TWI741366B - System and method for estimating transportation risk - Google Patents

System and method for estimating transportation risk Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI741366B
TWI741366B TW108132619A TW108132619A TWI741366B TW I741366 B TWI741366 B TW I741366B TW 108132619 A TW108132619 A TW 108132619A TW 108132619 A TW108132619 A TW 108132619A TW I741366 B TWI741366 B TW I741366B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
data
vibration
test
output
time
Prior art date
Application number
TW108132619A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW202111659A (en
Inventor
戚德彬
張小偉
陳雪鋒
Original Assignee
英業達股份有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 英業達股份有限公司 filed Critical 英業達股份有限公司
Priority to TW108132619A priority Critical patent/TWI741366B/en
Publication of TW202111659A publication Critical patent/TW202111659A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI741366B publication Critical patent/TWI741366B/en

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

A method for estimating transporation risk is adapted to an object transported by a vehicle. The method comprises disposing a sensor on a floor board of the vehicle to collect a vibration signal, with the floor board being configured to load the object, a computing device performs a time-domain processing task according to the vibration signal to output a first data, performs a frequency-domain processing task according to the first data to output a second data, performing a risk estimation procedure to output a risk level according to the second data and a tesingt data, wherein the second data comprises a real vibrating intensity and a real vibrating time and the testing data comprises a testing vibrating intensity and a testing vibrating time.

Description

運輸風險評估系統及其方法Transportation risk assessment system and method

本發明涉及一種運輸風險評估系統及其方法。The invention relates to a transportation risk assessment system and a method thereof.

在供應商提供伺服器予其客戶的流程中,組裝完成的整機櫃會從生產地被運送到客戶所在地。在車輛運送整機櫃的過程中,高速行駛的車輛因為不平整的路面而產生持續的振動。在運輸過程中,振動無法避免且持續存在。某些頻率的振動可能使產品中的敏感元件發生共振,雖然單次振動產生的應力不會立刻造成元件損壞,但是長時間持續的迴圈應力會造成元件結構的疲勞損傷,進而影響產品的功能或是讓產品損壞。運輸時的振動強度、發生時間、發生次數無法被預測,具有隨機性,因此需採用概率統計的方法去研究運輸過程的振動訊號特徵。In the process where the supplier provides the server to its customer, the assembled complete cabinet will be transported from the production site to the customer's location. In the process of transporting the entire cabinet by the vehicle, the high-speed vehicle generates continuous vibration due to the uneven road surface. During transportation, vibration cannot be avoided and persists. Vibration of certain frequencies may cause the sensitive components in the product to resonate. Although the stress generated by a single vibration will not cause damage to the component immediately, the long-term continuous loop stress will cause fatigue damage to the component structure, which will affect the function of the product. Or damage the product. The vibration intensity, occurrence time, and number of occurrences during transportation cannot be predicted and are random. Therefore, probability and statistics methods must be used to study the characteristics of vibration signals during transportation.

一般而言,振動訊號的資料採集係基於特定的運輸路線,採集後的資料只能代表該路線的平均振動水準。目前被大多數企業採用的隨機振動可靠性測試係參考美國材料和試驗協會(American Society for Testing and Materials,ASTM)或國際安全運輸協會(International Safe Transit Association,ISTA)所訂定的標準。然而,這兩個標準均是以指定載重量,指定懸吊系統的貨車在高速公路上以指定車速行駛作為基本情境進行資料採集,實際貨運的狀況往往與之差異甚大,因而上述二標準無法準確評估實際運輸在各種情況下的振動風險。Generally speaking, the data collection of vibration signals is based on a specific transportation route, and the collected data can only represent the average vibration level of the route. The random vibration reliability test currently used by most companies refers to the standards set by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or the International Safe Transit Association (ISTA). However, these two standards are based on the specified load capacity, and the truck with the specified suspension system is used as the basic situation to collect data on the expressway at the specified speed. The actual freight situation is often very different from it, so the above two standards are not accurate. Evaluate the vibration risk of actual transportation under various conditions.

有鑑於此,本發明提出一種運輸風險評估系統及其方法,針對實際運輸的隨機振動資料進行採集及處理,製成隨機振動加速度功率密度譜以評估產品在實際運輸時的振動風險。In view of this, the present invention proposes a transportation risk assessment system and method, which collect and process random vibration data of actual transportation to prepare random vibration acceleration power density spectrum to evaluate the vibration risk of products during actual transportation.

依據本發明一實施例敘述的一種運輸風險評估方法,適用於以車輛運輸之物件,所述的方法包括:設置感測器於車輛之底板,底板用於承載物件;感測器收集車輛運輸過程中之振動訊號;運算裝置依據振動訊號執行時域處理程序以輸出第一資料;運算裝置依據第一資料執行頻域處理程序以輸出第二資料;以及運算裝置依據第二資料及測試資料執行風險評估程序以輸出風險等級,其中第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間,測試資料包括測試振動強度及測試振動時間。According to an embodiment of the present invention, a transportation risk assessment method is applicable to objects transported by vehicles. The method includes: arranging a sensor on the floor of the vehicle, the floor is used to carry objects; the sensor collects the vehicle transportation process In the vibration signal; the computing device executes the time domain processing procedure according to the vibration signal to output the first data; the computing device executes the frequency domain processing procedure according to the first data to output the second data; and the computing device executes the risk based on the second data and the test data The evaluation process outputs the risk level, where the second data includes actual vibration intensity and actual vibration time, and the test data includes test vibration intensity and test vibration time.

依據本發明一實施例敘述的一種運輸風險評估系統,適用於以車輛運輸之物件,所述的系統包括:感測器、儲存裝置及運算裝置。感測器設置於車輛之底板。感測器用以收集車輛運輸過程中之振動訊號。儲存裝置用以儲存測試資料。測試資料包括測試振動時間及測試振動強度。運算裝置通訊連接儲存裝置。運算裝置用以執行時域處理程序、頻域處理程序及風險評估程序。時域處理程序依據振動訊號輸出第一資料。頻域處理程序依據第一資料輸出第二資料。第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間。風險評估程序依據第二資料及測試資料輸出風險等級。According to an embodiment of the present invention, a transportation risk assessment system is suitable for objects transported by vehicles. The system includes a sensor, a storage device, and a computing device. The sensor is arranged on the floor of the vehicle. The sensor is used to collect vibration signals during vehicle transportation. The storage device is used to store the test data. The test data includes test vibration time and test vibration intensity. The computing device is connected to the storage device in communication. The arithmetic device is used to execute time domain processing procedures, frequency domain processing procedures and risk assessment procedures. The time domain processing program outputs the first data according to the vibration signal. The frequency domain processing program outputs the second data according to the first data. The second data includes actual vibration intensity and actual vibration time. The risk assessment procedure outputs the risk level based on the second data and the test data.

藉由上述架構,本發明所揭露的運輸風險評估系統及其方法,透過實際收集的運輸的振動資料與實驗室測試的振動資料交互比對,進而得以準確地評估實際運輸時的風險等級,並且將評估結果應用於整機櫃包裝時增加減輕振動的設計,保證產品在運輸到目的地後的品質。With the above structure, the transportation risk assessment system and method disclosed in the present invention can compare the actual collected transportation vibration data with the laboratory test vibration data to accurately evaluate the risk level during actual transportation, and When the evaluation results are applied to the packaging of the entire cabinet, a design to reduce vibration is added to ensure the quality of the product after it is transported to the destination.

以上之關於本揭露內容之說明及以下之實施方式之說明係用以示範與解釋本發明之精神與原理,並且提供本發明之專利申請範圍更進一步之解釋。The above description of the disclosure and the following description of the implementation manners are used to demonstrate and explain the spirit and principle of the present invention, and to provide a further explanation of the patent application scope of the present invention.

以下在實施方式中詳細敘述本發明之詳細特徵以及優點,其內容足以使任何熟習相關技藝者了解本發明之技術內容並據以實施,且根據本說明書所揭露之內容、申請專利範圍及圖式,任何熟習相關技藝者可輕易地理解本發明相關之目的及優點。以下之實施例係進一步詳細說明本發明之觀點,但非以任何觀點限制本發明之範疇。The detailed features and advantages of the present invention will be described in detail in the following embodiments. The content is sufficient to enable anyone familiar with the relevant art to understand the technical content of the present invention and implement it accordingly, and according to the content disclosed in this specification, the scope of patent application and the drawings. Anyone who is familiar with relevant skills can easily understand the purpose and advantages of the present invention. The following examples further illustrate the viewpoints of the present invention in detail, but do not limit the scope of the present invention by any viewpoint.

請參考圖1,其係繪示本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統的方塊架構圖。如圖1所示,所述的系統包括感測器10、運算裝置30及儲存裝置50。Please refer to FIG. 1, which is a block diagram of a transportation risk assessment system according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the system includes a sensor 10, a computing device 30 and a storage device 50.

感測器10進行感測以產生感測資料。運算裝置30用以取得感測器10的感測資料。舉例來說,運算裝置30由感測器10取得感測資料的方式可以是:將感測器10電性連接至運算裝置30以傳輸感測資料,將感測器10內部儲存感測資料的記憶卡電性連接到運算裝置30以傳輸感測資料,或者運算裝置30透過網路下載感測器10上傳至雲端的感測資料,本發明對運算裝置30取得感測器10的感測資料的方式不予限制。儲存裝置50存有測試資料,儲存裝置50通訊連接運算裝置30以傳輸測試資料。The sensor 10 performs sensing to generate sensing data. The computing device 30 is used to obtain the sensing data of the sensor 10. For example, the way for the computing device 30 to obtain the sensing data from the sensor 10 may be: electrically connecting the sensor 10 to the computing device 30 to transmit the sensing data, and storing the sensing data inside the sensor 10 The memory card is electrically connected to the computing device 30 to transmit sensing data, or the computing device 30 downloads the sensing data from the sensor 10 to the cloud through the network, and the present invention obtains the sensing data of the sensor 10 from the computing device 30 The method is not limited. The storage device 50 stores test data, and the storage device 50 is communicatively connected to the computing device 30 to transmit the test data.

請參考圖2,其係繪示感測器10收集感測資料的設置示意圖。本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統適用於評估一物件70以車輛90實際運輸的風險等級。所述的物件70例如係整機櫃、伺服器或易受振動影響的貨物。所述的車輛90具有一底板92 ,用於承載物件70。Please refer to FIG. 2, which is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of the sensor 10 to collect sensing data. The transportation risk assessment system of an embodiment of the present invention is suitable for evaluating the risk level of an object 70 that is actually transported by a vehicle 90. The object 70 is, for example, a complete cabinet, a server, or goods susceptible to vibration. The vehicle 90 has a bottom plate 92 for carrying objects 70.

請參考圖3,其係繪示本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估方法的流程圖。本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統係依據圖3所示的流程運行。Please refer to FIG. 3, which shows a flowchart of a transportation risk assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention. The transportation risk assessment system of an embodiment of the present invention operates according to the process shown in FIG. 3.

請參考圖2及圖3的步驟S10,設置感測器10於車輛90的底板92。感測器10用以收集車輛90運輸過程中之振動訊號。感測器10具有三軸加速度計及內建電源,可以記錄運輸過程中的加速度訊號,例如美國Lansmont公司製造的SAVER  3X90環境記錄儀。實務上,可使用具有強力磁鐵的底座12將感測器10吸附於貨車車廂的底板,如圖2所示。但感測器10的設置方式並不以此為限。另需注意的是,圖2繪示的感測器10、底座12物件70、車輛90及其底板92並非按照實際比例繪製,而僅作為舉例說明這些元件的相對位置之用。Please refer to step S10 in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 to install the sensor 10 on the floor 92 of the vehicle 90. The sensor 10 is used to collect the vibration signal of the vehicle 90 during transportation. The sensor 10 has a three-axis accelerometer and a built-in power supply, which can record acceleration signals during transportation, such as the SAVER 3X90 environmental recorder manufactured by Lansmont, USA. In practice, a base 12 with a powerful magnet can be used to attach the sensor 10 to the floor of the truck compartment, as shown in FIG. 2. However, the setting method of the sensor 10 is not limited to this. It should also be noted that the sensor 10, the object 70 of the base 12, the vehicle 90 and the bottom plate 92 shown in FIG. 2 are not drawn according to actual scale, but are only used as an example to illustrate the relative positions of these elements.

請參考步驟S12,以感測器10收集車輛90運輸過程中之振動訊號。詳言之,在運輸開始時啟動感測器10收集資料,在貨物到達後關閉感測器,並將感測期間收集到的振動訊號導出至運算裝置30(相當於運算裝置30由感測器10取得振動訊號)。振動訊號例如係三軸加速度訊號。運算裝置30可依據振動訊號執行時域處理程序、頻域處理程序及風險評估程序,其中時域處理程序係依據振動訊號輸出第一資料,對應於圖3的步驟S20;頻域處理程序係依據第一資料輸出第二資料,對應於圖3的步驟S22,風險評估程序係依據第二資料及測試資料輸出風險等級,對應於圖3的步驟S30。Please refer to step S12 to collect the vibration signal of the vehicle 90 during transportation by the sensor 10. In detail, the sensor 10 is activated at the beginning of the transportation to collect data, the sensor is turned off after the goods arrive, and the vibration signal collected during the sensing period is exported to the computing device 30 (equivalent to the computing device 30 being used by the sensor 10 Obtain the vibration signal). The vibration signal is, for example, a three-axis acceleration signal. The arithmetic device 30 can execute time-domain processing procedures, frequency-domain processing procedures, and risk assessment procedures according to the vibration signal. The time-domain processing procedure outputs the first data based on the vibration signal, corresponding to step S20 in FIG. 3; the frequency-domain processing procedure is based on The first data outputs the second data, which corresponds to step S22 in FIG. 3, and the risk assessment procedure outputs the risk level based on the second data and the test data, which corresponds to step S30 in FIG. 3.

請參考步驟S20,運算裝置30依據振動訊號執行時域處理程序以輸出第一資料。具體而言,運算裝置30消除振動訊號中的噪音部分。實務上,由於電壓或環境的因素,使得振動訊號呈現逐漸往上飄移的趨勢。因此,運算裝置30消除原始訊號中的線性趨勢項及二次趨勢項以輸出呈現水平趨勢的振動訊號,在此稱其為第三資料。然後,運算裝置30計算第三資料的一均值並判斷該均值是否達到一均值閾值,如果「是」則從第三資料中消除此均值閾值並將消除後的資料作為第四資料,如果「否」則逕以第三資料作為第四資料。接著,運算裝置30依據一峰值閾值(例如為0.1g)從第四資料中濾除停車資料以作為第五資料。所述的停車資料係運輸過程中車輛停止時所測得的數據,且由於這些數據無助於評估運輸風險,因此需將其濾除。運算裝置30再依據一截止頻率及第五資料執行一低通濾波程序以輸出第一資料,藉此讓第一資料的採樣頻率範圍(例如為0~200Hz)對應於測試資料的採樣頻率範圍。Please refer to step S20, the computing device 30 executes a time-domain processing procedure according to the vibration signal to output the first data. Specifically, the computing device 30 eliminates the noise in the vibration signal. In practice, due to voltage or environmental factors, the vibration signal tends to drift upward gradually. Therefore, the computing device 30 eliminates the linear trend term and the quadratic trend term in the original signal to output a vibration signal showing a horizontal trend, which is referred to as the third data here. Then, the arithmetic device 30 calculates an average value of the third data and determines whether the average value reaches an average threshold value, if "Yes", the average value threshold value is eliminated from the third data and the eliminated data is used as the fourth data, if "No" "The third data is used as the fourth data. Then, the computing device 30 filters the parking data from the fourth data according to a peak threshold (for example, 0.1 g) to use as the fifth data. The parking data is the data measured when the vehicle stops during transportation, and because these data do not help evaluate transportation risks, they need to be filtered out. The arithmetic device 30 then performs a low-pass filtering process according to a cutoff frequency and the fifth data to output the first data, so that the sampling frequency range of the first data (for example, 0~200 Hz) corresponds to the sampling frequency range of the test data.

請參考步驟S22,運算裝置30對第一資料執行頻域處理程序以輸出第二資料。具體而言,運算裝置30從第一資料中提取多個頻率點以及在每個頻率點上的振動幅值。實務上,運算裝置30依據經過時域處理程序的第一資料以及複數個預設參數執行快速傅立葉轉換(Fast Fourier Transform,FFT)以輸出第二資料。第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間。所述的預設參數包括FFT參數、採樣頻率及最大分析頻率等。Please refer to step S22, the computing device 30 performs a frequency domain processing procedure on the first data to output the second data. Specifically, the computing device 30 extracts multiple frequency points and the vibration amplitude at each frequency point from the first data. In practice, the computing device 30 performs Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) according to the first data that has undergone the time-domain processing procedure and a plurality of preset parameters to output the second data. The second data includes actual vibration intensity and actual vibration time. The preset parameters include FFT parameters, sampling frequency and maximum analysis frequency.

請參考步驟S30,運算裝置30依據第二資料及測試資料執行風險評估程序以輸出風險等級。第二資料包括實際振動強度及實際振動時間,測試資料包括測試振動強度及測試振動時間。詳言之,實驗室進行振動測試後產生的測試數據係儲存於儲存裝置50作為測試資料。相對於實際運輸而言,實驗室進行的振動測試採用較大的振動強度及相對較短的測試時間。本發明係基於線性疲勞累積損傷理論(Palmgren-Miner rule)進行推算,在振動強度和振動時間之間建立如下關係式:Please refer to step S30. The computing device 30 executes a risk assessment procedure based on the second data and the test data to output a risk level. The second data includes actual vibration intensity and actual vibration time, and the test data includes test vibration intensity and test vibration time. In detail, the test data generated after the vibration test in the laboratory is stored in the storage device 50 as the test data. Compared with actual transportation, the vibration test conducted in the laboratory uses a larger vibration intensity and a relatively short test time. The present invention is calculated based on the linear fatigue cumulative damage theory (Palmgren-Miner rule), and the following relationship is established between the vibration intensity and the vibration time:

Figure 02_image001
(第1式)
Figure 02_image001
(Form 1)

其中tt 代表測試振動時間,at 代表測試振動強度的均方根值(Grms),aa 代表實際振動強度的均方根值(Grms), ta 代表實際振動時間,k一般而言取2。Where t t represents the test vibration time, a t represents the root mean square value of the test vibration intensity (Grms), a a represents the root mean square value of the actual vibration intensity (Grms), t a represents the actual vibration time, and k generally takes 2.

請參考圖4,其係繪示本發明一實施例的風險評估程序。Please refer to FIG. 4, which illustrates a risk assessment procedure of an embodiment of the present invention.

請參考步驟S32,運算裝置30依據測試資料之測試振動強度調整第二資料之實際振動強度,並依據測試資料之測試振動時間調整第二資料之實際振動時間。Please refer to step S32, the computing device 30 adjusts the actual vibration intensity of the second data according to the test vibration intensity of the test data, and adjusts the actual vibration time of the second data according to the test vibration time of the test data.

請參考步驟S34,運算裝置30依據調整後之實際振動強度轉換第二資料之實際振動時間為另一振動時間,並依據調整後之實際振動時間轉換第二資料之實際振動強度為另一振動強度。Please refer to step S34, the computing device 30 converts the actual vibration time of the second data to another vibration time according to the adjusted actual vibration intensity, and converts the actual vibration intensity of the second data to another vibration intensity according to the adjusted actual vibration time .

請參考步驟S36,運算裝置30比對測試振動時間及另一振動時間並比對測試振動強度及另一振動強度以輸出風險等級。Please refer to step S36, the computing device 30 compares the test vibration time and another vibration time and compares the test vibration intensity and another vibration intensity to output the risk level.

關於步驟S36中的風險等級判定,詳言之,若同時考慮振動強度及振動時間的比對,則有如下四種狀況:Regarding the risk level determination in step S36, in detail, if the comparison of vibration intensity and vibration time is considered at the same time, there are four situations as follows:

狀況1:測試振動強度大於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間大於另一振動時間。Condition 1: The test vibration intensity is greater than the other vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is greater than the other vibration time.

狀況2:測試振動強度大於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間小於或等於另一振動時間。Condition 2: The test vibration intensity is greater than the other vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is less than or equal to the other vibration time.

狀況3:測試振動強度小於或等於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間大於另一振動時間。Condition 3: The test vibration intensity is less than or equal to another vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is longer than the other vibration time.

狀況4:測試振動強度小於或等於另一振動強度,且測試振動時間小於或等於另一振動時間。Condition 4: The test vibration intensity is less than or equal to another vibration intensity, and the test vibration time is less than or equal to another vibration time.

若運算裝置30經比對得到狀況1,則可判定風險等級為低。若運算裝置30經比對得到狀況4,則可判定風險等級為高。若運算裝置30經比對得到狀況2或3時,可依據實際狀況,選擇性地偏重考慮振動時間或偏重考慮振動強度或選擇不偏重任一者。舉例來說,若選擇偏重考慮振動時間,則對於狀況2,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中高」,對於狀況3,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中低」。若選擇偏重考慮振動強度,則對於狀況2,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中低」,對於狀況3,運算裝置30判定風險等級為「中高」。若選擇不偏重任一者,則對於狀況2及狀況3,運算裝置30皆判定風險等級為「中」。If the computing device 30 obtains the situation 1 through the comparison, it can be determined that the risk level is low. If the computing device 30 obtains the situation 4 through the comparison, it can be determined that the risk level is high. If the computing device 30 obtains status 2 or 3 through the comparison, it can selectively focus on the vibration time or the vibration intensity or choose not to focus on either according to the actual situation. For example, if the vibration time is selected to give priority to consideration, for situation 2, the computing device 30 determines that the risk level is “medium-high”, and for situation 3, the computing device 30 determines that the risk level is “medium-low”. If it is chosen to give priority to the vibration intensity, for situation 2, the computing device 30 determines that the risk level is “medium-low”, and for situation 3, the computing device 30 determines that the risk level is “medium-high”. If you choose not to emphasize either, the computing device 30 determines that the risk level is "medium" for both situation 2 and situation 3.

請參考圖5,其係繪示本發明另一實施例的風險評估程序,此實施例的風險評估程序相當於前一實施例的風險評估程序的一種簡化版。Please refer to FIG. 5, which illustrates a risk assessment program of another embodiment of the present invention. The risk assessment program of this embodiment is equivalent to a simplified version of the risk assessment program of the previous embodiment.

請參考步驟S42,運算裝置30依據測試資料之測試振動強度調整第二資料之實際振動強度。舉例來說,假設測試資料之測試振動時間tt 為2小時,測試資料之測試振動強度at 為1.146g;並假設第二資料之實際振動強度aa 為0.239g,實際振動時間ta 為24小時。在步驟S42中,依據測試振動強度at 調整第二資料之實際測試量度aa 需放大約

Figure 02_image003
倍。Please refer to step S42, the computing device 30 adjusts the actual vibration intensity of the second data according to the test vibration intensity of the test data. For example, vibration test data of time t t hypothesis testing is 2 hours, the test data of the vibration intensity test is a t 1.146 g; and a second data assuming the actual vibration strength 0.239 g of a a, t a time of the actual vibration 24 hours. In step S42, a second metric based on actual test data of a t test vibration intensity adjustment required a a magnification of about
Figure 02_image003
Times.

請參考步驟S44,運算裝置30依據調整後之實際振動強度轉換第二資料之實際振動時間為另一振動時間。承前例,運算裝置30將上述數值代入第1式可轉換出另一振動時間為1.04小時。Please refer to step S44, the computing device 30 converts the actual vibration time of the second data into another vibration time according to the adjusted actual vibration intensity. Following the previous example, the computing device 30 substituting the above-mentioned value into the first formula can convert another vibration time of 1.04 hours.

請參考步驟S46,運算裝置30比對測試振動時間及另一振動時間以輸出一風險等級。風險等級例如可分為高、低兩等級。承前例,由於2小時大於1.04小時,因此可判斷實驗室中的測試強度大於實際運輸中的振動強度,故判斷風險等級為「低」。反之,則判斷風險等級為「高」。Please refer to step S46, the computing device 30 compares the test vibration time with another vibration time to output a risk level. The risk level can be divided into two levels, high and low, for example. Following the previous example, since 2 hours is greater than 1.04 hours, it can be judged that the test intensity in the laboratory is greater than the vibration intensity in actual transportation, so the risk level is judged to be "low". Otherwise, the risk level is judged to be "high".

需注意的是,圖5的風險評估程序僅為圖4的風險評估程序簡化後的一種實施方式。本發明所屬技術領域之通常知識者可依據圖4及圖5,而得到另一種實施方式(運算裝置30比對測試振動強度及另一振動強度以輸出風險等級),在此不重複敘述。It should be noted that the risk assessment procedure in Fig. 5 is only a simplified implementation of the risk assessment procedure in Fig. 4. Those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains can obtain another implementation (compare the test vibration intensity and another vibration intensity to output the risk level by the computing device 30) based on FIGS. 4 and 5, which will not be repeated here.

綜合以上所述,本發明所揭露的運輸風險評估系統及其方法,透過實際收集的運輸的振動資料與實驗室測試的振動資料交互比對,進而得以準確地評估實際運輸時的風險等級,並且將評估結果應用於整機櫃包裝時增加減輕振動的設計,保證產品在運輸到目的地後的品質。In summary, the transportation risk assessment system and method disclosed in the present invention can accurately evaluate the risk level during actual transportation through interactive comparison between the actually collected transportation vibration data and laboratory test vibration data, and When the evaluation results are applied to the packaging of the entire cabinet, a design to reduce vibration is added to ensure the quality of the product after it is transported to the destination.

雖然本發明以前述之實施例揭露如上,然其並非用以限定本發明。在不脫離本發明之精神和範圍內,所為之更動與潤飾,均屬本發明之專利保護範圍。關於本發明所界定之保護範圍請參考所附之申請專利範圍。Although the present invention is disclosed in the foregoing embodiments, it is not intended to limit the present invention. All changes and modifications made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention fall within the scope of the patent protection of the present invention. For the scope of protection defined by the present invention, please refer to the attached scope of patent application.

10:感測器 12:底座 30:儲存裝置 50:運算裝置 70:物件 90:車輛 92:底板 S10~S30:步驟10: Sensor 12: Base 30: storage device 50: computing device 70: Object 90: Vehicle 92: bottom plate S10~S30: steps

圖1係繪示本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估系統的方塊架構圖。 圖2係繪示感測器收集感測資料的設置示意圖。 圖3係依據本發明一實施例的運輸風險評估方法所繪示的流程圖。 圖4係依據本發明一實施例的風險評估程序所繪示的流程圖。 圖5係依據本發明另一實施例的風險評估程序所繪示的流程圖。FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a transportation risk assessment system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing the setup of the sensor to collect sensing data. FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a transportation risk assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a risk assessment program according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a risk assessment program according to another embodiment of the present invention.

S10~S30:步驟S10~S30: steps

Claims (8)

一種運輸風險評估方法,適用於以一車輛運輸之一物件,所述的方法包括:設置一感測器於該車輛之一底板,其中該底板用於承載該物件;以該感測器收集該車輛運輸過程中之一振動訊號;以一運算裝置依據該振動訊號執行一時域處理程序以輸出一第一資料;以該運算裝置依據該第一資料執行一頻域處理程序以輸出一第二資料;以及以該運算裝置依據該第二資料及一測試資料執行一風險評估程序以輸出一風險等級,其中該第二資料包括一實際振動強度及一實際振動時間,該測試資料包括一測試振動強度及一測試振動時間,以及該時域處理程序更包括:以該運算裝置依據該振動訊號消除線性趨勢項及二次趨勢項以輸出一第三資料;以該運算裝置依據一均值閾值及該第三資料執行一均值消除程序以輸出一第四資料;以該運算裝置依據一峰值閾值及該第四資料執行一停車資料濾除程序以輸出一第五資料;以及以該運算裝置依據一截止頻率及該第五資料執行一低通濾波程序以輸出該第一資料。 A transportation risk assessment method is suitable for transporting an object by a vehicle. The method includes: arranging a sensor on a floor of the vehicle, wherein the floor is used to carry the object; and the sensor is used to collect the object. A vibration signal during vehicle transportation; a computing device executes a time domain processing procedure based on the vibration signal to output a first data; the computing device executes a frequency domain processing procedure based on the first data to output a second data And using the computing device to execute a risk assessment procedure based on the second data and a test data to output a risk level, wherein the second data includes an actual vibration intensity and an actual vibration time, and the test data includes a test vibration intensity And a test vibration time, and the time-domain processing procedure further includes: using the computing device to eliminate linear trend terms and quadratic trend terms based on the vibration signal to output a third data; using the computing device to output a third data based on an average threshold and the first Three data execute a mean value elimination process to output a fourth data; use the computing device to execute a parking data filtering process based on a peak threshold and the fourth data to output a fifth data; and use the computing device to output a cutoff frequency And the fifth data performs a low-pass filtering process to output the first data. 如請求項1所述的運輸風險評估方法,其中以該運算裝置依據該第二資料及該測試資料執行該風險評估程序更包括:以該運算裝置依據該測試資料之該測試振動強度調整該第二資料之該實際振動強度;以該運算裝置依據該測試資料之該測試振動時間調整該第二資料之該實際振動時間;以該運算裝置依據調整後之該實際振動強度轉換該第二資料之該實際振動時間為另一振動時間;以該運算裝置依據調整後之該實際振動時間轉換該第二資料之該實際振動強度為另一振動強度;以及以該運算裝置比對該測試振動時間及該另一振動時間並比對該測試振動強度及該另一振動強度以輸出該風險等級。 The transportation risk assessment method according to claim 1, wherein executing the risk assessment procedure by the computing device according to the second data and the test data further includes: adjusting the second data by the computing device according to the test vibration intensity of the test data The actual vibration intensity of the second data; the actual vibration time of the second data is adjusted by the computing device according to the test vibration time of the test data; the actual vibration time of the second data is converted by the computing device according to the adjusted actual vibration intensity The actual vibration time is another vibration time; the calculation device converts the actual vibration intensity of the second data into another vibration intensity according to the adjusted actual vibration time; and the calculation device compares the test vibration time and The other vibration time is compared with the test vibration intensity and the other vibration intensity to output the risk level. 如請求項1所述的運輸風險評估方法,其中該振動訊號係三軸加速度訊號。 The transportation risk assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the vibration signal is a three-axis acceleration signal. 如請求項1所述的運輸風險評估方法,其中該頻域處理程序更包括:以該運算裝置依據該第一資料,一快速傅立葉參數、一採樣頻率及一最大分析頻率執行一快速傅立葉計算以輸出該第二資料。 The transportation risk assessment method of claim 1, wherein the frequency domain processing program further includes: using the computing device to perform a fast Fourier calculation based on the first data, a fast Fourier parameter, a sampling frequency, and a maximum analysis frequency to Output the second data. 一種運輸風險評估系統,適用於以一車輛運輸之一物件,所述的系統包括:一感測器,設置於該車輛之一底板,該感測器用以收集該車輛運輸過程中之一振動訊號; 一儲存裝置,用以儲存一測試資料,該測試資料包括一測試振動強度及一測試振動時間;以及一運算裝置,通訊連接該儲存裝置,該運算裝置用以從該感測器取得該振動訊號,該運算裝置用以執行一時域處理程序、一頻域處理程序及一風險評估程序,其中該時域處理程序用以依據該振動訊號輸出一第一資料;該頻域處理程序用以依據該第一資料輸出一第二資料,該第二資料包括一實際振動強度及一實際振動時間;該風險評估程序用以依據該第二資料及該測試資料輸出一風險等級,其中該時域處理程序係該運算裝置依據該振動訊號消除線性趨勢項及二次趨勢項以輸出一第三資料,依據一均值閾值及該第三資料執行一均值消除程序以輸出一第四資料,依據一峰值閾值及該第四資料執行一停車資料濾除程序以輸出一第五資料,以及依據一截止頻率及該第五資料執行一低通濾波程序以輸出該第一資料。 A transportation risk assessment system is suitable for transporting an object by a vehicle. The system includes: a sensor arranged on a floor of the vehicle; the sensor is used to collect a vibration signal during the transportation of the vehicle ; A storage device for storing a test data, the test data including a test vibration intensity and a test vibration time; and an arithmetic device, communicatively connected to the storage device, the arithmetic device for obtaining the vibration signal from the sensor , The arithmetic device is used to execute a time-domain processing procedure, a frequency-domain processing procedure and a risk assessment procedure, wherein the time-domain processing procedure is used to output a first data according to the vibration signal; the frequency-domain processing procedure is used according to the The first data outputs a second data, the second data includes an actual vibration intensity and an actual vibration time; the risk assessment procedure is used to output a risk level based on the second data and the test data, wherein the time domain processing procedure The arithmetic device eliminates the linear trend term and the quadratic trend term according to the vibration signal to output a third data, executes an average elimination procedure according to an average threshold and the third data to output a fourth data, and outputs a fourth data according to a peak threshold and The fourth data executes a parking data filtering process to output a fifth data, and executes a low-pass filtering process according to a cutoff frequency and the fifth data to output the first data. 如請求項5所述的運輸風險評估系統,其中該風險評估程序係:該運算裝置依據該測試資料之該測試振動強度及該第二資料之該實際振動強度轉換該第二資料之該實際振動時間為另一振動時間;該運算裝置依據該測試資料之該測試振動時間及該第二資料之該實際振動時間轉換該第二資料之該實際振動強度為另一振動強度;以及該運算裝置比對該測試振動時間及該另一振動時間並比對該測試振動強度及該另一振動強度以輸出該風險等級。 The transportation risk assessment system according to claim 5, wherein the risk assessment procedure is: the computing device converts the actual vibration of the second data according to the test vibration intensity of the test data and the actual vibration intensity of the second data Time is another vibration time; the computing device converts the actual vibration intensity of the second data into another vibration intensity based on the test vibration time of the test data and the actual vibration time of the second data; and the computing device ratio The test vibration time and the another vibration time are compared with the test vibration intensity and the another vibration intensity to output the risk level. 如請求項5所述的運輸風險評估系統,其中該振動訊號係三軸加速度訊號。 The transportation risk assessment system according to claim 5, wherein the vibration signal is a three-axis acceleration signal. 如請求項5所述的運輸風險評估系統,其中該頻域處理程序係該運算裝置依據該第一資料,一快速傅立葉參數、一採樣頻率及一最大分析頻率執行一快速傅立葉計算以輸出該第二資料。 The transportation risk assessment system of claim 5, wherein the frequency domain processing program is that the arithmetic device executes a fast Fourier calculation based on the first data, a fast Fourier parameter, a sampling frequency, and a maximum analysis frequency to output the first data 2. Information.
TW108132619A 2019-09-10 2019-09-10 System and method for estimating transportation risk TWI741366B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW108132619A TWI741366B (en) 2019-09-10 2019-09-10 System and method for estimating transportation risk

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW108132619A TWI741366B (en) 2019-09-10 2019-09-10 System and method for estimating transportation risk

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW202111659A TW202111659A (en) 2021-03-16
TWI741366B true TWI741366B (en) 2021-10-01

Family

ID=76035517

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW108132619A TWI741366B (en) 2019-09-10 2019-09-10 System and method for estimating transportation risk

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI741366B (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090312899A1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2009-12-17 Mitchell Bradley J Monitoring vehicle and equipment operations at an airport
CN102069769A (en) * 2010-12-17 2011-05-25 交通运输部公路科学研究所 Dangerous goods transport vehicle dynamic monitoring method and early warning device
CN102270829A (en) * 2010-06-01 2011-12-07 台达电子工业股份有限公司 Apparatus and calculating method for early warning on health of servo motor
CN104615177A (en) * 2014-12-09 2015-05-13 中国包装科研测试中心 Vehicle-mounted logistics monitoring system
US20180290621A1 (en) * 2017-04-11 2018-10-11 Blackberry Limited Adjusting cargo transportation unit elements in response to theft events

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090312899A1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2009-12-17 Mitchell Bradley J Monitoring vehicle and equipment operations at an airport
CN102270829A (en) * 2010-06-01 2011-12-07 台达电子工业股份有限公司 Apparatus and calculating method for early warning on health of servo motor
CN102069769A (en) * 2010-12-17 2011-05-25 交通运输部公路科学研究所 Dangerous goods transport vehicle dynamic monitoring method and early warning device
CN104615177A (en) * 2014-12-09 2015-05-13 中国包装科研测试中心 Vehicle-mounted logistics monitoring system
US20180290621A1 (en) * 2017-04-11 2018-10-11 Blackberry Limited Adjusting cargo transportation unit elements in response to theft events

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW202111659A (en) 2021-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11248950B2 (en) System and method for assessing transportation risk
US10919545B2 (en) Apparatus for monitoring railroad car and monitoring method using the same
CN103822696B (en) A kind of diagnostic method of transformer winding state
CN103359565B (en) The cable strain measuring method of elevator and device
Stein et al. Compact vibration measuring system for in-vehicle applications
Otari et al. Statistical characterization of acceleration levels of random vibrations during transport
CN113901580A (en) Method and system for predicting abnormal sound of vehicle shock absorber
Van Baren What is random vibration testing?
Long On the statistical correlation between the heave, pitch and roll motion of road transport vehicles
WO2008001836A1 (en) Test specification design method for random vibration test
TWI741366B (en) System and method for estimating transportation risk
CN105701278A (en) Modal parameter acquisition method
Baharin et al. Effect of accelerometer mass on thin plate vibration
Zhao et al. Hybrid identification method for multi-story buildings with unknown ground motion: Experimental investigation
JP4395563B2 (en) Vibration test method
DE102018200855A1 (en) Method of estimating a mass of a shipping container and its contents
Jung et al. Reliability achievement of the driving system parts through development of vibration-fatigue evaluation method
JP2023044402A (en) Diagnostic method, diagnostic apparatus, and diagnostic program
Cui et al. A methodology to integrate a nonlinear shock absorber dynamics into a vehicle model for system identification
Iyer et al. Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of an automotive exhaust system using operational modal analysis (OMA) and experimental modal analysis (EMA)
Flore et al. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of an Aircraft Wing with emphasis on vibration modes change with loading
Zhu Digital generation of non‐Gaussian random vibration signals in railway transportation and package response analysis
CN111473930A (en) Design method of battery module testing device and battery module testing device
Pidl Application of a Novel Methodology for the Detection of Harmonic Vibration in the Acceleration-Time Functions of Vehicle Platforms
Albinsson et al. Tire Lateral Vibration Considerations in Vehicle-Based Tire Testing