TW479182B - Polling rowing method with reliability comment - Google Patents

Polling rowing method with reliability comment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TW479182B
TW479182B TW89120768A TW89120768A TW479182B TW 479182 B TW479182 B TW 479182B TW 89120768 A TW89120768 A TW 89120768A TW 89120768 A TW89120768 A TW 89120768A TW 479182 B TW479182 B TW 479182B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
score
reliability
voting
participant
scope
Prior art date
Application number
TW89120768A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
Yung-Chiang Chen
Original Assignee
Yung-Chiang Chen
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yung-Chiang Chen filed Critical Yung-Chiang Chen
Priority to TW89120768A priority Critical patent/TW479182B/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TW479182B publication Critical patent/TW479182B/en

Links

Abstract

This invention is a polling rowing method with reliability comment applying to the network polling system. It implements reliabilities of participators' professional comments into the rowing and opinion investigation to increase the precision of rowing and opinion investigation. The participator's reliability index is acquired from the evaluation of comments over the past years and the career of commenting to transfer to the trust level of their polling behavior. By this method, it is able to increase precision of polling rowing results different from the traditional polling calculation method because the better reliability participators have large polling weights and the lower reliability participators have small polling weights.

Description

479182 A7 B7 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 五、發明說明(1 ) 領域 本發明係關於一種投票且進行排名之方法,特別是關 毛一種將可罪度坪論及評論年資納入投票排名之方法。 I明背景 傳統的投票排名方式係以一人一票,票r等值之方式 .來計算投票的結果,亦即以各選項累計票數的多寡決勝 負。此傳統方式乍看之下相當公平,但有時候某些人的意 見參考價值極高,而某些人的意見卻極偏頗,若同時賦予 兩方同等之信賴標準,反而會使排名結果背離真實情沉。 再則,無論何種領域,當進行評論投票排名或意見調 查時,一般人幾乎都會參酌該領域特定意見領袖的意見, 而所謂意見領袖則通常皆侷限於少數幾位專家、學者或名 人,他們的意見公正程度並未經過社會大眾的檢驗與認 可。所以為了得到更真實且公正的答案,一般大眾之認知 程度其實是更需要被重視的,尤其在社會科學方面的探討 更是如此。傳統之投票計分排名及意見調查方式完全無去 因應這方面的需求’故其呈現的結果之公信力也就有待商 榷。 此外,由於網際網路的快速普及和其高效率的特性, 經由網際網路進行的投票排名及意見調查與日俱增,如_ 讓這些調查不受極端意見的影響而呈現出最貼近真實的、妹 果,實為一重要課題。 發明之簡要說明 本發明之第一目的在於提供一種可增加投票結果準 (請先閱讀背面之注意事479182 A7 B7 Printed by the Consumer Cooperatives of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs V. Invention Description (1) Field The present invention relates to a method of voting and ranking, especially Guan Mao's method of incorporating guiltiness and comment on seniority into voting rankings. Method. I. Background The traditional voting ranking method is based on the method of one person, one vote, and r equal votes. The voting result is calculated, that is, the number of votes accumulated in each option determines the winner. At first glance, this traditional method is quite fair, but sometimes the opinions of some people are extremely high, while the opinions of some people are extremely biased. If the same standard of trust is given to both parties at the same time, the ranking results will deviate from the truth. Love. Furthermore, no matter what kind of field, when conducting comment voting rankings or opinion surveys, the average person will almost always take into account the opinions of specific opinion leaders in the field. The so-called opinion leaders are usually limited to a few experts, scholars or celebrities. The degree of fairness of opinions has not been tested and approved by the public. Therefore, in order to obtain a more truthful and fair answer, the general public's degree of understanding actually needs more attention, especially in the social sciences. The traditional voting scoring rankings and opinion survey methods are completely useless. In response to this demand, the credibility of the results presented remains to be discussed. In addition, due to the rapid popularity of the Internet and its highly efficient nature, poll rankings and opinion surveys conducted via the Internet are increasing day by day. For example, these surveys are not affected by extreme opinions and show the closest to the real, beautiful results. This is indeed an important subject. Brief description of the invention The first object of the present invention is to provide a method that can increase the accuracy of voting results (please read the notes on the back first)

K ▼—裝------ 1填寫本頁) ·11111111 4 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 479182 A7 B7 五、發明說明(2 ) 度及公正性之投票排名之方法。 本發明之第二目的在於提供一種每個人都可盡情評論 以表達自我意識,不受干擾且更為貼近真實情沉的評論投 票排名之方法。 本發明之第三目的在於提供一種藉由網路進行線上操 作,但亦可利用電子郵件或釭綠通說電篇裝f等+以進仃 之投票排名之方法。 為了達到上述目的,本發明提供一種可靠度評論下之投 票排名之方法,其特徵係由其他參與者對任一參與者在一 有效取樣時間區間内發表過之評論進行可靠度評分,並計 算出一投票可靠度加權分數以作為該參與者在一投票主題 之選項進行投票時之加權分數;且依據上述方式統計所有 參與者對該投票主題之各選項之累計分數,並依分數高低 予以排名。本發明將專業評論之可靠度融入投票排名及意見 調查中,以提升投票排名及意見調查結果之準確度。投票者 之投票可靠度加權分數係由其過去所發表之評論之可靠度及 其評論年資加權而得,並據以轉換為對其投票行為之信任程 度;亦即表現於其投票之選項之加權比重。如此一來可靠度 評分佳的參與者投票權數重,可靠度評分較差或從未發表評 論的人之投票權數則較輕,即可脫離傳統方式之一人一票、 票票等值之計分方式,而提高投票排名結果之準確度。 圖式之簡單說明 本發明將依照後附圖式來說明,其中: 圖1係本發明之一實施例之流程圖;及 圖2為本發明之網路連接環境。 本紙張尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規袼(210 X 297公釐) --------訂-------- (請先閱讀背面之注意事填寫本頁) 事 479182 五、發明說明(3 ) 元件符號說明 2 0投票網站 2 2處理單元 24資料庫 2 6第二參與者 2 8舉辨投票者 較佳實施例說明 2 1輸入端 2 3輸出端 25 第一參與者 27第N個參與者 2 9投票結果評分排名 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 圖1為本發明之-實施例之流程圖。在步驟1()1,本發明啟始。在步驟u2,預先設定若干統計參數之預設值: 例如評論可靠度菩紐齡 々二 土、j 數各評論可靠度等級對應之評論可 :度斤刀有放年k加權計算規則、有效取樣時間區間 P在設足各㈣參數時’可針對個別投票主題之性質做 相對應之設計。在步驟103,檢查任一參與者是否曾在設 定之有效取樣時間區間内發表過評論。若答案是肯定的, 則進入步騾104,否則進入步驟1〇8。在步驟1〇4,由其他 參與者對該參與者在該有效取樣時間區間内針對特定主題 而發表的評論進行評比,每一評比均對應至一評論可靠度 等級(G )及一評論可靠度評分(p m )。將任一特定主題之所 有評論可靠度評分加以平均,即為該參與者的該評論之平 均可靠度分數(P a)。評論可靠度等級可被區別為2 η + 1個, 其中η為一正整數。若情況需要,也可賦予該評論可靠度 等級一實質意義,例如很好、好、沒意見、差、很差等說 法。而每一等級對應之評論可靠度評分可如公式(1 )的 (請先閱讀背面之注意事ίριρ填寫本頁) _ · 1 I I I I I I « — — — — — — I — 本紙張尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規格(210 χ 297公釐) 479182 A7 B7 五、發明說明(4 ) 濟 部 智 慧 員 工 消 費 方式計算: 評論可靠度評Mm=ax[n+1_m]+1 · · ·⑴ 其中m為一評論可靠度等級之序號,a為-自行設定之 係數。評論可靠度評分乏八机 μ 、 刀數汁异法可視其發表評論主題 性質之不同而異,但位於妹 、 仫於汗淪可靠度等級之中間數所對扃 的評論可靠度評分Ρ(η+1)/2須為^ 一 在步驟105,將參與者分別於特定主題之評論之可靠 度分數(Pa)加以平均’得到一總平均可靠度分數(p… 需強調的是,熟諳技藝者可以輕易推知,步驟1〇4及1〇 可進一步合併使用,也就是將每一特定主題之每一評論 靠度評分(Pm)全部加總並加以平均亦可得到總平均可靠 分數(Pave)。 在步驟1〇6,計算該參與者之有效年資加權分數, 即將參與者之評論有效年資列入投票行為可靠度的考 中。該計算方式可如公式(2)所示: 有效年資加權分數(Ri)=bXi+l· · ·(2) 其中b為一自行設定之係數;i代表該參與者之有效 資’亦即i為一大於等於零之正實數。換言之,從未參與 論意見之評論者之有效年資加權分數被設定為丨。所謂〜 年資為參與者參加評論的資歷,如果參與者的評論在某期 間廣受好評,則該期間的評論資歷視為有效,可列入計 有效年貝時的重要基礎;需注意的是有效年資之取決可 需侷限於某限定之取樣時間區間内,而可溯及既往將參與 者以往所有發表過之評論均列入考慮。而有效年資計算 之 注 5 可 度 訂 亦 慮 4 年 評 的 算 不 方 ___ - 7 - 本紙張尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規格(210 X 297公釐)K ▼ —Installation ------ 1Fill in this page) · 11111111 4 Printed by the Consumer Cooperatives of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs 479182 A7 B7 V. Description of the invention (2) Voting ranking method of degree and fairness. A second object of the present invention is to provide a method for everyone to comment freely to express self-awareness, to be undisturbed, and to be closer to the true and affectionate ranking of comment votes. A third object of the present invention is to provide a method for performing online operations through the Internet, but it is also possible to use e-mail or 釭 Lvtong to talk about electronic articles to install f and other + to rank by voting. In order to achieve the above objective, the present invention provides a method for voting ranking under reliability reviews, which is characterized by the reliability scores of other participants on the reviews published by any participant within a valid sampling time interval and calculating A voting reliability weighted score is used as the weighted score of the participant when voting on an option of a voting theme; and the cumulative scores of all participants on the voting theme's options are counted according to the above method, and ranked according to the score. The present invention integrates the reliability of professional reviews into poll rankings and opinion surveys to improve the accuracy of poll rankings and opinion survey results. A voter's voting reliability weighted score is obtained by weighting the reliability of his past comments and his years of comment, and converted it to the degree of trust in his voting behavior; that is, the weight of the voting options proportion. In this way, participants with good reliability scores have heavy voting weights, people with poor reliability scores or people who have never commented have lower voting weights, which can depart from the traditional one-person, one-vote, vote-equivalent scoring method. , And improve the accuracy of voting ranking results. Brief Description of the Drawings The present invention will be described in accordance with the following drawings, wherein: FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an embodiment of the present invention; and FIG. 2 is a network connection environment of the present invention. This paper size applies the Chinese National Standard (CNS) A4 Regulations (210 X 297 mm) -------- Order -------- (Please read the notes on the back first and fill in this page) 479182 V. Description of the invention (3) Component symbol description 2 0 Voting website 2 2 Processing unit 24 database 2 6 Second participant 2 8 Identification of the preferred embodiment of the voter 2 1 input 2 3 output 25 first Participant 27 Nth participant 2 9 Voting result score ranking Printed by the Consumer Cooperative of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs Figure 1 is a flowchart of an embodiment of the present invention. At step 1 () 1, the invention starts. In step u2, preset values of certain statistical parameters are set in advance: for example, the reliability of the comment is the number of comments, the number of comments corresponding to the reliability level of the comment can be: the degree of k-weight calculation rules, effective sampling The time interval P can be designed correspondingly to the nature of the individual voting theme when setting various parameters. In step 103, it is checked whether any participant has commented within the set valid sampling time interval. If the answer is yes, go to step 104, otherwise go to step 108. In step 104, other participants evaluate the comments made by the participant on the specific topic within the valid sampling time interval, and each evaluation corresponds to a comment reliability level (G) and a comment reliability Rating (pm). The average reliability score of all reviews for any particular topic is the average reliability score (P a) of that review for that participant. Comment reliability levels can be distinguished as 2 η + 1, where η is a positive integer. If the situation requires, the reliability of the review can also be given a substantive meaning, such as very good, good, no opinion, bad, very bad, etc. And the reliability rating of the comment corresponding to each level can be as shown in formula (1) (please read the note on the back first and fill in this page) _ · 1 IIIIII «— — — — — — I — This paper scale applies Chinese national standards (CNS) A4 specifications (210 χ 297 mm) 479182 A7 B7 V. Description of invention (4) Calculation of consumption methods of Ministry of Economy employees: Comment reliability rating Mm = ax [n + 1_m] +1 · · · ⑴ where m Is the serial number of a comment reliability level, a is a coefficient set by yourself. Review reliability score lacks eight machines, and the number of knifes may vary depending on the nature of the subject matter of the review, but it is located in the middle of the reliability rating of the younger sister and the score of the reliability rating P (η +1) / 2 must be ^-At step 105, average the reliability scores (Pa) of the participants' comments on specific topics to get a total average reliability score (p ... It should be emphasized that the skilled artist It can be easily inferred that steps 104 and 10 can be further combined and used, that is, the total reliability score (Pave) can be obtained by adding up and averaging all the reliability scores (Pm) of each comment on each specific topic. In step 106, calculate the valid seniority weighted score of the participant, that is, include the valid seniority of the participant's comment in the test of the reliability of voting behavior. The calculation method can be shown in formula (2): Ri) = bXi + l · · · (2) where b is a self-set coefficient; i represents the effective capital of the participant ', that is, i is a positive real number greater than or equal to zero. In other words, never participated in the comments of opinion Valid years plus The score is set to 丨. The so-called seniority is the qualification of the participant to participate in the review. If the comment of the participant is widely praised in a certain period, the qualification of the review in that period is considered valid and can be included in the important basis of counting valid years. It should be noted that the determination of effective seniority may need to be limited to a limited sampling time period, and all previous comments made by participants have been taken into account retrospectively. Note 5 of the effective seniority calculation can be set Also consider that the 4-year evaluation is not countable ___-7-This paper size applies the Chinese National Standard (CNS) A4 specification (210 X 297 mm)

I /^182 五、發明說明(5 ) 式也應視實際需要而做調整 數大於1之累計年數為準;或採用:可二用= 之連續累計年數為準,若不連續目;千:可:度分數 式皆可被接受。 …、^,甚至是其他的方 在步驟107,計算該參與者 』\、 仅市可罪度加權分數, 如公式(3 )或(4 )所示: 银刀數 投票可靠度加權分數(s)=始 、 、心平均可罪度分數(P ) X有效年資加權分數(Ri) · · · (3) ( ave) 投票可靠度加權分數(s彳,,x / )=總平均可靠度分數 (Pave) +有效年資加權分數· .(4) 之後,進入步驟丨〇 9。 ,在步驟108,由於該參與者未曾發表評論,故將其總 平均可*度分數設定為i ’之後進入步驟i 〇 6計算其有效年 資加權分數。 在步驟1 0 9,該參與者針對一投票主題之選項進行投 示。在步驟110 ,根據該參與者之投票可靠度加權分數為 其所投票之選項累計分數。在步驟1U,統計所有參與者 在各選項累計之分數並予以排名。在步驟1 1 2,本發明流 程結束。 以下為根據本發明方法之一實施例: 1.假設一參與者A在1999年4月22號加入會員參與評論, 投票當天為2000年10月21號。 2 ·設定統計參數預設值: (1 )評論可靠度等級(G )分為2 η + 1個等級,假設n = 2, __ - 8 本紙張尺度適用T _家標準(CNS)A4規格( x 297公f (請先閱讀背面之注咅?事 > 「裝 填寫本頁) 訂--- 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 479182 A7 B7 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作祛印製 五、發明說明(6 故〇有〇1,〇2,〇3,〇4,〇5五個等級。其中〇3的可靠 度為中性’ Gi為可靠度最南的等級’而〇5為可靠度 最低的等級。並可將各等級賦予實質意義,例如: 〇! :您認為這篇評論: 很好 G2 :您認為這篇評論: 好 G 3 ••您認為這篇評論: 沒意見或普通 G 4 :您認為這篇評論: 差 G 5 :您認為這篇評論: 很差 (2) 評論可靠度評分(pm)設定為:I / ^ 182 V. Description of the invention (5) The formula should also be adjusted according to the actual needs, the cumulative number of years greater than 1 shall prevail; or adopt: continuous cumulative years of dual use = shall prevail, if discontinuous purposes; Thousands: Yes: Degree fractions are acceptable. …, ^, Or even the other party in step 107, calculate the participant ’\, only the city guilt-weighted score, as shown in formula (3) or (4): Silver Knife Voting Reliability Weighted Score (s ) = Starting, average, and average guilty score (P) X weighted score of effective seniority (Ri) · · · (3) (ave) Voting reliability weighted score (s 彳 ,, x /) = total average reliability score (Pave) + Valid Seniority Weighted Score ·. (4), then proceed to Step 9. In step 108, since the participant has not commented, the total average degree score of the participant is set to i ', and then the process proceeds to step i06 to calculate the weighting score of its effective years. In step 109, the participant presents an option for a voting topic. In step 110, a weighted score based on the participant's voting reliability is the cumulative score for the option they voted for. In step 1U, the total scores of all participants in each option are counted and ranked. At step 1 12 the process of the invention ends. The following is an embodiment of the method according to the present invention: 1. Assume that a participant A joins a member to participate in a comment on April 22, 1999, and the voting day is October 21, 2000. 2 · Set the default values of statistical parameters: (1) The reliability level (G) of the review is divided into 2 η + 1 level, assuming n = 2, __-8 This paper standard is applicable to the T _ house standard (CNS) A4 specification ( x 297 公 f (please read the note on the back first?> "Fill in this page" Order --- Printed by the Consumers ’Cooperative of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs 479182 A7 B7 Printed by the Consumers’ Cooperative of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs V. Description of the invention (6 Therefore, there are five levels of 〇1,0, 〇2, 〇3, 〇4, 〇5. Among them, the reliability of 〇3 is neutral, 'Gi is the most reliable level', and 〇5 is The lowest level of reliability. You can assign substantive meaning to each level, for example: 〇 !: Do you think this review: Very good G2: Do you think this review: Good G 3 •• Do you think this review: No opinion or Average G 4: Do you think this review: Poor G 5: Do you think this review: Poor (2) Set the review reliability score (pm) to:

Pm=l + aX (n+1-m) 其中a = 0 · 1,m = 1〜5。其中G與P對應情形為: G 1 ·· P 1 = 1 · 2 G 2 : P 2 = 1 . 1 G 3 : P 3 = 1 . 0 G 4 · P 4 = 0 · 9 G 5 : P 5 = 〇 · 8 (3) 有效年資加權分數(Ri)設定為: ^ i ^ 1 + b X i 其中b = 0.1,i為有效年資,為大於等於零之正實 數’在本實施例中並將其設定為總平均可靠度分數 (P“e)大於1之累計年數,故R〇=l,Rl=1.l , R2=l ·2,依此類推。 (4 )有效取樣時間區間設定為1 · 5年(1 8個月) #與者A針對任意的投票排名主題ΤΙ,T2,T3或其選 -9 - (CNS)A4 規格(210 X 297 公釐) (請先閱讀背面之注意事^^填寫本頁) 裝 n n I— n羼 MB· Ml·· I I · 479182 A7 _B7 五、發明說明(7 ) 項發表評論Ul,U2,U3。 4.其他參與者可針對參與者A在1999年4月22號到2000年 10月21號整整18個月之Ul,U2,U3,給予不同等級 的可靠度: (1 )三個人對U 1給予評論可靠度等級,分別為 G 1,G 2,G 3 ’亦即分別為1 . 2,1 . 1,1 . 0分,所以 U1 之平均可靠度分數 pal = (i.0+1.i + i.2)/3 = 1.1 (2 )四個人對U 2給予評論可靠度等級,分別為G 3, G3,Gi,G4,亦即分別為 1.〇,ι·〇,1.2,〇.9 分,所以 ϋ 2之平均可靠度分數 Pa2 = (l +1 + 1.2 + 0.9)/4=1.075 (3 )二個人對U 3給予評論可靠度等級,分別為g i, G 2,亦即分別為1 · 2,1 . 1分,所以u 3之平均可靠 度分數 Pa3 = (l.2+1.1)/2=1.15 5·總平均可靠度分數Pave = (Pai+Pa2 + Pa3)/3 = (1.1 + 1.075 + 1.15)/3 = 1·1〇8 6.由於參與者A在1999年4月22號才加入會員參與評論, 1 9 9 9年4月2 2號到2 0 0 〇年4月2 1號一整年之所有評論 所計算而得的總平均可靠度分數大於i,而2 〇 〇 〇年4月 2 2號到今天2 0 0 0年1 〇月2 1號尚未滿一年,故i 9 9 9年4 月22號到2000年4月21號一整年内參與者a的有效年資 判定為1年’故RfRfl+O lX 1 = 11 7·參與者A投票行為可靠度加權分數為 S-PaveXRi^l.lOS X I.1 = 1.22 本紙張尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規格(21〇 X 29^公爱)-----—- (請先閱讀背面之注意· 事 填寫本頁) 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 479182 A7 五、發明說明(8 ) .參與者A在當日所投之該選項其積分即可增加122分 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 本發明將參與者之評論可靠度評分(pm)及有效年資加 權匀數(S )引入投票排名程序計分方式内,其特性如下: 一、 將個人投票行為之可靠度建立在過去評論之可靠度及 年資的基礎上。以往受到高評價之評論,會得到較高 的可靠度評價分數,再加上經年累月的好評,有效年 資加權亦增加,結果將使投票行為可靠度加權分數大 於1,甚至會遠大於1。在此情況下,該參與者所投票 支持足選項其積分的增加會比較快,故自然成為該投 示主題之意見領袖,此等意見領袖為經過社會大眾的 嚴格檢驗與實質認可而自然產生。 二、 由評論可靠度來評定個人投票的影響力之作法,不啻 為一種鼓勵發言的獎勵;此作法將可使每一個投票評 論主題收到更多發言表態,因此也更貼近公眾意見, 故自然比傳統之單純投票作法更具公信力。 由於個人之評論可靠度會影響其後之投票行為可靠 度故在發表評論相關言論時,會特別小心以免得到 低的評論可靠度評分;因此可間接使當下充斥之不負 責任又評論或非理性之發言比率減低,亦即可促使參 與者對自己的言論負起貴任。 對於從不發表評論之個人而言,其投票行為可靠度加 權分數維持為1 ;即如傳統投票計票方式一般,採一 人一票、票票等值之方式,故對該類型參與者而言, 四Pm = l + aX (n + 1-m) where a = 0 · 1, and m = 1 to 5. The correspondence between G and P is: G 1 ·· P 1 = 1 · 2 G 2: P 2 = 1. 1 G 3: P 3 = 1. 0 G 4 · P 4 = 0 · 9 G 5: P 5 = 〇 · 8 (3) The weighted fraction of effective years (Ri) is set as: ^ i ^ 1 + b X i where b = 0.1, i is the effective years, which is a positive real number greater than or equal to zero. In this embodiment and it It is set as the cumulative years with the total average reliability score (P "e) greater than 1, so Ro = 1, Rl = 1.1, R2 = 1, · 2, and so on. (4) The effective sampling time interval is set as 1 · 5 years (1 8 months) # 与 者 A for any voting ranking theme ΤΙ, T2, T3 or its choice -9-(CNS) A4 specifications (210 X 297 mm) (Please read the note on the back first ^^ Fill in this page) Install nn I— n 羼 MB · Ml · · II · 479182 A7 _B7 V. Description of the Invention (7) Post a comment Ul, U2, U3. 4. Other participants can target Participant A at From April 22, 1999 to October 21, 2000, Ul, U2, and U3 were given different levels of reliability for a full 18 months: (1) Three people gave U 1 a reliability rating for reviews, respectively, G 1, G 2, G 3 'is 1.2, 1.1, 1.0, respectively, so U1 The average reliability score pal = (i.0 + 1.i + i.2) / 3 = 1.1 (2) Four people give U 2 a reliability rating for the reviews, which are G 3, G3, Gi, G4, that is, The scores are 1.0, 1.0, 1.2, and 0.9 respectively, so the average reliability score Pa2 of = 2 = (l +1 + 1.2 + 0.9) / 4 = 1.075 (3) Two people comment on U 3 Reliability grades are gi, G 2 respectively, that is, 1.2, 1.1 points, so the average reliability score of u 3 Pa3 = (l.2 + 1.1) /2=1.15 5. Total average reliability Degree score Pave = (Pai + Pa2 + Pa3) / 3 = (1.1 + 1.075 + 1.15) / 3 = 1.10. 6. Because participant A only joined the membership to participate in the review on April 22, 1999, 1 9 9 From April 22, 2009 to April 21, 2000, the total average reliability score calculated by all reviews for the whole year is greater than i, and from April 22, 2000 to April 22, 2000 Today, October 21, 2000, has not yet passed one year, so i 22 April 2009 to April 21, 2000. The valid seniority of participant a is determined to be 1 year, so RfRfl + O lX 1 = 11 7 · Participant A ’s voting behavior reliability weighted score is S-PaveXRi ^ l.lOS X I.1 = 1.22 This paper scale applies to China National Standard (CNS) A4 Specification (21〇X 29 ^ Public Love) ------- (Please read the note on the back and fill in this page first) Printed by the Consumer Cooperative of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs 479182 A7 V. Description of the invention (8). The points voted by participant A on the day can increase 122 points. This is printed by the Consumer Cooperative of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. The present invention weights the participant ’s comment reliability score (pm) and valid years of service. Even number (S) is introduced into the voting ranking program scoring method, and its characteristics are as follows: 1. The reliability of individual voting behavior is based on the reliability of past reviews and seniority. Comments that have received high evaluations in the past will get higher reliability evaluation scores. In addition, after years of praise, the effective years weighting will also increase. As a result, the voting behavior reliability weighting score will be greater than 1, or even much greater than 1. In this case, the participant's voting support for the foot option will increase its points relatively quickly, so it will naturally become the opinion leader of the subject of the investment. These opinion leaders are naturally generated after rigorous inspection and substantial recognition by the public. 2. The method of evaluating the influence of individual voting by the reliability of comments is not a reward for encouraging speeches; this method will allow each voting comment topic to receive more statements and therefore be closer to the public opinion, so naturally More credible than the traditional simple voting method. Because the reliability of personal comments will affect the reliability of subsequent voting behaviors, when you make comments related to the comment, you will take special care to avoid getting a low comment reliability score; therefore, it can indirectly make the current irresponsible and commentary or irrational Decreased speaking ratios can also encourage participants to take responsibility for their speeches. For individuals who have never commented, their voting behavior reliability weighted score remains at 1; that is, as in traditional voting counting methods, one person, one vote, votes and other equivalent methods are adopted, so for this type of participants , Four

(請先閱讀背面之注意事 裝-----II ,填寫本頁) 訂--------- A7五、發明說明(9 經 濟 部 智 慧 財 產 局 消 費 合 作 社 印 製 其權益不會有任何損害。 各項統計參數預設值可視投票主題的需要而變化,亦 可在事先由眾參與者自行投票決定,故無須擔心利用 本發明之方法會獨厚某些特定人士。 本發明又投票排名之方法並不限於任何之傳輸媒介, 可精由習知之電子郵件及無線傳輸電腦裝置等進行,但以 藉由網際網路作線上執行最為方便。 本發明之可靠度評論投票排名程序可於圖2所示之網路 連接環境中進行。該網路連接環境包含一投票網站2 〇、一 舉辨投票者28、參與投票之第一參與者25、第二參與者 26至第N個參與者27,及一投票結果評分排名29,其中該 投票網站20和該舉辨投票者28之間及該投票網站2〇和該 複數個參與者25〜27之間之連線裝置可以前述之傳輸媒介 (任一種予以電氣連接。該投票網站2 〇包含一輸入端2丄、 一輸出端23、一處理單元22及一資料庫24。該處理單元 22為該投票網站之核心,用於計算及控制該輸入端21、輸 出端23及資料庫24之運作。該資料庫以用於儲存該舉辨 才又示者所預设之資料及投票過程中之參與者之可靠度資訊 等。該舉辦投票者所預設之資料為前述之評論可靠度等 級、與其對應之評論可靠度評分、有效年資計算法及有效 取樣時間區間等。該投票過程中之參與者之可靠度資訊為 前述之總平均可靠度分數、有效年資加權分數,及投票可 靠度加權分數等。該複數個參與者可經由個人之連線裝置 電氣連接至該投票網站2 0而依據特定主題之選項進行投 五 丨!丨丨—J (請先閱讀背面之注意事填寫本頁) 蠓·(Please read the Precautions on the back ----- II first, fill out this page) Order --------- A7 V. Invention Description (9 The Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs will not print its rights and interests if it is printed by the Consumer Cooperatives. There are any damages. The preset values of various statistical parameters can be changed according to the needs of the voting theme, and can also be determined by the participants in advance, so there is no need to worry about using the method of the present invention to benefit certain specific people. The method of voting ranking is not limited to any transmission medium, and can be performed by conventional e-mail and wireless transmission of computer equipment, but it is most convenient to perform the online operation through the Internet. The reliability rating voting ranking procedure of the present invention can Performed in the network connection environment shown in Figure 2. The network connection environment includes a voting website 20, one-time voter identification 28, a first participant 25 participating in the voting, and a second participant 26 to the Nth participating 27, and a voting result ranking 29, in which the connection device between the voting website 20 and the discriminating voter 28 and between the voting website 20 and the plurality of participants 25-27 can be Transmission medium (any kind is electrically connected. The voting website 20 includes an input terminal 2 丄, an output terminal 23, a processing unit 22, and a database 24. The processing unit 22 is the core of the voting website and is used for calculation And control the operation of the input terminal 21, output terminal 23 and database 24. The database is used to store the information preset by the discerning talents and the reliability information of participants in the voting process, etc. The information preset by the voter is the above-mentioned review reliability level, the corresponding review reliability score, the effective seniority calculation method, and the effective sampling time interval, etc. The reliability information of the participants in the voting process is the aforementioned total. Average reliability score, valid seniority weighted score, voting reliability weighted score, etc. The plurality of participants can be electrically connected to the voting website 20 via a personal connection device and vote according to the options of a particular theme 丨! 丨丨 —J (Please read the notes on the back and fill in this page) 蠓 ·

479182 A7 B7 五、發明說明(10 票’且整個投票過程之演算法可藉由該處理單元22予以執 行。,投票結果評分排名29之結果由該處理單元22以上述 之計算方式處理後,經由該輸出端23輸出。 本發明之技術内容及技術特點巳揭示如上,然而孰夹 本項技術之人士仍可能基於本發明之教示及揭示而作種種 =離本發明精神之替換及修飾;㈣,本發明之保護範 、2限於實施例所揭示者,而應包括各種不背離本發明 《曰奐及修飾,並為以下之申請專利範圍所涵蓋。 (請先閱讀背面之注意. y --------訂------- ,填寫本頁) .礞. 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製479182 A7 B7 V. Description of the invention (10 votes) and the algorithm of the entire voting process can be executed by the processing unit 22. The result of the voting result ranking 29 is processed by the processing unit 22 in the above calculation method, and then The output terminal 23 outputs. The technical content and technical characteristics of the present invention are disclosed as above, however, those who clip this technology may still make various changes based on the teaching and disclosure of the present invention = substitutions and modifications away from the spirit of the present invention; ㈣, The protection scope 2 of the present invention is limited to those disclosed in the embodiments, but should include all kinds of modifications that do not depart from the present invention, "Yi and modifications, and are covered by the following patent application scope. (Please read the note on the back first. Y --- ----- Order -------, fill in this page). 礞. Printed by the Consumer Cooperative of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs

本、我張尺度顧中國國家標準(cns)a4規格⑽ X 297公爱YThis book and our standards are based on the Chinese National Standard (cns) a4 specifications X X 297 Public Love Y

Claims (1)

申請專利範圍 緩齊部智慧財產局員X消費合作社印製 *種可靠度評論下之投票排名之方法,應用於一網路投 π系統,用以將參與者之評論給予評分,並計算其投票 ]之加權刀數,以進行投票排名並提昇意見調查之準確 度,該方法包括下列步驟: (a)預先設定評論可靠度之等級及其相對應之分數、有 效年資之加權計算規則,及一有效取樣時間區間; (b )檢查任一參與者是否在該有效取樣時間區間内發表 過評論;若答案是否定的,則將該參與者之總平均 可非度分數設定為1 ,且進入步驟(d); (C)其他參與者針對該參與者在該有效取樣時間區間内 發表過之評論進行可靠度評分,並計算出一總平均 可靠度分數; ^ ⑷依據該有效年資之加權計算規則而計算該參與者之 有效年資加權分數; (e )依據該總平均可靠户八 — J j非度刀數和孩有效年資加權分數計 算該參與者之投票可靠度加權分數; (f)该參與者針對一投票主題之選項進行投票; ⑷依據該參與者之投票可靠度加權分數Λ計該選項 之分數,及 U)依據上述方式料时參與料該投票 項之累計分數,並依分數高低予以排名。 各遠 2. 如申請專利範圍第Μ之方法,其中在 度等級m之相對應分數為1+ax(n+i , = 行定義之係數,n為可靠度等級個數除以2後之中自 3. 如申請專利範圍第丨項之方法 斤值。 由所有參與者投票決定。 步驟U)足設定值可 〇;\65\65946.D〇c\en "嫌尺度適用中國國祕+ (UAM4規格(21G X 297公爱Γ 裝----—--訂--------- (請先閱讀-f面之注意事寫本頁) ΜThe scope of patent application for the Ministry of Intellectual Property Bureau X Consumer Cooperative Co., Ltd. prints the voting ranking method under * reliability reviews, which is applied to an online investment system to score participants' comments and calculate their votes] The weighted number of knives in order to vote ranking and improve the accuracy of opinion surveys, the method includes the following steps: (a) pre-set the rating of the reliability of the review and its corresponding score, the weighting rules for valid years, and a valid Sampling time interval; (b) Check whether any participant has commented within the valid sampling time interval; if the answer is negative, then set the participant's total average feasibility score to 1 and proceed to step ( d); (C) other participants rate the reliability of comments made by the participant within the valid sampling time interval, and calculate a total average reliability score; ^ ⑷ based on the weighted calculation rules for the effective years Calculate the effective seniority weighted score of the participant; (e) Calculate based on the total average reliable households — J j non-degree knife number and the effective seniority weighted score of the child Calculate the voting reliability weighted score of the participant; (f) the participant votes on an option for a voting subject; 计 calculate the option's score based on the participant's voting reliability weighted score Λ, and U) according to the above method Participate in the accumulative score of the voting item when they are expected, and rank them according to the score. Each far 2. If the method of the scope of patent application M, the corresponding score at the degree level m is 1 + ax (n + i, = coefficient defined by the line, n is the number of reliability levels divided by 2 From 3. If the method of applying for the item in the scope of the patent application, the value of the method is determined by voting by all participants. Step U) The set value can be 〇; \ 65 \ 65946.D〇c \ en " The scale is applicable to the Chinese state secret + (UAM4 specifications (21G X 297 public love Γ installed -------- order --------- (please read -f side note first to write this page)) Μ 8888 ABCD 申巧專利範圍 4.如申請專利範圍第i項之方法’其中在步驟⑷,係將立 他參與者針龍參與者在财效取㈣間區間内發表過 <至少—特定主題之評論分別進行可靠度評分,且分別 =算該至少—特定主題之平均分數,而該總平均可靠度 分數係為該至少一特定主題之平均分數之再平均。 5·如申請專利範圍第Η之方法,其中在步驟⑷,係將其 他,與者針對該參與者在該有效取#時間區間内發表過 <至少一特定主題之評論分別進行之可靠度評分加總並 平均之’而得該總平均可靠度分數。 6.如申請專利範圍第1項之方法,其中步驟(d)之有效年資 加權分數心等於1+bXi,其中b為一自行定義之係數, i為有效年資。 7 ·如申請專利範圍第6項之方法,其中該有效年資係將參 與者以往所有發表過之評論均列入考慮或於一有效取樣 時間區間内所發表之所有評論列入考慮。 8 ·如申印專利範圍第6項之方法,其中該有效年資係為總 平均可靠度分數大於丨之累計年數或總平均可靠度分數 大於1之連續累計年數。 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 9 ·如申請專利範圍第1項之方法,其中在步驟(e),該參與 者(投票可靠度加權分數係由該總平均可靠度分數乘以 該有效年資加權分數。 1 0 ·如申請專利範圍第i項之方法,其中在步驟(e),該參 與者(投票可靠度加權分數係由該總平均可靠度分數加 上該有效年資加權分數再減去1。 1 1 .如申請專利範圍第i項之方法,其中該網路投系系統為 網際網路、電子郵件及無線傳輸電腦裝置中之/音。 O:\65\65946.DOC\en ' 1 本紙張尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規_格(21〇 X 297公爱"· O:\65\65946.DOC\en 479182 A8 B8 C8 D8 申請專利範圍 1 2 ·種可罪度坪論下之投票排名之方法,應用於一網路 投票系統,用以將參與者之評論給予評分,並計算其投 票時之加權分數,以進行投票排名並提昇意見調查之準 確度,其特徵係由其他參與者對任一參與者在一有效取 樣時間區間内發表過之評論進行可靠度評分,並計算出 一投票可靠度加權分數以作為該參與者在一投票主題之 選員進行投票時之加權分數;且依據上述方式統計所有 參與者對該投票主題之各選項之累計分數,並依分數高 低予以排名。 13·如申請專利範圍第12項之方法,其中該投票可靠度加 權分數係依據其他參與者對該參與者在一有效取樣時間 區間内發表過之評論之總平均可靠度分數和該參與者之 一有效年資加權分數計算而得。 1 4 ·如申叫專利範圍第丨3項之方法,其中該總平均可靠度 分數係將其他參與者針對該參與者在該有效取樣時間區 間内發表過之至少一特定主題之評論分別進行可靠度評 分’且分別計算該至少一特定主題之平均分數,再由該 至少一特定主題之平均分數進行再平均。 1 5 .如申請專利範圍第1 3項之方法,其中該總平均可靠度 分數係將其他參與者針對該參與者在該有效取樣時間區 間内發表過之至少一特定主題之評論分別進行之可靠度 汗分加總並平均之,而得該總平均可靠度分數。 1 6 ·如申請專利範圍第丨3項之方法,其中該有效年資加權 分數等於1+bXi,其中b為一自行定義之係數,i為該 參與者之有效年資。 ’ 1 7 .如申請專利範圍第1 6項之方法,其中該有效年資係將 表紐尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規格⑵◦ χ挪公爱) (請先閱讀f面之注意事填寫本頁) ------- — ll· ----I---- Hr 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 479182 A8 B8 C8 D8 申請專利範圍 參與者以往所有發表過之評論均列入考慮或於一有效取 樣時間區間内所發表之所有評論列入考慮。. 1 8 ·如申凊專利範圍第1 $項之方法’其中该有效年資加權 分數係為總平均可靠度分數大於1之累計年數或總平均 可靠度分數大於1之連續累計年數。 1 9 ·如申請專利範圍第1 3項之方法,其中該參與者之投票 可靠度加權分數係由該總平均可靠度分數乘以該有效年 ^加椎分數。 2 0 ·如申請專利範圍第13項之方法,其中該參與者之投票 可靠度加權分數係由該總平均可靠度分數加上該有效年 資加權分數再減去1。 2 1,如申請專科範圍第1 2項之方法,其中該網路投票系統 為網際網路、電子郵件及無線傳輪電腦裝置中之一者。 ^-------III· · ---------. (請先閱讀*t面之注意事$填寫本頁) 經濟部智慧財產局員工消費合作社印製 O:\65\65946.DOC\en 本紙張尺度適用中國國家標準(CNS)A4規格(210x297公爱)8888 ABCD's application for patent scope 4. If the method of applying for the scope of the patent i item 'wherein step ⑷', the other participants Needle Dragon participants have published in the interval of financial effectiveness < at least-specific topics The reviews are scored separately for reliability, and the average score of the at least-specific topic is calculated separately, and the total average reliability score is a re-average of the average score of the at least one specific topic. 5. If the method in the scope of patent application (i), in step (ii), the reliability scores of the other and the participants' comments on at least one specific topic within the valid # time interval are separately scored. Add up and average 'to get the total average reliability score. 6. The method according to item 1 of the scope of patent application, wherein the weighted fraction of the effective years of step (d) is equal to 1 + bXi, where b is a self-defined coefficient and i is the effective years. 7 · If the method of applying for the scope of the patent No. 6 is adopted, the valid years will take into consideration all comments previously published by the participant or all comments published within a valid sampling period. 8 · The method of item 6 of the scope of patent application, wherein the effective years are the cumulative years with a total average reliability score greater than 丨 or the continuous cumulative years with a total average reliability score greater than 1. Printed by the Employees' Cooperatives of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs9. If the method of the scope of patent application for item 1 is applied, in step (e), the participant (voting reliability weighted score is multiplied by the total average reliability score and the validity The age-weighted score. 10 If the method of item i of the scope of patent application, in step (e), the participant (voting reliability weighted score is the total average reliability score plus the effective age-weighted score and then subtracted) Go to 1. 1 1. The method according to item i of the patent application range, wherein the network investment system is the Internet / e-mail and wireless transmission of audio / video in computer equipment. O: \ 65 \ 65946.DOC \ en '' 1 This paper size applies the Chinese National Standard (CNS) A4 rule_21 (21 × 297 public love " O: \ 65 \ 65946.DOC \ en 479182 A8 B8 C8 D8 patent application scope 12 2 kinds of guilty The voting ranking method under the Doping Theory is applied to an online voting system to score participants' comments and calculate their weighted scores in order to vote rankings and improve the accuracy of opinion surveys. Characteristic by other The participant scores the reliability of the comments posted by any participant within a valid sampling time interval, and calculates a voting reliability weighted score as the weighted score of the participant when voting on a voting subject elector And according to the above method, the total scores of all participants on the voting theme's various options are counted and ranked according to the scores. 13. If the method of item 12 of the patent application scope, the voting reliability weighted score is based on other participation The total average reliability score of the comments made by the participant within a valid sampling time interval and the weighted score of the valid seniority of one of the participants are calculated. Where the total average reliability score is a reliability score for each participant ’s comments on at least one specific topic published by the participant within the valid sampling time interval, and the average score for the at least one specific topic is calculated separately , And then re-average from the average score of the at least one specific topic. 1 5. 13. The method of item 13, wherein the total average reliability score is the sum of the average reliability sweat scores of other participants' comments on at least one specific topic published by the participant in the valid sampling time interval and averaged. The total average reliability score is obtained. 1 6 · As in the method of the scope of patent application No. 3, wherein the weighted score of effective years is equal to 1 + bXi, where b is a self-defined coefficient and i is the participant's Valid years of service. '17. For the method of applying for the item No. 16 of the scope of patent application, in which the valid years of service apply the standard of the table to the Chinese National Standard (CNS) A4 specification ⑵ 挪 Norway public love) (please read f (Notes to fill in this page) ------- — ll · ---- I ---- Hr Printed by the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economy Employees' Cooperatives 479182 A8 B8 C8 D8 All patent applicants have previously published All comments are considered or all comments published within a valid sampling period are considered. 1 8 · The method of item 1 $ in the scope of the patent application, where the weighted valid years is the cumulative years with a total average reliability score greater than 1 or the continuous cumulative years with a total average reliability score greater than 1. 19 · The method according to item 13 of the scope of patent application, wherein the participant's voting reliability weighted score is the total average reliability score multiplied by the effective year ^ plus the spine score. 2 0. The method according to item 13 of the scope of patent application, wherein the participant's voting reliability weighted score is the total average reliability score plus the effective seniority weighted score minus 1. 21 1. If you apply for the method of item 12 in the scope of the specialty, the online voting system is one of the Internet, email, and wireless transfer computer device. ^ ------- III · · ---------. (Please read the note above * t fill in this page) Printed by the Consumer Cooperatives of the Intellectual Property Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs O: \ 65 \ 65946.DOC \ en This paper size applies to China National Standard (CNS) A4 (210x297 public love)
TW89120768A 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Polling rowing method with reliability comment TW479182B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW89120768A TW479182B (en) 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Polling rowing method with reliability comment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW89120768A TW479182B (en) 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Polling rowing method with reliability comment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW479182B true TW479182B (en) 2002-03-11

Family

ID=21661446

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW89120768A TW479182B (en) 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Polling rowing method with reliability comment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TW479182B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8312276B2 (en) 2009-02-06 2012-11-13 Industrial Technology Research Institute Method for sending and receiving an evaluation of reputation in a social network
TWI506577B (en) * 2011-12-28 2015-11-01 Intel Corp System and method for identifying reviewers with incentives

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8312276B2 (en) 2009-02-06 2012-11-13 Industrial Technology Research Institute Method for sending and receiving an evaluation of reputation in a social network
TWI506577B (en) * 2011-12-28 2015-11-01 Intel Corp System and method for identifying reviewers with incentives

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Shin et al. Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media
Hopmann et al. Contagious media effects: How media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust
Krasnova et al. Privacy calculus on social networking sites: Explorative evidence from Germany and USA
Flanagin et al. Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility
Machlup Uses, value, and benefits of knowledge
Norton Parliament and citizens in the United Kingdom
Wang et al. Extending the spiral of silence: Partisan media, perceived support, and sharing opinions online
Theakston et al. Rating 20th-century British prime ministers
Edwards et al. To tweet or ‘subtweet’?: Impacts of social networking post directness and valence on interpersonal impressions
Gallicano et al. Is ghost blogging like speechwriting? A survey of practitioners about the ethics of ghost blogging
Galpin et al. Participatory populism: online discussion forums on mainstream news sites during the 2014 European parliament election
Wilson How Russians view electoral fairness: A qualitative analysis
Greaves et al. How low can we go? Declining survey response rates to New Zealand electoral roll mail surveys over three decades
Petrou et al. Overcoming precarity?: Social media, agency and ni-Vanuatu seasonal workers in Australia
Jacobsmeier Public opinion on government funding of the arts in the United States: Demographic and political Factors
Gramitto Ricci et al. The Corporate Forum
Kellar et al. Measuring racial discrimination remotely: A contemporary review of unobtrusive measures
Meyer et al. Quieting the commenters: The spiral of silence’s persistent effect on online news forums
TW479182B (en) Polling rowing method with reliability comment
Walker Blog commenting: A new political information space
Fuller Social media in higher education: Building mutually beneficial student and institutional relationships through social media
Szegda et al. The level of legal security of citizen journalists and social media users participating in public debate. Standards developed in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the European Court of Justice (ECJ)
Vermurlen et al. Is the Catholic Church in America Experiencing Internal Secularization? Priests’ Assessments of Pope Francis and the Condition of the Church
Chakradhar et al. Modern social support structures: Online social networks and their implications for social workers
Hample et al. Consequential unscripted interactions: A conceptual and empirical description

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
GD4A Issue of patent certificate for granted invention patent
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees