TWI602167B - Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit - Google Patents

Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI602167B
TWI602167B TW105130269A TW105130269A TWI602167B TW I602167 B TWI602167 B TW I602167B TW 105130269 A TW105130269 A TW 105130269A TW 105130269 A TW105130269 A TW 105130269A TW I602167 B TWI602167 B TW I602167B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
questionnaire
user
lawsuit
generator
question bank
Prior art date
Application number
TW105130269A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201814673A (en
Inventor
徐國良
莊嘉宏
Original Assignee
徐國良
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 徐國良 filed Critical 徐國良
Priority to TW105130269A priority Critical patent/TWI602167B/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI602167B publication Critical patent/TWI602167B/en
Publication of TW201814673A publication Critical patent/TW201814673A/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置及方法 Questionnaire-style litigation generating device and method

本發明係有關一種問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置及方法,尤指一種利用網頁問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置來形成一問一答的撰狀模式,而使不熟悉法律之民眾皆能輕鬆於網頁上量身訂作訴訟狀。 The invention relates to a questionnaire-style litigation generating device and method, in particular to a web-question-style litigation-like generating device to form a question-and-answer mode, so that people who are not familiar with the law can easily use the webpage. Customized as a lawsuit.

法律是國家約束社會及民眾的一種制度,使民眾不致產生脫序的行為,亦可能拓展至國與國的關係,故法律的影響力可謂是無遠弗界,為因應民眾不同行為及參與不同的團體,法律的制定被劃分得極其繁多,並隨著社會的演進,不斷有新的法律被創造出來,其目的仍然在於約束民眾妨礙他人權益行徑及保障已被他人侵害的民眾權益,因此法律制度適當的國家,其民眾的安定感會相對提昇,國家也將呈現強盛之姿。 The law is a system in which the state binds the society and the people, so that the people do not cause disorderly behavior, and may also expand to the relationship between the state and the country. Therefore, the influence of the law can be described as far-reaching, in order to respond to different behaviors and participation of the people. The group has been divided into a wide variety of laws. With the evolution of society, new laws have been created. The purpose is still to restrict the people from obstructing the rights and interests of others and protecting the rights and interests of people who have been infringed by others. In countries with appropriate systems, the sense of stability of the people will be relatively enhanced, and the country will also be in a strong position.

既然法律已與民眾的生活息息相關,按理而言民眾皆應懂法,但現實中研究過法律的民眾仍為少數,對於一般被侵害權益的民眾而言,如何撰寫告訴狀是件苦差事,有的人乾脆花錢了事,找個懂法的律師代寫狀紙,但有時僅是金額不大的債權糾紛,而偏要花數萬元至數十萬元找律師撰狀及出庭,顯然不是件划算的買賣。拜科技之發達,網路瀏覽器中之谷歌(GOOGLE)大神,更是人人膜拜的對象,但能搜尋到的告訴狀,幾乎皆為空白的告訴狀格式,一般的民眾亦無法靠著既有的常識來進行撰狀。 Since the law is closely related to the lives of the people, it is reasonable for the people to understand the law. However, in reality, the people who have studied the law are still a minority. For the people who are generally infringed on the rights and interests, how to write the message is a chore. The people simply spent money to find a lawyer who knows the law to write a paper, but sometimes it is only a small amount of credit disputes, but it costs tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars to find a lawyer to appear and appear in court, obviously Not a good deal. Thanks to the development of technology, the Google (Google) god in the web browser is the object of worship for everyone, but the message that can be found is almost blank, and the general public cannot rely on both. Some common sense to write.

也有的人是找尋告訴狀的範例,想藉由臨摹方式來撰狀,但有時卻是畫虎不成反類犬,無法抓到撰狀的精髓,反成了告不了任何人的壁紙,徒然浪費了時間與精力。本發明正可解決上述問題,利用網頁問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置來形成一問一答的撰狀模式,而使不熟悉法律之民眾皆能輕鬆於網頁上量身訂作訴訟狀。 Some people are looking for examples of telling questions. They want to write by means of copying, but sometimes they are not the anti-dogs of the tiger. They can’t catch the essence of the essay, but they can’t tell anyone’s wallpaper. Wasted time and effort. The invention can solve the above problems, and uses the webpage questionnaire-style litigation generating device to form a question-and-answer mode, so that people who are not familiar with the law can easily tailor the litigation on the webpage.

基於解決所述習知技藝的缺失,本發明為一種問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置及方法,其主要目的為提供一種問卷題庫之電子訴訟狀,引導使用者輸入如人、事、時、地、物之相關條件,配合一訴訟狀產生器、一問卷題庫及書狀模組生成一電子訴訟狀,而使不熟悉法律之民眾皆能輕鬆於網頁上量身訂作訴訟狀。 Based on solving the lack of the prior art, the present invention is a questionnaire-style litigation generating apparatus and method, the main purpose of which is to provide an electronic litigation form of a questionnaire question bank, guiding a user to input such as a person, a thing, a time, a place, and a thing. The relevant conditions, together with a lawsuit generator, a questionnaire question bank and a book module, generate an electronic lawsuit, so that people who are not familiar with the law can easily tailor the lawsuit on the website.

本發明之另一目的在於訴訟狀產生器連接一光學字元辨識單元,該光學字元辨識單元可辨識如提告證據或傷害證據之影像檔中的文字,並輸出一文字檔,並將文字檔置入電子訴訟狀中,以減少使用者輸入該些證據的時間及精力。 Another object of the present invention is to connect a litigation generator to an optical character recognizing unit that can recognize text in an image file such as evidence or injury evidence, and output a text file, and the text file Placed in an electronic lawsuit to reduce the time and effort of the user to enter the evidence.

本發明之另一目的在於該訴訟狀生成器連接一付費模組,以供該使用者進行付費使用之機制。 Another object of the present invention is that the litigation generator is coupled to a payment module for the user to perform a payment-using mechanism.

為達上述目的,本發明為一種問卷式訴訟狀生成方法,其係包括下列步驟:(a)使用者利用一用戶設備以網路連接一訴訟狀生成器;(b)該訴訟狀生成器自一問卷題庫及書狀模組擷取若干問卷題庫及若 干書狀模組,顯示於該用戶設備上;(c)該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一基本資料;(d)該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一被告對象;(e)該問卷題庫提供該使用者填寫該被告對象因何時及何事做一提告,該訴訟狀生成器判斷一提告時效是否已過期,若該提告時效已過,則該問卷題庫顯示無法提告,並執行步驟(i),若該提告時效未過,則執行步驟(f);(f)該問卷題庫提供受到損害問題令該使用者進行選擇回答;(g)該問卷題庫提供該使用者輸入一提告證據或一傷害證據;(h)根據該問卷題庫所獲得資料,融合該書狀模組,該訴訟狀生成器即生成一電子訴訟狀,以供該使用者下載使用;以及(i)結束。 To achieve the above objective, the present invention is a questionnaire-style litigation generating method, which comprises the following steps: (a) a user uses a user equipment to connect to a litigation generator via a network; (b) the litigation generator A questionnaire question bank and a book module draw a number of questionnaire questions and if a dry book module is displayed on the user equipment; (c) the user fills in a basic data according to the questionnaire question bank; (d) the user fills in a defendant object according to the questionnaire question bank; (e) the questionnaire The question bank provides the user to fill out the defendant object when and what to make a report, the lawsuit generator determines whether the time limit for the announcement has expired, and if the time limit for the notice has passed, the question bank display cannot be reported, and Performing step (i), if the time limit for the notification has not passed, performing step (f); (f) providing the subject of the damage question by the questionnaire question bank; (g) providing the user input to the questionnaire question bank (1) merging the book module according to the information obtained from the question bank, the lawsuit generator generates an electronic lawsuit for the user to download and use; and (i )End.

較佳者,該步驟(g)與該步驟(h)之間更包括一步驟(g1),該訴訟狀生成器根據該使用者所填入一事實發生地點來決定一告訴管轄法院。 Preferably, the step (g) and the step (h) further comprise a step (g1), and the suit generator determines to tell the jurisdiction court according to the place where the user fills in the fact.

較佳者,該步驟(g)更包括該提告證據或該傷害證據可以一影像檔上傳至該訴訟狀生成器,並由與該訴訟生成器耦接之一光學字元辨識單元將該影像檔轉換成一文字檔。 Preferably, the step (g) further includes the proof of the evidence or the evidence of the damage can be uploaded to the litigation generator in an image file, and the image is coupled to the optical character recognition unit coupled to the litigation generator. The file is converted into a text file.

較佳者,該步驟(e)之該提告時效,係指民法、刑法所規定追訴時效。 Preferably, the time limit for the reporting of the step (e) refers to the time limit for prosecution as stipulated in the civil law and the criminal law.

為達上述目的,本發明為一種問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置,其係包括:一用戶設備,係為一使用者用以上網之工具;一訴訟狀生成器,提供該用戶設備以網路連接,該訴狀生成器 具有運算及處理電子訴訟狀的能力;一光學字元辨識單元,與該訴訟狀生成器連接,該光學字元辨識單元具有將影像檔轉換成文字檔的能力;以及一問卷題庫及書狀模組,與該訴訟狀生成器連接,該問卷題庫及書狀模組儲存有複數個問卷題庫及複數個書狀模組,以供該訴訟狀生成器擷取使用。 In order to achieve the above object, the present invention is a questionnaire-style lawsuit generating device, which comprises: a user equipment, which is a tool for a user to access the Internet; and a lawsuit generator, which provides the user equipment with a network connection, The complaint generator Having the ability to calculate and process an electronic litigation; an optical character identifying unit coupled to the litigation generator, the optical character recognizing unit having the ability to convert an image file into a text file; and a questionnaire question bank and a book model The group is connected with the litigation generator, and the questionnaire and the book module store a plurality of questionnaires and a plurality of book modules for use by the litigation generator.

較佳者,該用戶設備係包括一桌上型電腦、一筆記型電腦、一平板電腦、一智慧型手機及一個人數位助理。 Preferably, the user equipment comprises a desktop computer, a notebook computer, a tablet computer, a smart phone and a number of assistants.

較佳者,該問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置更係包括一付費模組,該付費模組與該訴訟狀生成器連接,以供該使用者進行付費使用之機制。 Preferably, the questionnaire-style lawsuit generating device further comprises a payment module, and the payment module is connected to the lawsuit generator for the user to perform a payment-using mechanism.

較佳者,該付費模組之付費管道包括有一實體自動櫃員機、一網路自動櫃員機及一網路信用卡付費。 Preferably, the payment pipeline of the payment module includes a physical automatic teller machine, a network automatic teller machine and an internet credit card payment.

為進一步對本發明有更深入的說明,乃藉由以下圖示、圖號說明及發明詳細說明,冀能對 貴審查委員於審查工作有所助益。 In order to further explain the present invention, it will be helpful to review the review by the following illustrations, illustrations, and detailed descriptions of the invention.

11‧‧‧用戶設備 11‧‧‧User equipment

12‧‧‧訴訟生成器 12‧‧‧ litigation generator

13‧‧‧光學字元辨識單元 13‧‧‧ Optical Character Identification Unit

14‧‧‧問卷題庫及書狀模組 14‧‧‧ Questionnaire and book module

15‧‧‧付費模組 15‧‧‧Payment Module

21‧‧‧使用者利用一用戶設備以網路連接一訴訟狀生成器 21‧‧‧Users use a user device to connect to a litigation generator

22‧‧‧該訴訟狀生成器自一問卷題庫及書狀模組擷取若干問卷題庫及若干書狀模組,顯示於該用戶設備上 22‧‧‧ The litigation generator retrieves a number of questionnaires and a number of book modules from a questionnaire and a book module, which are displayed on the user equipment

23‧‧‧該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一基本資料 23‧‧‧The user fills in a basic information according to the questionnaire

24‧‧‧該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一被告對象 24‧‧‧The user fills in a defendant object according to the questionnaire

25‧‧‧該問卷題庫提供該使用者填寫該被告對象因何時及何事做一提告,該訴訟狀生成器判斷一提告時效是否已過期 25‧‧‧ The questionnaire question bank provides the user to fill out the defendant object when and what to do, and the litigation generator determines whether the time limit for a notice has expired

26‧‧‧該問卷題庫提供受到損害問題令該使用者進行選擇回答 26‧‧‧The questionnaire question bank provides the user with a choice answer

27‧‧‧該問卷題庫提供該使用者輸入一提告證據或一傷害證據 27‧‧‧ The questionnaire question bank provides the user with input of a report evidence or an injury evidence

28‧‧‧該訴訟狀生成器根據該使用者所填入一事實發生地點來決定一告訴管轄法院 28‧‧‧ The litigation generator decides to tell the competent court based on the location of the fact that the user has filled in

29‧‧‧根據該問卷題庫所獲得資料,融合該書狀模組,該訴訟狀生成器即生成一電子訴訟狀,以供該使用者下載使用 29‧‧‧ According to the information obtained from the questionnaire, the book module is integrated, and the lawsuit generator generates an electronic lawsuit for the user to download and use.

30‧‧‧結束 End of 30‧‧

第1圖係為本發明問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置之功能方塊示意圖;第2圖係為本發明問卷式訴訟狀生成方法之流程圖;第3A圖至第3I圖係為本發明問卷式訴訟狀之網頁操作示意圖。 1 is a functional block diagram of a questionnaire-style litigation generating apparatus of the present invention; FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a questionnaire-style litigation generating method of the present invention; and FIGS. 3A to 3I are questionnaires of the present invention. The schematic diagram of the webpage operation.

茲配合下列之圖式說明本發明之詳細結構,及其連結關係,以利於 貴審委做一瞭解。 The detailed structure of the present invention and its connection relationship will be described in conjunction with the following drawings to facilitate an understanding of the audit committee.

請參閱第1圖所示,係為本發明問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置之功能方 塊示意圖,其係包括:一用戶設備11,係為一使用者用以上網之工具,該用戶設備11係包括一桌上型電腦(PC)、一筆記型電腦(Notebook)、一平板電腦(Tablet PC)、一智慧型手機(Smartphone)及一個人數位助理(Personal Digital assistant,PDA),使用者上網管道可為網際網路(Internet)或行動電話網路或其他可上網的管道,本發明不以此自限;一訴訟狀生成器12,提供該用戶設備11以網路連接,該訴狀生成器12具有運算及處理電子訴訟狀的能力;一光學字元辨識單元(Optical Character Recognition,OCR)13,與該訴訟狀生成器12連接,該光學字元辨識單元13具有將影像檔轉換成文字檔的能力,該光學字元辨識單元13若遇到不易辨識的影像,可經由複數次模擬訓練,以達到較高的辨識度;一問卷題庫及問卷題庫及書狀模組14,與該訴訟狀生成器12連接,該問卷題庫及書狀模組14儲存有複數個問卷題庫及複數個書狀模組,以供該訴訟狀生成器12擷取使用;一付費模組15,該付費模組15與該訴訟狀生成器12連接,以供該使用者進行付費使用之機制,該付費模組15之付費管道包括有一實體自動櫃員機(ATM)、一網路自動櫃員機(Web ATM)及一網路信用卡付費。 Please refer to FIG. 1 , which is a functional party of the questionnaire type law generating device of the present invention. The block diagram includes a user equipment 11 as a tool for a user to access the Internet, and the user equipment 11 includes a desktop computer (PC), a notebook computer (Notebook), and a tablet computer ( Tablet PC), a smart phone (Smartphone) and a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA). The user's Internet access channel can be an Internet (Internet) or mobile phone network or other Internet-accessible pipe. In this way, a suit generator 12 provides the user equipment 11 with a network connection, and the complaint generator 12 has the ability to calculate and process an electronic lawsuit; an optical character recognition unit (OCR) 13. The law symbol generator 12 is connected to the optical character recognition unit 13 for converting the image file into a text file. The optical character recognition unit 13 can perform multiple simulation trainings if it encounters an image that is not easily recognized. To achieve a higher degree of recognition; a questionnaire question bank and a questionnaire question bank and a book module 14 are connected to the lawsuit generator 12, and the questionnaire question bank and the book module 14 store a plurality of questions. The question bank and the plurality of book modules are used by the lawsuit generator 12; a payment module 15 is connected to the lawsuit generator 12 for payment by the user. The payment pipeline of the payment module 15 includes a physical automatic teller machine (ATM), a network automatic teller machine (Web ATM) and an internet credit card payment.

請參閱第2圖所示,係為本發明問卷式訴訟狀生成方法之流程圖,其係包括有下列步驟: Please refer to FIG. 2 , which is a flow chart of the method for generating a questionnaire style according to the present invention, which includes the following steps:

步驟21~使用者利用一用戶設備以網路連接一訴訟狀生成器。 Step 21~ The user uses a user equipment to connect to a lawsuit generator over the network.

步驟22~該訴訟狀生成器自一問卷題庫及書狀模組擷取若干問卷題庫及若干書狀模組,顯示於該用戶設備上。 Step 22~ The litigation generator retrieves a plurality of questionnaire questions and a plurality of book modules from a questionnaire question bank and a book module, and displays the same on the user equipment.

步驟23~該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一基本資料,如第3A圖所示。 Step 23~ The user fills in a basic data according to the questionnaire question bank, as shown in FIG. 3A.

步驟24~該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一被告對象,如第3B圖所示。 Step 24~ The user fills in a defendant object according to the questionnaire question bank, as shown in FIG. 3B.

步驟25~該問卷題庫提供該使用者填寫該被告對象因何時及何事做一提告,該訴訟狀生成器判斷一提告時效是否已過期,若該提告時效已過,則該問卷題庫顯示無法提告,如第3I圖所示,並執行步驟30,若該提告時效未過,如第3C圖所示,則執行步驟26。 Step 25~ The questionnaire question bank provides the user to fill out the defendant object when and what to make a report, the lawsuit generator determines whether the time limit for the announcement has expired, and if the time limit for the notice has passed, the questionnaire question bank displays Unable to report, as shown in Figure 3I, and step 30 is performed. If the time limit for the announcement is not exceeded, as shown in Figure 3C, step 26 is performed.

步驟26~該問卷題庫提供受到損害問題令該使用者進行選擇回答,如第3D圖至第3F圖所示,舉例而言,第3D圖揭露問卷題庫提出「您受了何種損害?」的問題,此時使用者自選單中點選了「身體」;第3E圖中問卷題庫承繼使用者所點選答案,提出「您的身體受了何種損害?」的問題,此時使用者自選單中點選了「眼睛」,接著問卷題庫再提出「您的視覺損害達到何種程度?」,此時使用者自選單中點選了「嚴重減損」;第3F圖中問卷題庫提出「被告是以何種方式傷害您?」,此時使用者以自行敘述事實發生過程,而輸入「被告用球棒打了我的頭,於過程中我的眼睛受到極大撞擊,…」。 Step 26~ The questionnaire question bank provides the user with a selection question for the damage problem, as shown in Figures 3D to 3F. For example, the 3D chart reveals that the questionnaire question bank asks "What kind of damage did you suffer?" At this time, the user selects "Body" from the user's self-selection list; in the 3E chart, the questionnaire question bank inherits the answer selected by the user and asks "What is the damage to your body?" In the menu, click on "Eyes". Then the question bank will ask "How much does your visual impairment reach?", at this time, the user selects "Serious impairment" from the user's self-selection list; in the 3F chart, the questionnaire question bank proposes "The defendant In what way did you hurt you?" At this time, the user recited the facts by himself and entered "The defendant hit my head with a bat, and my eyes were greatly impacted during the process...".

步驟27~該問卷題庫提供該使用者輸入一提告證據或一傷害證據,如第3G圖所示,使用者以自行敘述事實發生過程後,問卷題庫提出「您有何種證據可以佐證?」,使用者自選單中點選了「驗傷單」後,該「驗傷單」出現了「證據上傳」的選項,使用者可自行對驗傷單拍照,再將影像檔傳送至訴訟狀生成器,與該訴訟生成器耦接之一光學字元辨識單元將該影像檔轉換成一文字檔。 Step 27~ The questionnaire question bank provides the user to input a report evidence or an injury evidence. As shown in the 3G figure, after the user describes the facts by himself, the questionnaire question bank asks "What evidence does you have to prove?" After the "inspection list" is selected in the user's self-selection list, the "evidence upload" option appears on the "injury list". The user can take a photo of the inspection list and send the image file to the lawsuit. And an optical character recognition unit coupled to the litigation generator converts the image file into a text file.

步驟28~該訴訟狀生成器根據該使用者所填入一事實發生地點來決定一 告訴管轄法院,如第3H圖所示,問卷題庫提出「被告在何處傷害您?」,使用者自選單中點選了「台北市」、「大安區」、「○○路」後,該訴訟生成器即決定管轄法院為「台北地方法院」。 Step 28~ The lawsuit generator determines a location according to the fact that the user fills in a fact occurrence place. Tell the jurisdictional court that, as shown in Figure 3H, the questionnaire question bank asks “Where does the defendant hurt you?”, after selecting “Taipei City”, “Da’an District” and “○○ Road” from the user’s self-selection list, The litigation generator determines that the court of jurisdiction is the "Taipei District Court."

步驟29~根據該問卷題庫所獲得資料,融合該書狀模組,該訴訟狀生成器即生成一電子訴訟狀,以供該使用者下載使用。 Step 29~ According to the information obtained by the questionnaire question bank, the book module is integrated, and the lawsuit generator generates an electronic lawsuit for the user to download and use.

步驟30~結束。 Step 30~ End.

藉由上述第1圖至第3I圖之揭露,即可瞭解本發明為一種問卷式訴訟狀生成裝置及方法,其主要為提供一種問卷題庫之電子訴訟狀,引導使用者輸入如人、事、時、地、物之相關條件,配合一訴訟狀產生器、一問卷題庫及書狀模組生成一電子訴訟狀,而使不熟悉法律之民眾皆能輕鬆於網頁上量身訂作訴訟狀。又者,該訴訟狀產生器連接一光學字元辨識單元,該光學字元辨識單元可辨識如提告證據或傷害證據之影像檔中的文字,並輸出一文字檔,並將文字檔置入電子訴訟狀中,以減少使用者輸入該些證據的時間及精力。再者,訴訟狀生成器連接一付費模組,以供該使用者進行付費使用之機制。本發明在法律領域中,對於法律素人自行撰狀上具有極大的幫助,故提出專利權申請以尋求專利權保護。 The invention is a questionnaire-style litigation generating device and method, which mainly provides an electronic litigation form of a questionnaire question bank, and guides the user to input such as a person, a thing, and the like. The relevant conditions of time, place and object, together with a lawsuit generator, a questionnaire question bank and a book module, generate an electronic lawsuit, so that people who are not familiar with the law can easily tailor the lawsuit on the website. Moreover, the litigation generator is coupled to an optical character recognizing unit that recognizes text in an image file such as evidence or damage evidence, and outputs a text file and places the text file in the electronic file. In the case of litigation, to reduce the time and effort of the user to enter the evidence. Furthermore, the litigation generator is connected to a payment module for the user to pay for the use mechanism. The invention is of great help to the legal amateur in the field of law, so the patent application is filed to seek patent protection.

綜上所述,本發明之結構特徵及各實施例皆已詳細揭示,而可充分顯示出本發明案在目的及功效上均深賦實施之進步性,極具產業之利用價值,且為目前市面上前所未見之運用,依專利法之精神所述,本發明案完全符合發明專利之要件。 In summary, the structural features and embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed in detail, and can fully demonstrate the progress of the invention in terms of purpose and efficacy, and is of great industrial value, and is currently The unprecedented use in the market, according to the spirit of the patent law, the invention is fully in line with the requirements of the invention patent.

唯所述者,僅為本發明之較佳實施例而已,當不能以之限定本發明所實施之範圍, 即大凡依本發明申請專利範圍所作之均等變化與修飾,皆應仍屬於本發明專利涵蓋之範圍內,謹請 貴審查委員明鑑,並祈惠准,是所至禱。 The present invention is only the preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. That is to say, the equivalent changes and modifications made by the applicant in accordance with the scope of the patent application of the present invention should still fall within the scope of the patent of the present invention. I would like to ask your review committee to give a clear explanation and pray for it.

21‧‧‧使用者利用一用戶設備以網路連接一訴訟狀生成器 21‧‧‧Users use a user device to connect to a litigation generator

22‧‧‧該訴訟狀生成器自一問卷題庫及書狀模組擷取若干問卷題庫及若干書狀模組,顯示於該用戶設備上 22‧‧‧ The litigation generator retrieves a number of questionnaires and a number of book modules from a questionnaire and a book module, which are displayed on the user equipment

23‧‧‧該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一基本資料 23‧‧‧The user fills in a basic information according to the questionnaire

24‧‧‧該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一被告對象 24‧‧‧The user fills in a defendant object according to the questionnaire

25‧‧‧該問卷題庫提供該使用者填寫該被告對象因何時及何事做一提告,該訴訟狀生成器判斷一提告時效是否已過期 25‧‧‧ The questionnaire question bank provides the user to fill out the defendant object when and what to do, and the litigation generator determines whether the time limit for a notice has expired

26‧‧‧該問卷題庫提供受到損害問題令該使用者進行選擇回答 26‧‧‧The questionnaire question bank provides the user with a choice answer

27‧‧‧該問卷題庫提供該使用者輸入一提告證據或一傷害證據 27‧‧‧ The questionnaire question bank provides the user with input of a report evidence or an injury evidence

28‧‧‧該訴訟狀生成器根據該使用者所填入一事實發生地點來決定一告訴管轄法院 28‧‧‧ The litigation generator decides to tell the competent court based on the location of the fact that the user has filled in

29‧‧‧根據該問卷題庫所獲得資料,融合該書狀模組,該訴訟狀生成器即生成一電子訴訟狀,以供該使用者下載使用 29‧‧‧ According to the information obtained from the questionnaire, the book module is integrated, and the lawsuit generator generates an electronic lawsuit for the user to download and use.

30‧‧‧結束 End of 30‧‧

Claims (4)

一種問卷式訴訟狀生成方法,其係包括下列步驟:(a)使用者利用一用戶設備以網路連接一訴訟狀生成器;(b)該訴訟狀生成器自一問卷題庫及書狀模組擷取若干問卷題庫及若干書狀模組,顯示於該用戶設備上;(c)該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一基本資料;(d)該使用者依該問卷題庫填入一被告對象;(e)該問卷題庫提供該使用者填寫該被告對象因何時及何事做一提告,該訴訟狀生成器判斷一提告時效是否已過期,若該提告時效已過,則該問卷題庫顯示無法提告,並執行步驟(i),若該提告時效未過,則執行步驟(f);(f)該問卷題庫提供受到損害問題令該使用者進行選擇回答;(g)該問卷題庫提供該使用者輸入一提告證據或一傷害證據;(h)根據該問卷題庫所獲得資料,融合該書狀模組,該訴訟狀生成器即生成一電子訴訟狀,以供該使用者下載使用;以及(i)結束。 A questionnaire-style litigation generation method includes the following steps: (a) a user uses a user equipment to connect to a litigation generator via a network; (b) the litigation generator from a questionnaire question bank and a book module Obtaining a number of questionnaire questions and a number of book modules displayed on the user equipment; (c) the user fills in a basic data according to the questionnaire question; (d) the user fills in a defendant object according to the questionnaire question bank (e) The questionnaire question bank provides the user to fill out the defendant object when and what to make a notice, the lawsuit generator determines whether the time limit for the announcement has expired, and if the time limit for the notice has passed, the questionnaire question bank The display cannot be reported, and step (i) is performed. If the time limit is not exceeded, step (f) is performed; (f) the question bank provides the damage problem for the user to select and answer; (g) the questionnaire The question bank provides the user with input of a report evidence or an injury evidence; (h) according to the information obtained from the question bank, the book module is integrated, and the lawsuit generator generates an electronic lawsuit for the user Download use; and (i) end. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之問卷式訴訟狀生成方法,其中該步驟(g)與該步驟(h)之間更包括一步驟(g1),該訴訟狀生成器根據該使用者所填入一事實發生地點來決定一告訴管轄法院。 The method for generating a questionnaire style according to the first aspect of the patent application, wherein the step (g) and the step (h) further comprise a step (g1), the lawsuit generator is filled according to the user Enter a factual place to decide to tell the competent court. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之問卷式訴訟狀生成方法,其中該步驟(g)更包括該提告證據或該傷害證據可以一影像檔上傳至該訴訟狀生成器,並由與該訴訟生成器耦接之一光學字元辨識單元將該影像檔轉換成一文字檔。 The method for generating a questionnaire-style lawsuit according to claim 1, wherein the step (g) further comprises the presenting evidence or the evidence of the injury can be uploaded to the lawsuit generator in an image file, and the lawsuit is The generator is coupled to one of the optical character recognition units to convert the image file into a text file. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之問卷式訴訟狀生成方法,其中該步驟(e)之該提告時效,係指民法、刑法所規定追訴時效。 For example, the method for generating a questionnaire-type litigation described in the first paragraph of the patent application scope, wherein the time limit for the reporting of the step (e) refers to the time limit for prosecution prescribed by the civil law and the criminal law.
TW105130269A 2016-09-20 2016-09-20 Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit TWI602167B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW105130269A TWI602167B (en) 2016-09-20 2016-09-20 Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW105130269A TWI602167B (en) 2016-09-20 2016-09-20 Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TWI602167B true TWI602167B (en) 2017-10-11
TW201814673A TW201814673A (en) 2018-04-16

Family

ID=61010947

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW105130269A TWI602167B (en) 2016-09-20 2016-09-20 Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI602167B (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TW201312496A (en) * 2011-09-15 2013-03-16 Wei-Ping Chang Production system of law document
US8635207B2 (en) * 2010-01-27 2014-01-21 26-F, Llc Computerized system and method for assisting in resolution of litigation discovery in conjunction with the federal rules of practice and procedure and other jurisdictions
TWI518627B (en) * 2014-01-28 2016-01-21 南臺科技大學 Method, computer program and computer readable recording medium for recommending legal experts
TWM541043U (en) * 2016-09-20 2017-05-01 徐國良 Questionnaire-type device for generating the lawsuit

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8635207B2 (en) * 2010-01-27 2014-01-21 26-F, Llc Computerized system and method for assisting in resolution of litigation discovery in conjunction with the federal rules of practice and procedure and other jurisdictions
TW201312496A (en) * 2011-09-15 2013-03-16 Wei-Ping Chang Production system of law document
TWI518627B (en) * 2014-01-28 2016-01-21 南臺科技大學 Method, computer program and computer readable recording medium for recommending legal experts
TWM541043U (en) * 2016-09-20 2017-05-01 徐國良 Questionnaire-type device for generating the lawsuit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201814673A (en) 2018-04-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bryant et al. Combatting human trafficking since Palermo: What do we know about what works?
Walsh et al. Cost analyses approaches in medical education: there are no simple solutions
Serrao-Neumann et al. Public engagement and climate adaptation: insights from three local governments in Australia
Buchholz SAS 99: Deconstructing the fraud triangle and some classroom suggestions
Shuhidan et al. Perceived risk towards mobile banking: A case study of Malaysia young adulthood
Hansen et al. Understanding EIA scoping in practice: A pragmatist interpretation of effectiveness
Strange et al. AidData’s Methodology for Tracking Underreported Financial Flows
Löbbers et al. A multi-perspective lens on web assurance seals: contrasting vendors’ intended and consumers’ perceived effects
Imran et al. Current landscape and potential of mobile computing research in the least developed countries
Khater et al. Factors influencing customers’ acceptance of internet banking services in Sudan
TWI602167B (en) Questionnaire-type device and method for generating the lawsuit
TWM541043U (en) Questionnaire-type device for generating the lawsuit
Effiong Managing reputation risk and situational crisis in higher institutions of learning
Sarker “Money does not understand disability”: Barriers to microfinance for people with disabilities in Bangladesh
Okuboyejo et al. Examining Users' Concerns while Using Mobile Learning Apps.
Hebie Improving mobile phone banking usefulness, usability, risk, cost, and intention to adopt
Morris et al. A qualitative study of legal and social justice needs for people with aphasia
Gathongo Older adults and technology adoption: investigating the use of online banking among the seniors in Nairobi county
Rahim et al. The promotion of electronic filing technology
Herzog et al. Qualified market access and inter-disciplinarity
Onimowo et al. Use of quick response (QR) codes to achieve timely feedback in clinical simulation settings
Warick et al. NCAN-Member Pulse Check: FAFSA Verification Flexibility.
Skaff The Impact of Matriculation Services on Student Completions at California Community Colleges Prior to Implementation of SB 1456.
Maksymov et al. Toward a More Complete Theory of Audit Dispute Resolution: Insights from Prominent Attorneys
Eaton Academic Integrity in Canadian Higher Education: The Impact of COVID-19 and a Call to Action Invited Presentation-2020 Award for Research and Scholarship

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees