TWI741366B - System and method for estimating transportation risk - Google Patents
System and method for estimating transportation risk Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TWI741366B TWI741366B TW108132619A TW108132619A TWI741366B TW I741366 B TWI741366 B TW I741366B TW 108132619 A TW108132619 A TW 108132619A TW 108132619 A TW108132619 A TW 108132619A TW I741366 B TWI741366 B TW I741366B
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- data
- vibration
- test
- output
- time
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本發明涉及一種運輸風險評估系統及其方法。The invention relates to a transportation risk assessment system and a method thereof.
在供應商提供伺服器予其客戶的流程中,組裝完成的整機櫃會從生產地被運送到客戶所在地。在車輛運送整機櫃的過程中,高速行駛的車輛因為不平整的路面而產生持續的振動。在運輸過程中,振動無法避免且持續存在。某些頻率的振動可能使產品中的敏感元件發生共振,雖然單次振動產生的應力不會立刻造成元件損壞,但是長時間持續的迴圈應力會造成元件結構的疲勞損傷,進而影響產品的功能或是讓產品損壞。運輸時的振動強度、發生時間、發生次數無法被預測,具有隨機性,因此需採用概率統計的方法去研究運輸過程的振動訊號特徵。In the process where the supplier provides the server to its customer, the assembled complete cabinet will be transported from the production site to the customer's location. In the process of transporting the entire cabinet by the vehicle, the high-speed vehicle generates continuous vibration due to the uneven road surface. During transportation, vibration cannot be avoided and persists. Vibration of certain frequencies may cause the sensitive components in the product to resonate. Although the stress generated by a single vibration will not cause damage to the component immediately, the long-term continuous loop stress will cause fatigue damage to the component structure, which will affect the function of the product. Or damage the product. The vibration intensity, occurrence time, and number of occurrences during transportation cannot be predicted and are random. Therefore, probability and statistics methods must be used to study the characteristics of vibration signals during transportation.
一般而言,振動訊號的資料採集係基於特定的運輸路線,採集後的資料只能代表該路線的平均振動水準。目前被大多數企業採用的隨機振動可靠性測試係參考美國材料和試驗協會(American Society for Testing and Materials,ASTM)或國際安全運輸協會(International Safe Transit Association,ISTA)所訂定的標準。然而,這兩個標準均是以指定載重量,指定懸吊系統的貨車在高速公路上以指定車速行駛作為基本情境進行資料採集,實際貨運的狀況往往與之差異甚大,因而上述二標準無法準確評估實際運輸在各種情況下的振動風險。Generally speaking, the data collection of vibration signals is based on a specific transportation route, and the collected data can only represent the average vibration level of the route. The random vibration reliability test currently used by most companies refers to the standards set by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or the International Safe Transit Association (ISTA). However, these two standards are based on the specified load capacity, and the truck with the specified suspension system is used as the basic situation to collect data on the expressway at the specified speed. The actual freight situation is often very different from it, so the above two standards are not accurate. Evaluate the vibration risk of actual transportation under various conditions.
有鑑於此,本發明提出一種運輸風險評估系統及其方法,針對實際運輸的隨機振動資料進行採集及處理,製成隨機振動加速度功率密度譜以評估產品在實際運輸時的振動風險。In view of this, the present invention proposes a transportation risk assessment system and method, which collect and process random vibration data of actual transportation to prepare random vibration acceleration power density spectrum to evaluate the vibration risk of products during actual transportation.
依據本發明一實施例敘述的一種運輸風險評估方法,適用於以車輛運輸之物件,所述的方法包括:設置感測器於車輛之底板,底板用於承載物件;感測器收集車輛運輸過程中之振動訊號;運算裝置依據振動訊號執行時域處理程序以輸出第一資料;運算裝置依據第一資料執行頻域處理程序以輸出第二資料;以及運算裝置依據第二資料及測試資料執行風險評估程序以輸出風險等級,其中第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間,測試資料包括測試振動強度及測試振動時間。According to an embodiment of the present invention, a transportation risk assessment method is applicable to objects transported by vehicles. The method includes: arranging a sensor on the floor of the vehicle, the floor is used to carry objects; the sensor collects the vehicle transportation process In the vibration signal; the computing device executes the time domain processing procedure according to the vibration signal to output the first data; the computing device executes the frequency domain processing procedure according to the first data to output the second data; and the computing device executes the risk based on the second data and the test data The evaluation process outputs the risk level, where the second data includes actual vibration intensity and actual vibration time, and the test data includes test vibration intensity and test vibration time.
依據本發明一實施例敘述的一種運輸風險評估系統,適用於以車輛運輸之物件,所述的系統包括:感測器、儲存裝置及運算裝置。感測器設置於車輛之底板。感測器用以收集車輛運輸過程中之振動訊號。儲存裝置用以儲存測試資料。測試資料包括測試振動時間及測試振動強度。運算裝置通訊連接儲存裝置。運算裝置用以執行時域處理程序、頻域處理程序及風險評估程序。時域處理程序依據振動訊號輸出第一資料。頻域處理程序依據第一資料輸出第二資料。第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間。風險評估程序依據第二資料及測試資料輸出風險等級。According to an embodiment of the present invention, a transportation risk assessment system is suitable for objects transported by vehicles. The system includes a sensor, a storage device, and a computing device. The sensor is arranged on the floor of the vehicle. The sensor is used to collect vibration signals during vehicle transportation. The storage device is used to store the test data. The test data includes test vibration time and test vibration intensity. The computing device is connected to the storage device in communication. The arithmetic device is used to execute time domain processing procedures, frequency domain processing procedures and risk assessment procedures. The time domain processing program outputs the first data according to the vibration signal. The frequency domain processing program outputs the second data according to the first data. The second data includes actual vibration intensity and actual vibration time. The risk assessment procedure outputs the risk level based on the second data and the test data.
藉由上述架構,本發明所揭露的運輸風險評估系統及其方法,透過實際收集的運輸的振動資料與實驗室測試的振動資料交互比對,進而得以準確地評估實際運輸時的風險等級,並且將評估結果應用於整機櫃包裝時增加減輕振動的設計,保證產品在運輸到目的地後的品質。With the above structure, the transportation risk assessment system and method disclosed in the present invention can compare the actual collected transportation vibration data with the laboratory test vibration data to accurately evaluate the risk level during actual transportation, and When the evaluation results are applied to the packaging of the entire cabinet, a design to reduce vibration is added to ensure the quality of the product after it is transported to the destination.
以上之關於本揭露內容之說明及以下之實施方式之說明係用以示範與解釋本發明之精神與原理,並且提供本發明之專利申請範圍更進一步之解釋。The above description of the disclosure and the following description of the implementation manners are used to demonstrate and explain the spirit and principle of the present invention, and to provide a further explanation of the patent application scope of the present invention.
以下在實施方式中詳細敘述本發明之詳細特徵以及優點,其內容足以使任何熟習相關技藝者了解本發明之技術內容並據以實施,且根據本說明書所揭露之內容、申請專利範圍及圖式,任何熟習相關技藝者可輕易地理解本發明相關之目的及優點。以下之實施例係進一步詳細說明本發明之觀點,但非以任何觀點限制本發明之範疇。The detailed features and advantages of the present invention will be described in detail in the following embodiments. The content is sufficient to enable anyone familiar with the relevant art to understand the technical content of the present invention and implement it accordingly, and according to the content disclosed in this specification, the scope of patent application and the drawings. Anyone who is familiar with relevant skills can easily understand the purpose and advantages of the present invention. The following examples further illustrate the viewpoints of the present invention in detail, but do not limit the scope of the present invention by any viewpoint.
請參考圖1,其係繪示本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統的方塊架構圖。如圖1所示,所述的系統包括感測器10、運算裝置30及儲存裝置50。Please refer to FIG. 1, which is a block diagram of a transportation risk assessment system according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the system includes a
感測器10進行感測以產生感測資料。運算裝置30用以取得感測器10的感測資料。舉例來說,運算裝置30由感測器10取得感測資料的方式可以是:將感測器10電性連接至運算裝置30以傳輸感測資料,將感測器10內部儲存感測資料的記憶卡電性連接到運算裝置30以傳輸感測資料,或者運算裝置30透過網路下載感測器10上傳至雲端的感測資料,本發明對運算裝置30取得感測器10的感測資料的方式不予限制。儲存裝置50存有測試資料,儲存裝置50通訊連接運算裝置30以傳輸測試資料。The
請參考圖2,其係繪示感測器10收集感測資料的設置示意圖。本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統適用於評估一物件70以車輛90實際運輸的風險等級。所述的物件70例如係整機櫃、伺服器或易受振動影響的貨物。所述的車輛90具有一底板92 ,用於承載物件70。Please refer to FIG. 2, which is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of the
請參考圖3,其係繪示本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估方法的流程圖。本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統係依據圖3所示的流程運行。Please refer to FIG. 3, which shows a flowchart of a transportation risk assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention. The transportation risk assessment system of an embodiment of the present invention operates according to the process shown in FIG. 3.
請參考圖2及圖3的步驟S10,設置感測器10於車輛90的底板92。感測器10用以收集車輛90運輸過程中之振動訊號。感測器10具有三軸加速度計及內建電源,可以記錄運輸過程中的加速度訊號,例如美國Lansmont公司製造的SAVER 3X90環境記錄儀。實務上,可使用具有強力磁鐵的底座12將感測器10吸附於貨車車廂的底板,如圖2所示。但感測器10的設置方式並不以此為限。另需注意的是,圖2繪示的感測器10、底座12物件70、車輛90及其底板92並非按照實際比例繪製,而僅作為舉例說明這些元件的相對位置之用。Please refer to step S10 in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 to install the
請參考步驟S12,以感測器10收集車輛90運輸過程中之振動訊號。詳言之,在運輸開始時啟動感測器10收集資料,在貨物到達後關閉感測器,並將感測期間收集到的振動訊號導出至運算裝置30(相當於運算裝置30由感測器10取得振動訊號)。振動訊號例如係三軸加速度訊號。運算裝置30可依據振動訊號執行時域處理程序、頻域處理程序及風險評估程序,其中時域處理程序係依據振動訊號輸出第一資料,對應於圖3的步驟S20;頻域處理程序係依據第一資料輸出第二資料,對應於圖3的步驟S22,風險評估程序係依據第二資料及測試資料輸出風險等級,對應於圖3的步驟S30。Please refer to step S12 to collect the vibration signal of the
請參考步驟S20,運算裝置30依據振動訊號執行時域處理程序以輸出第一資料。具體而言,運算裝置30消除振動訊號中的噪音部分。實務上,由於電壓或環境的因素,使得振動訊號呈現逐漸往上飄移的趨勢。因此,運算裝置30消除原始訊號中的線性趨勢項及二次趨勢項以輸出呈現水平趨勢的振動訊號,在此稱其為第三資料。然後,運算裝置30計算第三資料的一均值並判斷該均值是否達到一均值閾值,如果「是」則從第三資料中消除此均值閾值並將消除後的資料作為第四資料,如果「否」則逕以第三資料作為第四資料。接著,運算裝置30依據一峰值閾值(例如為0.1g)從第四資料中濾除停車資料以作為第五資料。所述的停車資料係運輸過程中車輛停止時所測得的數據,且由於這些數據無助於評估運輸風險,因此需將其濾除。運算裝置30再依據一截止頻率及第五資料執行一低通濾波程序以輸出第一資料,藉此讓第一資料的採樣頻率範圍(例如為0~200Hz)對應於測試資料的採樣頻率範圍。Please refer to step S20, the
請參考步驟S22,運算裝置30對第一資料執行頻域處理程序以輸出第二資料。具體而言,運算裝置30從第一資料中提取多個頻率點以及在每個頻率點上的振動幅值。實務上,運算裝置30依據經過時域處理程序的第一資料以及複數個預設參數執行快速傅立葉轉換(Fast Fourier Transform,FFT)以輸出第二資料。第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間。所述的預設參數包括FFT參數、採樣頻率及最大分析頻率等。Please refer to step S22, the
請參考步驟S30,運算裝置30依據第二資料及測試資料執行風險評估程序以輸出風險等級。第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間,測試資料包括測試振動強度及測試振動時間。詳言之,實驗室進行振動測試後產生的測試數據係儲存於儲存裝置50作為測試資料。相對於實際運輸而言,實驗室進行的振動測試採用較大的振動強度及相對較短的測試時間。本發明係基於線性疲勞累積損傷理論(Palmgren-Miner rule)進行推算,在振動強度和振動時間之間建立如下關係式:Please refer to step S30. The
(第1式) (Form 1)
其中tt 代表測試振動時間,at 代表測試振動強度的均方根值(Grms),aa 代表實際振動強度的均方根值(Grms), ta 代表實際振動時間,k一般而言取2。Where t t represents the test vibration time, a t represents the root mean square value of the test vibration intensity (Grms), a a represents the root mean square value of the actual vibration intensity (Grms), t a represents the actual vibration time, and k generally takes 2.
請參考圖4,其係繪示本發明一實施例的風險評估程序。Please refer to FIG. 4, which illustrates a risk assessment procedure of an embodiment of the present invention.
請參考步驟S32,運算裝置30依據測試資料之測試振動強度調整第二資料之實際振動強度,並依據測試資料之測試振動時間調整第二資料之實際振動時間。Please refer to step S32, the
請參考步驟S34,運算裝置30依據調整後之實際振動強度轉換第二資料之實際振動時間為另一振動時間,並依據調整後之實際振動時間轉換第二資料之實際振動強度為另一振動強度。Please refer to step S34, the
請參考步驟S36,運算裝置30比對測試振動時間及另一振動時間並比對測試振動強度及另一振動強度以輸出風險等級。Please refer to step S36, the
關於步驟S36中的風險等級判定,詳言之,若同時考慮振動強度及振動時間的比對,則有如下四種狀況:Regarding the risk level determination in step S36, in detail, if the comparison of vibration intensity and vibration time is considered at the same time, there are four situations as follows:
狀況1:測試振動強度大於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間大於另一振動時間。Condition 1: The test vibration intensity is greater than the other vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is greater than the other vibration time.
狀況2:測試振動強度大於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間小於或等於另一振動時間。Condition 2: The test vibration intensity is greater than the other vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is less than or equal to the other vibration time.
狀況3:測試振動強度小於或等於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間大於另一振動時間。Condition 3: The test vibration intensity is less than or equal to another vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is longer than the other vibration time.
狀況4:測試振動強度小於或等於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間小於或等於另一振動時間。Condition 4: The test vibration intensity is less than or equal to another vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is less than or equal to another vibration time.
若運算裝置30經比對得到狀況1,則可判定風險等級為低。若運算裝置30經比對得到狀況4,則可判定風險等級為高。若運算裝置30經比對得到狀況2或3時,可依據實際狀況,選擇性地偏重考慮振動時間或偏重考慮振動強度或選擇不偏重任一者。舉例來說,若選擇偏重考慮振動時間,則對於狀況2,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中高」,對於狀況3,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中低」。若選擇偏重考慮振動強度,則對於狀況2,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中低」,對於狀況3,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中高」。若選擇不偏重任一者,則對於狀況2及狀況3,運算裝置30皆判定風險等級為「中」。If the
請參考圖5,其係繪示本發明另一實施例的風險評估程序,此實施例的風險評估程序相當於前一實施例的風險評估程序的一種簡化版。Please refer to FIG. 5, which illustrates a risk assessment program of another embodiment of the present invention. The risk assessment program of this embodiment is equivalent to a simplified version of the risk assessment program of the previous embodiment.
請參考步驟S42,運算裝置30依據測試資料之測試振動強度調整第二資料之實際振動強度。舉例來說,假設測試資料之測試振動時間tt
為2小時,測試資料之測試振動強度at
為1.146g;並假設第二資料之實際振動強度aa
為0.239g,實際振動時間ta
為24小時。在步驟S42中,依據測試振動強度at
調整第二資料之實際測試量度aa
需放大約倍。Please refer to step S42, the
請參考步驟S44,運算裝置30依據調整後之實際振動強度轉換第二資料之實際振動時間為另一振動時間。承前例,運算裝置30將上述數值代入第1式可轉換出另一振動時間為1.04小時。Please refer to step S44, the
請參考步驟S46,運算裝置30比對測試振動時間及另一振動時間以輸出一風險等級。風險等級例如可分為高、低兩等級。承前例,由於2小時大於1.04小時,因此可判斷實驗室中的測試強度大於實際運輸中的振動強度,故判斷風險等級為「低」。反之,則判斷風險等級為「高」。Please refer to step S46, the
需注意的是,圖5的風險評估程序僅為圖4的風險評估程序簡化後的一種實施方式。本發明所屬技術領域之通常知識者可依據圖4及圖5,而得到另一種實施方式(運算裝置30比對測試振動強度及另一振動強度以輸出風險等級),在此不重複敘述。It should be noted that the risk assessment procedure in Fig. 5 is only a simplified implementation of the risk assessment procedure in Fig. 4. Those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains can obtain another implementation (compare the test vibration intensity and another vibration intensity to output the risk level by the computing device 30) based on FIGS. 4 and 5, which will not be repeated here.
綜合以上所述,本發明所揭露的運輸風險評估系統及其方法,透過實際收集的運輸的振動資料與實驗室測試的振動資料交互比對,進而得以準確地評估實際運輸時的風險等級,並且將評估結果應用於整機櫃包裝時增加減輕振動的設計,保證產品在運輸到目的地後的品質。In summary, the transportation risk assessment system and method disclosed in the present invention can accurately evaluate the risk level during actual transportation through interactive comparison between the actually collected transportation vibration data and laboratory test vibration data, and When the evaluation results are applied to the packaging of the entire cabinet, a design to reduce vibration is added to ensure the quality of the product after it is transported to the destination.
雖然本發明以前述之實施例揭露如上,然其並非用以限定本發明。在不脫離本發明之精神和範圍內,所為之更動與潤飾,均屬本發明之專利保護範圍。關於本發明所界定之保護範圍請參考所附之申請專利範圍。Although the present invention is disclosed in the foregoing embodiments, it is not intended to limit the present invention. All changes and modifications made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention fall within the scope of the patent protection of the present invention. For the scope of protection defined by the present invention, please refer to the attached scope of patent application.
10:感測器 12:底座 30:儲存裝置 50:運算裝置 70:物件 90:車輛 92:底板 S10~S30:步驟10: Sensor 12: Base 30: storage device 50: computing device 70: Object 90: Vehicle 92: bottom plate S10~S30: steps
圖1係繪示本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統的方塊架構圖。 圖2係繪示感測器收集感測資料的設置示意圖。 圖3係依據本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估方法所繪示的流程圖。 圖4係依據本發明一實施例的風險評估程序所繪示的流程圖。 圖5係依據本發明另一實施例的風險評估程序所繪示的流程圖。FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a transportation risk assessment system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing the setup of the sensor to collect sensing data. FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a transportation risk assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a risk assessment program according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a risk assessment program according to another embodiment of the present invention.
S10~S30:步驟S10~S30: steps
Claims (8)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW108132619A TWI741366B (en) | 2019-09-10 | 2019-09-10 | System and method for estimating transportation risk |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW108132619A TWI741366B (en) | 2019-09-10 | 2019-09-10 | System and method for estimating transportation risk |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TW202111659A TW202111659A (en) | 2021-03-16 |
TWI741366B true TWI741366B (en) | 2021-10-01 |
Family
ID=76035517
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW108132619A TWI741366B (en) | 2019-09-10 | 2019-09-10 | System and method for estimating transportation risk |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TWI741366B (en) |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090312899A1 (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2009-12-17 | Mitchell Bradley J | Monitoring vehicle and equipment operations at an airport |
CN102069769A (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2011-05-25 | 交通运输部公路科学研究所 | Dangerous goods transport vehicle dynamic monitoring method and early warning device |
CN102270829A (en) * | 2010-06-01 | 2011-12-07 | 台达电子工业股份有限公司 | Apparatus and calculating method for early warning on health of servo motor |
CN104615177A (en) * | 2014-12-09 | 2015-05-13 | 中国包装科研测试中心 | Vehicle-mounted logistics monitoring system |
US20180290621A1 (en) * | 2017-04-11 | 2018-10-11 | Blackberry Limited | Adjusting cargo transportation unit elements in response to theft events |
-
2019
- 2019-09-10 TW TW108132619A patent/TWI741366B/en active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090312899A1 (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2009-12-17 | Mitchell Bradley J | Monitoring vehicle and equipment operations at an airport |
CN102270829A (en) * | 2010-06-01 | 2011-12-07 | 台达电子工业股份有限公司 | Apparatus and calculating method for early warning on health of servo motor |
CN102069769A (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2011-05-25 | 交通运输部公路科学研究所 | Dangerous goods transport vehicle dynamic monitoring method and early warning device |
CN104615177A (en) * | 2014-12-09 | 2015-05-13 | 中国包装科研测试中心 | Vehicle-mounted logistics monitoring system |
US20180290621A1 (en) * | 2017-04-11 | 2018-10-11 | Blackberry Limited | Adjusting cargo transportation unit elements in response to theft events |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW202111659A (en) | 2021-03-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11248950B2 (en) | System and method for assessing transportation risk | |
US10919545B2 (en) | Apparatus for monitoring railroad car and monitoring method using the same | |
CN103822696B (en) | A kind of diagnostic method of transformer winding state | |
CN103359565B (en) | The cable strain measuring method of elevator and device | |
Stein et al. | Compact vibration measuring system for in-vehicle applications | |
Otari et al. | Statistical characterization of acceleration levels of random vibrations during transport | |
CN113901580A (en) | Method and system for predicting abnormal sound of vehicle shock absorber | |
Van Baren | What is random vibration testing? | |
Long | On the statistical correlation between the heave, pitch and roll motion of road transport vehicles | |
WO2008001836A1 (en) | Test specification design method for random vibration test | |
TWI741366B (en) | System and method for estimating transportation risk | |
CN105701278A (en) | Modal parameter acquisition method | |
Baharin et al. | Effect of accelerometer mass on thin plate vibration | |
Zhao et al. | Hybrid identification method for multi-story buildings with unknown ground motion: Experimental investigation | |
JP4395563B2 (en) | Vibration test method | |
DE102018200855A1 (en) | Method of estimating a mass of a shipping container and its contents | |
Jung et al. | Reliability achievement of the driving system parts through development of vibration-fatigue evaluation method | |
JP2023044402A (en) | Diagnostic method, diagnostic apparatus, and diagnostic program | |
Cui et al. | A methodology to integrate a nonlinear shock absorber dynamics into a vehicle model for system identification | |
Iyer et al. | Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of an automotive exhaust system using operational modal analysis (OMA) and experimental modal analysis (EMA) | |
Flore et al. | Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of an Aircraft Wing with emphasis on vibration modes change with loading | |
Zhu | Digital generation of non‐Gaussian random vibration signals in railway transportation and package response analysis | |
CN111473930A (en) | Design method of battery module testing device and battery module testing device | |
Pidl | Application of a Novel Methodology for the Detection of Harmonic Vibration in the Acceleration-Time Functions of Vehicle Platforms | |
Albinsson et al. | Tire Lateral Vibration Considerations in Vehicle-Based Tire Testing |