TWI389108B - Method for testing a recorder and a rw disk - Google Patents

Description

Burning machine and readable and writable disc test method

The invention relates to a burning machine and a readable and readable disc testing method, in particular to a method for automatically testing a burning machine and a rewritable disc recording performance.

CD storage technology is a high-tech developed in the early 1970s. The optical disc storage has the advantages of high storage density, large capacity, random access, long storage life, stable and reliable operation, light and easy to carry, and the like, which is especially suitable for the storage and exchange of large data information. The optical disc storage technology can not only meet the needs of massive information storage in the information society, but also store information of various media such as sound, text, graphics, images, etc., so that the traditional way of storing, transmitting, managing and using information is fundamental. The change.

In recent years, optical disc storage technology has made major breakthroughs and entered commercial large-scale production. In Japan, North America and European industrialized countries, an independent optical disc industry has gradually formed, and its application range is also expanding, almost reaching human society. All areas of activity and life have had a profound impact on how people work, how they learn, and how they live.

According to the performance of the read data, the disc can be mainly divided into: CD-ROM, CD-ROM and CD-ROM. A burning machine is a tool for writing data to a disc and a readable and writable disc. At present, for the burning test of the burning machine, basically the industry's well-known burning software is used for functional testing, such as: Nero, Easy CD Creator, Sonic, CD Copy, etc., these softwares are not compatible with the burning machine. Read and write (RW) discs set the loop test function, so the reliability of the burner cannot be guaranteed. It is also impossible to test the life of the burner and RW disc. To ensure the reliability of the burner, it must be monitored by the professional and the recording conditions must be set repeatedly. This semi-automated test method consumes a lot of manpower and time, and the test efficiency is low.

In view of the above, it is necessary to provide a burning machine test method, which can automatically test the burning performance of the burning machine, and also save manpower and test time.

In addition, it is also necessary to provide a readable and writable disc test method that automatically tests the recording performance of the readable and writable disc, and also saves manpower and test time.

The burning machine testing method comprises the following steps: providing a readable and readable disc with good burning performance, and mounting the readable and writable disc on the burning machine to be tested; according to the required testing of the burning machine Select the corresponding type of burner; specify the original file to be burned, set the burning speed, the number of loops N and the number of times the number of failed tests is M, and select the burning mode; erase all the data on the readable and readable disc; Burning the original file to the readable and readable disc; determining whether the original file is successfully burned onto the readable and readable disc; if the original original file is successfully burned onto the readable and readable disc, the counter J Adding 1; repeating the erasing data step, burning the original file step and the judging step, and counting the number of successful recordings through the counter J; when the counter J reaches N-M+1, the burning machine passes the burning performance test.

The readable and writable disc test method includes the following steps: providing a burner with good recording performance and mounting the readable and writable disc to be tested in the burning On the deck; select the corresponding disc type according to the readable and writable discs to be tested; specify the original file to be burned, set the burning speed, the number of loops N and the number of times the number of failed tests is M, and select the burning mode; In addition to reading all the data on the disc; burning the original file onto the readable and readable disc; determining whether the original file is successfully burned onto the readable and readable disc; if the original file is successfully burned Up to the readable and readable disc, the counter J is incremented by one; the step of erasing data is repeated, the original file step and the judging step are repeated, and the number of successful recordings is counted by the counter J; when the counter J reaches N-M+1 The readable and writable disc passes the burning performance test.

Compared with the prior art, the tester and the readable and writable disc test method automatically test the burning performance of the burner and the readable and readable disc by means of automatic loop recording, thereby saving test time. And labor costs.

Referring to FIG. 1, it is a structural diagram of an application environment of a tester and a readable and writable disc test method of the present invention. The application environment of the burner and the RW disc test method mainly includes: computer 1, database 2, burner 3 and RW disc 4.

The database 2 is connected to the computer 1 for storing data such as an original file. The database 2 can be independent of the computer 1 or located in the computer 1. The burning machine 3 is connected to the computer 1, and the RW disc 4 is placed in the burning machine 3, and accordingly, the burning machine 3 and the RW disc 4 are returned through the computer 1. Circle test. Generally speaking, the burning machine 3 can be a COMBO burner, a CDRW burner, a DVDRW burner, a DVD-SuperMulti burner, a Blu-Ray burner or a HD DVD. Recording machine. The RW disc 4 may be a CD-RW disc, a DVD-RW disc, a DVD+RW disc, a DVD-RAM disc, a BD-RE disc or an HD DVD-RW disc.

Referring to Figure 2, there is shown a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of the test method of the burner of the present invention. The design method of the burning machine test method is to install a good performance RW disc 4 on the burning machine 3 to be tested, and burn the data loop to the RW disc 4 through the computer 1 to test the institute. The burning performance of the recorder 3 to be tested.

Step S11, the preparing step includes: providing a RW disc 4 with good burning performance, mounting the RW disc 4 on the burning machine 3 to be tested, and connecting the burning machine 3 to the computer 1 .

In step S12, the corresponding type of the burner is selected according to the burner 3 to be tested. The optional burner types include COMBO, CDRW, DVDRW, DVD-SuperMulti, Blu-Ray and HD DVD. For example, if the burner 3 to be tested is a COMBO burner, the type of the burner to be selected in this step is COMBO.

In step S13, the original file is recorded from the database 2, the recording speed and the number of loops N are set, and the recording mode is selected. Wherein, the recorded original file may be any type of file, and the size of the original file to be burned should be the same as or similar to the capacity of the RW disc 4 (the size of the original file is slightly smaller than the size of the RW disc 4). capacity). The set recording speed should be less than or equal to the recording speed supported by the burner 3 and the RW disc 4. The recording method can be DAO (Disc-at-Once, full-write), TAO (Track-at-Once), SAO (Session-at-Once, Multi-Segment), Packet Writing, or On The Fly (OTF).

In step S14, the setting counter J=0, K=0 is initialized, and the upper limit M of the number of times of failing the test is set. Where M can be set to any integer greater than 0 (such as M=3). Counter J is used to record the number of times the original file was successfully burned onto RW disc 4. The counter K is used to record the number of times the original file was not successfully burned onto the RW disc 4. It can be seen from this that as long as the counter J=N-M+1, it can be judged that the recorder 3 passes the test.

In step S15, all the materials on the RW disc 4 are erased.

In step S16, the original recording file is burned onto the RW disc 4.

In step S17, it is determined whether the original file to be burned is successfully recorded onto the RW disc 4.

In step S18, if the original recording file is successfully recorded onto the RW disc 4, the counter J=J+1.

In step S19, it is judged whether the counter J is equal to N-M+1.

In step S20, if the counter J is equal to N-M+1, the recorder 3 passes the burning performance test.

In step S21, if the original recording file is not successfully recorded on the RW disc 4 in step S17, the counter K=K+1.

In step S22, it is judged whether the counter K is equal to the upper limit M of the number of times that the test has not passed.

In step S23, if the counter K is equal to the upper limit M of the number of times that the test has not passed, the burner 3 does not pass the recording performance test.

In step S19, when the counter J is not equal to the number of loops N-M+1, that is, J < N-M+1, the process goes to step S15 to resume the loop recording.

In step S22, when the counter K is not equal to the upper limit M of the number of times that the test has not passed, that is, K < M, the process proceeds to step S15 to perform the loop recording again.

Referring to Figure 3, there is shown a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of the readable and writable disc test method of the present invention. The design idea of the readable and writable disc test method is to mount the RW disc 4 to be tested on a good performance recorder 3, and burn the data loop to the RW disc 4 through the computer 1 to test The recording performance of the RW disc 4.

In step S31, the preparation step comprises: providing a burning machine 3 with good burning performance, mounting the RW disc 4 to be tested on the burning machine 3, and connecting the burning machine 3 to the computer 1.

In step S32, the disc type is selected according to the RW disc 4 to be tested. The optional disc types include CD-RW, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, BD-RE, and HD DVD-RW. For example, if the RW disc 4 to be tested is a DVD-RW disc, the disc type that should be selected in this step is a DVD-RW.

In step S33, the original file is recorded from the database 2, the recording speed and the number of loops N are set, and the recording mode is selected. The original file to be burned may be any type of file, and the size of the original file to be burned should be the same or similar to the capacity of the RW disc 4 to be tested (the size of the original file to be burned is slightly smaller than the size of the RW disc). 4 capacity). The setting of the moment The recording speed should be less than or equal to the recording speed supported by the burner 3 and the RW disc 4.

In step S34, the setting counter J=0, K=0 is initialized, and the upper limit M of the number of times that the test has not passed is set. Where M can be set to any integer greater than 0 (such as M=3). Counter J is used to record the number of times the original file was successfully burned onto RW disc 4. The counter K is used to record the number of times the original file was not successfully recorded onto the RW disc 4. It can be seen from this that as long as the counter J=N-M+1, it can be judged that the RW disc 4 passes the test.

In step S35, all the materials on the RW disc 4 are erased.

In step S36, the original file to be burned is burned onto the RW disc 4.

In step S37, it is determined whether the original file to be burned is successfully recorded onto the RW disc 4.

In step S38, if the original recording file is successfully recorded onto the RW disc 4, the counter J=J+1.

In step S39, it is judged whether the counter J is equal to N-M+1.

In step S40, if the counter J is equal to N-M+1, the RW disc 4 passes the burning performance test.

In step S41, if the original recording file is not successfully recorded on the RW disc 4 in step S37, the counter K=K+1.

In step S42, it is judged whether the counter K is equal to the upper limit M of the number of times that the test has not passed.

Step S43, if the counter K is equal to the upper limit M of the number of times of failing the test, then the RW disc 4 did not pass the burning performance test.

In step S39, when the counter J is not equal to the number of loops N-M+1, that is, J < N-M+1, the process proceeds to step S35 to perform the loop recording again.

In step S42, when the counter K is not equal to the upper limit M of the number of times that the test has not passed, that is, K < M, the process proceeds to step S35 to perform the loop recording again.

1‧‧‧ computer

2‧‧‧Database

3‧‧‧ burning machine

4‧‧‧Read and write discs

1 is a structural diagram of an application environment of a tester and a readable and writable disc test method of the present invention.

2 is a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of the test method of the burner of the present invention.

3 is a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of a method for testing a readable and writable disc of the present invention.

Claims (7)

A burning machine testing method, the method comprising the steps of: providing a readable and readable disc with good recording performance, and mounting the readable and writable disc on a burning machine to be tested; The burner selects the corresponding type of burner; specifies the original file to be burned, sets the burning speed, the number of loops N, and the upper limit of the number of times the test fails, and selects the recording mode; initializes the setting counter J=0; erases the described Read and write all the data on the disc; burn the original file to the readable and readable disc; determine whether the original file is successfully burned onto the readable and readable disc; if the original original file is successfully burned to the On the readable and writable disc, the counter J is incremented by one; the step of erasing data is repeated, the original file step and the judging step are repeated, and the number of successful recordings is counted by the counter J; when the counter J reaches N-M+1, Then the burner passes the burning performance test. The method for testing a burning machine according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises the steps of: initializing the setting counter K=0; if the original recording file is not successfully recorded onto the readable and readable disc, the counter K Add 1; repeat the step of erasing data, recording the original file step and the judging step, and counting the number of unsuccessful recordings by the counter K; when the counter K reaches the upper limit M of the number of failed tests, the burning machine is not Pass the performance test. For example, the test method of the first scope of the patent application includes the COMBO, CDRW, DVDRW, DVD-SuperMulti, Blu-Ray and HD DVD. For example, in the test method of the burning machine described in claim 1, the recording method is a whole writing method, a track writing method, a multi-segment writing method, a packaging method or a fast burning method. A readable and readable disc testing method, the method comprising the steps of: providing a burning machine with good burning performance, and mounting a readable and readable disc of the required test on the burning machine; Read and write discs to select the corresponding disc type; specify the original file to be burned, set the burning speed, the number of loops N and the number of times the number of failed tests is M, and select the burning mode; initialize the setting counter J=0; erase the Read and write all the data on the disc; burn the original file to the readable and readable disc; determine whether the original file is successfully burned onto the readable and readable disc; if the original file is successfully burned to the disc On the disc, the counter J is incremented by one; the erasing step, the original file step and the judging step are repeated, and the number of successful recordings is counted by the counter J; when the counter J reaches N-M+1, the Read and write discs pass the burning performance test. The method for testing a readable and writable disc according to claim 5, wherein the method further comprises the steps of: initializing a setting counter K=0; If the original file is not successfully burned onto the readable and readable disc, the counter K is incremented by one; the step of erasing data, the step of recording the original file and the step of judging are repeated, and the number of unsuccessful recordings is counted by the counter K; When the counter K reaches the upper limit M of the number of failed tests, the readable and writable disc fails the burning performance test. The readable and writable disc test method according to claim 5, wherein the disc type includes a CD-RW, a DVD-RW, a DVD+RW, a DVD-RAM, a BD-RE, and an HD DVD-RW. .