TWI494890B - Support system of sentencing decision - Google Patents

Support system of sentencing decision Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI494890B
TWI494890B TW101103701A TW101103701A TWI494890B TW I494890 B TWI494890 B TW I494890B TW 101103701 A TW101103701 A TW 101103701A TW 101103701 A TW101103701 A TW 101103701A TW I494890 B TWI494890 B TW I494890B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
sentencing
decision
database
unit
factor
Prior art date
Application number
TW101103701A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201241779A (en
Inventor
Gen Ming Guo
Huei Ru Liang
Sin Yu Li
Ai Hua Lin
Wei Ping Chang
Original Assignee
Univ Southern Taiwan
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Univ Southern Taiwan filed Critical Univ Southern Taiwan
Priority to TW101103701A priority Critical patent/TWI494890B/en
Publication of TW201241779A publication Critical patent/TW201241779A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI494890B publication Critical patent/TWI494890B/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

量刑決策支援系統Sentencing decision support system

本發明係有關於一種量刑決策支援系統,特別是指可供量刑者、法官、檢察官、律師、司法單位人員及法學院學生,做為量刑判決參考的模擬應用。The invention relates to a sentencing decision support system, in particular to a smuggler, a judge, a prosecutor, a lawyer, a judicial unit, and a law school student, as a simulation application for reference to sentencing judgments.

目前一般法院中的司法案件審理,完全經由法官根據自由心證而獨立進行審判,因此不同的法官即有可能因其本身的專業能力、主觀意識、引用判例的不同,而作出截然不同的判決結果,並會與一般社會大眾的認知而有所差距,甚至於因為法律條文經常修改,而造成法條引用錯誤的烏龍事件發生,因此,則必需藉助一些外在法律資料庫的引用,以作為判決的參考,例如有中華民國95年9月16日所公開之發明第200632692號「法律條文問答式搜詢方法」專利案,其主要係揭露包含下列步驟:建立一法律條文資料庫,該法律條文資料庫係依實務經驗,將各別之法律事件分類,依事件可能產生的問題,建立搜詢的路徑;提供一問答式搜詢系統,因應一法律事件,以問答之方式,至該法律條文資料庫,找到所需的法律解答。At present, judicial cases in general courts are judged independently by judges according to the free testimony. Therefore, different judges may make completely different judgments because of their own professional competence, subjective consciousness, and different jurisprudence. And will be different from the general public's cognition, and even because the legal provisions are often revised, causing the law to refer to the wrong Oolong incident, therefore, it is necessary to use some reference to the external legal database as a References to the judgment, such as the Patent Case No. 200632692 published in the Republic of China on September 16, 1995, the "Legal Provisions and Questions and Answers Search Method" patent case, which mainly discloses the following steps: establishing a legal text database, the law The text database is based on practical experience, classifying individual legal events, establishing a search route according to the problems that may arise from the incident; providing a question-and-answer search system, in response to a legal event, in a question and answer manner, to the law Find a legal database and find the legal answers you need.

另有中華民國99年7月1日所公告之發明第I326848號「自動化分析法律文件之方法及專家系統」專利案,其主要係揭露該方法包含下列步驟:首先, 將一法律文件儲存於一記憶單元。接著,根據一使用者對複數預設問題之回答,自一關鍵字資料庫中檢索適合之複數關鍵字以分析該法律文件,並產生複數法律策略建議,及標示該法律文件中對應該等關鍵字之文字。接著,藉由從該關鍵字資料庫連結一規範資料庫,並根據該等預設問題之回答,顯示一複數法律規範分析。In addition, the Patent No. I326848 of the Republic of China on July 1, 1999, "Method and Expert System for Automatic Analysis of Legal Documents" patent case, mainly discloses that the method comprises the following steps: First, Store a legal document in a memory unit. Then, according to a user's answer to the plural preset question, a suitable plural keyword is retrieved from a keyword database to analyze the legal document, and a plurality of legal strategy suggestions are generated, and the key points in the legal document are marked. The text of the word. Then, by linking a specification database from the keyword database, and based on the answers to the preset questions, a plural legal specification analysis is displayed.

惟,上述二件專利前案,均只能提供一法律條文之檢索參考,並無法根據現實狀況及先前判例等客觀條件,以提供法官等量刑者於判決量刑時之參考,故使用上並不盡理想。However, the above two patents can only provide a reference for the search of legal provisions, and cannot provide reference for judges and other sentencing in the judgment according to the actual conditions and objective conditions such as previous precedents. Do your best.

爰此,有鑑於目前刑事案件的審判量刑並無任何可以作為參考及輔助之系統,故本發明提供一種量刑決策支援系統,係設有一處理單元,其係設有一操作界面;一量刑決策單元,其係內建於該處理單元內,該量刑決策單元係包含有情報、設計、一般量刑、加重量刑、減輕量刑及罪刑合併之項目,以供輸入刑事案件之內容,並協助刑事案件進行決策分析及量刑優先排序;一量刑資料庫,其係內建於該處理單元內,並連結至該量刑決策單元,該量刑資料庫係連結至一法律條文資料庫、判決案例資料庫及犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫,以提供一量刑資訊;一量刑決策因子篩 選單元,其係內建於該處理單元內,該量刑決策因子篩選單元係設置有一量刑決策因子權重計算模組,該量刑決策因子權重計算模組並連結至該量刑決策單元,以產生提供一量刑決策因子權重係數;一量刑決策模式驗證單元,其係內建於該處理單元內,該量刑決策模式驗證單元係設置有一科技接收度分析模組,該量刑決策模式驗證單元並連結至該量刑決策因子權重計算模組,其係對於該量刑決策因子權重計算模組及其所產生之量刑決策因子權重係數進行後續驗證與更新。Therefore, in view of the fact that there is no system for reference and assistance in the trial of criminal cases in the current criminal case, the present invention provides a sentencing decision support system, which is provided with a processing unit, which is provided with an operation interface; It is built into the processing unit. The sentencing decision-making unit includes items such as intelligence, design, general sentencing, weighting, mitigation, and combination of crimes, for inputting criminal cases, and assisting criminal cases in decision analysis. And the sentencing priority ranking; a sentencing database, which is built in the processing unit and linked to the sentencing decision-making unit, the sentencing database is linked to a legal document database, a judgment case database, and a crime investigation and analysis Statistical database to provide a quantitative information; a penalty decision factor screening The selection unit is built in the processing unit, and the sentencing decision factor screening unit is provided with a penalty decision factor weight calculation module, and the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module is coupled to the sentencing decision unit to generate a Sentencing decision factor weight coefficient; a penalty decision mode verification unit, which is built in the processing unit, the sentencing decision mode verification unit is provided with a technology receiving degree analysis module, and the sentencing decision mode verification unit is linked to the sentencing The decision factor weight calculation module performs subsequent verification and update on the weighting calculation module of the sentencing decision factor and the weight coefficient of the sentencing decision factor generated by the sentencing decision factor.

上述處理單元係為個人電腦、筆記型電腦、平板電腦、手機或個人數位助理〔PDA〕。The above processing unit is a personal computer, a notebook computer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone or a personal digital assistant (PDA).

上述操作界面係為鍵盤、滑鼠、數位筆、數位板、觸控式螢幕、麥克風、攝影機其中之一或組合。The above operation interface is one or a combination of a keyboard, a mouse, a digital pen, a digital tablet, a touch screen, a microphone, and a camera.

上述法律條文資料庫係來自於司法院和大法官解釋、見解及最新增、修訂之刑法法條,而該判決案例資料庫則來自於刑事庭會議決議、歷年來之刑事判例,又該犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫則來自於法官聯席會議及相關刑事之統計、分析資料。The above-mentioned legal provisions database comes from the interpretation, opinions and the most newly added and revised criminal law articles of the courts and judges, and the judgment case database comes from the resolutions of the criminal court meeting, the criminal precedents over the years, and the criminal investigation. And the analytical statistics database comes from the joint meeting of judges and related criminal statistics and analysis materials.

上述量刑資料庫係透過網際網路、通訊網路、有線網路或無線網路連結至該法律條文資料庫、判決案例資料庫及犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫。The sentencing database is linked to the legal text database, the judgment case database, and the crime investigation and analysis statistical database through the Internet, communication network, wired network or wireless network.

上述量刑決策因子權重計算模組係包含有法律條 文與量刑決策因子轉換模組、論文文獻與量刑決策因子轉換模組、判決案例與量刑決策因子轉換模組及層級分析法〔AHP〕量刑決策因子線上問卷模組。The above-mentioned sentencing decision factor weight calculation module includes a legal section Text and sentencing decision factor conversion module, paper literature and sentencing decision factor conversion module, judgment case and sentencing decision factor conversion module and hierarchical analysis method [AHP] sentencing decision factor online questionnaire module.

上述影響一般量刑之決策因子係包含毒品類型、毒品的純度、毒品的總數量或總市價、各級毒品的最高與最低刑度、是否具有販賣獲利動機、毒品犯型態、犯罪時的角色、犯罪人是否認罪或協助偵察、犯罪人是否有毒品前科記錄;而影響加重量刑之決策因子係包含大量輸入或販賣、供應受刑人及未成年人毒品、A級〔一級〕毒品、曾因毒品相關犯罪前科被定罪、多次及持續供應、犯罪人身份、透過電腦系統對大眾販賣毒品、對運動選手供應違禁藥品、非法排放危險或有毒物質或非法運輸及處理或儲存危險廢棄物;而影響減輕量刑之決策因子係包含保證不再施用毒品、失業、初犯、損害輕微、認罪及協助辦案、從屬角色及提供適當保證金。The above-mentioned decision factors affecting general sentencing include the type of drugs, the purity of drugs, the total number of drugs or the total market price, the highest and lowest penalties for drugs at all levels, the motive for trafficking, the type of drug guilt, and the role of crime. The offender is denying the crime or assisting the reconnaissance, whether the offender has a drug record, and the decision-making factors affecting the weight of the sentence include a large amount of input or trafficking, supply of prisoners and minors, Class A [level 1] drugs, and drug-related drugs. Related criminal prosecutions are convicted, multiple and continuous supply, identity of offenders, trafficking of drugs to the public through computer systems, supply of illegal drugs to athletes, illegal discharge of dangerous or toxic substances or illegal transportation and handling or storage of hazardous waste; The decision-making factors for mitigating sentencing include ensuring that drugs are no longer used, unemployment, first-time offenses, minor damages, guilty and assistance in handling cases, subordinate roles, and providing appropriate security deposits.

上述科技接收度分析模組係包含量刑易用度線上問卷調查模組、量刑有用度線上問卷調查模組及量刑正確度線上問卷調查模組。The above-mentioned technology receiving degree analysis module includes a sentencing easement online questionnaire module, a sentencing usefulness online questionnaire module, and a sentencing accuracy online questionnaire module.

本發明具有下列之優點:The invention has the following advantages:

1.本發明尤適合於量刑者、法官、檢察官、律師、司法單位人員及法學院學生,做為量刑判決參考的模擬應用。1. The present invention is particularly suitable for use by sentencing persons, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, judicial personnel, and law school students as a simulation application for reference to sentencing decisions.

2.本發明係能提供審判時能有量刑化的公式可供參考使用,甚至於提醒法官一些更新的法條及判例分析,進而輔助法官做最佳化的量刑決策,以避免因情緒化或是個人思考的差異,而造成誤判、重判或輕判等不公平的情形發生。2. The present invention can provide a formula for discriminating at the time of trial, and even remind the judge of some updated laws and case analysis, thereby assisting the judge in making optimal sentencing decisions to avoid emotional or It is the difference of personal thinking, which leads to unfair situations such as misjudgment, heavy judgment or light judgment.

3.本發明係可供快速的找尋案例條文,以及模擬決策的量刑,完全自動化執行,免除大量人力資源之浪費,故可以大幅減少訴訟成本。3. The invention is capable of quickly finding case clauses, and simulating the decision-making, fully automated execution, and eliminating a lot of human resources waste, so the litigation cost can be greatly reduced.

4.本發明亦可提供一般民眾瀏覽及查詢法律等相關資訊,以及作為法界人仕之學習應用。4. The present invention can also provide general public browsing and enquiry laws and other related information, as well as learning applications for the legal profession.

首先,請參閱第一圖至第二圖所示,本發明係包括有處理單元(1)、量刑決策單元(2)、量刑資料庫(3)、量刑決策因子篩選單元(4)及量刑決策模式驗證單元(5),其中:處理單元(1),其係可為一個人電腦、筆記型電腦、平板電腦、手機或個人數位助理〔PDA〕,該處理單元(1)係設有一操作界面(11),該操作界面(11)係為鍵盤、滑鼠、數位筆、數位板、觸控式螢幕、麥克風、攝影機其中之一或組合。First, referring to the first to second figures, the present invention includes a processing unit (1), a sentencing decision unit (2), a sentencing database (3), a sentencing decision factor screening unit (4), and a sentencing decision. The mode verification unit (5), wherein: the processing unit (1) can be a personal computer, a notebook computer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone or a personal digital assistant (PDA), and the processing unit (1) is provided with an operation interface ( 11) The operation interface (11) is one or a combination of a keyboard, a mouse, a digital pen, a tablet, a touch screen, a microphone, and a camera.

量刑決策單元(2),其係內建於該處理單元(1)內,並可輸入刑事案件之內容,以協助量刑者及單一刑事案件進行決策分析及量刑優先排序,該量刑決策 單元(2)〔如第三圖所示〕係包含有情報(21)、設計(22)、一般量刑(23)、加重量刑(24)、減輕量刑(25)及罪刑合併(26)等項目。The sentencing decision unit (2) is built in the processing unit (1) and can input the content of the criminal case to assist the sentencing person and the single criminal case in decision analysis and sentencing prioritization. Unit (2) [as shown in the third figure] includes items such as intelligence (21), design (22), general sentencing (23), weighting (24), mitigation (25), and criminal integration (26). .

量刑資料庫(3),其係內建於該處理單元(1)內,並連結至該量刑決策單元(2),其係可透過網際網路(A)、通訊網路、有線網路或無線網路分別連結至一法律條文資料庫(31)、判決案例資料庫(32)及犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫(33),藉以匯整及更新該量刑資料庫(3)之內容,以提供一完整的量刑資訊(34)之參考,其中,該法律條文資料庫(31)係來自於司法院和大法官解釋(31A)、見解及最新增、修訂之刑法法條,而該判決案例資料庫(32)則來自於刑事庭會議決議(32A)、歷年來之刑事判例,又該犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫(33)則來自於法官聯席會議(33A)及相關刑事之統計、分析資料。The sentencing database (3) is built into the processing unit (1) and linked to the sentencing decision unit (2), which is accessible via the Internet (A), communication network, wired network or wireless The network is linked to a legal document database (31), a judgment case database (32), and a crime investigation and analysis statistical database (33) for collecting and updating the content of the sentencing database (3) to provide A complete reference to sentencing information (34), wherein the legal text database (31) is derived from the interpretation of the court and the judge (31A), the insights and the most new and revised criminal law, and the case data of the judgment The library (32) comes from the criminal court meeting resolution (32A), the criminal precedent over the years, and the criminal investigation and analysis statistical database (33) from the joint meeting of judges (33A) and related criminal statistics and analytical data. .

量刑決策因子篩選單元(4),如第四圖所示,其係內建於該處理單元(1)內,主要係提供一量刑決策因子權重係數篩選的功能,該量刑決策因子篩選單元(4)係設置有一量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41),該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)係包含有法律條文與量刑決策因子轉換模組(42)、論文文獻與量刑決策因子轉換模組(43)、判決案例與量刑決策因子轉換模組(44)及層級分析法〔AHP〕量刑決策因子線上問卷模組 (45),藉以透過資料蒐集、網路線上的問卷調查等方式獲得可導致量刑結果的因素,並經由敍述、推論統計分析及加值後的分析結果建置成與決策有關的模式與法則,而傳送至該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)加以計算分析,該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)並連結至該量刑決策單元(2),藉以提供產生一量刑決策因子權重係數(46),其中,該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)所提供影響一般量刑(23)之決策因子〔如第五圖所示〕係包含:毒品類型(231)、毒品的純度(232)、毒品的總數量或總市價(233)、各級毒品的最高與最低刑度(234)、是否具有販賣獲利動機(235)、毒品犯型態(236)、犯罪時的角色(237)、犯罪人是否認罪或協助偵察(238)、犯罪人是否有毒品前科記錄(239);而影響加重量刑(24)之決策因子係包含:大量輸入或販賣(241)、供應受刑人及未成年人毒品(242)、A級〔一級〕毒品(243)、曾因毒品相關犯罪前科被定罪(244)、多次及持續供應(245)、犯罪人身份(246)、透過電腦系統對大眾販賣毒品(247)、對運動選手供應違禁藥品(248)、非法排放危險或有毒物質或非法運輸及處理或儲存危險廢棄物(249);而影響減輕量刑(25)之決策因子係包含:保證不再施用毒品(251)、失業(252)、初犯(253)、損害輕微(254)、認罪及協助辦案(255)、從屬角色(256)及提供適當保證 金(257)。The sentencing decision factor screening unit (4), as shown in the fourth figure, is built in the processing unit (1), mainly provides a function of screening the weighting factor of the penalty decision factor, and the sentencing decision factor screening unit (4) The system is provided with a weighting decision factor weight calculation module (41), and the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) includes a legal article and a sentencing decision factor conversion module (42), a thesis document and a sentencing decision factor conversion module. Group (43), judgment case and sentencing decision factor conversion module (44) and hierarchical analysis method [AHP] sentencing decision factor online questionnaire module (45), through the collection of data, questionnaires on the Internet, etc., to obtain the factors that can lead to the outcome of sentencing, and to establish the patterns and rules related to decision-making through narrative, inferential statistical analysis and post-value analysis. And sent to the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) for calculation and analysis, the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) is coupled to the sentencing decision unit (2), thereby providing a weight coefficient for generating a penalty decision factor ( 46), wherein the decision factor of the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) that affects the general sentencing (23) (as shown in the fifth figure) includes: the type of drug (231), the purity of the drug (232) , the total number of drugs or the total market price (233), the highest and lowest punishment for drugs at all levels (234), whether there is a motive for trafficking (235), the type of drug offender (236), the role of crime (237) The offender is denying the crime or assisting the reconnaissance (238), whether the offender has a drug record (239); and the decision factors affecting the weight penalty (24) include: mass input or trafficking (241), supply of the inmate and minor Human drugs (242), A grade [ Drugs (243), convictions for drug-related crimes (244), multiple and continuous supply (245), offender status (246), drug trafficking to the public through computer systems (247), supply to athletes Prohibited drugs (248), illegal discharge of dangerous or toxic substances or illegal transportation and handling or storage of hazardous waste (249); and the decision-making factors affecting the reduction of sentencing (25) include: ensuring that drugs are no longer used (251), unemployment ( 252), first offense (253), minor damage (254), guilty plea and assistance in handling the case (255), subordinate role (256) and providing appropriate assurance Kim (257).

量刑決策模式驗證單元(5),如第六圖所示,其係內建於該處理單元(1)內,該量刑決策模式驗證單元(5)係設置有一科技接收度分析模組(51),該科技接收度分析模組(51)係包含量刑易用度線上問卷調查模組(52)、量刑有用度線上問卷調查模組(53)及量刑正確度線上問卷調查模組(54),該量刑決策模式驗證單元(5)並連結至該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41),其係對於該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)及其所產生之量刑決策因子權重係數(46)進行後續驗證與更新,以供讓系統管理者逐漸修正量刑決策因子篩選單元(4)之量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)的資料。The sentencing decision mode verification unit (5), as shown in the sixth figure, is built in the processing unit (1), and the sentencing decision mode verification unit (5) is provided with a technology receiving degree analysis module (51) The technology receiving degree analysis module (51) includes a sentencing easement online questionnaire module (52), a sentencing usefulness online questionnaire module (53), and a sentencing accuracy online questionnaire module (54). The sentencing decision mode verification unit (5) is coupled to the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41), which is for the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) and the sentencing decision factor weight coefficient (46) Subsequent verification and update for the system administrator to gradually correct the data of the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) of the sentencing decision factor screening unit (4).

使用時,如第三圖及第七圖所示,量刑者(B)〔或法官、檢察官、律師、司法單位人員及法學院學生〕係可先啟動處理單元(1),並透過操作界面(11)登入量刑決策單元(2)〔如第一圖所示〕,並於情報(21)之項目下輸入犯罪時(211)之動機212)〔如第二圖所示〕、目的(213)、手段(214)及所受之剌激(215);犯罪後(211A)之態度(212A)、所生之危險或損壞(213A);犯人(211B)之品行(212B)、生活狀況(213B)、知識程度(214B)、犯人與被害人平日之關係(215B)等內容後,則會透過該設計(22)之項目根據量刑資料庫(3)接收來自於法律條文資料庫(31)及其司法院和大法官解釋 (31A)、判決案例資料庫(32)及其刑事庭會議決議(32A)、犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫(33)及其法官聯席會議(33A)所統計、分析及更新後之資料,並再經由一般量刑(23)之項目〔如第五圖所示〕,而參考其影響之決策因子係包含毒品類型(231)、毒品的純度(232)、毒品的總數量或總市價(233)、各級毒品的最高與最低刑度(234)、是否具有販賣獲利動機(235)、毒品犯型態(236)、犯罪時的角色(237)、犯罪人是否認罪或協助偵察(238)、犯罪人是否有毒品前科記錄(239);而該加重量刑(24)所參考其影響之決策因子係包含大量輸入或販賣(241)、供應受刑人及未成年人毒品(242)、A級〔一級〕毒品(243)、曾因毒品相關犯罪前科被定罪(244)、多次及持續供應(245)、犯罪人身份(246)、透過電腦系統對大眾販賣毒品(247)、對運動選手供應違禁藥品(248)、非法排放危險或有毒物質或非法運輸及處理或儲存危險廢棄物(249);又該減輕量刑(25)所參考影響之決策因子係包含保證不再施用毒品(251)、失業(252)、初犯(253)、損害輕微(254)、認罪及協助辦案(255)、從屬角色(256)及提供適當保證金(257);並根據上述影響之決策因子而完成罪刑合併(26)之項目,另外該量刑決策因子篩選單元(4)〔如第四圖所示〕則會以法律條文與量刑決策因子轉換模組(42)、論文文獻與量刑決策因子轉換模組(43)、判 決案例與量刑決策因子轉換模組(44)及層級分析法〔AHP〕量刑決策因子線上問卷模組(45)所匯整至量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)之資料,並提供產生一量刑決策因子權重係數(46),而形成一罰金與刑期方案選擇(6),藉以可作為量刑者之選擇參考,然後選擇一適用之方案後則予以執行(7),並提供一執法人員所需資料(8)及受刑人權利需知(9),而產生一量刑之參考依據。When used, as shown in the third and seventh figures, the sentencing person (B) [or judges, prosecutors, lawyers, judicial personnel and law school students] can start the processing unit (1) first, and through the operation interface (11) Login to the sentencing decision-making unit (2) [as shown in the first figure], and enter the motive of the crime (211) under the item of information (21) 212) (as shown in the second figure), purpose (213 ), means (214) and stimuli (215); post-crime (211A) attitude (212A), risk or damage (213A); prisoner (211B) conduct (212B), living conditions ( 213B), the degree of knowledge (214B), the relationship between the prisoner and the victim (215B), etc., will be received through the project (22) from the sentencing database (3) from the legal provisions database (31) and The court and the judge explained (31A), the judgment case database (32) and its criminal court meeting resolution (32A), the crime investigation and analysis statistical database (33) and its joint meeting of judges (33A), statistics, analysis and updated information, and According to the general sentencing (23) project (as shown in the fifth figure), the decision-making factors referring to its influence include the type of drug (231), the purity of the drug (232), the total quantity of drugs or the total market price (233). The highest and lowest criminality of drugs at all levels (234), whether there is motive for trafficking (235), the type of drug offender (236), the role of crime (237), the offender is denying or assisting in reconnaissance (238) Whether the offender has a pre-drug record (239); and the weighting factor (24) refers to the influence of the decision-making factors including a large number of inputs or sales (241), the supply of inmates and minors (242), grade A [Grade 1] drugs (243), convictions for drug-related crimes (244), multiple and continuous supply (245), offender status (246), drug trafficking to the public through computer systems (247), sports players Supply of illicit drugs (248), illegal discharge of dangerous or toxic substances or illegal transportation and disposal or Hazardous waste (249); and the decision-making factors that mitigate the impact of sentencing (25) include ensuring that drugs are no longer used (251), unemployed (252), first-time offenders (253), minor damages (254), guilty plea and Assist in handling cases (255), subordinate roles (256), and providing appropriate margin (257); and completing the crime consolidation (26) project based on the above-mentioned influence decision factors, and the sentencing decision factor screening unit (4) [such as the fourth The figure shows] the legal provisions and sentencing decision-making factor conversion module (42), thesis literature and sentencing decision-factor conversion module (43), judgment The case and sentencing decision factor conversion module (44) and the hierarchical analysis method [AHP] sentencing decision factor online questionnaire module (45) are collected to the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) and provide a The weighting factor of the sentencing decision factor (46), and the formation of a penalty and the option of the sentence (6), can be used as a reference for the choice of the sentencing, and then choose an applicable program to be implemented (7), and provide a law enforcement personnel The information (8) and the rights of the inmate should be known (9), and a reference basis for the sentence is generated.

又該量刑決策模式驗證單元(5)〔如第六圖所示〕之科技接收度分析模組(51)則可透過該量刑易用度線上問卷調查模組(52)、量刑有用度線上問卷調查模組(53)及量刑正確度線上問卷調查模組(54),經由線上之調查方式,以供可以對於該量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)所產生之量刑決策因子權重係數(46)進行後續驗證與更新,以讓系統管理者作為修正量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41)中資料的依據。The science and technology acceptance analysis module (51) of the sentencing decision mode verification unit (5) (as shown in the sixth figure) can pass the sentencing easement online questionnaire module (52) and the sentencing usefulness online questionnaire. The survey module (53) and the sentencing correctness online questionnaire module (54) are passed through an online survey method for the weighting factor of the sentencing decision factor that can be generated for the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module (41) (46) Subsequent verification and update, so that the system administrator can be used as the basis for correcting the data in the weighting calculation factor (41) of the sentencing decision factor.

惟,以上所述僅為本發明其中之一最佳實施例,當不能以此限定本發明之申請專利保護範圍,舉凡依本發明之申請專利範圍及說明書內容所作之簡單的等效變化與替換,皆應仍屬於本發明申請專利範圍所涵蓋保護之範圍內。However, the above description is only one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and the scope of the patent application and the contents of the description of the present invention are not limited thereto. All should still fall within the scope of protection covered by the scope of the patent application of the present invention.

(1)‧‧‧處理單元(1) ‧‧‧Processing unit

(11)‧‧‧操作界面(11)‧‧‧Operation interface

(2)‧‧‧量刑決策單元(2) ‧ ‧ sentencing decision-making unit

(21)‧‧‧情報(21)‧‧‧Information

(211)‧‧‧犯罪時(211) ‧ ‧ at the time of the crime

(212)‧‧‧動機(212) ‧‧‧ Motivation

(213)‧‧‧目的(213) ‧ ‧ purpose

(214)‧‧‧手段(214) ‧ ‧ means

(215)‧‧‧所受之剌激(215) ‧‧‧

(211A)‧‧‧犯罪後(211A) ‧ ‧ after the crime

(212A)‧‧‧態度(212A) ‧ ‧ attitude

(213A)‧‧‧所生之危險或損壞(213A) ‧ ‧ dangerous or damaged

(211B)‧‧‧犯人(211B) ‧ ‧ prisoners

(212B)‧‧‧品行(212B) ‧ ‧ ‧ conduct

(213B)‧‧‧生活狀況(213B) ‧ ‧ living conditions

(214B)‧‧‧知識程度(214B) ‧ ‧ knowledge level

(215B)‧‧‧犯人與被害人平日之關係(215B) ‧‧The relationship between the prisoner and the victim on weekdays

(22)‧‧‧設計(22)‧‧‧ Design

(23)‧‧‧一般量刑(23)‧‧‧General sentencing

(231)‧‧‧毒品類型(231) ‧‧‧Drug type

(232)‧‧‧毒品的純度(232) ‧ ‧ the purity of drugs

(233)‧‧‧毒品的總數量或總市價(233) ‧‧‧ Total number of drugs or total market price

(234)‧‧‧各級毒品的最高與最低刑度(234) ‧ ‧ highest and minimum penalties for drugs at all levels

(235)‧‧‧是否具有販賣獲利動機(235) ‧ ‧ Is there a motive for selling profits?

(236)‧‧‧毒品犯型態(236) ‧ ‧ drug offenders

(237)‧‧‧犯罪時的角色(237) ‧‧‧The role of crime

(238)‧‧‧犯罪人是否認罪或協助偵察(238) ‧ ‧ The perpetrator is denying sin or assisting in reconnaissance

(239)‧‧‧犯罪人是否有毒品前科記錄(239) ‧ ‧ Does the offender have a pre-drug record

(24)‧‧‧加重量刑(24) ‧ ‧ plus weight

(241)‧‧‧大量輸入或販賣(241)‧‧‧Many input or sale

(242)‧‧‧供應受刑人及未成年人毒品(242)‧‧‧Supply of inmates and minors

(243)‧‧‧A級〔一級〕毒品(243)‧‧‧Class A (Grade 1) drugs

(244)‧‧‧曾因毒品相關犯罪前科被定罪(244) ‧ ‧ was convicted of a drug-related criminal prosecution

(245)‧‧‧多次及持續供應(245) ‧ ‧ multiple and continuous supply

(246)‧‧‧犯罪人身份(246) ‧‧‧Criminal identity

(247)‧‧‧透過電腦系統對大眾販賣毒品(247) ‧‧‧ Drug trafficking to the public through computer systems

(248)‧‧‧對運動選手供應違禁藥品(248) ‧‧‧Supply illicit drugs to athletes

(249)‧‧‧非法排放危險或有毒物質或非法運輸 及處理或儲存危險廢棄物(249) ‧‧‧Illegal discharge of dangerous or toxic substances or illegal transportation And handling or storing hazardous waste

(25)‧‧‧減輕量刑(25) ‧ ‧ mitigation

(251)‧‧‧保證不再施用毒品(251) ‧ ‧ guarantee to stop using drugs

(252)‧‧‧失業(252) ‧ ‧ Unemployment

(253)‧‧‧初犯(253) ‧ ‧ first offense

(254)‧‧‧損害輕微(254) ‧‧‧Slight damage

(255)‧‧‧認罪及協助辦案(255) ‧ ‧ plead guilty and assist in handling cases

(256)‧‧‧從屬角色(256) ‧‧‧Subordinate roles

(257)‧‧‧提供適當保證金(257) ‧ ‧ provide appropriate margin

(26)‧‧‧罪刑合併(26) ‧ ‧ confession

(3)‧‧‧量刑資料庫(3) ‧ ‧ sentencing database

(31)‧‧‧法律條文資料庫(31) ‧ ‧ legal provisions database

(31A)‧‧‧司法院和大法官解釋(31A) ‧ ‧ court and justice interpretation

(32)‧‧‧判決案例資料庫(32) ‧‧‧Judgement case database

(32A)‧‧‧刑事庭會議決議(32A) ‧ ‧ Resolutions of the Criminal Chamber

(33)‧‧‧犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫(33) ‧‧‧Criminal Investigation and Analysis Statistics Database

(33A)‧‧‧法官聯席會議(33A) ‧ ‧ Joint Judges Meeting

(34)‧‧‧量刑資訊(34)‧‧‧Sentencing information

(4)‧‧‧量刑決策因子篩選單元(4) ‧‧‧Sentencing decision factor screening unit

(41)‧‧‧量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41) ‧‧‧Sentencing Decision Factor Weight Calculation Module

(42)‧‧‧法律條文與量刑決策因子轉換模組(42) ‧ ‧ Legal provisions and sentencing decision-making factor conversion module

(43)‧‧‧論文文獻與量刑決策因子轉換模組(43) ‧ ‧ essay literature and sentencing decision factor conversion module

(44)‧‧‧判決案例與量刑決策因子轉換模組(44) ‧‧‧Judgement Case and Sentencing Decision Factor Conversion Module

(45)‧‧‧層級分析法〔AHP〕量刑決策因子線上問卷模組(45) ‧ ‧ tier analysis method [AHP] sentencing decision factor online questionnaire module

(46)‧‧‧量刑決策因子權重係數(46) ‧‧‧Sentencing decision factor weighting factor

(5)‧‧‧量刑決策模式驗證單元(5) ‧‧‧Sentencing Decision Mode Verification Unit

(51)‧‧‧科技接收度分析模組(51)‧‧‧Technical Reception Analysis Module

(52)‧‧‧量刑易用度線上問卷調查模組(52) ‧‧‧Sentence and Expenditure Online Questionnaire Module

(53)‧‧‧量刑有用度線上問卷調查模組(53)‧‧‧Sentence usefulness online questionnaire module

(54)‧‧‧量刑正確度線上問卷調查模組(54) ‧‧‧Sentence accuracy online questionnaire module

(6)‧‧‧罰金與刑期方案選擇(6) ‧ ‧ fines and sentence options

(7)‧‧‧執行(7) ‧‧‧Execution

(8)‧‧‧執法人員所需資料(8) ‧ ‧ Information required by law enforcement officials

(9)‧‧‧受刑人權利需知(9) ‧‧‧Responsibility of the rights of the inmate

(A)‧‧‧網際網路(A) ‧ ‧ Internet

(B)‧‧‧量刑者(B) ‧‧‧Sentenced

第一圖係為本發明系統配置之示意圖。The first figure is a schematic diagram of the system configuration of the present invention.

第二圖係為本發明量刑決策單元操作之流程圖。The second figure is a flow chart of the operation of the sentencing decision unit of the present invention.

第三圖係為本發明量刑時之操作流程圖。The third figure is a flow chart of the operation of the present invention.

第四圖係為本發明量刑決策因子篩選單元之示意圖。The fourth figure is a schematic diagram of the screening unit of the sentencing decision factor of the present invention.

第五圖係為本發明影響量刑之決策因子的示意圖。The fifth figure is a schematic diagram of the decision factors affecting sentencing according to the present invention.

第六圖係為本發明量刑決策模式驗證單元之示意圖。The sixth figure is a schematic diagram of the verification unit of the sentencing decision mode of the present invention.

第七圖係為本發明量刑者使用時之示意圖。The seventh figure is a schematic diagram of the use of the sentence according to the present invention.

(1)‧‧‧處理單元(1) ‧‧‧Processing unit

(11)‧‧‧操作界面(11)‧‧‧Operation interface

(2)‧‧‧量刑決策單元(2) ‧ ‧ sentencing decision-making unit

(3)‧‧‧量刑資料庫(3) ‧ ‧ sentencing database

(31)‧‧‧法律條文資料庫(31) ‧ ‧ legal provisions database

(32)‧‧‧判決案例資料庫(32) ‧‧‧Judgement case database

(33)‧‧‧犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫(33) ‧‧‧Criminal Investigation and Analysis Statistics Database

(4)‧‧‧量刑決策因子篩選單元(4) ‧‧‧Sentencing decision factor screening unit

(41)‧‧‧量刑決策因子權重計算模組(41) ‧‧‧Sentencing Decision Factor Weight Calculation Module

(5)‧‧‧量刑決策模式驗證單元(5) ‧‧‧Sentencing Decision Mode Verification Unit

(A)‧‧‧網際網路(A) ‧ ‧ Internet

(B)‧‧‧量刑者(B) ‧‧‧Sentenced

Claims (7)

一種量刑決策支援系統,包括有:一處理單元,其係設有一操作界面;一量刑決策單元,其係內建於該處理單元內,該量刑決策單元係包含有情報、設計、一般量刑、加重量刑、減輕量刑及罪刑合併之項目,以供輸入刑事案件之內容,並協助刑事案件進行決策分析及量刑優先排序;一量刑資料庫,其係內建於該處理單元內,並連結至該量刑決策單元,該量刑資料庫係連結至一法律條文資料庫、判決案例資料庫及犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫,以提供一量刑資訊;一量刑決策因子篩選單元,其係內建於該處理單元內,該量刑決策因子篩選單元係設置有一量刑決策因子權重計算模組,該量刑決策因子權重計算模組係包含有一法律條文與量刑決策因子轉換模組、一論文文獻與量刑決策因子轉換模組、一判決案例與量刑決策因子轉換模組及一層級分析法〔AHP〕量刑決策因子線上問卷模組,藉以透過資料蒐集、網路線上的問卷調查之方式獲得可導致量刑結果的因素,並經由敍述、推論統計分析及加值後的分析結果建置成與決策有關的模式與法則,而傳送至該量刑決策因子權重計算模組加以計算分析,該量刑決策因子權重計算模組 並連結至該量刑決策單元,並透過該量刑決策單元輸入一影響一般量刑之決策因子、一影響加重量刑之決策因子及一影響減輕量刑之決策因子,以產生提供一量刑決策因子權重係數,並根據上述影響之決策因子而完成罪刑合併,以形成一罰金或刑期之方案選擇,藉以作為量刑之選擇參考;一量刑決策模式驗證單元,其係內建於該處理單元內,該量刑決策模式驗證單元係設置有一科技接收度分析模組,該量刑決策模式驗證單元並連結至該量刑決策因子權重計算模組,其係對於該量刑決策因子權重計算模組及其所產生之量刑決策因子權重係數進行後續驗證與更新。 A sentencing decision support system includes: a processing unit having an operation interface; a penalty decision unit built in the processing unit, the sentencing decision unit includes intelligence, design, general sentencing, and aggravation Sentencing, mitigation and integration of crimes and punishments for the purpose of inputting criminal cases, and assisting criminal cases in decision analysis and sentencing prioritization; a criminal database, which is built into the processing unit and linked to the sentencing The decision-making unit, the sentencing database is linked to a legal document database, a judgment case database, and a crime investigation and analysis statistical database to provide a penalty information; a penalty decision factor screening unit, which is built in the processing unit The sentencing decision factor screening unit is provided with a weighting decision factor weight calculation module, and the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module includes a legal article and sentencing decision factor conversion module, a thesis document and a sentencing decision factor conversion module. , a judgment case and sentencing decision factor conversion module and a level analysis method [AHP] The online decision-making component of the sentencing decision-making factor is used to obtain the factors that can lead to the sentencing results through data collection and online questionnaire surveys, and is built into decision-making through narrative, inferential statistical analysis and post-value analysis results. The mode and the rule are transmitted to the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module for calculation and analysis, and the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module And linking to the sentencing decision-making unit, and inputting a decision factor affecting the general sentencing, a decision factor affecting the weight penalty, and a decision factor affecting the sentencing through the sentencing decision unit, thereby generating a weight coefficient for providing a penalty decision factor, and According to the above-mentioned influence decision factors, the crimes are combined to form a penalty or a penalty option, which is used as a reference for sentencing; a penalty decision mode verification unit is built in the processing unit, and the sentencing decision mode is verified. The unit system is provided with a technology receiving degree analysis module, and the sentencing decision mode verification unit is connected to the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module, which is a weighting coefficient for the sentencing decision factor weight calculation module and the sentencing decision factor generated by the unit Perform subsequent verification and updates. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述量刑決策支援系統,其中,該處理單元係為個人電腦、筆記型電腦、平板電腦、手機或個人數位助理〔PDA〕。 For example, the sentencing decision support system described in claim 1 is wherein the processing unit is a personal computer, a notebook computer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone, or a personal digital assistant (PDA). 如申請專利範圍第1或2項所述量刑決策支援系統,其中,該操作界面係為鍵盤、滑鼠、數位筆、數位板、觸控式螢幕、麥克風、攝影機其中之一或組合。 The sentencing decision support system described in claim 1 or 2, wherein the operation interface is one or a combination of a keyboard, a mouse, a digital pen, a tablet, a touch screen, a microphone, and a camera. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述量刑決策支援系統,其中,該法律條文資料庫係來自於司法院和大法官解釋、見解及最新增、修訂之刑法法條,而該判決案例資料庫則來自於刑事庭會議決議、歷年來之刑事 判例,又該犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫則來自於法官聯席會議及相關刑事之統計、分析資料。 For example, the sentencing decision support system mentioned in item 1 of the patent application scope, wherein the legal provisions database is derived from the interpretation, opinions and the most newly added and revised criminal law articles of the court and the judge, and the judgment case database is from Criminal resolutions, criminals over the years Jurisprudence, the criminal investigation and analysis statistics database comes from the joint meeting of judges and related criminal statistics and analysis materials. 如申請專利範圍第1或4項所述量刑決策支援系統,其中,該量刑資料庫係透過網際網路、通訊網路、有線網路或無線網路連結至該法律條文資料庫、判決案例資料庫及犯罪調查及分析統計資料庫。 For example, the sentencing decision support system described in claim 1 or 4, wherein the sentencing database is linked to the legal provision database and the judgment case database through an internet, a communication network, a wired network, or a wireless network. And a database of crime investigation and analysis statistics. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述量刑決策支援系統,其中,影響一般量刑之決策因子係包含毒品類型、毒品的純度、毒品的總數量或總市價、各級毒品的最高與最低刑度、是否具有販賣獲利動機、毒品犯型態、犯罪時的角色、犯罪人是否認罪或協助偵察、犯罪人是否有毒品前科記錄;而影響加重量刑之決策因子係包含大量輸入或販賣、供應受刑人及未成年人毒品、A級〔一級〕毒品、曾因毒品相關犯罪前科被定罪、多次及持續供應、犯罪人身份、透過電腦系統對大眾販賣毒品、對運動選手供應違禁藥品、非法排放危險或有毒物質或非法運輸及處理或儲存危險廢棄物;而影響減輕量刑之決策因子係包含保證不再施用毒品、失業、初犯、損害輕微、認罪及協助辦案、從屬角色及提供適當保證金。 For example, the sentencing decision support system mentioned in the first paragraph of the patent application scope, wherein the decision factors affecting the general sentencing include the type of drugs, the purity of drugs, the total quantity of drugs or the total market price, the highest and lowest punishments of drugs at all levels, and whether Have the motive of selling profit, the type of drug guilty, the role of the crime, the offender is denying the crime or assisting the reconnaissance, whether the offender has a drug record, and the decision-making factors affecting the weight of the sentence include a large number of inputs or sales, supply of the prisoner and Minor drugs, Class A (Grade 1) drugs, convictions for drug-related crimes, multiple and continuous supply, identity of offenders, drug trafficking to the public through computer systems, supply of illegal drugs to athletes, illegal discharge or Toxic substances or illegal transport and handling or storage of hazardous waste; and the decision-making factors affecting the reduction of sentencing include ensuring that drugs are no longer used, unemployment, first offense, minor damage, guilty and assistance in handling cases, subordinate roles and providing appropriate security deposits. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述量刑決策支援系統,其中,該科技接收度分析模組係包含量刑易用度線上問卷調查模組、量刑有用度線上問卷調查模組及 量刑正確度線上問卷調查模組。 For example, the sentencing decision support system described in claim 1 of the patent scope includes the online survey module for sentencing and ease of use, and the online survey module for sentencing usefulness. Sentencing accuracy online questionnaire module.
TW101103701A 2011-04-12 2011-04-12 Support system of sentencing decision TWI494890B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW101103701A TWI494890B (en) 2011-04-12 2011-04-12 Support system of sentencing decision

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW101103701A TWI494890B (en) 2011-04-12 2011-04-12 Support system of sentencing decision

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201241779A TW201241779A (en) 2012-10-16
TWI494890B true TWI494890B (en) 2015-08-01

Family

ID=47600173

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW101103701A TWI494890B (en) 2011-04-12 2011-04-12 Support system of sentencing decision

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI494890B (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI482106B (en) * 2013-01-25 2015-04-21 Univ Southern Taiwan Sci & Tec Attorney recommendation system
CN103279798A (en) * 2013-06-12 2013-09-04 林宝宗 Detainee detention necessity auditing system
TWI496103B (en) * 2013-06-27 2015-08-11 The system and method of sentencing and juries-guiding in taiwan
TWI588771B (en) * 2016-06-08 2017-06-21 南臺科技大學 Thesis analysis system
CN110751316A (en) * 2019-09-26 2020-02-04 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Method and device for predicting resolution result and terminal equipment

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060229999A1 (en) * 2005-04-11 2006-10-12 Herbert Dodell Decision support system for litigation evaluation
CN101872439A (en) * 2010-01-29 2010-10-27 秦野 Common criminal law sentencing method and system for hundred accusations
CN101872345A (en) * 2009-04-27 2010-10-27 刘冬梅 Logical reasoning mechanism being suitable for legal expert system
US20100274715A1 (en) * 2009-04-27 2010-10-28 Beach Michael J System and method for legal document authoring and electronic court filing
CN101950310A (en) * 2010-10-08 2011-01-19 北京博雅英杰科技有限公司 Sentencing normalizing system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060229999A1 (en) * 2005-04-11 2006-10-12 Herbert Dodell Decision support system for litigation evaluation
CN101872345A (en) * 2009-04-27 2010-10-27 刘冬梅 Logical reasoning mechanism being suitable for legal expert system
US20100274715A1 (en) * 2009-04-27 2010-10-28 Beach Michael J System and method for legal document authoring and electronic court filing
CN101872439A (en) * 2010-01-29 2010-10-27 秦野 Common criminal law sentencing method and system for hundred accusations
CN101950310A (en) * 2010-10-08 2011-01-19 北京博雅英杰科技有限公司 Sentencing normalizing system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201241779A (en) 2012-10-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Coglianese et al. AI in Adjudication and Administration
Kleinberg et al. Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms
Edwards et al. Slave to the algorithm? Why a'right to an explanation'is probably not the remedy you are looking for
Livermore et al. The Supreme Court and the judicial genre
Cotterrell Law's community: legal theory in sociological perspective
Hood et al. The government of risk: Understanding risk regulation regimes
Martin Incorporating values into sustainability decision-making
Anderson et al. Measuring statutory law and regulations for empirical research
TWI494890B (en) Support system of sentencing decision
Poirier Reading datasets: Strategies for interpreting the politics of data signification
Liu et al. The effects of customer online reviews on sales performance: The role of mobile phone’s quality characteristics
Savaşan Pollution, land
Bag et al. Research progress on working conditions in supply chains: a comprehensive literature review and future research propositions
Ospino Occupations: Labor market classifications, taxonomies, and ontologies in the 21st century
Lauritsen et al. Expanding our understanding of crime: The national academies report on the future of crime statistics and measurement
Chandra et al. Decision support system for Forest fire management using Ontology with Big Data and LLMs
Bevitori et al. Risk and resilience in a changing climate: a diachronic analysis in the press across the globe
Krupka et al. Case-based reasoning model in process of emergency management
Williams Contract maps
Kagan On surveying the whole legal forest
Coxen A risk analysis and data driven approach to combating sex trafficking
Choi AI Malpractice
Eman Crimes against the Environment—Comparative Criminology and Criminal Justice Perspectives
Vydra et al. Big data ethics: A life cycle perspective
Carter et al. Proximity and neighbourhood: Using topic modelling to read the development of law in the high court of Australia

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees