TWI735129B - Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating - Google Patents

Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI735129B
TWI735129B TW109100126A TW109100126A TWI735129B TW I735129 B TWI735129 B TW I735129B TW 109100126 A TW109100126 A TW 109100126A TW 109100126 A TW109100126 A TW 109100126A TW I735129 B TWI735129 B TW I735129B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
enterprise
value
intangible
risk
module
Prior art date
Application number
TW109100126A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW202127360A (en
Inventor
張世宗
Original Assignee
雷舍商務鑑價有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 雷舍商務鑑價有限公司 filed Critical 雷舍商務鑑價有限公司
Priority to TW109100126A priority Critical patent/TWI735129B/en
Publication of TW202127360A publication Critical patent/TW202127360A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI735129B publication Critical patent/TWI735129B/en

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)

Abstract

一種利用風險評等決定企業價值或無形資產價值的方法及系統,主要包括評斷企業或無形資產之風險評等以及推算出複數筆估算值的前置流程,再透過利用風險評等及市場特性等方式有效收斂估算值的筆數,進而決定出該企業或無形資產的最佳價值。 A method and system for determining the value of an enterprise or intangible assets by using risk ratings. It mainly includes the pre-process of judging the risk ratings of enterprises or intangible assets and calculating multiple estimates, and then using risk ratings and market characteristics. The method effectively converges the number of estimates, and then determines the best value of the enterprise or intangible assets.

Description

利用風險評等決定企業價值或無形資產價值的方法及系統 Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating

本發明係有關評價系統,特別是一種利用風險評等決定企業價值或無形資產價值的方法及系統。 The present invention relates to an evaluation system, especially a method and system for determining the value of an enterprise or intangible assets by using a risk rating.

社會經濟發展伴隨影響著產業變化,與企業之經營與發展不免有需要外部資金之情況,為了讓外來的資金主瞭解該企業的狀況,可供參考且公正客觀之評價報告是必要的。 Social and economic development is accompanied by industrial changes, and the operation and development of enterprises inevitably require external funds. In order for foreign capital owners to understand the status of the enterprise, a fair and objective evaluation report is necessary for reference.

近年來,對於企業之評價,除了衡量有形的企業價值外,也愈發重視企業所擁有的無形資產(諸如專利技術、專利權),而能更完整地評估企業的各層個面。然而,習知對於統計分析、估算企業價值或無形資產價值的方式,雖有多種不同的理論研究結果,諸如利用成本法的觀點來估計價值,又或是利用收益法、市場法等的觀點來估計價值,衡量因子不同,往往最終估算出的結果也有很大的出入,因此難以提供相關業者一個可信服的估算結果,是本領域一值以來普遍存在的問題。 In recent years, in addition to measuring the tangible corporate value, the evaluation of companies has also paid more and more attention to the intangible assets owned by the company (such as patented technology and patent rights), and can more completely evaluate all aspects of the company. However, there are many different theoretical research results for statistical analysis and estimation of enterprise value or intangible asset value. The estimated value and the measurement factors are different, and the final estimated results often differ greatly. Therefore, it is difficult to provide a credible estimation result of the relevant industry, which has been a common problem in this field since the beginning of the value.

有鑑於現有技術上的不足,本案發明人潛心於研析改進之道,經不斷嘗試,終完成有本發明。 In view of the shortcomings of the prior art, the inventor of this case concentrated on studying and analyzing the ways of improvement, and after continuous attempts, he finally completed the present invention.

本發明主要目的係提供一種利用風險評等決定企業價值或無形資產價值的方法和系統,其主要藉由各種計價理論估算的估算值,帶入風險因子作初步收斂,以及其他後續收斂程序,妥當地決定出最佳的企業或無形資產評估價值。 The main purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value by using risk rating. It mainly uses the estimated value estimated by various pricing theories to bring in risk factors for preliminary convergence, and other subsequent convergence procedures, which are appropriate To determine the best appraised value of the enterprise or intangible assets.

為達上述目的,本發明之方法可適用之標的物可以是一企業或一無形資產,主要採行之技術手段包括:根據該標的物之財務資料評斷該標的物之一風險評等;利用複數個評價式分別根據該標的物之財務資料推算出複數筆估算值,並依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆估算值;根據該風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取相應比例之筆數的估算值;以市場特性衡量被選取的估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該標的物市場特性的估算值;以保留之估算值決定出該標的物之價值。 In order to achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the object to which the method of the present invention can be applied can be an enterprise or an intangible asset. The main technical methods adopted include: assessing the risk rating of one of the objects based on the financial data of the object; using plurals A plurality of evaluation formulas are calculated based on the financial data of the subject matter, and the plurality of estimated values calculated above are sorted according to the numerical value; according to the ratio of the risk rating relative to the total grade and the position of the high and low, the corresponding selection is reversed The estimated value of the proportion of the number of transactions; the selected estimated value is measured by market characteristics, and the estimated value that meets the market characteristics of the subject matter is screened and retained; the value of the subject matter is determined by the retained estimated value.

進者,本發明在以保留之估算值決定出該標的物之價值的過程中,若保留之估算值為單筆時,係以該筆估算值決定出該標的物之價值,而若保留之估算值為複數筆時,本發明係進一步衡量保留之複數筆估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆估算值來決定出該標的物之價值。 Furthermore, in the process of determining the value of the subject matter by the estimated value retained in the present invention, if the estimated value retained is a single transaction, the value of the subject matter is determined by the estimated value, and if the retained value is retained When the estimated value is plural, the present invention further measures the value interval of any two combinations of the plural estimated values retained, and selects the two estimated values that are closest and does not exceed a preset confidence interval to determine the value of the subject matter .

其中,本發明所採用之複數個評價式,可分別為根據成本法、收益法或市場法計價的評價式。 Among them, the plural evaluation formulas used in the present invention may be evaluation formulas priced according to the cost method, the income method, or the market method, respectively.

依上述本發明利用風險評等決定價值之方法,可進一步應用在用以評價企業價值的系統中,或是應用在用以評價企業價值暨無形資產價值的系統。 According to the above method of the present invention using risk rating to determine value, it can be further applied to a system for evaluating enterprise value or a system for evaluating enterprise value and intangible asset value.

在評價企業價值的部分,應用有本發明之系統構成至少包括一第一輸入模組、一企業診斷模組及一企業評價模組;該一輸入模組係用以供使用者輸入一企業之財務資料;該企業診斷模組連結該第一輸入模組,用以根據該企業之財務資料評斷該企業之一企業風險評等;該企業評價模組連結該第一輸入模組及該企業診斷模組,係利用複數個企業評價式分別根據該企業之財務資料推算出複數筆企業估算值,且至少執行一風險收斂程序及一特性收斂程序決定出該企業之價值;其中,該風險收斂程序係先依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆企業估算值,並根據該企業風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取相應比例之筆數的企業估算值;該特性收斂程序係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序選取的企業估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該企業市場特性的企業估算值。 In the part of evaluating the value of an enterprise, the system configuration to which the present invention is applied includes at least a first input module, an enterprise diagnosis module, and an enterprise evaluation module; the input module is used for users to input information about an enterprise Financial data; the enterprise diagnostic module is connected to the first input module for judging one of the company’s corporate risk ratings based on the company’s financial data; the enterprise evaluation module is connected to the first input module and the company’s diagnostics The module uses a plurality of enterprise evaluation formulas to respectively calculate a plurality of enterprise estimates based on the financial data of the enterprise, and executes at least one risk convergence procedure and a characteristic convergence procedure to determine the value of the enterprise; among them, the risk convergence procedure It is to sort the estimated values of the above-mentioned multiple enterprises according to the numerical value, and select the corresponding proportion of the enterprise estimates according to the ratio of the enterprise risk rating to the total grade and the position of the enterprise; the characteristic convergence procedure is The market characteristics are used to measure the estimated value of the enterprise selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure, and the estimated value of the enterprise that meets the market characteristics of the enterprise is screened and retained.

而在評價無形資產的部分,應用有本發明之系統構成,係以上述評價企業價值的系統為基礎,更進一步包括一第二輸入模組、一無形資產診斷模組及一無形資產評價模組;該第二輸入模組係用以供使用者輸入該企業之無形資產資料;該無形資產診斷模組連結該第二輸入模組及該企業診斷模組,用以根據該企業之財務資料及無形資產資料評斷該企業之一無形資產風險評等;該無形資產評價模組連結該第一輸入模組、該第二輸入模組及該無形資產診斷模組,係利用複數個無形資產評價式分別根據該企業之無形資產資料及財務資料推算出複數筆無形資產估算值,且至少執行一風險收斂程序及一特性收斂程序決定出該企業無形資產之價值;其中,該無形資產評價模組所執行之該風險收斂程序係先依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆無形資產估算值,並根據該無形資產風險評等相對於總 等級的比例與高低位置反向選取相應比例之筆數的無形資產估算值;該無形資產評價模組所執行之該特性收斂程序係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序選取之無形資產估算值,篩選並保留其中符合無形資產市場特性的無形資產估算值。 In the part of evaluating intangible assets, the system configuration of the present invention is applied, which is based on the above-mentioned system for evaluating enterprise value, and further includes a second input module, an intangible asset diagnosis module, and an intangible asset evaluation module. ; The second input module is used for the user to input the enterprise’s intangible asset data; the intangible asset diagnostic module is connected to the second input module and the enterprise diagnostic module for the basis of the enterprise’s financial data and The intangible asset data judges the risk rating of one of the intangible assets of the enterprise; the intangible asset evaluation module connects the first input module, the second input module, and the intangible asset diagnostic module, using multiple intangible asset evaluation formulas According to the company’s intangible asset data and financial data, a plurality of intangible asset estimates are calculated, and at least one risk convergence procedure and one characteristic convergence procedure are performed to determine the value of the enterprise’s intangible assets; among them, the intangible asset evaluation module The risk convergence procedure implemented is to first sort the estimated values of the above-mentioned intangible assets according to the numerical value, and compare the intangible asset risk rating to the total The ratio of the grade and the position of the high and low positions are reversed to select the estimated value of the corresponding number of intangible assets; the characteristic convergence procedure executed by the intangible asset evaluation module is to measure the estimated value of the intangible assets selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure based on market characteristics. Filter and retain the estimated value of intangible assets that meet the characteristics of the intangible asset market.

依上述系統架構,其中該企業評價模組於執行該特性收斂程序後,若保留之企業估算值為單筆時,係以該筆企業估算值決定出該企業之價值,若保留之企業估算值為複數筆時,係進一步執行一區間收斂程序;該企業評價模組所執行之該區間收斂程序係衡量保留之複數筆企業估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆企業估算值來決定出該企業之價值。 According to the above system architecture, after the enterprise evaluation module performs the feature convergence procedure, if the retained enterprise estimate is a single transaction, the enterprise estimate is used to determine the value of the enterprise. If the retained enterprise estimate is When it is a plural number, an interval convergence procedure is further executed; the interval convergence procedure executed by the enterprise evaluation module is to measure the value interval of any two combinations of the plural enterprise estimates retained, and select the closest and not more than a predetermined value interval. Set up two enterprise estimates of the confidence interval to determine the value of the enterprise.

依上述系統架構,其中該無形資產評價模組於執行該特性收斂程序後,若保留之無形資產估算值為單筆時,係以該筆無形資產估算值決定出該企業無形資產之價值,若保留之無形資產估算值為複數筆時,係進一步執行一區間收斂程序;該無形資產評價模組所執行之該區間收斂程序係衡量保留之複數筆無形資產估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過該預設信賴區間之二筆無形資產估算值來決定出該企業無形資產之價值。 According to the above system architecture, after the intangible asset evaluation module executes the characteristic convergence procedure, if the retained intangible asset estimate is a single transaction, the intangible asset estimate is used to determine the value of the enterprise’s intangible asset. When the estimated value of the retained intangible assets is plural, an interval convergence procedure is further performed; the interval convergence procedure executed by the intangible asset evaluation module is to measure the value interval of any two combinations of the retained plural estimated intangible assets. The two estimated values of intangible assets that are closest to and do not exceed the preset confidence interval are selected to determine the value of the intangible assets of the enterprise.

為使本發明之上述目的、特徵及功能作用獲致更具體的瞭解,茲舉本發明較佳之實施例並配合附圖說明如後: In order to gain a more detailed understanding of the above-mentioned objectives, features, and functions of the present invention, a preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings as follows:

1‧‧‧風險評價系統 1‧‧‧Risk Evaluation System

10‧‧‧產業數據資料庫 10‧‧‧Industry Data Database

11‧‧‧第一輸入模組 11‧‧‧The first input module

12‧‧‧資料轉換模組 12‧‧‧Data Conversion Module

13‧‧‧財務分析模組 13‧‧‧Financial Analysis Module

14‧‧‧比對數據模組 14‧‧‧Comparison data module

15‧‧‧企業診斷模組 15‧‧‧Enterprise Diagnostic Module

16‧‧‧企業評價模組 16‧‧‧Enterprise Evaluation Module

161‧‧‧成本法模組 161‧‧‧Cost Method Module

162‧‧‧收益法模組 162‧‧‧ Income Method Module

163‧‧‧市場法模組 163‧‧‧Market Law Module

17‧‧‧報告產出模組 17‧‧‧Report output module

21‧‧‧第二輸入模組 21‧‧‧Second input module

22‧‧‧資料轉換模組 22‧‧‧Data Conversion Module

23‧‧‧無形資產診斷模組 23‧‧‧Intangible Assets Diagnostic Module

24‧‧‧無形資產評價模組 24‧‧‧Intangible Asset Evaluation Module

241‧‧‧成本法模組 241‧‧‧Cost Method Module

242‧‧‧收益法模組 242‧‧‧ Income Method Module

243‧‧‧市場法模組 243‧‧‧Market Law Module

25‧‧‧報告產出模組 25‧‧‧Report output module

S0‧‧‧價值計算程序 S0‧‧‧Value calculation program

S1‧‧‧風險收斂程序 S1‧‧‧Risk Convergence Procedure

S11‧‧‧排序程序 S11‧‧‧Sequencing program

S12‧‧‧選取程序 S12‧‧‧Select program

S2‧‧‧特性收斂程序 S2‧‧‧Characteristic convergence program

S3‧‧‧區間收斂程序 S3‧‧‧Interval Convergence Program

S4‧‧‧決定價值程序 S4‧‧‧Determining the value process

第1圖為本發明方法流程示意圖; Figure 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the method of the present invention;

第2圖為本發明較佳實施例之系統架構示意圖,主要為關於企業評價的部分; Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the system architecture of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, which is mainly related to the part of enterprise evaluation;

第3圖為本發明較佳實施例之系統大部架構示意圖; Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of most of the system architecture of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;

第4圖為本發明較佳實施例之系統架構示意圖,主要為關於無形資產評價的部分。 Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the system architecture of a preferred embodiment of the present invention, which is mainly related to the evaluation of intangible assets.

請參閱第1圖,可知本發明主要是利用風險評等作為衡量標的物價值的因子,合理有效地篩選多種理論估算出的估算值,進而決定出最終、最佳的估算結果,以最後篩出的估算值作為該標的物的評價價值;其中,本發明方法適用之標的物可以是一企業或是一無形資產。 Please refer to Figure 1, it can be seen that the present invention mainly uses risk rating as a factor to measure the value of the subject matter, reasonably and effectively screens the estimated values estimated by a variety of theories, and then determines the final and best estimation results, and finally screens out The estimated value of is used as the evaluation value of the subject matter; wherein, the subject matter to which the method of the present invention is applicable can be an enterprise or an intangible asset.

本發明方法主要係應用在一風險評價系統1(可配合參考第2至4圖),該風險評價系統1預設有風險評等的規範,藉以先評斷出該標的物之一風險評等;實務上,風險評等之評斷,本發明實施例主要是利用該標的物財務資料以及從一產業數據資料庫10中取得的同類數據進行比較,進而評比出該標的物的風險評等;至於該風險評等的規範,可依需求而定,諸如利用權術、指數分析風險程度,並以等級作劃分,本發明實施例主要是規範有高、中、低三大分級,各大分級再畫分三個小等級,形成一共九等級的風險評等規範。 The method of the present invention is mainly applied to a risk evaluation system 1 (with reference to Figures 2 to 4), the risk evaluation system 1 is preset with risk rating specifications, so as to first judge the risk rating of one of the objects; In practice, the evaluation of the risk rating, the embodiment of the present invention mainly uses the financial data of the subject matter and the similar data obtained from an industry data database 10 to compare, and then evaluate the risk rating of the subject matter; The standard of risk rating can be determined according to needs, such as the use of authority and index analysis of the degree of risk, and divided by levels. The embodiment of the present invention mainly regulates three levels of high, medium, and low, and each major level is divided into three levels. Three small levels form a total of nine levels of risk rating norms.

本發明在計算與決定標的物價值的過程,主要可分為價值計算程序S0、風險收斂程序S1、特性收斂程序S2、區間收斂程序S3 及決定價值程序S4等步驟;於進行價值計算程序S0時,係利用複數個評價式分別根據該標的物之財務資料推算出複數筆估算值,該複數個評價式分別為根據成本法、收益法或市場法計價的評價式;於進行風險收斂程序S1時,係先進行一排序程序S11,依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆估算值,再進行一選取程序S12,根據該風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取相應比例之筆數的估算值;於進行特性收斂程序S2時,係以市場特性衡量被選取的估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該標的物市場特性的估算值;隨後,會先判斷該特性收斂程序S2保留之估算值為單筆或複數筆,若為單筆時,直接進入決定價值程序S4,以該筆估算值決定出該標的物之價值,而若為複數筆時,則先進入區間收斂程序S3,衡量保留之複數筆估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆估算值,之後再進入決定價值程序S4,以該二筆估算值決定出該標的物之價值。 The process of calculating and determining the value of the subject matter in the present invention can be divided into value calculation program S0, risk convergence program S1, characteristic convergence program S2, and interval convergence program S3. And determine the value procedure S4 and other steps; in the value calculation procedure S0, a plurality of evaluation formulae are used to calculate a plurality of estimated values based on the financial data of the subject matter, and the plurality of evaluation formulae are based on the cost method and the income method respectively. Or the evaluation formula of market valuation; in the risk convergence procedure S1, a sorting procedure S11 is performed first, and the plural estimated values calculated above are sorted according to the numerical value, and then a selection procedure S12 is performed, and the risk rating is relative Select the estimated value of the corresponding proportion in the reverse of the proportion of the total grade and the high and low position; when performing the characteristic convergence procedure S2, the selected estimated value is measured by market characteristics, and the ones that meet the market characteristics of the subject matter are selected and retained Estimated value; then, it will first determine that the estimated value retained by the characteristic convergence procedure S2 is a single or plural number. If it is a single, directly enter the value determination procedure S4, and use the estimated value to determine the value of the subject matter. If it is a plural number, enter the interval convergence procedure S3 first, measure the value interval of any two combinations of the retained plural estimates, select the two estimates that are closest to and not exceed a preset confidence interval, and then enter The value determination procedure S4 uses the two estimated values to determine the value of the subject matter.

以下以一案例進一步說明本發明上述流程,如前述風險評等規範有9個等級為例,假設經系統評斷該標的物的風險評等為風險較高的第3級(風險最高為第1級),於價值計算程序S0推算出有72筆估算值,經風險收斂程序S1之排序程序S11依數值高低排序如下: The following takes a case to further illustrate the above process of the present invention. For example, the aforementioned risk rating specification has 9 levels as an example. Suppose that the risk rating of the subject matter is judged by the system as the higher risk level 3 (the highest risk is level 1 ), 72 estimated values are calculated in the value calculation program S0, and the ranking program S11 of the risk convergence program S1 is sorted according to the numerical value as follows:

Figure 109100126-A0101-12-0006-1
Figure 109100126-A0101-12-0006-1

Figure 109100126-A0101-12-0007-2
Figure 109100126-A0101-12-0007-2

在進行選取程序S12時,係根據該風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取相應比例之筆數的估算值,實務操作可根據風險評等的9級將72比估算值均分成9個群組(如第1組為133,261~145,236,第2組為145,236~185,854,第9組773,505~2,109,671),標的物為風險評等為風險第三高的等級,因此選取時反向選取估算價值第三低的群組,即185,854~199,494的群組,共選取了此群組中的8筆估算值。 In the selection procedure S12, the estimated value of the corresponding proportion is selected according to the proportion of the risk rating relative to the total grade and the high and low position. The practical operation can be based on the 9 levels of the risk rating to average the 72 to the estimated value. Divide into 9 groups (for example, the first group is 133,261~145,236, the second group is 145,236~185,854, the 9th group is 773,505~2,109,671), the target is the risk rating of the third highest risk level, so the selection is reverse Select the group with the third lowest estimated value, that is, the group from 185,854 to 199,494, and select a total of 8 estimates in this group.

隨後進行特性收斂程序S2,係根據市場特性作衡量與篩選,實務操作可衡量此8筆估算值中,哪些是採用公開或非公開發行的市場因子計算,篩選並保留其中符合該標的物市場特性的估算值;假設前述被選取的8筆估算值,經篩選後有187,978、197,207、198,351三筆估算值符合,則保留此三筆估算值進行後續的程序。 The characteristic convergence procedure S2 is then carried out, which is based on market characteristics for measurement and screening. The practical operation can measure which of the 8 estimated values are calculated using public or non-public issuance market factors, and filter and retain the market characteristics of the subject matter. Assuming that the 8 selected estimates mentioned above have been screened and there are three estimates of 187,978, 197,207, and 198,351 that match, these three estimates are retained for subsequent procedures.

由於保留之估算值筆數為複數筆,因此進行區間收斂程序S3,係依據所保留之三筆估算值任二筆組合的價值區間(最大為5.52%,最低為0.58%),選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆估算值(假設預設信賴區間為10%),即選取5.52%這組之的兩筆估算值187,978、198,351,隨後進入決定價值程序S4,即以該二筆估算值決定出該標的物之價值,即最終決定的標的物價值為187,978~198,351。 Since the number of retained estimates is plural, the interval convergence procedure S3 is performed based on the value interval of any two combinations of the retained three estimates (maximum 5.52%, minimum 0.58%), and select the closest and Two estimates that do not exceed a preset confidence interval (assuming that the preset confidence interval is 10%), that is, select two estimates of 5.52%, 187,978, 198,351, and then enter the value determination procedure S4, that is, use the two estimates The estimated value determines the value of the object, that is, the final value of the object is 187,978~198,351.

藉由本發明利用風險評等決定企業價值或無形資產價值的 方法,能利用風險因子作衡量,合理且有效地收斂多種估算結果,決定出企業或無形資產最佳的評估價值。 By using the risk rating of the present invention to determine the value of the enterprise or the value of intangible assets The method can use risk factors as a measure, reasonably and effectively converge a variety of estimation results, and determine the best appraisal value of the enterprise or intangible assets.

再請一併參閱第2至4圖,係應用有本發明計價、收斂等技術特徵的較佳實施例,其為一風險評價系統1,可用於提供企業的風險診斷與評價,主要構成至少包括有一產業數據資料庫10、一第一輸入模組11、一企業診斷模組15及一企業評價模組16;於本實施例中,該風險評價系統1亦可進一步提供企業無形資產的風險診斷與評價,其構成則更包括有一第二輸入模組21、一無形資產診斷模組23及一無形資產評價模組24。 Please also refer to Figures 2 to 4, which are a preferred embodiment applying the technical features of the present invention such as pricing and convergence. It is a risk evaluation system 1, which can be used to provide enterprise risk diagnosis and evaluation. The main components include at least There is an industry data database 10, a first input module 11, an enterprise diagnosis module 15, and an enterprise evaluation module 16. In this embodiment, the risk evaluation system 1 can also provide further risk diagnosis of enterprise intangible assets And evaluation, its composition further includes a second input module 21, an intangible asset diagnosis module 23, and an intangible asset evaluation module 24.

其中,有關於企業風險診斷與評價的部分,可配合參閱第2及3圖,該產業數據資料庫10係儲存有各行業類別的相關產業數據資料,其主要係從外部收集、彙整相關資料,經篩選與轉換為系統內部適用之數據。 Among them, for the part about enterprise risk diagnosis and evaluation, you can refer to Figures 2 and 3 in conjunction. The industry data database 10 stores relevant industry data of various industry categories, which mainly collects and aggregates relevant information from the outside. Filtered and converted into data applicable within the system.

該第一輸入模組11提供有供使用者操作的介面,供使用者輸入企業之財務資料,諸如企業基本資料、年度、財務報表(資產負債表、損益表)、行業、企業類別、財務預測等資料;該第一輸入模組11連結有一資料轉換模組12,該資料轉換模組12係將使用者輸入的企業財務資料轉換為系統內部適用數據或資料格式;該資料轉換模組12再連結有一財務分析模組13,該財務分析模組13係根據轉換後的數據,統計分析出提供診斷的相關數據,如企業的財務比率、歷年間變化比率等等;該財務分析模組13又連結有一比對數據模組14,該比對數據模組14係根據企業所屬的行業、類別、年度等條件,從產業數據資料庫10中取得相 對應的比對數據。 The first input module 11 provides an interface for the user to operate, for the user to enter the financial data of the enterprise, such as basic enterprise information, annual, financial statements (balance sheet, income statement), industry, enterprise category, and financial forecast And other data; the first input module 11 is connected to a data conversion module 12, the data conversion module 12 converts the enterprise financial data entered by the user into the system's internal applicable data or data format; the data conversion module 12 A financial analysis module 13 is connected. The financial analysis module 13 statistically analyzes the relevant data for diagnosis based on the converted data, such as the financial ratio of the enterprise, the rate of change over the years, etc.; the financial analysis module 13 also A comparison data module 14 is connected. The comparison data module 14 obtains the data from the industry data database 10 according to the industry, category, year and other conditions of the company. The corresponding comparison data.

該企業診斷模組15,係分別連結該財務分析模組13及該比對數據模組14,根據統計分析的企業財務比率,以同類比較衡量企業的財務結構、償債能力、經營能力、獲利能力及現金流量,提供企業診斷的結論,並根據預設的企業風險評等規範評斷出企業的風險評等。 The enterprise diagnostic module 15 is connected to the financial analysis module 13 and the comparison data module 14. According to the statistical analysis of the financial ratio of the enterprise, the enterprise’s financial structure, solvency, operating capacity, and profitability Profitability and cash flow, provide the conclusion of the company’s diagnosis, and judge the company’s risk rating based on the preset corporate risk rating norms.

該企業評價模組16,係分別連結該資料轉換模組12、該企業診斷模組15及該產業數據資料庫10,主要係執行價值計算程序S0、風險收斂程序S1、特性收斂程序S2、區間收斂程序S3及決定出該企業價值的決定價值程序S4。其中,價值計算程序S0係根據該企業之財務資料以及從產業數據資料庫10取得的相關資料,利用複數個企業評價式推算出複數筆企業估算值,而該複數個企業評價式可分別為建構於成本法模組161的成本法計價評價式、建構於收益法模組162的收益法計價評價式、以及建構於市場法模組163的市場法計價評價式;該成本法模組161主要是利用企業財務資料、匯率、同業主要財務比率等數據,帶入內建之資產法模型推算出企業估算值;該收益法模組162主要是利用企業財務資料、利率、報酬率、風險係數、成長率、折現率等數據,帶入內建之盈餘資本化法模型、資產報酬法模型、超額盈餘庫藏法模型、盈餘(現金流量)折現法模型等推算出企業估算值;該市場法模組163主要是利用企業財務資料、類比同業投資資本市價倍數、權益市值倍數、折溢價率等數據,帶入內建之投資資本市價倍數模型、權益市值倍數模型等推算出企業估算值。 The enterprise evaluation module 16 connects the data conversion module 12, the enterprise diagnostic module 15 and the industrial data database 10 respectively, and mainly executes the value calculation program S0, the risk convergence program S1, the characteristic convergence program S2, and the interval Convergence procedure S3 and value determination procedure S4 that determine the value of the enterprise. Among them, the value calculation program S0 is based on the financial data of the enterprise and the relevant data obtained from the industrial data database 10, using a plurality of enterprise evaluation formulas to calculate a plurality of enterprise estimates, and the plural enterprise evaluation formulas can be constructed separately The cost method pricing evaluation formula in the cost method module 161, the income method pricing evaluation formula constructed in the income method module 162, and the market method pricing evaluation formula constructed in the market method module 163; the cost method module 161 is mainly Use corporate financial data, exchange rates, major financial ratios in the industry and other data to bring in the built-in asset method model to calculate the estimated value of the enterprise; the income method module 162 mainly uses corporate financial data, interest rates, return rates, risk factors, and growth Calculate the company’s estimated value by bringing in the built-in surplus capitalization method model, asset return method model, excess surplus storage method model, surplus (cash flow) discount method model, etc. Group 163 mainly uses data such as corporate financial data, analogue investment capital market value multiples, equity market value multiples, discount and premium rates, etc., to bring into the built-in investment capital market multiple model, equity market value multiple model, etc. to calculate the estimated value of the enterprise.

於價值計算程序S0推算出複數筆企業估算值後,依序執行 收斂程序決定出最佳的結果;首先,係執行風險收斂程序S1,係依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆企業估算值,並根據該企業風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取相應比例之筆數的企業估算值;其次,執行特性收斂程序S2,係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序S1選取的企業估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該企業市場特性的企業估算值。之後,若保留之企業估算值為單筆時,直接跳至決定價值程序S4,以該筆企業估算值決定出該企業之價值,而若保留之企業估算值為複數筆時,則先執行區間收斂程序S3,衡量保留之複數筆企業估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆企業估算值,再執行決定價值程序S4,以該二筆企業估算值來決定出該企業之價值;最後可再透過一報告產出模組17輸出企業的風險與診斷結論以及決定的企業價值。 After calculating multiple enterprise estimates in the value calculation procedure S0, execute them in order The convergence procedure determines the best result; first, the risk convergence procedure S1 is executed, which is to sort the estimated values of the above-mentioned inferred enterprises according to the numerical value, and according to the ratio of the enterprise risk rating to the total grade and the reverse position To select the company's estimated value of the corresponding proportion of the number; secondly, perform the characteristic convergence procedure S2, which is to measure the estimated value of the enterprise selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure S1 by the market characteristic, and select and retain the enterprise estimated value that meets the market characteristic of the enterprise . After that, if the retained enterprise estimate is a single transaction, skip directly to the value determination procedure S4, and use the enterprise estimate to determine the value of the enterprise, and if the retained enterprise estimate is multiple, the interval will be executed first Convergence procedure S3, to measure the value range of any two combinations of the retained plural enterprise estimates, select the two enterprise estimates that are closest to and not exceed a preset confidence interval, and then execute the value determination procedure S4 to take the two enterprise estimates The estimated value determines the value of the enterprise; finally, a report output module 17 can output the enterprise's risk and diagnosis conclusions and the determined enterprise value.

以下,則係關於無形資產風險診斷與評價的部分,可配合參閱第3及4圖,其中,該第二輸入模組21提供有相應的輸入介面及衡量區塊選項,能供使用者輸入該企業之無形資產資料,諸如無形資產基本資料、技術名稱、專利證號、基準日等等,並根據預設的衡量區塊選項供使用者進行選擇;該第二輸入模組21連結有一資料轉換模組22,其係將使用者輸入的企業無形資產資料及衡量區塊的選項,轉換為系統內部適用數據或資料格式。 The following is about the part of intangible asset risk diagnosis and evaluation. You can refer to Figures 3 and 4 together. Among them, the second input module 21 provides a corresponding input interface and measurement block options for the user to input the The company’s intangible asset data, such as the basic information of intangible assets, technology name, patent certificate number, reference date, etc., are available for users to choose according to preset measurement block options; the second input module 21 is connected to a data conversion Module 22, which converts the enterprise intangible asset data and measurement block options entered by the user into the applicable data or data format within the system.

該無形資產診斷模組23,係分別連結該資料轉換模組22、該企業診斷模組15及一外部資料庫20,根據使用者輸入與選擇的無形資產資料、從外部資料庫20取得的相關資料、以及從該企業診斷模組15帶入相關的企業財務資料,綜合分析經營者能力構面、技術性構面、 產業應用構面及市場競爭構面,提供無形資產診斷的結論,並根據預設的無形資產風險評等規範評斷出該無形資產的風險評等。 The intangible asset diagnostic module 23 is respectively connected with the data conversion module 22, the enterprise diagnostic module 15 and an external database 20, based on user input and selection of intangible asset data, and related information obtained from the external database 20 Data, as well as relevant corporate financial data brought in from the corporate diagnostic module 15, comprehensively analyze the capabilities and technical aspects of the operators, Industrial application and market competition, provide intangible asset diagnosis conclusions, and judge the risk rating of the intangible asset according to the preset risk rating norms for intangible assets.

該無形資產評價模組24,係分別連結轉換企業財務資料的該資料轉換模組12、轉換無形資產資料的該資料轉換模組22、該無形資產診斷模組23及該產業數據資料庫10,主要係執行價值計算程序S0、風險收斂程序S1、特性收斂程序S2、區間收斂程序S3及決定出該企業無形資產價值的決定價值程序S4。其中,價值計算程序S0係根據企業的財務資料、企業的無形資產資料以及從產業數據資料庫10取得的相關資料,利用複數個無形資產評價式推算出複數筆無形資產估算值,而該複數個無形資產評價式可分別為建構於成本法模組241的成本法計價評價式、建構於收益法模組242的收益法計價評價式、以及建構於市場法模組243的市場法計價評價式;該成本法模組241主要是利用物價指數、耐用年數等數據,帶入內建之市價類比法模型、指數法模型、重置成本法模型等推算出無形資產估算值;該收益法模組242主要是利用權利金比率、利率、報酬率、風險係數、耐用年數等數據,帶入內建之增額收益法模型、超額收益法模型、權利金法模型、要素貢獻法模型等推算出無形資產估算值;該市場法模組243主要是利用類比技術交易價格等數據,帶入內建之類比價值調整法模型推算出無形資產估算值。 The intangible asset evaluation module 24 is connected to the data conversion module 12 for converting corporate financial data, the data conversion module 22 for converting intangible asset data, the intangible asset diagnostic module 23, and the industrial data database 10, respectively. Mainly perform value calculation program S0, risk convergence program S1, characteristic convergence program S2, interval convergence program S3, and value determination program S4 that determines the value of the enterprise's intangible assets. Among them, the value calculation program S0 is based on the financial data of the enterprise, the intangible asset data of the enterprise, and the relevant information obtained from the industrial data database 10, using multiple intangible asset evaluation formulas to calculate the estimated value of multiple intangible assets. Intangible assets evaluation formulas can be the cost method evaluation formula constructed in the cost method module 241, the income method evaluation formula constructed in the income method module 242, and the market method evaluation formula constructed in the market method module 243; The cost method module 241 mainly uses the price index, service life and other data to bring into the built-in market price analog method model, index method model, replacement cost method model, etc. to calculate the estimated value of intangible assets; the income method module 242 is mainly calculated by using data such as royalty ratio, interest rate, rate of return, risk coefficient, durability years, etc., into the built-in incremental income method model, excess return method model, royalty method model, factor contribution method model, etc. Estimated value of intangible assets: The market method module 243 mainly uses data such as analog technology transaction prices to bring in the built-in analog value adjustment model to calculate the estimated value of intangible assets.

於該無形資產評價模組24之價值計算程序S0推算出複數筆無形資產估算值後,依序執行收斂程序決定出最佳的結果;首先,係執行風險收斂程序S1,係依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆無形資產估算值,並根據該無形資產風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向 選取相應比例之筆數的無形資產估算值;其次,執行特性收斂程序S2,係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序S1選取的無形資產估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該企業市場特性的無形資產估算值。之後,若保留之無形資產估算值為單筆時,直接跳至決定價值程序S4,以該筆無形資產估算值決定出該企業無形資產之價值,而若保留之無形資產估算值為複數筆時,則先執行區間收斂程序S3,衡量保留之複數筆無形資產估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過該預設信賴區間之二筆無形資產估算值,再執行決定價值程序S4,以該二筆無形資產估算值來決定出該企業無形資產之價值;最後可再透過一報告產出模組25輸出企業無形資產的風險與診斷結論以及決定的無形資產價值。 After the value calculation program S0 of the intangible asset evaluation module 24 calculates a plurality of intangible asset estimates, the convergence process is executed in order to determine the best result; first, the risk convergence process S1 is executed, which is ranked according to the numerical value. The estimated value of a plurality of intangible assets is calculated, and the ratio of the risk rating of the intangible asset relative to the total grade is reversed from the high and low position Select the estimated value of the intangible assets of the corresponding proportion; secondly, perform the characteristic convergence procedure S2, which uses the market characteristics to measure the estimated value of the intangible assets selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure S1, and select and retain the intangible assets that meet the market characteristics of the enterprise estimated value. After that, if the estimated value of the retained intangible assets is a single transaction, skip directly to the value determination procedure S4, and use the estimated value of the intangible assets to determine the value of the company's intangible assets, and if the estimated value of the retained intangible assets is plural , First execute the interval convergence procedure S3, measure the value interval of any two combinations of the retained plural intangible asset estimates, select the two intangible asset estimates that are closest to and not exceed the preset confidence interval, and then execute the value determination procedure S4: Determine the value of the company's intangible assets based on the estimated values of the two intangible assets; finally, a report output module 25 can output the risk and diagnosis conclusions of the company's intangible assets and the determined value of the intangible assets.

惟上述說明之內容,僅為本發明較佳實施例之說明,舉凡依本發明之技術手段與範疇所延伸之變化、修飾、改變或等效置換者,亦皆應落入本發明之專利申請範圍內。 However, the content of the above description is only the description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. Any changes, modifications, alterations or equivalent substitutions extended according to the technical means and scope of the present invention should also fall into the patent application of the present invention. Within range.

10‧‧‧產業數據資料庫 10‧‧‧Industry Data Database

S0‧‧‧價值計算程序 S0‧‧‧Value calculation program

S1‧‧‧風險收斂程序 S1‧‧‧Risk Convergence Procedure

S11‧‧‧排序程序 S11‧‧‧Sequencing program

S12‧‧‧選取程序 S12‧‧‧Select program

S2‧‧‧特性收斂程序 S2‧‧‧Characteristic convergence program

S3‧‧‧區間收斂程序 S3‧‧‧Interval Convergence Program

S4‧‧‧決定價值程序 S4‧‧‧Determining the value process

Claims (8)

一種利用風險評等決定企業價值或無形資產價值的方法,係應用於一評價系統,以決定出企業或無形資產的價值,該方法包括:根據一標的物之財務資料評斷該標的物之一風險評等,其中,該標的物可為一企業或一無形資產;利用複數個評價式分別根據該標的物之財務資料推算出複數筆估算值,並依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆估算值;根據該風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取上述排序後之複數筆估算值中相應比例之筆數的估算值;以市場特性衡量上述選取之估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該標的物市場特性的估算值;以上述保留之估算值決定出該標的物之價值。 A method of using risk ratings to determine the value of an enterprise or intangible assets is applied to an evaluation system to determine the value of an enterprise or intangible assets. The method includes: judging one of the risks of an object based on its financial data Rating, where the subject matter can be an enterprise or an intangible asset; multiple evaluation formulas are used to calculate multiple estimates based on the subject matter’s financial data, and the multiple estimates calculated above are sorted according to the numerical value. ; According to the ratio of the risk rating to the total grade and the reverse position, select the estimated value of the corresponding proportion of the plural estimated values after the above sorting; measure the estimated value selected above by market characteristics, filter and retain them The estimated value that meets the market characteristics of the subject matter; the value of the subject matter is determined by the above-mentioned retained estimated value. 如請求項1所述之方法,其中,在以上述保留之估算值決定出該標的物之價值的過程,若保留之估算值為單筆時,係以該筆估算值決定出該標的物之價值,而若保留之估算值為複數筆時,則係衡量保留之複數筆估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆估算值來決定出該標的物之價值。 The method described in claim 1, wherein, in the process of determining the value of the subject matter by the estimated value of the reservation, if the estimated value of the reservation is a single transaction, the estimated value is used to determine the value of the subject matter Value, and if the retained estimate value is plural, then the value interval of any two combination of the retained plural estimate value is measured, and the two estimated values that are closest to and do not exceed a preset confidence interval are selected to determine the value. The value of the subject matter. 如請求項1或2所述之方法,其中該複數個評價式分別為根據成本法、收益法或市場法計價的評價式。 The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the plurality of evaluation formulae are respectively evaluated according to the cost method, the income method or the market method. 一種利用風險評等決定企業價值的系統,包括:一第一輸入模組,用以供使用者輸入一企業之財務資料;一企業診斷模組,連結該第一輸入模組,用以根據該企業之財務資料評斷該企業之一企業風險評等;一企業評價模組,連結該第一輸入模組及該企業診斷模組,係利用 複數個企業評價式分別根據該企業之財務資料推算出複數筆企業估算值,且至少執行一風險收斂程序及一特性收斂程序決定出該企業之價值;其中,該風險收斂程序係先依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆企業估算值,並根據該企業風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取上述排序後之複數筆企業估算值中相應比例之筆數的企業估算值;該特性收斂程序係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序選取的企業估算值,篩選並保留其中符合該企業市場特性的企業估算值。 A system that uses risk rating to determine the value of an enterprise includes: a first input module for users to input financial data of an enterprise; an enterprise diagnostic module connected to the first input module for the An enterprise’s financial data judges one of the enterprise’s enterprise risk ratings; an enterprise evaluation module, which links the first input module and the enterprise diagnostic module, is used A plurality of enterprise evaluation formulas respectively calculate a plurality of enterprise estimates based on the financial data of the enterprise, and perform at least one risk convergence procedure and one characteristic convergence procedure to determine the value of the enterprise; among them, the risk convergence procedure is first based on the value Sort the multiple enterprise estimates calculated above, and select the enterprise estimate of the corresponding proportion of the multiple enterprise estimates after the above sorting according to the ratio of the enterprise's risk rating to the total level and the position reversely; The characteristic convergence procedure is to measure the estimated value of the enterprise selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure based on the market characteristic, and to screen and retain the enterprise estimate that meets the market characteristic of the enterprise. 如請求項4所述之系統,其中該企業評價模組於執行該特性收斂程序後,若保留之企業估算值為單筆時,係以該筆企業估算值決定出該企業之價值,若保留之企業估算值為複數筆時,係進一步執行一區間收斂程序;該區間收斂程序係衡量保留之複數筆企業估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信賴區間之二筆企業估算值來決定出該企業之價值。 The system described in claim 4, wherein after the enterprise evaluation module executes the feature convergence procedure, if the retained enterprise estimate is a single transaction, the enterprise estimate is used to determine the value of the enterprise, if it is retained When the enterprise estimate value is plural, an interval convergence procedure is further implemented; the interval convergence procedure measures the value interval of any two combinations of the plural enterprise estimate values retained, and selects the closest and does not exceed a preset confidence interval Two enterprise estimates are used to determine the value of the enterprise. 一種利用風險評等決定企業價值暨無形資產價值的系統,包括:一第一輸入模組,用以供使用者輸入一企業之財務資料;一第二輸入模組,用以供使用者輸入該企業之無形資產資料;一企業診斷模組,連結該第一輸入模組,用以根據該企業之財務資料評斷該企業之一企業風險評等;一企業評價模組,連結該第一輸入模組及該企業診斷模組,係利用複數個企業評價式分別根據該企業之財務資料推算出複數筆企業估算值,且至少執行一風險收斂程序及一特性收斂程序決定出該企業之價值;其中,該企業評價模組所執行之該風險收斂程序係先依數值高 低排序上述推算出的複數筆企業估算值,並根據該企業風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取上述排序後之複數筆企業估算值中相應比例之筆數的企業估算值;該企業評價模組所執行之該特性收斂程序係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序選取之企業估算值,篩選並保留其中符合企業市場特性的企業估算值;一無形資產診斷模組,連結該第二輸入模組及該企業診斷模組,用以根據該企業之財務資料及無形資產資料評斷該企業之一無形資產風險評等;一無形資產評價模組,連結該第一輸入模組、該第二輸入模組及該無形資產診斷模組,係利用複數個無形資產評價式分別根據該企業之無形資產資料及財務資料推算出複數筆無形資產估算值,且至少執行一風險收斂程序及一特性收斂程序決定出該企業無形資產之價值;其中,該無形資產評價模組所執行之該風險收斂程序係先依數值高低排序上述推算出的複數筆無形資產估算值,並根據該無形資產風險評等相對於總等級的比例與高低位置反向選取上述排序後之複數筆無形資產估算值中相應比例之筆數的無形資產估算值;該無形資產評價模組所執行之該特性收斂程序係以市場特性衡量經前述風險收斂程序選取之無形資產估算值,篩選並保留其中符合無形資產市場特性的無形資產估算值。 A system for determining enterprise value and intangible asset value by using risk ratings includes: a first input module for users to input financial data of an enterprise; and a second input module for users to input the Enterprise’s intangible asset data; an enterprise diagnostic module, linked to the first input module, used to judge one of the company’s corporate risk ratings based on the company’s financial data; an enterprise evaluation module, linked to the first input module The group and the enterprise diagnostic module use a plurality of enterprise evaluation formulas to respectively calculate a plurality of enterprise estimates based on the financial data of the enterprise, and perform at least one risk convergence procedure and a characteristic convergence procedure to determine the value of the enterprise; , The risk convergence procedure executed by the enterprise evaluation module is based on the high value Low-ranking the plural enterprise estimates calculated above, and according to the ratio of the company’s risk rating relative to the total grade and the high-low position, select the enterprise estimate value of the corresponding proportion of the plural enterprise estimates after the above-mentioned sorting ; The characteristic convergence procedure executed by the enterprise evaluation module is to measure the estimated value of the enterprise selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure based on market characteristics, and to screen and retain the enterprise estimated value that meets the enterprise market characteristics; an intangible asset diagnostic module, link The second input module and the enterprise diagnostic module are used to judge the risk rating of an intangible asset of the enterprise based on the financial data and intangible asset data of the enterprise; an intangible asset evaluation module is connected to the first input module , The second input module and the intangible asset diagnostic module use multiple intangible asset evaluation formulas to calculate multiple intangible asset estimates based on the company’s intangible asset data and financial data, and perform at least one risk convergence procedure And a characteristic convergence procedure to determine the value of the enterprise’s intangible assets; among them, the risk convergence procedure executed by the intangible asset evaluation module is to first sort the estimated values of the intangible assets calculated above according to the intangible asset evaluation module. The ratio of asset risk rating relative to the total level and the position of the intangible asset are reversed to select the intangible asset estimate value of the corresponding proportion of the plural intangible asset estimate values after the above sorting; the characteristic implemented by the intangible asset evaluation module converges The procedure uses market characteristics to measure the estimated value of intangible assets selected by the aforementioned risk convergence procedure, and selects and retains the estimated value of intangible assets that meet the market characteristics of intangible assets. 如請求項6所述之系統,其中該企業評價模組於執行該特性收斂程序後,若保留之企業估算值為單筆時,係以該筆企業估算值決定出該企業之價值,若保留之企業估算值為複數筆時,係進一步執行一區間收斂程序;該企業評價模組所執行之該區間收斂程序係衡量保留之複數筆企業估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過一預設信 賴區間之二筆企業估算值來決定出該企業之價值。 The system described in claim 6, wherein after the enterprise evaluation module executes the feature convergence procedure, if the retained enterprise estimate is a single transaction, the enterprise estimate is used to determine the value of the enterprise. If retained When the enterprise estimate value is plural, an interval convergence procedure is further executed; the interval convergence procedure executed by the enterprise evaluation module is to measure the value interval of any two combinations of the plural enterprise estimate values retained, and select the closest and Not more than one pre-determined letter Relying on the two enterprise estimates in the interval to determine the value of the enterprise. 如請求項7所述之系統,其中該無形資產評價模組於執行該特性收斂程序後,若保留之無形資產估算值為單筆時,係以該筆無形資產估算值決定出該企業無形資產之價值,若保留之無形資產估算值為複數筆時,係進一步執行一區間收斂程序;該無形資產評價模組所執行之該區間收斂程序係衡量保留之複數筆無形資產估算值任二筆組合的價值區間,選取最接近且不超過該預設信賴區間之二筆無形資產估算值來決定出該企業無形資產之價值。 The system described in claim 7, wherein after the intangible asset evaluation module executes the characteristic convergence procedure, if the estimated value of the retained intangible asset is a single transaction, the intangible asset of the enterprise is determined by the estimated value of the intangible asset If the estimated value of the retained intangible assets is plural, an interval convergence procedure is further executed; the interval convergence procedure executed by the intangible asset evaluation module is to measure any two combinations of the estimated value of the retained intangible assets Select the two estimated values of intangible assets that are closest to and do not exceed the preset confidence interval to determine the value of the intangible assets of the enterprise.
TW109100126A 2020-01-03 2020-01-03 Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating TWI735129B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW109100126A TWI735129B (en) 2020-01-03 2020-01-03 Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW109100126A TWI735129B (en) 2020-01-03 2020-01-03 Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW202127360A TW202127360A (en) 2021-07-16
TWI735129B true TWI735129B (en) 2021-08-01

Family

ID=77908696

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW109100126A TWI735129B (en) 2020-01-03 2020-01-03 Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI735129B (en)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1894715A (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-01-10 朱莉安·范埃拉克 Asset analysis according to the required yield method
US20120072357A1 (en) * 2010-09-22 2012-03-22 Bradford Technologies, Inc. Method and system for predicting property values within discrete finite market elements
US20140279692A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Brad A. Boothby Optimizing return on investment in real property
US20160005131A1 (en) * 2014-06-11 2016-01-07 Bizequity Llc Engine, system and method of providing cloud-based business valuation and associated services
CN106952159A (en) * 2017-03-20 2017-07-14 重庆汇集源科技有限公司 A kind of real security risk control method, system and storage medium
TWM564215U (en) * 2018-04-20 2018-07-21 兆豐國際商業銀行股份有限公司 A system for establishing liquidity risk assessment form
CN110020802A (en) * 2019-04-09 2019-07-16 湖北风口网络科技有限公司 A kind of financing security system of financial industry

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1894715A (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-01-10 朱莉安·范埃拉克 Asset analysis according to the required yield method
US20120072357A1 (en) * 2010-09-22 2012-03-22 Bradford Technologies, Inc. Method and system for predicting property values within discrete finite market elements
US20140279692A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Brad A. Boothby Optimizing return on investment in real property
US20160005131A1 (en) * 2014-06-11 2016-01-07 Bizequity Llc Engine, system and method of providing cloud-based business valuation and associated services
CN106952159A (en) * 2017-03-20 2017-07-14 重庆汇集源科技有限公司 A kind of real security risk control method, system and storage medium
TWM564215U (en) * 2018-04-20 2018-07-21 兆豐國際商業銀行股份有限公司 A system for establishing liquidity risk assessment form
CN110020802A (en) * 2019-04-09 2019-07-16 湖北风口网络科技有限公司 A kind of financing security system of financial industry

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW202127360A (en) 2021-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chi et al. Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality
McGuire et al. Tax avoidance: Does tax-specific industry expertise make a difference?
McDonald The determinants of firm profitability in Australian manufacturing
US7418419B2 (en) Method and system for comparison and evaluation of investment portfolios
Hahn et al. Valuing supply chain performance within and across manufacturing industries: A DEA-based approach
Francis et al. Do better managers get better loan contracts?
CN115564482A (en) Construction method of internal marketing management system based on complex equipment delivery problem
Ashley et al. Dealing with data uncertainty
TWI735129B (en) Method and system for determining enterprise value or intangible asset value using risk rating
Chen et al. Mutual fund performance evaluation–application of system BCC model
KR101292130B1 (en) Integrated analysis method with real time relative evaluation system
Hogan et al. Pro forma earnings presentation effects and investment decisions
CN113723842A (en) Research and development expense investment scale and strength prediction method
Liu NPV and IRR’s Comparative Analysis in Enterprises Investment Decision Making
CN112990689A (en) Information data quality detection method and device
CN112116197A (en) Adverse behavior early warning method and system based on supplier evaluation system
Arce et al. Sudden Stops and Consumption Inequality with Nonhomothetic Preferences
O'mahony et al. Measuring the volume of services industries output and productivity: An audit of services producer price indices in OECD countries
CN109544336A (en) A kind of online estimation method of region equity market
Taram et al. Comparison Analysis of Financial Performance of BUMN and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks with RGEC Method
Al-Jawahry et al. Professional Specialization of Auditing Offices and Companies and its Effect in the Quality of Accounting Earnings
Margolis The Classification of Sectors in the Social Accounts
Das Estimating sectoral net saving (dissaving) of labour and capital in India under pre and post liberalisation: An input-output approach
Pailwar et al. Revealed comparative advantages for India in services trade
KNEŽEVIĆ et al. Measuring the efficiency of Serbian banks using data envelopment analysis