TW202247114A - Analysis method and device of learning situation based on evaluation results - Google Patents

Abstract

A method of learning situation analysis based on evaluation results, includes the following steps: creating a information database of test paper evaluation results, including collecting and identifying the number of correct answers to each test question, and the status of each tester's answer results; according to the number of correct answers for each test question, the question numbers of the examination papers are arranged in groups, and the question numbers with the same number of correct answers are arranged in the same group; set a relevance threshold; construct a test question association/relevance model based on the relevance threshold, and calculate the number of correct answers required to establish a correlation between the next set of listed test questions and the adjacent previous set of listed test questions based on the relevance threshold, and form it according to the correct number of answers the test question association model between the next set of listed test questions and the adjacent previous set of listed test questions. The correlation model of the test question can be represented by a correlation line. By analyzing the connection lines of each tester and the status of their answering results, confirm their academic profile.

Description

The academic situation analysis method and the academic situation analysis device based on the evaluation results

The present invention relates to the analysis of the learning situation of students in the field of education, in particular to a learning situation analysis method based on evaluation results and a learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results, which can be used to analyze and confirm the learning situation of students to attribute their causes because.

The rapid development of computer technology and network technology has brought earth-shaking changes and various conveniences to people's lives. At the same time, with the continuous improvement of living standards, parents and teachers pay more and more attention to the learning situation of students. Schools, extracurricular training institutions and other educational institutions need to keep abreast of each student's learning situation in order to provide targeted knowledge module guidance and training for each student.

Usually, the teachers of educational institutions generally use test questions and tests to understand and grasp the students' mastery of knowledge over a period of time, that is, the learning situation of each student. According to the learning situation of different students, teachers can adopt different methods of counseling and motivation for students with different learning situations.

Generally, there is a progressive hierarchical relationship between different knowledge points of various disciplines, and there are innumerable connections between different knowledge points. There is a certain degree of correlation between the knowledge points examined by different question numbers in each set of test questions (or each set of examination papers). The teacher passed these different question numbers Analyze the relevance of the knowledge points among them and the students' answers to the questions, and then understand and confirm the students' mastery of the knowledge points involved in the set of test questions, the status of answering questions, and the quality of the teacher's questions, etc.

Therefore, the main purpose of the present invention is to provide a method of how to understand and grasp the mastery of the knowledge points learned by each student within a certain period of time by analyzing the evaluation results of different examination questions or the correctness of the answers.

The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results and a device for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results, through which the device and method analyze the evaluation results or answer results of test questions to understand the learning situation of each student (such as knowledge mastery and level, etc.), it is beneficial for teachers to arrange more suitable teaching plans and provide targeted counseling for each student.

In order to achieve at least one of the advantages or other advantages, an embodiment of the present invention proposes a method for analyzing academic performance based on evaluation results, which at least includes the following steps:

S01: Create an examination paper evaluation result information database, including collecting and identifying the number of people who answered each test question correctly and the status of each test taker's answer result;

S02: Arrange the question numbers of the examination paper in groups according to the number of people who answered correctly for each question, and arrange the question numbers of the questions with the same number of correct answers in the same group;

S03: Setting a relevance threshold;

S04: Construct an item association model according to the association threshold. According to the relevance threshold, the number of correct answers required to establish the association between the next group of listed test questions and its adjacent previous group of listed test questions is calculated, and according to the number of correct answers, the next group of listed test questions and its adjacent group of test questions are formed. Previous Item association models between groups.

In the method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results, in step S04, the method for establishing the test question association model between the next set of listed test questions and its adjacent previous set of listed test questions is as follows: with its adjacent previous set The number of correct answers *relevance threshold, if the number of people who have answered correctly in the next group of questions listed in the next group and the adjacent group of questions listed in the previous group is greater than this value, then the test questions listed in the next group and the group adjacent to the previous group The listed questions are related.

In some embodiments, according to the test item correlation model, when establishing a correlation model for each test item number between each group, it can be represented by a correlation line.

In some embodiments, the influencing factors of the set value of the relevance threshold include at least the difficulty of the test questions and the number of test questions.

In some embodiments, when the number of questions in the examination paper is arranged in groups according to the number of people who answered correctly for each question, the number of people who answered correctly in each group in the hierarchical arrangement from bottom to top decreases in descending order.

In some embodiments, the method for analyzing knowledge points based on evaluation scores may also include determining the quality of the test papers according to the correlation lines of each test taker. Teachers can analyze and judge the results based on this to improve the quality of the questions, such as increasing the relevance of knowledge points between different test questions in the same set of test papers.

In some embodiments, the method for analyzing the academic situation based on the evaluation results can identify the status of each tester's test question number, so as to distinguish correct answers from wrong answers. Based on this logo, the teacher can initially analyze and understand the mastery of each tester or student's knowledge points at a glance.

A learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results, including: analysis and statistics module, statistics and analysis of the number of correct answers to each test question, the status of each tester's answer results; array establishment A module for grouping and arranging the question numbers of each test question; an association model building module for constructing an association model between each test question in an adjacent group according to the association threshold. The association models among these test items can have many different forms, such as association lines.

The learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results may also include an identification module, which is used to identify the status of each tester's right or wrong number of questions.

Therefore, utilize a kind of academic situation analysis method based on evaluation result provided by the present invention and the academic situation analysis device based on evaluation result, through the same set of test questions answer results of each tester or student and the correlation degree between each test question Analysis can quickly grasp the learning situation of each student, such as whether the knowledge points are mastered or not and the degree. Through this analysis, it is also possible to understand the quality of the teacher's test papers, such as whether the knowledge points of this set of test questions are too scattered, whether the knowledge points involved are too advanced, etc. Based on the analysis of the connection line between the test questions, it is beneficial for teachers to arrange more appropriate teaching plans and provide targeted counseling for each student.

The above description is only an overview of the technical solution of the present invention. In order to better understand the technical means of this creation, it can be implemented according to the contents of the description, and in order to make the above and other purposes, features and advantages of this creation more obvious and understandable , the following preferred embodiments are specifically cited below, and in conjunction with the attached drawings, the detailed description is as follows.

S01~S04: Steps

1~40: test question number

100:Academic situation analysis device

101: Statistical Analysis Module

102: Array building module

103:Association model building module

The included drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the embodiments of the present application, which constitute a part of the specification, are used to illustrate the implementation of the present application, and explain the principle of the present application together with the text description. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the application, and are not intended to limit the implementation of the application to this. For those skilled in the art, of course, they can be derived from these drawings. other schemata. Said figure formulas include:

〔Fig. 1〕 is the flow chart of the present invention's academic situation analysis method based on evaluation results.

[Fig. 2] is a schematic diagram of student A's answering questions of the present invention based on the evaluation result analysis method for student A.

[Fig. 3] is a schematic diagram of student B's answering questions of the present invention based on the evaluation result analysis method for student B.

[Fig. 4] is a schematic diagram of the academic performance analysis device based on the evaluation results of the present invention.

Specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are representative only and for purposes of describing example embodiments of the present invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in many alternative forms and should not be construed as limited to only the embodiments set forth herein. In describing the present invention, it should be understood that the terms "central", "lateral", "upper", "lower", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", " The orientation or positional relationship indicated by "bottom", "inner", "outer", etc. is based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the drawings, and is only for the convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying the referred device or positional relationship. Components must have a particular orientation, or be constructed and operated in a particular orientation, and therefore should not be construed as limiting the invention. In addition, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only, and cannot be interpreted as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the quantity of indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of these features. In the description of the present invention, unless otherwise specified, "plurality" means two or more. In addition, the term "comprising" and any variations thereof mean "comprising at least".

In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that unless otherwise specified and limited, the terms "installation", "connection" and "connection" should be understood in a broad sense, for example, it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integrally formed connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection. Connection; it can be a direct connection, or an indirect connection through an intermediary, or an internal connection between two components. For those skilled in the art, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood in specific situations.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of example embodiments. As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an" and "an" are intended to include the plural unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be understood that the terms "comprising" and/or "comprising" as used herein specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, units and/or components, but do not exclude the presence or addition of one or more Other features, integers, steps, operations, units, components and/or combinations thereof.

Please refer to Fig. 1, Fig. 1 is a flow chart of the method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results in the present invention. In order to achieve at least one of the above advantages or other advantages, an embodiment of the present invention proposes a method for analyzing academic performance based on evaluation results, which at least includes the following steps: (S01) creating an information database of examination paper evaluation results, including collecting and identifying each The number of people who answered the test questions correctly and the answering status of each tester. (S02) Arranging the question numbers of the examination paper in groups according to the number of correct answers to each test question, and arranging the test question numbers with the same number of correct answers in the same group. (S03) Setting a correlation threshold. (S04) Construct a test item association model according to the association threshold. According to the relevance threshold, the number of correct answers required to establish the association between the test questions listed in the next group (the group to be established) and the test questions listed in the previous group adjacent to it is calculated, and according to the number of correct answers to form the next The item association model between the items listed in the group and its adjacent previous group. The next group is located one layer above the previous group adjacent to it.

In the method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results, in step S04, the next group The method for establishing the test item association model between the listed test questions and the previous group of adjacent test questions is as follows: the number of correct answers in the previous adjacent group * correlation threshold, if the test questions listed in the next group and the adjacent test questions If the number of people who have answered correctly in the group of questions listed in the previous group is greater than this value, then the questions listed in the next group are related to the questions listed in the previous group adjacent to it. The test item association model constructed above can have many different forms of expression. In the illustrated example, the association line is used to represent the association relationship in the constructed test item association model.

In step S02, when the question numbers of the test questions in the examination paper are grouped according to the number of correct answers to each test question, the number of correct answers to the test question numbers listed in the group increases or decreases accordingly when grouped from top to bottom. For example, in the example shown in the illustration, when the question numbers of the test questions are arranged in groups, the test question numbers with the largest number of correct answers are arranged at the bottom, and the number of correct answers for each group of test question numbers listed from bottom to top decreases accordingly.

The method may further include a step of: marking the status of each tester's test question number to distinguish correct answers from wrong answers. At the same time, analyze and confirm the learning situation of each tester according to the connection line between the question numbers of the set of test questions established in the steps mentioned above and the distribution of each tester's wrong test questions. For example, in the example shown in the illustration, the question numbers of each tester's wrong answers are marked with color filling, so that teachers and other educators can check the overall situation and answers of each tester's answers to this set of test questions at a glance. The distribution of wrong questions. However, it is not limited to this. Different graphic shapes, other colors, or combinations of shapes and colors can be used to indicate the status of each tester's wrong and correct test questions, which can reflect differences. That's it.

The influencing factors of the value of the correlation include at least the degree of difficulty of the test questions and the number of test questions. For example, when the difficulty of these test questions is relatively high, the setting of the relevance threshold can be Relatively lower, the value is smaller. When the number of these test questions (also referred to as the amount of test questions) is large, the setting of the relevance threshold can be relatively reduced, and the numerical value is relatively small.

The method for analyzing knowledge points and learning conditions based on evaluation results may also include judging the quality of the set of test papers according to the connection lines between different question numbers of the set of test questions. Teachers can analyze and judge the results based on this to improve the quality of the questions, such as increasing the relevance of knowledge points between different test questions in the same set of test papers. For example, if the connection lines between each question number of each layer of test questions are relatively dense, and there are connection lines between different question numbers of each layer, it indicates that the knowledge points involved between the test questions of this set of examination papers are relatively dense, and the quality of the questions is high. . The evaluation results of this set of examination papers have a high reference value for teachers to understand and analyze the knowledge mastery of each student. In the existing basic education stage, there is a high degree of correlation and continuity between learning or knowledge points in different stages. According to the test-item correlation line graphs of the testers or students who participated in this set of examination papers, if there are more discretely distributed test question numbers in the correlation line graphs of most of the test papers, it indicates that the quality of the test papers is not good or does not meet expectations. Better show the relevance of the knowledge points involved in this set of test papers.

The academic performance analysis method based on the evaluation results can mark the question numbers of the wrong answers of each tester in a coloring and filling manner. Based on this logo, the teacher can initially analyze and understand the mastery of each tester or student's knowledge points at a glance. For example, if the question numbers that were answered incorrectly are mainly distributed in areas with relatively dense connection lines, the reasons for the tester or the student's incorrect answers may be: the lack of a firm grasp of these knowledge points; Can be better grasped. If the question numbers that are answered incorrectly are mainly distributed in areas where the connection lines are relatively sparse or where the question numbers of the test questions are arranged more scattered, the reason for the tester or the student's wrong answers may be: the test question is too difficult; the knowledge points involved in the question have not yet been taught ; The knowledge points involved in this question have been learned but have not been reviewed for a long time.

Referring to Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, Fig. 2 is the academic situation analysis method based on the evaluation results of the present invention Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the answering situation of student A of the present invention, which is a schematic diagram of student B's answering situation based on the evaluation result analysis method of the present invention. According to these graphs or test item relational line graphs, the method for analyzing the academic situation based on the evaluation results of the present invention is explained or explained in detail. In Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, a set of examination papers with 40 test questions is taken as an example to illustrate the method. After statistical analysis, it was found that question number 29 had the most correct answers in this evaluation, and it was arranged in the first group, which is the lowest in the example shown in the illustration. If there are 55 participants in this assessment, the number of people who answered question number 29 is the largest, which is 55 people. The question numbers with the most correct answers are listed in the second group/layer. For example, in the example shown in the illustration, the question numbers on the second floor are 31, 25...and so on. Arrange in groups or in layers.

Assume that the correlation threshold is set at 80%. According to the correlation model between the number of correct answers to each test question, a correlation line is established for the question numbers of each test question between adjacent groups. Take the adjacent first floor and second floor (from bottom to top) in the figure as an example for illustration. For example, 55 people in the first group with question number 29 are correct, and 52 people in the second group with question number 31 and question number 25 are correct. Further, the number of people with question number 31 and question number 29 is 48 people. , the question number 25 is correct and the number of question number 29 is correct is 50 people. The condition for the association between the question numbers of the first group and the second group is: 55*80%=44 people. In other words, when both the first group and the second group are answered correctly, and the number of people who have answered correctly in the second group is greater than or equal to 44, there is a relationship between the question numbers of the first group and the second group. 48>44, so question number 31 is related to question number 29. In the illustrated example, an association line is used to represent the relationship between them. 50>44, so question number 25 is related to question number 29. In the illustrated example, an association line is used to represent the relationship between them.

The test question numbers corresponding to the next group/layer adjacent to the second group are 32, 34, and 40, and the number of correct answers to question numbers 32, 34, and 40 is 51 people. The condition for the association between the question numbers of the second group and the third group is: 52*80%=42 people. That is, if the number of people who answered both question 31 and question 32 correctly is higher than 42, a relationship between question 31 and question 32 is established, which is represented by an association line. If both 31 questions are answered correctly and When the number of people with 34 questions is higher than 42, an association relationship is established between 31 questions and 34 questions, which is represented by an association line. If the number of people who answered both 31 questions and 40 questions correctly is higher than 42 people, a relationship between 31 questions and 40 questions is established, which is represented by a connection line.

Assume that the correlation threshold is set at 80%. As another example, the test question number 16 that is arranged in one group alone and the test question number 7, 10, 11, 13, 17, 8, 27 of its adjacent group. If the number of correct or correct answers for question number 16 is 44, the number of correct answers for question numbers 7, 10, 11, 13, 17, 8, and 27 in the same group/layer is 42. The condition for association between the question numbers of the adjacent group is: 44*80%=35 persons. The number of people who answered correctly with question number 16 (that is, the number of people who answered correctly with the next group of different question numbers at the same time) were 32 people for question number 7, 34 people for question number 10, 30 people for question number 13, and 30 people for question number 13. There are 31 people in 27, all of which are less than 35 people, so there is no connection line between these question numbers. The number of people who answered correctly with question number 16 is 36 people in question number 11, 38 people in question number 8, and more than 35 people. Therefore, an association relationship is established between question number 16 and question numbers 11 and 8 in the next adjacent group. Represented by associated lines.

If the test questions are more difficult and the number of test questions is larger, the value of the correlation threshold can be set to be smaller, for example, it can be set to 75%. According to the correlation model between the number of correct answers to each test question, a correlation line is established for the question numbers of each test question between adjacent groups. Assuming that the correlation threshold is set to 75%, it will be described with the examples shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 . 55 people answered correctly the question number 29 on the first floor (lowest floor), and 52 people answered the question numbers 31 and 25 on the second floor. Further, there are 48 people with correct question number 31 and correct question number 29, and 50 people with correct question number 25 and correct question number 29. The association line between the first layer and the second layer is: 55*0.75=41 people. 48>41, so question number 31 is related to question number 29, and the association line is used in the illustrated example to represent the relationship between them. 50>41, so question number 25 is related to question number 29. In the illustrated example, an association line is used to represent the relationship between them. According to this method, the construction of the connection line between the hierarchical arrangement maps of all the test questions in the examination paper is completed.

According to the aforementioned method, after the hierarchical arrangement of the test questions in the set of test papers is completed, the status of each tester's test question number is marked to distinguish the correct answer from the wrong answer. In the illustrated example, the question numbers of the wrong answers in the distribution map of each tester or student's test questions are marked by coloring and filling, and the names or student numbers of the testers or students can also be marked on these maps to distinguish them. If a tester or student's coloring and filling method indicates that the question numbers (wrong answers) are mainly distributed in the area with relatively dense connection lines, it indicates that the tester or student has not mastered the knowledge points learned recently. The reasons for the high number of wrong answers in this area may be: poor grasp of these knowledge points; carelessness in answering questions, and a little effort can be better grasped. If a tester or student's coloring and filling method identifies question numbers (wrong answers) are mainly distributed in the area where the connection lines are relatively sparse or the arrangement of test question numbers is relatively scattered, it indicates that the tester or the student is very satisfied with what they have learned in the recent period The mastery of knowledge points meets the teaching expectations. The reasons for many wrong answers in this area may be: the test questions are too difficult; the knowledge points involved in this question have not been taught; the knowledge points involved in this question have been learned but have not been reviewed for a long time, etc.

If the question numbers of the testers or students who answered wrongly in the distribution map of the test questions are mainly distributed in the area with relatively sparse connection lines or the area where the test question numbers are scattered, it means that the teacher or the question maker did not answer the questions in the set of test papers. The difficulty coefficient is too high; or the knowledge points involved in these test questions are too advanced; or the knowledge points involved in these test questions are learned before, and the time interval between the current and current time is relatively long, etc. If the number of questions answered incorrectly in the distribution map of the test questions by testers or students is mainly distributed in the area where the connection lines are relatively dense, it means that the questions designed by the teacher or the tester for the knowledge points that are investigated when writing the questions for this set of test papers are relatively difficult. High; or the overall difficulty of the knowledge points investigated in this assessment is relatively high, and the overall mastery of the learners has not met the teaching expectations. Based on the analysis results, teachers or educators can adjust the next teaching plan or learn about the poor knowledge points of the students as a whole Carry out repeated practice or strengthen relevant training.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results of the present invention. A learning situation analysis device 100 based on evaluation results at least includes a statistical analysis module 101 , an array building module 102 and an association model building module 103 . The statistical analysis module 101 counts and analyzes the number of correct answers to each test question and the answer results of each tester according to the information in the examination paper evaluation result information database. The array building module 102 is used to group and arrange the number of each test question according to the number of correct answers to each test question in the statistical analysis module, and arrange the test question numbers with the same number of correct answers in the same group/layer. The correlation model building module 103 builds a correlation model between the test questions of each question number in the adjacent group according to the set correlation threshold. According to the correlation threshold, the number of correct answers required to establish the association between the next group of listed test questions and its adjacent previous group of listed test questions is calculated, and according to the number of correct answers, the next group of listed test questions and its corresponding The item association model between the adjacent previous set of listed items.

The method for establishing the test question association model between the test questions listed in the next group and its adjacent test questions listed in the previous group (the test questions listed in the two adjacent groups) is as follows: the next group (the group to be associated) is adjacent The number of people who answered correctly in the previous group*relevance threshold, if the number of people who have answered correctly together with the test questions listed in the next group and the test questions listed in the adjacent group is greater than this value, then the test questions listed in the next group and their corresponding The adjacent previous set of listed questions is related. The learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results may also include an identification module, which is used to identify the status of each tester's right or wrong number of questions.

Therefore, utilize a kind of academic situation analysis method based on evaluation result provided by the present invention and the academic situation analysis device based on evaluation result, through the same set of test questions answer results of each tester or student and the correlation degree between each test question Analysis can quickly grasp the learning situation of each student, such as whether the knowledge points are mastered or not and the degree. Through this analysis, we can also understand the quality of the teacher's test papers this time, such as whether the knowledge points of this set of test questions are too scattered, whether the knowledge points involved are too Wait ahead. Based on the analysis of the connection line between the test questions, it is beneficial for teachers to arrange more suitable teaching plans, provide targeted counseling for each student, etc., and educational institutions can adjust teaching planning and other matters in real time.

Through the above detailed description of the preferred embodiments, it is hoped that the characteristics and spirit of the present invention can be described more clearly, and the scope of the present invention is not limited by the preferred embodiments disclosed above. On the contrary, the intention is to cover various changes and equivalent arrangements within the scope of the patent application for the present invention.

S01~S04: Steps

Claims (10)

A method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results, at least including the following steps: Create an information database of test paper evaluation results, including collecting and identifying the number of people who answered each test question correctly and the answer status of each test taker; According to the number of correct answers to each test question, the question numbers of the examination paper are grouped, and the test question numbers with the same number of correct answers are arranged in the same group; setting a correlation threshold; According to the correlation threshold, the number of correct answers required to establish the association between the next group of listed test questions and its adjacent previous group of listed test questions is calculated, and according to the number of correct answers, the next group of listed test questions and its corresponding The item association model between the adjacent previous set of listed items. The method for analyzing the academic situation based on the evaluation results as described in claim item 1, wherein the method for establishing the test question association model between the next group of listed test questions and its adjacent previous group of listed test questions is as follows: The number of correct answers in a group*relevance threshold, if the number of people who have answered correctly in the next group of test questions and its adjacent previous group of test questions is greater than this value, then the next group of test questions will be adjacent to it Related to the questions listed in the previous set of . The method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results as described in Claim 1, wherein the test item correlation model between the adjacent groups can be represented by a correlation line. According to claim 1, the academic performance analysis method based on evaluation results, wherein the influencing factors of the correlation threshold include at least the difficulty of the test questions and the number of test questions. As described in request item 1, the method of analyzing academic performance based on evaluation results, wherein when the number of questions in the examination paper is grouped according to the number of correct answers to each test question, the number of correct answers in each group in the grouping arrangement from bottom to top decreases in descending order ;The next group is listed on top of the previous group adjacent to it. The method for analyzing knowledge points based on evaluation results as described in Claim 1 further includes: judging the quality of the test papers according to the connection lines of each tester. The method for analyzing academic situation based on evaluation results as described in Claim 1, wherein the status of each tester's test question number is marked to distinguish correct answers from wrong answers. A learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results, including: Analysis statistics module, statistics and analysis of the number of correct answers to each test question and the answer results of each tester; The array building module is used to arrange the question numbers of each test question in groups; An association model building module is used to construct an association model between each test item in an adjacent group according to the association threshold. The learning situation analysis device based on evaluation results as described in Claim 7 further includes an identification module, which is used to identify the status of each tester's test question number, so as to distinguish correct answers from wrong answers. The academic analysis device based on evaluation results as described in claim item 8, wherein the method for establishing the test question association model between the next set of listed test questions and its adjacent previous set of listed test questions (adjacent two groups) is: The number of correct answers in the next group adjacent to the previous group*relevance threshold, if the number of people who have the same correct answers to the test questions listed in the next group and the test questions listed in the adjacent group is greater than this value, then the next group Listed questions are related to the previous set of listed questions next to them.

Images