TWI605431B - Text composition and translation scoring system - Google Patents
Text composition and translation scoring system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TWI605431B TWI605431B TW105133362A TW105133362A TWI605431B TW I605431 B TWI605431 B TW I605431B TW 105133362 A TW105133362 A TW 105133362A TW 105133362 A TW105133362 A TW 105133362A TW I605431 B TWI605431 B TW I605431B
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- module
- scoring
- comment
- error
- translation
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 title claims description 23
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 57
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006996 mental state Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Machine Translation (AREA)
Description
本發明係關於一種評分系統，尤指一種針對寫作與翻譯給予統一扣分標準之寫作與翻譯評分系統。 The present invention relates to a scoring system, and more particularly to a writing and translation scoring system that provides a unified deduction standard for writing and translation.
按，傳統之評量方式係由分發考試卷給應考人作答，於一定時間內回收其試卷，再統一集中批改評分，其中，考試卷除了是非題或選擇題係以答案卡劃記方式，讓電子辨識系統進行辨識評分外，對於有關寫作或翻譯之考題，其評分方式仍須由閱卷委員評分後鍵入電腦與選擇題、是非題整合計分。 According to the traditional evaluation method, the examination papers are distributed to the candidates to answer the questions, and the examination papers are collected within a certain period of time, and then the scores are unified and revised. Among them, the examination papers are in addition to the questions or the selection questions are based on the answer card. In addition to the identification scores of the electronic identification system, for the questions related to writing or translation, the scoring method must still be scored by the scoring committee and then typed into the computer and multiple-choice questions.
但是，因為每位閱卷委員之主觀意識不同，在評分之基準上會有所差異，故為求客觀，通常係一份考試卷給予多位委員評閱，將其分數平均。可是，每位閱卷委員可能因為閱卷時間、身心狀態等不同因素，導致評分標準有所差異，為了排除人為之主觀因素，考試中心通常會作閱卷研習、試閱、重閱(與其他閱卷委員差異過大)等方式，且閱卷委員離開閱卷一段時間後重回閱卷，須重新試閱通過後，方能繼續進行閱卷，而閱卷過程中也會穿插閱卷委員曾評閱過之考試卷，重新閱卷評分若與先前批改之分數相左時，登記分數之系統將會自動鎖定，必須要與其他閱卷委員討論該題評分之標準及差異後，再重新試閱及閱 卷，如此一來，將造成時間之浪費與人力成本之消耗。 However, because each scoring committee member's subjective consciousness is different, there will be differences in the scoring benchmark. Therefore, in order to be objective, usually an examination paper is given to a number of members for review and the scores are averaged. However, each scoring committee may have different scoring standards due to different factors such as the time of scoring, physical and mental state, etc. In order to exclude the subjective factors of human beings, the test center usually conducts scoring, reading, and re-reading (different from other scrutiny committee members). If the reviewing committee leaves the review for a period of time and then returns to the review, it must be re-examined before it can continue to be reviewed. During the marking process, the examination papers that have been reviewed by the reviewing committee will be interspersed. When the scores of the previous corrections are different, the system for registering the scores will be automatically locked. It is necessary to discuss the criteria and differences of the scores with other scoring committees before re-reading and reading. Volume, as a result, will result in wasted time and labor costs.
因此，如何針對寫作與翻譯給予客觀評分標準，減少因閱卷委員之主觀因素影響評分標準，並改善時間與人力成本之消耗，有待相關業者解決之。 Therefore, how to give objective scoring standards for writing and translation, reduce the subjective factors affecting the scoring committee, and improve the consumption of time and labor costs, which need to be resolved by relevant industry players.
為解決上述課題，本發明提供一種寫作與翻譯評分系統，評閱者根據試卷中出現之錯誤處，藉由輸入選取模組選取評分選項模組，而評分計算模組根據已選取之評分選項模組對應評分標準模組，計算錯誤處之扣分，藉此，使每一份試卷之扣分標準相同，避免因評閱者之主觀因素影響評分標準，並且達到減少時間與人力之浪費。 In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides a writing and translation scoring system. The reviewer selects a scoring option module by inputting a selection module according to an error occurred in the test paper, and the scoring calculation module selects a scoring option module according to the selected Corresponding to the scoring standard module, the deduction points of the error are calculated, so that the deduction points of each test paper are the same, avoiding the subjective factors of the reviewers affecting the scoring standard, and reducing the waste of time and manpower.
為達到上述目的，本發明提供一種寫作與翻譯評分系統，其包含：一處理顯示模組，其具有一處理單元與一顯示單元；一試卷，其連結處理單元並顯示於顯示單元；一評分標準模組，其連結處理單元，其中，評分標準模組具有一標準格式，其中，標準格式包含一自建校正符號，標準格式用以對照試卷作為一錯誤處之扣分依據，自建校正符號可根據需求設定錯誤處之扣分依據；一評分選項模組，其連結處理單元與評分標準模組，並顯示於顯示單元，評分選項模組具有複數錯誤符號選項，用以供閱卷者針對錯誤處對應錯誤符號選項作選取；一輸入選取模組，其連結評分選項模組，用以供閱卷者選取評分選項模組；以及一評分計算模組，其連結處理單元、評分標準模組及評分選項模組，其中，根據已選取之錯誤符號選項對應評分標準模組，計算錯誤處之扣分。 In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a writing and translation scoring system, comprising: a processing display module having a processing unit and a display unit; a test paper connected to the processing unit and displayed on the display unit; The module, the link processing unit, wherein the scoring standard module has a standard format, wherein the standard format includes a self-built correction symbol, and the standard format is used as a basis for deducting the test paper as an error, and the self-built correction symbol can be According to the demand setting error basis; a rating option module, which is connected to the processing unit and the scoring standard module, and displayed in the display unit, the scoring option module has a complex error symbol option for the reviewer to target the error Corresponding to the error symbol option; an input selection module, which is linked to the scoring option module for the scoring person to select the scoring option module; and a scoring calculation module, which is linked to the processing unit, the scoring standard module, and the scoring option Module, wherein the error standard is calculated according to the selected error symbol option corresponding to the scoring standard module Minute.
較佳地，更具有一評語模組，其連結處理單元與輸入選取模組並 顯示於試卷，評語模組係包含一自建評語單元，自建評語單元係供閱卷者藉由輸入選取模組輸入一評語。 Preferably, there is a comment module, which is connected to the processing unit and the input selection module. Displayed in the test paper, the comment module includes a self-built comment unit, and the self-built comment unit is for the reviewer to input a comment by inputting the selection module.
較佳地，評語模組更包含一內建評語單元，內建評語單元係已建立於評語模組之複數評語詞彙，供閱卷者藉由輸入選取模組選取等評語詞彙。 Preferably, the comment module further includes a built-in comment unit, and the built-in comment unit is a plurality of comment words that have been established in the comment module for the reviewer to select a comment vocabulary by inputting a selection module.
較佳地，更具有一顏色模組，其連結處理單元、輸入選取模組及評語模組，顏色模組藉由輸入選取模組改變評語與評語詞彙顯示之文字顏色。 Preferably, there is a color module connected to the processing unit, the input selection module and the comment module, and the color module changes the color of the text displayed by the comment and the comment vocabulary by inputting the selection module.
藉由上述，本發明可達成功效之一，評閱者根據試卷中出現之錯誤處，藉由輸入選取模組點選對應錯誤處之錯誤符號選項，當批改完畢後，評分計算模組會根據已選取之錯誤符號選項對應評分標準模組，計算錯誤處之扣分，以得到此份試卷之考試成績，藉此，統一每一份試卷相同錯誤處之扣分標準，可避免因評閱者之主觀因素影響評分標準，因此，不需要將同一份考試卷給予多位閱卷者作批改，使閱卷批改速度增加，且能夠減少人力成本消耗。 By the above, the present invention can achieve one of the effects. The reviewer selects the error symbol option corresponding to the error according to the error occurred in the test paper, and when the correction is completed, the score calculation module will be based on the The wrong symbol option is selected to correspond to the scoring standard module, and the deduction points of the error are calculated to obtain the test scores of the test paper, thereby unifying the deduction standard of the same error in each test paper, thereby avoiding the subjective opinion of the reviewer. Factors affect the scoring standard. Therefore, it is not necessary to give the same test paper to a number of reviewers for correction, so that the speed of marking correction is increased, and the labor cost can be reduced.
藉由上述，本發明可達成功效之二，藉由自訂評分基準單元作錯誤處之扣分基準設定，當考題較難或較簡單時，可降低或提高對於錯誤處之扣分基準，另外，亦可針對應考人之程度作扣分基準之不同，能夠針對初級班或進階班作不同錯誤處之扣分標準調整，藉此，可依考生程度不同、學習重點不同或是教學內容不同，選擇著重項目及配分，以增加本發明調整性及實用性，使適用範圍更廣泛。 By the above, the invention can achieve the second effect, and the custom scoring reference unit is used as the deduction basis setting of the error, and when the question is difficult or simple, the deduction basis for the error can be reduced or improved, and It can also be used as a benchmark for the degree of the candidate, and can be adjusted for the deduction points of different mistakes in the primary or advanced class. This can be different depending on the degree of the candidate, the learning focus is different, or the teaching content is different. Selecting the emphasis items and distribution points to increase the adjustability and practicability of the present invention, and to make the scope of application wider.
藉由上述，本發明可達成功效之三，藉由評語模組對於批改好之試卷作評語加註，可針對錯誤處加以說明，或是給予寫作與翻譯上之建議等，而評閱者能夠選取內建評語單元中之評語詞彙，或是藉由自建評語單元輸入評閱者之評語，另外，可針對評語詞彙或自行輸入之評語作文字顏色之修 改，藉此，當應考人於事後收到考試卷時，能夠針對評閱者給予之評語，更加了解此次考試之相關評語，提供應考人改進與吸取建議。 By the above, the invention can achieve the third effect, and the comment module can add a comment to the corrected test paper, and can explain the error, or give suggestions for writing and translation, and the reviewer can select The comment vocabulary in the built-in comment unit, or the commentator's comment is input by the self-built comment unit. In addition, the color of the comment can be made for the comment vocabulary or the self-entered comments. In this way, when the candidate receives the test paper after the event, he can better understand the relevant comments of the test and provide suggestions for the tester to improve and draw suggestions.
10‧‧‧處理顯示模組 10‧‧‧Processing display module
11‧‧‧處理單元 11‧‧‧Processing unit
12‧‧‧顯示單元 12‧‧‧Display unit
20‧‧‧試卷 20‧‧‧ papers
42‧‧‧自訂評分基準單元 42‧‧‧Custom scoring reference unit
50‧‧‧評分選項模組 50‧‧‧Scoring option module
51‧‧‧錯誤符號選項 51‧‧‧Error symbol options
60‧‧‧評分計算模組 60‧‧‧Scoring calculation module
21‧‧‧錯誤處 21‧‧‧ Errors
30‧‧‧輸入選取模組 30‧‧‧Input selection module
40‧‧‧評分標準模組 40‧‧‧Scoring standard module
41‧‧‧標準格式 41‧‧‧Standard format
411‧‧‧APA校正符號 411‧‧‧APA correction symbol
412‧‧‧MLA校正符號 412‧‧‧MLA correction symbol
413‧‧‧自建校正符號 413‧‧‧ self-built correction symbol
70‧‧‧評語模組 70‧‧‧Comment module
71‧‧‧自建評語單元 71‧‧‧Self-built comment unit
711‧‧‧評語 711‧‧‧Comments
72‧‧‧內建評語單元 72‧‧‧ Built-in comment unit
721‧‧‧評語詞彙 721‧‧‧Commentary vocabulary
80‧‧‧顏色模組 80‧‧‧ color module
圖1係本發明之整體架構方塊圖。 1 is a block diagram of the overall architecture of the present invention.
圖2係本發明之架構方塊圖(一)，表示評分計算模組根據已點選之錯誤符號選項作評分。 2 is a block diagram (1) of the architecture of the present invention, showing that the score calculation module scores according to the selected wrong symbol option.
圖3係本發明之架構方塊圖(二)，表示藉由輸入選組模組於評語模組中針對試卷作評語。 FIG. 3 is a block diagram (2) of the architecture of the present invention, which shows that a comment is made for a test paper in a comment module by inputting a selection module.
為便於說明本發明於上述發明內容一欄中所表示的中心思想，茲以具體實施例表達。實施例中各種不同物件係按適於說明之比例、尺寸、變形量或位移量而描繪，而非按實際元件的比例予以繪製，合先敘明。 For the convenience of the description, the central idea expressed by the present invention in the column of the above summary of the invention is expressed by the specific embodiments. Various items in the embodiments are depicted in terms of ratios, dimensions, amounts of deformation, or displacements that are suitable for illustration, and are not drawn to the proportions of actual elements, as set forth above.
請參閱圖1至圖3所示，本發明提供一種寫作與翻譯評分系統，其包含：一處理顯示模組10，其具有一處理單元11與一顯示單元12，其中，處理單元11係終端機，例如：電腦終端機、平板電腦其中之一，顯示單元12係電腦螢幕、平板電腦之處控螢幕，其中，於本發明中，處理單元11係電腦終端機，顯示單元12係電腦螢幕。 Referring to FIG. 1 to FIG. 3, the present invention provides a writing and translation scoring system, comprising: a processing display module 10 having a processing unit 11 and a display unit 12, wherein the processing unit 11 is a terminal For example, one of a computer terminal and a tablet computer, the display unit 12 is a computer screen, a tablet computer control screen, wherein, in the present invention, the processing unit 11 is a computer terminal, and the display unit 12 is a computer screen.
一試卷20，其連結處理單元11並顯示於顯示單元12上，其中， 試卷20係利用掃描轉換手段將紙本試卷轉置而成，或是於電腦或平板電腦上作答之電子試卷。 a test paper 20 connected to the processing unit 11 and displayed on the display unit 12, wherein The test paper 20 is formed by translating a paper test paper by means of a scan conversion method, or an electronic test paper for answering a question on a computer or a tablet computer.
一輸入選取模組30，其連結處理單元11，輸入選取模組30係為文字輸入、點取選項、觸控至少其中之一或其組合，輸入選取模組30係鍵盤、滑鼠、觸控方式至少其中之一或其組合，於本發明中，評閱者可藉由鍵盤輸入文字，或是藉由滑鼠點選相關選項。 An input selection module 30 is connected to the processing unit 11, and the input selection module 30 is at least one of a text input, a point selection option, and a touch, and the input selection module 30 is a keyboard, a mouse, and a touch. At least one of the modes or a combination thereof, in the present invention, the reviewer can input text by keyboard or click the relevant option by clicking the mouse.
一評分標準模組40，其連結處理單元11，而評分標準模組40具有一標準格式41，標準格式41用以對照試卷20作為一錯誤處21之扣分依據，其中，錯誤處21係包含語法、語意、語用、翻譯、錯字、標點符號至少其中之一或至少其中任二種以上之組合。而標準格式41係包含一APA校正符號411、一MLA校正符號412、一自建校正符號413至少其中之一或至少其中任二種以上之組合，APA為美國心理學會(American Psychological Association)之縮寫，MLA為現代語言學會(Modern Language Association)之縮寫，其中，自建校正符號413係藉由輸入選取模組30自行輸入文字，或已內建原始設定對應錯誤處21之選項，根據需求作點選設定扣分依據，供評閱者針對不同考試設定不同之扣分依據。再者，每個錯誤處21之扣分基準係為原始設定或是評閱者自行設定，例如一個語法錯誤扣2分，三個標點符號錯誤扣1分之扣分基準設定，藉此，增加本發明之應用範圍。 a scoring standard module 40, which is coupled to the processing unit 11, and the scoring standard module 40 has a standard format 41 for comparing the test paper 20 as a basis for the error 21, wherein the error 21 includes At least one of grammar, semantics, pragmatics, translation, typos, punctuation, or at least any combination of two or more. The standard format 41 includes at least one of at least one or at least one of an APA correction symbol 411, an MLA correction symbol 412, and a self-built correction symbol 413. The APA is an abbreviation of the American Psychological Association. The MLA is an abbreviation of the Modern Language Association. The self-built correction symbol 413 is input by the input selection module 30, or the built-in original setting corresponding to the error location 21 is selected according to requirements. The selection deduction points are used for reviewers to set different deduction points for different exams. Furthermore, the deduction point of each error area 21 is the original setting or the reviewer's own setting, for example, a grammatical error deducts 2 points, and three punctuation marks deducts 1 point deduction point reference setting, thereby increasing the number. The scope of application of the invention.
另外，評分標準模組40具有一自訂評分基準單元42，而自訂評分基準單元42顯示於顯示單元12，用以供閱卷者透過輸入選取模組30針對試卷20之難易度或應考人之程度作錯誤處21之扣分基準設定，例如：當考題較難時，一個語法錯誤扣1分，若試考題較簡單時，一個語法錯誤扣3分，也此類推 作考題難易之扣分基準調整；另外，亦可針對應考人之程度作扣分基準之不同，能夠針對初級班或進階班作不同錯誤處21之扣分標準調整，例如：基礎班注重文法及拼字，若錯誤處21係語法及錯字，則語法扣分由原始設定之2分改為4分，錯字扣分由原始設定之1分改為3分，而進階班注重文章組織與結構，若是錯誤處21係語用及語意，則，則語用扣分由原始設定之3分改為5分，語意扣分由原始設定之2分改為3分，以此類推；此外，針對考試內容作扣分基準之調整，例如：考試係以拼字為主，則錯字之扣分基準由原始設定之1分改為3分，以此類推作不同考試之扣分基準調整，藉此，可依考生程度不同、學習重點不同或是教學內容不同，選擇著重項目及配分，以增加本發明調整性及實用性，使適用範圍更廣泛。 In addition, the scoring standard module 40 has a custom scoring reference unit 42 and the custom scoring reference unit 42 is displayed on the display unit 12 for the difficulty of the scoring person to input the selection module 30 for the test paper 20 or the candidate. The degree is set as the benchmark for the error point 21. For example, when the question is difficult, a grammatical error is deducted by 1 point. If the test question is simple, a grammatical error is deducted by 3 points, and so on. It is also possible to make a deduction of the benchmark for the difficulty of the exam. In addition, it can also be used as a benchmark for the degree of the candidate, and can adjust the deduction criteria for the different classes of the primary or advanced class. For example, the basic class pays attention to the grammar. And spelling, if the error is 21 grammar and typo, the grammar deduction is changed from 2 points of the original setting to 4 points, and the typo points are changed from 1 point of the original setting to 3 points, and the advanced class pays attention to the article organization and Structure, if the error is in the 21st language and semantics, then the pragmatic deduction is changed from the original set of 3 points to 5 points, the semantic deduction points are changed from the original set of 2 points to 3 points, and so on; Adjust the benchmark for the test content. For example, if the test is based on spelling, the benchmark for the typo should be changed from 1 point of the original set to 3 points, and the benchmark for the different tests will be adjusted. Therefore, depending on the degree of candidates, different learning priorities or different teaching contents, the selection of items and distribution points can be added to increase the adjustability and practicability of the present invention, and the scope of application is wider.
一評分選項模組50，其連結處理單元11與評分標準模組40，並顯示於顯示單元12，評分選項模組50具有複數錯誤符號選項51，用以供閱卷者針對錯誤處21對應相關之錯誤符號選項51作選取，當評閱者於批閱試卷20過程中，批改到錯誤處21時，透過輸入選取模組30點選對應之錯誤符號選項51，且針對錯誤處21作圈選或劃線並顯示於試卷20上，例如試卷20中有一個語法及兩個語意之兩種錯誤處21，評閱者利用滑鼠點擊一次對應語法錯誤之錯誤符號選項51，及點擊兩次對應語意錯誤之錯誤符號選項51，以表示語法與語意之錯誤處21須扣分，並將錯誤處21圈選或劃線於試卷20上。其中，於本發明中，評分選項模組50係顯示於試卷20上，或是於試卷20旁顯示於另外一個視窗，供評閱者針對錯誤處21作點選。 a rating option module 50, which is coupled to the processing unit 11 and the scoring standard module 40, and displayed on the display unit 12, the scoring option module 50 has a complex error symbol option 51 for the reviewer to correspond to the error 21 The error symbol option 51 is selected. When the reviewer corrects the error test 21 in the process of reviewing the test paper 20, the corresponding error symbol option 51 is selected through the input selection module 30, and the error location 21 is circled or crossed. And displayed on the test paper 20, for example, the test paper 20 has a grammar and two semantic errors 21, the reviewer uses the mouse to click the error symbol option 51 corresponding to the grammatical error, and clicks the error corresponding to the semantic error twice. The symbol option 51 is to deduct points for the grammatical and semantic error 21 and to circle or scribe the error 21 on the test paper 20. In the present invention, the rating option module 50 is displayed on the test paper 20 or displayed in another window next to the test paper 20 for the reviewer to click on the error location 21.
一評分計算模組60，其連結處理單元11、評分標準模組40及評分選項模組50，其中，評分計算模組60會根據評閱者已選取之錯誤符號選項51， 用以對應評分標準模組40，計算錯誤處21之扣分，以得到此份試卷20之考試成績，例如：第一份試卷20總錯誤處21係10個，分別為3個語法扣6分、2個語意扣4分及5個錯字扣5分，其總扣分為15分，而第二份試卷20則是錯2個語法扣4分及2個錯字扣2分，其總扣分為6分，以此類推，藉此，統一每一份試卷20相同錯誤處21之扣分標準，增加考試之公平性，並且能夠避免閱卷者之主觀因素影響應考人之成績，且能夠減少多位閱卷者相互批改之時間，使閱卷批改速度增加，且能夠減少人力成本消耗。 a scoring calculation module 60, which is coupled to the processing unit 11, the scoring standard module 40, and the scoring option module 50, wherein the scoring calculation module 60 is based on the error symbol option 51 selected by the reviewer. Corresponding to the scoring standard module 40, the deduction points of the error section 21 are calculated to obtain the test scores of the test paper 20, for example, the first test paper 20 total error is 21 lines, 10, respectively, 3 grammar deductions 6 points 2 points deducted 4 points and 5 typo points 5 points, the total deduction is divided into 15 points, and the second test paper 20 is wrong 2 grammar deduction 4 points and 2 typo deduction 2 points, the total deduction points 6 points, and so on, thereby unifying the deduction points of the same error area of each test paper 20, increasing the fairness of the test, and avoiding the subjective factors of the reviewer affecting the testee's performance, and can reduce more The time for the reviewers to correct each other makes the speed of marking corrections increase, and the labor cost can be reduced.
一評語模組70，其連結處理單元11、輸入選取模組30，而評語模組70顯示於試卷20上，或於試卷20旁另一視窗顯示評語模組70。評語模組70係包含一自建評語單元71及一內建評語單元72，自建評語單元71係供閱卷者藉由輸入選取模組30以文字輸入一評語711，而內建評語單元72係已建立於評語模組70中之複數評語詞彙721，供閱卷者透過輸入選取模組30點選適當之評語詞彙721；藉此，以供閱卷者針對此份試卷20之錯誤處21給予指導，或是給予寫作或翻譯上之相關建議，閱卷者可透過滑鼠點選內建評語單元72之評語詞彙721，也可於自建評語單元71透過鍵盤自行輸入評語711，再將針對錯誤處21給予之評語711顯示於試卷20上，或於另一視窗完成評語711後，再將評語模組70與試卷20結合，或是另外附加於試卷20後，於讓應考人可於日後閱看自己之考卷時，藉由閱卷者給予之評語711或評語詞彙721得到指導幫助與改進。 A comment module 70 is connected to the processing unit 11 and the input selection module 30, and the comment module 70 is displayed on the test paper 20, or the comment module 70 is displayed in another window next to the test paper 20. The comment module 70 includes a self-built comment unit 71 and a built-in comment unit 72. The self-built comment unit 71 is for the reviewer to input a comment 711 by using the input selection module 30, and the built-in comment unit 72 is The plurality of review vocabulary 721 has been established in the comment module 70 for the reviewer to select an appropriate review vocabulary 721 through the input selection module 30; thereby, for the reviewer to give guidance on the error 21 of the test paper 20, Or give relevant suggestions on writing or translation, the reviewer can click on the comment 721 of the built-in comment unit 72 through the mouse, or enter the comment 711 through the keyboard in the self-built comment unit 71, and then target the error 21 The given comment 711 is displayed on the test paper 20, or after the comment 711 is completed in another window, the comment module 70 is combined with the test paper 20, or is additionally attached to the test paper 20, so that the candidate can read himself in the future. In the examination paper, guidance help and improvement are obtained by the reviewer 711 or the comment vocabulary 721 given by the reviewer.
一顏色模組80，其連結處理單元11、輸入選取模組30及評語模組70，而顏色模組80藉由輸入選取模組30改變評語711與評語詞彙721顯示之文字顏色，供閱卷者針對不同之意涵表示作區隔，讓應考人於日後閱看自己之 考卷時，藉由不同顏色之區分，更能夠清楚了解指導重點，獲得幫助與改進。 A color module 80 is connected to the processing unit 11, the input selection module 30 and the comment module 70, and the color module 80 changes the color of the text displayed by the comment 711 and the comment vocal 721 by the input selection module 30 for the reviewer. Representing the different meanings as a distinction, allowing the candidate to read their own in the future In the examination papers, by distinguishing between different colors, it is possible to clearly understand the guiding points, get help and improvement.
請參閱圖2，當評閱者批改試卷20，批改到試卷20中出現之錯誤處21時，評閱者藉由輸入選取模組30點選對應錯誤處21之錯誤符號選項51，當批改完畢後，評分計算模組60會根據已選取之錯誤符號選項51對應評分標準模組40之扣分基準，並計算錯誤處21之扣分，以得到此份試卷20之考試成績，藉此，使同次考試之試卷20在相同錯誤處21之扣分統一，可避免因評閱者之主觀因素影響評分標準，增加考試之公平性。 Referring to FIG. 2, when the reviewer corrects the test paper 20 and corrects the error 21 appearing in the test paper 20, the reviewer selects the error symbol option 51 corresponding to the error location 21 by inputting the selection module 30, and when the correction is completed, The scoring calculation module 60 will calculate the deduction points of the scoring standard module 40 according to the selected error symbol option 51, and calculate the deduction points of the error portion 21 to obtain the test scores of the test paper 20, thereby making the same time The deduction of the test paper 20 in the same error place 21 is unified, which can avoid the subjective factors of the reviewer affecting the scoring standard and increase the fairness of the test.
請參閱圖3，當評閱者批改完試卷20後，閱卷者可針對此份試卷20給予指導，或是給予寫作或翻譯上之相關建議，閱卷者可透過滑鼠點選內建評語單元72之評語詞彙721，也可於自建評語單元71透過鍵盤自行輸入評語711，讓應考人可於日後閱看自己之考卷時，藉由閱卷者給予之評語711或評語詞彙721得到指導幫助與改進。 Referring to FIG. 3, after the reviewer corrects the test paper 20, the reviewer can give guidance to the test paper 20, or give relevant suggestions on writing or translation, and the reviewer can select the built-in comment unit 72 through the mouse. The comment vocabulary 721 can also input the comment 711 through the keyboard by the self-built comment unit 71, so that the candidate can get the guidance help and improvement by the reviewer 711 or the comment vocabulary 721 when reading the test paper in the future.
以上所舉實施例僅用以說明本發明而已，非用以限制本發明之範圍。舉凡不違本發明精神所從事的種種修改或變化，俱屬本發明意欲保護之範疇。 The above embodiments are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Any modifications or variations that are made without departing from the spirit of the invention are intended to be protected.
10‧‧‧處理顯示模組 10‧‧‧Processing display module
11‧‧‧處理單元 11‧‧‧Processing unit
12‧‧‧顯示單元 12‧‧‧Display unit
30‧‧‧輸入選取模組 30‧‧‧Input selection module
40‧‧‧評分標準模組 40‧‧‧Scoring standard module
41‧‧‧標準格式 41‧‧‧Standard format
411‧‧‧APA校正符號 411‧‧‧APA correction symbol
412‧‧‧MLA校正符號 412‧‧‧MLA correction symbol
413‧‧‧自建校正符號 413‧‧‧ self-built correction symbol
42‧‧‧自訂評分基準單元 42‧‧‧Custom scoring reference unit
50‧‧‧評分選項模組 50‧‧‧Scoring option module
51‧‧‧錯誤符號選項 51‧‧‧Error symbol options
60‧‧‧評分計算模組 60‧‧‧Scoring calculation module
70‧‧‧評語模組 70‧‧‧Comment module
71‧‧‧自建評語單元 71‧‧‧Self-built comment unit
711‧‧‧評語 711‧‧‧Comments
72‧‧‧內建評語單元 72‧‧‧ Built-in comment unit
721‧‧‧評語詞彙 721‧‧‧Commentary vocabulary
80‧‧‧顏色模組 80‧‧‧ color module
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TW105133362A TWI605431B (en) | 2016-10-17 | 2016-10-17 | Text composition and translation scoring system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TW105133362A TWI605431B (en) | 2016-10-17 | 2016-10-17 | Text composition and translation scoring system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| TWI605431B true TWI605431B (en) | 2017-11-11 |
| TW201816749A TW201816749A (en) | 2018-05-01 |
Family
ID=61023121
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| TW105133362A TWI605431B (en) | 2016-10-17 | 2016-10-17 | Text composition and translation scoring system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| TW (1) | TWI605431B (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWI711017B (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2020-11-21 | 楊永賢 | Test paper scoring method |
| CN114730444A (en) * | 2019-11-06 | 2022-07-08 | 三菱电机楼宇解决方案株式会社 | User evaluation index calculation method and user evaluation index calculation device for buildings |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101248432A (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2008-08-20 | 慕迪灵公司 | Translation quality quantifying apparatus and method |
| US8306356B1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2012-11-06 | Language Technologies, Inc. | System, plug-in, and method for improving text composition by modifying character prominence according to assigned character information measures |
| TW201245983A (en) * | 2011-05-10 | 2012-11-16 | Inventec Corp | Writing system with real-time translation and writing method thereof |
| TW201520788A (en) * | 2013-11-28 | 2015-06-01 | Inventec Corp | Writing tips system and method thereof |
-
2016
- 2016-10-17 TW TW105133362A patent/TWI605431B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101248432A (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2008-08-20 | 慕迪灵公司 | Translation quality quantifying apparatus and method |
| US8306356B1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2012-11-06 | Language Technologies, Inc. | System, plug-in, and method for improving text composition by modifying character prominence according to assigned character information measures |
| TW201245983A (en) * | 2011-05-10 | 2012-11-16 | Inventec Corp | Writing system with real-time translation and writing method thereof |
| TW201520788A (en) * | 2013-11-28 | 2015-06-01 | Inventec Corp | Writing tips system and method thereof |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWI711017B (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2020-11-21 | 楊永賢 | Test paper scoring method |
| CN114730444A (en) * | 2019-11-06 | 2022-07-08 | 三菱电机楼宇解决方案株式会社 | User evaluation index calculation method and user evaluation index calculation device for buildings |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| TW201816749A (en) | 2018-05-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ai et al. | A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing | |
| Roquet et al. | Does gender have an impact on the potential benefits learners may achieve in two contexts compared: Formal instruction and formal instruction+ content and language integrated learning? | |
| Andreoui et al. | Heritage and non-heritage bilinguals | |
| Khanmohammad et al. | Moving toward objective scoring: A rubric for translation assessment | |
| TWI605431B (en) | Text composition and translation scoring system | |
| Khansir et al. | The study of written errors of EFL pre-university learners | |
| Al-Jamal | Students′ fossilized writing errors: EFL postgraduates at Jordanian universities as a model | |
| Booth | The variance of lexical diversity profiles and its relationship to learning style | |
| Koby | The ATA flowchart and framework as a differentiated error-marking scale in translation teaching | |
| Cross et al. | Creativity in the use of verb+ noun combinations by Chinese learners of English | |
| Scrimgeour | Responding to the diversity of Chinese language learners in Australian schools | |
| Liao | What skills are being assessed? Evaluating L2 Chinese essays written by hand and on a computer keyboard | |
| Tse et al. | Development of Chinese handwriting skills among kindergarten children: Copying of the composition in Chinese characters and name writing | |
| Wang | Impact of translation difficulty and working memory capacity on processing of translation units: evidence from Chinese-to-English translation | |
| Ling et al. | Knowledge and perception of stroke order among Chinese-as-a-Foreign language students in a Malaysian university | |
| Kashiha | Critical comments in the disciplines: a comparative look at peer review reports in applied linguistics and engineering | |
| Haji Sismat | Quality and productivity: A comparative analysis of human translation and post-editing with Malay learners of Arabic and English | |
| Soler | The effect of gender and working place of raters on university entrance examination scores | |
| Manning et al. | Visual design principles and effective sentence diagrams for the 21st century | |
| Kim et al. | The dynamics of changes in linguistic complexity and writing scores in timed argumentative writing among beginning-level EFL learners | |
| Reeder | Investigation of intelligibility judgments | |
| Kreyer | Collocations in learner English | |
| Tanashur et al. | The English Grammatical Speaking Errors of Sasakness Learners: A Case Study at English Literature Students | |
| Zhao | Error Analysis and Implications of Chinese Students' English Writing Based on Computer Scoring System | |
| Booth | Lexical development paths in relation to academic writing |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MM4A | Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees |