4.19 Please cooperate with Figure 5A, Figure 5B and Figure 5C to explain how to use the recovery score. Figure 5A is a comparison of score differences. In the figure, it can be seen that the scores of each school have little difference. From Figure 5B, it can be seen that the company has a higher level of requirements for graduates of National Taiwan University, but this is not possible. The self-score reflects the actual situation of each school. After calculating the reduction score, as shown in Figure 5C, if the "practical application ability" is used for calculation, the formula is as follows: Central Plains University reduction score=4.15+[(4.3/4.15)-1]=4.15+ 0.04=4.19

國立臺灣大學還原得分=4.12+[(4.42/4.12)-1]=4.12+0.07=4.19 National Taiwan University reduction score=4.12+[(4.42/4.12)-1]=4.12+0.07=4.19

蘭陽技術學院還原得分=4.09+[(4.02/4.09)-1]=4.09+(-0.02)=4.07經此即可發現「實務應用能力」類別中,中原大學與國立台灣大學的分數是相同的,藉以可打破舊有企業單純憑印象而無根據的判斷依據,提升人才尋找的正確性。 Lanyang Institute of Technology’s reduction score=4.09+[(4.02/4.09)-1]=4.09+(-0.02)=4.07 It can be found that in the "practical application ability" category, Chung Yuan Christian University and National Taiwan University have the same score It can break the old company's unfounded judgment based solely on impressions and improve the correctness of talent search.

再者,進一步於平台包括一問卷發放樣本結構調控模組 13,根據已收到的問卷數量進行分析,並再根據結果調整對應族群的問卷發送量,藉以供問卷調查的結果分析用。問卷發放樣本結構調控模組13可經由使用者進行變數的設定、設定目標比例與根據己回收數量調整行銷數(發送數),其中變數可為「地區」、「產業」或是「公司規模」,而設定目標比例係可依所選擇的變數進行對應的顯示,以第6圖所示,若是選擇「地區」變數,則顯示區域名稱,再供使用者對各區域進行目標比例的設定,接著,根據已回收數量調整行銷的數量,即如圖所示,當已回收的樣本數Si未達目標比例Pi時,將會配合可行銷名單數Ni對應增加調控發送數AdNi,而調控發送數AdNi的計算式為:

Figure 106120811-A0305-02-0012-2
Furthermore, the platform further includes a questionnaire distribution sample structure control module 13, which analyzes the number of questionnaires received, and then adjusts the number of questionnaires sent by the corresponding ethnic group according to the results, so as to analyze the results of the questionnaire survey. The questionnaire distribution sample structure control module 13 allows users to set variables, set target ratios, and adjust the number of marketing (number of deliveries) based on the number of collections. The variables can be "region", "industry" or "company size" , And setting the target ratio can be displayed corresponding to the selected variable. As shown in Figure 6, if the "region" variable is selected, the area name will be displayed for the user to set the target ratio for each area, and then , Adjust the marketing quantity according to the recovered quantity, that is, as shown in the figure, when the recovered sample number Si does not reach the target ratio Pi, the number of feasible sales lists Ni will be matched with the corresponding increase in the number of regulated sending AdNi, and the number of regulated sending AdNi will be increased. The calculation formula is:
Figure 106120811-A0305-02-0012-2

以北北基的數量來計算:3922*{1-[6.68%-(-6.99%)]}=3922*(1-13.67%)=3922*86.33%=3386。藉此可得知需要再發送3386份,才能達到目標比例Pi的設定值。藉此可控制問卷於相關變數的影響,提升整體的精確性。 Calculated by the number of North North Base: 3922*{1-[6.68%-(-6.99%)]}=3922*(1-13.67%)=3922*86.33%=3386. It can be known that 3386 copies need to be sent to reach the set value of the target ratio Pi. In this way, the influence of the questionnaire on related variables can be controlled and the overall accuracy can be improved.

綜上所述,僅為本發明之實施例,其可據以衍生之運用範圍廣泛,倍增生產效率亦可兼顧生產成本,實具產業利用價值。凡與本發明技術思想相同之簡易轉換或等效轉換者,皆屬本發明之專利範圍之中。 In summary, it is only an embodiment of the present invention, which can be derived from a wide range of applications, multiplying production efficiency can also take into account production costs, and has real industrial use value. Any simple conversion or equivalent conversion that is the same as the technical idea of the present invention falls within the scope of the patent of the present invention.

P‧‧‧問卷產生平台 P‧‧‧Questionnaire generation platform

D‧‧‧使用者裝置 D‧‧‧User device

1、2、3、N‧‧‧作答者 1, 2, 3, N‧‧‧Respondents

Claims (5)

一種問卷產生平台,係包括:一問卷產生器,係儲存於一網路伺服器內,其包括:一問卷產生介面,供使用者自使用者端的裝置連線操作:複數個問題選擇介面,係分別依問題類型被分類形成數個題型模組,此些題型模組皆儲存於該網路伺服器內;執行一推薦模組,透過該推薦模組建議問題出現順序,其中,該推薦模組係經由下列演算式來判斷推薦順序:先計算一出現頻率,係由被選擇題目的出現總次數除以所有被選擇的題目所的總出現次數的總合,當出現頻率高於0.1時,則一推薦分數的計算式即為:(在該問題內同一類別中出現的次數除以該問題出現的總次數)*2+出現頻率;當出現頻率小於或等於0.1時,則一推薦分數的計算式即為:(在該問題內同一類別中出現的次數除以該問題出現的總次數)+出現頻率;執行一順序調整模組,對該些題型模組或是該些問題進行排序;及,執行一問卷修改模組,對該些問題進行修改;以及,一通訊資料庫,係包括一使用者資料庫與一外部資料庫,其皆儲存於該網路伺服器或是另一網路伺服器內,供使用者選擇欲發送的對象;一問卷發送模組,係依照所選擇的對象經由電子郵件系統或是行動通訊系統或是無線通訊系統進行問卷發送,該所選擇的對象可經由電腦裝置或是行動裝置開啟對應網站或是應用程式來進行作答並回傳;一資料分析模組,依照回傳的結果執行下列模組,包括: 一報告產生單元,用以產生發送後的相關資訊。 A questionnaire generation platform includes: a questionnaire generator, which is stored in a network server, and includes: a questionnaire generation interface for users to connect to the device from the user side: a plurality of question selection interfaces, The question types are classified into several question type modules. These question type modules are stored in the network server; a recommendation module is executed and the order of the questions is suggested through the recommendation module. Among them, the recommendation The module uses the following formula to determine the recommended order: first calculate the frequency of occurrence, which is the total number of occurrences of the selected item divided by the sum of the total number of occurrences of all selected items, when the frequency of occurrence is higher than 0.1 , The calculation formula of a recommendation score is: (the number of occurrences in the same category in the question divided by the total number of occurrences of the question) * 2 + frequency of occurrence; when the frequency of occurrence is less than or equal to 0.1, a recommendation score The calculation formula of is: (the number of occurrences in the same category in the question divided by the total number of occurrences of the question) + frequency of occurrence; execute a sequence adjustment module, and perform these question type modules or these questions Sort; and, execute a questionnaire modification module to modify these questions; and, a communication database includes a user database and an external database, which are all stored in the network server or another In a web server, the user can choose the object to be sent; a questionnaire sending module is to send the questionnaire through an email system, a mobile communication system, or a wireless communication system according to the selected object. The selected object The subject can open the corresponding website or application via a computer device or a mobile device to answer and return; a data analysis module executes the following modules according to the returned results, including: A report generating unit is used to generate related information after sending. 如請求項1所述之問卷產生平台,其中進一步設置一關鍵字檢索系統。 The questionnaire generation platform described in claim 1, wherein a keyword retrieval system is further provided. 如請求項1所述之問卷產生平台,其中進一步包括一題目簡省模組,用以判斷同一答題者或是曾與答題者任職於相同公司的其他答題者是否在一指定時間內回答過相同問題,若有,則在問卷發送前,將相同問題刪除後再發出。 The questionnaire generation platform as described in claim 1, which further includes a question briefing module to determine whether the same answerer or other answerers who have worked in the same company as the answerer have answered the same question within a specified period of time If there are any questions, delete the same questions before sending the questionnaire. 如請求項1所述之問卷產生平台,其中該資料分析模組進一步包括一答題配合度分析單元,將答題者回答進行驗證分析確認回答品質,並且依此品質結果作為配合度之判斷,若品質結果好,則判斷此答題者為配合度高,並記錄於該網路伺服器內。 The questionnaire generation platform according to claim 1, wherein the data analysis module further includes an answer cooperation degree analysis unit, which verifies and analyzes the answers of the respondent to confirm the answer quality, and uses the quality result as the judgment of the degree of cooperation. If the result is good, the answerer is judged to be highly cooperative and recorded in the web server. 如請求項4所述之問卷產生平台,其中該答題配合度分析單元,進一步於挑選答題者時,若答題者無先前答題品質可參考,則依據其前一公司同事的答題品質作為判斷。 For example, the questionnaire generation platform described in claim 4, in which the answer coordination analysis unit further selects the answerer, if the answerer has no previous answer quality to refer to, it will be judged based on the answer quality of the previous company colleague.
TW106120811A 2017-06-22 2017-06-22 A questionnaire generation platform TWI744343B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW106120811A TWI744343B (en) 2017-06-22 2017-06-22 A questionnaire generation platform

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW106120811A TWI744343B (en) 2017-06-22 2017-06-22 A questionnaire generation platform

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201905780A TW201905780A (en) 2019-02-01
TWI744343B true TWI744343B (en) 2021-11-01

Family

ID=66213335

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW106120811A TWI744343B (en) 2017-06-22 2017-06-22 A questionnaire generation platform

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI744343B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112000412A (en) * 2020-08-20 2020-11-27 中国建设银行股份有限公司 Data acquisition method, device, equipment and storage medium

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI309806B (en) * 2004-05-26 2009-05-11 Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
CN101593295A (en) * 2008-05-26 2009-12-02 北京六所和瑞科技发展有限公司 A kind of questionnaire type computer-aided proposal estimating and examining system and evaluation method
TW201216193A (en) * 2010-10-08 2012-04-16 Yu xiang quan Questionnaire dispatching and processing device
CN104572136A (en) * 2015-02-15 2015-04-29 奚峰 Graphical questionnaire generation method and graphical questionnaire generation system
US20160117699A1 (en) * 2013-05-14 2016-04-28 Gut Feeling Laboratory Inc. Questionnaire system, questionnaire response device, questionnaire response method, and questionnaire response program

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI309806B (en) * 2004-05-26 2009-05-11 Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
CN101593295A (en) * 2008-05-26 2009-12-02 北京六所和瑞科技发展有限公司 A kind of questionnaire type computer-aided proposal estimating and examining system and evaluation method
TW201216193A (en) * 2010-10-08 2012-04-16 Yu xiang quan Questionnaire dispatching and processing device
US20160117699A1 (en) * 2013-05-14 2016-04-28 Gut Feeling Laboratory Inc. Questionnaire system, questionnaire response device, questionnaire response method, and questionnaire response program
CN104572136A (en) * 2015-02-15 2015-04-29 奚峰 Graphical questionnaire generation method and graphical questionnaire generation system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201905780A (en) 2019-02-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gledson et al. The adoption of 4D BIM in the UK construction industry: An innovation diffusion approach
WO2015002984A1 (en) Apparatus, system, and method for facilitating skills training
Briggs et al. Research mentorship in counselor education
US20210158714A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Inquiry Driven Learning
Zenebe et al. Relationship between individual's entrepreneurship intention, and adoption and knowledge of information technology and its applications: an empirical study
US20120109699A1 (en) Business risk system and program
CN113269662A (en) Intelligent teaching system based on big data
CN114600136A (en) System and method for automated operation of due diligence analysis to objectively quantify risk factors
Levy A study of learners' perceived value and satisfaction for implied effectiveness of online learning systems
TWI744343B (en) A questionnaire generation platform
Lamm et al. Getting to the Bottom Line: How Using Evaluation Results to Enhance Extension Programs can Lead to Greater Levels of Accountability.
Alstete An assessment of knowledge growth stages in organizations
Voorhees Institutional research's role in strategic planning
Jones et al. What makes ICT implementation successful: A case study of online assignment submission
Dattero et al. It pays to be agile
Coromina Soler Social networks and performance in knowledge creation. An application and a methodological proposal
Backlund et al. NCA program review standards: Background, application, and data
Narine The potential of mobile information communication technologies in strengthening the linkages between farmers and Extension in Trinidad
Salehi et al. Reforming accounting education content to fulfill business environment needs
Wee et al. Computer-Managed Instruction (CMI)-Based Online Forums
Talukder et al. Managerial skills and competencies in New Zealand organisations: a cause for concern
Langesee et al. EMPOWERING E-TUTORS: AN ITERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF AN E-TUTOR SELF-EVALUATION TOOL
Collini Exploring the impact of end-user engagement on the diffusion and adoption of a climate resilience tool in the Gulf of Mexico
Weitl-Harms USING SERVICE LEARNING PROJECTS TO INTRODUCE SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING TO SMALL RURAL ORGANIZATIONS
Todd Data-Driven Decisions: Business Intelligence (BI) Training Skills